On 10/09/2019 11:38, Norman Wells wrote:
On 10/09/2019 11:05, Dave Plowman (News) wrote:
In article ,
Â*Â*Â* Fredxx wrote:
You think the label will say 'The only way this product is suitable for
human consumption was by the addition of chlorine'?

It will probably say "enhanced cleanliness" or something similar. Do you
drink water made "suitable for human consumption was by the addition of
chlorine"?

Good to know you can't see the difference between something which is
necessary and something which isn't.

If adding chlorine was necessary to make chicken safe to eat, why
isn't it
used in the UK?

It isn't exactly safe to eat, not if you take preparation into account
as part of that.Â* There are even official warnings about washing raw
chicken under the tap for example:

https://www.nhs.uk/live-well/eat-wel...h-raw-chicken/

Moreover, campylobacter, which is the commonest form of food poisoning
in the UK, comes in the main from eating contaminated cooked chicken:

You mean insufficiently cooked meat and stored at refrigerated, and
above, temperatures. That rarely occurs when the chicken has been frozen.

Why not ban fresh chicken?