Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#401
Posted to uk.d-i-y,uk.legal,uk.politics.misc
|
|||
|
|||
UNBELIEVABLE: It's 02:43 am in Australia and the Senie Ozzietard is out of Bed and TROLLING already!!!! LOL
On Wed, 11 Sep 2019 02:43:35 +1000, cantankerous trolling geezer Rodent
Speed, the auto-contradicting senile sociopath, blabbered, again: Which car model and year ? 02:43 am in Australia??? LMAO! Did you get out of bed just to ask that question, you forsaken senile troll from Australia? LOL -- Website (from 2007) dedicated to the 85-year-old trolling senile cretin from Oz: https://www.pcreview.co.uk/threads/r...d-faq.2973853/ |
#402
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
UNBELIEVABLE: It's Past THREE am in Australia and the Senie Ozzietard is out of Bed and TROLLING already!!!! LOL
On Wed, 11 Sep 2019 03:25:37 +1000, jeikppkywk, better known as cantankerous
trolling senile geezer Rodent Speed, wrote: FLUSH troll**** Seriously, 03:25 am in Australia? And you've been out of bed and trolling for almost an hour ALREADY? Life seems to be really miserable if one has absolutely NO ONE to talk and if NO ONE likes you, eh, senile Rodent? -- The Natural Philosopher about senile Rot: "Rod speed is not a Brexiteer. He is an Australian troll and arsehole." Message-ID: |
#403
Posted to uk.d-i-y,uk.legal,uk.politics.misc
|
|||
|
|||
UNBELIEVABLE: The Autistic Illiterate FORESKIN PEELER'S Grik hypocrisy at its BEST: It's 02:43 am in Australia and the Senie [sic][SIC!!! LOL] Ozzietard is out of Bed and TROLLING already!!!! LOL
On Tue, 10 Sep 2019 19:43:59 +0200, Foreskin Peeler
wrote: [FLUHS Grik skata]...and better air in here again! [sic][SIC!!! LOL] Watch, it geezer! MEAN WHILE, YOU have been known to stay up until 2 am STALKING this latest BENEFICIARY of your DEMENTED AUTISTIC OBSESSIONS! And missing your nightly GREEKING as a RESULT! Such a hypocrisy already! |
#404
Posted to uk.radio.amateur,uk.d-i-y,uk.legal
|
|||
|
|||
BoJo a million miles out of his depth
On 10/09/2019 11:38, Norman Wells wrote:
On 10/09/2019 11:05, Dave Plowman (News) wrote: In article , *** Fredxx wrote: You think the label will say 'The only way this product is suitable for human consumption was by the addition of chlorine'? It will probably say "enhanced cleanliness" or something similar. Do you drink water made "suitable for human consumption was by the addition of chlorine"? Good to know you can't see the difference between something which is necessary and something which isn't. If adding chlorine was necessary to make chicken safe to eat, why isn't it used in the UK? It isn't exactly safe to eat, not if you take preparation into account as part of that.* There are even official warnings about washing raw chicken under the tap for example: https://www.nhs.uk/live-well/eat-wel...h-raw-chicken/ Moreover, campylobacter, which is the commonest form of food poisoning in the UK, comes in the main from eating contaminated cooked chicken: You mean insufficiently cooked meat and stored at refrigerated, and above, temperatures. That rarely occurs when the chicken has been frozen. Why not ban fresh chicken? |
#405
Posted to uk.d-i-y,uk.legal,uk.politics.misc
|
|||
|
|||
It's REAL DUMB Pedophilic serb nazi Bitchslapping Time, AGAIN!
On Tue, 10 Sep 2019 11:28:27 -0700, clinically insane, pedophilic, serbian
bitch Razovic, the resident psychopath of sci and scj and Usenet's famous sexual cripple, making an ass of herself as "Grikbasterd", farted again: [FLUHS Grik skata]...and better air in here again! [sic][SIC!!! LOL] Watch, it geezer! MEAN WHILE, YOU have been known to stay up until 2 am STALKING this latest BENEFICIARY of your DEMENTED AUTISTIC OBSESSIONS! And missing your nightly GREEKING as a RESULT! Such a hypocrisy already! LOL Just HOW do you manage to sound like a clinically insane nutter ALL of the time, Retardovic? What's your secret? Is it because you ARE clinically insane? As if we didn't know it, eh, serb peasant? ROTFLOL -- Pedophilic dreckserb Razovic answering a question whether there is any meaningful debate to lower the age of consent: "If there isn't, there should be." MID: |
#406
Posted to uk.d-i-y,uk.legal,uk.politics.misc
|
|||
|
|||
UNBELIEVABLE: The Autistic Illiterate FORESKIN PEELER'S Grik hypocrisy at its BEST: It's 02:43 am in Australia and the Senie [sic][SIC!!! LOL] Ozzietard is out of Bed and TROLLING already!!!! LOL
On Tue, 10 Sep 2019 11:28:27 -0700, Grikbasterd?
wrote: On Tue, 10 Sep 2019 19:43:59 +0200, Foreskin Peeler wrote: [FLUHS Grik skata]...and better air in here again! [sic][SIC!!! LOL] Watch, it geezer! MEAN WHILE, YOU have been known to stay up until 2 am STALKING this latest BENEFICIARY of your DEMENTED AUTISTIC OBSESSIONS! And missing your nightly GREEKING as a RESULT! Such a hypocrisy already! Simply UNBELIEBABLE! |
#407
Posted to uk.d-i-y,uk.legal,uk.politics.misc
|
|||
|
|||
It's REAL DUMB Pedophilic serb nazi Bitchslapping Time, AGAIN!
On Tue, 10 Sep 2019 12:49:09 -0700, clinically insane, pedophilic, serbian
bitch Razovic, the resident psychopath of sci and scj and Usenet's famous sexual cripple, making an ass of herself as "NEMO", farted again: Simply UNBELIEBABLE! Your idiocy certainly is, pedophilic gay Razovic! -- Pedophilic dreckserb Razovic arguing in favour of pedophilia, again: "There will always be progressives such as Harriet Harperson who want to take that extra step forward. Paedophiles are still a long way from being widely accepted." MID: |
#408
Posted to uk.radio.amateur,uk.d-i-y,uk.legal
|
|||
|
|||
BoJo a million miles out of his depth
Fredxx wrote:
On 10/09/2019 11:38, Norman Wells wrote: On 10/09/2019 11:05, Dave Plowman (News) wrote: In article , *** Fredxx wrote: You think the label will say 'The only way this product is suitable for human consumption was by the addition of chlorine'? It will probably say "enhanced cleanliness" or something similar. Do you drink water made "suitable for human consumption was by the addition of chlorine"? Good to know you can't see the difference between something which is necessary and something which isn't. If adding chlorine was necessary to make chicken safe to eat, why isn't it used in the UK? It isn't exactly safe to eat, not if you take preparation into account as part of that.* There are even official warnings about washing raw chicken under the tap for example: https://www.nhs.uk/live-well/eat-wel...h-raw-chicken/ Moreover, campylobacter, which is the commonest form of food poisoning in the UK, comes in the main from eating contaminated cooked chicken: You mean insufficiently cooked meat and stored at refrigerated, and above, temperatures. That rarely occurs when the chicken has been frozen. Why not ban fresh chicken? Freezing doesnt kill bacteria. Problems often arise when food isnt fully defrosted and, as a result, not fully cooked in the normal cooking times / temperature etc. Take beef. If it has bacteria on the surface, not at all uncommon, an you freeze it, the bacteria remains on the surface. If you defrost the beef and BBQ it, even if you eat it rare, the cooking will almost certainly kill the surface bacteria and there is no problem. However, if you mince the beef, either before or after freezing, the bacteria which was on the surface is now distributed through the mince. Form it into burgers and cook as before and some bacteria can survive, unless you cook it thoroughly. |
#409
Posted to uk.radio.amateur,uk.d-i-y,uk.legal
|
|||
|
|||
BoJo a million miles out of his depth
"Tim Streater" wrote in message .. . In article , The Natural Philosopher wrote: On 09/09/2019 17:26, michael adams wrote: At least you do get the odd latin phrase thrown in, when you splash out 25K I suppose. Have you been billed for any refreshers yet? Anyone know what the twerp is talking about? Man spends 30,000 fighting 100 speeding fine https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-englan...ester-49641063 Please note: fine 100 Barristers Fees 21,000 Court Fees 8,000 So that basically this chap ended up paying this barrister 21,000 for the privilege of being told it would be well worth his while paying him, the barrister 21,000 and 8000 in Court fees simply in order to avoid a 100 speeding fine. And not only that but much of this took place in a Magistrates Court. Where they're more used to people representing themselves and so may well have made allowances, and where your 21,000 barrister won't even be allowed to wear his or her wig or gown. Ultra vires is an extremely important legal principle, like habeas corpus. It is the one case in which the law can say 'act as though legally that has never happened' Indeed. Wikipedia is a really great idea isn't it ? It allows clueless people to convince even more clueless people that they actually know what they're talking about. More especially if, as I say, latin phrases are involved, michael adams .... |
#410
Posted to uk.radio.amateur,uk.d-i-y,uk.legal
|
|||
|
|||
BoJo a million miles out of his depth
"Brian Reay" wrote in message ... However, if you mince the beef, either before or after freezing, the bacteria which was on the surface is now distributed through the mince. Indeed. It's a shame nobody had ever explained that to the 77 year old Michael Winner at some point in his life. Before he embarked on the three days in a row steak tartare binge which ultimately killed him. Having previously eaten a poisoned oyster in Barbados four years previously. michael adams .... |
#411
Posted to uk.radio.amateur,uk.d-i-y,uk.legal
|
|||
|
|||
BoJo a million miles out of his depth
On 10/09/2019 19:40, Fredxx wrote:
On 10/09/2019 11:38, Norman Wells wrote: On 10/09/2019 11:05, Dave Plowman (News) wrote: In article , *** Fredxx wrote: You think the label will say 'The only way this product is suitable for human consumption was by the addition of chlorine'? It will probably say "enhanced cleanliness" or something similar. Do you drink water made "suitable for human consumption was by the addition of chlorine"? Good to know you can't see the difference between something which is necessary and something which isn't. If adding chlorine was necessary to make chicken safe to eat, why isn't it used in the UK? It isn't exactly safe to eat, not if you take preparation into account as part of that.* There are even official warnings about washing raw chicken under the tap for example: https://www.nhs.uk/live-well/eat-wel...h-raw-chicken/ Moreover, campylobacter, which is the commonest form of food poisoning in the UK, comes in the main from eating contaminated cooked chicken: You mean insufficiently cooked meat and stored at refrigerated, and above, temperatures. That rarely occurs when the chicken has been frozen. Why not ban fresh chicken? Maybe we should. But it's a damning indictment of the safety of fresh chicken in the UK, and of the EU rules for its production, if we should, isn't it? |
#412
Posted to uk.d-i-y,uk.legal,uk.politics.misc
|
|||
|
|||
BoJo a million miles out of his depth
"Dan S. MacAbre" wrote in message ... tim... wrote: "Dave Plowman (News)" wrote in message ... In article , dennis@home wrote: On 09/09/2019 16:50, Dave Plowman (News) wrote: In article , tim... wrote: Want to say what it was? some emission sensor or other the actual emissions were fine, it was just the sensor that was buggerd Pattern ones are about 30. You shouldn't tell him that he likes to think the EU caused him to scrap the car and not stupidity. Oddly, it was the US that started emissions controls on cars, not the EU. Nothing to do with saving the planet, but to make things more comfortable around LA. And an MOT doesn't check emissions throughout an engine's range. but it does check that the sensor warning light is off Any condition I can think of that would cause the engine management light to come on would also result in a failure; MOT Failure or Engine Management failure? but I don't think that just having the light come on would, by itself, do so. Any mandatory waning light that is permanently on, is an MOT failure. The owner is expected to fix, whatever it is that has caused the light to come on. The excuse "I don't use the rear seats so the seat belt warning light wrong being on when no-one is sitting in the rear seats isn't a problem for me", doesn't wash. (and any warning light that doesn't come on at start up is also a failure - to avoid people just taking the bulb out, if that's even possible with integrate consoles) Although I'd be interested to hear of any possible examples where it might not. The engine management systems light comes on when it detects any of the sensors has failed. It matters not that the emission are still 100% correct. The failed sensor is enough HTH tim |
#413
Posted to uk.d-i-y,uk.legal,uk.politics.misc
|
|||
|
|||
BoJo a million miles out of his depth
"The Natural Philosopher" wrote in message ... On 10/09/2019 14:03, Dan S. MacAbre wrote: tim... wrote: "Dave Plowman (News)" wrote in message ... In article , dennis@home wrote: On 09/09/2019 16:50, Dave Plowman (News) wrote: In article , tim... wrote: Want to say what it was? some emission sensor or other the actual emissions were fine, it was just the sensor that was buggerd Pattern ones are about £30. You shouldn't tell him that he likes to think the EU caused him to scrap the car and not stupidity. Oddly, it was the US that started emissions controls on cars, not the EU. Nothing to do with saving the planet, but to make things more comfortable around LA. And an MOT doesn't check emissions throughout an engine's range. but it does check that the sensor warning light is off Any condition I can think of that would cause the engine management light to come on would also result in a failure; but I don't think that just having the light come on would, by itself, do so. Although I'd be interested to hear of any possible examples where it might not. Well some of the exhaust sensors can fail and the engine will run, just at high emissions for example. some sensors can fail and the engine will still run normally tim |
#414
Posted to uk.radio.amateur,uk.d-i-y,uk.legal
|
|||
|
|||
BoJo a million miles out of his depth
michael adams mjadams25@ukonline wrote:
"Brian Reay" wrote in message ... However, if you mince the beef, either before or after freezing, the bacteria which was on the surface is now distributed through the mince. Indeed. It's a shame nobody had ever explained that to the 77 year old Michael Winner at some point in his life. Before he embarked on the three days in a row steak tartare binge which ultimately killed him. It is a very popular dish in France and the Low Countries. Im surprised Remainers dont eat it every meal ;-) |
#415
Posted to uk.d-i-y,uk.legal,uk.politics.misc
|
|||
|
|||
BoJo a million miles out of his depth
On Wed, 11 Sep 2019 09:15:41 +0100, dim... wrote:
some sensors can fail dim ....not as much as your senile brain fails you, dim! BG |
#416
Posted to uk.radio.amateur,uk.d-i-y,uk.legal
|
|||
|
|||
BoJo a million miles out of his depth
On 11/09/2019 08:53, michael adams wrote:
"Tim Streater" wrote in message .. . In article , The Natural Philosopher wrote: On 09/09/2019 17:26, michael adams wrote: At least you do get the odd latin phrase thrown in, when you splash out 25K I suppose. Have you been billed for any refreshers yet? Anyone know what the twerp is talking about? Man spends £30,000 fighting £100 speeding fine https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-englan...ester-49641063 Please note: fine £100 Barristers Fees £21,000 Court Fees £8,000 So that basically this chap ended up paying this barrister £21,000 for the privilege of being told it would be well worth his while paying him, the barrister £21,000 and £8000 in Court fees simply in order to avoid a £100 speeding fine. And not only that but much of this took place in a Magistrates Court. Where they're more used to people representing themselves and so may well have made allowances, and where your £21,000 barrister won't even be allowed to wear his or her wig or gown. Ultra vires is an extremely important legal principle, like habeas corpus. It is the one case in which the law can say 'act as though legally that has never happened' Indeed. Wikipedia is a really great idea isn't it ? It allows clueless people to convince even more clueless people that they actually know what they're talking about. More especially if, as I say, latin phrases are involved, Since I fought a case on whiuch that issue was pertinent Michael,it is more than just a latin phrase. Your egotism exceeds your ignorance. michael adams ... -- But what a weak barrier is truth when it stands in the way of an hypothesis! Mary Wollstonecraft |
#417
Posted to uk.radio.amateur,uk.d-i-y,uk.legal
|
|||
|
|||
BoJo a million miles out of his depth
On 11/09/2019 08:54, michael adams wrote:
in a row steak tartare binge which ultimately killed him. Presumably that shoud be steaks in row rather than row steaks? Having previously eaten a poisoned oyster in Barbados four years previously. Shame it didnt kill you. What a plonquer. -- But what a weak barrier is truth when it stands in the way of an hypothesis! Mary Wollstonecraft |
#418
Posted to uk.d-i-y,uk.legal,uk.politics.misc
|
|||
|
|||
BoJo a million miles out of his depth
On 11/09/2019 09:11, tim... wrote:
The excuse "I don't use the rear seats so the seat belt warning light wrong being on when no-one is sitting in the rear seats isn't a problem for me", doesn't wash. hey failed my freelander for 'inoperable rear seat belt' They had I suspect DELIBERATELY pulled the belt out, twisted it 180 degrees and fed it back into the slot. Didnt tale lomg to strip the lining and untwist it. -- But what a weak barrier is truth when it stands in the way of an hypothesis! Mary Wollstonecraft |
#419
Posted to uk.d-i-y,uk.legal,uk.politics.misc
|
|||
|
|||
BoJo a million miles out of his depth
On 11/09/2019 09:15, tim... wrote:
"The Natural Philosopher" wrote in message ... On 10/09/2019 14:03, Dan S. MacAbre wrote: tim... wrote: "Dave Plowman (News)" wrote in message ... In article , * dennis@home wrote: On 09/09/2019 16:50, Dave Plowman (News) wrote: In article , **** tim... wrote: Want to say what it was? some emission sensor or other the actual emissions were fine, it was just the sensor that was buggerd Pattern ones are about £30. You shouldn't tell him that he likes to think the EU caused him to scrap the car and not stupidity. Oddly, it was the US that started emissions controls on cars, not the EU. Nothing to do with saving the planet, but to make things more comfortable around LA. And an MOT doesn't check emissions throughout an engine's range. but it does check that the sensor warning light is off Any condition I can think of that would cause the engine management light to come on would also result in a failure; but I don't think that just having the light come on would, by itself, do so.* Although I'd be interested to hear of any possible examples where it might not. Well some of the exhaust sensors can fail and the engine will run, just at high emissions for example. some sensors can fail and the engine will still run normally Then one might question why they are there at all. tim -- "And if the blind lead the blind, both shall fall into the ditch". Gospel of St. Mathew 15:14 |
#420
Posted to uk.radio.amateur,uk.d-i-y,uk.legal
|
|||
|
|||
BoJo a million miles out of his depth
"The Natural Philosopher" wrote in message ... On 11/09/2019 08:53, michael adams wrote: "Tim Streater" wrote in message .. . In article , The Natural Philosopher wrote: On 09/09/2019 17:26, michael adams wrote: At least you do get the odd latin phrase thrown in, when you splash out 25K I suppose. Have you been billed for any refreshers yet? Anyone know what the twerp is talking about? Man spends 30,000 fighting 100 speeding fine https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-englan...ester-49641063 Please note: fine 100 Barristers Fees 21,000 Court Fees 8,000 So that basically this chap ended up paying this barrister 21,000 for the privilege of being told it would be well worth his while paying him, the barrister 21,000 and 8000 in Court fees simply in order to avoid a 100 speeding fine. And not only that but much of this took place in a Magistrates Court. Where they're more used to people representing themselves and so may well have made allowances, and where your 21,000 barrister won't even be allowed to wear his or her wig or gown. Ultra vires is an extremely important legal principle, like habeas corpus. It is the one case in which the law can say 'act as though legally that has never happened' Indeed. Wikipedia is a really great idea isn't it ? It allows clueless people to convince even more clueless people that they actually know what they're talking about. More especially if, as I say, latin phrases are involved, Since I fought a case on whiuch that issue was pertinent Michael,it is more than just a latin phrase. So what case would that be ? michael adams .... |
#421
Posted to uk.radio.amateur,uk.d-i-y,uk.legal
|
|||
|
|||
BoJo a million miles out of his depth
"The Natural Philosopher" wrote in message ... On 11/09/2019 08:54, michael adams wrote: in a row steak tartare binge which ultimately killed him. Presumably that shoud be steaks in row rather than row steaks? It was a "three days in a row"steak tartare binge not three steaks in a row. He only had one steak on each day. The idea that you could possibly have ever won a Court case of any description as you're now claiming elsewhere, recedes by the minute. Unless of course you relied on forged documents mirroring your posting behaviour on here. Or bribed the other side to work an insurance scam maybe. michael adams .... |
#422
Posted to uk.radio.amateur,uk.d-i-y,uk.legal
|
|||
|
|||
BoJo a million miles out of his depth
"The Natural Philosopher" wrote in message ... On 11/09/2019 08:53, michael adams wrote: It allows clueless people to convince even more clueless people that they actually know what they're talking about. More especially if, as I say, latin phrases are involved, Since I fought a case on whiuch that issue was pertinent Michael,it is more than just a latin phrase. Your egotism er ego /ig, e-/ n. Pl. -os. E19. [L = I pron.] DNB I take you do know what the L denotes there ? michael adams .... |
#423
Posted to uk.radio.amateur,uk.d-i-y,uk.legal
|
|||
|
|||
BoJo a million miles out of his depth
On 11/09/2019 12:13, michael adams wrote:
"The Natural Philosopher" wrote in message ... On 11/09/2019 08:53, michael adams wrote: "Tim Streater" wrote in message .. . In article , The Natural Philosopher wrote: On 09/09/2019 17:26, michael adams wrote: At least you do get the odd latin phrase thrown in, when you splash out 25K I suppose. Have you been billed for any refreshers yet? Anyone know what the twerp is talking about? Man spends £30,000 fighting £100 speeding fine https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-englan...ester-49641063 Please note: fine £100 Barristers Fees £21,000 Court Fees £8,000 So that basically this chap ended up paying this barrister £21,000 for the privilege of being told it would be well worth his while paying him, the barrister £21,000 and £8000 in Court fees simply in order to avoid a £100 speeding fine. And not only that but much of this took place in a Magistrates Court. Where they're more used to people representing themselves and so may well have made allowances, and where your £21,000 barrister won't even be allowed to wear his or her wig or gown. Ultra vires is an extremely important legal principle, like habeas corpus. It is the one case in which the law can say 'act as though legally that has never happened' Indeed. Wikipedia is a really great idea isn't it ? It allows clueless people to convince even more clueless people that they actually know what they're talking about. More especially if, as I say, latin phrases are involved, Since I fought a case on whiuch that issue was pertinent Michael,it is more than just a latin phrase. So what case would that be ? None of your ****ing business michael adams ... -- You can get much farther with a kind word and a gun than you can with a kind word alone. Al Capone |
#424
Posted to uk.radio.amateur,uk.d-i-y,uk.legal
|
|||
|
|||
BoJo a million miles out of his depth
On 11/09/2019 12:24, michael adams wrote:
"The Natural Philosopher" wrote in message ... On 11/09/2019 08:54, michael adams wrote: in a row steak tartare binge which ultimately killed him. Presumably that shoud be steaks in row rather than row steaks? It was a "three days in a row"steak tartare binge not three steaks in a row. He only had one steak on each day. The idea that you could possibly have ever won a Court case of any description as you're now claiming elsewhere, recedes by the minute. Unless of course you relied on forged documents mirroring your posting behaviour on here. Or bribed the other side to work an insurance scam maybe. It is always nice to see how the Remain mind works -- You can get much farther with a kind word and a gun than you can with a kind word alone. Al Capone |
#425
Posted to uk.radio.amateur,uk.d-i-y,uk.legal
|
|||
|
|||
BoJo a million miles out of his depth
On 11/09/2019 12:27, michael adams wrote:
"The Natural Philosopher" wrote in message ... On 11/09/2019 08:53, michael adams wrote: It allows clueless people to convince even more clueless people that they actually know what they're talking about. More especially if, as I say, latin phrases are involved, Since I fought a case on whiuch that issue was pertinent Michael,it is more than just a latin phrase. Your egotism er ego /ig, e-/ n. Pl. -os. E19. [L = I pron.] DNB I take you do know what the L denotes there ? er https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Egotism Christ you are a thicker **** than I ever imagined possible michael adams ... -- You can get much farther with a kind word and a gun than you can with a kind word alone. Al Capone |
#426
Posted to uk.radio.amateur,uk.d-i-y,uk.legal
|
|||
|
|||
BoJo a million miles out of his depth
"The Natural Philosopher" wrote in message ... On 11/09/2019 12:24, michael adams wrote: "The Natural Philosopher" wrote in message ... On 11/09/2019 08:54, michael adams wrote: in a row steak tartare binge which ultimately killed him. Presumably that shoud be steaks in row rather than row steaks? It was a "three days in a row"steak tartare binge not three steaks in a row. He only had one steak on each day. The idea that you could possibly have ever won a Court case of any description as you're now claiming elsewhere, recedes by the minute. Unless of course you relied on forged documents mirroring your posting behaviour on here. Or bribed the other side to work an insurance scam maybe. It is always nice to see how the Remain mind works We can rely on the Majesty of the Law. Possibly you and Timmy can come up with something he can present to the Supreme Court next week, to get him out of the **** ? Misleading the Her Majesty the Queen ? Dear dear me ! michael adams .... |
#427
Posted to uk.radio.amateur,uk.d-i-y,uk.legal
|
|||
|
|||
BoJo a million miles out of his depth
"The Natural Philosopher" wrote in message ... On 11/09/2019 12:27, michael adams wrote: "The Natural Philosopher" wrote in message ... On 11/09/2019 08:53, michael adams wrote: It allows clueless people to convince even more clueless people that they actually know what they're talking about. More especially if, as I say, latin phrases are involved, Since I fought a case on whiuch that issue was pertinent Michael,it is more than just a latin phrase. Your egotism er ego /ig, e-/ n. Pl. -os. E19. [L = I pron.] DNB I take you do know what the L denotes there ? er https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Egotism Christ you are a thicker **** than I ever imagined possible Still snipping away I see. As if nobody would notice. Anyway here is what I actually posted - Indeed. Wikipedia is a really great idea isn't it ? It allows clueless people to convince even more clueless people that they actually know what they're talking about. michael adams .... |
#428
Posted to uk.radio.amateur,uk.d-i-y,uk.legal
|
|||
|
|||
BoJo a million miles out of his depth
"The Natural Philosopher" wrote in message ... Since I fought a case on whiuch that issue was pertinent Michael,it is more than just a latin phrase. So what case would that be ? None of your ****ing business Weren't you disputing a Parking Ticket in Cambridge at one time ? Is it that ? michael adams .... |
#429
Posted to uk.d-i-y,uk.legal,uk.politics.misc
|
|||
|
|||
BoJo a million miles out of his depth
In article ,
tim... wrote: Well some of the exhaust sensors can fail and the engine will run, just at high emissions for example. some sensors can fail and the engine will still run normally Which ones would those be? -- *Warning: Dates in Calendar are closer than they appear. Dave Plowman London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound. |
#430
Posted to uk.d-i-y,uk.legal,uk.politics.misc
|
|||
|
|||
BoJo a million miles out of his depth
In article ,
The Natural Philosopher wrote: On 11/09/2019 09:11, tim... wrote: The excuse "I don't use the rear seats so the seat belt warning light wrong being on when no-one is sitting in the rear seats isn't a problem for me", doesn't wash. hey failed my freelander for 'inoperable rear seat belt' They had I suspect DELIBERATELY pulled the belt out, twisted it 180 degrees and fed it back into the slot. Your paranoia is in overdrive today. Didnt tale lomg to strip the lining and untwist it. -- *Can atheists get insurance for acts of God? * Dave Plowman London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound. |
#431
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
BoJo a million miles out of his depth
On Tuesday, 10 September 2019 17:05:44 UTC+1, Norman Wells wrote:
On 10/09/2019 13:50, Dave Plowman (News) wrote: In article , Norman Wells wrote: If adding chlorine was necessary to make chicken safe to eat, why isn't it used in the UK? It isn't exactly safe to eat, not if you take preparation into account as part of that. There are even official warnings about washing raw chicken under the tap for example: I wasn't suggesting you eat it raw. Do you do this? It's pretty serious contamination if you're advised *not* to wash it first for fear of spreading the contamination around. It does sound a little weird. I think using the word never is a bit odd. perhaps you shouldn't wash yuor hands either after using the toilet as that too could spread bacteria in a similar way. And if you buy it raw, you'll be handling it, preparing it, and maybe even undercooking it. I'd wash it if I thought it needed it. It *must* be better to do what you can to reduce the contamination, and chlotrine washing is one cheap and effective way. It's daft not to. |
#432
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
BoJo a million miles out of his depth
On Tuesday, 10 September 2019 18:40:48 UTC+1, dennis@home wrote:
On 10/09/2019 13:24, whisky-dave wrote: Chlorine is used to wash salad in the EU. You mean tap water? No. Washing chicken in chlorine and other disinfectants to remove harmful bacteria was a practice banned by the European Union (EU) in 1997 over food safety concerns. ... Chlorine-rinsed bagged salads are common in the UK and other countries in the EU.5 Mar 2019 https://www.healthyfood.com/ask-the-...-and-chlorine/ |
#433
Posted to uk.d-i-y,uk.legal,uk.politics.misc
|
|||
|
|||
BoJo a million miles out of his depth
On Wed, 11 Sep 2019 13:30:13 +0100
"Dave Plowman (News)" wrote: In article , tim... wrote: Well some of the exhaust sensors can fail and the engine will run, just at high emissions for example. some sensors can fail and the engine will still run normally Which ones would those be? Not the crankshaft position sensor. But the emissions sensors generally provide feedback. If one fails, the engine light will come on and the engine management system will use the last available settings from when the sensor was working. In the long term, the engine will drift out of emissions spec. but it will go on running reasonably well for a while. Early engine management systems used a default set of values after sensor failure, which would generally get you home but was quite poor. It's a bit more sophisticated today. But to drift back to the topic, my current car has tyre pressure sensors, which are literally more trouble than they are worth, as they are worthless. They are not particularly accurate, and apparently put more wear and tear on valve bodies than formerly. I've had to replace two valves, at a cost of about thirty pounds, which have torn around the seating. Again, light on, MOT fail, regardless of the actual tyre pressures, which of course are a potential failure point in their own right. -- Joe |
#434
Posted to uk.radio.amateur,uk.d-i-y,uk.legal
|
|||
|
|||
BoJo a million miles out of his depth
On 11/09/2019 13:16, michael adams wrote:
"The Natural Philosopher" wrote in message ... On 11/09/2019 12:27, michael adams wrote: "The Natural Philosopher" wrote in message ... On 11/09/2019 08:53, michael adams wrote: It allows clueless people to convince even more clueless people that they actually know what they're talking about. More especially if, as I say, latin phrases are involved, Since I fought a case on whiuch that issue was pertinent Michael,it is more than just a latin phrase. Your egotism er ego /ig, e-/ n. Pl. -os. E19. [L = I pron.] DNB I take you do know what the L denotes there ? er https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Egotism Christ you are a thicker **** than I ever imagined possible Still snipping away I see. As if nobody would notice. Anyway here is what I actually posted - Indeed. Wikipedia is a really great idea isn't it ? It allows clueless people to convince even more clueless people that they actually know what they're talking about. So you admit that egotism is a word with whuch you are entirely uinfmailar then? michael adams ... -- The lifetime of any political organisation is about three years before its been subverted by the people it tried to warn you about. Anon. |
#435
Posted to uk.d-i-y,uk.legal,uk.politics.misc
|
|||
|
|||
BoJo a million miles out of his depth
In article ,
Joe wrote: On Wed, 11 Sep 2019 13:30:13 +0100 "Dave Plowman (News)" wrote: In article , tim... wrote: Well some of the exhaust sensors can fail and the engine will run, just at high emissions for example. some sensors can fail and the engine will still run normally Which ones would those be? Not the crankshaft position sensor. But the emissions sensors generally provide feedback. If one fails, the engine light will come on and the engine management system will use the last available settings from when the sensor was working. In the long term, the engine will drift out of emissions spec. but it will go on running reasonably well for a while. Not on my new car 6 years ago. Engine would tick over - but that was it. -- from KT24 in Surrey, England "I'd rather die of exhaustion than die of boredom" Thomas Carlyle |
#436
Posted to uk.d-i-y,uk.legal,uk.politics.misc
|
|||
|
|||
BoJo a million miles out of his depth
Joe wrote:
On Wed, 11 Sep 2019 13:30:13 +0100 "Dave Plowman (News)" wrote: In article , tim... wrote: Well some of the exhaust sensors can fail and the engine will run, just at high emissions for example. some sensors can fail and the engine will still run normally Which ones would those be? Not the crankshaft position sensor. Possibly the worst one to go :-) But the emissions sensors generally provide feedback. If one fails, the engine light will come on and the engine management system will use the last available settings from when the sensor was working. In the long term, the engine will drift out of emissions spec. but it will go on running reasonably well for a while. Early engine management systems used a default set of values after sensor failure, which would generally get you home but was quite poor. It's a bit more sophisticated today. But to drift back to the topic, my current car has tyre pressure sensors, which are literally more trouble than they are worth, as they are worthless. They are not particularly accurate, and apparently put more wear and tear on valve bodies than formerly. I've had to replace two valves, at a cost of about thirty pounds, which have torn around the seating. Again, light on, MOT fail, regardless of the actual tyre pressures, which of course are a potential failure point in their own right. Did you have an actual fail for a tyre pressure warning? That seems a bit harsh, unless they are are obviously visually low. |
#437
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
BoJo a million miles out of his depth
whisky-dave wrote:
On Tuesday, 10 September 2019 17:05:44 UTC+1, Norman Wells wrote: On 10/09/2019 13:50, Dave Plowman (News) wrote: In article , Norman Wells wrote: If adding chlorine was necessary to make chicken safe to eat, why isn't it used in the UK? It isn't exactly safe to eat, not if you take preparation into account as part of that. There are even official warnings about washing raw chicken under the tap for example: I wasn't suggesting you eat it raw. Do you do this? It's pretty serious contamination if you're advised *not* to wash it first for fear of spreading the contamination around. It does sound a little weird. I think using the word never is a bit odd. perhaps you shouldn't wash yuor hands either after using the toilet as that too could spread bacteria in a similar way. And if you buy it raw, you'll be handling it, preparing it, and maybe even undercooking it. I'd wash it if I thought it needed it. It *must* be better to do what you can to reduce the contamination, and chlotrine washing is one cheap and effective way. It's daft not to. The idea behind not washing chicken, especially previously frozen chicken, in particular under a tap ( as was once recommended, is that you may splash contaminated water around and not clean it up. Any bacteria on the surface of the chicken, including the body cavity, should be killed by proper cooking. Problems arise if the chicken isnt fully defrosted and therefore doesnt reach the correct temperature everywhere or isnt cooked long enough or at a high enough temperature. |
#438
Posted to uk.radio.amateur,uk.d-i-y,uk.legal
|
|||
|
|||
BoJo a million miles out of his depth
"The Natural Philosopher" wrote in message ... On 11/09/2019 13:16, michael adams wrote: "The Natural Philosopher" wrote in message ... On 11/09/2019 12:27, michael adams wrote: "The Natural Philosopher" wrote in message ... On 11/09/2019 08:53, michael adams wrote: It allows clueless people to convince even more clueless people that they actually know what they're talking about. More especially if, as I say, latin phrases are involved, Since I fought a case on whiuch that issue was pertinent Michael,it is more than just a latin phrase. Your egotism er ego /ig, e-/ n. Pl. -os. E19. [L = I pron.] DNB I take you do know what the L denotes there ? er https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Egotism Christ you are a thicker **** than I ever imagined possible Still snipping away I see. As if nobody would notice. Anyway here is what I actually posted - Indeed. Wikipedia is a really great idea isn't it ? It allows clueless people to convince even more clueless people that they actually know what they're talking about. So you admit that egotism is a word with whuch you are entirely uinfmailar then? Er no. Because in this case, your citing of Wikipedia failed to convince me that you know what you're talking about. ( Which to be fair would be a diffiicult enough job under any circumstances) Had I been even more clueless then you are, then your conclusion would indeed be correct. But I'm not, so it isn't. Anyway how is Boris's defence coming along ? ( At this point I'd like to express a sincere vote of thanks to all those members of the Conservative Party who voted for Boris as leader of their Party for providing unparalleled entertainment ever since he was elected, What with Mr Pastry getting the bullet from Trtump it's been quite a week so far. michael adams .... |
#439
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
BoJo a million miles out of his depth
On Wednesday, 11 September 2019 15:23:04 UTC+1, Brian Reay wrote:
whisky-dave wrote: On Tuesday, 10 September 2019 17:05:44 UTC+1, Norman Wells wrote: On 10/09/2019 13:50, Dave Plowman (News) wrote: In article , Norman Wells wrote: If adding chlorine was necessary to make chicken safe to eat, why isn't it used in the UK? It isn't exactly safe to eat, not if you take preparation into account as part of that. There are even official warnings about washing raw chicken under the tap for example: I wasn't suggesting you eat it raw. Do you do this? It's pretty serious contamination if you're advised *not* to wash it first for fear of spreading the contamination around. It does sound a little weird. I think using the word never is a bit odd. perhaps you shouldn't wash yuor hands either after using the toilet as that too could spread bacteria in a similar way. And if you buy it raw, you'll be handling it, preparing it, and maybe even undercooking it. I'd wash it if I thought it needed it. It *must* be better to do what you can to reduce the contamination, and chlotrine washing is one cheap and effective way. It's daft not to. The idea behind not washing chicken, especially previously frozen chicken, in particular under a tap ( as was once recommended, is that you may splash contaminated water around and not clean it up. That goes for any product, including me washing my hands after I've fed the cat or had a crap. This sort of thing wss bought up a coupe of years ago regarding the new (then ) dyson hand dryers as they were blowing the water off peoples hands adn then into their face as you swiviled the nozel. Well at least I worked out the possible problems and said I didn't like them so I avioded toilets with them in. we have the new versions now which blow the water back onto the grion area of your trousers. https://www.dyson.co.uk/hand-dryers.html The right hand side version. Any bacteria on the surface of the chicken, including the body cavity, should be killed by proper cooking. Problems arise if the chicken isnt fully defrosted and therefore doesnt reach the correct temperature everywhere or isnt cooked long enough or at a high enough temperature. Stanard for most meats isn't it. |
#440
Posted to uk.d-i-y,uk.legal,uk.politics.misc
|
|||
|
|||
BoJo a million miles out of his depth
In article ,
Joe wrote: On Wed, 11 Sep 2019 13:30:13 +0100 "Dave Plowman (News)" wrote: In article , tim... wrote: Well some of the exhaust sensors can fail and the engine will run, just at high emissions for example. some sensors can fail and the engine will still run normally Which ones would those be? Not the crankshaft position sensor. On some makes, the cam position sensor can take over when the CPS fails, and allow the engine to run in limp home mode. But the emissions sensors generally provide feedback. If one fails, the engine light will come on and the engine management system will use the last available settings from when the sensor was working. In the long term, the engine will drift out of emissions spec. but it will go on running reasonably well for a while. True. Depends on what you mean by run normally. Early engine management systems used a default set of values after sensor failure, which would generally get you home but was quite poor. It's a bit more sophisticated today. But to drift back to the topic, my current car has tyre pressure sensors, which are literally more trouble than they are worth, as they are worthless. They are not particularly accurate, and apparently put more wear and tear on valve bodies than formerly. I've had to replace two valves, at a cost of about thirty pounds, which have torn around the seating. Again, light on, MOT fail, regardless of the actual tyre pressures, which of course are a potential failure point in their own right. -- *If work is so terrific, how come they have to pay you to do it? Dave Plowman London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
BoJo a million miles out of his depth | UK diy |