Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
Woodworking (rec.woodworking) Discussion forum covering all aspects of working with wood. All levels of expertise are encouraged to particiapte. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Efficient security or Keystone Cops
From an email, called Junk Mail from Bob:
Terrorists are Everywhere! Baltimore closed down tunnels last month. http://www.thewbalchannel.com/health...34/detail.html A lady in Davenport Iowa found a bomb in her home. But it turned out to be just a device to scare away underground aliens. Really! http://www.qctimes.net/articles/2005...8115115343.txt Kentucky is serious about antiterrorism. They are undertaking a program to keep terrorists out of bingo halls and other charitable games. They don't actually care if terrorists go play bingo. They just want to make sure the terrorists don't operate any Bingo games. The state Office of Charitable Gaming received a $36,300 grant to provide five investigators with laptop computers and access a law-enforcement database. http://www.wkyt.com/Global/story.asp?S=4019597 The border patrol in Detroit stopped some runners after a radiation sensor went off in the Detroit-Windsor Tunnel during a marathon. None of the runners was carrying a nuclear weapon. http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servl...1024.wmarath24 The FAA caught someone violating the Aircraft Defense Identification Zone around Washington. He was promptly cited. The problem was, he and his plane had never left Arizona. http://avweb.com/newswire/11_38b/leadnews/190621-1.html http://www.avweb.com/newswire/11_43b...ml?CMP=OTC-RSS About a year ago, a lady in Denver didn't want her breasts searched at the airport, so she drove home to San Diego. http://www.10news.com/news/3799783/detail.html A few days ago, a 63-year-old lady named Phyllis was fined $2000 and given one year probation after she grabbed a screeners breasts and said, "How would you like it if I did that to you?" The retired technical-college teacher was convicted in July of assault on a federal employee. http://www.ksl.com/?nid=157&sid=124638 |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Efficient security or Keystone Cops
Charlie Self said:
From an email, called Junk Mail from Bob: Terrorists are Everywhere! snip of remainder of ridiculous 'security' related stories I'm waiting for paint to dry... so.... I swear, it's absurd. We spent over an hour languishing around the San Francisco Airport last year because the snap in the better half's bra set off a detector. I was pulled for a rivet on my tennis shoe. Doesn't anyone actually calibrate these things? [/RANT] And to top it off, I don't think it makes us a darned bit safer - just annoyed and inconvenienced. Just a show for the public - something to put a scare into them, and then convince them that everything is all right because Uncle Sam is watching out for you - it would help considerably if Uncle would stop ****ing people off. For that matter, you can make a weapon out of just about anything - what then? Are we going to fly people around stark naked for fear that they might conceal something? Hey, let's do cavity searches... We cannot continue to walk in fear - and I think it would behoove some to consider what the passenger of one plane did. I guarantee you the next time somebody pulls something like that, they will ALL take out the terrorist. They've been knocked from the pedestal of "it can't happen here". Inspections, yes - but this is... well... don't get me started. [/RANT] SWMBO flies WAY more than I am will to. I'm not particularly fond of air travel. Yes, you get there fast, but what about all the neat stuff you just dumped a bunch of carbon particles on and missed. And some of those planes... But every time she gets on a plane, I still worry. Greg G. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Efficient security or Keystone Cops
Charlie Self said:
From an email, called Junk Mail from Bob: Terrorists are Everywhere! snip A few days ago, a 63-year-old lady named Phyllis was fined $2000 and given one year probation after she grabbed a screeners breasts and said, "How would you like it if I did that to you?" The retired technical-college teacher was convicted in July of assault on a federal employee. http://www.ksl.com/?nid=157&sid=124638 And this! Must have been my grandmother. They've GOT to be kidding. Is this stuff for real? I wouldn't be surprised (and I would have cheered her on) if she kicked the judge square in the shin - or maybe just a bit higher. ;-) Federal Employee? Probably an $8.00 hour hire from a temp service. Greg G. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Efficient security or Keystone Cops
On 6 Nov 2005 01:50:11 -0800, with neither quill nor qualm, "Charlie
Self" quickly quoth: From an email, called Junk Mail from Bob: Terrorists are Everywhere! You and Bob missed one, Charlie: http://www.chronwatch.com/content/co...408&catcode=31 Oh, and just for the record, all those Al Quaeda boys are all sitting back doing absolutely NOTHING and watching us **** all over ourselves with this anti-terrorism thing. For the record, recent changes happening in this country aren't about terrorism at all. They're about total governmental control of the public. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Poverty is easy. * http://diversify.com It's Charity and Chastity that are hard. * Data-based Website Design ------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Efficient security or Keystone Cops
Charlie, I'm surprised you omitted the incident with Joe Foss. Foss, a
WWII Marine ace fighter pilot and Medal of Honor winner, was flying from Phoenix to address the cadets at West Point. He was searched and questioned extensively because he had with him an object that looked like a throwing star with a sharp pin on the back - his Medal of Honor. To be honest, he also had a Medal of Honor commemorative nail file and a dummy bullet on a keychain with him. But, as a WWII ace and Medal of Honor winner, retired reserve general and former governor of South Dakota - and at 86 years old - he hardly fit the profile of a terrorist. As I recall, they asked him at one point why he hadn't just put his medal in his checked luggage. Incredible. John Martin |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Efficient security or Keystone Cops
Greg G. wrote: Charlie Self said: From an email, called Junk Mail from Bob: Terrorists are Everywhere! snip of remainder of ridiculous 'security' related stories I'm waiting for paint to dry... so.... I swear, it's absurd. We spent over an hour languishing around the San Francisco Airport last year because the snap in the better half's bra set off a detector. I was pulled for a rivet on my tennis shoe. Doesn't anyone actually calibrate these things? [/RANT] And to top it off, I don't think it makes us a darned bit safer - just annoyed and inconvenienced. Just a show for the public - something to put a scare into them, and then convince them that everything is all right because Uncle Sam is watching out for you - it would help considerably if Uncle would stop ****ing people off. For that matter, you can make a weapon out of just about anything - what then? Are we going to fly people around stark naked for fear that they might conceal something? Hey, let's do cavity searches... We cannot continue to walk in fear - and I think it would behoove some to consider what the passenger of one plane did. I guarantee you the next time somebody pulls something like that, they will ALL take out the terrorist. They've been knocked from the pedestal of "it can't happen here". Inspections, yes - but this is... well... don't get me started. [/RANT] SWMBO flies WAY more than I am will to. I'm not particularly fond of air travel. Yes, you get there fast, but what about all the neat stuff you just dumped a bunch of carbon particles on and missed. And some of those planes... But every time she gets on a plane, I still worry. I contend that the terrorists have won, because they have managed (quite easily) to force major and costly changes in our lifestyles, supposedly to keep them out. At the same time, this is of great benefit to an adminstration devoted to jerking knots in the list of rights the common man has access to, without really doing anything constructive to either suppress terrorism, or keep down the entry of terrorists to the U.S. The aim is to keep the public fearful so that government actions to "protect" us are gobbled up as necessities, though, in fact, none have been very effective at all...at the moment, both major borders are sieves, leaking illegal aliens to the south at an unprecedented rate, with many of those who are caught being released within hours--no place to hold 'em. I don't know what the answers are, but it seems to me neither does the government, while it also seems that the various governmental minions are doing their damndest to make sure no one even knows what the questions are. One thing for su this week definitely demonstrates that George Bush retains his worldwide level of appreciation from those in other countries. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Efficient security or Keystone Cops
"Charlie Self" wrote in message oups.com... About a year ago, a lady in Denver didn't want her breasts searched at the airport, so she drove home to San Diego. http://www.10news.com/news/3799783/detail.html I have to recommend this particular story........... |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Efficient security or Keystone Cops
On 6 Nov 2005 01:50:11 -0800, "Charlie Self" wrote:
From an email, called Junk Mail from Bob: Terrorists are Everywhere! Baltimore closed down tunnels last month. http://www.thewbalchannel.com/health...34/detail.html .... and snip of some more This is one area where I agree with you Charlie. This is a perfect example of our government learning exactly the wrong thing from an event. What 9/11 taught us was not that there were weapons on a plane that shouldn't have been there, what 9/11 taught us were two primary lessons: 1) there weren't enough private citizens on board those planes with the means to defend themselves, and more importantly 2) the claptrap mantra that, "in the event of a hijacking (or other crime), the victims should docilely go along with the thugs' wishes and no-one, or fewer people will get hurt" was proven to be the bogus bunch of hooey that it is. The people on the plane that went down in Pennsylvania got it, apparently the bureaucrats and government statists did not. The American flying public learned those lessons, thus the capture of the shoe-bomber (even though he was an apparent idiot) and several other instances in which, what would have been the victims in the past, have overpowered and subdued would-be hijackers. It is very unlikely that a plane full of passengers will sit still for any type of attempt to take over a flight in the future. What the current stupidity and window dressing being done by the TSA goons is doing is taking away useful tools from those potential victims, meaning that the possibility for injury to themselves will be greater when dealing with better armed adversaries who have circumvented the window dressing. All the thugs have to do is look middle-eastern and well-lawyered and TSA won't touch them -- passing them through checkpoints with barely a glance to avoid any possible ramifications from the ACLU. Instead the TSA will opt to strip search a few 90 year old grandmothers in wheelchairs or balding, middle-aged white guys in suits (or a few medal of honor winners). +--------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ If you're gonna be dumb, you better be tough +--------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Efficient security or Keystone Cops
Charlie Self said:
snipped previous thread content to conserve bandwidth ;-) I contend that the terrorists have won, because they have managed (quite easily) to force major and costly changes in our lifestyles, supposedly to keep them out. At the same time, this is of great benefit to an adminstration devoted to jerking knots in the list of rights the common man has access to, without really doing anything constructive to either suppress terrorism, or keep down the entry of terrorists to the U.S. Absolutely - down to the use of a color coded Terror Alert to yank the leash when favor wanes. The aim is to keep the public fearful so that government actions to "protect" us are gobbled up as necessities, though, in fact, none have been very effective at all...at the moment, both major borders are sieves, leaking illegal aliens to the south at an unprecedented rate, with many of those who are caught being released within hours--no place to hold 'em. Agreed. Poking around the border between Texas and Mexico in 1999 elicited an unnerving confrontation with border agents questioning my activities. (No, I was _not_ picking up a shipment of terrorist weapons.) But at night, all h%ll breaks lose. Look at Botswana for an indication of how easily you can close a border. Motivation is the key factor. http://www.gov.bw/home.html I don't know what the answers are, but it seems to me neither does the government, while it also seems that the various governmental minions are doing their damndest to make sure no one even knows what the questions are. And emotional red herring issues to distract. Hey Folks, watch the magicians _other_hand... One thing for su this week definitely demonstrates that George Bush retains his worldwide level of appreciation from those in other countries. Ride-em cowboy... (No offense to_real_cowboys...) The bromide claims that genius always skips a generation, but as asseveration we see the father, in contrast, as paragon of wisdom. I scowl at the shadow he casts upon me with heightening distain. JMHO, Greg G. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Efficient security or Keystone Cops
On Sun, 06 Nov 2005 06:14:33 -0800, Larry Jaques
wrote: On 6 Nov 2005 01:50:11 -0800, with neither quill nor qualm, "Charlie Self" quickly quoth: From an email, called Junk Mail from Bob: Terrorists are Everywhere! You and Bob missed one, Charlie: http://www.chronwatch.com/content/co...408&catcode=31 Oh, and just for the record, all those Al Quaeda boys are all sitting back doing absolutely NOTHING and watching us **** all over ourselves with this anti-terrorism thing. Unfortunately Larry, that's not entirely true. There are numerous accounts of various attempts to probe the security of our air system, one example: http://www.nationalreview.com/comment/morse200510260833.asp +--------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ If you're gonna be dumb, you better be tough +--------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Efficient security or Keystone Cops
Mark & Juanita said:
On 6 Nov 2005 01:50:11 -0800, "Charlie Self" wrote: From an email, called Junk Mail from Bob: Terrorists are Everywhere! Baltimore closed down tunnels last month. http://www.thewbalchannel.com/health...34/detail.html .... and snip of some more It is very unlikely that a plane full of passengers will sit still for any type of attempt to take over a flight in the future. What the current stupidity and window dressing being done by the TSA goons is doing is taking away useful tools from those potential victims, meaning that the possibility for injury to themselves will be greater when dealing with better armed adversaries who have circumvented the window dressing. All [TOT] Which is one reason I don't believe in gun abolition. (I think it's all there - just read it.) Don't _want_ to use it, play with it, obsess over it, treat it as part of the family - but it IS there if I _have_ to use it. A reasonable deterrent to terrorism, tyranny, yadda, yadda... (But not in bars, planes, malls, schools, asylums, etc, etc.) [/TOT] the thugs have to do is look middle-eastern and well-lawyered and TSA won't touch them -- passing them through checkpoints with barely a glance to avoid any possible ramifications from the ACLU. Instead the TSA will opt to strip search a few 90 year old grandmothers in wheelchairs or balding, middle-aged white guys in suits (or a few medal of honor winners). Don't forget Cat Stephens and one obviously middle class couple on their way home from vacation. :-\ Greg G. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Efficient security or Keystone Cops
Greg G. said:
I scowl at the shadow he casts upon me with heightening distain. And I still can't type - disdain... disdain... Only 98 more times... Greg G. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Efficient security or Keystone Cops
"Greg G." wrote in message ... Greg G. said: I scowl at the shadow he casts upon me with heightening distain. And I still can't type - disdain... disdain... Only 98 more times... Guess it skipped a generation with you, too? What we need is for geniuses like yourself to cut lose with your infallible method for detecting a thug without troubling the others people. While you're at it, how about a cure for cancer. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Efficient security or Keystone Cops
George said:
"Greg G." wrote in message .. . Greg G. said: I scowl at the shadow he casts upon me with heightening distain. And I still can't type - disdain... disdain... Only 98 more times... Guess it skipped a generation with you, too? What we need is for geniuses like yourself to cut lose with your infallible method for detecting a thug without troubling the others people. One shot - One kill. While you're at it, how about a cure for cancer. Even better, how about a cure for stupidity. Greg G. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Efficient security or Keystone Cops
George said:
Guess it skipped a generation with you, too? Missed that the first time. Do me a favor, and hop on Hwy 94 and leap into South Bay. Better yet, Furnace Bay, 'cause that's where the hot air originates. See, I can cast ad hominem attacks as well. Jeezz... Greg G. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Efficient security or Keystone Cops
On Sun, 06 Nov 2005 21:26:00 -0700, with neither quill nor qualm, Mark
& Juanita quickly quoth: On Sun, 06 Nov 2005 06:14:33 -0800, Larry Jaques Oh, and just for the record, all those Al Quaeda boys are all sitting back doing absolutely NOTHING and watching us **** all over ourselves with this anti-terrorism thing. Unfortunately Larry, that's not entirely true. There are numerous accounts of various attempts to probe the security of our air system, one example: http://www.nationalreview.com/comment/morse200510260833.asp The clincher: No arrests & no known terrorists. If you're afraid of flying any more, Mark, don't. But no self-respecting terrorist g is going to be hijacking a U.S. plane at a time when so much scrutiny is placed on flying. They have MUCH easier targets which would cause much more damage to us. That said, the Syrians might be getting a wee bit anxious over King Shrub's potential invasion of their country, and anxiety can breed stupidity. We'll see. Besides, there's not a damn thing DHS could have done had they been real terrorists. That's the nature of terrorism. It can happen with as small a group as -one- person. It can happen anywhere, any time, and nobody can stop it. Vigilance is pretty much our sole defense. And if you look at the mess we have in the vigilance department now, we're in deep kimchee, dude. (We allowed Syrians in with expired passports, etc.) Wasting hundreds of billions of dollars while gaining absolutely nothing (and becoming the laughing stock of the entire world) is -not- my idea of a smart practice. YMMV ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Poverty is easy. * http://diversify.com It's Charity and Chastity that are hard. * Data-based Website Design ------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Efficient security or Keystone Cops
Larry Jaques wrote: Wasting hundreds of billions of dollars while gaining absolutely nothing (and becoming the laughing stock of the entire world) is -not- my idea of a smart practice. YMMV Oh, c'mon, Larry. If you had a piece of Halliburton the size of the one Cheney has waiting for him, and some major chunks of oil companies and Hummer makers, you'd be laughing at the rest of the world, just as our adminstration is doing. Alfred E. Neuman and the Sneer. What a combo. If Karl Rove ends up out of the picture, who is going pull the puppet's strings? |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Efficient security or Keystone Cops
On Mon, 07 Nov 2005 09:10:13 -0800, Larry Jaques
wrote: On Sun, 06 Nov 2005 21:26:00 -0700, with neither quill nor qualm, Mark & Juanita quickly quoth: On Sun, 06 Nov 2005 06:14:33 -0800, Larry Jaques Oh, and just for the record, all those Al Quaeda boys are all sitting back doing absolutely NOTHING and watching us **** all over ourselves with this anti-terrorism thing. Unfortunately Larry, that's not entirely true. There are numerous accounts of various attempts to probe the security of our air system, one example: http://www.nationalreview.com/comment/morse200510260833.asp The clincher: No arrests & no known terrorists. If you're afraid of flying any more, Mark, don't. But no self-respecting terrorist g is going to be hijacking a U.S. plane at a time when so much scrutiny is placed on flying. They have MUCH easier targets which would cause much more damage to us. That said, the Syrians might be getting a wee bit anxious over King Shrub's potential invasion of their country, and anxiety can breed stupidity. We'll see. Besides, there's not a damn thing DHS could have done had they been real terrorists. That's the nature of terrorism. It can happen with as small a group as -one- person. It can happen anywhere, any time, and nobody can stop it. Vigilance is pretty much our sole defense. And if you look at the mess we have in the vigilance department now, we're in deep kimchee, dude. (We allowed Syrians in with expired passports, etc.) Wasting hundreds of billions of dollars while gaining absolutely nothing (and becoming the laughing stock of the entire world) is -not- my idea of a smart practice. YMMV You apparently missed my other post regarding the current window dressing approach being taken to airport security. Larry, flying doesn't scare me, I used ot love flying, now what I really, really, really hate is getting to the airplane. Blaming Bush for all this is convenient, but I guarantee you that had the other party won the White House and control of the congress, what you are seeing now would be a dream compared to the clamps they'd be putting on society right now. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Poverty is easy. * http://diversify.com It's Charity and Chastity that are hard. * Data-based Website Design ------------------------------------------------------------------------- +--------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ If you're gonna be dumb, you better be tough +--------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Efficient security or Keystone Cops
On Sun, 06 Nov 2005 21:20:15 -0700, with neither quill nor qualm, Mark
& Juanita quickly quoth: On 6 Nov 2005 01:50:11 -0800, "Charlie Self" wrote: From an email, called Junk Mail from Bob: Terrorists are Everywhere! Baltimore closed down tunnels last month. http://www.thewbalchannel.com/health...34/detail.html ... and snip of some more AM radio can't be wrong, eh? snicker This is one area where I agree with you Charlie. This is a perfect example of our government learning exactly the wrong thing from an event. You got it in one. What 9/11 taught us was not that there were weapons on a plane that shouldn't have been there, what 9/11 taught us were two primary lessons: 1) there weren't enough private citizens on board those planes with the means to defend themselves, and more importantly 2) the claptrap mantra that, "in the event of a hijacking (or other crime), the victims should docilely go along with the thugs' wishes and no-one, or fewer people will get hurt" was proven to be the bogus bunch of hooey that it is. The people on the plane that went down in Pennsylvania got it, apparently the bureaucrats and government statists did not. Right. The American flying public learned those lessons, thus the capture of the shoe-bomber (even though he was an apparent idiot) and several other instances in which, what would have been the victims in the past, have overpowered and subdued would-be hijackers. I climbed on a plane less than an hour after the shoe-bomber was caught. Guess what the San Diego security had me do? I was the first person in line (that I saw this happen to, anyway) to have to remove my shoes and belt to have them scanned. And I was personally frisked. I wanted to ask the gal if she'd do it but a guy jumped up instead. It is very unlikely that a plane full of passengers will sit still for any type of attempt to take over a flight in the future. What the current stupidity and window dressing being done by the TSA goons is doing is taking away useful tools from those potential victims, meaning that the Like our lethal 1.5" long pocket knives? chortle Just to prove what a total crock airport security was, I carried a brand new, freshly- sharpened pencil in my shirt pocket, sharp point UP and in clear view. Said lead came within a foot and a half of the TSA inspector, who said nothing and didn't even eyeball the thing. He did, however, catch the lethal weapon behind me. A pair of round-point bandage scissors which hadn't been opened up so they could see the round points. The lethal blades on that thing were nearly an inch long! possibility for injury to themselves will be greater when dealing with better armed adversaries who have circumvented the window dressing. All the thugs have to do is look middle-eastern and well-lawyered and TSA won't touch them -- passing them through checkpoints with barely a glance to avoid any possible ramifications from the ACLU. Instead the TSA will opt to strip search a few 90 year old grandmothers in wheelchairs or balding, middle-aged white guys in suits (or a few medal of honor winners). Ain't profiling fun? Our tax dollars at work. big sigh ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Poverty is easy. * http://diversify.com It's Charity and Chastity that are hard. * Data-based Website Design ------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Efficient security or Keystone Cops
In article .com,
"John Martin" wrote: Charlie, I'm surprised you omitted the incident with Joe Foss. Foss, a WWII Marine ace fighter pilot and Medal of Honor winner, was flying from Phoenix to address the cadets at West Point. He was searched and questioned extensively because he had with him an object that looked like a throwing star with a sharp pin on the back - his Medal of Honor. To be honest, he also had a Medal of Honor commemorative nail file and a dummy bullet on a keychain with him. But, as a WWII ace and Medal of Honor winner, retired reserve general and former governor of South Dakota - and at 86 years old - he hardly fit the profile of a terrorist. As I recall, they asked him at one point why he hadn't just put his medal in his checked luggage. Incredible. An Oregon veteran experienced something similar, I believe it was about a year ago. Seems a group of WW2 vets were invited to a European town they had helped liberate. During a ceremony the vets were given vintage-WW2-style Zippo lighters with engraving of their unit insignia, the town's name and the liberation date. On the way home the Oregonian's lighter was confiscated in the US by the screeners. He showed them it had never had fluid in it, nor a flint; they took it anyway and wouldn't consider an exception. Upon returning home, the vet told his story to a relative or friend who then contacted one of the Oregon senators who tracked it down and had it returned to the veteran. A thought has been rattling around in my noggin' for a couple years: why doesn't the USPS, UPS or FedEx open offices in the airports specifically for the purpose of shipping items that would be confiscated at the checkpoints? Hell, they could even offer to hold the item at the recipient's closest terminal until a specific date the recipient would return to accept delivery. Granted, most items wouldn't be worth the shipping cost, but take the lighter or the Medal of Honor incidents. Or the special pair of sewing scissors Grandma received from Grandpa on their 50th? -- Owen Lowe The Fly-by-Night Copper Company __________ "I pledge allegiance to the flag of the Corporate States of America and to the Republicans for which it stands, one nation, under debt, easily divisible, with liberty and justice for oil." - Wiley Miller, Non Sequitur, 1/24/05 |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
Efficient security or Keystone Cops
Mark & Juanita wrote: On Mon, 07 Nov 2005 09:10:13 -0800, Larry Jaques wrote: On Sun, 06 Nov 2005 21:26:00 -0700, with neither quill nor qualm, Mark & Juanita quickly quoth: On Sun, 06 Nov 2005 06:14:33 -0800, Larry Jaques Oh, and just for the record, all those Al Quaeda boys are all sitting back doing absolutely NOTHING and watching us **** all over ourselves with this anti-terrorism thing. Unfortunately Larry, that's not entirely true. There are numerous accounts of various attempts to probe the security of our air system, one example: http://www.nationalreview.com/comment/morse200510260833.asp The clincher: No arrests & no known terrorists. If you're afraid of flying any more, Mark, don't. But no self-respecting terrorist g is going to be hijacking a U.S. plane at a time when so much scrutiny is placed on flying. They have MUCH easier targets which would cause much more damage to us. That said, the Syrians might be getting a wee bit anxious over King Shrub's potential invasion of their country, and anxiety can breed stupidity. We'll see. Besides, there's not a damn thing DHS could have done had they been real terrorists. That's the nature of terrorism. It can happen with as small a group as -one- person. It can happen anywhere, any time, and nobody can stop it. Vigilance is pretty much our sole defense. And if you look at the mess we have in the vigilance department now, we're in deep kimchee, dude. (We allowed Syrians in with expired passports, etc.) Wasting hundreds of billions of dollars while gaining absolutely nothing (and becoming the laughing stock of the entire world) is -not- my idea of a smart practice. YMMV You apparently missed my other post regarding the current window dressing approach being taken to airport security. Larry, flying doesn't scare me, I used ot love flying, now what I really, really, really hate is getting to the airplane. Blaming Bush for all this is convenient, but I guarantee you that had the other party won the White House and control of the congress, what you are seeing now would be a dream compared to the clamps they'd be putting on society right now. You cannot possibly "guarantee" such a thing. You THINK it MIGHT happen. Your answer is total speculation, based on beliefs you have that may or may not be accurate. |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Efficient security or Keystone Cops
On Mon, 07 Nov 2005 21:18:30 -0700, Mark & Juanita
wrote: Blaming Bush for all this is convenient, but I guarantee you that had the other party won the White House and control of the congress, what you are seeing now would be a dream compared to the clamps they'd be putting on society right now. And how do _you_ know this ? Your logic of "I admit Bush is bad, but it's all the fault of the Democrats" is simple blind partisanship and ridiculous. |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Efficient security or Keystone Cops
"Andy Dingley" wrote in message ... On Mon, 07 Nov 2005 21:18:30 -0700, Mark & Juanita wrote: Blaming Bush for all this is convenient, but I guarantee you that had the other party won the White House and control of the congress, what you are seeing now would be a dream compared to the clamps they'd be putting on society right now. And how do _you_ know this ? Your logic of "I admit Bush is bad, but it's all the fault of the Democrats" is simple blind partisanship and ridiculous. I'll tell you what's ridiculous. A bunch of whiners talking about how they want to be "protected" but not inconvenienced. Used to remind such people that I could only act after the law was broken, not before. What's worse, the lawbreaker was normally set free after great public expense in investigation, incarceration and trial. "First-time offender" doesn't mean a lot when considering successful suicide bombers. The real partisanship , as we should remember, was evidenced by those who wanted a bunch of _federalized_ screeners with the double immunity provided by union and government rather than folks who might be suspended or fired for their attitude or treatment of those they were supposed to serve. What was that about absolute power? |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Efficient security or Keystone Cops
On Mon, 07 Nov 2005 21:18:30 -0700, with neither quill nor qualm, Mark
& Juanita quickly quoth: On Mon, 07 Nov 2005 09:10:13 -0800, Larry Jaques wrote: Wasting hundreds of billions of dollars while gaining absolutely nothing (and becoming the laughing stock of the entire world) is -not- my idea of a smart practice. YMMV You apparently missed my other post regarding the current window dressing approach being taken to airport security. Larry, flying doesn't scare me, I used ot love flying, now what I really, really, really hate is getting to the airplane. Ditto that. Dog and pony shows, undressing, and pat-downs aren't supposed to be a part of the fun trip on an airplane. Takeoffs and landings are supposed to be the only exciting parts. Blaming Bush for all this is convenient, but I guarantee you that had the other party won the White House and control of the congress, what you are seeing now would be a dream compared to the clamps they'd be putting on society right now. Herr Shrub is acting like a member of that other party, Mark. What's the diff? Toss out ALL those bums. mega sigh ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Poverty is easy. * http://diversify.com It's Charity and Chastity that are hard. * Data-based Website Design ------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Efficient security or Keystone Cops
Charlie Self said:
From an email, called Junk Mail from Bob: Terrorists are Everywhere! snip Worse than that, your children are subversives... http://www.alternet.org/story/26503/ Pardon the source... Greg G. |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Efficient security or Keystone Cops
Greg G. wrote: Charlie Self said: From an email, called Junk Mail from Bob: Terrorists are Everywhere! snip Worse than that, your children are subversives... http://www.alternet.org/story/26503/ Pardon the source... I had read about this--it was a big topic for a week in photo NGs--and had one more disturbing thought, beyond the absolute arrogance of the WalMart employee, the local fuzz and the SS. It is OUR money paying for these idiots to act like this. |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
Efficient security or Keystone Cops
On 7 Nov 2005 09:36:23 -0800, with neither quill nor qualm, "Charlie
Self" quickly quoth: Larry Jaques wrote: Wasting hundreds of billions of dollars while gaining absolutely nothing (and becoming the laughing stock of the entire world) is -not- my idea of a smart practice. YMMV Oh, c'mon, Larry. If you had a piece of Halliburton the size of the one Cheney has waiting for him, and some major chunks of oil companies and Hummer makers, you'd be laughing at the rest of the world, just as our adminstration is doing. Alfred E. Neuman and the Sneer. What a combo. If Karl Rove ends up out of the picture, who is going pull the puppet's strings? What I want to know is "Who pulls Rove's strings?" ================================================== ============ Like peace and quiet? Buy a phoneless cord. http://www/diversify.com/stees.html Hilarious T-shirts online ================================================== ============ |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
Efficient security or Keystone Cops
Mark & Juanita wrote:
On 6 Nov 2005 01:50:11 -0800, "Charlie Self" wrote: From an email, called Junk Mail from Bob: Terrorists are Everywhere! Baltimore closed down tunnels last month. http://www.thewbalchannel.com/health...34/detail.html ... and snip of some more This is one area where I agree with you Charlie. This is a perfect example of our government learning exactly the wrong thing from an event. What 9/11 taught us was not that there were weapons on a plane that shouldn't have been there, what 9/11 taught us were two primary lessons: 1) there weren't enough private citizens on board those planes with the means to defend themselves, and more importantly 2) the claptrap mantra that, "in the event of a hijacking (or other crime), the victims should docilely go along with the thugs' wishes and no-one, or fewer people will get hurt" was proven to be the bogus bunch of hooey that it is. The people on the plane that went down in Pennsylvania got it, apparently the bureaucrats and government statists did not. Damn straight! Resist! The American flying public learned those lessons, thus the capture of the shoe-bomber (even though he was an apparent idiot) and several other instances in which, what would have been the victims in the past, have overpowered and subdued would-be hijackers. Indeed. It is very unlikely that a plane full of passengers will sit still for any type of attempt to take over a flight in the future. What the current stupidity and window dressing being done by the TSA goons is doing is taking away useful tools from those potential victims, meaning that the possibility for injury to themselves will be greater when dealing with better armed adversaries who have circumvented the window dressing. All the thugs have to do is look middle-eastern and well-lawyered and TSA won't touch them -- passing them through checkpoints with barely a glance to avoid any possible ramifications from the ACLU. This, I do not believe for a second. Instead the TSA will opt to strip search a few 90 year old grandmothers in wheelchairs or balding, middle-aged white guys in suits (or a few medal of honor winners). If any particular demographic is exempted from security then someone wishing to get a bomb on a plane merely has to trick a person from that demographic into carrying th bomb on for him. Of the last three aircraft destroyed in flight by bombs all three bombs were carried on by white women. A fourth attempt was thwarted--also a white woman. At least two of those four did not know they were carrying a bomb. -- FF |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
Efficient security or Keystone Cops
On Tue, 08 Nov 2005 13:01:51 +0000, Andy Dingley
wrote: On Mon, 07 Nov 2005 21:18:30 -0700, Mark & Juanita wrote: Blaming Bush for all this is convenient, but I guarantee you that had the other party won the White House and control of the congress, what you are seeing now would be a dream compared to the clamps they'd be putting on society right now. And how do _you_ know this ? This can certainly be inferred by the various actions proposed by members of that party. Who was it who pushed so hard that all federal baggage screeners should be federal employees? It can also be inferred by the reaction that members of that party have exhibited to other similar events. While many of the current republican party are exhibiting statist trends, with the exception of activities that tend toward what used to be called immorality, the reaction of the democrat party has always been statist -- more regulation, more government control,and less individual freedom in the realms of economic, political, or personal property rights. Your logic of "I admit Bush is bad, but it's all the fault of the Democrats" is simple blind partisanship and ridiculous. Nowhere in my post did is say "it's all the fault of the democrats". What I said was that the alternative to the current party in power would have been worse. ... and I'm not crazy about what the current party in power has done in this regard. +--------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ If you're gonna be dumb, you better be tough +--------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
Efficient security or Keystone Cops
On Tue, 08 Nov 2005 07:30:05 -0800, Larry Jaques
wrote: What's the diff? Toss out ALL those bums. mega sigh Smartest thing ever written in a political thread on usenet. -- "We need to make a sacrifice to the gods, find me a young virgin... oh, and bring something to kill" Tim Douglass http://www.DouglassClan.com |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
Efficient security or Keystone Cops
Fly-by-Night CC wrote: I A thought has been rattling around in my noggin' for a couple years: why doesn't the USPS, UPS or FedEx open offices in the airports specifically for the purpose of shipping items that would be confiscated at the checkpoints? Hell, they could even offer to hold the item at the recipient's closest terminal until a specific date the recipient would return to accept delivery. Granted, most items wouldn't be worth the shipping cost, but take the lighter or the Medal of Honor incidents. Or the special pair of sewing scissors Grandma received from Grandpa on their 50th? I recall seeing something like that at Cleveland Hopkins a while back. They had something like a vending machine that sold pre-paid padded envelopes and a place to drop them to be mailed. Dunno if it is still there. -- FF |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
CDC List (was Efficient security or Keystone Cops)
On Fri, 11 Nov 2005 12:20:39 -0800, with neither quill nor qualm, Tim
Douglass quickly quoth: On Tue, 08 Nov 2005 07:30:05 -0800, Larry Jaques wrote: What's the diff? Toss out ALL those bums. mega sigh Smartest thing ever written in a political thread on usenet. Thank you. This just in: CDC Bird Flu Symptom List ------------------------- The Center for Disease Control has released a list of symptoms of bird flu. If you experience any of the following, please seek medical treatment immediately: 1. High fever 2. Congestion 3. Nausea 4. Fatigue 5. Aching in the joints 6. An irresistible urge to **** on someone's windshield. (LJ note: There must be several different strains, as the urge is to **** on all politicians' heads.) ================================================== ============ Like peace and quiet? Buy a phoneless cord. http://www/diversify.com/stees.html Hilarious T-shirts online ================================================== ============ |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Two questions about security light above the garage door | Home Repair | |||
Euro-Meridian home security system | UK diy | |||
Johnny Carson, late-night TV legend, dies at 79 | Metalworking | |||
OT Guns more Guns | Metalworking |