Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
Home Repair (alt.home.repair) For all homeowners and DIYers with many experienced tradesmen. Solve your toughest home fix-it problems. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#41
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
California electric rates are getting ridiculous
BobR wrote:
.... I believe there are safe ways to dispose of it but until a valid plan is in place to do so, we have no damn business creating yet more waste. Right now, there is nothing but stockpiling the stuff in holding areas that are an ever increasing hazard to everyone. Find a solution, prove it, implement it and then lets talk about building new facilities. Until then, NO! Unfortunately, we need the power now and the problem to be solved is primarily political, not technical. As noted upthread, Reid has been using Yucca Mountain as his own personal populist whipping boy to his personal advantage for nearly 30 years. Once it does finally open and we can move stuff from the spent fuel pools, there really is no crisis as far as ultimate disposal by whatever means is finally allowed. Again, that will primarily be a political, not technical decision. -- |
#42
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
California electric rates are getting ridiculous
On Thu, 04 Dec 2008 16:00:44 -0600, dpb wrote:
BobR wrote: ... I believe there are safe ways to dispose of it but until a valid plan is in place to do so, we have no damn business creating yet more waste. Right now, there is nothing but stockpiling the stuff in holding areas that are an ever increasing hazard to everyone. Find a solution, prove it, implement it and then lets talk about building new facilities. Until then, NO! Unfortunately, we need the power now and the problem to be solved is primarily political, not technical. As noted upthread, Reid has been using Yucca Mountain as his own personal populist whipping boy to his personal advantage for nearly 30 years. Once it does finally open and we can move stuff from the spent fuel pools, there really is no crisis as far as ultimate disposal by whatever means is finally allowed. Again, that will primarily be a political, not technical decision. Harry "Pinky" Reid says Yucca Mountain will not open. Other recent comment (DAGS). "DOE: Cost Estimate Soars for Yucca Mountain Project 08/06/2008 By Pam Hunter and Tom Ichniowski The cost of the proposed nuclear waste repository beneath Nevada’s Yucca Mountain has risen sharply. The Dept. of Energy reported on Aug. 5 the project’s estimated 150-year life-cycle cost is $96.2 billion, up 67% from 2001’s $57.5-billion. DOE says the hike includes $16 billion for inflation and a 26% rise in the amount of spent fuel to be disposed. Construction, operation and decommissioning comprise $54.8 billion of the new figure." http://enr.ecnext.com/coms2/article_newaar080806d Intersting photos he http://www.yuccamountain.org/photo.htm |
#43
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
California electric rates are getting ridiculous
Oren wrote:
.... Harry "Pinky" Reid says Yucca Mountain will not open. .... Oh, it _will_ open, the question is just how much longer Harry can keep dragging it out. There simply isn't a viable alternative any longer and it is inevitable imo there will begin to be brownouts before we final get past the quagmire which is (also imo) only going to deepen w/ the next adminstration which will focus on the utopian dreams which will turn out to be unrealizable in time if ever. At that point, public opinion will change dramatically and Harry won't matter any longer. pictures, etc., ... did quite a bit of work there years ago thru consulting firm was working for at the time. Always hated it when was short enough of other work that ever had to work on DOE-sponsored stuff instead of commercial, but in Oak Ridge one always had to hold one's nose and do what needed doing on occasion to stay in groceries. -- |
#44
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
California electric rates are getting ridiculous
On Dec 4, 3:29*pm, "HeyBub" wrote:
BobR wrote: On Dec 4, 11:27 am, "HeyBub" wrote: BobR wrote: What makes the cost so bizarre is the anti-nuclear movement! Fifteen years of litigation, design changes ten times the requirements of engineering best practices, abundant political machinations, all contribute to the bill. Who needs the grief?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - I agree on most respects but the one cost that has been and continues to be ignored is how to dispose of the contaminated waste. This cost is growing and may well be the biggest expense we will yet pay for nuclear power. Until this issue is resolved, there should be NO FURTHER development of nuclear power plants. And before you get on your high horse about me being anti-nuclear, I am not. I simply believe that we have to solve the disposal problems before we increase the problems beyond the point of no return. This is straw-man argument. No decision has been made on the disposal of nuclear waste because a decision is not yet necessary! There are several seemingly-excellent disposal techniques: Imbedding the waste in molten glass and sinking the ingots in the Marinaras Trench, shooting the waste into the sun, pumping the stuff into abandonded salt mines, yak-yak-yak. There is almost no end to possible fixes. Until we HAVE to make a decision, it is best to DELAY the decision on the chance a better solution will present itself. Suppose, for example, the glass-ingot method were put into play. Then, ten years from now, somebody discovers you can turn radioactive material into burgers and feed the world. Can you imagine the effort and treasure necessary to retrieve all those ingots from five miles under water? If, on the other hand, we had shot the waste into the sun, we'd NEVER be able to get it back (unless we went at night).- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - I believe there are safe ways to dispose of it but until a valid plan is in place to do so, we have no damn business creating yet more waste. *Right now, there is nothing but stockpiling the stuff in holding areas that are an ever increasing hazard to everyone. *Find a solution, prove it, implement it and then lets talk about building new facilities. *Until then, NO! We HAVE a plan! The plan is to NOT dispose of the stuff until we HAVE to dispose of the stuff. At the moment we can no longer safely store the waste, we'll pick from competing alternatives. Until then, it is prudent and responsible to wait for any alternative methods that haven't yet made it to the party. NOT disposing of nuclear waste is far preferable to disposing of it the wrong way.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - That's not a plan, its a disaster just waiting to happen. It just plain stupid and anyone with half a brain would recognize that. What you have just said is that you don't have a valid alternative for disposal so you just ignore the problem in the hope that some way will eventually be found BEFORE a disaster occurs. |
#45
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
California electric rates are getting ridiculous
On Dec 4, 4:00*pm, dpb wrote:
BobR wrote: ... I believe there are safe ways to dispose of it but until a valid plan is in place to do so, we have no damn business creating yet more waste. *Right now, there is nothing but stockpiling the stuff in holding areas that are an ever increasing hazard to everyone. *Find a solution, prove it, implement it and then lets talk about building new facilities. *Until then, NO! Unfortunately, we need the power now and the problem to be solved is primarily political, not technical. As noted upthread, Reid has been using Yucca Mountain as his own personal populist whipping boy to his personal advantage for nearly 30 years. *Once it does finally open and we can move stuff from the spent fuel pools, there really is no crisis as far as ultimate disposal by whatever means is finally allowed. *Again, that will primarily be a political, not technical decision. -- We already have more nuclear waste waiting to be disposed of that can be put into the Yucca Mountain site if it were opened tomorrow and it is not ready to be opened. Political or Technical, it is a problem that must be addressed before it becomes a disaster not after. |
#46
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
California electric rates are getting ridiculous
h wrote: "Pete C." wrote in message ster.com... Norminn wrote: Stormin Mormon wrote: Subsidized: Where the government takes money, by force, from the citizens. To pay for something that the citizens don't want to think they are really actually paying for. I'm sure California could have lower energy prices, if they raised taxes to pay the difference. Then, they could be just as socialist as Albeeta. How is giving my money to big banks NOT Socialist? And why do Socialist countries have a much higher standard of living than we do? Care to give an example of such a socialist country with a higher standard of living than that in the US? Sweden. And just a point, the US doesn't even make the top ten list of countries with the highest standard of living, although Canada, Finland, Norway, and Sweden all do. Care to provide cites to that ranking and to the criteria used to determine it? I expect an objective eye will find significant bias in the criteria, intentional or unintentional. It could well be unintentional as I've found in much dealings with Europeans that they have great difficulty grasping just how large and diverse the US is (The entire UK would fit into Texas something like 3.5X) and that one seemingly bad statistic in one city in no way applies to the entire US. I can't say I've been to Sweden, Norway or Finland, however I have been to Canada numerous times and from everything I've seen, the standard of living there is not any better than that in the US. |
#47
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
California electric rates are getting ridiculous
On Dec 4, 4:39*pm, dpb wrote:
Oren wrote: ... Harry "Pinky" Reid says Yucca Mountain will not open. ... Oh, it _will_ open, the question is just how much longer Harry can keep dragging it out. *There simply isn't a viable alternative any longer and it is inevitable imo there will begin to be brownouts before we final get past the quagmire which is (also imo) only going to deepen w/ the next adminstration which will focus on the utopian dreams which will turn out to be unrealizable in time if ever. *At that point, public opinion will change dramatically and Harry won't matter any longer. pictures, etc., ... did quite a bit of work there years ago thru consulting firm was working for at the time. *Always hated it when was short enough of other work that ever had to work on DOE-sponsored stuff instead of commercial, but in Oak Ridge one always had to hold one's nose and do what needed doing on occasion to stay in groceries. -- Obama has made it clear in the past that he does not favor nuclear power and Reid will not have any problem getting his support to continue to stonewall. |
#48
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
California electric rates are getting ridiculous
On Dec 4, 9:47*am, Jim Yanik wrote:
"Pete C." wrote onster.com: David Nebenzahl wrote: anti babble deleted Nuclear energy is "green", both safe and non polluting and given proper reprocessing, largely renewable. Nuclear is also the only source that is currently viable at the scale necessary to eliminate coal and nat gas fueled generation, and further to provide subsidized charging electricity for electric/hybrid vehicles to further reduce oil consumption. Nuclear is the only viable intermediate source that can allow a significant shift away from fossil fuels *now* while the technologies for other sources such as solar, wind, hydro and tidal develop further to overcome the significant issues they currently have, largely the utility scale energy storage capabilities required given the intermittent generation of most of those sources. plus you have to remember that the greenies are against dams, so that kills hydropower,and they are against windmills because they kill birds. They also are against the power lines necessary to distribute the electric power from remote windfarms.(or any other power generating source...) Their concept is that you DO WITHOUT;Reduce your lifestyle. Meanwhile Russia,Iran,Venezuela,other countries all are proceeding with new nuclear powerplants. Nebenzahl is just a Luddite. MORE nuclear power,NOW! -- Jim Yanik jyanik at kua.net- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - You should have put it slightly differently. Their concept is that YOU DO WITHOUT just like Gore wanted everyone (But Him) to do without while he continued to burn more energy that any 50 other people in the country. They never want to look in the mirror at their own consumption but are quick to ask YOU to sacrifice. |
#49
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
California electric rates are getting ridiculous
BobR wrote:
On Dec 4, 4:39 pm, dpb wrote: Oren wrote: ... Harry "Pinky" Reid says Yucca Mountain will not open. ... Oh, it _will_ open, the question is just how much longer Harry can keep dragging it out. There simply isn't a viable alternative any longer and it is inevitable imo there will begin to be brownouts before we final get past the quagmire which is (also imo) only going to deepen w/ the next adminstration which will focus on the utopian dreams which will turn out to be unrealizable in time if ever. At that point, public opinion will change dramatically and Harry won't matter any longer. pictures, etc., ... did quite a bit of work there years ago thru consulting firm was working for at the time. Always hated it when was short enough of other work that ever had to work on DOE-sponsored stuff instead of commercial, but in Oak Ridge one always had to hold one's nose and do what needed doing on occasion to stay in groceries. -- Obama has made it clear in the past that he does not favor nuclear power and Reid will not have any problem getting his support to continue to stonewall. Until the lights go out...then sentiment will change overnight. And, unless something is done sizably w/ conventional generation of one sort or the other, it's inevitable assuming he's not so adamant the he does actually drive the boat into a complete economic collapse. It's simply not possible w/ any short term alternative technology on the present horizon. And, don't forget, there are 28+ new units already filed on the NRC licensing docket. There will be some delay owing to the current slowdown undoubtedly that will allow for some additional deferral of demand, but as those new units approach operation and time continues w/ operating units, the spent fuel pools _will_ have to be emptied or the current units will have to shut down with nothing to replace them. And, of course, also as noted upthread don't forget that if the big-O and his minions are really serious about C-sequestration, there simply is no large-scale alternative w/ the necessary reliability factor. Solar and wind are simply too intermittent for more than the 20% sort of contribution unless he can figure out how to pull a Joshua on the solar and harness the hot air from DC for the wind. Otherwise, afaik, the one sets every night still and will probably continue to do so and the other is sporadic even in the windiest of areas, also somewhat inconveniently at typical minimums in the height of summer and the depth of winter; the two highest demand times of the year. It's a case of reality will trump hoping for in the end. -- |
#50
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
California electric rates are getting ridiculous
On Wed, 3 Dec 2008 20:25:38 -0800, scorpster wrote:
I just received a notice from California Edison that Tier 3, 4 and 5 rates are increasing AGAIN in the first quarter of 2009. My electric bill is typically $400 a month. I don't think very many people fall into Tier 1 or 2. Here's what really ****es me off: the electric utilities fail to take advantage of clean nuclear power. They keep wasting our money on natural gas, wind power, and all kinds of inefficient "green" ideas but they are blind to nuclear power. If we had nuclear power we'd only be paying a fraction of the price and it would be good for the environment!! Blame the envirowackos who have fought nuclear power and the stupid politicians and judges who caved in to their demands and the stupid California residents for continuing to elect morons, like the sex offender governator. |
#51
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
California electric rates are getting ridiculous
BobR wrote:
On Dec 4, 4:00 pm, dpb wrote: BobR wrote: ... I believe there are safe ways to dispose of it but until a valid plan is in place to do so, we have no damn business creating yet more waste. Right now, there is nothing but stockpiling the stuff in holding areas that are an ever increasing hazard to everyone. Find a solution, prove it, implement it and then lets talk about building new facilities. Until then, NO! Unfortunately, we need the power now and the problem to be solved is primarily political, not technical. As noted upthread, Reid has been using Yucca Mountain as his own personal populist whipping boy to his personal advantage for nearly 30 years. Once it does finally open and we can move stuff from the spent fuel pools, there really is no crisis as far as ultimate disposal by whatever means is finally allowed. Again, that will primarily be a political, not technical decision. -- We already have more nuclear waste waiting to be disposed of that can be put into the Yucca Mountain site if it were opened tomorrow and it is not ready to be opened. Political or Technical, it is a problem that must be addressed before it becomes a disaster not after. Change the politics, then. And, of course, it doesn't take anything near the complexity of Yucca Mountain for spent fuel storage. -- |
#52
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
California electric rates are getting ridiculous
Norminn wrote: Someone said we should just keep the nuclear waste until we develop technology to make it safe..........nukes take fuel, too. We have the technology to make it safe - reprocess it and reuse it in the plants. That cycle can continue so long as to make nuclear energy effectively renewable. As for the greenie who babbled about the sun and it being inexhaustible - wrong, it will run out of energy one day too. |
#53
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
California electric rates are getting ridiculous
On Thu, 04 Dec 2008 16:39:03 -0600, dpb wrote:
Oren wrote: ... Harry "Pinky" Reid says Yucca Mountain will not open. ... Oh, it _will_ open, the question is just how much longer Harry can keep dragging it out. There simply isn't a viable alternative any longer and it is inevitable imo there will begin to be brownouts before we final get past the quagmire which is (also imo) only going to deepen w/ the next adminstration which will focus on the utopian dreams which will turn out to be unrealizable in time if ever. At that point, public opinion will change dramatically and Harry won't matter any longer. Harry don't matter anyway, imo. I think completion is due in 2020? Just a layman here, BUT there are a lot of transport problems to be faced in our future. Particularly trucking and train safety. pictures, etc., ... did quite a bit of work there years ago thru consulting firm was working for at the time. What about earthquakes at Yucca Mt.? Just yesterday Vegas had a small quake. "LAS VEGAS -- A 2.6 magnitude earthquake could be felt across the Valley Wednesday night, according to the National Earthquake Center. The minor earthquake originated from the area of East Lake Mead and North Nellis boulevards, near Nellis Air Force Base." http://www.fox5vegas.com/news/18199923/detail.html |
#54
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
California electric rates are getting ridiculous
Oren wrote:
.... Just a layman here, BUT there are a lot of transport problems to be faced in our future. Particularly trucking and train safety. No. Spent fuel transport casks have been demonstrated experimentally to take direct hit from 70-mph railroad locomotive followed by fire and not leak contamination. There's no significant radioactive risk. .... What about earthquakes at Yucca Mt.? Just yesterday Vegas had a small quake. .... What about them? If worst were to come to worst, it will simply bury the waste underground. Meanwhile, the facility is designed to accommodate seismic activity. There are far more real dangers and boogey men to worry over in this world. -- |
#55
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
California electric rates are getting ridiculous
dpb wrote:
Oren wrote: ... Just a layman here, BUT there are a lot of transport problems to be faced in our future. Particularly trucking and train safety. No. Spent fuel transport casks have been demonstrated experimentally to take direct hit from 70-mph railroad locomotive followed by fire and not leak contamination. There's no significant radioactive risk. ... What about earthquakes at Yucca Mt.? Just yesterday Vegas had a small quake. ... What about them? If worst were to come to worst, it will simply bury the waste underground. Meanwhile, the facility is designed to accommodate seismic activity. There are far more real dangers and boogey men to worry over in this world. -- Being buried far underground does not necessarily contain the radioactivity (10,000 years worth?).. |
#56
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
California electric rates are getting ridiculous
Norminn wrote:
dpb wrote: Oren wrote: ... Just a layman here, BUT there are a lot of transport problems to be faced in our future. Particularly trucking and train safety. No. Spent fuel transport casks have been demonstrated experimentally to take direct hit from 70-mph railroad locomotive followed by fire and not leak contamination. There's no significant radioactive risk. ... What about earthquakes at Yucca Mt.? Just yesterday Vegas had a small quake. ... What about them? If worst were to come to worst, it will simply bury the waste underground. Meanwhile, the facility is designed to accommodate seismic activity. There are far more real dangers and boogey men to worry over in this world. -- Being buried far underground does not necessarily contain the radioactivity (10,000 years worth?).. Even _IF_ (the proverbial "big if" which in this case is simply huge, not just big) it were to happen, that it's underground would prevent any massive immediate release and the effects afterward could be dealt with w/o any need for rush. I reiterate that there are far more serious boogey men to worry over than some theorized disaster at Yucca Mtn is my point. Sure, a large enough 'quake could make a mess of the facility, but it would not be any nuclear disaster. -- |
#57
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
California electric rates are getting ridiculous
Pete C. wrote:
Ed Pawlowski wrote: "scorpster" wrote in message ... I just received a notice from California Edison that Tier 3, 4 and 5 rates are increasing AGAIN in the first quarter of 2009. My electric bill is typically $400 a month. BFD, that is meaningless to all of us outside of CA. What is the rate per kW hour? I'm paying 18¢. I'm paying about 13¢ here in TX. Here in S. Texas is 10.7¢. I am not complaining but having such a diversity doesn't make much sense to me... |
#58
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
California electric rates are getting ridiculous
not surprised, everything about california is rediculous..
---------------------------------------------------------------- http://www.minibite.com/america/malone.htm |
#59
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
California electric rates are getting ridiculous
Erma1ina wrote:
.... ... The Sacramento Municipal Utility District, which shut down its Rancho Seco nuclear plant in 1989 due to high costs and chronically poor performance, is unlikely to want to go down that road again." ... SMUD was, regrettably, a _VERY_ poor nuclear operating utility--the problems there were really very little related to the power plant per se but to poor (primarily inexperienced w/ nuclear generation vis a vis fossil so they didn't control the interaction w/ the NRC and follow the regulatory requirements to the tee. That led to the extremely high costs in having to try to meet those after the fact which is far more difficult and costly than doing so originally). I was, in fact, working in the commercial nuclear division of the particular reactor vendor during construction and went through plant startup and first year or so of operation so know the plant pretty well and knew SMUD well also. I'd have to refresh my memory on the actual shutdown decision politics, but as I recall it was a plebiscite organized by the various activist groups of the time that made the final determination rather than a Utility District decision. IMO of the time, if they would have brought in an experienced operating contractor to oversee the plant day-to-day operation early on rather than trying to operate it inhouse it would be a positive impact economically to the state and an additional 850 MWe on the grid today. SMUD, btw, wasn't terribly unique to several other relatively small and first-time-nuclear utilities. They and others tended to think of them as simply generation units w/ a nuclear boiler instead of coil or oil which they were used to operating. Consequently, they generally would name an experienced fossil manager as head of the nuclear project and that would start the problems of not building the correct nuclear management and operation mindset of even more precise attention to detail. Many of the "performance issues" in these cases really had very little at all to do with other than paper audit trails on welds or similar QA/QC processes. The problem would be, when a failure to document was found, it could be months down the road after a zillion more welds had been completed or thousands of yards of concrete poured or whatever and to have to go back and qualify the oversight was terribly expensive. Experienced nuclear utilities (often w/ ex-nuclear Navy-trained folks who had already been thru the drill w/ Rickover) managed to avoid many those mistakes; or at least minimized them. If I were in the area, I'd have no qualms of a restart of Rancho Seco from the plant safety aspect at all. It is, of course, out of the question at this point as the plant wasn't maintained w/ the idea of a restart. quake-prone CA and nukes -- If there were a serious quake, in containment would be an ideal place to be to ride it out. -- Regarding the general issue the nuclear power in [fresh-water-starved-fault-riddled] California: "Rivers in California . . . are increasingly impractical and unavailable for nuclear power. . . . there is continued demand for fresh water from agriculture, industry and residential development. In the southern United States, recent droughts have resulted in nuclear reactors being shut down due to low water levels and high water temperatures in rivers and lakes. The bulk of California's rivers are fed by Sierra snowmelt, which means that drought and global warming (combined with the other demands for water), tend to make river water an unreliable long-term source, particularly in the quantities needed by nuclear plants." and "The Pacific Ocean provides the water for California's two operating nuclear power plants, Diablo Canyon (on the Central Coast) and San Onofre (between Los Angeles and San Diego), and there is certainly plenty of ocean water. One problem in siting new nuclear plants on the coast becomes apparent upon looking at seismic hazard maps - the coastal region of California also is largely an area of significant seismic risk. Even the staunchest advocates of nuclear plants should hesitate to locate a reactor in an earthquake-prone area. "In short, siting a nuclear plant in California presents a dilemma - if you site it where there is plenty of water, you are increasing your earthquake risk." |
#60
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
California electric rates are getting ridiculous
Chris wrote:
Pete C. wrote: Ed Pawlowski wrote: .... BFD, that is meaningless to all of us outside of CA. What is the rate per kW hour? I'm paying 18¢. I'm paying about 13¢ here in TX. Here in S. Texas is 10.7¢. I am not complaining but having such a diversity doesn't make much sense to me... Look to your rate commission and be glad it isn't even worse. Here E KS is as much as 60% lower than W owing to bias in the makeup of the rate commission in the populated areas vis a vis the agricultural/less populated. -- |
#61
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
California electric rates are getting ridiculous
On 12/4/2008 2:00 PM dpb spake thus:
BobR wrote: I believe there are safe ways to dispose of it but until a valid plan is in place to do so, we have no damn business creating yet more waste. Right now, there is nothing but stockpiling the stuff in holding areas that are an ever increasing hazard to everyone. Find a solution, prove it, implement it and then lets talk about building new facilities. Until then, NO! Unfortunately, we need the power now and the problem to be solved is primarily political, not technical. As noted upthread, Reid has been using Yucca Mountain as his own personal populist whipping boy to his personal advantage for nearly 30 years. Once it does finally open and we can move stuff from the spent fuel pools, there really is no crisis as far as ultimate disposal by whatever means is finally allowed. Again, that will primarily be a political, not technical decision. You're at least partially correct that the problem is political rather than technical, except that the technical objections to nuclear waste storage are also formidable. Regarding Nevada as you mentioned, it should be pointed out that not only Nevada, but also Utah have both maintained very strong opposition to high-level nuclear waste storage policy at the federal level. I know about this: in college I won a cash award for a paper I wrote on the subject. I used to subscribe to both the Utah and Nevada state newsletters from the agencies in those states set up specifically to fight the waste repositories from going there. So it wasn't just one senator's personal vendetta. And I hardly need to point out that these are both conservative states, hardly bastions of antinuclear activity or havens for tree-huggers. (Interesting to note that Utah also vigorously opposed the MX missile--remember that?--on account of the Mormon Church's *moral* opposition to siting a weapon of mass destruction in the state.) -- Washing one's hands of the conflict between the powerful and the powerless means to side with the powerful, not to be neutral. - Paulo Freire |
#62
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
California electric rates are getting ridiculous
On 12/4/2008 3:21 PM dpb spake thus:
Oren wrote: What about earthquakes at Yucca Mt.? Just yesterday Vegas had a small quake. What about them? If worst were to come to worst, it will simply bury the waste underground. Meanwhile, the facility is designed to accommodate seismic activity. There are far more real dangers and boogey men to worry over in this world. You obviously don't know what the hell you're talking about. One of the requirements for any high-level nuclear waste repository (such as Yucca Mountain) is that the waste be both monitored and retrievable. They don't just chuck it in there willy-nilly and figure "out of sight, out of mind". Mind you, these are DOE's rules, not those written by some granola-munching tree hugger. So earthquakes do pose significant risks, and you can be sure that the DOE is paying attention to the reports they get from the USGS. -- Washing one's hands of the conflict between the powerful and the powerless means to side with the powerful, not to be neutral. - Paulo Freire |
#63
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
California electric rates are getting ridiculous
On Wed, 3 Dec 2008 20:25:38 -0800, "scorpster"
wrote: but they are blind to nuclear power. If we had nuclear power we'd only be paying a fraction of the price and it would be good for the environment!! It is not cheap if you include the cost of decommissioning. Consider the cost of taking care of the leftovers for the next few thousand years. Frankly no one knows what that cost might be since no one has ever decommissioned a atomic plant. They have shut them down and keep the maintenance up because: A: No one wants the wase in their back yard B: No one knows how to do it. Maybe you don't care, but frankly I don't want to leave my grand kids and great great great grand kids with all that waste and cost. Atomic energy has never been cheep enough to compete with other sources. The only way atomic plants have been built was to provide materials for great projects like bombs. Take a look and see what the true cost of building and operating a modern atomic plant per unit of energy (after deducting government investment) and see what the real cost is, not counting decommissioning. |
#64
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
California electric rates are getting ridiculous
On 12/4/2008 3:13 PM Pete C. spake thus:
As for the greenie who babbled about the sun and it being inexhaustible - wrong, it will run out of energy one day too. Since that was me, let me say how idiotic that objection is. It (the sun) *is* inexhaustable for all intents and purposes, since when the sun finally does go out, the game's over for all of us. -- Washing one's hands of the conflict between the powerful and the powerless means to side with the powerful, not to be neutral. - Paulo Freire |
#65
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
California electric rates are getting ridiculous
David Nebenzahl wrote:
On 12/4/2008 2:00 PM dpb spake thus: BobR wrote: I believe there are safe ways to dispose of it but until a valid plan is in place to do so, we have no damn business creating yet more waste. Right now, there is nothing but stockpiling the stuff in holding areas that are an ever increasing hazard to everyone. Find a solution, prove it, implement it and then lets talk about building new facilities. Until then, NO! Unfortunately, we need the power now and the problem to be solved is primarily political, not technical. As noted upthread, Reid has been using Yucca Mountain as his own personal populist whipping boy to his personal advantage for nearly 30 years. Once it does finally open and we can move stuff from the spent fuel pools, there really is no crisis as far as ultimate disposal by whatever means is finally allowed. Again, that will primarily be a political, not technical decision. You're at least partially correct that the problem is political rather than technical, except that the technical objections to nuclear waste storage are also formidable. Regarding Nevada as you mentioned, it should be pointed out that not only Nevada, but also Utah have both maintained very strong opposition to high-level nuclear waste storage policy at the federal level. I know about this: in college I won a cash award for a paper I wrote on the subject. I used to subscribe to both the Utah and Nevada state newsletters from the agencies in those states set up specifically to fight the waste repositories from going there. So it wasn't just one senator's personal vendetta. And I hardly need to point out that these are both conservative states, hardly bastions of antinuclear activity or havens for tree-huggers. (Interesting to note that Utah also vigorously opposed the MX missile--remember that?--on account of the Mormon Church's *moral* opposition to siting a weapon of mass destruction in the state.) Cash prize or no, the point is it is policy and that policy was made by the processes of government. I'm not saying it necessarily was the best decision, but it was the decision reached and NV did not prevail in the debate. So far, they've been unable to win a change in that decision and for the better good of the whole it's time to move forward. The technical issues can't be resolved until there is a stable political framework within which to operate to solve them. As noted earlier, a misguided (1) former president tossed over a billion dollars of private investment in a reprocessing facility about 20 years ago and nobody in the national political spectrum has had the backbone since to pay more than lip service to any truly coherent and realizable energy policy. Time is coming, however, when it will no longer be able to be pushed aside and ignored as it has been and (imo) when the generation shortage reaches the crises stage there will be a massive change in public attitude and all these apparently insurmountable issues of such importance will be swept aside almost overnight in the rush. (1) Despite (or perhaps because of the military side of it) his training in the nuclear Navy, this former president was never able to separate and understand the difference between commercial and military nuclear power. Hence despite his well-intentioned but naive efforts he succeeded in neither accomplishing nonproliferation (witness N Korea and Iran) and in hastening and sealing the current stagnation of the US commercial nuclear industry, thereby hastening the use of significant quantities of natural gas for electrical power generation, surely one of the most extreme examples of shortsighted use of a resource ever. -- |
#66
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
California electric rates are getting ridiculous
On Thu, 4 Dec 2008 08:24:25 -0600, "HeyBub"
wrote: David Nebenzahl wrote: Nuclear power, on its own, is clean, cheap, and reliable. It's certainly clean - the only thing it emits is heat. And radiation, and lots of radioactive waste that no one has yet found an acceptable safe way of disposing of. It is all sitting in on sight storage, costing us taxpayers money while producing no power. Building a nuclear power plant is relatively cheap - it can cost on the same order as a coal-fired plant. Care to provide numbers. Please include full life cycle cost, including full cost of decommissioning. What makes the cost so bizarre is the anti-nuclear movement! Fifteen years of litigation, design changes ten times the requirements of engineering best practices, abundant political machinations, all contribute to the bill. Who needs the grief? |
#67
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
California electric rates are getting ridiculous
David Nebenzahl wrote:
On 12/4/2008 3:21 PM dpb spake thus: Oren wrote: What about earthquakes at Yucca Mt.? Just yesterday Vegas had a small quake. What about them? If worst were to come to worst, it will simply bury the waste underground. Meanwhile, the facility is designed to accommodate seismic activity. There are far more real dangers and boogey men to worry over in this world. You obviously don't know what the hell you're talking about. One of the requirements for any high-level nuclear waste repository (such as Yucca Mountain) is that the waste be both monitored and retrievable. They don't just chuck it in there willy-nilly and figure "out of sight, out of mind". Mind you, these are DOE's rules, not those written by some granola-munching tree hugger. So earthquakes do pose significant risks, and you can be sure that the DOE is paying attention to the reports they get from the USGS. You didn't read or at least pay attention to what I wrote upthread. I had already talked of there being seismic criteria for the design and construction of Yucca Mountain. I was simply saying that in the extremely unlikely event of a seismic event even greater than the design basis plus the overdesign that something did happen it would _still_ not cause a nuclear disaster. A design for a high-level waste repository only requires it be both monitored and retrievable _IF_ that is the goal and design criterion. It does so happen that that is the criterion for Yucca Mountain, true. The reason for that is, of course, owing to the fact that the reprocessing option had previously been removed from the table leaving this as the only way forward at the time the decision was made. I reiterate that there are far more serious boogey men to worry over in the world than a postulated seismic event at Yucca Mountain. That is true in large part to what I do know has been included in the design of the facility and what I know from 30 years commercial nuclear power experience of the nature of spent nuclear fuel. -- |
#68
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
California electric rates are getting ridiculous
David Nebenzahl wrote:
On 12/4/2008 3:13 PM Pete C. spake thus: As for the greenie who babbled about the sun and it being inexhaustible - wrong, it will run out of energy one day too. Since that was me, let me say how idiotic that objection is. It (the sun) *is* inexhaustable for all intents and purposes, since when the sun finally does go out, the game's over for all of us. The problem is it still isn't connected to the grid in any cost-effective manner that can contribute more than fractional percentages of demand and it doesn't appear likely that that can change within any near term horizon. -- |
#69
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
California electric rates are getting ridiculous
|
#70
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
California electric rates are getting ridiculous
On Thu, 04 Dec 2008 17:21:15 -0600, dpb wrote:
Oren wrote: ... Just a layman here, BUT there are a lot of transport problems to be faced in our future. Particularly trucking and train safety. No. Spent fuel transport casks have been demonstrated experimentally to take direct hit from 70-mph railroad locomotive followed by fire and not leak contamination. There's no significant radioactive risk. How does the layman trust the government for the truth on this experiment? Some how, I read a particular metal would be needed to encase (shielded around) all this mess (10,000 years) and would deplete the earth supply of that material. What about earthquakes at Yucca Mt.? Just yesterday Vegas had a small quake. ... What about them? If worst were to come to worst, it will simply bury the waste underground. Meanwhile, the facility is designed to accommodate seismic activity. There are far more real dangers and boogey men to worry over in this world. I'm just more skeptical of the government than I am of the dangers of a quake. But I live here 100 miles away. |
#71
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
California electric rates are getting ridiculous
Oren wrote:
On Thu, 04 Dec 2008 17:21:15 -0600, dpb wrote: Oren wrote: ... Just a layman here, BUT there are a lot of transport problems to be faced in our future. Particularly trucking and train safety. No. Spent fuel transport casks have been demonstrated experimentally to take direct hit from 70-mph railroad locomotive followed by fire and not leak contamination. There's no significant radioactive risk. How does the layman trust the government for the truth on this experiment? .... There are tapes of the impact -- I'm sure if one looked one could find them on the internet by now. I'm absolutely positive one can still find the reports and look at the pictures. If you're worried about the black helicopters, sorry I can't help. -- |
#72
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
California electric rates are getting ridiculous
|
#73
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
California electric rates are getting ridiculous
I doubt the higher standard of living. Socialism fosters laziness. The
bailout is Socialist. -- Christopher A. Young Learn more about Jesus www.lds.org .. "Norminn" wrote in message m... How is giving my money to big banks NOT Socialist? And why do Socialist countries have a much higher standard of living than we do? |
#74
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
California electric rates are getting ridiculous
David Nebenzahl wrote: On 12/4/2008 3:13 PM Pete C. spake thus: As for the greenie who babbled about the sun and it being inexhaustible - wrong, it will run out of energy one day too. Since that was me, let me say how idiotic that objection is. It (the sun) *is* inexhaustable for all intents and purposes, since when the sun finally does go out, the game's over for all of us. The reprocessing of our nuclear fuel sources is equally inexhaustible in that context as well. As for the game being over when the sun runs out of juice, that is very much dependent on how far we progress in space travel and colonization in the millenias until the sun does go kaput. |
#75
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
California electric rates are getting ridiculous
You know, Bob, that's about what I was thinking. You think socialism is so
good, move to England. And take all the elected leftists with you. -- Christopher A. Young Learn more about Jesus www.lds.org .. "BobR" wrote in message ... How is giving my money to big banks NOT Socialist? And why do Socialist countries have a much higher standard of living than we do? By who's measure? And if you think they are so damn great, why don't you move your butt there and shut up? |
#76
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
California electric rates are getting ridiculous
dpb wrote:
David Nebenzahl wrote: On 12/4/2008 3:13 PM Pete C. spake thus: As for the greenie who babbled about the sun and it being inexhaustible - wrong, it will run out of energy one day too. Since that was me, let me say how idiotic that objection is. It (the sun) *is* inexhaustable for all intents and purposes, since when the sun finally does go out, the game's over for all of us. The problem is it still isn't connected to the grid in any cost-effective manner that can contribute more than fractional percentages of demand and it doesn't appear likely that that can change within any near term horizon. -- Only if you think in terms of electricity. We should have been building all houses with at least some passive solar capability for the last 30 years. It ain't rocket science or gee-whiz tech- the sunnier, less-electrified parts of the world have been taking advantage of the sun for thousands of years. Electric and gas have simply been so damn cheap since central HVAC for the masses came along, that nobody bothered to think about it. Build the house right, and you can reduce your need for electric and gas a bunch. -- aem sends... |
#77
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
California electric rates are getting ridiculous
I suggest we hang onto it. Sooner or later, someone will form some new kind
of reactor, which will take our nuke wastes, and turn them into more energy. -- Christopher A. Young Learn more about Jesus www.lds.org .. "BobR" wrote in message ... I agree on most respects but the one cost that has been and continues to be ignored is how to dispose of the contaminated waste. This cost is growing and may well be the biggest expense we will yet pay for nuclear power. Until this issue is resolved, there should be NO FURTHER development of nuclear power plants. And before you get on your high horse about me being anti-nuclear, I am not. I simply believe that we have to solve the disposal problems before we increase the problems beyond the point of no return. |
#78
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
California electric rates are getting ridiculous
We must immediately halt all production of electric cars, until the
pollution and waste problem is solved. What to do with all the huge batteries, after two or three years. Car batteries at present are 4 to 5 years, and they are shallow discharge. Deep cycle trolling batteries (or some new technology) will need to be replaced every few years. Think of the children! In my own unscientific texts, ethanol is a major loser. My van gets 18 MPG on gasoline, and 15.5 MPG on ethanol. What that means, is that I burn MORE petroleum with gasohol than I do by burning pure gasoline. I lose more than 10% mileage, on the 10% ethanol. -- Christopher A. Young Learn more about Jesus www.lds.org .. "RickH" wrote in message ... You think they are high now, just wait till every hippie in CA is driving a Chevy Volt. The problem with most environmentalists is that they will protest for electric cars or ethanol, etc. then realize later that the laws of thermodynamics are still in effect. The gasoline-burned energy that pushes your car 60 miles, is the same amount of electric energy needed to push your car 60 miles on a charge. Yes if electric cars become the norm, then nuclear will have to be increased. I live around Chicago where we have the highest concentration of nuclear plants anywhere in the US, they are perfectly safe, and the newer plants are even safer. |
#79
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
California electric rates are getting ridiculous
Evidence?
-- Christopher A. Young Learn more about Jesus www.lds.org .. "h" wrote in message ... Care to give an example of such a socialist country with a higher standard of living than that in the US? Sweden. And just a point, the US doesn't even make the top ten list of countries with the highest standard of living, although Canada, Finland, Norway, and Sweden all do. |
#80
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
California electric rates are getting ridiculous
On Thu, 04 Dec 2008 20:00:01 -0600, dpb wrote:
Oren wrote: On Thu, 04 Dec 2008 17:21:15 -0600, dpb wrote: Oren wrote: ... Just a layman here, BUT there are a lot of transport problems to be faced in our future. Particularly trucking and train safety. No. Spent fuel transport casks have been demonstrated experimentally to take direct hit from 70-mph railroad locomotive followed by fire and not leak contamination. There's no significant radioactive risk. How does the layman trust the government for the truth on this experiment? ... There are tapes of the impact -- I'm sure if one looked one could find them on the internet by now. I'm absolutely positive one can still find the reports and look at the pictures. I've seen impacts provided - I'm just not totally CONvinced. If you're worried about the black helicopters, sorry I can't help. Nope, not at all. It's the government I worry about. Like I say, just a laymen and non-expert. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
OT getting ridiculous | Metalworking | |||
This is ridiculous.... | Electronics Repair | |||
northern california skilled labor rates | Home Repair | |||
This is getting ridiculous! | Woodworking |