On Tue, 03 Jan 2017 03:24:15 -0000, Gordon Shumway wrote:

On Tue, 03 Jan 2017 00:36:31 -0000, "James Wilkinson Sword" wrote:

On Mon, 02 Jan 2017 23:32:35 -0000, Oren wrote:

On Mon, 02 Jan 2017 16:32:27 -0500, FromTheRafters
wrote:

After serious thinking burfordTjustice wrote :
Liberals Mock and Celebrate Shooting Death of Conservative Columnist

http://heatst.com/culture-wars/liber...ive-columnist/

He thought it was a good idea to hand a loaded gun to a kid? Well,
guess what, it *isn't*!!

Every gun is "loaded" until you ensure it is not. Kids with training
will know that. If I look at a gun in a store, the clerk passes it to
me I will always check it for ammo.

It's a lot easier when there are no guns. Tell me one good reason for having guns everywhere.

Travon Martin is one. Michael Brown is two. Shall I continue?

Travon Martin? You can't be ****ing serious. The kid bought some candy, was shot by some trumped up pretend policeman for looking suspicious, then the MURDERER that shot him got away with it.

--
Brazil nuts are an STD. If you eat a Brazil nut then have sex with someone who has nut allergies, they will have an allergic reaction.

James Wilkinson Sword formulated on Tuesday :
On Tue, 03 Jan 2017 03:24:15 -0000, Gordon Shumway
wrote:

On Tue, 03 Jan 2017 00:36:31 -0000, "James Wilkinson Sword"
wrote:

On Mon, 02 Jan 2017 23:32:35 -0000, Oren wrote:

On Mon, 02 Jan 2017 16:32:27 -0500, FromTheRafters
wrote:

After serious thinking burfordTjustice wrote :
Liberals Mock and Celebrate Shooting Death of Conservative Columnist

http://heatst.com/culture-wars/liber...ive-columnist/

He thought it was a good idea to hand a loaded gun to a kid? Well,
guess what, it *isn't*!!

Every gun is "loaded" until you ensure it is not. Kids with training
will know that. If I look at a gun in a store, the clerk passes it to
me I will always check it for ammo.

It's a lot easier when there are no guns. Tell me one good reason for
having guns everywhere.

Travon Martin is one. Michael Brown is two. Shall I continue?

Travon Martin? You can't be ****ing serious. The kid bought some candy, was
shot by some trumped up pretend policeman for looking suspicious, then the
MURDERER that shot him got away with it.

LOL

On Tue, 03 Jan 2017 16:50:34 -0000, FromTheRafters wrote:

James Wilkinson Sword formulated on Tuesday :
On Tue, 03 Jan 2017 03:24:15 -0000, Gordon Shumway
wrote:

On Tue, 03 Jan 2017 00:36:31 -0000, "James Wilkinson Sword"
wrote:

On Mon, 02 Jan 2017 23:32:35 -0000, Oren wrote:

On Mon, 02 Jan 2017 16:32:27 -0500, FromTheRafters
wrote:

After serious thinking burfordTjustice wrote :
Liberals Mock and Celebrate Shooting Death of Conservative Columnist

http://heatst.com/culture-wars/liber...ive-columnist/

He thought it was a good idea to hand a loaded gun to a kid? Well,
guess what, it *isn't*!!

Every gun is "loaded" until you ensure it is not. Kids with training
will know that. If I look at a gun in a store, the clerk passes it to
me I will always check it for ammo.

It's a lot easier when there are no guns. Tell me one good reason for
having guns everywhere.

Travon Martin is one. Michael Brown is two. Shall I continue?

Travon Martin? You can't be ****ing serious. The kid bought some candy, was
shot by some trumped up pretend policeman for looking suspicious, then the
MURDERER that shot him got away with it.

LOL

You disagree?

--
The problem with today's society is adults are treated like children, children are treated like retards, and retards are exempt from the law.

It happens that James Wilkinson Sword formulated :
On Tue, 03 Jan 2017 16:50:34 -0000, FromTheRafters
wrote:

James Wilkinson Sword formulated on Tuesday :
On Tue, 03 Jan 2017 03:24:15 -0000, Gordon Shumway
wrote:

On Tue, 03 Jan 2017 00:36:31 -0000, "James Wilkinson Sword"
wrote:

On Mon, 02 Jan 2017 23:32:35 -0000, Oren wrote:

On Mon, 02 Jan 2017 16:32:27 -0500, FromTheRafters
wrote:

After serious thinking burfordTjustice wrote :
Liberals Mock and Celebrate Shooting Death of Conservative Columnist

http://heatst.com/culture-wars/liber...ive-columnist/

He thought it was a good idea to hand a loaded gun to a kid? Well,
guess what, it *isn't*!!

Every gun is "loaded" until you ensure it is not. Kids with training
will know that. If I look at a gun in a store, the clerk passes it to
me I will always check it for ammo.

It's a lot easier when there are no guns. Tell me one good reason for
having guns everywhere.

Travon Martin is one. Michael Brown is two. Shall I continue?

Travon Martin? You can't be ****ing serious. The kid bought some candy,
was
shot by some trumped up pretend policeman for looking suspicious, then the
MURDERER that shot him got away with it.

LOL

You disagree?

Absolutely! He wouldn't have been shot had he not attacked someone with
the authority to do what he was doing. Evidence pointed to the truth of
Zimmerman's statements about the attack and he was exonerated.

On Tue, 03 Jan 2017 20:20:57 -0000, FromTheRafters wrote:

It happens that James Wilkinson Sword formulated :
On Tue, 03 Jan 2017 16:50:34 -0000, FromTheRafters
wrote:

James Wilkinson Sword formulated on Tuesday :
On Tue, 03 Jan 2017 03:24:15 -0000, Gordon Shumway
wrote:

On Tue, 03 Jan 2017 00:36:31 -0000, "James Wilkinson Sword"
wrote:

On Mon, 02 Jan 2017 23:32:35 -0000, Oren wrote:

On Mon, 02 Jan 2017 16:32:27 -0500, FromTheRafters
wrote:

After serious thinking burfordTjustice wrote :
Liberals Mock and Celebrate Shooting Death of Conservative Columnist

http://heatst.com/culture-wars/liber...ive-columnist/

He thought it was a good idea to hand a loaded gun to a kid? Well,
guess what, it *isn't*!!

Every gun is "loaded" until you ensure it is not. Kids with training
will know that. If I look at a gun in a store, the clerk passes it to
me I will always check it for ammo.

It's a lot easier when there are no guns. Tell me one good reason for
having guns everywhere.

Travon Martin is one. Michael Brown is two. Shall I continue?

Travon Martin? You can't be ****ing serious. The kid bought some candy,
was
shot by some trumped up pretend policeman for looking suspicious, then the
MURDERER that shot him got away with it.

LOL

You disagree?

Absolutely! He wouldn't have been shot had he not attacked someone with
the authority to do what he was doing. Evidence pointed to the truth of
Zimmerman's statements about the attack and he was exonerated.

The gunman had zero authority. Only the police have the authority to kill a suspect. The shooter should be hung.

--
Researchers have recently unearthed the text of the first transcontinental telegraph message. Reportedly, it reads
ENLARGE YOUR MALE MEMBER STOP GUARANTEED RESULTS STOP ...

James Wilkinson Sword wrote on 1/3/2017 :
On Tue, 03 Jan 2017 20:20:57 -0000, FromTheRafters
wrote:

It happens that James Wilkinson Sword formulated :
On Tue, 03 Jan 2017 16:50:34 -0000, FromTheRafters
wrote:

James Wilkinson Sword formulated on Tuesday :
On Tue, 03 Jan 2017 03:24:15 -0000, Gordon Shumway

wrote:

On Tue, 03 Jan 2017 00:36:31 -0000, "James Wilkinson Sword"
wrote:

On Mon, 02 Jan 2017 23:32:35 -0000, Oren wrote:

On Mon, 02 Jan 2017 16:32:27 -0500, FromTheRafters
wrote:

After serious thinking burfordTjustice wrote :
Liberals Mock and Celebrate Shooting Death of Conservative
Columnist

http://heatst.com/culture-wars/liber...ive-columnist/

He thought it was a good idea to hand a loaded gun to a kid? Well,
guess what, it *isn't*!!

Every gun is "loaded" until you ensure it is not. Kids with training
will know that. If I look at a gun in a store, the clerk passes it to
me I will always check it for ammo.

It's a lot easier when there are no guns. Tell me one good reason for
having guns everywhere.

Travon Martin is one. Michael Brown is two. Shall I continue?

Travon Martin? You can't be ****ing serious. The kid bought some
candy,
was
shot by some trumped up pretend policeman for looking suspicious, then
the
MURDERER that shot him got away with it.

LOL

You disagree?

Absolutely! He wouldn't have been shot had he not attacked someone with
the authority to do what he was doing. Evidence pointed to the truth of
Zimmerman's statements about the attack and he was exonerated.

The gunman had zero authority. Only the police have the authority to kill a
suspect. The shooter should be hung.

He had as much right to be where he was as Trayvon did. Sure, it was
not recommended that he do so, but he could get in front of Trayvon
call him names, and stick his thumbs in his ears and wave his fingers
at him if he wanted to. What went wrong for Trayvon was Trayvon's
violent attack, and George's right to defend himself.

On Tue, 03 Jan 2017 22:41:24 -0000, FromTheRafters wrote:

James Wilkinson Sword wrote on 1/3/2017 :
On Tue, 03 Jan 2017 20:20:57 -0000, FromTheRafters
wrote:

It happens that James Wilkinson Sword formulated :
On Tue, 03 Jan 2017 16:50:34 -0000, FromTheRafters
wrote:

James Wilkinson Sword formulated on Tuesday :
On Tue, 03 Jan 2017 03:24:15 -0000, Gordon Shumway

wrote:

On Tue, 03 Jan 2017 00:36:31 -0000, "James Wilkinson Sword"
wrote:

On Mon, 02 Jan 2017 23:32:35 -0000, Oren wrote:

On Mon, 02 Jan 2017 16:32:27 -0500, FromTheRafters
wrote:

After serious thinking burfordTjustice wrote :
Liberals Mock and Celebrate Shooting Death of Conservative
Columnist

http://heatst.com/culture-wars/liber...ive-columnist/

He thought it was a good idea to hand a loaded gun to a kid? Well,
guess what, it *isn't*!!

Every gun is "loaded" until you ensure it is not. Kids with training
will know that. If I look at a gun in a store, the clerk passes it to
me I will always check it for ammo.

It's a lot easier when there are no guns. Tell me one good reason for
having guns everywhere.

Travon Martin is one. Michael Brown is two. Shall I continue?

Travon Martin? You can't be ****ing serious. The kid bought some
candy,
was
shot by some trumped up pretend policeman for looking suspicious, then
the
MURDERER that shot him got away with it.

LOL

You disagree?

Absolutely! He wouldn't have been shot had he not attacked someone with
the authority to do what he was doing. Evidence pointed to the truth of
Zimmerman's statements about the attack and he was exonerated.

The gunman had zero authority. Only the police have the authority to kill a
suspect. The shooter should be hung.

He had as much right to be where he was as Trayvon did. Sure, it was
not recommended that he do so, but he could get in front of Trayvon
call him names, and stick his thumbs in his ears and wave his fingers
at him if he wanted to. What went wrong for Trayvon was Trayvon's
violent attack, and George's right to defend himself.

Vigilantes deserve to be attaked, it's a pity Trayvon didn't kill him.

--
If it's zero degrees outside today and it's supposed to be twice as cold tomorrow, how cold is it going to be?

On Tuesday, January 3, 2017 at 11:04:36 AM UTC-5, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Tue, 03 Jan 2017 03:24:15 -0000, Gordon Shumway wrote:

On Tue, 03 Jan 2017 00:36:31 -0000, "James Wilkinson Sword" wrote:

On Mon, 02 Jan 2017 23:32:35 -0000, Oren wrote:

On Mon, 02 Jan 2017 16:32:27 -0500, FromTheRafters
wrote:

After serious thinking burfordTjustice wrote :
Liberals Mock and Celebrate Shooting Death of Conservative Columnist

http://heatst.com/culture-wars/liber...ive-columnist/

He thought it was a good idea to hand a loaded gun to a kid? Well,
guess what, it *isn't*!!

Every gun is "loaded" until you ensure it is not. Kids with training
will know that. If I look at a gun in a store, the clerk passes it to
me I will always check it for ammo.

It's a lot easier when there are no guns. Tell me one good reason for having guns everywhere.

Travon Martin is one. Michael Brown is two. Shall I continue?

Travon Martin? You can't be ****ing serious. The kid bought some candy, was shot by some trumped up pretend policeman for looking suspicious, then the MURDERER that shot him got away with it.

More lies worthy of Black Lies Matter. Martin was on top of Z,
pounding his head into the sidewalk. Z was screaming for help.
An eyewitness, the man who called police, confirmed that account.
Z had wounds to the back of his head, grass/dirt on his back,
on his head, etc. The witness described the attack as MMA style.
It was only after that where Z used his right of self defense,
shot Martin, to end the attack. Facts matter.

On Tue, 03 Jan 2017 23:01:56 -0000, trader_4 wrote:

On Tuesday, January 3, 2017 at 11:04:36 AM UTC-5, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Tue, 03 Jan 2017 03:24:15 -0000, Gordon Shumway wrote:

On Tue, 03 Jan 2017 00:36:31 -0000, "James Wilkinson Sword" wrote:

On Mon, 02 Jan 2017 23:32:35 -0000, Oren wrote:

On Mon, 02 Jan 2017 16:32:27 -0500, FromTheRafters
wrote:

After serious thinking burfordTjustice wrote :
Liberals Mock and Celebrate Shooting Death of Conservative Columnist

http://heatst.com/culture-wars/liber...ive-columnist/

He thought it was a good idea to hand a loaded gun to a kid? Well,
guess what, it *isn't*!!

Every gun is "loaded" until you ensure it is not. Kids with training
will know that. If I look at a gun in a store, the clerk passes it to
me I will always check it for ammo.

It's a lot easier when there are no guns. Tell me one good reason for having guns everywhere.

Travon Martin is one. Michael Brown is two. Shall I continue?

Travon Martin? You can't be ****ing serious. The kid bought some candy, was shot by some trumped up pretend policeman for looking suspicious, then the MURDERER that shot him got away with it.

More lies worthy of Black Lies Matter. Martin was on top of Z,
pounding his head into the sidewalk. Z was screaming for help.
An eyewitness, the man who called police, confirmed that account.
Z had wounds to the back of his head, grass/dirt on his back,
on his head, etc. The witness described the attack as MMA style.
It was only after that where Z used his right of self defense,
shot Martin, to end the attack. Facts matter.

Ask yourself why he attacked him. Nobody likes a self-professed pretend cop vigilante ****.

--
A man has six items in his bathroom: toothbrush and toothpaste, shaving cream, razor, a bar of soap, and a towel.
The average number of items in the typical woman's bathroom is 337. A man would not be able to identify more than 20 of these items.

On Tuesday, January 3, 2017 at 6:06:49 PM UTC-5, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Tue, 03 Jan 2017 23:01:56 -0000, trader_4 wrote:

On Tuesday, January 3, 2017 at 11:04:36 AM UTC-5, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Tue, 03 Jan 2017 03:24:15 -0000, Gordon Shumway wrote:

On Tue, 03 Jan 2017 00:36:31 -0000, "James Wilkinson Sword" wrote:

On Mon, 02 Jan 2017 23:32:35 -0000, Oren wrote:

On Mon, 02 Jan 2017 16:32:27 -0500, FromTheRafters
wrote:

After serious thinking burfordTjustice wrote :
Liberals Mock and Celebrate Shooting Death of Conservative Columnist

http://heatst.com/culture-wars/liber...ive-columnist/

He thought it was a good idea to hand a loaded gun to a kid? Well,
guess what, it *isn't*!!

Every gun is "loaded" until you ensure it is not. Kids with training
will know that. If I look at a gun in a store, the clerk passes it to
me I will always check it for ammo.

It's a lot easier when there are no guns. Tell me one good reason for having guns everywhere.

Travon Martin is one. Michael Brown is two. Shall I continue?

Travon Martin? You can't be ****ing serious. The kid bought some candy, was shot by some trumped up pretend policeman for looking suspicious, then the MURDERER that shot him got away with it.

More lies worthy of Black Lies Matter. Martin was on top of Z,
pounding his head into the sidewalk. Z was screaming for help.
An eyewitness, the man who called police, confirmed that account.
Z had wounds to the back of his head, grass/dirt on his back,
on his head, etc. The witness described the attack as MMA style.
It was only after that where Z used his right of self defense,
shot Martin, to end the attack. Facts matter.

Ask yourself why he attacked him. Nobody likes a self-professed pretend cop vigilante ****.


I see, so just because you don't like someone, that gives you the
right to physically attack them MMA style, to pound their head into
the pavement. Is that how it works in the UK? You really are the
total village idiot. One minute you complain about violence in the
US, next you endorse it.

On Tue, 03 Jan 2017 23:10:34 -0000, trader_4 wrote:

On Tuesday, January 3, 2017 at 6:06:49 PM UTC-5, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Tue, 03 Jan 2017 23:01:56 -0000, trader_4 wrote:

On Tuesday, January 3, 2017 at 11:04:36 AM UTC-5, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Tue, 03 Jan 2017 03:24:15 -0000, Gordon Shumway wrote:

On Tue, 03 Jan 2017 00:36:31 -0000, "James Wilkinson Sword" wrote:

On Mon, 02 Jan 2017 23:32:35 -0000, Oren wrote:

On Mon, 02 Jan 2017 16:32:27 -0500, FromTheRafters
wrote:

After serious thinking burfordTjustice wrote :
Liberals Mock and Celebrate Shooting Death of Conservative Columnist

http://heatst.com/culture-wars/liber...ive-columnist/

He thought it was a good idea to hand a loaded gun to a kid? Well,
guess what, it *isn't*!!

Every gun is "loaded" until you ensure it is not. Kids with training
will know that. If I look at a gun in a store, the clerk passes it to
me I will always check it for ammo.

It's a lot easier when there are no guns. Tell me one good reason for having guns everywhere.

Travon Martin is one. Michael Brown is two. Shall I continue?

Travon Martin? You can't be ****ing serious. The kid bought some candy, was shot by some trumped up pretend policeman for looking suspicious, then the MURDERER that shot him got away with it.

More lies worthy of Black Lies Matter. Martin was on top of Z,
pounding his head into the sidewalk. Z was screaming for help.
An eyewitness, the man who called police, confirmed that account.
Z had wounds to the back of his head, grass/dirt on his back,
on his head, etc. The witness described the attack as MMA style.
It was only after that where Z used his right of self defense,
shot Martin, to end the attack. Facts matter.

Ask yourself why he attacked him. Nobody likes a self-professed pretend cop vigilante ****.


I see, so just because you don't like someone, that gives you the
right to physically attack them MMA style, to pound their head into
the pavement. Is that how it works in the UK? You really are the
total village idiot. One minute you complain about violence in the
US, next you endorse it.

He decided to beat up someone who continually runs around enforcing laws, even though he isn't a policeman. Sounds like a good idea to me. How would you like all the cops to run around with no training?

--
Hello, you have reached technical support.
Please dial 1 to report an issue, 2 to report a challenge, 3 to report a problem, or 4 to report a cockup.

On Tue, 3 Jan 2017 15:01:56 -0800 (PST), trader_4
wrote:

Travon Martin? You can't be ****ing serious. The kid bought some candy, was shot by some trumped up pretend policeman for looking suspicious, then the MURDERER that shot him got away with it.

More lies worthy of Black Lies Matter. Martin was on top of Z,
pounding his head into the sidewalk. Z was screaming for help.
An eyewitness, the man who called police, confirmed that account.
Z had wounds to the back of his head, grass/dirt on his back,
on his head, etc. The witness described the attack as MMA style.
It was only after that where Z used his right of self defense,
shot Martin, to end the attack. Facts matter.

I watched the entire trial streaming. Take note of the district
prosecutor and her agenda, bringing charges and her plans to run for
governor. She screwed the pooch under Florida laws of the Castle
Doctrine. Even Alan Dershowitz (Harvard liberal) said she didn't put
facts into the Information indictment.

The star witness for the prosecution was proven to be an idiot. When
she stated in direct cross examination, "Don't you watch 48 hours" I
nearly ****ed myself laughing.

The case was brought forth for political reasons, period.

The Brit is an idiot.

On Tuesday, January 3, 2017 at 10:04:36 AM UTC-6, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Tue, 03 Jan 2017 03:24:15 -0000, Gordon Shumway wrote:

On Tue, 03 Jan 2017 00:36:31 -0000, "James Wilkinson Sword" wrote:

On Mon, 02 Jan 2017 23:32:35 -0000, Oren wrote:

On Mon, 02 Jan 2017 16:32:27 -0500, FromTheRafters
wrote:

After serious thinking burfordTjustice wrote :
Liberals Mock and Celebrate Shooting Death of Conservative Columnist

http://heatst.com/culture-wars/liber...ive-columnist/

He thought it was a good idea to hand a loaded gun to a kid? Well,
guess what, it *isn't*!!

Every gun is "loaded" until you ensure it is not. Kids with training
will know that. If I look at a gun in a store, the clerk passes it to
me I will always check it for ammo.

It's a lot easier when there are no guns. Tell me one good reason for having guns everywhere.

Travon Martin is one. Michael Brown is two. Shall I continue?

Travon Martin? You can't be ****ing serious. The kid bought some candy, was shot by some trumped up pretend policeman for looking suspicious, then the MURDERER that shot him got away with it.
--


The innocent little snowflake thug Trayvon Martin made the mistake of jumping and attacking an armed citizen, pounding his head into the sidewalk thus earning little Trayvon a Darwin award. The Liberal/Leftist news media had to howl about a "White Hispanic", with an emphasis on "White", shooting a Black child in order to stir up racial strife. The media even flooded the news with a picture of innocent little 12 year old Trayvon not the 17 year old thug Trayvon who attacked George Zimmerman a volunteer on the neighborhood watch. A neighborhood that had a problem with teens committing crimes there. Zimmerman did as he should have and called the police about a Black male he did not recognize walking through the neighborhood. Zimmerman did not hunt little Trayvon down and shoot him. Innocent little Trayvon was the aggressor not Zimmerman. Zimmerman was lucky to have been able to get to his weapon and take out a thug saving taxpayers countless dollars over many years because the way innocent little Trayvon was behaving, there was a good chance of him winding up in prison. The lesson here is for Negro youth not to attack a Hispanic man because he may have a gun and pop a cap in yo ass. ”Œ( à²*_à²*)”˜

[8~{} Uncle Armed Monster

On Tuesday, January 3, 2017 at 4:48:11 PM UTC-6, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Tue, 03 Jan 2017 22:41:24 -0000, FromTheRafters wrote:

James Wilkinson Sword wrote on 1/3/2017 :
On Tue, 03 Jan 2017 20:20:57 -0000, FromTheRafters
wrote:

It happens that James Wilkinson Sword formulated :
On Tue, 03 Jan 2017 16:50:34 -0000, FromTheRafters
wrote:

James Wilkinson Sword formulated on Tuesday :
On Tue, 03 Jan 2017 03:24:15 -0000, Gordon Shumway

wrote:

On Tue, 03 Jan 2017 00:36:31 -0000, "James Wilkinson Sword"
wrote:

On Mon, 02 Jan 2017 23:32:35 -0000, Oren wrote:

On Mon, 02 Jan 2017 16:32:27 -0500, FromTheRafters
wrote:

After serious thinking burfordTjustice wrote :
Liberals Mock and Celebrate Shooting Death of Conservative
Columnist

http://heatst.com/culture-wars/liber...ive-columnist/

He thought it was a good idea to hand a loaded gun to a kid? Well,
guess what, it *isn't*!!

Every gun is "loaded" until you ensure it is not. Kids with training
will know that. If I look at a gun in a store, the clerk passes it to
me I will always check it for ammo.

It's a lot easier when there are no guns. Tell me one good reason for
having guns everywhere.

Travon Martin is one. Michael Brown is two. Shall I continue?

Travon Martin? You can't be ****ing serious. The kid bought some
candy,
was
shot by some trumped up pretend policeman for looking suspicious, then
the
MURDERER that shot him got away with it.

LOL

You disagree?

Absolutely! He wouldn't have been shot had he not attacked someone with
the authority to do what he was doing. Evidence pointed to the truth of
Zimmerman's statements about the attack and he was exonerated.

The gunman had zero authority. Only the police have the authority to kill a
suspect. The shooter should be hung.

He had as much right to be where he was as Trayvon did. Sure, it was
not recommended that he do so, but he could get in front of Trayvon
call him names, and stick his thumbs in his ears and wave his fingers
at him if he wanted to. What went wrong for Trayvon was Trayvon's
violent attack, and George's right to defend himself.

Vigilantes deserve to be attaked, it's a pity Trayvon didn't kill him.
--


My good man are you daft?! George Zimmerman was not a vigilante. He was a member of The Neighborhood Watch which works closely with police to keep an eye on his gated community. That's why he called police when he saw an unknown Black male walking through the gated community. Oh yea, Trayvon did not reside there he was visiting. ヽ(à²*_à²*)ノ

http://lawofselfdefense.com/zimmerma...leeing-martin/

http://tinyurl.com/phpbzvy

[8~{} Uncle Murdurous Monster

Uncle Monster pretended :
On Tuesday, January 3, 2017 at 4:48:11 PM UTC-6, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Tue, 03 Jan 2017 22:41:24 -0000, FromTheRafters
wrote:

James Wilkinson Sword wrote on 1/3/2017 :
On Tue, 03 Jan 2017 20:20:57 -0000, FromTheRafters
wrote:

It happens that James Wilkinson Sword formulated :
On Tue, 03 Jan 2017 16:50:34 -0000, FromTheRafters
wrote:

James Wilkinson Sword formulated on Tuesday :
On Tue, 03 Jan 2017 03:24:15 -0000, Gordon Shumway

wrote:

On Tue, 03 Jan 2017 00:36:31 -0000, "James Wilkinson Sword"
wrote:

On Mon, 02 Jan 2017 23:32:35 -0000, Oren wrote:

On Mon, 02 Jan 2017 16:32:27 -0500, FromTheRafters
wrote:

After serious thinking burfordTjustice wrote :
Liberals Mock and Celebrate Shooting Death of Conservative
Columnist

http://heatst.com/culture-wars/liber...ive-columnist/

He thought it was a good idea to hand a loaded gun to a kid? Well,
guess what, it *isn't*!!

Every gun is "loaded" until you ensure it is not. Kids with
training will know that. If I look at a gun in a store, the clerk
passes it to me I will always check it for ammo.

It's a lot easier when there are no guns. Tell me one good reason
for having guns everywhere.

Travon Martin is one. Michael Brown is two. Shall I continue?

Travon Martin? You can't be ****ing serious. The kid bought some
candy,
was
shot by some trumped up pretend policeman for looking suspicious, then
the
MURDERER that shot him got away with it.

LOL

You disagree?

Absolutely! He wouldn't have been shot had he not attacked someone with
the authority to do what he was doing. Evidence pointed to the truth of
Zimmerman's statements about the attack and he was exonerated.

The gunman had zero authority. Only the police have the authority to kill
a suspect. The shooter should be hung.

He had as much right to be where he was as Trayvon did. Sure, it was
not recommended that he do so, but he could get in front of Trayvon
call him names, and stick his thumbs in his ears and wave his fingers
at him if he wanted to. What went wrong for Trayvon was Trayvon's
violent attack, and George's right to defend himself.

Vigilantes deserve to be attaked, it's a pity Trayvon didn't kill him.
--


My good man are you daft?! George Zimmerman was not a vigilante. He was a
member of The Neighborhood Watch which works closely with police to keep an
eye on his gated community. That's why he called police when he saw an
unknown Black male walking through the gated community. Oh yea, Trayvon did
not reside there he was visiting. ヽ(à²*_à²*)ノ

http://lawofselfdefense.com/zimmerma...leeing-martin/

http://tinyurl.com/phpbzvy

[8~{} Uncle Murdurous Monster

He didn't report a black male, only a male wearing a hoodie. The
'dispatcher' aksed him several times if the subject was black, and he
responded that he didn't know, it's too dark. That didn't stop people
from accusing him of racial profiling though. Also, contrary to what
CNN reported, he didn't disobey the dispatcher after (she?) said 'we
don't need you to do that' after being asked if he was following the
suspect, he was already following him so he could give the cops a
better location by that time and, according to him, he was going back
to his vehicle when he was attacked. The physical evidence supported
his story. Too bad for the 'protesters' or so-called witnesses who
never seem to get their story straight or correct.

On 1/4/2017 8:48 AM, FromTheRafters wrote:


He didn't report a black male, only a male wearing a hoodie. The
'dispatcher' aksed him several times if the subject was black, and he
responded that he didn't know, it's too dark. That didn't stop people
from accusing him of racial profiling though. Also, contrary to what CNN
reported, he didn't disobey the dispatcher after (she?) said 'we don't
need you to do that' after being asked if he was following the suspect,
he was already following him so he could give the cops a better location
by that time and, according to him, he was going back to his vehicle
when he was attacked. The physical evidence supported his story. Too bad
for the 'protesters' or so-called witnesses who never seem to get their
story straight or correct.

Makes a better news story to tell how a little boy was going to the tore
to buy candy. Don't confuse it with facts.

Ed Pawlowski pretended :
On 1/4/2017 8:48 AM, FromTheRafters wrote:


He didn't report a black male, only a male wearing a hoodie. The
'dispatcher' aksed him several times if the subject was black, and he
responded that he didn't know, it's too dark. That didn't stop people
from accusing him of racial profiling though. Also, contrary to what CNN
reported, he didn't disobey the dispatcher after (she?) said 'we don't
need you to do that' after being asked if he was following the suspect,
he was already following him so he could give the cops a better location
by that time and, according to him, he was going back to his vehicle
when he was attacked. The physical evidence supported his story. Too bad
for the 'protesters' or so-called witnesses who never seem to get their
story straight or correct.

Makes a better news story to tell how a little boy was going to the tore to
buy candy. Don't confuse it with facts.

Exactly! Make it sensational and be the first with the story, more
advertising income that way and your stockholders will be happy. At one
time long ago it was about keeping the readership informed, now it's
all about keeping them misinformed for cash.

On Wednesday, January 4, 2017 at 8:48:41 AM UTC-5, FromTheRafters wrote:
Uncle Monster pretended :
On Tuesday, January 3, 2017 at 4:48:11 PM UTC-6, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Tue, 03 Jan 2017 22:41:24 -0000, FromTheRafters
wrote:

James Wilkinson Sword wrote on 1/3/2017 :
On Tue, 03 Jan 2017 20:20:57 -0000, FromTheRafters
wrote:

It happens that James Wilkinson Sword formulated :
On Tue, 03 Jan 2017 16:50:34 -0000, FromTheRafters
wrote:

James Wilkinson Sword formulated on Tuesday :
On Tue, 03 Jan 2017 03:24:15 -0000, Gordon Shumway

wrote:

On Tue, 03 Jan 2017 00:36:31 -0000, "James Wilkinson Sword"
wrote:

On Mon, 02 Jan 2017 23:32:35 -0000, Oren wrote:

On Mon, 02 Jan 2017 16:32:27 -0500, FromTheRafters
wrote:

After serious thinking burfordTjustice wrote :
Liberals Mock and Celebrate Shooting Death of Conservative
Columnist

http://heatst.com/culture-wars/liber...ive-columnist/

He thought it was a good idea to hand a loaded gun to a kid? Well,
guess what, it *isn't*!!

Every gun is "loaded" until you ensure it is not. Kids with
training will know that. If I look at a gun in a store, the clerk
passes it to me I will always check it for ammo.

It's a lot easier when there are no guns. Tell me one good reason
for having guns everywhere.

Travon Martin is one. Michael Brown is two. Shall I continue?

Travon Martin? You can't be ****ing serious. The kid bought some
candy,
was
shot by some trumped up pretend policeman for looking suspicious, then
the
MURDERER that shot him got away with it.

LOL

You disagree?

Absolutely! He wouldn't have been shot had he not attacked someone with
the authority to do what he was doing. Evidence pointed to the truth of
Zimmerman's statements about the attack and he was exonerated.

The gunman had zero authority. Only the police have the authority to kill
a suspect. The shooter should be hung.

He had as much right to be where he was as Trayvon did. Sure, it was
not recommended that he do so, but he could get in front of Trayvon
call him names, and stick his thumbs in his ears and wave his fingers
at him if he wanted to. What went wrong for Trayvon was Trayvon's
violent attack, and George's right to defend himself.

Vigilantes deserve to be attaked, it's a pity Trayvon didn't kill him.
--


My good man are you daft?! George Zimmerman was not a vigilante. He was a
member of The Neighborhood Watch which works closely with police to keep an
eye on his gated community. That's why he called police when he saw an
unknown Black male walking through the gated community. Oh yea, Trayvon did
not reside there he was visiting. ヽ(à²*_à²*)ノ

http://lawofselfdefense.com/zimmerma...leeing-martin/

http://tinyurl.com/phpbzvy

[8~{} Uncle Murdurous Monster

He didn't report a black male, only a male wearing a hoodie. The
'dispatcher' aksed him several times if the subject was black, and he
responded that he didn't know, it's too dark.

This is just as incorrect as what some in the media reported
at the time. I believe it was NBC that edited it so that Z just said
"he looks black", without showing what immediately proceeded it.
You just edited it to leave out that Z did say
he looks black. What actually happened was the police dispatcher asked
if the person what white, hispanic or black. Z responded "He looks black".





That didn't stop people
from accusing him of racial profiling though. Also, contrary to what
CNN reported, he didn't disobey the dispatcher after (she?) said 'we
don't need you to do that' after being asked if he was following the
suspect, he was already following him so he could give the cops a
better location by that time and, according to him, he was going back
to his vehicle when he was attacked. The physical evidence supported
his story. Too bad for the 'protesters' or so-called witnesses who
never seem to get their story straight or correct.

You didn't get part of it correct either.

On Wed, 04 Jan 2017 09:12:23 -0000, Uncle Monster wrote:

On Tuesday, January 3, 2017 at 10:04:36 AM UTC-6, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Tue, 03 Jan 2017 03:24:15 -0000, Gordon Shumway wrote:

On Tue, 03 Jan 2017 00:36:31 -0000, "James Wilkinson Sword" wrote:

On Mon, 02 Jan 2017 23:32:35 -0000, Oren wrote:

On Mon, 02 Jan 2017 16:32:27 -0500, FromTheRafters
wrote:

After serious thinking burfordTjustice wrote :
Liberals Mock and Celebrate Shooting Death of Conservative Columnist

http://heatst.com/culture-wars/liber...ive-columnist/

He thought it was a good idea to hand a loaded gun to a kid? Well,
guess what, it *isn't*!!

Every gun is "loaded" until you ensure it is not. Kids with training
will know that. If I look at a gun in a store, the clerk passes it to
me I will always check it for ammo.

It's a lot easier when there are no guns. Tell me one good reason for having guns everywhere.

Travon Martin is one. Michael Brown is two. Shall I continue?

Travon Martin? You can't be ****ing serious. The kid bought some candy, was shot by some trumped up pretend policeman for looking suspicious, then the MURDERER that shot him got away with it.
--


The innocent little snowflake thug Trayvon Martin made the mistake of jumping and attacking an armed citizen, pounding his head into the sidewalk thus earning little Trayvon a Darwin award. The Liberal/Leftist news media had to howl about a "White Hispanic", with an emphasis on "White", shooting a Black child in order to stir up racial strife. The media even flooded the news with a picture of innocent little 12 year old Trayvon not the 17 year old thug Trayvon who attacked George Zimmerman a volunteer on the neighborhood watch. A neighborhood that had a problem with teens committing crimes there. Zimmerman did as he should have and called the police about a Black male he did not recognize walking through the neighborhood. Zimmerman did not hunt little Trayvon down and shoot him. Innocent little Trayvon was the aggressor not Zimmerman. Zimmerman was lucky to have been able to get to his weapon and take out a thug saving taxpayers countless dollars over many years because the way
innocent little Trayvon was behaving, there was a good chance of him winding up in prison. The lesson here is for Negro youth not to attack a Hispanic man because he may have a gun and pop a cap in yo ass. ”Œ( à²*_à²*)”˜

Depends what report you read. Do you have proof he attacked first? Do you know why he attacked?

--
Ireland's worst air disaster occurred early this morning when a small two-seater Cessna plane crashed into a cemetery. Irish search and rescue workers have recovered 2826 bodies so far and expect that number to climb as digging continues into the night.

trader_4 wrote on 1/4/2017 :
On Wednesday, January 4, 2017 at 8:48:41 AM UTC-5, FromTheRafters wrote:
Uncle Monster pretended :
On Tuesday, January 3, 2017 at 4:48:11 PM UTC-6, James Wilkinson Sword
wrote:
On Tue, 03 Jan 2017 22:41:24 -0000, FromTheRafters
wrote:

James Wilkinson Sword wrote on 1/3/2017 :
On Tue, 03 Jan 2017 20:20:57 -0000, FromTheRafters
wrote:

It happens that James Wilkinson Sword formulated :
On Tue, 03 Jan 2017 16:50:34 -0000, FromTheRafters
wrote:

James Wilkinson Sword formulated on Tuesday :
On Tue, 03 Jan 2017 03:24:15 -0000, Gordon Shumway

wrote:

On Tue, 03 Jan 2017 00:36:31 -0000, "James Wilkinson Sword"
wrote:

On Mon, 02 Jan 2017 23:32:35 -0000, Oren wrote:

On Mon, 02 Jan 2017 16:32:27 -0500, FromTheRafters
wrote:

After serious thinking burfordTjustice wrote :
Liberals Mock and Celebrate Shooting Death of Conservative
Columnist

http://heatst.com/culture-wars/liber...ive-columnist/

He thought it was a good idea to hand a loaded gun to a kid?
Well, guess what, it *isn't*!!

Every gun is "loaded" until you ensure it is not. Kids with
training will know that. If I look at a gun in a store, the clerk
passes it to me I will always check it for ammo.

It's a lot easier when there are no guns. Tell me one good reason
for having guns everywhere.

Travon Martin is one. Michael Brown is two. Shall I continue?

Travon Martin? You can't be ****ing serious. The kid bought some
candy,
was
shot by some trumped up pretend policeman for looking suspicious,
then the
MURDERER that shot him got away with it.

LOL

You disagree?

Absolutely! He wouldn't have been shot had he not attacked someone with
the authority to do what he was doing. Evidence pointed to the truth of
Zimmerman's statements about the attack and he was exonerated.

The gunman had zero authority. Only the police have the authority to
kill a suspect. The shooter should be hung.

He had as much right to be where he was as Trayvon did. Sure, it was
not recommended that he do so, but he could get in front of Trayvon
call him names, and stick his thumbs in his ears and wave his fingers
at him if he wanted to. What went wrong for Trayvon was Trayvon's
violent attack, and George's right to defend himself.

Vigilantes deserve to be attaked, it's a pity Trayvon didn't kill him.
--


My good man are you daft?! George Zimmerman was not a vigilante. He was a
member of The Neighborhood Watch which works closely with police to keep an
eye on his gated community. That's why he called police when he saw an
unknown Black male walking through the gated community. Oh yea, Trayvon did
not reside there he was visiting. ヽ(à²*_à²*)ノ

http://lawofselfdefense.com/zimmerma...leeing-martin/

http://tinyurl.com/phpbzvy

[8~{} Uncle Murdurous Monster

He didn't report a black male, only a male wearing a hoodie. The
'dispatcher' aksed him several times if the subject was black, and he
responded that he didn't know, it's too dark.

This is just as incorrect as what some in the media reported
at the time. I believe it was NBC that edited it so that Z just said
"he looks black", without showing what immediately proceeded it.
You just edited it to leave out that Z did say
he looks black. What actually happened was the police dispatcher asked
if the person what white, hispanic or black. Z responded "He looks black".

Yeah you're right. I should have reviewed the tape before posting. The
thing is, he didn't know he was black until he said later he was a
black male. It's not racial profiling if you make the decision to call
in a suspicious character before you even know his race.

That didn't stop people
from accusing him of racial profiling though. Also, contrary to what
CNN reported, he didn't disobey the dispatcher after (she?) said 'we
don't need you to do that' after being asked if he was following the
suspect, he was already following him so he could give the cops a
better location by that time and, according to him, he was going back
to his vehicle when he was attacked. The physical evidence supported
his story. Too bad for the 'protesters' or so-called witnesses who
never seem to get their story straight or correct.

You didn't get part of it correct either.

What else did I get wrong?

On Wed, 04 Jan 2017 09:43:39 -0000, Uncle Monster wrote:

On Tuesday, January 3, 2017 at 4:48:11 PM UTC-6, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Tue, 03 Jan 2017 22:41:24 -0000, FromTheRafters wrote:

James Wilkinson Sword wrote on 1/3/2017 :
On Tue, 03 Jan 2017 20:20:57 -0000, FromTheRafters
wrote:

It happens that James Wilkinson Sword formulated :
On Tue, 03 Jan 2017 16:50:34 -0000, FromTheRafters
wrote:

James Wilkinson Sword formulated on Tuesday :
On Tue, 03 Jan 2017 03:24:15 -0000, Gordon Shumway

wrote:

On Tue, 03 Jan 2017 00:36:31 -0000, "James Wilkinson Sword"
wrote:

On Mon, 02 Jan 2017 23:32:35 -0000, Oren wrote:

On Mon, 02 Jan 2017 16:32:27 -0500, FromTheRafters
wrote:

After serious thinking burfordTjustice wrote :
Liberals Mock and Celebrate Shooting Death of Conservative
Columnist

http://heatst.com/culture-wars/liber...ive-columnist/

He thought it was a good idea to hand a loaded gun to a kid? Well,
guess what, it *isn't*!!

Every gun is "loaded" until you ensure it is not. Kids with training
will know that. If I look at a gun in a store, the clerk passes it to
me I will always check it for ammo.

It's a lot easier when there are no guns. Tell me one good reason for
having guns everywhere.

Travon Martin is one. Michael Brown is two. Shall I continue?

Travon Martin? You can't be ****ing serious. The kid bought some
candy,
was
shot by some trumped up pretend policeman for looking suspicious, then
the
MURDERER that shot him got away with it.

LOL

You disagree?

Absolutely! He wouldn't have been shot had he not attacked someone with
the authority to do what he was doing. Evidence pointed to the truth of
Zimmerman's statements about the attack and he was exonerated.

The gunman had zero authority. Only the police have the authority to kill a
suspect. The shooter should be hung.

He had as much right to be where he was as Trayvon did. Sure, it was
not recommended that he do so, but he could get in front of Trayvon
call him names, and stick his thumbs in his ears and wave his fingers
at him if he wanted to. What went wrong for Trayvon was Trayvon's
violent attack, and George's right to defend himself.

Vigilantes deserve to be attaked, it's a pity Trayvon didn't kill him..
--


My good man are you daft?! George Zimmerman was not a vigilante. He was a member of The Neighborhood Watch which works closely with police to keep an eye on his gated community. That's why he called police when he saw an unknown Black male walking through the gated community. Oh yea, Trayvon did not reside there he was visiting. ヽ(à²*_à²*)ノ

http://lawofselfdefense.com/zimmerma...leeing-martin/

http://tinyurl.com/phpbzvy

[8~{} Uncle Murdurous Monster

He took it upon himself to take the law into his own hands and kill somebody. In the rather more civilised UK, only the police are allowed to do that. This guy was a member of a little neighbourhood watch scheme, not a properly trained police officer.

--
gods don't smite people anymore because people of many different religions now living in the same town.
No god wants to accidentally smite the wrong person and get sued by another god.
-- David James

On Wed, 04 Jan 2017 14:38:25 -0000, Ed Pawlowski wrote:

On 1/4/2017 8:48 AM, FromTheRafters wrote:


He didn't report a black male, only a male wearing a hoodie. The
'dispatcher' aksed him several times if the subject was black, and he
responded that he didn't know, it's too dark. That didn't stop people
from accusing him of racial profiling though. Also, contrary to what CNN
reported, he didn't disobey the dispatcher after (she?) said 'we don't
need you to do that' after being asked if he was following the suspect,
he was already following him so he could give the cops a better location
by that time and, according to him, he was going back to his vehicle
when he was attacked. The physical evidence supported his story. Too bad
for the 'protesters' or so-called witnesses who never seem to get their
story straight or correct.

Makes a better news story to tell how a little boy was going to the tore
to buy candy. Don't confuse it with facts.

The little boy somehow was going to overpower the adult, so the adult, suspecting he was going to be killed by someone half his size, pulled out his penis enlarging gun and killed him. How pathetic.

--
"A slipping gear could let your M203 grenade launcher fire when you least expect it. That would make you quite unpopular in what's left of your unit."
- Army preventative maintainance publication

On Wednesday, January 4, 2017 at 3:15:33 PM UTC-6, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Wed, 04 Jan 2017 09:43:39 -0000, Uncle Monster wrote:

On Tuesday, January 3, 2017 at 4:48:11 PM UTC-6, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:

He took it upon himself to take the law into his own hands and kill somebody. In the rather more civilised UK, only the police are allowed to do that. This guy was a member of a little neighbourhood watch scheme, not a properly trained police officer.
--

You silly git, Zimmerman didn't just take the law into his own hands! Trayvon Martin attacked George Zimmerman and tried to cause him serious bodily harm. Zimmerman was well within his rights to defend himself against a thug who was bashing Zimmerman's head into the concrete sidewalk. The use of deadly force was definitely called for. You're going to wish your native citizens were armed when the Muslim hordes overrun your country. Of course you can be a nonviolent pacifist and learn to speak Arabic. Have you obtained your Koran yet? ヽ(ヅ)ノ

[8~{} Uncle Armed Monster

On Fri, 06 Jan 2017 12:53:06 -0000, Uncle Monster wrote:

On Wednesday, January 4, 2017 at 3:15:33 PM UTC-6, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Wed, 04 Jan 2017 09:43:39 -0000, Uncle Monster wrote:

On Tuesday, January 3, 2017 at 4:48:11 PM UTC-6, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:

He took it upon himself to take the law into his own hands and kill somebody. In the rather more civilised UK, only the police are allowed to do that. This guy was a member of a little neighbourhood watch scheme, not a properly trained police officer.
--

You silly git, Zimmerman didn't just take the law into his own hands! Trayvon Martin attacked George Zimmerman and tried to cause him serious bodily harm. Zimmerman was well within his rights to defend himself against a thug who was bashing Zimmerman's head into the concrete sidewalk. The use of deadly force was definitely called for. You're going to wish your native citizens were armed when the Muslim hordes overrun your country. Of course you can be a nonviolent pacifist and learn to speak Arabic. Have you obtained your Koran yet? ヽ(ヅ)ノ

[8~{} Uncle Armed Monster

But WHY did Trayvon attack Zimmerman? There may have been good reason.

In the UK, even if you punched me three times, I can't just shoot you dead. I can only respond with REASONABLE force.

--
My childbirth instructor says it's not pain I'll feel during labour, but pressure. Is she right?
Yes, in the same way that a tornado might be called an air current.

On Saturday, January 7, 2017 at 9:21:41 AM UTC-6, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Fri, 06 Jan 2017 12:53:06 -0000, Uncle Monster wrote:

On Wednesday, January 4, 2017 at 3:15:33 PM UTC-6, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Wed, 04 Jan 2017 09:43:39 -0000, Uncle Monster wrote:

On Tuesday, January 3, 2017 at 4:48:11 PM UTC-6, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:

He took it upon himself to take the law into his own hands and kill somebody. In the rather more civilised UK, only the police are allowed to do that. This guy was a member of a little neighbourhood watch scheme, not a properly trained police officer.
--

You silly git, Zimmerman didn't just take the law into his own hands! Trayvon Martin attacked George Zimmerman and tried to cause him serious bodily harm. Zimmerman was well within his rights to defend himself against a thug who was bashing Zimmerman's head into the concrete sidewalk. The use of deadly force was definitely called for. You're going to wish your native citizens were armed when the Muslim hordes overrun your country. Of course you can be a nonviolent pacifist and learn to speak Arabic. Have you obtained your Koran yet? ヽ(ヅ)ノ

[8~{} Uncle Armed Monster

But WHY did Trayvon attack Zimmerman? There may have been good reason.

In the UK, even if you punched me three times, I can't just shoot you dead. I can only respond with REASONABLE force.
--


Trayvon attacked Zimmerman because Trayvon was a thug. He is now a dead and buried thug. Zimmerman performed a public service by removing a thug from the gene pool thus preventing the spawning of any number of little thugletts. In The U.S. you have a right to defend yourself except in the Progressive Liberal Leftist Commiecrat Freak enclaves. We need sanctuary cities for law abiding citizens. ヽ(à²*_à²*)ノ

[8~{} Uncle Removal Monster

On Sat, 07 Jan 2017 15:21:36 -0000, "James Wilkinson Sword"
wrote:

But WHY did Trayvon attack Zimmerman? There may have been good reason.

Because he was a thug who wanted to teach a "cracker" how bad he was?
That certainly seems to be what he told his friend on the phone.

In the UK, even if you punched me three times, I can't just shoot you dead. I can only respond with REASONABLE force.

How many times can they smash your head on the pavement before you are
in fear of your life? Shooting a violent attacker IS reasonable force
in Florida.

I am still amazed that when we have had many incidents of innocent
black people being murdered, the left focuses on thugs that needed
killing like Trayvonn and Michael Brown.

On Sat, 07 Jan 2017 15:44:55 -0000, Uncle Monster wrote:

On Saturday, January 7, 2017 at 9:21:41 AM UTC-6, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Fri, 06 Jan 2017 12:53:06 -0000, Uncle Monster wrote:

On Wednesday, January 4, 2017 at 3:15:33 PM UTC-6, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Wed, 04 Jan 2017 09:43:39 -0000, Uncle Monster wrote:

On Tuesday, January 3, 2017 at 4:48:11 PM UTC-6, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:

He took it upon himself to take the law into his own hands and kill somebody. In the rather more civilised UK, only the police are allowed to do that. This guy was a member of a little neighbourhood watch scheme, not a properly trained police officer.
--

You silly git, Zimmerman didn't just take the law into his own hands! Trayvon Martin attacked George Zimmerman and tried to cause him serious bodily harm. Zimmerman was well within his rights to defend himself against a thug who was bashing Zimmerman's head into the concrete sidewalk. The use of deadly force was definitely called for. You're going to wish your native citizens were armed when the Muslim hordes overrun your country. Of course you can be a nonviolent pacifist and learn to speak Arabic. Have you obtained your Koran yet? ヽ(ヅ)ノ

[8~{} Uncle Armed Monster

But WHY did Trayvon attack Zimmerman? There may have been good reason.

On Sat, 07 Jan 2017 16:42:16 -0000, wrote:

On Sat, 07 Jan 2017 15:21:36 -0000, "James Wilkinson Sword"
wrote:

But WHY did Trayvon attack Zimmerman? There may have been good reason.

Because he was a thug who wanted to teach a "cracker" how bad he was?
That certainly seems to be what he told his friend on the phone.

Nobody likes vigilantes. Good on Trayvon for trying.

In the UK, even if you punched me three times, I can't just shoot you dead. I can only respond with REASONABLE force.

How many times can they smash your head on the pavement before you are
in fear of your life? Shooting a violent attacker IS reasonable force
in Florida.

So this adult was got the better of by a kid? How pathetic.

I am still amazed that when we have had many incidents of innocent
black people being murdered, the left focuses on thugs that needed
killing like Trayvonn and Michael Brown.

What?

--
What are the "Man's Three Rules When Getting Old?"
Never pass a bathroom, don't waste a hard-on, and never trust a fart.

On Saturday, January 7, 2017 at 5:14:38 PM UTC-6, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Sat, 07 Jan 2017 15:44:55 -0000, Uncle Monster wrote:

On Saturday, January 7, 2017 at 9:21:41 AM UTC-6, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Fri, 06 Jan 2017 12:53:06 -0000, Uncle Monster wrote:

On Wednesday, January 4, 2017 at 3:15:33 PM UTC-6, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Wed, 04 Jan 2017 09:43:39 -0000, Uncle Monster wrote:

On Tuesday, January 3, 2017 at 4:48:11 PM UTC-6, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:

He took it upon himself to take the law into his own hands and kill somebody. In the rather more civilised UK, only the police are allowed to do that. This guy was a member of a little neighbourhood watch scheme, not a properly trained police officer.
--

You silly git, Zimmerman didn't just take the law into his own hands! Trayvon Martin attacked George Zimmerman and tried to cause him serious bodily harm. Zimmerman was well within his rights to defend himself against a thug who was bashing Zimmerman's head into the concrete sidewalk. The use of deadly force was definitely called for. You're going to wish your native citizens were armed when the Muslim hordes overrun your country. Of course you can be a nonviolent pacifist and learn to speak Arabic. Have you obtained your Koran yet? ヽ(ヅ)ノ

[8~{} Uncle Armed Monster

But WHY did Trayvon attack Zimmerman? There may have been good reason..

In the UK, even if you punched me three times, I can't just shoot you dead. I can only respond with REASONABLE force.
--
Trayvon attacked Zimmerman because Trayvon was a thug. He is now a dead and buried thug. Zimmerman performed a public service by removing a thug from the gene pool thus preventing the spawning of any number of little thugletts. In The U.S. you have a right to defend yourself except in the Progressive Liberal Leftist Commiecrat Freak enclaves. We need sanctuary cities for law abiding citizens. ヽ(à²*_à²*)ノ

[8~{} Uncle Removal Monster

Zimmerman is not a policeman. Zimmerman has no right to enforce the law.
--
What do you call an aerobics instructor who doesn't cause pain & agony?
Unemployed.

He wasn't a law enforcement officer. He was a member of a Neighborhood Watch. What part of "Watch" don't you understand? He saw suspicious activity, called the police and followed an unknown individual as he should have. If innocent little Trayvon had not attacked Zimmerman and simply continued on his way to the home at which he was staying, he'd be alive today, in jail for other thuggery or killed by someone else he attacked. If the dumbass had just kept walking and police showed up, he would have been questioned to determine what he was doing there and sent on his way. He would have become known to the Neighborhood Watch as someone who belonged there in the "Gated Community".

A gated community is not a thoroughfare, people who have no business there don't belong there. Such walled communities exist because the people who live there want to be insulated from crime. Many gated communities have armed security guards at the gates who check all vehicles coming and going. Otherwise, the thugs would head for the wealthy neighborhoods because that's where they can break into homes, steal vehicles or rob people walking their dogs. An infamous bank robber was asked why he robbed banks and he answered,"Because that's where the money is."

You don't seem to grasp the concept of "Self Defense". Where I'm from, if someone attacks you, you have the right to use deadly force if you feel your life is in danger such as a teenage thug jumping you and slamming your head into a concrete sidewalk. I've come close to killing attackers with my bare hands but I can't physically defend myself anymore so if I were attacked by a thug and I had my firearm with me, the thug would become DRT. You should be more concerned with the savage Muslim hordes streaming into your country and breeding like rabbits because they want to take over. Stop obsessing about The United States and be more concerned about the coming carnage in your country. Perhaps you can cower in a corner when an invading Muslim savage wishes to bugger you. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

[8~{} Uncle Armed Monster

On Sat, 07 Jan 2017 23:14:32 -0000, "James Wilkinson Sword"
wrote:

Trayvon attacked Zimmerman because Trayvon was a thug. He is now a dead and buried thug. Zimmerman performed a public service by removing a thug from the gene pool thus preventing the spawning of any number of little thugletts. In The U.S. you have a right to defend yourself except in the Progressive Liberal Leftist Commiecrat Freak enclaves. We need sanctuary cities for law abiding citizens. ?(?_?)?

[8~{} Uncle Removal Monster

Zimmerman is not a policeman. Zimmerman has no right to enforce the law.

He was not enforcing the law. He saw a suspicious person, looking into
parked cars and he called the police. Trayvonn attacked him while the
police were responding and the police were there a minute later. If
Trayvonn had have waited a minute, the cops would have shot him.
As an aside Trayvonn was already being investigated for burglary,
illegal gun possession and vandalism by the Miami police when he was
shot. It may have been why he was in Sanford in the first place.
Maybe all of that information never made it to Scotland. The North
Miami police suppressed all of their investigations after Martin was
killed,

On Sat, 07 Jan 2017 23:17:32 -0000, "James Wilkinson Sword"
wrote:

in fear of your life? Shooting a violent attacker IS reasonable force
in Florida.

So this adult was got the better of by a kid? How pathetic.

This "kid" was an athletic 17 year old who was 5" taller than
Zimmerman, in better shape and had the element of surprise.

I am still amazed that when we have had many incidents of innocent
black people being murdered, the left focuses on thugs that needed
killing like Trayvonn and Michael Brown.

What?

What is hard to understand. Martin and Brown were thugs who preyed on
innocent people. They were destined to either die in a puddle of blood
on the street, die by lethal injection (legally or illegally) or
simply die of old age in prison.
There are far better cases of police killing innocents people the left
could choose to be upset about but the fact remains most black people
get killed by other black people with very little attention at all
paid to it. In places like Baltimore, Chicago and Detroit, the
majority of these crimes go unsolved. Nobody saw anything and if they
did, there is a universal no snitching policy in that culture.
Any investigation will be superficial at best.
I suppose that is why we hear so much if a white guy shoots a black
guy, it is such a rare occurrence and something the community might
actually testify about.

On Sat, 07 Jan 2017 20:46:59 -0500, wrote:

Zimmerman is not a policeman. Zimmerman has no right to enforce the law.

He was not enforcing the law. He saw a suspicious person, looking into
parked cars and he called the police. Trayvonn attacked him while the
police were responding and the police were there a minute later. If
Trayvonn had have waited a minute, the cops would have shot him.
As an aside Trayvonn was already being investigated for burglary,
illegal gun possession and vandalism by the Miami police when he was
shot. It may have been why he was in Sanford in the first place.
Maybe all of that information never made it to Scotland. The North
Miami police suppressed all of their investigations after Martin was
killed,

Zimmerman didn't have to be a cop to defend himself and kill the sum
beach Travon. He had every right to prevent his own death at the hands
of a wannabe gangster. Travon brought MMA tactics to a fight he lost.
One shot -- one kill. The Brits would give Travon, the innocent child,
chocolate bars instead of delivering American justice under the law.
--
you never meet a horse that needs stealing, but you meet a man that needs killin'

On Sun, 08 Jan 2017 00:38:23 -0000, Uncle Monster wrote:

On Saturday, January 7, 2017 at 5:14:38 PM UTC-6, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Sat, 07 Jan 2017 15:44:55 -0000, Uncle Monster wrote:

On Saturday, January 7, 2017 at 9:21:41 AM UTC-6, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Fri, 06 Jan 2017 12:53:06 -0000, Uncle Monster wrote:

On Wednesday, January 4, 2017 at 3:15:33 PM UTC-6, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Wed, 04 Jan 2017 09:43:39 -0000, Uncle Monster wrote:

On Tuesday, January 3, 2017 at 4:48:11 PM UTC-6, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:

He took it upon himself to take the law into his own hands and kill somebody. In the rather more civilised UK, only the police are allowed to do that. This guy was a member of a little neighbourhood watch scheme, not a properly trained police officer.
--

You silly git, Zimmerman didn't just take the law into his own hands! Trayvon Martin attacked George Zimmerman and tried to cause him serious bodily harm. Zimmerman was well within his rights to defend himself against a thug who was bashing Zimmerman's head into the concrete sidewalk. The use of deadly force was definitely called for. You're going to wish your native citizens were armed when the Muslim hordes overrun your country. Of course you can be a nonviolent pacifist and learn to speak Arabic. Have you obtained your Koran yet? ヽ(ヅ)ノ

[8~{} Uncle Armed Monster

But WHY did Trayvon attack Zimmerman? There may have been good reason.

In the UK, even if you punched me three times, I can't just shoot you dead. I can only respond with REASONABLE force.
--
Trayvon attacked Zimmerman because Trayvon was a thug. He is now a dead and buried thug. Zimmerman performed a public service by removing a thug from the gene pool thus preventing the spawning of any number of little thugletts. In The U.S. you have a right to defend yourself except in the Progressive Liberal Leftist Commiecrat Freak enclaves. We need sanctuary cities for law abiding citizens. ヽ(à²*_à²*)ノ

[8~{} Uncle Removal Monster

Zimmerman is not a policeman. Zimmerman has no right to enforce the law.
--
What do you call an aerobics instructor who doesn't cause pain & agony?
Unemployed.

He wasn't a law enforcement officer. He was a member of a Neighborhood Watch. What part of "Watch" don't you understand? He saw suspicious activity, called the police and followed an unknown individual as he should have. If innocent little Trayvon had not attacked Zimmerman and simply continued on his way to the home at which he was staying, he'd be alive today, in jail for other thuggery or killed by someone else he attacked. If the dumbass had just kept walking and police showed up, he would have been questioned to determine what he was doing there and sent on his way. He would have become known to the Neighborhood Watch as someone who belonged there in the "Gated Community".

A gated community is not a thoroughfare, people who have no business there don't belong there. Such walled communities exist because the people who live there want to be insulated from crime. Many gated communities have armed security guards at the gates who check all vehicles coming and going. Otherwise, the thugs would head for the wealthy neighborhoods because that's where they can break into homes, steal vehicles or rob people walking their dogs. An infamous bank robber was asked why he robbed banks and he answered,"Because that's where the money is."

You don't seem to grasp the concept of "Self Defense". Where I'm from, if someone attacks you, you have the right to use deadly force if you feel your life is in danger such as a teenage thug jumping you and slamming your head into a concrete sidewalk. I've come close to killing attackers with my bare hands but I can't physically defend myself anymore so if I were attacked by a thug and I had my firearm with me, the thug would become DRT. You should be more concerned with the savage Muslim hordes streaming into your country and breeding like rabbits because they want to take over. Stop obsessing about The United States and be more concerned about the coming carnage in your country. Perhaps you can cower in a corner when an invading Muslim savage wishes to bugger you. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

[8~{} Uncle Armed Monster

Yes, I'd respond like with like. If you punched me, I'd punch you back, perhaps twice as hard to make sure. But I'd not respond to a little boy hitting me with a gun ffs.

--
My wife doesn't surf the net, she paddles.

On Sun, 08 Jan 2017 01:59:51 -0000, wrote:

On Sat, 07 Jan 2017 23:17:32 -0000, "James Wilkinson Sword"
wrote:

in fear of your life? Shooting a violent attacker IS reasonable force
in Florida.

So this adult was got the better of by a kid? How pathetic.

This "kid" was an athletic 17 year old who was 5" taller than
Zimmerman, in better shape and had the element of surprise.

So, unlike a proper policeman, this wannabe was unfit for the job.

I am still amazed that when we have had many incidents of innocent
black people being murdered, the left focuses on thugs that needed
killing like Trayvonn and Michael Brown.

What?

What is hard to understand. Martin and Brown were thugs who preyed on
innocent people. They were destined to either die in a puddle of blood
on the street, die by lethal injection (legally or illegally) or
simply die of old age in prison.
There are far better cases of police killing innocents people the left
could choose to be upset about but the fact remains most black people
get killed by other black people with very little attention at all
paid to it. In places like Baltimore, Chicago and Detroit, the
majority of these crimes go unsolved. Nobody saw anything and if they
did, there is a universal no snitching policy in that culture.
Any investigation will be superficial at best.
I suppose that is why we hear so much if a white guy shoots a black
guy, it is such a rare occurrence and something the community might
actually testify about.

Our police don't shoot violent people, they lock them up.

--
Warren wanked William while Wendy wildly wobbled Wayne's Willy within warm water.

On Sun, 08 Jan 2017 01:46:59 -0000, wrote:

On Sat, 07 Jan 2017 23:14:32 -0000, "James Wilkinson Sword"
wrote:

Trayvon attacked Zimmerman because Trayvon was a thug. He is now a dead and buried thug. Zimmerman performed a public service by removing a thug from the gene pool thus preventing the spawning of any number of little thugletts. In The U.S. you have a right to defend yourself except in the Progressive Liberal Leftist Commiecrat Freak enclaves. We need sanctuary cities for law abiding citizens. ?(?_?)?

[8~{} Uncle Removal Monster

Zimmerman is not a policeman. Zimmerman has no right to enforce the law.

He was not enforcing the law. He saw a suspicious person, looking into
parked cars and he called the police. Trayvonn attacked him while the
police were responding and the police were there a minute later. If
Trayvonn had have waited a minute, the cops would have shot him.
As an aside Trayvonn was already being investigated for burglary,
illegal gun possession and vandalism by the Miami police when he was
shot. It may have been why he was in Sanford in the first place.
Maybe all of that information never made it to Scotland. The North
Miami police suppressed all of their investigations after Martin was
killed,

Wikipedia says he was buying candy.

--
Watching his date from the corner of his eye while he poured her a drink, the young bachelor said, "Say when."
She replied, "Right after that drink."

On Sun, 08 Jan 2017 20:28:50 -0000
"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote:

On Sun, 08 Jan 2017 01:59:51 -0000, wrote:

On Sat, 07 Jan 2017 23:17:32 -0000, "James Wilkinson Sword"
wrote:

in fear of your life? Shooting a violent attacker IS reasonable
force in Florida.

So this adult was got the better of by a kid? How pathetic.

This "kid" was an athletic 17 year old who was 5" taller than
Zimmerman, in better shape and had the element of surprise.

So, unlike a proper policeman, this wannabe was unfit for the job.

I am still amazed that when we have had many incidents of innocent
black people being murdered, the left focuses on thugs that needed
killing like Trayvonn and Michael Brown.

What?

What is hard to understand. Martin and Brown were thugs who preyed
on innocent people. They were destined to either die in a puddle of
blood on the street, die by lethal injection (legally or illegally)
or simply die of old age in prison.
There are far better cases of police killing innocents people the
left could choose to be upset about but the fact remains most black
people get killed by other black people with very little attention
at all paid to it. In places like Baltimore, Chicago and Detroit,
the majority of these crimes go unsolved. Nobody saw anything and
if they did, there is a universal no snitching policy in that
culture. Any investigation will be superficial at best.
I suppose that is why we hear so much if a white guy shoots a black
guy, it is such a rare occurrence and something the community might
actually testify about.

Our police don't shoot violent people, they lock them up.


You have not been to a "no go" area have you?

On Sun, 08 Jan 2017 20:29:47 -0000
"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote:

On Sun, 08 Jan 2017 01:46:59 -0000, wrote:

On Sat, 07 Jan 2017 23:14:32 -0000, "James Wilkinson Sword"
wrote:

Trayvon attacked Zimmerman because Trayvon was a thug. He is now
a dead and buried thug. Zimmerman performed a public service by
removing a thug from the gene pool thus preventing the spawning
of any number of little thugletts. In The U.S. you have a right
to defend yourself except in the Progressive Liberal Leftist
Commiecrat Freak enclaves. We need sanctuary cities for law
abiding citizens. ?(?_?)?

[8~{} Uncle Removal Monster

Zimmerman is not a policeman. Zimmerman has no right to enforce
the law.

He was not enforcing the law. He saw a suspicious person, looking
into parked cars and he called the police. Trayvonn attacked him
while the police were responding and the police were there a minute
later. If Trayvonn had have waited a minute, the cops would have
shot him. As an aside Trayvonn was already being investigated for
burglary, illegal gun possession and vandalism by the Miami police
when he was shot. It may have been why he was in Sanford in the
first place. Maybe all of that information never made it to
Scotland. The North Miami police suppressed all of their
investigations after Martin was killed,

Wikipedia says he was buying candy.


You would not survive one hour on the streets with the yanks.
The thugs love you pussified types.

On 1/8/2017 3:29 PM, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Sun, 08 Jan 2017 01:46:59 -0000, wrote:

On Sat, 07 Jan 2017 23:14:32 -0000, "James Wilkinson Sword"
wrote:

Trayvon attacked Zimmerman because Trayvon was a thug. He is now a dead and buried thug. Zimmerman performed a public service by removing a thug from the gene pool thus preventing the spawning of any number of little thugletts. In The U.S. you have a
right to defend yourself except in the Progressive Liberal Leftist Commiecrat Freak enclaves. We need sanctuary cities for law abiding citizens. ?(?_?)?

[8~{} Uncle Removal Monster

Zimmerman is not a policeman. Zimmerman has no right to enforce the law.

He was not enforcing the law. He saw a suspicious person, looking into
parked cars and he called the police. Trayvonn attacked him while the
police were responding and the police were there a minute later. If
Trayvonn had have waited a minute, the cops would have shot him.
As an aside Trayvonn was already being investigated for burglary,
illegal gun possession and vandalism by the Miami police when he was
shot. It may have been why he was in Sanford in the first place.
Maybe all of that information never made it to Scotland. The North
Miami police suppressed all of their investigations after Martin was
killed,

Wikipedia says he was buying candy.

Yes, Treyvon was a model citizen, boy scout, top student in his class, voted most likely to succeed by his classmates, and spent his free time helping the less fortunate. He was the kind of kid fathers hope their daughters will marry. Too bad that
creepy-ass-cracker white-hispanic murdered him.

On Sun, 08 Jan 2017 20:28:50 -0000, "James Wilkinson Sword"
wrote:

This "kid" was an athletic 17 year old who was 5" taller than
Zimmerman, in better shape and had the element of surprise.

So, unlike a proper policeman, this wannabe was unfit for the job.

We have 5'1 little girls in uniform along with old fat guys as I
suspect you do.
define "unfit"
He was just walking around the neighborhood watching a suspected
burglar and he HAD called the cops and he was just watching this guy
until the cops arrived. Martin hid in the bushes and jumped out on
him.


Our police don't shoot violent people, they lock them up.


Your police don't get shot very often either. You do not have the same
kind of criminals as we do. As I said, maybe if we scooped up 30,000
of our "inner city youth" and sent them to UK, your cop's policy would
change. Until it did, they would ravage your place like Attila the
Hun.

On Sun, 08 Jan 2017 20:29:47 -0000, "James Wilkinson Sword"
wrote:

On Sun, 08 Jan 2017 01:46:59 -0000, wrote:

On Sat, 07 Jan 2017 23:14:32 -0000, "James Wilkinson Sword"
wrote:

Trayvon attacked Zimmerman because Trayvon was a thug. He is now a dead and buried thug. Zimmerman performed a public service by removing a thug from the gene pool thus preventing the spawning of any number of little thugletts. In The U.S. you have a right to defend yourself except in the Progressive Liberal Leftist Commiecrat Freak enclaves. We need sanctuary cities for law abiding citizens. ?(?_?)?

[8~{} Uncle Removal Monster

Zimmerman is not a policeman. Zimmerman has no right to enforce the law.

He was not enforcing the law. He saw a suspicious person, looking into
parked cars and he called the police. Trayvonn attacked him while the
police were responding and the police were there a minute later. If
Trayvonn had have waited a minute, the cops would have shot him.
As an aside Trayvonn was already being investigated for burglary,
illegal gun possession and vandalism by the Miami police when he was
shot. It may have been why he was in Sanford in the first place.
Maybe all of that information never made it to Scotland. The North
Miami police suppressed all of their investigations after Martin was
killed,

Wikipedia says he was buying candy.

Yeah, there's a source.
We were all Zimmerman all the time on TV here and a lot of stuff about
Martin that was reported here, did not make it to the national and
international media. They shut down releases from the Miami police
pretty quickly but stuff was still leaking out. This "kid" was a thug,
into burglary, guns and violence. They found stolen property and
burglary tools in his school locker, he was trying to sell one gun and
he had taken pictures if himself with his new gun.
That just disappeared.