Upscale wrote:
On Thu, 25 Mar 2010 20:45:34 -0500, Tim Daneliuk

You see asshole, that's why I'm going to come after you for as long as
I'm able. You attacked me personally as well as questioned my ethics
and honesty.

I believe it was you that wished Tim dead, just recently? Your ethics
are obvious to anyone bored enough to read your drivel.

Maybe you can bull**** your way out of much of what
you've said, but for this, there's no excuse or explanation that will
exempt you.

I think he stands by most everything he says, very, very consistent he
is. You are as well, just that what you say is mostly childish drivel.

--
Jack
Got Change: Now CHANGE IT BACK!
http://jbstein.com

Tim Daneliuk wrote:

Not when the Ruling Critters feel no obligation to uphold their oath to
defend the Constitution. The simple fact about all this is that we
as a whole are getting what we (as a whole) deserve. An historically
ignorant population that that skipped civics, philosophy, ethics,
and economics while they were busy getting stoned in the 1960s is
unlikely to make good calls about limiting the power of an intrusive
central government. Obama and his slimy sidewinders didn't get elected
because they were good at running for office, they got elected because
the public are big, dumb, and happy. Collectivism is ultimately
self-inflicted... The moochers and the looters have won the day, at
least for the moment.


Everyone may as well get used to it, because
you cannot change what the Villagers With Torches demand at the point
of their pitchforks...

I'm glad Washington, Jefferson, Madison, et al didn't share that
sentiment, not to mention Churchill, Patton and millions of others.

--
Jack
Got Change: God Bless America ====== God Damn Amerika!
http://jbstein.com

I'm glad Washington, Jefferson, Madison, et al didn't share that
sentiment, not to mention Churchill, Patton and millions of others.

When the British tried to control us, Washington and others had them shot...
I'm not quite there yet, but I can see that MANY others are...

I wonder how much we don't hear about in the media...
--


Regards,
Joe Agro, Jr.
(800) 871-5022
01.908.542.0244
Automatic / Pneumatic Drills: http://www.AutoDrill.com
Multiple Spindle Drills: http://www.Multi-Drill.com
Production Tapping: http://Production-Tapping-Equipment.com/
Flagship Site: http://www.Drill-N-Tap.com
VIDEOS: http://www.youtube.com/user/AutoDrill

V8013-R

Upscale wrote:
On Fri, 26 Mar 2010 08:19:59 -0400, "Mike Marlow"
You're wrong on this one Dave. At least down here, there is an
entire class of people who electively remain "poor", in order to
enjoy a lifestyle supported by government programs. Sort of the
unintended consequences of government programs. Regardless, it does
exist, and it will continue to exist.

We have our "street people" who do essentially the same thing despite
programs and processes in place that offer to help them leave their
cycle of poverty.

I was commenting from the point of view of people becoming
intentionally poor just to get free health insurance. People having
been prosperous or at the very least self supporting, do not all of a
sudden give it all up just to get something free. Not in my experience
anyway.

Ok - I missed that.

--

-Mike-

On Fri, 26 Mar 2010 15:56:20 -0400, Jack Stein
wrote:

When I got home, the phone was ringing, it was the doctor, who
apologized and gave me the diagnosis and he phoned in a prescription for
me....

30 days indeed....

You're comparing an emergency room visit to a general doctor's office
visit?

You really are a ****ing twit aren't you?

On Fri, 26 Mar 2010 16:03:52 -0400, Jack Stein
wrote:

I believe it was you that wished Tim dead, just recently? Your ethics
are obvious to anyone bored enough to read your drivel.

I was referring to Tim's actions several years ago. Something you have
zero knowledge about. Not surprising though. Lack of knowledge is not
something that would ever prevent you from speaking. Assholes like you
don't need a reason.

I think he stands by most everything he says, very, very consistent he
is.

About time you and Tim went and got a room isn't it?

On Thu, 25 Mar 2010 21:53:33 -0600, the infamous Dave Balderstone
scrawled the following:

In article , Larry Jaques
wrote:

_You're_ nervous? You're the one backing the Obamaflush of our
economy!

What? Neither I nor Canada as a nation are backing the Obama plan.

You've been saying how wonderful it is that he passed it for a few
days now. I'd call that "backing", wouldn't you?


We're up here saying as little as possible and praying we can hold on
to the lid when the big flush happens!

Yeah, you're definitely close enough to get sprayed.

--
Challenges are gifts that force us to search for a new center of gravity.
Don't fight them. Just find a different way to stand.
-- Oprah Winfrey

On Thu, 25 Mar 2010 22:10:15 -0700, the infamous "LDosser"
scrawled the following:

"Larry Jaques" wrote in message
.. .
On Thu, 25 Mar 2010 18:20:26 -0600, the infamous Dave Balderstone
scrawled the following:

In article , Larry Jaques
wrote:

On Wed, 24 Mar 2010 10:01:40 -0500, the infamous Upscale
scrawled the following:

On Tue, 23 Mar 2010 22:02:52 -0400, "J. Clarke"
wrote:

Suppose the government told you that you _must_ buy a Unisaw whether
you
want one or not and whether you can afford one or not. Would you say
that that was acceptable? If not then why is them telling you that
you
_must_ buy insurance acceptable?

To bolster your argument you're comparing a table saw to country wide
health insurance?

That's not even remotely on the level of an apples and oranges
comparison. It's just a fall flat, 6 1/2 IQ demonstration of shooting
your foot off with a bazooka.

No, Uppy. He made a valid point.

Why are you in this debate, anyway? You don't even live here!
What do you expect to win?

I have no idea why he's taking the stand he's taking, but what happens
south of the 49th is of great concern to us north of same.

We're watching your economy into slow death spiral, with Obamacare only
the latest and probably not the last rocket to fire.

And our economy is so tied to yours that, frankly, I'm bloody nervous.

_You're_ nervous? You're the one backing the Obamaflush of our
economy! I don't get it. We see our futures in the swirlies and it's
not fun to look at that kind of possibility, especially when it's
initiated by our own leader. shudder

If this healthcare plan goes through as it appears, it'll be like
getting gutshot by that bazooka you mentioned. Half the country will
be working for the gov't and the other half will be whipped, chained,
and working to pay for the overloaded mess. At least until it falls
dead from the weight and strain.

Maybe you will. I'd rather be shooting.

No comment. evil Hoppes #9 grin

--
Challenges are gifts that force us to search for a new center of gravity.
Don't fight them. Just find a different way to stand.
-- Oprah Winfrey

On Thu, 25 Mar 2010 22:20:04 -0700, the infamous "LDosser"
scrawled the following:

"Steve" wrote in message
ng.com...
On 2010-03-22 23:28:29 -0400, Robatoy said:

By golly, me thinks you are correct, sir. We've been Godwinned.

That happened at the first advocation of Gestapo and razor wire... amazing
that anyone would espouse practices of a despised former enemy.


Amazing? The practices WORKED.

Driven a VW or a Beemer lately?

What? Whatever FOR? Ptui!

--
Challenges are gifts that force us to search for a new center of gravity.
Don't fight them. Just find a different way to stand.
-- Oprah Winfrey

On Fri, 26 Mar 2010 00:10:27 -0500, the infamous Upscale
scrawled the following:

On Thu, 25 Mar 2010 21:01:58 -0700, Larry Jaques
wrote:
So if you're poor, you'll be allowed _not_ to have insurance (aka:
healthcare), eh?!?

Statements like that bother me. Big joke eh? Nobody likes being poor.
No one is going to become poor just to get "free" health insurance. It
wouldn't make sense.

I'm hitting on the total irony of it all. Their ploy makes no sense
whatsoever. If you cna' afford health insurance, they'll allow you to
opt out of this forced plan, leaving you EXACTLY WHERE YOU WERE BEFORE
HIS WONDERFUL ****ING HEALTHCARE PLAN.


Call me a bleeding heart liberal or whatever you want, but at least
make a feeble attempt to appear empathetic.

Let us know if you ever really FEEL empathy. Sheesh...


P.S: The joke's on me. I qualify for exemption.

--
Challenges are gifts that force us to search for a new center of gravity.
Don't fight them. Just find a different way to stand.
-- Oprah Winfrey

"Upscale" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 26 Mar 2010 00:06:26 -0700, "LDosser"
wrote:

them that, if she lived that long they'd get all of it. Had her $10 check
on
the desk and asked them whether they wanted that, or nothing. They opted
for
the payment plan and she paid for the rest of her life.

That immediately makes me think of your housing boom that went bust.
People taking on debt that they can't ever realistically pay off, yet
the bean counters authorized the transaction anyway. Of course, that
debt wasn't for paltry small sums such as your aunt took on, but it's
a debt that should never have been authorized anyway.


It was my deceased uncle's hospital bill, and it was not paltry at the time.

"Upscale" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 26 Mar 2010 02:46:51 -0700, "LDosser"
wrote:

And the internationally known Canadian Pharmaceutical companies are?

Of course they are, but still measurably cheaper than the gouging that
happens every day by US drug companies.


So, you have no pharmaceutical companies doing research?

"Robatoy" wrote in message
...
On Mar 26, 1:53 am, Mark & Juanita wrote:


Actually Larry, I don't think the majority of Canadians (with two
exceptions in this newsgroup) are backing our hellscare bill and are
probably watching it with some dismay.

Cite or STFU.


He stated it as opinion, not fact. In that case if you disagree, where is
your cite? We want facts, or STFU

On Mar 26, 10:57*pm, "Ed Pawlowski" wrote:
"Robatoy" wrote in message

...

On Mar 26, 1:53 am, Mark & Juanita wrote:

* Actually Larry, I don't think the majority of Canadians (with two
exceptions in this newsgroup) are backing our hellscare bill and are
probably watching it with some dismay.

Cite or STFU.

He stated it as opinion, not fact. *In that case if you disagree, where is
your cite? *We want facts, or STFU

How do I know if I can even agree or disagree? It is MY opinion that
Mark, once again, is doing a Beck by insinuating he has some numbers,
but...? Surely he bases his opinion on SOMETHING? Or, like a few
others around here, is he just pulling opinions out of his arse?

Oh...and Ed...I was talking to Mark, so STFU.

"Robatoy" wrote in message
...
On Mar 26, 10:57 pm, "Ed Pawlowski" wrote:
"Robatoy" wrote in message

...

On Mar 26, 1:53 am, Mark & Juanita wrote:

Actually Larry, I don't think the majority of Canadians (with two
exceptions in this newsgroup) are backing our hellscare bill and are
probably watching it with some dismay.

Cite or STFU.

He stated it as opinion, not fact. In that case if you disagree, where
is
your cite? We want facts, or STFU

How do I know if I can even agree or disagree? It is MY opinion that
Mark, once again, is doing a Beck by insinuating he has some numbers,
but...? Surely he bases his opinion on SOMETHING? Or, like a few
others around here, is he just pulling opinions out of his arse?

Oh...and Ed...I was talking to Mark, so STFU.

If you give an opinion, such as "I don't think the majority of Canadians "
it is exactly that, an opinion, not backed by facts. He does not have to
offer any cites. Yes, I know you were talking to Mark, but given the
circumstances you were talking out your ass and no, I don't have the STFU if
I don't want to I'd rather antagonize the hell out of you. We can do that
on this side of the border.

J. Clarke wrote:

On 3/26/2010 12:59 PM, Larry Blanchard wrote:
On Thu, 25 Mar 2010 17:45:50 -0400, J. Clarke wrote:

I'll see your Canada and raise you Japan:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Health_...ystem_in_Japan

Let me know what you think after (if?) you read it.

Let me know what you think when the elderly retirees outnumber the
workers. Japan's in trouble and they know it.


That scenario applies to a lot more than health care. And to a lot more
countries than Japan. What happens to all those seniors who are unable
to work and are not independently wealthy when a government stops paying
Social Security or it's equivalent?

Uh if you investigate you will find that Japan's population is now in
decline and has been for some time. I do not believe that any other
industrialized nation has reached that point.


Great Britain, France, many of the European countries have birthrates
below replacement rate. Russia has the same problem. All of these
countries have birthrates below replacement rate with the exception of a
certain population of middle-eastern immigrants with strong religious
affiliations toward a philosophy diametrically opposed to tolerance,
freedom, and liberty.

In addition, China is also deliberately pushing a population reduction
policy as well with their one-child policy. Due to the culture in that
country that places a high value on boys and very little on girls, the
desire for a son has led to widespread abortion and even infanticide. The
other side effect of this is that they have a lopsided gender-gap skewed
toward males. This is going to create very interesting problems in the not
very distant future.




--

There is never a situation where having more rounds is a disadvantage

Rob Leatham

"Mark & Juanita" wrote

In addition, China is also deliberately pushing a population reduction
policy as well with their one-child policy. Due to the culture in that
country that places a high value on boys and very little on girls, the
desire for a son has led to widespread abortion and even infanticide. The
other side effect of this is that they have a lopsided gender-gap skewed
toward males. This is going to create very interesting problems in the
not
very distant future.

China is already importing females as wives for its horny young male
population. I wonder how that is going to work out in the long term? And
what is that going to do to the gender balance where the girls are coming
from?

Also, what is the effect going to be on society with such a surplus of young
males. All that fustrated testosterone is going to need an outlet of some
kind.

Lee Michaels wrote:


"Mark & Juanita" wrote

In addition, China is also deliberately pushing a population reduction
policy as well with their one-child policy. Due to the culture in that
country that places a high value on boys and very little on girls, the
desire for a son has led to widespread abortion and even infanticide.
The other side effect of this is that they have a lopsided gender-gap
skewed
toward males. This is going to create very interesting problems in the
not
very distant future.

China is already importing females as wives for its horny young male
population. I wonder how that is going to work out in the long term? And
what is that going to do to the gender balance where the girls are coming
from?

Also, what is the effect going to be on society with such a surplus of
young males. All that fustrated testosterone is going to need an outlet of
some kind.

Bingo! Taiwan, Japan, and South Korea have reason to be nervous. In the
past, excessive male populations and frustrated testosterone have found
release in military conquest.


--

There is never a situation where having more rounds is a disadvantage

Rob Leatham

On Fri, 26 Mar 2010 10:07:58 -0500, the infamous Upscale
scrawled the following:

On Fri, 26 Mar 2010 00:06:26 -0700, "LDosser"
wrote:

them that, if she lived that long they'd get all of it. Had her $10 check on
the desk and asked them whether they wanted that, or nothing. They opted for
the payment plan and she paid for the rest of her life.

That immediately makes me think of your housing boom that went bust.
People taking on debt that they can't ever realistically pay off, yet
the bean counters authorized the transaction anyway. Of course, that
debt wasn't for paltry small sums such as your aunt took on, but it's
a debt that should never have been authorized anyway.

Nope, they shoulda let the old biddy die instead, huh, Uppy?
Man, you're conflicted.

--
"Not always right, but never uncertain." --Heinlein
-=-=-

"Upscale" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 26 Mar 2010 19:41:05 -0700, "LDosser"
wrote:
Of course they are, but still measurably cheaper than the gouging that
happens every day by US drug companies.

So, you have no pharmaceutical companies doing research?

I can't speak as to new experimental drugs, maybe that's what you have
in mind, but then they're not yet regular pharmacy drugs are they?
We're talking about everyday prescription drugs.

Canadian drugs are markedly cheaper than in the US. Flocks of your
seniors make day trips on buses to come up here and buy generic drugs.
Read a little bit will you?
http://drugs.about.com/od/faqsabouty...nada_cheap.htm


CLUE: You get MOST of them from the US or from patent rip-offs in India.

On Fri, 26 Mar 2010 19:41:05 -0700, "LDosser"
wrote:
Of course they are, but still measurably cheaper than the gouging that
happens every day by US drug companies.

So, you have no pharmaceutical companies doing research?

I can't speak as to new experimental drugs, maybe that's what you have
in mind, but then they're not yet regular pharmacy drugs are they?
We're talking about everyday prescription drugs.

Canadian drugs are markedly cheaper than in the US. Flocks of your
seniors make day trips on buses to come up here and buy generic drugs.
Read a little bit will you?
http://drugs.about.com/od/faqsabouty...nada_cheap.htm

On Fri, 26 Mar 2010 23:28:41 -0400, "Ed Pawlowski"
wrote:

I don't want to I'd rather antagonize the hell out of you. We can do that
on this side of the border.

I'm sure you're capable of doing that on either side of the border,
but that's just my opinion, no cites.

On Fri, 26 Mar 2010 21:46:12 -0700, Mark & Juanita
wrote:

I mean, since the government has now declared that others should pay for
my health care if I am unable or unwilling to do so, shouldn't they also
have to pay to make sure that I am well-housed and well-fed? Oh, and
clothing is a basic human need as well. Why aren't we nationalizing that as
well?

It appears that you've got the national right to whine down pat. Guess
the national right to whine even more shrilly is just around the
corner.

On Fri, 26 Mar 2010 22:48:28 -0700, Larry Jaques
wrote:

Nope, they shoulda let the old biddy die instead, huh, Uppy?
Man, you're conflicted.

I said that it was a untenable debt, not that she shouldn't get health
care, so stick it up your ass.

"Upscale" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 27 Mar 2010 01:14:05 -0700, "LDosser"
wrote:

CLUE: You get MOST of them from the US or from patent rip-offs in India.

Yeah, I guess you're right. Our Canadian history consists of ripping
off the US for everything.

What part of Canada is INDIA?

On Sat, 27 Mar 2010 01:14:05 -0700, "LDosser"
wrote:

CLUE: You get MOST of them from the US or from patent rip-offs in India.

Yeah, I guess you're right. Our Canadian history consists of ripping
off the US for everything.

Who did you rip off to get the formula for insulin?
Who did you rip off to get the formula for penicillin?
Who did you rip off for the pacemaker?
Who did you rip off for the discovery of the cancer stem cell?

No doubt about it, the US has contributed many significant medical
discoveries to the world, but your unwarranted arrogance at being the
best in everything is laughable at best, pitiful at worst.

Hell, you didn't even invent basketball. I wonder who that might have
been?

Perhaps you'd like to read a bit?
http://findarticles.com/p/articles/m.../ai_n13720006/

On Sat, 27 Mar 2010 02:29:03 -0700, "LDosser"
wrote:

"Upscale" wrote in message
.. .
On Sat, 27 Mar 2010 01:14:05 -0700, "LDosser"
wrote:

CLUE: You get MOST of them from the US or from patent rip-offs in India.

Yeah, I guess you're right. Our Canadian history consists of ripping
off the US for everything.

What part of Canada is INDIA?

The High Commission of India in Ottawa.

Didn't you know that dummy? Guess you don't know everything. Careful
or you'll lose your world title for arrogance. Or worse, the US title
for arrogance will be substituted with the title for whining which is
ALL that's been coming out of your side of the border lately.

(Figured I'd practice some of that free speech that you're always
bragging about. How does it feel BTW? Guess you enjoy it seeing as how
it's enshrined in your constitution.)

snippage

ACORN FOLDED. Just this week.

This shows what a few stupid people can do to an otherwise good
organization. The groaning old party should take a lesson and do
something
about teapartiers.

--
Best regards
Han

If you consider that organization good, there is no hope for you... your
brainwashing is dried and folded!
As to Tea Baggers (count me in!) they may well be the lever that gets power
back to our Constitution and our Republic back!
Yours in Constitutional Patriotism,
Tom

On Mar 27, 1:10*am, Mark & Juanita wrote:
Lee Michaels wrote:

"Mark & Juanita" *wrote

*In addition, China is also deliberately pushing *a population reduction
policy as well with their one-child policy. *Due to the culture in that
country that places a high value on boys and very little on girls, the
desire for a son has led to widespread abortion and even infanticide.
The other side effect of this is that they have a lopsided gender-gap
skewed
toward males. *This is going to create very interesting problems in the
not
very distant future.

China is already importing females as wives for its horny young male
population. *I wonder how that is going to work out in the long term? *And
what is that going to do to the gender balance where the girls are coming
from?

Also, what is the effect going to be on society with such a surplus of
young males. All that fustrated testosterone is going to need an outlet of
some kind.

* Bingo! *Taiwan, Japan, and South Korea have reason to be nervous. *In the
past, excessive male populations and frustrated testosterone have found
release in military conquest.

--

There is never a situation where having more rounds is a disadvantage

Rob Leatham

That's right, Janet Reno having a woodie led to to Waco.

Upscale wrote:
On Fri, 26 Mar 2010 15:56:20 -0400, Jack Stein
wrote:

When I got home, the phone was ringing, it was the doctor, who
apologized and gave me the diagnosis and he phoned in a prescription for
me....

30 days indeed....

You're comparing an emergency room visit to a general doctor's office
visit?

Nope! I'm comparing a reaction to a 3 hour wait in a free market
capitalist health care system to a 30 day wait in a government
controlled, socialist health care system.

You really are a ****ing twit aren't you?

I never ****ed a twit, and I'm not about to start now... Why do you ask?
--
Jack
Obama Ca Efficiency of the DMV, compassion of the IRS!
http://jbstein.com

Jack Stein wrote:
LDosser wrote:
"Jack Stein" wrote in message
...
Mark & Juanita wrote:
Jack Stein wrote:

2) The Republicans always have to have a margin of victory that
exceeds the margin of vote fraud. In this case, the anger is so
significant, the margin of fraud would be noticeable even to the
leftist media.

Don't ever underestimate the left wing media machine. I would think
any voting district that had more voters than registered voters would
be BIG news, and HOTLY investigated and prosecuted. Nope, hardly
raised an eyebrow.

Anyway, an example of the effects of ACORN is Al Franken, socialist
******* from Minnesota. Franken won by 312 votes. ACORN claimed to
have registered 48,000. The fact ACORN uses tax money to registers
ONLY socialist Democrats, and the fact ACORN is guilty as hell in
registration fraud makes the math a little hard to do.

Jack, ACORN IS FOLDING.

Into what?

Jack,

ACORN was fighting for the disenfranchised. They bore the brunt of a
full-scale right-wing media attack (if you doubt it, you haven't been
paying attention), and the fatal blows were a libelous video, later
proven to be faked, and a defunding bill in Congress specifically aimed
at ACORN. That bill is a bill of attainder, and unconstitutional.

ACORN was fighting for you, Jack. Al Franken is also fighting for you.
Or would you care to return to the days when a 6- or 7-day work week
was standard? Days when five-year-old children picked rocks from coal?
Days when you literally worked until you dropped dead on the job.
Days when company operators hired thugs to kill a few brave workers who
had the gall to stand up to the owners? When you got old, you starved?
When you got sick you died, penniless?

Jack, the only reason you are not squashed under the thumb of the rich
and powerful is because the Left is fighting back. Wake up.

Upscale wrote:
On Fri, 26 Mar 2010 16:03:52 -0400, Jack Stein
wrote:

I believe it was you that wished Tim dead, just recently? Your ethics
are obvious to anyone bored enough to read your drivel.

I was referring to Tim's actions several years ago. Something you have
zero knowledge about.

Really? I heard him apologize for that one slip, and perhaps a hundred
time state he doesn't have an issue with you using the health care
system forced upon you, rather has an issue with you thinking the system
that forces everyone to contribute to your welfare is hunky dory.

Not surprising though. Lack of knowledge is not
something that would ever prevent you from speaking. Assholes like you
don't need a reason.

Again, I thought I was a douche-nozzle? Still having trouble keeping up
with you two twits.

I think he stands by most everything he says, very, very consistent he
is.

About time you and Tim went and got a room isn't it?

I already got a room, Tim probably does as well, why do you ask?

--
Jack
Obama Care...Freedom not Included!
http://jbstein.com

On Sat, 27 Mar 2010 04:06:29 -0500, the infamous Upscale
scrawled the following:

On Fri, 26 Mar 2010 22:48:28 -0700, Larry Jaques
wrote:

Nope, they shoulda let the old biddy die instead, huh, Uppy?
Man, you're conflicted.

I said that it was a untenable debt, not that she shouldn't get health
care, so stick it up your ass.

Enough. Buh bye!

--
"Not always right, but never uncertain." --Heinlein
-=-=-

Tim Daneliuk wrote:
On 3/26/2010 3:23 PM, Jack Stein wrote:

Everyone may as well get used to it, because
you cannot change what the Villagers With Torches demand at the point
of their pitchforks...

I'm glad Washington, Jefferson, Madison, et al didn't share that
sentiment, not to mention Churchill, Patton and millions of others.

They had the sentiment of the population mostly *with* them. The problem
today is not the politicians. It is that the public at large has
increasingly been populated with moochers and something-for-nothing
parasites who *oppose* small government, personal responsibility,
thrift, hard work, and so forth.

I'm not sure you are right about this. I've seen surveys that indicate
about 70% of Americans are conservative, 25% liberal. I suspect the
number might even be higher. I know a slew of democrats that are right
of Attila the Hun, but still vote 100% for the socialist *******s that
call themselves Democrats. They are bombarded with left wing, socialist
propaganda and mostly are watching left wing crap on tv, like the
network news, law and order, david letterman and so on, while Rome is
burning just outside their front door.

The problem with all these threads
is that many of you see Obama et al as the problem.

Well, I agree with that, the problem is far more with Congress than with
the Executive.

He and his fellow travelers are merely the visible sign of a much, much deeper
disease infesting the nation as a whole.

Yes, but I'm not thinking its the American people as much as the
socialist controlled, media propaganda machine. Thank god for Fox News,
it's the ONLY thing I've seen on TV in the past 50 years that is not
blatantly far left wing, socialist propaganda.

--
Jack
Got Change: Individual Freedom ======= Government Control!
http://jbstein.com

Robatoy wrote:
On Mar 26, 10:57 pm, "Ed Pawlowski" wrote:

Oh...and Ed...I was talking to Mark, so STFU.

Hey Douche Bag, this is a newsgroup and you are talking to everyone
reading the group. If you want a private conversation, give email a shot.

Assuming of course that Canada still allows private Email?

--
Jack
What part of 'shall not be infringed' do you NOT understand?
http://jbstein.com

On Sat, 27 Mar 2010 10:54:08 -0400, the infamous Jack Stein
scrawled the following:

Upscale wrote:
On Fri, 26 Mar 2010 15:56:20 -0400, Jack Stein
wrote:

When I got home, the phone was ringing, it was the doctor, who
apologized and gave me the diagnosis and he phoned in a prescription for
me....

30 days indeed....

You're comparing an emergency room visit to a general doctor's office
visit?

Nope! I'm comparing a reaction to a 3 hour wait in a free market
capitalist health care system to a 30 day wait in a government
controlled, socialist health care system.

You really are a ****ing twit aren't you?

I never ****ed a twit, and I'm not about to start now... Why do you ask?

Just plonk him and forget him.

Love your new sig, Jack. g

"Obama Ca Efficiency of the DMV, compassion of the IRS!"

--
"Not always right, but never uncertain." --Heinlein
-=-=-

On 2010-03-27, LDosser wrote:

Like night follows day, so do sales and marketing follow research. But First
there has to be something to sell and market.

So, let's make something up, like restless leg syndrome, and invent a
drug to foist off on the public for big $$$. What crap. I've had the
"jimmies" fer 62 yrs! My brother had em. My daughter has 'em. So
what? Never been more than a curiosity. Hardly the affliction the
drug companies would have us believe. What were those symptoms they
mentioned for Zoloft? "Do you feel less than comfortable at social
gatherings?", or some such nonsense. Yeah!! It's called shyness, you
dolts! Not some psychobabble affliction you need to run to the
pharmacy for.

God! ...the masses are dumber'n a bag o' hammers. No wonder
homeopathy is more popular than ever. And despite computers, space
stations, etc, some people still believe eating a tiger's winkie will
get theirs up. Lordy!, I can't think of a species that deserves to
become extint more than us. :\

nb

On 2010-03-27, Mark & Juanita wrote:

Great Britain, France, many of the European countries have birthrates
below replacement rate.

In addition, China is also deliberately pushing a population reduction
policy as well....

About damn time! ...but it's already too late. I give the human
species less than 25 yrs on this rock. We've already screwed it up
beyond saving, I truly believe. So, eat, drink, screw, and be merry
and buy a new Ford Incursion or HoaxHummer2 to squander even more gas.
I'll be dead by then, anyway. Toodles!

nb

On Mar 27, 11:31*am, Jack Stein wrote:
Robatoy wrote:
On Mar 26, 10:57 pm, "Ed Pawlowski" wrote:
Oh...and Ed...I was talking to Mark, so STFU.

Hey Douche Bag, this is a newsgroup and you are talking to everyone
reading the group. *If you want a private conversation, give email a shot.

Assuming of course that Canada still allows private Email?


Yup, we still have private e-mail. And no laws that allows the gov't
reading e-mails. THAT, my friend, is freedom. Privacy is part of
freedom. You should try it sometime.

"Upscale" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 26 Mar 2010 23:28:41 -0400, "Ed Pawlowski"
wrote:

I don't want to I'd rather antagonize the hell out of you. We can do
that
on this side of the border.

I'm sure you're capable of doing that on either side of the border,
but that's just my opinion, no cites.

If you want a cite, just ask my wife.