Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
Woodworking (rec.woodworking) Discussion forum covering all aspects of working with wood. All levels of expertise are encouraged to particiapte. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
OT - this group is alone
I read about 10 different newsgroups. With the proliferation of other
online sources and the dropping of Usenet by several providers, the traffic in my newsgroups has been slowly going away. For the last week or so, this newsgroup has been the only one with posts - not counting an occasional troller/spammer who gets through the filters. Wonder how long this group will keep going? -- When fascism comes to America, it will be wrapped in the flag and carrying a cross. |
#2
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
OT - this group is alone
On 9/10/13 11:11 AM, Larry Blanchard wrote:
I read about 10 different newsgroups. With the proliferation of other online sources and the dropping of Usenet by several providers, the traffic in my newsgroups has been slowly going away. For the last week or so, this newsgroup has been the only one with posts - not counting an occasional troller/spammer who gets through the filters. Wonder how long this group will keep going? Old people with old computers. :-) -- -MIKE- "Playing is not something I do at night, it's my function in life" --Elvin Jones (1927-2004) -- http://mikedrums.com ---remove "DOT" ^^^^ to reply |
#3
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
OT - this group is alone
On 9/10/2013 11:17 AM, -MIKE- wrote:
On 9/10/13 11:11 AM, Larry Blanchard wrote: I read about 10 different newsgroups. With the proliferation of other online sources and the dropping of Usenet by several providers, the traffic in my newsgroups has been slowly going away. For the last week or so, this newsgroup has been the only one with posts - not counting an occasional troller/spammer who gets through the filters. Wonder how long this group will keep going? Old people with old computers. :-) Probably a long time. Woodworking, unlike other types of groups, CB radio buffs, hot pics of Cristina Aguilara, global warming, etc is not a fad. |
#4
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
OT - this group is alone
On 9/10/2013 11:11 AM, Larry Blanchard wrote:
I read about 10 different newsgroups. With the proliferation of other online sources and the dropping of Usenet by several providers, the traffic in my newsgroups has been slowly going away. For the last week or so, this newsgroup has been the only one with posts - not counting an occasional troller/spammer who gets through the filters. Wonder how long this group will keep going? I monitor about a half-dozen; three of which are roughly the same volume as r.w; one is about half the other is 3-5X the traffic. I don't see usenet disappearing entirely for a while yet altho certainly the proliferation of the web forum is all that newbies generally ever see unless they're pointed to usenet by other users. -- |
#5
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
OT - this group is alone
On 9/10/13 12:24 PM, dpb wrote:
On 9/10/2013 11:11 AM, Larry Blanchard wrote: I read about 10 different newsgroups. With the proliferation of other online sources and the dropping of Usenet by several providers, the traffic in my newsgroups has been slowly going away. For the last week or so, this newsgroup has been the only one with posts - not counting an occasional troller/spammer who gets through the filters. Wonder how long this group will keep going? I monitor about a half-dozen; three of which are roughly the same volume as r.w; one is about half the other is 3-5X the traffic. I don't see usenet disappearing entirely for a while yet altho certainly the proliferation of the web forum is all that newbies generally ever see unless they're pointed to usenet by other users. -- It's dead for all intents and purposes. Even if on life support, it should be shot and taken out of its misery. The only people left are technophobes and grumpy old men too stubborn to change. Even "forums" are old school. There are woodworking groups on facebook and google+ that allow instant dialogue and video chatting. In the time it takes to write this message and see a reply, an entire group of people could've discussed and solved a problem that we'll still be bitching and arguing about a month from now. Of course, that's the other reason this newsgroup is still breathing. People love to bitch and moan and we have fun doing it with each other. There are several guys in here whose skill, knowledge and opinions I trust and that's pretty much the only reason I'm still here. If I could get all those guys active in the same facebook or google+ group, I'd place usenet in the same time capsule with my floppy discs and buggy whips. -- -MIKE- "Playing is not something I do at night, it's my function in life" --Elvin Jones (1927-2004) -- http://mikedrums.com ---remove "DOT" ^^^^ to reply |
#6
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
OT - this group is alone
Larry Blanchard wrote:
I read about 10 different newsgroups. With the proliferation of other online sources and the dropping of Usenet by several providers, the traffic in my newsgroups has been slowly going away. For the last week or so, this newsgroup has been the only one with posts - not counting an occasional troller/spammer who gets through the filters. Wonder how long this group will keep going? It's not dead, it's just being leached off of http://www.homeownershub.com/ see your own post 3rd one down in the middle |
#7
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
OT - this group is alone
"-MIKE-" wrote in message ...
There are several guys in here whose skill, knowledge and opinions I trust and that's pretty much the only reason I'm still here. If I could get all those guys active in the same facebook or google+ group, I'd place usenet in the same time capsule with my floppy discs and buggy whips. I have firmly resisted Facebook and pretty much all of the web site based groups/forums. Despite the noise here at times I prefer it to the moderated/censored groups. Let people rise to the top or sink to the bottom on their own... censors interfere with natural selection! There are also advantages to not being in real time contact for things like this... Read/write/leave and do something vs. read/write/read/write/read/write/what day is it? ;~) |
#8
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
OT - this group is alone
On 9/10/2013 12:36 PM, -MIKE- wrote:
.... get all those guys active in the same facebook or google+ group, I'd place usenet in the same time capsule with my floppy discs and buggy whips. This grumpy ol' guy does none of the above (and won't)... The most active group of those I mentioned is non-official support for a commercial software product the manufacturer of whom started a self-supported forum a couple of years ago so they could have more control than they have over usenet. I have tried owing to some agreements I made with them to use it and provide aid there as have on the usenet group for years. It's simply too unwieldy and takes too long to use the web interface as all other forums or the other interfaces I've seen as compared to the plain text and threaded view of a classic newsreader. I've given it up after an effort of some months--it's just not worth the time/effort required. If fewer get the help I can offer there by not using the usenet portal, so be it; just way it'll have to be. Similarly for the other w-working sites I've seen--they're just too interface-intensive to be time-beneficial for my time invested/required. -- |
#9
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
OT - this group is alone
On Tue, 10 Sep 2013 12:36:14 -0500, -MIKE-
wrote: It's dead for all intents and purposes. Even if on life support, it should be shot and taken out of its misery. The only people left are technophobes and grumpy old men too stubborn to change. Even "forums" are old school. There are woodworking groups on facebook and google+ that allow instant dialogue and video chatting. In the time it takes to write this message and see a reply, an entire group of people could've discussed and solved a problem that we'll still be bitching and arguing about a month from now. Of course, that's the other reason this newsgroup is still breathing. People love to bitch and moan and we have fun doing it with each other. There are several guys in here whose skill, knowledge and opinions I trust and that's pretty much the only reason I'm still here. If I could get all those guys active in the same facebook or google+ group, I'd place usenet in the same time capsule with my floppy discs and buggy whips. Yeah but you have conform to the rules, here on usenet not so much. Mark |
#10
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
OT - this group is alone
On 9/10/13 1:35 PM, Markem wrote:
On Tue, 10 Sep 2013 12:36:14 -0500, -MIKE- wrote: It's dead for all intents and purposes. Even if on life support, it should be shot and taken out of its misery. The only people left are technophobes and grumpy old men too stubborn to change. Even "forums" are old school. There are woodworking groups on facebook and google+ that allow instant dialogue and video chatting. In the time it takes to write this message and see a reply, an entire group of people could've discussed and solved a problem that we'll still be bitching and arguing about a month from now. Of course, that's the other reason this newsgroup is still breathing. People love to bitch and moan and we have fun doing it with each other. There are several guys in here whose skill, knowledge and opinions I trust and that's pretty much the only reason I'm still here. If I could get all those guys active in the same facebook or google+ group, I'd place usenet in the same time capsule with my floppy discs and buggy whips. Yeah but you have conform to the rules, here on usenet not so much. Mark No "rules" on either sites I mentioned. -- -MIKE- "Playing is not something I do at night, it's my function in life" --Elvin Jones (1927-2004) -- http://mikedrums.com ---remove "DOT" ^^^^ to reply |
#11
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
OT - this group is alone
"-MIKE-" wrote: There are woodworking groups on facebook and google+ that allow instant dialogue and video chatting. -------------------------------------------------------------- Cold day when I get involved with facebook or google+. Lew |
#12
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
OT - this group is alone
On 9/10/2013 1:58 PM, -MIKE- wrote:
Sorry, Mike, but that's exactly what is killing Usenet. Rec.Craft.Metalworking - completely overrun but political and personal attacks by people who don't feel they need to follow the rules. Yeah but you have conform to the rules, here on usenet not so much. Mark No "rules" on either sites I mentioned. |
#13
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
OT - this group is alone
On 9/10/2013 2:54 PM, Richard wrote:
On 9/10/2013 1:58 PM, -MIKE- wrote: Sorry, Mike, but that's exactly what is killing Usenet. Rec.Craft.Metalworking - completely overrun but political and personal attacks by people who don't feel they need to follow the rules. Yeah but you have conform to the rules, here on usenet not so much. Mark No "rules" on either sites I mentioned. Along w/ the topposters... I suspect the biggest hidden rule is more stringent spam blockers is generally the case w/ all I've seen. That isn't all _a_bad_thing_ (tm) but otoh it doesn't take terribly much effort to have effective-enough filters that even r.c.m mentioned above is pretty much benign. -- -- |
#14
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
OT - this group is alone
On 9/10/2013 1:58 PM, -MIKE- wrote:
On 9/10/13 1:35 PM, Markem wrote: On Tue, 10 Sep 2013 12:36:14 -0500, -MIKE- wrote: It's dead for all intents and purposes. Even if on life support, it should be shot and taken out of its misery. The only people left are technophobes and grumpy old men too stubborn to change. Even "forums" are old school. There are woodworking groups on facebook and google+ that allow instant dialogue and video chatting. In the time it takes to write this message and see a reply, an entire group of people could've discussed and solved a problem that we'll still be bitching and arguing about a month from now. Of course, that's the other reason this newsgroup is still breathing. People love to bitch and moan and we have fun doing it with each other. There are several guys in here whose skill, knowledge and opinions I trust and that's pretty much the only reason I'm still here. If I could get all those guys active in the same facebook or google+ group, I'd place usenet in the same time capsule with my floppy discs and buggy whips. Yeah but you have conform to the rules, here on usenet not so much. Mark No "rules" on either sites I mentioned. And strangely, some of the really old timers, who participated here for years, can be contacted quicker on FaceBook (Tom Watson, Charlie Self, John Paquay, Luigi, David Eisan, among others), so not all the old wRec farts are Luddites. Go figure. Still don't feel, for my purposes, that FB is an alternative to the wRec; and G+ may just be a bit too full of hand tool snobs for most hanging on here. Thought G+ was great for a while, can't abide web based forums, and have always gravitated back here out of preference. Just been too damned busy to do much but lurk lately. -- eWoodShop: www.eWoodShop.com Wood Shop: www.e-WoodShop.net https://plus.google.com/114902129577517371552/posts http://www.custommade.com/by/ewoodshop/ KarlCaillouet@ (the obvious) |
#15
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
OT - this group is alone
On 9/10/2013 1:14 PM, ChairMan wrote:
It's not dead, it's just being leached off of http://www.homeownershub.com/ see your own post 3rd one down in the middle Yep, that is something you would have had a tough time getting away with back in the early days of Usenet, before the big ISP's and corporate advertising, when a bunch of sympathetic and knowledgable sysadmins running BIND could still play hell with a rogue site that was not playing nice. -- eWoodShop: www.eWoodShop.com Wood Shop: www.e-WoodShop.net https://plus.google.com/114902129577517371552/posts http://www.custommade.com/by/ewoodshop/ KarlCaillouet@ (the obvious) |
#16
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
OT - this group is alone
"ChairMan" wrote in message ...
It's not dead, it's just being leached off of http://www.homeownershub.com/ see your own post 3rd one down in the middle This is rather amusing... I never heard of the site so I went to look. To my surprise an item I posted years ago about the LI Woodworking Show shows up as a "Best Rated Discussion." I also took a look at the Google Groups thing and found stuff of mine there 20+ years old... It is no wonder the search engines come up with millions of hits (though there are really only 100 that have been pirated!) John |
#17
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
OT - this group is alone
On Tue, 10 Sep 2013 14:17:36 -0400, John Grossbohlin wrote:
I have firmly resisted Facebook and pretty much all of the web site based groups/forums. I'm reasonably satisfied with the Yahoo groups I belong to - except when Yahoo decides to "improve" it. But I avoid most of that brouhaha by getting posts sent to my email and replying via email. The only time I actually go to the site is to peruse the photos and files. -- When fascism comes to America, it will be wrapped in the flag and carrying a cross. |
#18
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
OT - this group is alone
On Tue, 10 Sep 2013 13:14:00 -0500, ChairMan wrote:
Wonder how long this group will keep going? It's not dead, it's just being leached off of http://www.homeownershub.com/ see your own post 3rd one down in the middle I just posted the following to them: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ I just discovered that you are ripping off posts to rec.woodworking and posting them here. Without attribution to rec.woodworking. While this may not be illegal, it strikes me as reprehensible. I will suggest to the wreck members that they start posting messages calling out your behavior. Will you keep ripping us off then? ----------------------------------------------------------------------- So lets start muttering about homeownershub and their piracy in every message :-). -- This message was for rec.woodworking - if it appears in homeownershub they ripped it off. |
#19
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
OT - this group is alone
SNIP
I follow this group closely, but also take a peek now and then at Sawmill Creek, Lumberjocks and Router Forum. The wREC best meets my needs for sensible solutions to a pretty broad variety of woodworking tasks. There's usually more than one right way of doing something and I've come to count on you guys (and gals)for laying out the options. And it's terrific that no one holds back on their opinions. Larry |
#20
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
OT - this group is alone
On 9/10/13 8:29 PM, Gramps' shop wrote:
SNIP I follow this group closely, but also take a peek now and then at Sawmill Creek, Lumberjocks and Router Forum. The wREC best meets my needs for sensible solutions to a pretty broad variety of woodworking tasks. There's usually more than one right way of doing something and I've come to count on you guys (and gals)for laying out the options. And it's terrific that no one holds back on their opinions. Larry All those groups are floppy discs compared to what's available now. -- -MIKE- "Playing is not something I do at night, it's my function in life" --Elvin Jones (1927-2004) -- http://mikedrums.com ---remove "DOT" ^^^^ to reply |
#21
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
OT - this group is alone
On Tue, 10 Sep 2013 16:32:31 -0500, Swingman wrote:
Thought G+ was great for a while, can't abide web based forums, and have always gravitated back here out of preference. Just been too damned busy to do much but lurk lately. Also, the rec around much earlier than most other woodworking groups. At least, it was for me. Sure, there's many other groups around now, but being active in them all would mean spending your whole day just screwing around on the keyboard. Much of it overlaps at some point. For me, I've limited myself to three. rec.woodworking, Festool owners group and I regularly look into Canadian Woodworking swap meet. |
#22
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
OT - this group is alone
dpb wrote: On 9/10/2013 11:11 AM, Larry Blanchard wrote: I read about 10 different newsgroups. With the proliferation of other online sources and the dropping of Usenet by several providers, the traffic in my newsgroups has been slowly going away. For the last week or so, this newsgroup has been the only one with posts - not counting an occasional troller/spammer who gets through the filters. Wonder how long this group will keep going? I monitor about a half-dozen; three of which are roughly the same volume as r.w; one is about half the other is 3-5X the traffic. I don't see usenet disappearing entirely for a while yet altho certainly the proliferation of the web forum is all that newbies generally ever see unless they're pointed to usenet by other users. Yes, but do you want that Eternal September crowd? Before Eternal September started, I doubt there was more activity than now. I wouldn't mind if it moved toward the way it was. -- Reply in group, but if emailing remove the last word. |
#23
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
OT - this group is alone
Tom Del Rosso wrote:
Yes, but do you want that Eternal September crowd? Before Eternal September started, I doubt there was more activity than now. I wouldn't mind if it moved toward the way it was. I don't know about the comparison of now versus pre-September 1993 - memory would certainly fail me if I tried to make a comparison. The old days and ways always seem to have been better... or at least more different than they probably are. I don't think there's any doubt that the activity level across usenet has dropped significantly over the past several years. A lot of the old netiquette has certainly fallen away, but I see that across the board - from new age usenet participants as well as from the old dogs that have been here all along. It's just that the old dogs cry about it while they themselves are guilty of it. It's one of the privliledges of being a old dog... -- -Mike- |
#24
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
OT - this group is alone
On 9/12/2013 8:26 AM, Mike Marlow wrote:
Tom Del Rosso wrote: Yes, but do you want that Eternal September crowd? Before Eternal September started, I doubt there was more activity than now. I wouldn't mind if it moved toward the way it was. I don't know about the comparison of now versus pre-September 1993 - memory would certainly fail me if I tried to make a comparison. The old days and ways always seem to have been better... or at least more different than they probably are. I don't think there's any doubt that the activity level across usenet has dropped significantly over the past several years. A lot of the old netiquette has certainly fallen away, but I see that across the board - from new age usenet participants as well as from the old dogs that have been here all along. It's just that the old dogs cry about it while they themselves are guilty of it. It's one of the privliledges of being a old dog... the rec.metalworking (I think that's the name) Usenet group is totally disfunctional. I tried it several times and gave up. This one represents, at least for me, what I would call a "3rd Place" (or "3rd Space")--look it up. Bill |
#25
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
OT - this group is alone
As long as I can keep typing and building.
john "Larry Blanchard" wrote in message ... I read about 10 different newsgroups. With the proliferation of other online sources and the dropping of Usenet by several providers, the traffic in my newsgroups has been slowly going away. For the last week or so, this newsgroup has been the only one with posts - not counting an occasional troller/spammer who gets through the filters. Wonder how long this group will keep going? -- When fascism comes to America, it will be wrapped in the flag and carrying a cross. |
#26
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
OT - this group is alone
On 9/10/2013 11:11 AM, Larry Blanchard wrote:
I read about 10 different newsgroups. With the proliferation of other online sources and the dropping of Usenet by several providers, the traffic in my newsgroups has been slowly going away. For the last week or so, this newsgroup has been the only one with posts - not counting an occasional troller/spammer who gets through the filters. Wonder how long this group will keep going? Probably not very long. A troll going by the name Harry along with a few others have destroyed two boating newsgroups. Harry is now working on Alt. Home.Repair. One of his puppets is posting on this group now. Often playing the part of a buffoon. They will succeed here as well because usernet people cannot control themselves. The trolls simply start off topic controversial threads and the usernet people go off the deep end. Sex, politics, religion and racism are their favorites topics. Throw in some bad language then watch the fireworks. The trolls can be beat but it takes some will power on behalf of the users. You simply do not respond to any off topic thread regardless of how ignorant or immoral it may sound. Mark my words and keep this thread in mind. The trolls do it for fun and there is no better target for them than a bunch of indignant old men. LdB |
#27
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
OT - this group is alone
O
The only people left are technophobes and grumpy old men too stubborn to change. Even "forums" are old school. There are woodworking groups on facebook and google+ that allow instant dialogue and video chatting. I use FB everyday and keep to connected to friends and family. I added in one group for awhile that was advantageous to a project I was in but dropped it quickly. I guess if I made a separate FB account for joining a WW group it may be worth it but not personally aware of any such group that would interest me. |
#28
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
OT - this group is alone
On Thu, 12 Sep 2013 13:09:25 -0500, LdB wrote:
Mark my words and keep this thread in mind. The trolls do it for fun and there is no better target for them than a bunch of indignant old men. I have seen trolls come and go, they have been here and lost interest. Guess we are not any fun in this group. |
#29
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
OT - this group is alone
On 9/12/2013 6:14 PM, Markem wrote:
On Thu, 12 Sep 2013 13:09:25 -0500, LdB wrote: Mark my words and keep this thread in mind. The trolls do it for fun and there is no better target for them than a bunch of indignant old men. I have seen trolls come and go, they have been here and lost interest. Guess we are not any fun in this group. I am not impressed with the Facebook concept. It is bad enough on the newsgroups when people (I have done that) respond without completely reading the post they are responding to. I can image what it is like receiving a bunch of random sentences about the subject your are trying to follow. |
#30
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
OT - this group is alone
On 9/12/2013 12:09 PM, LdB wrote:
On 9/10/2013 11:11 AM, Larry Blanchard wrote: I read about 10 different newsgroups. With the proliferation of other online sources and the dropping of Usenet by several providers, the traffic in my newsgroups has been slowly going away. For the last week or so, this newsgroup has been the only one with posts - not counting an occasional troller/spammer who gets through the filters. Wonder how long this group will keep going? Probably not very long. A troll going by the name Harry along with a few others have destroyed two boating newsgroups. Harry is now working on Alt. Home.Repair. One of his puppets is posting on this group now. Often playing the part of a buffoon. They will succeed here as well because usernet people cannot control themselves. The trolls simply start off topic controversial threads and the usernet people go off the deep end. Sex, politics, religion and racism are their favorites topics. Throw in some bad language then watch the fireworks. An English teacher assigned her class to write a short story mystery using profanity, religion, politics and sex. One student handed in a paper that said simply, "My God!", said the Queen. "I wonder who did it?" He got an A. Is that far enough off the deep end? Is this destroying ARM? |
#31
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
OT - this group is alone
On 9/10/2013 4:32 PM, Swingman wrote:
On 9/10/2013 1:58 PM, -MIKE- wrote: On 9/10/13 1:35 PM, Markem wrote: Yeah but you have conform to the rules, here on usenet not so much. Mark No "rules" on either sites I mentioned. And strangely, some of the really old timers, who participated here for years, can be contacted quicker on FaceBook (Tom Watson, Charlie Self, John Paquay, Luigi, David Eisan, among others), so not all the old wRec farts are Luddites. Go figure. Still don't feel, for my purposes, that FB is an alternative to the wRec; and G+ may just be a bit too full of hand tool snobs for most hanging on here. Thought G+ was great for a while, can't abide web based forums, and have always gravitated back here out of preference. Just been too damned busy to do much but lurk lately. I agree with your assessments too, Karl. G+ is far superior to FB for the types of dialogs we're accustomed to here, but try as I might to get into it, it's just not doing it for me. I haven't seen anybody here mention Reddit: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reddit It's kind of the rage these days as the up and coming alternative to those "other" social networks, and I think it lines up pretty well as a modern alternative to newsgroups. It has all those things that I think we consider here to be advantages: anonymity (if you so choose), no "rules" (unless the creators and/or admins choose to lock it down), and a threaded discussion hierarchy (A BIG plus for me; FB and G+ annoy the hell out of me in this regard). It also has modern features that we're missing here, like integrated image hosting, and a rating system that allows you to "up-vote" or "down-vote" individual posts, which cause the higher-rated and more active threads and posts to sorta "float to the top", as it were. Pretty cool. There are literally a jillion "subreddits", and of course there is one for woodworking; check it out: http://www.reddit.com/r/woodworking/ Of course, if "we" didn't find this one suitable, a "rec.woodworking" subreddit could easily be created that better fits our needs. -- Free bad advice available here. To reply, eat the taco. http://www.flickr.com/photos/bbqboyee/ |
#32
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
OT - this group is alone
On 9/14/2013 9:47 PM, Steve Turner wrote:
check it out: http://www.reddit.com/r/woodworking/ No interest at all, huh? I sorta expected at the very least a few replies along the lines of "That sucks!" :-) -- Free bad advice available here. To reply, eat the taco. http://www.flickr.com/photos/bbqboyee/ |
#33
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
OT - this group is alone
On 9/10/13 12:11 PM, Larry Blanchard wrote:
I read about 10 different newsgroups. With the proliferation of other online sources and the dropping of Usenet by several providers, the traffic in my newsgroups has been slowly going away. For the last week or so, this newsgroup has been the only one with posts - not counting an occasional troller/spammer who gets through the filters. Wonder how long this group will keep going? I am one of the moderators at misc.taxes.moderated, and post there have slowed to less traffic than here. I've lurked here since the mid-80's, and it's amazing this group is still going strong in comparison to many others. There's a population that doesn't know what usenet is and worse, think that initialisms are a teen invention for twitter. I try to teach them that IMHO, SWMBO, YMMV are all old enough to be the grandparents of these teens. My bet? A good decade to go. |
#34
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
OT - this group is alone
On Sun, 15 Sep 2013 19:58:53 -0400, JoeTaxpayer
My bet? A good decade to go. Nah! It will go longer than that as long as middle agers here keep turning into old geezers like the rest of us. At the very worst, this newsgroup might turn into retro.rec.woodworking and gain new life by doing so. |
#35
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
OT - this group is alone
On 9/15/2013 6:38 PM, Steve Turner wrote:
On 9/14/2013 9:47 PM, Steve Turner wrote: check it out: http://www.reddit.com/r/woodworking/ No interest at all, huh? I sorta expected at the very least a few replies along the lines of "That sucks!" :-) Actually, appears to be a workable hybrid solution. Except for the rampant, age based, resistance to change of the inmates. -- eWoodShop: www.eWoodShop.com Wood Shop: www.e-WoodShop.net https://plus.google.com/114902129577517371552/posts http://www.custommade.com/by/ewoodshop/ KarlCaillouet@ (the obvious) |
#36
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
OT - this group is alone
On Sun, 15 Sep 2013 18:38:24 -0500, Steve Turner wrote:
http://www.reddit.com/r/woodworking/ No interest at all, huh? I sorta expected at the very least a few replies along the lines of "That sucks!" :-) I looked at it, but saw no resemblance to a newsgroup. For what it is, it seems OK. As for a Usenet alternative, the best I've found is to configure a Yahoo group to send me all posts as plain text via email and I then respond as needed via email. That way I need to go to the website only to view files or photos. Go to groups.yahoo.com and type woodworking into the search box. There are pages and pages of groups, several with thousands of members. Of course Yahoo is constantly tinkering with things, so that option my not be available forever. -- This message was for rec.woodworking - if it appears in homeownershub they ripped it off. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted tothis group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet. | Electronics Repair | |||
add to the group | Home Repair | |||
Thanks to the group. | UK diy | |||
New to group | Woodworking | |||
Does this group have a FAQ? | Home Ownership |