Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
Woodworking (rec.woodworking) Discussion forum covering all aspects of working with wood. All levels of expertise are encouraged to particiapte. |
Reply |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#41
![]()
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 10/12/10 2:06 PM, J. Clarke wrote:
If you have it set correctly for the stock thickness then you should be able to alternate cutting from the front and back faces and have them mate perfectly without any shim required. I guess I'm picturing this correctly. However, with what Robo says about the top surface, that may not work out correctly. Of course, I'm not sure it would matter for wood... maybe it would. (pun) -- -MIKE- "Playing is not something I do at night, it's my function in life" --Elvin Jones (1927-2004) -- http://mikedrums.com ---remove "DOT" ^^^^ to reply |
#42
![]()
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 12, 5:14*pm, -MIKE- wrote:
On 10/12/10 2:31 PM, Robatoy wrote: Hard to explain, I need to draw that up for you.... maybe not. You want the upside seam to be vertical, not on any tangent of that 1/8". You're saying the top of the surface of material should match up with the apex of the curve in the cutter... the farthest point in or out in the curve. -- * -MIKE- * "Playing is not something I do at night, it's my function in life" * * *--Elvin Jones *(1927-2004) * -- *http://mikedrums.com * * ---remove "DOT" ^^^^ to reply You want the exit apex to be vertical, 90° to the surface. If you do anything less or more than that, you will be feathering the edges, lengthening/widening the edge. It would make sense to keep that as tight as possible. Your question, in itself, tells me you understand. |
#43
![]()
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 12, 5:27*pm, -MIKE- wrote:
On 10/12/10 2:06 PM, J. Clarke wrote: If you have it set correctly for the stock thickness then you should be able to alternate cutting from the front and back faces and have them mate perfectly without any shim required. I guess I'm picturing this correctly. *However, with what Robo says about the top surface, that may not work out correctly. *Of course, I'm not sure it would matter for wood... maybe it would. *(pun) -- * -MIKE- * "Playing is not something I do at night, it's my function in life" * * *--Elvin Jones *(1927-2004) * -- *http://mikedrums.com * * ---remove "DOT" ^^^^ to reply It is all about that top surface. Whatever happens to the bottom edge would be in variance to the thickness accuracy. |
#44
![]()
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 12, 3:06*pm, "J. Clarke" wrote:
In article , says... On 10/12/10 1:07 PM, Robatoy wrote: On Oct 12, 1:54 pm, *wrote: On 10/12/10 12:36 PM, Robatoy wrote: * *zzactly. I got into the TruMatch routerbits/base combo and had so much luck with it, I never looked back. So, I get how the left and right match up with the wavy edge... like T&G. Is the base combo part of it a spacer that is half the thickness of one 'wave?" -- * *-MIKE- an exact 1/8" however you get to that. Either a dedicated router base or a shim laid on one edge (not as reliable. I can hook you up with the right router base, which you can eithew drill yourself or predrilled for your router. I don't know how much of this you're going to do, so.... I think Tom calls it SeamRite http://preview.tinyurl.com/2elob3u If it's just a matter of setting the depth 1/8" up or down, I can do that and make a test cut to check it. I've also gotten pretty adept at running long stock over the router table, so that's not an issue. Funny, but this bit, with the exact offset of the outfeed fence, would function as a jointer as well. If you have it set correctly for the stock thickness then you should be able to alternate cutting from the front and back faces and have them mate perfectly without any shim required. Only if the thickness is in perfect increments of .125" |
#45
![]()
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 10/12/10 4:37 PM, Robatoy wrote:
On Oct 12, 5:14 pm, wrote: On 10/12/10 2:31 PM, Robatoy wrote: Hard to explain, I need to draw that up for you.... maybe not. You want the upside seam to be vertical, not on any tangent of that 1/8". You're saying the top of the surface of material should match up with the apex of the curve in the cutter... the farthest point in or out in the curve. -MIKE- You want the exit apex to be vertical, 90° to the surface. If you do anything less or more than that, you will be feathering the edges, lengthening/widening the edge. It would make sense to keep that as tight as possible. Your question, in itself, tells me you understand. In between posts, I finally found a manual on the PC website for the "system." -- -MIKE- "Playing is not something I do at night, it's my function in life" --Elvin Jones (1927-2004) -- http://mikedrums.com ---remove "DOT" ^^^^ to reply |
#46
![]()
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 12, 6:00*pm, -MIKE- wrote:
On 10/12/10 4:37 PM, Robatoy wrote: On Oct 12, 5:14 pm, *wrote: On 10/12/10 2:31 PM, Robatoy wrote: Hard to explain, I need to draw that up for you.... maybe not. You want the upside seam to be vertical, not on any tangent of that 1/8". You're saying the top of the surface of material should match up with the apex of the curve in the cutter... the farthest point in or out in the curve. * *-MIKE- You want the exit apex to be vertical, 90° to the surface. If you do anything less or more than that, you will be feathering the edges, lengthening/widening the edge. It would make sense to keep that as tight as possible. Your question, in itself, tells me you understand. In between posts, I finally found a manual on the PC website for the "system." -- * -MIKE- * "Playing is not something I do at night, it's my function in life" * * *--Elvin Jones *(1927-2004) * -- *http://mikedrums.com * * ---remove "DOT" ^^^^ to reply I have also used the 'system' to butt-join laminated countertops with very good results. |
#47
![]()
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 12 Oct 2010 10:45:53 -0700 (PDT), Robatoy
wrote: On Oct 12, 1:35*pm, Robatoy wrote: On Oct 12, 12:40*pm, -MIKE- wrote: I think it's a unanimous verdict from the jury. *Thanks guys. -- * -MIKE- * "Playing is not something I do at night, it's my function in life" * * *--Elvin Jones *(1927-2004) * -- *http://mikedrums.com * * ---remove "DOT" ^^^^ to reply Not so fast. TruMatch router bit is the way to go for end-to-end panel glue-ups. IMHO. (Wavy bit) Once you get used to that system, nothing else will do. How rude of me... http://i123.photobucket.com/albums/o.../TrueMatch.jpg http://www.whitesiderouterbits.is.co...uter_Bits.aspx Purty cool, ensuring flatness while mating. What's the process to set up the offset? -- Ask not what the world needs. Ask what makes you come alive... then go do it. Because what the world needs is people who have come alive. -- Howard Thurman |
#48
![]()
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 12, 6:40*pm, Larry Jaques
wrote: On Tue, 12 Oct 2010 10:45:53 -0700 (PDT), Robatoy wrote: On Oct 12, 1:35*pm, Robatoy wrote: On Oct 12, 12:40*pm, -MIKE- wrote: I think it's a unanimous verdict from the jury. *Thanks guys. -- * -MIKE- * "Playing is not something I do at night, it's my function in life" * * *--Elvin Jones *(1927-2004) * -- *http://mikedrums.com * * ---remove "DOT" ^^^^ to reply Not so fast. TruMatch router bit is the way to go for end-to-end panel glue-ups. IMHO. (Wavy bit) Once you get used to that system, nothing else will do. How rude of me... http://i123.photobucket.com/albums/o.../TrueMatch.jpg http://www.whitesiderouterbits.is.co...uter_Bits.aspx Purty cool, ensuring flatness while mating. *What's the process to set up the offset? -- Ask not what the world needs. Ask what makes you come alive... then go do it. Because what the world needs is people who have come alive. * * *-- Howard Thurman The base has the offset. Half of it is .125 higher. |
#49
![]()
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 10/12/2010 6:17 PM, Robatoy wrote:
How rude of me... http://i123.photobucket.com/albums/o.../TrueMatch.jpg http://www.whitesiderouterbits.is.co...uter_Bits.aspx The base has the offset. Half of it is .125 higher. Makes me want to go find some solid surface material to play with. I'm sure I can find a use for this somewhere down the line ... an answer looking for a question. -- www.e-woodshop.net Last update: 4/15/2010 KarlC@ (the obvious) |
#50
![]()
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 10/12/10 6:21 PM, Swingman wrote:
... an answer looking for a question. That's the urge I'm trying to resist. :-) -- -MIKE- "Playing is not something I do at night, it's my function in life" --Elvin Jones (1927-2004) -- http://mikedrums.com ---remove "DOT" ^^^^ to reply |
#51
![]()
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 10/12/2010 6:23 PM, -MIKE- wrote:
On 10/12/10 6:21 PM, Swingman wrote: ... an answer looking for a question. That's the urge I'm trying to resist. :-) An elegant solution has an allure of its own ... -- www.e-woodshop.net Last update: 4/15/2010 KarlC@ (the obvious) |
#52
![]()
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 12, 7:21*pm, Swingman wrote:
On 10/12/2010 6:17 PM, Robatoy wrote: How rude of me... http://i123.photobucket.com/albums/o.../TrueMatch.jpg http://www.whitesiderouterbits.is.co...uter_Bits.aspx The base has the offset. Half of it is .125 higher. Makes me want to go find some solid surface material to play with. I'm sure I can find a use for this somewhere down the line ... an answer looking for a question. --www.e-woodshop.net Last update: 4/15/2010 KarlC@ (the obvious) But but but it works for everything. I have taken a 4x8 sheet of cherry veneer and cut it crosswise into 3 pieces and wavybitted the three pieces together to face a sit-down bar. You can see that on my old website www.topworks.ca |
#53
![]()
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 12, 7:23*pm, -MIKE- wrote:
On 10/12/10 6:21 PM, Swingman wrote: ... an answer looking for a question. That's the urge I'm trying to resist. * :-) what??? you scaredycat? |
#54
![]()
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 10/12/2010 6:23 PM, -MIKE- wrote:
On 10/12/10 6:21 PM, Swingman wrote: ... an answer looking for a question. That's the urge I'm trying to resist. :-) A solution looking for a problem. I get those a lot. :-) -- See Nad. See Nad go. Go Nad! To reply, eat the taco. http://www.flickr.com/photos/bbqboyee/ |
#55
![]()
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 10/12/10 6:40 PM, Robatoy wrote:
On Oct 12, 7:23 pm, wrote: On 10/12/10 6:21 PM, Swingman wrote: ... an answer looking for a question. That's the urge I'm trying to resist. :-) what??? you scaredycat? No. :-) I'm schedule bound. -- -MIKE- "Playing is not something I do at night, it's my function in life" --Elvin Jones (1927-2004) -- http://mikedrums.com ---remove "DOT" ^^^^ to reply |
#56
![]()
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 12, 8:36*pm, -MIKE- wrote:
On 10/12/10 6:40 PM, Robatoy wrote: On Oct 12, 7:23 pm, *wrote: On 10/12/10 6:21 PM, Swingman wrote: ... an answer looking for a question. That's the urge I'm trying to resist. * :-) what??? you scaredycat? No. *:-) * I'm schedule bound. -- * -MIKE- * "Playing is not something I do at night, it's my function in life" * * *--Elvin Jones *(1927-2004) * -- *http://mikedrums.com * * ---remove "DOT" ^^^^ to reply schedule schmedule |
#57
![]()
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Larry Jaques" wrote
Purty cool, ensuring flatness while mating. What's the process to set up the offset? Flatness while mating. Isn't that what they used to call the Methodist position? Max |
#58
![]()
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I've always used just a saw cut, and check the gap before gluing by
laying out the boards and trial fitting them. In the rare case that their is some adjustment needed (Saw blade is a WW2, so it is pretty rare) I use my 22 inch jointer to straighten that edge. (Jointer made by Stanley) -- There are no stupid questions, but there are lots of stupid answers. Larry Wasserman - Baltimore Maryland - lwasserm(a)sdf. lonestar. org |
#59
![]()
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 12 Oct 2010 17:00:18 -0500, -MIKE-
wrote: On 10/12/10 4:37 PM, Robatoy wrote: On Oct 12, 5:14 pm, wrote: On 10/12/10 2:31 PM, Robatoy wrote: Hard to explain, I need to draw that up for you.... maybe not. You want the upside seam to be vertical, not on any tangent of that 1/8". You're saying the top of the surface of material should match up with the apex of the curve in the cutter... the farthest point in or out in the curve. -MIKE- You want the exit apex to be vertical, 90° to the surface. If you do anything less or more than that, you will be feathering the edges, lengthening/widening the edge. It would make sense to keep that as tight as possible. Your question, in itself, tells me you understand. In between posts, I finally found a manual on the PC website for the "system." Can you give a link to the manual? I couldn't find it. |
#60
![]()
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "routerman" wrote in message ... Perfect boards, no drying stresses, sharp rip blade, saw tuned, blade parallel to fence? Then expect a good time & a good glue line without jointing. Reality: Rarely are any 2 sticks parallel along their edges after sawing. As stress is released the work goes its own way (always out of parallel) & chatters against the blade no matter what the quality of the blade may be. Perfect edges essential? Then joint. I am not quite sure why the mention of 2 sticks not being parallel after sawing would be of any matter. Jointing will not aid in bringing board edges parallel either. Board edges need not be parallel to form a panel. Board edges only need to be straight, which a TS and a jointer will do. Granted a board may not remain straight after being cut on a TS but another trip through the TS on a sled, not unlike multiple passes through a jointer, will again recreate the straight edge. |
#61
![]()
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "-MIKE-" wrote in message ... On 10/12/10 4:32 AM, J. Clarke wrote: Forrest Woodworker II is the standard. I use an Oldham (now sold as Porter-Cable) Signature which does fine. If you're working with stock less than 1 inch thick and are willing to go with separate blades for rip and crosscut, the Freud LU85 and LM74 for crosscut and rip respectively would be good choices--Freud says that they do better than the Freud rip and crosscut blades that I have and the ones I have do a fine job. I have a high-tooth Freud on there, now which has served me very well. I can get that LM74 for under 60 bucks, but have been looking for an excuse to get a WWII. Are you saying the WWII will have as good a finish as the LM74? I quit swapping blades when I bought a WWII. I get a cut when ripping normal thickness stock that is shiney smooth with out tooth marks. You might be able to get a better cut from another blade buty what would be the point. As it is the edge does not have to be sanded for appearance sake. Now if you are going to be ripping THICK stock you might opt for a rip blade. 10+ years and I only use a rip blade for ripping 2x4's. |
#63
![]()
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 13, 12:04*pm, -MIKE- wrote:
On 10/13/10 6:57 AM, wrote: On Tue, 12 Oct 2010 17:00:18 -0500, wrote: On 10/12/10 4:37 PM, Robatoy wrote: On Oct 12, 5:14 pm, * wrote: On 10/12/10 2:31 PM, Robatoy wrote: Hard to explain, I need to draw that up for you.... maybe not. You want the upside seam to be vertical, not on any tangent of that 1/8". You're saying the top of the surface of material should match up with the apex of the curve in the cutter... the farthest point in or out in the curve. * * -MIKE- You want the exit apex to be vertical, 90° to the surface. If you do anything less or more than that, you will be feathering the edges, lengthening/widening the edge. It would make sense to keep that as tight as possible. Your question, in itself, tells me you understand. In between posts, I finally found a manual on the PC website for the "system." Can you give a link to the manual? *I couldn't find it. There website is horrible. http://www.dewaltservicenet.com/documents/English/Instruction%20Manua... orhttp://xrl.us/trumatch If that doesn't work, do to the front of the link and search for "tru-match" under "model." -- * -MIKE- * "Playing is not something I do at night, it's my function in life" * * *--Elvin Jones *(1927-2004) * -- *http://mikedrums.com * * ---remove "DOT" ^^^^ to reply Oh my..... That base is a piece of awfulness. It flexes, doesn't stay true and simply isn't big enough. $ 46.00 buys a precision phenolic base from Pinske. You don't have to buy his insert bit holder and wavy bit inserts, because the PC and Freud ones work just fine. http://www.pinske-edge.com Look for 'wavy bit' and base. |
#64
![]()
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 10/13/10 12:45 PM, Robatoy wrote:
On Oct 13, 12:04 pm, wrote: On 10/13/10 6:57 AM, wrote: On Tue, 12 Oct 2010 17:00:18 -0500, wrote: On 10/12/10 4:37 PM, Robatoy wrote: On Oct 12, 5:14 pm, wrote: On 10/12/10 2:31 PM, Robatoy wrote: Hard to explain, I need to draw that up for you.... maybe not. You want the upside seam to be vertical, not on any tangent of that 1/8". You're saying the top of the surface of material should match up with the apex of the curve in the cutter... the farthest point in or out in the curve. -MIKE- You want the exit apex to be vertical, 90° to the surface. If you do anything less or more than that, you will be feathering the edges, lengthening/widening the edge. It would make sense to keep that as tight as possible. Your question, in itself, tells me you understand. In between posts, I finally found a manual on the PC website for the "system." Can you give a link to the manual? I couldn't find it. There website is horrible. http://www.dewaltservicenet.com/documents/English/Instruction%20Manua... orhttp://xrl.us/trumatch If that doesn't work, do to the front of the link and search for "tru-match" under "model." Oh my..... That base is a piece of awfulness. It flexes, doesn't stay true and simply isn't big enough. $ 46.00 buys a precision phenolic base from Pinske. You don't have to buy his insert bit holder and wavy bit inserts, because the PC and Freud ones work just fine. http://www.pinske-edge.com Look for 'wavy bit' and base. It wasn't an endorsement from me. I was just looking for pictures for my feeble brain. :-) http://www.pinske-edge.com/shop/prod...base-no-holes/ http://www.pinske-edge.com/shop/prod...y-base-wholes/ His stuff definitely looks better. -- -MIKE- "Playing is not something I do at night, it's my function in life" --Elvin Jones (1927-2004) -- http://mikedrums.com ---remove "DOT" ^^^^ to reply |
#65
![]()
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
By the way, I just came home with this...
http://www.woodcraft.com/Product/2020101/19173/Freud-Glue-Line-Ripping-Saw-Blade.aspx I love multitaskers and I've never had a good rip blade. I know I paid too much, but that silly schedule schmedule got the best of me. -- -MIKE- "Playing is not something I do at night, it's my function in life" --Elvin Jones (1927-2004) -- http://mikedrums.com ---remove "DOT" ^^^^ to reply |
#66
![]()
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 13, 3:29*pm, -MIKE- wrote:
By the way, I just came home with this... http://www.woodcraft.com/Product/2020101/19173/Freud-Glue-Line-Rippin... I love multitaskers and I've never had a good rip blade. I know I paid too much, but that silly schedule schmedule got the best of me. -- * -MIKE- * "Playing is not something I do at night, it's my function in life" * * *--Elvin Jones *(1927-2004) * -- *http://mikedrums.com * * ---remove "DOT" ^^^^ to reply Great blade. Used it a lot. |
#67
![]()
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 11 Oct 2010 21:27:17 -0500, -MIKE-
wrote: I'm getting ready to glue up some panels for an electronics rack case I'm building for a client. The longest panels will be 42". In what I think was a table saw thread, maybe a year ago, someone mentioned that they get a glue-up-ready edge joint with their table saw. I do have a jointer, but I also have a good table saw with a good blade, a long rip fence and a long outfeed table. This thread was starting to make me feel inadequate about my table saw, because inspite of having all the fancy blades mentioned here no way in hell can I go straight to a glue up. Then I flattened a cherry slab that had a twist in it on the cnc and felt better about things ![]() -Kevin |
#68
![]()
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 13, 6:24*pm, Kevin wrote:
On Mon, 11 Oct 2010 21:27:17 -0500, -MIKE- wrote: I'm getting ready to glue up some panels for an electronics rack case I'm building for a client. *The longest panels will be 42". In what I think was a table saw thread, maybe a year ago, someone mentioned that they get a glue-up-ready edge joint with their table saw. *I do have a jointer, but I also have a good table saw with a good blade, a long rip fence and a long outfeed table. This thread was starting to make me feel inadequate about my table saw, because inspite of having all the fancy blades mentioned here no way in hell can I go straight to a glue up. * Then I flattened a cherry slab that had a twist in it on the cnc and felt better about things ![]() -Kevin Fun, huh? |
#69
![]()
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 13 Oct 2010 16:16:00 -0700 (PDT), Robatoy
wrote: On Oct 13, 6:24*pm, Kevin wrote: This thread was starting to make me feel inadequate about my table saw, because inspite of having all the fancy blades mentioned here no way in hell can I go straight to a glue up. * Then I flattened a cherry slab that had a twist in it on the cnc and felt better about things ![]() -Kevin Fun, huh? Yeah, but then you make me feel inadequate about my cnc ![]() -Kevin |
#70
![]()
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 10/13/10 2:36 PM, Robatoy wrote:
On Oct 13, 3:29 pm, wrote: By the way, I just came home with this... http://www.woodcraft.com/Product/2020101/19173/Freud-Glue-Line-Rippin... Great blade. Used it a lot. This blade is living up to its hype. First thing I noticed is that the stock moves a lot faster with a dedicated rip blade. Second thing I noticed is that the cut surface comes out looking as good or better than a edge done on a router. With the exception of some light burns due to operator error, it cuts a pristine edge. -- -MIKE- "Playing is not something I do at night, it's my function in life" --Elvin Jones (1927-2004) -- http://mikedrums.com ---remove "DOT" ^^^^ to reply |
#71
![]()
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 12 Oct 2010 12:53:22 -0400, J. Clarke wrote:
WWII is a combination blade. I don't have one and have never felt the need so can't say whether it gives a finish better than any of the blades I do have, however I would not expect any combination blade to give a finish as good as a purpose made rip or crosscut blade doing rip or crosscut respectively. I used to use the Freud rip and crosscut blades and they did a great job. But since I bought a Freud Fusion I don't switch blades very often - it's that good. But it's still not quite as good as the Freud rip blade. It seems to be better than the Freud crosscut blade. And I no longer use a plywood blade at all. -- Intelligence is an experiment that failed - G. B. Shaw |
#72
![]()
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 15, 9:06*pm, -MIKE- wrote:
On 10/13/10 2:36 PM, Robatoy wrote: On Oct 13, 3:29 pm, *wrote: By the way, I just came home with this... http://www.woodcraft.com/Product/2020101/19173/Freud-Glue-Line-Rippin.... Great blade. Used it a lot. This blade is living up to its hype. First thing I noticed is that the stock moves a lot faster with a dedicated rip blade. Second thing I noticed is that the cut surface comes out looking as good or better than a edge done on a router. With the exception of some light burns due to operator error, it cuts a pristine edge. -- * -MIKE- * "Playing is not something I do at night, it's my function in life" * * *--Elvin Jones *(1927-2004) * -- *http://mikedrums.com * * ---remove "DOT" ^^^^ to reply IMHO, table saws shine at ripping, it is what they do best. Cutting panels to size (plywood, MDF, PB) is another of its strong points, but a proper panel saw does that job better and takes up way less space, but you can't rip lumber on a panel saw, so table saw it is. |
#73
![]()
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 12, 10:27*am, -MIKE- wrote:
I'm getting ready to glue up some panels for an electronics rack case I'm building for a client. *The longest panels will be 42". In what I think was a table saw thread, maybe a year ago, someone mentioned that they get a glue-up-ready edge joint with their table saw. * I do have a jointer, but I also have a good table saw with a good blade, a long rip fence and a long outfeed table. Any of you guys remember writing that? Anyone else glue up panels with the saw cut alone? Is there a better saw blade for this? -- * -MIKE- * "Playing is not something I do at night, it's my function in life" * * *--Elvin Jones *(1927-2004) * -- *http://mikedrums.com * * ---remove "DOT" ^^^^ to reply I remember that an electrical tool can do this easily. ---------------- http://www.towood.com/ is a market place for importers and exporters to trading furniture, plywood, timbers, hardwood floors, MDF, HDF, tropical logs. |
#74
![]()
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Swingman writes:
Well, the WWII is a "combination" blade, optimized as an all purpose blade that does an exceptional job either ripping or crosscutting. The Freud Glue Line Rip is optimized, in tooth pattern and setting, specifically for ripping, as well as for getting an exceptional cut. In actual practice, and IME, either blade will work fine in most stock for making glue line ready rip cuts. That said, not all stock is the same and, particularly with thicker hardwoods, I firmly believe that a high quality, dedicated "rip" blade is the best tool for the job if you're not going to use the jointer. When I spend a thousand dollars on material on a project, I want every single advantage I can reasonably buy ... thus my preference for the jointer in this situation; followed closely by the Freud GLR. I noticed on Amazon that there are several 10" Freud Glue line rip blades. Can you tell me which one you have had the good experiences with? |
#75
![]()
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() I noticed on Amazon that there are several 10" Freud Glue line rip blades. Can you tell me which one you have had the good experiences with? I have the LM74R010 which is the 30 teeth, 12 degree hook, full kerf, 10" blade with the red "perma-shield" coating. I am extremely pleased with it. As far as I can tell, the other Amazon blades are the thin kerf version and the industial version. The industrial is the one that isn't red. It has the "silver ice" non-stick coating, which I'm guessing accomplishes the same thing as the red blade, without the red. :-) The red version actually has "industrial" printed on it, too. The thin kerf versions are for lower powered saws. If you have a contractor saw that is under 2hp or so, thin kerf would help you out. But if you have a cabinet or hybrid with a heavy duty motor, you'll want the full kerf for stability. -- -MIKE- "Playing is not something I do at night, it's my function in life" --Elvin Jones (1927-2004) -- http://mikedrums.com ---remove "DOT" ^^^^ to reply |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Best jointing glue. | Woodworking | |||
Using a router for edge jointing | Woodworking | |||
BIG edge jointing problem | Woodworking | |||
BIG edge jointing ==Solved== | Woodworking | |||
proper way to deal with a convex edge when jointing? | Woodworking |