Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
Home Repair (alt.home.repair) For all homeowners and DIYers with many experienced tradesmen. Solve your toughest home fix-it problems. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I recently had an electrician verify that I need a new grounding rod but
before he does the work I wanted to get clear regarding the manner in which telephone, cable, roof mounted TV antenna, and water pipes should be grounded to the main service ground. The rod will be planted a few feet from the house just opposite the inside service panel. Must the TV Antenna ground go all the way to the top of the rod or is it okay to split-bolt to the grounding wire at or just below ground level? The main water pipe enters the house about 25 yards away from the grounding rod. Is it acceptable to ground the cold water pipe to the service ground from inside the house? In this case I would split-bolt to the service ground wire just before it goes through the basement wall. My house is cabled for cable TV (although I don't currently subscribe). Where is the best (practical) place to ground the TV Cable? Split-Bolt again to service wire as it leaves basement? Finally, what about Telephone system ground? Split-bolt as it leaves basement? Is this something the phone company must do (for demarcation reasons) and if so, are they gonna charge me for it? Yes, the electrician answered these questions for me already, but my newsgroup search shows that answers vary and that sometimes the "pros" don't always do things 100% right, so that's why I've come back here to trusty old alt.home.repair. Thanks for your thoughts. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Mark Wilson" wrote in message
... I recently had an electrician verify that I need a new grounding rod but before he does the work I wanted to get clear regarding the manner in which telephone, cable, roof mounted TV antenna, and water pipes should be grounded to the main service ground. The rod will be planted a few feet from the house just opposite the inside service panel. Must the TV Antenna ground go all the way to the top of the rod or is it okay to split-bolt to the grounding wire at or just below ground level? Your safest guide is the local municipal licensing office which authorizes (and perhaps inspects) new electric installations. -- Don Phillipson Carlsbad Springs (Ottawa, Canada) dphillipson[at]trytel.com |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thomas D. Horne has accurately summarized important points
as required by code. However effective earthing exceeds code. Every incoming utility must make a less than 10 foot connection where they all meet at your new central earth ground rod. That includes connections from cable ground block, from TV antenna and satellite dish wires before entering building, and ground wire from telco supplied surge protector in NID premise interface box. All earthing wires must also be direct (not via other wires, no sharp bends, no splices), and independent (not bundled with other non grounding wires and separate from all other earthing wires until they all meet at central earth ground). An old expression that says a better ground is not neat. No clean sharp bends. If an angled wire to earth ground is shorter, then angle the wire rather than make it look clean, sharp, and neat. TV antenna is suppose to be earthed at shortest point. If TV antenna is earthed by a separate ground rod, then a buried solid copper wire (as sized according to code) must interconnect that separate rod with the main central earth ground rod. If soil is non-conductive, than additional rods should be attached to that central earth ground rod. Central earth ground must be the best earthing point in the facility. Poorly conductive soil includes sand, loom, gravel, or soils bleached of ionic materials. Some examples of how the earthing system should be reinstalled- http://www.cinergy.com/surge/ttip08.htm http://www.psihq.com/iread/strpgrnd.htm http://www.xantrex.com/support/docserve.asp?id=337 Of course, the grounding system must comply with what Thomas D. Horne has posted since we earth for multiple reasons - one is demanded by cited code. Water pipe is safety grounded - not necessarily earth grounded. Connection from water pipe must be to breaker box safety ground bar because that ground wire is to remove dangerous currents from the water pipe - a human safety function. Mark Wilson wrote: I recently had an electrician verify that I need a new grounding rod but before he does the work I wanted to get clear regarding the manner in which telephone, cable, roof mounted TV antenna, and water pipes should be grounded to the main service ground. The rod will be planted a few feet from the house just opposite the inside service panel. Must the TV Antenna ground go all the way to the top of the rod or is it okay to split-bolt to the grounding wire at or just below ground level? The main water pipe enters the house about 25 yards away from the grounding rod. Is it acceptable to ground the cold water pipe to the service ground from inside the house? In this case I would split-bolt to the service ground wire just before it goes through the basement wall. My house is cabled for cable TV (although I don't currently subscribe). Where is the best (practical) place to ground the TV Cable? Split-Bolt again to service wire as it leaves basement? Finally, what about Telephone system ground? Split-bolt as it leaves basement? Is this something the phone company must do (for demarcation reasons) and if so, are they gonna charge me for it? Yes, the electrician answered these questions for me already, but my newsgroup search shows that answers vary and that sometimes the "pros" don't always do things 100% right, so that's why I've come back here to trusty old alt.home.repair. Thanks for your thoughts. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Thomas D. Horne" wrote in message ... Finally, what about Telephone system ground? Split-bolt as it leaves basement? Is this something the phone company must do (for demarcation reasons) and if so, are they gonna charge me for it? The telephone system ground is attached using a saddle clamp and in most areas that work is done by the telco staff at no cost to you. The rules governing communications grounding in the US NEC require that the conductor used to ground the communications wiring be kept to six feet or less in length. If six feet will not get to the Service's accessible grounding means then install a separate ground rod and bond it to the service grounding electrode with a #6 AWG bonding conductor. Didn't you mean to say 6 meters (20 ft.) instead of 6 feet Tom? |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
volts500 wrote:
"Thomas D. Horne" wrote in message ... Finally, what about Telephone system ground? Split-bolt as it leaves basement? Is this something the phone company must do (for demarcation reasons) and if so, are they gonna charge me for it? The telephone system ground is attached using a saddle clamp and in most areas that work is done by the telco staff at no cost to you. The rules governing communications grounding in the US NEC require that the conductor used to ground the communications wiring be kept to six feet or less in length. If six feet will not get to the Service's accessible grounding means then install a separate ground rod and bond it to the service grounding electrode with a #6 AWG bonding conductor. Didn't you mean to say 6 meters (20 ft.) instead of 6 feet Tom? Yes and thank you for catching that. I included the code reference which correctly shows six meters. I guess I just shouldn't type so fast. -- Tom |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks for the help Thomas D. Horne and everyone else. Sorry about the
cut&paste manner in which I'm responding. I'm having newsgroup trouble. The guy helping me is a retired electrician. We're waiting on the gas company to label the gas lines before pounding the rod in the ground. Given your answers I can see you're being more techincal and accurate than he was, which is good! It's my job to go pick up the parts we'll need to do the job. Replies are in line. Mark Wilson wrote: I recently had an electrician verify that I need a new grounding rod but before he does the work I wanted to get clear regarding the manner in which telephone, cable, roof mounted TV antenna, and water pipes should be grounded to the main service ground. The rod will be planted a few feet from the house just opposite the inside service panel. Must the TV Antenna ground go all the way to the top of the rod or is it okay to split-bolt to the grounding wire at or just below .ground level? You can attach the grounding conductors of other services to the Electrical Service's Equipment's Grounding Electrode Conductor (EGC) at any convenient point along it's exposed length. Thanks I understand, (assuming the EGC is just a fancy way of saying main-ground-wire-coming-from-the-service-panel-and-heading-toward-the-ground ing-rod.) I'll use a split bolt to ground the outside TV antenna ground conductor to the EGC after the EGC leaves the basement but before it reaches the ground rod. The main water pipe enters the house about 25 yards away from the grounding rod. Is it acceptable to ground the cold water pipe to the service ground from inside the house? In this case I would split-bolt to the service ground wire just before it goes through the basement wall. You may not make any connection of the EGC using a split bolt connector or any other reversible splice. You can run the EGC from the bonded buss bar of the service equipment to the pipe and a separate EGC from the same buss bar to the driven rod. Alternatively you can run the EGC to either the rod or the piping and from that electrode to the other electrode. Thanks for clearing that up. I'll bond the water pipe to the bus bar in the service panel, and then run the main ground EGC from that same bus bar to the ground rod. (Techincally, for the main EGC, I'll use the bolt-like attachement provided at the bottom of said bus bar) Because I'll be replacing the main EGC with fresh 4 gauge conductor, I'll probably just use some extra 4 gauge for the pipe to bus conductor as well. My house is cabled for cable TV (although I don't currently subscribe). Where is the best (practical) place to ground the TV Cable? Split-Bolt again to service wire as it leaves basement? Yes you can use a split bolt connector to attach the grounding conductor of other services to the EGC. Thanks to you and "w_tom", I see I may be referring to something different when I say TV cable ground. After the cable enters the house, it goes to a standard RCA splitter and it's from there that there is some kind of bleed off ground wire. It was this ground wire that I was referring to rather than something coming off a block outside the house. Right now the plan is to just split bolt the cable ground wire to the EGC just before it heads outside through the basement wall. I'll will have a look at the outside block for the TV Cable. Finally, what about Telephone system ground? Split-bolt as it leaves basement? Is this something the phone company must do (for demarcation reasons) and if so, are they gonna charge me for it? The telephone system ground is attached using a saddle clamp and in most areas that work is done by the telco staff at no cost to you. The rules governing communications grounding in the US NEC require that the conductor used to ground the communications wiring be kept to six feet or less in length. If six feet will not get to the Service's accessible grounding means then install a separate ground rod and bond it to the service grounding electrode with a #6 AWG bonding conductor. (assuming six feet means six meters as was corrected earlier) The six meters is no problem as the telephone line enters the house right next to the service panel. However, I'm a little confused by what is meant by "Service's accessible grounding means". "Accessible" being the key word, I'm assuming you mean that Telco will ground to the EGC after exists the service panel, but before it heads outside through the basement wall. IV. Grounding Methods 800.40 Cable and Primary Protector Grounding. The metallic member(s) of the cable sheath, where required to be grounded by 800.33, and primary protectors shall be grounded as specified in 800.40(A) through (D). (A) Grounding Conductor. (1) Insulation. The grounding conductor shall be insulated and shall be listed as suitable for the purpose. Hmm. Assuming this section "IV" is referring to the EGC, are you saying that the main ground conductor must be insulated? And by insulated does that mean plastic wire covering? I thought I'd be safe with a bare solid copper 4 gauge wire? I must be reading this wrong... (2) Material. The grounding conductor shall be copper or other corrosion-resistant conductive material, stranded or solid. (3) Size. The grounding conductor shall not be smaller than 14 AWG. Again, although this specifies 14 as the smallest, even 10 or 8 seems too small. Maybe this part of the code is not referring to the main EGC? It's very kind of you to take the time to respond, Mr. Horne. If you'll indulge me in a little further clarification, I'd appreciate it all the more, but I'm already plenty grateful at this point. Thanks again. |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ground block is really nothing more than a connector that
attached to CATV cable and that permits a 10 AWG ground wire to be connected. It is even sold in Home Depot with other CATV cable accessories. Best to put grounding block on cable outside building and as close to new ground rod as is possible. Make distance from CATV to ground rod shorter with minimal bends, etc. Yes that grounded RCA splitter accomplishes same for human safety and NEC reqirements. But transistor safety wants that connection to earth ground to be closer to central earth ground. Also an outside ground block to ground rod connection makes it easier to keep that ground wire separate from other non-grounded wires. Telco provides a "Service's accessible grounding means" in a box called NID. Their 10 AWG earth ground wire connects their NID box mounted outside (so that it is accessible) to that earth ground rod. Some installers want to make that 10 AWG wire look neat. They will even 'split bolt' attach it to the breaker box ground wire. However better trained installers will run their ground wire directly to the top of that ground rod - as should be the CATV wire ground. All grounds should run indepenently until they all meet at central earth ground. This last requirement is not required in code but creates a more robust and effective earth ground. As a reminder to others, smart move to have all utilities located before pounding down the rod. Mark Wilson wrote: Thanks to you and "w_tom", I see I may be referring to something different when I say TV cable ground. After the cable enters the house, it goes to a standard RCA splitter and it's from there that there is some kind of bleed off ground wire. It was this ground wire that I was referring to rather than something coming off a block outside the house. Right now the plan is to just split bolt the cable ground wire to the EGC just before it heads outside through the basement wall. I'll will have a look at the outside block for the TV Cable. ... The six meters is no problem as the telephone line enters the house right next to the service panel. However, I'm a little confused by what is meant by "Service's accessible grounding means". "Accessible" being the key word, I'm assuming you mean that Telco will ground to the EGC after exists the service panel, but before it heads outside through the basement wall. |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks for your help Tom. I also explored the links you provided and found
them helpful. In fact, part of the reason I started looking into this is because I have lost a modem. Although I have no reason to believe there have been multiple grounds in the past, I'll be sure everything goes to the same place before I'm done. Ground block is really nothing more than a connector that attached to CATV cable and that permits a 10 AWG ground wire to be connected. It is even sold in Home Depot with other CATV cable accessories. Best to put grounding block on cable outside building and as close to new ground rod as is possible. Make distance from CATV to ground rod shorter with minimal bends, etc. Yes that grounded RCA splitter accomplishes same for human safety and NEC reqirements. But transistor safety wants that connection to earth ground to be closer to central earth ground. Also an outside ground block to ground rod connection makes it easier to keep that ground wire separate from other non-grounded wires. Hmm. Well, I checked and there's no ground whatsoever coming off the CATV line at the point it enters the house. I'd have to install a new one outside in order to run a ground line from the entrance point, and that side of the house is the exact opposite of where I plan to put the ground rod. The CATV comes from the street to the top of my house and then runs down before meeting a splitter and entering the house. Becuase I don't currently subscribe to Cable (and don't plan to), I think I'll just disconnect the cable so that it never even enters the house and then I'll just forget about grounding it. Is there any reason why this would be unsafe or cause electrical trouble? Telco provides a "Service's accessible grounding means" in a box called NID. Their 10 AWG earth ground wire connects their NID box mounted outside (so that it is accessible) to that earth ground rod. Some installers want to make that 10 AWG wire look neat. They will even 'split bolt' attach it to the breaker box ground wire. However better trained installers will run their ground wire directly to the top of that ground rod - as should be the CATV wire ground. All grounds should run indepenently until they all meet at central earth ground. This last requirement is not required in code but creates a more robust and effective earth ground. Well, the Network Interface Box I have now is really old and in bad shape. There's no NID or block or anything outside of house. The line comes straight in. (I'll spare you the details, but let me just say that I'll be calling Telco as soon as I get my electrical troubles in order.) Even so, I'm glad you mentioned it. I can leave the top of the ground rod exposed and that way Telco can have the option to run a conductor straight to it, rather than using the split-bolt method. At this point I have no idea what they will do or if they will even install an outside NID. One way or the other, the current telephone junction box needs replacing. If I'm following your line of thinking, then wouldn't it be slightly better to run the TV Antenna ground straight to the grounding rod tip as opposed to split-bolting it to the main ground (coming from the service panel and heading towards the rod)? Oh, an in case I don't hear from Thomas Horne, is bare 4 gauge copper conductor appropriate for grounding the service panel to the grounding rod, or must it be insulated with plastic? (I was just at Lowes and the "x-electrician" there says I only need the bare wire) Thanks. Sorry for being so caught up in the details. I really want to do this right and do it safe, and I'm not getting the same answers from the local "Pros". As a reminder to others, smart move to have all utilities located before pounding down the rod. |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Replies are in line.
Mark Wilson wrote: Thanks for the help Thomas D. Horne and everyone else. Sorry about the cut&paste manner in which I'm responding. I'm having newsgroup trouble. The guy helping me is a retired electrician. We're waiting on the gas company to label the gas lines before pounding the rod in the ground. Given your answers I can see you're being more techincal and accurate than he was, which is good! It's my job to go pick up the parts we'll need to do the job. Replies are in line. Mark Wilson wrote: I recently had an electrician verify that I need a new grounding rod but before he does the work I wanted to get clear regarding the manner in which telephone, cable, roof mounted TV antenna, and water pipes should be grounded to the main service ground. The rod will be planted a few feet from the house just opposite the inside service panel. Must the TV Antenna ground go all the way to the top of the rod or is it okay to split-bolt to the grounding wire at or just below .ground level? You can attach the grounding conductors of other services to the Electrical Service's Equipment's Grounding Electrode Conductor (EGC) at any convenient point along it's exposed length. Thanks I understand, (assuming the EGC is just a fancy way of saying main-ground-wire-coming-from-the-service-panel-and-heading-toward-the-ground ing-rod.) I'll use a split bolt to ground the outside TV antenna ground conductor to the EGC after the EGC leaves the basement but before it reaches the ground rod. Once again I have typed too fast. The abbreviation I meant to use is GEC. The main water pipe enters the house about 25 yards away from the grounding rod. Is it acceptable to ground the cold water pipe to the service ground from inside the house? In this case I would split-bolt to the service ground wire just before it goes through the basement wall. You may not make any connection of the EGC using a split bolt connector or any other reversible splice. You can run the EGC from the bonded buss bar of the service equipment to the pipe and a separate EGC from the same buss bar to the driven rod. Alternatively you can run the EGC to either the rod or the piping and from that electrode to the other electrode. Thanks for clearing that up. I'll bond the water pipe to the bus bar in the service panel, and then run the main ground EGC from that same bus bar to the ground rod. (Techincally, for the main EGC, I'll use the bolt-like attachement provided at the bottom of said bus bar) Because I'll be replacing the main EGC with fresh 4 gauge conductor, I'll probably just use some extra 4 gauge for the pipe to bus conductor as well. My house is cabled for cable TV (although I don't currently subscribe). Where is the best (practical) place to ground the TV Cable? Split-Bolt again to service wire as it leaves basement? Yes you can use a split bolt connector to attach the grounding conductor of other services to the EGC. Thanks to you and "w_tom", I see I may be referring to something different when I say TV cable ground. After the cable enters the house, it goes to a standard RCA splitter and it's from there that there is some kind of bleed off ground wire. It was this ground wire that I was referring to rather than something coming off a block outside the house. Right now the plan is to just split bolt the cable ground wire to the EGC just before it heads outside through the basement wall. I'll will have a look at the outside block for the TV Cable. Finally, what about Telephone system ground? Split-bolt as it leaves basement? Is this something the phone company must do (for demarcation reasons) and if so, are they gonna charge me for it? The telephone system ground is attached using a saddle clamp and in most areas that work is done by the telco staff at no cost to you. The rules governing communications grounding in the US NEC require that the conductor used to ground the communications wiring be kept to six feet or less in length. If six feet will not get to the Service's accessible grounding means then install a separate ground rod and bond it to the service grounding electrode with a #6 AWG bonding conductor. (assuming six feet means six meters as was corrected earlier) The six meters is no problem as the telephone line enters the house right next to the service panel. However, I'm a little confused by what is meant by "Service's accessible grounding means". "Accessible" being the key word, I'm assuming you mean that Telco will ground to the EGC after exists the service panel, but before it heads outside through the basement wall. That primary telephone protector should be located outside the home. That will keep much of the surge and spike energy outside of your home. IV. Grounding Methods 800.40 Cable and Primary Protector Grounding. The metallic member(s) of the cable sheath, where required to be grounded by 800.33, and primary protectors shall be grounded as specified in 800.40(A) through (D). (A) Grounding Conductor. (1) Insulation. The grounding conductor shall be insulated and shall be listed as suitable for the purpose. Hmm. Assuming this section "IV" is referring to the EGC, are you saying that the main ground conductor must be insulated? And by insulated does that mean plastic wire covering? I thought I'd be safe with a bare solid copper 4 gauge wire? I must be reading this wrong... (2) Material. The grounding conductor shall be copper or other corrosion-resistant conductive material, stranded or solid. (3) Size. The grounding conductor shall not be smaller than 14 AWG. Again, although this specifies 14 as the smallest, even 10 or 8 seems too small. Maybe this part of the code is not referring to the main EGC? It's very kind of you to take the time to respond, Mr. Horne. If you'll indulge me in a little further clarification, I'd appreciate it all the more, but I'm already plenty grateful at this point. Thanks again. That part of the code CEOs not refer to the Electrical Service GEC but rather to the Communications Grounding Conductor. This conductor bonds the communications protector to the GEC or the other accessible grounding means. W_Tom's suggestion to run the communications grounding conductor to the Ground rod itself will cause a few challenges. One is that conductors smaller than #6 must have protection from physical damage. Lawn mowers, edge trimmers, & weed eaters expose GECs to severe physical damage so any conductor that is run within reach of such equipment must be number four or be run in protective raceway. If the conductors would run adjacent to each other anyway than a split bolt or saddle clamp would be just as effective. -- Tom |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Mark Wilson" wrote in message
... I recently had an electrician verify that I need a new grounding rod but before he does the work I wanted to get clear regarding the manner in which telephone, cable, roof mounted TV antenna, and water pipes should be grounded to the main service ground. The rod will be planted a few feet from the house just opposite the inside service panel. Did the electrician say you need a NEW grounding rod or a SECOND grounding rod? The reason that I am asking is that a local electrical inspector just told me that the "new electrical code" now calls for TWO grounding rods to be installed 6 feet apart -- instead of just one grounding rod. He said one continuous #6 grounding wire would go from one rod to the next rod 6 feet away (and looped around it) and then to the neutral block on the electric panel box. I know nothing about how all of this works and will probably just have an electrician do it. But, when I saw your subject line, I figured I'd pass on what I was just told in case it helps. |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks to both Toms (and everyone else) for all the clarifications. Words
are cheap, but I really do appreciate the help. I'm ready to let the Electrician lead the way, but now I can make sure all is on the up and up. Of course, knowing me, there's one last detail. Power comes into my house to a main breaker box, then goes out to a separate modern service panel. The main breaker box is nothing more than a 100 amp breaker with no bus bars or anything like that. (Sorry if that was obvious). Power goes through this main breaker and over to a separate modern service panel. Likewise, a 4 gague copper ground conductor leaves this main breaker box and goes out to the modern service panel. Currently, the GEC leaves from the main breaker box and goes out through the basement wall to earth ground. If I understand correctly, from what I've learned here, the new setup should have the GEC going from the ground bar of the modern service panel out through the wall to the grounding rod, instead of the GEC coming from the initial main breaker box. Is that correct? (If the correct method is to run the GEC from the initial breaker box, then does that mean the water pipe ground conductor should also be grounded to this same box as opposed to using the modern service panel's ground bus bar?) And with that, I'll let this long thread putter out. Thanks for sticking with me and my poor newserver access. lol. |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() The main breaker box is nothing more than a 100 amp breaker with no bus bars or anything like that. Just to be clear, there is a small 4 inch bar that accepts the incoming ground and allows for the copper conductor to leave the box to go to the earth ground and another to go to the modern service panel. I just meant there's no modern style bus bar and no room for additional circuits or anything like that. |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "w_tom" wrote in message ... Telco provides a "Service's accessible grounding means" in a box called NID. Their 10 AWG earth ground wire connects their NID box mounted outside (so that it is accessible) to that earth ground rod. Some installers want to make that 10 AWG wire look neat. They will even 'split bolt' attach it to the breaker box ground wire. However better trained installers will run their ground wire directly to the top of that ground rod - as should be the CATV wire ground. All grounds should run indepenently until they all meet at central earth ground. This last requirement is not required in code but creates a more robust and effective earth ground. As a reminder to others, smart move to have all utilities located before pounding down the rod. There is no such thing as a "central earth ground" unless only _one_ grounding electrode is used.....a very poor practice in itself (with the possible exception of a metal well casing)....much better to have _multiple_ grounding electrodes bonded together. All grounding electrodes are bonded together to form a _single_ grounding electode _system_. The ground rod that is being installed is merely a _supplement_ to the main grounding electrode.......in this case the metal water pipe. Not a good idea to try to dump all that on a single ground rod.......a single ground rod will in fact become a choke to lightning trying to get into the ground. That single ground rod should be supplemented by at least another ground rod 6 feet away (or use a delta ground), or a ground ring can be installed with a minimum #2.....and catch the cable TV while you are at it. The basic idea is too run an unbroken GEC from the main panel to the underground water pipe (min. #4) and suppliment that with a ground rod (or two). Then bond all systems together. The idea is that when all the systems are bonded together, ALL will come up to the same voltage (can be ma ny thousands of volts), thus _not_ allowing a destructive current flow in equipment served from different systems....like a modem. Don't forget to jumper around the water meter and bond the hot water. Bottom line, electric system grounding is a very misunderstood subject and needs to be done by people who know and care about how to install it. You still have your inside metal gas line to deal with.......you should call your gas co. to see if they allow an (inside) connection to the electric grounding system as required by NEC. I hope that after going through all that trouble that you are also going to install a lightning arrestor at the electric meter or service panel. Then use a decent point of use surge protector for the computer that has provision for power _and_ phone....cable too if you ever use a cable modem. Also, since you said that you have a subpanel in another thread, you should check to see that the subpanel is fed from the main panel with a _4_ wire feeder (2 hots, neutral, equipment ground). |
#14
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Volts500,
There is no such thing as a "central earth ground" unless only _one_ grounding electrode is used.....a very poor practice in itself (with the possible exception of a metal well casing)....much better to have _multiple_ grounding electrodes bonded together. All grounding electrodes are bonded together to form a _single_ grounding electode _system_. The ground rod that is being installed is merely a _supplement_ to the main grounding electrode.......in this case the metal water pipe. Not a good idea to try to dump all that on a single ground rod.......a single ground rod will in fact become a choke to lightning trying to get into the ground. That single ground rod should be supplemented by at least another ground rod 6 feet away (or use a delta ground), or a ground ring can be installed with a minimum #2.....and catch the cable TV while you are at it. I guess I could be convinced to install 2 rods. I'm doing the work to install the first. The basic idea is too run an unbroken GEC from the main panel to the underground water pipe (min. #4) and suppliment that with a ground rod (or two). Then bond all systems together. If I plant the ground rods just outside the wall of my service panel, I'd have to dig 20 yards over and eight feet down to bring the #4 to the water pipe. If I run #4 from the ground bar to the water pipe from inside the house and then do two ground rods, won't that be enough? The idea is that when all the systems are bonded together, ALL will come up to the same voltage (can be ma ny thousands of volts), thus _not_ allowing a destructive current flow in equipment served from different systems....like a modem. Don't forget to jumper around the water meter and bond the hot water. If I bond the hot water pipe, I'm guessing I would do it the same way as the cold (from the inside). What do you mean by "jumping around" the water meter? Bottom line, electric system grounding is a very misunderstood subject and needs to be done by people who know and care about how to install it. Don't get me wrong. I trust the advice here or I wouldn't be here. But here's the bottom line for me. Whatever electrician the previous home owner hired didn't do the job right, the electrician I hired to inspect the home before I bought it didn't see the problems, and the electrician I'm currently paying to fix things now is contradicting the advice I'm getting here. I guess I could go to the yellow pages again, but at this point I if I don't know what "right" is, I don't think I'll ever have peace of mind over what work is finally done. You still have your inside metal gas line to deal with.......you should call your gas co. to see if they allow an (inside) connection to the electric grounding system as required by NEC. I had the gas guy out ther other day. Although the pipes I see are metal, he said the lines underground were plastic, but I'll make the call to make sure. I hope that after going through all that trouble that you are also going to install a lightning arrestor at the electric meter or service panel. I'll look into that, but it seems like overkill at this point. Then use a decent point of use surge protector for the computer that has provision for power _and_ phone....cable too if you ever use a cable modem. I have a $35 surge protector I use for electrical and telephone. Also, since you said that you have a subpanel in another thread, you should check to see that the subpanel is fed from the main panel with a _4_ wire feeder (2 hots, neutral, equipment ground). Power enters the house in the form of two hot conductors going to the single 100A breaker box and then exit the box, going to the modern service panel. The neutral conductor coming into the house goes to a short metal "bar" which is bonded to the box itself, and then it also leaves the box and goes to the neutral bar of the modern service panel. From inside the 100A breaker box, from that same short metal "bar" there are also two 4 gague bare copper conductors that leave the box. Currenly, one leaves the box and goes through the basement wall and out to earth ground. The other copper conductor leaves the box and goes to the ground bus bar of the modern service panel. Thanks keeping me straight on the details. |
#15
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Mark Wilson" wrote in message ... Mark Wrote: It is required to connect the GEC to the service equipment without any splices between the service equipment and the electrode. Your service equipment stops at the 100A disconnect. From that point on, neutral and ground should always be kept separate and panels are no longer called service rated panels. Okay, so if I understand what you're saying, the 100A breaker box is what the NEC would call my "service equipment" and therefore it is from this box that I should run the GEC. Correct. So hopefully your modern panel has the neutral bus ISOLATED from the grounding bus and chassis. Hopefully, the #4 wire you mentioned goes only to the grounding bus, which in turn must be bonded to the chassis. correctly described Good! Someone knew what they were doing. There is no problem sinking another ground rod at the modern panel and connecting it to the grounding bus. This will just expand and improve your grounding electrode system. I'm not adding a second grounding rod. I'm just trying to replace my current grounding rod and I intend to ground everything to that same point. But because this grounding bus is a splice, the primary GEC can not be done this way -- but supplimental bonding can. I'm confused as to why I can't just run the GEC from the 100A breaker box because to my understanding it would then NOT be a splice. Is it because at this point the ground and neutral are the same and have not yet separated? Sorry, I wasn't clear when I said "panel". You must connect the mandatory GEC at the 100A small disconnect box (or other connected service equipment). You may NOT run the mandatory GEC from your modern panel, because it is not part of your service equipment. It sounds like you want to ground from the proper place, which is at the service equipment, which is where neutral and ground are the same wire or bus. In your other post, you mentioned a water pipe ground. We just went through this in "Ground Rod Questions - summary". To summarize, if you have a metal water pipe that is in contact with the earth for 10 feet or more, you MUST use it as your primary grounding electrode. You must connect to it within 5' from where the water pipe enters the house. This wire must be unspliced from the water pipe to the service equipment neutral lug or wire. If you have a water pipe ground, in most cases you must install a second electrode which is usually a single rod. You shouldn't need two rods, but if you replace your water pipe with plastic, then you do need two. Putting two in now prepares you for the future and improves your grounding electrode system. Additional rods must be at least 6' from any other rods in the same grounding system. Alternatively, if you switch to plastic water service, leave the old pipe buried in the ground and use that as your second electrode (if you can get an unspliced wire to it). Jumping around the meter means clamping a #4 wire between the input and output sides of the meter. You can't be sure if a meter is conductive, so you must put a jumper around it. This only applies if the meter at your house between the buried water pipe and your inside pipes. My water meter is at the street, and you don't jumper those. -- Mark Kent, WA |
#16
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Attitude of code is that water pipe is not sufficient as the
primary or reliable earth ground connection. A separate ground rod (or something equivalent) is required even if water pipe earthing is available. Other incoming utilities will use that ground rod as central earth ground; not water pipe. Connection to water pipe is supplemental earthing to new installations. Connection to one or multiple earth ground rod (or whatever else you use for the earthing system), all at same point, becomes single point earth ground. Everything earths to multiple ground rods at same point. Even the television aerial should make some connection to that single point earth ground before entering a building even though the aerial itself has a direct connection to a separate ground rod - to fully optimize earthing for surge protection. These exceed code requirements to make a superior protection 'system'. That connection to water pipe is primarily to remove currents from pipes - for human safety. Same safety reason is why hot water pipes would also be grounded to panel ground. If water pipe is also being used Code requires a second ground rod if the first does not measure less than 25 ohms. If second rod does not make less than 25 ohms, then a third rod is not required - by code. Code is not optimized for effective surge protection. If earth is so non-conductive as to not supply less than 25 ohms, then a more serious earthing system should be installed such as halo ground, plate electrodes, or Ufer grounding. One rod will make a minimally sufficient earthing connection in most cases. Two rods will make every 'whole house' protector more effective. The most important component in a surge protection 'system' is its earth ground. Earthing and distance of wire to that central earth ground will often be the 'choke point' for system effectiveness. Additional money spent on surge protection often is best spent on enhancing the single point earth ground. Code does not define how that earth resistance is to be measured. Most locations will get less than 25 ohms with only one ground rod. However, considering how important that earthing system is also for transistor safety, then a second rod is cheap insurance. Utility will install massive grounding networks underneath a substation and still obtain resistance on the order of 2 ohms. The first rod will lower resistance. Every additional rod will provide less improvement. 'nuther Bob wrote: On Sat, 12 Jul 2003 03:22:50 GMT, "Mark or Sue" wrote: To summarize, if you have a metal water pipe that is in contact with the earth for 10 feet or more, you MUST use it as your primary grounding electrode. WOuld "MUST" still apply if the proper attachment location to the water pipe is 35 feet from the panel ? Or would the code then prefer two grounding rods ? |
#17
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "w_tom" wrote in message ... Attitude of code is that water pipe is not sufficient as the primary or reliable earth ground connection. That's just not true, Tom. An underground metal water pipe is indeed a very good grounding electrode. Why then does NEC (2002)Section 250.30(4) _specifically_ require that an underground water pipe (and/or structural steel) be used as the primary grounding electrode? Why then does the NEC allow _made_ grounding electrodes (ground rods,etc) ONLY when a water ground or structural steel is not available? A separate ground rod (or something equivalent) is required even if water pipe earthing is available. The ONLY reason that a ground rod is required by NEC to _supplement_ a water ground is because of the distinct possibility that the metal water pipe may be replaced by the water co.......leaving the system with no ground at all. While a single ground rod is not the best ground, it's _certainly_ better than none at all. Other incoming utilities will use that ground rod as central earth ground; not water pipe. Again, just not true. The other utilities will grab on to any ground that they can find. The NEC indeed requires that the electric service have provision for same......even if it's just a bare #6 hanging out of the bottom of the electric panel. There is not such thing as "central earth ground" as you describe it.......and is in fact ludicrous to think that a single ground rod is the "central earth ground." A single ground rod is about the worst possible grounding electrode permitted by NEC.......it just can't dissipate near as many electrons in a given time time as compared to a water ground, ufer, structural steel, or a ground ring. In fact, it if you try to dump all that on a single ground rod it will become a choke. That's why, when installing a single ground rod (only) as a supplement to a better ground, such as a water ground, that the wire to the an _individual_ ground rod, REGARDLESS of the size of service only needs to be a #6 wire (per NEC)........the ground rod just won't dissipate any more electrons than the #6 can handle. Connection to water pipe is supplemental earthing to new installations. No, it is _not_. It is the _primary_ grounding electrode, if available. Problem is, these days plastic pipe is used. Any interior metal water piping is connected to the neutral busbar to clear ground-faults should they become energized. Connection to one or multiple earth ground rod (or whatever else you use for the earthing system), all at same point, becomes single point earth ground. No, connection (bonding) of multiple grounding electrodes forms a _single_ grounding electrode _system_. If you want to call something "a central earth ground" the service entrance neutral busbar would be a more accurate description. Even microwave towers have at least 100 or more Cad Welds bonding every possible piece of metal and ground together. Where is the "central earth ground" on that? There is _no_ single grounding point. If you're referring to a single grounding connection point on a micowave tower before all cables enter the building, then the corresponding single grounding connection point on a house is basically the service equipment neutral busbar. And if you want to start rambling about differential and common mode surges......then you should at least recognize that, indeed, the service entrance neutral busbar is _where_ the neutral and the equipment grounding conductors are bonded together.......and _think_ about _that_ before you respond. Everything earths to multiple ground rods at same point. Yeah, like the neutral busbar in the service equipment! It's not a radar station, Tom. Even the television aerial should make some connection to that single point earth ground before entering a building even though the aerial itself has a direct connection to a separate ground rod - to fully optimize earthing for surge protection. These exceed code requirements to make a superior protection 'system'. That connection to water pipe is primarily to remove currents from pipes - for human safety. No, the primary purpose of a metal underground water pipe is to ground the electric system. Same safety reason is why hot water pipes would also be grounded to panel ground. If water pipe is also being used Code requires a second ground rod if the first does not measure less than 25 ohms. If second rod does not make less than 25 ohms, then a third rod is not required - by code. Code is not optimized for effective surge protection. THAT, I will concur. With more and more plastic being used these days, it's very difficult to obtain a decent electric system ground. It would not be much of a hardship on electrical contractors for the NEC to require a Ufer (concrete-encased) grounding system......they just need to be there before the concrete gets poured. Make it a requirement to get the OK to pour, just like bug spray is required in most areas. If earth is so non-conductive as to not supply less than 25 ohms, then a more serious earthing system should be installed such as halo ground, plate electrodes, or Ufer grounding. One rod will make a minimally sufficient earthing connection in most cases. Two rods will make every 'whole house' protector more effective. The most important component in a surge protection 'system' is its earth ground. Totally agree. Earthing and distance of wire to that central earth ground will often be the 'choke point' for system effectiveness. Additional money spent on surge protection often is best spent on enhancing the single point earth ground. Code does not define how that earth resistance is to be measured. Most locations will get less than 25 ohms with only one ground rod. However, considering how important that earthing system is also for transistor safety, then a second rod is cheap insurance. Utility will install massive grounding networks underneath a substation and still obtain resistance on the order of 2 ohms. The first rod will lower resistance. Every additional rod will provide less improvement. 'nuther Bob wrote: On Sat, 12 Jul 2003 03:22:50 GMT, "Mark or Sue" wrote: To summarize, if you have a metal water pipe that is in contact with the earth for 10 feet or more, you MUST use it as your primary grounding electrode. WOuld "MUST" still apply if the proper attachment location to the water pipe is 35 feet from the panel ? Or would the code then prefer two grounding rods ? |
#18
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Volts500,
Wow, thanks for the generously long reply. Another thing......it's _not_ a good idea to be working on the electric grounding system while the system is energized......you can be electrocuted if the right conditions prevail (such as a low ampere ground-fault that hasn't been cleared). Best to do as much preparation as possible (like drilling holes, running ground wire, driving ground rods, etc.), then shut down the main disconnect before removing the existing grounding system and fully install the new system before re-energizing.......plus it can get hazardous when installing bare conductors in energized panels. Well, the truth is I didn't discover that I need a new grounding rod, I discovered, upon tracing the GEC, that the conductor was severed due to corrosion. Right now the only ground I have is #4 going from the ground bar (in the modern service panel) to the cold water pipe inside the house. I'm not doing anything without the electrician, and nothing without shutting down the main disconnect first. The first thing that I would do is determine that the TV antenna is as far away as possible from any overhead electric lines and the electric service drop. I would then drive an 8 or 10 foot ground rod directly under the antenna mast (assuming roof mount), at least 18" away from the house...enough to get outside the roof drip line. Then, that's what I'll do. (or hire someone to do) I would then drive another 8' ground rod (again, outside the roof drip line) close to the electric service and at least 6' (or more) from the TV antenna ground rod. I would then run a #4 bare stranded copper wire from the neutral busbar in the first (main) disconnect box to the ground rod installed close to the electric service. Right, understanding that a the point of the first main disconnect box the "netural" busbar is the only busbar there is, and it is at this same bar that the ground conductors originate as well. Pull enough extra wire to get to the antenna ground rod without splice, then slip an acorn grounding connector over the wire and attach it to the first ground rod.......then use another acorn to attach the #4 to the antenna ground rod (leave enough room at the top of the ground rod for another acorn. Usually once the all the connections are made to the ground rods they are driven below ground. If you want the connections to be accessible, you can cut an 8 or 10 inch long piece of 4 inch PVC (gray, sunlight resistant) conduit and install it around the ground rod at finished grade level. Exposed connections to ground rods are required to be protected or driven below finished grade. I would then attach an antenna discharge unit (on a non-metallic surface) to the side of the house about a foot or so above grade. After attaching a ground clamp to the TV mast, I would run a #8 or #10 copper wire from the mast ground clamp, through the lug on the antenna discharge unit, unbroken, and on to the antenna ground rod, using another acorn. The antenna lead-ins are then attached to the antenna discharge unit and brought into the house. OK, antenna is done. On to interior gas line. The NEC requires that an _interior_ gas line be connected to the grounding electrode system. After calling the gas co. to be sure it's OK with _them_, one way to accomplish that goal would be to be to install a ground clamp on the gas line closest to the main disconnect and run a #4 bare to the neutral busbar in the main disconnect. Okay, I still need to make that call. Ok, gas is done. On to the water ground. I don't know where your water heater is located or if you have a water meter inside the house, but the idea is the same as for the TV antenna run.......install a ground clamp on the metal hot and cold water pipes near the water heater.....then install ground clamps on both sides of the water meter. Then (if possible) run a #4 bare from the neutral busbar in the main diconnect, UNBROKEN, through the ground clamps on the water heater, through the ground clamps on the water meter, To restate, the water heater, incoming gas line, and incoming power line (and the service panels) are all in one corner of the basement so those are short and easy access. However, the water line actually enters the home about 30 feet away, and there's one right angle turn to get there, although I could probably make the bend much more gradual. Because the water meter is located less than three feet from the point at which the the water pipe enters the home, if I install ground clamps on both sides of the water meter, I'm assuming I won't need to worry about another clamp "within 5 feet of where the water pipe enters the house". Knowing it's a 4 foot run to the water heater and another 30 foot run to the water meter, do you still recommend using an UNBROKEN wire? leaving enough of a loop at the water meter so that it can be replaced without disrupting the continuity ot the GEC, "it" meaning the water meter.. in case it ever needs replacing.. got it. and on to a point within 5 feet of where the metal underground water pipe enters the house. It doesn't have to be done exactly like that, but that's the way I would do it, if possible. At the very least an unbroken #4 must be ran from the neutral busbar to within 5 feet of where the water pipe enters the house.......then jumper the water meter and hot water with short pieces if you want. Okay, this sounds like a good way to do it. Because using a conductor to join the water pipe and the grounding rods OUTDOORS would be very difficult, is grounding the water pipe from the inside (as you describe) really an adequate substitute? Also, because the ground rods will be located at one part of front yard while the water pipes enter the home about 20 yards away, will this be a problem having "two separate ground" locations, so to speak? The neutral and the equipment grounding conductors are bonded to each other and the service equipment enclosure _at_ the main disconnect _only_. Your description of the feeder from the main disconnect to the panelboard sounded kind of hokey.......the cable running to the panelboard should be 4 wire (in the _same_ cable or conduit) and the panelboard neutral busbar should be isolated from ground (look to see if a green screw goes through the panelboard neutral busbar and into the back of the panel, if so, remove it. The green screw is called the "main bonding jumper," but it also can be a wire or strap in-leu of the green screw.) I'm just going to have to get some images up for you to see. I've tried to find online diagrams or descriptions of how the panelboard should looked properly wired, but I can't find any. Let me try one more time to describe it. Incoming power to my house has three stranded conductors contained in one cable. The two hot conductors are insulated and the third is bare metal. These conductors are several times the size of a 4 gague wire, including the bare one. Inside the main disconnect box, the two hot conductors go to the solitary 100A Breaker. The bare metal conductor goes to what I guess we have been calling the neutral "busbar". This little busbar is grounded to the box itself, and from this busbar a relatively smaller #4 wire originates and, acting as GEC, goes out to earth ground. A second #4 wire also originates from this bus bar and goes out to the grounding bus bar of the panelboard (which I have been calling the modern service panel). Leaving from the main disconnect box is a cable exactly like the one that comes into the main disconnect box. The two hots go to the 100A breaker IN the panelbox. The neutral goes to neutral bus bar of the panelboard. There is no green screw that I can see, but it seems clear that a metal bar grounds one bus to the box itself. Although the electrician already said it was okay, I'll have him look at it again to be certain. I really am going to let him mess with it rather than doing it myself. OK, water ground done. On to cable TV. While you say that you won't be using cable, now is the time to get a decent ground connection to it.........if cable is installed later and not grounded properly, the TV, VCR and/or cable modem, and possibly the computer will be subject to damage. From the outside cable TV ground block, an insulated #10 can be split bolted to any of the above mentioned ground wires. I may not understand the term, but there really isn't any kind of cable ground block outside the house. Cable runs down the house to a splitter, then enters the house in two places. I guess I could install some kind of "antenna discharge unit" and run a ground from there. But you're saying I should run the #10 outside the house all the way to one of the grounding rods? It's literally on the opposite side of the house from where the rods will be. It would be a very long horizontal run at best IF I dug under my sidewalk and/or porch. If I don't go under the concrete, then I'd have to go along side the house and over the front door and past a few windows. My wife would kill me. Would it be unsafe to run the #10 ground through the INSIDE of the house? (That's the way it is now) Now for the phone. The telephone primary protector should be installed outside the house by the tele co. and attached to the bare #4 that's coming outside to catch the ground rod......or to the ground rod......whatever floats your boat. This connection is best made by the tele co. people though, if/when they come out to get the demark box right. Ok, will do. The ground conductors connecting the phone and cable ground blocks to the grounding electrode system are usually a insulated wire from the ground block to where they are connected to the grounding electrode system. Like I said, that's how I would do it. Without seeing it, that's the best I can do for you. Actual installation may differ somewhat, but that's the general idea. One thing is for sure, as slow as I type, I could have done had the job done for you in the same amount of time that it has took me to type this post. Tell me, what DO you get out of helping out guys like me? Is is just good samaritanism? I'm always amazed at how generous some people are with their knowledge and time. I really do appreciate it. Please get it inspected by a _real_ electrical inspector. I will Volts500. Thanks for your genuine concern. If your neutral busbar in the main disconnect can't acommodate all the wires, you'll have to buy one that will. Also, a Square D lightning protector at Home Depot only costs about $35..........takes about 5 minutes to install. And I could use the Square D instead of the TWO rods, and you think that would be better? If so, that's what I'll do. If you want an authoritative book on the subject of grounding here's one recommended by the IAEI (International Association of Electrical Inspectors. Soares Book on Grounding, 8E http://www.iaei.org/products_books.htm I'll check it out. I can't thank you enough. ![]() |
#19
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I uploaded two images. The top image show the first box power comes into,
or the service disconnect. The bottom picture is the modern service panel which branches off from the service disconnect. Service Disconnect: Does it look like this busbar will be able to support 4 outgoing conductors? 1. #4 ground going to grounding rod(s) 2. #4 ground going to water pipe 3. Big gague mesh going to service panel neutral bus bar 4. #4 ground going to service panel ground bus bar If I can't put more than one conductor on each bolt, then I'm guessing I'll have to upgrade. Will I need to change the whole box or can I just upgrade the bar? Modern Service Panel: Some connections have actually be corrected since this picture was taken, but please comment as-is and I'll know what to change. You'll notice that it's upside down. This is how it was installed. The #4 ground coming from the service disconnect enters the panel and attaches to the LEFT bus bar. It attaches to the bus bar in the same as you would install a wire for a new circuit. Is it correct to assume this wire should have been installed to the heavier bolt to the lower left of the bar? Please identify at which point the ground bus grounds to the box. http://www.geocities.com/mydeadpresidents/index.html I've got a new electrician coming over in a day or two. Hopefully, this will be my last post.... thanks for your patience. |
#20
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Sorry, another long post.
"Mark Wilson" wrote in message ... Volts 500 wrote: Ok, gas is done. On to the water ground. I don't know where your water heater is located or if you have a water meter inside the house, but the idea is the same as for the TV antenna run.......install a ground clamp on the metal hot and cold water pipes near the water heater.....then install ground clamps on both sides of the water meter. Then (if possible) run a #4 bare from the neutral busbar in the main diconnect, UNBROKEN, through the ground clamps on the water heater, through the ground clamps on the water meter, Mark Wilson wrote: To restate, the water heater, incoming gas line, and incoming power line (and the service panels) are all in one corner of the basement so those are short and easy access. However, the water line actually enters the home about 30 feet away, and there's one right angle turn to get there, although I could probably make the bend much more gradual. Because the water meter is located less than three feet from the point at which the the water pipe enters the home, if I install ground clamps on both sides of the water meter, I'm assuming I won't need to worry about another clamp "within 5 feet of where the water pipe enters the house" Right. Mark Wilson wrote: . Knowing it's a 4 foot run to the water heater and another 30 foot run to the water meter, do you still recommend using an UNBROKEN wire? If you roll out the new #4 wire on the basement floor from the main disconnect to the water meter, you can slide the wire through the lugs on the two ground clamps for the water heater (clamps not connected to pipes yet). Then connect the #4 to the service disconnect neutral busbar (first box), staple the #4 on its way to the water heater, attach the clamps on the hot and cold water pipes and tighten the lugs....then staple the #4 to the bottom of the floor joists on its way to the water meter. When you get to the water meter, slide on the ground clamps as you did for the water heater. Finito. Volts500 wrote: and on to a point within 5 feet of where the metal underground water pipe enters the house. It doesn't have to be done exactly like that, but that's the way I would do it, if possible. At the very least an unbroken #4 must be ran from the neutral busbar to within 5 feet of where the water pipe enters the house.......then jumper the water meter and hot water with short pieces if you want. Mark Wilson wrote: Okay, this sounds like a good way to do it. Because using a conductor to join the water pipe and the grounding rods OUTDOORS would be very difficult, is grounding the water pipe from the inside (as you describe) really an adequate substitute? Substitute for what? I seriously doubt that you will find an electrician who won't run the wire on the inside of the basement from the main disconnect to the water meter. The #4 bare wire run to the ground rods will be totally a separate run.......they will be bonded together with the water ground _at_ the neutral busbar in the main service disconnect (first box). Does that answer your question? Mark Wilson wrote: Also, because the ground rods will be located at one part of front yard while the water pipes enter the home about 20 yards away, will this be a problem having "two separate ground" locations, so to speak? No, they will be bonded together as mentioned above, and permitted by code. Actually, it's the prefered method since the water ground is so far away. Mark Wilson wrote: I'm just going to have to get some images up for you to see. I checked them out, thanks, pictures help a _lot_. I've tried to find online diagrams or descriptions of how the panelboard should looked properly wired, but I can't find any. Let me try one more time to describe it. Incoming power to my house has three stranded conductors contained in one cable. The two hot conductors are insulated and the third is bare metal. These conductors are several times the size of a 4 gague wire, including the bare one. Inside the main disconnect box, the two hot conductors go to the solitary 100A Breaker. The bare metal conductor goes to what I guess we have been calling the neutral "busbar". This little busbar is grounded to the box itself, and from this busbar a relatively smaller #4 wire originates and, acting as GEC, goes out to earth ground. A second #4 wire also originates from this bus bar and goes out to the grounding bus bar of the panelboard (which I have been calling the modern service panel). OK, that part is wrong, IMO. The cable going from the main disconnect (first box) to the "modern panelboard" should have been a 4 wire cable with two hots, one insulated neutral and one bare equipment grounding conductor. The neutral in the "modern panelboard" must be isolated from ground.........once the neutral is grounded at the main disconnect (first box) it should never be grounded again. Mark Wilson wrote: Leaving from the main disconnect box is a cable exactly like the one that comes into the main disconnect box. The two hots go to the 100A breaker IN the panelbox. The neutral goes to neutral bus bar of the panelboard. There is no green screw that I can see, but it seems clear that a metal bar grounds one bus to the box itself. You should have two buses in the "modern panelboard". One bus, the neutral, should be _isolated_ from ground (and have only white circuit wires connected to it). The other bus in the "modern panelboard" is the equipment grounding bus. It should be connected to the panelboard metal enclosure and have all of the bare and green circuit wires connected to it. Mark Wilson wrote: Although the electrician already said it was okay, I'll have him look at it again to be certain. I really am going to let him mess with it rather tha n doing it myself. This is kinda turning into a mess (that's OK, I kinda figured that it would from the time that you first posted a while back.) Before the electrician gets started ask him how much a new service will cost. IMO, the hourly rate that he is going to charge to fix that mess and the grounding just may come close to the price of a new service. At least tell him that you want a permit pulled and an inspection done for the work that he is going to do so he'll know that he can't take any shortcuts.......and he'll have to fix anything that he knows is wrong. Again, it may be cheaper just to tear it all out and start over.......would only take 4 to 6 hrs. to totally rebuild and properly ground that service (I looked at your pictures). Just keep in mind that rebuilding a service is most likely his bread and butter work......he'll probably have a fixed price that will not reflect an hourly rate. Something to think about anyway. Volts500 wrote: OK, water ground done. On to cable TV. While you say that you won't be using cable, now is the time to get a decent ground connection to it.........if cable is installed later and not grounded properly, the TV, VCR and/or cable modem, and possibly the computer will be subject to damage. From the outside cable TV ground block, an insulated #10 can be split bolted to any of the above mentioned ground wires. Mark Wilson wrote: I may not understand the term, but there really isn't any kind of cable ground block outside the house. Cable runs down the house to a splitter, then enters the house in two places. I guess I could install some kind of "antenna discharge unit" and run a ground from there. But you're saying I should run the #10 outside the house all the way to one of the grounding rods? It's literally on the opposite side of the house from where the rods will be. It would be a very long horizontal run at best IF I dug under my sidewalk and/or porch. If I don't go under the concrete, then I'd have to go along side the house and over the front door and past a few windows. My wife would kill me. Would it be unsafe to run the #10 ground through the INSIDE of the house? (That's the way it is now) The way that I would do it (since it such a long distance) is to drive a ground rod outside where the cable enters the house......connect a #10 from the cable ground block (look for a screw or a lug on it) to the ground rod........then run a #6 (from the ground rod) through the inside of the house and split-bolt it to anywhere on the GEC.....or land it on the main disconnect (first box) neutral busbar. Since you aren't using the cable at this time, if you can get the ground rod in and the #6 to the GEC, if/when the cable gets hooked up, the cable people will be able to do the rest. Volts500 wrote: Now for the phone. The telephone primary protector should be installed outside the house by the tele co. and attached to the bare #4 that's coming outside to catch the ground rod......or to the ground rod......whatever floats your boat. This connection is best made by the tele co. people though, if/when they come out to get the demark box right. Mark Wilson wrote: Ok, will do. Volts500 wrote: The ground conductors connecting the phone and cable ground blocks to the grounding electrode system are usually a insulated wire from the ground block to where they are connected to the grounding electrode system. Like I said, that's how I would do it. Without seeing it, that's the best I can do for you. Actual installation may differ somewhat, but that's the general idea. One thing is for sure, as slow as I type, I could have done had the job done for you in the same amount of time that it has took me to type this post. Mark Wilson wrote: Tell me, what DO you get out of helping out guys like me? Is is just good samaritanism? I'm always amazed at how generous some people are with their knowledge and time. I really do appreciate it. Something to do I guess. It's my way of relaxing after work too. Plus, while I have my certification and have done my bit as a residential wireman, I've always been a large commercial and industrial electrician. Helping people in this NG helps me stay up with current residential wiring codes, methods, get homeowner feedback, etc., for those times when people ask me to do some residential wiring for them (so much for samaritanism :-). Also, I get a lot of info from other people on unrelated topics in this NG, so it's my way of returning the favor. Of course, a word of thanks or appreciation goes a long way too, and for that, I thank _you_. Also, in your case, you've been jerked around by so many so called "electricians" that I felt you deserved some extra effort. Volts500 wrote: Please get it inspected by a _real_ electrical inspector. Mark Wilson wrote: I will Volts500. Thanks for your genuine concern. Volts500 wrote: If your neutral busbar in the main disconnect can't acommodate all the wires, you'll have to buy one that will. Also, a Square D lightning protector at Home Depot only costs about $35..........takes about 5 minutes to install. Mark Wilson wrote: And I could use the Square D instead of the TWO rods, and you think that would be better? If so, that's what I'll do. The lightning arrestor is_not_ a replacement for the two ground rods. Since your water ground is so far from the electric service, the two ground rods, IMO, are a_must._ A lightning arrestor is basically useless without a good grounding system. Volts500 wrote: If you want an authoritative book on the subject of grounding here's one recommended by the IAEI (International Association of Electrical Inspectors. Soares Book on Grounding, 8E http://www.iaei.org/products_books.htm If you read that book, you should have no trouble understanding the principles and doing the work yourself.......but still get it inspected, please. The whole job, if you do DIY and pay for a permit and inspection (and including the price of the book) should be about $200. Just remember that I've overkilled this deal a bit in an attempt to avoid confusion and a lot of what ifs and why for's. If you are having trouble driving the ground rods, rent a rotory hammer that has a chuck that is big enough to slip over the ground rod and have at it. Mark Wilson wrote: I'll check it out. I can't thank you enough. ![]() You're welcome. I hope this hasn't become too confusing. |
#21
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "'nuther Bob" wrote in message ... I may have some issues with the depth. You hit hardpan in my yard at 6 to 8 feet deep. I don't think a copper rod will got through it, no matter what. The stuff is like concrete, I couldn't get through it with a steel truck bar. Sorry, living on an overgrown sandbar, sometimes I forget how hard it is to drive ground rods in some other parts of the country. The NEC permits a ground rod to be driven at a 45 degree angle (no less), if that helps. How deep does the ring have to be ? Does it really need to be a circle ? Or could I run 20 feet along side the house in a ditch ? 2 feet deep, doesn't need to be a circle, but make it as long as you can past the required 20 feet.....use a #2 copper.......keep the trench beyond the roof drip line, where the soil will stay wet(er). |
#22
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Mark Wilson" wrote in message
... I uploaded two images. The top image show the first box power comes into, or the service disconnect. The bottom picture is the modern service panel which branches off from the service disconnect. Service Disconnect: Does it look like this busbar will be able to support 4 outgoing conductors? 1. #4 ground going to grounding rod(s) 2. #4 ground going to water pipe 3. Big gague mesh going to service panel neutral bus bar 4. #4 ground going to service panel ground bus bar Looks ugly. You may want to look for a normal 5 to 8 hole panel grounding bus bar and screw it to that disconnect panel. They can usually accomodate wires up to #4, and some will go even larger. They require a #10 threaded hole in your chassis. If you don't have that, you can get double lugs that bolt to the panel, but you'll need two it doesn't look like they'll fit. If I can't put more than one conductor on each bolt, then I'm guessing I'll have to upgrade. Will I need to change the whole box or can I just upgrade the bar? May want to buy a new disconnect. Yours looks old and it may be difficult to now the listings for multiple wires under a screw. Getting compatible bars may even be a problem. I bought a 3R (raintight) Cutler Hammer disconnect that can do up to 125A for about $30 at home depot. Modern Service Panel: Some connections have actually be corrected since this picture was taken, but please comment as-is and I'll know what to change. You'll notice that it's upside down. This is how it was installed. The #4 ground coming from the service disconnect enters the panel and attaches to the LEFT bus bar. It attaches to the bus bar in the same as you would install a wire for a new circuit. Is it correct to assume this wire should have been installed to the heavier bolt to the lower left of the bar? Please identify at which point the ground bus grounds to the box. You have more serious problems here (I think volts500 answered some of these questions in a combined reply). You only have 3 wires, and must have 4. It also appears that you have a mix of neutrals and grounds on each bus. Hopefully, the neutrals are on one side and the ground on the other. If not, you need to rearrange them so that is the case. It looks like that big horizontal bar is connecting both your busses together. This needs to come out if you're separating the neutral and ground (unless there is yet another grounding bus that I don't see, but I don't know where it would fit). Then, connect an insulated neutral to the neutral bus and a grounding wire to the grounding bus. I'm not sure if that braided neutral counts as an insulated neutral. You should replace that cable with SER (3 insulated, 1 braided ground), or some other suitable wire/cable type. Also, look for the bus that has a bonding screw into the cabinet back. This is the bus that must be ground. The other should be insulated and will be the neutral (hopefully, either bar can be bonded depending on which one you put the screw in). It doesn't matter which hole the ground wire uses, because the screws have a minimum and maximum wire limit -- just use one that is correct for your wire (and use the correct bus). I can't see enough to now how salvagable this is -- you may need to start over. -- Mark Kent, WA |
#23
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Code does not define how to measure resistance of earth
ground. The same application notes that demonstrate how to install a more serious 'single point earth ground' (which is labeled MGB in the picture): http://www.leminstruments.com/pdf/LEGP.pdf (figure on page 14 or) http://leminstruments.com/grounding_...ml/index.shtml (section entitled "Measuring Ground Resistance at Cellular Sites,Microwave and Radio Towers") That Lem Instrument application describes measuring earth ground resistance since that is what they are selling. 'nuther Bob wrote: On Sat, 12 Jul 2003 19:13:36 -0400, w_tom wrote: Code does not define how that earth resistance is to be measured. Most locations will get less than 25 ohms with only one ground rod. What do you do to measure this ? Stick one lead of the meter on the rod and another in the ground ? How far away would you put the ground lead ? I can see this having a serious variation in my area in the summer dry season. The rest of the year is probably wet enough to get some conductivity. |
#24
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Code does not state distance to water pipe because code
addresses human safety issues. Wire length in a residence is irrelevant for human safety. But wire longer than 10 feet has adverse effects to earthing for surge protection. Again, code is only concerned with wire resistance. Surge protection worries about wire impedance which is why that wire must be short and other requirements (no splices, no sharp bends, etc). Transistor safety (also known as surge protection) is beyond scope and purpose of the NEC. After all, who creates NEC requirements? National Fire Protection Association - because code is written to protect human life. But for transistor safety, that ground wire length and how the earthing system is connected (single point earth ground) exceeds what code requires. We must enhance an 'NEC required' earthing system to also provide an effective 'surge protection' earthing system. For example, a ground wire can be grouped with other wires to meet NEC. But for effective surge protection, that earthing wire must be separate from other wires - so as to not create induced surges on those other wires. Ground wire must not be in close electromagnetic proximity with other non earthing wires. Code does not require this because code does not fully address surge protection issues. Ground wire from incoming utility can connect to breaker box ground to meet code. But for surge protection, the earthing system must be enhanced. All earthing wires must run independently and meet at the central earth ground - be it the MGB, bulkhead, earthed structural member, or earth ground rod(s). All utilities must meet at this single point ground to upgrade an 'NEC required' earth ground into an effective surge protection earth ground. Other limitations. Buried ground wire may be 2 foot deep to meet code. But for surge protection, that wire must also remain below the frost line. Earth ground is non conductive when frozen. Therefore many ring grounds also include 8' earth ground rods to address problems such as deep frozen earth and geology variations. Sand is also a serious problem for earthing. Halo or ring ground addresses problems beyond what code requires; especially if in sandy soil. Since we cannot make earth ground conductive enough, then we attempt to make earth under the building "equipotential". But wire is not a conductor to surges. Wire becomes an electronic component. So we also want that ring ground to become the best conductive earth ground in the facility - the 'single point earth ground'. IOW ring ground enhances an NEC required earth ground for two complementary reasons as demonstrated in that previously cited Lem Instrument URL and in a figures from another industry professionals: http://www.erico.com/erico_public/pd...es/Tncr002.pdf http://www.xantrex.com/support/docserve.asp?id=337 http://www.cinergy.com/surge/ttip08.htm Mark or Sue wrote: "'nuther Bob" wrote in message ... On Sat, 12 Jul 2003 03:22:50 GMT, "Mark or Sue" wrote: To summarize, if you have a metal water pipe that is in contact with the earth for 10 feet or more, you MUST use it as your primary grounding electrode. WOuld "MUST" still apply if the proper attachment location to the water pipe is 35 feet from the panel ? Or would the code then prefer two grounding rods ? Bob Code says "must", but is silent on the distance from the panel. You have to run a wire to the pipes anyway (whether outside pipes are metal or plastic), the wire is just larger when it is your GEC. So you can't skip this part. |
#25
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Volts500, Mark and Sue,
Thanks to your help and the help of others I now feel I know enough to keep the electrician honest. I've got the soars book on order and I plan to do some of the grunt work myself. I honestly didn't realize this thread would get so involved. It's very kind of you to help out while keeping the focus on my safety. To ease my guilt at having imposed on so much of your time, I can only hope others will get some use out of it as well. Keeping everything in mind, I'm going to follow Volt's advice for all the grounding. I'm also going to replace the Service Disconnect (as Mark suggested), and rewire the panelboard. Now, this opens up a few more questions. If I had any shame, I would feel too guilty to ask any more, but I guess I'm a bit shameless. If you guys would start giving crappy and vague advice, you really would avoid people like me buggying you so much. ![]() Volts: It appears that the metal housing of the water meter negates the need to jumper it. In this case, I think it would be better to simply attach the grounding clamp as near as possible to the point at which the pipe enters the home. Agreed? (See image) http://www.geocities.com/mydeadpresidents/index.html As for outgoing circuits, what kind of trouble can be caused by having a mix of neutrals and grounds on each bus? I'm gonna fix it no matter what, but it won't be the first thing I do. You've seen my Service Disconnect box. Is it common to have a separate service disconnect box as I do? Had it been wired correctly, couldn't I have just used the panelboard which has it's own 100 AMP breaker) and then skip the current Service Disconnect box? Tell me I have this right. Let's assume I keep the Service Disconnect at 100 AMP but I want to upgrade the box. I would then get a new box (that supports at least 100amps) then add a 100 AMP breaker for the incoming power and then get another 100 AMP breaker for the power outgoing to the panelboard. In other words, because my panelboard has room for the circuits I need and that I forsee needing, I see no reason to try to run circuits from my new Service Disconnect box and therfore, the power should just go straight through. Put another way, I'm not using the panelboard as a subpanel in the traditonal sense. I'm using the panelboard for ALL circuits and the Service Disconnect is really nothing more than a way to kill the main power and provide a lauching point for grouding conductors. Is there anything wrong with this setup? My main service breaker only allows for 100amps. I've read that a 100 breaker usually means you can go 200 or more, but I've totaled up the amps of the circuits in my panel box and it's around 500! However, in the two years I've lived here, I've never once thrown a breaker. Also, some of the circuits are used seasonally. I've got 60 amps dedicated to the AC, but I also have 160 amps dedicated to space heaters which I almost never use, not even in the winter time (because that same room also has a wood stove). Is it time to upgrade to 200amps? I regards to power coming into my home (2 hot/1 neutral), how much power is available? I mean, right now, judging by the breaker in my Service Disconnect, I'm utilizing up to 100 AMPs of power. If I wanted to go 200, then can I just upgrade to a breaker and panel that support the extra amps? Or, is there some kind of physical change the Power Co will have to make? Thanks |
#26
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Mark Wilson" wrote in message
... Volts500, Mark and Sue, Thanks to your help and the help of others I now feel I know enough to keep the electrician honest. I've got the soars book on order and I plan to do some of the grunt work myself. I honestly didn't realize this thread would get so involved. It's very kind of you to help out while keeping the focus on my safety. To ease my guilt at having imposed on so much of your time, I can only hope others will get some use out of it as well. Keeping everything in mind, I'm going to follow Volt's advice for all the grounding. I'm also going to replace the Service Disconnect (as Mark suggested), and rewire the panelboard. Now, this opens up a few more questions. If I had any shame, I would feel too guilty to ask any more, but I guess I'm a bit shameless. If you guys would start giving crappy and vague advice, you really would avoid people like me buggying you so much. ![]() Don't feel guilty -- that what these forums are for. If we get tired of your questions, you'll only get lame (or no) answers. Volts: It appears that the metal housing of the water meter negates the need to jumper it. In this case, I think it would be better to simply attach the grounding clamp as near as possible to the point at which the pipe enters the home. Agreed? (See image) http://www.geocities.com/mydeadpresidents/index.html As for outgoing circuits, what kind of trouble can be caused by having a mix of neutrals and grounds on each bus? I'm gonna fix it no matter what, but it won't be the first thing I do. If it is service equipment, then none as ground and neutral are the same. In a subpanel, the voltage drop across the neutral will raise your ground this same amount (typically 1 to 3 volts). For things that actually go to a true ground, such as audio tuners and cable TV cables, you'll get a current flowing in the shield causing noise, hum, or other interesting behavior. You've seen my Service Disconnect box. Is it common to have a separate service disconnect box as I do? Had it been wired correctly, couldn't I have just used the panelboard which has it's own 100 AMP breaker) and then skip the current Service Disconnect box? This seems to be a regional thing. Some areas demand an outside disconnect. Where I live, the disconnects can be inside the house as long as they are very near where the service cables enter. Since your second panel is also outside, you meet the outside disconnect rule. The only other issue would be if your area has a limitation on how far the main disconnect needs to be from the meter. If they have one, it may be short, like 5 feet. The intent here is to minimize the length of unfused service conductors and the amount of structure they will damage should they flame up. Tell me I have this right. Let's assume I keep the Service Disconnect at 100 AMP but I want to upgrade the box. I would then get a new box (that supports at least 100amps) then add a 100 AMP breaker for the incoming power and then get another 100 AMP breaker for the power outgoing to the panelboard. In other words, because my panelboard has room for the circuits I need and that I forsee needing, I see no reason to try to run circuits from my new Service Disconnect box and therfore, the power should just go straight through. Put another way, I'm not using the panelboard as a subpanel in the traditonal sense. I'm using the panelboard for ALL circuits and the Service Disconnect is really nothing more than a way to kill the main power and provide a lauching point for grouding conductors. Is there anything wrong with this setup? The first panel is still your service disconnect because it has a breaker in it. Additional service rated panels must be grouped (can't be 20 feet across the wall) and there is usually no fusing between them. If your local inspector says its OK, you may be able to replace the 100A disconnect with just a junction box if the existing house circuit panel has a 100A main disconnect. Then run new wires from the meter base to the panel where all your circuits are and use it as a main service rated panel. My main service breaker only allows for 100amps. I've read that a 100 breaker usually means you can go 200 or more, but I've totaled up the amps of the circuits in my panel box and it's around 500! However, in the two years I've lived here, I've never once thrown a breaker. Also, some of the circuits are used seasonally. I've got 60 amps dedicated to the AC, but I also have 160 amps dedicated to space heaters which I almost never use, not even in the winter time (because that same room also has a wood stove). Is it time to upgrade to 200amps? Again a local thing. Here, all services must be wired for 200A, but you could put in a 100A breakered panel if you want to. The wires will have to be sized for 200A though. If your service wires are 100A, then you can't increase to 200A without replacing them. Same with your meter base -- is it 100A or 200A? You can put a 200A breakered panel on a 100A service if you've done a load calculation and it indicates you're not exceeding the 100A service. Finally, check with your utility to see how big your transformer is. You'll want at least a 20 KVA for a 200A service, and preferably a 25 or 30 KVA. I regards to power coming into my home (2 hot/1 neutral), how much power is available? I mean, right now, judging by the breaker in my Service Disconnect, I'm utilizing up to 100 AMPs of power. If I wanted to go 200, then can I just upgrade to a breaker and panel that support the extra amps? Or, is there some kind of physical change the Power Co will have to make? 100A is available at 240V (24 KVA). Power company may have to increase their wires to you and may have to increase the transformer. You may have to increase the meter base, the service entrance wires and the main panel. -- Mark Kent, WA |
#27
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Mark Wilson" wrote in message ... Volts: It appears that the metal housing of the water meter negates the need to jumper it. In this case, I think it would be better to simply attach the grounding clamp as near as possible to the point at which the pipe enters the home. Agreed? (See image) http://www.geocities.com/mydeadpresidents/index.html Now we're getting into the what if's and why for's (Although you seem to be grasping the concepts, I'm trying to avoid all of that to keep misunderstandings to a minimum.) Best to jumper the meter and be done with it.......$2 part, 5 min. work, tops. Don't forget to jumper the hot water to the cold water at the water meter. As for outgoing circuits, what kind of trouble can be caused by having a mix of neutrals and grounds on each bus? I'm gonna fix it no matter what, but it won't be the first thing I do. Can cause all sorts of nasty problems. I think Mark covered that and the rest of it pretty well. |
#28
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "volts500" wrote "Mark Wilson" wrote in message ... Volts: It appears that the metal housing of the water meter negates the need to jumper it. In this case, I think it would be better to simply attach the grounding clamp as near as possible to the point at which the pipe enters the home. Agreed? (See image) http://www.geocities.com/mydeadpresidents/index.html Now we're getting into the what if's and why for's (Although you seem to be grasping the concepts, I'm trying to avoid all of that to keep misunderstandings to a minimum.) Best to jumper the meter and be done with it.......$2 part, 5 min. work, tops. Don't forget to jumper the hot water to the cold water at the water meter. As for outgoing circuits, what kind of trouble can be caused by having a mix of neutrals and grounds on each bus? I'm gonna fix it no matter what, but it won't be the first thing I do. Can cause all sorts of nasty problems. I think Mark covered that and the rest of it pretty well. Most water meters that I'm familiar with use rubber compression or washer type seals. Those big brass nuts, they really don't connect electrically to the tubing to the meter body all that well. Gary Quality Water Associates |
#29
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mark,
You've seen my Service Disconnect box. Is it common to have a separate service disconnect box as I do? Had it been wired correctly, couldn't I have just used the panelboard which has it's own 100 AMP breaker) and then skip the current Service Disconnect box? This seems to be a regional thing. Some areas demand an outside disconnect. Where I live, the disconnects can be inside the house as long as they are very near where the service cables enter. Since your second panel is also outside, you meet the outside disconnect rule. The only other issue would be if your area has a limitation on how far the main disconnect needs to be from the meter. If they have one, it may be short, like 5 feet. The intent here is to minimize the length of unfused service conductors and the amount of structure they will damage should they flame up. Actually, both my Service Disconnect and Panelboard are inside the house. Outside the house there is only a meter. All in all, having a separate Service Disconnect is fine for now, although I think I'll replace it with the Cutler Hammer box you suggested. Of course the Power Co will have to someone disconnect power for the Service Disconnect to be rewired. How does the Power Co go about shutting down power? Do they have to climb the pole or is there something they can do at the meter? My main service breaker only allows for 100amps. I've read that a 100 breaker usually means you can go 200 or more, but I've totaled up the amps of the circuits in my panel box and it's around 500! However, in the two years I've lived here, I've never once thrown a breaker. Also, some of the circuits are used seasonally. I've got 60 amps dedicated to the AC, but I also have 160 amps dedicated to space heaters which I almost never use, not even in the winter time (because that same room also has a wood stove). Is it time to upgrade to 200amps? Again a local thing. Here, all services must be wired for 200A, but you could put in a 100A breakered panel if you want to. The wires will have to be sized for 200A though. If your service wires are 100A, then you can't increase to 200A without replacing them. Same with your meter base -- is it 100A or 200A? You can put a 200A breakered panel on a 100A service if you've done a load calculation and it indicates you're not exceeding the 100A service. Finally, check with your utility to see how big your transformer is. You'll want at least a 20 KVA for a 200A service, and preferably a 25 or 30 KVA. The meter says something like "200cl 240v 3w" I'll give the Power Co a call and look into it. I'm sure it's not a black and white issue, but if I'm not throwing breakers, is it fair to say I don't really need 200A at this time? I hate to rewire everything only to decide later that I need to upgrade the panelboard too. |
#30
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Volts,
I'll go ahead and jumper that water meter as you said. Regarding the ground wire going from netural bar to water heater over to water meter.... While trying not to make dramtic bends in the conductor, it's going to be almost impossible to prevent the it from contacting the metal ducts and armored cable that run along the ceiling. I suppose I could try to insulate the wire somehow when it gets near the AC, or perhaps I can find some insulated green #4 (afterall, this is being used inside anyway). Does contact with the ducts or AC create a problem? About how much bend can a ground wire take (and still function well)? 135 degrees? |
#31
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Mark Wilson" wrote in message
... Actually, both my Service Disconnect and Panelboard are inside the house. Outside the house there is only a meter. All in all, having a separate Service Disconnect is fine for now, although I think I'll replace it with the Cutler Hammer box you suggested. Of course the Power Co will have to someone disconnect power for the Service Disconnect to be rewired. How does the Power Co go about shutting down power? Do they have to climb the pole or is there something they can do at the meter? Ah, now were making progress. Inside the house, they want your main disconnect as soon as possible. Usually, this means within 5' of where the wire penetrates the exterior wall. If your service panel is 20 feet from the disconnect, that explains why you have a disconnect. Why they didn't put a normal panelboard where the disconnect is located I don't know.... Usually, power is disconnected by pulling the meter. Sometimes, you can do this yourself, but you must inform the power company so they can come back and seal it (and know why the seal has been broken). It would be better to have the power company come pull your meter, as they can deal with any oh-****s that happen. A service enclosure is not a nice place to have things stuck or falling out! The only thing that sucks here is re-establishing service. You may be without power for a day while you wait for the power company to come back. You may feel more comfortable putting the meter back in than taking it out. That would get you going again sooner. Climbing the pole would work too, but they'll only do that if you need to work in or replace the meter enclosure. The meter says something like "200cl 240v 3w" I'll give the Power Co a call and look into it. I'm sure it's not a black and white issue, but if I'm not throwing breakers, is it fair to say I don't really need 200A at this time? I hate to rewire everything only to decide later that I need to upgrade the panelboard too. That would be a Class 200 meter for normal 240/120 household service. You probably have a 200A meter enclosure if you have a 200A meter, so perhaps this part can stay forever (unless its deteriorated). Yes, if that main is not tripping you're probably OK (unless that breaker is defective). However, you may want to measure your voltage sometime when you're pushing things and see how much it sags. A wimpy transformer will help prevent you blowing the breaker. I think that is why my power company uses a transformer that is about half the size of your needs. When you really need 100A, you're going to have a fair amount of voltage drop and may not get to drawing 100A because things are drawing less current at the lower voltage. Finally, just because you have a 200A meter doesn't mean you had 200A service entrance conductors installed. If you ever decide to upgrade the main disconnect to 200A, you'll need to check the wires to the meter and from the meter for proper size. You can defer that task if you just replace the 100A disconect with another 100A unit. -- Mark Kent, WA |
#32
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Mark Wilson" wrote in message
... Actually, both my Service Disconnect and Panelboard are inside the house. Outside the house there is only a meter. All in all, having a separate Service Disconnect is fine for now, although I think I'll replace it with the Cutler Hammer box you suggested. Of course the Power Co will have to someone disconnect power for the Service Disconnect to be rewired. How does the Power Co go about shutting down power? Do they have to climb the pole or is there something they can do at the meter? Ah, now were making progress. Inside the house, they want your main disconnect as soon as possible. Usually, this means within 5' of where the wire penetrates the exterior wall. If your service panel is 20 feet from the disconnect, that explains why you have a disconnect. Why they didn't put a normal panelboard where the disconnect is located I don't know.... Usually, power is disconnected by pulling the meter. Sometimes, you can do this yourself, but you must inform the power company so they can come back and seal it (and know why the seal has been broken). It would be better to have the power company come pull your meter, as they can deal with any oh-****s that happen. A service enclosure is not a nice place to have things stuck or falling out! The only thing that sucks here is re-establishing service. You may be without power for a day while you wait for the power company to come back. You may feel more comfortable putting the meter back in than taking it out. That would get you going again sooner. Climbing the pole would work too, but they'll only do that if you need to work in or replace the meter enclosure. The meter says something like "200cl 240v 3w" I'll give the Power Co a call and look into it. I'm sure it's not a black and white issue, but if I'm not throwing breakers, is it fair to say I don't really need 200A at this time? I hate to rewire everything only to decide later that I need to upgrade the panelboard too. That would be a Class 200 meter for normal 240/120 household service. You probably have a 200A meter enclosure if you have a 200A meter, so perhaps this part can stay forever (unless its deteriorated). Yes, if that main is not tripping you're probably OK (unless that breaker is defective). However, you may want to measure your voltage sometime when you're pushing things and see how much it sags. A wimpy transformer will help prevent you blowing the breaker. I think that is why my power company uses a transformer that is about half the size of your needs. When you really need 100A, you're going to have a fair amount of voltage drop and may not get to drawing 100A because things are drawing less current at the lower voltage. Finally, just because you have a 200A meter doesn't mean you had 200A service entrance conductors installed. If you ever decide to upgrade the main disconnect to 200A, you'll need to check the wires to the meter and from the meter for proper size. You can defer that task if you just replace the 100A disconect with another 100A unit. -- Mark Kent, WA |
#33
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"'nuther Bob" wrote in message
... If you only have a service panel - as in the meter is on a box and direct wired to a 100A breaker in the service panel - are there rules about separating ground and neutral ? In my box, it's all one bus bar. I also have a subpanel off the main panel - do the rules change when we get into the subpanel ? Yes. At the service, where you have the meter and main breaker, this is your Service Disconnect and it is where your "Service" stops. This is the last place that neutral and ground are connected together. If you have another panel in the house, this is a subpanel and it must have a 4 wire feeder and the neutral and ground busses must be isolated. Only the grounding bus may be electrically connected to the panel enclosure in a subpanel. There is an exception to this for a panels at detached buildings, but there must be no electrically conductive path between the service equipment and the remote panelboards (ecxcept for the service feeder itself). Typical connections that would mandate a 4 wire feeder to a remote building -- grounded phone or CATV wires, or metal water, gas, or oil pipes. I also think that mobile homes must have a 4 wire feeder from the typically yard mounted pole/disconnect. The idiot that did my house ran a 3-wire feeder to the pool shed (which because its a pool is not allowed), but there is an oil pipe in there and another one in the house. The oil pipe was a parallel neutral back to the panel. Thankfully, this pipe was not loose or arcing in the oil tank! -- Mark Kent, WA |
#34
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Mark Wilson" wrote in message ... "Mark Wilson" wrote in message What you say makes sense, but the cable makes it to the Service Disconnect within 3 feet of entering the building, and the panelboard is right next to it. I'm pretty sure the "electrician" (and I use that term lightly.. he he) just didn't want to mess with shutting power off at the meter or having to call the Power Co. Plus, he wouldn't have to rewire as much. Because the panelboard also has it's own 100A breaker (which has never been thrown) I'm even more likely to believe things are okay for now. With what you've said now, your panels are OK. Both are service rated panels, and you have two disconnects. One of those disconnects is not really needed and could be removed. Or, perhaps replace it with a 100A transfer switch if you've thought about generator power... -- Mark Kent, WA |
#35
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"'nuther Bob" wrote in message
... On Thu, 17 Jul 2003 03:36:19 GMT, "Mark or Sue" wrote: Yes. At the service, where you have the meter and main breaker, this is your Service Disconnect and it is where your "Service" stops. This is the last place that neutral and ground are connected together. If you have another panel in the house, If the second panel is physically connected to the main panel via a 1.5" coupling, is it still a "sub panel" and is it a source of concern ? This coupling is equivalent to the equipment grounding wire, and may even replace the equipment grounding wire if the conduit is hard metal (not flex) and effectively bonded to the service panel or neutral. If these two panels are side by side, then I'm not sure if you're allowed to have it be a second service panel or not. You definitely could if the meter was double lugged and a service conductor went to each. If a breaker in the first panel is feeding the second panel a few inches away, I'm not sure if that forces it to be a subpanel or not...I'm leaning towards it having to be a subpanel, but I can't prove my case. If this second panel must be a subpanel, then in it you'd need a grounding bus that is bonded to the 1.5" conduit and the neutral bus would have to be insulated from the panel chassis. -- Mark Kent, WA |
#36
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mark,
"Mark Wilson" wrote in message ... "Mark Wilson" wrote in message What you say makes sense, but the cable makes it to the Service Disconnect within 3 feet of entering the building, and the panelboard is right next to it. I'm pretty sure the "electrician" (and I use that term lightly.. he he) just didn't want to mess with shutting power off at the meter or having to call the Power Co. Plus, he wouldn't have to rewire as much. Because the panelboard also has it's own 100A breaker (which has never been thrown) I'm even more likely to believe things are okay for now. With what you've said now, your panels are OK. Both are service rated panels, and you have two disconnects. One of those disconnects is not really needed and could be removed. Or, perhaps replace it with a 100A transfer switch if you've thought about generator power... oh no, not another tangent... lol. (generator) I was wrong about the panelboard. It's actually rated at 200A and the breaker is 200, not 100. I'm still considering an upgrade to 200A. Because the panelboard is rated for 200, if I upgrade to 200, I could skip the first disconnect which might be the cost effective way to go. This would mean about a 5 foot run from the outside meter to the panelboard. If I did this, I'm guessing I'd just run all my GEC and other grounds from the ground bus bar. I might check back with you guys on a few things, but I've got enough to get to work now and I think I'll let this thread die. Oh, but I am still wondering about that ground conductor going from the Service Disconnect to my water meter and pipe (from the inside of the house). Is it bad for the bare conductor to contact armored cable (bx) or metal duct work? Knowing the answer will make a big difference in the amount of work I have to do to run the wire. Thanks for all your help and advice. |
#37
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Mark Wilson" wrote in message ... "Mark Wilson" wrote in message ... With what you've said now, your panels are OK. Both are service rated panels, and you have two disconnects. One of those disconnects is not really needed and could be removed. Or, perhaps replace it with a 100A transfer switch if you've thought about generator power... oh no, not another tangent... lol. (generator) I was wrong about the panelboard. It's actually rated at 200A and the breaker is 200, not 100. I'm still considering an upgrade to 200A. Because the panelboard is rated for 200, if I upgrade to 200, I could skip the first disconnect which might be the cost effective way to go. This would mean about a 5 foot run from the outside meter to the panelboard. If I did this, I'm guessing I'd just run all my GEC and other grounds from the ground bus bar. I might check back with you guys on a few things, but I've got enough to get to work now and I think I'll let this thread die. So your 100A disconnect is required. A single disconnect can not be greater than the size of the service, so a 100A breaker had to be placed in front of the 200A panel main. And right again, if you upgrade to 200, just remove that 100A disconnect box and go straight to the 200A panel you already have. Oh, but I am still wondering about that ground conductor going from the Service Disconnect to my water meter and pipe (from the inside of the house). Is it bad for the bare conductor to contact armored cable (bx) or metal duct work? Knowing the answer will make a big difference in the amount of work I have to do to run the wire. No, it is not bad. Those things should already be grounded by the circuit that feeds them. Those items touching the GEC won't change anything. If you just don't like doing that, you can run insulated wire, but you'll need to color it green (use tape or paint) where it is exposed. If you're planning on a 200A upgrade at some point, run a #4 copper GEC to the water pipe. Otherwise, you'll need to upsize it when you upgrade the service. -- Mark Kent, WA |
#38
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Mark Wilson" wrote in message ... "Mark Wilson" wrote in message ... With what you've said now, your panels are OK. Both are service rated panels, and you have two disconnects. One of those disconnects is not really needed and could be removed. Or, perhaps replace it with a 100A transfer switch if you've thought about generator power... oh no, not another tangent... lol. (generator) I was wrong about the panelboard. It's actually rated at 200A and the breaker is 200, not 100. I'm still considering an upgrade to 200A. Because the panelboard is rated for 200, if I upgrade to 200, I could skip the first disconnect which might be the cost effective way to go. This would mean about a 5 foot run from the outside meter to the panelboard. If I did this, I'm guessing I'd just run all my GEC and other grounds from the ground bus bar. I might check back with you guys on a few things, but I've got enough to get to work now and I think I'll let this thread die. So your 100A disconnect is required. A single disconnect can not be greater than the size of the service, so a 100A breaker had to be placed in front of the 200A panel main. And right again, if you upgrade to 200, just remove that 100A disconnect box and go straight to the 200A panel you already have. understood. Oh, but I am still wondering about that ground conductor going from the Service Disconnect to my water meter and pipe (from the inside of the house). Is it bad for the bare conductor to contact armored cable (bx) or metal duct work? Knowing the answer will make a big difference in the amount of work I have to do to run the wire. No, it is not bad. Those things should already be grounded by the circuit that feeds them. Those items touching the GEC won't change anything. If you just don't like doing that, you can run insulated wire, but you'll need to color it green (use tape or paint) where it is exposed. If you're planning on a 200A upgrade at some point, run a #4 copper GEC to the water pipe. Otherwise, you'll need to upsize it when you upgrade the service. In my case it will be MUCH easier if I don't have to worry about the GEC touching the ducts. -- Mark Kent, WA That's it for me on this thread. Thanks! |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
WTD Info on Tapmatic 700X and info on Tapmatics | Metalworking | |||
Jointech routerbits? | Woodworking | |||
Lorch Junior lathe slide rest info? | Metalworking | |||
*** Rec.Woodworking Mini-FAQ *** 126 (w/Filter info!) | Woodworking | |||
Grounding Rod *and* Rebar for service grounds? | Home Repair |