Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
UK diy (uk.d-i-y) For the discussion of all topics related to diy (do-it-yourself) in the UK. All levels of experience and proficency are welcome to join in to ask questions or offer solutions. |
Reply |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi All
We have a house alarm keypad which needs moving. Unfortunately the wire is not long enough. Can I simply solder another bit of alarm wire to it to extend it? Probably about 1m. I seem to recall somewhere that the resistance of the cable run is relevant hence the question. Thanks in advance Lee. |
#3
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote:
Hi All We have a house alarm keypad which needs moving. Unfortunately the wire is not long enough. Can I simply solder another bit of alarm wire to it to extend it? Probably about 1m. I seem to recall somewhere that the resistance of the cable run is relevant hence the question. Thanks in advance Lee. Well, given that its most unlikely that the keypad can *only* be connected with a fixed length of cable Id be amazed it adding a metre more cable would make any difference. Assuming you have the codes to deactivate the system whilst doing any wiring, why not just try it? Tim -- Please don't feed the trolls |
#4
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 03/05/2018 08:15, wrote:
Hi All We have a house alarm keypad which needs moving. Unfortunately the wire is not long enough. Can I simply solder another bit of alarm wire to it to extend it? Probably about 1m. I seem to recall somewhere that the resistance of the cable run is relevant hence the question. Thanks in advance You would possibly have to extend the cable by thousands of metres for any resistance changes to be noticed by an alarm box. As alternative to soldering maybe consider gel connectors used for telephone wires Example (random ebay listing) https://www.ebay.co.uk/p/20-Pack-2-W...d=352017373664 No need to strip the wire, Just push in the two wires to be connected and use a pair of pliers to push down the mechanism to make the connection. -- mailto : news {at} admac {dot} myzen {dot} co {dot} uk |
#5
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 03/05/2018 08:38, alan_m wrote:
As alternative to soldering maybe consider gel connectors used for telephone wires https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c854VnEjHaA -- mailto : news {at} admac {dot} myzen {dot} co {dot} uk |
#6
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 03/05/2018 08:38, alan_m wrote:
As alternative to soldering maybe consider gel connectors used for telephone wires Example (random ebay listing) https://www.ebay.co.uk/p/20-Pack-2-W...d=352017373664 No need to strip the wire, Just push in the two wires to be connected and use a pair of pliers to push down the mechanism to make the connection. Never used them, what's the difference between the blue and the yellow ones? Is it worth having a pack in the toolbox do you think? --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus |
#7
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 03/05/2018 08:44, newshound wrote:
No need to strip the wire, Just push in the two wires to be connected and use a pair of pliers to push down the mechanism to make the connection. Never used them, what's the difference between the blue and the yellow ones? Is it worth having a pack in the toolbox do you think? I don't know what the difference is with the colours. Maybe different manufactures, maybe different wire size? I purchased the un-coloured ones which claimed to be BT originals which are suitable for telephone/cat5/alarm type wires. I used some to re-position my incoming telephone wires where they worked as advertised. I still have the spares from around 4 years ago which I have not found another use for. -- mailto : news {at} admac {dot} myzen {dot} co {dot} uk |
#8
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
alan_m writes: On 03/05/2018 08:15, wrote: Hi All We have a house alarm keypad which needs moving. Unfortunately the wire is not long enough. Can I simply solder another bit of alarm wire to it to extend it? Probably about 1m. I seem to recall somewhere that the resistance of the cable run is relevant hence the question. Thanks in advance You would possibly have to extend the cable by thousands of metres for any resistance changes to be noticed by an alarm box. As alternative to soldering maybe consider gel connectors used for telephone wires Example (random ebay listing) https://www.ebay.co.uk/p/20-Pack-2-W...d=352017373664 No need to strip the wire, Just push in the two wires to be connected and use a pair of pliers to push down the mechanism to make the connection. You might be lucky, but they are designed for solid-core telephone cable, not stranded alarm cable, and that is likely to make a difference to the quality and longevity of the connection. They are designed to cut into the surface of the solid core coper to make a good connection, but the connection with strands which can just move out of the way is likely to be much poorer. Also note that alarm cable now comes in the traditional tinned copper wire (good stuff) or in copper covered aluminium (CCA) which is the cheaper grotty stuff, which is to be avoided. Which reminds me - I picked up a reel of alarm cable from Maplin last week (proper copper). At 80% off, it was down to about the same price as CPC's regular price. -- Andrew Gabriel [email address is not usable -- followup in the newsgroup] |
#9
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
wrote: Hi All We have a house alarm keypad which needs moving. Unfortunately the wire is not long enough. Can I simply solder another bit of alarm wire to it to extend it? Probably about 1m. Is the cable on show? If so, soldering and sleeving carefully using heat shrink sleeving may look best. If concealed, simply twist and use small choc strip. I seem to recall somewhere that the resistance of the cable run is relevant hence the question. Not with either of the two keypads I've used. Thanks in advance Lee. -- *When a man opens a car door for his wife, it's either a new car or a new Dave Plowman London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound. |
#10
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dave Plowman wrote:
leenowell wrote: I seem to recall somewhere that the resistance of the cable run is relevant hence the question. Not with either of the two keypads I've used. Even with alarms that do use EOL resistors (to sense multiple conditions [normal, alarm, anti-mask, fault, tamper with a single pair) the cable resistance is trivial compared to the resistances being measured. |
#11
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 03/05/2018 09:22, Andrew Gabriel wrote:
Also note that alarm cable now comes in the traditional tinned copper wire (good stuff) or in copper covered aluminium (CCA) which is the cheaper grotty stuff, which is to be avoided. That is a worthwhile point. I recently gave a mate a hand to do his alarm. He bought all the kit and the cable was CCA. I got him to swap it. -- Adam |
#12
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 03 May 2018 11:05:25 +0100, Dave Plowman (News) wrote:
Is the cable on show? If so, soldering and sleeving carefully using heat shrink sleeving may look best. If concealed, simply twist and use small choc strip. A choc strip isn't tamper proof. Solder and sleeving is as tamper proof as the cable. Use a proper alarm cable jointing box. Terminal for each wire and a tamper switch that operates when you take the cover off. -- Cheers Dave. |
#13
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote
We have a house alarm keypad which needs moving. Unfortunately the wire is not long enough. Can I simply solder another bit of alarm wire to it to extend it? Probably about 1m. Yes. I seem to recall somewhere that the resistance of the cable run is relevant Not in that sense. They just use the resistance to decide if the wire to the sensor has been cut or has got broken etc. hence the question. |
#14
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article l.net,
Dave Liquorice wrote: Is the cable on show? If so, soldering and sleeving carefully using heat shrink sleeving may look best. If concealed, simply twist and use small choc strip. A choc strip isn't tamper proof. Solder and sleeving is as tamper proof as the cable. If someone can take up the floorboards etc to get at an alarm cable, just how it may or not be jointed is likely to be the least of your problems... Use a proper alarm cable jointing box. Terminal for each wire and a tamper switch that operates when you take the cover off. -- *Even a blind pig stumbles across an acorn now and again * Dave Plowman London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound. |
#15
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks all for your help. Another job on the list for the weekend.
|
#16
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Depending on the run in place now being quite long I'd not expect an extra
metre to make any difference. is this the multi core or just a supply wire or what. lots of alarm types out there and one would need to be mindful of any anti tamper devices fitted, such as window comparators on a resistance of a circuit etc. Brian -- ----- - This newsgroup posting comes to you directly from... The Sofa of Brian Gaff... Blind user, so no pictures please! wrote in message ... Hi All We have a house alarm keypad which needs moving. Unfortunately the wire is not long enough. Can I simply solder another bit of alarm wire to it to extend it? Probably about 1m. I seem to recall somewhere that the resistance of the cable run is relevant hence the question. Thanks in advance Lee. |
#17
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 03/05/2018 19:30, ARW wrote:
On 03/05/2018 09:22, Andrew Gabriel wrote: Also note that alarm cable now comes in the traditional tinned copper wire (good stuff) or in copper covered aluminium (CCA) which is the cheaper grotty stuff, which is to be avoided. That is a worthwhile point. I recently gave a mate a hand to do his alarm. He bought all the kit and the cable was CCA. I got him to swap it. If it is CCA the OPs preferred solution of soldering may not work too well. -- mailto : news {at} admac {dot} myzen {dot} co {dot} uk |
#18
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 03/05/2018 11:17, Andy Burns wrote:
Dave Plowman wrote: leenowell wrote: I seem to recall somewhere that the resistance of the cable run is relevant hence the question. Not with either of the two keypads I've used. Even with alarms that do use EOL resistors (to sense multiple conditions [normal, alarm, anti-mask, fault, tamper with a single pair) the cable resistance is trivial compared to the resistances being measured. Typical specification for a good quality alarm wire is around 100 ohms per kilometre. The anti tamper threshold resistances are 1000s of ohms However, if the OP is going to extend the cable by many Km he may have other problems than just the resistance of the wire. http://www.neweyandeyre.co.uk/media/..._Technical.pdf -- mailto : news {at} admac {dot} myzen {dot} co {dot} uk |
#19
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 03 May 2018 23:34:00 +0100, Dave Plowman (News) wrote:
Is the cable on show? If so, soldering and sleeving carefully using heat shrink sleeving may look best. If concealed, simply twist and use small choc strip. A choc strip isn't tamper proof. Solder and sleeving is as tamper proof as the cable. If someone can take up the floorboards etc to get at an alarm cable, just how it may or not be jointed is likely to be the least of your problems... I got the impression that the joint would be exposed at the position of the old device. If going the solder/heatshrink route stagger each joint by about 1 cm to prevent gert big bulge if all the joints are at the same place. -- Cheers Dave. |
#20
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The joint would most likely be under the floorboards. I haven't yet looked at the route the wire takes but worse case is I cut it under the floor or ceiling above
|
#21
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 03/05/2018 20:11, Dave Liquorice wrote:
On Thu, 03 May 2018 11:05:25 +0100, Dave Plowman (News) wrote: Is the cable on show? If so, soldering and sleeving carefully using heat shrink sleeving may look best. If concealed, simply twist and use small choc strip. A choc strip isn't tamper proof. Solder and sleeving is as tamper proof as the cable. Use a proper alarm cable jointing box. Terminal for each wire and a tamper switch that operates when you take the cover off. Do you know how easy it is to take the cover off one without activating the tamper switch if you wanted to? The same goes for bell boxes and alarm panels. -- Adam |
#22
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
ARW wrote: On 03/05/2018 20:11, Dave Liquorice wrote: On Thu, 03 May 2018 11:05:25 +0100, Dave Plowman (News) wrote: Is the cable on show? If so, soldering and sleeving carefully using heat shrink sleeving may look best. If concealed, simply twist and use small choc strip. A choc strip isn't tamper proof. Solder and sleeving is as tamper proof as the cable. Use a proper alarm cable jointing box. Terminal for each wire and a tamper switch that operates when you take the cover off. Do you know how easy it is to take the cover off one without activating the tamper switch if you wanted to? The same goes for bell boxes and alarm panels. I'd guess any ner-do-well who was into tampering with alarm wiring would be well aware of the easiest ways to do it. And it's not that difficult to get at the conductors inside a cable run anyway, when you don't care about how much damage you might do. -- *Procrastination is the art of keeping up with yesterday. Dave Plowman London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound. |
#23
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dave Plowman wrote:
I'd guess any ner-do-well who was into tampering with alarm wiring would be well aware of the easiest ways to do it. If it's wired with a separate tamper loop, they're never going to be sure which colour wires are which, and if it uses resistors any cutting/shorting is going to trigger it anyway. I presume they're either 'clever' enough to avoid places with an alarm, or 'dumb' enough to assume it will go off and they have a few minutes to grab and run anyway ... FSVO clever or dumb. |
#24
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 05/05/2018 10:45, Dave Plowman (News) wrote:
In article , ARW wrote: On 03/05/2018 20:11, Dave Liquorice wrote: On Thu, 03 May 2018 11:05:25 +0100, Dave Plowman (News) wrote: Is the cable on show? If so, soldering and sleeving carefully using heat shrink sleeving may look best. If concealed, simply twist and use small choc strip. A choc strip isn't tamper proof. Solder and sleeving is as tamper proof as the cable. Use a proper alarm cable jointing box. Terminal for each wire and a tamper switch that operates when you take the cover off. Do you know how easy it is to take the cover off one without activating the tamper switch if you wanted to? The same goes for bell boxes and alarm panels. I'd guess any ner-do-well who was into tampering with alarm wiring would be well aware of the easiest ways to do it. And it's not that difficult to get at the conductors inside a cable run anyway, when you don't care about how much damage you might do. I suppose it it worth mentioning again that 9 out of 10 of the alarms that I fit (other than new builds) are fitted about a week after the house has been burgled. -- Adam |
#25
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Andy Burns wrote: Dave Plowman wrote: I'd guess any ner-do-well who was into tampering with alarm wiring would be well aware of the easiest ways to do it. If it's wired with a separate tamper loop, they're never going to be sure which colour wires are which, and if it uses resistors any cutting/shorting is going to trigger it anyway. I presume they're either 'clever' enough to avoid places with an alarm, or 'dumb' enough to assume it will go off and they have a few minutes to grab and run anyway ... FSVO clever or dumb. Yes - I'd guess most would either be an alarm expert and capable of getting round the security systems, or not. Only a very thick burglar would simply cut the cable. -- *Why do we say something is out of whack? What is a whack? * Dave Plowman London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound. |
#26
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
ARW wrote: I suppose it it worth mentioning again that 9 out of 10 of the alarms that I fit (other than new builds) are fitted about a week after the house has been burgled. Yup. I've lived here for a long time, and the area has changed a lot. I obviously could afford this area when I moved in, but zero chance if doing the same now. I had one 'successful' burglary and a couple of attempts before fitting an alarm some 30 years ago, and since then none. But just how well it has acted as a deterrent rather than just the area changing, I dunno. -- *Reality is a crutch for people who can't handle drugs. Dave Plowman London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound. |
#27
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 05/05/2018 11:39, Dave Plowman (News) wrote:
Yes - I'd guess most would either be an alarm expert and capable of getting round the security systems, or not. Haven't you been watching the latest films and TV programs? All you need is a box with flashing LEDs connected by two wires with croc clips. Getting into security systems is in the same league as obtaining high resolution pictures from a single pixel on a camera. -- mailto : news {at} admac {dot} myzen {dot} co {dot} uk |
#28
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 05/05/2018 10:45, Dave Plowman (News) wrote:
In article , ARW wrote: On 03/05/2018 20:11, Dave Liquorice wrote: On Thu, 03 May 2018 11:05:25 +0100, Dave Plowman (News) wrote: Is the cable on show? If so, soldering and sleeving carefully using heat shrink sleeving may look best. If concealed, simply twist and use small choc strip. A choc strip isn't tamper proof. Solder and sleeving is as tamper proof as the cable. Use a proper alarm cable jointing box. Terminal for each wire and a tamper switch that operates when you take the cover off. Do you know how easy it is to take the cover off one without activating the tamper switch if you wanted to? The same goes for bell boxes and alarm panels. I'd guess any ner-do-well who was into tampering with alarm wiring would be well aware of the easiest ways to do it. And it's not that difficult to get at the conductors inside a cable run anyway, when you don't care about how much damage you might do. Its more difficult with modern systems, they can use end of line terminations so they can detect cuts, shorts and changes in resistance. The old Chubb systems I used to work on 40 years ago were easy to hack if you knew how. |
#29
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 05/05/2018 17:26, dennis@home wrote:
On 05/05/2018 10:45, Dave Plowman (News) wrote: In article , Â*Â*Â* ARW wrote: On 03/05/2018 20:11, Dave Liquorice wrote: On Thu, 03 May 2018 11:05:25 +0100, Dave Plowman (News) wrote: Is the cable on show? If so, soldering and sleeving carefully using heat shrink sleeving may look best. If concealed, simply twist and use small choc strip. A choc strip isn't tamper proof. Solder and sleeving is as tamper proof as the cable. Use a proper alarm cable jointing box. Terminal for each wire and a tamper switch that operates when you take the cover off. Do you know how easy it is to take the cover off one without activating the tamper switch if you wanted to? The same goes for bell boxes and alarm panels. I'd guess any ner-do-well who was into tampering with alarm wiring would be well aware of the easiest ways to do it. And it's not that difficult to get at the conductors inside a cable run anyway, when you don't care about how much damage you might do. Its more difficult with modern systems, they can use end of line terminations so they can detect cuts, shorts and changes in resistance. The old Chubb systems I used to work on 40 years ago were easy to hack if you knew how. They can use EOL if they want. The first thing to disable is the bell box. Five minutes job done and the ladders are back on the van. -- Adam |
#30
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 05/05/2018 17:54, ARW wrote:
They can use EOL if they want. The first thing to disable is the bell box. Five minutes job done and the ladders are back on the van. Taking the cover off mine will sound the alarm in both bell boxes. They probably think one is a dummy so will not be prepared. They probably won't cut the phone either. |
#31
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 05/05/2018 11:53, Huge wrote:
On 2018-05-05, ARW wrote: [27 lines snipped] I suppose it it worth mentioning again that 9 out of 10 of the alarms that I fit (other than new builds) are fitted about a week after the house has been burgled. I know this isn't why they're fitted, but it's quite "normal" for the burglars to come back in a few weeks to steal all the new shiny things the insurance payout has bought. Quite often exactly a week later. The insurance money has been spent on replacing whatever was stolen and the burglars know from their previous visit that the householder is most probably out. Add in that any windows or doors that were forced will probably not have been fixed to be completely secu it's much faster to replace a laptop than it is to replace a back door and frame. -- F |
#32
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "dennis@home" wrote in message ... On 05/05/2018 17:54, ARW wrote: They can use EOL if they want. The first thing to disable is the bell box. Five minutes job done and the ladders are back on the van. Taking the cover off mine will sound the alarm in both bell boxes. They probably think one is a dummy so will not be prepared. They probably won't cut the phone either. Not possible to cut my phone. |
#33
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
F wrote:
Quite often exactly a week later. The insurance money has been spent on replacing whatever was stolen Sounds optimistic, a colleague was burgled just after xmas, he only got the payment through last week to go out and replace stuff ... |
#34
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 06 May 2018 09:40:47 +0100, Andy Burns wrote:
F wrote: Quite often exactly a week later. The insurance money has been spent on replacing whatever was stolen Sounds optimistic, a colleague was burgled just after xmas, he only got the payment through last week to go out and replace stuff ... We were burgled on a Friday. I reported it on the Friday, and emailed details of how much on Friday evening. The money was in my account by close of business on Monday. -- My posts are my copyright and if @diy_forums or Home Owners' Hub wish to copy them they can pay me £1 a message. Use the BIG mirror service in the UK: http://www.mirrorservice.org *lightning surge protection* - a w_tom conductor |
#35
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 06 May 2018 08:24:34 +0000, Huge wrote:
On 2018-05-05, F news@nowhere wrote: On 05/05/2018 11:53, Huge wrote: On 2018-05-05, ARW wrote: [27 lines snipped] I suppose it it worth mentioning again that 9 out of 10 of the alarms that I fit (other than new builds) are fitted about a week after the house has been burgled. I know this isn't why they're fitted, but it's quite "normal" for the burglars to come back in a few weeks to steal all the new shiny things the insurance payout has bought. Quite often exactly a week later. I doubt it. Which insurance company will pay out in a week? I've just made a travel insurance claim, where we had a 100% squeaky clean justification and full documentation and it still took them about six weeks. Insurance companies are only quick and efficient at collecting premiums. Not true with our burglary. One working day. -- My posts are my copyright and if @diy_forums or Home Owners' Hub wish to copy them they can pay me £1 a message. Use the BIG mirror service in the UK: http://www.mirrorservice.org *lightning surge protection* - a w_tom conductor |
#36
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 06 May 2018 10:16:19 +0000, Huge wrote:
On 2018-05-06, Bob Eager wrote: On Sun, 06 May 2018 09:40:47 +0100, Andy Burns wrote: F wrote: Quite often exactly a week later. The insurance money has been spent on replacing whatever was stolen Sounds optimistic, a colleague was burgled just after xmas, he only got the payment through last week to go out and replace stuff ... We were burgled on a Friday. I reported it on the Friday, and emailed details of how much on Friday evening. The money was in my account by close of business on Monday. When was that, 1972? Last October. -- My posts are my copyright and if @diy_forums or Home Owners' Hub wish to copy them they can pay me £1 a message. Use the BIG mirror service in the UK: http://www.mirrorservice.org *lightning surge protection* - a w_tom conductor |
#37
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bob Eager wrote:
We were burgled on a Friday. I reported it on the Friday, and emailed details of how much on Friday evening. The money was in my account by close of business on Monday. Hiscox? |
#38
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 06 May 2018 12:29:50 +0100, Andy Burns wrote:
Bob Eager wrote: We were burgled on a Friday. I reported it on the Friday, and emailed details of how much on Friday evening. The money was in my account by close of business on Monday. Hiscox? M & S -- My posts are my copyright and if @diy_forums or Home Owners' Hub wish to copy them they can pay me £1 a message. Use the BIG mirror service in the UK: http://www.mirrorservice.org *lightning surge protection* - a w_tom conductor |
#39
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 05/05/2018 23:05, dennis@home wrote:
On 05/05/2018 17:54, ARW wrote: They can use EOL if they want. The first thing to disable is the bell box. Five minutes job done and the ladders are back on the van. Taking the cover off mine will sound the alarm in both bell boxes. They probably think one is a dummy so will not be prepared. They probably won't cut the phone either. Most bell boxes sound if you remove the cover, hence you use other methods to disable them than do not involve removing the cover. -- Adam |
#40
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 06/05/2018 09:24, Huge wrote:
On 2018-05-05, F news@nowhere wrote: On 05/05/2018 11:53, Huge wrote: On 2018-05-05, ARW wrote: [27 lines snipped] I suppose it it worth mentioning again that 9 out of 10 of the alarms that I fit (other than new builds) are fitted about a week after the house has been burgled. I know this isn't why they're fitted, but it's quite "normal" for the burglars to come back in a few weeks to steal all the new shiny things the insurance payout has bought. Quite often exactly a week later. I doubt it. Which insurance company will pay out in a week? I've just made a travel insurance claim, where we had a 100% squeaky clean justification and full documentation and it still took them about six weeks. Insurance companies are only quick and efficient at collecting premiums. Direct Line were pretty fast when one of their drivers ran into the back of my van at slow speed. I got a phone call the next day offering a hire van and a full repair to my van. I actually had sustained no damage and my tow bar had wrecked her air con radiator and bumper etc. I spent ages arguing on the phone that I did not need a repair and in the end they posted me a disclaimer for me to sign. -- Adam |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Smoke alarm or stink alarm | Home Repair | |||
Cutting and extending alarm cable problem | UK diy | |||
Extending Earth Wire For Sink | UK diy | |||
Extending the Neutral Wire for AFCI & GFCI Breakers in a Breaker Panel | Home Repair | |||
Simple cheap wireless personal alarm (not intruder alarm) required | UK diy |