Thread: Lets roll!
View Single Post
  #707   Report Post  
Posted to alt.home.repair,alt.survival,rec.crafts.metalworking
[email protected] krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 8,589
Default Lets roll!

On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 12:14:05 -0700, Neville M Wiles
wrote:

On 7/30/2012 11:43 AM, zzzzzzzzzz wrote:
On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 11:25:44 -0700, Oren wrote:

On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 13:46:26 -0400, "
wrote:

On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 10:11:51 -0700, Oren wrote:

On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 12:53:16 -0400, "
wrote:

On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 06:55:52 -0700, Neville M Wiles
wrote:

On 7/30/2012 12:15 AM, Gunner Asch wrote:
On Sun, 29 Jul 2012 16:14:06 -0700, Oren wrote:


In Californictionstain, I understand a single 30 round mag in your car
-- no guns or ammo within thirty miles of you car is a crime. They
will lock you up back behind the down yonder.

No, thats not true in the slightest. Even 40 rnd mags are legal here.

gummer ****s it up again.

From the California attorney-general's FAQ page on firearms:

9. If I have a large-capacity magazine, do I need to get rid of it?

No. Continued possession of large-capacity magazines (able to
accept more than 10 rounds) that you owned in California before
January 1, 2000, is not prohibited. However as of January 1,
2000, it is illegal to buy, manufacture, import, keep for sale,
expose for sale, give or lend any large-capacity magazine in
California except by law enforcement agencies, California peace
officers, or licensed dealers.

http://oag.ca.gov/firearms/pubfaqs#9


It's nice that you support what Gunner said.


Gunner said: "... not true in the slightest".

In response to :

"In Californictionstain, I understand a single 30 round mag in your car
no guns or ammo within thirty miles of you car is a crime. They
will lock you up back behind the down yonder."

IOW, it's "... not true in the slightest" that a "single 30 round mag in your
car or ammo within thirty miles of your car is a crime".


Your point is taken. I spoke of my "understanding" of the current ban
on high-cap mags. Since 2000 it would be a crime, now. He is correct
for large mags prior to 2000.


Minor nit: ...for large mags you've had in your possession since 2000.


That's not a "minor nit" at all, you ****wit.


A minor nit because it wasn't stated either way, moron. Do try first grade
agina. This time try Phonics.