On Tue, 08 Nov 2005 13:01:51 +0000, Andy Dingley
wrote:

On Mon, 07 Nov 2005 21:18:30 -0700, Mark & Juanita
wrote:

Blaming Bush for all this is convenient, but I guarantee you that had the
other party won the White House and control of the congress, what you are
seeing now would be a dream compared to the clamps they'd be putting on
society right now.

And how do _you_ know this ?

This can certainly be inferred by the various actions proposed by members
of that party. Who was it who pushed so hard that all federal baggage
screeners should be federal employees? It can also be inferred by the
reaction that members of that party have exhibited to other similar events.
While many of the current republican party are exhibiting statist trends,
with the exception of activities that tend toward what used to be called
immorality, the reaction of the democrat party has always been statist --
more regulation, more government control,and less individual freedom in the
realms of economic, political, or personal property rights.


Your logic of "I admit Bush is bad, but it's all the fault of the
Democrats" is simple blind partisanship and ridiculous.

Nowhere in my post did is say "it's all the fault of the democrats". What
I said was that the alternative to the current party in power would have
been worse. ... and I'm not crazy about what the current party in power
has done in this regard.


+--------------------------------------------------------------------------------+

If you're gonna be dumb, you better be tough

+--------------------------------------------------------------------------------+