DIYbanter - View Single Post

Tom Gardner[_6_]

On 1/1/2013 9:53 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 01 Jan 2013 09:13:58 -0800, "Fred C. Dobbs"
wrote:

On 1/1/2013 9:07 AM, Jonathan Banquer wrote:
On Jan 1, 8:59 am, "Lloyd E. Sponenburgh"
lloydspinsidemindspring.com wrote:
jon_banquer fired this volley in news:8aabb8b6-
:

The typo shows you don't pay attention to detail. Even at .030, where
I gave you the benefit of the doubt, you have already shown you don't
know what's required to do tight tolerance aerospace work.

Maybe he doesn't, maybe he does. That's what multiple layers of checking
are for -- indentifying purely "human" errors.

OTOH, Jon, you just demonstrated conclusively that you don't have what it
takes to _manage_ any high-tech activities (or advise on them, or teach
them, or... any human-interaction tasks) If you abused your machines
like you do people, _they_ wouldn't work for you, either.'

So, at most, you're just a tech. At least, you're probably just a tech-
poser.

Lloyd

The unfortunate part for worthless blowhards like you Loud is that my
LinkedIn connections (many of whom endorse my skill set)

You don't have a skill set, little jonny banqueer. Blabbering about
CADCAM isn't a skill. You can't actually *DO* anything, little jonny
banqueer.
A machinist is a guy who can do manually what a cad-cam programmer
can only dream about.. The big difference is a cad-cam operator can
make 50 bad parts per minute

Also, a programmer has no "feel" for the material's properties, nor can
he correct for it.