Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
Woodworking (rec.woodworking) Discussion forum covering all aspects of working with wood. All levels of expertise are encouraged to particiapte. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#81
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Pass You Eye! Assembled Table Pics
Leon wrote:
On 9/18/2015 6:39 AM, Mike Marlow wrote: Leon wrote: Yeah I forgot to mention that. I might suggest adding "Stabil" or another gasoline stabilizer. while I never had a problem with my Honda the additive worked wonders for my fathers Honda. The dealer recommended it since alcohol is likely to be in the gas and that attracts water. Relative inexpensive and good insurance against bad gas or gas that might go bad. The best approach is to use enthanol free gas in all of your small engines. Unlike you car, the gas for your small engines can sit around for a long time before you have to fill up the gas can again, and can it in the tank over the winter season. Some of the stabilizers do work, but not for as long as they advertise. That said, the stabilizers do nothing to mitigate the effect of alcohol on rubber hoses. Replacing fuel lines can get expensive at $6-$8 per foot for neoprene lines. Carb diaphrams disintegrate, the pot metal used for the carb disintegrates. It's just bad stuff. Around here ethanol free gas has become very common, but it is only sold as 91 Octane, so you're paying a premium price for it. Cheaper though, than the repair costs for ethanol related problems. Down here it is kind of hard to find ethanol free. You know what really sucks? All gas comes in ethanol free. My SIL works for a company that delivers gas to gas stations. They are the dominant player in that space, in all of this region. They mix the ethanol in right there at their facility. It all comes in as just plain old gasoline, and then they ruin it by adding ethanol. Even worse - ethanol free is only available at the pump as 91 Octane, as I said above. There is no reason that it can't be available as 87 Octane as well. In NY, the requirement is for a minimum of 10% ethanol, and different brand names have different requirements for the ethanol blend. Sunoco has one requirement (they are very specific about their gasoline), the regional names have (or can have...) a different requirement, all based on their marketing. (Sunoco for example, even stipulates that the tanker trucks be branded as Sunoco, rather than the name of the company that is doing the delivery. They want to really protect their branding). They're all at least 10%, but some are more. Around here, none are 15% yet, but give Congress enough time and they'll foist that on us too. It's too bad that you can't find ethanol free gas easily down there - it makes a huge difference in maintenance and reliability. I used to use the additives, and they were OK, but they were not the total solution. I found they would keep gas useable for up to a year (as compared to the manufacturer's claim of up to 3 years...), but like I said earlier, that only address separation, and does not address the corrosive and destructive nature of alcohol on different forms of metal and rubbers. I've taken apart many carbs - from things like string trimmers, to my 1945 farm tractor, and have personally seen the effects of ethanol. Some can be addressed with a bit of work, and some just can't. Small engine carbs of today (things like string trimmers, etc.), just are not even worth the effort. You can't get into all of the passages to clean them out and your chances of rebuilding them is 50/50 at best. Anyone who works on these or has experience with them will quickly tell you that it's not worth the effort - just buy a new carb off ebay. I can attest to that. The biggest shame of this whole ethanol scam is that it is a net energy loss. But - whackos in California were able to convince idiots in Washington... -- -Mike- |
#82
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Pass You Eye! Assembled Table Pics
On 9/18/2015 9:09 AM, Jack wrote:
On 9/17/2015 1:18 PM, Leon wrote: I bought my wife a Ricar America vacuum cleaner. Expensive and appears to be cheaply made. I bought that in 1991. that thing still performs like it was new and most manufacturers have copied the concept. My wife bought me a wet/dry Shop Vac around 1976. That thing got a lot of use, and still works the same as the day I got it. The problem with that thing is it makes your ears bleed. It's the _only_ tool I wear ear muffs with, that includes chainsaws, air hammers and routers. Last Christmas My kids got me a new Ridged 6 amp 14 gal model for Xmas. It was around $100, I don't need ear muffs with it at all and if it sucked any harder it would be hard to use. It came with a bunch of attachments, and all my old 2 1/2" hoses/attachments fit it perfectly. I could buy 6 of them for the cost of one Festool. If it lasts as long as the shop vac, that would be 6 times 40 years. The only feature I wished it had was a auto wind for the cord, like my wife's Hoover has. That would make it perfect. My wife bought me a broom for about $25. The last one lasted me 20 years. I could buy 4 of them for the cost of one Ridged, that would be 4 times 20 years. Longer than I would live. If you like the tools you buy fine. Don't knock something you know little about. I don't really understand your obsession with trashing Festool. |
#83
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Pass You Eye! Assembled Table Pics
Jack wrote:
My wife bought me a wet/dry Shop Vac around 1976. That thing got a lot of use, and still works the same as the day I got it. The problem with that thing is it makes your ears bleed. It's the _only_ tool I wear ear muffs with, that includes chainsaws, air hammers and routers. Had this same experience with an old 16 gallon Craftsman shop vac. Thought I was doing a good thing by buying a big thing - quickly learned otherwise. Bulky, unweildy, and louder than a KC135 on takeoff with water injection. This thing literally made your ears ring. Last Christmas My kids got me a new Ridged 6 amp 14 gal model for Xmas. It was around $100, I don't need ear muffs with it at all and if it sucked any harder it would be hard to use. It came with a bunch of attachments, and all my old 2 1/2" hoses/attachments fit it perfectly. Again - same experience. A few years ago my daughter bought me a Ridged (I think it's 6 gallon). It's much more appropriately sized for my needs, sucks like... well - you know where I could take that..., and it's quiet enough to use in the house. Does not blow out as much as it vaccums up - as that old Craftsman did. I can clean up spackling dust and not notice any dust output back into the room. It's picked up anything I've ever tried to vaccum. I could buy 6 of them for the cost of one Festool. If it lasts as long as the shop vac, that would be 6 times 40 years. The only feature I wished it had was a auto wind for the cord, like my wife's Hoover has. That would make it perfect. Agreed. But my agreement is based completely on my needs, and what I'm willing to put up with. I'm honestly not sure how well it would compare to any other vaccum as a dust collection device. I'm sure it would do better than nothing, but right now - I use nothing, so it's all speculation in my mind. -- -Mike- |
#84
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Pass You Eye! Assembled Table Pics
On 9/18/2015 9:25 AM, Mike Marlow wrote:
Leon wrote: On 9/18/2015 6:39 AM, Mike Marlow wrote: Leon wrote: Yeah I forgot to mention that. I might suggest adding "Stabil" or another gasoline stabilizer. while I never had a problem with my Honda the additive worked wonders for my fathers Honda. The dealer recommended it since alcohol is likely to be in the gas and that attracts water. Relative inexpensive and good insurance against bad gas or gas that might go bad. The best approach is to use enthanol free gas in all of your small engines. Unlike you car, the gas for your small engines can sit around for a long time before you have to fill up the gas can again, and can it in the tank over the winter season. Some of the stabilizers do work, but not for as long as they advertise. That said, the stabilizers do nothing to mitigate the effect of alcohol on rubber hoses. Replacing fuel lines can get expensive at $6-$8 per foot for neoprene lines. Carb diaphrams disintegrate, the pot metal used for the carb disintegrates. It's just bad stuff. Around here ethanol free gas has become very common, but it is only sold as 91 Octane, so you're paying a premium price for it. Cheaper though, than the repair costs for ethanol related problems. Down here it is kind of hard to find ethanol free. You know what really sucks? All gas comes in ethanol free. My SIL works for a company that delivers gas to gas stations. They are the dominant player in that space, in all of this region. They mix the ethanol in right there at their facility. It all comes in as just plain old gasoline, and then they ruin it by adding ethanol. Even worse - ethanol free is only available at the pump as 91 Octane, as I said above. There is no reason that it can't be available as 87 Octane as well. In NY, the requirement is for a minimum of 10% ethanol, and different brand names have different requirements for the ethanol blend. Sunoco has one requirement (they are very specific about their gasoline), the regional names have (or can have...) a different requirement, all based on their marketing. (Sunoco for example, even stipulates that the tanker trucks be branded as Sunoco, rather than the name of the company that is doing the delivery. They want to really protect their branding). They're all at least 10%, but some are more. Around here, none are 15% yet, but give Congress enough time and they'll foist that on us too. It's too bad that you can't find ethanol free gas easily down there - it makes a huge difference in maintenance and reliability. I used to use the additives, and they were OK, but they were not the total solution. I found they would keep gas useable for up to a year (as compared to the manufacturer's claim of up to 3 years...), but like I said earlier, that only address separation, and does not address the corrosive and destructive nature of alcohol on different forms of metal and rubbers. I've taken apart many carbs - from things like string trimmers, to my 1945 farm tractor, and have personally seen the effects of ethanol. Some can be addressed with a bit of work, and some just can't. Small engine carbs of today (things like string trimmers, etc.), just are not even worth the effort. You can't get into all of the passages to clean them out and your chances of rebuilding them is 50/50 at best. Anyone who works on these or has experience with them will quickly tell you that it's not worth the effort - just buy a new carb off ebay. I can attest to that. The biggest shame of this whole ethanol scam is that it is a net energy loss. But - whackos in California were able to convince idiots in Washington... It seems that every station I go to has a warning label that indicates that anything from the pump may contain up to 10% alcohol. It does not indicate a specific octane having or not having it. From what I understand there are typically two underground tanks for the three different obtains. The medium grade is a mixture of regular and premium. That probably explains why premium is alcohol free and the lower grades are not, IF gasoline is handled the same way up there. And if so a medium grade gasoline should have less alcohol content. Alcohol in fuel is like cereal in dog food, strictly a filler. |
#85
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Pass You Eye! Assembled Table Pics
On 9/18/2015 9:24 AM, Jack wrote:
On 9/17/2015 3:05 PM, Leon wrote: You mostly see Ricar vacuum cleaners at dealer and repair shops that mostly sell to cleaning companies. It is a commercial machine. The real beauty is that it is quiet compared to others and is very light weight. Probably 10~15 lbs. I worked in an office and used the janitors vacuum once to clean something I spilt. This thing was beat up to hell and back, cleaning many thousands of square feet a day for years. I was amazed at how this thing cleaned, and was super easy to push around. It was jaw dropping. Anyway, I don't recall the name, but at the time, I looked it up and the price was also jaw dropping, so my wife was stuck with the Hoover.:-) Yeah the Ricar is north of $1000 now. I'm glad ours still works well although for the past 8 years we have been using a Roomba vac. It vacuums 5 days a week every week on the entire down stairs in the new house. My wife uses the Ricar in a single carpeted room up stairs. |
#86
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Pass You Eye! Assembled Table Pics
On 9/17/2015 9:23 PM, krw wrote:
honda motors are good The whole mower is built well. I've never had a problem with cheap mowers motors. I have had problems with the rest of the mower however. The frames rust out, the wheels fall apart, but the motors work. I'm on my second lawn mower since getting married, 40 years ago. The first one. a $75 Murray with a Briggs engine, the frame rusted out, the second also a Briggs engine, is still working fine, I had to fix the wheels on it, but it starts on first/second pull. -- Jack Add Life to your Days not Days to your Life. http://jbstein.com |
#87
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Pass You Eye! Assembled Table Pics
On 9/18/2015 9:36 AM, Mike Marlow wrote:
Agreed. But my agreement is based completely on my needs, and what I'm willing to put up with. I'm honestly not sure how well it would compare to any other vaccum as a dust collection device. I'm sure it would do better than nothing, but right now - I use nothing, so it's all speculation in my mind. LOL, FWIW the Festool has two relative large HEPA filters the pretty much keep it all inside. Actually the inside of the VAC leading to those filters stays pretty dust free. Probably 20 years ago we agreed to see a Rainbow demonstration. Jeez what a complicated messy vacuum. Anyway the salesman wanted to compare the Rainbow to our Ricar. So the smoke and mirrors demonstration started. Both his and ours sucked and held his bowling ball, even score. He asked me to vacuum a section of carpet and go over it 10 times. Then he places a black cloth mid hose on his to act as a filter and vacuumed over the same spot 10 times more. There was dust on the black cloth. Rainbow 1, Ricar 0. I asked to see another black cloth and did the same with the hose on our vacuum. I re-vacuumed the same spot 10 more times and we examined the black cloth. Rainbow 0, Ricar, 1 His next bag of tricks was to turn out the lights and he truned on a bright light directed near the exhaust on the Rainbow. Just a wee bit of dust was seen floating in the air. He did the same with our Ricar and said see how much dust is floating in the air. I said no, he took another look and pointed the light is several directions around our vac. Humm, must be something wrong with my light. I said goodbye. |
#88
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Pass You Eye! Assembled Table Pics
On 9/18/2015 10:07 AM, Jack wrote:
On 9/17/2015 9:23 PM, krw wrote: honda motors are good The whole mower is built well. I've never had a problem with cheap mowers motors. I have had problems with the rest of the mower however. The frames rust out, the wheels fall apart, but the motors work. I'm on my second lawn mower since getting married, 40 years ago. The first one. a $75 Murray with a Briggs engine, the frame rusted out, the second also a Briggs engine, is still working fine, I had to fix the wheels on it, but it starts on first/second pull. Every once in a while one gets out that was built right. You sure a lucky guy Jack. |
#89
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Pass You Eye! Assembled Table Pics
On 9/17/2015 9:36 PM, krw wrote:
On Thu, 17 Sep 2015 11:15:04 -0400, Jack wrote: I call this the Coors effect, and I think for this group, you could call it the Festool effect. From someone who's never used the product? Nope. From someone that understands marketing. Are you saying that you are a Festool user? No. I'm saying that some products are marketed as high priced products. Some, particularly hobbyists, don't mind paying $650 for a shop vac, and in fact, many insist on having the most expensive product made. Festool, imo, is aiming directly at that market, and the fact Festool doesn't allow their stuff to be discounted by the retailer fits that model. It's not that their stuff isn't good, it certainly _should_ be, but, again, imo, the difference between a quality saw, vacuum, drill and the price Festool charges is insane. Tradesmen generally don't buy festool stuff either, not because it's not quality, but because it costs too much, and they can get more bang for the buck with good quality stuff that costs considerably less, particularly if they are not the only guy using the tools. -- Jack Add Life to your Days not Days to your Life. http://jbstein.com |
#90
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Pass You Eye! Assembled Table Pics
On Friday, September 18, 2015 at 9:02:33 AM UTC-5, Swingman wrote:
The _true value_ of any equipment/tool used in business is it's cost effectiveness. Well said, and completely on target. When I am working at a homeowner's house that is a hobby guy, they are in one of two camps. They either have really cheap tools, if any, or they are collectors that enjoy using really expensive tools. Nothing wrong with that. |
#91
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Pass You Eye! Assembled Table Pics
On 9/18/2015 10:58 AM, Jack wrote:
On 9/17/2015 9:36 PM, krw wrote: On Thu, 17 Sep 2015 11:15:04 -0400, Jack wrote: I call this the Coors effect, and I think for this group, you could call it the Festool effect. From someone who's never used the product? Nope. From someone that understands marketing. Are you saying that you are a Festool user? No. I'm saying that some products are marketed as high priced products. Some, particularly hobbyists, don't mind paying $650 for a shop vac, and in fact, many insist on having the most expensive product made. Festool, imo, is aiming directly at that market, and the fact Festool doesn't allow their stuff to be discounted by the retailer fits that model. It's not that their stuff isn't good, it certainly _should_ be, but, again, imo, the difference between a quality saw, vacuum, drill and the price Festool charges is insane. Tradesmen generally don't buy festool stuff either, not because it's not quality, but because it costs too much, and they can get more bang for the buck with good quality stuff that costs considerably less, particularly if they are not the only guy using the tools. AAMOF tradesmen were using Festool long long before Festool became known to the general hobbyist such as yourself. |
#92
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Pass You Eye! Assembled Table Pics
On Fri, 18 Sep 2015 07:39:54 -0400, "Mike Marlow"
wrote: Leon wrote: Yeah I forgot to mention that. I might suggest adding "Stabil" or another gasoline stabilizer. while I never had a problem with my Honda the additive worked wonders for my fathers Honda. The dealer recommended it since alcohol is likely to be in the gas and that attracts water. Relative inexpensive and good insurance against bad gas or gas that might go bad. The best approach is to use enthanol free gas in all of your small engines. Unlike you car, the gas for your small engines can sit around for a long time before you have to fill up the gas can again, and can it in the tank over the winter season. Some of the stabilizers do work, but not for as long as they advertise. That said, the stabilizers do nothing to mitigate the effect of alcohol on rubber hoses. Replacing fuel lines can get expensive at $6-$8 per foot for neoprene lines. Carb diaphrams disintegrate, the pot metal used for the carb disintegrates. It's just bad stuff. Around here ethanol free gas has become very common, but it is only sold as 91 Octane, so you're paying a premium price for it. Cheaper though, than the repair costs for ethanol related problems. Yeah, it's around $3.40 a gallon around here. I buy it, when it's convenient but I haven't had trouble with "old" gas since they improved the supply system a decade or so back. I never do anything special to the gas, other than dumping what's left in the gas can into my car at the end of the season. |
#93
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Pass You Eye! Assembled Table Pics
On Fri, 18 Sep 2015 11:58:13 -0400, Jack wrote:
On 9/17/2015 9:36 PM, krw wrote: On Thu, 17 Sep 2015 11:15:04 -0400, Jack wrote: I call this the Coors effect, and I think for this group, you could call it the Festool effect. From someone who's never used the product? Nope. From someone that understands marketing. Are you saying that you are a Festool user? No. I'm saying that some products are marketed as high priced products. No, stuff sells for what it's worth. It really is that simple. If you don't believe that, you need to go back to Economics 101. Some, particularly hobbyists, don't mind paying $650 for a shop vac, and in fact, many insist on having the most expensive product made. Festool, imo, is aiming directly at that market, and the fact Festool doesn't allow their stuff to be discounted by the retailer fits that model. Your opinion is wrong, of course. I may have a few Festools but it's not because they're expensive. Most users are *not* hobbyists. Clearly if they were meant for hobbyists there wouldn't be the big emphasis on the Systainer system. They're just another case to me, and not as good as a good blow-mold case at that. It's not that their stuff isn't good, it certainly _should_ be, but, again, imo, the difference between a quality saw, vacuum, drill and the price Festool charges is insane. Tradesmen generally don't buy festool stuff either, not because it's not quality, but because it costs too much, and they can get more bang for the buck with good quality stuff that costs considerably less, particularly if they are not the only guy using the tools. Since you've never used Festools, your opinion isn't worth more than the hot air it is. The fact is that you're wrong. |
#94
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Pass You Eye! Assembled Table Pics
On Friday, September 18, 2015 at 11:51:28 AM UTC-5, wrote:
About 18 years ago I bought a DeWalt 10" miter saw and paid $225 for it. Just last month, the saw handle broke. The rest of the saw is fine, but the replacement handle is about 25% of the cost of a new saw. Can you repair or make a new handle? Or want to spend the time trying? A possible option: I often try to repair stuff, so just a thought.... Would fiber glass work for the repair? There is fiber glass wrap, for making casts for broken limbs and such. Seems, if your handle is similar to a child's small arm, repairing it may be similar to applying a cast to a child's small arm.... with a splint/metal rod inserted inside the wrapping, if need be?). https://www.google.com/search?q=orth...w=1280&bih=841 You simply dip the roll in water, to activate it, slightly wringing the excess water out, and wrap, forming whatever contour, etc, to whatever shape you need. It's very easy. You can easily cut it with scissors, to stop and restart any wrapping, if need be. You may not be able to purchase the rolls directly from a medical supply outlet, but maybe you can. You'd probably have to purchase a box of 10-12, rather than one or two rolls. Maybe your local orthopedist would sell you two 3" rolls. I would suppose 2 rolls would be enough. I see online prices are much lower than med supply outlets. An orthopedist may charge up to 10X the online rate. Sonny |
#95
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Pass You Eye! Assembled Table Pics
"Swingman" wrote in message ... On 9/17/2015 10:28 AM, Jack wrote: Did Festool suddenly change their pricing structure to more accurately reflect the true value of the tools, or are you just being fatuous? The _true value_ of any equipment/tool used in business is it's cost effectiveness. Bought first Festool (starting with a TS-75) in 2009, and collectively they have played a big part in well over $300k in sales in just the shop/cabinetry part of my business alone during that period ... making them the most _cost effective_ brand of tools I've ever owned. First, a sarcastic remark. Gee Karl, only 300 K worth of hobby cabinets? You are obviously a hobbyist and amateur. If you were a true professional, you would save up your money and buy the good stuff. There are a lot of folks who just don't understand economics, tools or appropriate technology. I work with some special computers that are only built in about 4 or five shops in the US. And it takes three to four weeks to get one built and shipped to you. And they only run a few programs. And yes, they are expensive. But the interesting thing is that there are local shops that will build you a monster machine that costs twice as much. And they won't be as stable, or as fast and will burn out quite rapidly in use. Because throwing money at it doesn't get the job done. Due to some unique demands, that increase every year, not a lot of machines can keep up. The key is not the money spent or expensive components. The key is building a machine optimized for a certain function. Price is not the only issue. IS IT THE RIGHT TOOL FOR THE JOB??? People who work in the real world, solving real problems, spending their own money don't have any problems making appropriate decisions in this area. Besides, it takes a certain kind of person to whine about tools or somebody else's choice of tool. I have always admired good tools. I have always admired true craftsman. I don't have any problem figuring out whose opinions I respect and those opinions I disregard. |
#96
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Pass You Eye! Assembled Table Pics
On Thursday, September 17, 2015 at 4:28:12 PM UTC-5, Leon wrote:
I remember that, mostly because Festool does not charge $1000 for that saw. The bigger corded one is $750.00 including a 75" track and systainer case. Bought separately the 75" track is $200 and the case is north of $70. I find that when someone exaggerates the price this is not all that is suspect about their comments. Either way it is a fine saw and system. With its quality of cut it very well could replace or put off the need to buy a quality TS for cutting. Ya know, the more you guys speak of, not just Festool, but their track saw, the more I think I'd benefit with one. Aside, I suppose I've made my share of snide remarks, jokingly, relating to Festool. I often use a circular saw and there are times I wish I had something more convenient for a better job, a better cutting method, more accuracy, etc., especially with the work at the farm. I can't conveniently bring a table saw to the farm, and I'm becoming more convinced the track saw would do wonders for the ongoing work, there. A circular saw is not always the best saw for applications, there, and $750 is economical, in all respects, for the farm application. I'd probably leave it there, permanently. My only hesitancy is with others not taking good care of the tools, as I take care of them. If I'm not there to watch over them, they'll abuse stuff..... *if and when they decide to try to do something productive, **for a change. More rant: A set of decent saw horses, at the farm, would do wonders, also, and I'm sure would accommodate a track saw. The present saw horses were made by a nephew and are pitifully inadequate: Poor construction and 20" tall. What was he thinking?!! Sometimes, the woodworking sense, I try to instill in them, just doesn't seem to be getting through. But, at least his efforts were a try, at saw horseing. Sonny |
#97
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Pass You Eye! Assembled Table Pics
On Fri, 18 Sep 2015 10:25:45 -0400, "Mike Marlow"
wrote: You know what really sucks? All gas comes in ethanol free. My SIL works for a company that delivers gas to gas stations. Ethanol is way better than MTBE additive for better emission control. |
#98
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Pass You Eye! Assembled Table Pics
Sonny wrote:
Ya know, the more you guys speak of, not just Festool, but their track saw, the more I think I'd benefit with one. Aside, I suppose I've made my share of snide remarks, jokingly, relating to Festool. I often use a circular saw and there are times I wish I had something more convenient for a better job, a better cutting method, more accuracy, etc., especially with the work at the farm. I can't conveniently bring a table saw to the farm, and I'm becoming more convinced the track saw would do wonders for the ongoing work, there. A circular saw is not always the best saw for applications, there, and $750 is economical, in all respects, for the farm application. I'd probably leave it there, permanently. You're not so far from thoughts that I've had Sonny, but to be honest - I keep going back to the same thought - can't I get almost the same thing out of my circular saw and a saw guide (or whatever they call it...). You know what I mean - the sled you build such that your saw always cuts just like the Festool jig does - only it does not have the nice dust collection system. Huge difference in cost though. You can build your own for $10 versus what the retail versions cost - Festool being the top of the heap, cost wise. Here's just one of many videos about these homemade jigs... http://www.thisoldhouse.com/toh/vide...808204,00.html Probably not as sophisticated as the retail versions, but for a lot of us - it's really all we need. And - it works. It will cut a straight line just as well as any of the expensive alternatives. -- -Mike- |
#99
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Pass You Eye! Assembled Table Pics
Markem wrote:
On Fri, 18 Sep 2015 10:25:45 -0400, "Mike Marlow" wrote: You know what really sucks? All gas comes in ethanol free. My SIL works for a company that delivers gas to gas stations. Ethanol is way better than MTBE additive for better emission control. From mixing to combustion, it's a net energy loss. End of story. -- -Mike- |
#100
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Pass You Eye! Assembled Table Pics
On 9/18/2015 4:25 PM, Sonny wrote:
On Thursday, September 17, 2015 at 4:28:12 PM UTC-5, Leon wrote: I remember that, mostly because Festool does not charge $1000 for that saw. The bigger corded one is $750.00 including a 75" track and systainer case. Bought separately the 75" track is $200 and the case is north of $70. I find that when someone exaggerates the price this is not all that is suspect about their comments. Either way it is a fine saw and system. With its quality of cut it very well could replace or put off the need to buy a quality TS for cutting. Ya know, the more you guys speak of, not just Festool, but their track saw, the more I think I'd benefit with one. Aside, I suppose I've made my share of snide remarks, jokingly, relating to Festool. We will help yu remove some of the egg from your face when you buy one. ;~) I often use a circular saw and there are times I wish I had something more convenient for a better job, a better cutting method, more accuracy, etc., especially with the work at the farm. I can't conveniently bring a table saw to the farm, and I'm becoming more convinced the track saw would do wonders for the ongoing work, there. A circular saw is not always the best saw for applications, there, and $750 is economical, in all respects, for the farm application. I'd probably leave it there, permanently. Something to consider, the Festool will produce cabinet saw quality cuts. Do you need that or the accuracy of straight lines? If only the accuracy of straight lines Grizzly offers a track saw that might be the answer and take some sting out it being abused. But if you want top of the line and quality cuts I highly recommend the Festool. Let me add a bit of buying strategy. If you are going to be ripping sheets of 4x8 plywood you are going to also need to purchase an extra length of track. The TS55 track saw comes with a 55" track, the TS75 track saw comes with a 75" track. To rip an 8' sheet you will need about 10' of track. The 75" and the 55" tracks give you almost 11', and you will need to buy 2 rail connectors, $36. If you buy a TS55 track saw with 55" rail and add the connectors and a 75" rail you are going to pay $640 for the saw, $36 for the connectors and $200 for the 75" rail, total $875. If you buy a TS75 track saw with 75" rail and add the connectors and a 55" rail you are going to pay $750 for the saw, $36 for the connectors and $129 for the 55" rail, total $915. With the understanding that the TS55 needs an additional 75" rail and the TS75 needs and additional 55" rail the difference between the two saw set ups is only $40 more for the bigger TS 75 saw. Just something to consider if you are thinking one saw over the other and will need to make 96" or longer cuts. My only hesitancy is with others not taking good care of the tools, as I take care of them. If I'm not there to watch over them, they'll abuse stuff.... *if and when they decide to try to do something productive, **for a change. The case that comes with the saw is very good and easy to deal with, take the saw home with you. OTOH they could be abusing a $1500 TS. Going a bit further, I recently had to replace my, all plastic, Stanley saw horses. The picture shows my set up for cutting sheet goods with my track saw and may be the only true example of something none of us thought was possible, having too many clamps. I ended up buying a set of Dewalt saw horses that have steel legs and pretty much plastic every where else. I think you can figure out the set up which worked well until one of the plastic legs on the saw horse buckled. https://www.flickr.com/photos/lcb112...posted-public/ |
#101
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Pass You Eye! Assembled Table Pics
Leon wrote:
Something to consider, the Festool will produce cabinet saw quality cuts. Do you need that or the accuracy of straight lines? If only the accuracy of straight lines Grizzly offers a track saw that might be the answer and take some sting out it being abused. But if you want top of the line and quality cuts I highly recommend the Festool. But honestly Leon - isn't that more a matter of the blade, than anything else? How can it be any other factor? If you buy a TS55 track saw with 55" rail and add the connectors and a 75" rail you are going to pay $640 for the saw, $36 for the connectors and $200 for the 75" rail, total $875. Ouch! If you buy a TS75 track saw with 75" rail and add the connectors and a 55" rail you are going to pay $750 for the saw, $36 for the connectors and $129 for the 55" rail, total $915. Oucher! -- -Mike- |
#102
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Pass You Eye! Assembled Table Pics
On 9/18/2015 5:08 PM, Mike Marlow wrote:
Sonny wrote: Ya know, the more you guys speak of, not just Festool, but their track saw, the more I think I'd benefit with one. Aside, I suppose I've made my share of snide remarks, jokingly, relating to Festool. I often use a circular saw and there are times I wish I had something more convenient for a better job, a better cutting method, more accuracy, etc., especially with the work at the farm. I can't conveniently bring a table saw to the farm, and I'm becoming more convinced the track saw would do wonders for the ongoing work, there. A circular saw is not always the best saw for applications, there, and $750 is economical, in all respects, for the farm application. I'd probably leave it there, permanently. You're not so far from thoughts that I've had Sonny, but to be honest - I keep going back to the same thought - can't I get almost the same thing out of my circular saw and a saw guide (or whatever they call it...). You know what I mean - the sled you build such that your saw always cuts just like the Festool jig does - only it does not have the nice dust collection system. Huge difference in cost though. You can build your own for $10 versus what the retail versions cost - Festool being the top of the heap, cost wise. Here's just one of many videos about these homemade jigs... http://www.thisoldhouse.com/toh/vide...808204,00.html Probably not as sophisticated as the retail versions, but for a lot of us - it's really all we need. And - it works. It will cut a straight line just as well as any of the expensive alternatives. You can absolutely do that Mike and it does work well. Swingman and I did that countless times with his Makita and a similar guide rail. The problem is that many saws simply have slack tolerances. The blade does not always spin in the same plane and you get a relatively straight cut once you clear away all the tear out, especially if you are cross cutting plywood. But relative straight is all dependent on whether the blade moves side to side. This is not absolutely a problem with all saws but I have seen many older saws that display this problem. Additionally the Festool saw address the possibility of tear out on the top of the cut. This is a real problem when cross cutting. The Festool plunges safely mid panel with out having to lift the saw to start the cut. And maybe not so important, the Festool saw is stellar with dust control providing you have a vac and hose connected. With most any home or shop built track you are going to need a couple of clamps to hold the track in place. The Festool track stays in place with out clamps if the surface is not covered with dust. Now if you are simply cutting material to a workable size what you suggest is a great way to go. Because Swingman and I sell a majority of our work the old saying, time is money, kicks in. We found that the Festool eliminates, in many instances, the need to re-cut the plywood panels and that along with all the other features I mentioned really speeds up production. What Swingman and Nailshooter and I have been indicating over and over is that a quality tool that was designed for the tradesman, you are going to get results that you can sell whether you are a cabinet maker or a fine furniture builder. If time is important the Festool is going to be a good choice. |
#103
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Pass You Eye! Assembled Table Pics
On 9/18/2015 5:42 PM, Mike Marlow wrote:
Leon wrote: Something to consider, the Festool will produce cabinet saw quality cuts. Do you need that or the accuracy of straight lines? If only the accuracy of straight lines Grizzly offers a track saw that might be the answer and take some sting out it being abused. But if you want top of the line and quality cuts I highly recommend the Festool. But honestly Leon - isn't that more a matter of the blade, than anything else? How can it be any other factor? The blade is very important and Festool provides and has a nice selection of premium blades. But a great blade can not make better a tool that is not built for accuracy. How many times have we seen the comment that the Forrest WWII does not improve the cut over my "brand X" blade. The set up is wrong or the TS is simply not capable of producing a better cut regardless of the blade. The big deal that we/I have found is that with the Festool saw you can start a cut, stop, lift the saw, replace the saw, start the saw, plunge and continue cutting with out being able to tell where you stopped and started. Many circular saws are simply designed to cut relatively straight. I have seen several, I own two, that you can move the blade back and forth, in and out towards the motor housing and that causes a cut that is not flat. It's the tolerances built into the Festool track saw that puts it above the non track circular saws. If you have noticed, most all of the major saw makers are offering track saws and all of them are unique. I am certain those saws have higher build quality tolerances otherwise they could simply offer a track to work with one of their existing saws. And it is not just the quality of a straight line cut. It is also the quality and accuracy of a plunge cut. The accuracy of being able to start and stop precisely where you want in a plunge cut. Granted these are a lot of features that many may not ever need but with more options come more opportunities. I never dreamed that I would be using my Domino 10 more than I used my biscuit cutters. If you are anal with your precision the results show. These saws are absolutely not for every one nor does it make sense for everyone to buy one. BUT if you want to save time, get premium cuts, or just appreciate a top quality product I don't think you will be dissatisfied. If you buy a TS55 track saw with 55" rail and add the connectors and a 75" rail you are going to pay $640 for the saw, $36 for the connectors and $200 for the 75" rail, total $875. Ouch! If you buy a TS75 track saw with 75" rail and add the connectors and a 55" rail you are going to pay $750 for the saw, $36 for the connectors and $129 for the 55" rail, total $915. Oucher! |
#104
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Pass You Eye! Assembled Table Pics
On 9/18/2015 5:09 PM, Mike Marlow wrote:
Markem wrote: On Fri, 18 Sep 2015 10:25:45 -0400, "Mike Marlow" wrote: You know what really sucks? All gas comes in ethanol free. My SIL works for a company that delivers gas to gas stations. Ethanol is way better than MTBE additive for better emission control. From mixing to combustion, it's a net energy loss. End of story. Ironically and what many do not realize is the truth that there is a net energy loss and as a result you literally have to burn more fuel to get the same output and therefore create more emissions. |
#105
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Pass You Eye! Assembled Table Pics
Leon wrote:
The blade is very important and Festool provides and has a nice selection of premium blades. But a great blade can not make better a tool that is not built for accuracy. How many times have we seen the comment that the Forrest WWII does not improve the cut over my "brand X" blade. The set up is wrong or the TS is simply not capable of producing a better cut regardless of the blade. The big deal that we/I have found is that with the Festool saw you can start a cut, stop, lift the saw, replace the saw, start the saw, plunge and continue cutting with out being able to tell where you stopped and started. Many circular saws are simply designed to cut relatively straight. I have seen several, I own two, that you can move the blade back and forth, in and out towards the motor housing and that causes a cut that is not flat. It's the tolerances built into the Festool track saw that puts it above the non track circular saws. That actually makes a lot of sense. I guess I never really paid any or enough attention to the stability of the common circular saw blade. -- -Mike- |
#106
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Pass You Eye! Assembled Table Pics
Leon wrote:
On 9/18/2015 5:09 PM, Mike Marlow wrote: Markem wrote: On Fri, 18 Sep 2015 10:25:45 -0400, "Mike Marlow" wrote: You know what really sucks? All gas comes in ethanol free. My SIL works for a company that delivers gas to gas stations. Ethanol is way better than MTBE additive for better emission control. From mixing to combustion, it's a net energy loss. End of story. Ironically and what many do not realize is the truth that there is a net energy loss and as a result you literally have to burn more fuel to get the same output and therefore create more emissions. Yup! -- -Mike- |
#107
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Pass You Eye! Assembled Table Pics
On 9/18/2015 6:33 PM, Mike Marlow wrote:
Leon wrote: The blade is very important and Festool provides and has a nice selection of premium blades. But a great blade can not make better a tool that is not built for accuracy. How many times have we seen the comment that the Forrest WWII does not improve the cut over my "brand X" blade. The set up is wrong or the TS is simply not capable of producing a better cut regardless of the blade. The big deal that we/I have found is that with the Festool saw you can start a cut, stop, lift the saw, replace the saw, start the saw, plunge and continue cutting with out being able to tell where you stopped and started. Many circular saws are simply designed to cut relatively straight. I have seen several, I own two, that you can move the blade back and forth, in and out towards the motor housing and that causes a cut that is not flat. It's the tolerances built into the Festool track saw that puts it above the non track circular saws. That actually makes a lot of sense. I guess I never really paid any or enough attention to the stability of the common circular saw blade. Something that I for got to mention. I think it was Christmas time 2008. Karl sent me a picture of his new Track saw. We went to see them on our weekly get together and he and I went out to his shop. I looked at it, touched it, maybe even smelled it. LOL Anyway he cut a scrap piece of wood to show me what to push, what to pull, and how the riving knife came down with the blade and then he stepped aside to let me make a test "cross cut" in a piece of plywood. I hate to say this but it seems like yesterday. I set the saw on the track, pushed the plunge release, pulled the trigger, pushed down to plunge the blade, and pushed the saw about 6". I stopped and I think I said daaaamn. That was all it took to see and feel the difference in this saw and and any other circular saw that I have used. I can only say it is a slippery slope. I think Karl may have said daaamn when he saw a kitchen that we had built and installed and that I had finished sanding with my Festool sanders and vac. He got those sanders too. LOL He is behind in score, 1 Domino and 1 drill. ;~) |
#108
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Pass You Eye! Assembled Table Pics
On Fri, 18 Sep 2015 14:25:33 -0700 (PDT), Sonny
wrote: On Thursday, September 17, 2015 at 4:28:12 PM UTC-5, Leon wrote: I remember that, mostly because Festool does not charge $1000 for that saw. The bigger corded one is $750.00 including a 75" track and systainer case. Bought separately the 75" track is $200 and the case is north of $70. I find that when someone exaggerates the price this is not all that is suspect about their comments. Either way it is a fine saw and system. With its quality of cut it very well could replace or put off the need to buy a quality TS for cutting. Ya know, the more you guys speak of, not just Festool, but their track saw, the more I think I'd benefit with one. Aside, I suppose I've made my share of snide remarks, jokingly, relating to Festool. You'll kick yourself for holding out this long. Be prepared to buy at least another rail and couplers. ;-) I've thrown my share of Festool barbs at Leon myself. ;-) I often use a circular saw and there are times I wish I had something more convenient for a better job, a better cutting method, more accuracy, etc., especially with the work at the farm. I can't conveniently bring a table saw to the farm, and I'm becoming more convinced the track saw would do wonders for the ongoing work, there. A circular saw is not always the best saw for applications, there, and $750 is economical, in all respects, for the farm application. I'd probably leave it there, permanently. My only hesitancy is with others not taking good care of the tools, as I take care of them. If I'm not there to watch over them, they'll abuse stuff.... *if and when they decide to try to do something productive, **for a change. More rant: A set of decent saw horses, at the farm, would do wonders, also, and I'm sure would accommodate a track saw. The present saw horses were made by a nephew and are pitifully inadequate: Poor construction and 20" tall. What was he thinking?!! Sometimes, the woodworking sense, I try to instill in them, just doesn't seem to be getting through. But, at least his efforts were a try, at saw horseing. Sonny |
#109
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Pass You Eye! Assembled Table Pics
On Fri, 18 Sep 2015 18:42:15 -0400, "Mike Marlow"
wrote: Leon wrote: Something to consider, the Festool will produce cabinet saw quality cuts. Do you need that or the accuracy of straight lines? If only the accuracy of straight lines Grizzly offers a track saw that might be the answer and take some sting out it being abused. But if you want top of the line and quality cuts I highly recommend the Festool. But honestly Leon - isn't that more a matter of the blade, than anything else? How can it be any other factor? Not a real good answer but my first circular saw (Crapsman) couldn't cut a straight line for anything. I thought it was me but when I replaced it, even with a just slightly less crappy saw (pre-BORG Ryobi) the lines all of a sudden got a lot straighter. Those that say a craftsman never blames his tools has never worked with good tools. If you buy a TS55 track saw with 55" rail and add the connectors and a 75" rail you are going to pay $640 for the saw, $36 for the connectors and $200 for the 75" rail, total $875. Ouch! If you buy a TS75 track saw with 75" rail and add the connectors and a 55" rail you are going to pay $750 for the saw, $36 for the connectors and $129 for the 55" rail, total $915. Oucher! It only goes down from there. ;-) |
#110
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Pass You Eye! Assembled Table Pics
On Fri, 18 Sep 2015 16:28:22 -0500, Markem
wrote: On Fri, 18 Sep 2015 10:25:45 -0400, "Mike Marlow" wrote: You know what really sucks? All gas comes in ethanol free. My SIL works for a company that delivers gas to gas stations. Ethanol is way better than MTBE additive for better emission control. A *whole* lot better to drink, too! |
#111
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Pass You Eye! Assembled Table Pics
On Fri, 18 Sep 2015 16:28:22 -0500, Markem
wrote: On Fri, 18 Sep 2015 10:25:45 -0400, "Mike Marlow" wrote: You know what really sucks? All gas comes in ethanol free. My SIL works for a company that delivers gas to gas stations. Ethanol is way better than MTBE additive for better emission control. Should have added that neither are needed with modern engines. |
#112
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Pass You Eye! Assembled Table Pics
Mike Marlow wrote:
Here's just one of many videos about these homemade jigs... http://www.thisoldhouse.com/toh/vide...808204,00.html Thanks for the video, Mike! |
#113
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Pass You Eye! Assembled Table Pics
On 9/18/2015 7:18 PM, krw wrote:
On Fri, 18 Sep 2015 14:25:33 -0700 (PDT), Sonny wrote: On Thursday, September 17, 2015 at 4:28:12 PM UTC-5, Leon wrote: I remember that, mostly because Festool does not charge $1000 for that saw. The bigger corded one is $750.00 including a 75" track and systainer case. Bought separately the 75" track is $200 and the case is north of $70. I find that when someone exaggerates the price this is not all that is suspect about their comments. Either way it is a fine saw and system. With its quality of cut it very well could replace or put off the need to buy a quality TS for cutting. Ya know, the more you guys speak of, not just Festool, but their track saw, the more I think I'd benefit with one. Aside, I suppose I've made my share of snide remarks, jokingly, relating to Festool. You'll kick yourself for holding out this long. Be prepared to buy at least another rail and couplers. ;-) I've thrown my share of Festool barbs at Leon myself. ;-) Yeah but now you are under the "Spell". LOL |
#114
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Pass You Eye! Assembled Table Pics
On 9/18/2015 9:51 PM, krw wrote:
On Fri, 18 Sep 2015 18:42:15 -0400, "Mike Marlow" wrote: Leon wrote: Something to consider, the Festool will produce cabinet saw quality cuts. Do you need that or the accuracy of straight lines? If only the accuracy of straight lines Grizzly offers a track saw that might be the answer and take some sting out it being abused. But if you want top of the line and quality cuts I highly recommend the Festool. But honestly Leon - isn't that more a matter of the blade, than anything else? How can it be any other factor? Not a real good answer but my first circular saw (Crapsman) couldn't cut a straight line for anything. I thought it was me but when I replaced it, even with a just slightly less crappy saw (pre-BORG Ryobi) the lines all of a sudden got a lot straighter. Those that say a craftsman never blames his tools has never worked with good tools. ABSOLUTELY Correct! If you buy a TS55 track saw with 55" rail and add the connectors and a 75" rail you are going to pay $640 for the saw, $36 for the connectors and $200 for the 75" rail, total $875. Ouch! If you buy a TS75 track saw with 75" rail and add the connectors and a 55" rail you are going to pay $750 for the saw, $36 for the connectors and $129 for the 55" rail, total $915. Oucher! It only goes down from there. ;-) Yeah that is the big bite. Although my local Woodcraft kept the 197" Guide Rail FS 5000 in stock, stood up in the corner like a flag pole. $595.00 But you would not need the connector bars. ;~) |
#115
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Pass You Eye! Assembled Table Pics
On Fri, 18 Sep 2015 09:58:51 -0500
Leon lcb11211@swbelldotnet wrote: although for the past 8 years we have been using a Roomba vac. It Be careful with that around dogs http://www.craigslist.org/about/best...112700681.html |
#116
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Pass You Eye! Assembled Table Pics
On 9/18/2015 10:33 AM, Leon wrote:
My wife bought me a broom for about $25. The last one lasted me 20 years. I could buy 4 of them for the cost of one Ridged, that would be 4 times 20 years. Longer than I would live. Her broom doesn't suck as hard as my Ridgid vacuum, and it's hoses don't fit it either. If you like the tools you buy fine. Don't knock something you know little about. I don't really understand your obsession with trashing Festool. I like some, don't like others. I don't obsess about any of them. I also don't trash Festools, I never once said they are trash. I don't even mind that they cost more than other tools, it's a marketing scheme that works well for them. -- Jack Add Life to your Days not Days to your Life. http://jbstein.com |
#117
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Pass You Eye! Assembled Table Pics
On 9/18/2015 2:04 PM, Leon wrote:
On 9/18/2015 10:58 AM, Jack wrote: On 9/17/2015 9:36 PM, krw wrote: On Thu, 17 Sep 2015 11:15:04 -0400, Jack wrote: It's not that their stuff isn't good, it certainly _should_ be, but, again, imo, the difference between a quality saw, vacuum, drill and the price Festool charges is insane. Tradesmen generally don't buy festool stuff either, not because it's not quality, but because it costs too much, and they can get more bang for the buck with good quality stuff that costs considerably less, particularly if they are not the only guy using the tools. AAMOF tradesmen were using Festool long long before Festool became known to the general hobbyist such as yourself. I'm sure, but I've never seen them used on a job site, and I asked around once at a local club with around 10 professional tradesman, all in the business for many years, and not one of them owned or used any festools, supporting my view not many tradesman use Festools, choosing to use cheaper, high quality tools. I suspect most Festool users are general hobbyists, with oil wells in their back yard, like yourself. "Look at me ma, I'm using a Festool, y'all know what this thing cost?" I'm sure some professionals, that mostly work alone, own Festools, they are supposedly top quality, as they should be considering the price. I've just never met one, or talked to one, or walked past one. Rockler sells them though. -- Jack Add Life to your Days not Days to your Life. http://jbstein.com |
#118
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Pass You Eye! Assembled Table Pics
On 9/18/2015 2:17 PM, krw wrote:
On Fri, 18 Sep 2015 11:58:13 -0400, Jack wrote: Some, particularly hobbyists, don't mind paying $650 for a shop vac, and in fact, many insist on having the most expensive product made. Festool, imo, is aiming directly at that market, and the fact Festool doesn't allow their stuff to be discounted by the retailer fits that model. Your opinion is wrong, of course. Of course, because you say so right? I actually took the time to ask a bunch of people in the business, and not one, not ONE used Festools. Some didn't even know what they were, and it's what they do for a living. Others simple said they are far too expensive. For a closer view, here is what one of our own (nailshooter) just said: "Agreeing with you Karl, finding he exact fit of price/utility/performance is the real key to what a tool is worth. Excepting you and Leon whom I know both use your Festool(s)extensively and constantly, _I know of no one else that does._" I may have a few Festools but it's not because they're expensive. Most users are *not* hobbyists. And what exactly is your profession, or are you a hobbyist? Since you've never used Festools, your opinion isn't worth more than the hot air it is. The fact is that you're wrong. I've been using tools my entire life, been woodworking for going on 60 years. I know good tools, junk tools, and overpriced tools. Why is it only Festool owners get their panties in a bunch when someone doesn't get on their knees at the mention of their beloved Festool? If you don't trust my answer, you could email Festool marketing dept, I'm sure they could tell you. -- Jack Add Life to your Days not Days to your Life. http://jbstein.com |
#119
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Pass You Eye! Assembled Table Pics
On 9/19/2015 8:10 AM, Jack wrote:
Rockler sells them though. Rockler hasn't sold Festool in a couple of years ... WoodCraft does. -- eWoodShop: www.eWoodShop.com Wood Shop: www.e-WoodShop.net https://www.google.com/+eWoodShop https://plus.google.com/+KarlCaillouet/posts http://www.custommade.com/by/ewoodshop/ KarlCaillouet@ (the obvious) |
#120
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Pass You Eye! Assembled Table Pics
On 9/18/2015 7:03 PM, Leon wrote:
I can only say it is a slippery slope. I think Karl may have said daaamn when he saw a kitchen that we had built and installed and that I had finished sanding with my Festool sanders and vac. He got those sanders too. LOL He is behind in score, 1 Domino and 1 drill. ;~) What I need is more shop space. A Domino takes up a lot less room than my Multi-Router, but I'm fond of the damned thing. One of these days that will be the tipping point... -- eWoodShop: www.eWoodShop.com Wood Shop: www.e-WoodShop.net https://www.google.com/+eWoodShop https://plus.google.com/+KarlCaillouet/posts http://www.custommade.com/by/ewoodshop/ KarlCaillouet@ (the obvious) |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
A Few Table Top Pics | Woodworking | |||
Gun/China Cabinet is Assembled - Pics | Woodworking | |||
hall table w/ pics.. maybe? | Woodworking Plans and Photos | |||
Ash Table all Galooed up w/pics | Woodworking | |||
Took a Sawzall to my Ash Table :( w/pics | Woodworking |