Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
UK diy (uk.d-i-y) For the discussion of all topics related to diy (do-it-yourself) in the UK. All levels of experience and proficency are welcome to join in to ask questions or offer solutions. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#41
Posted to uk.d-i-y,uk.people.silversurfers,uk.tech.broadcast,uk.tech.digital-tv
|
|||
|
|||
patronising digital advert
On Tue, 01 Sep 2009 00:03:38 +0100, Java Jive
wrote: Another was to get an old can, not one that contained anything highly flammable, something like olive oil would do. Put a centimetre or two of water in the tin, and boil it until steam is coming out of the top. Then turn off the gas, and quickly, using oven gloves, replace the lid making sure it's tight. Stand back and wait. After a while, the can crumples. EXPLAIN Simples. Our local coffee bar uses steam from the espresso machine to collapse pop bottles before they are put in the bin for collection by a quite expensive waste service that charges by volume. I do remember a letter to one of the papers years ago asking why they didn't wait until the old people had died off before introducing decimalisation :-) I was away training on D-Day and the quite old & poorly educated ladies in the canteen had no problems with decimal currency (Been trained you see) whereas the graduate engineers in the queue just boggled when their time came to pay. Derek |
#42
Posted to uk.d-i-y,uk.people.silversurfers,uk.tech.broadcast,uk.tech.digital-tv
|
|||
|
|||
patronising digital advert
"Steve Terry" wrote in message ... "Andy Champ" wrote in message . uk... Mark Carver wrote: tony sayer wrote: It seems that in modern Britain, whilst racism is almost a capital offence, ageism is officially condoned. Totally agree!. Don't they -ever- think that one day they'll be old to?.. You don't when you're in your twenties, and that's the root problem. One of two roots. The other is - why are people that age in charge of the ad. campaign anyway? Andy Gov ministers love giving contracts to quangos run or chaired by their friends / relatives / children. Every party since the war has claimed it will reduce quangos when they get into office, then when they do they realise it's an easy and legal way to funnel large quantities of taxpayers money to friends and relatives. As we don't have any anti-racketeering laws in the UK, our contractual law is a farce and would be illegal in more civilised countries Like where? Z |
#43
Posted to uk.d-i-y,uk.people.silversurfers,uk.tech.broadcast,uk.tech.digital-tv
|
|||
|
|||
patronising digital advert
....and meaningful relevant contributions to a thread.
Z "james" wrote in message ... In message , Brian Gaff writes Whatever happened to dignity and tolerence? Same thing that happened to logical, chronological posting! JF |
#44
Posted to uk.d-i-y,uk.people.silversurfers,uk.tech.broadcast,uk.tech.digital-tv
|
|||
|
|||
patronising digital advert
"dennis@home" wrote in message
... "Java Jive" wrote in message ... On Mon, 31 Aug 2009 23:16:24 +0100, geoff wrote: In message , Cash ?.?.?.?.?.?.?.?.?.?.?.?.?.?@?.?.?.?.?.?.?.?.?.?.? .?.?.?.?.//.com.invalid writes And *WHAT* were your thoughts on 'oldies' when you were in your teens, twenties, thirties - and possibly forties when you were showing them how to use that new fangled invention called the video recorder - or even early mobile phones? ;-) Actually, in my day it was hifi, but, while they needed some advice on what technical specifications (remember them?) constituted hifi, none of my parents had any difficulty at all in using such things. I would have thought that setting up a hi-fi turntable and understanding the need for a different input for a magnetic cartridge would have flummoxed most people in the 70s. HiFi is something the youth of today fail to understand. They wouldn't buy mp3 players if they knew anything about HiFi. Run of the mill audio is much better quality (wrt bass, treble and noise) than was common in the past, at least electrically. A cheapy MP3 player connected via the headphone socket to a hi-fi amp and speakers is almost as good as CD. -- Max Demian |
#45
Posted to uk.d-i-y,uk.people.silversurfers,uk.tech.broadcast,uk.tech.digital-tv
|
|||
|
|||
patronising digital advert
On Tue, 1 Sep 2009 02:20:42 -0700 (PDT), Owain
wrote: On 1 Sep, 00:03, Java Jive wrote: Another was to get an old can, not one that contained anything highly flammable, something like olive oil would do. *Put a centimetre or two of water in the tin, and boil it until steam is coming out of the top. Then turn off the gas, and quickly, using oven gloves, replace the lid making sure it's tight. *Stand back and wait. *After a while, the can crumples. That one's atmospheric pressure. Same thing can happen to hot water cylinders :-) It can! I saw the results in an office kitchen when the plumbed-in hot water boiler (substitute for a kettle) had been emptied of hot water to make many cups of coffee and tea in the space of a few minutes. The cold tap was turned on to refill it. The lid was an airtight fit -- Bang! -- one crumpled boiler! The tea lady who had been innocently using it was almost as damaged, mentally, as the boiler. She recovered but the boiler didn't. -- Peter Duncanson (in uk.tech.digital-tv) |
#46
Posted to uk.d-i-y,uk.people.silversurfers,uk.tech.broadcast,uk.tech.digital-tv
|
|||
|
|||
patronising digital advert
On Tue, 1 Sep 2009 00:26:37 +0100, "Bill Wright"
wrote: "Peter Duncanson" wrote in message .. . On Mon, 31 Aug 2009 21:06:19 +0000 (UTC), J G Miller wrote: I saw it before it was pulled. It is both humorous and informative. The humour outweighs any hint of patronisation. No, that's not possible in today's world. Suppose the film featured a black person who was depicted as characteristically lazy and stupid, but was very funny? That wouldn't be allowed would it? I realised after I posted that one big difference between the Fox (American) commercial and the BBC one described is that the Fox one had a voiceover giving instructions and an old lady, and her wires, becoming confused. There was no one else on screen. It was open to viewers of all ages to think "I'd be just as confused as her". -- Peter Duncanson (in uk.tech.digital-tv) |
#47
Posted to uk.d-i-y,uk.people.silversurfers,uk.tech.broadcast,uk.tech.digital-tv
|
|||
|
|||
patronising digital advert
On Tue, 01 Sep 2009 00:20:32 +0100, Java Jive
wrote: Years ago, I used to live in the Gloucester area, and Glyn Worsnip (I think that was the name) used to write a weekly column in the local rag. There is a church in Westgate St missing the top of its spire. IIRC, what actually happened is that after the war it was deemed unsafe (war damage?), so the top 10 to 15 feet were removed and replaced by a cap. What to do with the bit that had been removed? It was re-erected in a bit of park round the back of the cathedral, near a supermarket entrance, about a quarter to half a mile away from the original church. So, for April Fool's Day, Glyn Worsnip invented this cock 'n' bull story that actually there was a complete church underneath the park, with just its spire still showing above the surface. Laughter all round ... Soon long forgotten in the wider scheme of things. However, many years later, again around April 1st, he related that recently he had happened to walk by the spire, and overheard one old dear telling another about the buried church! I wonder if Time Team would like to do a dig there? -- Peter Duncanson (in uk.tech.digital-tv) |
#48
Posted to uk.d-i-y,uk.people.silversurfers,uk.tech.broadcast,uk.tech.digital-tv
|
|||
|
|||
patronising digital advert
On Tue, 1 Sep 2009 10:09:42 +0100, james
wrote: In message , Brian Gaff writes Whatever happened to dignity and tolerence? Same thing that happened to logical, chronological posting! JF James, Brian Gaff is blind. His style of posting is dictated by practical considerations. -- Peter Duncanson (in uk.tech.digital-tv) |
#49
Posted to uk.d-i-y,uk.people.silversurfers,uk.tech.broadcast,uk.tech.digital-tv
|
|||
|
|||
patronising digital advert
|
#50
Posted to uk.d-i-y,uk.people.silversurfers,uk.tech.broadcast,uk.tech.digital-tv
|
|||
|
|||
patronising digital advert
On Tue, 1 Sep 2009 12:05:53 +0100, Terry Casey
wrote: Why do flour mills explode? The same reason that explosions occurred in some cotton mills. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dust_explosion Connect a funnel to a (longish) length of tubing. Block the bottom of the funnel with a loose plug of tissue and pour flour into the funnel. Place a lighted candle on the top of a wall or similar, a couple of inches from the edge. Hold funnel against wall and place 7lb biscuit tin or similar over both candle and funnel, so that funnel is held in place btween tin and wall. Blow sharply down tubing. The tin may travel some considerable distance, so stand well clear! EXPLAIN -- Peter Duncanson (in uk.tech.digital-tv) |
#51
Posted to uk.d-i-y,uk.people.silversurfers,uk.tech.broadcast,uk.tech.digital-tv
|
|||
|
|||
patronising digital advert
In message , Adrian
writes james wrote: In message , Brian Gaff writes Can one complain to the ASA about stuff on the BBC? Naw. Some can whinge about jeopardy posting, though. JF You're being an arsehole, Brian has no choice about top posting as he's blind. As you would know if you bothered to ask instead of making snide comments. My dear Adrian. Your outrage is wholly understandable; wholly commendable; and, alas, wholly misplaced. I know more than most about using the Usenet when blind than most because I have been blind. I used to use JAWS (IMS: Job Application With Speech) as a Usenet client which depended on correct usage of the Usenet's attribution carets to be of any use. I daresay later machines are better but there are still many thousands of JAWS machines in use out there. Jeopardy posting used to drive an old friend of mine mad, Richard Christopher, of the RNIB (he's working on the Moon project and Pelham at the moment) to drink! So much so that he was moved to send a plea to all jeopardy posters he encountered requesting that they he encountered. You can read his plea at: http://www.blakjak.demon.co.uk/gey_chr0.htm I must take issue with you regarding your comment: 'Brian has no choice about top posting'. Not to put too find a point on it, this is patronising in the extreme towards blind people and their problems. When I set out to be playwright I went to lot of trouble to ensure that my plays would stand on their own merit so I took care to ensure that there was nothing about the typescript to indicate that I was blind. I think from the foregoing that I can safely say that my 'arseholeness' is questionable and that your comment: 'As you would know if you bothered to ask instead of making snide comments' does cause a certain well-known phrase about kettles and their colour to spring readily to mind. I won't repeat it because I never resort to trotting out insults. They tend to say more about the insulter rather than the insultee and might make me look incredibly stupid when I get taken to the cleaners. Cheers -- James Follett. http://www.jamesfollett.dswilliams.co.uk "There is perhaps no phenomenon which contains so much destructive feeling as moral indignation, which permits envy or hate to be acted out under the guise of virtue." (Erich Fromm) |
#52
Posted to uk.d-i-y,uk.people.silversurfers,uk.tech.broadcast,uk.tech.digital-tv
|
|||
|
|||
patronising digital advert
In article , Max Demian
scribeth thus "dennis@home" wrote in message ... "Java Jive" wrote in message ... On Mon, 31 Aug 2009 23:16:24 +0100, geoff wrote: In message , Cash ?.?.?.?.?.?.?.?.?.?.?.?.?.?@?.?.?.?.?.?.?.?.?.?.? .?.?.?.?.//.com.invalid writes And *WHAT* were your thoughts on 'oldies' when you were in your teens, twenties, thirties - and possibly forties when you were showing them how to use that new fangled invention called the video recorder - or even early mobile phones? ;-) Actually, in my day it was hifi, but, while they needed some advice on what technical specifications (remember them?) constituted hifi, none of my parents had any difficulty at all in using such things. I would have thought that setting up a hi-fi turntable and understanding the need for a different input for a magnetic cartridge would have flummoxed most people in the 70s. HiFi is something the youth of today fail to understand. They wouldn't buy mp3 players if they knew anything about HiFi. Run of the mill audio is much better quality (wrt bass, treble and noise) than was common in the past, at least electrically. A cheapy MP3 player connected via the headphone socket to a hi-fi amp and speakers is almost as good as CD. Should get your hearing checked;!.. -- Tony Sayer |
#53
Posted to uk.d-i-y,uk.people.silversurfers,uk.tech.broadcast,uk.tech.digital-tv
|
|||
|
|||
patronising digital advert
Brian is blind and uses a screen reader of some sort.
Bottom posting is a problem when used with a screen reader as it is difficult to find the content. It may seem logical to bottom post but that doesn't make it correct once you understand all the implications. Same thing that happened to logical, chronological posting! JF |
#54
Posted to uk.d-i-y,uk.people.silversurfers,uk.tech.broadcast,uk.tech.digital-tv
|
|||
|
|||
patronising digital advert
"james" wrote in message ... In message , "dennis@home" writes HiFi is something the youth of today fail to understand. They wouldn't buy mp3 players if they knew anything about HiFi. What a strange thing to say! Some folk, myself included, don't want high fidelity and humping speakers around. I go for convenience. For me sheer luxury is having an entire 9-hour book reading or several concerts on one CD. See, I said people don't understand HiFi. Headphones, even 99p ones, are usually more HiFi than even the best speakers. However mp3 is poor, very poor. |
#55
Posted to uk.d-i-y,uk.people.silversurfers,uk.tech.broadcast,uk.tech.digital-tv
|
|||
|
|||
patronising digital advert
"Peter Duncanson" wrote in message ... It can! I saw the results in an office kitchen when the plumbed-in hot water boiler (substitute for a kettle) had been emptied of hot water to make many cups of coffee and tea in the space of a few minutes. The cold tap was turned on to refill it. The lid was an airtight fit -- Bang! -- one crumpled boiler! The tea lady who had been innocently using it was almost as damaged, mentally, as the boiler. She recovered but the boiler didn't. Just as well the thing didn't have a big heater in the bottom or the opposite could have happened as the water boiled rapidly. Which reminds me of the cock-up the mythbusters made with the steam cannon myth. How they came to the idea that, plugging a cannon and filling it with water, then heating it to make steam was the same as heating it till it was really hot and then chucking the water in, I will never understand. One would do little, the other would work as a cannon needless to say they choose the wrong one. |
#56
Posted to uk.d-i-y,uk.people.silversurfers,uk.tech.broadcast,uk.tech.digital-tv
|
|||
|
|||
patronising digital advert
On Tue, 01 Sep 2009 11:03:45 +0100, Zimmy wrote:
Like where? Australia, Canada, New Zealand. |
#57
Posted to uk.d-i-y,uk.people.silversurfers,uk.tech.broadcast,uk.tech.digital-tv
|
|||
|
|||
patronising digital advert
On Tue, 01 Sep 2009 14:16:17 +0100, Dennis@Home explained:
However mp3 is poor, very poor. So use Ogg Vorbis then Or if you have the disk space, FLAC. |
#58
Posted to uk.d-i-y,uk.people.silversurfers,uk.tech.broadcast,uk.tech.digital-tv
|
|||
|
|||
patronising digital advert
On Tue, 01 Sep 2009 10:27:49 +0100, Derek Geldard wrote:
Thus leading to the absurdity of a (late) female nominee cabinet minister saying that IT was "Just a simple manual skill", presumably like packing veggies in boxes in the fields. Yes because in the mind of that person, their scope of understanding of IT skills was limited to switching on a computer, knowing how to click on the start button to get to Internet Explorer, Outook and Office, and being able to create a document in Word or a spreadsheet in Excel. |
#59
Posted to uk.d-i-y,uk.people.silversurfers,uk.tech.broadcast,uk.tech.digital-tv
|
|||
|
|||
patronising digital advert
On Tue, 01 Sep 2009 11:34:08 +0100, Max Demian wrote:
A cheapy MP3 player connected via the headphone socket to a hi-fi amp and speakers is almost as good as CD. You have failed to consider the quality of the MP3 files themselves. Files encoded at 320 kbps may sound near CD quality, but the usual 128 kbps most certainly will not. |
#60
Posted to uk.d-i-y,uk.people.silversurfers,uk.tech.broadcast,uk.tech.digital-tv
|
|||
|
|||
patronising digital advert
On Tue, 01 Sep 2009 08:31:20 +0100, Tony Sayer wrote:
And from that generation who kept out the invaders in the 40's. I thought that was David Vincent in 1967-1968? "it began one lost night on a lonely country road, looking for a shortcut that he never found. |
#61
Posted to uk.d-i-y,uk.people.silversurfers,uk.tech.broadcast,uk.tech.digital-tv
|
|||
|
|||
patronising digital advert
On Mon, 31 Aug 2009 21:25:42 +0100, Peter Duncanson
wrote: The advert should be made in such a way as to appeal to the over 75s. It should be addressed to them. "Are you over 75? Yes? Well, you know how you don't have to pay for the TV licence any more? That's because we're turning the TV off soon. Confused? Use the extended support network which we assume you have, or listen to Radio 2 instead. Good-bye." -- |
#62
Posted to uk.d-i-y,uk.people.silversurfers,uk.tech.broadcast,uk.tech.digital-tv
|
|||
|
|||
patronising digital advert
On Tue, 1 Sep 2009 06:08:36 +0100, james
wrote: There was a dreadful series of super market ads that depicted a senile customer played by Prunella Scales being looked after by smiling, patronising sales staff. I don't know if I agree with that. She wasn't portrayed as being senile at all - she was extremely confident and domineering. Any smiling by the sales staff was firmly in the "Oh god, what a nightmare" vein. The were confused AA customers who knew a man who did. Similarly, not confused, just people with the intelligence to realise when some things were beyond their skillset. If you want patronising, look at the Orange "phone trainers" adverts. "You're so thick you can't even use your mobile, so we've hired some six-year-olds to show you how." ISTR there was a considerable backlash about that. -- |
#63
Posted to uk.d-i-y,uk.people.silversurfers,uk.tech.broadcast,uk.tech.digital-tv
|
|||
|
|||
patronising digital advert
Sorry?
I was asked the question and as I'm supposed to be the font of all knowledge around here, I thought I'd ask here! Brian -- Brian Gaff - Note:- In order to reduce spam, any email without 'Brian Gaff' in the display name may be lost. Blind user, so no pictures please! "james" wrote in message news In message , Brian Gaff writes Can one complain to the ASA about stuff on the BBC? Naw. Some can whinge about jeopardy posting, though. JF |
#64
Posted to uk.d-i-y,uk.people.silversurfers,uk.tech.broadcast,uk.tech.digital-tv
|
|||
|
|||
patronising digital advert
In article , Java Jive
wrote: A favourite trick was to get an old-fashioned tin with a replacable lid, like a syrup or treacle tin, and punch one hole with a nail through each of the base and the lid. You then: 1) Remove the lid 2) Seal the hole in the base of the tin with a finger 3) Turn it upside down 4) Fill it with gas from the cooker (gas is lighter than air, so it goes up into the tin). Er, turn the gas off once you smell gas! That means it's full! You couldn't do that now. Modern domestic gas is heavier than air. It used to be possible to fill a huge plastic bag with the stuff and send it floating off into the sky, but it's no fun any more. Rod. -- Virtual Access V6.3 free usenet/email software from http://sourceforge.net/projects/virtual-access/ |
#65
Posted to uk.d-i-y,uk.people.silversurfers,uk.tech.broadcast,uk.tech.digital-tv
|
|||
|
|||
patronising digital advert
"Peter Duncanson" wrote in message ... On Tue, 1 Sep 2009 10:09:42 +0100, james wrote: In message , Brian Gaff writes Whatever happened to dignity and tolerence? Same thing that happened to logical, chronological posting! JF James, Brian Gaff is blind. His style of posting is dictated by practical considerations. We get this over and over again, and I wonder, Brian, if it makes you a bit self-conscious. Would it be a good idea if you amended your signature thus?: Blind user, so no pictures please, and my reading system dictates top posting. Bill |
#66
Posted to uk.d-i-y,uk.people.silversurfers,uk.tech.broadcast,uk.tech.digital-tv
|
|||
|
|||
patronising digital advert
"Roderick Stewart" wrote in
message .myzen.co.uk... In article , Java Jive wrote: A favourite trick was to get an old-fashioned tin with a replacable lid, like a syrup or treacle tin, and punch one hole with a nail through each of the base and the lid. You then: 1) Remove the lid 2) Seal the hole in the base of the tin with a finger 3) Turn it upside down 4) Fill it with gas from the cooker (gas is lighter than air, so it goes up into the tin). Er, turn the gas off once you smell gas! That means it's full! You couldn't do that now. Modern domestic gas is heavier than air. It used to be possible to fill a huge plastic bag with the stuff and send it floating off into the sky, but it's no fun any more. Natural gas isn't heavier than air. CH4 = 16 or so, compared to air at about 29, so slightly under half the density. (g/mol, 1 mol = constant volume). LPG - propane at 44 and butane at 58 are heavier, hence problems in boats with them. The tin thing still works. |
#67
Posted to uk.d-i-y,uk.people.silversurfers,uk.tech.broadcast,uk.tech.digital-tv
|
|||
|
|||
patronising digital advert
In message , Bill Wright
writes "Peter Duncanson" wrote in message .. . On Tue, 1 Sep 2009 10:09:42 +0100, james wrote: In message , Brian Gaff writes Whatever happened to dignity and tolerence? Same thing that happened to logical, chronological posting! JF James, Brian Gaff is blind. His style of posting is dictated by practical considerations. We get this over and over again, and I wonder, Brian, if it makes you a bit self-conscious. Would it be a good idea if you amended your signature thus?: Blind user, so no pictures please, and my reading system dictates top posting. Well meant but I know what my answer would've been! JF |
#68
Posted to uk.d-i-y,uk.people.silversurfers,uk.tech.broadcast,uk.tech.digital-tv
|
|||
|
|||
patronising digital advert
"dennis@home" wrote in message
... Brian is blind and uses a screen reader of some sort. Bottom posting is a problem when used with a screen reader as it is difficult to find the content. So how does he know what to reply to? -- Max Demian |
#69
Posted to uk.d-i-y,uk.people.silversurfers,uk.tech.broadcast,uk.tech.digital-tv
|
|||
|
|||
patronising digital advert
On Tuesday, September 1st, 2009 at 20:43:19h +0100, Java Jive pondered:
I wonder what the different formulae were/are. Town gas (synthetic gas) consists primarily of hydrogen (H2) and carbon monoxide (C0), plus varying proportions of nitrogen (N2) and carbon dioxide (C02). Natural gas (earth gas) consists primarily of methane (CH4). A mercaptan (foul smelling sulfur compound) is added to both town gas and natural gas as a means to quickly alert people of gas leaks. Town gas is sold by the therm and natural gas is often sold by the cubic metre, since town gas may have differing energy properties due to fluctuations in its composition. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Therm |
#70
Posted to uk.d-i-y,uk.people.silversurfers,uk.tech.broadcast,uk.tech.digital-tv
|
|||
|
|||
patronising digital advert
On Tue, 01 Sep 2009 21:09:12 +0100, Max Demian wrote:
So how does he know what to reply to? A better question is, why bother to quote the previous article at all? |
#72
Posted to uk.d-i-y,uk.people.silversurfers,uk.tech.broadcast,uk.tech.digital-tv
|
|||
|
|||
patronising digital advert
brightside S9 wrote:
Thomas Newcomen understood that 300 years ago. .... and for anyone who wants to see it in action, I can thoroughly recommend Crofton Beam Engines. http://www.croftonbeamengines.org/about.html Andy |
#73
Posted to uk.d-i-y,uk.people.silversurfers,uk.tech.broadcast,uk.tech.digital-tv
|
|||
|
|||
patronising digital advert
Java Jive wrote:
Really, I'm very surprised to hear that. I wonder what the different formulae were/are. Town gas was largely hydrogen (with a substantial level of carbon monoxide, which is why it was poisonous) whereas natural gas is largely methane. Andy |
#74
Posted to uk.d-i-y,uk.people.silversurfers,uk.tech.broadcast,uk.tech.digital-tv
|
|||
|
|||
patronising digital advert
In message en.co.uk,
Roderick Stewart writes In article , Ivan wrote: I wouldn't mind betting that there are plenty of people in their sixties' nudging seventies contributing to this newsgroup who wouldn't mind a pound for every technical problem they've sorted out for people less than half their age ;-) Indeed. But if we're talking about people one sixth of my age, that could be a different matter... But 6 doesn't go into 87 -- geoff |
#75
Posted to uk.d-i-y,uk.people.silversurfers,uk.tech.broadcast,uk.tech.digital-tv
|
|||
|
|||
patronising digital advert
In message , "dennis@home"
writes "Java Jive" wrote in message .. . On Mon, 31 Aug 2009 23:16:24 +0100, geoff wrote: In message , Cash ?.?.?.?.?.?.?.?.?.?.?.?.?.?@?.?.?.?.?.?.?.?.?.?.? .?.?.?.?.//.com.invalid writes And *WHAT* were your thoughts on 'oldies' when you were in your teens, twenties, thirties - and possibly forties when you were showing them how to use that new fangled invention called the video recorder - or even early mobile phones? ;-) Actually, in my day it was hifi, but, while they needed some advice on what technical specifications (remember them?) constituted hifi, none of my parents had any difficulty at all in using such things. HiFi is something the youth of today fail to understand. They wouldn't buy mp3 players if they knew anything about HiFi. From my experience the youth of today understands very little technical stuff, the majority know next to nothing about how computers, TV, radio, cars, (insert what you like) work. A bit like you then, Dennis -- geoff |
#76
Posted to uk.d-i-y,uk.people.silversurfers,uk.tech.broadcast,uk.tech.digital-tv
|
|||
|
|||
patronising digital advert
In message , J G Miller
writes On Tue, 01 Sep 2009 11:34:08 +0100, Max Demian wrote: A cheapy MP3 player connected via the headphone socket to a hi-fi amp and speakers is almost as good as CD. You have failed to consider the quality of the MP3 files themselves. Files encoded at 320 kbps may sound near CD quality, but the usual 128 kbps most certainly will not. However ... The brain is wonderful at filtering the crappiness, be it sound or the imperfections on a projected wall. After a while, if you are actually listening to the music, most of it doesn't matter in day to day life. People who still hear the reduced quality should either not download pirated music or listen to something that actually absorbs them -- geoff |
#77
Posted to uk.d-i-y,uk.people.silversurfers,uk.tech.broadcast,uk.tech.digital-tv
|
|||
|
|||
patronising digital advert
In message , Java Jive
writes Just in case anybody's actually interested and wants to know ... On Tue, 01 Sep 2009 00:03:38 +0100, Java Jive wrote: My stepfather used to teach me science through, say, explaining why popcorn popped. EXPLAIN Popcorn before cooking is a seed, but the thing that makes it a little different is that the skin of the seed is virtually impermeable. To cook it, you place a small amount of oil or fat in a saucepan, just enough to almost cover the bottom (so that it will, just, cover the bottom when heated) and enough popcorn to just cover the bottom of the pan. You then cover it with the saucepan lid (vital!), and put it over the heat. Within a minute or two, the pan starts to tremble and roar as all the popcorn pops. Once this is truly over, remove from the heat and pour the popcorn into something like a colander. Serve with sea-salt. So, that's how you cook it, but why does it pop? The seed contains small amounts of water vapour, which on heating turns to steam, cooking the 'flour', or whatever you want to call the contents of the seed, and, building up pressure until it ruptures the seed casing and turns it inside out, all in a moment. A favourite trick was to get an old-fashioned tin with a replacable lid, like a syrup or treacle tin, and punch one hole with a nail through each of the base and the lid. You then: 1) Remove the lid 2) Seal the hole in the base of the tin with a finger 3) Turn it upside down 4) Fill it with gas from the cooker (gas is lighter than air, so it goes up into the tin). Er, turn the gas off once you smell gas! That means it's full! 5) Replace the lid 6) Seal the hole in the lid with another finger (so you're now sealing both) 7) Turn it the right way up 8) Run out into the garden and place it on something like a brick 9) Light the gas at the lid hole, and stand well back. After a few seconds the lid goes about 15 feet in the air. EXPLAIN The thing here is that gas and air, strictly the oxygen in the air, are only explosive if mixed in the right quantities, and what exactly are the 'right quantities' depends on the chemical formula of the gas used. When you initially light the flame, it just burns like any gas cigarette lighter, or like a gas cooker flame, only rather more weakly because it isn't under pressure and doesn't have an optimised burner outlet. As the gas is burned from the hole in the lid above, it is replaced by air coming through the hole in the base below, until, when the right quantities are reached ... BOOM! No ****, sherlock - as they say So what, without looking it up, it the explosive concentration for mains gas ? No peeking, if you don't know, take a guess ... -- geoff |
#78
Posted to uk.d-i-y,uk.people.silversurfers,uk.tech.broadcast,uk.tech.digital-tv
|
|||
|
|||
patronising digital advert
In message , Java Jive
writes On Tue, 01 Sep 2009 19:51:32 +0100, Roderick Stewart wrote: You couldn't do that now. Modern domestic gas is heavier than air. Really, I'm very surprised to hear that. I wonder what the different formulae were/are. It used to be possible to fill a huge plastic bag with the stuff and send it floating off into the sky, but it's no fun any more. That *has* to be a good thing. Plastic bags that end up in the ocean get mistaken by turtles for jellyfish. They try to swallow them, and choke to death. But do they explode when you shove a pipe up 'em ? -- geoff |
#79
Posted to uk.d-i-y,uk.people.silversurfers,uk.tech.broadcast,uk.tech.digital-tv
|
|||
|
|||
patronising digital advert
In message , Adrian
writes james wrote: In message , Brian Gaff writes Can one complain to the ASA about stuff on the BBC? Naw. Some can whinge about jeopardy posting, though. JF You're being an arsehole, Brian has no choice about top posting as he's blind. As you would know if you bothered to ask instead of making snide comments. So let him put the words "blind ****" in his sig then -- geoff |
#80
Posted to uk.d-i-y,uk.people.silversurfers,uk.tech.broadcast,uk.tech.digital-tv
|
|||
|
|||
patronising digital advert
"geoff" wrote in message
... In message en.co.uk, Roderick Stewart writes In article , Ivan wrote: I wouldn't mind betting that there are plenty of people in their sixties' nudging seventies contributing to this newsgroup who wouldn't mind a pound for every technical problem they've sorted out for people less than half their age ;-) Indeed. But if we're talking about people one sixth of my age, that could be a different matter... But 6 doesn't go into 87 Yes it does. It gives 14.5. -- Max Demian |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
TV distribution equipment (advert) | UK diy | |||
1906 saw advert | Woodworking Plans and Photos | |||
1906 knife advert | Woodworking Plans and Photos | |||
OT - Advert music | UK diy | |||
Milwaukee tools advert | Woodworking |