On Dec 31 2012, 4:12*pm, "Lloyd E. Sponenburgh"
lloydspinsidemindspring.com wrote:
" fired this volley in news:0bef4425-
:

Unless otherwise stated on the drg. the tolerances were +/- 0.30

Cough! *POINT-THREE-INCHES?

I've heard of "slop" before, but isn't that taking it to extremes?

(or were you working in millimeters?)

LLoyd

Damn, another typo. Just interchanget the decimal point and the
leading zero.

Dan

On Jan 1, 7:22*am, " wrote:
On Dec 31 2012, 4:12*pm, "Lloyd E. Sponenburgh"

lloydspinsidemindspring.com wrote:
" fired this volley in news:0bef4425-
:

Unless otherwise stated on the drg. the tolerances were +/- 0.30

Cough! *POINT-THREE-INCHES?

I've heard of "slop" before, but isn't that taking it to extremes?

(or were you working in millimeters?)

LLoyd

Damn, another typo. *Just interchanget the decimal point and the
leading zero.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *Dan

The typo shows you don't pay attention to detail. Even at .030, where
I gave you the benefit of the doubt, you have already shown you don't
know what's required to do tight tolerance aerospace work.

jon_banquer fired this volley in news:8aabb8b6-
:

The typo shows you don't pay attention to detail. Even at .030, where
I gave you the benefit of the doubt, you have already shown you don't
know what's required to do tight tolerance aerospace work.

Maybe he doesn't, maybe he does. That's what multiple layers of checking
are for -- indentifying purely "human" errors.

OTOH, Jon, you just demonstrated conclusively that you don't have what it
takes to _manage_ any high-tech activities (or advise on them, or teach
them, or... any human-interaction tasks) If you abused your machines
like you do people, _they_ wouldn't work for you, either.

So, at most, you're just a tech. At least, you're probably just a tech-
poser.

Lloyd

"jon_banquer" wrote in message
news:8aabb8b6-406a-4379-b232-
-The typo shows you don't pay attention to detail. Even at .030, where
-I gave you the benefit of the doubt, you have already shown you don't
-know what's required to do tight tolerance aerospace work.

Just comply with MIL-TFP-41.

On Jan 1, 8:59*am, "Lloyd E. Sponenburgh"
lloydspinsidemindspring.com wrote:
jon_banquer fired this volley in news:8aabb8b6-
:

The typo shows you don't pay attention to detail. Even at .030, where
I gave you the benefit of the doubt, you have already shown you don't
know what's required to do tight tolerance aerospace work.

Maybe he doesn't, maybe he does. *That's what multiple layers of checking
are for -- indentifying purely "human" errors.

OTOH, Jon, you just demonstrated conclusively that you don't have what it
takes to _manage_ any high-tech activities (or advise on them, or teach
them, or... any human-interaction tasks) *If you abused your machines
like you do people, _they_ wouldn't work for you, either.

So, at most, you're just a tech. *At least, you're probably just a tech-
poser.

Lloyd

The unfortunate part for worthless blowhards like you Loud is that my
LinkedIn connections (many of whom endorse my skill set), my published
comments on the most respected CADCAM blogs, and the membership of my
LinkedIn group CADCAM Technology Leaders show how full of **** you
are.

http://www.linkedin.com/profile/view...80&trk=tab_pro

When it comes to machining and CADCAM I talk the talk and I walk the
walk. I've done it for many, many years now.

http://cadinsider.typepad.com/my_web...dge-again.html

On 1/1/2013 9:07 AM, Jonathan Banquer wrote:
On Jan 1, 8:59 am, "Lloyd E. Sponenburgh"
lloydspinsidemindspring.com wrote:
jon_banquer fired this volley in news:8aabb8b6-
:

The typo shows you don't pay attention to detail. Even at .030, where
I gave you the benefit of the doubt, you have already shown you don't
know what's required to do tight tolerance aerospace work.

Maybe he doesn't, maybe he does. That's what multiple layers of checking
are for -- indentifying purely "human" errors.

OTOH, Jon, you just demonstrated conclusively that you don't have what it
takes to _manage_ any high-tech activities (or advise on them, or teach
them, or... any human-interaction tasks) If you abused your machines
like you do people, _they_ wouldn't work for you, either.

So, at most, you're just a tech. At least, you're probably just a tech-
poser.

Lloyd

The unfortunate part for worthless blowhards like you Loud is that my
LinkedIn connections (many of whom endorse my skill set)

You don't have a skill set, little jonny banqueer. Blabbering about
CADCAM isn't a skill. You can't actually *DO* anything, little jonny
banqueer.


--
Any more lip out of you and I'll haul off and let you have it...if you
know what's good for you, you won't monkey around with Fred C. Dobbs.

On Jan 1, 9:06*am, "Jim Wilkins" wrote:
"jon_banquer" wrote in message

news:8aabb8b6-406a-4379-b232-
-The typo shows you don't pay attention to detail. Even at .030, where
-I gave you the benefit of the doubt, you have already shown you don't
-know what's required to do tight tolerance aerospace work.

Just comply with MIL-TFP-41.


Tolerance information is now embedded with the solid model on newer
aerospace parts. No prints.

http://www10.mcadcafe.com/nbc/articl...ticleid=294155

"Jonathan Banquer" wrote in message
...
On Jan 1, 9:06 am, "Jim Wilkins" wrote:
Just comply with MIL-TFP-41.

-Tolerance information is now embedded with the solid model on newer
-aerospace parts. No prints.

That was an insider joke to see if you'd get it. It stands for

Make It Like The Friggin Print For Once.

Perhaps it's better known among draftsmen and assemblers than
machinists.

On Jan 1, 9:06*am, "Jim Wilkins" wrote:
"jon_banquer" wrote in message

news:8aabb8b6-406a-4379-b232-
-The typo shows you don't pay attention to detail. Even at .030, where
-I gave you the benefit of the doubt, you have already shown you don't
-know what's required to do tight tolerance aerospace work.

Just comply with MIL-TFP-41.

Join me in the modern world with all of its problems and tons of
bull**** it's still often better than dealing with old Solar Turbine
prints. ;)

http://www.qualitymag.com/articles/8...sed-definition

"Increasing numbers of aerospace manufacturers are benefiting from
model-based definition's quality assurance processes.

Model based definition (MBD) is not a new concept in the aerospace
manufacturing industry. While it has been applied to product
definition and manufacturing for years, its use as a fully implemented
process for quality control only has been realized recently. Many
companies are modernizing quality assurance processes to embrace MBD
because aerospace's prime manufacturers are demanding it. Advancements
in both software and hardware technologies are making it easier to put
all the key elements in place, giving aerospace manufacturers the last
piece of the puzzle for an enterprise wide system of digital product
definition."

On Jan 1, 9:40*am, "Jim Wilkins" wrote:
"Jonathan Banquer" wrote in message

...
On Jan 1, 9:06 am, "Jim Wilkins" wrote:

Just comply with MIL-TFP-41.

-Tolerance information is now embedded with the solid model on newer
-aerospace parts. No prints.

That was an insider joke to see if you'd get it. It stands for

Make It Like The Friggin Print For Once.

Perhaps it's better known among draftsmen and assemblers than
machinists.

Oh, I got the joke and so would most machinists. The problem is it's a
very dated joke and that was my point.

Jonathan Banquer fired this volley in
:

The unfortunate part for worthless blowhards like you Loud is that my
LinkedIn connections (many of whom endorse my skill set), my published
comments on the most respected CADCAM blogs, and the membership of my
LinkedIn group CADCAM Technology Leaders show how full of **** you
are.

That's so silly its funny! When did LinkedIn - which is basically a
social site with "friends" - constitute a "resume"?

Give us all a list of prior employers we can _actually_ check with to
verify your people skills. I commented on your lack of people skills,
not your lack of skill at posting _claims_ of your CNC accomplishments.

BTW, When did I ever post anything claiming I was an expert at any aspect
of machining? You claim it all the time. That, alone, is the 'smoke' of
posing. All claims. No jobs you can cite.

LLoyd

On Jan 1, 9:59*am, "Lloyd E. Sponenburgh"
lloydspinsidemindspring.com wrote:
Jonathan Banquer fired this volley :

The unfortunate part for worthless blowhards like you Loud is that my
LinkedIn connections (many of whom endorse my skill set), my published
comments on the most respected CADCAM blogs, and the membership of my
LinkedIn group CADCAM Technology Leaders show how full of **** you
are.

That's so silly its funny! *When did LinkedIn - which is basically a
social site with "friends" - constitute a "resume"?

Give us all a list of prior employers we can _actually_ check with to
verify your people skills. *I commented on your lack of people skills,
not your lack of skill at posting _claims_ of your CNC accomplishments.

BTW, When did I ever post anything claiming I was an expert at any aspect
of machining? *You claim it all the time. *That, alone, is the 'smoke' of
posing. *All claims. *No jobs you can cite.

LLoyd

I'll give you a list of all the ways you can **** off and die. You're
a worthless idiot and it clearly shows in so many ways, Loud.

On 1/1/2013 10:03 AM, Jonathan Banquer wrote:
On Jan 1, 9:59 am, "Lloyd E. Sponenburgh"
lloydspinsidemindspring.com wrote:
Jonathan Banquer fired this volley :

The unfortunate part for worthless blowhards like you Loud is that my
LinkedIn connections (many of whom endorse my skill set), my published
comments on the most respected CADCAM blogs, and the membership of my
LinkedIn group CADCAM Technology Leaders show how full of **** you
are.

That's so silly its funny! When did LinkedIn - which is basically a
social site with "friends" - constitute a "resume"?

Give us all a list of prior employers we can _actually_ check with to
verify your people skills. I commented on your lack of people skills,
not your lack of skill at posting _claims_ of your CNC accomplishments.

BTW, When did I ever post anything claiming I was an expert at any aspect
of machining? You claim it all the time. That, alone, is the 'smoke' of
posing. All claims. No jobs you can cite.

LLoyd

I'll give you a list of all the ways you can **** off and die. You're
a worthless idiot and it clearly shows in so many ways, Loud.

Translation: little jonny banqueer has an unbelievably spotty job
history, and he wouldn't dare list past employers and positions.

Little jonny banqueer is a fraud - a CADCAM fraud with an arrest record
for domestic violence.

--
Any more lip out of you and I'll haul off and let you have it...if you
know what's good for you, you won't monkey around with Fred C. Dobbs.

On Tue, 1 Jan 2013 12:40:24 -0500, "Jim Wilkins"
wrote:


"Jonathan Banquer" wrote in message
...
On Jan 1, 9:06 am, "Jim Wilkins" wrote:
Just comply with MIL-TFP-41.

-Tolerance information is now embedded with the solid model on newer
-aerospace parts. No prints.

That was an insider joke to see if you'd get it. It stands for

Make It Like The Friggin Print For Once.

Perhaps it's better known among draftsmen and assemblers than
machinists.

PDFTFT, Lloyd.


--
You can ignore reality, but you cannot ignore
the consequences of ignoring reality.
--Ayn Rand

Larry Jaques fired this volley in
:

PDFTFT, Lloyd.


Sometimes, you just GOTTA, Larry! G
Trolls don't live on eating our responses, they live purely on ego.(not
that anything anyone could say would ever reduce their intake...)


LLoyd

On Jan 1, 11:49*am, Larry Jaques
wrote:
On Tue, 1 Jan 2013 12:40:24 -0500, "Jim Wilkins"









wrote:

"Jonathan Banquer" wrote in message
...
On Jan 1, 9:06 am, "Jim Wilkins" wrote:
Just comply with MIL-TFP-41.

-Tolerance information is now embedded with the solid model on newer
-aerospace parts. No prints.

That was an insider joke to see if you'd get it. It stands for

Make It Like The Friggin Print For Once.

Perhaps it's better known among draftsmen and assemblers than
machinists.

PDFTFT, Lloyd.

--
You can ignore reality, but you cannot ignore
the consequences of ignoring reality.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *--Ayn Rand


Reality isn't something ****tards like you can deal with Larry.
Perhaps this will help you with your adolescent Ayn Rand worship:

http://www.amazon.com/Ayn-Rand-Natio.../dp/0312590733

On Jan 1, 11:49*am, Larry Jaques
wrote:
On Tue, 1 Jan 2013 12:40:24 -0500, "Jim Wilkins"









wrote:

"Jonathan Banquer" wrote in message
...
On Jan 1, 9:06 am, "Jim Wilkins" wrote:
Just comply with MIL-TFP-41.

-Tolerance information is now embedded with the solid model on newer
-aerospace parts. No prints.

That was an insider joke to see if you'd get it. It stands for

Make It Like The Friggin Print For Once.

Perhaps it's better known among draftsmen and assemblers than
machinists.

PDFTFT, Lloyd.

--
You can ignore reality, but you cannot ignore
the consequences of ignoring reality.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *--Ayn Rand



Ayn Rand worshiper Alan Greenspan gets a dose of reality he can't
handle:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nBnKh6B2cMw

I bet Alan Greenspan never forgot getting his ass handed to him like
Bernie Sanders handed it to him. History has now shown us beyond a
shadow of a doubt how stupid and how wrong Alan Greenspan was.

On Jan 1, 12:59*pm, "Lloyd E. Sponenburgh"
lloydspinsidemindspring.com wrote:

Give us all a list of prior employers we can _actually_ check with to
verify your people skills. *I commented on your lack of people skills,
not your lack of skill at posting _claims_ of your CNC accomplishments.

BTW, When did I ever post anything claiming I was an expert at any aspect
of machining? *You claim it all the time. *That, alone, is the 'smoke' of
posing. *All claims. *No jobs you can cite.

LLoyd

Well we do know he does not own any machine tools.

Dan

On Jan 1, 1:07*pm, " wrote:
On Jan 1, 12:59*pm, "Lloyd E. Sponenburgh"

lloydspinsidemindspring.com wrote:
Give us all a list of prior employers we can _actually_ check with to
verify your people skills. *I commented on your lack of people skills,
not your lack of skill at posting _claims_ of your CNC accomplishments.

BTW, When did I ever post anything claiming I was an expert at any aspect
of machining? *You claim it all the time. *That, alone, is the 'smoke' of
posing. *All claims. *No jobs you can cite.

LLoyd

Well we do know he does not own any machine tools.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *Dan

You would be wrong. In addition, it's pretty easy to see the kinds of
precision tools I own as some of them are for sale and listed on eBay.
They aren't cheap!

On Jan 1, 4:13*pm, jon_banquer wrote:

LLoyd

Well we do know he does not own any machine tools.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *Dan

You would be wrong. In addition, it's pretty easy to see the kinds of
precision tools I own as some of them are for sale and listed on eBay.
They aren't cheap!

So where are the pictures of your shop. Machine tool are those used
to machine.

Dan

On Jan 1, 1:22*pm, " wrote:
On Jan 1, 4:13*pm, jon_banquer wrote:

LLoyd

Well we do know he does not own any machine tools.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *Dan

You would be wrong. In addition, it's pretty easy to see the kinds of
precision tools I own as some of them are for sale and listed on eBay.
They aren't cheap!

So where are the pictures of your shop. *Machine tool are those used
to machine.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Dan



A much better question to ask of yourself is what happened to your
brain and will it ever again function normally.

On Tue, 01 Jan 2013 14:00:02 -0600, "Lloyd E. Sponenburgh"
lloydspinsidemindspring.com wrote:

Larry Jaques fired this volley in
:

PDFTFT, Lloyd.


Sometimes, you just GOTTA, Larry! G

Filtering is much more fun. They still think they have an audience
when they don't.


Trolls don't live on eating our responses, they live purely on ego.(not
that anything anyone could say would ever reduce their intake...)

Think about it. Wouldn't feeding 'em be a function of YOUR ego? Any
response gives them more fodder. Just like voting gives DC
inspiration. I'm still holding out for a None of the Above button on
my ballots.

Just Say No!


--
You can ignore reality, but you cannot ignore
the consequences of ignoring reality.
--Ayn Rand

Larry Jaques wrote:

On Tue, 01 Jan 2013 14:00:02 -0600, "Lloyd E. Sponenburgh"
lloydspinsidemindspring.com wrote:

Larry Jaques fired this volley in
:

PDFTFT, Lloyd.


Sometimes, you just GOTTA, Larry! G

Filtering is much more fun. They still think they have an audience
when they don't.

Trolls don't live on eating our responses, they live purely on ego.(not
that anything anyone could say would ever reduce their intake...)

Think about it. Wouldn't feeding 'em be a function of YOUR ego? Any
response gives them more fodder. Just like voting gives DC
inspiration. I'm still holding out for a None of the Above button on
my ballots.


I've moved on to wanting "You've got to be kidding!" and "No way in
hell will I vote for any of these fools!!!" choices on ballots.

On Jan 1, 1:41*pm, Larry Jaques
wrote:
On Tue, 01 Jan 2013 14:00:02 -0600, "Lloyd E. Sponenburgh"

lloydspinsidemindspring.com wrote:
Larry Jaques fired this volley in
:

PDFTFT, Lloyd.

Sometimes, you just GOTTA, Larry! G

Filtering is much more fun. They still think they have an audience
when they don't.

Trolls don't live on eating our responses, they live purely on ego.(not
that anything anyone could say would ever reduce their intake...)

Think about it. *Wouldn't feeding 'em be a function of YOUR ego? *Any
response gives them more fodder. *Just like voting gives DC
inspiration. *I'm still holding out for a None of the Above button on
my ballots.

*Just Say No!

--
You can ignore reality, but you cannot ignore
the consequences of ignoring reality.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *--Ayn Rand



"Just Say No! "

Exactly the kind of idea / program that a phony conservative moron
like Larry Jaques thinks is actually effective:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Just_Say_No

"Nancy Reagan's approach to promoting drug awareness was also labeled
simplistic by critics who argued that the solution was reduced to a
catch phrase"

On Jan 1, 1:44*pm, "Michael A. Terrell"
wrote:
Larry Jaques wrote:

On Tue, 01 Jan 2013 14:00:02 -0600, "Lloyd E. Sponenburgh"
lloydspinsidemindspring.com wrote:

Larry Jaques fired this volley in
:

PDFTFT, Lloyd.

Sometimes, you just GOTTA, Larry! G

Filtering is much more fun. They still think they have an audience
when they don't.

Trolls don't live on eating our responses, they live purely on ego.(not
that anything anyone could say would ever reduce their intake...)

Think about it. *Wouldn't feeding 'em be a function of YOUR ego? *Any
response gives them more fodder. *Just like voting gives DC
inspiration. *I'm still holding out for a None of the Above button on
my ballots.

* *I've moved on to wanting "You've got to be kidding!" and "No way in
hell will I vote for any of these fools!!!" choices on ballots.


If Michael Terrell's name was on the ballot both would be appropriate
choices.

"Jonathan Banquer" wrote in message
...
On Jan 1, 8:59 am, "Lloyd E. Sponenburgh"
lloydspinsidemindspring.com wrote:
jon_banquer fired this volley in news:8aabb8b6-
:

The typo shows you don't pay attention to detail. Even at .030, where
I gave you the benefit of the doubt, you have already shown you don't
know what's required to do tight tolerance aerospace work.

Maybe he doesn't, maybe he does. That's what multiple layers of checking
are for -- indentifying purely "human" errors.

OTOH, Jon, you just demonstrated conclusively that you don't have what it
takes to _manage_ any high-tech activities (or advise on them, or teach
them, or... any human-interaction tasks) If you abused your machines
like you do people, _they_ wouldn't work for you, either.

So, at most, you're just a tech. At least, you're probably just a tech-
poser.

Lloyd

The unfortunate part for worthless blowhards like you Loud is that my
LinkedIn connections (many of whom endorse my skill set), my published
comments on the most respected CADCAM blogs, and the membership of my
LinkedIn group CADCAM Technology Leaders show how full of **** you
are.

http://www.linkedin.com/profile/view...80&trk=tab_pro

When it comes to machining and CADCAM I talk the talk and I walk the
walk. I've done it for many, many years now.

http://cadinsider.typepad.com/my_web...dge-again.html


Don't know about the rest of you, but I am tired of this clown.

Adieu.

On Jan 1, 1:51*pm, "Steve B" wrote:
"Jonathan Banquer" wrote in message

...
On Jan 1, 8:59 am, "Lloyd E. Sponenburgh"









lloydspinsidemindspring.com wrote:
jon_banquer fired this volley in news:8aabb8b6-
:

The typo shows you don't pay attention to detail. Even at .030, where
I gave you the benefit of the doubt, you have already shown you don't
know what's required to do tight tolerance aerospace work.

Maybe he doesn't, maybe he does. That's what multiple layers of checking
are for -- indentifying purely "human" errors.

OTOH, Jon, you just demonstrated conclusively that you don't have what it
takes to _manage_ any high-tech activities (or advise on them, or teach
them, or... any human-interaction tasks) If you abused your machines
like you do people, _they_ wouldn't work for you, either.

So, at most, you're just a tech. At least, you're probably just a tech-
poser.

Lloyd

The unfortunate part for worthless blowhards like you Loud is that my
LinkedIn connections (many of whom endorse my skill set), my published
comments on the most respected CADCAM blogs, and the membership of my
LinkedIn group CADCAM Technology Leaders show how full of **** you
are.

http://www.linkedin.com/profile/view...80&trk=tab_pro

When it comes to machining and CADCAM I talk the talk and I walk the
walk. I've done it for many, many years now.

http://cadinsider.typepad.com/my_web...-plm-promises-...

Don't know about the rest of you, but I am tired of this clown.

Adieu.

Then stop looking in the mirror.

Problem solved.

Jonathan Banquer wrote:

On Jan 1, 1:44 pm, "Michael A. Terrell"
wrote:
Larry Jaques wrote:

On Tue, 01 Jan 2013 14:00:02 -0600, "Lloyd E. Sponenburgh"
lloydspinsidemindspring.com wrote:

Larry Jaques fired this volley in
:

PDFTFT, Lloyd.

Sometimes, you just GOTTA, Larry! G

Filtering is much more fun. They still think they have an audience
when they don't.

Trolls don't live on eating our responses, they live purely on ego.(not
that anything anyone could say would ever reduce their intake...)

Think about it. Wouldn't feeding 'em be a function of YOUR ego? Any
response gives them more fodder. Just like voting gives DC
inspiration. I'm still holding out for a None of the Above button on
my ballots.

I've moved on to wanting "You've got to be kidding!" and "No way in
hell will I vote for any of these fools!!!" choices on ballots.

If Michael Terrell's name was on the ballot both would be appropriate
choices.


Yawn. Why would I want to lower myself to your level, just so I
could run for office? I DID keep one ass from being re-elected back in
the '80s. I took him to court for 'Conversion of Property' and got a
settlement. 'Conversion of Property' is theft by a politician. They
can't even be honest enough to call it theft. Come to think of it, you
should run for president. Of Somalia.

On Jan 1, 1:59*pm, "Michael A. Terrell"
wrote:
Jonathan Banquer wrote:

On Jan 1, 1:44 pm, "Michael A. Terrell"
wrote:
Larry Jaques wrote:

On Tue, 01 Jan 2013 14:00:02 -0600, "Lloyd E. Sponenburgh"
lloydspinsidemindspring.com wrote:

Larry Jaques fired this volley in
:

PDFTFT, Lloyd.

Sometimes, you just GOTTA, Larry! G

Filtering is much more fun. They still think they have an audience
when they don't.

Trolls don't live on eating our responses, they live purely on ego..(not
that anything anyone could say would ever reduce their intake...)

Think about it. *Wouldn't feeding 'em be a function of YOUR ego? *Any
response gives them more fodder. *Just like voting gives DC
inspiration. *I'm still holding out for a None of the Above button on
my ballots.

* *I've moved on to wanting "You've got to be kidding!" and "No way in
hell will I vote for any of these fools!!!" choices on ballots.

If Michael Terrell's name was on the ballot both would be appropriate
choices.

* *Yawn. *Why would I want to lower myself to your level, just so I
could run for office? *I DID keep one ass from being re-elected back in
the '80s. I took him to court for 'Conversion of Property' and got a
settlement. *'Conversion of Property' is theft by a politician. *They
can't even be honest enough to call it theft. *Come to think of it, you
should run for president. *Of Somalia.

I bet they have better roofs in Somalia and that don't leak like yours
does. Suggest you move there and see what they know that you don't.

On Jan 1, 1:59*pm, "Michael A. Terrell"
wrote:
Jonathan Banquer wrote:

On Jan 1, 1:44 pm, "Michael A. Terrell"
wrote:
Larry Jaques wrote:

On Tue, 01 Jan 2013 14:00:02 -0600, "Lloyd E. Sponenburgh"
lloydspinsidemindspring.com wrote:

Larry Jaques fired this volley in
:

PDFTFT, Lloyd.

Sometimes, you just GOTTA, Larry! G

Filtering is much more fun. They still think they have an audience
when they don't.

Trolls don't live on eating our responses, they live purely on ego..(not
that anything anyone could say would ever reduce their intake...)

Think about it. *Wouldn't feeding 'em be a function of YOUR ego? *Any
response gives them more fodder. *Just like voting gives DC
inspiration. *I'm still holding out for a None of the Above button on
my ballots.

* *I've moved on to wanting "You've got to be kidding!" and "No way in
hell will I vote for any of these fools!!!" choices on ballots.

If Michael Terrell's name was on the ballot both would be appropriate
choices.

* *Yawn. *Why would I want to lower myself to your level, just so I
could run for office? *I DID keep one ass from being re-elected back in
the '80s. I took him to court for 'Conversion of Property' and got a
settlement. *'Conversion of Property' is theft by a politician. *They
can't even be honest enough to call it theft. *Come to think of it, you
should run for president. *Of Somalia.

I bet in Somalia they have roofs that don't leak like yours do.
Suggest you go there and try and learn what you're doing wrong. Expect
to stay what's left of your miserable life.

"Michael A. Terrell" on Tue, 01 Jan 2013
16:44:39 -0500 typed in rec.crafts.metalworking the following:

Larry Jaques wrote:

On Tue, 01 Jan 2013 14:00:02 -0600, "Lloyd E. Sponenburgh"
lloydspinsidemindspring.com wrote:

Larry Jaques fired this volley in
:

PDFTFT, Lloyd.


Sometimes, you just GOTTA, Larry! G

Filtering is much more fun. They still think they have an audience
when they don't.

Trolls don't live on eating our responses, they live purely on ego.(not
that anything anyone could say would ever reduce their intake...)

Think about it. Wouldn't feeding 'em be a function of YOUR ego? Any
response gives them more fodder. Just like voting gives DC
inspiration. I'm still holding out for a None of the Above button on
my ballots.


I've moved on to wanting "You've got to be kidding!" and "No way in
hell will I vote for any of these fools!!!" choices on ballots.

Vote "Present".



--
pyotr filipivich
You've read my sig file, that's enough Social Interaction for the Day.

On Jan 1, 4:29*pm, jon_banquer wrote:

So where are the pictures of your shop. *Machine tool are those used
to machine.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Dan

A much better question to ask of yourself is what *happened to your
brain and will it ever again function normally.

Still wondering where your shop pictures are.

Dan

On Jan 1, 4:30*pm, " wrote:
On Jan 1, 4:29*pm, jon_banquer wrote:

So where are the pictures of your shop. *Machine tool are those used
to machine.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Dan

A much better question to ask of yourself is what *happened to your
brain and will it ever again function normally.

Still wondering where your shop pictures are.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Dan

I'm still wondering when you're going to pull your head out of your
ass.

pyotr filipivich wrote:

"Michael A. Terrell" on Tue, 01 Jan 2013
16:44:39 -0500 typed in rec.crafts.metalworking the following:

Larry Jaques wrote:

On Tue, 01 Jan 2013 14:00:02 -0600, "Lloyd E. Sponenburgh"
lloydspinsidemindspring.com wrote:

Larry Jaques fired this volley in
:

PDFTFT, Lloyd.


Sometimes, you just GOTTA, Larry! G

Filtering is much more fun. They still think they have an audience
when they don't.

Trolls don't live on eating our responses, they live purely on ego.(not
that anything anyone could say would ever reduce their intake...)

Think about it. Wouldn't feeding 'em be a function of YOUR ego? Any
response gives them more fodder. Just like voting gives DC
inspiration. I'm still holding out for a None of the Above button on
my ballots.


I've moved on to wanting "You've got to be kidding!" and "No way in
hell will I vote for any of these fools!!!" choices on ballots.

Vote "Present".


They are rarely present.

On Tue, 01 Jan 2013 19:36:10 -0500, "Michael A. Terrell"
wrote:


pyotr filipivich wrote:

"Michael A. Terrell" on Tue, 01 Jan 2013
16:44:39 -0500 typed in rec.crafts.metalworking the following:

Larry Jaques wrote:

On Tue, 01 Jan 2013 14:00:02 -0600, "Lloyd E. Sponenburgh"
lloydspinsidemindspring.com wrote:

Larry Jaques fired this volley in
:

PDFTFT, Lloyd.


Sometimes, you just GOTTA, Larry! G

Filtering is much more fun. They still think they have an audience
when they don't.

Trolls don't live on eating our responses, they live purely on ego.(not
that anything anyone could say would ever reduce their intake...)

Think about it. Wouldn't feeding 'em be a function of YOUR ego? Any
response gives them more fodder. Just like voting gives DC
inspiration. I'm still holding out for a None of the Above button on
my ballots.


I've moved on to wanting "You've got to be kidding!" and "No way in
hell will I vote for any of these fools!!!" choices on ballots.

Vote "Present".


They are rarely present.

Even when they're there.

--
You can ignore reality, but you cannot ignore
the consequences of ignoring reality.
--Ayn Rand

Larry Jaques wrote:

Michael A. Terrell wrote:

pyotr filipivich wrote:

"Michael A. Terrell wrote:

Larry Jaques wrote:

Trolls don't live on eating our responses, they live purely on ego.(not
that anything anyone could say would ever reduce their intake...)

Think about it. Wouldn't feeding 'em be a function of YOUR ego? Any
response gives them more fodder. Just like voting gives DC
inspiration. I'm still holding out for a None of the Above button on
my ballots.

I've moved on to wanting "You've got to be kidding!" and "No way in
hell will I vote for any of these fools!!!" choices on ballots.

Vote "Present".

They are rarely present.

Even when they're there.


Even less likely when they're there.

On Tue, 01 Jan 2013 09:13:58 -0800, "Fred C. Dobbs"
wrote:

On 1/1/2013 9:07 AM, Jonathan Banquer wrote:
On Jan 1, 8:59 am, "Lloyd E. Sponenburgh"
lloydspinsidemindspring.com wrote:
jon_banquer fired this volley in news:8aabb8b6-
:

The typo shows you don't pay attention to detail. Even at .030, where
I gave you the benefit of the doubt, you have already shown you don't
know what's required to do tight tolerance aerospace work.

Maybe he doesn't, maybe he does. That's what multiple layers of checking
are for -- indentifying purely "human" errors.

OTOH, Jon, you just demonstrated conclusively that you don't have what it
takes to _manage_ any high-tech activities (or advise on them, or teach
them, or... any human-interaction tasks) If you abused your machines
like you do people, _they_ wouldn't work for you, either.

So, at most, you're just a tech. At least, you're probably just a tech-
poser.

Lloyd

The unfortunate part for worthless blowhards like you Loud is that my
LinkedIn connections (many of whom endorse my skill set)

You don't have a skill set, little jonny banqueer. Blabbering about
CADCAM isn't a skill. You can't actually *DO* anything, little jonny
banqueer.
A machinist is a guy who can do manually what a cad-cam programmer
can only dream about.. The big difference is a cad-cam operator can
make 50 bad parts per minute

"Michael A. Terrell" on Tue, 01 Jan 2013
19:36:10 -0500 typed in rec.crafts.metalworking the following:
pyotr filipivich wrote:
"Michael A. Terrell" on Tue, 01 Jan 2013
16:44:39 -0500 typed in rec.crafts.metalworking the following:
Larry Jaques wrote:
On Tue, 01 Jan 2013 14:00:02 -0600, "Lloyd E. Sponenburgh"
lloydspinsidemindspring.com wrote:
Larry Jaques fired this volley:
PDFTFT, Lloyd.

Sometimes, you just GOTTA, Larry! G

Filtering is much more fun. They still think they have an audience
when they don't.

Trolls don't live on eating our responses, they live purely on ego.(not
that anything anyone could say would ever reduce their intake...)

Think about it. Wouldn't feeding 'em be a function of YOUR ego? Any
response gives them more fodder. Just like voting gives DC
inspiration. I'm still holding out for a None of the Above button on
my ballots.

I've moved on to wanting "You've got to be kidding!" and "No way in
hell will I vote for any of these fools!!!" choices on ballots.

Vote "Present".

They are rarely present.

That is my opinion of all those who make a Principled Vote for a
third party - they are just voting "Present" indicating that they're
good with whatever the majority decides. Left, Right - matters not.
They "voted". Usually not to keep the politician who is "wrong" out,
but keep the candidate who is not "pure enough" from getting in.


--
pyotr filipivich
Question for the gun Control advocates, "Do you agree with
this statement?"
"I would rather have a society without guns, even if it
means that people cannot defend themselves against murder
(with other weapons), rape, robbery, and assault. I would
rather make everyone defenseless than have to endure the
mass shootings that occasionally occur. If that means that
many more people, (particularly the old, the weak, and the
infirm) are subjected to these violent crimes, then so be
it. They'll just have to suffer more. I do claim the power
to dictate whether or not others are able to defend themselves."

pyotr filipivich wrote:

"Michael A. Terrell wrote:

They are rarely present.

That is my opinion of all those who make a Principled Vote for a
third party - they are just voting "Present" indicating that they're
good with whatever the majority decides. Left, Right - matters not.
They "voted". Usually not to keep the politician who is "wrong" out,
but keep the candidate who is not "pure enough" from getting in.


Or they were so high that they were just happy they found their
voting precinct while it was still open? Just wait till they realize
there will be no more Twinkies.

On 1/1/2013 9:53 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 01 Jan 2013 09:13:58 -0800, "Fred C. Dobbs"
wrote:

On 1/1/2013 9:07 AM, Jonathan Banquer wrote:
On Jan 1, 8:59 am, "Lloyd E. Sponenburgh"
lloydspinsidemindspring.com wrote:
jon_banquer fired this volley in news:8aabb8b6-
:

The typo shows you don't pay attention to detail. Even at .030, where
I gave you the benefit of the doubt, you have already shown you don't
know what's required to do tight tolerance aerospace work.

Maybe he doesn't, maybe he does. That's what multiple layers of checking
are for -- indentifying purely "human" errors.

OTOH, Jon, you just demonstrated conclusively that you don't have what it
takes to _manage_ any high-tech activities (or advise on them, or teach
them, or... any human-interaction tasks) If you abused your machines
like you do people, _they_ wouldn't work for you, either.'

So, at most, you're just a tech. At least, you're probably just a tech-
poser.

Lloyd

The unfortunate part for worthless blowhards like you Loud is that my
LinkedIn connections (many of whom endorse my skill set)

You don't have a skill set, little jonny banqueer. Blabbering about
CADCAM isn't a skill. You can't actually *DO* anything, little jonny
banqueer.
A machinist is a guy who can do manually what a cad-cam programmer
can only dream about.. The big difference is a cad-cam operator can
make 50 bad parts per minute



Also, a programmer has no "feel" for the material's properties, nor can
he correct for it.