On 2/12/2015 8:04 AM, trader_4 wrote:
Or maybe he's
just panicked at getting old. (Like the rest of us.
I don't know. But that's his problem to work out.
Since his posts are almost always mean-spirited
and rarely helpful, I just ignore them.

Ignoring the truth, the basic facts that fly in the face
of your BS, that's why you don't learn. As to my posts always
being mean-spirited and not helpful, that's a lie too. I've
helped people here for years, before your dumb ass ever showed up.


In the early Mormon days, the mobs drove the Mormons
out of Palmyra NY, then out of Manchester NY, then
out of Harmony PA, then out of Kirtland Ohio, then
out of Nauvoo Illinois, then out of Far West Indiana,
and finally ending up in Salt Lake Valley.

But let one couple of irritated Mormons kill a few
antagonists in the Mountain Meadows Massacre, and that's
all Mormons hear about for the next hundred years.

On Usenet, you libs hurl insults all day. But let a
conservative winger dinger say "you dumb ass" and it
gets thrown back at us forever.

-
..
Christopher A. Young
learn more about Jesus
.. www.lds.org
..
..

On Thursday, February 12, 2015 at 8:20:28 AM UTC-5, Stormin Mormon wrote:
On 2/12/2015 8:04 AM, trader_4 wrote:
Or maybe he's
just panicked at getting old. (Like the rest of us.
I don't know. But that's his problem to work out.
Since his posts are almost always mean-spirited
and rarely helpful, I just ignore them.

Ignoring the truth, the basic facts that fly in the face
of your BS, that's why you don't learn. As to my posts always
being mean-spirited and not helpful, that's a lie too. I've
helped people here for years, before your dumb ass ever showed up.


In the early Mormon days, the mobs drove the Mormons
out of Palmyra NY, then out of Manchester NY, then
out of Harmony PA, then out of Kirtland Ohio, then
out of Nauvoo Illinois, then out of Far West Indiana,
and finally ending up in Salt Lake Valley.

But let one couple of irritated Mormons kill a few
antagonists in the Mountain Meadows Massacre, and that's
all Mormons hear about for the next hundred years.


Oh my! Have you informed Dear Leader of this? He could add that
to his next speech when he lectures us on how all religions do
bad things and compares ISIS of today to the Crusades of 1000 years ago
and the Jim Crow era South. ISIS? Is it ISIS or ISIL? First time in
history we're at war and the president calls the enemy something
different from 99% of the rest of us. What's up with that?

| Much of the Earth experience is for our benefit,
| and a lot of it is just "well, stuff happens".
| Sorry about all that snow. Where are you? I'm in
| western NY, USA.
|
I'm in Boston. You probably have a similar amount
of snow. I know that upstate NY is famous for lake
effect snow.

| Have you tried prayer, and then listening? Might
| find out why the snow drift.
|

You mean that I'm stuck shoveling all this snow
because I've "sinned", or maybe even because I'm
not a devout Mormon? That's a rather presumptuous
thing to say, even for a Mormon. It's serious business
to advise others on their own spiritual life. Likewise,
evangelism is the chief symptom of lacking faith.

On 2/12/2015 8:58 AM, trader_4 wrote:
Oh my! Have you informed Dear Leader of this? He could add that
to his next speech when he lectures us on how all religions do
bad things and compares ISIS of today to the Crusades of 1000 years ago
and the Jim Crow era South. ISIS? Is it ISIS or ISIL? First time in
history we're at war and the president calls the enemy something
different from 99% of the rest of us. What's up with that?


Can't possibly be that Beeho is a Muslim, that can't
be affecting any thing in this matter. Besides, didn't
he once say he was everyone's President?

-
..
Christopher A. Young
learn more about Jesus
.. www.lds.org
..
..

On 2/12/2015 9:35 AM, Mayayana wrote:
| Have you tried prayer, and then listening? Might
| find out why the snow drift.
|

You mean that I'm stuck shoveling all this snow
because I've "sinned", or maybe even because I'm
not a devout Mormon? That's a rather presumptuous
thing to say, even for a Mormon. It's serious business
to advise others on their own spiritual life. Likewise,
evangelism is the chief symptom of lacking faith.


One thing I also find with You Libs, is lots and
lots of absurde, false accusations.

Actually no, and no. And that's not what I wrote.

CFR about evangelism. I've never heard that.

-
..
Christopher A. Young
learn more about Jesus
.. www.lds.org
..
..

On 02/11/2015 02:11 PM, Mayayana wrote:
| She? No. It's Mayayana, Sanskrit for "vehicle
| of illusion", which seemed like a suitable pen name.
| It's not Maryanna.
|
| Okay, so do I refer to you in the feminine or masculine?
|

?? As I just said, I'm not a she. I'm a man.
A 59 y.o. carpenter and remodeling contractor.
I'm assuming you thought I was a woman
because of the name I use in newsgroups. That's
not a woman's name. It's just a Sanskrit word
I made up in order to have a unique pen name.



Mayayana, Dude,

Part to do with the name (May), which I did think was
a girl's name, and part to do with the way you write,
which is eloquent and profuse (girls talk a lot). If you
had not told me your were a carpenter and remodeling
contractor, I would have thought you were a professional
writer. Maybe you should be after you retire?

That is twice in two months I have referred to a dude
as a chick. Thank you for being a good sport.

-T

And I can't remember you ever making a single typo.
I probably made five in this letter alone.

On 02/11/2015 04:12 PM, Stormin Mormon wrote:
On 2/11/2015 12:28 PM, T wrote:
Keep it in the arena of ideas. How ofter do you
find someone on the other side that will actually
dialog like a gentleman with us? Mostly, the
other side just name calls. She does not.
Be nice!

-T


Not many liberals can stay on topic. I've
also noticed the endless dumping new distractions
into conversations, hurled accusations, name
calling, and it gets bad after that.

Hi Stormin,

It is like nailing jello to a wall. Mayayana
is a gentleman. It is rare now a days to find
a liberal that will do that.

I have a customer that is a retired engineering teacher
and a huge liberal. He is the old fashioned liberal
that actually believed in free speech. He loves
to talk politics.

What he does is unique. He first asks you what you
think on a subject. Then he repeats it back to you
and allows you to clarify things. He won't say
his part until you agree to with him that he totally
understands your viewpoint. Then he makes his point
based on what you said, not a bunch of name calling.
He is the most open minded liberal I have ever come
across.

He is a total blast. And because of his technique,
you actually listen to what he says. Today's
liberals seem to miss the point that if they
attack you for something you never said or never
thought of, that they are somehow going to bring
you around to their opinion. They really don't
understand what it means to participate in a
free society.

-T

On 2/12/2015 12:28 PM, T wrote:

Hi Stormin,

It is like nailing jello to a wall. Mayayana
is a gentleman. It is rare now a days to find
a liberal that will do that.

I have a customer that is a retired engineering teacher
and a huge liberal. He is the old fashioned liberal
that actually believed in free speech. He loves
to talk politics.

What he does is unique. He first asks you what you
think on a subject. Then he repeats it back to you
and allows you to clarify things. He won't say
his part until you agree to with him that he totally
understands your viewpoint. Then he makes his point
based on what you said, not a bunch of name calling.
He is the most open minded liberal I have ever come
across.

He is a total blast. And because of his technique,
you actually listen to what he says. Today's
liberals seem to miss the point that if they
attack you for something you never said or never
thought of, that they are somehow going to bring
you around to their opinion. They really don't
understand what it means to participate in a
free society.

-T


Many libs tend to read back "what you said" and
get it totally wrong. As May did a few hours ago,
or maybe yesterday. They try to make the reasonable
conservatives look like nut jobs that way. And
they try to evoke anger, which doesn't help the
thought process. Can't say as I've ever met a
reasonable or reasoning lib.

-
..
Christopher A. Young
learn more about Jesus
.. www.lds.org
..
..

| part to do with the way you write,
| which is eloquent and profuse (girls talk a lot).



| That is twice in two months I have referred to a dude
| as a chick. Thank you for being a good sport.
|

I don't mind, and the assumption is understandable.
It's actually come up before in this group, and
Trader_4 has continued to refer to me as "she" a
number of times. I didn't bother to correct it because
I figured he was probably doing it deliberately, thinking
it was an insult.

I might prefer being a "she" to being a "liberal",
though. Separating people into "us" and "you
libs" seems to pre-define nearly all topics so that
new angles can't be explored. Suddenly a discussion
becomes a sporting event, with teams trying to
beat each other, and anything one doesn't want to
hear can be dismissed as "typical of those other
people". I've never been political, and while
I'm probably more liberal than conservative I don't
feel comfortable on either side. The way I see it,
the former veers too far toward unrealistic socialism
while the latter goes too far toward monarchy. But
I suspect that statement will raise some hoots. The
people who like to say "you libs" just don't allow
anyone to define shades of gray.

Stormin Mormon wrote:
On 2/12/2015 12:28 PM, T wrote:

Hi Stormin,

It is like nailing jello to a wall. Mayayana
is a gentleman. It is rare now a days to find
a liberal that will do that.

I have a customer that is a retired engineering teacher
and a huge liberal. He is the old fashioned liberal
that actually believed in free speech. He loves
to talk politics.

What he does is unique. He first asks you what you
think on a subject. Then he repeats it back to you
and allows you to clarify things. He won't say
his part until you agree to with him that he totally
understands your viewpoint. Then he makes his point
based on what you said, not a bunch of name calling.
He is the most open minded liberal I have ever come
across.

He is a total blast. And because of his technique,
you actually listen to what he says. Today's
liberals seem to miss the point that if they
attack you for something you never said or never
thought of, that they are somehow going to bring
you around to their opinion. They really don't
understand what it means to participate in a
free society.

-T


Many libs tend to read back "what you said" and
get it totally wrong. As May did a few hours ago,
or maybe yesterday. They try to make the reasonable
conservatives look like nut jobs that way. And
they try to evoke anger, which doesn't help the
thought process. Can't say as I've ever met a
reasonable or reasoning lib.

-
.
Christopher A. Young
learn more about Jesus
. www.lds.org
.
.

With such a large fraction of the population of the U.S. being liberal /
democratic voters, isn't it really way too overly simplistic to lump people
into a mindless description which categorically describes liberals as not
being 'reasonable' or 'reasoning' people.

Wouldn't that be like saying all Mormons wear magic underwear ??.....

On Thursday, February 12, 2015 at 5:38:26 PM UTC-5, Mayayana wrote:
| part to do with the way you write,
| which is eloquent and profuse (girls talk a lot).



| That is twice in two months I have referred to a dude
| as a chick. Thank you for being a good sport.
|

I don't mind, and the assumption is understandable.
It's actually come up before in this group, and
Trader_4 has continued to refer to me as "she" a
number of times. I didn't bother to correct it because
I figured he was probably doing it deliberately, thinking
it was an insult.



Good grief. Like I'm the only one who thought you were a woman
because of your handle.



I might prefer being a "she" to being a "liberal",
though.

Why? Are you ashamed of what you are?



Separating people into "us" and "you
libs" seems to pre-define nearly all topics so that
new angles can't be explored. Suddenly a discussion
becomes a sporting event, with teams trying to
beat each other, and anything one doesn't want to
hear can be dismissed as "typical of those other
people".

Oh please. This is like pretending that the reason Republicans
and Democrats can't come to agreement on many issues is because
they just don't like each other and totally ignoring that at the heart
of it are deeply held core differences.



I've never been political,

Really? It was *you* who just falsely tried to place the
blame on the conservatives on the Supreme Court for letting
Monsanto's win stand. At least that's the case I think you
were bitching about, because as usual, you libs don't have
much in the way of actual factt. You never told us what case
you were talking about. But assuming it's the one regarding
Monsanto GMO, you lamented that the SC need
to change because the conservatives were a problem. Of course
the truth is that the SC let the appeals court ruling in Monanto's
favor stand by not taking the case. It only takes 4 votes to take
a case, so obviously the libs on the court agreed.

Just the facts.





and while
I'm probably more liberal than conservative I don't
feel comfortable on either side. The way I see it,
the former veers too far toward unrealistic socialism
while the latter goes too far toward monarchy.

Which shows how ignorant you are of conservative positions.
Conservatives greatly fear the power of a large, central
govt. A monarchy is the last thing they'd want. It's libs
that welcome big govt and the current lib president is the
one acting like a monarch, eg his recent illegal immigration
stunt.



But
I suspect that statement will raise some hoots. The
people who like to say "you libs" just don't allow
anyone to define shades of gray.

Not when it's done with another pile of BS. Conservatives
and monarchy? Good grief you're dumb.

"Smarty" wrote in message
...

stuff snipped

With such a large fraction of the population of the U.S. being liberal /
democratic voters, isn't it really way too overly simplistic to lump
people
into a mindless description which categorically describes liberals as not
being 'reasonable' or 'reasoning' people.

It's fascinating to see someone like SM who's apparently completely unaware
of the hypocrisy of claiming a entire group of people aren't "good folk like
us" - especially after some of his more impressive tirades like the one
claiming that homosexuals should be put to death. Then there was his
charming Nazi run-in with HeyBub and oh so many other hypocritical moments
that earned him a place in my kill file. All signed with his Jesus sig.

Jesus would weep at the number of times his name has been put on similiar
intemperate messages that run completely counter to everything Jesus
preached. I gave up counting the number of times I've read his messages
bearing false witness against people he clearly dislikes. But then, what
good are the Ten Commandments to someone willing to tar more than half the
country with insults about their intellect with absolutely no proof.
Fortunately I only see his "words of wisdom" when someone quotes him. Given
how many posts he apparently makes each month, he must be in a *lot* of
kill-files.

Wouldn't that be like saying all Mormons wear magic underwear ??.....

That reminds me, a while back he was going on about how all black kids wear
their caps backwards and wear baggy pants that hang below their waist. It
was particularly delicious hypocrisy from a person who follows a religion
with a specific (and very unusual) dress code. People in glass houses as
the saying goes . . .

--
Bobby G.

On 02/12/2015 02:39 PM, Mayayana wrote:
| part to do with the way you write,
| which is eloquent and profuse (girls talk a lot).



| That is twice in two months I have referred to a dude
| as a chick. Thank you for being a good sport.
|

I don't mind, and the assumption is understandable.
It's actually come up before in this group, and
Trader_4 has continued to refer to me as "she" a
number of times. I didn't bother to correct it because
I figured he was probably doing it deliberately, thinking
it was an insult.

I might prefer being a "she" to being a "liberal",
though. Separating people into "us" and "you
libs" seems to pre-define nearly all topics so that
new angles can't be explored. Suddenly a discussion
becomes a sporting event, with teams trying to
beat each other, and anything one doesn't want to
hear can be dismissed as "typical of those other
people". I've never been political, and while
I'm probably more liberal than conservative I don't
feel comfortable on either side. The way I see it,
the former veers too far toward unrealistic socialism
while the latter goes too far toward monarchy. But
I suspect that statement will raise some hoots. The
people who like to say "you libs" just don't allow
anyone to define shades of gray.

Hi Mayayana,

For a republic to survive, it is necessary that we
have free and open dialog. You are correct about the
sporting event description. It is not good for
our republic. You do a good job.

You will have to excuse us over on the Conservative camp.
We are use to getting insults hurled at us: racist, sexist,
deniers (a religious extremist term), etc.. We don't always
react well to someone who disagrees with us, as we think,
"here we go again". Most liberals just name call and shout
at us these days. The "arena of ideas" means nothing to most
of them anymore.

By the way, it gets rather boring if everyone agrees with
you as it is annoying when no one agrees with you.

-T

On 02/13/2015 05:18 AM, trader_4 wrote:
Which shows how ignorant you are of conservative positions.
Conservatives greatly fear the power of a large, central
govt. A monarchy is the last thing they'd want. It's libs
that welcome big govt and the current lib president is the
one acting like a monarch, eg his recent illegal immigration
stunt.

Liberals do tend to believe some rather wild stuff about us.
Then they attack us for it and won't listen to a thing we say.
Oh ya, the Tea Party is racist.

On 02/12/2015 02:30 PM, Stormin Mormon wrote:
On 2/12/2015 12:28 PM, T wrote:

Hi Stormin,

It is like nailing jello to a wall. Mayayana
is a gentleman. It is rare now a days to find
a liberal that will do that.

I have a customer that is a retired engineering teacher
and a huge liberal. He is the old fashioned liberal
that actually believed in free speech. He loves
to talk politics.

What he does is unique. He first asks you what you
think on a subject. Then he repeats it back to you
and allows you to clarify things. He won't say
his part until you agree to with him that he totally
understands your viewpoint. Then he makes his point
based on what you said, not a bunch of name calling.
He is the most open minded liberal I have ever come
across.

He is a total blast. And because of his technique,
you actually listen to what he says. Today's
liberals seem to miss the point that if they
attack you for something you never said or never
thought of, that they are somehow going to bring
you around to their opinion. They really don't
understand what it means to participate in a
free society.

-T


Many libs tend to read back "what you said" and
get it totally wrong. As May did a few hours ago,
or maybe yesterday. They try to make the reasonable
conservatives look like nut jobs that way. And
they try to evoke anger, which doesn't help the
thought process. Can't say as I've ever met a
reasonable or reasoning lib.

The reason I love talking politics with this guy, is
that he makes sure I agree his him as to his understanding
of my viewpoint before he proceeds. They also look
for keyword that mean you are this or that. Most of
the time we don't even know what they are talking about.

Actually I have, but I can count them on one hand.

On Fri, 13 Feb 2015 14:07:16 -0800, T wrote:

You will have to excuse us over on the Conservative camp.
We are use to getting insults hurled at us: racist, sexist,
deniers (a religious extremist term), etc.. We don't always
react well to someone who disagrees with us, as we think,
"here we go again". Most liberals just name call and shout
at us these days. The "arena of ideas" means nothing to most
of them anymore.


Bingo Todd.

When the liberals call you a racist, you know they have lost the
argument! They think you are not entitled to your opinion. According
to them you have to conform with their perception of reality.

By the way, it gets rather boring if everyone agrees with
you as it is annoying when no one agrees with you.

Like we said in the business; it takes all kinds to run a prison

On Fri, 13 Feb 2015 14:09:31 -0800, T wrote:

Liberals do tend to believe some rather wild stuff about us.
Then they attack us for it and won't listen to a thing we say.
Oh ya, the Tea Party is racist.

You do know that liberals think of themselves as superior thinkers,
right? Only they are allowed to think and impose their views on you.
Disagree and you are a racist. Your;re not smart.

Ask one on them "what is a racist". They can't answer and then go
silent on the subject.

Actually, it is a mental problem.

So God Made A Liberal...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=EUzMPlQb2G4

On 2/13/2015 5:07 PM, T wrote:
Most liberals just name call and shout
at us these days. The "arena of ideas" means nothing to most
of them anymore.

By the way, it gets rather boring if everyone agrees with
you as it is annoying when no one agrees with you.

-T


I can't say as I ever remember having an honest
and factual discussion with one of you libs, it
rapidly either becomes name calling, or one
absurd accusation after another. The maturity
level you libs display is really lacking.

-
..
Christopher A. Young
learn more about Jesus
.. www.lds.org
..
..

On 2/13/2015 5:09 PM, T wrote:
Liberals do tend to believe some rather wild stuff about us.
Then they attack us for it and won't listen to a thing we say.
Oh ya, the Tea Party is racist.

When faced with the truth, you libs believe the
liberal party line, not the evidence or certainly
not the conservative right in front of you who
is telling the truth.

-
..
Christopher A. Young
learn more about Jesus
.. www.lds.org
..
..

On 02/13/2015 05:08 PM, Stormin Mormon wrote:
On 2/13/2015 5:09 PM, T wrote:
Liberals do tend to believe some rather wild stuff about us.
Then they attack us for it and won't listen to a thing we say.
Oh ya, the Tea Party is racist.

When faced with the truth, you libs believe the
liberal party line, not the evidence or certainly
not the conservative right in front of you who
is telling the truth.

That is because it is a religion

On 02/13/2015 03:00 PM, Oren wrote:
On Fri, 13 Feb 2015 14:07:16 -0800, T wrote:

You will have to excuse us over on the Conservative camp.
We are use to getting insults hurled at us: racist, sexist,
deniers (a religious extremist term), etc.. We don't always
react well to someone who disagrees with us, as we think,
"here we go again". Most liberals just name call and shout
at us these days. The "arena of ideas" means nothing to most
of them anymore.


Bingo Todd.

When the liberals call you a racist, you know they have lost the
argument! They think you are not entitled to your opinion. According
to them you have to conform with their perception of reality.

By the way, it gets rather boring if everyone agrees with
you as it is annoying when no one agrees with you.

Like we said in the business; it takes all kinds to run a prison


The level of elitism is beyond comprehension. They truly
think they know better how to run other's lives

On Fri, 13 Feb 2015 17:22:07 -0800, T wrote:

On 02/13/2015 03:00 PM, Oren wrote:
On Fri, 13 Feb 2015 14:07:16 -0800, T wrote:

You will have to excuse us over on the Conservative camp.
We are use to getting insults hurled at us: racist, sexist,
deniers (a religious extremist term), etc.. We don't always
react well to someone who disagrees with us, as we think,
"here we go again". Most liberals just name call and shout
at us these days. The "arena of ideas" means nothing to most
of them anymore.


Bingo Todd.

When the liberals call you a racist, you know they have lost the
argument! They think you are not entitled to your opinion. According
to them you have to conform with their perception of reality.

By the way, it gets rather boring if everyone agrees with
you as it is annoying when no one agrees with you.

Like we said in the business; it takes all kinds to run a prison


The level of elitism is beyond comprehension. They truly
think they know better how to run other's lives

Airhead Liberal Political Disorder (ALPD) is in fact a mental
disorder.

http://familysecuritymatters.org/publications/id.5529/pub_detail.asp

Doctors are tying to treat it.

On Friday, February 13, 2015 at 3:19:33 PM UTC-5, Robert Green wrote:
"Smarty" wrote in message
...

stuff snipped

With such a large fraction of the population of the U.S. being liberal /
democratic voters, isn't it really way too overly simplistic to lump
people
into a mindless description which categorically describes liberals as not
being 'reasonable' or 'reasoning' people.

It's fascinating to see someone like SM who's apparently completely unaware
of the hypocrisy of claiming a entire group of people aren't "good folk like
us" - especially after some of his more impressive tirades like the one
claiming that homosexuals should be put to death. Then there was his
charming Nazi run-in with HeyBub and oh so many other hypocritical moments
that earned him a place in my kill file. All signed with his Jesus sig.

Jesus would weep at the number of times his name has been put on similiar
intemperate messages that run completely counter to everything Jesus
preached. I gave up counting the number of times I've read his messages
bearing false witness against people he clearly dislikes. But then, what
good are the Ten Commandments to someone willing to tar more than half the
country with insults about their intellect with absolutely no proof.

Wait! But there is proof:

http://dailycaller.com/2012/04/22/sc...d-open-minded/


"Yet another new survey shows that Republican supporters know more about politics and political history than Democrats.

On eight of 13 questions about politics, Republicans outscored Democrats by an average of 18 percentage points, according to a new Pew survey titled "Partisan Differences in Knowledge."

The Pew survey adds to a wave of surveys and studies showing that GOP-sympathizers are better informed, more intellectually consistent, more open-minded, more empathetic and more receptive to criticism than their fellow Americans who support the Democratic Party."

On 02/14/2015 05:51 AM, trader_4 wrote:
On Friday, February 13, 2015 at 3:19:33 PM UTC-5, Robert Green wrote:
"Smarty" wrote in message
...

stuff snipped

With such a large fraction of the population of the U.S. being liberal /
democratic voters, isn't it really way too overly simplistic to lump
people
into a mindless description which categorically describes liberals as not
being 'reasonable' or 'reasoning' people.

It's fascinating to see someone like SM who's apparently completely unaware
of the hypocrisy of claiming a entire group of people aren't "good folk like
us" - especially after some of his more impressive tirades like the one
claiming that homosexuals should be put to death. Then there was his
charming Nazi run-in with HeyBub and oh so many other hypocritical moments
that earned him a place in my kill file. All signed with his Jesus sig.

Jesus would weep at the number of times his name has been put on similiar
intemperate messages that run completely counter to everything Jesus
preached. I gave up counting the number of times I've read his messages
bearing false witness against people he clearly dislikes. But then, what
good are the Ten Commandments to someone willing to tar more than half the
country with insults about their intellect with absolutely no proof.

Wait! But there is proof:

http://dailycaller.com/2012/04/22/sc...d-open-minded/


"Yet another new survey shows that Republican supporters know more about politics and political history than Democrats.

On eight of 13 questions about politics, Republicans outscored Democrats by an average of 18 percentage points, according to a new Pew survey titled "Partisan Differences in Knowledge."

The Pew survey adds to a wave of surveys and studies showing that GOP-sympathizers are better informed, more intellectually consistent, more open-minded, more empathetic and more receptive to criticism than their fellow Americans who support the Democratic Party."




This is news?

On 2/13/2015 8:22 PM, T wrote:
By the way, it gets rather boring if everyone agrees with
you as it is annoying when no one agrees with you.

Like we said in the business; it takes all kinds to run a prison


The level of elitism is beyond comprehension. They truly
think they know better how to run other's lives

I talked to a you lib years ago. I asked about
the various stats about who pays how much of
the taxes. Is it fair if a poor person pays
zero, and a rich person pays 75%.

you lib said yes that's fine.
why?
You lib said cause they can afford to.

Now libs tell rich people how much they can afford.


-
..
Christopher A. Young
learn more about Jesus
.. www.lds.org
..
..

On 2/13/2015 8:38 PM, Oren wrote:
On Fri, 13 Feb 2015 17:22:07 -0800, T wrote:


The level of elitism is beyond comprehension. They truly
think they know better how to run other's lives

Airhead Liberal Political Disorder (ALPD) is in fact a mental
disorder.

http://familysecuritymatters.org/publications/id.5529/pub_detail.asp

Doctors are tying to treat it.


Treat, how? I can't imagine how I'd even
begin to adress that condition.

-
..
Christopher A. Young
learn more about Jesus
.. www.lds.org
..
..

On Sat, 14 Feb 2015 15:09:37 -0500, Stormin Mormon
wrote:

On 2/13/2015 8:38 PM, Oren wrote:
On Fri, 13 Feb 2015 17:22:07 -0800, T wrote:


The level of elitism is beyond comprehension. They truly
think they know better how to run other's lives

Airhead Liberal Political Disorder (ALPD) is in fact a mental
disorder.

http://familysecuritymatters.org/publications/id.5529/pub_detail.asp

Doctors are tying to treat it.


Treat, how? I can't imagine how I'd even
begin to adress that condition.

""Shhh. Be vewy vewy quiet, I'm hunting wabbits""

On Sat, 14 Feb 2015 15:04:47 -0500, Stormin Mormon
wrote:

On 2/13/2015 8:22 PM, T wrote:
By the way, it gets rather boring if everyone agrees with
you as it is annoying when no one agrees with you.

Like we said in the business; it takes all kinds to run a prison


The level of elitism is beyond comprehension. They truly
think they know better how to run other's lives

I talked to a you lib years ago. I asked about
the various stats about who pays how much of
the taxes. Is it fair if a poor person pays
zero, and a rich person pays 75%.

you lib said yes that's fine.
why?
You lib said cause they can afford to.

Now libs tell rich people how much they can afford.


Why do you seem so surprised?

For the record, you do not always need to listen to 'educated idiots'.

On Sat, 14 Feb 2015 11:59:47 -0800, T wrote:

Wait! But there is proof:

http://dailycaller.com/2012/04/22/sc...d-open-minded/


"Yet another new survey shows that Republican supporters know more about politics and political history than Democrats.

On eight of 13 questions about politics, Republicans outscored Democrats by an average of 18 percentage points, according to a new Pew survey titled "Partisan Differences in Knowledge."

The Pew survey adds to a wave of surveys and studies showing that GOP-sympathizers are better informed, more intellectually consistent, more open-minded, more empathetic and more receptive to criticism than their fellow Americans who support the Democratic Party."




This is news?

No! Conservatives are also more charitable, donate more blood than
liberals and poor conservatives contribute more to help the down
trodden.

On 2/14/2015 4:51 PM, Oren wrote:

Conservatives are also more charitable, donate more blood than
liberals and poor conservatives contribute more to help the down
trodden.


Myself, 57 pints of blood donated, if I remember
right. Might be more. I also donate what I can
to church, to help the poor and.

-
..
Christopher A. Young
learn more about Jesus
.. www.lds.org
..
..

On Sat, 14 Feb 2015 18:35:14 -0500, Stormin Mormon
wrote:

On 2/14/2015 4:51 PM, Oren wrote:

Conservatives are also more charitable, donate more blood than
liberals and poor conservatives contribute more to help the down
trodden.


Myself, 57 pints of blood donated, if I remember
right. Might be more. I also donate what I can
to church, to help the poor and.


Conservatives do also give more time in volunteerism for community
service. I donate to Veterans and abused women shelters, little as it
is. Every little bit helps.

Ask Joe Biden what his charitable donations are. It shows liberal
democrats are not generous in every instance.

On 02/14/2015 03:35 PM, Stormin Mormon wrote:
On 2/14/2015 4:51 PM, Oren wrote:

Conservatives are also more charitable, donate more blood than
liberals and poor conservatives contribute more to help the down
trodden.


Myself, 57 pints of blood donated, if I remember
right. Might be more. I also donate what I can
to church, to help the poor and.

A liberal's idea of charity is to hit someone else over
the head, take their money, give most of it to their friends,
and spend what little is left over on some cause they support.
Give their own money and/or time? Not going to happen.

They don't understand that "Government" and "Society" are
two different things