UK diy (uk.d-i-y) For the discussion of all topics related to diy (do-it-yourself) in the UK. All levels of experience and proficency are welcome to join in to ask questions or offer solutions.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Posted to uk.d-i-y
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 12,364
Default CU cable entry

How to get 4 cables into this CU?

Metal CU has clearances of:
top 4"
bottom 4"
right: 0
left: plenty, but the tails run up there.

A christmas-tree cone bit is at least 2" long, leaving little space for a drill for top or bottom.
Right is possible by drilling through what it's up against, but the result would look lousy.
Left there's enough space in theory, but a lot of hand held drilling with a large bit very close to tails? Not loving that idea.
Looked at cutting into the front edge rather than using round entry glands, but not seeing fireproof grommet strip anywhere.

Suggestions welcome!
  #3   Report Post  
Posted to uk.d-i-y
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 5,774
Default CU cable entry

On 29/04/2020 10:01, alan_m wrote:


Q max punch?


Smaller hole still required to fit punch but could that be done by
drilling from inside of the box?


--
mailto : news {at} admac {dot} myzen {dot} co {dot} uk
  #4   Report Post  
Posted to uk.d-i-y
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4,564
Default CU cable entry

On Wednesday, 29 April 2020 09:54:31 UTC+1, wrote:
How to get 4 cables into this CU?


Photo please :-)

Can you unfix it from the wall and pull it forward?

Owain

  #5   Report Post  
Posted to uk.d-i-y
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 12,364
Default CU cable entry

On Wednesday, 29 April 2020 10:02:00 UTC+1, alan_m wrote:
On 29/04/2020 09:54, tabbypurr wrote:
How to get 4 cables into this CU?

Metal CU has clearances of:
top 4"
bottom 4"
right: 0
left: plenty, but the tails run up there.

A christmas-tree cone bit is at least 2" long, leaving little space for a drill for top or bottom.
Right is possible by drilling through what it's up against, but the result would look lousy.
Left there's enough space in theory, but a lot of hand held drilling with a large bit very close to tails? Not loving that idea.
Looked at cutting into the front edge rather than using round entry glands, but not seeing fireproof grommet strip anywhere.

Suggestions welcome!


Q max punch?

Example
https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Q-Max-SHE...MAAOSwPaNdB4Is

or

https://tinyurl.com/y8xv4wtl


Interesting. Last time I used those, long ago, they severely distorted the sheet they were punching. Is there some way to avoid that?


NT


  #8   Report Post  
Posted to uk.d-i-y
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 5,774
Default CU cable entry

On 29/04/2020 10:14, wrote:

Interesting. Last time I used those, long ago, they severely distorted the sheet they were punching. Is there some way to avoid that?


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RxQE6mtRWCk

I've used them in the past without problems but are you sure that it was
the punch causing the distortion or you applying a sideways force to the
whole punch assembly and twisting the metal.

You can get a Q-MAX Thrust Race to make winding in the punch much easier
and possibly help with with any unwanted forces you apply to the
structure you are working on

Google "Q-MAX Thrust Race"


--
mailto : news {at} admac {dot} myzen {dot} co {dot} uk
rather than
  #10   Report Post  
Posted to uk.d-i-y
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 43,017
Default CU cable entry

In article ,
wrote:
How to get 4 cables into this CU?


Metal CU has clearances of:
top 4"
bottom 4"
right: 0
left: plenty, but the tails run up there.


A christmas-tree cone bit is at least 2" long, leaving little space for a drill for top or bottom.
Right is possible by drilling through what it's up against, but the result would look lousy.
Left there's enough space in theory, but a lot of hand held drilling with a large bit very close to tails? Not loving that idea.
Looked at cutting into the front edge rather than using round entry glands, but not seeing fireproof grommet strip anywhere.


Suggestions welcome!


A Q-Max cutter. Needs very little clearance once you have the pilot hole.
And gives a perfect hole.

--
*Do paediatricians play miniature golf on Wednesdays?

Dave Plowman London SW
To e-mail, change noise into sound.


  #11   Report Post  
Posted to uk.d-i-y
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 5,774
Default CU cable entry

On 29/04/2020 11:06, Brian Gaff (Sofa 2) wrote:
Have you ever spent longer getting the bit you punched out of the cutting
tool than cutting the hole in the first place? Grin.
Brian



I usually have that problem with hole saws into wood

--
mailto : news {at} admac {dot} myzen {dot} co {dot} uk
  #12   Report Post  
Posted to uk.d-i-y
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 12,364
Default CU cable entry

On Wednesday, 29 April 2020 11:29:12 UTC+1, alan_m wrote:
On 29/04/2020 10:14, tabbypurr wrote:

Interesting. Last time I used those, long ago, they severely distorted the sheet they were punching. Is there some way to avoid that?


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RxQE6mtRWCk

I've used them in the past without problems but are you sure that it was
the punch causing the distortion or you applying a sideways force to the
whole punch assembly and twisting the metal.


the metal was in free air, and the punch tightened with spanners. The problem is that the punch cutting edge is not flat, so as it pushes 2 parts of the potential hole, the whole sheet wanted to follow it & get very bent. I know punches sometimes work, but IMLE with them you need a lot of surrounding metal to resist that urge to bend horribly.


You can get a Q-MAX Thrust Race to make winding in the punch much easier
and possibly help with with any unwanted forces you apply to the
structure you are working on


sure, not sure it's worth it for 1 or 2 holes.


NT
  #13   Report Post  
Posted to uk.d-i-y
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 12,364
Default CU cable entry

On Wednesday, 29 April 2020 11:32:00 UTC+1, wrote:
On 29/04/2020 09:54, tabbypurr wrote:


How to get 4 cables into this CU?

Metal CU has clearances of:
top 4"
bottom 4"
right: 0
left: plenty, but the tails run up there.

A christmas-tree cone bit is at least 2" long, leaving little space for a drill for top or bottom.
Right is possible by drilling through what it's up against, but the result would look lousy.
Left there's enough space in theory, but a lot of hand held drilling with a large bit very close to tails? Not loving that idea.
Looked at cutting into the front edge rather than using round entry glands, but not seeing fireproof grommet strip anywhere.

Suggestions welcome!

Aren't there any knock-outs to, errr, knock-out?


It looks like there are, but I can only conclude they weren't pressed deep enough, as the whole box starts to bend under great force before those bits show any interest in moving.


If not, you could get a nibbler into a 4" gap and then improvise grommet
strip from anything suitable (saw blade protector, slit sleeving, T&E
outer ...) and then use high-temp silicone to form a seal.
I have a hand nibbler and also one that goes onto a drill, for this job
I'd use the latter. Mine is one of these:
https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Falcon-Ni...-/250816902636
but bought 10-15 years ago and much used for sheet metal work.


Interesting.


NT
  #14   Report Post  
Posted to uk.d-i-y
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 12,364
Default CU cable entry

On Wednesday, 29 April 2020 11:32:00 UTC+1, wrote:

Aren't there any knock-outs to, errr, knock-out?
If not, you could get a nibbler into a 4" gap and then improvise grommet
strip from anything suitable (saw blade protector, slit sleeving, T&E
outer ...) and then use high-temp silicone to form a seal.


Is that 18th edition passable?
  #16   Report Post  
Posted to uk.d-i-y
ARW ARW is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 10,161
Default CU cable entry

On 29/04/2020 10:19, Andy Burns wrote:
wrote:

How to get 4 cables into this CU?


armeg holesaw, doesn't need separate arbor so shorter (use with right
angle drill if possible)

https://screwfix.com/p/armeg-acceler8/1009r


The absolute best.

Did I show you them at ELEX or did you already know about them? I cannot
remember.

Also they do not fly through the hole you have just cut as they have a
wider diameter base than the hole you have cut.

Both CK and Starrett now have similar (first links I could find)

https://www.tlc-direct.co.uk/Products/FXSSH20.html?

https://www.buildingsuppliesdirect.c...w-20mm-bf1320?

Its worth noting that they fit impact drivers (the Armeg one does) which
are usually smaller than a cordless drill if space is tight.

Usually when cutting into a DB or trunking full of cables I use the
floorboard lifter as protection against against the hole cutter causing
any damage.

--
Adam
  #17   Report Post  
Posted to uk.d-i-y
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 7,829
Default CU cable entry

ARW wrote:

Did I show you them at ELEX


Yes, you did ...

Both CK and Starrett now have similar


cheaper too.

  #18   Report Post  
Posted to uk.d-i-y
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 43,017
Default CU cable entry

In article ,
wrote:
Interesting. Last time I used those, long ago, they severely distorted
the sheet they were punching. Is there some way to avoid that?


Get some decent quality ones? If the tolerances are poor, it won't shear
accurately.

--
*I believe five out of four people have trouble with fractions. *

Dave Plowman London SW
To e-mail, change noise into sound.
  #19   Report Post  
Posted to uk.d-i-y
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,624
Default CU cable entry

It might be easier to simply pull the CU off the wall, this of course means pulling the DNOs service fuse but will also give you the opportunity to fit a separate isolator switch. I would not worry about anybody Complaining about it, I did it and when the guy came to fit the smart meter he said nothing and resealed the fuse afterwards as well as the isolator switch.

Richard
  #20   Report Post  
Posted to uk.d-i-y
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 12,364
Default CU cable entry

On Thursday, 30 April 2020 11:37:57 UTC+1, Dave Plowman (News) wrote:
In article ,
tabbypurr wrote:


Interesting. Last time I used those, long ago, they severely distorted
the sheet they were punching. Is there some way to avoid that?


Get some decent quality ones? If the tolerances are poor, it won't shear
accurately.


The ones I was using were the Qmax you recommended.


  #21   Report Post  
Posted to uk.d-i-y
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 12,364
Default CU cable entry

On Thursday, 30 April 2020 11:46:56 UTC+1, Tricky Dicky wrote:

It might be easier to simply pull the CU off the wall, this of course means pulling the DNOs service fuse but will also give you the opportunity to fit a separate isolator switch. I would not worry about anybody Complaining about it, I did it and when the guy came to fit the smart meter he said nothing and resealed the fuse afterwards as well as the isolator switch.

Richard


At the moment the most interesting options look like removing the mounting screws or cutting a temporary wooden guard panel & drilling the left.


Cheers everyone.
  #22   Report Post  
Posted to uk.d-i-y
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 34
Default CU cable entry

On Wed, 29 Apr 2020 11:14:53 -0700, tabbypurr wrote:

On Wednesday, 29 April 2020 11:29:12 UTC+1, alan_m wrote:
On 29/04/2020 10:14, tabbypurr wrote:

Interesting. Last time I used those, long ago, they severely
distorted the sheet they were punching. Is there some way to avoid
that?


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RxQE6mtRWCk

I've used them in the past without problems but are you sure that it
was the punch causing the distortion or you applying a sideways force
to the whole punch assembly and twisting the metal.


the metal was in free air, and the punch tightened with spanners. The
problem is that the punch cutting edge is not flat, so as it pushes 2
parts of the potential hole, the whole sheet wanted to follow it & get
very bent. I know punches sometimes work, but IMLE with them you need a
lot of surrounding metal to resist that urge to bend horribly.


You can get a Q-MAX Thrust Race to make winding in the punch much
easier and possibly help with with any unwanted forces you apply to the
structure you are working on


sure, not sure it's worth it for 1 or 2 holes.


NT


Cor! I used to cut holes in folded brass chassis for B7G and B9A valve
bases with Q-Max cutters sixty years ago......didn't know you could still
get them.
  #23   Report Post  
Posted to uk.d-i-y
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 43,017
Default CU cable entry

In article ,
wrote:
On Thursday, 30 April 2020 11:37:57 UTC+1, Dave Plowman (News) wrote:
In article ,
tabbypurr wrote:


Interesting. Last time I used those, long ago, they severely
distorted the sheet they were punching. Is there some way to avoid
that?


Get some decent quality ones? If the tolerances are poor, it won't
shear accurately.


The ones I was using were the Qmax you recommended.


What were you cutting? I've made loads and loads of holes with them in
various materials and not had a problem with distortion. Assuming you took
care using them, as it would obviously be possible to bend sheet steel by
the action of turning them with a spanner, etc. In thin sheet, where it
matters, I tend to use a T handle driver.

--
*No husband has ever been shot while doing the dishes *

Dave Plowman London SW
To e-mail, change noise into sound.
  #24   Report Post  
Posted to uk.d-i-y
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 43,017
Default CU cable entry

In article ,
John wrote:
Cor! I used to cut holes in folded brass chassis for B7G and B9A valve
bases with Q-Max cutters sixty years ago......didn't know you could still
get them.


Not sure there is any DIY alternative that makes a near perfect hole so
quickly?

--
*How do they get the deer to cross at that yellow road sign?

Dave Plowman London SW
To e-mail, change noise into sound.
  #25   Report Post  
Posted to uk.d-i-y
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 12,364
Default CU cable entry

On Thursday, 30 April 2020 14:56:33 UTC+1, Dave Plowman (News) wrote:
In article ,
tabbypurr wrote:
On Thursday, 30 April 2020 11:37:57 UTC+1, Dave Plowman (News) wrote:
In article ,
tabbypurr wrote:


Interesting. Last time I used those, long ago, they severely
distorted the sheet they were punching. Is there some way to avoid
that?

Get some decent quality ones? If the tolerances are poor, it won't
shear accurately.


The ones I was using were the Qmax you recommended.


What were you cutting?


boxes, mainly sheet ali. IIRC they were fine in plastic.

I've made loads and loads of holes with them in
various materials and not had a problem with distortion. Assuming you took
care using them, as it would obviously be possible to bend sheet steel by
the action of turning them with a spanner, etc.


With the metal in free air it's not going to see problematic torque.


In thin sheet, where it
matters, I tend to use a T handle driver.



  #26   Report Post  
Posted to uk.d-i-y
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 43,017
Default CU cable entry

In article ,
wrote:
On Thursday, 30 April 2020 14:56:33 UTC+1, Dave Plowman (News) wrote:
In article ,
tabbypurr wrote:
On Thursday, 30 April 2020 11:37:57 UTC+1, Dave Plowman (News)
wrote:
In article
,
tabbypurr wrote:


Interesting. Last time I used those, long ago, they severely
distorted the sheet they were punching. Is there some way to
avoid that?

Get some decent quality ones? If the tolerances are poor, it won't
shear accurately.


The ones I was using were the Qmax you recommended.


What were you cutting?


boxes, mainly sheet ali. IIRC they were fine in plastic.


I've made loads and loads of holes with them in various materials and
not had a problem with distortion. Assuming you took care using them,
as it would obviously be possible to bend sheet steel by the action of
turning them with a spanner, etc.


With the metal in free air it's not going to see problematic torque.


Given you'd normally hold the work while using the cutter, not so sure
about that.

But it sounds like you were using a worn cutter. If a common problem.


In thin sheet, where it matters, I tend to use a T handle driver.


--
*Virtual reality is its own reward *

Dave Plowman London SW
To e-mail, change noise into sound.
  #27   Report Post  
Posted to uk.d-i-y
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 12,364
Default CU cable entry

On Friday, 1 May 2020 11:34:24 UTC+1, Dave Plowman (News) wrote:
In article ,
tabbypurr wrote:
On Thursday, 30 April 2020 14:56:33 UTC+1, Dave Plowman (News) wrote:
In article ,
tabbypurr wrote:
On Thursday, 30 April 2020 11:37:57 UTC+1, Dave Plowman (News)
wrote:
In article
,
tabbypurr wrote:

Interesting. Last time I used those, long ago, they severely
distorted the sheet they were punching. Is there some way to
avoid that?

Get some decent quality ones? If the tolerances are poor, it won't
shear accurately.

The ones I was using were the Qmax you recommended.

What were you cutting?


boxes, mainly sheet ali. IIRC they were fine in plastic.


I've made loads and loads of holes with them in various materials and
not had a problem with distortion. Assuming you took care using them,
as it would obviously be possible to bend sheet steel by the action of
turning them with a spanner, etc.


With the metal in free air it's not going to see problematic torque.


Given you'd normally hold the work while using the cutter, not so sure
about that.

But it sounds like you were using a worn cutter. If a common problem.


They were brand new. I explained why it happened several posts back.


NT
  #28   Report Post  
Posted to uk.d-i-y
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 43,017
Default CU cable entry

In article ,
wrote:
On Friday, 1 May 2020 11:34:24 UTC+1, Dave Plowman (News) wrote:
In article ,
tabbypurr wrote:
On Thursday, 30 April 2020 14:56:33 UTC+1, Dave Plowman (News) wrote:
In article ,
tabbypurr wrote:
On Thursday, 30 April 2020 11:37:57 UTC+1, Dave Plowman (News)
wrote:
In article
,
tabbypurr wrote:

Interesting. Last time I used those, long ago, they severely
distorted the sheet they were punching. Is there some way to
avoid that?

Get some decent quality ones? If the tolerances are poor, it won't
shear accurately.

The ones I was using were the Qmax you recommended.

What were you cutting?


boxes, mainly sheet ali. IIRC they were fine in plastic.


I've made loads and loads of holes with them in various materials and
not had a problem with distortion. Assuming you took care using them,
as it would obviously be possible to bend sheet steel by the action of
turning them with a spanner, etc.


With the metal in free air it's not going to see problematic torque.


Given you'd normally hold the work while using the cutter, not so sure
about that.

But it sounds like you were using a worn cutter. If a common problem.


They were brand new. I explained why it happened several posts back.


Even the best tools need skill to give good results.


NT


--
*Verbs HAS to agree with their subjects *

Dave Plowman London SW
To e-mail, change noise into sound.
  #29   Report Post  
Posted to uk.d-i-y
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 12,364
Default CU cable entry

On Saturday, 2 May 2020 11:24:00 UTC+1, Dave Plowman (News) wrote:
In article ,
tabbypurr wrote:
On Friday, 1 May 2020 11:34:24 UTC+1, Dave Plowman (News) wrote:
In article ,
tabbypurr wrote:
On Thursday, 30 April 2020 14:56:33 UTC+1, Dave Plowman (News) wrote:
In article ,
tabbypurr wrote:
On Thursday, 30 April 2020 11:37:57 UTC+1, Dave Plowman (News)
wrote:
In article
,
tabbypurr wrote:

Interesting. Last time I used those, long ago, they severely
distorted the sheet they were punching. Is there some way to
avoid that?

Get some decent quality ones? If the tolerances are poor, it won't
shear accurately.

The ones I was using were the Qmax you recommended.

What were you cutting?

boxes, mainly sheet ali. IIRC they were fine in plastic.

I've made loads and loads of holes with them in various materials and
not had a problem with distortion. Assuming you took care using them,
as it would obviously be possible to bend sheet steel by the action of
turning them with a spanner, etc.

With the metal in free air it's not going to see problematic torque.

Given you'd normally hold the work while using the cutter, not so sure
about that.

But it sounds like you were using a worn cutter. If a common problem.


They were brand new. I explained why it happened several posts back.


Even the best tools need skill to give good results.


Sure. The relevant skill in this case being awareness of what cases punches are not suited for.


NT
  #30   Report Post  
Posted to uk.d-i-y
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,237
Default CU cable entry

wrote:

On Saturday, 2 May 2020 11:24:00 UTC+1, Dave Plowman (News) wrote:
In article ,
tabbypurr wrote:
On Friday, 1 May 2020 11:34:24 UTC+1, Dave Plowman (News) wrote:
In
article ,
tabbypurr wrote: On Thursday, 30 April 2020 14:56:33 UTC+1, Dave
Plowman (News) wrote: In article
,
tabbypurr wrote: On Thursday, 30 April 2020 11:37:57 UTC+1,
Dave Plowman (News)
wrote:
In article
,
tabbypurr wrote:

Interesting. Last time I used those, long ago, they severely
distorted the sheet they were punching. Is there some way to
avoid that?

Get some decent quality ones? If the tolerances are poor, it
won't shear accurately.

The ones I was using were the Qmax you recommended.

What were you cutting?

boxes, mainly sheet ali. IIRC they were fine in plastic.

I've made loads and loads of holes with them in various
materials and not had a problem with distortion. Assuming you
took care using them, as it would obviously be possible to bend
sheet steel by the action of turning them with a spanner, etc.

With the metal in free air it's not going to see problematic torque.

Given you'd normally hold the work while using the cutter, not so sure
about that.

But it sounds like you were using a worn cutter. If a common problem.


They were brand new. I explained why it happened several posts back.


Even the best tools need skill to give good results.


Sure. The relevant skill in this case being awareness of what cases
punches are not suited for.


NT


Another error is using them too near the edge of a thin sheet. DAMHIKT.

--

Roger Hayter


  #31   Report Post  
Posted to uk.d-i-y
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 12,364
Default CU cable entry

On Sunday, 3 May 2020 00:42:58 UTC+1, Roger Hayter wrote:
tabbypurr wrote:
On Saturday, 2 May 2020 11:24:00 UTC+1, Dave Plowman (News) wrote:
In article ,
tabbypurr wrote:
On Friday, 1 May 2020 11:34:24 UTC+1, Dave Plowman (News) wrote:
In
article ,
tabbypurr wrote: On Thursday, 30 April 2020 14:56:33 UTC+1, Dave
Plowman (News) wrote: In article
,
tabbypurr wrote: On Thursday, 30 April 2020 11:37:57 UTC+1,
Dave Plowman (News)
wrote:
In article
,
tabbypurr wrote:

Interesting. Last time I used those, long ago, they severely
distorted the sheet they were punching. Is there some way to
avoid that?

Get some decent quality ones? If the tolerances are poor, it
won't shear accurately.

The ones I was using were the Qmax you recommended.

What were you cutting?

boxes, mainly sheet ali. IIRC they were fine in plastic.

I've made loads and loads of holes with them in various
materials and not had a problem with distortion. Assuming you
took care using them, as it would obviously be possible to bend
sheet steel by the action of turning them with a spanner, etc..

With the metal in free air it's not going to see problematic torque.

Given you'd normally hold the work while using the cutter, not so sure
about that.

But it sounds like you were using a worn cutter. If a common problem.

They were brand new. I explained why it happened several posts back..

Even the best tools need skill to give good results.


Sure. The relevant skill in this case being awareness of what cases
punches are not suited for.


NT


Another error is using them too near the edge of a thin sheet. DAMHIKT.


That is precisely the problem. Hand operated qmax Punches use a non-flat cutting edge to keep peak forces within practical limits for human, screw thread & spanners. So the metal is at once trying to conform to both flatness and the bent steel created by the punching action. The lack of a large enough thick enough sheet causes distortion, sometimes severe enough to produce only scrap. That's what happened.

And in the current situation, once again holes are required near an unsupported edge. Don't really want to write off the CU, so the punch option seems risky.


NT
  #32   Report Post  
Posted to uk.d-i-y
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,237
Default CU cable entry

wrote:

On Sunday, 3 May 2020 00:42:58 UTC+1, Roger Hayter wrote:

snip


Another error is using them too near the edge of a thin sheet. DAMHIKT.


That is precisely the problem. Hand operated qmax Punches use a non-flat
cutting edge to keep peak forces within practical limits for human, screw
thread & spanners. So the metal is at once trying to conform to both
flatness and the bent steel created by the punching action. The lack of a
large enough thick enough sheet causes distortion, sometimes severe enough
to produce only scrap. That's what happened.

And in the current situation, once again holes are required near an
unsupported edge. Don't really want to write off the CU, so the punch
option seems risky.


NT

If there's room, how about clamping the edge in a vice? I've never
tried it, though.

--

Roger Hayter
  #33   Report Post  
Posted to uk.d-i-y
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 43,017
Default CU cable entry

In article ,
wrote:
Even the best tools need skill to give good results.


Sure. The relevant skill in this case being awareness of what cases
punches are not suited for.


Was trying to get you to state exactly when this was the case. Type of
material and thickness. How close to an edge. And so on.

--
*When did my wild oats turn to prunes and all bran?

Dave Plowman London SW
To e-mail, change noise into sound.
  #34   Report Post  
Posted to uk.d-i-y
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 43,017
Default CU cable entry

In article ,
Roger Hayter wrote:
Sure. The relevant skill in this case being awareness of what cases
punches are not suited for.


NT


Another error is using them too near the edge of a thin sheet. DAMHIKT.


True - but if too close to an edge you'd not be able to fit a gland or
grommet etc. I've used them happily to cut a half moon out of ally plate.

--
*Why do overlook and oversee mean opposite things? *

Dave Plowman London SW
To e-mail, change noise into sound.
  #35   Report Post  
Posted to uk.d-i-y
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 12,364
Default CU cable entry

On Sunday, 3 May 2020 11:25:06 UTC+1, Roger Hayter wrote:
tabbypurr wrote:
On Sunday, 3 May 2020 00:42:58 UTC+1, Roger Hayter wrote:

snip


Another error is using them too near the edge of a thin sheet. DAMHIKT.


That is precisely the problem. Hand operated qmax Punches use a non-flat
cutting edge to keep peak forces within practical limits for human, screw
thread & spanners. So the metal is at once trying to conform to both
flatness and the bent steel created by the punching action. The lack of a
large enough thick enough sheet causes distortion, sometimes severe enough
to produce only scrap. That's what happened.

And in the current situation, once again holes are required near an
unsupported edge. Don't really want to write off the CU, so the punch
option seems risky.


NT

If there's room, how about clamping the edge in a vice? I've never
tried it, though.


Not a bad idea. Dangle iron & bolts would do.


NT


  #36   Report Post  
Posted to uk.d-i-y
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 12,364
Default CU cable entry

On Sunday, 3 May 2020 12:46:10 UTC+1, Dave Plowman (News) wrote:
In article ,
Roger Hayter wrote:


Sure. The relevant skill in this case being awareness of what cases
punches are not suited for.


NT


Another error is using them too near the edge of a thin sheet. DAMHIKT.


True - but if too close to an edge you'd not be able to fit a gland or
grommet etc.


nonsense

I've used them happily to cut a half moon out of ally plate.

  #37   Report Post  
Posted to uk.d-i-y
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 43,017
Default CU cable entry

In article ,
wrote:
Another error is using them too near the edge of a thin sheet.
DAMHIKT.


True - but if too close to an edge you'd not be able to fit a gland or
grommet etc.


nonsense


Have it your own way, pet.

--
*Why doesn't glue stick to the inside of the bottle?

Dave Plowman London SW
To e-mail, change noise into sound.
  #38   Report Post  
Posted to uk.d-i-y
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 12,364
Default CU cable entry

On Sunday, 3 May 2020 16:46:00 UTC+1, Dave Plowman (News) wrote:
In article ,
tabbypurr wrote:


Another error is using them too near the edge of a thin sheet.
DAMHIKT.

True - but if too close to an edge you'd not be able to fit a gland or
grommet etc.


nonsense


Have it your own way, pet.


I've done it before. You just keep trolling.
  #39   Report Post  
Posted to uk.d-i-y
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 43,017
Default CU cable entry

In article ,
wrote:
On Sunday, 3 May 2020 16:46:00 UTC+1, Dave Plowman (News) wrote:
In article ,
tabbypurr wrote:


Another error is using them too near the edge of a thin sheet.
DAMHIKT.

True - but if too close to an edge you'd not be able to fit a gland or
grommet etc.


nonsense


Have it your own way, pet.


I've done it before. You just keep trolling.


How many Q-max cutters do you have? I count about a dozen here - including
ones which do other than a round hole.

Odd I manage to use them without bending the material.

--
*Seen it all, done it all, can't remember most of it*

Dave Plowman London SW
To e-mail, change noise into sound.
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
"rear cable entry" outside lights Jim K[_3_] UK diy 5 November 6th 12 04:26 PM
Xpelair GXC6 rear cable entry Mike Clarke UK diy 6 June 24th 09 09:38 PM
Beefing up the cable entry to ps box N Cook Electronics Repair 2 January 9th 08 08:08 PM
Service Entry Cable caused partial blackout in my house? [email protected] Home Repair 10 August 5th 06 03:27 PM
Sealer for Cable Entry TheScullster UK diy 4 May 9th 05 08:58 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:39 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 DIYbanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about DIY & home improvement"