On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 13:39:41 -0700, Gunner Asch
wrote:

I thought so. You cannot drive to Las Vegas to buy a "large-capacity"
mag and cross back into the state of California with it.


You cant? Really? Odd...folks do it every month. Really? Are you
sure its physically impossible to do? Damn!

A 50 cal ammo can full of Beretta 9mm mags that hold more than 10 is
impossible to get into California..yet 500,000 wetbacks have no
problem...along with a million tons of drugs....fascinating how that
works!!

Are you sure????

You can do anything you damn well please, so can I. I've stood in a
gun store; watching folks from California wanting to buy things. When
the shop found out they were from California -- all discussion
stopped. YMMV.

I'm not trying to make you stop doing what you feel comfortable doing.

Go for it.
--

On 7/30/2012 2:02 PM, Gunner Asch wrote:
On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 10:11:51 -0700, Oren wrote:

On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 12:53:16 -0400, "
wrote:

On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 06:55:52 -0700, Neville M Wiles
wrote:

On 7/30/2012 12:15 AM, Gunner Asch wrote:
On Sun, 29 Jul 2012 16:14:06 -0700, Oren wrote:


In Californictionstain, I understand a single 30 round mag in your car
-- no guns or ammo within thirty miles of you car is a crime. They
will lock you up back behind the down yonder.

No, thats not true in the slightest. Even 40 rnd mags are legal here.

gummer ****s it up again.

From the California attorney-general's FAQ page on firearms:

9. If I have a large-capacity magazine, do I need to get rid of it?

No. Continued possession of large-capacity magazines (able to
accept more than 10 rounds) that you owned in California before
January 1, 2000, is not prohibited. However as of January 1,
2000, it is illegal to buy, manufacture, import, keep for sale,
expose for sale, give or lend any large-capacity magazine in
California except by law enforcement agencies, California peace
officers, or licensed dealers.

http://oag.ca.gov/firearms/pubfaqs#9


It's nice that you support what Gunner said.


Gunner said: "... not true in the slightest".

If there were some way of proving that a magazine was manufactured prior
to 2000, then I suppose you could have a bunch of large-capacity
magazines that you acquired after that date and plausibly say you
obtained them earlier, but if you got caught with a high-cap magazine
manufactured after that date and the state could prove it, then
Counselor Gummer's advice is just going to be laughed at and you'd go to
jail.

He said they're legal. Your article doesn't refute that.

IF you owned it before January 1, 2000. They are now banned from
purchase or import for the average Joe.

A gun shop in Las Vegas will not sell you one if you have a California
address and identification from that state.


They ask for ID in Vegas to sell magazines? Odd...no problem in
Aridzona.

You cannot buy or acquire a magazine with greater than 10-round capacity
in Arizona or Nevada and lawfully bring it into California, gummer.

On 7/30/2012 2:05 PM, Gunner Asch wrote:
On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 10:09:33 -0700, Donn Messenheimer
wrote:

What does posting that header information do for you, gummer?



Path: Xl.tags.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com !nntp.giganews.com!local2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!ne ws.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2012 12:09:34 -0500
Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2012 10:09:33 -0700
From: Donn Messenheimer
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120713 Thunderbird/14.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: alt.home.repair,alt.survival,rec.crafts.metalworki ng
Subject: Lets roll!
References:
In-Reply-To:
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID:
Lines: 49
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-CrF4YPZsSHa9jIcINOvXp3+D5PkI+3nYio89NNHuy7E8Pz4SQt S/fwn4AlXYSvfTeA12GSQGUnbq/0Q!Bllgalo2CYwOHADoAJ6vbPVwU61shT8zDhA79+ubwcSy12R e5x4lhH42pZN1BFmWAlRLRKLvIs4=
X-Complaints-To:
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
Bytes: 3330
X-Original-Bytes: 3269
Xref: number.nntp.dca.giganews.com rec.crafts.metalworking:1354512 alt.survival:206347 alt.home.repair:1418095

On 7/30/2012 10:05 AM, zzzzzzzzzz wrote:
On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 10:02:10 -0500, "Doug" wrote:

On Sun, 29 Jul 2012 14:22:20 -0700, Gunner Asch
wrote:

On Sun, 29 Jul 2012 11:49:35 -0400, "
wrote:

On Sun, 29 Jul 2012 08:34:16 -0500, "Doug" wrote:

On Sun, 29 Jul 2012 01:22:25 -0400, "
wrote:

On Sun, 29 Jul 2012 00:15:07 -0500, "Doug" wrote:

On Sat, 28 Jul 2012 19:00:04 -0400, "
wrote:
snip - finally - you're too stupid

Gunner's got you pretty well nailed; Ignorati.


Sure... you just make me smile!!

People with double-digit IQs do that a lot.


Just curious in your infinite amount of wisdom allowed for the
possibility that you could be wrong? This answer should be
interesting !!

I could be, but I research my positions rather than react to leg tingles from
the mainstream media. Leftist loons can only respond to media knee jerks, as
you've openly admitted here. Evidence: low (i.e. bargain basement) IQ.

Well said. Indeed.

Gunner


Yes, especially the first 3 words !!

The first three words are "Well said. Indeed".

What a moron

gummer is a moron. Those who agree with him usually are as well.


Snicker....

You impotent ****.

On 7/30/2012 2:06 PM, Gunner Asch wrote:
On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 12:16:33 -0700, Donn Messenheimer
wrote:


Not even remotely clever or witty; nothing but ****wittery.


Indeed. But thats all I can do. Sadly

Indeed.

chortle

On 7/30/2012 2:09 PM, Gunner Asch wrote:
On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 11:27:57 -0700, Donn Messenheimer
wrote:


Who is this latest ****tard trying to suck up to gummer, anyway? Not a
nym I've seen before.

You are the same guy who keeps nym shifting and sending me pleading
emails

Never sent you an e-mail, gummer.


Want me to post the emails and their headers?

Go right ahead, ****flaps. I've never sent you any e-mails. But I did
drive by your ******** double-wide across the street from the
trash-strewn week-choked vacant lot (which you do *not* own) and snap a
few pictures of all the worthless debris cluttering up your front yard.
You know - the double-wide on the lot that is at below 2000' elevation
and so is *not* considered "high desert" chortle.

On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 14:02:52 -0700, Gunner Asch
wrote:

They ask for ID in Vegas to sell magazines?

A couple of "dudes" from California was standing by me one day, about
to buy a gun. The salesperson asked where they were from and requested
an ID. NOPE you can't buy that stuff here Dude!

Would not even sell them, say, a 12 round mag.

Smart people would not live in California. YMMV.
--

On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 16:57:38 -0400, "Michael A. Terrell"
wrote:


Gunner Asch wrote:

You cant? Really? Odd...folks do it every month. Really? Are you
sure its physically impossible to do? Damn!

A 50 cal ammo can full of Beretta 9mm mags that hold more than 10 is
impossible to get into California..yet 500,000 wetbacks have no
problem...along with a million tons of drugs....fascinating how that
works!!


That would be a million magazines if each had two in their pockets as
they slipped over the US border.


Too bad that idiots don't have to declare their stupidity at the
state border.

Guard: Do you have anything to declare?

Detainee: I'm an idiot!

Guard: Sorry, We're already over our quota of idiots. You'll have
to go back to New Jersey.

LOL. I advocate a border fence between California and Nevada. Nobody
listens to me....
--

In article ,
Neville M Wiles wrote:

On 7/30/2012 10:11 AM, Oren wrote:
On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 12:53:16 -0400, "
wrote:

On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 06:55:52 -0700, Neville M Wiles
wrote:

On 7/30/2012 12:15 AM, Gunner Asch wrote:
On Sun, 29 Jul 2012 16:14:06 -0700, Oren wrote:


In Californictionstain, I understand a single 30 round mag in your car
-- no guns or ammo within thirty miles of you car is a crime. They
will lock you up back behind the down yonder.

No, thats not true in the slightest. Even 40 rnd mags are legal here.

gummer ****s it up again.

From the California attorney-general's FAQ page on firearms:

9. If I have a large-capacity magazine, do I need to get rid of it?

No. Continued possession of large-capacity magazines (able to
accept more than 10 rounds) that you owned in California before
January 1, 2000, is not prohibited. However as of January 1,
2000, it is illegal to buy, manufacture, import, keep for sale,
expose for sale, give or lend any large-capacity magazine in
California except by law enforcement agencies, California peace
officers, or licensed dealers.

http://oag.ca.gov/firearms/pubfaqs#9


It's nice that you support what Gunner said.


Gunner said: "... not true in the slightest".

Exactly. gummer, the liar and dole scrounger, meant to suggest that
anyone could acquire a magazine with a capacity greater than 10 rounds.
That's absolutely false. *NO ONE* (other than law enforcement) may
legally acquire one in California. gummer may not lawfully acquire a 40
round magazine to keep in his ******** in Taft, CA.

Actually all he said that they are legal.. and they are until
someone can prove that you bought it after the change over. Just having
one in your car, the original discussion, isn't an automatic bust.
--
America is at that awkward stage. It's too late
to work within the system, but too early to shoot
the *******s."-- Claire Wolfe

"Michael A. Terrell" wrote in
news
snip
To not treat real pain properly is malpractice (my book).
To treat fake pain with real meds is malpractice too.

--
Best regards
Han
email address is invalid

On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 14:22:12 -0700, Donn Messenheimer
wrote:

On 7/30/2012 2:05 PM, Gunner Asch wrote:
On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 10:09:33 -0700, Donn Messenheimer
wrote:

What does posting that header information do for you, gummer?

I bet he imagines that the invisible cullers will use that header info
to track you down. It's probably one of those detective tricks he
learned from his 10 years as a cop. Arf arf

On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 14:02:52 -0700, Gunner Asch
wrote:

As is noted..the law is a joke. It was sheer buffoonery passed by a
antigun, far leftwing extremist fringe kooker political party which has
controlled the state for over 40 yrs.

I have no argument with that. But you still live there, right?
--

In article ,
Gunner Asch wrote:

Electric engravers are a $8 item at Radio Shack.


Just out of personal curiosity, do most magazines have a serial
number of other way to tell that the person wielding the engraver might
have been.. shall we say "creative"?
--
America is at that awkward stage. It's too late
to work within the system, but too early to shoot
the *******s."-- Claire Wolfe

Stormin Mormon wrote:

Ah, the non agressive G Morgan, the liberal. His true stripes show, now.

The liberal? Lol...

Oren wrote:

On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 16:57:38 -0400, "Michael A. Terrell"
wrote:


Gunner Asch wrote:

You cant? Really? Odd...folks do it every month. Really? Are you
sure its physically impossible to do? Damn!

A 50 cal ammo can full of Beretta 9mm mags that hold more than 10 is
impossible to get into California..yet 500,000 wetbacks have no
problem...along with a million tons of drugs....fascinating how that
works!!


That would be a million magazines if each had two in their pockets as
they slipped over the US border.


Too bad that idiots don't have to declare their stupidity at the
state border.

Guard: Do you have anything to declare?

Detainee: I'm an idiot!

Guard: Sorry, We're already over our quota of idiots. You'll have
to go back to New Jersey.

LOL. I advocate a border fence between California and Nevada. Nobody
listens to me....


I want want one the Florida border, but alas...

Stormin Mormon wrote:

I hear you, that's bitter irony. Well, life can be
like that. I hope the new guy made some phone
calls, got what he needed, and things were bettter
after the first few days?


I have no clue. I was less than two weeks from being released from
active duty & on my way home. He did say he was going to have to
requisition a new dental chair, though. Apparently he felt it was too
old, and then too damaged to repair after he finished removing those
teeth.

Michael A. Terrell wrote:


"G. Morgan" wrote:



You must be the resident right-tard that has the unbelievable ability to
separate everything into a right/left issue. Your voting card is
predictable and requires no thought, straight Republican! Yeah? You
don't bother to actually research the candidates, just look for the
elephant and move the lever, right?

Ignorance is bliss, you must have a grin from ear to ear - like a
retard.

Ignorance is bliss


And you keep ****ing yourself.

Nope, no **** here.

You did not address my post, dodge noted. Doing so would require you to
acknowledge what I said, without agreeing with me. You can't because
I'm right and you have nothing to dispute it.

Han wrote:

"Michael A. Terrell" wrote in
news
snip
To not treat real pain properly is malpractice (my book).
To treat fake pain with real meds is malpractice too.


Most VA doctors give a damn, and try to do the right thing. It's all
the lifer government employees that screw things up. Like any other
system, they can only hire forom the pool of what's availible.

On 7/30/2012 2:52 PM, Kurt Ullman wrote:
In article ,
Neville M Wiles wrote:

On 7/30/2012 10:11 AM, Oren wrote:
On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 12:53:16 -0400, "
wrote:

On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 06:55:52 -0700, Neville M Wiles
wrote:

On 7/30/2012 12:15 AM, Gunner Asch wrote:
On Sun, 29 Jul 2012 16:14:06 -0700, Oren wrote:


In Californictionstain, I understand a single 30 round mag in your car
-- no guns or ammo within thirty miles of you car is a crime. They
will lock you up back behind the down yonder.

No, thats not true in the slightest. Even 40 rnd mags are legal here.

gummer ****s it up again.

From the California attorney-general's FAQ page on firearms:

9. If I have a large-capacity magazine, do I need to get rid of it?

No. Continued possession of large-capacity magazines (able to
accept more than 10 rounds) that you owned in California before
January 1, 2000, is not prohibited. However as of January 1,
2000, it is illegal to buy, manufacture, import, keep for sale,
expose for sale, give or lend any large-capacity magazine in
California except by law enforcement agencies, California peace
officers, or licensed dealers.

http://oag.ca.gov/firearms/pubfaqs#9


It's nice that you support what Gunner said.


Gunner said: "... not true in the slightest".

Exactly. gummer, the liar and dole scrounger, meant to suggest that
anyone could acquire a magazine with a capacity greater than 10 rounds.
That's absolutely false. *NO ONE* (other than law enforcement) may
legally acquire one in California. gummer may not lawfully acquire a 40
round magazine to keep in his ******** in Taft, CA.

Actually all he said that they are legal..

Generally, they aren't legal. In fact, I'm surprised that the law
grandfathered existing ones as of the effective date of the law. If
they can ban the manufacture, sale, importation and transfer of any of
them after that date, then they could just as well have banned them
outright. Note that if someone owning a grandfathered high-cap magazine
dies, the estate item cannot lawfully pass to any heir in California.

The liar and dole scrounger, gummer, very definitely was trying to
suggest that high-cap magazines are generally legal in California, and
that's false.

On 7/30/2012 2:52 PM, whoyakidding wrote:
On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 14:22:12 -0700, Donn Messenheimer
wrote:

On 7/30/2012 2:05 PM, Gunner Asch wrote:
On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 10:09:33 -0700, Donn Messenheimer
wrote:

What does posting that header information do for you, gummer?

I bet he imagines that the invisible cullers will use that header info
to track you down. It's probably one of those detective tricks he
learned from his 10 years as a cop. Arf arf

That header information most certainly cannot be used to track anyone
down. Not all that long ago, Usenet posts commonly contained an IP
address of the poster, and it is possible to get a broad geographic
location for an IP address, the operative word being "broad". I've done
geographic lookups on my own IP address - which changes every time I
start my router - and the result has often been a location 75 or more
miles distant from where I actually am.

There will be no "great cull." There is no "list" of people to be
culled, and so necessarily there is no "those who maintain the list."
It's all just a lot of South Taft mangy dog woofin'.

On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 18:30:42 -0400, "Michael A. Terrell"
wrote:


Oren wrote:

On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 16:57:38 -0400, "Michael A. Terrell"
wrote:


Gunner Asch wrote:

You cant? Really? Odd...folks do it every month. Really? Are you
sure its physically impossible to do? Damn!

A 50 cal ammo can full of Beretta 9mm mags that hold more than 10 is
impossible to get into California..yet 500,000 wetbacks have no
problem...along with a million tons of drugs....fascinating how that
works!!


That would be a million magazines if each had two in their pockets as
they slipped over the US border.


Too bad that idiots don't have to declare their stupidity at the
state border.

Guard: Do you have anything to declare?

Detainee: I'm an idiot!

Guard: Sorry, We're already over our quota of idiots. You'll have
to go back to New Jersey.

LOL. I advocate a border fence between California and Nevada. Nobody
listens to me....


I want want one the Florida border, but alas...

There was a border change in Florida in 1982. The feds choked off
Monroe county and moved the border to Dade county at Florida City. It
devastated the local economy.

I lived through it G

"...At noon, on the day of secession, at Mallory Square in Key West
Florida, Mayor Wardlow read the proclamation of secession and
proclaimed aloud that the Conch Republic was an independent nation
separate from the U.S. and then symbolically began the Conch
Republic's Civil Rebellion by breaking a loaf of stale Cuban bread
over the head of a man dressed in a U.S. Navy uniform. After one
minute of rebellion, the now, Prime Minister Wardlow turned to the
Admiral in charge of the Navy Base at Key West, and surrendered to the
Union Forces, and demanded 1 Billion dollars in foreign aid and War
Relief to rebuild our nation after the long Federal siege!"

http://www.conchrepublic.com/history.htm

You can get a Diplomatic Passport online.
--

Oren wrote:

On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 18:30:42 -0400, "Michael A. Terrell"
wrote:


Oren wrote:

On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 16:57:38 -0400, "Michael A. Terrell"
wrote:


Gunner Asch wrote:

You cant? Really? Odd...folks do it every month. Really? Are you
sure its physically impossible to do? Damn!

A 50 cal ammo can full of Beretta 9mm mags that hold more than 10 is
impossible to get into California..yet 500,000 wetbacks have no
problem...along with a million tons of drugs....fascinating how that
works!!


That would be a million magazines if each had two in their pockets as
they slipped over the US border.


Too bad that idiots don't have to declare their stupidity at the
state border.

Guard: Do you have anything to declare?

Detainee: I'm an idiot!

Guard: Sorry, We're already over our quota of idiots. You'll have
to go back to New Jersey.

LOL. I advocate a border fence between California and Nevada. Nobody
listens to me....


I want want one the Florida border, but alas...

There was a border change in Florida in 1982. The feds choked off
Monroe county and moved the border to Dade county at Florida City. It
devastated the local economy.

I lived through it G

"...At noon, on the day of secession, at Mallory Square in Key West
Florida, Mayor Wardlow read the proclamation of secession and
proclaimed aloud that the Conch Republic was an independent nation
separate from the U.S. and then symbolically began the Conch
Republic's Civil Rebellion by breaking a loaf of stale Cuban bread
over the head of a man dressed in a U.S. Navy uniform. After one
minute of rebellion, the now, Prime Minister Wardlow turned to the
Admiral in charge of the Navy Base at Key West, and surrendered to the
Union Forces, and demanded 1 Billion dollars in foreign aid and War
Relief to rebuild our nation after the long Federal siege!"

http://www.conchrepublic.com/history.htm

You can get a Diplomatic Passport online.


That's the 'Duchy of Grand Fenwick' all over again

On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 15:47:02 -0700, Donn Messenheimer
wrote:

On 7/30/2012 2:52 PM, whoyakidding wrote:
On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 14:22:12 -0700, Donn Messenheimer
wrote:

On 7/30/2012 2:05 PM, Gunner Asch wrote:
On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 10:09:33 -0700, Donn Messenheimer
wrote:

What does posting that header information do for you, gummer?

I bet he imagines that the invisible cullers will use that header info
to track you down. It's probably one of those detective tricks he
learned from his 10 years as a cop. Arf arf

That header information most certainly cannot be used to track anyone
down. Not all that long ago, Usenet posts commonly contained an IP
address of the poster, and it is possible to get a broad geographic
location for an IP address, the operative word being "broad". I've done
geographic lookups on my own IP address - which changes every time I
start my router - and the result has often been a location 75 or more
miles distant from where I actually am.

There will be no "great cull." There is no "list" of people to be
culled, and so necessarily there is no "those who maintain the list."
It's all just a lot of South Taft mangy dog woofin'.

You mean Gunner lied about being able to identify victims based on
their header info? That can't be right because he says he NEVER lies!
Arf arf.

On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 19:34:06 -0400, "Michael A. Terrell"
wrote:


Oren wrote:

On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 18:30:42 -0400, "Michael A. Terrell"
wrote:


Oren wrote:

On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 16:57:38 -0400, "Michael A. Terrell"
wrote:


Gunner Asch wrote:

You cant? Really? Odd...folks do it every month. Really? Are you
sure its physically impossible to do? Damn!

A 50 cal ammo can full of Beretta 9mm mags that hold more than 10 is
impossible to get into California..yet 500,000 wetbacks have no
problem...along with a million tons of drugs....fascinating how that
works!!


That would be a million magazines if each had two in their pockets as
they slipped over the US border.


Too bad that idiots don't have to declare their stupidity at the
state border.

Guard: Do you have anything to declare?

Detainee: I'm an idiot!

Guard: Sorry, We're already over our quota of idiots. You'll have
to go back to New Jersey.

LOL. I advocate a border fence between California and Nevada. Nobody
listens to me....


I want want one the Florida border, but alas...

There was a border change in Florida in 1982. The feds choked off
Monroe county and moved the border to Dade county at Florida City. It
devastated the local economy.

I lived through it G

"...At noon, on the day of secession, at Mallory Square in Key West
Florida, Mayor Wardlow read the proclamation of secession and
proclaimed aloud that the Conch Republic was an independent nation
separate from the U.S. and then symbolically began the Conch
Republic's Civil Rebellion by breaking a loaf of stale Cuban bread
over the head of a man dressed in a U.S. Navy uniform. After one
minute of rebellion, the now, Prime Minister Wardlow turned to the
Admiral in charge of the Navy Base at Key West, and surrendered to the
Union Forces, and demanded 1 Billion dollars in foreign aid and War
Relief to rebuild our nation after the long Federal siege!"

http://www.conchrepublic.com/history.htm

You can get a Diplomatic Passport online.


That's the 'Duchy of Grand Fenwick' all over again

The Conch Republic is not fictional. It really happened. Many times I
was able to by-pass the new Union border, so I could go fishing in
Monroe county. Lets just say I knew the swamps and the local area
better than the Border Patrol at the time.
--

Oren wrote:

On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 19:34:06 -0400, "Michael A. Terrell"
wrote:


Oren wrote:

On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 18:30:42 -0400, "Michael A. Terrell"
wrote:


Oren wrote:

On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 16:57:38 -0400, "Michael A. Terrell"
wrote:


Gunner Asch wrote:

You cant? Really? Odd...folks do it every month. Really? Are you
sure its physically impossible to do? Damn!

A 50 cal ammo can full of Beretta 9mm mags that hold more than 10 is
impossible to get into California..yet 500,000 wetbacks have no
problem...along with a million tons of drugs....fascinating how that
works!!


That would be a million magazines if each had two in their pockets as
they slipped over the US border.


Too bad that idiots don't have to declare their stupidity at the
state border.

Guard: Do you have anything to declare?

Detainee: I'm an idiot!

Guard: Sorry, We're already over our quota of idiots. You'll have
to go back to New Jersey.

LOL. I advocate a border fence between California and Nevada. Nobody
listens to me....


I want want one the Florida border, but alas...

There was a border change in Florida in 1982. The feds choked off
Monroe county and moved the border to Dade county at Florida City. It
devastated the local economy.

I lived through it G

"...At noon, on the day of secession, at Mallory Square in Key West
Florida, Mayor Wardlow read the proclamation of secession and
proclaimed aloud that the Conch Republic was an independent nation
separate from the U.S. and then symbolically began the Conch
Republic's Civil Rebellion by breaking a loaf of stale Cuban bread
over the head of a man dressed in a U.S. Navy uniform. After one
minute of rebellion, the now, Prime Minister Wardlow turned to the
Admiral in charge of the Navy Base at Key West, and surrendered to the
Union Forces, and demanded 1 Billion dollars in foreign aid and War
Relief to rebuild our nation after the long Federal siege!"

http://www.conchrepublic.com/history.htm

You can get a Diplomatic Passport online.


That's the 'Duchy of Grand Fenwick' all over again

The Conch Republic is not fictional. It really happened. Many times I
was able to by-pass the new Union border, so I could go fishing in
Monroe county. Lets just say I knew the swamps and the local area
better than the Border Patrol at the time.


I meant 'declare war, surrender and demand money'.

On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 18:30:42 -0400, "Michael A. Terrell"
wrote:


Oren wrote:

On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 16:57:38 -0400, "Michael A. Terrell"
wrote:


Gunner Asch wrote:

You cant? Really? Odd...folks do it every month. Really? Are you
sure its physically impossible to do? Damn!

A 50 cal ammo can full of Beretta 9mm mags that hold more than 10 is
impossible to get into California..yet 500,000 wetbacks have no
problem...along with a million tons of drugs....fascinating how that
works!!


That would be a million magazines if each had two in their pockets as
they slipped over the US border.


Too bad that idiots don't have to declare their stupidity at the
state border.

Guard: Do you have anything to declare?

Detainee: I'm an idiot!

Guard: Sorry, We're already over our quota of idiots. You'll have
to go back to New Jersey.

LOL. I advocate a border fence between California and Nevada. Nobody
listens to me....


I want want one the Florida border, but alas...

Hey now! The Redneck Riveria is pretty nice and I keep your taxes low. ;-)

On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 12:13:34 -0700, Neville M Wiles
wrote:

On 7/30/2012 11:39 AM, zzzzzzzzzz wrote:
On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 11:26:12 -0700, Neville M Wiles
wrote:

On 7/30/2012 11:18 AM, zzzzzzzzzz wrote:
On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 11:12:55 -0700, Neville M Wiles
wrote:

On 7/30/2012 10:41 AM, zzzzzzzzzz wrote:
On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 10:07:39 -0700, Neville M Wiles
wrote:

On 7/30/2012 9:53 AM, zzzzzzzzzz wrote:
On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 06:55:52 -0700, Neville M Wiles
wrote:

On 7/30/2012 12:15 AM, Gunner Asch wrote:
On Sun, 29 Jul 2012 16:14:06 -0700, Oren wrote:


In Californictionstain, I understand a single 30 round mag in your car
-- no guns or ammo within thirty miles of you car is a crime. They
will lock you up back behind the down yonder.

No, thats not true in the slightest. Even 40 rnd mags are legal here.

gummer ****s it up again.

From the California attorney-general's FAQ page on firearms:

9. If I have a large-capacity magazine, do I need to get rid of it?

No. Continued possession of large-capacity magazines (able to
accept more than 10 rounds) that you owned in California before
January 1, 2000, is not prohibited. However as of January 1,
2000, it is illegal to buy, manufacture, import, keep for sale,
expose for sale, give or lend any large-capacity magazine in
California except by law enforcement agencies, California peace
officers, or licensed dealers.

http://oag.ca.gov/firearms/pubfaqs#9


It's nice that you support what Gunner said.

I did not, of course, support what gummer said. gummer's comment
suggestions one may obtain 40 round magazines legally in California.
That's false, of course.

The *fact*, as you showed, is that high capacity magazines

...may not be legally acquired, sold, offered for sale, bought, given,
or manufactured in California, since 2000.

...which, if you could read, would have figured out wasn't what was said.

If there were some way of proving that a magazine was manufactured prior
to 2000, then I suppose you could have a bunch of large-capacity
magazines that you acquired after that date and plausibly say you
obtained them earlier, but if you got caught with a high-cap magazine
manufactured after that date and the state could prove it, then
Counselor Gummer's advice is just going to be laughed at and you'd go to
jail.

He said they're legal. Your article doesn't refute that.

It says they may not be legally obtained or sold or offered for sale or
manufactured or acquired since 2000. gummer suggests one may legally
make, sell, buy, import or transfer magazines with a capacity greater
than 10 rounds. He is wrong.

Try reading what was written

I did. gummer, the liar and dole scrounger and ignoramus, meant to
suggest that anyone may still acquire, sell, buy, offer for sale, import
or manufacture a 40 round magazine. He's full of ****, just like you.

You're *not* making your case.

I have made it quite well.

IFF your "case" was

My case is that gummer is full of **** about large-cap magazines.

You dumb ****, your cite *supported* what he said! Of course, you're too
stupid to have read what he wrote so you continue to make a damned fool of
yourself.

Why do ****eaters always stick together? Puzzling...

Good question?

Yes, it's a question for you. You're full of ****, just like gummer.
Why? Why don't you learn to distance yourself from stupid dole
scroungers like gummer?

Perhaps you could actually read what was written.

I did.

You certainly didn't understand anything you read. Try first grade again.

gummer very clearly was saying that anyone can lawfully obtain
and own a large-cap magazine, and he's wrong.

No, moron, that wasn't what was said in the post we're talking about.

He's full of ****, and
you're dining on the **** with him and calling it sirloin.

Well, Sir Loin of ****, you're a damned fool.

On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 12:14:05 -0700, Neville M Wiles
wrote:

On 7/30/2012 11:43 AM, zzzzzzzzzz wrote:
On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 11:25:44 -0700, Oren wrote:

On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 13:46:26 -0400, "
wrote:

On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 10:11:51 -0700, Oren wrote:

On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 12:53:16 -0400, "
wrote:

On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 06:55:52 -0700, Neville M Wiles
wrote:

On 7/30/2012 12:15 AM, Gunner Asch wrote:
On Sun, 29 Jul 2012 16:14:06 -0700, Oren wrote:


In Californictionstain, I understand a single 30 round mag in your car
-- no guns or ammo within thirty miles of you car is a crime. They
will lock you up back behind the down yonder.

No, thats not true in the slightest. Even 40 rnd mags are legal here.

gummer ****s it up again.

From the California attorney-general's FAQ page on firearms:

9. If I have a large-capacity magazine, do I need to get rid of it?

No. Continued possession of large-capacity magazines (able to
accept more than 10 rounds) that you owned in California before
January 1, 2000, is not prohibited. However as of January 1,
2000, it is illegal to buy, manufacture, import, keep for sale,
expose for sale, give or lend any large-capacity magazine in
California except by law enforcement agencies, California peace
officers, or licensed dealers.

http://oag.ca.gov/firearms/pubfaqs#9


It's nice that you support what Gunner said.


Gunner said: "... not true in the slightest".

In response to :

"In Californictionstain, I understand a single 30 round mag in your car
no guns or ammo within thirty miles of you car is a crime. They
will lock you up back behind the down yonder."

IOW, it's "... not true in the slightest" that a "single 30 round mag in your
car or ammo within thirty miles of your car is a crime".


Your point is taken. I spoke of my "understanding" of the current ban
on high-cap mags. Since 2000 it would be a crime, now. He is correct
for large mags prior to 2000.

Minor nit: ...for large mags you've had in your possession since 2000.

That's not a "minor nit" at all, you ****wit.

A minor nit because it wasn't stated either way, moron. Do try first grade
agina. This time try Phonics.

On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 15:42:13 -0700, Neville M Wiles
wrote:

On 7/30/2012 2:52 PM, Kurt Ullman wrote:
In article ,
Neville M Wiles wrote:

On 7/30/2012 10:11 AM, Oren wrote:
On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 12:53:16 -0400, "
wrote:

On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 06:55:52 -0700, Neville M Wiles
wrote:

On 7/30/2012 12:15 AM, Gunner Asch wrote:
On Sun, 29 Jul 2012 16:14:06 -0700, Oren wrote:


In Californictionstain, I understand a single 30 round mag in your car
-- no guns or ammo within thirty miles of you car is a crime. They
will lock you up back behind the down yonder.

No, thats not true in the slightest. Even 40 rnd mags are legal here.

gummer ****s it up again.

From the California attorney-general's FAQ page on firearms:

9. If I have a large-capacity magazine, do I need to get rid of it?

No. Continued possession of large-capacity magazines (able to
accept more than 10 rounds) that you owned in California before
January 1, 2000, is not prohibited. However as of January 1,
2000, it is illegal to buy, manufacture, import, keep for sale,
expose for sale, give or lend any large-capacity magazine in
California except by law enforcement agencies, California peace
officers, or licensed dealers.

http://oag.ca.gov/firearms/pubfaqs#9


It's nice that you support what Gunner said.


Gunner said: "... not true in the slightest".

Exactly. gummer, the liar and dole scrounger, meant to suggest that
anyone could acquire a magazine with a capacity greater than 10 rounds.
That's absolutely false. *NO ONE* (other than law enforcement) may
legally acquire one in California. gummer may not lawfully acquire a 40
round magazine to keep in his ******** in Taft, CA.

Actually all he said that they are legal..

Generally, they aren't legal. In fact, I'm surprised that the law
grandfathered existing ones as of the effective date of the law. If
they can ban the manufacture, sale, importation and transfer of any of
them after that date, then they could just as well have banned them
outright. Note that if someone owning a grandfathered high-cap magazine
dies, the estate item cannot lawfully pass to any heir in California.

The liar and dole scrounger, gummer, very definitely was trying to
suggest that high-cap magazines are generally legal in California, and
that's false.

Good God, you're an idiot.

On 7/30/2012 5:30 PM, zzzzzzzzzz wrote:
On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 12:13:34 -0700, Neville M Wiles
wrote:

On 7/30/2012 11:39 AM, zzzzzzzzzz wrote:
On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 11:26:12 -0700, Neville M Wiles
wrote:

On 7/30/2012 11:18 AM, zzzzzzzzzz wrote:
On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 11:12:55 -0700, Neville M Wiles
wrote:

On 7/30/2012 10:41 AM, zzzzzzzzzz wrote:
On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 10:07:39 -0700, Neville M Wiles
wrote:

On 7/30/2012 9:53 AM, zzzzzzzzzz wrote:
On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 06:55:52 -0700, Neville M Wiles
wrote:

On 7/30/2012 12:15 AM, Gunner Asch wrote:
On Sun, 29 Jul 2012 16:14:06 -0700, Oren wrote:


In Californictionstain, I understand a single 30 round mag in your car
-- no guns or ammo within thirty miles of you car is a crime. They
will lock you up back behind the down yonder.

No, thats not true in the slightest. Even 40 rnd mags are legal here.

gummer ****s it up again.

From the California attorney-general's FAQ page on firearms:

9. If I have a large-capacity magazine, do I need to get rid of it?

No. Continued possession of large-capacity magazines (able to
accept more than 10 rounds) that you owned in California before
January 1, 2000, is not prohibited. However as of January 1,
2000, it is illegal to buy, manufacture, import, keep for sale,
expose for sale, give or lend any large-capacity magazine in
California except by law enforcement agencies, California peace
officers, or licensed dealers.

http://oag.ca.gov/firearms/pubfaqs#9


It's nice that you support what Gunner said.

I did not, of course, support what gummer said. gummer's comment
suggestions one may obtain 40 round magazines legally in California.
That's false, of course.

The *fact*, as you showed, is that high capacity magazines

...may not be legally acquired, sold, offered for sale, bought, given,
or manufactured in California, since 2000.

...which, if you could read, would have figured out wasn't what was said.

If there were some way of proving that a magazine was manufactured prior
to 2000, then I suppose you could have a bunch of large-capacity
magazines that you acquired after that date and plausibly say you
obtained them earlier, but if you got caught with a high-cap magazine
manufactured after that date and the state could prove it, then
Counselor Gummer's advice is just going to be laughed at and you'd go to
jail.

He said they're legal. Your article doesn't refute that.

It says they may not be legally obtained or sold or offered for sale or
manufactured or acquired since 2000. gummer suggests one may legally
make, sell, buy, import or transfer magazines with a capacity greater
than 10 rounds. He is wrong.

Try reading what was written

I did. gummer, the liar and dole scrounger and ignoramus, meant to
suggest that anyone may still acquire, sell, buy, offer for sale, import
or manufacture a 40 round magazine. He's full of ****, just like you.

You're *not* making your case.

I have made it quite well.

IFF your "case" was

My case is that gummer is full of **** about large-cap magazines.

You dumb ****, your cite *supported* what he said! Of course, you're too
stupid to have read what he wrote so you continue to make a damned fool of
yourself.

Why do ****eaters always stick together? Puzzling...

Good question?

Yes, it's a question for you. You're full of ****, just like gummer.
Why? Why don't you learn to distance yourself from stupid dole
scroungers like gummer?

Perhaps you could actually read what was written.

I did.

You certainly didn't understand anything you read.

I understood it fully.


gummer very clearly was saying that anyone can lawfully obtain
and own a large-cap magazine, and he's wrong.

No, moron, that wasn't what was said in the post we're talking about.

It is, of course, what gummer was saying in his usual slipshod,
imprecise, mangled-syntax manner.

On 7/30/2012 5:31 PM, zzzzzzzzzz wrote:
On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 12:14:05 -0700, Neville M Wiles
wrote:

On 7/30/2012 11:43 AM, zzzzzzzzzz wrote:
On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 11:25:44 -0700, Oren wrote:

On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 13:46:26 -0400, "
wrote:

On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 10:11:51 -0700, Oren wrote:

On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 12:53:16 -0400, "
wrote:

On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 06:55:52 -0700, Neville M Wiles
wrote:

On 7/30/2012 12:15 AM, Gunner Asch wrote:
On Sun, 29 Jul 2012 16:14:06 -0700, Oren wrote:


In Californictionstain, I understand a single 30 round mag in your car
-- no guns or ammo within thirty miles of you car is a crime. They
will lock you up back behind the down yonder.

No, thats not true in the slightest. Even 40 rnd mags are legal here.

gummer ****s it up again.

From the California attorney-general's FAQ page on firearms:

9. If I have a large-capacity magazine, do I need to get rid of it?

No. Continued possession of large-capacity magazines (able to
accept more than 10 rounds) that you owned in California before
January 1, 2000, is not prohibited. However as of January 1,
2000, it is illegal to buy, manufacture, import, keep for sale,
expose for sale, give or lend any large-capacity magazine in
California except by law enforcement agencies, California peace
officers, or licensed dealers.

http://oag.ca.gov/firearms/pubfaqs#9


It's nice that you support what Gunner said.


Gunner said: "... not true in the slightest".

In response to :

"In Californictionstain, I understand a single 30 round mag in your car
no guns or ammo within thirty miles of you car is a crime. They
will lock you up back behind the down yonder."

IOW, it's "... not true in the slightest" that a "single 30 round mag in your
car or ammo within thirty miles of your car is a crime".


Your point is taken. I spoke of my "understanding" of the current ban
on high-cap mags. Since 2000 it would be a crime, now. He is correct
for large mags prior to 2000.

Minor nit: ...for large mags you've had in your possession since 2000.

That's not a "minor nit" at all, you ****wit.

A minor nit because

It's not a "minor nit" in any way, for any reason. It's at the crux of
what gummer the dole-scrounging imbecile wrote.

On 7/30/2012 5:32 PM, zzzzzzzzzz wrote:
On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 15:42:13 -0700, Neville M Wiles
wrote:

On 7/30/2012 2:52 PM, Kurt Ullman wrote:
In article ,
Neville M Wiles wrote:

On 7/30/2012 10:11 AM, Oren wrote:
On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 12:53:16 -0400, "
wrote:

On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 06:55:52 -0700, Neville M Wiles
wrote:

On 7/30/2012 12:15 AM, Gunner Asch wrote:
On Sun, 29 Jul 2012 16:14:06 -0700, Oren wrote:


In Californictionstain, I understand a single 30 round mag in your car
-- no guns or ammo within thirty miles of you car is a crime. They
will lock you up back behind the down yonder.

No, thats not true in the slightest. Even 40 rnd mags are legal here.

gummer ****s it up again.

From the California attorney-general's FAQ page on firearms:

9. If I have a large-capacity magazine, do I need to get rid of it?

No. Continued possession of large-capacity magazines (able to
accept more than 10 rounds) that you owned in California before
January 1, 2000, is not prohibited. However as of January 1,
2000, it is illegal to buy, manufacture, import, keep for sale,
expose for sale, give or lend any large-capacity magazine in
California except by law enforcement agencies, California peace
officers, or licensed dealers.

http://oag.ca.gov/firearms/pubfaqs#9


It's nice that you support what Gunner said.


Gunner said: "... not true in the slightest".

Exactly. gummer, the liar and dole scrounger, meant to suggest that
anyone could acquire a magazine with a capacity greater than 10 rounds.
That's absolutely false. *NO ONE* (other than law enforcement) may
legally acquire one in California. gummer may not lawfully acquire a 40
round magazine to keep in his ******** in Taft, CA.

Actually all he said that they are legal..

Generally, they aren't legal. In fact, I'm surprised that the law
grandfathered existing ones as of the effective date of the law. If
they can ban the manufacture, sale, importation and transfer of any of
them after that date, then they could just as well have banned them
outright. Note that if someone owning a grandfathered high-cap magazine
dies, the estate item cannot lawfully pass to any heir in California.

The liar and dole scrounger, gummer, very definitely was trying to
suggest that high-cap magazines are generally legal in California, and
that's false.

Good God, you're an idiot.

Nope. It's exactly what the dole-scrounger was saying.

On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 14:40:03 -0700, Oren wrote:

On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 14:02:52 -0700, Gunner Asch
wrote:

They ask for ID in Vegas to sell magazines?

A couple of "dudes" from California was standing by me one day, about
to buy a gun. The salesperson asked where they were from and requested
an ID. NOPE you can't buy that stuff here Dude!

This has nothing to do with Californica. Generally, you can only buy guns in
your state of residency )or have them shipped to a FFL holder in your state).

Would not even sell them, say, a 12 round mag.

Smart people would not live in California. YMMV.

It takes one dumb SOB to live in Californica.

On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 12:16:33 -0700, Donn Messenheimer
wrote:

On 7/30/2012 11:47 AM, zzzzzzzzzz wrote:
On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 11:23:52 -0700, Donn Messenheimer
wrote:

On 7/30/2012 10:47 AM, zzzzzzzzzz wrote:
On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 10:09:33 -0700, Donn Messenheimer
wrote:

On 7/30/2012 10:05 AM, zzzzzzzzzz wrote:
On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 10:02:10 -0500, "Doug" wrote:

On Sun, 29 Jul 2012 14:22:20 -0700, Gunner Asch
wrote:

On Sun, 29 Jul 2012 11:49:35 -0400, "
wrote:

On Sun, 29 Jul 2012 08:34:16 -0500, "Doug" wrote:

On Sun, 29 Jul 2012 01:22:25 -0400, "
wrote:

On Sun, 29 Jul 2012 00:15:07 -0500, "Doug" wrote:

On Sat, 28 Jul 2012 19:00:04 -0400, "
wrote:
snip - finally - you're too stupid

Gunner's got you pretty well nailed; Ignorati.


Sure... you just make me smile!!

People with double-digit IQs do that a lot.


Just curious in your infinite amount of wisdom allowed for the
possibility that you could be wrong? This answer should be
interesting !!

I could be, but I research my positions rather than react to leg tingles from
the mainstream media. Leftist loons can only respond to media knee jerks, as
you've openly admitted here. Evidence: low (i.e. bargain basement) IQ.

Well said. Indeed.

Gunner


Yes, especially the first 3 words !!

The first three words are "Well said. Indeed".

What a moron

gummer is a moron. Those who agree with him usually are as well.

Nice to see that your "logic" is as good as Douggie's.

My logic is impeccable.

Your logic is nonexistant, Mr. Chamberlain. another nym shifting moron

Tell us right now who told you how to spell the word. It's obvious you
have no familiarity with it whatever.

W - O - R - D.

Not even remotely clever or witty; nothing but ****wittery.

Well, I was trying to communicate with a nym-shifting ****wit. It's clear
that it's an impossible task since you're a member of the illiterate ignorati.

On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 15:45:41 -0400, "Michael A. Terrell"
wrote:


" wrote:

The first three words are "Well said. Indeed".

What a moron


Looks like the dimmies are breeding again.

Another nymbecile.

On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 16:07:22 -0500, "Doug" wrote:

On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 13:05:04 -0400, "
wrote:

On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 10:02:10 -0500, "Doug" wrote:

On Sun, 29 Jul 2012 14:22:20 -0700, Gunner Asch
wrote:

On Sun, 29 Jul 2012 11:49:35 -0400, "
wrote:

On Sun, 29 Jul 2012 08:34:16 -0500, "Doug" wrote:

On Sun, 29 Jul 2012 01:22:25 -0400, "
wrote:

On Sun, 29 Jul 2012 00:15:07 -0500, "Doug" wrote:

On Sat, 28 Jul 2012 19:00:04 -0400, "
wrote:
snip - finally - you're too stupid

Gunner's got you pretty well nailed; Ignorati.


Sure... you just make me smile!!

People with double-digit IQs do that a lot.


Just curious in your infinite amount of wisdom allowed for the
possibility that you could be wrong? This answer should be
interesting !!

I could be, but I research my positions rather than react to leg tingles from
the mainstream media. Leftist loons can only respond to media knee jerks, as
you've openly admitted here. Evidence: low (i.e. bargain basement) IQ.

Well said. Indeed.

Gunner


Yes, especially the first 3 words !!

The first three words are "Well said. Indeed".

What a moron


Well since you resort to name calling I will go along that path....

No, moron, just calling them as they are. Again.

Moron I was agreeing with him about your first 3 words (last
paragraph) in your last post. I guess reading isn't your best
subject.

You are another illiterate moron, but that's old news.

On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 20:50:05 -0400, "
wrote:

On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 16:07:22 -0500, "Doug" wrote:

On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 13:05:04 -0400, "
wrote:

On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 10:02:10 -0500, "Doug" wrote:

On Sun, 29 Jul 2012 14:22:20 -0700, Gunner Asch
wrote:

On Sun, 29 Jul 2012 11:49:35 -0400, "
wrote:

On Sun, 29 Jul 2012 08:34:16 -0500, "Doug" wrote:

On Sun, 29 Jul 2012 01:22:25 -0400, "
wrote:

On Sun, 29 Jul 2012 00:15:07 -0500, "Doug" wrote:

On Sat, 28 Jul 2012 19:00:04 -0400, "
wrote:
snip - finally - you're too stupid

Gunner's got you pretty well nailed; Ignorati.


Sure... you just make me smile!!

People with double-digit IQs do that a lot.


Just curious in your infinite amount of wisdom allowed for the
possibility that you could be wrong? This answer should be
interesting !!

I could be, but I research my positions rather than react to leg tingles from
the mainstream media. Leftist loons can only respond to media knee jerks, as
you've openly admitted here. Evidence: low (i.e. bargain basement) IQ.

Well said. Indeed.

Gunner


Yes, especially the first 3 words !!

The first three words are "Well said. Indeed".

What a moron


Well since you resort to name calling I will go along that path....

No, moron, just calling them as they are. Again.

Moron I was agreeing with him about your first 3 words (last
paragraph) in your last post. I guess reading isn't your best
subject.

You are another illiterate moron, but that's old news.


Can't explain you lack of reading skills????

Gunner Asch wrote:

And of course..you may buy magazine "repair kits", which are all the
parts for a high cap magazine, which have not been assembled. They are
of course...for replacing worn parts in ones legal magazines...of
course.

http://www.calguns.net/calgunforum/s...ty+m agazines

A number of people will replace the various parts in their pre 99 mags
except for (1)..and then in a couple months or a year..replace it,
making the magazine legally repaired with all new parts. If the worn
parts are then assembled into a "old worn beater" magazine..they are
all original parts and pre-2000


Right. I saw an ad once (Ebay?) for the very hatchet George Washington used
to chop down the legendary cherry tree.

Part of the description read: "Since 1742 the hatchet has had the handle
replaced seven times and the head replaced twice. Other than that, it is the
original."

" wrote:

Michael A. Terrell wrote:

I want want one on the Florida border, but alas...

Hey now! The Redneck Riveria is pretty nice and I keep your taxes low. ;-)


I didn't say some people couldn't get a visa to visit. If they have
a sponsor and can prove they can pay for their stay. No busloads of
deported homeless from NY or NJ, though. There's an old saying about
snowbirds. They arrive in Florida with a $20 bill, and still have it
when they go back north.

" wrote:

On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 14:40:03 -0700, Oren wrote:

On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 14:02:52 -0700, Gunner Asch
wrote:

They ask for ID in Vegas to sell magazines?

A couple of "dudes" from California was standing by me one day, about
to buy a gun. The salesperson asked where they were from and requested
an ID. NOPE you can't buy that stuff here Dude!

This has nothing to do with Californica. Generally, you can only buy guns in
your state of residency )or have them shipped to a FFL holder in your state).

Would not even sell them, say, a 12 round mag.

Smart people would not live in California. YMMV.

It takes one dumb SOB to live in Californica.


And enough additional to elect them. Like the old saying: The 99%
of bad lawyers make the other percent look bad.

" wrote:

On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 15:45:41 -0400, "Michael A. Terrell"
wrote:


" wrote:

The first three words are "Well said. Indeed".

What a moron


Looks like the dimmies are breeding again.

Another nymbecile.


We need to up their cyanide levels.