Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
Home Repair (alt.home.repair) For all homeowners and DIYers with many experienced tradesmen. Solve your toughest home fix-it problems. |
Reply |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Accidental use of water and water company?
A buddy of mine was away for a week and returned to find that the water
heater in his rented condo had sprung a major leak. He said it was running about like half of a wide open sink faucet rate. The friggin thing was about 23 years old. I remember seeing the label on it, how the area around the pipe connections looked corroded, etc. I warned him about it and told him to make sure he shut off the water when he was away on trips, but obviously, he didn't. Good news is that the water was handled by the sump pump. Bad news is a lot of water may have been billed. Not sure about the gas, as he shut the thing off without finding out if the thing had been fired up. The water coming out was cold, but at that flow rate, it could just be that it couldn't heat it fast enough. He did say he didn't hear it running. I'm hoping the water put the pilot out, but on the other hand, from where it was leaking, it sounds like it was the anode rod fitting area at the top of the tank that went. Just wondering, does anyone have any experience in what happens with the water or gas company in a case like this. Do they expect full payment for the water/gas? Or if you can show it was an accident do they negotiate or give you a break? Also, what are views on the landlord's responsibility for paying for the water/gas if the utility company does not? In the general case, where it just happens to say a reasonably new water heater, it would seem to me this is a grey area as to whether the landlord would be responsible to pay for water. In the case of a 20+ year old water heater, I think he has a much better case, as it's well known that these things usually fail long before that, so it looks like a case for negligence could be made. |
#2
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Accidental use of water and water company?
|
#3
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Accidental use of water and water company?
wrote in message Just wondering, does anyone have any experience in what happens with the water or gas company in a case like this. Do they expect full payment for the water/gas? Or if you can show it was an accident do they negotiate or give you a break? Of course they want full payment. It went through the meter so you pay. If you don't pay, everyone else pays a little more to make up the difference. If , at the end of the week, your employer said he really didn't need what you did on Tuesday, would you accept that he won't pay you? |
#4
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Accidental use of water and water company?
|
#5
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Accidental use of water and water company?
RicodJour wrote:
The gas and water companies have no role in this. If you consume, you pay. In my town, water meters read like odometers. The meter reader is competent and reliable. The retired couple across the street used about 2500 gallons per month. They were thrifty and sensible. They would not water their lawn or even their shrubs. One month they were billed for something like 15,000 gallons. They couldn't account for it. They would certainly have heard that much water running in the house, such as in a stuck toilet. It was a drought. I'd been over there frequently and would have noticed wet ground if a hose had been left on. They had to pay. All bills before and after were normal. Other people in town have had the same experience. What could cause it? |
#6
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Accidental use of water and water company?
|
#8
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Accidental use of water and water company?
Abe wrote: Just wondering, does anyone have any experience in what happens with the water or gas company in a case like this. Do they expect full payment for the water/gas? Or if you can show it was an accident do they negotiate or give you a break? Of course they want full payment. It went through the meter so you pay. If you don't pay, everyone else pays a little more to make up the difference. Not so quick Ed. In my area, the water district provides partial relief if the water usage was found to be caused by a leak, and within the next billing cycle you provide proof (receipts) of repair. In my case, I had the main going from the meter to my house spring a leak caused by a rock that had, over time, finally punctured the line. I got an astronomical bill. I immediately called a good plumber, who located and repaired the leak. I then submitted the correct paperwork to the water district, and on the next bill, they gave me 50% relief for the excess water usage, calculated by comparing the previous year usage for the same billing cycle to the current year. Thanks, Abe, that's what I was looking for, some real world actual experience, as opposed to "it's your own fault, what do u expect, yaddda yaddda yaddda. |
#9
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Accidental use of water and water company?
RicodJour wrote: wrote: A buddy of mine was away for a week and returned to find that the water heater in his rented condo had sprung a major leak. He said it was running about like half of a wide open sink faucet rate. The friggin thing was about 23 years old. I remember seeing the label on it, how the area around the pipe connections looked corroded, etc. I warned him about it and told him to make sure he shut off the water when he was away on trips, but obviously, he didn't. Good news is that the water was handled by the sump pump. Bad news is a lot of water may have been billed. Not sure about the gas, as he shut the thing off without finding out if the thing had been fired up. The water coming out was cold, but at that flow rate, it could just be that it couldn't heat it fast enough. He did say he didn't hear it running. I'm hoping the water put the pilot out, but on the other hand, from where it was leaking, it sounds like it was the anode rod fitting area at the top of the tank that went. Just wondering, does anyone have any experience in what happens with the water or gas company in a case like this. Do they expect full payment for the water/gas? Or if you can show it was an accident do they negotiate or give you a break? Also, what are views on the landlord's responsibility for paying for the water/gas if the utility company does not? In the general case, where it just happens to say a reasonably new water heater, it would seem to me this is a grey area as to whether the landlord would be responsible to pay for water. In the case of a 20+ year old water heater, I think he has a much better case, as it's well known that these things usually fail long before that, so it looks like a case for negligence could be made. The major causative factor was your friend ignoring your advice and warning. There's the negligence for you. The landlord may or may not have been aware of the age and condition of the water heater. Unless your friend sent a letter to the landlord alerting him to the heater's imminent demise, then expecting the landlord to rollover on the gas/water bill is highly unrelaistic. He's already facing a larger than usual monthly cost in replacing the water heater and probably won't take kindly to be asked to spring for more money to cover utility bills. The gas and water companies have no role in this. If you consume, you pay. This is one of those situations where the tenant escaped a bullet. Expecting to be reimbursed for the bullet is ridiculous. I wouldn't be stoking the fire for compensation from the landlord or utility companies, but rather pointing out the tenant's role and ultimate responsibility. Throw in a "I told you so." or three so they learn something and will listen to you next time. R So, the tenant is now the one responsible for making sure the building structure and utilities are properly maintained? And it's there fault if something that is way beyond it's expected service life fails and damage results? That's a new concept. The place passed a CO inspection. Should they then hire a home inspector to review everything, give opinions and document everything that they find wrong? And how would the typical landlord react to that? Amazing that you have more empathy for the landlord who has to pay for a new water heater after 23 years, than the tenant who was not in control of deciding when to replace it. I don't think it's at all ridiculous for the tenant to be looking for reimbursement. In fact, I think if it went to small claims, the tenant would have a pretty good case. |
#10
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Accidental use of water and water company?
|
#11
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Accidental use of water and water company?
wrote in message Thanks, Abe, that's what I was looking for, some real world actual experience, as opposed to "it's your own fault, what do u expect, yaddda yaddda yaddda. The yaddda yaddda yaddda I gave you was based on a 60,000 gallon use of water over the norm. The water department did come back to verify the reading since it was unusual, but they sent the bill and we had to pay it. If you want to come to Uxbridge MA, I'll show you the meter and you can verify the readings and bill. |
#12
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Accidental use of water and water company?
wrote: RicodJour wrote: wrote: A buddy of mine was away for a week and returned to find that the water heater in his rented condo had sprung a major leak. He said it was running about like half of a wide open sink faucet rate. The friggin thing was about 23 years old. I remember seeing the label on it, how the area around the pipe connections looked corroded, etc. I warned him about it and told him to make sure he shut off the water when he was away on trips, but obviously, he didn't. Good news is that the water was handled by the sump pump. Bad news is a lot of water may have been billed. Not sure about the gas, as he shut the thing off without finding out if the thing had been fired up. The water coming out was cold, but at that flow rate, it could just be that it couldn't heat it fast enough. He did say he didn't hear it running. I'm hoping the water put the pilot out, but on the other hand, from where it was leaking, it sounds like it was the anode rod fitting area at the top of the tank that went. Just wondering, does anyone have any experience in what happens with the water or gas company in a case like this. Do they expect full payment for the water/gas? Or if you can show it was an accident do they negotiate or give you a break? Also, what are views on the landlord's responsibility for paying for the water/gas if the utility company does not? In the general case, where it just happens to say a reasonably new water heater, it would seem to me this is a grey area as to whether the landlord would be responsible to pay for water. In the case of a 20+ year old water heater, I think he has a much better case, as it's well known that these things usually fail long before that, so it looks like a case for negligence could be made. The major causative factor was your friend ignoring your advice and warning. There's the negligence for you. The landlord may or may not have been aware of the age and condition of the water heater. Unless your friend sent a letter to the landlord alerting him to the heater's imminent demise, then expecting the landlord to rollover on the gas/water bill is highly unrelaistic. He's already facing a larger than usual monthly cost in replacing the water heater and probably won't take kindly to be asked to spring for more money to cover utility bills. The gas and water companies have no role in this. If you consume, you pay. This is one of those situations where the tenant escaped a bullet. Expecting to be reimbursed for the bullet is ridiculous. I wouldn't be stoking the fire for compensation from the landlord or utility companies, but rather pointing out the tenant's role and ultimate responsibility. Throw in a "I told you so." or three so they learn something and will listen to you next time. R So, the tenant is now the one responsible for making sure the building structure and utilities are properly maintained? And it's there fault if something that is way beyond it's expected service life fails and damage results? That's a new concept. The place passed a CO inspection. Should they then hire a home inspector to review everything, give opinions and document everything that they find wrong? And how would the typical landlord react to that? Amazing that you have more empathy for the landlord who has to pay for a new water heater after 23 years, than the tenant who was not in control of deciding when to replace it. I don't think it's at all ridiculous for the tenant to be looking for reimbursement. In fact, I think if it went to small claims, the tenant would have a pretty good case. This whole situation is not exactly cut & dried; the water heater was old, the landlord did or should have know it's age & conditionm the CO inspection should have flagged the w/h your friend should have listened to you about turing the water off your firend could have had someone house sit or at least do a walk through your friend is in physical posession of the property; the eyes & ears on site, he had material knowledge of a potential problem; information not given to the landlord like R said, this has slide over to the area of ethics since there conditon was recognized. maybe someone's insurance can cover it or maybe the two parties can split the extra bills bottom line, you discovered a potential problem (like a smoldering fire? but not as bad) & your friend choose not to act or pass on that information; in the legal world I believe this is call contingent liabiltiy.........no one (excpet for you) in this situation has entirely clean hands, the truth be told. cheers Bob |
#13
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Accidental use of water and water company?
|
#14
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Accidental use of water and water company?
My city charges for sewer based on the gallons of water consumed. They
assume a certain amount of water usage goes down the sewer in the summer months. The rest of the water bill does not have the sewer charge. Not sure if they have their own fixed numbers or if they use your average water usage. In the summer months this "rate reduction" is automatic. Likewise, if you tell them you will be filling your swimming pool, you can provide the before and after water meter readings and they will charge you only for the water (not sewer). The swimming pool example is first-hand from my neighbor. |
#15
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Accidental use of water and water company?
Oren wrote: On 12 Jul 2006 09:37:58 -0700, wrote: Thanks, Abe, that's what I was looking for, some real world actual experience, as opposed to "it's your own fault, what do u expect, yaddda yaddda yaddda. Don't like responses you get here - to bad. My comments were real world. I know the difference in a "new smiling tenant" and one that later shows "true colors". Oren What the hell are you talking about now? A new smiling tenant and one that shows true colors? It was the landlord's water heater that sprang a leak and caused the problem. I've seen plenty of cases in small claims where a tenant had property damaged do to a pipe breaking. And in just about every case, the landlord wound up responsible and had to pay for the damages. Or are you the kind of landlord that doesn't replace a 23 year old water heater and then says it's all the tenants fault? |
#16
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Accidental use of water and water company?
Oren wrote: On 12 Jul 2006 07:41:31 -0700, wrote: A buddy of mine was away for a week and returned to find that the water heater in his rented condo had sprung a major leak. He said it was running about like half of a wide open sink faucet rate. The friggin thing was about 23 years old. I remember seeing the label on it, how the area around the pipe connections looked corroded, etc. I warned him about it and told him to make sure he shut off the water when he was away on trips, but obviously, he didn't. Good news is that the water was handled by the sump pump. Bad news is a lot of water may have been billed. Not sure about the gas, as he shut the thing off without finding out if the thing had been fired up. The water coming out was cold, but at that flow rate, it could just be that it couldn't heat it fast enough. He did say he didn't hear it running. I'm hoping the water put the pilot out, but on the other hand, from where it was leaking, it sounds like it was the anode rod fitting area at the top of the tank that went. Just wondering, does anyone have any experience in what happens with the water or gas company in a case like this. Do they expect full payment for the water/gas? Or if you can show it was an accident do they negotiate or give you a break? Also, what are views on the landlord's responsibility for paying for the water/gas if the utility company does not? In the general case, where it just happens to say a reasonably new water heater, it would seem to me this is a grey area as to whether the landlord would be responsible to pay for water. In the case of a 20+ year old water heater, I think he has a much better case, as it's well known that these things usually fail long before that, so it looks like a case for negligence could be made. The person "billed" for the account will be the one to pay. When I had tenants, the lease specifically indicated they paid all utilities and those accounts were in their names. Some things like garbage pick up and association fees could not be placed in the tenant name, but it was written in the lease that they pay them. I always had an emergency fund for big items, like a broken AC, water heater, etc. Tenants, by the lease were to notify me if any broke.. I think the landlord should fix the water heater as he has a vested interest keeping property in good shape. Wow, that's big of you. You THINK the landlord should fix the water heater? As opposed to doing what? Some great landlord you must be. PS: Just because the lease says the tenant pays the utilities doesn't absolve the landlord from winding up having to pay in small claims, because the issue obviously is that the tenant would not have incurred this expense had the landlords 23 year old water heater failed. I had one leak and guess I lost about 500 gallons, just looking at the bill that I paid. A neighbor lost somewhere close to 5,000 gallons due to a main from the meter to the house that broke from a tree root. The builder fixed the water line, I think he paid the water. Oh my! The builder paid? Why would he ever do that instead of the homeowner paying? Oren |
#17
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Accidental use of water and water company?
On Wed, 12 Jul 2006 17:11:31 GMT, "Edwin Pawlowski"
wrote: wrote in message Thanks, Abe, that's what I was looking for, some real world actual experience, as opposed to "it's your own fault, what do u expect, yaddda yaddda yaddda. The yaddda yaddda yaddda I gave you was based on a 60,000 gallon use of water over the norm. The water department did come back to verify the So what happened that took 60,000 gallons? reading since it was unusual, but they sent the bill and we had to pay it. If you want to come to Uxbridge MA, I'll show you the meter and you can verify the readings and bill. |
#18
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Accidental use of water and water company?
Bart Byers wrote: RicodJour wrote: The gas and water companies have no role in this. If you consume, you pay. In my town, water meters read like odometers. The meter reader is competent and reliable. The retired couple across the street used about 2500 gallons per month. They were thrifty and sensible. They would not water their lawn or even their shrubs. One month they were billed for something like 15,000 gallons. They couldn't account for it. They would certainly have heard that much water running in the house, such as in a stuck toilet. It was a drought. I'd been over there frequently and would have noticed wet ground if a hose had been left on. They had to pay. All bills before and after were normal. Other people in town have had the same experience. What could cause it? revenue enhancement. D |
#19
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Accidental use of water and water company?
On 12 Jul 2006 11:10:05 -0700, wrote:
Oren wrote: On 12 Jul 2006 09:37:58 -0700, wrote: Thanks, Abe, that's what I was looking for, some real world actual experience, as opposed to "it's your own fault, what do u expect, yaddda yaddda yaddda. Don't like responses you get here - to bad. My comments were real world. I know the difference in a "new smiling tenant" and one that later shows "true colors". Oren What the hell are you talking about now? A new smiling tenant and one that shows true colors? It was the landlord's water heater that sprang a leak and caused the problem. I've seen plenty of cases in small claims where a tenant had property damaged do to a pipe breaking. And in just about every case, the landlord wound up responsible and had to pay for the damages. Or are you the kind of landlord that doesn't replace a 23 year old water heater and then says it's all the tenants fault? Read my thread. I said the landlord should fix the water heater. Read my thread where I said I kept an emergency fund for major things like AC, water heater .... meaning things essential to a tenants well being. So don't give me a phriggn lecture, as I may day dream. Anyway the person billed should pay the bill. No claim for property damage from the tenant? No the sump pump worked, so get a date. You may be this tenant, so back off if you think I will sign-off on a way out of a water bill or the landlord's responsibility. Oren |
#20
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Accidental use of water and water company?
On 12 Jul 2006 11:14:03 -0700, wrote:
Oren wrote: On 12 Jul 2006 07:41:31 -0700, wrote: A buddy of mine was away for a week and returned to find that the water heater in his rented condo had sprung a major leak. He said it was running about like half of a wide open sink faucet rate. The friggin thing was about 23 years old. I remember seeing the label on it, how the area around the pipe connections looked corroded, etc. I warned him about it and told him to make sure he shut off the water when he was away on trips, but obviously, he didn't. Good news is that the water was handled by the sump pump. Bad news is a lot of water may have been billed. Not sure about the gas, as he shut the thing off without finding out if the thing had been fired up. The water coming out was cold, but at that flow rate, it could just be that it couldn't heat it fast enough. He did say he didn't hear it running. I'm hoping the water put the pilot out, but on the other hand, from where it was leaking, it sounds like it was the anode rod fitting area at the top of the tank that went. Just wondering, does anyone have any experience in what happens with the water or gas company in a case like this. Do they expect full payment for the water/gas? Or if you can show it was an accident do they negotiate or give you a break? Also, what are views on the landlord's responsibility for paying for the water/gas if the utility company does not? In the general case, where it just happens to say a reasonably new water heater, it would seem to me this is a grey area as to whether the landlord would be responsible to pay for water. In the case of a 20+ year old water heater, I think he has a much better case, as it's well known that these things usually fail long before that, so it looks like a case for negligence could be made. The person "billed" for the account will be the one to pay. When I had tenants, the lease specifically indicated they paid all utilities and those accounts were in their names. Some things like garbage pick up and association fees could not be placed in the tenant name, but it was written in the lease that they pay them. I always had an emergency fund for big items, like a broken AC, water heater, etc. Tenants, by the lease were to notify me if any broke.. I think the landlord should fix the water heater as he has a vested interest keeping property in good shape. Wow, that's big of you. You THINK the landlord should fix the water heater? As opposed to doing what? Some great landlord you must be. Still don't like answers you get, so you must attack. Tell us the tenant's responsibility in this case. PS: Just because the lease says the tenant pays the utilities doesn't absolve the landlord from winding up having to pay in small claims, because the issue obviously is that the tenant would not have incurred this expense had the landlords 23 year old water heater failed. The court has to WIND 'em up. Go ahead take up your friend's cause. You may be his best advice, that he did not take before. I had one leak and guess I lost about 500 gallons, just looking at the bill that I paid. A neighbor lost somewhere close to 5,000 gallons due to a main from the meter to the house that broke from a tree root. The builder fixed the water line, I think he paid the water. Oh my! The builder paid? Why would he ever do that instead of the homeowner paying? The builder planted the tree at or near the water line and was under warranty, not like a 23 yo water heater.......... Oren |
#21
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Accidental use of water and water company?
"Bart Byers" wrote in message ... RicodJour wrote: In my town, water meters read like odometers. The meter reader is competent and reliable. The retired couple across the street used about 2500 gallons per month. They were thrifty and sensible. They would not water their lawn or even their shrubs. One month they were billed for something like 15,000 gallons. They couldn't account for it. They would certainly have heard that much water running in the house, such as in a stuck toilet. It was a drought. I'd been over there frequently and would have noticed wet ground if a hose had been left on. They had to pay. All bills before and after were normal. Other people in town have had the same experience. What could cause it? Possibly the water company was sending out estimated usage bills which were low and then finally got around to actually reading the meters?? lee |
#22
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Accidental use of water and water company?
mm wrote:
The yaddda yaddda yaddda I gave you was based on a 60,000 gallon use of water over the norm. The water department did come back to verify the So what happened that took 60,000 gallons? Four female visitors for a week? |
#23
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Accidental use of water and water company?
RicodJour wrote: wrote: Thanks, Abe, that's what I was looking for, some real world actual experience, as opposed to "it's your own fault, what do u expect, yaddda yaddda yaddda. Why are you assuming my advice on the utility company reaction isn't actual experience? And it was the tenant's fault. When you're made aware of a potentially damaging situation, and you ignore it, you've bought the situation. Now obviously the landlord and utility companies won't know that you explicitly warned the tenant about the water heater, but you and the tenant do. Now it shifts from a question of home repair into the area of ethics. You're looking at a couple or three hundred bucks in utility bills. And you and/or the tenant is looking for a way to slide out of this one for free. No, I'm more interested in who is legally responsible. I see small claims cases regularly where a water or sewer pipe breaks, damages tenants property and the landlord winds up having to pay. This seems very similar. As for who knows what, first, all I gave was my opinion. There is nothing to say that my opinion or advice was right. I'm no plumber or home inspector. It's also clear the landlord knew how old the water heater was, because she has owned it the whole time. Abe's situation was completely different. It was a hidden condition where a rock pierced a buried water line. Ask Abe if he would have ignored an ancient water heater after he had been warned about its inevitable demise. Personally, I'd be thanking the landlord for having a sump pump that was in place and working. Why should the landlord be thanked for having a working sump pump, which the basement requires to begin with to keep it dry? R |
#24
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Accidental use of water and water company?
Oren wrote: On 12 Jul 2006 11:14:03 -0700, wrote: Oren wrote: On 12 Jul 2006 07:41:31 -0700, wrote: A buddy of mine was away for a week and returned to find that the water heater in his rented condo had sprung a major leak. He said it was running about like half of a wide open sink faucet rate. The friggin thing was about 23 years old. I remember seeing the label on it, how the area around the pipe connections looked corroded, etc. I warned him about it and told him to make sure he shut off the water when he was away on trips, but obviously, he didn't. Good news is that the water was handled by the sump pump. Bad news is a lot of water may have been billed. Not sure about the gas, as he shut the thing off without finding out if the thing had been fired up. The water coming out was cold, but at that flow rate, it could just be that it couldn't heat it fast enough. He did say he didn't hear it running. I'm hoping the water put the pilot out, but on the other hand, from where it was leaking, it sounds like it was the anode rod fitting area at the top of the tank that went. Just wondering, does anyone have any experience in what happens with the water or gas company in a case like this. Do they expect full payment for the water/gas? Or if you can show it was an accident do they negotiate or give you a break? Also, what are views on the landlord's responsibility for paying for the water/gas if the utility company does not? In the general case, where it just happens to say a reasonably new water heater, it would seem to me this is a grey area as to whether the landlord would be responsible to pay for water. In the case of a 20+ year old water heater, I think he has a much better case, as it's well known that these things usually fail long before that, so it looks like a case for negligence could be made. The person "billed" for the account will be the one to pay. When I had tenants, the lease specifically indicated they paid all utilities and those accounts were in their names. Some things like garbage pick up and association fees could not be placed in the tenant name, but it was written in the lease that they pay them. I always had an emergency fund for big items, like a broken AC, water heater, etc. Tenants, by the lease were to notify me if any broke.. Wow, that's big of you. You THINK the landlord should fix the water heater? As opposed to doing what? Some great landlord you must be. Still don't like answers you get, so you must attack. Tell us the tenant's responsibility in this case. The tenant's responsibility for what? The landlord knew how old the water heater was. The condo passed a CO inspection in Dec. What more do you want? Just because I gave an opinion, that now turned out to be right, that means the landlord has no responsibility? As for attacking, call it what you want. But when a water heater bursts and you say: "I think the landlord should fix the water heater as he has a vested interest keeping property in good shape." I think it pretty much shows where you're coming from. Most reasonable people would say the landlord must replace the water heater because the landlord is responsible for it as a most basic part of the rental contract. PS: Just because the lease says the tenant pays the utilities doesn't absolve the landlord from winding up having to pay in small claims, because the issue obviously is that the tenant would not have incurred this expense had the landlords 23 year old water heater failed. The court has to WIND 'em up. Go ahead take up your friend's cause. You may be his best advice, that he did not take before. I had one leak and guess I lost about 500 gallons, just looking at the bill that I paid. A neighbor lost somewhere close to 5,000 gallons due to a main from the meter to the house that broke from a tree root. The builder fixed the water line, I think he paid the water. Oh my! The builder paid? Why would he ever do that instead of the homeowner paying? The builder planted the tree at or near the water line and was under warranty, not like a 23 yo water heater.......... Whether the water heater had a warranty or not is irrelevant as far as damages go. And I've never seen a home warranty that includes coverage for paying for water or gas that was billed as a result of a leak. The fact that the builder who paid for the repair and the lost water, planted a tree nearby that contributed to the problem seems pretty similar to a landlord choosing to continue using a 23 year old gas water heater. So, I'd say your example does prove that in at least some of these cases, someone other than the homeowner/tenant does pay for the lost water. We've also seen that others have reported utilities cutting breaks to help as well. Oren |
#25
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Accidental use of water and water company?
lee houston wrote:
"Bart Byers" wrote in message ... RicodJour wrote: In my town, water meters read like odometers. The meter reader is competent and reliable. The retired couple across the street used about 2500 gallons per month. They were thrifty and sensible. They would not water their lawn or even their shrubs. One month they were billed for something like 15,000 gallons. They couldn't account for it. They would certainly have heard that much water running in the house, such as in a stuck toilet. It was a drought. I'd been over there frequently and would have noticed wet ground if a hose had been left on. They had to pay. All bills before and after were normal. Other people in town have had the same experience. What could cause it? Possibly the water company was sending out estimated usage bills which were low and then finally got around to actually reading the meters?? lee More likely they misread the meter. Had that happen several times on electric meters where they would misread an upper digit. Had to call in corrected readings. Even if I didn't call in corrected readings it would be corrected at the next proper reading since it's a continuous count, not a monthly reset. The bills after that 15,000 gallons were likely not "normal", but rather "minimum" charges that showed little or no water use, just the base charge. In my case anything from 2,000 gal down is the base charge. I did once blow a 3/4" fitting past the meter and it dumped about 12,000 gal before I found and fixed it. The lawn was nice and green for a while in the area sloping downhill from the meter pit. Pete C. |
#26
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Accidental use of water and water company?
"HeyBub" wrote in message ... mm wrote: The yaddda yaddda yaddda I gave you was based on a 60,000 gallon use of water over the norm. The water department did come back to verify the So what happened that took 60,000 gallons? Four female visitors for a week? Was the week worth it? Bob |
#27
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Accidental use of water and water company?
"Les" wrote in message ups.com... My city charges for sewer based on the gallons of water consumed. They assume a certain amount of water usage goes down the sewer in the summer months. The rest of the water bill does not have the sewer charge. Not sure if they have their own fixed numbers or if they use your average water usage. In the summer months this "rate reduction" is automatic. Likewise, if you tell them you will be filling your swimming pool, you can provide the before and after water meter readings and they will charge you only for the water (not sewer). The swimming pool example is first-hand from my neighbor. My utility charge for sewage based on the winter water usage rate. Bob |
#28
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Accidental use of water and water company?
Charlie Morgan wrote: On 12 Jul 2006 15:35:30 -0700, wrote: Charlie Morgan wrote: I think YOU should pay for all this misery. It's clear that you did not make a strong enough effort to make your friend take your warnings seriously. You really failed badly, and just look at the result. While you are at it, I think you should apologize to the landlord for not notifying him of this clear danger before disaster struck. CWM Your roof is in very bad shape and so is your furnace. That is my opinion, for which I have I have no qualifications as an expert. Now you must replace it immediately. Do it now! Actually, I just paid for an inspection on a property I own but do not occupy. Among other items, it calls for replacing not just one furnace, but also the boiler in the other wing of the house. This is a single family residence of about 5000 sf. with two wings. One half forced air and the other baseboard hot water. The roof is also in bad shape and will cost about $75k - $100k to correct. Meanwhile, I think you should stop being such a busy-body. Since when is asking for what experience others have had in similar situations being a busy-body? Isn't that what this newsgroup is about? Apparently it interests you enough to keep posting, even when you have no direct experience to contibute. Your friend should sort out his own problems. You have already demonstrated that he doesn't value your opinion, anyway. Why are you still trying to insert yourself in the situation? Time to butt-out ...if you are smart. CWM |
#29
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Accidental use of water and water company?
It is the landlords responsibility to maintain the equipment, not the
tennant. Did the landlord have in the lease to turn off the water heater when leaving, no he did not, no one does, so why should the tennant be responsible, he is not. Utility companies may or may not understand the landlords problems. Of course all will want the tennant to pay, but its not his equipment that failed, he rents, not owns. |
#30
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Accidental use of water and water company?
|
#31
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Accidental use of water and water company?
Charlie Morgan wrote: On 12 Jul 2006 16:40:13 -0700, wrote: Charlie Morgan wrote: On 12 Jul 2006 15:35:30 -0700, wrote: Charlie Morgan wrote: I think YOU should pay for all this misery. It's clear that you did not make a strong enough effort to make your friend take your warnings seriously. You really failed badly, and just look at the result. While you are at it, I think you should apologize to the landlord for not notifying him of this clear danger before disaster struck. CWM Your roof is in very bad shape and so is your furnace. That is my opinion, for which I have I have no qualifications as an expert. Now you must replace it immediately. Do it now! Actually, I just paid for an inspection on a property I own but do not occupy. Among other items, it calls for replacing not just one furnace, but also the boiler in the other wing of the house. This is a single family residence of about 5000 sf. with two wings. One half forced air and the other baseboard hot water. The roof is also in bad shape and will cost about $75k - $100k to correct. Meanwhile, I think you should stop being such a busy-body. Since when is asking for what experience others have had in similar situations being a busy-body? Isn't that what this newsgroup is about? Apparently it interests you enough to keep posting, even when you have no direct experience to contibute. Your friend should sort out his own problems. You have already demonstrated that he doesn't value your opinion, anyway. Why are you still trying to insert yourself in the situation? Time to butt-out ...if you are smart. CWM Excuse me? It seems that you asked a question and were only interested in answers that agreed with what you had already decided. Add to that, that you are not even a legitimate party to the issue, and we are left with the reality that you are simply a meddler. Find a better hobby. CWM Excuse you? No, **** you. You called me a busy body and a meddler. Who the hell appointed you to decide who has a legitimate question or what questions are appropriate to the newsgroup. |
#32
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Accidental use of water and water company?
mm wrote: On Wed, 12 Jul 2006 17:11:31 GMT, "Edwin Pawlowski" wrote: wrote in message Thanks, Abe, that's what I was looking for, some real world actual experience, as opposed to "it's your own fault, what do u expect, yaddda yaddda yaddda. The yaddda yaddda yaddda I gave you was based on a 60,000 gallon use of water over the norm. The water department did come back to verify the So what happened that took 60,000 gallons? Dumbski read a post about brain enemas. After 60,000 gallons he's still a dumb ass. |
#33
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Accidental use of water and water company?
Charlie Morgan wrote: You have just further proved my point. I'll bet lots of people just can't wait to try and help you the next time you post something here. CWM I've been a long time poster here and regulars here can reach there own conclusions. I can't recall you ever contributing anything here before you chimed in with total nonsense. Your very first post in this thread was: "I think YOU should pay for all this misery. It's clear that you did not make a strong enough effort to make your friend take your warnings seriously. You really failed badly, and just look at the result. While you are at it, I think you should apologize to the landlord for not notifying him of this clear danger before disaster struck. " Now, how stupid was that? I replied trying to dismiss it as a possible joke, by saying your roof and furnace are shot, you should go replace them. As if anyone seriously expects parties that are not even qualified experts and are 3 times removed to start giving unsolicited advice to a landlord that they don't know. So then you chime back with the state of your roof, so obviously that went right over your head. And then you tell me I'm a busy-body and meddler, for asking a perfectly legitimate question, as if someone appointed you moderator. So, yeah, **** off. |
#34
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Accidental use of water and water company?
Some water companies provide catastrophe relief in the form of a one
time bill based upon your average consumtion- it's worth looking into. Also if the water did not exit back through sewage treatment you might get relief from that portion of your bill. wrote: A buddy of mine was away for a week and returned to find that the water heater in his rented condo had sprung a major leak. He said it was running about like half of a wide open sink faucet rate. The friggin thing was about 23 years old. I remember seeing the label on it, how the area around the pipe connections looked corroded, etc. I warned him about it and told him to make sure he shut off the water when he was away on trips, but obviously, he didn't. Good news is that the water was handled by the sump pump. Bad news is a lot of water may have been billed. Not sure about the gas, as he shut the thing off without finding out if the thing had been fired up. The water coming out was cold, but at that flow rate, it could just be that it couldn't heat it fast enough. He did say he didn't hear it running. I'm hoping the water put the pilot out, but on the other hand, from where it was leaking, it sounds like it was the anode rod fitting area at the top of the tank that went. Just wondering, does anyone have any experience in what happens with the water or gas company in a case like this. Do they expect full payment for the water/gas? Or if you can show it was an accident do they negotiate or give you a break? Also, what are views on the landlord's responsibility for paying for the water/gas if the utility company does not? In the general case, where it just happens to say a reasonably new water heater, it would seem to me this is a grey area as to whether the landlord would be responsible to pay for water. In the case of a 20+ year old water heater, I think he has a much better case, as it's well known that these things usually fail long before that, so it looks like a case for negligence could be made. |
#35
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Accidental use of water and water company?
Someone asked about the 60,000 gallon loss of water we had. It was a flush valve in a bathrrom in a warehouse that is not used. No one even went into that roomf or a long time. |
#36
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Accidental use of water and water company?
|
#37
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Accidental use of water and water company?
Pete C. wrote:
lee houston wrote: "Bart Byers" wrote in message ... RicodJour wrote: In my town, water meters read like odometers. The meter reader is competent and reliable. The retired couple across the street used about 2500 gallons per month. They were thrifty and sensible. They would not water their lawn or even their shrubs. One month they were billed for something like 15,000 gallons. They couldn't account for it. They would certainly have heard that much water running in the house, such as in a stuck toilet. It was a drought. I'd been over there frequently and would have noticed wet ground if a hose had been left on. They had to pay. All bills before and after were normal. Other people in town have had the same experience. What could cause it? Possibly the water company was sending out estimated usage bills which were low and then finally got around to actually reading the meters?? lee More likely they misread the meter. Had that happen several times on electric meters where they would misread an upper digit. Had to call in corrected readings. Even if I didn't call in corrected readings it would be corrected at the next proper reading since it's a continuous count, not a monthly reset. The bills after that 15,000 gallons were likely not "normal", but rather "minimum" charges that showed little or no water use, just the base charge. In my case anything from 2,000 gal down is the base charge. I did once blow a 3/4" fitting past the meter and it dumped about 12,000 gal before I found and fixed it. The lawn was nice and green for a while in the area sloping downhill from the meter pit. Pete C. Once a month the reader can be seen walking down the street and writing the reading from each reader. A reading approximately 12,000 gallons high would mean more than one digit was misread. As soon as I heard about the high reading, I checked the meter. The usage since that reading was consistent with historic usage. |
#38
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Accidental use of water and water company?
On 13 Jul 2006 12:17:41 -0700, "TheNIGHTCRAWLER"
wrote: Edwin Pawlowski wrote: Someone asked about the 60,000 gallon loss of water we had. It was a flush valve in a bathrrom in a warehouse that is not used. No one even went into that roomf or a long time. Hehe. It couldn't have happened to a nicer guy, dumbski. He did not pay, dumbski. How about that cite on pulling a permit for replacing a light switch and receptacle, fool? You do have one, don't you? When does school start, dumbski? You must be the first generation to masturbate sitting up-right. Sincerely, Oren |
#39
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Accidental use of water and water company?
"TheNIGHTCRAWLER" wrote in message How about that cite on pulling a permit for replacing a light switch and receptacle, fool? You do have one, don't you? Now this was fun http://www.city.pittsburgh.pa.us/BBI...al_permit.html http://www.co.chatham.nc.us/dept/cen...20required.htm. Electrical Permits Required No person shall install, alter, repair, replace or relocate any electrical material, appliances or equipment without first having obtained a permit for the specific work to be performed. http://www.ci.watauga.tx.us/publicworks/epermits.htm WHEN IS AN ELECTRICAL PERMIT REQUIRED? A person, firm or corporation shall not erect, construct, enlarge, add to, alter, repair, replace, move improve, remove, install, convert, demolish, equip, use, occupy or maintain a structure or building, service equipment or cause same to be done without first obtaining a permit from the Public Works and Parks Department. |
#40
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Accidental use of water and water company?
Oren wrote: On 13 Jul 2006 12:17:41 -0700, "TheNIGHTCRAWLER" wrote: Edwin Pawlowski wrote: Someone asked about the 60,000 gallon loss of water we had. It was a flush valve in a bathrrom in a warehouse that is not used. No one even went into that roomf or a long time. Hehe. It couldn't have happened to a nicer guy, dumbski. He did not pay, dumbski. Are you calling him a liar, retard? "The water department did come back to verify the reading since it was unusual, but they sent the bill and we had to pay it. " Or are you just stupid? How about that cite on pulling a permit for replacing a light switch and receptacle, fool? You do have one, don't you? When does school start, dumbski? How original! Did you make that up all by your little self? Do you think it's a Usenet first? |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
The #1 rated home water filter in America Aquasana AQ-4000 | Home Repair | |||
The #1 rated home water filter in America Aquasana AQ-4000 | Home Repair | |||
need hot water FAST | Home Repair | |||
NO MORE hot water problems | Home Repair |