Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
UK diy (uk.d-i-y) For the discussion of all topics related to diy (do-it-yourself) in the UK. All levels of experience and proficency are welcome to join in to ask questions or offer solutions. |
Reply |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Anyone else think they'd look a bit 'industrial' (or office) in a kitchen?
-- *There are two kinds of pedestrians... the quick and the dead. Dave Plowman London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound. |
#2
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 12/10/2019 14:48, Dave Plowman (News) wrote:
Anyone else think they'd look a bit 'industrial' (or office) in a kitchen? No but I do think a kitchen, bathroom or hallway with multiple down-lighters looks naff. I also think that the fad for butler sinks and wooden draining boards makes a kitchen look if it desperately needs modernising. The same with those impractical sinks that sit on top of bathroom worktops. -- mailto : news {at} admac {dot} myzen {dot} co {dot} uk |
#3
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 12/10/2019 14:48, Dave Plowman (News) wrote:
Anyone else think they'd look a bit 'industrial' (or office) in a kitchen? +1. I don't think you can beat a Mazda Netaline. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6zAzsMFn1j8 LED conversion is optional:-) -- Adam |
#4
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dave Plowman (News) wrote
Anyone else think they'd look a bit 'industrial' (or office) in a kitchen? Nope, look fine to me. Tho with most of the kitchen I prefer under cupboard led strips which give much better lighting for the work surfaces. Doesn’t work for the island bench tho. I'd prefer a modular led panel for the island bench extending the entire length of the island bench but that’s not going to be cheap with current led panels and since the Hue system doesn’t have led panels yet, I currently have led strip suspended from the ceiling at a bit over head height for that. I don’t have lighting above the cupboards reflecting off a white ceiling because I prefer the look of cupboards going right up to the ceiling even if the top shelves don’t get used. But then I never gave a damn about what looks a bit industrial or office and had normal double tube fluoros before the leds. |
#5
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
ARW wrote:
On 12/10/2019 14:48, Dave Plowman (News) wrote: Anyone else think they'd look a bit 'industrial' (or office) in a kitchen? +1. I don't think you can beat a Mazda Netaline. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6zAzsMFn1j8 LED conversion is optional:-) A lovely bit of design. Tim -- Please don't feed the trolls |
#6
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 13 Oct 2019 05:12:50 +1100, ZakJames, better known as cantankerous
trolling senile geezer Rodent Speed, wrote: Anyone else think they'd look a bit 'industrial' (or office) in a kitchen? Nope, look fine to me. NOBODY asked you ANYTHING, senile asshole troll from Oz! LOL -- Richard addressing Rot Speed: "**** you're thick/pathetic excuse for a troll." MID: |
#7
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
alan_m wrote
Dave Plowman (News) wrote Anyone else think they'd look a bit 'industrial' (or office) in a kitchen? No but I do think a kitchen, bathroom or hallway with multiple down-lighters looks naff. Yeah, me too. Tho you can certainly claim that I might not be the one to talk given that the original house design done in the very early 70s had twin tube fluoros recessed into the ceiling right throughout the entire house with a translucent plastic panel visible in the room. And I then added PAR38 floods in the main room and those with a movement sensor in the bathroom/laundry. I also think that the fad for butler sinks and wooden draining boards makes a kitchen look if it desperately needs modernising. True. Stainless steel double sink there for me. I wont post a photo because that would certainly kill Pam. The same with those impractical sinks that sit on top of bathroom worktops. Yeah, I have those very narrow china basins in the separate dunnys. The basins look fine, but the exposed waste piping doesnt. |
#8
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "ARW" wrote in message ... On 12/10/2019 14:48, Dave Plowman (News) wrote: Anyone else think they'd look a bit 'industrial' (or office) in a kitchen? +1. I don't think you can beat a Mazda Netaline. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6zAzsMFn1j8 Wonder why you never hear anyone talk like that anymore, either one. LED conversion is optional:-) |
#9
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 13 Oct 2019 08:56:49 +1100, cantankerous trolling geezer Rodent
Speed, the auto-contradicting senile sociopath, blabbered, again: No but I do think a kitchen, bathroom or hallway with multiple down-lighters looks naff. Yeah, me too. NOBODY gives a ****, obnoxious trolling senile cretin! -- dennis@home to know-it-all Rot Speed: "You really should stop commenting on things you know nothing about." Message-ID: |
#10
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 13 Oct 2019 09:09:11 +1100, cantankerous trolling geezer Rodent
Speed, the auto-contradicting senile sociopath, blabbered, again: Wonder why you never hear anyone talk like that anymore, either one. You'd better wonder you got NOBODY in real life to talk to, you clinically insane cantankerous asshole troll! -- Richard addressing Rot Speed: "**** you're thick/pathetic excuse for a troll." MID: |
#11
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
alan_m wrote: On 12/10/2019 14:48, Dave Plowman (News) wrote: Anyone else think they'd look a bit 'industrial' (or office) in a kitchen? No but I do think a kitchen, bathroom or hallway with multiple down-lighters looks naff. I also think that the fad for butler sinks and wooden draining boards makes a kitchen look if it desperately needs modernising. The same with those impractical sinks that sit on top of bathroom worktops. Luckily we all have different tastes. Thing would be very boring otherwise. -- *Certain frogs can be frozen solid, then thawed, and survive * Dave Plowman London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound. |
#12
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 13/10/2019 11:57, Dave Plowman (News) wrote:
In article , alan_m wrote: On 12/10/2019 14:48, Dave Plowman (News) wrote: Anyone else think they'd look a bit 'industrial' (or office) in a kitchen? No but I do think a kitchen, bathroom or hallway with multiple down-lighters looks naff. I also think that the fad for butler sinks and wooden draining boards makes a kitchen look if it desperately needs modernising. The same with those impractical sinks that sit on top of bathroom worktops. Luckily we all have different tastes. Thing would be very boring otherwise. Sometimes it's not just taste but from lessons learnt or from experience of similar. As I get older I find that I prefer a brighter "daylight" type light, especially for reading and anywhere that I'm working. As for basins on top of worktops I've seen these installed in workplace toilets where they are only used for washing hands and noticed an amazing amount of water ends up on the worktop rather than in the basin. I hate to think how much water would end up on the work surface when washing other body parts ![]() My latest mistake was made a few years ago when purchasing a replacement toilet suite. Rather than the traditional shape the toilet pan has a large horizontal ledge before a drop into the water. When seated the **** tends to land on this flat bit for inspection and leaves skid marks when flushing unless a bit of paper is placed in the porcelain first. Whats worse is splash back. Its OK if you manage a strong steam into the hole but the dribbles hit a near horizontal surface a few inches below the rim and splashes back up and sideways in all directions. ![]() had previous experience of this type of design I wouldn't have purchased it! -- mailto : news {at} admac {dot} myzen {dot} co {dot} uk |
#13
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 13/10/2019 12:29, alan_m wrote:
My latest mistake was made a few years ago when purchasing a replacement toilet suite. Rather than the traditional shape the toilet pan has a large horizontal ledge before a drop into the water. When seated the **** tends to land on this flat bit for inspection and leaves skid marks when flushing unless a bit of paper is placed in the porcelain first. Whats worse is splash back. Its OK if you manage a strong steam into the hole but the dribbles hit a near horizontal surface a few inches below the rim and splashes back up and sideways in all directions. ![]() had previous experience of this type of design I wouldn't have purchased it! That style is (or used to be) popular on the continent. I suppose it is handy when you reach the age for DIY bowel cancer screening. Although the new kit is much nicer than the old three cardboard sticks. |
#14
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
alan_m wrote: Luckily we all have different tastes. Thing would be very boring otherwise. Sometimes it's not just taste but from lessons learnt or from experience of similar. As I get older I find that I prefer a brighter "daylight" type light, especially for reading and anywhere that I'm working. Well, in a kitchen, you could concentrate that over the work surfaces. Rather than flood the entire room. -- *I finally got my head together, now my body is falling apart. Dave Plowman London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound. |
#15
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
newshound wrote: On 13/10/2019 12:29, alan_m wrote: My latest mistake was made a few years ago when purchasing a replacement toilet suite. Rather than the traditional shape the toilet pan has a large horizontal ledge before a drop into the water. When seated the **** tends to land on this flat bit for inspection and leaves skid marks when flushing unless a bit of paper is placed in the porcelain first. Whats worse is splash back. Its OK if you manage a strong steam into the hole but the dribbles hit a near horizontal surface a few inches below the rim and splashes back up and sideways in all directions. ![]() this type of design I wouldn't have purchased it! That style is (or used to be) popular on the continent. I suppose it is handy when you reach the age for DIY bowel cancer screening. Although the new kit is much nicer than the old three cardboard sticks. That's when a bidet comes in handy. Some kitchen paper on it - then easy to transfer to the loo after getting the samples. Not had the new style kit yet. -- *Did you ever notice when you blow in a dog's face he gets mad at you? * Dave Plowman London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound. |
#16
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
alan_m wrote:
As I get older I find that I prefer a brighter "daylight" type light, especially for reading and anywhere that I'm working. Yep, my garage has "daylight" fluoros, and my study has "daylight" LEDs everywhere else (inside and out) has warm white. |
#17
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
ARW wrote:
I don't think you can beat a Mazda Netaline. Some friends bought an house that hadn't been refurbish since the 60's, still had one in use, not sure if they kept it ... |
#18
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 13/10/2019 14:15, Dave Plowman (News) wrote:
That's when a bidet comes in handy. Some kitchen paper on it - then easy to transfer to the loo after getting the samples. Not had the new style kit yet. The kit I had early in the year still had the 3 cardboard sticks. -- mailto : news {at} admac {dot} myzen {dot} co {dot} uk |
#19
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 13 Oct 2019 13:20:30 +0100, newshound wrote:
On 13/10/2019 12:29, alan_m wrote: My latest mistake was made a few years ago when purchasing a replacement toilet suite. Rather than the traditional shape the toilet pan has a large horizontal ledge before a drop into the water. When seated the **** tends to land on this flat bit for inspection and leaves skid marks when flushing unless a bit of paper is placed in the porcelain first. Whats worse is splash back. Its OK if you manage a strong steam into the hole but the dribbles hit a near horizontal surface a few inches below the rim and splashes back up and sideways in all directions. ![]() design I wouldn't have purchased it! That style is (or used to be) popular on the continent. I suppose it is handy when you reach the age for DIY bowel cancer screening. Although the new kit is much nicer than the old three cardboard sticks. It is indeed. Got (and used) mine about a month ago. -- My posts are my copyright and if @diy_forums or Home Owners' Hub wish to copy them they can pay me £1 a message. Use the BIG mirror service in the UK: http://www.mirrorservice.org *lightning surge protection* - a w_tom conductor |
#20
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bob Eager wrote:
On Sun, 13 Oct 2019 13:20:30 +0100, newshound wrote: On 13/10/2019 12:29, alan_m wrote: My latest mistake was made a few years ago when purchasing a replacement toilet suite. Rather than the traditional shape the toilet pan has a large horizontal ledge before a drop into the water. When seated the **** tends to land on this flat bit for inspection and leaves skid marks when flushing unless a bit of paper is placed in the porcelain first. Whats worse is splash back. Its OK if you manage a strong steam into the hole but the dribbles hit a near horizontal surface a few inches below the rim and splashes back up and sideways in all directions. ![]() design I wouldn't have purchased it! That style is (or used to be) popular on the continent. I suppose it is handy when you reach the age for DIY bowel cancer screening. Although the new kit is much nicer than the old three cardboard sticks. It is indeed. Got (and used) mine about a month ago. Got mine on Wednesday and chucked it in the bin. Having had a colonoscopy on Tuesday it seemed a bit superfluous. ;-) (Incidentally, chucking the kit was done with the agreement of the bowel screening folk). Tim -- Please don't feed the trolls |
#21
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 13/10/2019 14:47, Andy Burns wrote:
ARW wrote: I don't think you can beat a Mazda Netaline. Some friends bought an house that hadn't been refurbish since the 60's, still had one in use, not sure if they kept it ... I did a rewire of a house that had a new owner. He said "And get rid or that" I did. I sold it for £50. -- Adam |
#22
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Andy Burns" wrote in message ... alan_m wrote: As I get older I find that I prefer a brighter "daylight" type light, especially for reading and anywhere that I'm working. Yep, my garage has "daylight" fluoros, and my study has "daylight" LEDs everywhere else (inside and out) has warm white. I hated the first Hue warm white leds, very yellow, even tho I did prefer PAR38 floods inside the house to daylight fluoros. I put the Hue warm whites in the less used rooms like the bedroom and the beer storage room and replaced them with what Hue calls white ambience which can be set to any color temp you like, and set them to as white as I can. Dont even notice the warm white in the bedroom anymore even I use that every single day. I dont read in bed anymore tho, prefer ebooks with the easy dictionary and google and dont find that reading ebooks in bed works as well. |
#23
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 14 Oct 2019 06:12:54 +1100, ZakJames, better known as cantankerous
trolling senile geezer Rodent Speed, wrote: I hated the first Hue warm white leds But NOBODY talked to you, senile cretin! Just why do you keep telling everyone that bull****? Because people on Usenet can't as easily get away from you as in real life? EG -- Website (from 2007) dedicated to the 85-year-old trolling senile cretin from Oz: https://www.pcreview.co.uk/threads/r...d-faq.2973853/ |
#24
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
alan_m wrote:
On 13/10/2019 14:15, Dave Plowman (News) wrote: Not had the new style kit yet. The kit I had early in the year still had the 3 cardboard sticks. Just had the new one - a slim liquid-filled container from which you remove a thin plastic rod with a grooved end. Rub it on your saved deposit and pop it back into the container. Simples! Chris -- Chris J Dixon Nottingham UK @ChrisJDixon1 Plant amazing Acers. |
#25
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
alan_m wrote:
Dave Plowman wrote: That's when a bidet comes in handy. Some kitchen paper on it - then easy to transfer to the loo after getting the samples. Not had the new style kit yet. The kit I had early in the year still had the 3 cardboard sticks. I've just received my first bowel cancer screening invite, no cardboard sticks around here, apparently they will post an enema to be "applied" an hour before the appointment with a video camera up the bum, that'll be interesting as the hospital is almost an hour's drive away ... |
#26
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Andy Burns wrote:
alan_m wrote: Dave Plowman wrote: That's when a bidet comes in handy. Some kitchen paper on it - then easy to transfer to the loo after getting the samples. Not had the new style kit yet. The kit I had early in the year still had the 3 cardboard sticks. I've just received my first bowel cancer screening invite, no cardboard sticks around here, apparently they will post an enema to be "applied" an hour before the appointment with a video camera up the bum, that'll be interesting as the hospital is almost an hour's drive away ... Sounds like a half arsed approach. I really cant see you getting adequate bowel clearance in that time and without proper clearance they cant do a proper scope. Where is this happening? Tim -- Please don't feed the trolls |
#27
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dave Plowman (News) wrote:
In article , newshound wrote: I suppose it is handy when you reach the age for DIY bowel cancer screening. Although the new kit is much nicer than the old three cardboard sticks. That's when a bidet comes in handy. Some kitchen paper on it - then easy to transfer to the loo after getting the samples. Who needs a bidet? Couple of sheets of loo paper in your hand and then reach under and pinch off a lump as it emerges. Cant get much simpler or less messy than that. Tim -- Please don't feed the trolls |
#28
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Tim+ wrote: Andy Burns wrote: I've just received my first bowel cancer screening invite, no cardboard sticks around here, apparently they will post an enema to be "applied" an hour before the appointment with a video camera up the bum, that'll be interesting as the hospital is almost an hour's drive away ... Sounds like a half arsed approach. This is just from the first leaflet they've sent, apparently they will send more info in a couple of months, if I choose to go ahead I really cant see you getting adequate bowel clearance in that time They do say allow for up to half a day from start to finish and without proper clearance they cant do a proper scope. Where is this happening? QMC Nottingham |
#29
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 14/10/2019 15:59, Tim+ wrote:
Andy Burns wrote: alan_m wrote: Dave Plowman wrote: That's when a bidet comes in handy. Some kitchen paper on it - then easy to transfer to the loo after getting the samples. Not had the new style kit yet. The kit I had early in the year still had the 3 cardboard sticks. I've just received my first bowel cancer screening invite, no cardboard sticks around here, apparently they will post an enema to be "applied" an hour before the appointment with a video camera up the bum, that'll be interesting as the hospital is almost an hour's drive away ... Yep, same here. When I explained this to them it'll now involve arriving 30 minuted before the scope, when they'll enemyse me. I'd add that 2 pals I've discussed this with won't go through screening because of this self-enema thing - I'm not that happy with it, TBH. I discussed this with them, and they said the 24 hour orally taken enema is for a different type of colonscopy. Sounds like a half arsed approach. I really cant see you getting adequate bowel clearance in that time and without proper clearance they cant do a proper scope. Where is this happening? Exactly what happened to a friend - they couldn't get a proper view because of it. -- Cheers, Rob |
#30
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
RJH wrote:
2 pals I've discussed this with won't go through screening because of this self-enema thing - I'm not that happy with it, TBH. I think I'd prefer to get there early and let them do it ... I discussed this with them, and they said the 24 hour orally taken enema is for a different type of colonscopy. Picolax is the one I've heard horror stories about ... |
#31
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 14/10/2019 16:49, Andy Burns wrote:
RJH wrote: 2 pals I've discussed this with won't go through screening because of this self-enema thing - I'm not that happy with it, TBH. I think I'd prefer to get there early and let them do it ... Same here - in fairness, they have offered - but that's more because I'm over an hour away I think. I discussed this with them, and they said the 24 hour orally taken enema is for a different type of colonscopy. Picolax is the one I've heard horror stories about ... Ug. Clyssie is the one they sent me, that I don't intend to use. -- Cheers, Rob |
#32
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Andy Burns wrote:
Tim+ wrote: Andy Burns wrote: I've just received my first bowel cancer screening invite, no cardboard sticks around here, apparently they will post an enema to be "applied" an hour before the appointment with a video camera up the bum, that'll be interesting as the hospital is almost an hour's drive away ... Sounds like a half arsed approach. This is just from the first leaflet they've sent, apparently they will send more info in a couple of months, if I choose to go ahead I really cant see you getting adequate bowel clearance in that time They do say allow for up to half a day from start to finish and without proper clearance they cant do a proper scope. Where is this happening? QMC Nottingham Thinking about, you probably are having a less invasive procedure, namely sigmoidoscopy rather than full colonoscopy. Lower bowel prep is appropriate for that. I jumped to conclusions. Tim -- Please don't feed the trolls |
#33
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tim+ wrote:
you probably are having a less invasive procedure, namely sigmoidoscopy rather than full colonoscopy. Lower bowel prep is appropriate for that. That seems to agree with their cartoon explanation ... |
#34
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 14/10/2019 15:53, Andy Burns wrote:
alan_m wrote: Dave Plowman wrote: That's when a bidet comes in handy. Some kitchen paper on it - then easy to transfer to the loo after getting the samples. Not had the new style kit yet. The kit I had early in the year still had the 3 cardboard sticks. I've just received my first bowel cancer screening invite, no cardboard sticks around here, apparently they will post an enema to be "applied" an hour before the appointment with a video camera up the bum, that'll be interesting as the hospital is almost an hour's drive away ... New method for youngsters (55+). Don't they give you a choice? I imagine many would prefer to take samples at home, even if it is every two years. This method is once-and-for-all. What if you live to be 95? Can they really be sure that the absence of polyps at 55 guarantees you will be clear for the rest of your life? -- Max Demian |
#35
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Max Demian wrote:
New method for youngsters (55+). yes, I'm 55 Don't they give you a choice? I can opt-out of the enema and camera up the bum, if so then they won't contact me about it again, but I can request it any time until I'm 60 I imagine many would prefer to take samples at home, even if it is every two years. This method is once-and-for-all. What if you live to be 95? Can they really be sure that the absence of polyps at 55 guarantees you will be clear for the rest of your life? |
#36
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 14/10/2019 15:53, Andy Burns wrote:
alan_m wrote: Dave Plowman wrote: That's when a bidet comes in handy. Some kitchen paper on it - then easy to transfer to the loo after getting the samples. Not had the new style kit yet. The kit I had early in the year still had the 3 cardboard sticks. I've just received my first bowel cancer screening invite, no cardboard sticks around here, apparently they will post an enema to be "applied" an hour before the appointment with a video camera up the bum, that'll be interesting as the hospital is almost an hour's drive away ... Err, this is a DIY forum so you could use a USB endoscope ... (not a serious suggestion) |
#37
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
ZakJames has brought this to us :
Nope, look fine to me. Tho with most of the kitchen I prefer under cupboard led strips which give much better lighting for the work surfaces. Doesnt work for the island bench tho. I'd prefer a modular led panel for the island bench extending the entire length of the island bench but thats not going to be cheap with current led panels and since the Hue system doesnt have led panels yet, I currently have led strip suspended from the ceiling at a bit over head height for that. I've fitted a couple of these.. https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/253999720189 ...to replace a couple of recessed downlighters. I was left with a 5" diameter hole in the ceiling, so I made up some circular panels to mount the LED's onto. They are intended for surface mount, with a supplied base /socket, which they just click into, so very quick to replace in case of failures. They claim 120 degree spread and I woud not dispute that, but they do need a high ceiling to avoid being directly in your eyeline. |
#38
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Harry Bloomfield"; "Esq." wrote in message ... ZakJames has brought this to us : Nope, look fine to me. Tho with most of the kitchen I prefer under cupboard led strips which give much better lighting for the work surfaces. Doesnt work for the island bench tho. I'd prefer a modular led panel for the island bench extending the entire length of the island bench but thats not going to be cheap with current led panels and since the Hue system doesnt have led panels yet, I currently have led strip suspended from the ceiling at a bit over head height for that. I've fitted a couple of these.. https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/253999720189 I dont like those because the island bench is long rectangular, 20'x 4' ..to replace a couple of recessed downlighters. I was left with a 5" diameter hole in the ceiling, so I made up some circular panels to mount the LED's onto. They are intended for surface mount, with a supplied base /socket, which they just click into, so very quick to replace in case of failures. They claim 120 degree spread and I woud not dispute that, but they do need a high ceiling to avoid being directly in your eyeline. I have the led strip for the island bench at around the under cupboard height off the work bench, but with no cupboard above it. Works fine. |
#39
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 16 Oct 2019 04:14:03 +1100, ZakJames, better known as cantankerous
trolling senile geezer Rodent Speed, wrote: FLUSH senile asshole's latest troll**** -- about senile Rot Speed: "This is like having a conversation with someone with brain damage." MID: |
#40
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 12/10/2019 19:23, Tim+ wrote:
ARW wrote: On 12/10/2019 14:48, Dave Plowman (News) wrote: Anyone else think they'd look a bit 'industrial' (or office) in a kitchen? +1. I don't think you can beat a Mazda Netaline. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6zAzsMFn1j8 LED conversion is optional:-) A lovely bit of design. Tim Snip at 79 shillings and 9 pence (tax paid). Why not 79 bob and 11 pence though ?. £4 in 1960 is just over £90 now though :-( |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|