Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
UK diy (uk.d-i-y) For the discussion of all topics related to diy (do-it-yourself) in the UK. All levels of experience and proficency are welcome to join in to ask questions or offer solutions. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]()
Posted to uk.rec.cars.maintenance,uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I've just replaced the front discs and pads on my wife's 20-year-old
Ford Puma, and I have a query about the so called retaining clips. They are made of highly tempered steel wire and the free ends plug into holes in the caliper. They have loops which hook behind lugs on the caliper carrier. They look like this: https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/292224457537?ul_noapp=true According to my Haynes Fiesta manual (Haynes don't do a Puma manual, but the running gear is the same as a 1995-onwards Fiesta) they look like this when fitted: https://app.box.com/s/jelr78aedt1uandeka74e05dnqjc8bq8 Anyone know what their function is? Is the middle bit supposed to contact the back of the pad? Mine don't - by 2 or 3 mm - see: https://app.box.com/s/b8vaov18obat0kvldauu8bzt5r16vjrx Sadly, I didn't make a careful enough note of what they originally looked like before I removed them. I wonder whether I have put them back correctly - but I can't see any other way they could go. The loops look as if they should go further onto the lugs - but if I tap the free ends further into the holes, they pivot on the caliper body and the loops move *outwards* rather than inwards. Any informed comment will be greatly appreciated. -- Cheers, Roger |
#2
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 25 Jan 2020 20:23:58 +0000, Roger Mills
wrote: I've just replaced the front discs and pads on my wife's 20-year-old Ford Puma, and I have a query about the so called retaining clips. They are made of highly tempered steel wire and the free ends plug into holes in the caliper. They have loops which hook behind lugs on the caliper carrier. They look like this: https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/292224457537?ul_noapp=true According to my Haynes Fiesta manual (Haynes don't do a Puma manual, but the running gear is the same as a 1995-onwards Fiesta) they look like this when fitted: https://app.box.com/s/jelr78aedt1uandeka74e05dnqjc8bq8 Anyone know what their function is? Is the middle bit supposed to contact the back of the pad? Mine don't - by 2 or 3 mm - see: https://app.box.com/s/b8vaov18obat0kvldauu8bzt5r16vjrx Aren't they just to provide a bit of resistance between the moving parts of the caliper to stop them moving too easily? Sadly, I didn't make a careful enough note of what they originally looked like before I removed them. I wonder whether I have put them back correctly - but I can't see any other way they could go. The loops look as if they should go further onto the lugs - but if I tap the free ends further into the holes, they pivot on the caliper body and the loops move *outwards* rather than inwards. Any informed comment will be greatly appreciated. Assuming everything is sitting in the right place, then I think that looks right, assuming the clips are the same design / size as the ones you took out? Your digital camera is your friend on this sort of thing (before you take it to bits). ;-) Cheers, T i m |
#3
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 25/01/2020 21:15, T i m wrote:
On Sat, 25 Jan 2020 20:23:58 +0000, Roger Mills wrote: I've just replaced the front discs and pads on my wife's 20-year-old Ford Puma, and I have a query about the so called retaining clips. They are made of highly tempered steel wire and the free ends plug into holes in the caliper. They have loops which hook behind lugs on the caliper carrier. They look like this: https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/292224457537?ul_noapp=true According to my Haynes Fiesta manual (Haynes don't do a Puma manual, but the running gear is the same as a 1995-onwards Fiesta) they look like this when fitted: https://app.box.com/s/jelr78aedt1uandeka74e05dnqjc8bq8 Anyone know what their function is? Is the middle bit supposed to contact the back of the pad? Mine don't - by 2 or 3 mm - see: https://app.box.com/s/b8vaov18obat0kvldauu8bzt5r16vjrx Aren't they just to provide a bit of resistance between the moving parts of the caliper to stop them moving too easily? Sadly, I didn't make a careful enough note of what they originally looked like before I removed them. I wonder whether I have put them back correctly - but I can't see any other way they could go. The loops look as if they should go further onto the lugs - but if I tap the free ends further into the holes, they pivot on the caliper body and the loops move *outwards* rather than inwards. Any informed comment will be greatly appreciated. Assuming everything is sitting in the right place, then I think that looks right, assuming the clips are the same design / size as the ones you took out? Thanks. They're the original clips - I didn't get new ones. [The Ebay link was to show what the clips look like when not installed] I'd still like to know what their function is. If, for example, it's to damp lateral oscillations of the caliper on its carrier, it doesn't need to be in contact with the pad. But if it's to push the pad away from the end of the caliper when the brakes are not applied - which would, in turn, retract the piston a bit and provide more clearance and less drag between pads and disc - it *would* need to contact the pad. I just don't know. It definitely doesn't retain anything. Nothing would fall off it it wasn't there. Your digital camera is your friend on this sort of thing (before you take it to bits). ;-) Yes, I know - and I usually do. But I erroneously deemed it unnecessary on this occasion! -- Cheers, Roger |
#4
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 25 Jan 2020 22:49:05 +0000, Roger Mills
wrote: snip Assuming everything is sitting in the right place, then I think that looks right, assuming the clips are the same design / size as the ones you took out? Thanks. They're the original clips - I didn't get new ones. [The Ebay link was to show what the clips look like when not installed] I'd still like to know what their function is. If, for example, it's to damp lateral oscillations of the caliper on its carrier, it doesn't need to be in contact with the pad. I believe that's their purpose. And to stop the floating caliper cover from flopping about, assuming the pins allowed such etc. But if it's to push the pad away from the end of the caliper when the brakes are not applied - which would, in turn, retract the piston a bit and provide more clearance and less drag between pads and disc - it *would* need to contact the pad. No, I don't believe it's for that Roger. I just don't know. It definitely doesn't retain anything. Nothing would fall off it it wasn't there. Quite. The only thing it might do is hold the caliper cover in place when you undid the two retaining pins (but only while you were working on it etc). Your digital camera is your friend on this sort of thing (before you take it to bits). ;-) Yes, I know - and I usually do. But I erroneously deemed it unnecessary on this occasion! Doh! ;-) As mentioned, as long as everything else is in place then the clip only needs to be pushed in till the main part was flush with the outer part of the cover. The key thing is that nothing would fail even if they weren't fitted, they just keep the two caliper halves under a bit of tension / control to stop them slopping about (as I don't believe the clips would resist against much else). A third opinion is a good thing though. ;-) Cheers, T i m |
#5
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Saturday, 25 January 2020 20:24:05 UTC, Roger Mills wrote:
I've just replaced the front discs and pads on my wife's 20-year-old Ford Puma, and I have a query about the so called retaining clips. They are made of highly tempered steel wire and the free ends plug into holes in the caliper. They have loops which hook behind lugs on the caliper carrier. They look like this: https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/292224457537?ul_noapp=true According to my Haynes Fiesta manual (Haynes don't do a Puma manual, but the running gear is the same as a 1995-onwards Fiesta) they look like this when fitted: https://app.box.com/s/jelr78aedt1uandeka74e05dnqjc8bq8 Anyone know what their function is? Is the middle bit supposed to contact the back of the pad? Mine don't - by 2 or 3 mm - see: https://app.box.com/s/b8vaov18obat0kvldauu8bzt5r16vjrx Sadly, I didn't make a careful enough note of what they originally looked like before I removed them. I wonder whether I have put them back correctly - but I can't see any other way they could go. The loops look as if they should go further onto the lugs - but if I tap the free ends further into the holes, they pivot on the caliper body and the loops move *outwards* rather than inwards. Any informed comment will be greatly appreciated. Their purpose is "anti-squeal" Stops high frequency vibration when the brakes are applied. There are various designs https://carsmobilemechanic.co.uk/bra...you-need-them/ |
#6
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 25 Jan 2020 22:42:30 -0800 (PST), harry
wrote: snip Any informed comment will be greatly appreciated. Their purpose is "anti-squeal" Stops high frequency vibration when the brakes are applied. There are various designs https://carsmobilemechanic.co.uk/bra...you-need-them/ Most 'anti-squeal' solutions go between the pad and caliper / piston in some way. I believe what Roger has there are more 'anti-rattle' clips that keep a bit of tension between the two caliper components, stopping them and the pads from clunking about as you go over bumps or steer etc (although there is some crossover on some designs). Cheers, T i m |
#7
![]()
Posted to uk.rec.cars.maintenance,uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Roger Mills wrote: I've just replaced the front discs and pads on my wife's 20-year-old Ford Puma, and I have a query about the so called retaining clips. They are made of highly tempered steel wire and the free ends plug into holes in the caliper. They have loops which hook behind lugs on the caliper carrier. They look like this: They're not retaining clips. They are correctly anti-rattle springs. Which may also reduce the chances of brake squeal. -- *No I haven't stolen it , I'm just a **** driver* Dave Plowman London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound. |
#8
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 25/01/2020 22:49, Roger Mills wrote:
On 25/01/2020 21:15, T i m wrote: Thanks. They're the original clips - I didn't get new ones. [The Ebay link was to show what the clips look like when not installed] Old ones may have deformed a bit over time. I never understood why this happened at ordinary temperatures until I asked a very good metallurgist from an automotive background. Even tempered carbon steel has microcracks within the structure and you can get plastic deformation at these sites that relieves local stresses. Riders of old british motorbikes will know how valve springs shorten over time. Inlets as well as exhausts, although the exhausts shorten more. Car suspension springs also shorten a bit. |
#9
![]()
Posted to uk.rec.cars.maintenance,uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 26/01/2020 11:14, Dave Plowman (News) wrote:
In article , Roger Mills wrote: I've just replaced the front discs and pads on my wife's 20-year-old Ford Puma, and I have a query about the so called retaining clips. They are made of highly tempered steel wire and the free ends plug into holes in the caliper. They have loops which hook behind lugs on the caliper carrier. They look like this: They're not retaining clips. They are correctly anti-rattle springs. Which may also reduce the chances of brake squeal. You mean that they stop the caliper from rattling on its carrier? In that case, mine are probably fitted correctly. Do they look ok to you? [Link to photo in my original post] -- Cheers, Roger |
#10
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 26 Jan 2020 11:14:03 +0000 (GMT), "Dave Plowman (News)"
wrote: In article , Roger Mills wrote: I've just replaced the front discs and pads on my wife's 20-year-old Ford Puma, and I have a query about the so called retaining clips. They are made of highly tempered steel wire and the free ends plug into holes in the caliper. They have loops which hook behind lugs on the caliper carrier. They look like this: They're not retaining clips. They are correctly anti-rattle springs. Yup. Which may also reduce the chances of brake squeal. Because they help keep the parts together there is less chance of any rust / brake dust buildup holding the pads away from the rotor slightly and then squealing? Cheers, T i m |
#11
![]()
Posted to uk.rec.cars.maintenance,uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 26/01/2020 10:58, Jethro_uk wrote:
On Sat, 25 Jan 2020 20:23:58 +0000, Roger Mills wrote: I've just replaced the front discs and pads on my wife's 20-year-old Ford Puma, and I have a query about the so called retaining clips. They are made of highly tempered steel wire and the free ends plug into holes in the caliper. They have loops which hook behind lugs on the caliper carrier. They look like this: https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/292224457537?ul_noapp=true According to my Haynes Fiesta manual (Haynes don't do a Puma manual, but the running gear is the same as a 1995-onwards Fiesta) they look like this when fitted: https://app.box.com/s/jelr78aedt1uandeka74e05dnqjc8bq8 Anyone know what their function is? Is the middle bit supposed to contact the back of the pad? Mine don't - by 2 or 3 mm - see: https://app.box.com/s/b8vaov18obat0kvldauu8bzt5r16vjrx Sadly, I didn't make a careful enough note of what they originally looked like before I removed them. I wonder whether I have put them back correctly - but I can't see any other way they could go. The loops look as if they should go further onto the lugs - but if I tap the free ends further into the holes, they pivot on the caliper body and the loops move *outwards* rather than inwards. Any informed comment will be greatly appreciated. Aren't they meant to stop the shim that the caliper "floats" on from floating away ? Don't think so. There are no shims on my setup. The single piston caliper can move sideways on its guide pins in order to centre the pads on the disc. But no shims to "float away". -- Cheers, Roger |
#12
![]()
Posted to uk.rec.cars.maintenance,uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Roger Mills wrote: On 26/01/2020 11:14, Dave Plowman (News) wrote: In article , Roger Mills wrote: I've just replaced the front discs and pads on my wife's 20-year-old Ford Puma, and I have a query about the so called retaining clips. They are made of highly tempered steel wire and the free ends plug into holes in the caliper. They have loops which hook behind lugs on the caliper carrier. They look like this: They're not retaining clips. They are correctly anti-rattle springs. Which may also reduce the chances of brake squeal. You mean that they stop the caliper from rattling on its carrier? In that case, mine are probably fitted correctly. Do they look ok to you? [Link to photo in my original post] Just had a look - sorry, not familiar with that type of caliper. -- *What happens when none of your bees wax? * Dave Plowman London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound. |
#13
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 26 Jan 2020 12:28:55 +0000, Roger Mills
wrote: On 26/01/2020 11:14, Dave Plowman (News) wrote: In article , Roger Mills wrote: I've just replaced the front discs and pads on my wife's 20-year-old Ford Puma, and I have a query about the so called retaining clips. They are made of highly tempered steel wire and the free ends plug into holes in the caliper. They have loops which hook behind lugs on the caliper carrier. They look like this: They're not retaining clips. They are correctly anti-rattle springs. Which may also reduce the chances of brake squeal. You mean that they stop the caliper from rattling on its carrier? No, not really, as the pins are usually a close sliding fit and there are often bellows to keep the dirt and dust out so they don't (typically) wear that much (if maintained properly). In that case, mine are probably fitted correctly. Yes, assuming they are the right clips for that caliper (and the eBay link suggested they were) then they can't really be fitted any other way to do what they were designed to do.. Do they look ok to you? [Link to photo in my original post] Yes. If the caliper bits were allowed to just float about and assuming the piston(s) were very freely moving then you can get 'slack' in the sandwich, allowing the pads and moving caliper component(s) to clatter as you went over bumps and allow for more slack to take up when you pressed the pedal. By providing a bit of resistance (the spring in the clip), things stay together better and when the pads / rotor wear, the looped ends of the clips can move (slide) to compensate. Cheers, T i m |
#14
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 26 Jan 2020 12:28:55 +0000, Roger Mills
wrote: snip You mean that they stop the caliper from rattling on its carrier? In that case, mine are probably fitted correctly. Do they look ok to you? [Link to photo in my original post] To potentially put your mind at rest, the following link should be to a picture of a similar caliper with similar clips fitted to a Mazda: https://s33.postimg.cc/r7vkx9sov/Aftermarket_side_1.jpg And a Volvo: https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQlkTa0IoN4q0h0WgV99ekrLN1Q5S0Vz LxnXsiRgfTM3bvyXf1uIw&s And an Audi: https://www.audiforums.com/forum/attachments/diy-do-yourself-55/32082d1501219592-diy-b5-control-arms-tie-rod-end-assemblies-part-1-preparation-frontsuspension.jpg https://www.audiforums.com/forum/attachments/diy-do-yourself-55/32083d1501219592-diy-b5-control-arms-tie-rod-end-assemblies-part-1-preparation-removeclip.jpg HTH. ;-) Cheers, T i m |
#15
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 26/01/2020 13:49, T i m wrote:
On Sun, 26 Jan 2020 12:28:55 +0000, Roger Mills wrote: On 26/01/2020 11:14, Dave Plowman (News) wrote: In article , Roger Mills wrote: I've just replaced the front discs and pads on my wife's 20-year-old Ford Puma, and I have a query about the so called retaining clips. They are made of highly tempered steel wire and the free ends plug into holes in the caliper. They have loops which hook behind lugs on the caliper carrier. They look like this: They're not retaining clips. They are correctly anti-rattle springs. Which may also reduce the chances of brake squeal. You mean that they stop the caliper from rattling on its carrier? No, not really, as the pins are usually a close sliding fit and there are often bellows to keep the dirt and dust out so they don't (typically) wear that much (if maintained properly). In that case, mine are probably fitted correctly. Yes, assuming they are the right clips for that caliper (and the eBay link suggested they were) then they can't really be fitted any other way to do what they were designed to do.. Yes, they're the *original* clips. The Ebay link was just for illustration - I haven't bought any. Incidentally, buying brake bits for that car is slightly fraught because Ford started fitting larger discs and pads part-way through 2000 - and mine predates the change. The first set of discs and pads I bought were too big, and I had to send them back. Presumably the calipers - and probably the clips - changed at the same time Do they look ok to you? [Link to photo in my original post] Yes. If the caliper bits were allowed to just float about and assuming the piston(s) were very freely moving then you can get 'slack' in the sandwich, allowing the pads and moving caliper component(s) to clatter as you went over bumps and allow for more slack to take up when you pressed the pedal. By providing a bit of resistance (the spring in the clip), things stay together better and when the pads / rotor wear, the looped ends of the clips can move (slide) to compensate. Yes, that makes sense - thanks. -- Cheers, Roger |
#16
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 26/01/2020 14:19, T i m wrote:
On Sun, 26 Jan 2020 12:28:55 +0000, Roger Mills wrote: snip You mean that they stop the caliper from rattling on its carrier? In that case, mine are probably fitted correctly. Do they look ok to you? [Link to photo in my original post] To potentially put your mind at rest, the following link should be to a picture of a similar caliper with similar clips fitted to a Mazda: https://s33.postimg.cc/r7vkx9sov/Aftermarket_side_1.jpg And a Volvo: https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQlkTa0IoN4q0h0WgV99ekrLN1Q5S0Vz LxnXsiRgfTM3bvyXf1uIw&s And an Audi: https://www.audiforums.com/forum/attachments/diy-do-yourself-55/32082d1501219592-diy-b5-control-arms-tie-rod-end-assemblies-part-1-preparation-frontsuspension.jpg https://www.audiforums.com/forum/attachments/diy-do-yourself-55/32083d1501219592-diy-b5-control-arms-tie-rod-end-assemblies-part-1-preparation-removeclip.jpg HTH. ;-) Cheers, T i m Thanks for those links. The Mazda looks very much like mine - and the others are quite similar. I reckon mine are ok - and I'll stop worrying about them! -- Cheers, Roger |
#17
![]()
Posted to uk.rec.cars.maintenance,uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 25/01/2020 20:23:58, Roger Mills wrote:
I've just replaced the front discs and pads on my wife's 20-year-old Ford Puma, and I have a query about the so called retaining clips. They are made of highly tempered steel wire and the free ends plug into holes in the caliper. They have loops which hook behind lugs on the caliper carrier. They look like this: https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/292224457537?ul_noapp=true According to my Haynes Fiesta manual (Haynes don't do a Puma manual, but the running gear is the same as a 1995-onwards Fiesta) they look like this when fitted: https://app.box.com/s/jelr78aedt1uandeka74e05dnqjc8bq8 Anyone know what their function is? Is the middle bit supposed to contact the back of the pad? Mine don't - by 2 or 3 mm - see: https://app.box.com/s/b8vaov18obat0kvldauu8bzt5r16vjrx Sadly, I didn't make a careful enough note of what they originally looked like before I removed them. I wonder whether I have put them back correctly - but I can't see any other way they could go. The loops look as if they should go further onto the lugs - but if I tap the free ends further into the holes, they pivot on the caliper body and the loops move *outwards* rather than inwards. Any informed comment will be greatly appreciated. Youtube is a good resource for reference. Look at 50s into this, it's for a Ford Focus but looks the same as yours: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YWNT3Sa0pFM |
#18
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 26 Jan 2020 15:09:04 +0000, Roger Mills
wrote: On 26/01/2020 13:49, T i m wrote: On Sun, 26 Jan 2020 12:28:55 +0000, Roger Mills wrote: On 26/01/2020 11:14, Dave Plowman (News) wrote: In article , Roger Mills wrote: I've just replaced the front discs and pads on my wife's 20-year-old Ford Puma, and I have a query about the so called retaining clips. They are made of highly tempered steel wire and the free ends plug into holes in the caliper. They have loops which hook behind lugs on the caliper carrier. They look like this: They're not retaining clips. They are correctly anti-rattle springs. Which may also reduce the chances of brake squeal. You mean that they stop the caliper from rattling on its carrier? No, not really, as the pins are usually a close sliding fit and there are often bellows to keep the dirt and dust out so they don't (typically) wear that much (if maintained properly). In that case, mine are probably fitted correctly. Yes, assuming they are the right clips for that caliper (and the eBay link suggested they were) then they can't really be fitted any other way to do what they were designed to do.. Yes, they're the *original* clips. Well, unless you have had the car from new and only serviced it yourself (or never had it serviced) how can you be sure they are the original clips (and my point etc). The Ebay link was just for illustration - I haven't bought any. I know, you said. ;-) Incidentally, buying brake bits for that car is slightly fraught because Ford started fitting larger discs and pads part-way through 2000 - and mine predates the change. The first set of discs and pads I bought were too big, and I had to send them back. Presumably the calipers - and probably the clips - changed at the same time Whilst I've always liked Fords (and built the kitcar from one) ... they had a reputation for (supposedly) using whatever bits were available at the time. ;-) Do they look ok to you? [Link to photo in my original post] Yes. If the caliper bits were allowed to just float about and assuming the piston(s) were very freely moving then you can get 'slack' in the sandwich, allowing the pads and moving caliper component(s) to clatter as you went over bumps and allow for more slack to take up when you pressed the pedal. By providing a bit of resistance (the spring in the clip), things stay together better and when the pads / rotor wear, the looped ends of the clips can move (slide) to compensate. Yes, that makes sense - thanks. You are welcome. Cheers, T i m |
#19
![]()
Posted to uk.rec.cars.maintenance,uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 26/01/2020 12:28, Roger Mills wrote:
On 26/01/2020 11:14, Dave Plowman (News) wrote: In article , Â*Â*Â* Roger Mills wrote: I've just replaced the front discs and pads on my wife's 20-year-old Ford Puma, and I have a query about the so called retaining clips. They are made of highly tempered steel wire and the free ends plug into holes in the caliper. They have loops which hook behind lugs on the caliper carrier. They look like this: They're not retaining clips. They are correctly anti-rattle springs. Which may also reduce the chances of brake squeal. You mean that they stop the caliper from rattling on its carrier? In that case, mine are probably fitted correctly. Do they look ok to you? [Link to photo in my original post] I think the wire loop at the upper end could do with being pushed a bit further in. |
#20
![]()
Posted to uk.rec.cars.maintenance,uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 25/01/2020 20:23, Roger Mills wrote:
I've just replaced the front discs and pads on my wife's 20-year-old Ford Puma, and I have a query about the so called retaining clips. They are made of highly tempered steel wire and the free ends plug into holes in the caliper. They have loops which hook behind lugs on the caliper carrier. They look like this: https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/292224457537?ul_noapp=true According to my Haynes Fiesta manual (Haynes don't do a Puma manual, but the running gear is the same as a 1995-onwards Fiesta) they look like this when fitted: https://app.box.com/s/jelr78aedt1uandeka74e05dnqjc8bq8 Anyone know what their function is? Is the middle bit supposed to contact the back of the pad? Mine don't - by 2 or 3 mm - see: https://app.box.com/s/b8vaov18obat0kvldauu8bzt5r16vjrx Sadly, I didn't make a careful enough note of what they originally looked like before I removed them. I wonder whether I have put them back correctly - but I can't see any other way they could go. The loops look as if they should go further onto the lugs - but if I tap the free ends further into the holes, they pivot on the caliper body and the loops move *outwards* rather than inwards. Any informed comment will be greatly appreciated. That spring wire pulls the caliper toward its bracket, taking up any play on the sliding pins, and stops the caliper shaking about. It does not touch the pad. New ones are easily obtained, running without them will not stop the brakes working, but you might get sqeal or shudder. |
#21
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 25 Jan 2020 22:49:05 +0000, Roger Mills wrote:
Anyone know what their function is? Is the middle bit supposed to contact the back of the pad? Mine don't - by 2 or 3 mm Your digital camera is your friend on this sort of thing (before you take it to bits). ;-) Yes, I know - and I usually do. But I erroneously deemed it unnecessary on this occasion! Fall back to examination of the removed bits for marks left where bits contact each other. -- Cheers Dave. |
#22
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 26/01/2020 16:03, T i m wrote:
On Sun, 26 Jan 2020 15:09:04 +0000, Roger Mills wrote: Yes, they're the *original* clips. Well, unless you have had the car from new and only serviced it yourself (or never had it serviced) how can you be sure they are the original clips (and my point etc). True. However, we *have* had the car from new and its only done about 35,000 miles in its 20 year life. I haven't serviced it myself, but know that the discs and/or pads haven't previously been replaced - so there's no reason why the clips would have been replaced. -- Cheers, Roger |
#23
![]()
Posted to uk.rec.cars.maintenance,uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 27/01/2020 07:52, Peter Hill wrote:
On 26/01/2020 12:28, Roger Mills wrote: On 26/01/2020 11:14, Dave Plowman (News) wrote: In article , Â*Â*Â* Roger Mills wrote: I've just replaced the front discs and pads on my wife's 20-year-old Ford Puma, and I have a query about the so called retaining clips. They are made of highly tempered steel wire and the free ends plug into holes in the caliper. They have loops which hook behind lugs on the caliper carrier. They look like this: They're not retaining clips. They are correctly anti-rattle springs. Which may also reduce the chances of brake squeal. You mean that they stop the caliper from rattling on its carrier? In that case, mine are probably fitted correctly. Do they look ok to you? [Link to photo in my original post] I think the wire loop at the upper end could do with being pushed a bit further in. I agree that it looks that way - but if I try, it pivots on the caliper and starts to push the raw end out of its hole. It should move further in as the pads wear - but may take a while. the previous ones lasted 20 years! -- Cheers, Roger |
#24
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 27/01/2020 09:45, Dave Liquorice wrote:
On Sat, 25 Jan 2020 22:49:05 +0000, Roger Mills wrote: Anyone know what their function is? Is the middle bit supposed to contact the back of the pad? Mine don't - by 2 or 3 mm Your digital camera is your friend on this sort of thing (before you take it to bits). ;-) Yes, I know - and I usually do. But I erroneously deemed it unnecessary on this occasion! Fall back to examination of the removed bits for marks left where bits contact each other. Trouble is that, after fitting new pads, the caliper and its carrier end up in different relative position. So a photo may not have helped anyway. But many thanks to all who have replied. I now feel happy that they're ok. [The discs and pads were an "advisory" in the previous MOT (last March) so I have replaced them myself at an all-in cost of £35 rather than paying the garage about £200 to do it. I don't want them to be able to criticise what I've done when they MOT it this March]. -- Cheers, Roger |
#25
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 27 Jan 2020 13:52:31 -0000, Roger Mills wrote:
On 27/01/2020 09:45, Dave Liquorice wrote: On Sat, 25 Jan 2020 22:49:05 +0000, Roger Mills wrote: Anyone know what their function is? Is the middle bit supposed to contact the back of the pad? Mine don't - by 2 or 3 mm Your digital camera is your friend on this sort of thing (before you take it to bits). ;-) Yes, I know - and I usually do. But I erroneously deemed it unnecessary on this occasion! Fall back to examination of the removed bits for marks left where bits contact each other. Trouble is that, after fitting new pads, the caliper and its carrier end up in different relative position. So a photo may not have helped anyway. But many thanks to all who have replied. I now feel happy that they're ok. [The discs and pads were an "advisory" in the previous MOT (last March) so I have replaced them myself at an all-in cost of £35 rather than paying the garage about £200 to do it. I don't want them to be able to criticise what I've done when they MOT it this March]. You fixed something before it was required?! I'd have waited to see if it was upgraded from advisory to "must" on the next MOT. |
#26
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y,uk.rec.cars.maintenance
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 26 Jan 2020 at 15:32:55 GMT, "Fredxx" wrote:
On 25/01/2020 20:23:58, Roger Mills wrote: I've just replaced the front discs and pads on my wife's 20-year-old Ford Puma, and I have a query about the so called retaining clips. They are made of highly tempered steel wire and the free ends plug into holes in the caliper. They have loops which hook behind lugs on the caliper carrier. They look like this: https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/292224457537?ul_noapp=true According to my Haynes Fiesta manual (Haynes don't do a Puma manual, but the running gear is the same as a 1995-onwards Fiesta) they look like this when fitted: https://app.box.com/s/jelr78aedt1uandeka74e05dnqjc8bq8 Anyone know what their function is? Is the middle bit supposed to contact the back of the pad? Mine don't - by 2 or 3 mm - see: https://app.box.com/s/b8vaov18obat0kvldauu8bzt5r16vjrx Sadly, I didn't make a careful enough note of what they originally looked like before I removed them. I wonder whether I have put them back correctly - but I can't see any other way they could go. The loops look as if they should go further onto the lugs - but if I tap the free ends further into the holes, they pivot on the caliper body and the loops move *outwards* rather than inwards. Any informed comment will be greatly appreciated. Youtube is a good resource for reference. Look at 50s into this, it's for a Ford Focus but looks the same as yours: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YWNT3Sa0pFM Good guide - and the end of the video shows the clip is not in contact with the pad. Very odd section on bleeding the brakes . . . |
#27
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 27 Jan 2020 13:38:16 +0000, Roger Mills
wrote: On 26/01/2020 16:03, T i m wrote: On Sun, 26 Jan 2020 15:09:04 +0000, Roger Mills wrote: Yes, they're the *original* clips. Well, unless you have had the car from new and only serviced it yourself (or never had it serviced) how can you be sure they are the original clips (and my point etc). True. Phew, we got there in the end. ;-) I was making the point because it's dangerous to assuming that because you found something some way that was the way it was intended to be, *unless* you can minimise that by knowing it had come out of the factory like that (but it's still possibly it was incorrect from the factory etc (hence recalls etc)). 'Original clips' could have meant they hadn't been replaced by you / this time round (and hence the qualification). However, we *have* had the car from new and its only done about 35,000 miles in its 20 year life. I haven't serviced it myself, but know that the discs and/or pads haven't previously been replaced - so there's no reason why the clips would have been replaced. Agreed. So that's *officially* another question we can (probably) cross off the list then. ;-) Cheers, T i m |
#28
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 25/01/2020 21:15, T i m wrote:
On Sat, 25 Jan 2020 20:23:58 +0000, Roger Mills wrote: I've just replaced the front discs and pads on my wife's 20-year-old Ford Puma, and I have a query about the so called retaining clips. They are made of highly tempered steel wire and the free ends plug into holes in the caliper. They have loops which hook behind lugs on the caliper carrier. They look like this: https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/292224457537?ul_noapp=true According to my Haynes Fiesta manual (Haynes don't do a Puma manual, but the running gear is the same as a 1995-onwards Fiesta) they look like this when fitted: https://app.box.com/s/jelr78aedt1uandeka74e05dnqjc8bq8 Anyone know what their function is? Is the middle bit supposed to contact the back of the pad? Mine don't - by 2 or 3 mm - see: https://app.box.com/s/b8vaov18obat0kvldauu8bzt5r16vjrx Aren't they just to provide a bit of resistance between the moving parts of the caliper to stop them moving too easily? Sadly, I didn't make a careful enough note of what they originally looked like before I removed them. I wonder whether I have put them back correctly - but I can't see any other way they could go. The loops look as if they should go further onto the lugs - but if I tap the free ends further into the holes, they pivot on the caliper body and the loops move *outwards* rather than inwards. Any informed comment will be greatly appreciated. Assuming everything is sitting in the right place, then I think that looks right, assuming the clips are the same design / size as the ones you took out? Your digital camera is your friend on this sort of thing (before you take it to bits). ;-) Doing one side at a time is even better - a full, 3d item to inspect from all angles and copy! SteveW |
#29
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y,uk.rec.cars.maintenance
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 27/01/2020 17:14:25, RJH wrote:
On 26 Jan 2020 at 15:32:55 GMT, "Fredxx" wrote: On 25/01/2020 20:23:58, Roger Mills wrote: I've just replaced the front discs and pads on my wife's 20-year-old Ford Puma, and I have a query about the so called retaining clips. They are made of highly tempered steel wire and the free ends plug into holes in the caliper. They have loops which hook behind lugs on the caliper carrier. They look like this: https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/292224457537?ul_noapp=true According to my Haynes Fiesta manual (Haynes don't do a Puma manual, but the running gear is the same as a 1995-onwards Fiesta) they look like this when fitted: https://app.box.com/s/jelr78aedt1uandeka74e05dnqjc8bq8 Anyone know what their function is? Is the middle bit supposed to contact the back of the pad? Mine don't - by 2 or 3 mm - see: https://app.box.com/s/b8vaov18obat0kvldauu8bzt5r16vjrx Sadly, I didn't make a careful enough note of what they originally looked like before I removed them. I wonder whether I have put them back correctly - but I can't see any other way they could go. The loops look as if they should go further onto the lugs - but if I tap the free ends further into the holes, they pivot on the caliper body and the loops move *outwards* rather than inwards. Any informed comment will be greatly appreciated. Youtube is a good resource for reference. Look at 50s into this, it's for a Ford Focus but looks the same as yours: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YWNT3Sa0pFM Good guide - and the end of the video shows the clip is not in contact with the pad. Very odd section on bleeding the brakes . . . I did think the bleeding of brakes was a little short of the mark. Also very little fluid came out after unscrewing the caliper implying the pipe was clamped somewhere. I have used gravity to bleed brakes with a lot of success. It very much depends on the vehicle. Also no torquing done on those sliding bolts. |
#30
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y,uk.rec.cars.maintenance
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 27/01/2020 17:14, RJH wrote:
On 26 Jan 2020 at 15:32:55 GMT, "Fredxx" wrote: On 25/01/2020 20:23:58, Roger Mills wrote: I've just replaced the front discs and pads on my wife's 20-year-old Ford Puma, and I have a query about the so called retaining clips. They are made of highly tempered steel wire and the free ends plug into holes in the caliper. They have loops which hook behind lugs on the caliper carrier. They look like this: https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/292224457537?ul_noapp=true According to my Haynes Fiesta manual (Haynes don't do a Puma manual, but the running gear is the same as a 1995-onwards Fiesta) they look like this when fitted: https://app.box.com/s/jelr78aedt1uandeka74e05dnqjc8bq8 Anyone know what their function is? Is the middle bit supposed to contact the back of the pad? Mine don't - by 2 or 3 mm - see: https://app.box.com/s/b8vaov18obat0kvldauu8bzt5r16vjrx Sadly, I didn't make a careful enough note of what they originally looked like before I removed them. I wonder whether I have put them back correctly - but I can't see any other way they could go. The loops look as if they should go further onto the lugs - but if I tap the free ends further into the holes, they pivot on the caliper body and the loops move *outwards* rather than inwards. Any informed comment will be greatly appreciated. Youtube is a good resource for reference. Look at 50s into this, it's for a Ford Focus but looks the same as yours: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YWNT3Sa0pFM Good guide - and the end of the video shows the clip is not in contact with the pad. Very odd section on bleeding the brakes . . . Bleeding?! I wouldn't drive that car after what he did - would you? I'm not sure how usual it is to replace just the caliper, retaining the old disc and pads. But as far as removing and re-fitting the spring goes, it was good! -- Cheers, Roger |
#31
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y,uk.rec.cars.maintenance
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 28/01/2020 10:55, Roger Mills wrote:
I'm not sure how usual it is to replace just the caliper, retaining the old disc and pads. If they are in good nick why not? -- The theory of Communism may be summed up in one sentence: Abolish all private property. Karl Marx |
#32
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y,uk.rec.cars.maintenance
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 28/01/2020 11:21, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
On 28/01/2020 10:55, Roger Mills wrote: I'm not sure how usual it is to replace just the caliper, retaining the old disc and pads. If they are in good nick why not? Under what circumstances would you replace the caliper? Surely, unless it was physically broken - which that one didn't appear to be - it would be cheaper to refurbish it with new seals, etc. -- Cheers, Roger |
#33
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 28 Jan 2020 12:02:53 +0000, Roger Mills
wrote: On 28/01/2020 11:21, The Natural Philosopher wrote: On 28/01/2020 10:55, Roger Mills wrote: I'm not sure how usual it is to replace just the caliper, retaining the old disc and pads. If they are in good nick why not? Under what circumstances would you replace the caliper? Seized / worn piston(s). Scored bore / Leaking? Surely, unless it was physically broken - which that one didn't appear to be - it would be cheaper to refurbish it with new seals, etc. Wasn't there some talk of changing the rules re d-i-y brake refurbishment? Many garages won't refurb because it's often cheaper to replace (in labour terms) and less risk to them should something go wrong. Cheers, T i m |
#34
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y,uk.rec.cars.maintenance
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 28/01/2020 12:02, Roger Mills wrote:
On 28/01/2020 11:21, The Natural Philosopher wrote: On 28/01/2020 10:55, Roger Mills wrote: I'm not sure how usual it is to replace just the caliper, retaining the old disc and pads. If they are in good nick why not? Under what circumstances would you replace the caliper? Surely, unless it was physically broken - which that one didn't appear to be - it would be cheaper to refurbish it with new seals, etc. Not nowadays, most calipers are quite cheap, and the skills needed to rebuild one properly are sadly lacking. The last ones I remember doing needed 8 pistons plus seals, over two hundred quids worth 20 years ago. Same with most parts now, cheaper to buy a unit than fix the old. |
#35
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
T i m wrote: Many garages won't refurb because it's often cheaper to replace (in labour terms) and less risk to them should something go wrong. And many garages don't seem to have mechanics anymore - merely fitters of new parts. What makes sense to someone paying £150 an hour labour may be total nonsense to a competent DIYer. -- *Why isn't there a special name for the back of your knee? Dave Plowman London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound. |
#36
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dave Plowman (News) wrote:
In article , T i m wrote: Many garages won't refurb because it's often cheaper to replace (in labour terms) and less risk to them should something go wrong. And many garages don't seem to have mechanics anymore - merely fitters of new parts. What makes sense to someone paying £150 an hour labour may be total nonsense to a competent DIYer. I still have a set seals for a Riello oil burner pump off my old boiler. I was going to repair the spare, but got a new pump for speed and reliability of repair, in midwinter. Since then the boiler failed. But if it hadn't been so cold I think I could have saved about 50 GBP. -- Roger Hayter |
#37
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y,uk.rec.cars.maintenance
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 28/01/2020 12:02, Roger Mills wrote:
On 28/01/2020 11:21, The Natural Philosopher wrote: On 28/01/2020 10:55, Roger Mills wrote: I'm not sure how usual it is to replace just the caliper, retaining the old disc and pads. If they are in good nick why not? Under what circumstances would you replace the caliper? Surely, unless it was physically broken - which that one didn't appear to be - it would be cheaper to refurbish it with new seals, etc. It can be as cheap to replace sometimes. I bought a pair for my kitcar and as a company was selling off old stock, it cost me less than £25 for two brand new calipers! When one of the calipers on my wife's car seized, it was time that was the decider. A refurb kit would have taken two or three days to arrive, but I could pick up another caliper in an hour. SteveW |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Clinch clips, U clips, mesh clips, aviary clips. | UK diy | |||
OT - Would You Buy A Brake Caliper From An Electronics Vendor? | Home Repair | |||
screw through clips: u clips, spire clips? | UK diy | |||
Glass retaining clips | Woodworking | |||
Retaining Wall in front of another Retaining Wall | Home Repair |