On Tue, 03 Apr 2007 20:56:08 +1000, Lionel Gave
us:

Note how I referred to "the group" and not "OUR group" or "my
group". If he frequented them so much, he would have known about the
NORMAL modus operandi of all that commonly DO frequent the group.

*snicker* Why do you think I got on your case, dimwit?


Idiot. Only a retard like you or the other twits in AUK would even
regard the usage the way you did. You are all truly pathetic, every
one of you retarded *******s.

On Tue, 03 Apr 2007 20:56:08 +1000, Lionel Gave
us:

Not that YOU would ever post off-topic rubbish to YOUR group, eh
MinusDong? ;^)

You forget, dumb****. The culture of the group is such that WE
don't care, dip****. If you have a problem with that, then you
further prove, yet again, that you really have no clue about the group
or its most common members or any of the behaviors therein.

Now got get a clue, and **** off, you retarded KooTard ****head!

On Tue, 03 Apr 2007 13:09:00 +1000, Lionel
wrote:


That's an extremely diplomatic way of describing him.
Let's have a little look at the kind of pleasant chit-chat that the
ever so "Professional" Mr John Fields considers so inoffensive.
http://groups.google.com/groups/search?q=(liberal+OR+****+OR+communist+OR+****+OR+ moron+OR+brat+OR+pathetic+OR+****ing+OR+loser)+aut hor%3Ajfields%40austininstruments.com
---
Results 1 - 10 of 550 for (liberal OR **** OR communist OR **** OR
moron OR brat OR pathetic OR ****ing OR loser)

---

Hm. Quite a few hits, a fair proportion of which are the highly
"Professional" Mr John Fields making vicious attacks on other
sci.electronics.* posters for failing to kowtow to his obvious wisdom
on all matters political.

---
Ah, yesss! Pleasant memories from the past, but not so much
political as technically derogative. Kinda like how I nailed your
phony ass with that faulty 4013 "advice" you gave.
---

But perhaps I'm being unfair to Mr Fields. He & his bitch-boy Prongie
claim that I'm the source of all the flamage over the last 6 days or
so,

---
Really? Hmmm... I don't recall having said that. But then, you do
have a tendency to exaggerate.
---

so I'll filter out his demented rants from the last couple of
weeks, & see what a charmer he is when dem mean old Kookologists
aren't picking on him:
http://groups.google.com/groups?as_q=&num=10&scoring=d&as_epq=&as_oq=libera l+****+communist+****+moron+brat+pathetic+****ing+ loser&as_eq=&as_ugroup=&as_usubject=&as_uauthors=j fields%40austininstruments.com&lr=&as_qdr=&as_drrb =b&as_mind=1&as_minm=1&as_miny=1981&as_maxd=18&as_ maxm=3&as_maxy=2007&safe=off
---
Results 1 - 10 of 535 from Jan 1, 1981 to Mar 18, 2007 for (liberal
OR **** OR communist OR **** OR moron OR brat OR pathetic OR ****ing
OR loser)
---

Gee, when it comes to forcing his beliefs on other posters in
technical newsgroups, it sure looks like Mr Fields doesn't need any
help at all.

---
"Forcing" my beliefs? LOL, you seem to think that everyone but you
is a Zombie with no will of their own.
---

Fortunately, his little strategy of omnipotence failed when he
decided to post his CMOS "solution" to one of the electronics
groups.

You're right because he targeted me as one of his subjects, however
misguided that action might have been.

The bullseye is of your own making, John. Always has been.

He certainly seems determined to portray himself as a long suffering
martyr with Christ-like tolerance. He seems to be struggling with that
last nail, though.

---
Only because you keep squirming, but I'll getcha yet! :-)



--
JF

On Tue, 03 Apr 2007 13:19:26 +1000, Lionel
wrote:


Looking at his oh-so "Professional" posting history, it seems likely
that the blackhole formed around him:
http://groups.google.com/groups?as_oq=liberal+****+communist+****+moron+bra t+pathetic+****ing+loser&as_uauthors=jfields%40aus tininstruments.com&safe=off

And this John Fields turd has the gall to accuse others of
name-calling. What a ****ing hypocrite!

---
I don't recall any instances of importance when I accused anyone of
being a name-caller, but if you think that's not the proper way to
behave, then perhaps "turd" and "****ing hypocrite" show you up for
the badly brought up, two-faced phony you are.


--
JF

"Eeyore" wrote in message

Aratzio wrote:

John Fields wrote:

You're wrong because Lionel isn't an innocuous "Artist", he's a
control freak trying to bend everyone to his will, and it seems he's
got you in tow.

This from a right-wing apologist who has ranting frothfests when he
identifies anyone to the left of Atllia The Hun.

Your assessment of John Fields seems quite astute.

Does Bertie know what you're up to these days, Graham?

ada added

--
Rhonda Lea Kirk

If you ever need some proof that time can heal your wounds,
just step inside my heart and walk around these rooms;
where the shadows used to be.... Mary Chapin Carpenter

On Tue, 03 Apr 2007 07:33:47 +0100, Eeyore
wrote:



Aratzio wrote:

John Fields wrote:

You're wrong because Lionel isn't an innocuous "Artist", he's a
control freak trying to bend everyone to his will, and it seems he's
got you in tow.

This from a right-wing apologist who has ranting frothfests when he
identifies anyone to the left of Atllia The Hun.

Your assessment of John Fields seems quite astute.

---
LOL, that from someone who characterizes himself as an ass.


--
JF

On Tue, 03 Apr 2007 07:34:50 +0100, Eeyore
wrote:



John Fields wrote:

"Atllia?"

Lern to spel, semi-cretin.

Bwaahahahahhahaha !

A spelling lame ! Have you run out of expletives to use ?

---
Of course not, you stupid cocksucker.


--
JF

Lionel wrote:
On Tue, 03 Apr 2007 01:54:51 -0700, MassiveProng
wrote:

On Tue, 3 Apr 2007 02:27:40 +0000 (UTC), Meat Plow
Gave us:

Do you have some electronics to discuss? Or have you been sucked into the
black hole of hypocrisy also?

Said the total hypocrite that also never posts to the group unless it
is some lame derogatory AUK bull****.

Hm. I'm having trouble seeing any non-derogatory, non-bull****
electronics content in your post, TinyDong.

That's because he jizzed in yer eyes again... It kind of messes with
your vision.

MassiveProng pinched out a steaming pile
:

On Tue, 03 Apr 2007 20:37:48 +1000, Lionel Gave
us:

On Tue, 03 Apr 2007 03:14:37 -0700, MassiveProng
wrote:

On Tue, 03 Apr 2007 20:01:03 +1000, Lionel
Gave
us:


3: You called me a liar, because you couldn't find any posts from
me
on Google that were more than 6 days old.


Wrong.

I told YOU to look on google, dip****.

Why on earth would I need to look for *my own posts* on Google?
I /know/ where I post, you ****ing retard.

Typical auktard sidestep action. Good job, auktard.

You claimed I looked on google, when what really happened is that I
challenged you to prove your claim, which you incessantly sidestep.

What I DID say was that YOU should google up some proof, which you
conveniently sidestepped.

The only thing I'm interested in proving is your stupidity, & you're
doing a really slick job of proving that for me. ;^)

Typical auktard meaningless tripe.

Ahem...Angry Guy...do you know anything about 802.11 wireless antennas?
I saw some plans for a Pringles Can antenna but it looks pretty
complex.
Is a usb-based parabolic reflector the better way to go?
TIA

On Tue, 03 Apr 2007 22:16:14 +1000, Lionel
wrote:

On Tue, 03 Apr 2007 07:12:20 -0500, John Fields
wrote:

On Tue, 03 Apr 2007 13:19:26 +1000, Lionel
wrote:


Looking at his oh-so "Professional" posting history, it seems likely
that the blackhole formed around him:
http://groups.google.com/groups?as_oq=liberal+****+communist+****+moron+bra t+pathetic+****ing+loser&as_uauthors=jfields%40aus tininstruments.com&safe=off

And this John Fields turd has the gall to accuse others of
name-calling. What a ****ing hypocrite!

---
I don't recall any instances of importance when I accused anyone of
being a name-caller, but if you think that's not the proper way to
behave, then perhaps "turd" and "****ing hypocrite" show you up for
the badly brought up, two-faced phony you are.

I couldn't care less if you call me names, dickhead. You were the one
whining about name-calling, etc.

---
You just type to hear yourself talk, don't you?


--
JF

Rhonda Lea Kirk wrote:

"Eeyore" wrote:
Aratzio wrote:
John Fields wrote:

You're wrong because Lionel isn't an innocuous "Artist", he's a
control freak trying to bend everyone to his will, and it seems he's
got you in tow.

This from a right-wing apologist who has ranting frothfests when he
identifies anyone to the left of Atllia The Hun.

Your assessment of John Fields seems quite astute.

Does Bertie know what you're up to these days, Graham?

ada added

You'd better ask the Bunyip yourself to be honest.

Given a chance, Bertei certainly barely misses an opportunity to be offensive.

Graham

On Tue, 03 Apr 2007 18:34:01 +0100, Eeyore
wrote:


Given a chance, Bertei certainly barely misses an opportunity to be offensive.

---
Oh, any _you're_ all sweetness and light???


--
JF

On Tue, 03 Apr 2007 13:19:26 +1000, Lionel
wrote:

On Tue, 3 Apr 2007 02:27:40 +0000 (UTC), Meat Plow
wrote:

On Mon, 02 Apr 2007 21:04:29 -0500, John Fields wrote:

On Mon, 02 Apr 2007 18:31:30 -0700, Aratzio
wrote:

This from a right-wing apologist who has ranting frothfests when he
identifies anyone to the left of Atllia The Hun.

---
"Apologist"?

Hardly.

"Atllia?"

Lern to spel, semi-cretin.

The bullseye is of your own making, John. Always has been.

---
So now the target finally gets a chance to speak?

What do you want?

Do you have some electronics to discuss? Or have you been sucked into the
black hole of hypocrisy also?

Looking at his oh-so "Professional" posting history, it seems likely
that the blackhole formed around him:
http://groups.google.com/groups?as_oq=liberal+****+communist+****+moron+bra t+pathetic+****ing+loser&as_uauthors=jfields%40aus tininstruments.com&safe=off

And this John Fields turd has the gall to accuse others of
name-calling. What a ****ing hypocrite!

I don't understand why you guys aren't boring yourselves senseless
with this third-grade name calling.

Oh, maybe I do understand.

John

"Eeyore" wrote in message

Rhonda Lea Kirk wrote:

"Eeyore" wrote:
Aratzio wrote:
John Fields wrote:

You're wrong because Lionel isn't an innocuous "Artist", he's a
control freak trying to bend everyone to his will, and it seems
he's got you in tow.

This from a right-wing apologist who has ranting frothfests when he
identifies anyone to the left of Atllia The Hun.

Your assessment of John Fields seems quite astute.

Does Bertie know what you're up to these days, Graham?

ada added

You'd better ask the Bunyip yourself to be honest.

looks at groups line Never fear.

Given a chance, Bertei certainly barely misses an opportunity to be
offensive.

I think you mean "charming."

--
Rhonda Lea Kirk

If you ever need some proof that time can heal your wounds,
just step inside my heart and walk around these rooms;
where the shadows used to be.... Mary Chapin Carpenter

Do you, $B%!(Bñühw$B!"!W(Bf, deny that the USSR placed and is placing medium- and
intermediate-range missiles in sites in alt.usenet.kooks? Yes or no? Don't wait
for the translation! Yes or no?!:

MassiveProng pinched out a steaming pile
:

On Tue, 03 Apr 2007 20:37:48 +1000, Lionel Gave
us:

On Tue, 03 Apr 2007 03:14:37 -0700, MassiveProng
wrote:

On Tue, 03 Apr 2007 20:01:03 +1000, Lionel
Gave
us:


3: You called me a liar, because you couldn't find any posts from
me
on Google that were more than 6 days old.


Wrong.

I told YOU to look on google, dip****.

Why on earth would I need to look for *my own posts* on Google?
I /know/ where I post, you ****ing retard.

Typical auktard sidestep action. Good job, auktard.

You claimed I looked on google, when what really happened is that I
challenged you to prove your claim, which you incessantly sidestep.

What I DID say was that YOU should google up some proof, which you
conveniently sidestepped.

The only thing I'm interested in proving is your stupidity, & you're
doing a really slick job of proving that for me. ;^)

Typical auktard meaningless tripe.

Ahem...Angry Guy...do you know anything about 802.11 wireless antennas?
I saw some plans for a Pringles Can antenna but it looks pretty
complex.
Is a usb-based parabolic reflector the better way to go?
TIA


Dear Angry Electronics Guy,

I am planning to set up a half-wave antenna on my roof so I can tune in to Radio
Free Europe and need some advice on how to mount the insulators. Any thoughts?

Thanks awfully,


--
The 2-Belo [the2beloATmsdDOTbiglobeDOTneDOTjp]
All-Seeing All-Knowing Glorious Emperor for Life, Meow [Ret.]
The alt.fan.karl-malden.nose Webcenter Museum:
http://www.godhatesjanks.org/webcenter/
auk: Diamond Hammer of Thor 1999
aavf3: mhm21x20
Top Usenet Asshole #16
Lits Slut #4

"I found the 'Nose a newsgroup of bricks, and left it
a newsgroup of marble." -- Raoul Xemblinosky III (attributed)

On Tue, 03 Apr 2007 21:51:24 +1000, Lionel Gave
us:


Who's 'WE', dip****?

About thirty of the REGULAR posters in the groups.

That A:
doesn't include you,

and B: Is a list you are clueless about due to your lack of
participation in the groups other than as lame netkopp wanna be and
even more lame AUKTARD battle twit.

On Tue, 03 Apr 2007 21:51:24 +1000, Lionel Gave
us:

Now got get a clue, and **** off, you retarded KooTard ****head!

Go ahead & make me, you impotent freak. ;^)


Admittance to being a retarded KooTard ****head duly noted.

Also note that you have no clue as to my abilities.

As to the freak moniker, PKB, little boy... PKB.

On 03 Apr 2007 14:26:44 GMT, ???hw??f Gave
us:

MassiveProng pinched out a steaming pile
:

On Tue, 03 Apr 2007 20:37:48 +1000, Lionel Gave
us:

On Tue, 03 Apr 2007 03:14:37 -0700, MassiveProng
wrote:

On Tue, 03 Apr 2007 20:01:03 +1000, Lionel
Gave
us:


3: You called me a liar, because you couldn't find any posts from
me
on Google that were more than 6 days old.


Wrong.

I told YOU to look on google, dip****.

Why on earth would I need to look for *my own posts* on Google?
I /know/ where I post, you ****ing retard.

Typical auktard sidestep action. Good job, auktard.

You claimed I looked on google, when what really happened is that I
challenged you to prove your claim, which you incessantly sidestep.

What I DID say was that YOU should google up some proof, which you
conveniently sidestepped.

The only thing I'm interested in proving is your stupidity, & you're
doing a really slick job of proving that for me. ;^)

Typical auktard meaningless tripe.

Ahem...Angry Guy...do you know anything about 802.11 wireless antennas?
I saw some plans for a Pringles Can antenna but it looks pretty
complex.
Is a usb-based parabolic reflector the better way to go?
TIA


Do a search on diversity receivers.
A 14 antenna array.

You are too ****ing poor though, dingledorf.

http://www.avalonrf.com/products/acc-antennas.htm

Your nym is retarded as well.

On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 08:35:36 +0900, The 2-Belo
wrote:


Dear Angry Electronics Guy,

I am planning to set up a half-wave antenna on my roof so I can tune in to Radio
Free Europe and need some advice on how to mount the insulators. Any thoughts?

---
Hmmm... Insulators aren't usually in contact with the Earth.


--
JF

On Tue, 03 Apr 2007 11:35:42 -0700, John Larkin
Gave us:

Oh, maybe I do understand.

I really don't think you do.

It never seemed to stop you when it was you doing it.

How many different names did you morph my nym into?

On Tue, 03 Apr 2007 17:14:56 -0700, MassiveProng
wrote:

On Tue, 03 Apr 2007 11:35:42 -0700, John Larkin
Gave us:

Oh, maybe I do understand.

I really don't think you do.

Yes. You guys *have* bored yourselves senseless.


It never seemed to stop you when it was you doing it.

I never called you names... well, hardly ever. Our disputes were
usually over issues of fact.


How many different names did you morph my nym into?

If you had a real name, or picked less silly nyms, or weren't so
consistantly obnoxious, people would like you better.

Do you have a real name? Mine is really

John

On Tue, 03 Apr 2007 17:25:52 -0700, John Larkin
Gave us:

If you had a real name, or picked less silly nyms, or weren't so
consistantly obnoxious, people would like you better.

You keep saying that, but I really don't think you have a clue as to
what the **** is going on. The KRWTARD has attacked me no matter what
name I choose, as have others. The BloggsTard makes claims every
month or so that I am every poster that he ever got into an argument
with over the last ten years. He only got one right, and that is
always the current one. That show how little that dumb **** knows
about Usenet, regardless of what he may or may not know about
electronics.

Do you have a real name? Mine is really

I pride myself in my psudonymical anonymity. Particularly here in
Usenet. Too many loony KookTards about. Also, I have never
completely hidden who I am, regardless of what I post under, and I
never post under multiple nyms at the same time, like the RichTard
does, or the real trolls.

Do you really have a problem with that? If so... sad, really.

BTW, JOHN. I saw a 4 foot diameter marble ball at Fry's the other
day. It gets supported by a small film of water and spins freely on
it.

You nuke would be like a bb gun pumped one time hitting that, and
no, it would have not enough effect to keep it from hitting the earth
if that's where it was heading, and no, the bb does NOT "embed" itself
into it.

another question:

Bounce a steel ball off another held in the hand causes the ball to
rebound nearly back to the hand that tossed it.

Doing the same with two golf balls results in nearly no bounce, and
a nearly dead impact.

Wouldn't both cases be "elastic" or "inelastic" collisions?

Why can the golf ball not be made to rebound regardless of how hard
it gets thrown into the other?

On Tue, 03 Apr 2007 17:25:52 -0700, John Larkin
wrote:

On Tue, 03 Apr 2007 17:14:56 -0700, MassiveProng
wrote:

On Tue, 03 Apr 2007 11:35:42 -0700, John Larkin
Gave us:

Oh, maybe I do understand.

I really don't think you do.

Yes. You guys *have* bored yourselves senseless.


It never seemed to stop you when it was you doing it.

I never called you names... well, hardly ever. Our disputes were
usually over issues of fact.


How many different names did you morph my nym into?

If you had a real name, or picked less silly nyms, or weren't so
consistantly obnoxious, people would like you better.

Do you have a real name? Mine is really

John

---
Want in?


--
JF

On Tue, 03 Apr 2007 19:59:43 -0500, John Fields
Gave us:

On Tue, 03 Apr 2007 17:25:52 -0700, John Larkin
wrote:

On Tue, 03 Apr 2007 17:14:56 -0700, MassiveProng
wrote:

On Tue, 03 Apr 2007 11:35:42 -0700, John Larkin
Gave us:

Oh, maybe I do understand.

I really don't think you do.

Yes. You guys *have* bored yourselves senseless.


It never seemed to stop you when it was you doing it.

I never called you names... well, hardly ever. Our disputes were
usually over issues of fact.


How many different names did you morph my nym into?

If you had a real name, or picked less silly nyms, or weren't so
consistantly obnoxious, people would like you better.

Do you have a real name? Mine is really

John

---
Want in?


Is he "John The Craptist?

Why can the golf ball not be made to rebound regardless of how hard
it gets thrown into the other?

In a word, "heat"


--
JF

On Tue, 03 Apr 2007 20:03:52 -0500, John Fields
Gave us:


Why can the golf ball not be made to rebound regardless of how hard
it gets thrown into the other?

In a word, "heat"


Now... throw the steel ball onto the concrete floor and it fails to
bounce, yet the golf ball comes back to well over 90% of it's original
drop height. If thrown, it rebounds even more.

Place a steel ball on the concrete floor, and the steel ball still
refuses to bounce "right", and a golf ball against a golf ball DOES
bounce.

It has to do with how the shock wave propagates through them.

In my hand, the golf ball couples the wave directly to my hand, and
the dropped/thrown ball refuses to bounce. The steel ball, being so
much more massive, has time (key element) to hold its position long
enough to push back on the dropping steel ball much harder, and there
is enough to actually pop it back up.

Interesting set of tricks to observe there.

On Tue, 03 Apr 2007 17:42:40 -0700, MassiveProng
wrote:



another question:

Bounce a steel ball off another held in the hand causes the ball to
rebound nearly back to the hand that tossed it.

Doing the same with two golf balls results in nearly no bounce, and
a nearly dead impact.

Wouldn't both cases be "elastic" or "inelastic" collisions?

Why can the golf ball not be made to rebound regardless of how hard
it gets thrown into the other?

Again, you have to do the math.

In an elastic collision, no energy is lost. So, say, a perfectly
springy steel ball is floating free, motionless in space relative to
our frame of reference. An identical ball comes sailing in at some
constant velocity V and smacks the stationary ball dead-center. What
happens to the first ball? To the second?

Repeat for an inelastic collision, two balls made of putty.

Conservation of energy and conservation of momentum answers both
cases.

How about an intermediate case, say two golf balls that are
imperfectly springy? That's also inelastic. What happens?

John

MassiveProng wrote:

On Tue, 03 Apr 2007 21:51:24 +1000, Lionel Gave
us:


Who's 'WE', dip****?

About thirty of the REGULAR posters in the groups.

That A:
doesn't include you,

and B: Is a list you are clueless about due to your lack of
participation in the groups other than as lame netkopp wanna be and
even more lame AUKTARD battle twit.

Hi, Numby!

--
Supreme Leader of the Brainwashed Followers of Art Deco

"To err is human, to cover it up is Weasel" -- Dogbert

On Tue, 03 Apr 2007 18:41:03 -0700, John Larkin
Gave us:

How about an intermediate case, say two golf balls that are
imperfectly springy? That's also inelastic. What happens?

You forgot to notice that it depends on their location. In my hand,
no rebound on the golf balls. Against a ball laid on the floor,
rebound.

So you would call it "less perfectly springy" when on the floor?

Also, the steel balls behave in the opposite manner. In my hand, I
get a rebound. Against a ball laid on the floor, no rebound, just a
side deflection from the not quite so centered hit.

MassiveProng wrote:

The BloggsTard makes claims every
month or so that I am every poster that he ever got into an argument
with over the last ten years. He only got one right, and that is
always the current one. That show how little that dumb **** knows
about Usenet, regardless of what he may or may not know about
electronics.

Bloggs is indeed astonishingly ignorant.

Graham

On Tue, 03 Apr 2007 11:22:03 -0500, John Fields did the cha-cha, and
screamed:
On Tue, 03 Apr 2007 22:16:14 +1000, Lionel wrote:
On Tue, 03 Apr 2007 07:12:20 -0500, John Fields wrote:
On Tue, 03 Apr 2007 13:19:26 +1000, Lionel wrote:

Looking at his oh-so "Professional" posting history, it seems likely
that the blackhole formed around him:
http://groups.google.com/groups?as_oq=liberal+****+communist+****+moron+bra t+pathetic+****ing+loser&as_uauthors=jfields%40aus tininstruments.com&safe=off

And this John Fields turd has the gall to accuse others of
name-calling. What a ****ing hypocrite!

---
I don't recall any instances of importance when I accused anyone of
being a name-caller, but if you think that's not the proper way to
behave, then perhaps "turd" and "****ing hypocrite" show you up for the
badly brought up, two-faced phony you are.

I couldn't care less if you call me names, dickhead. You were the one
whining about name-calling, etc.

---
You just type to hear yourself talk, don't you?

Why would he "type" to do that?

--
__________________________________________________ ______________________
Hail Eris! TM#5; COOSN-029-06-71069; Usenet Ruiner #5; Gutter Chix0r #16
Cardinal Snarky of the Fannish Inquisition; Official Chung Demon
Most Hated Usenetizen of All Time #13; Top Asshole #3; Lits Slut #16

Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle
Trainer of PorchMonkey4Life
http://www.screedbomb.info/porchie/

AUK FAQ: http://www.caballista.org/auk/faq.html

VOTE! Usenet Kook Awards, March 2007
Message-ID:

WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, February 2007
Message-ID: 1

WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, January 2007 MID:
70

"6. Who is a net.giggler?" -- Bloxy's "Monkay", that's who. Message-ID:


"'I find this genetic sequence all the way down the evolutionary
ladder,' he says. 'The major significance of this protein is that it may
be a communication line between the nucleus and the mitochondria.'" --
Andrew B. Chung, from
http://gtalumni.org/Publications/mag...n91/chung.html

"Pot...kettle...so black it picks cotton." -- But Alex "Dink" Cain isn't
racist at all, oh no. Not him. Why, some of his best friends are porch
monkeys. I'll bet. Message-ID:

"You think I don't know this? What gives you the right to speak as if
you have authority over me? You have none. I like his use of the words
'wanton woman'. They are biblical. Maybe there is some hope for k man
after all. You? There is no hope for you at all you freak of nature. Go
back to the hole you came out of." -- Atlanta Olympiada Kane "knows"
Kadaitcha Man was referring to me, but addressed him as though he was
referring to himself, then foamed all over me, in Message-ID:


"No effort at all c*cksucking you, b1tch." -- At last, the Monkey-man
comes out of the closet, in MID: aXkth.3535$QE6.1902@trnddc02

http://www6.kingdomofloathing.com/login.php

"This is a sandwich made by a Spam Witch. You know why Spam Witches
can't starve if they're at the beach? Because they can always eat the
sand which is there." -- Spam Witch sammich, from The Kingdom of
Loathing

http://www.runescape.com/
No one expects the Fannish Inquisition!
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Cabal_...y_Pretzel/join
Cabal of the Holy International Discordian Internet & Usenet Terrorist
Pretzel

"i have no need for sex; i'd rather tease you, honeybuns." -- Teh Mop
Jockey doesn't know the meaning of "TMI". MID:


"What are marijuana tablets?"

"When logic and proportion
Have fallen softly dead
And the White Knight is talking backwards
And the Red Queen's 'off with her head!'
Remember what the dormouse said:
'Feed your head
Feed your head
Feed your head'"
-- "White Rabbit", Jefferson Airplane

I own "James C Cracked is God!!!":
MID: .com

"Chips on you dud, you got bugged for being near me, Viruses transmit
that way you know." -- Blooey: Master of the Autoflame. Message-ID:


"The nonsense screeds you compose and post to usenet lack any kind of
coherent and rational meaning whatsoever, and are composed of random
bits and pieces stolen from mythology, science fiction, religion, comic
books, etc., placed into a blender, and the switch turned to the highest
setting.
About every other screed has droppings of death threats, racial
bigotry, laughably false prophesies of gloom and doom, and inane
attempts to extort money. These bland, meaningless, pulpy messes are
then trowled into usenet; identical or nearly identical screeds are
repeated ad nauseum." -- Art Deco had to clean up bits of Warhol for
days after using the Hammer on him

"Q: How many Bush administration officials does it take to change a
light bulb?
A: None. There is no need to change anything. We made the right decision
to stick with that light bulb. People who say that it is burned out are
giving aid and encouragement to the Forces of Darkness." -- Anon.

"Outlaw amateur assassins!" -- Chiun

"Property is theft."
-- P. J. Proudhon
"Property is liberty."
-- P. J. Proudhon
"Property is impossible."
-- P. J. Proudhon

"Etymology:
Argumentum ad Septicus : argument to putrefaction. Derived from Septicum
Argumentum : putrefaction of argument.

"Septic \Sep"tic\, Septical \Sep"tic*al\
a. [L. septicus to make putrid: cf. F. septique.]
Having power to promote putrefaction. Of or relating to or
caused by putrefaction." -- Kadaitcha Man, indirectly to
Donald "Skeptic"/"Septic" Alford, in MID:

"I never fail to be amazing" -- Looney Maroon for September 2006 nominee
William Barwell's ego knows no bounds. MID:


"Red meat won't hurt you. Fuzzy, blue-green meat will."
-- Zog the etc., in alt.discordia (correct
as needed)

"may you live to whatever age you'd like to." -- Dave Hillstrom,
in alt.discordia

"We are most nearly ourselves when we achieve the seriousness of the
child at play." -- Heraclitus

"And thats another mistake on your part. Your 'playing' games on usenet,
and I'm not playing...It has nothing to do with impressing you, it has
more to do with making sure you have the education you'll need to debate.
The debate is no fun for me if you are mentally incapable of it. I'm
giving you an opportunity to educate yourself. That's all." -- A trashy
former virus-writer turned Outer Filth doesn't know if he's playing or
working, in MID: om

"I am incapable of original thoughts" -- Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤ has an honest
moment, in MID:

"But now the end is near. Now Mark Foley comes along and is making
almost all liberal dreams come true and seriously, I'm sorry for it.
See, I believe in karma. I believe what comes around goes around and I
know full well that it's just bad juju to wish such a level of turmoil
and ill upon other humans, warmongering gay-hating maladroits or no, and
that the real path of enlightenment is paved with forgiveness and
progress and white-hot love and turning the other cheek and scotch.

"In fact, Jesus said something about that, I do believe. He said, "Knock
it off already with the warmongering and the hating of each other and
let's all get some wine and party like it's 2012." Then again, he never
saw Karl Rove stab the nation with the dull ice pick of bogus fear. He
never heard George W. Bush describe brutal war and the death of tens of
thousands as "just a comma" in world history.

"Check that. Maybe I'm not so sorry after all." -- Mark Morford,
http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cg...ve/2006/10/11/
notes101106.DTL&nl=fix
http://tinyurl.com/kusmr

On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 04:09:03 GMT, The Secretary of HomIntern
wrote:

On Tue, 03 Apr 2007 12:41:12 -0500, John Fields k'lamed:
On Tue, 03 Apr 2007 18:34:01 +0100, Eeyore wrote:

Given a chance, Bertei certainly barely misses an opportunity to be
offensive.

---
Oh, any _you're_ all sweetness and light???

Hey, spelling lamer, you shouldn't post while eating.

---
Yup, Thanks.


--
JF

John Fields wrote:

Drunk bit of mutton with vile coont and substantial lemons is in need
of lax night stick for relentless anal crippler. Mail me at



--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 15:40:32 +1000, Lionel
wrote:

On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 04:01:50 GMT, The Secretary of HomIntern
wrote:

On Tue, 03 Apr 2007 11:35:42 -0700, John Larkin k'lamed:
On Tue, 03 Apr 2007 13:19:26 +1000, Lionel wrote:
On Tue, 3 Apr 2007 02:27:40 +0000 (UTC), Meat Plow wrote:
On Mon, 02 Apr 2007 21:04:29 -0500, John Fields wrote:
On Mon, 02 Apr 2007 18:31:30 -0700, Aratzio wrote:

This from a right-wing apologist who has ranting frothfests when he
identifies anyone to the left of Atllia The Hun.

---
"Apologist"?

Hardly.

"Atllia?"

Lern to spel, semi-cretin.

The bullseye is of your own making, John. Always has been.

---
So now the target finally gets a chance to speak?

What do you want?

Do you have some electronics to discuss? Or have you been sucked into
the black hole of hypocrisy also?

Looking at his oh-so "Professional" posting history, it seems likely that
the blackhole formed around him:
http://groups.google.com/groups?as_oq=liberal+****+communist+****+moron+bra t+pathetic+****ing+loser&as_uauthors=jfields%40aus tininstruments.com&safe=off

And this John Fields turd has the gall to accuse others of name-calling.
What a ****ing hypocrite!

I don't understand why you guys aren't boring yourselves senseless with
this third-grade name calling.

Oh, maybe I do understand.

Third-grade name-calling usually bores me senseless, hence why I don't
do it much. However, I haven't noticed that "hypocrite" is a word often
found in the lexicons of third-graders, generally speaking.

Perhaps John heard it a lot from his teacher when he was in 3rd grade?

---
The only way that could be true was if we went to third grade
together.


--
JF

On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 16:04:34 +1000, Lionel
wrote:


You somehow missed the post where I supplied a Google URL that turned
up some 500+ examples of your squealing & caterwauling about "liberal
weenies", "communists", etc? No problem, here it is again:
http://groups.google.com/groups?as_oq=liberal+****+communist+****+moron+bra t+pathetic+****ing+loser&as_uauthors=jfields%40aus tininstruments.com&safe=off

---
Ah, yes!!! Some of my best work!

I'd forgotten this one, originally penned for Phil, but which seems
even more appropriate for you, dear boy:


"There once was a retard from Oz,
whose rhet'ric brought nothing but bahs.
So he stopped all the pain
with a round through his brain,
to a round of applause and hurrahs."


---
Correction: _I_ didn't involve myself in "these threads", _you_
were the one who deliberately crossposted to auk in an effort to try
to get some support for your weak, vindictive ass.

Oh, so what you're saying is that by crossposting to AUK, I am FORCING
you to reply to my posts?

---
Certainly not, and you must surely remember that I was replying to
your weaselly posts and rubbing your nose in your own **** before
you brought auk into it.

What I _am_ saying is that your intention, by bringing auk into it,
was to try to bring to bear some horsepower which you clearly don't
possess in order to try to win the argument you had already lost at
that point.
---

ObHint: When it comes to flame wars, "My enemy's enemy is my friend"
is /not/ true.

---
Geez, thanks... Just what I need: farts.

Well, you seem to be so lacking in them that it would be uncharitable
of me not to share.

---
Interesting snippage, chicken****.



--
JF

On Mon, 02 Apr 2007 21:04:29 -0500, John Fields
transparently proposed:

On Mon, 02 Apr 2007 18:31:30 -0700, Aratzio
wrote:

This from a right-wing apologist who has ranting frothfests when he
identifies anyone to the left of Atllia The Hun.

---
"Apologist"?

Hardly.

Well, I was too lazy to type "non-thinking knee jerk reactionary
****wit willing to believe anything his lying hero spews".


"Atllia?"

Lern to spel, semi-cretin.

1. Spelling Lame - Check.
2. Attempted Irony - Check.
3. "Third-Grade Name Calling" - Check
4. Snip-n-Run - Check

Not bad, not many can get that much spanktard lamery packed into just
two lines.


The bullseye is of your own making, John. Always has been.

---
So now the target finally gets a chance to speak?

You hearing things, John?


What do you want?

1971 Dodge Challenger R/T Convertible with the 426 Hemi


--

Does the name Pavlov ring a bell?

Aratzio - Usenet ruiner #2

On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 04:09:03 GMT, The Secretary of HomIntern
transparently proposed:

On Tue, 03 Apr 2007 12:41:12 -0500, John Fields k'lamed:
On Tue, 03 Apr 2007 18:34:01 +0100, Eeyore wrote:

Given a chance, Bertei certainly barely misses an opportunity to be
offensive.

---
Oh, any _you're_ all sweetness and light???

Hey, spelling lamer, you shouldn't post while eating.

It's the law of speeling lamers.

--

Does the name Pavlov ring a bell?

Aratzio - Usenet ruiner #2

On Tue, 03 Apr 2007 22:20:20 -0700, MassiveProng
transparently proposed:

On Tue, 03 Apr 2007 18:41:03 -0700, John Larkin
Gave us:

How about an intermediate case, say two golf balls that are
imperfectly springy? That's also inelastic. What happens?

You forgot to notice that it depends on their location. In my hand,
no rebound on the golf balls. Against a ball laid on the floor,
rebound.

So you would call it "less perfectly springy" when on the floor?

Also, the steel balls behave in the opposite manner. In my hand, I
get a rebound. Against a ball laid on the floor, no rebound, just a
side deflection from the not quite so centered hit.

Sprongy sure has a thing about the physics of handling balls that are
not his.

--

Does the name Pavlov ring a bell?

Aratzio - Usenet ruiner #2

On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 14:06:05 GMT, Aratzio
wrote:


You hearing things, John?

---
What?^)


--
JF

The 2-Belo pinched out a
steaming pile :

Do you, $B%!(Bñühw$B!"!W(Bf, deny that the USSR placed and is
placing medium- and
intermediate-range missiles in sites in alt.usenet.kooks? Yes or no?
Don't wait
for the translation! Yes or no?!:

MassiveProng pinched out a steaming pile
:

On Tue, 03 Apr 2007 20:37:48 +1000, Lionel
Gave
us:

On Tue, 03 Apr 2007 03:14:37 -0700, MassiveProng
g wrote:

On Tue, 03 Apr 2007 20:01:03 +1000, Lionel
Gave
us:


3: You called me a liar, because you couldn't find any posts from
me
on Google that were more than 6 days old.


Wrong.

I told YOU to look on google, dip****.

Why on earth would I need to look for *my own posts* on Google?
I /know/ where I post, you ****ing retard.

Typical auktard sidestep action. Good job, auktard.

You claimed I looked on google, when what really happened is that
I
challenged you to prove your claim, which you incessantly sidestep.

What I DID say was that YOU should google up some proof, which
you
conveniently sidestepped.

The only thing I'm interested in proving is your stupidity, &
you're
doing a really slick job of proving that for me. ;^)

Typical auktard meaningless tripe.

Ahem...Angry Guy...do you know anything about 802.11 wireless
antennas?
I saw some plans for a Pringles Can antenna but it looks pretty
complex.
Is a usb-based parabolic reflector the better way to go?
TIA


Dear Angry Electronics Guy,

I am planning to set up a half-wave antenna on my roof so I can tune
in to Radio
Free Europe and need some advice on how to mount the insulators. Any
thoughts?

Thanks awfully,


ROTFPMSL

http://www.wardrive.net/