Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
Woodworking (rec.woodworking) Discussion forum covering all aspects of working with wood. All levels of expertise are encouraged to particiapte. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#41
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Progress on the Nightstands
Swingman wrote:
On 2/1/2016 10:27 PM, Leon wrote: I think you better reword that. LOL Most residential construction sites use prefab and the drawers and slides are already in the cabinets when they are delivered. Not all new homes being built today are cookie cutter "tract" homes; and certainly not all those use pre-fab cabinets. Granted but I believe the trend has been headed that way for quite some time in other than totally custom built homes or in our case, when upper end remodeling. Perry homes has been better cookie cutter and still offered job site built cabinets up until about 10 years ago. Out where I live I would venture to say the vast majority of the homes built in the last 20 years had prefab including the homes approaching $1M. Although the trend to further cut costs by using pre-fabs (versus built-ins or custom cabinets) has certainly grown since the bust of 2008 in the "spec" home market, pre-fabs, being particularly suited to "cookie cutter" constructions methods, are still rarely seen in "spec" homes; and even more rarely in "custom" homes. Understood and agreed but I highly suspect that the homers you are referencing are a much smaller percentage of what is being built since the 70's. Even then, it is evident that the cabinetry in _most_ homes in existence in most parts of the country today are not prefabs, but most likely to be onsite built-ins, which almost always require component installation to be done onsite. Correct and I agree here but you mentioned to go on any residential construction site in the country during installation of the kitchen cabinets and you will likely see something identical in use by the trim carpenters during drawer installation. residential home site construction and I took that to mean new home construction. I think we are just looking at what you said differently. Obviously we never installed drawers in the kitchens that we did together prior to install. Just another reason why the modern drawer slide/cabinet hinge hardware business has grown by leaps and bounds during the last twenty+ years. Well the prefab cabs are certainly coming with better hardware, that is for sure. I was a bit surprised that Colon & Reeda's new home with prefab cabinets came with full extension side mount slides but equally surprised that they were not soft close. And, which makes knowing how to efficiently, and cost effectively, use and install that type of hardware a valuable skill today. Absolutely. That skill being basically being the subject of the thread. |
#42
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Progress on the Nightstands
|
#43
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Progress on the Nightstands
On 2/2/2016 8:01 AM, Leon wrote:
I think we are just looking at what you said differently. Pffft ... I think you're just arguing because my deck is bigger than yours. LOL -- eWoodShop: www.eWoodShop.com Wood Shop: www.e-WoodShop.net https://www.google.com/+eWoodShop https://plus.google.com/+KarlCaillouet/posts http://www.custommade.com/by/ewoodshop/ KarlCaillouet@ (the obvious) |
#44
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Progress on the Nightstands
On 2/2/2016 8:26 AM, Swingman wrote:
On 2/2/2016 8:01 AM, Leon wrote: I think we are just looking at what you said differently. Pffft ... I think you're just arguing because my deck is bigger than yours. LOL Guilty! |
#45
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Progress on the Nightstands
On 1/31/2016 4:48 PM, OFWW wrote:
Long story short, I am redesigning the kitchen, doing far more than originally planned and on paper, it is looking mighty good. Even so, we are going to sell, hopefully, in a couple years and get out of Dodge. In Sketchup, go to File|3D Warehouse|Get Model, and you can find all kinds of cabinet models to help you populate your particular space. Try to find the ones that are truly "dynamic", IOW, which can be resized/scaled to fill a certain area, often in both height and width. Or go here with a web browser and search around: https://3dwarehouse.sketchup.com/sea...Clas s=entity They should all download into a folder, or if in SketchUp, directly into your model that is open. Back six or seven years ago, before SU use was as widespread as it is today, I had to program my own DC (Dynamic Component) face frames, doors, wall and base cabinets, in both Traditional and Euro style, which I still use today for designing kitchens and baths. Most of what you will find on the 3D Warehouse are much more sophisticated than my old ones, with many more options, but you may not get the level of detail that will help with fabrication of the components that make up the cabinets. Nonetheless, give it a try ... it will quickly leverage your actual benefit of using SketchUp as you learn. - eWoodShop: www.eWoodShop.com Wood Shop: www.e-WoodShop.net https://www.google.com/+eWoodShop https://plus.google.com/+KarlCaillouet/posts http://www.custommade.com/by/ewoodshop/ KarlCaillouet@ (the obvious) |
#46
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Progress on the Nightstands
On Tue, 2 Feb 2016 08:26:45 -0600, Swingman wrote:
I think we are just looking at what you said differently. Pffft ... I think you're just arguing because my deck is bigger than yours. LOL That means he can come over to your place more often and mooch some barbeque. |
#47
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Progress on the Nightstands
On 2/2/2016 9:44 AM, wrote:
On Tue, 2 Feb 2016 08:26:45 -0600, Swingman wrote: I think we are just looking at what you said differently. Pffft ... I think you're just arguing because my deck is bigger than yours. LOL That means he can come over to your place more often and mooch some barbeque. He keeps this up, it's crackers and water ... -- eWoodShop: www.eWoodShop.com Wood Shop: www.e-WoodShop.net https://www.google.com/+eWoodShop https://plus.google.com/+KarlCaillouet/posts http://www.custommade.com/by/ewoodshop/ KarlCaillouet@ (the obvious) |
#48
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Progress on the Nightstands
On Tue, 2 Feb 2016 09:28:02 -0600, Swingman wrote:
On 1/31/2016 4:48 PM, OFWW wrote: Long story short, I am redesigning the kitchen, doing far more than originally planned and on paper, it is looking mighty good. Even so, we are going to sell, hopefully, in a couple years and get out of Dodge. In Sketchup, go to File|3D Warehouse|Get Model, and you can find all kinds of cabinet models to help you populate your particular space. Try to find the ones that are truly "dynamic", IOW, which can be resized/scaled to fill a certain area, often in both height and width. Or go here with a web browser and search around: https://3dwarehouse.sketchup.com/sea...Clas s=entity They should all download into a folder, or if in SketchUp, directly into your model that is open. Back six or seven years ago, before SU use was as widespread as it is today, I had to program my own DC (Dynamic Component) face frames, doors, wall and base cabinets, in both Traditional and Euro style, which I still use today for designing kitchens and baths. Most of what you will find on the 3D Warehouse are much more sophisticated than my old ones, with many more options, but you may not get the level of detail that will help with fabrication of the components that make up the cabinets. Nonetheless, give it a try ... it will quickly leverage your actual benefit of using SketchUp as you learn. Thanks for the link, I checked it out, and found that the dynamic feature is only for the pro version. I had seen a little about this feature and it was on my bucket list of thinks to check out. A very nice feature, makes a lot of things reusable. I finally got my pieces to link up and a beautiful sight to see when an end panel with Dado's and Grooves link up to its associated pieces. I have already found some issues regarding my new cabinet designs in my head, rather correct them in Sketchup than with real wood products. I am glad that you and Leon stressed using the program, Thank you. |
#49
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Progress on the Nightstands
On Sun, 31 Jan 2016 22:46:49 -0600, Leon lcb11211@swbelldotnet
wrote: snip If the offer is still open, Yes, I would love to see what you did. I finally started getting my drawings to link up, so that the shelves fit into the dado's and so on. In some ways it is easier than Auto Cad, and more productive from what I have seen with the training vids. It seems once you "get it" Sketchup is simple to use. It took me a few times to "get it". ;~) If you give me an e-mail address to send the file to I send it. Keep in mind that I often modify and dimensions might differ in different parts of the drawing. That's quite alright, just being able to see how someone in your position does things is what is important to me, since you would more than likely emphasize it. Sort of like we would on HVAC and Control drawings. Is your email addy a workable one. If so I can send you my email address. I'd love to see what is done by someone at your skill level. Replace "dot" with "." Will be sending you my addy tonight. You got mail! Something else I will tell you about my drawing. You will notice components are a few different colors. Those colors/materials are named to suggest what type material I am using. The brown is Oak Plywood. the Green is solid Oak wood, and the blue is Baltic birch plywood. I don't have a problem knowing what it what however it assures me that I have properly assigned each component a particular type material. I use an import program that copies all highlighted components into my CutList Plus program and it imports the material assigned to each component also. Color coding materials helps to insure that the optimization cutting program, CutList Plus does not think that solid wood components should be cut from a sheet of plywood, visa versa, or a what ever. Just in case you were wondering. Leon, I really appreciated seeing that, and your color legend idea for wood products. I had been thinking about that very same thing and you, lol, gave me the solution before I even mentioned it. I finally got things linking up, nice to see joints "hook up" I have already found some problems with my cabinet designs, and it is so much easier to correct them in the drawing than making the same mistake with real wood. To think, that this all started out with the idea of installing slide out drawers for the pots n pans, and large under the counter appliances, then advancing to full replacement due to upgraded appliances and the knowledge that my cabinets were at the end of their life cycle. Thanks for your insistence on using Sketchup, it has turned into a real plus. I had downloaded a cutlist program for version 16 but have not gotten to the point where I need to set it up, yet. I hope to later this week. Thanks again, and thank you for the link on drawer slides, those prices are 2/3rds of the prices I see around here. |
#50
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Progress on the Nightstands
On Mon, 1 Feb 2016 18:31:56 -0600, Swingman wrote:
On 2/1/2016 3:39 PM, OFWW wrote: Do you make dovetails on all four corners of your drawers? Normally speaking? For fine furniture and cabinetry, normally yes. For Tier 1 kitchen cabinets with 3/4" sides and 1/2" bottoms, depends upon the budget. Tier 2 kitchen cabinets, not usually, just on the front. Consider the two most detrimental forces that act upon a kitchen cabinet drawer that cause it to fail: 1.The sheer force acting on the drawer sides when pulling the drawer out by the drawer front, or false front. 2. The downward force of the load on the drawer bottom from the contents. Front dovetails totally mitigate #1; And a dadoed drawer back, cut high enough to allow a thinner drawer bottom to slide into grooves, thereby allowing for drawer bottom replacement, instead of a new drawer if it becomes necessary from overloading, mitigates, to a large extent #2. My Kitchen and bathroom drawers lasted 30+ years before the drawer faces would occasionally come free, or the drawer boxes started coming apart. Proves the point: A 30 year old kitchen is not a "modern" kitchen, and it appears some of the existing drawers did not even withstand that. Note: I can make a good living just bringing 7 year old kitchen cabinet components in multi-million dollar homes up to modern standards (that's how shoddy residential construction workmanship is these days) ... and certainly anything older for damned sure. LOL Super great advice, thank you. |
#51
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Progress on the Nightstands
On Mon, 1 Feb 2016 16:28:37 -0600, Leon lcb11211@swbelldotnet wrote:
On 2/1/2016 3:21 PM, OFWW wrote: On Sun, 31 Jan 2016 22:35:18 -0600, Leon lcb11211@swbelldotnet wrote: On 1/31/2016 8:21 PM, OFWW wrote: On Sun, 31 Jan 2016 12:44:10 -0600, Swingman wrote: On 1/28/2016 7:28 PM, OFWW wrote: I was contemplating how I would do some of the drawers I was going to build, and you solved every problem I can think of, including but not limited to saving all the trying to fit in the cabinets to mount the slides and align them, and then drill the holes and install the screws. Once again, when you have more than one or two drawers to do, and you're using a drawer slide/spacer assembly to attach them to your cabinet sides, a jig is your friend. Easily made from scraps as needed, and which can be immediately customized with simple custom spacers (cut for different slide and face frame parameters), it will also allow you to reference the drawer slide the proper distance for any face frame thickness and/or distance from cabinet front edge ... as well as giving you some nailing/screwing space below the slide which comes in handy when tweaking/shimming in existing cabinetry. https://picasaweb.google.com/1113554...7 55711086306 (scroll right for all four photos) When you have many drawers to install, this "trim carpenters" jig to do the drawer slide/spacer assembly will save tons of time. I can see that, and the ability to screw below the slides is a great option as well. I'd like to ask a question here, it has been on my mind ever since I started looking at these things, the metal slides. The side slides take up space, making it necessary to narrow the drawer and everytime you pull the drawer out you see that big gap. Is mounting the slide portion that attaches to the drawer possible to install in a groove/dado about 1/4" deep that would pretty much make the gap look normal and cover the slide when looking from above? Or would create complications down the road? The grove down the side of the drawer would have to be approximately 2" wide and about 1/2" deep to fill the gap. That would not work with 1/2" thick material. I think that the gap would not be a thing to fixate on. Instead look at the big gap between the drawer sides when you pull the drawer open. ;~) Alternatively, and referencing Swingmans link showing his jig and "undermount" slides, you see no hardware at all with that set up. BUT IIRC you have limitations as to how tall the drawer can be compared to the height of the drawer opening. Yeah, you guys are probably right, no sense swimming against the tide, all things considered. But I will probably try at least one for the garage to see. I thought the jig was for his side mounts, anyhow I was looking at the bottom slides, but the costs drive up the job higher than the wood for the carcases. If it was my final home I would go for it. But the house I am in it just isn't worth it for this area, unless I happened upon a real discriminating buyer. Here is the way I look at it, if you are introducing mechanical metal slides you are crossing that line away from really high end craftsmanship. IOT if I don't to see compromises I build a web frame in the cabinet, with center guide and a matching center guide for the drawer, out of wood. No metal.... But in kitchen cabinets that will see a lot of wear, and like Swingman said, wood on wood movement does not hold up for the long haul. Anyway if you are looking for a pretty good side mount full extension 100# Soft close slide I buy from this place. Really good pricing for a KV distributed product. http://www.cabinethardware.com/G-Sli...ose-p/1012.htm The link info was great, less expensive that what I can get here locally, even less than the box stores. We decided at the beginning to use metal slides for their full length extension capability, making it far easier to get at the stuff at the back of the cabinet without having to unload the cabinet every time you need something. I also ran across a mention of a slide with an extra 3/4 " extension for drawers that are under the counter top so that those drawers are also fully extendable when you take the countertop overhang into account. Thanks again Leon.! |
#52
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Progress on the Nightstands
OFWW wrote:
On Mon, 1 Feb 2016 16:28:37 -0600, Leon lcb11211@swbelldotnet wrote: On 2/1/2016 3:21 PM, OFWW wrote: On Sun, 31 Jan 2016 22:35:18 -0600, Leon lcb11211@swbelldotnet wrote: On 1/31/2016 8:21 PM, OFWW wrote: On Sun, 31 Jan 2016 12:44:10 -0600, Swingman wrote: On 1/28/2016 7:28 PM, OFWW wrote: I was contemplating how I would do some of the drawers I was going to build, and you solved every problem I can think of, including but not limited to saving all the trying to fit in the cabinets to mount the slides and align them, and then drill the holes and install the screws. Once again, when you have more than one or two drawers to do, and you're using a drawer slide/spacer assembly to attach them to your cabinet sides, a jig is your friend. Easily made from scraps as needed, and which can be immediately customized with simple custom spacers (cut for different slide and face frame parameters), it will also allow you to reference the drawer slide the proper distance for any face frame thickness and/or distance from cabinet front edge ... as well as giving you some nailing/screwing space below the slide which comes in handy when tweaking/shimming in existing cabinetry. https://picasaweb.google.com/1113554...7 55711086306 (scroll right for all four photos) When you have many drawers to install, this "trim carpenters" jig to do the drawer slide/spacer assembly will save tons of time. I can see that, and the ability to screw below the slides is a great option as well. I'd like to ask a question here, it has been on my mind ever since I started looking at these things, the metal slides. The side slides take up space, making it necessary to narrow the drawer and everytime you pull the drawer out you see that big gap. Is mounting the slide portion that attaches to the drawer possible to install in a groove/dado about 1/4" deep that would pretty much make the gap look normal and cover the slide when looking from above? Or would create complications down the road? The grove down the side of the drawer would have to be approximately 2" wide and about 1/2" deep to fill the gap. That would not work with 1/2" thick material. I think that the gap would not be a thing to fixate on. Instead look at the big gap between the drawer sides when you pull the drawer open. ;~) Alternatively, and referencing Swingmans link showing his jig and "undermount" slides, you see no hardware at all with that set up. BUT IIRC you have limitations as to how tall the drawer can be compared to the height of the drawer opening. Yeah, you guys are probably right, no sense swimming against the tide, all things considered. But I will probably try at least one for the garage to see. I thought the jig was for his side mounts, anyhow I was looking at the bottom slides, but the costs drive up the job higher than the wood for the carcases. If it was my final home I would go for it. But the house I am in it just isn't worth it for this area, unless I happened upon a real discriminating buyer. Here is the way I look at it, if you are introducing mechanical metal slides you are crossing that line away from really high end craftsmanship. IOT if I don't to see compromises I build a web frame in the cabinet, with center guide and a matching center guide for the drawer, out of wood. No metal.... But in kitchen cabinets that will see a lot of wear, and like Swingman said, wood on wood movement does not hold up for the long haul. Anyway if you are looking for a pretty good side mount full extension 100# Soft close slide I buy from this place. Really good pricing for a KV distributed product. http://www.cabinethardware.com/G-Sli...ose-p/1012.htm The link info was great, less expensive that what I can get here locally, even less than the box stores. We decided at the beginning to use metal slides for their full length extension capability, making it far easier to get at the stuff at the back of the cabinet without having to unload the cabinet every time you need something. I also ran across a mention of a slide with an extra 3/4 " extension for drawers that are under the counter top so that those drawers are also fully extendable when you take the countertop overhang into account. Thanks again Leon.! You are welcome. Keep in mind that the over travel slides can be a bit pricey for that extra 3/4" of travel. You cab accomplish the same thing by simply making the drawer 3/4" or more shorter front to back. |
#53
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Progress on the Nightstands
OFWW wrote:
On Sun, 31 Jan 2016 22:46:49 -0600, Leon lcb11211@swbelldotnet wrote: snip If the offer is still open, Yes, I would love to see what you did. I finally started getting my drawings to link up, so that the shelves fit into the dado's and so on. In some ways it is easier than Auto Cad, and more productive from what I have seen with the training vids. It seems once you "get it" Sketchup is simple to use. It took me a few times to "get it". ;~) If you give me an e-mail address to send the file to I send it. Keep in mind that I often modify and dimensions might differ in different parts of the drawing. That's quite alright, just being able to see how someone in your position does things is what is important to me, since you would more than likely emphasize it. Sort of like we would on HVAC and Control drawings. Is your email addy a workable one. If so I can send you my email address. I'd love to see what is done by someone at your skill level. Replace "dot" with "." Will be sending you my addy tonight. You got mail! Something else I will tell you about my drawing. You will notice components are a few different colors. Those colors/materials are named to suggest what type material I am using. The brown is Oak Plywood. the Green is solid Oak wood, and the blue is Baltic birch plywood. I don't have a problem knowing what it what however it assures me that I have properly assigned each component a particular type material. I use an import program that copies all highlighted components into my CutList Plus program and it imports the material assigned to each component also. Color coding materials helps to insure that the optimization cutting program, CutList Plus does not think that solid wood components should be cut from a sheet of plywood, visa versa, or a what ever. Just in case you were wondering. Leon, I really appreciated seeing that, and your color legend idea for wood products. I had been thinking about that very same thing and you, lol, gave me the solution before I even mentioned it. And just go a bird rather with that, when I send a drawing to a customer I use wood grain materials instead of different colors. I finally got things linking up, nice to see joints "hook up" I have already found some problems with my cabinet designs, and it is so much easier to correct them in the drawing than making the same mistake with real wood. Exactly. To think, that this all started out with the idea of installing slide out drawers for the pots n pans, and large under the counter appliances, then advancing to full replacement due to upgraded appliances and the knowledge that my cabinets were at the end of their life cycle. Slippery slope. In 1989 my wife and I began discussing replacing cabinet doors and drawers in our kitchen for a more fresh look to an 8 year old prefab kitchen. I still had a real full time job and about 2 years later we ended up with all new cabinets, a foot print twice as large, an additional pantry, new appliances, Olympic sized kitchen sink, and new tile floor. 25 years later that kitchen, which now belongs to our son, still looks better than the original kitchen. Thanks for your insistence on using Sketchup, it has turned into a real plus. The more you use it the more you will wonder how you did with out it. It is as important as any tool in my shop. I had downloaded a cutlist program for version 16 but have not gotten to the point where I need to set it up, yet. I hope to later this week. Thanks again, and thank you for the link on drawer slides, those prices are 2/3rds of the prices I see around here. And if you need a link to Blum Euro style hinges,,,,, I buy boxes of 50 at a time.. In particular a FF screw mounted Blum hinge with 1/2" over lay. IIRC Blum calls it a Compact 35. The site that I buy from has sales on multiples of 50. I just reordered and paid about $1.15 per hinge. Considering that their regular price is around $1.75 each that is a substantial savings. |
#54
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Progress on the Nightstands
On 2/4/2016 2:50 AM, OFWW wrote:
Thanks for the link, I checked it out, and found that the dynamic feature is only for the pro version. Only partly true. You can only "development" them in the Pro version. You can certainly use Dynamic Components, and take advantage of their abilities in Make. -- eWoodShop: www.eWoodShop.com Wood Shop: www.e-WoodShop.net https://www.google.com/+eWoodShop https://plus.google.com/+KarlCaillouet/posts http://www.custommade.com/by/ewoodshop/ KarlCaillouet@ (the obvious) |
#55
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Progress on the Nightstands
On 2/4/2016 2:50 AM, OFWW wrote:
I am glad that you and Leon stressed using the program, Thank you. Be careful, you'll have a shop full of Festool before you know it. -- eWoodShop: www.eWoodShop.com Wood Shop: www.e-WoodShop.net https://www.google.com/+eWoodShop https://plus.google.com/+KarlCaillouet/posts http://www.custommade.com/by/ewoodshop/ KarlCaillouet@ (the obvious) |
#56
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Progress on the Nightstands
On Thu, 4 Feb 2016 08:10:33 -0600, Swingman wrote:
On 2/4/2016 2:50 AM, OFWW wrote: Thanks for the link, I checked it out, and found that the dynamic feature is only for the pro version. Only partly true. You can only "development" them in the Pro version. You can certainly use Dynamic Components, and take advantage of their abilities in Make. Oh, I didn't realize that. Right now I am in the 30 day tryout period of the pro. Wondering what kind of a hit I will take when that part of the program stops. I've seen the actions of "follow me" when moldings around a piece of furniture, HOT! |
#57
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Progress on the Nightstands
On Thu, 4 Feb 2016 08:11:38 -0600, Swingman wrote:
On 2/4/2016 2:50 AM, OFWW wrote: I am glad that you and Leon stressed using the program, Thank you. Be careful, you'll have a shop full of Festool before you know it. ROTFLOL, I doubt it, but that domino tool the way Leon used it makes be want to look and see what it costs. BAH Humbug, I just had to go look, but hey! They give you free shipping. Think I'll do fine without it and with what I have, plus if I get hungry I can eat biscuits which is better than playing a game of domino's. |
#58
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Progress on the Nightstands
On Thu, 4 Feb 2016 07:35:57 -0600, Leon wrote:
OFWW wrote: On Mon, 1 Feb 2016 16:28:37 -0600, Leon lcb11211@swbelldotnet wrote: On 2/1/2016 3:21 PM, OFWW wrote: On Sun, 31 Jan 2016 22:35:18 -0600, Leon lcb11211@swbelldotnet wrote: On 1/31/2016 8:21 PM, OFWW wrote: On Sun, 31 Jan 2016 12:44:10 -0600, Swingman wrote: On 1/28/2016 7:28 PM, OFWW wrote: I was contemplating how I would do some of the drawers I was going to build, and you solved every problem I can think of, including but not limited to saving all the trying to fit in the cabinets to mount the slides and align them, and then drill the holes and install the screws. Once again, when you have more than one or two drawers to do, and you're using a drawer slide/spacer assembly to attach them to your cabinet sides, a jig is your friend. Easily made from scraps as needed, and which can be immediately customized with simple custom spacers (cut for different slide and face frame parameters), it will also allow you to reference the drawer slide the proper distance for any face frame thickness and/or distance from cabinet front edge ... as well as giving you some nailing/screwing space below the slide which comes in handy when tweaking/shimming in existing cabinetry. https://picasaweb.google.com/1113554...7 55711086306 (scroll right for all four photos) When you have many drawers to install, this "trim carpenters" jig to do the drawer slide/spacer assembly will save tons of time. I can see that, and the ability to screw below the slides is a great option as well. I'd like to ask a question here, it has been on my mind ever since I started looking at these things, the metal slides. The side slides take up space, making it necessary to narrow the drawer and everytime you pull the drawer out you see that big gap. Is mounting the slide portion that attaches to the drawer possible to install in a groove/dado about 1/4" deep that would pretty much make the gap look normal and cover the slide when looking from above? Or would create complications down the road? The grove down the side of the drawer would have to be approximately 2" wide and about 1/2" deep to fill the gap. That would not work with 1/2" thick material. I think that the gap would not be a thing to fixate on. Instead look at the big gap between the drawer sides when you pull the drawer open. ;~) Alternatively, and referencing Swingmans link showing his jig and "undermount" slides, you see no hardware at all with that set up. BUT IIRC you have limitations as to how tall the drawer can be compared to the height of the drawer opening. Yeah, you guys are probably right, no sense swimming against the tide, all things considered. But I will probably try at least one for the garage to see. I thought the jig was for his side mounts, anyhow I was looking at the bottom slides, but the costs drive up the job higher than the wood for the carcases. If it was my final home I would go for it. But the house I am in it just isn't worth it for this area, unless I happened upon a real discriminating buyer. Here is the way I look at it, if you are introducing mechanical metal slides you are crossing that line away from really high end craftsmanship. IOT if I don't to see compromises I build a web frame in the cabinet, with center guide and a matching center guide for the drawer, out of wood. No metal.... But in kitchen cabinets that will see a lot of wear, and like Swingman said, wood on wood movement does not hold up for the long haul. Anyway if you are looking for a pretty good side mount full extension 100# Soft close slide I buy from this place. Really good pricing for a KV distributed product. http://www.cabinethardware.com/G-Sli...ose-p/1012.htm The link info was great, less expensive that what I can get here locally, even less than the box stores. We decided at the beginning to use metal slides for their full length extension capability, making it far easier to get at the stuff at the back of the cabinet without having to unload the cabinet every time you need something. I also ran across a mention of a slide with an extra 3/4 " extension for drawers that are under the counter top so that those drawers are also fully extendable when you take the countertop overhang into account. Thanks again Leon.! You are welcome. Keep in mind that the over travel slides can be a bit pricey for that extra 3/4" of travel. You cab accomplish the same thing by simply making the drawer 3/4" or more shorter front to back. I was thinking about that very same thing. Thanks for the confirmation. |
#59
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Progress on the Nightstands
On 2/5/2016 1:17 AM, OFWW wrote:
On Thu, 4 Feb 2016 08:10:33 -0600, Swingman wrote: On 2/4/2016 2:50 AM, OFWW wrote: Thanks for the link, I checked it out, and found that the dynamic feature is only for the pro version. Only partly true. You can only "development" them in the Pro version. You can certainly use Dynamic Components, and take advantage of their abilities in Make. Oh, I didn't realize that. Right now I am in the 30 day tryout period of the pro. Wondering what kind of a hit I will take when that part of the program stops. I've seen the actions of "follow me" when moldings around a piece of furniture, HOT! IIRC when the trial period ends the only thing you loose is the ability to construct dynamic components, most of the solid object modification tools, Style Builder, and Layout. Of all of those the dynamic components is probably the biggest hit you will notice. None of the others are really necessary for typical woodworking. I am a shortcut freak. I despise having to click on icons for every frequently used operation. You can assign just about any command a shortcut. If you open up the top menus the drop down windows show commands that you can either click or you can use the short cut key that is shown and assigned to the command. If that sort of thing interests you there is a window for setting up the short cut key strokes. AND some of the commands do not appear in that window UNLESS........ you have actually selected a line or component in the drawing. For instance the right click "flip along" command is very helpful for giving you a mirror image of something that you have copied and placed in another spot in the drawing. The Flip Along commands no not appear in the short cut window if you do not have something selected in the drawing. Clear as mud? LOL Just something else to think about as you progress with the program. |
#60
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Progress on the Nightstands
On 2/5/2016 1:25 AM, OFWW wrote:
On Thu, 4 Feb 2016 08:11:38 -0600, Swingman wrote: On 2/4/2016 2:50 AM, OFWW wrote: I am glad that you and Leon stressed using the program, Thank you. Be careful, you'll have a shop full of Festool before you know it. ROTFLOL, I doubt it, but that domino tool the way Leon used it makes be want to look and see what it costs. BAH Humbug, I just had to go look, but hey! They give you free shipping. LOL, Don't you have a spare thousand dollars for that tool??? AND you need to run a shop vac with that tool to insure that the chips are cleared out of the mortise. The Festool brand vacs are right on up there also BUT IMHO worth every penny. They are exceptionally quiet. You seldom hear them running when using another power tool, even sanders. Think I'll do fine without it and with what I have, plus if I get hungry I can eat biscuits which is better than playing a game of domino's. You really need to be doing volume to justify the expense, I have had my Domino since early 2008 IIRC and I have averaged about 1500 mortises for each year that I have had it so it has paid me back in spades owning one. |
#61
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Progress on the Nightstands
On 2/5/2016 1:17 AM, OFWW wrote:
Oh, I didn't realize that. Right now I am in the 30 day tryout period of the pro. Wondering what kind of a hit I will take when that part of the program stops. Unless you have some programming chops, and have a direct need for rolling your own "Dynamic Components", you won't notice anything that will impact your use of SU Make for woodworking at all. I'm pretty sure Leon has always used the free version since day 1. As previously noted, you can download, and use, many Dynamic Components (cabinets, fences, stairs, etc) on the 3D Warehouse straight to your model in the free version. I personally would miss the "Solid Object" tools, available only in SU Pro, but only because I've experienced them by having the Pro version for a number of years. Never missed them before I upgraded to SU Pro because there are many different ways to skin any particular cat in SU, including thousands of SU plug-ins. The "Plug-ins" and extensions (there is an Extension Warehouse under you WINDOW menu also) are another world of utilitarian tools you need to check into, most free, but some need to be purchased. There are also third party sites dedicated solely to SU plug-ins. Google is your friend. I build homes, and do a lot of kitchen and bath remodeling, therefore the Pro version that comes with "Layout", was imperative for me to generate industry standard, and formatted, construction documents for permitting, bidding and building. Either version is hard to beat for the price as a design tool, a presentation tool to clients, as well as to design, build and fabricate just about anything you can think of. Wouldn't leave home, or go to the shop, without it ... literally. -- eWoodShop: www.eWoodShop.com Wood Shop: www.e-WoodShop.net https://www.google.com/+eWoodShop https://plus.google.com/+KarlCaillouet/posts http://www.custommade.com/by/ewoodshop/ KarlCaillouet@ (the obvious) |
#62
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Progress on the Nightstands
On Fri, 5 Feb 2016 08:33:25 -0600, Leon lcb11211@swbelldotnet wrote:
On 2/5/2016 1:17 AM, OFWW wrote: On Thu, 4 Feb 2016 08:10:33 -0600, Swingman wrote: On 2/4/2016 2:50 AM, OFWW wrote: Thanks for the link, I checked it out, and found that the dynamic feature is only for the pro version. Only partly true. You can only "development" them in the Pro version. You can certainly use Dynamic Components, and take advantage of their abilities in Make. Oh, I didn't realize that. Right now I am in the 30 day tryout period of the pro. Wondering what kind of a hit I will take when that part of the program stops. I've seen the actions of "follow me" when moldings around a piece of furniture, HOT! IIRC when the trial period ends the only thing you loose is the ability to construct dynamic components, most of the solid object modification tools, Style Builder, and Layout. Of all of those the dynamic components is probably the biggest hit you will notice. None of the others are really necessary for typical woodworking. I am a shortcut freak. I despise having to click on icons for every frequently used operation. You can assign just about any command a shortcut. If you open up the top menus the drop down windows show commands that you can either click or you can use the short cut key that is shown and assigned to the command. If that sort of thing interests you there is a window for setting up the short cut key strokes. I do a little of each. AND some of the commands do not appear in that window UNLESS........ you have actually selected a line or component in the drawing. Yes, I have run across that too, even your ability to do certain things is not there unless you are facing in the right direction, sometimes I just use the correct plane. For instance the right click "flip along" command is very helpful for giving you a mirror image of something that you have copied and placed in another spot in the drawing. The Flip Along commands no not appear in the short cut window if you do not have something selected in the drawing. Clear as mud? LOL Actually I have been using the flip commands, if I design an end panel I can copy it with the appropriate flips, or slide the copy of the bare end panel and flip, then whatever I do to the one panel will appear on the other side, inside where it should be. But not useful to duplicate on all cabinets with a different purpose at the other end. Just something else to think about as you progress with the program. This weekend I will probably be spending my time in the shop as it is warming up, supposedly, and practice on dovetails, and some other joints and also check out my new Dado set. |
#63
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Progress on the Nightstands
On Fri, 5 Feb 2016 10:14:56 -0600, Swingman wrote:
On 2/5/2016 1:17 AM, OFWW wrote: Oh, I didn't realize that. Right now I am in the 30 day tryout period of the pro. Wondering what kind of a hit I will take when that part of the program stops. Unless you have some programming chops, and have a direct need for rolling your own "Dynamic Components", you won't notice anything that will impact your use of SU Make for woodworking at all. I'm pretty sure Leon has always used the free version since day 1. As previously noted, you can download, and use, many Dynamic Components (cabinets, fences, stairs, etc) on the 3D Warehouse straight to your model in the free version. I personally would miss the "Solid Object" tools, available only in SU Pro, but only because I've experienced them by having the Pro version for a number of years. Never missed them before I upgraded to SU Pro because there are many different ways to skin any particular cat in SU, including thousands of SU plug-ins. The "Plug-ins" and extensions (there is an Extension Warehouse under you WINDOW menu also) are another world of utilitarian tools you need to check into, most free, but some need to be purchased. There are also third party sites dedicated solely to SU plug-ins. Google is your friend. I build homes, and do a lot of kitchen and bath remodeling, therefore the Pro version that comes with "Layout", was imperative for me to generate industry standard, and formatted, construction documents for permitting, bidding and building. Either version is hard to beat for the price as a design tool, a presentation tool to clients, as well as to design, build and fabricate just about anything you can think of. Wouldn't leave home, or go to the shop, without it ... literally. Yeah, I have a copy on my tablet/notebook with duplicate files from my desktop in case I have a thought. On Layout, is that the ability to layout the floor plan and walls, and then put in the various cabinets and appliances to see a picture of the final results of the cabinet designs? Or so that I can redesign my garage layout for tool locations, etc? I would miss those, and as my wife lacks visual imagination in certain area, It would be hard to show her something without a picture of it. I can only envision doing this as a business if the economy went dramatically south and I needed a source of income. I have learned to do things sparingly for friends. True friends, IYKWIM. I've seen some of what it can do based on geographic location, I am totally impressed. You can use that for tree placement around a bldg with deciduous trees for energy management amongst other things. |
#64
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Progress on the Nightstands
On Fri, 5 Feb 2016 08:40:06 -0600, Leon lcb11211@swbelldotnet wrote:
On 2/5/2016 1:25 AM, OFWW wrote: On Thu, 4 Feb 2016 08:11:38 -0600, Swingman wrote: On 2/4/2016 2:50 AM, OFWW wrote: I am glad that you and Leon stressed using the program, Thank you. Be careful, you'll have a shop full of Festool before you know it. ROTFLOL, I doubt it, but that domino tool the way Leon used it makes be want to look and see what it costs. BAH Humbug, I just had to go look, but hey! They give you free shipping. LOL, Don't you have a spare thousand dollars for that tool??? VBG AND you need to run a shop vac with that tool to insure that the chips are cleared out of the mortise. The Festool brand vacs are right on up there also BUT IMHO worth every penny. They are exceptionally quiet. You seldom hear them running when using another power tool, even sanders. They would have had to do an excellent job of bafflling air flow, without introducing a restriction. I have one that you have to wear ear protectors or you cannot hear anything, I have another that is a lot quieter with similar CFM. I put it in the garage attic space running a hose to the Oneida dust separator and its intake at the center of my garage. One hose that can reach anything and hook up to my equipment and also clean the floor with it. No more yelling to be heard, and like you say with yours, mine is quite, but mine has plywood separating it from the garage. (w/remote control) Think I'll do fine without it and with what I have, plus if I get hungry I can eat biscuits which is better than playing a game of domino's. You really need to be doing volume to justify the expense, I have had my Domino since early 2008 IIRC and I have averaged about 1500 mortises for each year that I have had it so it has paid me back in spades owning one. That would be my reason for owning one. That does speak to the durability of the tool. That said, I still would like to get a decent mortiser or make one of those Woodsmith Mag homebuilt ones using a router. Either way it would be a shop use tool only. |
#65
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Progress on the Nightstands
On 2/5/2016 2:04 PM, OFWW wrote:
On Fri, 5 Feb 2016 10:14:56 -0600, Swingman wrote: On 2/5/2016 1:17 AM, OFWW wrote: Oh, I didn't realize that. Right now I am in the 30 day tryout period of the pro. Wondering what kind of a hit I will take when that part of the program stops. Unless you have some programming chops, and have a direct need for rolling your own "Dynamic Components", you won't notice anything that will impact your use of SU Make for woodworking at all. I'm pretty sure Leon has always used the free version since day 1. As previously noted, you can download, and use, many Dynamic Components (cabinets, fences, stairs, etc) on the 3D Warehouse straight to your model in the free version. I personally would miss the "Solid Object" tools, available only in SU Pro, but only because I've experienced them by having the Pro version for a number of years. Never missed them before I upgraded to SU Pro because there are many different ways to skin any particular cat in SU, including thousands of SU plug-ins. The "Plug-ins" and extensions (there is an Extension Warehouse under you WINDOW menu also) are another world of utilitarian tools you need to check into, most free, but some need to be purchased. There are also third party sites dedicated solely to SU plug-ins. Google is your friend. I build homes, and do a lot of kitchen and bath remodeling, therefore the Pro version that comes with "Layout", was imperative for me to generate industry standard, and formatted, construction documents for permitting, bidding and building. Either version is hard to beat for the price as a design tool, a presentation tool to clients, as well as to design, build and fabricate just about anything you can think of. Wouldn't leave home, or go to the shop, without it ... literally. Yeah, I have a copy on my tablet/notebook with duplicate files from my desktop in case I have a thought. On Layout, is that the ability to layout the floor plan and walls, and then put in the various cabinets and appliances to see a picture of the final results of the cabinet designs? IIRC it is used to filter out sections of the drawing that are not pertinent to whom you might be giving a drawing to. And IIRC it lets you set that part of drawing to scale. I think you can do what you mentioned above with the free version. You can simply put different elements on different layers. Or so that I can redesign my garage layout for tool locations, etc? I did that with the free version. I in fact have a complete model of my home drawn up with all my pieces that I have built in the model and the shop items too. One thing I have not mentioned is that in our home I place the furniture drawing/model in to the model of our home to see what is going to look like in place. I built a large cabinet/pantry 4 years ago, 8'x8', and was going to stain it a very dark color to match our kitchen cabinets. In the model of the house it looked like a black hole. I ended up toning back a lot of the dark and going two tone with the finish. I will to this for the customer too, but just the room that the piece that I am going to build. Concept https://www.flickr.com/photos/lcb112...posted-public/ Reality https://www.flickr.com/photos/lcb112...posted-public/ And a shot of our home with populated with pieces you may have seen already. https://www.flickr.com/photos/lcb112...posted-public/ I would miss those, and as my wife lacks visual imagination in certain area, It would be hard to show her something without a picture of it. I can only envision doing this as a business if the economy went dramatically south and I needed a source of income. I have learned to do things sparingly for friends. True friends, IYKWIM. I've seen some of what it can do based on geographic location, I am totally impressed. You can use that for tree placement around a bldg with deciduous trees for energy management amongst other things. |
#66
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Progress on the Nightstands
On 2/5/2016 2:26 PM, OFWW wrote:
Snip Think I'll do fine without it and with what I have, plus if I get hungry I can eat biscuits which is better than playing a game of domino's. You really need to be doing volume to justify the expense, I have had my Domino since early 2008 IIRC and I have averaged about 1500 mortises for each year that I have had it so it has paid me back in spades owning one. That would be my reason for owning one. That does speak to the durability of the tool. The tool literally looks like it did when I bought it. And contrary to what some have indicated, the 5mm bit, I have 4 sizes, has not been replaced or resharpened. That in itself is amazing considering that this bit alone has cut over 7,000 mortises. Yes I eat, breath, and sleep Festool products, guilty. But I have not seen any brand that holds up like this one does. I have a couple of Festool sanders, a drill, and track saw, also This will blow your mind. LOL I'm still not sure Swingman believes me. I built a small entertainment center of a customer in November. I sanded all joints and the glue squeeze out with a 120 grit Festool brand Granat sand paper. I also removed the initial finish on the cabinet top that I was not happy with. Removing the finish alone is tough on sand paper. Now I am working on the night stands and did the same, sanded all joints and glue squeeze out and in fact this morning sanded the FF stain and first coat of varnish off. This was all done on both projects with a "single" piece of 120 grit Granat sand paper on the Festool Rotex sander. That said, I still would like to get a decent mortiser or make one of those Woodsmith Mag homebuilt ones using a router. Either way it would be a shop use tool only. I have had a Delta mortiser for about 18 years. I have used it about 10 times, maybe. They are cool but I have not touched it since getting the Domino. Essentially the Domino is operated and very much like a Plate Joiner, AKA Biscuit cutter, except much much more accurate. I have been interest in woodworking since I was 10 and have only really been selling my work since retiring at 40. IMHO the Domino enabled me to step up my game significantly and IMHO several times more useful than a mortiser and shockingly faster than a mortiser. With the Domino you do not have to cut a tenon for the mating part. Anyway........ ;~) |
#67
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Progress on the Nightstands
On 2/5/2016 2:04 PM, OFWW wrote:
On Layout, is that the ability to layout the floor plan and walls, and then put in the various cabinets and appliances to see a picture of the final results of the cabinet designs? Layout allows you to generate, from your model, a set of professional construction plans (dimension, scale, annotate, and print, etc) and views suitable for permitting, bidding and building, just as an architect or engineer would do. Or so that I can redesign my garage layout for tool locations, etc? Ya don't need Layout to do that, just use your Sketchup... Here's mine: https://3dwarehouse.sketchup.com/mod...0-aca29128c131 -- eWoodShop: www.eWoodShop.com Wood Shop: www.e-WoodShop.net https://www.google.com/+eWoodShop https://plus.google.com/+KarlCaillouet/posts http://www.custommade.com/by/ewoodshop/ KarlCaillouet@ (the obvious) |
#68
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Progress on the Nightstands
On Fri, 5 Feb 2016 14:38:47 -0600, Leon lcb11211@swbelldotnet wrote:
On 2/5/2016 2:04 PM, OFWW wrote: On Fri, 5 Feb 2016 10:14:56 -0600, Swingman wrote: On 2/5/2016 1:17 AM, OFWW wrote: Oh, I didn't realize that. Right now I am in the 30 day tryout period of the pro. Wondering what kind of a hit I will take when that part of the program stops. Unless you have some programming chops, and have a direct need for rolling your own "Dynamic Components", you won't notice anything that will impact your use of SU Make for woodworking at all. I'm pretty sure Leon has always used the free version since day 1. As previously noted, you can download, and use, many Dynamic Components (cabinets, fences, stairs, etc) on the 3D Warehouse straight to your model in the free version. I personally would miss the "Solid Object" tools, available only in SU Pro, but only because I've experienced them by having the Pro version for a number of years. Never missed them before I upgraded to SU Pro because there are many different ways to skin any particular cat in SU, including thousands of SU plug-ins. The "Plug-ins" and extensions (there is an Extension Warehouse under you WINDOW menu also) are another world of utilitarian tools you need to check into, most free, but some need to be purchased. There are also third party sites dedicated solely to SU plug-ins. Google is your friend. I build homes, and do a lot of kitchen and bath remodeling, therefore the Pro version that comes with "Layout", was imperative for me to generate industry standard, and formatted, construction documents for permitting, bidding and building. Either version is hard to beat for the price as a design tool, a presentation tool to clients, as well as to design, build and fabricate just about anything you can think of. Wouldn't leave home, or go to the shop, without it ... literally. Yeah, I have a copy on my tablet/notebook with duplicate files from my desktop in case I have a thought. On Layout, is that the ability to layout the floor plan and walls, and then put in the various cabinets and appliances to see a picture of the final results of the cabinet designs? IIRC it is used to filter out sections of the drawing that are not pertinent to whom you might be giving a drawing to. And IIRC it lets you set that part of drawing to scale. I think you can do what you mentioned above with the free version. You can simply put different elements on different layers. Cool. Or so that I can redesign my garage layout for tool locations, etc? I did that with the free version. I in fact have a complete model of my home drawn up with all my pieces that I have built in the model and the shop items too. One thing I have not mentioned is that in our home I place the furniture drawing/model in to the model of our home to see what is going to look like in place. I built a large cabinet/pantry 4 years ago, 8'x8', and was going to stain it a very dark color to match our kitchen cabinets. In the model of the house it looked like a black hole. I ended up toning back a lot of the dark and going two tone with the finish. I will to this for the customer too, but just the room that the piece that I am going to build. Concept https://www.flickr.com/photos/lcb112...posted-public/ Reality https://www.flickr.com/photos/lcb112...posted-public/ Is that real or is that Memorex? And a shot of our home with populated with pieces you may have seen already. https://www.flickr.com/photos/lcb112...posted-public/ Awesome, that sure set my mind at rest. I would miss those, and as my wife lacks visual imagination in certain area, It would be hard to show her something without a picture of it. I can only envision doing this as a business if the economy went dramatically south and I needed a source of income. I have learned to do things sparingly for friends. True friends, IYKWIM. I've seen some of what it can do based on geographic location, I am totally impressed. You can use that for tree placement around a bldg with deciduous trees for energy management amongst other things. |
#69
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Progress on the Nightstands
On Fri, 5 Feb 2016 15:12:19 -0600, Swingman wrote:
On 2/5/2016 2:04 PM, OFWW wrote: On Layout, is that the ability to layout the floor plan and walls, and then put in the various cabinets and appliances to see a picture of the final results of the cabinet designs? Layout allows you to generate, from your model, a set of professional construction plans (dimension, scale, annotate, and print, etc) and views suitable for permitting, bidding and building, just as an architect or engineer would do. Or so that I can redesign my garage layout for tool locations, etc? Ya don't need Layout to do that, just use your Sketchup... Here's mine: https://3dwarehouse.sketchup.com/mod...0-aca29128c131 I like very much, do you have too many drawers? I D/L's the drawing so now I can walk around your shop from here? And I would probably kill the comment about where your Festools are stored, even tho you have a great view of the shop. Were all your upper cabinets Euro styled? It seems hard to believe you built so much out of the Plywood you picked up. I like the idea of covering up the work stations not in use to keep the dust out. Why I never considered that is beyond me. So I put a dust extractor fan in, Rikon. All in all, it looks very nice. That said.... Now Sonny, he has a real man cave. Stuff stashed for centuries splorf all that history around him, probably something only an outside visitor would love to see. |
#70
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Progress on the Nightstands
Leon lcb11211@swbelldotnet wrote in
: The tool literally looks like it did when I bought it. And contrary to what some have indicated, the 5mm bit, I have 4 sizes, has not been replaced or resharpened. That in itself is amazing considering that this bit alone has cut over 7,000 mortises. Yes I eat, breath, and sleep Festool products, guilty. But I have not seen any brand that holds up like this one does. I have a couple of Festool sanders, a drill, and track saw, also This will blow your mind. LOL I'm still not sure Swingman believes me. I built a small entertainment center of a customer in November. I sanded all joints and the glue squeeze out with a 120 grit Festool brand Granat sand paper. I also removed the initial finish on the cabinet top that I was not happy with. Removing the finish alone is tough on sand paper. Now I am working on the night stands and did the same, sanded all joints and glue squeeze out and in fact this morning sanded the FF stain and first coat of varnish off. This was all done on both projects with a "single" piece of 120 grit Granat sand paper on the Festool Rotex sander. Has anyone tried Festool paper on other sanders? I used two pieces of 24 grit Saphir paper sanding down some Homasote Spline roadbed with my Festool sander and Fein vac, and while it impressed everybody at the [model railroad] club I can't swing $700 for a "once every year or two" tool. $70 on a Bosch sander and maybe $100 on a decent vac might be doable. Think I'd get anywhere near the performance with just the paper? Enough to make it worthwhile? I know, this is kinda like putting racing tires on a Buick... Puckdropper |
#71
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Progress on the Nightstands
On 2/5/2016 11:34 PM, Puckdropper wrote:
Leon lcb11211@swbelldotnet wrote in : The tool literally looks like it did when I bought it. And contrary to what some have indicated, the 5mm bit, I have 4 sizes, has not been replaced or resharpened. That in itself is amazing considering that this bit alone has cut over 7,000 mortises. Yes I eat, breath, and sleep Festool products, guilty. But I have not seen any brand that holds up like this one does. I have a couple of Festool sanders, a drill, and track saw, also This will blow your mind. LOL I'm still not sure Swingman believes me. I built a small entertainment center of a customer in November. I sanded all joints and the glue squeeze out with a 120 grit Festool brand Granat sand paper. I also removed the initial finish on the cabinet top that I was not happy with. Removing the finish alone is tough on sand paper. Now I am working on the night stands and did the same, sanded all joints and glue squeeze out and in fact this morning sanded the FF stain and first coat of varnish off. This was all done on both projects with a "single" piece of 120 grit Granat sand paper on the Festool Rotex sander. Has anyone tried Festool paper on other sanders? I used two pieces of 24 grit Saphir paper sanding down some Homasote Spline roadbed with my Festool sander and Fein vac, and while it impressed everybody at the [model railroad] club I can't swing $700 for a "once every year or two" tool. $70 on a Bosch sander and maybe $100 on a decent vac might be doable. Think I'd get anywhere near the performance with just the paper? Enough to make it worthwhile? I know, this is kinda like putting racing tires on a Buick... Puckdropper The paper is absolutely a major part of the longevity, and a vac. It wold probably work pretty good on any sander/vac combo. |
#72
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Progress on the Nightstands
On Friday, February 5, 2016 at 11:34:43 PM UTC-6, wrote:
$70 on a Bosch sander and maybe $100 on a decent vac might be doable. Think I'd get anywhere near the performance with just the paper? Enough to make it worthwhile? I know, this is kinda like putting racing tires on a Buick... And think how much better your Buick runs with good tires on it! On Saturday, February 6, 2016 at 12:15:03 AM UTC-6, Leon wrote: The paper is absolutely a major part of the longevity, and a vac. It wold probably work pretty good on any sander/vac combo. Leon is right. No doubt you can get superior performance with the Rotex/Vac Festool combo. But I have very satisfactory results sanding INSIDE homes with my Bosch 5", my Milwaukee half sheet, my Ridgid 5" oscillator and my Ridgid 4" finisher. I hook them up to my big shop vac with two sections of hose and put the vac outside if I am doing a lot of heavy sanding. If I am doing finer work like sanding inside bookcases (refinishing) and not raising much dust, I use the same shop vac with a HEPA or Allergen rated filter in it. http://www.homedepot.com/s/shop%2520...0filter?NCNI-5 It is almost dustless. However, my one guy that I trust on Festool use (beside Leon!!) tells me that the Rotex setup with his Festool vac is about 99% dustless in a house if he watches his technique. He does custom cabinet installs as well as custom butcher block counter tops. He would know. And as a sidebar, it is a $1400 sanding setup. Sure he vacuums after installation so the vac isn't a single use tool, but the primary use of his setup is to sand inside houses. I would bet that I get most of that performance out of my setup, but it isn't as elegant, it is uglier, and it is on helluva lot noisier. His setup just sounds more professional! As far as the paper goes, spend the money on paper. Spend the money on paper. Spend the money on paper. Your satisfaction with your sanding setup will start with the paper you buy, and the paper should be about the best you can get. When I was doing a lot of refinishing, I used to buy this stuff wholesale: http://www.amazon.com/MIRKA-GOLD-HOL.../dp/B000XY0VZM Good paper, good price. If you aren't going to use a ton of it, then buy their combo pack. Worth every penny. Our old friend Robatoy turned me on to this product as I was using 3M, and this turned out to be much better. Lasted longer, and the hook and loop was better. A good sander doesn't have to be a commercial grade product like Leon has. He USES his a lot, so it makes perfect sense for him. My oldest Milwaukee random orbit is needing to be replaced as there are no more parts for it, but I don't use sanders enough to justify the price of a Festool. If I had a cabinet shop, Leon and Karl have me won over on the value of Festool, so no doubt I would own some of their products. But... I don't. So the next refinish job I get I will either be looking at this if it is a small one, then keep this in the stable of utility sanders: http://www.amazon.com/Makita-BO5041K...words=5+sander or this one, the one I really want. This baby is a really nice sander, made in Switzerland so it probably is a rebranded Elu, like my 3hp DeWalt plunge router. If I buy this one, it is a Robert only sander. I have tested this and it is so smooth it was sexy just turning it on: http://www.amazon.com/Bosch-ROS65VC-...words=5+sander It picks up an amazing amount of dust even without a vacuum attachment with its on board filter system. Do some homework and you can make yourself a great setup for a very reasonable cost. Oh yeah... and spend the money on paper! Robert |
#74
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Progress on the Nightstands
On 2/5/2016 10:36 PM, OFWW wrote:
I like very much, do you have too many drawers? I did ... gave some to Leon. -- eWoodShop: www.eWoodShop.com Wood Shop: www.e-WoodShop.net https://www.google.com/+eWoodShop https://plus.google.com/+KarlCaillouet/posts http://www.custommade.com/by/ewoodshop/ KarlCaillouet@ (the obvious) |
#75
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Progress on the Nightstands
On Saturday, February 6, 2016 at 6:05:39 AM UTC-6, Leon wrote:
Robert you might want to take a look and test drive this sander. Oddly it is in the price range of the "for Roberts hands only" Bosch sander. Although only considered a finish sander it is silky smooth. I played with one at a WW show a few years ago. I was shocked at how I could literally run and guide that sander with a single finger resting on top of the sander. http://www.festoolusa.com/power-tool...-sander-571817 Well, I have to say I have never seen that sander. We don't get wood working shows here for some reason, they never have manufacturer demos at our local equipment distributors, and I haven't been in a Woodcraft in years. So.... never seen it. My first impression was, no... I don't want a Speedbloc type sander, but then I watched the video and that isn't it at all. It looks pretty well though out for the grip. I read a ton of reviews, some professional and some not, some on FOG. They all say the same thing, this is a finish sander, and does great finish work. In fact the only complaints I read about was that it didn't do more than finishing. Users recommend to buy the next sander up for an overall utility sander. That's not a deal breaker for me as I have a stable of sanders for hard work, including one old Ridgid I have used to sand concrete more than once with a 40gr pad. With quality paper, my other sanders work fine, although they are noisy as hell and the dust collection isn't as good compared to the newer stuff. The $200 isn't scary at all, another surprise. I paid that for my Milwaukee half sheet sander 20 years ago! Thanks for the heads up. Have you used the Mirka gold paper? This is the stuff I usually get, and when I do I get this package most of the time since I am really on board (as are just about all serious finishers) of working through the grits with no skipping. http://goo.gl/uw2nEY The only thing I don't like about the Mirka gold is that they are stearate coated. This has on occasion fouled finishes, especially when dying wood. Cheaper stearates can foul anything when they get hot. Looking around at the Festool discs they say they are "coated" but it doesn't say with what. Have you ever used the regular Festool discs? They aren't cheap, but they really aren't that expensive when you put them in as a "disc per project" cost. Not talking about the Granat stuff... it's expensive! I miss my old sandpaper connection. When I was doing a lot of finishing and refinishing I used sandpaper like guy with a cold uses tissues. I got his contact info from a finishing forum. I found that he bought all the roll ends of Klingspor and Mirka he cold, then took them back to his machinery and punched out 5" and 6" discs on his own. He only bought upper end paper and had some odd grit sizes, but his price was about .35 a disc or less depending on what he had in stock and how much you bought. Apparently the cheap sandpaper from China a India did him in as he couldn't get as cheap as his big production shops demanded. And he had stearated and non in most grits. He is no longer in the paper business. Robert |
#76
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Progress on the Nightstands
On 2/7/2016 3:11 AM, wrote:
On Saturday, February 6, 2016 at 6:05:39 AM UTC-6, Leon wrote: Robert you might want to take a look and test drive this sander. Oddly it is in the price range of the "for Roberts hands only" Bosch sander. Although only considered a finish sander it is silky smooth. I played with one at a WW show a few years ago. I was shocked at how I could literally run and guide that sander with a single finger resting on top of the sander. http://www.festoolusa.com/power-tool...-sander-571817 Well, I have to say I have never seen that sander. We don't get wood working shows here for some reason, they never have manufacturer demos at our local equipment distributors, and I haven't been in a Woodcraft in years. So... never seen it. My first impression was, no... I don't want a Speedbloc type sander, but then I watched the video and that isn't it at all. It looks pretty well though out for the grip. Well you should go to to Woodcraft to try it out If you put it on the short list. I don't own it but again I was really surprised that I could guide it with a finger on the top and it did not bounce around like many ROS sanders if you don't have a good hold. And it is likely to last a very long time. I read a ton of reviews, some professional and some not, some on FOG. They all say the same thing, this is a finish sander, and does great finish work. In fact the only complaints I read about was that it didn't do more than finishing. That would be my bone of contention. The Rotex will just about keep up with a belt sander in aggressive mode but two hands are required in either mode. My Rotex replaced an old right angle PC ROS which was also aggressive. BUT I do have the small rectangular Festool finish sander and it can get into corners, something that round disk sanders do not do. Otherwise I would strongly consider it if any of my Festool sanders actually wear out. I did wear a PC Speedbloc out. ;~) Users recommend to buy the next sander up for an overall utility sander. That's not a deal breaker for me as I have a stable of sanders for hard work, including one old Ridgid I have used to sand concrete more than once with a 40gr pad. With quality paper, my other sanders work fine, although they are noisy as hell and the dust collection isn't as good compared to the newer stuff. I don't recall any of the Festool sanders being noisy. The $200 isn't scary at all, another surprise. I paid that for my Milwaukee half sheet sander 20 years ago! Thanks for the heads up. sure! Have you used the Mirka gold paper? Not on a sander. Before Festool I use a lot of 3M which I did not have to pay for. I acquired it in 250 disk rolls. That was when I worked for a 3M distributor. We looked into taking on Mirka way back when as many of the GM dealerships that we sold to used that brand in the body shops. I do use Mirka Goldflex Soft 4.5" x 5.5" tear off pads. These come on a roll and tear off. They are foam backed and great for easing edges and uneven surfaces but are strictly for hand sanding. They last pretty well and the foam backing gives them just enough stiffness to easily use them with out a block of wood, sand with just your hands on the paper. Several months ago 3M came out with a rubber backed paper that was supposed to last a long time. I tried a couple of sheets and was unimpressed. I have been using the foam back Mirka for hand sanding for about 4 years now. This is the stuff I usually get, and when I do I get this package most of the time since I am really on board (as are just about all serious finishers) of working through the grits with no skipping. http://goo.gl/uw2nEY I have strictly used Festool paper since switching to the Festool sanders. It is expensive but it lasts a long time. I started with the Rubin "red" paper which is interned for bare wood. And used up until I discovered the Granat which is also good for removing paint and finishes. The Granat is very expensive by comparison. BUT the 5" disks I bought in a 10 pack for $13.00. That was many months ago, last Spring maybe and I think there are 6 discs left. And no kidding I have been on a single disk on 3 different pieces of furniture that I have built including removing a finish on all three. Expensive until you realize that the paper lasts 4~5 times longer because it does not load up. On another note, if you remember a customer's Mexico imported small table in my office, the one we were talking about at Christmas and what may have been used used as a finish and you mentioned "tar", I thought used diesel motor oil. I absolutely think tar was part of the finish. This was not new furniture but it did load up the Granat paper when I sanded the legs. No other modern finish has loaded that paper up at all after it has dried. The only thing I don't like about the Mirka gold is that they are stearate coated. This has on occasion fouled finishes, especially when dying wood. Cheaper stearates can foul anything when they get hot. Looking around at the Festool discs they say they are "coated" but it doesn't say with what. Have you ever used the regular Festool discs? They aren't cheap, but they really aren't that expensive when you put them in as a "disc per project" cost. Yes, I use/used the Ruben Festool paper. Good paper but it does eventually wear out. LOL. If I am sanding flat surfaces I have to stop the sander and feel how sharp the paper is to determine when to change it. With the dust extraction the paper does not change color and there is no dust to judge if it is still cutting or not. You literally have to feel the paper with your fingers to determine if it has been worn out or not. AND it does have a relatively stiff backing, stiffer than 3M gold. Not talking about the Granat stuff... it's expensive! LOL, but that stuff lasts a loooong time in my shop. AND this paper seems to be a bit more flexible than the Ruben which lead me to think it might tear more easily. That has not been the case yet. It does seem to be more touchy about sanding with the grain with both my ROS and finish sander. That is the reason that I have had to sand down and reapply the stain finish in places on the last 3 projects. I had scratches show up at the joints. Resanding and paying attention to grain direction instantly solved the issue. I had to be careful with the Rubin but it did not seem to be quite so touchy at the joints. I bought a 100 pack of 180 grit Granat for the finish sander and IIRC it was about $58. BUT I suspect that it is going to last me for a few years, maybe 3~6. The Ruben 50 packs were lasting me 1~2 years. Of course that all depends on how much work I am doing. But seriously the Granat seems to last at least three times longer than the Rubin and sanding dried glue and finishes is not an issue at all, the paper remains clean. I seldom wipe off glue squeeze out any more. I miss my old sandpaper connection. When I was doing a lot of finishing and refinishing I used sandpaper like guy with a cold uses tissues. I got his contact info from a finishing forum. I found that he bought all the roll ends of Klingspor and Mirka he cold, then took them back to his machinery and punched out 5" and 6" discs on his own. He only bought upper end paper and had some odd grit sizes, but his price was about .35 a disc or less depending on what he had in stock and how much you bought. Apparently the cheap sandpaper from China a India did him in as he couldn't get as cheap as his big production shops demanded. And he had stearated and non in most grits. He is no longer in the paper business. Robert |
#77
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Progress on the Nightstands
On 2/5/2016 4:03 PM, Leon wrote:
On 2/5/2016 2:26 PM, OFWW wrote: Snip That said, I still would like to get a decent mortiser or make one of those Woodsmith Mag homebuilt ones using a router. Either way it would be a shop use tool only. I have had a Delta mortiser for about 18 years. I have used it about 10 times, maybe. They are cool but I have not touched it since getting the Domino. Essentially the Domino is operated and very much like a Plate Joiner, AKA Biscuit cutter, except much much more accurate. I have been interest in woodworking since I was 10 and have only really been selling my work since retiring at 40. IMHO the Domino enabled me to step up my game significantly and IMHO several times more useful than a mortiser and shockingly faster than a mortiser. With the Domino you do not have to cut a tenon for the mating part. Anyway........ ;~) I also have a Delta Mortiser. The only thing good about it is it is cheap, and is always set up ready to go. I recommend you go with the Domino rather than waste your money (and space) on a dedicated mortiser. If I were younger, and planned on making lots of furniture, I would get a Domino or possibly another brand that does the same thing, if one exists. A mortiser takes up space and unless you have a really nice one, (not a cheapie like the Delta) they are less than stellar. Domino seems to be a stellar piece, quick and easy to use and very, very useful. -- Jack Add Life to your Days not Days to your Life. http://jbstein.com |
#78
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Progress on the Nightstands
On Sat, 6 Feb 2016 06:05:34 -0600, Leon wrote:
wrote: On Friday, February 5, 2016 at 11:34:43 PM UTC-6, wrote: $70 on a Bosch sander and maybe $100 on a decent vac might be doable. Think I'd get anywhere near the performance with just the paper? Enough to make it worthwhile? I know, this is kinda like putting racing tires on a Buick... And think how much better your Buick runs with good tires on it! On Saturday, February 6, 2016 at 12:15:03 AM UTC-6, Leon wrote: The paper is absolutely a major part of the longevity, and a vac. It wold probably work pretty good on any sander/vac combo. Leon is right. No doubt you can get superior performance with the Rotex/Vac Festool combo. But I have very satisfactory results sanding INSIDE homes with my Bosch 5", my Milwaukee half sheet, my Ridgid 5" oscillator and my Ridgid 4" finisher. I hook them up to my big shop vac with two sections of hose and put the vac outside if I am doing a lot of heavy sanding. If I am doing finer work like sanding inside bookcases (refinishing) and not raising much dust, I use the same shop vac with a HEPA or Allergen rated filter in it. http://www.homedepot.com/s/shop%2520...0filter?NCNI-5 It is almost dustless. However, my one guy that I trust on Festool use (beside Leon!!) tells me that the Rotex setup with his Festool vac is about 99% dustless in a house if he watches his technique. He does custom cabinet installs as well as custom butcher block counter tops. He would know. And as a sidebar, it is a $1400 sanding setup. Sure he vacuums after installation so the vac isn't a single use tool, but the primary use of his setup is to sand inside houses. I would bet that I get most of that performance out of my setup, but it isn't as elegant, it is uglier, and it is on helluva lot noisier. His setup just sounds more professional! As far as the paper goes, spend the money on paper. Spend the money on paper. Spend the money on paper. Your satisfaction with your sanding setup will start with the paper you buy, and the paper should be about the best you can get. When I was doing a lot of refinishing, I used to buy this stuff wholesale: http://www.amazon.com/MIRKA-GOLD-HOL.../dp/B000XY0VZM Good paper, good price. If you aren't going to use a ton of it, then buy their combo pack. Worth every penny. Our old friend Robatoy turned me on to this product as I was using 3M, and this turned out to be much better. Lasted longer, and the hook and loop was better. A good sander doesn't have to be a commercial grade product like Leon has. He USES his a lot, so it makes perfect sense for him. My oldest Milwaukee random orbit is needing to be replaced as there are no more parts for it, but I don't use sanders enough to justify the price of a Festool. If I had a cabinet shop, Leon and Karl have me won over on the value of Festool, so no doubt I would own some of their products. But... I don't. So the next refinish job I get I will either be looking at this if it is a small one, then keep this in the stable of utility sanders: http://www.amazon.com/Makita-BO5041K...words=5+sander or this one, the one I really want. This baby is a really nice sander, made in Switzerland so it probably is a rebranded Elu, like my 3hp DeWalt plunge router. If I buy this one, it is a Robert only sander. I have tested this and it is so smooth it was sexy just turning it on: http://www.amazon.com/Bosch-ROS65VC-...words=5+sander It picks up an amazing amount of dust even without a vacuum attachment with its on board filter system. Do some homework and you can make yourself a great setup for a very reasonable cost. Oh yeah... and spend the money on paper! Robert Robert you might want to take a look and test drive this sander. Oddly it is in the price range of the "for Roberts hands only" Bosch sander. Although only considered a finish sander it is silky smooth. I played with one at a WW show a few years ago. I was shocked at how I could literally run and guide that sander with a single finger resting on top of the sander. http://www.festoolusa.com/power-tool...-sander-571817 Is the ETS125 different than the RO125 in its less aggressive mode? IOW, is there an argument for having both? |
#79
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Progress on the Nightstands
On 2/7/2016 4:31 PM, krw wrote:
On Sat, 6 Feb 2016 06:05:34 -0600, Leon wrote: wrote: On Friday, February 5, 2016 at 11:34:43 PM UTC-6, wrote: $70 on a Bosch sander and maybe $100 on a decent vac might be doable. Think I'd get anywhere near the performance with just the paper? Enough to make it worthwhile? I know, this is kinda like putting racing tires on a Buick... And think how much better your Buick runs with good tires on it! On Saturday, February 6, 2016 at 12:15:03 AM UTC-6, Leon wrote: The paper is absolutely a major part of the longevity, and a vac. It wold probably work pretty good on any sander/vac combo. Leon is right. No doubt you can get superior performance with the Rotex/Vac Festool combo. But I have very satisfactory results sanding INSIDE homes with my Bosch 5", my Milwaukee half sheet, my Ridgid 5" oscillator and my Ridgid 4" finisher. I hook them up to my big shop vac with two sections of hose and put the vac outside if I am doing a lot of heavy sanding. If I am doing finer work like sanding inside bookcases (refinishing) and not raising much dust, I use the same shop vac with a HEPA or Allergen rated filter in it. http://www.homedepot.com/s/shop%2520...0filter?NCNI-5 It is almost dustless. However, my one guy that I trust on Festool use (beside Leon!!) tells me that the Rotex setup with his Festool vac is about 99% dustless in a house if he watches his technique. He does custom cabinet installs as well as custom butcher block counter tops. He would know. And as a sidebar, it is a $1400 sanding setup. Sure he vacuums after installation so the vac isn't a single use tool, but the primary use of his setup is to sand inside houses. I would bet that I get most of that performance out of my setup, but it isn't as elegant, it is uglier, and it is on helluva lot noisier. His setup just sounds more professional! As far as the paper goes, spend the money on paper. Spend the money on paper. Spend the money on paper. Your satisfaction with your sanding setup will start with the paper you buy, and the paper should be about the best you can get. When I was doing a lot of refinishing, I used to buy this stuff wholesale: http://www.amazon.com/MIRKA-GOLD-HOL.../dp/B000XY0VZM Good paper, good price. If you aren't going to use a ton of it, then buy their combo pack. Worth every penny. Our old friend Robatoy turned me on to this product as I was using 3M, and this turned out to be much better. Lasted longer, and the hook and loop was better. A good sander doesn't have to be a commercial grade product like Leon has. He USES his a lot, so it makes perfect sense for him. My oldest Milwaukee random orbit is needing to be replaced as there are no more parts for it, but I don't use sanders enough to justify the price of a Festool. If I had a cabinet shop, Leon and Karl have me won over on the value of Festool, so no doubt I would own some of their products. But... I don't. So the next refinish job I get I will either be looking at this if it is a small one, then keep this in the stable of utility sanders: http://www.amazon.com/Makita-BO5041K...words=5+sander or this one, the one I really want. This baby is a really nice sander, made in Switzerland so it probably is a rebranded Elu, like my 3hp DeWalt plunge router. If I buy this one, it is a Robert only sander. I have tested this and it is so smooth it was sexy just turning it on: http://www.amazon.com/Bosch-ROS65VC-...words=5+sander It picks up an amazing amount of dust even without a vacuum attachment with its on board filter system. Do some homework and you can make yourself a great setup for a very reasonable cost. Oh yeah... and spend the money on paper! Robert Robert you might want to take a look and test drive this sander. Oddly it is in the price range of the "for Roberts hands only" Bosch sander. Although only considered a finish sander it is silky smooth. I played with one at a WW show a few years ago. I was shocked at how I could literally run and guide that sander with a single finger resting on top of the sander. http://www.festoolusa.com/power-tool...-sander-571817 Is the ETS125 different than the RO125 in its less aggressive mode? IOW, is there an argument for having both? Could everyone in the back seats move up to the empty ones in the front? ROTF Welllll.. The RO125 in aggressive mode will remove material at an alarming rate, and in regular ROS it is more normal but IMHO still not a finish sander. Its sanding stroke is 9/64", that is a hair under 1/8". So I typically start my sanding in aggressive mode on solid wood only at the joints with the Rotex. I then switch to the RO mode with the same paper. Then I switch to a finer grit, 150 in RO mode and finish up with the RTS 400 finish sander using 180 grit. Both the RTS 400 and the ETS125 have a 5/64" sanding stroke, about half that of the Rotex Ro125. So yes the ETS125 is different than the RO125 as far as fine sanding goes. If you are staining you will probably have to go additional finer grits to keep from seeing the swirls. With the finish sander I typically stop at 180. Going finer grits typically means that the stain will come out lighter too. If you are looking for a good Festool finish sander I would recommend the RTS4000 or the ETS125. If you want to speed up initial sanding, the sanding to make joints smooth and remove glue, the Rotex is going to do that 10 times faster in aggressive mode. With the Granat 120 grit paper. The Rotex can smooth out a glue joint with an undetectable by touch glue line 3~5 seconds, that includes removing glue squeeze out. In regular RO mode probably 10~15 seconds. It can do either with the regular Rubin sand paper also however the glue will load the paper pretty quickly. I have yet to see any loading on the Granat paper when doing this procedure. As for as an argument for having both, I have always owned, in the past 25 years, RO sanders that were never really considered finish sanders. And I burned through a couple of PC SpeedBloc finish sanders during that time period. The SpeedBloc was a great sander but lacked any kind of dust control. I like a square pad finish sander simply because it gets into tight corners. That said in the past 4~5 years I have changed up how I finish and assemble. While it takes significantly longer to finish and assemble I prefinish parts that would be difficult to finish after assembly. Soooo the ETS125 would probably work better for me these days. I did not do any edge sanding with one but it seems to be quite easy to control and does not require much more than a finger to guide it. So again, With both sanders, the Rotex and a finish sander, I could see you cutting sanding time down to 1/3 of the time than if you were doing all sanding with a finish sander. The Rotex is really a game changer when considering speed of initial sanding as you are tweaking the fit of the joints especially if the joint surfaces are not on the same plane. After that initial sanding you could finish the rest of the grits with a finish sander in about the same time as with the Rotex in RO mode. With that in mind, the Rotex might be good enough right down to the finish "polishing" if you are mostly using coarse grain woods like oak AND use a clear finish, no stain. Festool has videos of the Rotex demonstrated on a rough cut slam of "whatever". They use no varnish but in the end steps they use a polish and the wood surface is amazing. Now I keep mentioning Aggressive, Robatoy turned me on to the Rotex and I recall him cautioning to be careful in Aggressive mode. In that mode the sander removes a lot of material fast. It is not a big concern of controlling the sander, in aggressive mode, so much as the material disappearing pronto. And especially if you are using a vac for dust collection. You will see basically nothing as far as dust is concerned so you don't know how much you are removing unless you check the progress every 3~4 seconds when working on a particular problem area like a joint. I personally would not consider not having both. They are both equally important tools in their own rights. They both bring something to the table of equal importance, speed and finer finish sanding. And remember I build a lot and speed is important to me when sanding. Thank y'all for coming out tonight! |
#80
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Progress on the Nightstands
On Sun, 7 Feb 2016 17:55:01 -0600, Leon lcb11211@swbelldotnet wrote:
On 2/7/2016 4:31 PM, krw wrote: On Sat, 6 Feb 2016 06:05:34 -0600, Leon wrote: wrote: On Friday, February 5, 2016 at 11:34:43 PM UTC-6, wrote: $70 on a Bosch sander and maybe $100 on a decent vac might be doable. Think I'd get anywhere near the performance with just the paper? Enough to make it worthwhile? I know, this is kinda like putting racing tires on a Buick... And think how much better your Buick runs with good tires on it! On Saturday, February 6, 2016 at 12:15:03 AM UTC-6, Leon wrote: The paper is absolutely a major part of the longevity, and a vac. It wold probably work pretty good on any sander/vac combo. Leon is right. No doubt you can get superior performance with the Rotex/Vac Festool combo. But I have very satisfactory results sanding INSIDE homes with my Bosch 5", my Milwaukee half sheet, my Ridgid 5" oscillator and my Ridgid 4" finisher. I hook them up to my big shop vac with two sections of hose and put the vac outside if I am doing a lot of heavy sanding. If I am doing finer work like sanding inside bookcases (refinishing) and not raising much dust, I use the same shop vac with a HEPA or Allergen rated filter in it. http://www.homedepot.com/s/shop%2520...0filter?NCNI-5 It is almost dustless. However, my one guy that I trust on Festool use (beside Leon!!) tells me that the Rotex setup with his Festool vac is about 99% dustless in a house if he watches his technique. He does custom cabinet installs as well as custom butcher block counter tops. He would know. And as a sidebar, it is a $1400 sanding setup. Sure he vacuums after installation so the vac isn't a single use tool, but the primary use of his setup is to sand inside houses. I would bet that I get most of that performance out of my setup, but it isn't as elegant, it is uglier, and it is on helluva lot noisier. His setup just sounds more professional! As far as the paper goes, spend the money on paper. Spend the money on paper. Spend the money on paper. Your satisfaction with your sanding setup will start with the paper you buy, and the paper should be about the best you can get. When I was doing a lot of refinishing, I used to buy this stuff wholesale: http://www.amazon.com/MIRKA-GOLD-HOL.../dp/B000XY0VZM Good paper, good price. If you aren't going to use a ton of it, then buy their combo pack. Worth every penny. Our old friend Robatoy turned me on to this product as I was using 3M, and this turned out to be much better. Lasted longer, and the hook and loop was better. A good sander doesn't have to be a commercial grade product like Leon has. He USES his a lot, so it makes perfect sense for him. My oldest Milwaukee random orbit is needing to be replaced as there are no more parts for it, but I don't use sanders enough to justify the price of a Festool. If I had a cabinet shop, Leon and Karl have me won over on the value of Festool, so no doubt I would own some of their products. But... I don't. So the next refinish job I get I will either be looking at this if it is a small one, then keep this in the stable of utility sanders: http://www.amazon.com/Makita-BO5041K...words=5+sander or this one, the one I really want. This baby is a really nice sander, made in Switzerland so it probably is a rebranded Elu, like my 3hp DeWalt plunge router. If I buy this one, it is a Robert only sander. I have tested this and it is so smooth it was sexy just turning it on: http://www.amazon.com/Bosch-ROS65VC-...words=5+sander It picks up an amazing amount of dust even without a vacuum attachment with its on board filter system. Do some homework and you can make yourself a great setup for a very reasonable cost. Oh yeah... and spend the money on paper! Robert Robert you might want to take a look and test drive this sander. Oddly it is in the price range of the "for Roberts hands only" Bosch sander. Although only considered a finish sander it is silky smooth. I played with one at a WW show a few years ago. I was shocked at how I could literally run and guide that sander with a single finger resting on top of the sander. http://www.festoolusa.com/power-tool...-sander-571817 Is the ETS125 different than the RO125 in its less aggressive mode? IOW, is there an argument for having both? Could everyone in the back seats move up to the empty ones in the front? ROTF Welllll.. The RO125 in aggressive mode will remove material at an alarming rate, and in regular ROS it is more normal but IMHO still not a finish sander. Its sanding stroke is 9/64", that is a hair under 1/8". So I typically start my sanding in aggressive mode on solid wood only at the joints with the Rotex. I then switch to the RO mode with the same paper. Then I switch to a finer grit, 150 in RO mode and finish up with the RTS 400 finish sander using 180 grit. Both the RTS 400 and the ETS125 have a 5/64" sanding stroke, about half that of the Rotex Ro125. So yes the ETS125 is different than the RO125 as far as fine sanding goes. If you are staining you will probably have to go additional finer grits to keep from seeing the swirls. With the finish sander I typically stop at 180. Going finer grits typically means that the stain will come out lighter too. If you are looking for a good Festool finish sander I would recommend the RTS4000 or the ETS125. If you want to speed up initial sanding, the sanding to make joints smooth and remove glue, the Rotex is going to do that 10 times faster in aggressive mode. With the Granat 120 grit paper. The Rotex can smooth out a glue joint with an undetectable by touch glue line 3~5 seconds, that includes removing glue squeeze out. In regular RO mode probably 10~15 seconds. It can do either with the regular Rubin sand paper also however the glue will load the paper pretty quickly. I have yet to see any loading on the Granat paper when doing this procedure. As for as an argument for having both, I have always owned, in the past 25 years, RO sanders that were never really considered finish sanders. And I burned through a couple of PC SpeedBloc finish sanders during that time period. The SpeedBloc was a great sander but lacked any kind of dust control. I like a square pad finish sander simply because it gets into tight corners. That said in the past 4~5 years I have changed up how I finish and assemble. While it takes significantly longer to finish and assemble I prefinish parts that would be difficult to finish after assembly. Soooo the ETS125 would probably work better for me these days. I did not do any edge sanding with one but it seems to be quite easy to control and does not require much more than a finger to guide it. So again, With both sanders, the Rotex and a finish sander, I could see you cutting sanding time down to 1/3 of the time than if you were doing all sanding with a finish sander. The Rotex is really a game changer when considering speed of initial sanding as you are tweaking the fit of the joints especially if the joint surfaces are not on the same plane. After that initial sanding you could finish the rest of the grits with a finish sander in about the same time as with the Rotex in RO mode. With that in mind, the Rotex might be good enough right down to the finish "polishing" if you are mostly using coarse grain woods like oak AND use a clear finish, no stain. Festool has videos of the Rotex demonstrated on a rough cut slam of "whatever". They use no varnish but in the end steps they use a polish and the wood surface is amazing. Now I keep mentioning Aggressive, Robatoy turned me on to the Rotex and I recall him cautioning to be careful in Aggressive mode. In that mode the sander removes a lot of material fast. It is not a big concern of controlling the sander, in aggressive mode, so much as the material disappearing pronto. And especially if you are using a vac for dust collection. You will see basically nothing as far as dust is concerned so you don't know how much you are removing unless you check the progress every 3~4 seconds when working on a particular problem area like a joint. I personally would not consider not having both. They are both equally important tools in their own rights. They both bring something to the table of equal importance, speed and finer finish sanding. And remember I build a lot and speed is important to me when sanding. Thank y'all for coming out tonight! Good Show and especially the info, being in the back row the explanations make up for the loss of sight because of the fat guys in front of me. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Progress | Metalworking | |||
More mill progress | Metalworking | |||
Some more fun and progress | Metalworking | |||
Bed progress | Woodworking | |||
Progress Payments | Home Repair |