On 4/4/07 7:58 AM, in article ,
"Lionel" wrote:

On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 06:16:30 -0500, John Fields
wrote:

On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 15:40:32 +1000, Lionel
wrote:

On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 04:01:50 GMT, The Secretary of HomIntern
wrote:

On Tue, 03 Apr 2007 11:35:42 -0700, John Larkin k'lamed:
On Tue, 03 Apr 2007 13:19:26 +1000, Lionel wrote:
On Tue, 3 Apr 2007 02:27:40 +0000 (UTC), Meat Plow wrote:
On Mon, 02 Apr 2007 21:04:29 -0500, John Fields wrote:
On Mon, 02 Apr 2007 18:31:30 -0700, Aratzio wrote:

This from a right-wing apologist who has ranting frothfests when he
identifies anyone to the left of Atllia The Hun.

---
"Apologist"?

Hardly.

"Atllia?"

Lern to spel, semi-cretin.

The bullseye is of your own making, John. Always has been.

---
So now the target finally gets a chance to speak?

What do you want?

Do you have some electronics to discuss? Or have you been sucked into
the black hole of hypocrisy also?

Looking at his oh-so "Professional" posting history, it seems likely that
the blackhole formed around him:
http://groups.google.com/groups?as_o...st+****+moron+
brat+pathetic+****ing+loser&as_uauthors=jfields%40 austininstruments.com&s
afe=off

And this John Fields turd has the gall to accuse others of name-calling.
What a ****ing hypocrite!

I don't understand why you guys aren't boring yourselves senseless with
this third-grade name calling.

Oh, maybe I do understand.

Third-grade name-calling usually bores me senseless, hence why I don't
do it much. However, I haven't noticed that "hypocrite" is a word often
found in the lexicons of third-graders, generally speaking.

Perhaps John heard it a lot from his teacher when he was in 3rd grade?

---
The only way that could be true was if we went to third grade
together.

You're not very good at this whole reading comprehension thing, John.
Your grades must've been awful.

You didn't comprehend his post. Try again.

Don

MassiveProng pinched out a steaming pile
:

On 03 Apr 2007 14:26:44 GMT, ???hw??f Gave
us:

MassiveProng pinched out a steaming pile
:

On Tue, 03 Apr 2007 20:37:48 +1000, Lionel
Gave
us:

On Tue, 03 Apr 2007 03:14:37 -0700, MassiveProng
g wrote:

On Tue, 03 Apr 2007 20:01:03 +1000, Lionel
Gave
us:


3: You called me a liar, because you couldn't find any posts from
me
on Google that were more than 6 days old.


Wrong.

I told YOU to look on google, dip****.

Why on earth would I need to look for *my own posts* on Google?
I /know/ where I post, you ****ing retard.

Typical auktard sidestep action. Good job, auktard.

You claimed I looked on google, when what really happened is that
I
challenged you to prove your claim, which you incessantly sidestep.

What I DID say was that YOU should google up some proof, which
you
conveniently sidestepped.

The only thing I'm interested in proving is your stupidity, &
you're
doing a really slick job of proving that for me. ;^)

Typical auktard meaningless tripe.

Ahem...Angry Guy...do you know anything about 802.11 wireless
antennas?
I saw some plans for a Pringles Can antenna but it looks pretty
complex.
Is a usb-based parabolic reflector the better way to go?
TIA


Do a search on diversity receivers.
A 14 antenna array.

You are too ****ing poor though, dingledorf.


Well duh.

http://www.avalonrf.com/products/acc-antennas.htm


It would be nice if they had pictures...

Your nym is retarded as well.

Just because your char-set wont handle euro-fonts?
snarf

http://nocat.net/

On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 08:02:44 -0700, Don Bowey
transparently proposed:

On 4/4/07 7:58 AM, in article ,
"Lionel" wrote:

On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 06:16:30 -0500, John Fields
wrote:

On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 15:40:32 +1000, Lionel
wrote:

On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 04:01:50 GMT, The Secretary of HomIntern
wrote:

On Tue, 03 Apr 2007 11:35:42 -0700, John Larkin k'lamed:
On Tue, 03 Apr 2007 13:19:26 +1000, Lionel wrote:
On Tue, 3 Apr 2007 02:27:40 +0000 (UTC), Meat Plow wrote:
On Mon, 02 Apr 2007 21:04:29 -0500, John Fields wrote:
On Mon, 02 Apr 2007 18:31:30 -0700, Aratzio wrote:

This from a right-wing apologist who has ranting frothfests when he
identifies anyone to the left of Atllia The Hun.

---
"Apologist"?

Hardly.

"Atllia?"

Lern to spel, semi-cretin.

The bullseye is of your own making, John. Always has been.

---
So now the target finally gets a chance to speak?

What do you want?

Do you have some electronics to discuss? Or have you been sucked into
the black hole of hypocrisy also?

Looking at his oh-so "Professional" posting history, it seems likely that
the blackhole formed around him:
http://groups.google.com/groups?as_o...st+****+moron+
brat+pathetic+****ing+loser&as_uauthors=jfields%40 austininstruments.com&s
afe=off

And this John Fields turd has the gall to accuse others of name-calling.
What a ****ing hypocrite!

I don't understand why you guys aren't boring yourselves senseless with
this third-grade name calling.

Oh, maybe I do understand.

Third-grade name-calling usually bores me senseless, hence why I don't
do it much. However, I haven't noticed that "hypocrite" is a word often
found in the lexicons of third-graders, generally speaking.

Perhaps John heard it a lot from his teacher when he was in 3rd grade?

---
The only way that could be true was if we went to third grade
together.

You're not very good at this whole reading comprehension thing, John.
Your grades must've been awful.

You didn't comprehend his post. Try again.

Don

PeeWee Herman would have been proud of John's post. Scathing in its
rhetorical power.

--

Does the name Pavlov ring a bell?

Aratzio - Usenet ruiner #2

On Tue, 03 Apr 2007 22:20:20 -0700, MassiveProng
wrote:

On Tue, 03 Apr 2007 18:41:03 -0700, John Larkin
Gave us:

How about an intermediate case, say two golf balls that are
imperfectly springy? That's also inelastic. What happens?

You forgot to notice that it depends on their location. In my hand,
no rebound on the golf balls. Against a ball laid on the floor,
rebound.

So you would call it "less perfectly springy" when on the floor?

Also, the steel balls behave in the opposite manner. In my hand, I
get a rebound. Against a ball laid on the floor, no rebound, just a
side deflection from the not quite so centered hit.

You didn't answer any of these beginner's questions. If you can't do
the simple stuff, you certainly can't figure out the harder cases,
like rolling balls.

John

On 4/4/07 8:12 AM, in article ,
"Aratzio" wrote:

On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 08:02:44 -0700, Don Bowey
transparently proposed:

On 4/4/07 7:58 AM, in article ,
"Lionel" wrote:

On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 06:16:30 -0500, John Fields
wrote:

On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 15:40:32 +1000, Lionel
wrote:

On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 04:01:50 GMT, The Secretary of HomIntern
wrote:

On Tue, 03 Apr 2007 11:35:42 -0700, John Larkin k'lamed:
On Tue, 03 Apr 2007 13:19:26 +1000, Lionel wrote:
On Tue, 3 Apr 2007 02:27:40 +0000 (UTC), Meat Plow wrote:
On Mon, 02 Apr 2007 21:04:29 -0500, John Fields wrote:
On Mon, 02 Apr 2007 18:31:30 -0700, Aratzio wrote:

This from a right-wing apologist who has ranting frothfests when he
identifies anyone to the left of Atllia The Hun.

---
"Apologist"?

Hardly.

"Atllia?"

Lern to spel, semi-cretin.

The bullseye is of your own making, John. Always has been.

---
So now the target finally gets a chance to speak?

What do you want?

Do you have some electronics to discuss? Or have you been sucked into
the black hole of hypocrisy also?

Looking at his oh-so "Professional" posting history, it seems likely
that
the blackhole formed around him:
http://groups.google.com/groups?as_o...nist+****+moro
n+
brat+pathetic+****ing+loser&as_uauthors=jfields%40 austininstruments.com
&s
afe=off

And this John Fields turd has the gall to accuse others of
name-calling.
What a ****ing hypocrite!

I don't understand why you guys aren't boring yourselves senseless with
this third-grade name calling.

Oh, maybe I do understand.

Third-grade name-calling usually bores me senseless, hence why I don't
do it much. However, I haven't noticed that "hypocrite" is a word often
found in the lexicons of third-graders, generally speaking.

Perhaps John heard it a lot from his teacher when he was in 3rd grade?

---
The only way that could be true was if we went to third grade
together.

You're not very good at this whole reading comprehension thing, John.
Your grades must've been awful.

You didn't comprehend his post. Try again.

Don

PeeWee Herman would have been proud of John's post. Scathing in its
rhetorical power.

So it's over your head also.

On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 08:01:36 +0100, Eeyore
wrote:



MassiveProng wrote:

The BloggsTard makes claims every
month or so that I am every poster that he ever got into an argument
with over the last ten years. He only got one right, and that is
always the current one. That show how little that dumb **** knows
about Usenet, regardless of what he may or may not know about
electronics.

Bloggs is indeed astonishingly ignorant.

Graham

He generally gets his electronics right, which counts for something in
an electronics design newsgroup. MP seems to have only anechdotal
knowledge of electronics.

John

On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 06:16:30 -0500, John Fields
wrote:

On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 15:40:32 +1000, Lionel
wrote:

On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 04:01:50 GMT, The Secretary of HomIntern
wrote:

On Tue, 03 Apr 2007 11:35:42 -0700, John Larkin k'lamed:
On Tue, 03 Apr 2007 13:19:26 +1000, Lionel wrote:
On Tue, 3 Apr 2007 02:27:40 +0000 (UTC), Meat Plow wrote:
On Mon, 02 Apr 2007 21:04:29 -0500, John Fields wrote:
On Mon, 02 Apr 2007 18:31:30 -0700, Aratzio wrote:

This from a right-wing apologist who has ranting frothfests when he
identifies anyone to the left of Atllia The Hun.

---
"Apologist"?

Hardly.

"Atllia?"

Lern to spel, semi-cretin.

The bullseye is of your own making, John. Always has been.

---
So now the target finally gets a chance to speak?

What do you want?

Do you have some electronics to discuss? Or have you been sucked into
the black hole of hypocrisy also?

Looking at his oh-so "Professional" posting history, it seems likely that
the blackhole formed around him:
http://groups.google.com/groups?as_oq=liberal+****+communist+****+moron+bra t+pathetic+****ing+loser&as_uauthors=jfields%40aus tininstruments.com&safe=off

And this John Fields turd has the gall to accuse others of name-calling.
What a ****ing hypocrite!

I don't understand why you guys aren't boring yourselves senseless with
this third-grade name calling.

Oh, maybe I do understand.

Third-grade name-calling usually bores me senseless, hence why I don't
do it much. However, I haven't noticed that "hypocrite" is a word often
found in the lexicons of third-graders, generally speaking.

Perhaps John heard it a lot from his teacher when he was in 3rd grade?

---
The only way that could be true was if we went to third grade
together.

Gosh, did you go to McDonnah #14 in New Orleans?

John

On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 08:17:56 -0700, Don Bowey
transparently proposed:

On 4/4/07 8:12 AM, in article ,
"Aratzio" wrote:

On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 08:02:44 -0700, Don Bowey
transparently proposed:

On 4/4/07 7:58 AM, in article ,
"Lionel" wrote:

On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 06:16:30 -0500, John Fields
wrote:

On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 15:40:32 +1000, Lionel
wrote:

On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 04:01:50 GMT, The Secretary of HomIntern
wrote:

On Tue, 03 Apr 2007 11:35:42 -0700, John Larkin k'lamed:
On Tue, 03 Apr 2007 13:19:26 +1000, Lionel wrote:
On Tue, 3 Apr 2007 02:27:40 +0000 (UTC), Meat Plow wrote:
On Mon, 02 Apr 2007 21:04:29 -0500, John Fields wrote:
On Mon, 02 Apr 2007 18:31:30 -0700, Aratzio wrote:

This from a right-wing apologist who has ranting frothfests when he
identifies anyone to the left of Atllia The Hun.

---
"Apologist"?

Hardly.

"Atllia?"

Lern to spel, semi-cretin.

The bullseye is of your own making, John. Always has been.

---
So now the target finally gets a chance to speak?

What do you want?

Do you have some electronics to discuss? Or have you been sucked into
the black hole of hypocrisy also?

Looking at his oh-so "Professional" posting history, it seems likely
that
the blackhole formed around him:
http://groups.google.com/groups?as_o...nist+****+moro
n+
brat+pathetic+****ing+loser&as_uauthors=jfields%40 austininstruments.com
&s
afe=off

And this John Fields turd has the gall to accuse others of
name-calling.
What a ****ing hypocrite!

I don't understand why you guys aren't boring yourselves senseless with
this third-grade name calling.

Oh, maybe I do understand.

Third-grade name-calling usually bores me senseless, hence why I don't
do it much. However, I haven't noticed that "hypocrite" is a word often
found in the lexicons of third-graders, generally speaking.

Perhaps John heard it a lot from his teacher when he was in 3rd grade?

---
The only way that could be true was if we went to third grade
together.

You're not very good at this whole reading comprehension thing, John.
Your grades must've been awful.

You didn't comprehend his post. Try again.

Don

PeeWee Herman would have been proud of John's post. Scathing in its
rhetorical power.

So it's over your head also.


BWAHAHAHAHAHA
pats head
Gawd, I love Irony.

(Nalbar rkcynvaf vg gb guvf arj gneq trgf n obbg hc gur nff.)

--

Does the name Pavlov ring a bell?

Aratzio - Usenet ruiner #2

On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 01:01:07 +1000, Lionel
wrote:





What I _am_ saying is that your intention, by bringing auk into it,
was to try to bring to bear some horsepower which you clearly don't
possess in order to try to win the argument you had already lost at
that point.

Which argument would that be, John?

---
Can't you read? I said the one you lost.


--
JF

On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 08:20:59 -0700, John Larkin
wrote:

On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 06:16:30 -0500, John Fields
wrote:

On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 15:40:32 +1000, Lionel
wrote:

On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 04:01:50 GMT, The Secretary of HomIntern
wrote:

On Tue, 03 Apr 2007 11:35:42 -0700, John Larkin k'lamed:
On Tue, 03 Apr 2007 13:19:26 +1000, Lionel wrote:
On Tue, 3 Apr 2007 02:27:40 +0000 (UTC), Meat Plow wrote:
On Mon, 02 Apr 2007 21:04:29 -0500, John Fields wrote:
On Mon, 02 Apr 2007 18:31:30 -0700, Aratzio wrote:

This from a right-wing apologist who has ranting frothfests when he
identifies anyone to the left of Atllia The Hun.

---
"Apologist"?

Hardly.

"Atllia?"

Lern to spel, semi-cretin.

The bullseye is of your own making, John. Always has been.

---
So now the target finally gets a chance to speak?

What do you want?

Do you have some electronics to discuss? Or have you been sucked into
the black hole of hypocrisy also?

Looking at his oh-so "Professional" posting history, it seems likely that
the blackhole formed around him:
http://groups.google.com/groups?as_oq=liberal+****+communist+****+moron+bra t+pathetic+****ing+loser&as_uauthors=jfields%40aus tininstruments.com&safe=off

And this John Fields turd has the gall to accuse others of name-calling.
What a ****ing hypocrite!

I don't understand why you guys aren't boring yourselves senseless with
this third-grade name calling.

Oh, maybe I do understand.

Third-grade name-calling usually bores me senseless, hence why I don't
do it much. However, I haven't noticed that "hypocrite" is a word often
found in the lexicons of third-graders, generally speaking.

Perhaps John heard it a lot from his teacher when he was in 3rd grade?

---
The only way that could be true was if we went to third grade
together.

Gosh, did you go to McDonnah #14 in New Orleans?

---
Nope, Cristobal Grade School in the Canal Zone. :-)


--
JF

On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 01:26:28 +1000, Lionel
wrote:

On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 14:11:40 GMT, Aratzio
wrote:

On Tue, 03 Apr 2007 22:20:20 -0700, MassiveProng
transparently proposed:

On Tue, 03 Apr 2007 18:41:03 -0700, John Larkin
Gave us:

How about an intermediate case, say two golf balls that are
imperfectly springy? That's also inelastic. What happens?

You forgot to notice that it depends on their location. In my hand,
no rebound on the golf balls. Against a ball laid on the floor,
rebound.

So you would call it "less perfectly springy" when on the floor?

Also, the steel balls behave in the opposite manner. In my hand, I
get a rebound. Against a ball laid on the floor, no rebound, just a
side deflection from the not quite so centered hit.

Sprongy sure has a thing about the physics of handling balls that are
not his.

Not to mention his fetish for sticks that're bigger than his.

---
He won't come knocking on your door anytime soon, then, I'm sure.


--
JF

On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 01:51:24 +1000, Lionel
wrote:

On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 08:02:44 -0700, Don Bowey
wrote:

You didn't comprehend his post. Try again.

Some of us prefer to discuss actual issues over playing silly word
games.

---
Unfortunately, you're not one of the ones with the tools which allow
him to do that.


--
JF

On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 11:36:44 -0500, John Fields
transparently proposed:

On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 01:26:28 +1000, Lionel
wrote:

On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 14:11:40 GMT, Aratzio
wrote:

On Tue, 03 Apr 2007 22:20:20 -0700, MassiveProng
transparently proposed:

On Tue, 03 Apr 2007 18:41:03 -0700, John Larkin
Gave us:

How about an intermediate case, say two golf balls that are
imperfectly springy? That's also inelastic. What happens?

You forgot to notice that it depends on their location. In my hand,
no rebound on the golf balls. Against a ball laid on the floor,
rebound.

So you would call it "less perfectly springy" when on the floor?

Also, the steel balls behave in the opposite manner. In my hand, I
get a rebound. Against a ball laid on the floor, no rebound, just a
side deflection from the not quite so centered hit.

Sprongy sure has a thing about the physics of handling balls that are
not his.

Not to mention his fetish for sticks that're bigger than his.

---
He won't come knocking on your door anytime soon, then, I'm sure.

Fantasizing about other men, John.


--

Does the name Pavlov ring a bell?

Aratzio - Usenet ruiner #2

On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 02:07:00 +1000, Lionel
wrote:

On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 15:47:39 GMT, Aratzio
wrote:

On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 08:17:56 -0700, Don Bowey
transparently proposed:

On 4/4/07 8:12 AM, in article ,
"Aratzio" wrote:

On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 08:02:44 -0700, Don Bowey
transparently proposed:

On 4/4/07 7:58 AM, in article ,
"Lionel" wrote:

On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 06:16:30 -0500, John Fields
wrote:

On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 15:40:32 +1000, Lionel
wrote:

On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 04:01:50 GMT, The Secretary of HomIntern
wrote:

On Tue, 03 Apr 2007 11:35:42 -0700, John Larkin k'lamed:
On Tue, 03 Apr 2007 13:19:26 +1000, Lionel wrote:
On Tue, 3 Apr 2007 02:27:40 +0000 (UTC), Meat Plow wrote:
On Mon, 02 Apr 2007 21:04:29 -0500, John Fields wrote:
On Mon, 02 Apr 2007 18:31:30 -0700, Aratzio wrote:

This from a right-wing apologist who has ranting frothfests when he
identifies anyone to the left of Atllia The Hun.

---
"Apologist"?

Hardly.

"Atllia?"

Lern to spel, semi-cretin.

The bullseye is of your own making, John. Always has been.

---
So now the target finally gets a chance to speak?

What do you want?

Do you have some electronics to discuss? Or have you been sucked into
the black hole of hypocrisy also?

Looking at his oh-so "Professional" posting history, it seems likely
that
the blackhole formed around him:
http://groups.google.com/groups?as_o...nist+****+moro
n+
brat+pathetic+****ing+loser&as_uauthors=jfields%40 austininstruments.com
&s
afe=off

And this John Fields turd has the gall to accuse others of
name-calling.
What a ****ing hypocrite!

I don't understand why you guys aren't boring yourselves senseless with
this third-grade name calling.

Oh, maybe I do understand.

Third-grade name-calling usually bores me senseless, hence why I don't
do it much. However, I haven't noticed that "hypocrite" is a word often
found in the lexicons of third-graders, generally speaking.

Perhaps John heard it a lot from his teacher when he was in 3rd grade?

---
The only way that could be true was if we went to third grade
together.

You're not very good at this whole reading comprehension thing, John.
Your grades must've been awful.

You didn't comprehend his post. Try again.

Don

PeeWee Herman would have been proud of John's post. Scathing in its
rhetorical power.

So it's over your head also.


BWAHAHAHAHAHA
pats head
Gawd, I love Irony.

(Nalbar rkcynvaf vg gb guvf arj gneq trgf n obbg hc gur nff.)

Abg n shpxvat punapr, V ybir frrvat fvatyr-tebhc gbhtu thlf
snpr-cynagvat ba gur erny jbeyq.

---
YBY, gur bayl snpr-cynagvat lbh'er yvxryl gb or qbvat nal gvzr fbba
vf lbhef orgjrra fbzrbar'f
ohgg purrxf, ln pbceb****bhf pybq.


--
JF

Aratzio wrote:

On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 11:36:44 -0500, John Fields
transparently proposed:

He won't come knocking on your door anytime soon, then, I'm sure.

Fantasizing about other men, John.


I see that you're still try to find a new homosexual lover.


--
Service to my country? Been there, Done that, and I've got my DD214 to
prove it.
Member of DAV #85.

Michael A. Terrell
Central Florida

On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 02:47:49 +1000, Lionel
transparently proposed:

On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 11:36:44 -0500, John Fields
wrote:

On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 01:26:28 +1000, Lionel
wrote:

On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 14:11:40 GMT, Aratzio
wrote:

On Tue, 03 Apr 2007 22:20:20 -0700, MassiveProng
g transparently proposed:

On Tue, 03 Apr 2007 18:41:03 -0700, John Larkin
Gave us:

How about an intermediate case, say two golf balls that are
imperfectly springy? That's also inelastic. What happens?

You forgot to notice that it depends on their location. In my hand,
no rebound on the golf balls. Against a ball laid on the floor,
rebound.

So you would call it "less perfectly springy" when on the floor?

Also, the steel balls behave in the opposite manner. In my hand, I
get a rebound. Against a ball laid on the floor, no rebound, just a
side deflection from the not quite so centered hit.

Sprongy sure has a thing about the physics of handling balls that are
not his.

Not to mention his fetish for sticks that're bigger than his.

---
He won't come knocking on your door anytime soon, then, I'm sure.

Please keep your homosexual fantasies to yourself.

****head. 4 minutes.

--

Does the name Pavlov ring a bell?

Aratzio - Usenet ruiner #2

On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 02:44:17 +1000, Lionel
wrote:

On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 11:20:45 -0500, John Fields
wrote:

On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 01:01:07 +1000, Lionel
wrote:





What I _am_ saying is that your intention, by bringing auk into it,
was to try to bring to bear some horsepower which you clearly don't
possess in order to try to win the argument you had already lost at
that point.

Which argument would that be, John?

---
Can't you read? I said the one you lost.

You haven't yet identified one of those. See, unlike the friendly
little pixies in your head, normal people tend not to believe claims
for which they've seen no evidence.

---
Your intelligence, for example?


--
JF

On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 02:47:49 +1000, Lionel
wrote:

On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 11:36:44 -0500, John Fields
wrote:

On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 01:26:28 +1000, Lionel
wrote:

On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 14:11:40 GMT, Aratzio
wrote:

On Tue, 03 Apr 2007 22:20:20 -0700, MassiveProng
g transparently proposed:

On Tue, 03 Apr 2007 18:41:03 -0700, John Larkin
Gave us:

How about an intermediate case, say two golf balls that are
imperfectly springy? That's also inelastic. What happens?

You forgot to notice that it depends on their location. In my hand,
no rebound on the golf balls. Against a ball laid on the floor,
rebound.

So you would call it "less perfectly springy" when on the floor?

Also, the steel balls behave in the opposite manner. In my hand, I
get a rebound. Against a ball laid on the floor, no rebound, just a
side deflection from the not quite so centered hit.

Sprongy sure has a thing about the physics of handling balls that are
not his.

Not to mention his fetish for sticks that're bigger than his.

---
He won't come knocking on your door anytime soon, then, I'm sure.

Please keep your homosexual fantasies to yourself.

---
Why? Do you feel strangely aroused by the thought of man-meat bigger
than yours?


--
JF

On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 11:53:39 -0500, John Fields
transparently proposed:

On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 02:07:00 +1000, Lionel
wrote:

On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 15:47:39 GMT, Aratzio
wrote:

On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 08:17:56 -0700, Don Bowey
transparently proposed:

On 4/4/07 8:12 AM, in article ,
"Aratzio" wrote:

On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 08:02:44 -0700, Don Bowey
transparently proposed:

On 4/4/07 7:58 AM, in article ,
"Lionel" wrote:

On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 06:16:30 -0500, John Fields
wrote:

On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 15:40:32 +1000, Lionel
wrote:

On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 04:01:50 GMT, The Secretary of HomIntern
wrote:

On Tue, 03 Apr 2007 11:35:42 -0700, John Larkin k'lamed:
On Tue, 03 Apr 2007 13:19:26 +1000, Lionel wrote:
On Tue, 3 Apr 2007 02:27:40 +0000 (UTC), Meat Plow wrote:
On Mon, 02 Apr 2007 21:04:29 -0500, John Fields wrote:
On Mon, 02 Apr 2007 18:31:30 -0700, Aratzio wrote:

This from a right-wing apologist who has ranting frothfests when he
identifies anyone to the left of Atllia The Hun.

---
"Apologist"?

Hardly.

"Atllia?"

Lern to spel, semi-cretin.

The bullseye is of your own making, John. Always has been.

---
So now the target finally gets a chance to speak?

What do you want?

Do you have some electronics to discuss? Or have you been sucked into
the black hole of hypocrisy also?

Looking at his oh-so "Professional" posting history, it seems likely
that
the blackhole formed around him:
http://groups.google.com/groups?as_o...nist+****+moro
n+
brat+pathetic+****ing+loser&as_uauthors=jfields%40 austininstruments.com
&s
afe=off

And this John Fields turd has the gall to accuse others of
name-calling.
What a ****ing hypocrite!

I don't understand why you guys aren't boring yourselves senseless with
this third-grade name calling.

Oh, maybe I do understand.

Third-grade name-calling usually bores me senseless, hence why I don't
do it much. However, I haven't noticed that "hypocrite" is a word often
found in the lexicons of third-graders, generally speaking.

Perhaps John heard it a lot from his teacher when he was in 3rd grade?

---
The only way that could be true was if we went to third grade
together.

You're not very good at this whole reading comprehension thing, John.
Your grades must've been awful.

You didn't comprehend his post. Try again.

Don

PeeWee Herman would have been proud of John's post. Scathing in its
rhetorical power.

So it's over your head also.


BWAHAHAHAHAHA
pats head
Gawd, I love Irony.

(Nalbar rkcynvaf vg gb guvf arj gneq trgf n obbg hc gur nff.)

Abg n shpxvat punapr, V ybir frrvat fvatyr-tebhc gbhtu thlf
snpr-cynagvat ba gur erny jbeyq.

---
LOL, the only face-planting you're likely to be doing any time soon
is yours between someone's
butt cheeks, ya coprophagous clod.

Wow, John, the whole online sexual fantasy thing, been done to death.
Can I suggest maybe you stick to the typo laming.

--

Does the name Pavlov ring a bell?

Aratzio - Usenet ruiner #2

On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 17:09:00 GMT, Aratzio
wrote:

On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 11:53:39 -0500, John Fields
transparently proposed:

On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 02:07:00 +1000, Lionel
wrote:

On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 15:47:39 GMT, Aratzio
wrote:

On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 08:17:56 -0700, Don Bowey
transparently proposed:

On 4/4/07 8:12 AM, in article ,
"Aratzio" wrote:

On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 08:02:44 -0700, Don Bowey
transparently proposed:

On 4/4/07 7:58 AM, in article ,
"Lionel" wrote:

On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 06:16:30 -0500, John Fields
wrote:

On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 15:40:32 +1000, Lionel
wrote:

On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 04:01:50 GMT, The Secretary of HomIntern
wrote:

On Tue, 03 Apr 2007 11:35:42 -0700, John Larkin k'lamed:
On Tue, 03 Apr 2007 13:19:26 +1000, Lionel wrote:
On Tue, 3 Apr 2007 02:27:40 +0000 (UTC), Meat Plow wrote:
On Mon, 02 Apr 2007 21:04:29 -0500, John Fields wrote:
On Mon, 02 Apr 2007 18:31:30 -0700, Aratzio wrote:

This from a right-wing apologist who has ranting frothfests when he
identifies anyone to the left of Atllia The Hun.

---
"Apologist"?

Hardly.

"Atllia?"

Lern to spel, semi-cretin.

The bullseye is of your own making, John. Always has been.

---
So now the target finally gets a chance to speak?

What do you want?

Do you have some electronics to discuss? Or have you been sucked into
the black hole of hypocrisy also?

Looking at his oh-so "Professional" posting history, it seems likely
that
the blackhole formed around him:
http://groups.google.com/groups?as_o...nist+****+moro
n+
brat+pathetic+****ing+loser&as_uauthors=jfields%40 austininstruments.com
&s
afe=off

And this John Fields turd has the gall to accuse others of
name-calling.
What a ****ing hypocrite!

I don't understand why you guys aren't boring yourselves senseless with
this third-grade name calling.

Oh, maybe I do understand.

Third-grade name-calling usually bores me senseless, hence why I don't
do it much. However, I haven't noticed that "hypocrite" is a word often
found in the lexicons of third-graders, generally speaking.

Perhaps John heard it a lot from his teacher when he was in 3rd grade?

---
The only way that could be true was if we went to third grade
together.

You're not very good at this whole reading comprehension thing, John.
Your grades must've been awful.

You didn't comprehend his post. Try again.

Don

PeeWee Herman would have been proud of John's post. Scathing in its
rhetorical power.

So it's over your head also.


BWAHAHAHAHAHA
pats head
Gawd, I love Irony.

(Nalbar rkcynvaf vg gb guvf arj gneq trgf n obbg hc gur nff.)

Abg n shpxvat punapr, V ybir frrvat fvatyr-tebhc gbhtu thlf
snpr-cynagvat ba gur erny jbeyq.

---
LOL, the only face-planting you're likely to be doing any time soon
is yours between someone's
butt cheeks, ya coprophagous clod.

Wow, John, the whole online sexual fantasy thing, been done to death.
Can I suggest maybe you stick to the typo laming.

---
Suggest away!


--
JF

On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 16:55:58 GMT, "Michael A. Terrell"
transparently proposed:

Aratzio wrote:

On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 11:36:44 -0500, John Fields
transparently proposed:

He won't come knocking on your door anytime soon, then, I'm sure.

Fantasizing about other men, John.


I see that you're still try to find a new homosexual lover.

Let me guess, you probably believe that to be a "flame"?

You do realize the only people that feel a need to scream "FAGGOT!" at
other men are those unsure of their own sexuality. Pointing that out
to you lame ****wits is tiresome, but it is a duty that must be
performed if usenet is to be saved from the sexually repressed and
mentally lame.

--

Does the name Pavlov ring a bell?

Aratzio - Usenet ruiner #2

On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 12:03:06 -0500, John Fields
transparently proposed:

On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 02:47:49 +1000, Lionel
wrote:

On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 11:36:44 -0500, John Fields
wrote:

On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 01:26:28 +1000, Lionel
wrote:

On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 14:11:40 GMT, Aratzio
wrote:

On Tue, 03 Apr 2007 22:20:20 -0700, MassiveProng
transparently proposed:

On Tue, 03 Apr 2007 18:41:03 -0700, John Larkin
m Gave us:

How about an intermediate case, say two golf balls that are
imperfectly springy? That's also inelastic. What happens?

You forgot to notice that it depends on their location. In my hand,
no rebound on the golf balls. Against a ball laid on the floor,
rebound.

So you would call it "less perfectly springy" when on the floor?

Also, the steel balls behave in the opposite manner. In my hand, I
get a rebound. Against a ball laid on the floor, no rebound, just a
side deflection from the not quite so centered hit.

Sprongy sure has a thing about the physics of handling balls that are
not his.

Not to mention his fetish for sticks that're bigger than his.

---
He won't come knocking on your door anytime soon, then, I'm sure.

Please keep your homosexual fantasies to yourself.

---
Why? Do you feel strangely aroused by the thought of man-meat bigger
than yours?

So, keeping your homosexual fantasies to yourself was not an option.

--

Does the name Pavlov ring a bell?

Aratzio - Usenet ruiner #2

On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 17:42:37 GMT, Aratzio
wrote:

On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 12:03:06 -0500, John Fields
transparently proposed:

On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 02:47:49 +1000, Lionel
wrote:

On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 11:36:44 -0500, John Fields
wrote:

On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 01:26:28 +1000, Lionel
wrote:

On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 14:11:40 GMT, Aratzio
wrote:

On Tue, 03 Apr 2007 22:20:20 -0700, MassiveProng
g transparently proposed:

On Tue, 03 Apr 2007 18:41:03 -0700, John Larkin
Gave us:

How about an intermediate case, say two golf balls that are
imperfectly springy? That's also inelastic. What happens?

You forgot to notice that it depends on their location. In my hand,
no rebound on the golf balls. Against a ball laid on the floor,
rebound.

So you would call it "less perfectly springy" when on the floor?

Also, the steel balls behave in the opposite manner. In my hand, I
get a rebound. Against a ball laid on the floor, no rebound, just a
side deflection from the not quite so centered hit.

Sprongy sure has a thing about the physics of handling balls that are
not his.

Not to mention his fetish for sticks that're bigger than his.

---
He won't come knocking on your door anytime soon, then, I'm sure.

Please keep your homosexual fantasies to yourself.

---
Why? Do you feel strangely aroused by the thought of man-meat bigger
than yours?

So, keeping your homosexual fantasies to yourself was not an option.

---
Of course it was an option, just not one I chose to exercise.


--
JF

Aratzio wrote:

On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 16:55:58 GMT, "Michael A. Terrell"
transparently proposed:

Aratzio wrote:

On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 11:36:44 -0500, John Fields
transparently proposed:

He won't come knocking on your door anytime soon, then, I'm sure.

Fantasizing about other men, John.


I see that you're still try to find a new homosexual lover.

Let me guess, you probably believe that to be a "flame"?

You do realize the only people that feel a need to scream "FAGGOT!" at
other men are those unsure of their own sexuality. Pointing that out
to you lame ****wits is tiresome, but it is a duty that must be
performed if usenet is to be saved from the sexually repressed and
mentally lame.


No, dumbass, it was sarcasm about your "Fantasizing about other
men", but obviously it bounced right off that thick and empty skull of
yours.


Does the name Pavlov ring a bell?


Yes! It tells me it time to refill Aratzio's dirty bowl with kibble.
You know, the stuff that was just recalled?


--
Service to my country? Been there, Done that, and I've got my DD214 to
prove it.
Member of DAV #85.

Michael A. Terrell
Central Florida

John Fields wrote:

On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 17:09:00 GMT, Aratzio
wrote:

Wow, John, the whole online sexual fantasy thing, been done to death.
Can I suggest maybe you stick to the typo laming.

Suggest away!


I see that he is tired of losing THAT fight.


--
Service to my country? Been there, Done that, and I've got my DD214 to
prove it.
Member of DAV #85.

Michael A. Terrell
Central Florida

On Tue, 03 Apr 2007 22:20:20 -0700, MassiveProng
wrote:

On Tue, 03 Apr 2007 18:41:03 -0700, John Larkin
Gave us:

How about an intermediate case, say two golf balls that are
imperfectly springy? That's also inelastic. What happens?

You forgot to notice that it depends on their location.

I specified the location with sufficient precision to answer the
problems. So answer them.

John

On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 04:01:50 GMT, The Secretary of HomIntern
wrote:


I don't understand why you guys aren't boring yourselves senseless with
this third-grade name calling.

Oh, maybe I do understand.

Third-grade name-calling usually bores me senseless, hence why I don't
do it much. However, I haven't noticed that "hypocrite" is a word often
found in the lexicons of third-graders, generally speaking.

Do you know anything about electronics?

John

On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 11:28:51 -0500, John Fields
wrote:



Gosh, did you go to McDonnah #14 in New Orleans?

---
Nope, Cristobal Grade School in the Canal Zone. :-)

Probably an equally bad climate.

John

On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 18:12:04 GMT, "Michael A. Terrell"
transparently proposed:

Aratzio wrote:

On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 16:55:58 GMT, "Michael A. Terrell"
transparently proposed:

Aratzio wrote:

On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 11:36:44 -0500, John Fields
transparently proposed:

He won't come knocking on your door anytime soon, then, I'm sure.

Fantasizing about other men, John.


I see that you're still try to find a new homosexual lover.

Let me guess, you probably believe that to be a "flame"?

You do realize the only people that feel a need to scream "FAGGOT!" at
other men are those unsure of their own sexuality. Pointing that out
to you lame ****wits is tiresome, but it is a duty that must be
performed if usenet is to be saved from the sexually repressed and
mentally lame.


No, dumbass, it was sarcasm about your "Fantasizing about other
men", but obviously it bounced right off that thick and empty skull of
yours.

Oh, yeah, *sarcasm*. Sure it was. Rather than just another sexually
repressed lamer presenting his own fears as a *flame*.

pats pointy head

Next he will try "the big kids made me do it and they ran away"




Does the name Pavlov ring a bell?


Yes! It tells me it time to refill Aratzio's dirty bowl with kibble.
You know, the stuff that was just recalled?

Wow, another "flame". - see that is sarcasm

--

Does the name Pavlov ring a bell?

Aratzio - Usenet ruiner #2

On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 18:13:34 GMT, "Michael A. Terrell"
transparently proposed:

John Fields wrote:

On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 17:09:00 GMT, Aratzio
wrote:

Wow, John, the whole online sexual fantasy thing, been done to death.
Can I suggest maybe you stick to the typo laming.

Suggest away!


I see that he is tired of losing THAT fight.

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
"He has not responded in 20 minutes, he ran away!!!!"


--

Does the name Pavlov ring a bell?

Aratzio - Usenet ruiner #2

On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 20:07:03 +1000, Lionel attempted to confuse the issue
further by squeaking:
On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 09:53:54 GMT, The Original Demon Prince of Absurdity
wrote:
On Tue, 03 Apr 2007 11:22:03 -0500, John Fields did the cha-cha, and
screamed:
On Tue, 03 Apr 2007 22:16:14 +1000, Lionel wrote:
On Tue, 03 Apr 2007 07:12:20 -0500, John Fields wrote:
On Tue, 03 Apr 2007 13:19:26 +1000, Lionel wrote:

Looking at his oh-so "Professional" posting history, it seems likely
that the blackhole formed around him:
http://groups.google.com/groups?as_oq=liberal+****+communist+****+moron+bra t+pathetic+****ing+loser&as_uauthors=jfields%40aus tininstruments.com&safe=off

And this John Fields turd has the gall to accuse others of
name-calling. What a ****ing hypocrite!

---
I don't recall any instances of importance when I accused anyone of
being a name-caller, but if you think that's not the proper way to
behave, then perhaps "turd" and "****ing hypocrite" show you up for
the badly brought up, two-faced phony you are.

I couldn't care less if you call me names, dickhead. You were the one
whining about name-calling, etc.

---
You just type to hear yourself talk, don't you?

Why would he "type" to do that?

Careful! - Mr Fields might 'insult' you by calling you pedantic.

snicker

It's about the only thing he could say, really -- he displayed his
tendency to post without thinking, and got caught...

--
__________________________________________________ ______________________
Hail Eris! mhm 29x21; TM#5; COOSN-029-06-71069; Usenet Ruiner #5
The God of Odd Statements, the Ugliest Pig****er In The Universe
Stupidity Takes Its Toll. Please Have Exact Change.
Most Hated Usenetizen of All Time #13; Lits Slut #16
Gutter Chix0r #16
Remove all the confusion and k00ks from my posting addy to send me your
sekrit messages.

Official Chung Demon

VOTE! Usenet Kook Awards, March 2007
Message-ID:

Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle
Trainer of PorchMonkey4Life
http://www.screedbomb.info/porchie/

AUK FAQ: http://www.caballista.org/auk/faq.html

WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, February 2007
Message-ID: 1

"You are the GOD-DAMNED, IGNORANT LIAR here.
Now, that is not me taking the Lord's name in vain."
-- John Wentzky: Living proof of the Death of Irony, in Message-ID:


I mourned:
The Mop Jockey did most oddly state:
DUDE, YOU WIN TEH INTERNETS!!!

the oversized check is in the mail.

Alas, all I get for my trouble is a Monkey that's trained to hurl ****
under several of my nyms.

"DevMcKinHole, you also get the pleasure of sucking off my doggy and
cleaning out his butthole with your tongue." -- He's not so much a
*Porch*Monkey as a _Fire_Monkey, as in one who's on fire due to his
own tendency to mess with lighter fluid while standing beside a hot
stove. Message-ID: 77Uxh.1996$384.1135@trnddc05

Said I:
You, Monkey-man, are quite possibly the only usenetter in existence
who does not and cannot own Hatter.

"[...] What's the matter fagboi, am I beating your as$ so badly that
you're no seeking an alliance with the diaperboi?...YOu really don't
know how dumb you are, do ya?" -- I guess I don't, Monkey.
Message-ID: gHVIh.1760$Bi2.1639@trnddc01

"Ok, but I am not stalking Teh Mop Jockey, I seem to be building a
relationship with him. Remember, I am a Christian so the secular rules
do not apply to me. I strive to be amoral, which I think applies to this
situation. Keep this in mind, please. Since I am currently mentally ill
and since I can not nominate, that is what I am doing at this time." --
Olympiada: Teh amoral "Christian", in Message-ID:


"You're like some kind of rabid attack-gerbil." -- Lionel Lauer to Joxer
in MID:

"I say you are out of your ****ing mind." -- Ying Guo, posting as
"SameAsB4" , tells PorchMonkey4Life, posting
as the same nick but a slightly different morph, the score, in MID:


"in the holy spirit i know you would satisfy every single person in a
room if you were the only person present." -- ~tanya, to Crazy Andy II,
in MID: . com

If you never read anything else in any of my sigs, read this:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/15321167/
http://borealin.livejournal.com/15104.html
Or watch it he
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uqxmPjB0WSs
Then, if you manage to read/watch all that, try this:
http://www.newamericancentury.org/Re...asDefenses.pdf
And Molly Ivins had a few choice words to say about it, weeks befo
http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/092906B.shtml
Here's Chris Floyd: Fatal Vision: The Deeper Evil Behind the Detainee
Bill: http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/100206A.shtml

"Q: What's the difference between the Vietnam War and the Iraq War?
A: George W. Bush had a plan to get out of the Vietnam War." -- Anon.

Thread where outing begins: http://tinyurl.com/hojf8
George Pickett Memorial Trophy, Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart,
and the Order of the Holey Sockpuppet winner on
outing personal contact info in x-poasted subject lines:
"Plenty of people post under their real names and do not attempt to hide
their contact info. You are scared of being 'outed' because you are a
pathological abuser of usenet, and people rightly despise you for it.
You're afraid of being reported to the authorities or, better, visited
by a couple of guys with baseball bats. Other people don't have this
obsessive fear. Ward Hardman himself has posted plenty of personal
information - nothing that anyone else added was hidden in any way.
You're so ****ing scared you've built up this whole sick mythology about
different categories of bad dudes who 'out' scum like you.

"Meanwhile you are the ugliest pig****er in the universe. You are the
coward without ethics. You call me a 'newbie' - ha! what an asshole you
are. Those who want to remain anonymous do so. There is absolutely no
way you could identify me, not unless you had the sort of subpoena power
that only gets turned on for big-time terrorists. That's because I chose
to be anonymous. Some people don't. Only really stupid dicks like you
choose the sort of semi-anonymity which leaves you in constant fear.

"What a dickless wonder you are 'Snarky' you fat asshole."
-- in MID: . com

"I am the only one who has outer filthed Ward" -- James C. "Crackhead"
Cracked voluntarily self-immolates, in MID:


"When I told Abbie Hoffman that he was the first one who made me laugh
since Lenny Bruce died, Hoffman said, "Really? He was my god." The
combination of satirical irreverence and sense of justice that Bruce and
Hoffman shared was the real spirit behind the Yippies--a term I coined
to describe a phenomenon that already existed: an organic coalition of
stoned hippies and political activists who engaged in such actions as
throwing money on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange, then
explaining to reporters the meaning of that symbolism. Folksinger Phil
Ochs summed it up: "A demonstration should turn you on, not turn you
off." So when journalists link the Yippies with misleading bedfellows,
at best it's careless shorthand; at worst it's deliberate demonization.
Osama bin Laden wanted an aircraft to crash into the Pentagon. Abbie
Hoffman merely wanted to levitate it." -- Paul Krassner,
http://tinyurl.com/ehu3v

To Whom It May Concern: Michael J. Cranston attorney kook is a dog****er

On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 11:36:44 -0500, John Fields attempted to confuse the
issue further by squeaking:
On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 01:26:28 +1000, Lionel wrote:
On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 14:11:40 GMT, Aratzio wrote:
On Tue, 03 Apr 2007 22:20:20 -0700, MassiveProng transparently
proposed:
On Tue, 03 Apr 2007 18:41:03 -0700, John Larkin Gave us:

How about an intermediate case, say two golf balls that are
imperfectly springy? That's also inelastic. What happens?

You forgot to notice that it depends on their location. In my hand,
no rebound on the golf balls. Against a ball laid on the floor,
rebound.

So you would call it "less perfectly springy" when on the floor?

Also, the steel balls behave in the opposite manner. In my hand, I
get a rebound. Against a ball laid on the floor, no rebound, just a
side deflection from the not quite so centered hit.

Sprongy sure has a thing about the physics of handling balls that are
not his.

Not to mention his fetish for sticks that're bigger than his.

---
He won't come knocking on your door anytime soon, then, I'm sure.

I'm sure Lionel is most grateful.

--
__________________________________________________ ______________________
Hail Eris! mhm 29x21; TM#5; COOSN-029-06-71069; Usenet Ruiner #5
The God of Odd Statements, the Ugliest Pig****er In The Universe
Stupidity Takes Its Toll. Please Have Exact Change.
Most Hated Usenetizen of All Time #13; Lits Slut #16
Gutter Chix0r #16
Remove all the confusion and k00ks from my posting addy to send me your
sekrit messages.

Official Chung Demon

VOTE! Usenet Kook Awards, March 2007
Message-ID:

Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle
Trainer of PorchMonkey4Life
http://www.screedbomb.info/porchie/

AUK FAQ: http://www.caballista.org/auk/faq.html

WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, February 2007
Message-ID: 1

"You are the GOD-DAMNED, IGNORANT LIAR here.
Now, that is not me taking the Lord's name in vain."
-- John Wentzky: Living proof of the Death of Irony, in Message-ID:


I mourned:
The Mop Jockey did most oddly state:
DUDE, YOU WIN TEH INTERNETS!!!

the oversized check is in the mail.

Alas, all I get for my trouble is a Monkey that's trained to hurl ****
under several of my nyms.

"DevMcKinHole, you also get the pleasure of sucking off my doggy and
cleaning out his butthole with your tongue." -- He's not so much a
*Porch*Monkey as a _Fire_Monkey, as in one who's on fire due to his
own tendency to mess with lighter fluid while standing beside a hot
stove. Message-ID: 77Uxh.1996$384.1135@trnddc05

Said I:
You, Monkey-man, are quite possibly the only usenetter in existence
who does not and cannot own Hatter.

"[...] What's the matter fagboi, am I beating your as$ so badly that
you're no seeking an alliance with the diaperboi?...YOu really don't
know how dumb you are, do ya?" -- I guess I don't, Monkey.
Message-ID: gHVIh.1760$Bi2.1639@trnddc01

"Ok, but I am not stalking Teh Mop Jockey, I seem to be building a
relationship with him. Remember, I am a Christian so the secular rules
do not apply to me. I strive to be amoral, which I think applies to this
situation. Keep this in mind, please. Since I am currently mentally ill
and since I can not nominate, that is what I am doing at this time." --
Olympiada: Teh amoral "Christian", in Message-ID:


"You're like some kind of rabid attack-gerbil." -- Lionel Lauer to Joxer
in MID:

"I say you are out of your ****ing mind." -- Ying Guo, posting as
"SameAsB4" , tells PorchMonkey4Life, posting
as the same nick but a slightly different morph, the score, in MID:


"in the holy spirit i know you would satisfy every single person in a
room if you were the only person present." -- ~tanya, to Crazy Andy II,
in MID: . com

If you never read anything else in any of my sigs, read this:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/15321167/
http://borealin.livejournal.com/15104.html
Or watch it he
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uqxmPjB0WSs
Then, if you manage to read/watch all that, try this:
http://www.newamericancentury.org/Re...asDefenses.pdf
And Molly Ivins had a few choice words to say about it, weeks befo
http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/092906B.shtml
Here's Chris Floyd: Fatal Vision: The Deeper Evil Behind the Detainee
Bill: http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/100206A.shtml

"Q: What's the difference between the Vietnam War and the Iraq War?
A: George W. Bush had a plan to get out of the Vietnam War." -- Anon.

Thread where outing begins: http://tinyurl.com/hojf8
George Pickett Memorial Trophy, Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart,
and the Order of the Holey Sockpuppet winner on
outing personal contact info in x-poasted subject lines:
"Plenty of people post under their real names and do not attempt to hide
their contact info. You are scared of being 'outed' because you are a
pathological abuser of usenet, and people rightly despise you for it.
You're afraid of being reported to the authorities or, better, visited
by a couple of guys with baseball bats. Other people don't have this
obsessive fear. Ward Hardman himself has posted plenty of personal
information - nothing that anyone else added was hidden in any way.
You're so ****ing scared you've built up this whole sick mythology about
different categories of bad dudes who 'out' scum like you.

"Meanwhile you are the ugliest pig****er in the universe. You are the
coward without ethics. You call me a 'newbie' - ha! what an asshole you
are. Those who want to remain anonymous do so. There is absolutely no
way you could identify me, not unless you had the sort of subpoena power
that only gets turned on for big-time terrorists. That's because I chose
to be anonymous. Some people don't. Only really stupid dicks like you
choose the sort of semi-anonymity which leaves you in constant fear.

"What a dickless wonder you are 'Snarky' you fat asshole."
-- in MID: . com

"I am the only one who has outer filthed Ward" -- James C. "Crackhead"
Cracked voluntarily self-immolates, in MID:


"When I told Abbie Hoffman that he was the first one who made me laugh
since Lenny Bruce died, Hoffman said, "Really? He was my god." The
combination of satirical irreverence and sense of justice that Bruce and
Hoffman shared was the real spirit behind the Yippies--a term I coined
to describe a phenomenon that already existed: an organic coalition of
stoned hippies and political activists who engaged in such actions as
throwing money on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange, then
explaining to reporters the meaning of that symbolism. Folksinger Phil
Ochs summed it up: "A demonstration should turn you on, not turn you
off." So when journalists link the Yippies with misleading bedfellows,
at best it's careless shorthand; at worst it's deliberate demonization.
Osama bin Laden wanted an aircraft to crash into the Pentagon. Abbie
Hoffman merely wanted to levitate it." -- Paul Krassner,
http://tinyurl.com/ehu3v

To Whom It May Concern: Michael J. Cranston attorney kook is a dog****er

Aratzio wrote:

On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 18:12:04 GMT, "Michael A. Terrell"
transparently proposed:

Aratzio wrote:

On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 16:55:58 GMT, "Michael A. Terrell"
transparently proposed:

Aratzio wrote:

On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 11:36:44 -0500, John Fields
transparently proposed:

He won't come knocking on your door anytime soon, then, I'm sure.

Fantasizing about other men, John.


I see that you're still try to find a new homosexual lover.

Let me guess, you probably believe that to be a "flame"?

You do realize the only people that feel a need to scream "FAGGOT!" at
other men are those unsure of their own sexuality. Pointing that out
to you lame ****wits is tiresome, but it is a duty that must be
performed if usenet is to be saved from the sexually repressed and
mentally lame.


No, dumbass, it was sarcasm about your "Fantasizing about other
men", but obviously it bounced right off that thick and empty skull of
yours.

Oh, yeah, *sarcasm*. Sure it was. Rather than just another sexually
repressed lamer presenting his own fears as a *flame*.


the only fear I have is that a moron like you will move into my
neighborhood. Its so much trouble to get the neighbors together with
pitchforks and flaming torches these days. (Damn EPA and fire bans!)


pats pointy head


It would be the only point you ever make. I guess having a pea brain
makes it easy for you to get your head into the electric pencil
sharpener, though.


Next he will try "the big kids made me do it and they ran away"


I'll bet that there is a damn good reason that kids run away from
you. As for me, I am a 100% disabled Veteran, and home bound, so there
are no kids around to run off.




Does the name Pavlov ring a bell?


Yes! It tells me it time to refill Aratzio's dirty bowl with kibble.
You know, the stuff that was just recalled?

Wow, another "flame". - see that is sarcasm


Once more you show that you can't tell the difference.


--
Service to my country? Been there, Done that, and I've got my DD214 to
prove it.
Member of DAV #85.

Michael A. Terrell
Central Florida

Aratzio wrote:

On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 18:13:34 GMT, "Michael A. Terrell"
transparently proposed:

John Fields wrote:

On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 17:09:00 GMT, Aratzio
wrote:

Wow, John, the whole online sexual fantasy thing, been done to death.
Can I suggest maybe you stick to the typo laming.

Suggest away!


I see that he is tired of losing THAT fight.

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
"He has not responded in 20 minutes, he ran away!!!!"


WHO ran away, and from WHAT? WHEN and WHERE did they run to, and WHY
did they run? You sure don't seem to have any grasp on reality, let
alone any valid information.

Some people have other things to do than spend 24 hours a day on
USENET. You, on the other hand? You have to try to bore us to death
with your stupid little preschool games, till we finally just ignore
you. (Its againts the law to beat the mentally ill) You barely hit a
negative 3 on the troll meter, which disqualifies you from being a
kook. After all, its not nice to call the mentally ill a "Kook"


--
Service to my country? Been there, Done that, and I've got my DD214 to
prove it.
Member of DAV #85.

Michael A. Terrell
Central Florida

On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 12:52:46 -0500, John Fields attempted to confuse the
issue further by squeaking:
On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 17:42:37 GMT, Aratzio wrote:
On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 12:03:06 -0500, John Fields transparently proposed:
On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 02:47:49 +1000, Lionel wrote:
On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 11:36:44 -0500, John Fields wrote:
On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 01:26:28 +1000, Lionel wrote:
On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 14:11:40 GMT, Aratzio wrote:
On Tue, 03 Apr 2007 22:20:20 -0700, MassiveProng transparently
proposed:
On Tue, 03 Apr 2007 18:41:03 -0700, John Larkin Gave us:

How about an intermediate case, say two golf balls that are
imperfectly springy? That's also inelastic. What happens?

You forgot to notice that it depends on their location. In my
hand,
no rebound on the golf balls. Against a ball laid on the floor,
rebound.

So you would call it "less perfectly springy" when on the floor?

Also, the steel balls behave in the opposite manner. In my hand,
I
get a rebound. Against a ball laid on the floor, no rebound, just
a side deflection from the not quite so centered hit.

Sprongy sure has a thing about the physics of handling balls that
are not his.

Not to mention his fetish for sticks that're bigger than his.

---
He won't come knocking on your door anytime soon, then, I'm sure.

Please keep your homosexual fantasies to yourself.

---
Why? Do you feel strangely aroused by the thought of man-meat bigger
than yours?

So, keeping your homosexual fantasies to yourself was not an option.

---
Of course it was an option, just not one I chose to exercise.

Ahhh, so you /are/ gay! Well, not to worry. I'm bi, so I don't do gay
lames.

--
__________________________________________________ ______________________
Hail Eris! mhm 29x21; TM#5; COOSN-029-06-71069; Usenet Ruiner #5
The God of Odd Statements, the Ugliest Pig****er In The Universe
Stupidity Takes Its Toll. Please Have Exact Change.
Most Hated Usenetizen of All Time #13; Lits Slut #16
Gutter Chix0r #16
Remove all the confusion and k00ks from my posting addy to send me your
sekrit messages.

Official Chung Demon

VOTE! Usenet Kook Awards, March 2007
Message-ID:

Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle
Trainer of PorchMonkey4Life
http://www.screedbomb.info/porchie/

AUK FAQ: http://www.caballista.org/auk/faq.html

WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, February 2007
Message-ID: 1

"You are the GOD-DAMNED, IGNORANT LIAR here.
Now, that is not me taking the Lord's name in vain."
-- John Wentzky: Living proof of the Death of Irony, in Message-ID:


I mourned:
The Mop Jockey did most oddly state:
DUDE, YOU WIN TEH INTERNETS!!!

the oversized check is in the mail.

Alas, all I get for my trouble is a Monkey that's trained to hurl ****
under several of my nyms.

"DevMcKinHole, you also get the pleasure of sucking off my doggy and
cleaning out his butthole with your tongue." -- He's not so much a
*Porch*Monkey as a _Fire_Monkey, as in one who's on fire due to his
own tendency to mess with lighter fluid while standing beside a hot
stove. Message-ID: 77Uxh.1996$384.1135@trnddc05

Said I:
You, Monkey-man, are quite possibly the only usenetter in existence
who does not and cannot own Hatter.

"[...] What's the matter fagboi, am I beating your as$ so badly that
you're no seeking an alliance with the diaperboi?...YOu really don't
know how dumb you are, do ya?" -- I guess I don't, Monkey.
Message-ID: gHVIh.1760$Bi2.1639@trnddc01

"Ok, but I am not stalking Teh Mop Jockey, I seem to be building a
relationship with him. Remember, I am a Christian so the secular rules
do not apply to me. I strive to be amoral, which I think applies to this
situation. Keep this in mind, please. Since I am currently mentally ill
and since I can not nominate, that is what I am doing at this time." --
Olympiada: Teh amoral "Christian", in Message-ID:


"You're like some kind of rabid attack-gerbil." -- Lionel Lauer to Joxer
in MID:

"I say you are out of your ****ing mind." -- Ying Guo, posting as
"SameAsB4" , tells PorchMonkey4Life, posting
as the same nick but a slightly different morph, the score, in MID:


"in the holy spirit i know you would satisfy every single person in a
room if you were the only person present." -- ~tanya, to Crazy Andy II,
in MID: . com

If you never read anything else in any of my sigs, read this:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/15321167/
http://borealin.livejournal.com/15104.html
Or watch it he
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uqxmPjB0WSs
Then, if you manage to read/watch all that, try this:
http://www.newamericancentury.org/Re...asDefenses.pdf
And Molly Ivins had a few choice words to say about it, weeks befo
http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/092906B.shtml
Here's Chris Floyd: Fatal Vision: The Deeper Evil Behind the Detainee
Bill: http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/100206A.shtml

"Q: What's the difference between the Vietnam War and the Iraq War?
A: George W. Bush had a plan to get out of the Vietnam War." -- Anon.

Thread where outing begins: http://tinyurl.com/hojf8
George Pickett Memorial Trophy, Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart,
and the Order of the Holey Sockpuppet winner on
outing personal contact info in x-poasted subject lines:
"Plenty of people post under their real names and do not attempt to hide
their contact info. You are scared of being 'outed' because you are a
pathological abuser of usenet, and people rightly despise you for it.
You're afraid of being reported to the authorities or, better, visited
by a couple of guys with baseball bats. Other people don't have this
obsessive fear. Ward Hardman himself has posted plenty of personal
information - nothing that anyone else added was hidden in any way.
You're so ****ing scared you've built up this whole sick mythology about
different categories of bad dudes who 'out' scum like you.

"Meanwhile you are the ugliest pig****er in the universe. You are the
coward without ethics. You call me a 'newbie' - ha! what an asshole you
are. Those who want to remain anonymous do so. There is absolutely no
way you could identify me, not unless you had the sort of subpoena power
that only gets turned on for big-time terrorists. That's because I chose
to be anonymous. Some people don't. Only really stupid dicks like you
choose the sort of semi-anonymity which leaves you in constant fear.

"What a dickless wonder you are 'Snarky' you fat asshole."
-- in MID: . com

"I am the only one who has outer filthed Ward" -- James C. "Crackhead"
Cracked voluntarily self-immolates, in MID:


"When I told Abbie Hoffman that he was the first one who made me laugh
since Lenny Bruce died, Hoffman said, "Really? He was my god." The
combination of satirical irreverence and sense of justice that Bruce and
Hoffman shared was the real spirit behind the Yippies--a term I coined
to describe a phenomenon that already existed: an organic coalition of
stoned hippies and political activists who engaged in such actions as
throwing money on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange, then
explaining to reporters the meaning of that symbolism. Folksinger Phil
Ochs summed it up: "A demonstration should turn you on, not turn you
off." So when journalists link the Yippies with misleading bedfellows,
at best it's careless shorthand; at worst it's deliberate demonization.
Osama bin Laden wanted an aircraft to crash into the Pentagon. Abbie
Hoffman merely wanted to levitate it." -- Paul Krassner,
http://tinyurl.com/ehu3v

To Whom It May Concern: Michael J. Cranston attorney kook is a dog****er

On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 11:17:32 -0700, John Larkin attempted to confuse the
issue further by squeaking:
On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 04:01:50 GMT, The Secretary of HomIntern wrote:

I don't understand why you guys aren't boring yourselves senseless with
this third-grade name calling.

Oh, maybe I do understand.

Third-grade name-calling usually bores me senseless, hence why I don't do
it much. However, I haven't noticed that "hypocrite" is a word often
found in the lexicons of third-graders, generally speaking.

Do you know anything about electronics?

Not a great deal. I'm here for the popcorn and k00kfroth.

--
__________________________________________________ ______________________
Hail Eris! mhm 29x21; TM#5; COOSN-029-06-71069; Usenet Ruiner #5
The God of Odd Statements, the Ugliest Pig****er In The Universe
Stupidity Takes Its Toll. Please Have Exact Change.
Most Hated Usenetizen of All Time #13; Lits Slut #16
Gutter Chix0r #16
Remove all the confusion and k00ks from my posting addy to send me your
sekrit messages.

Official Chung Demon

VOTE! Usenet Kook Awards, March 2007
Message-ID:

Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle
Trainer of PorchMonkey4Life
http://www.screedbomb.info/porchie/

AUK FAQ: http://www.caballista.org/auk/faq.html

WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, February 2007
Message-ID: 1

"You are the GOD-DAMNED, IGNORANT LIAR here.
Now, that is not me taking the Lord's name in vain."
-- John Wentzky: Living proof of the Death of Irony, in Message-ID:


I mourned:
The Mop Jockey did most oddly state:
DUDE, YOU WIN TEH INTERNETS!!!

the oversized check is in the mail.

Alas, all I get for my trouble is a Monkey that's trained to hurl ****
under several of my nyms.

"DevMcKinHole, you also get the pleasure of sucking off my doggy and
cleaning out his butthole with your tongue." -- He's not so much a
*Porch*Monkey as a _Fire_Monkey, as in one who's on fire due to his
own tendency to mess with lighter fluid while standing beside a hot
stove. Message-ID: 77Uxh.1996$384.1135@trnddc05

Said I:
You, Monkey-man, are quite possibly the only usenetter in existence
who does not and cannot own Hatter.

"[...] What's the matter fagboi, am I beating your as$ so badly that
you're no seeking an alliance with the diaperboi?...YOu really don't
know how dumb you are, do ya?" -- I guess I don't, Monkey.
Message-ID: gHVIh.1760$Bi2.1639@trnddc01

"Ok, but I am not stalking Teh Mop Jockey, I seem to be building a
relationship with him. Remember, I am a Christian so the secular rules
do not apply to me. I strive to be amoral, which I think applies to this
situation. Keep this in mind, please. Since I am currently mentally ill
and since I can not nominate, that is what I am doing at this time." --
Olympiada: Teh amoral "Christian", in Message-ID:


"You're like some kind of rabid attack-gerbil." -- Lionel Lauer to Joxer
in MID:

"I say you are out of your ****ing mind." -- Ying Guo, posting as
"SameAsB4" , tells PorchMonkey4Life, posting
as the same nick but a slightly different morph, the score, in MID:


"in the holy spirit i know you would satisfy every single person in a
room if you were the only person present." -- ~tanya, to Crazy Andy II,
in MID: . com

If you never read anything else in any of my sigs, read this:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/15321167/
http://borealin.livejournal.com/15104.html
Or watch it he
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uqxmPjB0WSs
Then, if you manage to read/watch all that, try this:
http://www.newamericancentury.org/Re...asDefenses.pdf
And Molly Ivins had a few choice words to say about it, weeks befo
http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/092906B.shtml
Here's Chris Floyd: Fatal Vision: The Deeper Evil Behind the Detainee
Bill: http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/100206A.shtml

"Q: What's the difference between the Vietnam War and the Iraq War?
A: George W. Bush had a plan to get out of the Vietnam War." -- Anon.

Thread where outing begins: http://tinyurl.com/hojf8
George Pickett Memorial Trophy, Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart,
and the Order of the Holey Sockpuppet winner on
outing personal contact info in x-poasted subject lines:
"Plenty of people post under their real names and do not attempt to hide
their contact info. You are scared of being 'outed' because you are a
pathological abuser of usenet, and people rightly despise you for it.
You're afraid of being reported to the authorities or, better, visited
by a couple of guys with baseball bats. Other people don't have this
obsessive fear. Ward Hardman himself has posted plenty of personal
information - nothing that anyone else added was hidden in any way.
You're so ****ing scared you've built up this whole sick mythology about
different categories of bad dudes who 'out' scum like you.

"Meanwhile you are the ugliest pig****er in the universe. You are the
coward without ethics. You call me a 'newbie' - ha! what an asshole you
are. Those who want to remain anonymous do so. There is absolutely no
way you could identify me, not unless you had the sort of subpoena power
that only gets turned on for big-time terrorists. That's because I chose
to be anonymous. Some people don't. Only really stupid dicks like you
choose the sort of semi-anonymity which leaves you in constant fear.

"What a dickless wonder you are 'Snarky' you fat asshole."
-- in MID: . com

"I am the only one who has outer filthed Ward" -- James C. "Crackhead"
Cracked voluntarily self-immolates, in MID:


"When I told Abbie Hoffman that he was the first one who made me laugh
since Lenny Bruce died, Hoffman said, "Really? He was my god." The
combination of satirical irreverence and sense of justice that Bruce and
Hoffman shared was the real spirit behind the Yippies--a term I coined
to describe a phenomenon that already existed: an organic coalition of
stoned hippies and political activists who engaged in such actions as
throwing money on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange, then
explaining to reporters the meaning of that symbolism. Folksinger Phil
Ochs summed it up: "A demonstration should turn you on, not turn you
off." So when journalists link the Yippies with misleading bedfellows,
at best it's careless shorthand; at worst it's deliberate demonization.
Osama bin Laden wanted an aircraft to crash into the Pentagon. Abbie
Hoffman merely wanted to levitate it." -- Paul Krassner,
http://tinyurl.com/ehu3v

To Whom It May Concern: Michael J. Cranston attorney kook is a dog****er

On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 20:11:13 GMT, Demon Lord of Confusion
ballista.org wrote:

On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 11:17:32 -0700, John Larkin attempted to confuse the
issue further by squeaking:
On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 04:01:50 GMT, The Secretary of HomIntern wrote:

I don't understand why you guys aren't boring yourselves senseless with
this third-grade name calling.

Oh, maybe I do understand.

Third-grade name-calling usually bores me senseless, hence why I don't do
it much. However, I haven't noticed that "hypocrite" is a word often
found in the lexicons of third-graders, generally speaking.

Do you know anything about electronics?

Not a great deal. I'm here for the popcorn and k00kfroth.

Sounds boring. Why don't you do something useful?

John

On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 06:48:25 -0500, John Fields attempted to confuse the
issue further by squeaking:
On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 16:04:34 +1000, Lionel wrote:

You somehow missed the post where I supplied a Google URL that turned up
some 500+ examples of your squealing & caterwauling about "liberal
weenies", "communists", etc? No problem, here it is again:
http://groups.google.com/groups?as_oq=liberal+****+communist+****+moron+bra t+pathetic+****ing+loser&as_uauthors=jfields%40aus tininstruments.com&safe=off

---
Ah, yes!!! Some of my best work!

I'd forgotten this one, originally penned for Phil, but which seems even
more appropriate for you, dear boy:


"There once was a retard from Oz,
whose rhet'ric brought nothing but bahs.
So he stopped all the pain
with a round through his brain,
to a round of applause and hurrahs."

That should go a long way toward getting you a Busted Urinal Award.

---
Correction: _I_ didn't involve myself in "these threads", _you_ were
the one who deliberately crossposted to auk in an effort to try to get
some support for your weak, vindictive ass.

Oh, so what you're saying is that by crossposting to AUK, I am FORCING
you to reply to my posts?

---
Certainly not, and you must surely remember that I was replying to your
weaselly posts and rubbing your nose in your own **** before you brought
auk into it.

What I _am_ saying is that your intention, by bringing auk into it, was to
try to bring to bear some horsepower which you clearly don't possess in
order to try to win the argument you had already lost at that point.

Wrong, cluebie. He's x-poasting to AUK for the purpose of winning you
whatever recognition you deserve. I foresee many awards in your
future...

--
__________________________________________________ ______________________
Hail Eris! mhm 29x21; TM#5; COOSN-029-06-71069; Usenet Ruiner #5
The God of Odd Statements, the Ugliest Pig****er In The Universe
Stupidity Takes Its Toll. Please Have Exact Change.
Most Hated Usenetizen of All Time #13; Lits Slut #16
Gutter Chix0r #16
Remove all the confusion and k00ks from my posting addy to send me your
sekrit messages.

Official Chung Demon

VOTE! Usenet Kook Awards, March 2007
Message-ID:

Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle
Trainer of PorchMonkey4Life
http://www.screedbomb.info/porchie/

AUK FAQ: http://www.caballista.org/auk/faq.html

WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, February 2007
Message-ID: 1

"You are the GOD-DAMNED, IGNORANT LIAR here.
Now, that is not me taking the Lord's name in vain."
-- John Wentzky: Living proof of the Death of Irony, in Message-ID:


I mourned:
The Mop Jockey did most oddly state:
DUDE, YOU WIN TEH INTERNETS!!!

the oversized check is in the mail.

Alas, all I get for my trouble is a Monkey that's trained to hurl ****
under several of my nyms.

"DevMcKinHole, you also get the pleasure of sucking off my doggy and
cleaning out his butthole with your tongue." -- He's not so much a
*Porch*Monkey as a _Fire_Monkey, as in one who's on fire due to his
own tendency to mess with lighter fluid while standing beside a hot
stove. Message-ID: 77Uxh.1996$384.1135@trnddc05

Said I:
You, Monkey-man, are quite possibly the only usenetter in existence
who does not and cannot own Hatter.

"[...] What's the matter fagboi, am I beating your as$ so badly that
you're no seeking an alliance with the diaperboi?...YOu really don't
know how dumb you are, do ya?" -- I guess I don't, Monkey.
Message-ID: gHVIh.1760$Bi2.1639@trnddc01

"Ok, but I am not stalking Teh Mop Jockey, I seem to be building a
relationship with him. Remember, I am a Christian so the secular rules
do not apply to me. I strive to be amoral, which I think applies to this
situation. Keep this in mind, please. Since I am currently mentally ill
and since I can not nominate, that is what I am doing at this time." --
Olympiada: Teh amoral "Christian", in Message-ID:


"You're like some kind of rabid attack-gerbil." -- Lionel Lauer to Joxer
in MID:

"I say you are out of your ****ing mind." -- Ying Guo, posting as
"SameAsB4" , tells PorchMonkey4Life, posting
as the same nick but a slightly different morph, the score, in MID:


"in the holy spirit i know you would satisfy every single person in a
room if you were the only person present." -- ~tanya, to Crazy Andy II,
in MID: . com

If you never read anything else in any of my sigs, read this:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/15321167/
http://borealin.livejournal.com/15104.html
Or watch it he
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uqxmPjB0WSs
Then, if you manage to read/watch all that, try this:
http://www.newamericancentury.org/Re...asDefenses.pdf
And Molly Ivins had a few choice words to say about it, weeks befo
http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/092906B.shtml
Here's Chris Floyd: Fatal Vision: The Deeper Evil Behind the Detainee
Bill: http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/100206A.shtml

"Q: What's the difference between the Vietnam War and the Iraq War?
A: George W. Bush had a plan to get out of the Vietnam War." -- Anon.

Thread where outing begins: http://tinyurl.com/hojf8
George Pickett Memorial Trophy, Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart,
and the Order of the Holey Sockpuppet winner on
outing personal contact info in x-poasted subject lines:
"Plenty of people post under their real names and do not attempt to hide
their contact info. You are scared of being 'outed' because you are a
pathological abuser of usenet, and people rightly despise you for it.
You're afraid of being reported to the authorities or, better, visited
by a couple of guys with baseball bats. Other people don't have this
obsessive fear. Ward Hardman himself has posted plenty of personal
information - nothing that anyone else added was hidden in any way.
You're so ****ing scared you've built up this whole sick mythology about
different categories of bad dudes who 'out' scum like you.

"Meanwhile you are the ugliest pig****er in the universe. You are the
coward without ethics. You call me a 'newbie' - ha! what an asshole you
are. Those who want to remain anonymous do so. There is absolutely no
way you could identify me, not unless you had the sort of subpoena power
that only gets turned on for big-time terrorists. That's because I chose
to be anonymous. Some people don't. Only really stupid dicks like you
choose the sort of semi-anonymity which leaves you in constant fear.

"What a dickless wonder you are 'Snarky' you fat asshole."
-- in MID: . com

"I am the only one who has outer filthed Ward" -- James C. "Crackhead"
Cracked voluntarily self-immolates, in MID:


"When I told Abbie Hoffman that he was the first one who made me laugh
since Lenny Bruce died, Hoffman said, "Really? He was my god." The
combination of satirical irreverence and sense of justice that Bruce and
Hoffman shared was the real spirit behind the Yippies--a term I coined
to describe a phenomenon that already existed: an organic coalition of
stoned hippies and political activists who engaged in such actions as
throwing money on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange, then
explaining to reporters the meaning of that symbolism. Folksinger Phil
Ochs summed it up: "A demonstration should turn you on, not turn you
off." So when journalists link the Yippies with misleading bedfellows,
at best it's careless shorthand; at worst it's deliberate demonization.
Osama bin Laden wanted an aircraft to crash into the Pentagon. Abbie
Hoffman merely wanted to levitate it." -- Paul Krassner,
http://tinyurl.com/ehu3v

To Whom It May Concern: Michael J. Cranston attorney kook is a dog****er

On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 20:05:07 GMT, Demon Lord of Confusion
ballista.org
wrote:

On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 12:52:46 -0500, John Fields attempted to confuse the
issue further by squeaking:
On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 17:42:37 GMT, Aratzio wrote:
On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 12:03:06 -0500, John Fields transparently proposed:
On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 02:47:49 +1000, Lionel wrote:
On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 11:36:44 -0500, John Fields wrote:
On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 01:26:28 +1000, Lionel wrote:
On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 14:11:40 GMT, Aratzio wrote:
On Tue, 03 Apr 2007 22:20:20 -0700, MassiveProng transparently
proposed:
On Tue, 03 Apr 2007 18:41:03 -0700, John Larkin Gave us:

How about an intermediate case, say two golf balls that are
imperfectly springy? That's also inelastic. What happens?

You forgot to notice that it depends on their location. In my
hand,
no rebound on the golf balls. Against a ball laid on the floor,
rebound.

So you would call it "less perfectly springy" when on the floor?

Also, the steel balls behave in the opposite manner. In my hand,
I
get a rebound. Against a ball laid on the floor, no rebound, just
a side deflection from the not quite so centered hit.

Sprongy sure has a thing about the physics of handling balls that
are not his.

Not to mention his fetish for sticks that're bigger than his.

---
He won't come knocking on your door anytime soon, then, I'm sure.

Please keep your homosexual fantasies to yourself.

---
Why? Do you feel strangely aroused by the thought of man-meat bigger
than yours?

So, keeping your homosexual fantasies to yourself was not an option.

---
Of course it was an option, just not one I chose to exercise.

Ahhh, so you /are/ gay! Well, not to worry. I'm bi, so I don't do gay
lames.

---
You prefer lay games?


--
JF

On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 20:19:14 GMT, Demon Lord of Confusion
ballista.org
wrote:

On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 06:48:25 -0500, John Fields attempted to confuse the
issue further by squeaking:
On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 16:04:34 +1000, Lionel wrote:

You somehow missed the post where I supplied a Google URL that turned up
some 500+ examples of your squealing & caterwauling about "liberal
weenies", "communists", etc? No problem, here it is again:
http://groups.google.com/groups?as_oq=liberal+****+communist+****+moron+bra t+pathetic+****ing+loser&as_uauthors=jfields%40aus tininstruments.com&safe=off

---
Ah, yes!!! Some of my best work!

I'd forgotten this one, originally penned for Phil, but which seems even
more appropriate for you, dear boy:


"There once was a retard from Oz,
whose rhet'ric brought nothing but bahs.
So he stopped all the pain
with a round through his brain,
to a round of applause and hurrahs."

That should go a long way toward getting you a Busted Urinal Award.

---
Correction: _I_ didn't involve myself in "these threads", _you_ were
the one who deliberately crossposted to auk in an effort to try to get
some support for your weak, vindictive ass.

Oh, so what you're saying is that by crossposting to AUK, I am FORCING
you to reply to my posts?

---
Certainly not, and you must surely remember that I was replying to your
weaselly posts and rubbing your nose in your own **** before you brought
auk into it.

What I _am_ saying is that your intention, by bringing auk into it, was to
try to bring to bear some horsepower which you clearly don't possess in
order to try to win the argument you had already lost at that point.

Wrong, cluebie. He's x-poasting to AUK for the purpose of winning you
whatever recognition you deserve. I foresee many awards in your
future...

---
Awards, recognition... Geez, guys, I'm touched. Wipes tear from
eye And here I was let to believe you were all assholes...


--
JF