Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
Home Repair (alt.home.repair) For all homeowners and DIYers with many experienced tradesmen. Solve your toughest home fix-it problems. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Wiring electric baseboard
Hi,
I'm wiring four new electric baseboards in my basement. All four are 220Volt units: 500W, 500W, 1000W, 1500W, for a total of 3500W. From the main panel to the farthest unit is less than 100ft. If I understood the rules, putting all of this on one circuit will require a 20Amp breaker (1.25*3500W/220V), and the wire can be #12AWG. Did I get that right, and am I missing any other design factor? Many thanks, especially if you can reference the NEC so I know I'm doing it right. Theodore |
#2
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Wiring electric baseboard
|
#3
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Wiring electric baseboard
Fantastic. Thank you soooo much for the detailed reply. Very much appreciated.
|
#4
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Wiring electric baseboard
|
#5
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Wiring electric baseboard
Why the hell wood anybuddy want electric baseboards?
Are you nuts? No, no, no... it's only for backup. Definitely NOT the primary heat source for the rooms. |
#6
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Wiring electric baseboard
|
#7
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Wiring electric baseboard
|
#8
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Wiring electric baseboard
On 5/26/2016 9:04 AM, Colonel Edmund J. Burke wrote:
On 5/25/2016 9:59 PM, wrote: Hi, I'm wiring four new electric baseboards in my basement. All four are 220Volt units: 500W, 500W, 1000W, 1500W, for a total of 3500W. From the main panel to the farthest unit is less than 100ft. If I understood the rules, putting all of this on one circuit will require a 20Amp breaker (1.25*3500W/220V), and the wire can be #12AWG. Did I get that right, and am I missing any other design factor? Many thanks, especially if you can reference the NEC so I know I'm doing it right. Theodore Why the hell wood anybuddy want electric baseboards? Are you nuts? So when that gobdamn fancy 96% efficient furnace with all its phucking safety sensors and switches takes a **** (and it will), my house won't freeze. OK? These phucking new fangled furnaces ain't as reliable as the old ones. |
#9
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Wiring electric baseboard
On 5/26/2016 7:09 PM, wrote:
Around here, that might be the only heat we have and we still might not use it more than a few times a year. My wife survives quite well with the 1.4kw heater in an electric fireplace and that only gets used an a few cold mornings. Hmmm. Memory says you live in Far North, Alberta, Canada, just north of the Arctic Circle? -- .. Christopher A. Young learn more about Jesus .. www.lds.org .. .. |
#10
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Wiring electric baseboard
On Thu, 26 May 2016 20:20:19 -0400, Stormin Mormon
wrote: On 5/26/2016 7:09 PM, wrote: Around here, that might be the only heat we have and we still might not use it more than a few times a year. My wife survives quite well with the 1.4kw heater in an electric fireplace and that only gets used an a few cold mornings. Hmmm. Memory says you live in Far North, Alberta, Canada, just north of the Arctic Circle? Yeah, we are a hardy bunch up here http://tinyurl.com/hq7g4bz |
#12
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Wiring electric baseboard
Thu, 26 May 2016 05:50:22 GMT in alt.home.repair, wrote: "Continuous load" means you size the circuit to 125% of total load (14.6*1.25=18.25a) so 18.25a is OK on a 12 ga wire with a 20a breaker You're going over the 80% trade standard load (16amps on a 20amp circuit) at that point, though...If you're going over 50ft or so, I'd probably use 10/2wg for the main run and come off that with a 12/2wg tail for each of the heater units. As each tail is only going to be asked to carry whatever heater it's connected to will ask for, not the combined load for all of them. While I wouldn't expect to see an overheat fire risk situation using 12/2wg for the main run (If it's not for a long distance run...), I'd feel better knowing the main line I ran to feed them was more than upto the task and wasn't near full capacity if I ran one or all of the heaters at the same time. -- MID: Hmmm. I most certainly don't understand how I can access a copy of a zip file but then not be able to unzip it so I can watch it. That seems VERY clever! http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=145716711400 |
#13
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Wiring electric baseboard
On Saturday, May 28, 2016 at 4:08:17 PM UTC-4, Diesel wrote:
Thu, 26 May 2016 05:50:22 GMT in alt.home.repair, wrote: "Continuous load" means you size the circuit to 125% of total load (14.6*1.25=18.25a) so 18.25a is OK on a 12 ga wire with a 20a breaker You're going over the 80% trade standard load (16amps on a 20amp circuit) at that point, though... Where is the over 16 amps coming from? All I see are 14.6 and it meets NEC. |
#14
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Wiring electric baseboard
On Sat, 28 May 2016 20:04:33 -0000 (UTC), Diesel
wrote: Thu, 26 May 2016 05:50:22 GMT in alt.home.repair, wrote: "Continuous load" means you size the circuit to 125% of total load (14.6*1.25=18.25a) so 18.25a is OK on a 12 ga wire with a 20a breaker You're going over the 80% trade standard load (16amps on a 20amp circuit) at that point, Excuse me but the load is 14.6a. The 18.25a IS 125% of the load so the 80% has been accounted for. |
#15
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Wiring electric baseboard
Sat, 28 May 2016 23:17:05 GMT in alt.home.repair, wrote: On Sat, 28 May 2016 20:04:33 -0000 (UTC), Diesel wrote: Thu, 26 May 2016 05:50:22 GMT in alt.home.repair, wrote: "Continuous load" means you size the circuit to 125% of total load (14.6*1.25=18.25a) so 18.25a is OK on a 12 ga wire with a 20a breaker You're going over the 80% trade standard load (16amps on a 20amp circuit) at that point, Excuse me but the load is 14.6a. The 18.25a IS 125% of the load so the 80% has been accounted for. The load is 14.6A under perfect conditions of a wire 100ft or less in total length, yes. However, if the last heater happens to be a bit further away from the panel than 100ft as the OP suggested, there's a real risk of voltage drop to the last heater with the others running because the 12/2 wire just can't provide the full load that far out to the last device. A voltage drop will increase the amount of amps required by that heater to do it's job. The 12/2 isn't going to appreciate that and neither will the breaker. It will tolerate being over 20amps until it heats up enough to trip. It's why I suggested 10/2. So, the OP won't even have to worry about problems down the road if their estimates are off. It certainly won't hurt the situation. http://handymanwire.com/ubbthreads/u...ngest_distance 100feet is the normal usual maximum spec'd The code does not rule on lenghts and voltage drop.. --only suggests! The end of run outlet is where the starvation is the worst and any inductive load will suffer the worst at that point so you must consider this as you overall design limit at 100feet. A 20amp circuit fully loaded at this outlet will drop 5.6% where 5% is the RECOMMENDED maximum and we must install 10gage wiring if we still insist on a 20amp rated circuit. The other choice is to derate this long run to a 15 amp circuit on this 12g wire and you could possibly expect to be at 5% drop at 140-150feet. Tthe full 15 amp dribbles off at around 120 feet! 20amp circuit loaded at 18amp is 5% 16amp will result in 4.5% missing at that far outlet. The loss will be accumulative along the run as other 'stuff' is plugged in. Most equipment that uses electricity is designed to function well at plus or minus 10%,whetner it is a resitive load like light bulb or an inductive load like a lighting ballast or motor. This all becomes even more crucial when the power company is experiencing voltage sags in the summer high loads and the volatage that arrives at the pole down the street is already considerably LOW!!!---and if you designed your circuit lengths at the extra long end ---you are causing motor loads to labor,and lights to be dim! Go with the far outlet at 100feet MAX...and you will be with the majority!!! from the OPS original post: From the main panel to the farthest unit is less than 100ft. So, the last heater on the circuit, depending on how far away it actually is from the panel and if the others are all running or not, could exceed the rated capacity for the wire and/or the breaker. IE: it's too far and the wire is too skinny to get the needed amps to the device. I understand there is a cost difference going with 10/2 and some individuals consider that to be more important than the total amount of amps the circuit might pull when fully energized (all heaters on - high) So, for short distance, and if the OP is very close with his figure on distance to last device on the circuit, your suggestion will save him money and work fine. If he's wrong or a bit off and it's a bit further, he might have to break up the heaters into seperate fed circuits to keep the amps low enough. Which will use additional wire and another breaker or two in his panel, assuming there's room for that. At this point, whatever cost savings the OP had by not running 10/2 have disappeared. Why even have to be concerned with it? Use the thicker wire, you KNOW each device will get all the amps it needs, without any possibility of an overload condition. Like I said though, whatever choice the OP makes, it looks fine from here. -- MID: Hmmm. I most certainly don't understand how I can access a copy of a zip file but then not be able to unzip it so I can watch it. That seems VERY clever! http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=145716711400 |
#16
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Wiring electric baseboard
On Sun, 29 May 2016 03:47:25 -0000 (UTC), Diesel
wrote: Sat, 28 May 2016 23:17:05 GMT in alt.home.repair, wrote: On Sat, 28 May 2016 20:04:33 -0000 (UTC), Diesel wrote: Thu, 26 May 2016 05:50:22 GMT in alt.home.repair, wrote: "Continuous load" means you size the circuit to 125% of total load (14.6*1.25=18.25a) so 18.25a is OK on a 12 ga wire with a 20a breaker You're going over the 80% trade standard load (16amps on a 20amp circuit) at that point, Excuse me but the load is 14.6a. The 18.25a IS 125% of the load so the 80% has been accounted for. The load is 14.6A under perfect conditions of a wire 100ft or less in total length, yes. However, if the last heater happens to be a bit further away from the panel than 100ft as the OP suggested, there's a real risk of voltage drop to the last heater with the others running because the 12/2 wire just can't provide the full load that far out to the last device. A voltage drop will increase the amount of amps required by that heater to do it's job. The 12/2 isn't going to appreciate that and neither will the breaker. It will tolerate being over 20amps until it heats up enough to trip. The heater is not going to decrease it's resistance and draw more current to compensate for the voltage drop. It will just be a slightly smaller heater. Heaters are rated at 120, 208 or 240v. If the voltage is lower, the heater will just have a lower output. An example is an oven element. At 240v it is rated 3600w, at 208 it is only 2700w |
#17
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Wiring electric baseboard
On Saturday, May 28, 2016 at 11:51:10 PM UTC-4, Diesel wrote:
The load is 14.6A under perfect conditions of a wire 100ft or less in total length, yes. However, if the last heater happens to be a bit further away from the panel than 100ft as the OP suggested, there's a real risk of voltage drop to the last heater with the others running because the 12/2 wire just can't provide the full load that far out to the last device. A voltage drop will increase the amount of amps required by that heater to do it's job. The 12/2 isn't going to appreciate that and neither will the breaker. It will tolerate being over 20amps until it heats up enough to trip. Like Gfre said, a resistance heater isn't going to increase it's current draw because there is some additional resistance in the circuit. It's like saying a light bulb will burn just as bright with a rheostat in the circuit to dim it, because it's going to pull additional current to compensate for the lower voltage. Put additional resistance in the circuit and the total current goes down, not up. And the difference here, the resistance in that wire is negligible. It's why I suggested 10/2. So, the OP won't even have to worry about problems down the road if their estimates are off. It certainly won't hurt the situation. There won't be problems if he follows the code. I can see using the heavier gauge wire if he thinks he might need to go to a larger load in the future, ie adding a heater or using larger ones. http://handymanwire.com/ubbthreads/u...ngest_distance 100feet is the normal usual maximum spec'd The code does not rule on lenghts and voltage drop.. --only suggests! A random internet posting is your cited source of information? The end of run outlet is where the starvation is the worst and any inductive load will suffer the worst at that point so you must consider this as you overall design limit at 100feet. There are no inductive loads. A 20amp circuit fully loaded at this outlet will drop 5.6% where 5% is the RECOMMENDED maximum and we must install 10gage wiring if we still insist on a 20amp rated circuit. The other choice is to derate this long run to a 15 amp circuit on this 12g wire and you could possibly expect to be at 5% drop at 140-150feet. Tthe full 15 amp dribbles off at around 120 feet! You don't show the calculations that is based on, and IDK how you came up with it. The resistance of 12 gauge wire is .0016 ohms per foot. 100 ft, you have .16 ohms. At 20A, that produces a voltage drop of 3.2V . There are two conductors so double it, 6.4V. It's a 240V circuit, 6.4V drop from 240V is just 2.7%, not 5.6%. 20amp circuit loaded at 18amp is 5% 16amp will result in 4.5% missing at that far outlet. IKD where any of that is coming from, the relevant calcs are above. The loss will be accumulative along the run as other 'stuff' is plugged in. What plugged in stuff? He's wiring a dedicated circuit for baseboard heaters, there are no receptacles. Most equipment that uses electricity is designed to function well at plus or minus 10%,whetner it is a resitive load like light bulb or an inductive load like a lighting ballast or motor. And he's within 2.7%. This all becomes even more crucial when the power company is experiencing voltage sags in the summer high loads and the volatage that arrives at the pole down the street is already considerably LOW!!!---and if you designed your circuit lengths at the extra long end ---you are causing motor loads to labor,and lights to be dim! There is no motor load. If there were, we'd use the appropriate NEC to size for that. Go with the far outlet at 100feet MAX...and you will be with the majority!!! from the OPS original post: From the main panel to the farthest unit is less than 100ft. So, the last heater on the circuit, depending on how far away it actually is from the panel and if the others are all running or not, could exceed the rated capacity for the wire and/or the breaker. IE: it's too far and the wire is too skinny to get the needed amps to the device. The worse case is with all heaters on and that is what we sized for, 12 gauge is sufficient. I understand there is a cost difference going with 10/2 and some individuals consider that to be more important than the total amount of amps the circuit might pull when fully energized (all heaters on - high) Good grief. We have used the rated capacity of the heaters. And there is already margin in the NEC, they don't say do the calcs, then upsize it more. You can if you want to, but there is no operational or safety issue here. So, for short distance, and if the OP is very close with his figure on distance to last device on the circuit, your suggestion will save him money and work fine. If he's wrong or a bit off and it's a bit further, he might have to break up the heaters into seperate fed circuits to keep the amps low enough. Which will use additional wire and another breaker or two in his panel, assuming there's room for that. Nonsense as the NEC and above calcs show. At this point, whatever cost savings the OP had by not running 10/2 have disappeared. Why even have to be concerned with it? That's right, just use 12 gauge which NEC says is perfectly fine. You're the one throwing all kinds of FUD in and using incorrect calculations. |
#18
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Wiring electric baseboard
trader_4
Sun, 29 May 2016 14:45:19 GMT in alt.home.repair, wrote: Like Gfre said, a resistance heater isn't going to increase it's current draw because there is some additional resistance in the circuit. It's like saying a light bulb will burn just as bright with a rheostat in the circuit to dim it, because it's going to pull additional current to compensate for the lower voltage. Put additional resistance in the circuit and the total current goes down, not up. And the difference here, the resistance in that wire is negligible. That isn't what I'm saying at all. I'm saying that the further out you go with 12/2 (or any wire really, it just depends on the thickness of the wire, the power you started with, and how far you're actually going), the less available voltage you'll have at the end of the run. The less volts you have, the more amps you'll need to make up the difference to get the desired wattage. Also, the 10/2 isn't going to be near capacity at any time, either. even if he has them all going on high at the same time. The 12/2 however, will be depending on the amount of heaters going and their setting(s). going by Ugly: 7.9 volts lost 12/2 at 100ft 4.97 volts lost on 10/2 at 100ft 240-7.9=232.1 on the 12ga 240-4.97=235 on the 10ga 1500/232.1=6.5 amps *rounded up* 1500/235=6.39 amps *rounded up* And that's due entirely to distance with no loads present on the line yet. 100ft on 12/2 according to my 2014 edition of Ugly's electrical reference is a net loss of 7.9 volts at the end of the run, with no load present, yet. At 125 ft out, the loss increases to 9.8 volts. And, obviously gets worse from there. OTH, the 10/2 wire loses 4.97 volts at 100ft and 6.21 volts at 125ft out. I'd rather get as many volts to the device (heaters) as is realistically possible. The closer I can get to their expected input voltage, the less amps they'll require to do their jobs. The more heat I'll get (which is obviously the point here) and the less power I'll use doing it. A win win win. To do anything less is only costing me more money and time in the future. The 12/2 is going to heat up a bit more under various conditions than the 10/2 ever thought about doing, even if all heaters were on at the same time, on HIGH. Over time, the 12/2 wire will degrade due to heating/cooling cycles that the 10/2 won't have experienced. As it degrades, it's own resistance will increase. Another side effect of running the wire warm/possibly hot to the touch at near full load over a period of time is that the connection points and terminals in the panel and the heaters will also become a little 'warmer' than they would if they'd been powered from the 10/2 line and pigtailed to it with a short 12/2 run. A random internet posting is your cited source of information? Uhh, no. I remembered it was 100ft or so off hand as the general rule of thumb, but didn't remember how much voltage was lost as a result. I've also got various NEC books and my 2014 edition of the yellow Ugly electricians reference book. It's where the voltage drop figures I used today came from, actually. That's right, just use 12 gauge which NEC says is perfectly fine. You're the one throwing all kinds of FUD in and using incorrect calculations. Just to clarify, the calculations I provided in this post aren't FUD, unless you're able to dismiss the yellow Ugly electrician reference book. I haven't seen any 240volt baseboard heater wired with a 12/2 in sometime, actually. I think the last time I actually observed that was with a trailer. Alas, they're built with heavy consideration on cost. IE: as cheap as you can get away with. I don't work like that, I don't offer advice with that in mind first and foremost. If it were me, writing only for myself, I'd spend the extra money for the heavier gauge wire and use the 12/2 wire for pigtailing off of it into the heater units. I've already explained why I'd run it in this manner. No real point in doing so again. -- MID: Hmmm. I most certainly don't understand how I can access a copy of a zip file but then not be able to unzip it so I can watch it. That seems VERY clever! http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=145716711400 |
#19
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Wiring electric baseboard
On Mon, 30 May 2016 02:23:31 -0000 (UTC), Diesel
wrote: 7.9 volts lost 12/2 at 100ft 4.97 volts lost on 10/2 at 100ft 240-7.9=232.1 on the 12ga 240-4.97=235 on the 10ga And that's due entirely to distance with no loads present on the line yet. With no load, there is no voltage drop at all. If you are actually dropping 7.9v you do not have a 1500w heater anymore. The element is going to be still around 38.4 ohms (the element did not change, just the voltage) so at 232.1 v heater draws 6.04a and becomes a 1402.8w heater. 1500/232.1=6.5 amps *rounded up* 1500/235=6.39 amps *rounded up* This means nothing at this point unless you are changing the element to get 1500w at 232v. |
#20
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Wiring electric baseboard
|
#21
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Wiring electric baseboard
On 05/29/2016 09:23 PM, Diesel wrote:
[snip] 1500/232.1=6.5 amps *rounded up* 1500/235=6.39 amps *rounded up* And that's due entirely to distance with no loads present on the line yet. I'm often surprised by how little some people know about electricity. Voltage drop depends on current flow. There's no power (wattage) without current flow either. So you have a load which is not present. How is it drawing power? [ship] |
#22
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Wiring electric baseboard
On 05/29/2016 09:23 PM, Diesel wrote:
[snip] Just to clarify, the calculations I provided in this post aren't FUD, unless you're able to dismiss the yellow Ugly electrician reference book. If it says you have voltage drop without load, it SHOULD be dismissed. [snip] |
#23
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Wiring electric baseboard
Sat, 28 May 2016 23:17:05 GMT in alt.home.repair, wrote: On Sat, 28 May 2016 20:04:33 -0000 (UTC), Diesel wrote: Thu, 26 May 2016 05:50:22 GMT in alt.home.repair, wrote: "Continuous load" means you size the circuit to 125% of total load (14.6*1.25=18.25a) so 18.25a is OK on a 12 ga wire with a 20a breaker You're going over the 80% trade standard load (16amps on a 20amp circuit) at that point, Excuse me but the load is 14.6a. The 18.25a IS 125% of the load so the 80% has been accounted for. I sincerely do apologize for having missed that in my original reply to you. With that said, I'd still have opted for 10/2 to feed them, and come off the feed with a 12/2 for each heater. This reduces heat creation along the wire, extends the life of the chosen wire, ensures the greatest possible amount of power is available to each heater on the circuit. Although power loss will still occur at the last one, the voltage drop won't be as bad as it would have been with a 12/2 run from the panel; and the feed wire won't run as hot supplying power to an individual heater or all of them at the same time. A bit more costly, but, a decent enough tradeoff imo, that I would personally have used 10/2. As I said though, at the end of the day, it all looks great from here. -- MID: Hmmm. I most certainly don't understand how I can access a copy of a zip file but then not be able to unzip it so I can watch it. That seems VERY clever! http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=145716711400 |
#24
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Wiring electric baseboard
On 05/29/2016 09:23 PM, Diesel wrote:
[snip] 1500/232.1=6.5 amps *rounded up* 1500/235=6.39 amps *rounded up* And that's due entirely to distance with no loads present on the line yet. [snip] Where can I get one of these magic heaters, that uses 1500 watts when it isn't connected? |
#25
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Wiring electric baseboard
Sam E
Mon, 30 May 2016 03:14:39 GMT in alt.home.repair, wrote: On 05/29/2016 09:23 PM, Diesel wrote: [snip] 1500/232.1=6.5 amps *rounded up* 1500/235=6.39 amps *rounded up* And that's due entirely to distance with no loads present on the line yet. I'm often surprised by how little some people know about electricity. I sometimes feel the same way. Voltage drop depends on current flow. There's no power (wattage) without current flow either. If you put 120volts AC on a 12/2 wire, and run that wire, 100 ft out, and take a measurement at the end of the run, the available voltage at the end of the run isn't going to match the volts going into the wire. Some is lost during transit due to the wires resistance and the length. If you try this experiment using DC power, it's even worse. DC really doesn't travel distance well. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voltage_drop For example, an electric space heater may have a resistance of ten ohms, and the wires which supply it may have a resistance of 0.2 ohms, about 2% of the total circuit resistance. This means that approximately 2% of the supplied voltage is lost in the wire itself. Excessive voltage drop may result in unsatisfactory operation of, and damage to, electrical and electronic equipment. The simplest way to reduce voltage drop is to increase the diameter of the conductor between the source and the load, which lowers the overall resistance. In power distribution systems, a given amount of power can be transmitted with less voltage drop if a higher voltage is used. More sophisticated techniques use active elements to compensate for the undesired voltage drop. So you have a load which is not present. How is it drawing power? You aren't losing power due to the load, You've already lost it in route to the load via wire resistance and the distance said electricity has to travel on the wire. Thicker wire, less resistance, less voltage drop. Simple concept, really. Like you wrote though, it does sometimes amaze me how little people know/understand about electricity. -- MID: Hmmm. I most certainly don't understand how I can access a copy of a zip file but then not be able to unzip it so I can watch it. That seems VERY clever! http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=145716711400 |
#26
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Wiring electric baseboard
notX Mon,
30 May 2016 03:19:44 GMT in alt.home.repair, wrote: On 05/29/2016 09:23 PM, Diesel wrote: [snip] Just to clarify, the calculations I provided in this post aren't FUD, unless you're able to dismiss the yellow Ugly electrician reference book. If it says you have voltage drop without load, it SHOULD be dismissed. http://www.uglys.net/ You have voltage drop due to the length and size of the wire. Because the wire isn't a super conductor. At the end of the day, you might have put 120 volts on the line, but, 100ft down that line, you aren't getting 120 volts. Some has been lost on the wire, due to the wires own resistance. Switch from AC to DC with no other changes, and the voltage drop is more pronounced. -- MID: Hmmm. I most certainly don't understand how I can access a copy of a zip file but then not be able to unzip it so I can watch it. That seems VERY clever! http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=145716711400 |
#27
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Wiring electric baseboard
Mon, 30 May 2016 02:46:57 GMT in alt.home.repair, wrote: On Mon, 30 May 2016 02:23:31 -0000 (UTC), Diesel wrote: 7.9 volts lost 12/2 at 100ft 4.97 volts lost on 10/2 at 100ft 240-7.9=232.1 on the 12ga 240-4.97=235 on the 10ga And that's due entirely to distance with no loads present on the line yet. With no load, there is no voltage drop at all. The voltage drop is due to the wire's own resistance, and the distance the voltage must travel. The wire we're using isn't a super conductor. It has a certain amount of resistance to it. As a result, some volts are no longer available to us, we spent them getting the rest down the line. Nothing for free, you know. Watts is watts, man. Available voltage determines how many amps it's going to take to get them, though. Lower voltage=more amps to do the same job. -- MID: Hmmm. I most certainly don't understand how I can access a copy of a zip file but then not be able to unzip it so I can watch it. That seems VERY clever! http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=145716711400 |
#28
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Wiring electric baseboard
On Mon, 30 May 2016 05:57:44 -0000 (UTC), Diesel
wrote: Sam E Mon, 30 May 2016 03:14:39 GMT in alt.home.repair, wrote: On 05/29/2016 09:23 PM, Diesel wrote: [snip] 1500/232.1=6.5 amps *rounded up* 1500/235=6.39 amps *rounded up* And that's due entirely to distance with no loads present on the line yet. I'm often surprised by how little some people know about electricity. I sometimes feel the same way. Voltage drop depends on current flow. There's no power (wattage) without current flow either. If you put 120volts AC on a 12/2 wire, and run that wire, 100 ft out, and take a measurement at the end of the run, the available voltage at the end of the run isn't going to match the volts going into the wire. Some is lost during transit due to the wires resistance and the length. If you try this experiment using DC power, it's even worse. DC really doesn't travel distance well. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voltage_drop For example, an electric space heater may have a resistance of ten ohms, and the wires which supply it may have a resistance of 0.2 ohms, about 2% of the total circuit resistance. This means that approximately 2% of the supplied voltage is lost in the wire itself. Excessive voltage drop may result in unsatisfactory operation of, and damage to, electrical and electronic equipment. The simplest way to reduce voltage drop is to increase the diameter of the conductor between the source and the load, which lowers the overall resistance. In power distribution systems, a given amount of power can be transmitted with less voltage drop if a higher voltage is used. More sophisticated techniques use active elements to compensate for the undesired voltage drop. So you have a load which is not present. How is it drawing power? You aren't losing power due to the load, You've already lost it in route to the load via wire resistance and the distance said electricity has to travel on the wire. Thicker wire, less resistance, less voltage drop. Simple concept, really. Like you wrote though, it does sometimes amaze me how little people know/understand about electricity. |
#29
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Wiring electric baseboard
On Mon, 30 May 2016 05:57:44 -0000 (UTC), Diesel
wrote: Mon, 30 May 2016 02:46:57 GMT in alt.home.repair, wrote: On Mon, 30 May 2016 02:23:31 -0000 (UTC), Diesel wrote: 7.9 volts lost 12/2 at 100ft 4.97 volts lost on 10/2 at 100ft 240-7.9=232.1 on the 12ga 240-4.97=235 on the 10ga And that's due entirely to distance with no loads present on the line yet. With no load, there is no voltage drop at all. The voltage drop is due to the wire's own resistance, and the distance the voltage must travel. The wire we're using isn't a super conductor. It has a certain amount of resistance to it. As a result, some volts are no longer available to us, we spent them getting the rest down the line. Nothing for free, you know. Voltage drop still depends on the load. If there is no load, there is no voltage drop. If you have a wire with no load at all, there will be full circuit voltage at both ends. Watts is watts, man. Available voltage determines how many amps it's going to take to get them, though. Lower voltage=more amps to do the same job. If you have a lower voltage, the watts will be lower. In our example, that 1500 watt heater (at 240v) will be 1407 watts at 232v. Current will actually be less, not more. |
#30
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Wiring electric baseboard
hah
Mon, 30 May 2016 05:25:23 GMT in alt.home.repair, wrote: On 05/29/2016 09:23 PM, Diesel wrote: [snip] 1500/232.1=6.5 amps *rounded up* 1500/235=6.39 amps *rounded up* And that's due entirely to distance with no loads present on the line yet. [snip] Where can I get one of these magic heaters, that uses 1500 watts when it isn't connected? Hmm? Oh.. ROFL, I see. That's what happens when you don't pay attention to context and choose to selectively quote. Those are load calculations based on a 1500watt element running at two different voltages. It shows the amount of amps required to get 1500watts at those voltages. The different voltages are directly related to length and diameter of wire and have nothing to do with the load from the heater at this point. Thanks to the wire and the wire alone, some volts have already been lost (as in they'll never reach the heater) in transit, due again, to the wires own resistance and length. In this case, the length is the same; 100ft. But, the wire size or gauge is not. 12ga is on the top, 10ga is on the bottom; for comparison. Might I suggest a simple english comprehension class or two? Muggles suffers from a similar problem. So, you're in very good company. -- MID: Hmmm. I most certainly don't understand how I can access a copy of a zip file but then not be able to unzip it so I can watch it. That seems VERY clever! http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=145716711400 |
#31
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Wiring electric baseboard
Mon, 30 May 2016 06:09:42 GMT in alt.home.repair, wrote: Voltage drop still depends on the load. If there is no load, there is no voltage drop. If you have a wire with no load at all, there will be full circuit voltage at both ends. No, there won't. The wire isn't a super conductor. It takes a little to push the electrons on it. The thinner and longer the length, the more is lost in transit. If it were a super conductor, what you've written would be absolutely true. As long as the wire has resistance of it's own, we're subject to voltage drop. We have various ways in which to minimize the voltage drop, though. Short of using a super conductor however, we can't outright prevent it. Watts is watts, man. Available voltage determines how many amps it's going to take to get them, though. Lower voltage=more amps to do the same job. If you have a lower voltage, the watts will be lower. In our example, that 1500 watt heater (at 240v) will be 1407 watts at 232v. Current will actually be less, not more. Not exactly. You can have high voltage and next to no current behind it (think of a taser) or low voltage and a considerable amount of current behind it (think of your car battery) it's no chump and your starter motor isn't exactly a low drain device...You can also lose a few volts in our example, and, still be able to pull enough current to make up the difference. The easiest way I know of to explain the relationship is this: It may be useful to consider the image of water in a hose. Voltage is equivalent to pressure, water flow is equivalent to current and the diameter of the pipe is equivalent ot the thickness of the wire - or resistance. -- MID: Hmmm. I most certainly don't understand how I can access a copy of a zip file but then not be able to unzip it so I can watch it. That seems VERY clever! http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=145716711400 |
#32
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Wiring electric baseboard
On 05/30/2016 12:53 AM, Diesel wrote:
Mon, 30 May 2016 06:09:42 GMT in alt.home.repair, wrote: Voltage drop still depends on the load. If there is no load, there is no voltage drop. If you have a wire with no load at all, there will be full circuit voltage at both ends. No, there won't. The wire isn't a super conductor. It takes a little to push the electrons on it. The thinner and longer the length, the more is lost in transit. If it were a super conductor, what you've written would be absolutely true. As long as the wire has resistance of it's own, we're subject to voltage drop. We have various ways in which to minimize the voltage drop, though. Short of using a super conductor however, we can't outright prevent it. Voltage drop is represented by the formula E=I*R Seems to me if the current flow is zero, then the voltage would be zero as well. |
#33
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Wiring electric baseboard
On Mon, 30 May 2016 05:13:02 -0600, Al Gebra wrote:
On 05/30/2016 12:53 AM, Diesel wrote: Mon, 30 May 2016 06:09:42 GMT in alt.home.repair, wrote: Voltage drop still depends on the load. If there is no load, there is no voltage drop. If you have a wire with no load at all, there will be full circuit voltage at both ends. No, there won't. The wire isn't a super conductor. It takes a little to push the electrons on it. The thinner and longer the length, the more is lost in transit. If it were a super conductor, what you've written would be absolutely true. As long as the wire has resistance of it's own, we're subject to voltage drop. We have various ways in which to minimize the voltage drop, though. Short of using a super conductor however, we can't outright prevent it. Voltage drop is represented by the formula E=I*R Seems to me if the current flow is zero, then the voltage would be zero as well. You are correct. If there is no current flowing, there is no voltage drop. The same is true for water pipes. If no water is flowing, the pressure is the same at both ends. |
#34
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Wiring electric baseboard
on 5/30/2016, Al Gebra supposed :
On 05/30/2016 12:53 AM, Diesel wrote: Mon, 30 May 2016 06:09:42 GMT in alt.home.repair, wrote: Voltage drop still depends on the load. If there is no load, there is no voltage drop. If you have a wire with no load at all, there will be full circuit voltage at both ends. No, there won't. The wire isn't a super conductor. It takes a little to push the electrons on it. The thinner and longer the length, the more is lost in transit. If it were a super conductor, what you've written would be absolutely true. As long as the wire has resistance of it's own, we're subject to voltage drop. We have various ways in which to minimize the voltage drop, though. Short of using a super conductor however, we can't outright prevent it. Voltage drop is represented by the formula E=I*R Seems to me if the current flow is zero, then the voltage would be zero as well. That's a good theory, but IMO it is wrong. |
#35
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Wiring electric baseboard
On Sunday, May 29, 2016 at 10:23:36 PM UTC-4, Diesel wrote:
trader_4 Sun, 29 May 2016 14:45:19 GMT in alt.home.repair, wrote: Like Gfre said, a resistance heater isn't going to increase it's current draw because there is some additional resistance in the circuit. It's like saying a light bulb will burn just as bright with a rheostat in the circuit to dim it, because it's going to pull additional current to compensate for the lower voltage. Put additional resistance in the circuit and the total current goes down, not up. And the difference here, the resistance in that wire is negligible. That isn't what I'm saying at all. I'm saying that the further out you go with 12/2 (or any wire really, it just depends on the thickness of the wire, the power you started with, and how far you're actually going), the less available voltage you'll have at the end of the run. The less volts you have, the more amps you'll need to make up the difference to get the desired wattage. The heating element looks like a resistor. There is no magical making up. Take a simple circuit with a voltage source V and a resistor of value R1. The current is V/R. Now add an additional resistor in series, R2 that represents the resistance of the wire in our system. The current is now V/(R1+R2), which is less than the current of V/R1. Like Gfre said, if you look at a heating element, if it's rated for two voltages, the power output is stated lower at the lower voltage. Also, the 10/2 isn't going to be near capacity at any time, either. even if he has them all going on high at the same time. The 12/2 however, will be depending on the amount of heaters going and their setting(s). going by Ugly: 7.9 volts lost 12/2 at 100ft 4.97 volts lost on 10/2 at 100ft IDK what parameters they used. I worked out the actual numbers, it's very simple and the voltage drop due to the resistance in the wire is only 2.7%, at 20A, for 100 ft of #12. Why no reply to the actual math? Here it is again: The resistance of 12 gauge wire is .0016 ohms per foot. 100 ft, you have .16 ohms. At 20A, that produces a voltage drop of 3.2V . There are two conductors so double it, 6.4V. It's a 240V circuit, 6.4V drop from 240V is just 2.7%, not 5.6%. 240-7.9=232.1 on the 12ga 240-4.97=235 on the 10ga 1500/232.1=6.5 amps *rounded up* 1500/235=6.39 amps *rounded up* And that's due entirely to distance with no loads present on the line yet. No idea what you're even doing here, no loads? yet 1500? 100ft on 12/2 according to my 2014 edition of Ugly's electrical reference is a net loss of 7.9 volts at the end of the run, with no load present, yet. At 125 ft out, the loss increases to 9.8 volts. And, obviously gets worse from there. Again, the resistance of #12 is .0016 per ft. The math has been presented above, the voltage drop at the full 20A is just is just 6.4V, which at 240V is just 2.7%. Even using your higher number, which is probably coming from using some high temperature, you still get a voltage drop of only 3.2%. There is no 125 ft, he said the run is under 100 ft. And you say this is with no load present yet. That's incorrect too. This is with the MAX load the circuit is rated for, the full 20A. With no load, there is no voltage drop period. OTH, the 10/2 wire loses 4.97 volts at 100ft and 6.21 volts at 125ft out. I'd rather get as many volts to the device (heaters) as is realistically possible. Then use #8, #6, etc. Same argument can be made there. It does nothing in terms of safety or proper operation of the heater. The closer I can get to their expected input voltage, the less amps they'll require to do their jobs. The more heat I'll get (which is obviously the point here) and the less power I'll use doing it. A win win win. You're really confused here. The heater does not magically adjust to draw more amps. Take this to an extreme. If I put just 24V across those heaters, following your logic instead of drawing 14A at 240V they would draw 10 x 14A = 140A? It doesn't work that way. To do anything less is only costing me more money and time in the future. The 12/2 is going to heat up a bit more under various conditions than the 10/2 ever thought about doing, even if all heaters were on at the same time, on HIGH. Over time, the 12/2 wire will degrade due to heating/cooling cycles that the 10/2 won't have experienced. As it degrades, it's own resistance will increase. BS. If that was the case, no electrical inspector would approve it. You have one, Gfre, telling you that it does meet code and citing NEC to back it up. Another side effect of running the wire warm/possibly hot to the touch More BS. at near full load over a period of time is that the connection points and terminals in the panel and the heaters will also become a little 'warmer' than they would if they'd been powered from the 10/2 line and pigtailed to it with a short 12/2 run. A random internet posting is your cited source of information? Uhh, no. I remembered it was 100ft or so off hand as the general rule of thumb, but didn't remember how much voltage was lost as a result. I've also got various NEC books and my 2014 edition of the yellow Ugly electricians reference book. It's where the voltage drop figures I used today came from, actually. And even using those numbers, the voltage drop at the full 20A circuit rating is just 3.2%. At the actual load, 14.6 amps, it's just 2.3%, so again there is no problem, no hot wires. That's right, just use 12 gauge which NEC says is perfectly fine. You're the one throwing all kinds of FUD in and using incorrect calculations. Just to clarify, the calculations I provided in this post aren't FUD, unless you're able to dismiss the yellow Ugly electrician reference book. Show us where Ugly's says it's a violation of NEC, unsafe, etc to wire the circuit on a #12. I haven't seen any 240volt baseboard heater wired with a 12/2 in sometime, actually. That depends entirely on what the rated capacity of the heaters is. And if you're that familiar with heating elements you should know that there ones that are rated for either 240V or 120V and that at the lower voltage they put out LESS power, they don't magically adjust, pull more current, to put out the same power they do at 240V. I think the last time I actually observed that was with a trailer. Alas, they're built with heavy consideration on cost. IE: as cheap as you can get away with. I don't work like that, I don't offer advice with that in mind first and foremost. If it were me, writing only for myself, I'd spend the extra money for the heavier gauge wire and use the 12/2 wire for pigtailing off of it into the heater units. I've already explained why I'd run it in this manner. No real point in doing so again. Which again implies that this is destined to fail, when of course it's not. |
#36
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Wiring electric baseboard
On Mon, 30 May 2016 06:53:52 -0000 (UTC), Diesel
wrote: Mon, 30 May 2016 06:09:42 GMT in alt.home.repair, wrote: Voltage drop still depends on the load. If there is no load, there is no voltage drop. If you have a wire with no load at all, there will be full circuit voltage at both ends. No, there won't. The wire isn't a super conductor. It takes a little to push the electrons on it. The thinner and longer the length, the more is lost in transit. If it were a super conductor, what you've written would be absolutely true. As long as the wire has resistance of it's own, we're subject to voltage drop. We have various ways in which to minimize the voltage drop, though. Short of using a super conductor however, we can't outright prevent it. Bull****. If there is no current flowing, there is no voltage drop. Volts (dropped) = Amps x Resistance. If there are no Amps, it doesn't matter what the resistance is, volts (dropped) is still zero. You might argue that when you actually measure the volts at the far end, you are loading the circuit with your meter but a digital meter has in impedance in the meg ohms so the current is still virtually zero and you will still see the full voltage within the accuracy of the meter. As a sanity check, notice voltage drop charts always base the number on the load in amps times the resistance of the wire. Watts is watts, man. Available voltage determines how many amps it's going to take to get them, though. Lower voltage=more amps to do the same job. If you have a lower voltage, the watts will be lower. In our example, that 1500 watt heater (at 240v) will be 1407 watts at 232v. Current will actually be less, not more. Not exactly. You can have high voltage and next to no current behind it (think of a taser) or low voltage and a considerable amount of current behind it (think of your car battery) it's no chump and your starter motor isn't exactly a low drain device...You can also lose a few volts in our example, and, still be able to pull enough current to make up the difference. The easiest way I know of to explain the relationship is this: It may be useful to consider the image of water in a hose. Voltage is equivalent to pressure, water flow is equivalent to current and the diameter of the pipe is equivalent ot the thickness of the wire - or resistance. |
#37
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Wiring electric baseboard
On Monday, May 30, 2016 at 1:57:48 AM UTC-4, Diesel wrote:
Mon, 30 May 2016 02:46:57 GMT in alt.home.repair, wrote: On Mon, 30 May 2016 02:23:31 -0000 (UTC), Diesel wrote: 7.9 volts lost 12/2 at 100ft 4.97 volts lost on 10/2 at 100ft 240-7.9=232.1 on the 12ga 240-4.97=235 on the 10ga And that's due entirely to distance with no loads present on the line yet. With no load, there is no voltage drop at all. The voltage drop is due to the wire's own resistance, and the distance the voltage must travel. The wire we're using isn't a super conductor. It has a certain amount of resistance to it. As a result, some volts are no longer available to us, we spent them getting the rest down the line. Nothing for free, you know. Good grief, you need to take electricity 101. Gfre is correct, with no load there is no voltage drop, the full 240V is available and can be measured at the end of the 100 ft of wire. The only way you get voltage drop is with a load and current flowing. Let RL be the load connected to a voltage source V using wires that have a resistance RW. With RL not present the voltage at the open wires where RL would be is equal to V. With the load RL inserted, the voltage across RL is V- RW*V/(RL+RW). You should know this just from common experience. Measure the voltage at a receptacle on a long circuit with no loads on it, you get the same voltage as you do at the panel. Turn all the appliances, lights, etc on and you get some number of volts less, due to the voltage drop. Watts is watts, man. Available voltage determines how many amps it's going to take to get them, though. Lower voltage=more amps to do the same job. Resistor is a resistor man. And a heating element looks more like a resistor that an intelligent widget that draws more amps. Here's a though experiment. I take a 3500W heating element that draws 14.6 A at 240V. Now I hook it up instead to a 24V source. Does it draw 146 A? |
#38
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Wiring electric baseboard
On Monday, May 30, 2016 at 7:13:00 AM UTC-4, Al Gebra wrote:
On 05/30/2016 12:53 AM, Diesel wrote: Mon, 30 May 2016 06:09:42 GMT in alt.home.repair, wrote: Voltage drop still depends on the load. If there is no load, there is no voltage drop. If you have a wire with no load at all, there will be full circuit voltage at both ends. No, there won't. The wire isn't a super conductor. It takes a little to push the electrons on it. The thinner and longer the length, the more is lost in transit. If it were a super conductor, what you've written would be absolutely true. As long as the wire has resistance of it's own, we're subject to voltage drop. We have various ways in which to minimize the voltage drop, though. Short of using a super conductor however, we can't outright prevent it. Voltage drop is represented by the formula E=I*R Seems to me if the current flow is zero, then the voltage would be zero as well. Seems to me Mr. Ohm would be proud, like most of us, you have it right. |
#39
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Wiring electric baseboard
On Monday, May 30, 2016 at 10:37:10 AM UTC-4, FromTheRafters wrote:
on 5/30/2016, Al Gebra supposed : On 05/30/2016 12:53 AM, Diesel wrote: Mon, 30 May 2016 06:09:42 GMT in alt.home.repair, wrote: Voltage drop still depends on the load. If there is no load, there is no voltage drop. If you have a wire with no load at all, there will be full circuit voltage at both ends. No, there won't. The wire isn't a super conductor. It takes a little to push the electrons on it. The thinner and longer the length, the more is lost in transit. If it were a super conductor, what you've written would be absolutely true. As long as the wire has resistance of it's own, we're subject to voltage drop. We have various ways in which to minimize the voltage drop, though. Short of using a super conductor however, we can't outright prevent it. Voltage drop is represented by the formula E=I*R Seems to me if the current flow is zero, then the voltage would be zero as well. That's a good theory, but IMO it is wrong. No theory, it's correct from electricity 101. With an open circuit, no current flow, the voltage across the wires is the same at both ends. |
#40
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Wiring electric baseboard
On Monday, May 30, 2016 at 2:53:56 AM UTC-4, Diesel wrote:
Mon, 30 May 2016 06:09:42 GMT in alt.home.repair, wrote: Voltage drop still depends on the load. If there is no load, there is no voltage drop. If you have a wire with no load at all, there will be full circuit voltage at both ends. No, there won't. The wire isn't a super conductor. No one ever said it was. It takes a little to push the electrons on it. There is no "pushing" with no load. The thinner and longer the length, the more is lost in transit. That's true, but with no load, there is no current, no pushing, no transit. Capiche? If it were a super conductor, what you've written would be absolutely true. What we've written is true, it's electricity 101 and quite frankly if you don't understand these simple basics, you shouldn't be here giving advice. As long as the wire has resistance of it's own, we're subject to voltage drop. Sure, as long as there is a load and current flowing. The voltage drop on each conductor will be V = I * RW, where I is the current flowing and RW is the resistance of the wire. Set I=0 and what do you get for V? We have various ways in which to minimize the voltage drop, though. Short of using a super conductor however, we can't outright prevent it. Watts is watts, man. Available voltage determines how many amps it's going to take to get them, though. Lower voltage=more amps to do the same job. If you have a lower voltage, the watts will be lower. In our example, that 1500 watt heater (at 240v) will be 1407 watts at 232v. Current will actually be less, not more. Not exactly. You can have high voltage and next to no current behind it (think of a taser) or low voltage and a considerable amount of current behind it (think of your car battery) it's no chump and your starter motor isn't exactly a low drain device...You can also lose a few volts in our example, and, still be able to pull enough current to make up the difference. Resistors don't change to make up the difference. Go look at the specs for some heating elements rated for dual voltages. The heater in my spa for example, is rated at 1500W at 120V, 6000W at 240V. At lower voltages, they pull less current, not more. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Hydronic elecric baseboard heater vs standard electric baseboard heater | Home Repair | |||
Wiring an Emerson Electric Baseboard | Home Repair | |||
Wiring electric baseboard heaters | Home Repair | |||
Electric baseboard and T-stat wiring | Home Repair | |||
wiring baseboard heater | Home Repair |