Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
UK diy (uk.d-i-y) For the discussion of all topics related to diy (do-it-yourself) in the UK. All levels of experience and proficency are welcome to join in to ask questions or offer solutions. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
B&Q (OT rant)
Saw a battery operated hand held fan with rows of LEDs at the check-out
today. I wondered who thought that a Chinese factory should bother making such a daft thing and then ship it half way around the world so that we end up putting it in our land-fill sites. We have people getting up-tight about carbon footprints and renewable sources - yet we appear to be encouraging ridiculous production that uses up resources without adding to the value of life of the person buying it. We should be putting resources (including transportation) into useful things - not tat. John |
#2
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
B&Q (OT rant)
"John" wrote We have people getting up-tight about carbon footprints and renewable sources - If any of said people were serious about the issue, we wouldn't have Tescos etc using strong arm methods to put local shops out of business. Local shops provide excellent service for single/retire people and families doing in-between shops. Taking travelling cost into account, they are not that much more expensive (if used with caution). Tescos would have us believe that a local shop is defined as one that is reachable by women in 4x4s in under half an hour! Similarly OT rant over Phil |
#3
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
B&Q (OT rant)
TheScullster wrote:
"John" wrote We have people getting up-tight about carbon footprints and renewable sources - If any of said people were serious about the issue, we wouldn't have Tescos etc using strong arm methods to put local shops out of business. People do not *have* to shop in Tesco. Si |
#4
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
B&Q (OT rant)
"TheScullster" wrote in message news "John" wrote We have people getting up-tight about carbon footprints and renewable sources - If any of said people were serious about the issue, we wouldn't have Tescos etc using strong arm methods to put local shops out of business. Local shops provide excellent service for single/retire people and families doing in-between shops. Taking travelling cost into account, they are not that much more expensive (if used with caution). Tescos would have us believe that a local shop is defined as one that is reachable by women in 4x4s in under half an hour! Similarly OT rant over Phil ....and once the local shops have disappeared Tesco will start increasing their prices. This is certainly what happened with DIY shops when B&Q, Focus and others muscled the local shop out of business. (although I still have an excellent one near me) |
#5
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
B&Q (OT rant)
On Mon, 14 May 2007 17:24:42 +0100 TheScullster wrote :
If any of said people were serious about the issue, we wouldn't have Tescos etc using strong arm methods to put local shops out of business. Local people put local shops out of business when they stop using them. Local shops provide excellent service for single/retire people and families doing in-between shops. Taking travelling cost into account, they are not that much more expensive (if used with caution). On the sorts of things I buy the local shop is 20-30% more expensive than Tesco. -- Tony Bryer SDA UK 'Software to build on' http://www.sda.co.uk |
#6
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
B&Q (OT rant)
Mungo "Two Sheds" Toadfoot wrote:
People do not *have* to shop in Tesco. And for those that want to, they will deliver. One van, 20 customers is way better than one car per customer. -- Cheers, John. /================================================== ===============\ | Internode Ltd - http://www.internode.co.uk | |-----------------------------------------------------------------| | John Rumm - john(at)internode(dot)co(dot)uk | \================================================= ================/ |
#7
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
B&Q (OT rant)
In article ,
TheScullster wrote: If any of said people were serious about the issue, we wouldn't have Tescos etc using strong arm methods to put local shops out of business. Local shops provide excellent service for single/retire people and families doing in-between shops. Taking travelling cost into account, they are not that much more expensive (if used with caution). Strangely it wasn't the large supermarkets that killed off my local grocer type shops but the Tesco Metro. It's no larger than some of the previous competition, but provides exactly what I, as a single person, want. Ignoring price too. Previously, the local shops seemed only to sell what they wanted to sell rather than what I actually wanted to buy. What do I want from this sort of shop? A selection of decent fresh produce. Possibly ready made main courses of good quality if I'm in a hurry. And the fact they have a car park is a big plus. -- *7up is good for you, signed snow white* Dave Plowman London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound. |
#8
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
B&Q (OT rant)
In article ,
Tony Bryer wrote: On Mon, 14 May 2007 17:24:42 +0100 TheScullster wrote : If any of said people were serious about the issue, we wouldn't have Tescos etc using strong arm methods to put local shops out of business. Local people put local shops out of business when they stop using them. Out of the several that used to be round here, few provided a pleasant shopping experience - mainly through surly staff on the till. The local small Tesco types seem to manage a smile. I'd have thought that more difficult for an employee than owner. Local shops provide excellent service for single/retire people and families doing in-between shops. Taking travelling cost into account, they are not that much more expensive (if used with caution). On the sorts of things I buy the local shop is 20-30% more expensive than Tesco. My main complaint was of poor selection and quality. In the 'convenience' stores. Sure if you had the time to traipse round several specialist shops - baker, greengrocer, butcher, etc you could get decent quality. But generally I can't be bothered. -- *Remember not to forget that which you do not need to know.* Dave Plowman London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound. |
#9
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
B&Q (OT rant)
Owain wrote:
I think about half the people in my computing class do that. They're over 80 and a bit bewildered, but getting there slowly and very enthusiastic. Is this a class you attend yourself or teach? -- Cheers, John. /================================================== ===============\ | Internode Ltd - http://www.internode.co.uk | |-----------------------------------------------------------------| | John Rumm - john(at)internode(dot)co(dot)uk | \================================================= ================/ |
#10
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
B&Q (OT rant)
Owain wrote:
TheScullster wrote: Local shops provide excellent service for single/retire people No they don't. They take far too long to get round for single people and don't open long enough hours (usually). For oldies, Tesco means they can get everything they need under one roof without having to go out in the cold and wet, they can have a snack in the cafe and there are nice clean loos and a freephone for the taxi home. Or there's online ordering and home delivery - I think about half the people in my computing class do that. They're over 80 and a bit bewildered, but getting there slowly and very enthusiastic. Owain Zactly. Our 24 hour Tescos are like Dawn of the Dead at 6am. The coffin dodgers love 'em! Si |
#11
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
B&Q (OT rant)
Dave Plowman (News) wrote:
Strangely it wasn't the large supermarkets that killed off my local grocer type shops but the Tesco Metro. It's no larger than some of the previous competition, but provides exactly what I, as a single person, want. Ignoring price too. Previously, the local shops seemed only to sell what they wanted to sell rather than what I actually wanted to buy. What do I want from this sort of shop? A selection of decent fresh produce. Possibly ready made main courses of good quality if I'm in a hurry. And the fact they have a car park is a big plus. Supermarkets just do things right. Owners of all small shops had the opportunity to do that too, but only a few of them did. Jack Cohen, for one, who started with a market stall. Si |
#12
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
B&Q (OT rant)
"John Rumm" wrote in message ... Mungo "Two Sheds" Toadfoot wrote: People do not *have* to shop in Tesco. And for those that want to, they will deliver. One van, 20 customers is way better than one car per customer. Unless, like me, going to Tesco adds about 200 yards to a journey I make every day anyway. Colin Bignell |
#13
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
B&Q (OT rant)
"John" wrote in message ... Saw a battery operated hand held fan with rows of LEDs at the check-out today. I wondered who thought that a Chinese factory should bother making such a daft thing and then ship it half way around the world so that we end up putting it in our land-fill sites. If it didn't sell, they wouldn't import them and shipping a container halfway around the world takes less fuel than driving it from one end of the country to the other. We have people getting up-tight about carbon footprints and renewable sources - yet we appear to be encouraging ridiculous production that uses up resources without adding to the value of life of the person buying it. The people who buy them must disagree with that, or they wouldn't buy them. Colin Bignell |
#14
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
B&Q (OT rant)
Mungo "Two Sheds" Toadfoot wrote:
Dave Plowman (News) wrote: Strangely it wasn't the large supermarkets that killed off my local grocer type shops but the Tesco Metro. It's no larger than some of the previous competition, but provides exactly what I, as a single person, want. Ignoring price too. Previously, the local shops seemed only to sell what they wanted to sell rather than what I actually wanted to buy. What do I want from this sort of shop? A selection of decent fresh produce. Possibly ready made main courses of good quality if I'm in a hurry. And the fact they have a car park is a big plus. Supermarkets just do things right. Owners of all small shops had the opportunity to do that too, but only a few of them did. Jack Cohen, for one, who started with a market stall. At last the voice of reason! Why are Tesco et al so successful? They give the punters what they want. We had a 'corner shop'. Closed on Wednesday arvo, hugely expensive, very basic stock - mostly past its sell by date, surly staff, smelled like a Turkish Brothel (alledgedly). It closed a few years ago. Since January we have a Tesco Metro 300 yards away - open 6am till midnight, fresh produce, good selection, ample parking, cheap petrol, wide variety, nice staff, good prices. Simple innit? -- Dave The Medway Handyman www.medwayhandyman.co.uk 01634 717930 07850 597257 |
#15
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
B&Q (OT rant)
Owain wrote:
Is this a class you attend yourself or teach? Sauce! I'm much more bewildered than they are. Thought that might be the case, but the way you worded it... ;-) It's a class I voluntarily "buddy". I got one of them inserting clipart into headers and footers in Word today. I spent 45mins one trying to get an en-dash into header in word 97 once... it crashed every time! -- Cheers, John. /================================================== ===============\ | Internode Ltd - http://www.internode.co.uk | |-----------------------------------------------------------------| | John Rumm - john(at)internode(dot)co(dot)uk | \================================================= ================/ |
#16
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
B&Q (OT rant)
The Medway Handyman wrote:
At last the voice of reason! Why are Tesco et al so successful? They give the punters what they want. Yus. I fail to see why, when people demonstrate against a new supermarket, they don't just ignore it and continue to use their existing shops. The reason appears to be that *most* people *do* want a supermarket local to them, but perhaps are currently forced to use ****e local shops where they wait an hour to be served whilst knitting patterns are discussed at length by the mad tivvies behind the counter. If a community was entirely happy with their shopping arrangements prior to said supermarket opening surely it would be forced to close soon enough? Even Dave "I fookin' 'ate Tesco, me!" Fawthrop uses Tesco when he "has to"! Si |
#17
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
B&Q (OT rant)
On Tue, 15 May 2007 02:51:12 +0100 John Rumm wrote :
I spent 45mins one trying to get an en-dash into header in word 97 once... it crashed every time! I use Lotus WordPro for virtually all my wordprocessing but switched one of our software manuals over to Word 2003 as I felt that I ought to acquire some competence at using it, and using it on a real document was the way to do this. I really cannot believe how poor it is in many respects compared with WordPro; this is not just unfamiliarity. Little gems like this "When you delete a section break, or move an entire section to another part of the document, you get what seem to be very strange results. For instance, deleting a Continuous section break causes the preceding Next Page section break to convert to a Continuous one, or deleting a section break causes an important Header to disappear from the document, or causes the entire document to become landscape.. I agree it's confusing, but it's “by design”." I write computer software; I do my best to make it usable. But when an MVP (Microsoft guru) is reduced to saying "I agree it's confusing" I just shake my head in disbelief. No doubt BillG will tell me that the answer is to buy Office 2007 - cheap for home users, rip-off price for businesses who want to be legal. -- Tony Bryer SDA UK 'Software to build on' http://www.sda.co.uk |
#18
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
B&Q (OT rant)
On May 14, 5:48 pm, "John" wrote:
"TheScullster" wrote in message news "John" wrote We have people getting up-tight about carbon footprints and renewable sources - If any of said people were serious about the issue, we wouldn't have Tescos etc using strong arm methods to put local shops out of business. Local shops provide excellent service for single/retire people and families doing in-between shops. Taking travelling cost into account, they are not that much more expensive (if used with caution). Tescos would have us believe that a local shop is defined as one that is reachable by women in 4x4s in under half an hour! Similarly OT rant over Phil ...and once the local shops have disappeared Tesco will start increasing their prices. This is certainly what happened with DIY shops when B&Q, Focus and others muscled the local shop out of business. (although I still have an excellent one near me)- So then you go shop at Sainsbury or somewhere else. Competition isn't just against the local shops. There are still plenty of local "happy shopper" type places around but they do not even attempt to compete on price with supermarkets. MBQ |
#19
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
B&Q (OT rant)
On May 14, 7:39 pm, Owain wrote:
TheScullster wrote: Local shops provide excellent service for single/retire people No they don't. They take far too long to get round for single people and don't open long enough hours (usually). For oldies, Tesco means they can get everything they need under one roof without having to go out in the cold and wet, they can have a snack in the cafe and there are nice clean loos and a freephone for the taxi home. Or a bus stop for the free bus that is very often provided. MBQ |
#20
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
B&Q (OT rant)
Tony Bryer wrote:
shake my head in disbelief. No doubt BillG will tell me that the answer is to buy Office 2007 - cheap for home users, rip-off price for businesses who want to be legal. From a "confusing" POV that may in fact not be a bad idea. The latest version has a radically different UI that is claimed to be better if you are learning it from scratch. (not so good if you need to un-learn the old version first. I often find it surprising just how poor it is. You can tell that a large proportion of the userbase must just use it to knock out 3 page memos and letters. Doing complex techie documents on it is march harder than in word perfect. -- Cheers, John. /================================================== ===============\ | Internode Ltd - http://www.internode.co.uk | |-----------------------------------------------------------------| | John Rumm - john(at)internode(dot)co(dot)uk | \================================================= ================/ |
#21
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
B&Q (OT rant)
John Rumm wrote:
Tony Bryer wrote: shake my head in disbelief. No doubt BillG will tell me that the answer is to buy Office 2007 - cheap for home users, rip-off price for businesses who want to be legal. From a "confusing" POV that may in fact not be a bad idea. The latest version has a radically different UI that is claimed to be better if you are learning it from scratch. (not so good if you need to un-learn the old version first. I often find it surprising just how poor it is. You can tell that a large proportion of the userbase must just use it to knock out 3 page memos and letters. Doing complex techie documents on it is march harder than in word perfect. Indeed. I never use word without managing to turn the air blue. It has so many invisible hidden formatting gotchas that one is either in the position of spending hours setting up styles, and adhering rigidly to them, or not using them at all. What You See is What you Get, is fine enough, but it would be nice for once if What You Got was What You Typed, and not what some nerd in Seattle thought you *ought* to have typed. |
#22
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
B&Q (OT rant)
On Tue, 15 May 2007 10:48:34 +0100 Mungo "Two Sheds" Toadfoot wrote :
Yus. I fail to see why, when people demonstrate against a new supermarket, they don't just ignore it and continue to use their existing shops. The reason appears to be that *most* people *do* want a supermarket local to them, but perhaps are currently forced to use ****e local shops where they wait an hour to be served whilst knitting patterns are discussed at length by the mad tivvies behind the counter. If a community was entirely happy with their shopping arrangements prior to said supermarket opening surely it would be forced to close soon enough? As in many planning stories, "the view of the community" is usually the view of a vociferous subset. When our local Great Mills, now Wickes was up for PP the campaign against it was on two fronts: "No one wants it" and "When it opens it will bring traffic chaos to the area". The evident contradiction between these two was lost on most people. -- Tony Bryer SDA UK 'Software to build on' http://www.sda.co.uk |
#23
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
B&Q (OT rant)
Owain wrote:
Mungo "Two Sheds" Toadfoot wrote: For oldies, Tesco means they can get everything they need under one roof without having to go out in the cold and wet, they can have a snack in the cafe and there are nice clean loos and a freephone for the taxi home. Zactly. Our 24 hour Tescos are like Dawn of the Dead at 6am. The coffin dodgers love 'em! Mobility scooter racing in the frozen foods aisle? More like slow-motion dithering and staring at mince. Old people can stare at mince for *ages*. I don't know what they think it's going to do. Si |
#24
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
B&Q (OT rant)
Mungo "Two Sheds" Toadfoot wrote:
Owain wrote: Mungo "Two Sheds" Toadfoot wrote: For oldies, Tesco means they can get everything they need under one roof without having to go out in the cold and wet, they can have a snack in the cafe and there are nice clean loos and a freephone for the taxi home. Zactly. Our 24 hour Tescos are like Dawn of the Dead at 6am. The coffin dodgers love 'em! Mobility scooter racing in the frozen foods aisle? More like slow-motion dithering and staring at mince. Old people can stare at mince for *ages*. I don't know what they think it's going to do. Si They are waiting for it to get near enough its sell by date to be marked down... |
#25
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
B&Q (OT rant)
The Natural Philosopher wrote:
Mungo "Two Sheds" Toadfoot wrote: Owain wrote: Mungo "Two Sheds" Toadfoot wrote: For oldies, Tesco means they can get everything they need under one roof without having to go out in the cold and wet, they can have a snack in the cafe and there are nice clean loos and a freephone for the taxi home. Zactly. Our 24 hour Tescos are like Dawn of the Dead at 6am. The coffin dodgers love 'em! Mobility scooter racing in the frozen foods aisle? More like slow-motion dithering and staring at mince. Old people can stare at mince for *ages*. I don't know what they think it's going to do. They are waiting for it to get near enough its sell by date to be marked down... LOL! Well done Si |
#26
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
B&Q (OT rant)
Huge wrote:
Indeed. I never use word without managing to turn the air blue. I'm glad it's not just me, then. I was about to say that! I worked in Tech Pubs for some years, and Word is a heap of cack for complex techie documents. Too right. Especially when you need a group of related documents and want to try cross reference tables that reach between documents. I have not yet found a way in word of doing something that was easy in WP - Say you have a engineering change request form that updates a doc. When you issue the new version of the doc, you need to produce a version summary in the front of the doc that states which change requests have been implemented in this version, and which pages were affected. In WP I would mark a target called say SCR0245 (matching the change request ID), and drop that target next to each change I made. Then in the summary you can put in a auto reference to page numbers and it gives you a nice list of every page number with that target on it. And you can then compare the doc against the previous version and have it redline or sidebar the changes as well. (Actually, it's just a heap of cack, period.) So it seems. -- Cheers, John. /================================================== ===============\ | Internode Ltd - http://www.internode.co.uk | |-----------------------------------------------------------------| | John Rumm - john(at)internode(dot)co(dot)uk | \================================================= ================/ |
#27
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
B&Q (OT rant)
On May 15, 12:40 pm, Tony Bryer wrote:
As in many planning stories, "the view of the community" is usually the view of a vociferous subset. When our local Great Mills, now Wickes was up for PP the campaign against it was on two fronts: "No one wants it" and "When it opens it will bring traffic chaos to the area". The evident contradiction between these two was lost on most people. There's not necessarilly any contradiction in those fronts at all - perhaps no one in the *local area* wants it but many others, from *outside the area*, may travel to it if such outlets are thin on the ground in that part of the country? They sound like fair enough concerns to me... (perhaps I'm one of those 'most people'!) Mathew |
#28
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
B&Q (OT rant)
Mathew Newton wrote:
On May 15, 12:40 pm, Tony Bryer wrote: As in many planning stories, "the view of the community" is usually the view of a vociferous subset. When our local Great Mills, now Wickes was up for PP the campaign against it was on two fronts: "No one wants it" and "When it opens it will bring traffic chaos to the area". The evident contradiction between these two was lost on most people. There's not necessarilly any contradiction in those fronts at all - perhaps no one in the *local area* wants it but many others, from *outside the area*, may travel to it if such outlets are thin on the ground in that part of the country? They sound like fair enough concerns to me... (perhaps I'm one of those 'most people'!) Mm. Cambridge is a complete example of the above. Once a thriving market town attracting shoppers from a 30 mile radius catchment area, its now a place to avoid completely, since it has been made virtually unusable by cars, in order that tourists and residents can cycle all over it and play football in its streets. Shoppers now travel further, to less car unfriendly places, or to out of town supermarkets, or shop online. Residents who have to get to the business parks by car, move out to the surrounding villages, creating traffic issues there. But the council firmly believes this is good for the town. Mathew |
#29
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
B&Q (OT rant)
"The Natural Philosopher" wrote in message
... Mm. Cambridge is a complete example of the above. Once a thriving market town attracting shoppers from a 30 mile radius catchment area, its now a place to avoid completely, since it has been made virtually unusable by cars, in order that tourists and residents can cycle all over it and play football in its streets. Shoppers now travel further, to less car unfriendly places, or to out of town supermarkets, or shop online. Residents who have to get to the business parks by car, move out to the surrounding villages, creating traffic issues there. But the council firmly believes this is good for the town. I don't see the town suffering for this - on the contrary, it appears to be thriving. So maybe they're doing something right? cheers, clive |
#30
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
B&Q (OT rant)
On 15 May 2007 12:06:19 GMT Huge wrote :
I worked in Tech Pubs for some years, and Word is a heap of cack for complex techie documents. (Actually, it's just a heap of cack, period.) I am somewhat relieved to read these comments. I thought that using one of our software manuals as a learning tool would be a good idea: we have styles, page numbering (starting again after prelims, what pain!), contents, indexing, cross referencing, pictures etc. When I took the decision to switch this to Word I expected to be hugely impressed, given that WordPro effectively stopped being developed c.1998. Then I put my frustration down to being a novice. Now I find out the truth! -- Tony Bryer SDA UK 'Software to build on' http://www.sda.co.uk |
#31
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
B&Q (OT rant)
In article ,
The Natural Philosopher wrote: Mm. Cambridge is a complete example of the above. Once a thriving market town attracting shoppers from a 30 mile radius catchment area, its now a place to avoid completely, since it has been made virtually unusable by cars, in order that tourists and residents can cycle all over it and play football in its streets. When it was a thriving market town the majority of shoppers probably went there by bus - two car families weren't the norm and dad drove the car - if indeed the family had one. Now everyone has cars and wants to use them this sort of old town simply hasn't either the roads or the carparks in the centre for them all. Of course you could always knock down all the shops etc to make carparks... -- *Ah, I see the f**k-up fairy has visited us again Dave Plowman London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|