On Oct 12, 5:27*pm, -MIKE- wrote:
On 10/12/10 2:06 PM, J. Clarke wrote:



If you have it set correctly for the stock thickness then you should be
able to alternate cutting from the front and back faces and have them
mate perfectly without any shim required.

I guess I'm picturing this correctly. *However, with what Robo says
about the top surface, that may not work out correctly. *Of course, I'm
not sure it would matter for wood... maybe it would. *(pun)

--

* -MIKE-

* "Playing is not something I do at night, it's my function in life"
* * *--Elvin Jones *(1927-2004)
* --
*http://mikedrums.com
*
* ---remove "DOT" ^^^^ to reply

It is all about that top surface. Whatever happens to the bottom edge
would be in variance to the thickness accuracy.