"The Natural Philosopher" wrote in message
...
On 11/09/2019 13:16, michael adams wrote:
"The Natural Philosopher" wrote in message
...
On 11/09/2019 12:27, michael adams wrote:
"The Natural Philosopher" wrote in message
...
On 11/09/2019 08:53, michael adams wrote:
It allows clueless people to convince even more clueless
people that they actually know what they're talking about.
More especially if, as I say, latin phrases are involved,
Since I fought a case on whiuch that issue was pertinent Michael,it is more than
just
a
latin phrase.
Your egotism
er ego /ig, e-/ n. Pl. -os. E19. [L = I pron.] DNB
I take you do know what the L denotes there ?
er
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Egotism
Christ you are a thicker **** than I ever imagined possible
Still snipping away I see. As if nobody would notice. Anyway here
is what I actually posted -
Indeed. Wikipedia is a really great idea isn't it ?
It allows clueless people to convince even more clueless
people that they actually know what they're talking about.
So you admit that egotism is a word with whuch you are entirely uinfmailar then?
Er no.
Because in this case, your citing of Wikipedia failed to convince
me that you know what you're talking about.
( Which to be fair would be a diffiicult enough job under any circumstances)
Had I been even more clueless then you are, then your conclusion
would indeed be correct.
But I'm not, so it isn't.
Anyway how is Boris's defence coming along ?
( At this point I'd like to express a sincere vote of thanks to all those
members of the Conservative Party who voted for Boris as
leader of their Party for providing unparalleled entertainment
ever since he was elected, What with Mr Pastry getting the
bullet from Trtump it's been quite a week so far.
michael adams
....