| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
 |
|
Menu
| Woodworking (rec.woodworking) Discussion forum covering all aspects of working with wood. All levels of expertise are encouraged to particiapte. |
| Reply |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
| Woodworking (rec.woodworking) Discussion forum covering all aspects of working with wood. All levels of expertise are encouraged to particiapte. |
| Reply |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
California Considers Tougher Safety Standards for Tablesaws
(Pasted from Fine woodwroking website. Some of you may already be
aware of this, I wasn't) Marc The California State Assembly is considering a bill that will require all tablesaws sold in the state be equipped with SawStop-like technology, which can detect and prevent blade contact injuries. Called the Table Saw Safety Act, the legislation was introduced by Assemblyman Das Williams (D- Santa Barbara), and, if passed, will be included in California’s Health and Safety Code. The legislation has caused a stir among tablesaw manufacturers, with a few posting “legislative action advisory” on their websites, urging folks to contact Williams and other members of the California Assembly to voice their opposition to the legislation. The fear among manufacturers is that such a law will spread quickly to other states. If passed, the bill would go into effect Jan. 1, 2015. Any seller that does not comply will be subject to a civil fine, with a maximum of $5,000 per sale. The announcement of the bill comes as the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commision ponders the same possible requirements on a national scale. |
|
#2
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
|
California Considers Tougher Safety Standards for Tablesaws
On 3/15/2012 9:27 PM, marc rosen wrote:
(Pasted from Fine woodwroking website. Some of you may already be aware of this, I wasn't) Marc The California State Assembly is considering a bill that will require all tablesaws sold in the state be equipped with SawStop-like technology, which can detect and prevent blade contact injuries. Called the Table Saw Safety Act, the legislation was introduced by Assemblyman Das Williams (D- Santa Barbara), and, if passed, will be included in California’s Health and Safety Code. The legislation has caused a stir among tablesaw manufacturers, with a few posting “legislative action advisory” on their websites, urging folks to contact Williams and other members of the California Assembly to voice their opposition to the legislation. The fear among manufacturers is that such a law will spread quickly to other states. If passed, the bill would go into effect Jan. 1, 2015. Any seller that does not comply will be subject to a civil fine, with a maximum of $5,000 per sale. The announcement of the bill comes as the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commision ponders the same possible requirements on a national scale. I betcha it is going to have to come with a cancer warning label also! |
|
#3
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
|
California Considers Tougher Safety Standards for Tablesaws
NO... NO... IT CAN'T BE...
I'm to young for this... I don't deserve this... It wasn't my fault... I'll change... please... for the love of all things sacred... NOT ANOTHER F'IN SAWSTOP THREAD. I don't care about civil rights violations, or having to join the Michigan militia out of protest. I won't vote for Ron Paul so he can stop this. I won't renounce my citizenship to this country nor be a Dittohead because I feel put upon as a little guy. I don't give one **** about the nanny state or the whining that follows it. I don't care if anyone wants to cut of hands, ears, fingers, smash their head into a spinning blade, or jump naked onto their saw leading with their privates to cut them off and prove that is their God given right as a human being. Just not another Sawstop thread. Please... all the keyboard Limbaughs... all the Bill Mahers... all the indignant people being crushed by an unfair system... just read the other Sawstop threads. There are many **hundreds** of responses on some of them, many with mean nasty personal remarks fired at fellow formites, comments on the inherent profound stupidity of people that don't agree with a post, and personal challenges to members to be more professional and risk their body parts in the name of personal independence and protecting their rights. It's all been said. Over and over and over and over and over and over again. Somehow... I'll bet this will be one of those. Nice, Marc. I am sure that pages of indignant bitching here will serve a great purpose. Robert |
|
#4
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
|
California Considers Tougher Safety Standards for Tablesaws
Leon wrote:
On 3/15/2012 9:27 PM, marc rosen wrote: (Pasted from Fine woodwroking website. Some of you may already be aware of this, I wasn't) Marc The California State Assembly is considering a bill that will require all tablesaws sold in the state be equipped with SawStop-like technology, which can detect and prevent blade contact injuries. Called the Table Saw Safety Act, the legislation was introduced by Assemblyman Das Williams (D- Santa Barbara), and, if passed, will be included in California’s Health and Safety Code. The legislation has caused a stir among tablesaw manufacturers, with a few posting “legislative action advisory” on their websites, urging folks to contact Williams and other members of the California Assembly to voice their opposition to the legislation. The fear among manufacturers is that such a law will spread quickly to other states. If passed, the bill would go into effect Jan. 1, 2015. Any seller that does not comply will be subject to a civil fine, with a maximum of $5,000 per sale. The announcement of the bill comes as the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commision ponders the same possible requirements on a national scale. I betcha it is going to have to come with a cancer warning label also! This reminds me of what I read in the manual for the Grizzly 690 TS (page 86): Safety labels warn about machine hazards and ways to prevent injury. The owner of this machine MUST maintain the original location and readability of the labels on the machine. If any label is removed or becomes unreadable, REPLACE that label before using the machine again. The lawyers surely got to them! : ) |
|
#5
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
|
California Considers Tougher Safety Standards for Tablesaws
|
|
#6
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
|
California Considers Tougher Safety Standards for Tablesaws
See the rest of Robert's comments above.
It's all been said. * Over and over and over and over and over and over again. Somehow... I'll bet this will be one of those. Nice, Marc. *I am sure that pages of indignant bitching here will serve a great purpose. Robert Hey Robert, I sincerely apologize for this. I was, and am not trying to start another Sawstop thread and I am also not anything like Limball or Maher. I just thought it was interesting that a State (or more accurately, one of its Representatives) would offer to enact a law requiring such technology. I think I learned a lesson here; If I ever post again and it is not strictly woodworking related I'll be sure it won't be political. An occasional joke, sure, but no offerings to upset anyone. Marc (But you can also ignore any posting that has the words Saw or Stop in them.) |
|
#7
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
|
California Considers Tougher Safety Standards for Tablesaws
On Fri, 16 Mar 2012 00:13:00 -0400, Bill wrote:
Leon wrote: On 3/15/2012 9:27 PM, marc rosen wrote: (Pasted from Fine woodwroking website. Some of you may already be aware of this, I wasn't) Marc The California State Assembly is considering a bill that will require all tablesaws sold in the state be equipped with SawStop-like technology, which can detect and prevent blade contact injuries. Called the Table Saw Safety Act, the legislation was introduced by Assemblyman Das Williams (D- Santa Barbara), and, if passed, will be included in California’s Health and Safety Code. The legislation has caused a stir among tablesaw manufacturers, with a few posting “legislative action advisory” on their websites, urging folks to contact Williams and other members of the California Assembly to voice their opposition to the legislation. The fear among manufacturers is that such a law will spread quickly to other states. If passed, the bill would go into effect Jan. 1, 2015. Any seller that does not comply will be subject to a civil fine, with a maximum of $5,000 per sale. The announcement of the bill comes as the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commision ponders the same possible requirements on a national scale. I betcha it is going to have to come with a cancer warning label also! This reminds me of what I read in the manual for the Grizzly 690 TS (page 86): Safety labels warn about machine hazards and ways to prevent injury. The owner of this machine MUST maintain the original location and readability of the labels on the machine. If any label is removed or becomes unreadable, REPLACE that label before using the machine again. The lawyers surely got to them! : ) Ayup. And the first (what, NINETEEN?) pages in every electrical hand tool is rife with warnings from the same crew of speaking weasels. Years ago, there was a story about some idiot who lost his entire hand when he reached up inside the _wood chipper_ from the bottom to see if he could get whatever was stuck out the bottom. I wish I'd saved a hard copy, as the speaking weasels had it taken off the Internet soon thereafter. It resulted in the caution/danger signs at the bottom of the unit. Connected to every warning label, there is a truly mystifying DUH! -- Stay centered by accepting whatever you are doing. This is the ultimate. -- Chuang-tzu |
|
#8
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
|
California Considers Tougher Safety Standards for Tablesaws
On Thu, 15 Mar 2012 21:02:39 -0700 (PDT), "
wrote: NO... NO... IT CAN'T BE... I'm to young for this... I don't deserve this... It wasn't my fault... I'll change... please... for the love of all things sacred... NOT ANOTHER F'IN SAWSTOP THREAD. I don't care about civil rights violations, or having to join the Michigan militia out of protest. I won't vote for Ron Paul so he can stop this. I won't renounce my citizenship to this country nor be a Dittohead because I feel put upon as a little guy. I don't give one **** about the nanny state or the whining that follows it. I don't care if anyone wants to cut of hands, ears, fingers, smash their head into a spinning blade, or jump naked onto their saw leading with their privates to cut them off and prove that is their God given right as a human being. Just not another Sawstop thread. Please... all the keyboard Limbaughs... all the Bill Mahers... all the indignant people being crushed by an unfair system... just read the other Sawstop threads. There are many **hundreds** of responses on some of them, many with mean nasty personal remarks fired at fellow formites, comments on the inherent profound stupidity of people that don't agree with a post, and personal challenges to members to be more professional and risk their body parts in the name of personal independence and protecting their rights. It's all been said. Over and over and over and over and over and over again. Somehow... I'll bet this will be one of those. Nice, Marc. I am sure that pages of indignant bitching here will serve a great purpose. I'm witcha, Naily. The new acronym for this topic will be NAFSST. -- Stay centered by accepting whatever you are doing. This is the ultimate. -- Chuang-tzu |
|
#9
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
|
On a different note....;~(
|
|
#10
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
|
California Considers Tougher Safety Standards for Tablesaws
"marc rosen" wrote in message
... (Pasted from Fine woodwroking website. Some of you may already be aware of this, I wasn't) Marc The California State Assembly is considering a bill that will require all tablesaws sold in the state be equipped with SawStop-like technology, which can detect and prevent blade contact injuries. Called the Table Saw Safety Act, the legislation was introduced by Assemblyman Das Williams (D- Santa Barbara), and, if passed, will be included in California’s Health and Safety Code. The worst part about this, from my vantage point, is that a lot of "ground breaking" "safety related" legistlation in CA ends up being pushed in NY... it doesn't matter if it doesn't work right, creates new problems, or costs a lot and solves no problems... For example, though probably a national thing, the spill proof gas cans are a good example of all of these situations. The one way valve doesn't fit the fuel fill hole on many small engines and is so tough to depress that you end up moving/knocking over some machines. The solution is to remove the fill tube and pour straight from the can with or without a funnel.... especially with the 1 and 3 gallon cans. Another area of idiocy are some of the gun regulations... The uninteneded consequences of feel good legislation. John |
|
#11
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
|
California Considers Tougher Safety Standards for Tablesaws
On 3/16/2012 6:52 AM, John Grossbohlin wrote:
"marc rosen" wrote in message ... (Pasted from Fine woodwroking website. Some of you may already be aware of this, I wasn't) Marc The California State Assembly is considering a bill that will require all tablesaws sold in the state be equipped with SawStop-like technology, which can detect and prevent blade contact injuries. Called the Table Saw Safety Act, the legislation was introduced by Assemblyman Das Williams (D- Santa Barbara), and, if passed, will be included in California’s Health and Safety Code. The worst part about this, from my vantage point, is that a lot of "ground breaking" "safety related" legistlation in CA ends up being pushed in NY... it doesn't matter if it doesn't work right, creates new problems, or costs a lot and solves no problems... For example, though probably a national thing, the spill proof gas cans are a good example of all of these situations. The one way valve doesn't fit the fuel fill hole on many small engines and is so tough to depress that you end up moving/knocking over some machines. The solution is to remove the fill tube and pour straight from the can with or without a funnel.... especially with the 1 and 3 gallon cans. Another area of idiocy are some of the gun regulations... The uninteneded consequences of feel good legislation. John I HATE those spill proof gas cans and it seems a few years ago those showed up and nothing else is available any longer. I do spill more now than I did. The spout is absolutely too short to be of any good. I partially fixed one of its problems by disabling the lock lever you have to depress in order to open the valve. The ill thought POS would be 100 times better if it had a 12" flexible spout. |
|
#12
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
|
On a different note....;~(
"Leon" wrote in message ... On 3/15/2012 11:02 PM, wrote: Somehow... I'll bet this will be one of those. Nice, Marc. I am sure that pages of indignant bitching here will serve a great purpose. Robert Robert, have you tried Rebecca Creek whiskey? Made in Texas and IMHO pretty good. A very different taste.' ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Forget the booze. Smoke a joint, it's better for you. |
|
#13
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
|
On a different note....;~(
In article ,
Leon lcb11211@swbelldotnet wrote: Robert, have you tried Rebecca Creek whiskey? Made in Texas and IMHO pretty good. A very different taste. Send us a bottle, I'll give it a try. I normally dring the Islay malts -- Stuart Winsor Only plain text for emails http://www.asciiribbon.org |
|
#14
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
|
On a different note....;~(
On 3/16/2012 9:02 AM, CW wrote:
"Leon" wrote in message ... On 3/15/2012 11:02 PM, wrote: Somehow... I'll bet this will be one of those. Nice, Marc. I am sure that pages of indignant bitching here will serve a great purpose. Robert Robert, have you tried Rebecca Creek whiskey? Made in Texas and IMHO pretty good. A very different taste.' ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Forget the booze. Smoke a joint, it's better for you. Still better in Brownies. |
|
#15
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
|
California Considers Tougher Safety Standards for Tablesaws
Leon lcb11211@swbelldotnet wrote in
: I HATE those spill proof gas cans and it seems a few years ago those showed up and nothing else is available any longer. I do spill more now than I did. The spout is absolutely too short to be of any good. I partially fixed one of its problems by disabling the lock lever you have to depress in order to open the valve. The ill thought POS would be 100 times better if it had a 12" flexible spout. The ones I got had a detachable flexible hose, but it really didn't do very much good. It might work for smaller cans, but the big 5 gallon ones are just too heavy for it to be useful. One can company had a "venting spout" design that barely worked before this non-sense spill-proof stuff. It only worked if the can was at just the right angle, and you didn't move it... Whatever happened to a can that's stable in its normal position (so it's hard to knock over), with a open spout and a vent hole on the back? Was the design just too good? Sure, I spilled quite a bit with those cans, but that was because the gas tank on the mower was opaque. Puckdropper -- Make it to fit, don't make it fit. |
|
#16
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
|
California Considers Tougher Safety Standards for Tablesaws
On 3/16/2012 7:52 AM, John Grossbohlin wrote:
..... The one way valve doesn't fit the fuel fill hole on many small engines and is so tough to depress that you end up moving/knocking over some machines. The solution is to remove the fill tube and pour straight from the can with or without a funnel.... especially with the 1 and 3 gallon cans. Another area of idiocy are some of the gun regulations... The uninteneded consequences of feel good legislation. QUINNs FIRST LAW: Liberalism always generates the exact opposite of its stated intent -- Jack Add Life to your Days not Days to your Life. http://jbstein.com |
|
#17
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
|
California Considers Tougher Safety Standards for Tablesaws
On 3/16/2012 12:02 AM, wrote: NO... NO... IT CAN'T BE... Perhaps rather than participating in threads that hold no interest to you, you could simply skip them instead of telling everyone interested enough to read and reply how it should be... When government insists on telling folks what they must buy, particularly expensive wood working products, it tends to spark the interest of woodworkers, hard as that is for you to believe. Further, if a thread gets tons of play, it's not because people are not interested. Further, since forced use of saw stop tech is fresh on the minds of the dolts in government hell bent in protecting everyone from themselves, the subject is timely. After the laws are passed, it's a little late to do much about it. Personally, I think anyone dumb enough to vote for dolts like Pelosi, Brown and other left wing dingbats, probably should not be using dangerous wood working tools to begin with, and certainly not without intense government intervention. -- Jack Add Life to your Days not Days to your Life. http://jbstein.com I'm to young for this... I don't deserve this... It wasn't my fault... I'll change... please... for the love of all things sacred... NOT ANOTHER F'IN SAWSTOP THREAD. I don't care about civil rights violations, or having to join the Michigan militia out of protest. I won't vote for Ron Paul so he can stop this. I won't renounce my citizenship to this country nor be a Dittohead because I feel put upon as a little guy. I don't give one **** about the nanny state or the whining that follows it. I don't care if anyone wants to cut of hands, ears, fingers, smash their head into a spinning blade, or jump naked onto their saw leading with their privates to cut them off and prove that is their God given right as a human being. Just not another Sawstop thread. Please... all the keyboard Limbaughs... all the Bill Mahers... all the indignant people being crushed by an unfair system... just read the other Sawstop threads. There are many **hundreds** of responses on some of them, many with mean nasty personal remarks fired at fellow formites, comments on the inherent profound stupidity of people that don't agree with a post, and personal challenges to members to be more professional and risk their body parts in the name of personal independence and protecting their rights. It's all been said. Over and over and over and over and over and over again. Somehow... I'll bet this will be one of those. Nice, Marc. I am sure that pages of indignant bitching here will serve a great purpose. Robert |
|
#18
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
|
California Considers Tougher Safety Standards for Tablesaws
Jack wrote:
QUINNs FIRST LAW: Liberalism always generates the exact opposite of its stated intent Which is the unstated purpose of Liberalism. EdR |
|
#19
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
|
California Considers Tougher Safety Standards for Tablesaws
In article , Jack wrote:
On 3/16/2012 12:02 AM, wrote: NO... NO... IT CAN'T BE... Perhaps rather than participating in threads that hold no interest to you, you could simply skip them instead of telling everyone interested enough to read and reply how it should be... ...snipped... Well, it sure didn't take long for Marc to prove his point! -- Make it as simple as possible, but not simpler. (Albert Einstein) Larry Wasserman - Baltimore Maryland - lwasserm(a)sdf. lonestar. org |
|
#20
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
|
California Considers Tougher Safety Standards for Tablesaws
On 3/16/2012 7:03 AM, Leon wrote:
On 3/16/2012 6:52 AM, John Grossbohlin wrote: "marc rosen" wrote in message ... (Pasted from Fine woodwroking website. Some of you may already be aware of this, I wasn't) Marc The California State Assembly is considering a bill that will require all tablesaws sold in the state be equipped with SawStop-like technology, which can detect and prevent blade contact injuries. Called the Table Saw Safety Act, the legislation was introduced by Assemblyman Das Williams (D- Santa Barbara), and, if passed, will be included in California’s Health and Safety Code. The worst part about this, from my vantage point, is that a lot of "ground breaking" "safety related" legistlation in CA ends up being pushed in NY... it doesn't matter if it doesn't work right, creates new problems, or costs a lot and solves no problems... For example, though probably a national thing, the spill proof gas cans are a good example of all of these situations. The one way valve doesn't fit the fuel fill hole on many small engines and is so tough to depress that you end up moving/knocking over some machines. The solution is to remove the fill tube and pour straight from the can with or without a funnel.... especially with the 1 and 3 gallon cans. Another area of idiocy are some of the gun regulations... The uninteneded consequences of feel good legislation. John I HATE those spill proof gas cans and it seems a few years ago those showed up and nothing else is available any longer. I do spill more now than I did. The spout is absolutely too short to be of any good. I partially fixed one of its problems by disabling the lock lever you have to depress in order to open the valve. The ill thought POS would be 100 times better if it had a 12" flexible spout. the secret is to buy the old fashioned vented cans at farm auctions. I have a couple dozen five gallon cans in perfect condition being stored in a cool dark place. I'll never have one of the worthless new style, slow flowing junk *******s. -- Steve Barker remove the "not" from my address to email |
|
#21
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
|
California Considers Tougher Safety Standards for Tablesaws
Steve Barker wrote:
the secret is to buy the old fashioned vented cans at farm auctions. I have a couple dozen five gallon cans in perfect condition being stored in a cool dark place. I'll never have one of the worthless new style, slow flowing junk *******s. I am now accepting offers for Steve's old style gas cans. Please be advised that due to the rare and valuable nature of these cans, offers below $100 (for a one gallon can), will not be entertained. (psssttttt... Steve - can we talk off to the side?...) -- -Mike- |
|
#22
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
|
California Considers Tougher Safety Standards for Tablesaws
On 3/16/2012 9:58 PM, Mike Marlow wrote:
Steve Barker wrote: the secret is to buy the old fashioned vented cans at farm auctions. I have a couple dozen five gallon cans in perfect condition being stored in a cool dark place. I'll never have one of the worthless new style, slow flowing junk *******s. I am now accepting offers for Steve's old style gas cans. Please be advised that due to the rare and valuable nature of these cans, offers below $100 (for a one gallon can), will not be entertained. (psssttttt... Steve - can we talk off to the side?...) no way dude. find yer own. LOL! -- Steve Barker remove the "not" from my address to email |
|
#23
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
|
On a different note....;~(
"Leon" wrote in message ... On 3/16/2012 9:02 AM, CW wrote: "Leon" wrote in message ... On 3/15/2012 11:02 PM, wrote: Somehow... I'll bet this will be one of those. Nice, Marc. I am sure that pages of indignant bitching here will serve a great purpose. Robert Robert, have you tried Rebecca Creek whiskey? Made in Texas and IMHO pretty good. A very different taste.' ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Forget the booze. Smoke a joint, it's better for you. Still better in Brownies. -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------  |
|
#24
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
|
California Considers Tougher Safety Standards for Tablesaws
Jack wrote:
On 3/16/2012 7:52 AM, John Grossbohlin wrote: .... The one way valve doesn't fit the fuel fill hole on many small engines and is so tough to depress that you end up moving/knocking over some machines. The solution is to remove the fill tube and pour straight from the can with or without a funnel.... especially with the 1 and 3 gallon cans. Another area of idiocy are some of the gun regulations... The uninteneded consequences of feel good legislation. QUINNs FIRST LAW: Liberalism always generates the exact opposite of its stated intent I have another: Most problems in society can be traced to a failed, up-stream, liberal, solution to another problem (i.e., schools, homlessness, etc.). |
|
#25
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
|
On a different note....;~(
On Sat, 17 Mar 2012 02:27:28 -0700, "CW" wrote:
"Leon" wrote in message ... On 3/16/2012 9:02 AM, CW wrote: "Leon" wrote in message ... On 3/15/2012 11:02 PM, wrote: Somehow... I'll bet this will be one of those. Nice, Marc. I am sure that pages of indignant bitching here will serve a great purpose. Robert Robert, have you tried Rebecca Creek whiskey? Made in Texas and IMHO pretty good. A very different taste.' ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Forget the booze. Smoke a joint, it's better for you. Still better in Brownies. DANGEROUS! Once you eat one, you get the munchies and... -- The greatest justice in life is that your vision and looks tend to go simultaneously. -- Kevin Bacon |
|
#26
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
|
California Considers Tougher Safety Standards for Tablesaws
On 3/16/2012 7:50 PM, Larry W wrote:
In , wrote: On 3/16/2012 12:02 AM, wrote: NO... NO... IT CAN'T BE... Perhaps rather than participating in threads that hold no interest to you, you could simply skip them instead of telling everyone interested enough to read and reply how it should be... ...snipped... Well, it sure didn't take long for Marc to prove his point! Marc made no point other than California was considering tougher Safety standards for Table saws. Someone else made the point that they were tired of reading threads about Saw Stop tech and didn't deserve to read them. My point was don't participate in threads you are not interested in. The point is just as valid to you and anyone else that feels the need to dictate what everyone else should be interested in. -- Jack Got Change: big government ===== BIG GOVERNMENT! http://jbstein.com |
|
#27
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
|
On a different note....;~(
Leon wrote:
On 3/15/2012 11:02 PM, wrote: Somehow... I'll bet this will be one of those. Nice, Marc. I am sure that pages of indignant bitching here will serve a great purpose. Robert Robert, have you tried Rebecca Creek whiskey? Made in Texas and IMHO pretty good. A very different taste. Can't find it her in GA. Can you send me a bottle to try? -- Gerald Ross Every vision has an equal and opposite revision. |
|
#28
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
|
On a different note....;~(
On Sat, 17 Mar 2012 13:41:18 -0400, Gerald Ross
Robert, have you tried Rebecca Creek whiskey? Made in Texas and IMHO pretty good. A very different taste. Can't find it her in GA. Can you send me a bottle to try? Hmmm! There's none up here in Canada either. Better send me a case so me and Robatoy can pass it around. |
|
#29
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
|
On a different note....;~(
Gerald Ross wrote:
Leon wrote: On 3/15/2012 11:02 PM, wrote: Somehow... I'll bet this will be one of those. Nice, Marc. I am sure that pages of indignant bitching here will serve a great purpose. Robert Robert, have you tried Rebecca Creek whiskey? Made in Texas and IMHO pretty good. A very different taste. Can't find it her in GA. Can you send me a bottle to try? Or in NY - could you send a bottle up here as well...? -- -Mike- |
|
#30
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
|
California Considers Tougher Safety Standards for Tablesaws
In article , Jack wrote:
On 3/16/2012 7:50 PM, Larry W wrote: In , wrote: On 3/16/2012 12:02 AM, wrote: NO... NO... IT CAN'T BE... Perhaps rather than participating in threads that hold no interest to you, you could simply skip them instead of telling everyone interested enough to read and reply how it should be... ...snipped... Well, it sure didn't take long for Marc to prove his point! Marc made no point other than California was considering tougher Safety standards for Table saws. I meant his point where he said he realized he was risking another crazy sawstop thread. -- Often wrong, never in doubt. Larry Wasserman - Baltimore Maryland - lwasserm(a)sdf. lonestar. org |
|
#31
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
|
California Considers Tougher Safety Standards for Tablesaws
On 3/18/2012 8:58 AM, Larry W wrote:
In , wrote: On 3/16/2012 7:50 PM, Larry W wrote: In , wrote: On 3/16/2012 12:02 AM, wrote: NO... NO... IT CAN'T BE... Perhaps rather than participating in threads that hold no interest to you, you could simply skip them instead of telling everyone interested enough to read and reply how it should be... ...snipped... Well, it sure didn't take long for Marc to prove his point! Marc made no point other than California was considering tougher Safety standards for Table saws. I meant his point where he said he realized he was risking another crazy sawstop thread. So you agree with Nailshooter that it's fun to participate in threads you are not even slightly interested in. Way cool dude. -- Jack God save us from concerned citizens and the politicians who listen to them! http://jbstein.com |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| California Considers Tougher Safety Standards for Tablesaws | Woodworking | |||
| tablesaws | Woodworking | |||
| Grizzly tablesaws | Woodworking | |||
| tablesaws | Woodworking | |||
Linear Mode
