Took some photos in the shop today....
On Dec 31 2012, 4:12*pm, "Lloyd E. Sponenburgh"
lloydspinsidemindspring.com wrote: " fired this volley in news:0bef4425- : Unless otherwise stated on the drg. the tolerances were +/- 0.30 Cough! *POINT-THREE-INCHES? I've heard of "slop" before, but isn't that taking it to extremes? (or were you working in millimeters?) LLoyd Damn, another typo. Just interchanget the decimal point and the leading zero. Dan |
Took some photos in the shop today....
On Jan 1, 7:22*am, " wrote:
On Dec 31 2012, 4:12*pm, "Lloyd E. Sponenburgh" lloydspinsidemindspring.com wrote: " fired this volley in news:0bef4425- : Unless otherwise stated on the drg. the tolerances were +/- 0.30 Cough! *POINT-THREE-INCHES? I've heard of "slop" before, but isn't that taking it to extremes? (or were you working in millimeters?) LLoyd Damn, another typo. *Just interchanget the decimal point and the leading zero. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *Dan The typo shows you don't pay attention to detail. Even at .030, where I gave you the benefit of the doubt, you have already shown you don't know what's required to do tight tolerance aerospace work. |
Took some photos in the shop today....
|
Took some photos in the shop today....
"jon_banquer" wrote in message
news:8aabb8b6-406a-4379-b232- -The typo shows you don't pay attention to detail. Even at .030, where -I gave you the benefit of the doubt, you have already shown you don't -know what's required to do tight tolerance aerospace work. Just comply with MIL-TFP-41. |
Took some photos in the shop today....
On Jan 1, 8:59*am, "Lloyd E. Sponenburgh"
lloydspinsidemindspring.com wrote: jon_banquer fired this volley in news:8aabb8b6- : The typo shows you don't pay attention to detail. Even at .030, where I gave you the benefit of the doubt, you have already shown you don't know what's required to do tight tolerance aerospace work. Maybe he doesn't, maybe he does. *That's what multiple layers of checking are for -- indentifying purely "human" errors. OTOH, Jon, you just demonstrated conclusively that you don't have what it takes to _manage_ any high-tech activities (or advise on them, or teach them, or... any human-interaction tasks) *If you abused your machines like you do people, _they_ wouldn't work for you, either. So, at most, you're just a tech. *At least, you're probably just a tech- poser. Lloyd The unfortunate part for worthless blowhards like you Loud is that my LinkedIn connections (many of whom endorse my skill set), my published comments on the most respected CADCAM blogs, and the membership of my LinkedIn group CADCAM Technology Leaders show how full of **** you are. http://www.linkedin.com/profile/view...80&trk=tab_pro When it comes to machining and CADCAM I talk the talk and I walk the walk. I've done it for many, many years now. http://cadinsider.typepad.com/my_web...dge-again.html |
Took some photos in the shop today....
On 1/1/2013 9:07 AM, Jonathan Banquer wrote:
On Jan 1, 8:59 am, "Lloyd E. Sponenburgh" lloydspinsidemindspring.com wrote: jon_banquer fired this volley in news:8aabb8b6- : The typo shows you don't pay attention to detail. Even at .030, where I gave you the benefit of the doubt, you have already shown you don't know what's required to do tight tolerance aerospace work. Maybe he doesn't, maybe he does. That's what multiple layers of checking are for -- indentifying purely "human" errors. OTOH, Jon, you just demonstrated conclusively that you don't have what it takes to _manage_ any high-tech activities (or advise on them, or teach them, or... any human-interaction tasks) If you abused your machines like you do people, _they_ wouldn't work for you, either. So, at most, you're just a tech. At least, you're probably just a tech- poser. Lloyd The unfortunate part for worthless blowhards like you Loud is that my LinkedIn connections (many of whom endorse my skill set) You don't have a skill set, little jonny banqueer. Blabbering about CADCAM isn't a skill. You can't actually *DO* anything, little jonny banqueer. -- Any more lip out of you and I'll haul off and let you have it...if you know what's good for you, you won't monkey around with Fred C. Dobbs. |
Took some photos in the shop today....
On Jan 1, 9:06*am, "Jim Wilkins" wrote:
"jon_banquer" wrote in message news:8aabb8b6-406a-4379-b232- -The typo shows you don't pay attention to detail. Even at .030, where -I gave you the benefit of the doubt, you have already shown you don't -know what's required to do tight tolerance aerospace work. Just comply with MIL-TFP-41. Tolerance information is now embedded with the solid model on newer aerospace parts. No prints. http://www10.mcadcafe.com/nbc/articl...ticleid=294155 |
Took some photos in the shop today....
"Jonathan Banquer" wrote in message ... On Jan 1, 9:06 am, "Jim Wilkins" wrote: Just comply with MIL-TFP-41. -Tolerance information is now embedded with the solid model on newer -aerospace parts. No prints. That was an insider joke to see if you'd get it. It stands for Make It Like The Friggin Print For Once. Perhaps it's better known among draftsmen and assemblers than machinists. |
Took some photos in the shop today....
On Jan 1, 9:06*am, "Jim Wilkins" wrote:
"jon_banquer" wrote in message news:8aabb8b6-406a-4379-b232- -The typo shows you don't pay attention to detail. Even at .030, where -I gave you the benefit of the doubt, you have already shown you don't -know what's required to do tight tolerance aerospace work. Just comply with MIL-TFP-41. Join me in the modern world with all of its problems and tons of bull**** it's still often better than dealing with old Solar Turbine prints. ;) http://www.qualitymag.com/articles/8...sed-definition "Increasing numbers of aerospace manufacturers are benefiting from model-based definition's quality assurance processes. Model based definition (MBD) is not a new concept in the aerospace manufacturing industry. While it has been applied to product definition and manufacturing for years, its use as a fully implemented process for quality control only has been realized recently. Many companies are modernizing quality assurance processes to embrace MBD because aerospace's prime manufacturers are demanding it. Advancements in both software and hardware technologies are making it easier to put all the key elements in place, giving aerospace manufacturers the last piece of the puzzle for an enterprise wide system of digital product definition." |
Took some photos in the shop today....
On Jan 1, 9:40*am, "Jim Wilkins" wrote:
"Jonathan Banquer" wrote in message ... On Jan 1, 9:06 am, "Jim Wilkins" wrote: Just comply with MIL-TFP-41. -Tolerance information is now embedded with the solid model on newer -aerospace parts. No prints. That was an insider joke to see if you'd get it. It stands for Make It Like The Friggin Print For Once. Perhaps it's better known among draftsmen and assemblers than machinists. Oh, I got the joke and so would most machinists. The problem is it's a very dated joke and that was my point. |
Took some photos in the shop today....
Jonathan Banquer fired this volley in
: The unfortunate part for worthless blowhards like you Loud is that my LinkedIn connections (many of whom endorse my skill set), my published comments on the most respected CADCAM blogs, and the membership of my LinkedIn group CADCAM Technology Leaders show how full of **** you are. That's so silly its funny! When did LinkedIn - which is basically a social site with "friends" - constitute a "resume"? Give us all a list of prior employers we can _actually_ check with to verify your people skills. I commented on your lack of people skills, not your lack of skill at posting _claims_ of your CNC accomplishments. BTW, When did I ever post anything claiming I was an expert at any aspect of machining? You claim it all the time. That, alone, is the 'smoke' of posing. All claims. No jobs you can cite. LLoyd |
Took some photos in the shop today....
On Jan 1, 9:59*am, "Lloyd E. Sponenburgh"
lloydspinsidemindspring.com wrote: Jonathan Banquer fired this volley : The unfortunate part for worthless blowhards like you Loud is that my LinkedIn connections (many of whom endorse my skill set), my published comments on the most respected CADCAM blogs, and the membership of my LinkedIn group CADCAM Technology Leaders show how full of **** you are. That's so silly its funny! *When did LinkedIn - which is basically a social site with "friends" - constitute a "resume"? Give us all a list of prior employers we can _actually_ check with to verify your people skills. *I commented on your lack of people skills, not your lack of skill at posting _claims_ of your CNC accomplishments. BTW, When did I ever post anything claiming I was an expert at any aspect of machining? *You claim it all the time. *That, alone, is the 'smoke' of posing. *All claims. *No jobs you can cite. LLoyd I'll give you a list of all the ways you can **** off and die. You're a worthless idiot and it clearly shows in so many ways, Loud. |
Took some photos in the shop today....
On 1/1/2013 10:03 AM, Jonathan Banquer wrote:
On Jan 1, 9:59 am, "Lloyd E. Sponenburgh" lloydspinsidemindspring.com wrote: Jonathan Banquer fired this volley : The unfortunate part for worthless blowhards like you Loud is that my LinkedIn connections (many of whom endorse my skill set), my published comments on the most respected CADCAM blogs, and the membership of my LinkedIn group CADCAM Technology Leaders show how full of **** you are. That's so silly its funny! When did LinkedIn - which is basically a social site with "friends" - constitute a "resume"? Give us all a list of prior employers we can _actually_ check with to verify your people skills. I commented on your lack of people skills, not your lack of skill at posting _claims_ of your CNC accomplishments. BTW, When did I ever post anything claiming I was an expert at any aspect of machining? You claim it all the time. That, alone, is the 'smoke' of posing. All claims. No jobs you can cite. LLoyd I'll give you a list of all the ways you can **** off and die. You're a worthless idiot and it clearly shows in so many ways, Loud. Translation: little jonny banqueer has an unbelievably spotty job history, and he wouldn't dare list past employers and positions. Little jonny banqueer is a fraud - a CADCAM fraud with an arrest record for domestic violence. -- Any more lip out of you and I'll haul off and let you have it...if you know what's good for you, you won't monkey around with Fred C. Dobbs. |
Took some photos in the shop today....
On Tue, 1 Jan 2013 12:40:24 -0500, "Jim Wilkins"
wrote: "Jonathan Banquer" wrote in message ... On Jan 1, 9:06 am, "Jim Wilkins" wrote: Just comply with MIL-TFP-41. -Tolerance information is now embedded with the solid model on newer -aerospace parts. No prints. That was an insider joke to see if you'd get it. It stands for Make It Like The Friggin Print For Once. Perhaps it's better known among draftsmen and assemblers than machinists. PDFTFT, Lloyd. -- You can ignore reality, but you cannot ignore the consequences of ignoring reality. --Ayn Rand |
Took some photos in the shop today....
Larry Jaques fired this volley in
: PDFTFT, Lloyd. Sometimes, you just GOTTA, Larry! G Trolls don't live on eating our responses, they live purely on ego.(not that anything anyone could say would ever reduce their intake...) LLoyd |
Took some photos in the shop today....
On Jan 1, 11:49*am, Larry Jaques
wrote: On Tue, 1 Jan 2013 12:40:24 -0500, "Jim Wilkins" wrote: "Jonathan Banquer" wrote in message ... On Jan 1, 9:06 am, "Jim Wilkins" wrote: Just comply with MIL-TFP-41. -Tolerance information is now embedded with the solid model on newer -aerospace parts. No prints. That was an insider joke to see if you'd get it. It stands for Make It Like The Friggin Print For Once. Perhaps it's better known among draftsmen and assemblers than machinists. PDFTFT, Lloyd. -- You can ignore reality, but you cannot ignore the consequences of ignoring reality. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *--Ayn Rand Reality isn't something ****tards like you can deal with Larry. Perhaps this will help you with your adolescent Ayn Rand worship: http://www.amazon.com/Ayn-Rand-Natio.../dp/0312590733 |
Took some photos in the shop today....
On Jan 1, 11:49*am, Larry Jaques
wrote: On Tue, 1 Jan 2013 12:40:24 -0500, "Jim Wilkins" wrote: "Jonathan Banquer" wrote in message ... On Jan 1, 9:06 am, "Jim Wilkins" wrote: Just comply with MIL-TFP-41. -Tolerance information is now embedded with the solid model on newer -aerospace parts. No prints. That was an insider joke to see if you'd get it. It stands for Make It Like The Friggin Print For Once. Perhaps it's better known among draftsmen and assemblers than machinists. PDFTFT, Lloyd. -- You can ignore reality, but you cannot ignore the consequences of ignoring reality. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *--Ayn Rand Ayn Rand worshiper Alan Greenspan gets a dose of reality he can't handle: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nBnKh6B2cMw I bet Alan Greenspan never forgot getting his ass handed to him like Bernie Sanders handed it to him. History has now shown us beyond a shadow of a doubt how stupid and how wrong Alan Greenspan was. |
Took some photos in the shop today....
On Jan 1, 12:59*pm, "Lloyd E. Sponenburgh"
lloydspinsidemindspring.com wrote: Give us all a list of prior employers we can _actually_ check with to verify your people skills. *I commented on your lack of people skills, not your lack of skill at posting _claims_ of your CNC accomplishments. BTW, When did I ever post anything claiming I was an expert at any aspect of machining? *You claim it all the time. *That, alone, is the 'smoke' of posing. *All claims. *No jobs you can cite. LLoyd Well we do know he does not own any machine tools. Dan |
Took some photos in the shop today....
On Jan 1, 1:07*pm, " wrote:
On Jan 1, 12:59*pm, "Lloyd E. Sponenburgh" lloydspinsidemindspring.com wrote: Give us all a list of prior employers we can _actually_ check with to verify your people skills. *I commented on your lack of people skills, not your lack of skill at posting _claims_ of your CNC accomplishments. BTW, When did I ever post anything claiming I was an expert at any aspect of machining? *You claim it all the time. *That, alone, is the 'smoke' of posing. *All claims. *No jobs you can cite. LLoyd Well we do know he does not own any machine tools. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *Dan You would be wrong. In addition, it's pretty easy to see the kinds of precision tools I own as some of them are for sale and listed on eBay. They aren't cheap! |
Took some photos in the shop today....
On Jan 1, 4:13*pm, jon_banquer wrote:
LLoyd Well we do know he does not own any machine tools. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *Dan You would be wrong. In addition, it's pretty easy to see the kinds of precision tools I own as some of them are for sale and listed on eBay. They aren't cheap! So where are the pictures of your shop. Machine tool are those used to machine. Dan |
Took some photos in the shop today....
On Jan 1, 1:22*pm, " wrote:
On Jan 1, 4:13*pm, jon_banquer wrote: LLoyd Well we do know he does not own any machine tools. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *Dan You would be wrong. In addition, it's pretty easy to see the kinds of precision tools I own as some of them are for sale and listed on eBay. They aren't cheap! So where are the pictures of your shop. *Machine tool are those used to machine. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Dan A much better question to ask of yourself is what happened to your brain and will it ever again function normally. |
Took some photos in the shop today....
On Tue, 01 Jan 2013 14:00:02 -0600, "Lloyd E. Sponenburgh"
lloydspinsidemindspring.com wrote: Larry Jaques fired this volley in : PDFTFT, Lloyd. Sometimes, you just GOTTA, Larry! G Filtering is much more fun. They still think they have an audience when they don't. Trolls don't live on eating our responses, they live purely on ego.(not that anything anyone could say would ever reduce their intake...) Think about it. Wouldn't feeding 'em be a function of YOUR ego? Any response gives them more fodder. Just like voting gives DC inspiration. I'm still holding out for a None of the Above button on my ballots. Just Say No! -- You can ignore reality, but you cannot ignore the consequences of ignoring reality. --Ayn Rand |
Took some photos in the shop today....
Larry Jaques wrote: On Tue, 01 Jan 2013 14:00:02 -0600, "Lloyd E. Sponenburgh" lloydspinsidemindspring.com wrote: Larry Jaques fired this volley in : PDFTFT, Lloyd. Sometimes, you just GOTTA, Larry! G Filtering is much more fun. They still think they have an audience when they don't. Trolls don't live on eating our responses, they live purely on ego.(not that anything anyone could say would ever reduce their intake...) Think about it. Wouldn't feeding 'em be a function of YOUR ego? Any response gives them more fodder. Just like voting gives DC inspiration. I'm still holding out for a None of the Above button on my ballots. I've moved on to wanting "You've got to be kidding!" and "No way in hell will I vote for any of these fools!!!" choices on ballots. |
Took some photos in the shop today....
On Jan 1, 1:41*pm, Larry Jaques
wrote: On Tue, 01 Jan 2013 14:00:02 -0600, "Lloyd E. Sponenburgh" lloydspinsidemindspring.com wrote: Larry Jaques fired this volley in : PDFTFT, Lloyd. Sometimes, you just GOTTA, Larry! G Filtering is much more fun. They still think they have an audience when they don't. Trolls don't live on eating our responses, they live purely on ego.(not that anything anyone could say would ever reduce their intake...) Think about it. *Wouldn't feeding 'em be a function of YOUR ego? *Any response gives them more fodder. *Just like voting gives DC inspiration. *I'm still holding out for a None of the Above button on my ballots. *Just Say No! -- You can ignore reality, but you cannot ignore the consequences of ignoring reality. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *--Ayn Rand "Just Say No! " Exactly the kind of idea / program that a phony conservative moron like Larry Jaques thinks is actually effective: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Just_Say_No "Nancy Reagan's approach to promoting drug awareness was also labeled simplistic by critics who argued that the solution was reduced to a catch phrase" |
Took some photos in the shop today....
On Jan 1, 1:44*pm, "Michael A. Terrell"
wrote: Larry Jaques wrote: On Tue, 01 Jan 2013 14:00:02 -0600, "Lloyd E. Sponenburgh" lloydspinsidemindspring.com wrote: Larry Jaques fired this volley in : PDFTFT, Lloyd. Sometimes, you just GOTTA, Larry! G Filtering is much more fun. They still think they have an audience when they don't. Trolls don't live on eating our responses, they live purely on ego.(not that anything anyone could say would ever reduce their intake...) Think about it. *Wouldn't feeding 'em be a function of YOUR ego? *Any response gives them more fodder. *Just like voting gives DC inspiration. *I'm still holding out for a None of the Above button on my ballots. * *I've moved on to wanting "You've got to be kidding!" and "No way in hell will I vote for any of these fools!!!" choices on ballots. If Michael Terrell's name was on the ballot both would be appropriate choices. |
Took some photos in the shop today....
"Jonathan Banquer" wrote in message ... On Jan 1, 8:59 am, "Lloyd E. Sponenburgh" lloydspinsidemindspring.com wrote: jon_banquer fired this volley in news:8aabb8b6- : The typo shows you don't pay attention to detail. Even at .030, where I gave you the benefit of the doubt, you have already shown you don't know what's required to do tight tolerance aerospace work. Maybe he doesn't, maybe he does. That's what multiple layers of checking are for -- indentifying purely "human" errors. OTOH, Jon, you just demonstrated conclusively that you don't have what it takes to _manage_ any high-tech activities (or advise on them, or teach them, or... any human-interaction tasks) If you abused your machines like you do people, _they_ wouldn't work for you, either. So, at most, you're just a tech. At least, you're probably just a tech- poser. Lloyd The unfortunate part for worthless blowhards like you Loud is that my LinkedIn connections (many of whom endorse my skill set), my published comments on the most respected CADCAM blogs, and the membership of my LinkedIn group CADCAM Technology Leaders show how full of **** you are. http://www.linkedin.com/profile/view...80&trk=tab_pro When it comes to machining and CADCAM I talk the talk and I walk the walk. I've done it for many, many years now. http://cadinsider.typepad.com/my_web...dge-again.html Don't know about the rest of you, but I am tired of this clown. Adieu. |
Took some photos in the shop today....
On Jan 1, 1:51*pm, "Steve B" wrote:
"Jonathan Banquer" wrote in message ... On Jan 1, 8:59 am, "Lloyd E. Sponenburgh" lloydspinsidemindspring.com wrote: jon_banquer fired this volley in news:8aabb8b6- : The typo shows you don't pay attention to detail. Even at .030, where I gave you the benefit of the doubt, you have already shown you don't know what's required to do tight tolerance aerospace work. Maybe he doesn't, maybe he does. That's what multiple layers of checking are for -- indentifying purely "human" errors. OTOH, Jon, you just demonstrated conclusively that you don't have what it takes to _manage_ any high-tech activities (or advise on them, or teach them, or... any human-interaction tasks) If you abused your machines like you do people, _they_ wouldn't work for you, either. So, at most, you're just a tech. At least, you're probably just a tech- poser. Lloyd The unfortunate part for worthless blowhards like you Loud is that my LinkedIn connections (many of whom endorse my skill set), my published comments on the most respected CADCAM blogs, and the membership of my LinkedIn group CADCAM Technology Leaders show how full of **** you are. http://www.linkedin.com/profile/view...80&trk=tab_pro When it comes to machining and CADCAM I talk the talk and I walk the walk. I've done it for many, many years now. http://cadinsider.typepad.com/my_web...-plm-promises-... Don't know about the rest of you, but I am tired of this clown. Adieu. Then stop looking in the mirror. Problem solved. |
Took some photos in the shop today....
Jonathan Banquer wrote: On Jan 1, 1:44 pm, "Michael A. Terrell" wrote: Larry Jaques wrote: On Tue, 01 Jan 2013 14:00:02 -0600, "Lloyd E. Sponenburgh" lloydspinsidemindspring.com wrote: Larry Jaques fired this volley in : PDFTFT, Lloyd. Sometimes, you just GOTTA, Larry! G Filtering is much more fun. They still think they have an audience when they don't. Trolls don't live on eating our responses, they live purely on ego.(not that anything anyone could say would ever reduce their intake...) Think about it. Wouldn't feeding 'em be a function of YOUR ego? Any response gives them more fodder. Just like voting gives DC inspiration. I'm still holding out for a None of the Above button on my ballots. I've moved on to wanting "You've got to be kidding!" and "No way in hell will I vote for any of these fools!!!" choices on ballots. If Michael Terrell's name was on the ballot both would be appropriate choices. Yawn. Why would I want to lower myself to your level, just so I could run for office? I DID keep one ass from being re-elected back in the '80s. I took him to court for 'Conversion of Property' and got a settlement. 'Conversion of Property' is theft by a politician. They can't even be honest enough to call it theft. Come to think of it, you should run for president. Of Somalia. |
Took some photos in the shop today....
On Jan 1, 1:59*pm, "Michael A. Terrell"
wrote: Jonathan Banquer wrote: On Jan 1, 1:44 pm, "Michael A. Terrell" wrote: Larry Jaques wrote: On Tue, 01 Jan 2013 14:00:02 -0600, "Lloyd E. Sponenburgh" lloydspinsidemindspring.com wrote: Larry Jaques fired this volley in : PDFTFT, Lloyd. Sometimes, you just GOTTA, Larry! G Filtering is much more fun. They still think they have an audience when they don't. Trolls don't live on eating our responses, they live purely on ego..(not that anything anyone could say would ever reduce their intake...) Think about it. *Wouldn't feeding 'em be a function of YOUR ego? *Any response gives them more fodder. *Just like voting gives DC inspiration. *I'm still holding out for a None of the Above button on my ballots. * *I've moved on to wanting "You've got to be kidding!" and "No way in hell will I vote for any of these fools!!!" choices on ballots. If Michael Terrell's name was on the ballot both would be appropriate choices. * *Yawn. *Why would I want to lower myself to your level, just so I could run for office? *I DID keep one ass from being re-elected back in the '80s. I took him to court for 'Conversion of Property' and got a settlement. *'Conversion of Property' is theft by a politician. *They can't even be honest enough to call it theft. *Come to think of it, you should run for president. *Of Somalia. I bet they have better roofs in Somalia and that don't leak like yours does. Suggest you move there and see what they know that you don't. |
Took some photos in the shop today....
On Jan 1, 1:59*pm, "Michael A. Terrell"
wrote: Jonathan Banquer wrote: On Jan 1, 1:44 pm, "Michael A. Terrell" wrote: Larry Jaques wrote: On Tue, 01 Jan 2013 14:00:02 -0600, "Lloyd E. Sponenburgh" lloydspinsidemindspring.com wrote: Larry Jaques fired this volley in : PDFTFT, Lloyd. Sometimes, you just GOTTA, Larry! G Filtering is much more fun. They still think they have an audience when they don't. Trolls don't live on eating our responses, they live purely on ego..(not that anything anyone could say would ever reduce their intake...) Think about it. *Wouldn't feeding 'em be a function of YOUR ego? *Any response gives them more fodder. *Just like voting gives DC inspiration. *I'm still holding out for a None of the Above button on my ballots. * *I've moved on to wanting "You've got to be kidding!" and "No way in hell will I vote for any of these fools!!!" choices on ballots. If Michael Terrell's name was on the ballot both would be appropriate choices. * *Yawn. *Why would I want to lower myself to your level, just so I could run for office? *I DID keep one ass from being re-elected back in the '80s. I took him to court for 'Conversion of Property' and got a settlement. *'Conversion of Property' is theft by a politician. *They can't even be honest enough to call it theft. *Come to think of it, you should run for president. *Of Somalia. I bet in Somalia they have roofs that don't leak like yours do. Suggest you go there and try and learn what you're doing wrong. Expect to stay what's left of your miserable life. |
Took some photos in the shop today....
"Michael A. Terrell" on Tue, 01 Jan 2013
16:44:39 -0500 typed in rec.crafts.metalworking the following: Larry Jaques wrote: On Tue, 01 Jan 2013 14:00:02 -0600, "Lloyd E. Sponenburgh" lloydspinsidemindspring.com wrote: Larry Jaques fired this volley in : PDFTFT, Lloyd. Sometimes, you just GOTTA, Larry! G Filtering is much more fun. They still think they have an audience when they don't. Trolls don't live on eating our responses, they live purely on ego.(not that anything anyone could say would ever reduce their intake...) Think about it. Wouldn't feeding 'em be a function of YOUR ego? Any response gives them more fodder. Just like voting gives DC inspiration. I'm still holding out for a None of the Above button on my ballots. I've moved on to wanting "You've got to be kidding!" and "No way in hell will I vote for any of these fools!!!" choices on ballots. Vote "Present". -- pyotr filipivich You've read my sig file, that's enough Social Interaction for the Day. |
Took some photos in the shop today....
On Jan 1, 4:29*pm, jon_banquer wrote:
So where are the pictures of your shop. *Machine tool are those used to machine. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Dan A much better question to ask of yourself is what *happened to your brain and will it ever again function normally. Still wondering where your shop pictures are. Dan |
Took some photos in the shop today....
On Jan 1, 4:30*pm, " wrote:
On Jan 1, 4:29*pm, jon_banquer wrote: So where are the pictures of your shop. *Machine tool are those used to machine. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Dan A much better question to ask of yourself is what *happened to your brain and will it ever again function normally. Still wondering where your shop pictures are. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Dan I'm still wondering when you're going to pull your head out of your ass. |
Took some photos in the shop today....
pyotr filipivich wrote: "Michael A. Terrell" on Tue, 01 Jan 2013 16:44:39 -0500 typed in rec.crafts.metalworking the following: Larry Jaques wrote: On Tue, 01 Jan 2013 14:00:02 -0600, "Lloyd E. Sponenburgh" lloydspinsidemindspring.com wrote: Larry Jaques fired this volley in : PDFTFT, Lloyd. Sometimes, you just GOTTA, Larry! G Filtering is much more fun. They still think they have an audience when they don't. Trolls don't live on eating our responses, they live purely on ego.(not that anything anyone could say would ever reduce their intake...) Think about it. Wouldn't feeding 'em be a function of YOUR ego? Any response gives them more fodder. Just like voting gives DC inspiration. I'm still holding out for a None of the Above button on my ballots. I've moved on to wanting "You've got to be kidding!" and "No way in hell will I vote for any of these fools!!!" choices on ballots. Vote "Present". They are rarely present. |
Took some photos in the shop today....
On Tue, 01 Jan 2013 19:36:10 -0500, "Michael A. Terrell"
wrote: pyotr filipivich wrote: "Michael A. Terrell" on Tue, 01 Jan 2013 16:44:39 -0500 typed in rec.crafts.metalworking the following: Larry Jaques wrote: On Tue, 01 Jan 2013 14:00:02 -0600, "Lloyd E. Sponenburgh" lloydspinsidemindspring.com wrote: Larry Jaques fired this volley in : PDFTFT, Lloyd. Sometimes, you just GOTTA, Larry! G Filtering is much more fun. They still think they have an audience when they don't. Trolls don't live on eating our responses, they live purely on ego.(not that anything anyone could say would ever reduce their intake...) Think about it. Wouldn't feeding 'em be a function of YOUR ego? Any response gives them more fodder. Just like voting gives DC inspiration. I'm still holding out for a None of the Above button on my ballots. I've moved on to wanting "You've got to be kidding!" and "No way in hell will I vote for any of these fools!!!" choices on ballots. Vote "Present". They are rarely present. Even when they're there. -- You can ignore reality, but you cannot ignore the consequences of ignoring reality. --Ayn Rand |
Took some photos in the shop today....
Larry Jaques wrote: Michael A. Terrell wrote: pyotr filipivich wrote: "Michael A. Terrell wrote: Larry Jaques wrote: Trolls don't live on eating our responses, they live purely on ego.(not that anything anyone could say would ever reduce their intake...) Think about it. Wouldn't feeding 'em be a function of YOUR ego? Any response gives them more fodder. Just like voting gives DC inspiration. I'm still holding out for a None of the Above button on my ballots. I've moved on to wanting "You've got to be kidding!" and "No way in hell will I vote for any of these fools!!!" choices on ballots. Vote "Present". They are rarely present. Even when they're there. Even less likely when they're there. |
Took some photos in the shop today....
On Tue, 01 Jan 2013 09:13:58 -0800, "Fred C. Dobbs"
wrote: On 1/1/2013 9:07 AM, Jonathan Banquer wrote: On Jan 1, 8:59 am, "Lloyd E. Sponenburgh" lloydspinsidemindspring.com wrote: jon_banquer fired this volley in news:8aabb8b6- : The typo shows you don't pay attention to detail. Even at .030, where I gave you the benefit of the doubt, you have already shown you don't know what's required to do tight tolerance aerospace work. Maybe he doesn't, maybe he does. That's what multiple layers of checking are for -- indentifying purely "human" errors. OTOH, Jon, you just demonstrated conclusively that you don't have what it takes to _manage_ any high-tech activities (or advise on them, or teach them, or... any human-interaction tasks) If you abused your machines like you do people, _they_ wouldn't work for you, either. So, at most, you're just a tech. At least, you're probably just a tech- poser. Lloyd The unfortunate part for worthless blowhards like you Loud is that my LinkedIn connections (many of whom endorse my skill set) You don't have a skill set, little jonny banqueer. Blabbering about CADCAM isn't a skill. You can't actually *DO* anything, little jonny banqueer. A machinist is a guy who can do manually what a cad-cam programmer can only dream about.. The big difference is a cad-cam operator can make 50 bad parts per minute |
Took some photos in the shop today....
"Michael A. Terrell" on Tue, 01 Jan 2013
19:36:10 -0500 typed in rec.crafts.metalworking the following: pyotr filipivich wrote: "Michael A. Terrell" on Tue, 01 Jan 2013 16:44:39 -0500 typed in rec.crafts.metalworking the following: Larry Jaques wrote: On Tue, 01 Jan 2013 14:00:02 -0600, "Lloyd E. Sponenburgh" lloydspinsidemindspring.com wrote: Larry Jaques fired this volley: PDFTFT, Lloyd. Sometimes, you just GOTTA, Larry! G Filtering is much more fun. They still think they have an audience when they don't. Trolls don't live on eating our responses, they live purely on ego.(not that anything anyone could say would ever reduce their intake...) Think about it. Wouldn't feeding 'em be a function of YOUR ego? Any response gives them more fodder. Just like voting gives DC inspiration. I'm still holding out for a None of the Above button on my ballots. I've moved on to wanting "You've got to be kidding!" and "No way in hell will I vote for any of these fools!!!" choices on ballots. Vote "Present". They are rarely present. That is my opinion of all those who make a Principled Vote for a third party - they are just voting "Present" indicating that they're good with whatever the majority decides. Left, Right - matters not. They "voted". Usually not to keep the politician who is "wrong" out, but keep the candidate who is not "pure enough" from getting in. -- pyotr filipivich Question for the gun Control advocates, "Do you agree with this statement?" "I would rather have a society without guns, even if it means that people cannot defend themselves against murder (with other weapons), rape, robbery, and assault. I would rather make everyone defenseless than have to endure the mass shootings that occasionally occur. If that means that many more people, (particularly the old, the weak, and the infirm) are subjected to these violent crimes, then so be it. They'll just have to suffer more. I do claim the power to dictate whether or not others are able to defend themselves." |
Took some photos in the shop today....
pyotr filipivich wrote: "Michael A. Terrell wrote: They are rarely present. That is my opinion of all those who make a Principled Vote for a third party - they are just voting "Present" indicating that they're good with whatever the majority decides. Left, Right - matters not. They "voted". Usually not to keep the politician who is "wrong" out, but keep the candidate who is not "pure enough" from getting in. Or they were so high that they were just happy they found their voting precinct while it was still open? Just wait till they realize there will be no more Twinkies. |
Took some photos in the shop today....
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:06 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 DIYbanter