Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
UK diy (uk.d-i-y) For the discussion of all topics related to diy (do-it-yourself) in the UK. All levels of experience and proficency are welcome to join in to ask questions or offer solutions. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
BT phone line
My neice moved into a new build flat, its has a white bt phone line and
BT will charge £122.50 to activate it! which sounds like a lot of money to me. All the wiring is done and there is a phone line 3 rooms. Which seem to be wired up to a grey box on the outside of the property. There is no dial tone when a phone is plugged in. Is there anyway I can activate the line or does this require some special equipment to do ? Hoping to try and save her some money as its her first home. |
#2
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
BT phone line
On Mon, 09 Nov 2009 23:22:06 +0000, Peter smith
wrote: My neice moved into a new build flat, its has a white bt phone line and BT will charge £122.50 to activate it! Standard BT rate for a new connection. which sounds like a lot of money to me. Tough! All the wiring is done and there is a phone line 3 rooms. Which seem to be wired up to a grey box on the outside of the property. There is no dial tone when a phone is plugged in. Is there anyway I can activate the line or does this require some special equipment to do ? No chance! Just pay up ... |
#3
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
BT phone line
Peter smith wrote:
My neice moved into a new build flat, its has a white bt phone line and BT will charge £122.50 to activate it! which sounds like a lot of money to me. Hoping to try and save her some money as its her first home. http://www.moneysavingexpert.com/dea...e-installation Read through the following forum entries - that offer still seems to be open. http://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/...640845&page=29 -- Adrian C |
#4
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
BT phone line
On Mon, 09 Nov 2009 23:22:06 +0000, Peter smith wrote:
There is no dial tone when a phone is plugged in. Is there anyway I can activate the line ... Short answer: No. or does this require some special equipment to do ? Long answer: The wiring within the building may be present, probably done by the builder. BT may have installed a street cable into the building but they probably won't have connected the two bits together and the street cable may only go as far as the nearest green box or a joint box in a manhole and be unconnected that end as well. Depending on the route and capacity of the local cables, it may take BT quite a while to connect that line back to the exchange. And as they have a "universal service obligation" to provide voice telephony even if they spend a several days and several engineers making that connection all you'll pay is that hundred odd quid that you have been quoted. I thought all young things had mobiles surgically attached to an ear these days. Does she need a landline? Daft question really yes she does probably needs it for broadband(*)(though reasonable speeds can be had on 3G) but mainly for resilience. When the power fails the mobile networks also fail, some straight away some after a few minutes. Very few cells have long term ( than an hour or two) power back up. Even when the power comes back some take ages (day or two) to come back online... (*) I don't think you can side step the BT new install charge by choosing a LLU provider, fairly sure their T&Cs demand an existing BT line. But it could be worth looking but don't expect to save much. -- Cheers Dave. |
#5
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
BT phone line
Peter smith wrote:
My neice moved into a new build flat, its has a white bt phone line and BT will charge £122.50 to activate it! which sounds like a lot of money to me. All the wiring is done and there is a phone line 3 rooms. Which seem to be wired up to a grey box on the outside of the property. There is no dial tone when a phone is plugged in. Is there anyway I can activate the line or does this require some special equipment to do ? No, you cannot activate the line as it will need 'connecting up' at the exchange or local junction box. Actually, it probably is already connected, but needs a software or actual switch turning on to make it live. Yes, BT connection charges are not in the real world, though I thought it was nearer to £75 for connection. Alan. -- To reply by e-mail, change the ' + ' to 'plus'. |
#6
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
BT phone line
On Mon, 09 Nov 2009 23:22:06 +0000, Peter smith wrote:
My neice moved into a new build flat, its has a white bt phone line and BT will charge £122.50 to activate it! which sounds like a lot of money to me. All the wiring is done and there is a phone line 3 rooms. Which seem to be wired up to a grey box on the outside of the property. There is no dial tone when a phone is plugged in. Is there anyway I can activate the line or does this require some special equipment to do ? Hoping to try and save her some money as its her first home. Has she considered not having a fixed line and just using her mobile instead? AFAICS the only drawback would be internet provision if she's a high-volume downloader, but for just checking email and casual surfing a 1GB/month add-on should do the job. |
#7
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
BT phone line
"A.Lee" wrote in message ... Peter smith wrote: My neice moved into a new build flat, its has a white bt phone line and BT will charge £122.50 to activate it! which sounds like a lot of money to me. All the wiring is done and there is a phone line 3 rooms. Which seem to be wired up to a grey box on the outside of the property. There is no dial tone when a phone is plugged in. Is there anyway I can activate the line or does this require some special equipment to do ? No, you cannot activate the line as it will need 'connecting up' at the exchange or local junction box. Actually, it probably is already connected, but needs a software or actual switch turning on to make it live. Yes, BT connection charges are not in the real world, though I thought it was nearer to £75 for connection. Alan. Considering what it costs these days to get a plumber or electrician or builder to your house, or if you look at the hourly rate your local garage charges, I don't think that BT's connection charges are "not in the real world" at all - even if it is 120 quid. As a father of daughters myself, and having been through the 'first house - save money' scenario, I can appreciate the desire to try to help in this respect, but sometimes, the lessons of how much it *really* costs to live in the modern world, just have to be learnt ... :-\ Arfa |
#8
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
BT phone line
Peter smith wrote:
My neice moved into a new build flat, its has a white bt phone line and BT will charge £122.50 to activate it! which sounds like a lot of money to me. All the wiring is done and there is a phone line 3 rooms. Which seem to be wired up to a grey box on the outside of the property. There is no dial tone when a phone is plugged in. Is there anyway I can activate the line or does this require some special equipment to do ? Hoping to try and save her some money as its her first home. Have BT actually said they'll definitely make the charge? Quite often they don't charge at all for activating an existing line and as Adrian says there is/was an offer of free *installation*, which is generally a lot more work than reconnection. Si |
#9
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
BT phone line
On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 09:45:51 -0000, "Mungo \"Two Sheds\" Toadfoot"
wrote: Have BT actually said they'll definitely make the charge? Quite often they don't charge at all for activating an existing line But it is a *new* line! New property, new line. Why should it be free, or subsidised? That would only mean that existing BT subscribers would be paying for it. I'm sorry, but I don't see why I should pay for someone else's new phone line. |
#10
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
BT phone line
On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 09:22:24 -0000, Arfa Daily wrote:
Considering what it costs these days to get a plumber or electrician or builder to your house, or if you look at the hourly rate your local garage charges, I don't think that BT's connection charges are "not in the real world" at all - even if it is 120 quid. Quite, it's a bargin for a new install of a line. Say engineer on national average wage of 24k or about £15/hr takes a morning to fully jumper the line from the exchange to customer that £60 in wages plus employers NI, Pension etc not to mention the costs associated with the van for the engineer, tools and consumables. "Same day take overs" are free non-same day have a nominal fee as hopefully it's just a setting in the exchange card that the line might still be connected to but there is no guarantee that an previously used line is still connected back to the exchnage. Faults on other lines will be cured by using "unused" pairs in the same cable. -- Cheers Dave. |
#11
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
BT phone line
Dave Liquorice wrote:
On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 09:22:24 -0000, Arfa Daily wrote: Considering what it costs these days to get a plumber or electrician or builder to your house, or if you look at the hourly rate your local garage charges, I don't think that BT's connection charges are "not in the real world" at all - even if it is 120 quid. Quite, it's a bargin for a new install of a line. Say engineer on national average wage of 24k or about £15/hr takes a morning to fully jumper the line from the exchange to customer that £60 in wages plus employers NI, Pension etc not to mention the costs associated with the van for the engineer, tools and consumables. "Same day take overs" are free non-same day have a nominal fee as hopefully it's just a setting in the exchange card that the line might still be connected to but there is no guarantee that an previously used line is still connected back to the exchnage. Faults on other lines will be cured by using "unused" pairs in the same cable. You may find that a reconnect via a third party phone supplier is cheaper. check www.idnet.net and see. Oh £108+ VAT. same price. At least you dont have to mess with BT tho. |
#12
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
BT phone line
Bruce wrote:
On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 09:45:51 -0000, "Mungo \"Two Sheds\" Toadfoot" wrote: Have BT actually said they'll definitely make the charge? Quite often they don't charge at all for activating an existing line But it is a *new* line! New property, new line. Why should it be free, or subsidised? That would only mean that existing BT subscribers would be paying for it. I'm sorry, but I don't see why I should pay for someone else's new phone line. Difficult area. I live 80m from the exchange (great for broadband:-)). Do I subsidise those who live further away with longer lines and probably more maintenance? Old chestnut about the same price for Royal Mail mis-deliveries to remote rural houses as local post will be up next! |
#13
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
BT phone line
On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 04:52:31 -0800 (PST), Owain
wrote: On 10 Nov, 10:02, Bruce wrote: Why should it be free, or subsidised? *That would only mean that existing BT subscribers would be paying for it. * I'm sorry, but I don't see why I should pay for someone else's new phone line. The principle that costs should be averaged over all subscribers dates back to the fairly early days of the public network, on the grounds that every new addition to the network benefited those already on it. Nonsense. No such "principle" has ever existed. A new line has always had to be paid for. |
#14
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
BT phone line
On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 13:15:42 +0000, Invisible Man
wrote: Bruce wrote: On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 09:45:51 -0000, "Mungo \"Two Sheds\" Toadfoot" wrote: Have BT actually said they'll definitely make the charge? Quite often they don't charge at all for activating an existing line But it is a *new* line! New property, new line. Why should it be free, or subsidised? That would only mean that existing BT subscribers would be paying for it. I'm sorry, but I don't see why I should pay for someone else's new phone line. Difficult area. I live 80m from the exchange (great for broadband:-)). Do I subsidise those who live further away with longer lines and probably more maintenance? I also live close to the exchange. I'm happy that there is a national standard charge for line rental. If that means that I subsidise the maintenance of longer rural lines, that's fine by me. What I *do* strongly object to is the expectation that I and other BT subscribers should pay for other people's new installations. £122 is not an unreasonable charge. No one is forcing them to have a landline. If they want one, why should *I* have to pay for it? |
#15
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
BT phone line
On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 07:14:17 +0000, A.Lee wrote:
No, you cannot activate the line as it will need 'connecting up' at the exchange or local junction box. Actually, it probably is already connected, but needs a software or actual switch turning on to make it live. .... so that sounds like 2 minutes work. 60 quid a minute's not a bad rate :-) I can understand a charge for doing some real work - but if the line's already laid without them ever knowing if someone will want it then more fool them; I'm not sure why the first person who happens to want it should get stung for work that's already been done. |
#16
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
BT phone line
Bruce wrote:
On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 04:52:31 -0800 (PST), Owain wrote: On 10 Nov, 10:02, Bruce wrote: Why should it be free, or subsidised? That would only mean that existing BT subscribers would be paying for it. I'm sorry, but I don't see why I should pay for someone else's new phone line. The principle that costs should be averaged over all subscribers dates back to the fairly early days of the public network, on the grounds that every new addition to the network benefited those already on it. Nonsense. No such "principle" has ever existed. A new line has always had to be paid for. But not by the new line recipient. Its always been subsidised by the rest of the network, and originally, the taxpayer. That £120 covers the case even where they have to dig up 5 miles of moorland, or sling a microwave dish in. |
#17
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
BT phone line
Jules wrote:
On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 07:14:17 +0000, A.Lee wrote: No, you cannot activate the line as it will need 'connecting up' at the exchange or local junction box. Actually, it probably is already connected, but needs a software or actual switch turning on to make it live. ... so that sounds like 2 minutes work. 60 quid a minute's not a bad rate :-) I can understand a charge for doing some real work - but if the line's already laid without them ever knowing if someone will want it then more fool them; I'm not sure why the first person who happens to want it should get stung for work that's already been done. It wont be already necessarily laid. Typically in a new build it merely means that there is a cable to somewhere in BTs ducts. Someone still has to go out in the cold and wet, hunker over a street cabinet, connect some wires up, go back to the exchange, set it all up there, go to the customers premises, check they got the right pair, if not redo from start, check if noise is acceptable, and then drive back to base. |
#18
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
BT phone line
On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 09:22:24 -0000, "Arfa Daily"
wrote: "A.Lee" wrote in message . .. Peter smith wrote: My neice moved into a new build flat, its has a white bt phone line and BT will charge £122.50 to activate it! which sounds like a lot of money to me. All the wiring is done and there is a phone line 3 rooms. Which seem to be wired up to a grey box on the outside of the property. There is no dial tone when a phone is plugged in. Is there anyway I can activate the line or does this require some special equipment to do ? No, you cannot activate the line as it will need 'connecting up' at the exchange or local junction box. Actually, it probably is already connected, but needs a software or actual switch turning on to make it live. Yes, BT connection charges are not in the real world, though I thought it was nearer to £75 for connection. Alan. Considering what it costs these days to get a plumber or electrician or builder to your house, or if you look at the hourly rate your local garage charges, I don't think that BT's connection charges are "not in the real world" at all - even if it is 120 quid. And just try getting a plumber or an electrician to turn up for a job paying that little. It's not possible IME. -- (\__/) M. (='.'=) Due to the amount of spam posted via googlegroups and (")_(") their inaction to the problem. I am blocking most articles posted from there. If you wish your postings to be seen by everyone you will need use a different method of posting. [Reply-to address valid until it is spammed.] |
#19
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
BT phone line
On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 14:30:42 +0000, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
That £120 covers the case even where they have to dig up 5 miles of moorland, or sling a microwave dish in. They try a wriggle if it is going to cost a lot of money, indeed there may even be a get out clause these days. -- Cheers Dave. |
#20
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
BT phone line
On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 12:21:19 +0000, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
You may find that a reconnect via a third party phone supplier is cheaper. check www.idnet.net and see. Oh £108+ VAT. same price. At least you dont have to mess with BT tho. Not BT Retail but BT Openreach will be involved to do the physical work of jumpering the appropriate pair from the customers premises to the 3rd parties kit in the exchange. -- Cheers Dave. |
#21
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
BT phone line
Dave Liquorice wrote:
On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 12:21:19 +0000, The Natural Philosopher wrote: You may find that a reconnect via a third party phone supplier is cheaper. check www.idnet.net and see. Oh £108+ VAT. same price. At least you dont have to mess with BT tho. Not BT Retail but BT Openreach will be involved to do the physical work of jumpering the appropriate pair from the customers premises to the 3rd parties kit in the exchange. Indeed, BUT you don't have to deal with their crap. Someone else does, and best of all, you don't have to deal with BTs opaque billing systems. OpenReach is the GOOD bit of BT, if there is such. BUT you can't get to them unless you are trade..the bad bit is the support desk, the marketing and the billing. |
#22
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
BT phone line
On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 14:33:40 +0000, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
Jules wrote: On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 07:14:17 +0000, A.Lee wrote: No, you cannot activate the line as it will need 'connecting up' at the exchange or local junction box. Actually, it probably is already connected, but needs a software or actual switch turning on to make it live. ... so that sounds like 2 minutes work. 60 quid a minute's not a bad rate :-) I can understand a charge for doing some real work - but if the line's already laid without them ever knowing if someone will want it then more fool them; I'm not sure why the first person who happens to want it should get stung for work that's already been done. It wont be already necessarily laid. Typically in a new build it merely means that there is a cable to somewhere in BTs ducts. Someone still has to go out in the cold and wet, hunker over a street cabinet, connect some wires up, go back to the exchange, set it all up there, go to the customers premises, check they got the right pair, if not redo from start, check if noise is acceptable, and then drive back to base. Yes, I can understand that costing real money - but it seems unfair to lump it on one resident if the cable is already there and the work involved is minimal. I'm getting the impression that BT don't make the distinction though and just charge anyway. It's not necessarily a nice little earner for them of course because the work's still been done by them at some point - but I'm quite surprised that if it *has* been done then it hasn't already somehow been absorbed into the development costs for the new build. cheers Jules |
#23
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
BT phone line
On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 11:34:58 -0600, Jules wrote:
It's not necessarily a nice little earner for them of course because the work's still been done by them at some point - but I'm quite surprised that if it *has* been done then it hasn't already somehow been absorbed into the development costs for the new build. Usually BT pay the builder for their part in the work. But that only covers the costs from the house back to some local connection point - BT still provide the connection to the exchange, and the exchange equipment. -- Use the BIG mirror service in the UK: http://www.mirrorservice.org |
#24
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
BT phone line
On Mon, 09 Nov 2009 23:22:06 +0000, Peter smith wrote:
My neice moved into a new build flat, its has a white bt phone line and BT will charge £122.50 to activate it! which sounds like a lot of money to me. All the wiring is done and there is a phone line 3 rooms. Which seem to be wired up to a grey box on the outside of the property. There is no dial tone when a phone is plugged in. Is there anyway I can activate the line or does this require some special equipment to do ? Hoping to try and save her some money as its her first home. Talk Talk put in a new line for 59.99 - but you are on a 2 year contract IIRC. Pretty good on calls too so probably worth looking at if they are available at that exchange. I've just been through this as my BT line was disconnected years ago. -- Mick (Working in a M$-free zone!) Web: http://www.nascom.info Filtering everything posted from googlegroups to kill spam. |
#25
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
BT phone line
Bruce wrote:
On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 09:45:51 -0000, "Mungo \"Two Sheds\" Toadfoot" wrote: Have BT actually said they'll definitely make the charge? Quite often they don't charge at all for activating an existing line But it is a *new* line! New property, new line. Why should it be free, or subsidised? That would only mean that existing BT subscribers would be paying for it. I'm sorry, but I don't see why I should pay for someone else's new phone line. Because it's already there! All the real work's already been done, surely, or am I missing something? Si |
#26
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
BT phone line
Mungo "Two Sheds" Toadfoot wrote:
Bruce wrote: On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 09:45:51 -0000, "Mungo \"Two Sheds\" Toadfoot" wrote: Have BT actually said they'll definitely make the charge? Quite often they don't charge at all for activating an existing line But it is a *new* line! New property, new line. Why should it be free, or subsidised? That would only mean that existing BT subscribers would be paying for it. I'm sorry, but I don't see why I should pay for someone else's new phone line. Because it's already there! All the real work's already been done, surely, or am I missing something? Si Yes you are missing something. Work out how much it costs to provide that cable, and who paid for it. It was explained to me by a BT manager it can take some years before a line returns a profit. |
#27
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
BT phone line
On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 20:49:05 +0000, Mungo \"Two Sheds\" Toadfoot wrote:
Because it's already there! All the real work's already been done, surely, or am I missing something? Yes. All that's there is a wire back to a local connection point. It still needs to be connected back to the exchange. BT will have multi-core cables running between various connection points, but someone has to get in there and connect up spare pairs back to the exchange. That can take some time (I watched them do it, in part, when they connected the extra line so I could have ADSL). Not to mention connecting it to the exchange equipment, testing it and so on. -- Use the BIG mirror service in the UK: http://www.mirrorservice.org |
#28
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
BT phone line
James Salisbury nntp.dsl.pipex.com
wibbled on Tuesday 10 November 2009 21:05 Yes you are missing something. Work out how much it costs to provide that cable, and who paid for it. It was explained to me by a BT manager it can take some years before a line returns a profit. Yes - but the lifetime of the cable should be quite a lot longer. I think it would be quite reasonable to get a single[1] line installed for nowt on the expectation that BT *will* derive a profit from it in the medium term. The number of cases of someone installing a line, then lapsing it after a couple of years must be quite small. [1] I can understand a case of charging if one customer wants more than one line as the probability of a future encumbent using and paying line rental[2] on those lines is also perhaps small. [2] My reasoning is that you have to pay line rental anyway - guaranteed revenue even if you make sod all calls. To draw a parallel, you don't pay the car hire place to buy their new cars - that's factored into the rent you and all future hirers pay. -- Tim Watts This space intentionally left blank... |
#29
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
BT phone line
Bob Eager wrote:
On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 20:49:05 +0000, Mungo \"Two Sheds\" Toadfoot wrote: Because it's already there! All the real work's already been done, surely, or am I missing something? Yes. All that's there is a wire back to a local connection point. It still needs to be connected back to the exchange. BT will have multi-core cables running between various connection points, but someone has to get in there and connect up spare pairs back to the exchange. That can take some time (I watched them do it, in part, when they connected the extra line so I could have ADSL). Not to mention connecting it to the exchange equipment, testing it and so on. Then why do they offer free installations on a regular basis? Si |
#30
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
BT phone line
James Salisbury wrote:
Mungo "Two Sheds" Toadfoot wrote: Bruce wrote: On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 09:45:51 -0000, "Mungo \"Two Sheds\" Toadfoot" wrote: Have BT actually said they'll definitely make the charge? Quite often they don't charge at all for activating an existing line But it is a *new* line! New property, new line. Why should it be free, or subsidised? That would only mean that existing BT subscribers would be paying for it. I'm sorry, but I don't see why I should pay for someone else's new phone line. Because it's already there! All the real work's already been done, surely, or am I missing something? Si Yes you are missing something. Work out how much it costs to provide that cable, and who paid for it. It was explained to me by a BT manager it can take some years before a line returns a profit. Then why do they offer free installations on a regular basis? Si |
#31
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
BT phone line
On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 21:27:07 +0000, Mungo \"Two Sheds\" Toadfoot wrote:
Then why do they offer free installations on a regular basis? Marketing. -- Use the BIG mirror service in the UK: http://www.mirrorservice.org |
#32
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
BT phone line
On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 20:49:05 -0000, "Mungo \"Two Sheds\" Toadfoot"
had this to say: Bruce wrote: On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 09:45:51 -0000, "Mungo \"Two Sheds\" Toadfoot" wrote: Have BT actually said they'll definitely make the charge? Quite often they don't charge at all for activating an existing line But it is a *new* line! New property, new line. Why should it be free, or subsidised? That would only mean that existing BT subscribers would be paying for it. I'm sorry, but I don't see why I should pay for someone else's new phone line. Because it's already there! All the real work's already been done, surely, or am I missing something? You're missing something. There isn't (normally) a single pair going back to the exchange from your premises. Lines go through one or more 'flexibility points' (cabinets and, at one time (there are still a few!) pillars), as well as the actual DP (pole or wall-mounted distribution point). In the 60s, the predicted takeup of telephone service was typically assumed as some 20 - 50% of premises (this was assessed by the Sales Group), and would certainly assume no more than one line per premise. These flexibility points allowed (obviously) some variation across an area, but there were (are) some cases where there are loads of local wires, but few spare ones to the exchange. In many cases link pairs were provided between cabinets so that the PO could enable service under varying circumstances. Nowadays, it's even more complicated. Many (even residential) premises have more than one line; others use lines provided by cable TV companies, or purely mobile phones. Clearly Openreach want to maximise use of their copper (or sometimes aluminium) wires around the place. -- Frank Erskine |
#33
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
BT phone line
On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 21:27:07 -0000 Mungo "Two Sheds" Toadfoot wrote :
Then why do they offer free installations on a regular basis? "Free" with a lock-in period? -- Tony Bryer, Greentram: 'Software to build on' Melbourne, Australia www.superbeam.co.uk www.superbeam.com www.greentram.com |
#34
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
BT phone line
Mungo "Two Sheds" Toadfoot wrote:
Bruce wrote: On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 09:45:51 -0000, "Mungo \"Two Sheds\" Toadfoot" wrote: Have BT actually said they'll definitely make the charge? Quite often they don't charge at all for activating an existing line But it is a *new* line! New property, new line. Why should it be free, or subsidised? That would only mean that existing BT subscribers would be paying for it. I'm sorry, but I don't see why I should pay for someone else's new phone line. Because it's already there! All the real work's already been done, surely, or am I missing something? I dont see why I should pay for someone elses baby, someone elses education, someone elses bloody windmill, and someone elses wars. I'd settle for a phone line, anyday. Si |
#35
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
BT phone line
Tim W wrote:
James Salisbury nntp.dsl.pipex.com wibbled on Tuesday 10 November 2009 21:05 Yes you are missing something. Work out how much it costs to provide that cable, and who paid for it. It was explained to me by a BT manager it can take some years before a line returns a profit. Yes - but the lifetime of the cable should be quite a lot longer. I think it would be quite reasonable to get a single[1] line installed for nowt on the expectation that BT *will* derive a profit from it in the medium term. Not if the moment the contract is up you switch to someone else. DE regulation means BT the customer retail cant make a profit on you to cover BT openreach the connector. so you get cheaper calls, more expensive installation. |
#36
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
BT phone line
Mungo "Two Sheds" Toadfoot wrote:
Bob Eager wrote: On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 20:49:05 +0000, Mungo \"Two Sheds\" Toadfoot wrote: Because it's already there! All the real work's already been done, surely, or am I missing something? Yes. All that's there is a wire back to a local connection point. It still needs to be connected back to the exchange. BT will have multi-core cables running between various connection points, but someone has to get in there and connect up spare pairs back to the exchange. That can take some time (I watched them do it, in part, when they connected the extra line so I could have ADSL). Not to mention connecting it to the exchange equipment, testing it and so on. Then why do they offer free installations on a regular basis? Probably with a two year contract or somesuch. Si |
#37
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
BT phone line
"The Natural Philosopher" wrote in message ... Dave Liquorice wrote: On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 12:21:19 +0000, The Natural Philosopher wrote: You may find that a reconnect via a third party phone supplier is cheaper. check www.idnet.net and see. Oh £108+ VAT. same price. At least you dont have to mess with BT tho. Not BT Retail but BT Openreach will be involved to do the physical work of jumpering the appropriate pair from the customers premises to the 3rd parties kit in the exchange. Indeed, BUT you don't have to deal with their crap. Someone else does, and best of all, you don't have to deal with BTs opaque billing systems. OpenReach is the GOOD bit of BT, if there is such. BUT you can't get to them unless you are trade..the bad bit is the support desk, the marketing and the billing. Just as a matter of interest, what do you find wrong with the way that BT handles its billing ? I have always found mine to be totally concise and clear to understand, especially the on-line version, which allows me to examine the cost of every item, in detail, right up to last night. Arfa |
#38
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
BT phone line
"Jules" wrote in message news On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 07:14:17 +0000, A.Lee wrote: No, you cannot activate the line as it will need 'connecting up' at the exchange or local junction box. Actually, it probably is already connected, but needs a software or actual switch turning on to make it live. ... so that sounds like 2 minutes work. 60 quid a minute's not a bad rate :-) I can understand a charge for doing some real work - but if the line's already laid without them ever knowing if someone will want it then more fool them; I'm not sure why the first person who happens to want it should get stung for work that's already been done. "More fool them ..." seems like a bit of an odd sentiment. How else do you imagine that the real commercial world does, or *could* work ? If every physical line had to be put in on an 'as required' basis, the cost would be a lot higher than 120 quid ... I don't suppose that customers would be too happy at having a retrofitted cable strung all around their nice new house, either. Arfa |
#39
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
BT phone line
On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 01:42:23 -0000, "Arfa Daily"
wrote: "More fool them ..." seems like a bit of an odd sentiment. How else do you imagine that the real commercial world does, or *could* work ? If every physical line had to be put in on an 'as required' basis, the cost would be a lot higher than 120 quid ... I don't suppose that customers would be too happy at having a retrofitted cable strung all around their nice new house, either. There would come a point above which the amount of installation work going on "went critical" and would never be finished because new installations were being requested faster that existing ones were finished. I.E. The BT vans would always be continuously on site. AFAICS the water co's and "gaspipes-R-us" or whatever they call themselves this week, work like that already round here creating their ubiquitous holes in the ground, and are pilloried by the public for their trouble. Derek |
#40
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
BT phone line
Arfa Daily wrote:
"The Natural Philosopher" wrote in message ... Dave Liquorice wrote: On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 12:21:19 +0000, The Natural Philosopher wrote: You may find that a reconnect via a third party phone supplier is cheaper. check www.idnet.net and see. Oh £108+ VAT. same price. At least you dont have to mess with BT tho. Not BT Retail but BT Openreach will be involved to do the physical work of jumpering the appropriate pair from the customers premises to the 3rd parties kit in the exchange. Indeed, BUT you don't have to deal with their crap. Someone else does, and best of all, you don't have to deal with BTs opaque billing systems. OpenReach is the GOOD bit of BT, if there is such. BUT you can't get to them unless you are trade..the bad bit is the support desk, the marketing and the billing. Just as a matter of interest, what do you find wrong with the way that BT handles its billing ? I have always found mine to be totally concise and clear to understand, especially the on-line version, which allows me to examine the cost of every item, in detail, right up to last night. well basically I had two accounts, they had to be accesses separately, and they weren't itemised, and I was paying a fortiune, and BT people kept pestering me with incomprehensible deals, and if things went wrong it was a 27 layer switch board 'press one, press 2' and then I got cut off. Or put to to someone incomprehensible. Probably in Galashiels. Or Bombay. Hard to tell. Arfa |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Clicking on phone line | Home Repair | |||
Phone line & DSL | Electronic Schematics | |||
Phone Line | Home Repair | |||
phone line problems | Home Repair | |||
Help On Fax/Phone Line | Home Repair |