Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
Woodworking (rec.woodworking) Discussion forum covering all aspects of working with wood. All levels of expertise are encouraged to particiapte. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Google Groups Search
So, I was trying to do a search of the group archives using Google
Groups. It seems that I'm only getting results from the past month. I did a test search on the term 'saw' and only got 280 results, with the oldest being from July 9. I've looked all over in the groups preferences and so on, but cannot find anything that would set a limit on the age of the results. Any one have the same problem, or a fix? |
#2
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Google Groups Search
Mike wrote:
So, I was trying to do a search of the group archives using Google Groups. It seems that I'm only getting results from the past month. I did a test search on the term 'saw' and only got 280 results, with the oldest being from July 9. I've looked all over in the groups preferences and so on, but cannot find anything that would set a limit on the age of the results. Any one have the same problem, or a fix? You are right, something is at least broken temporarily. Hopefully not permanent. -- Froz... |
#3
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Google Groups Search
On Wed, 29 Jul 2009 17:29:24 -0700 (PDT), Mike wrote:
So, I was trying to do a search of the group archives using Google Groups. It seems that I'm only getting results from the past month. I did a test search on the term 'saw' and only got 280 results, with the oldest being from July 9. I've looked all over in the groups preferences and so on, but cannot find anything that would set a limit on the age of the results. Any one have the same problem, or a fix? Get yourself a news reader and use a news server instead of Google. Gordon Shumway |
#4
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Google Groups Search
Mike wrote:
So, I was trying to do a search of the group archives using Google Groups. It seems that I'm only getting results from the past month. I did a test search on the term 'saw' and only got 280 results, with the oldest being from July 9. I've looked all over in the groups preferences and so on, but cannot find anything that would set a limit on the age of the results. Any one have the same problem, or a fix? "Hello All, Currently some Google Groups are not being indexed and thus new content is not showing up in search results. We're aware of the issue and hope to have it resolved shortly. Thanks for your patience." The Google Groups Team http://groups.google.com/group/group...8d02f269a7d20d That says that "new content" is not showing up but what you found, and I verified, is that older content isn't being shown. Maybe the two are related. Tanus |
#5
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Google Groups Search
On Wed, 29 Jul 2009 19:46:50 -0500, Gordon Shumway
wrote: Get yourself a news reader and use a news server instead of Google. I believe the typical news server doesn't archive the content. If that's the case, the only posts that would be available would be those within that server's retention policy which varies from provider to provider. There may be more complete archives of specific groups, but it's my understanding that Google Groups is probably the most complete (least incomplete?) general archive available. Tom Veatch Wichita, KS USA |
#6
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Google Groups Search
Gordon Shumway wrote:
On Wed, 29 Jul 2009 17:29:24 -0700 (PDT), Mike wrote: So, I was trying to do a search of the group archives using Google Groups. It seems that I'm only getting results from the past month. I did a test search on the term 'saw' and only got 280 results, with the oldest being from July 9. I've looked all over in the groups preferences and so on, but cannot find anything that would set a limit on the age of the results. Any one have the same problem, or a fix? Get yourself a news reader and use a news server instead of Google. A news readar and news server is not a substitute for the dejanews archive that Google maintains, containing posts going back into the late '80s. |
#7
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Google Groups Search
Mike wrote:
So, I was trying to do a search of the group archives using Google Groups. It seems that I'm only getting results from the past month. I did a test search on the term 'saw' and only got 280 results, with the oldest being from July 9. I've looked all over in the groups preferences and so on, but cannot find anything that would set a limit on the age of the results. Any one have the same problem, or a fix? Somehow Google has managed to hose their indexes. Give it a few days and it will probably be working again and some other group will be busted. |
#8
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Google Groups Search
On Wed, 29 Jul 2009 20:54:15 -0500, Tom Veatch wrote:
On Wed, 29 Jul 2009 19:46:50 -0500, Gordon Shumway wrote: Get yourself a news reader and use a news server instead of Google. I believe the typical news server doesn't archive the content. If that's the case, the only posts that would be available would be those within that server's retention policy which varies from provider to provider. There may be more complete archives of specific groups, but it's my understanding that Google Groups is probably the most complete (least incomplete?) general archive available. Tom Veatch Wichita, KS USA Tom, Currently there are over 30,000 posts on Newsguy that match the OP's criteria. The oldest is dated May of 2005. I have no idea how long Google retains posts for but I would think it wouldn't be that long. Gordon Shumway |
#9
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Google Groups Search
Gordon Shumway wrote in
: On Wed, 29 Jul 2009 20:54:15 -0500, Tom Veatch wrote: On Wed, 29 Jul 2009 19:46:50 -0500, Gordon Shumway wrote: Get yourself a news reader and use a news server instead of Google. I believe the typical news server doesn't archive the content. If that's the case, the only posts that would be available would be those within that server's retention policy which varies from provider to provider. There may be more complete archives of specific groups, but it's my understanding that Google Groups is probably the most complete (least incomplete?) general archive available. Tom Veatch Wichita, KS USA Tom, Currently there are over 30,000 posts on Newsguy that match the OP's criteria. The oldest is dated May of 2005. I have no idea how long Google retains posts for but I would think it wouldn't be that long. Gordon Shumway Scroll down to 2001 and look at the first company aquisition. To the best of my knowledge, Google does not remove newsgroup posts, ever. Larry |
#10
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Google Groups Search
Larry wrote in
: Gordon Shumway wrote in : On Wed, 29 Jul 2009 20:54:15 -0500, Tom Veatch wrote: On Wed, 29 Jul 2009 19:46:50 -0500, Gordon Shumway wrote: Get yourself a news reader and use a news server instead of Google. I believe the typical news server doesn't archive the content. If that's the case, the only posts that would be available would be those within that server's retention policy which varies from provider to provider. There may be more complete archives of specific groups, but it's my understanding that Google Groups is probably the most complete (least incomplete?) general archive available. Tom Veatch Wichita, KS USA Tom, Currently there are over 30,000 posts on Newsguy that match the OP's criteria. The oldest is dated May of 2005. I have no idea how long Google retains posts for but I would think it wouldn't be that long. Gordon Shumway Scroll down to 2001 and look at the first company aquisition. To the best of my knowledge, Google does not remove newsgroup posts, ever. Larry I guess if I wasn't a dumbass I could have included the link. http://www.google.com/corporate/history.html |
#11
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Google Groups Search
On Wed, 29 Jul 2009 22:30:00 -0400, "J. Clarke"
wrote: Gordon Shumway wrote: On Wed, 29 Jul 2009 17:29:24 -0700 (PDT), Mike wrote: So, I was trying to do a search of the group archives using Google Groups. It seems that I'm only getting results from the past month. I did a test search on the term 'saw' and only got 280 results, with the oldest being from July 9. I've looked all over in the groups preferences and so on, but cannot find anything that would set a limit on the age of the results. Any one have the same problem, or a fix? Get yourself a news reader and use a news server instead of Google. A news readar and news server is not a substitute for the dejanews archive that Google maintains, containing posts going back into the late '80s. I'm not too sure about your "dejanews archive" statement. I just looked at Google Groups for the first time tonight. There are currently 216,000+ messages archived in this group at Google. At the same time there are also 216,000+ messages on NewsGuy. Actually there are a few hundred more on newsguy than Google but who's counting. With that information I wouldn't be surprised to know that Google is maintaining a Newsguy archive. Gordon Shumway |
#12
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Google Groups Search
On 30 Jul 2009 03:35:52 GMT, Larry wrote:
Larry wrote in : Gordon Shumway wrote in : On Wed, 29 Jul 2009 20:54:15 -0500, Tom Veatch wrote: On Wed, 29 Jul 2009 19:46:50 -0500, Gordon Shumway wrote: Get yourself a news reader and use a news server instead of Google. I believe the typical news server doesn't archive the content. If that's the case, the only posts that would be available would be those within that server's retention policy which varies from provider to provider. There may be more complete archives of specific groups, but it's my understanding that Google Groups is probably the most complete (least incomplete?) general archive available. Tom Veatch Wichita, KS USA Tom, Currently there are over 30,000 posts on Newsguy that match the OP's criteria. The oldest is dated May of 2005. I have no idea how long Google retains posts for but I would think it wouldn't be that long. Gordon Shumway Scroll down to 2001 and look at the first company aquisition. To the best of my knowledge, Google does not remove newsgroup posts, ever. Larry I guess if I wasn't a dumbass I could have included the link. http://www.google.com/corporate/history.html Larry, See my reply to J.Clarke. I didn't sort Google by date to find the oldest message because I couldn't find how to sort. How old is the oldest message at google for this group? Is it older than Newsguy's May of 2005? Gordon Shumway |
#13
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Google Groups Search
Gordon Shumway wrote:
On Wed, 29 Jul 2009 20:54:15 -0500, Tom Veatch wrote: On Wed, 29 Jul 2009 19:46:50 -0500, Gordon Shumway wrote: Get yourself a news reader and use a news server instead of Google. I believe the typical news server doesn't archive the content. If that's the case, the only posts that would be available would be those within that server's retention policy which varies from provider to provider. There may be more complete archives of specific groups, but it's my understanding that Google Groups is probably the most complete (least incomplete?) general archive available. Tom Veatch Wichita, KS USA Tom, Currently there are over 30,000 posts on Newsguy that match the OP's criteria. The oldest is dated May of 2005. I have no idea how long Google retains posts for but I would think it wouldn't be that long. Well, Gordon, you think wrong. Google Groups is what used to be known as "dejanews", whose sole purpose to existence was an attempt to archive _everything_ that had _ever_ been posted on USENET. When Google took over deja, they had posts going back to 1996. Google has since obtained several other archives that contain posts going back to 1981. Where Google went wrong was when they decided to compete with USENET instead of just archiving it. |
#14
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Google Groups Search
Larry wrote:
Gordon Shumway wrote in : On Wed, 29 Jul 2009 20:54:15 -0500, Tom Veatch wrote: On Wed, 29 Jul 2009 19:46:50 -0500, Gordon Shumway wrote: Get yourself a news reader and use a news server instead of Google. I believe the typical news server doesn't archive the content. If that's the case, the only posts that would be available would be those within that server's retention policy which varies from provider to provider. There may be more complete archives of specific groups, but it's my understanding that Google Groups is probably the most complete (least incomplete?) general archive available. Tom Veatch Wichita, KS USA Tom, Currently there are over 30,000 posts on Newsguy that match the OP's criteria. The oldest is dated May of 2005. I have no idea how long Google retains posts for but I would think it wouldn't be that long. Gordon Shumway Scroll down to 2001 and look at the first company aquisition. To the best of my knowledge, Google does not remove newsgroup posts, ever. They will on request, under some circumstances. |
#15
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Google Groups Search
Gordon Shumway wrote:
On 30 Jul 2009 03:35:52 GMT, Larry wrote: Larry wrote in : Gordon Shumway wrote in : On Wed, 29 Jul 2009 20:54:15 -0500, Tom Veatch wrote: On Wed, 29 Jul 2009 19:46:50 -0500, Gordon Shumway wrote: Get yourself a news reader and use a news server instead of Google. I believe the typical news server doesn't archive the content. If that's the case, the only posts that would be available would be those within that server's retention policy which varies from provider to provider. There may be more complete archives of specific groups, but it's my understanding that Google Groups is probably the most complete (least incomplete?) general archive available. Tom Veatch Wichita, KS USA Tom, Currently there are over 30,000 posts on Newsguy that match the OP's criteria. The oldest is dated May of 2005. I have no idea how long Google retains posts for but I would think it wouldn't be that long. Gordon Shumway Scroll down to 2001 and look at the first company aquisition. To the best of my knowledge, Google does not remove newsgroup posts, ever. Larry I guess if I wasn't a dumbass I could have included the link. http://www.google.com/corporate/history.html Larry, See my reply to J.Clarke. I didn't sort Google by date to find the oldest message because I couldn't find how to sort. How old is the oldest message at google for this group? Is it older than Newsguy's May of 2005? December 20, 1990. |
#16
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Google Groups Search
Gordon Shumway wrote:
On Wed, 29 Jul 2009 22:30:00 -0400, "J. Clarke" wrote: Gordon Shumway wrote: On Wed, 29 Jul 2009 17:29:24 -0700 (PDT), Mike wrote: So, I was trying to do a search of the group archives using Google Groups. It seems that I'm only getting results from the past month. I did a test search on the term 'saw' and only got 280 results, with the oldest being from July 9. I've looked all over in the groups preferences and so on, but cannot find anything that would set a limit on the age of the results. Any one have the same problem, or a fix? Get yourself a news reader and use a news server instead of Google. A news readar and news server is not a substitute for the dejanews archive that Google maintains, containing posts going back into the late '80s. I'm not too sure about your "dejanews archive" statement. Read the wikipedia entry on "dejanews". If you are doubting the existence of dejanews, google it. If you are doubting that Google took over the archive, go to http://www.dejanews.com and see what you get. If you doubt that the archive goes back to the 1980s then go to http://www.dejanews.com, click "advanced search", set the Message Dates to 1 Jan 1981 to 1 Jan 1982, and for "Group" put "*" (without the quotes), and see what you get. I just looked at Google Groups for the first time tonight. There are currently 216,000+ messages archived in this group at Google. At the same time there are also 216,000+ messages on NewsGuy. Actually there are a few hundred more on newsguy than Google but who's counting. With that information I wouldn't be surprised to know that Google is maintaining a Newsguy archive. Gordon Shumway |
#17
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Google Groups Search
Larry wrote in news:Xns9C57E5765BBBnone@
216.151.153.60: Scroll down to 2001 and look at the first company aquisition. To the best of my knowledge, Google does not remove newsgroup posts, ever. Larry FWIW, they seem to respect X-No-Archive. I've seen messages that were going to disappear in a few days when the X-No-Archive timeout expired. Puckdropper -- "The potential difference between the top and bottom of a tree is the reason why all trees have to be grounded..." -- Bored Borg on rec.woodworking To email me directly, send a message to puckdropper (at) fastmail.fm |
#18
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Google Groups Search
Puckdropper wrote:
Larry wrote in news:Xns9C57E5765BBBnone@ 216.151.153.60: Scroll down to 2001 and look at the first company aquisition. To the best of my knowledge, Google does not remove newsgroup posts, ever. Larry FWIW, they seem to respect X-No-Archive. I've seen messages that were going to disappear in a few days when the X-No-Archive timeout expired. x-no-archive originated with deja so of course deja honors it. |
#19
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Google Groups Search
On Jul 29, 8:37*pm, Gordon Shumway wrote:
On Wed, 29 Jul 2009 22:30:00 -0400, "J. Clarke" wrote: Gordon Shumway wrote: On Wed, 29 Jul 2009 17:29:24 -0700 (PDT), Mike wrote: So, I was trying to do a search of the group archives using Google Groups. It seems that I'm only getting results from the past month. I did a test search on the term 'saw' and only got 280 results, with the oldest being from July 9. I've looked all over in the groups preferences and so on, but cannot find anything that would set a limit on the age of the results. Any one have the same problem, or a fix? Get yourself a news reader and use a news server instead of Google. A news readar and news server is not a substitute for the dejanews archive that Google maintains, containing posts going back into the late '80s. I'm not too sure about your "dejanews archive" statement. *I just looked at Google Groups for the first time tonight. *There are currently 216,000+ messages archived in this group at Google. *At the same time there are also 216,000+ messages on NewsGuy. *Actually there are a few hundred more on newsguy than Google but who's counting. With that information I wouldn't be surprised to know that Google is maintaining a Newsguy archive. You can see a whole lot of rec.woodworking posts archived by Google back to 1994 or so on my humour page. http://www.yukonomics.ca/wooddorking/humour.html Luigi |
#20
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Google Groups Search
On 7/29/2009 6:54 PM Tom Veatch spake thus:
On Wed, 29 Jul 2009 19:46:50 -0500, Gordon Shumway wrote: Get yourself a news reader and use a news server instead of Google. I believe the typical news server doesn't archive the content. If that's the case, the only posts that would be available would be those within that server's retention policy which varies from provider to provider. There may be more complete archives of specific groups, but it's my understanding that Google Groups is probably the most complete (least incomplete?) general archive available. Someone should compose a requiem for DejaNews, which was a hundred times better than Google's ****ed-up implementation of an internet archive (complete with non-altruistic profit motive, unlike Deja). -- Found--the gene that causes belief in genetic determinism |
#21
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Google Groups Search
On Jul 29, 11:48*pm, Gordon Shumway wrote:
On 30 Jul 2009 03:35:52 GMT, Larry wrote: Larry wrote in : Gordon Shumway wrote in m: On Wed, 29 Jul 2009 20:54:15 -0500, Tom Veatch wrote: On Wed, 29 Jul 2009 19:46:50 -0500, Gordon Shumway wrote: Get yourself a news reader and use a news server instead of Google. I believe the typical news server doesn't archive the content. If that's the case, the only posts that would be available would be those within that server's retention policy which varies from provider to provider. There may be more complete archives of specific groups, but it's my understanding that Google Groups is probably the most complete (least incomplete?) general archive available. Tom Veatch Wichita, KS USA Tom, Currently there are over 30,000 posts on Newsguy that match the OP's criteria. *The oldest is dated May of 2005. *I have no idea how long Google retains posts for but I would think it wouldn't be that long. Gordon Shumway Scroll down to 2001 and look at the first company aquisition. To the best of my knowledge, Google does not remove newsgroup posts, ever. Larry I guess if I wasn't a dumbass I could have included the link. http://www.google.com/corporate/history.html Larry, See my reply to J.Clarke. *I didn't sort Google by date to find the oldest message because I couldn't find how to sort. *How old is the oldest message at google for this group? *Is it older than Newsguy's May of 2005? Gordon Shumway I regularly get results from 1998 and earlier when doing basic searches. I just recently tried to look up some information on solid surface countertops in here, because it's a regularly discussed topic, and I got 1 result, and that was with "Corian." I couldn't even use "solid surface counter" and get any hits. Hopefully they get this cleared up soon. |
#22
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Google Groups Search
Gordon Shumway wrote:
On 30 Jul 2009 03:35:52 GMT, Larry wrote: Larry wrote in : Gordon Shumway wrote in : On Wed, 29 Jul 2009 20:54:15 -0500, Tom Veatch wrote: On Wed, 29 Jul 2009 19:46:50 -0500, Gordon Shumway wrote: Get yourself a news reader and use a news server instead of Google. I believe the typical news server doesn't archive the content. If that's the case, the only posts that would be available would be those within that server's retention policy which varies from provider to provider. There may be more complete archives of specific groups, but it's my understanding that Google Groups is probably the most complete (least incomplete?) general archive available. Tom Veatch Wichita, KS USA Tom, Currently there are over 30,000 posts on Newsguy that match the OP's criteria. The oldest is dated May of 2005. I have no idea how long Google retains posts for but I would think it wouldn't be that long. Gordon Shumway Scroll down to 2001 and look at the first company aquisition. To the best of my knowledge, Google does not remove newsgroup posts, ever. Larry I guess if I wasn't a dumbass I could have included the link. http://www.google.com/corporate/history.html Larry, See my reply to J.Clarke. I didn't sort Google by date to find the oldest message because I couldn't find how to sort. How old is the oldest message at google for this group? Is it older than Newsguy's May of 2005? Gordon Shumway At one point the DejaNews archives, which was sold to eBay in 2000 and then to Google in 2001, contained the messages back to 1981. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deja_News -- Jack Novak Buffalo, NY - USA |
#23
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Google Groups Search
David Nebenzahl wrote:
Someone should compose a requiem for DejaNews, which was a hundred times better than Google's ****ed-up implementation of an internet archive (complete with non-altruistic profit motive, unlike Deja). Except, Deja is GONE! If it weren't for Googles "non-altruistic profit motive" so would the archives be gone... Not to mention I have never had to pay Google a dime, for anything from which they profit. In fact, I often marvel at how much they are worth, considering they charge consumers nothing for their services. Not bad for a company with a "non-altruistic profit motive" -- Jack Using FREE News Server: http://www.eternal-september.org/ http://jbstein.com |
#24
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Google Groups Search
Mike wrote:
: So, I was trying to do a search of the group archives using Google : Groups. It seems that I'm only getting results from the past month. I : did a test search on the term 'saw' and only got 280 results, with the : oldest being from July 9. : I've looked all over in the groups preferences and so on, but cannot : find anything that would set a limit on the age of the results. Any : one have the same problem, or a fix? I've been having problems searching newsgroups on Google for months now. If you go to "advanced search", there is a date delimiter, but more often than not I can't retrieve posts I know exist even if I set the date rang for the last ten years. Something's awry. -- Andy Barss |
#25
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Google Groups Search
On 7/30/2009 7:40 AM Jack Stein spake thus:
David Nebenzahl wrote: Someone should compose a requiem for DejaNews, which was a hundred times better than Google's ****ed-up implementation of an internet archive (complete with non-altruistic profit motive, unlike Deja). Except, Deja is GONE! Well, that's my point. Not to mention I have never had to pay Google a dime, for anything from which they profit. In fact, I often marvel at how much they are worth, considering they charge consumers nothing for their services. Not bad for a company with a "non-altruistic profit motive" Of course they don't charge users for their services. But think for a minute about how they make their money, and who pays them for what. -- Found--the gene that causes belief in genetic determinism |
#26
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Google Groups Search
Gordon Shumway wrote in
: See my reply to J.Clarke. I didn't sort Google by date to find the oldest message because I couldn't find how to sort. How old is the oldest message at google for this group? Is it older than Newsguy's May of 2005? Gordon Shumway I just did a quick search and found posts as far back as Dec 1992. Are we using the same Google Groups? ;o} Larry |
#27
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Google Groups Search
On 31 Jul 2009 02:20:37 GMT, Larry wrote:
Gordon Shumway wrote in : See my reply to J.Clarke. I didn't sort Google by date to find the oldest message because I couldn't find how to sort. How old is the oldest message at google for this group? Is it older than Newsguy's May of 2005? Gordon Shumway I just did a quick search and found posts as far back as Dec 1992. Are we using the same Google Groups? ;o} Larry Here is where I went: http://groups.google.com/groups/dir?...ec.woodworking I don't know of any other. But then I only went there yesterday for the first time Gordon Shumway |
#28
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Google Groups Search
Gordon Shumway wrote:
On 31 Jul 2009 02:20:37 GMT, Larry wrote: Gordon Shumway wrote in : See my reply to J.Clarke. I didn't sort Google by date to find the oldest message because I couldn't find how to sort. How old is the oldest message at google for this group? Is it older than Newsguy's May of 2005? Gordon Shumway I just did a quick search and found posts as far back as Dec 1992. Are we using the same Google Groups? ;o} Larry Here is where I went: http://groups.google.com/groups/dir?...ec.woodworking I don't know of any other. But then I only went there yesterday for the first time That page doesn't have a sort--to find the oldest message you have to use the advanced search. |
#29
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Google Groups Search
Gordon Shumway wrote in
: Larry Here is where I went: http://groups.google.com/groups/dir?...q=rec.woodwork ing I don't know of any other. But then I only went there yesterday for the first time Gordon Shumway Then click on "Advanced Search". Pick a date range of 1/1/1992 - 1/1/1993 In the field below that put in rec.woodworking. Leave everything else blank and click on the Advanced Search button. What I see is 3110 messages that meet that criteria. Larry |
#31
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Google Groups Search
|
#33
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Google Groups Search
On Fri, 31 Jul 2009 23:20:07 -0400, phorbin
wrote: It was a failed attempt to migrate the Dejanews database to Google. I don't know how much they lost, but every thing I'd written was erased from the record and I'd been a participant all over the place for a long time. There was a sorta oops, we broke it permanently message when it happened. --I'll admit to wondering if they meant to break it. (Are there typos or words missing from that sentence. I confess to a failure to decipher any meaning from it.) The information is here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deja_News According to the cited article, the "oops" occurred in 1999-2000 prior to the DejaNews/eBay transaction in 2000. I offer no comment as to the validity of the information on Wikipedia. Quote In 1999 the site (now known as Deja.com) sharply changed direction and made its primary feature a shopping comparison service. During this transition, which involved relocation of the servers, many older messages in the Usenet archive became unavailable. By late 2000 the company, in financial distress, sold the shopping service to eBay, who incorporated the technology into their half.com service. By 2001 the search service was shut down. The archives were acquired by Google[3] and reintroduced as Google Groups. /Quote Tom Veatch Wichita, KS USA |
#34
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Google Groups Search
In article , phorbin wrote:
In article , says... phorbin wrote: In article , says... A news readar and news server is not a substitute for the dejanews archive that Google maintains, containing posts going back into the late '80s. Google is not a substitute for the dejanews archive, which Google lost. When did this loss occur? It was a failed attempt to migrate the Dejanews database to Google. I don't know how much they lost, but every thing I'd written was erased from the record and I'd been a participant all over the place for a long time. There was a sorta oops, we broke it permanently message when it happened. --I'll admit to wondering if they meant to break it. The information is here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deja_News No mention there at all of Google losing any data, just the statement that "during this transition, many older messages ... became unavailable." In the first place, the wording of this sentence implies temporary unavailability, not permanent loss. Second, the "transition" referred to was (as the article makes clear) a change in *Deja's* operations which occurred two years *before* the sale to Google. |
#35
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Google Groups Search
phorbin wrote:
In article , says... phorbin wrote: In article , says... A news readar and news server is not a substitute for the dejanews archive that Google maintains, containing posts going back into the late '80s. Google is not a substitute for the dejanews archive, which Google lost. When did this loss occur? It was a failed attempt to migrate the Dejanews database to Google. I don't know how much they lost, but every thing I'd written was erased from the record and I'd been a participant all over the place for a long time. There was a sorta oops, we broke it permanently message when it happened. --I'll admit to wondering if they meant to break it. The information is here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deja_News It says that deja lost a lot of data in 1999 and that Google bought deja in 2001. Seems to me that you're blaming Google for somebody else's mistake. |
#36
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Google Groups Search
phorbin wrote:
It was a failed attempt to migrate the Dejanews database to Google. I don't know how much they lost, but every thing I'd written was erased from the record and I'd been a participant all over the place for a long time. There was a sorta oops, we broke it permanently message when it happened. --I'll admit to wondering if they meant to break it. The information is here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deja_News Did you even read the above article? Generally, if you post a link to support your case, the link supports your case? I know doing a search on "the" back to 1981 you get messages posted back that far. What parts of usenet is archived, or if any message have been lost, or removed, I certainly can't say, and your wikipedia link doesn't say Google lost anything. If you can't find messages you know you posted, I guess either they were lost, or, your search parameters didn't work, or, the search engine isn't working. I know while looking through some of this I found Google said they have over a TRILLION web pages indexed. I know, thats not messages but that is a hell of a lot of pages. For an old guy like me, I'm constantly amazed at how fast all this stuff works. Storing this much stuff is awesome, but searching through it for info is mind boggling to me. -- Jack Using FREE News Server: http://www.eternal-september.org/ http://jbstein.com |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Edge sanders and google groups search weirdness | Woodworking | |||
Google Groups. | UK diy | |||
oh god they f**ked up google groups bigtime | Metalworking | |||
New google Groups: Somewhat OT | Woodworking | |||
Sorry- OT Re Google Groups- WTF? | Woodworking |