On Tue, 09 May 2017 21:52:54 +0100, Rod Speed wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message
news
On Sun, 07 May 2017 22:16:46 +0100, Rod Speed
wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message
news On Sun, 07 May 2017 21:18:33 +0100, Rod Speed
wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message
news On Sun, 07 May 2017 00:59:06 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message
news On Sat, 06 May 2017 22:54:42 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message
news On Sat, 06 May 2017 00:44:48 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message
news On Wed, 03 May 2017 20:54:41 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message
news On Tue, 25 Apr 2017 23:11:25 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in
message
news On Tue, 25 Apr 2017 20:27:49 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in
message
news On Sat, 22 Apr 2017 21:36:38 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in
message
news On Sat, 22 Apr 2017 16:11:29 +0100, Bod

wrote:

On 22/04/2017 15:04, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Fri, 21 Apr 2017 20:03:18 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:

No one has got within a bulls roar of him for
centurys.

Even Vlad the Impaler wasn't a patch on him.

Trump and BNP are getting there.

Hmm, Trump is a God lover.

So was Hitler,

Like hell he was.

Catholic apparently.

Nope, he never bothered to go to church as an adult.

Didn't bother with a priest when he killed himself either.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religi...f_Adolf_Hitler
agrees with you.

Yeah, its pretty accurate.

I blame Bod for giving me false information.

Yeah, have him summarily executed forthwith.

Bullet in the back of the neck is the way to go.

I did used to think he was an atheist.

Nar, just another stupid god botherer.

Make up your mind. Was Hitler religious or not?

I thought you were talking about Bod there.

Bod is an atheist.

but he still managed to get rid of a load of competing
god
lovers.

And then they got rid of him.

He got more of them then they got of him.

Not with the yanks, they killed a lot
more krauts than the krauts killed yanks.

But how many religious nuts were killed vs. atheists?

Hard to say because it's a tad hard to define a religious
nut.

Someone who believes in god.

Hard to claim that 95% of people are religious nuts.

Why? Most people are pretty stupid.

Heaps more god botherers than atheist tho, just because
there will always be heaps more than need a crutch for
their pathetic excuses for 'minds' than don't.

So no great loss then.

Dunno, we need someone to dig the ditches,
clean the dunnys, wipe little kids arses etc etc etc.

Remove all religious nuts, then the atheists can **** a lot and
fill
in
the gaps.

But wouldn't be stupid enough to do **** like that.

Nothing wrong with cleansing the world of idiots.

There is when you need idiots to do **** like that.

The non idiots arent stupid enough to do **** like that,
they are smart enough to get idiots to do it for them.

Somebody has to do it.

Yes, but it might as well be the idiots.

Having to do easy manual labour is a small price to pay for removing
all
stupidity.

Not possible to remove all stupidity.

We could if we did away with political correctness and morals.

Nope, more would show up due to their mother's activity.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fetal_...ctrum_disorder

Not common enough to matter.

It is in fact very common indeed.

Cite a percentage.

Money tends to make people do things.

Wouldn't make me wipe little kids arses all day.

Or me. Then again women don't seem to hate things like that,
otherwise
nobody would ever have children.

Its more tolerated because you don't have to do it for long.

Then explain those who have many children.

They make the other children wipe the arses of the latest ones.

Never happened with me.

Your parents didn't have many children.

Two. So opportunity for me to. Which I didn't, and was never asked to.

You need god bothering stupids to do that ****.

That's the whole point of religion, tell the most
stupid that they end up hell if they don't do that
sort of ****, so they keep doing that **** so they
don't end up in hell.

Nah, they do **** work to get paid.

Nope, they put their hand out to the state for benefits.

Then remove them.

Not legal to do that.

Then change the law.

Not possible, the stupid god botherers outnumber us.

They must be exterminated.

Not even possible when there are only 5% of us.

I do not believe 95% believe in god.

They do anyway.

Stats show otherwise.

--
Do not adjust your mind - the fault is with reality.

On 11/05/2017 10:34, The Peeler wrote:
On Thu, 11 May 2017 02:06:13 +0100, Fredxxx, the resident smartass,
smartassed again:

LOL! The funny thing is, it's YOU, and ONLY you, who keeps coming up, time
and again, with that erotic thing for Birdbrain. You a fag, smartass? That
would explain a few things about you.

When you an alternative explanation for your infatuation with
Peter............

There you go again with your notorious sexual thing. You ARE a fag. Or
abysmally stupid like the sick idiot you stand up for. Or, more likely,
both! BG

Your insecurity shows.

Are you admitting your infatuation with Peter is based on lust?

"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message
news
On Tue, 09 May 2017 21:52:54 +0100, Rod Speed
wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message
news
On Sun, 07 May 2017 22:16:46 +0100, Rod Speed
wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message
news On Sun, 07 May 2017 21:18:33 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message
news On Sun, 07 May 2017 00:59:06 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message
news On Sat, 06 May 2017 22:54:42 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message
news On Sat, 06 May 2017 00:44:48 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message
news On Wed, 03 May 2017 20:54:41 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in
message
news On Tue, 25 Apr 2017 23:11:25 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in
message
news On Tue, 25 Apr 2017 20:27:49 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in
message
news On Sat, 22 Apr 2017 21:36:38 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in
message
news On Sat, 22 Apr 2017 16:11:29 +0100, Bod

wrote:

On 22/04/2017 15:04, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Fri, 21 Apr 2017 20:03:18 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:

No one has got within a bulls roar of him for
centurys.

Even Vlad the Impaler wasn't a patch on him.

Trump and BNP are getting there.

Hmm, Trump is a God lover.

So was Hitler,

Like hell he was.

Catholic apparently.

Nope, he never bothered to go to church as an adult.

Didn't bother with a priest when he killed himself
either.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religi...f_Adolf_Hitler
agrees with you.

Yeah, its pretty accurate.

I blame Bod for giving me false information.

Yeah, have him summarily executed forthwith.

Bullet in the back of the neck is the way to go.

I did used to think he was an atheist.

Nar, just another stupid god botherer.

Make up your mind. Was Hitler religious or not?

I thought you were talking about Bod there.

Bod is an atheist.

but he still managed to get rid of a load of competing
god
lovers.

And then they got rid of him.

He got more of them then they got of him.

Not with the yanks, they killed a lot
more krauts than the krauts killed yanks.

But how many religious nuts were killed vs. atheists?

Hard to say because it's a tad hard to define a religious
nut.

Someone who believes in god.

Hard to claim that 95% of people are religious nuts.

Why? Most people are pretty stupid.

Heaps more god botherers than atheist tho, just because
there will always be heaps more than need a crutch for
their pathetic excuses for 'minds' than don't.

So no great loss then.

Dunno, we need someone to dig the ditches,
clean the dunnys, wipe little kids arses etc etc etc.

Remove all religious nuts, then the atheists can **** a lot
and
fill
in
the gaps.

But wouldn't be stupid enough to do **** like that.

Nothing wrong with cleansing the world of idiots.

There is when you need idiots to do **** like that.

The non idiots arent stupid enough to do **** like that,
they are smart enough to get idiots to do it for them.

Somebody has to do it.

Yes, but it might as well be the idiots.

Having to do easy manual labour is a small price to pay for removing
all
stupidity.

Not possible to remove all stupidity.

We could if we did away with political correctness and morals.

Nope, more would show up due to their mother's activity.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fetal_...ctrum_disorder

Not common enough to matter.

It is in fact very common indeed.

Cite a percentage.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fetal_...rder#Australia

Money tends to make people do things.

Wouldn't make me wipe little kids arses all day.

Or me. Then again women don't seem to hate things like that,
otherwise
nobody would ever have children.

Its more tolerated because you don't have to do it for long.

Then explain those who have many children.

They make the other children wipe the arses of the latest ones.

Never happened with me.

Your parents didn't have many children.

Two.

Notning even remotely like enough to see that done,
if only because they are so close together in age.

You need god bothering stupids to do that ****.

That's the whole point of religion, tell the most
stupid that they end up hell if they don't do that
sort of ****, so they keep doing that **** so they
don't end up in hell.

Nah, they do **** work to get paid.

Nope, they put their hand out to the state for benefits.

Then remove them.

Not legal to do that.

Then change the law.

Not possible, the stupid god botherers outnumber us.

They must be exterminated.

Not even possible when there are only 5% of us.

I do not believe 95% believe in god.

They do anyway.

Stats show otherwise.

Like hell they do.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demogr...United_Kingdom
9% but its much lower in the US.

On Thu, 11 May 2017 20:05:31 +0100, Rod Speed wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message
news
On Tue, 09 May 2017 21:52:54 +0100, Rod Speed
wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message
news On Sun, 07 May 2017 22:16:46 +0100, Rod Speed
wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message
news On Sun, 07 May 2017 21:18:33 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message
news On Sun, 07 May 2017 00:59:06 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message
news On Sat, 06 May 2017 22:54:42 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message
news On Sat, 06 May 2017 00:44:48 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message
news On Wed, 03 May 2017 20:54:41 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in
message
news On Tue, 25 Apr 2017 23:11:25 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in
message
news On Tue, 25 Apr 2017 20:27:49 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in
message
news On Sat, 22 Apr 2017 21:36:38 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in
message
news On Sat, 22 Apr 2017 16:11:29 +0100, Bod

wrote:

On 22/04/2017 15:04, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Fri, 21 Apr 2017 20:03:18 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:

No one has got within a bulls roar of him for
centurys.

Even Vlad the Impaler wasn't a patch on him.

Trump and BNP are getting there.

Hmm, Trump is a God lover.

So was Hitler,

Like hell he was.

Catholic apparently.

Nope, he never bothered to go to church as an adult.

Didn't bother with a priest when he killed himself
either.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religi...f_Adolf_Hitler
agrees with you.

Yeah, its pretty accurate.

I blame Bod for giving me false information.

Yeah, have him summarily executed forthwith.

Bullet in the back of the neck is the way to go.

I did used to think he was an atheist.

Nar, just another stupid god botherer.

Make up your mind. Was Hitler religious or not?

I thought you were talking about Bod there.

Bod is an atheist.

but he still managed to get rid of a load of competing
god
lovers.

And then they got rid of him.

He got more of them then they got of him.

Not with the yanks, they killed a lot
more krauts than the krauts killed yanks.

But how many religious nuts were killed vs. atheists?

Hard to say because it's a tad hard to define a religious
nut.

Someone who believes in god.

Hard to claim that 95% of people are religious nuts.

Why? Most people are pretty stupid.

Heaps more god botherers than atheist tho, just because
there will always be heaps more than need a crutch for
their pathetic excuses for 'minds' than don't.

So no great loss then.

Dunno, we need someone to dig the ditches,
clean the dunnys, wipe little kids arses etc etc etc.

Remove all religious nuts, then the atheists can **** a lot
and
fill
in
the gaps.

But wouldn't be stupid enough to do **** like that.

Nothing wrong with cleansing the world of idiots.

There is when you need idiots to do **** like that.

The non idiots arent stupid enough to do **** like that,
they are smart enough to get idiots to do it for them.

Somebody has to do it.

Yes, but it might as well be the idiots.

Having to do easy manual labour is a small price to pay for removing
all
stupidity.

Not possible to remove all stupidity.

We could if we did away with political correctness and morals.

Nope, more would show up due to their mother's activity.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fetal_...ctrum_disorder

Not common enough to matter.

It is in fact very common indeed.

Cite a percentage.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fetal_...rder#Australia

"In Western Australia, the rate of births resulting in FASD is 0.02 per 1000 births for non-Indigenous Australians, however among indigenous births the rate is 2.76 per 1000 births"

So, between 0.002% and 0.276%. Not common then.

Money tends to make people do things.

Wouldn't make me wipe little kids arses all day.

Or me. Then again women don't seem to hate things like that,
otherwise
nobody would ever have children.

Its more tolerated because you don't have to do it for long.

Then explain those who have many children.

They make the other children wipe the arses of the latest ones.

Never happened with me.

Your parents didn't have many children.

Two.

Notning even remotely like enough to see that done,
if only because they are so close together in age.

5 years apart.

You need god bothering stupids to do that ****.

That's the whole point of religion, tell the most
stupid that they end up hell if they don't do that
sort of ****, so they keep doing that **** so they
don't end up in hell.

Nah, they do **** work to get paid.

Nope, they put their hand out to the state for benefits.

Then remove them.

Not legal to do that.

Then change the law.

Not possible, the stupid god botherers outnumber us.

They must be exterminated.

Not even possible when there are only 5% of us.

I do not believe 95% believe in god.

They do anyway.

Stats show otherwise.

Like hell they do.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demogr...United_Kingdom
9% but its much lower in the US.

39%.

--
What is the difference between a female jogger and a sewing machine?
A sewing machine only has one bobbin.

On 11/05/2017 19:47, The Peeler wrote:
On Thu, 11 May 2017 19:38:24 +0100, Fredxxx, the resident smartass,
smartassed again:

There you go again with your notorious sexual thing. You ARE a fag. Or
abysmally stupid like the sick idiot you stand up for. Or, more likely,
both! BG

Your insecurity shows.

Are you admitting your infatuation with Peter is based on lust?

...and he does it again, right on cue! Just HOW dumb are you? LOL!!!

They do say the truth hurts. Name calling being a symptom of pain.

"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message
news
On Thu, 11 May 2017 20:05:31 +0100, Rod Speed
wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message
news
On Tue, 09 May 2017 21:52:54 +0100, Rod Speed
wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message
news On Sun, 07 May 2017 22:16:46 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message
news On Sun, 07 May 2017 21:18:33 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message
news On Sun, 07 May 2017 00:59:06 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message
news On Sat, 06 May 2017 22:54:42 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message
news On Sat, 06 May 2017 00:44:48 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in
message
news On Wed, 03 May 2017 20:54:41 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in
message
news On Tue, 25 Apr 2017 23:11:25 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in
message
news On Tue, 25 Apr 2017 20:27:49 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in
message
news On Sat, 22 Apr 2017 21:36:38 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote
in
message
news On Sat, 22 Apr 2017 16:11:29 +0100, Bod

wrote:

On 22/04/2017 15:04, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Fri, 21 Apr 2017 20:03:18 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:

No one has got within a bulls roar of him for
centurys.

Even Vlad the Impaler wasn't a patch on him.

Trump and BNP are getting there.

Hmm, Trump is a God lover.

So was Hitler,

Like hell he was.

Catholic apparently.

Nope, he never bothered to go to church as an adult.

Didn't bother with a priest when he killed himself
either.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religi...f_Adolf_Hitler
agrees with you.

Yeah, its pretty accurate.

I blame Bod for giving me false information.

Yeah, have him summarily executed forthwith.

Bullet in the back of the neck is the way to go.

I did used to think he was an atheist.

Nar, just another stupid god botherer.

Make up your mind. Was Hitler religious or not?

I thought you were talking about Bod there.

Bod is an atheist.

but he still managed to get rid of a load of
competing
god
lovers.

And then they got rid of him.

He got more of them then they got of him.

Not with the yanks, they killed a lot
more krauts than the krauts killed yanks.

But how many religious nuts were killed vs. atheists?

Hard to say because it's a tad hard to define a religious
nut.

Someone who believes in god.

Hard to claim that 95% of people are religious nuts.

Why? Most people are pretty stupid.

Heaps more god botherers than atheist tho, just because
there will always be heaps more than need a crutch for
their pathetic excuses for 'minds' than don't.

So no great loss then.

Dunno, we need someone to dig the ditches,
clean the dunnys, wipe little kids arses etc etc etc.

Remove all religious nuts, then the atheists can **** a lot
and
fill
in
the gaps.

But wouldn't be stupid enough to do **** like that.

Nothing wrong with cleansing the world of idiots.

There is when you need idiots to do **** like that.

The non idiots arent stupid enough to do **** like that,
they are smart enough to get idiots to do it for them.

Somebody has to do it.

Yes, but it might as well be the idiots.

Having to do easy manual labour is a small price to pay for
removing
all
stupidity.

Not possible to remove all stupidity.

We could if we did away with political correctness and morals.

Nope, more would show up due to their mother's activity.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fetal_...ctrum_disorder

Not common enough to matter.

It is in fact very common indeed.

Cite a percentage.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fetal_...rder#Australia

"In Western Australia, the rate of births resulting in FASD is 0.02 per
1000 births for non-Indigenous Australians, however among indigenous
births the rate is 2.76 per 1000 births"

So, between 0.002% and 0.276%. Not common then.

Money tends to make people do things.

Wouldn't make me wipe little kids arses all day.

Or me. Then again women don't seem to hate things like that,
otherwise
nobody would ever have children.

Its more tolerated because you don't have to do it for long.

Then explain those who have many children.

They make the other children wipe the arses of the latest ones.

Never happened with me.

Your parents didn't have many children.

Two.

Notning even remotely like enough to see that done,
if only because they are so close together in age.

5 years apart.

You need god bothering stupids to do that ****.

That's the whole point of religion, tell the most
stupid that they end up hell if they don't do that
sort of ****, so they keep doing that **** so they
don't end up in hell.

Nah, they do **** work to get paid.

Nope, they put their hand out to the state for benefits.

Then remove them.

Not legal to do that.

Then change the law.

Not possible, the stupid god botherers outnumber us.

They must be exterminated.

Not even possible when there are only 5% of us.

I do not believe 95% believe in god.

They do anyway.

Stats show otherwise.

Like hell they do.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demogr...United_Kingdom
9% but its much lower in the US.

39%.

Nope. The extra 30% are those stupid enough to believe that there might be
some god or other.

"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message
news
On Thu, 11 May 2017 20:05:31 +0100, Rod Speed
wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message
news
On Tue, 09 May 2017 21:52:54 +0100, Rod Speed
wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message
news On Sun, 07 May 2017 22:16:46 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message
news On Sun, 07 May 2017 21:18:33 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message
news On Sun, 07 May 2017 00:59:06 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message
news On Sat, 06 May 2017 22:54:42 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message
news On Sat, 06 May 2017 00:44:48 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in
message
news On Wed, 03 May 2017 20:54:41 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in
message
news On Tue, 25 Apr 2017 23:11:25 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in
message
news On Tue, 25 Apr 2017 20:27:49 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in
message
news On Sat, 22 Apr 2017 21:36:38 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote
in
message
news On Sat, 22 Apr 2017 16:11:29 +0100, Bod

wrote:

On 22/04/2017 15:04, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Fri, 21 Apr 2017 20:03:18 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:

No one has got within a bulls roar of him for
centurys.

Even Vlad the Impaler wasn't a patch on him.

Trump and BNP are getting there.

Hmm, Trump is a God lover.

So was Hitler,

Like hell he was.

Catholic apparently.

Nope, he never bothered to go to church as an adult.

Didn't bother with a priest when he killed himself
either.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religi...f_Adolf_Hitler
agrees with you.

Yeah, its pretty accurate.

I blame Bod for giving me false information.

Yeah, have him summarily executed forthwith.

Bullet in the back of the neck is the way to go.

I did used to think he was an atheist.

Nar, just another stupid god botherer.

Make up your mind. Was Hitler religious or not?

I thought you were talking about Bod there.

Bod is an atheist.

but he still managed to get rid of a load of
competing
god
lovers.

And then they got rid of him.

He got more of them then they got of him.

Not with the yanks, they killed a lot
more krauts than the krauts killed yanks.

But how many religious nuts were killed vs. atheists?

Hard to say because it's a tad hard to define a religious
nut.

Someone who believes in god.

Hard to claim that 95% of people are religious nuts.

Why? Most people are pretty stupid.

Heaps more god botherers than atheist tho, just because
there will always be heaps more than need a crutch for
their pathetic excuses for 'minds' than don't.

So no great loss then.

Dunno, we need someone to dig the ditches,
clean the dunnys, wipe little kids arses etc etc etc.

Remove all religious nuts, then the atheists can **** a lot
and
fill
in
the gaps.

But wouldn't be stupid enough to do **** like that.

Nothing wrong with cleansing the world of idiots.

There is when you need idiots to do **** like that.

The non idiots arent stupid enough to do **** like that,
they are smart enough to get idiots to do it for them.

Somebody has to do it.

Yes, but it might as well be the idiots.

Having to do easy manual labour is a small price to pay for
removing
all
stupidity.

Not possible to remove all stupidity.

We could if we did away with political correctness and morals.

Nope, more would show up due to their mother's activity.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fetal_...ctrum_disorder

Not common enough to matter.

It is in fact very common indeed.

Cite a percentage.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fetal_...rder#Australia

"In Western Australia, the rate of births resulting in FASD is 0.02 per
1000 births for non-Indigenous Australians, however among indigenous
births the rate is 2.76 per 1000 births"

So, between 0.002% and 0.276%. Not common then.

It's a lot higher than that in the worst of the indigenous camps.

Money tends to make people do things.

Wouldn't make me wipe little kids arses all day.

Or me. Then again women don't seem to hate things like that,
otherwise
nobody would ever have children.

Its more tolerated because you don't have to do it for long.

Then explain those who have many children.

They make the other children wipe the arses of the latest ones.

Never happened with me.

Your parents didn't have many children.

Two.

Notning even remotely like enough to see that done,
if only because they are so close together in age.

5 years apart.

Nothing like old enough to wipe a little kids arse.
They can't even wipe their own arse at that age.

You need god bothering stupids to do that ****.

That's the whole point of religion, tell the most
stupid that they end up hell if they don't do that
sort of ****, so they keep doing that **** so they
don't end up in hell.

Nah, they do **** work to get paid.

Nope, they put their hand out to the state for benefits.

Then remove them.

Not legal to do that.

Then change the law.

Not possible, the stupid god botherers outnumber us.

They must be exterminated.

Not even possible when there are only 5% of us.

I do not believe 95% believe in god.

They do anyway.

Stats show otherwise.

Like hell they do.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demogr...United_Kingdom
9% but its much lower in the US.

39%.

The other 30% are actually stupid enough to believe that there might be some
god.

And you lot are rather more irreligious than most of the first and second
world.

On Thu, 11 May 2017 21:07:53 +0100, Rod Speed wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message
news
On Thu, 11 May 2017 20:05:31 +0100, Rod Speed
wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message
news On Tue, 09 May 2017 21:52:54 +0100, Rod Speed
wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message
news On Sun, 07 May 2017 22:16:46 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message
news On Sun, 07 May 2017 21:18:33 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message
news On Sun, 07 May 2017 00:59:06 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message
news On Sat, 06 May 2017 22:54:42 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message
news On Sat, 06 May 2017 00:44:48 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in
message
news On Wed, 03 May 2017 20:54:41 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in
message
news On Tue, 25 Apr 2017 23:11:25 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in
message
news On Tue, 25 Apr 2017 20:27:49 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in
message
news On Sat, 22 Apr 2017 21:36:38 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote
in
message
news On Sat, 22 Apr 2017 16:11:29 +0100, Bod

wrote:

On 22/04/2017 15:04, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Fri, 21 Apr 2017 20:03:18 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:

No one has got within a bulls roar of him for
centurys.

Even Vlad the Impaler wasn't a patch on him.

Trump and BNP are getting there.

Hmm, Trump is a God lover.

So was Hitler,

Like hell he was.

Catholic apparently.

Nope, he never bothered to go to church as an adult.

Didn't bother with a priest when he killed himself
either.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religi...f_Adolf_Hitler
agrees with you.

Yeah, its pretty accurate.

I blame Bod for giving me false information.

Yeah, have him summarily executed forthwith.

Bullet in the back of the neck is the way to go.

I did used to think he was an atheist.

Nar, just another stupid god botherer.

Make up your mind. Was Hitler religious or not?

I thought you were talking about Bod there.

Bod is an atheist.

but he still managed to get rid of a load of
competing
god
lovers.

And then they got rid of him.

He got more of them then they got of him.

Not with the yanks, they killed a lot
more krauts than the krauts killed yanks.

But how many religious nuts were killed vs. atheists?

Hard to say because it's a tad hard to define a religious
nut.

Someone who believes in god.

Hard to claim that 95% of people are religious nuts.

Why? Most people are pretty stupid.

Heaps more god botherers than atheist tho, just because
there will always be heaps more than need a crutch for
their pathetic excuses for 'minds' than don't.

So no great loss then.

Dunno, we need someone to dig the ditches,
clean the dunnys, wipe little kids arses etc etc etc.

Remove all religious nuts, then the atheists can **** a lot
and
fill
in
the gaps.

But wouldn't be stupid enough to do **** like that.

Nothing wrong with cleansing the world of idiots.

There is when you need idiots to do **** like that.

The non idiots arent stupid enough to do **** like that,
they are smart enough to get idiots to do it for them.

Somebody has to do it.

Yes, but it might as well be the idiots.

Having to do easy manual labour is a small price to pay for
removing
all
stupidity.

Not possible to remove all stupidity.

We could if we did away with political correctness and morals.

Nope, more would show up due to their mother's activity.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fetal_...ctrum_disorder

Not common enough to matter.

It is in fact very common indeed.

Cite a percentage.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fetal_...rder#Australia

"In Western Australia, the rate of births resulting in FASD is 0.02 per
1000 births for non-Indigenous Australians, however among indigenous
births the rate is 2.76 per 1000 births"

So, between 0.002% and 0.276%. Not common then.

Money tends to make people do things.

Wouldn't make me wipe little kids arses all day.

Or me. Then again women don't seem to hate things like that,
otherwise
nobody would ever have children.

Its more tolerated because you don't have to do it for long.

Then explain those who have many children.

They make the other children wipe the arses of the latest ones.

Never happened with me.

Your parents didn't have many children.

Two.

Notning even remotely like enough to see that done,
if only because they are so close together in age.

5 years apart.

You need god bothering stupids to do that ****.

That's the whole point of religion, tell the most
stupid that they end up hell if they don't do that
sort of ****, so they keep doing that **** so they
don't end up in hell.

Nah, they do **** work to get paid.

Nope, they put their hand out to the state for benefits.

Then remove them.

Not legal to do that.

Then change the law.

Not possible, the stupid god botherers outnumber us.

They must be exterminated.

Not even possible when there are only 5% of us.

I do not believe 95% believe in god.

They do anyway.

Stats show otherwise.

Like hell they do.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demogr...United_Kingdom
9% but its much lower in the US.

39%.

Nope. The extra 30% are those stupid enough to believe that there might be
some god or other.

Not having an opinion either way is acceptable.

--
The evening news is where they begin with "Good evening", and then proceed to tell you why it isn't.

"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message
news
On Thu, 11 May 2017 21:07:53 +0100, Rod Speed
wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message
news
On Thu, 11 May 2017 20:05:31 +0100, Rod Speed
wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message
news On Tue, 09 May 2017 21:52:54 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message
news On Sun, 07 May 2017 22:16:46 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message
news On Sun, 07 May 2017 21:18:33 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message
news On Sun, 07 May 2017 00:59:06 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message
news On Sat, 06 May 2017 22:54:42 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in
message
news On Sat, 06 May 2017 00:44:48 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in
message
news On Wed, 03 May 2017 20:54:41 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in
message
news On Tue, 25 Apr 2017 23:11:25 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in
message
news On Tue, 25 Apr 2017 20:27:49 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote
in
message
news On Sat, 22 Apr 2017 21:36:38 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword"
wrote
in
message
news On Sat, 22 Apr 2017 16:11:29 +0100, Bod

wrote:

On 22/04/2017 15:04, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Fri, 21 Apr 2017 20:03:18 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:

No one has got within a bulls roar of him for
centurys.

Even Vlad the Impaler wasn't a patch on him.

Trump and BNP are getting there.

Hmm, Trump is a God lover.

So was Hitler,

Like hell he was.

Catholic apparently.

Nope, he never bothered to go to church as an adult.

Didn't bother with a priest when he killed himself
either.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religi...f_Adolf_Hitler
agrees with you.

Yeah, its pretty accurate.

I blame Bod for giving me false information.

Yeah, have him summarily executed forthwith.

Bullet in the back of the neck is the way to go.

I did used to think he was an atheist.

Nar, just another stupid god botherer.

Make up your mind. Was Hitler religious or not?

I thought you were talking about Bod there.

Bod is an atheist.

but he still managed to get rid of a load of
competing
god
lovers.

And then they got rid of him.

He got more of them then they got of him.

Not with the yanks, they killed a lot
more krauts than the krauts killed yanks.

But how many religious nuts were killed vs. atheists?

Hard to say because it's a tad hard to define a
religious
nut.

Someone who believes in god.

Hard to claim that 95% of people are religious nuts.

Why? Most people are pretty stupid.

Heaps more god botherers than atheist tho, just because
there will always be heaps more than need a crutch for
their pathetic excuses for 'minds' than don't.

So no great loss then.

Dunno, we need someone to dig the ditches,
clean the dunnys, wipe little kids arses etc etc etc.

Remove all religious nuts, then the atheists can **** a
lot
and
fill
in
the gaps.

But wouldn't be stupid enough to do **** like that.

Nothing wrong with cleansing the world of idiots.

There is when you need idiots to do **** like that.

The non idiots arent stupid enough to do **** like that,
they are smart enough to get idiots to do it for them.

Somebody has to do it.

Yes, but it might as well be the idiots.

Having to do easy manual labour is a small price to pay for
removing
all
stupidity.

Not possible to remove all stupidity.

We could if we did away with political correctness and morals.

Nope, more would show up due to their mother's activity.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fetal_...ctrum_disorder

Not common enough to matter.

It is in fact very common indeed.

Cite a percentage.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fetal_...rder#Australia

"In Western Australia, the rate of births resulting in FASD is 0.02 per
1000 births for non-Indigenous Australians, however among indigenous
births the rate is 2.76 per 1000 births"

So, between 0.002% and 0.276%. Not common then.

Money tends to make people do things.

Wouldn't make me wipe little kids arses all day.

Or me. Then again women don't seem to hate things like that,
otherwise
nobody would ever have children.

Its more tolerated because you don't have to do it for long.

Then explain those who have many children.

They make the other children wipe the arses of the latest ones.

Never happened with me.

Your parents didn't have many children.

Two.

Notning even remotely like enough to see that done,
if only because they are so close together in age.

5 years apart.

You need god bothering stupids to do that ****.

That's the whole point of religion, tell the most
stupid that they end up hell if they don't do that
sort of ****, so they keep doing that **** so they
don't end up in hell.

Nah, they do **** work to get paid.

Nope, they put their hand out to the state for benefits.

Then remove them.

Not legal to do that.

Then change the law.

Not possible, the stupid god botherers outnumber us.

They must be exterminated.

Not even possible when there are only 5% of us.

I do not believe 95% believe in god.

They do anyway.

Stats show otherwise.

Like hell they do.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demogr...United_Kingdom
9% but its much lower in the US.

39%.

Nope. The extra 30% are those stupid enough to believe that there might
be some god or other.

Not having an opinion either way is acceptable.

That's not the case with those 30%

On Thu, 11 May 2017 21:13:12 +0100, Rod Speed wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message
news
On Thu, 11 May 2017 20:05:31 +0100, Rod Speed
wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message
news On Tue, 09 May 2017 21:52:54 +0100, Rod Speed
wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message
news On Sun, 07 May 2017 22:16:46 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message
news On Sun, 07 May 2017 21:18:33 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message
news On Sun, 07 May 2017 00:59:06 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message
news On Sat, 06 May 2017 22:54:42 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message
news On Sat, 06 May 2017 00:44:48 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in
message
news On Wed, 03 May 2017 20:54:41 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in
message
news On Tue, 25 Apr 2017 23:11:25 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in
message
news On Tue, 25 Apr 2017 20:27:49 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in
message
news On Sat, 22 Apr 2017 21:36:38 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote
in
message
news On Sat, 22 Apr 2017 16:11:29 +0100, Bod

wrote:

On 22/04/2017 15:04, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Fri, 21 Apr 2017 20:03:18 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:

No one has got within a bulls roar of him for
centurys.

Even Vlad the Impaler wasn't a patch on him.

Trump and BNP are getting there.

Hmm, Trump is a God lover.

So was Hitler,

Like hell he was.

Catholic apparently.

Nope, he never bothered to go to church as an adult.

Didn't bother with a priest when he killed himself
either.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religi...f_Adolf_Hitler
agrees with you.

Yeah, its pretty accurate.

I blame Bod for giving me false information.

Yeah, have him summarily executed forthwith.

Bullet in the back of the neck is the way to go.

I did used to think he was an atheist.

Nar, just another stupid god botherer.

Make up your mind. Was Hitler religious or not?

I thought you were talking about Bod there.

Bod is an atheist.

but he still managed to get rid of a load of
competing
god
lovers.

And then they got rid of him.

He got more of them then they got of him.

Not with the yanks, they killed a lot
more krauts than the krauts killed yanks.

But how many religious nuts were killed vs. atheists?

Hard to say because it's a tad hard to define a religious
nut.

Someone who believes in god.

Hard to claim that 95% of people are religious nuts.

Why? Most people are pretty stupid.

Heaps more god botherers than atheist tho, just because
there will always be heaps more than need a crutch for
their pathetic excuses for 'minds' than don't.

So no great loss then.

Dunno, we need someone to dig the ditches,
clean the dunnys, wipe little kids arses etc etc etc.

Remove all religious nuts, then the atheists can **** a lot
and
fill
in
the gaps.

But wouldn't be stupid enough to do **** like that.

Nothing wrong with cleansing the world of idiots.

There is when you need idiots to do **** like that.

The non idiots arent stupid enough to do **** like that,
they are smart enough to get idiots to do it for them.

Somebody has to do it.

Yes, but it might as well be the idiots.

Having to do easy manual labour is a small price to pay for
removing
all
stupidity.

Not possible to remove all stupidity.

We could if we did away with political correctness and morals.

Nope, more would show up due to their mother's activity.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fetal_...ctrum_disorder

Not common enough to matter.

It is in fact very common indeed.

Cite a percentage.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fetal_...rder#Australia

"In Western Australia, the rate of births resulting in FASD is 0.02 per
1000 births for non-Indigenous Australians, however among indigenous
births the rate is 2.76 per 1000 births"

So, between 0.002% and 0.276%. Not common then.

It's a lot higher than that in the worst of the indigenous camps.

But nobody cares about the Abbos.

Money tends to make people do things.

Wouldn't make me wipe little kids arses all day.

Or me. Then again women don't seem to hate things like that,
otherwise
nobody would ever have children.

Its more tolerated because you don't have to do it for long.

Then explain those who have many children.

They make the other children wipe the arses of the latest ones.

Never happened with me.

Your parents didn't have many children.

Two.

Notning even remotely like enough to see that done,
if only because they are so close together in age.

5 years apart.

Nothing like old enough to wipe a little kids arse.
They can't even wipe their own arse at that age.

At some point one will be able to for 5 years when the other cannot.

You need god bothering stupids to do that ****.

That's the whole point of religion, tell the most
stupid that they end up hell if they don't do that
sort of ****, so they keep doing that **** so they
don't end up in hell.

Nah, they do **** work to get paid.

Nope, they put their hand out to the state for benefits.

Then remove them.

Not legal to do that.

Then change the law.

Not possible, the stupid god botherers outnumber us.

They must be exterminated.

Not even possible when there are only 5% of us.

I do not believe 95% believe in god.

They do anyway.

Stats show otherwise.

Like hell they do.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demogr...United_Kingdom
9% but its much lower in the US.

39%.

The other 30% are actually stupid enough to believe that there might be some
god.

And you lot are rather more irreligious than most of the first and second
world.

That's because we're more intelligent than for example the Americans.

--
Snap-off parts, because it's French.

"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message
news
On Thu, 11 May 2017 21:13:12 +0100, Rod Speed
wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message
news
On Thu, 11 May 2017 20:05:31 +0100, Rod Speed
wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message
news On Tue, 09 May 2017 21:52:54 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message
news On Sun, 07 May 2017 22:16:46 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message
news On Sun, 07 May 2017 21:18:33 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message
news On Sun, 07 May 2017 00:59:06 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message
news On Sat, 06 May 2017 22:54:42 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in
message
news On Sat, 06 May 2017 00:44:48 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in
message
news On Wed, 03 May 2017 20:54:41 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in
message
news On Tue, 25 Apr 2017 23:11:25 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in
message
news On Tue, 25 Apr 2017 20:27:49 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote
in
message
news On Sat, 22 Apr 2017 21:36:38 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword"
wrote
in
message
news On Sat, 22 Apr 2017 16:11:29 +0100, Bod

wrote:

On 22/04/2017 15:04, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Fri, 21 Apr 2017 20:03:18 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:

No one has got within a bulls roar of him for
centurys.

Even Vlad the Impaler wasn't a patch on him.

Trump and BNP are getting there.

Hmm, Trump is a God lover.

So was Hitler,

Like hell he was.

Catholic apparently.

Nope, he never bothered to go to church as an adult.

Didn't bother with a priest when he killed himself
either.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religi...f_Adolf_Hitler
agrees with you.

Yeah, its pretty accurate.

I blame Bod for giving me false information.

Yeah, have him summarily executed forthwith.

Bullet in the back of the neck is the way to go.

I did used to think he was an atheist.

Nar, just another stupid god botherer.

Make up your mind. Was Hitler religious or not?

I thought you were talking about Bod there.

Bod is an atheist.

but he still managed to get rid of a load of
competing
god
lovers.

And then they got rid of him.

He got more of them then they got of him.

Not with the yanks, they killed a lot
more krauts than the krauts killed yanks.

But how many religious nuts were killed vs. atheists?

Hard to say because it's a tad hard to define a
religious
nut.

Someone who believes in god.

Hard to claim that 95% of people are religious nuts.

Why? Most people are pretty stupid.

Heaps more god botherers than atheist tho, just because
there will always be heaps more than need a crutch for
their pathetic excuses for 'minds' than don't.

So no great loss then.

Dunno, we need someone to dig the ditches,
clean the dunnys, wipe little kids arses etc etc etc.

Remove all religious nuts, then the atheists can **** a
lot
and
fill
in
the gaps.

But wouldn't be stupid enough to do **** like that.

Nothing wrong with cleansing the world of idiots.

There is when you need idiots to do **** like that.

The non idiots arent stupid enough to do **** like that,
they are smart enough to get idiots to do it for them.

Somebody has to do it.

Yes, but it might as well be the idiots.

Having to do easy manual labour is a small price to pay for
removing
all
stupidity.

Not possible to remove all stupidity.

We could if we did away with political correctness and morals.

Nope, more would show up due to their mother's activity.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fetal_...ctrum_disorder

Not common enough to matter.

It is in fact very common indeed.

Cite a percentage.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fetal_...rder#Australia

"In Western Australia, the rate of births resulting in FASD is 0.02 per
1000 births for non-Indigenous Australians, however among indigenous
births the rate is 2.76 per 1000 births"

So, between 0.002% and 0.276%. Not common then.

It's a lot higher than that in the worst of the indigenous camps.

But nobody cares about the Abbos.

Money tends to make people do things.

Wouldn't make me wipe little kids arses all day.

Or me. Then again women don't seem to hate things like that,
otherwise
nobody would ever have children.

Its more tolerated because you don't have to do it for long.

Then explain those who have many children.

They make the other children wipe the arses of the latest ones.

Never happened with me.

Your parents didn't have many children.

Two.

Notning even remotely like enough to see that done,
if only because they are so close together in age.

5 years apart.

Nothing like old enough to wipe a little kids arse.
They can't even wipe their own arse at that age.

At some point one will be able to for 5 years when the other cannot.

You need god bothering stupids to do that ****.

That's the whole point of religion, tell the most
stupid that they end up hell if they don't do that
sort of ****, so they keep doing that **** so they
don't end up in hell.

Nah, they do **** work to get paid.

Nope, they put their hand out to the state for benefits.

Then remove them.

Not legal to do that.

Then change the law.

Not possible, the stupid god botherers outnumber us.

They must be exterminated.

Not even possible when there are only 5% of us.

I do not believe 95% believe in god.

They do anyway.

Stats show otherwise.

Like hell they do.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demogr...United_Kingdom
9% but its much lower in the US.

39%.

The other 30% are actually stupid enough to believe that there might be
some
god.

And you lot are rather more irreligious than most of the first and second
world.

That's because we're more intelligent than for example the Americans.

--
Snap-off parts, because it's French.

"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message
news
On Thu, 11 May 2017 21:13:12 +0100, Rod Speed
wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message
news
On Thu, 11 May 2017 20:05:31 +0100, Rod Speed
wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message
news On Tue, 09 May 2017 21:52:54 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message
news On Sun, 07 May 2017 22:16:46 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message
news On Sun, 07 May 2017 21:18:33 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message
news On Sun, 07 May 2017 00:59:06 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message
news On Sat, 06 May 2017 22:54:42 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in
message
news On Sat, 06 May 2017 00:44:48 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in
message
news On Wed, 03 May 2017 20:54:41 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in
message
news On Tue, 25 Apr 2017 23:11:25 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in
message
news On Tue, 25 Apr 2017 20:27:49 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote
in
message
news On Sat, 22 Apr 2017 21:36:38 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword"
wrote
in
message
news On Sat, 22 Apr 2017 16:11:29 +0100, Bod

wrote:

On 22/04/2017 15:04, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Fri, 21 Apr 2017 20:03:18 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:

No one has got within a bulls roar of him for
centurys.

Even Vlad the Impaler wasn't a patch on him.

Trump and BNP are getting there.

Hmm, Trump is a God lover.

So was Hitler,

Like hell he was.

Catholic apparently.

Nope, he never bothered to go to church as an adult.

Didn't bother with a priest when he killed himself
either.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religi...f_Adolf_Hitler
agrees with you.

Yeah, its pretty accurate.

I blame Bod for giving me false information.

Yeah, have him summarily executed forthwith.

Bullet in the back of the neck is the way to go.

I did used to think he was an atheist.

Nar, just another stupid god botherer.

Make up your mind. Was Hitler religious or not?

I thought you were talking about Bod there.

Bod is an atheist.

but he still managed to get rid of a load of
competing
god
lovers.

And then they got rid of him.

He got more of them then they got of him.

Not with the yanks, they killed a lot
more krauts than the krauts killed yanks.

But how many religious nuts were killed vs. atheists?

Hard to say because it's a tad hard to define a
religious
nut.

Someone who believes in god.

Hard to claim that 95% of people are religious nuts.

Why? Most people are pretty stupid.

Heaps more god botherers than atheist tho, just because
there will always be heaps more than need a crutch for
their pathetic excuses for 'minds' than don't.

So no great loss then.

Dunno, we need someone to dig the ditches,
clean the dunnys, wipe little kids arses etc etc etc.

Remove all religious nuts, then the atheists can **** a
lot
and
fill
in
the gaps.

But wouldn't be stupid enough to do **** like that.

Nothing wrong with cleansing the world of idiots.

There is when you need idiots to do **** like that.

The non idiots arent stupid enough to do **** like that,
they are smart enough to get idiots to do it for them.

Somebody has to do it.

Yes, but it might as well be the idiots.

Having to do easy manual labour is a small price to pay for
removing
all
stupidity.

Not possible to remove all stupidity.

We could if we did away with political correctness and morals.

Nope, more would show up due to their mother's activity.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fetal_...ctrum_disorder

Not common enough to matter.

It is in fact very common indeed.

Cite a percentage.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fetal_...rder#Australia

"In Western Australia, the rate of births resulting in FASD is 0.02 per
1000 births for non-Indigenous Australians, however among indigenous
births the rate is 2.76 per 1000 births"

So, between 0.002% and 0.276%. Not common then.

It's a lot higher than that in the worst of the indigenous camps.

But nobody cares about the Abbos.

Those that end up paying to keep them in jail do.

So do those who pay for their benefits.

Money tends to make people do things.

Wouldn't make me wipe little kids arses all day.

Or me. Then again women don't seem to hate things like that,
otherwise
nobody would ever have children.

Its more tolerated because you don't have to do it for long.

Then explain those who have many children.

They make the other children wipe the arses of the latest ones.

Never happened with me.

Your parents didn't have many children.

Two.

Notning even remotely like enough to see that done,
if only because they are so close together in age.

5 years apart.

Nothing like old enough to wipe a little kids arse.
They can't even wipe their own arse at that age.

At some point one will be able to for 5 years when the other cannot.

Nope, while they can eventually wipe their own arses, by the
time there are big enough to wipe someone else's arse, that
younger one can wipe its own arse with a 5 year difference.

You need god bothering stupids to do that ****.

That's the whole point of religion, tell the most
stupid that they end up hell if they don't do that
sort of ****, so they keep doing that **** so they
don't end up in hell.

Nah, they do **** work to get paid.

Nope, they put their hand out to the state for benefits.

Then remove them.

Not legal to do that.

Then change the law.

Not possible, the stupid god botherers outnumber us.

They must be exterminated.

Not even possible when there are only 5% of us.

I do not believe 95% believe in god.

They do anyway.

Stats show otherwise.

Like hell they do.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demogr...United_Kingdom
9% but its much lower in the US.

39%.

The other 30% are actually stupid enough to believe that there might be
some god.

And you lot are rather more irreligious than most of the first and second
world.

That's because we're more intelligent than for example the Americans.

Nope. It appears to be because quite a few of the
earliest that moved to yankeeland from england
particularly did so because of the religious
persecution they got in england so its hardly
surprising that that did produce more stupid
believers in america eventually.

On Fri, 12 May 2017 18:46:47 +0100, Rod Speed wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message
news
On Thu, 11 May 2017 21:07:53 +0100, Rod Speed
wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message
news On Thu, 11 May 2017 20:05:31 +0100, Rod Speed
wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message
news On Tue, 09 May 2017 21:52:54 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message
news On Sun, 07 May 2017 22:16:46 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message
news On Sun, 07 May 2017 21:18:33 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message
news On Sun, 07 May 2017 00:59:06 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message
news On Sat, 06 May 2017 22:54:42 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in
message
news On Sat, 06 May 2017 00:44:48 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in
message
news On Wed, 03 May 2017 20:54:41 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in
message
news On Tue, 25 Apr 2017 23:11:25 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in
message
news On Tue, 25 Apr 2017 20:27:49 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote
in
message
news On Sat, 22 Apr 2017 21:36:38 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword"
wrote
in
message
news On Sat, 22 Apr 2017 16:11:29 +0100, Bod

wrote:

On 22/04/2017 15:04, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Fri, 21 Apr 2017 20:03:18 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:

No one has got within a bulls roar of him for
centurys.

Even Vlad the Impaler wasn't a patch on him.

Trump and BNP are getting there.

Hmm, Trump is a God lover.

So was Hitler,

Like hell he was.

Catholic apparently.

Nope, he never bothered to go to church as an adult.

Didn't bother with a priest when he killed himself
either.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religi...f_Adolf_Hitler
agrees with you.

Yeah, its pretty accurate.

I blame Bod for giving me false information.

Yeah, have him summarily executed forthwith.

Bullet in the back of the neck is the way to go.

I did used to think he was an atheist.

Nar, just another stupid god botherer.

Make up your mind. Was Hitler religious or not?

I thought you were talking about Bod there.

Bod is an atheist.

but he still managed to get rid of a load of
competing
god
lovers.

And then they got rid of him.

He got more of them then they got of him.

Not with the yanks, they killed a lot
more krauts than the krauts killed yanks.

But how many religious nuts were killed vs. atheists?

Hard to say because it's a tad hard to define a
religious
nut.

Someone who believes in god.

Hard to claim that 95% of people are religious nuts.

Why? Most people are pretty stupid.

Heaps more god botherers than atheist tho, just because
there will always be heaps more than need a crutch for
their pathetic excuses for 'minds' than don't.

So no great loss then.

Dunno, we need someone to dig the ditches,
clean the dunnys, wipe little kids arses etc etc etc.

Remove all religious nuts, then the atheists can **** a
lot
and
fill
in
the gaps.

But wouldn't be stupid enough to do **** like that.

Nothing wrong with cleansing the world of idiots.

There is when you need idiots to do **** like that.

The non idiots arent stupid enough to do **** like that,
they are smart enough to get idiots to do it for them.

Somebody has to do it.

Yes, but it might as well be the idiots.

Having to do easy manual labour is a small price to pay for
removing
all
stupidity.

Not possible to remove all stupidity.

We could if we did away with political correctness and morals.

Nope, more would show up due to their mother's activity.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fetal_...ctrum_disorder

Not common enough to matter.

It is in fact very common indeed.

Cite a percentage.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fetal_...rder#Australia

"In Western Australia, the rate of births resulting in FASD is 0.02 per
1000 births for non-Indigenous Australians, however among indigenous
births the rate is 2.76 per 1000 births"

So, between 0.002% and 0.276%. Not common then.

Money tends to make people do things.

Wouldn't make me wipe little kids arses all day.

Or me. Then again women don't seem to hate things like that,
otherwise
nobody would ever have children.

Its more tolerated because you don't have to do it for long.

Then explain those who have many children.

They make the other children wipe the arses of the latest ones.

Never happened with me.

Your parents didn't have many children.

Two.

Notning even remotely like enough to see that done,
if only because they are so close together in age.

5 years apart.

You need god bothering stupids to do that ****.

That's the whole point of religion, tell the most
stupid that they end up hell if they don't do that
sort of ****, so they keep doing that **** so they
don't end up in hell.

Nah, they do **** work to get paid.

Nope, they put their hand out to the state for benefits.

Then remove them.

Not legal to do that.

Then change the law.

Not possible, the stupid god botherers outnumber us.

They must be exterminated.

Not even possible when there are only 5% of us.

I do not believe 95% believe in god.

They do anyway.

Stats show otherwise.

Like hell they do.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demogr...United_Kingdom
9% but its much lower in the US.

39%.

Nope. The extra 30% are those stupid enough to believe that there might
be some god or other.

Not having an opinion either way is acceptable.

That's not the case with those 30%

It's a damn sight better than believing in god.

--
"I wonder who discovered we could get milk from cows and what the **** did he think he was doing?!" -- Billy Connolly

On Sat, 13 May 2017 04:24:05 +0100, Rod Speed wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message
news
On Thu, 11 May 2017 21:13:12 +0100, Rod Speed
wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message
news On Thu, 11 May 2017 20:05:31 +0100, Rod Speed
wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message
news On Tue, 09 May 2017 21:52:54 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message
news On Sun, 07 May 2017 22:16:46 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message
news On Sun, 07 May 2017 21:18:33 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message
news On Sun, 07 May 2017 00:59:06 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message
news On Sat, 06 May 2017 22:54:42 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in
message
news On Sat, 06 May 2017 00:44:48 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in
message
news On Wed, 03 May 2017 20:54:41 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in
message
news On Tue, 25 Apr 2017 23:11:25 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in
message
news On Tue, 25 Apr 2017 20:27:49 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote
in
message
news On Sat, 22 Apr 2017 21:36:38 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword"
wrote
in
message
news On Sat, 22 Apr 2017 16:11:29 +0100, Bod

wrote:

On 22/04/2017 15:04, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Fri, 21 Apr 2017 20:03:18 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:

No one has got within a bulls roar of him for
centurys.

Even Vlad the Impaler wasn't a patch on him.

Trump and BNP are getting there.

Hmm, Trump is a God lover.

So was Hitler,

Like hell he was.

Catholic apparently.

Nope, he never bothered to go to church as an adult.

Didn't bother with a priest when he killed himself
either.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religi...f_Adolf_Hitler
agrees with you.

Yeah, its pretty accurate.

I blame Bod for giving me false information.

Yeah, have him summarily executed forthwith.

Bullet in the back of the neck is the way to go.

I did used to think he was an atheist.

Nar, just another stupid god botherer.

Make up your mind. Was Hitler religious or not?

I thought you were talking about Bod there.

Bod is an atheist.

but he still managed to get rid of a load of
competing
god
lovers.

And then they got rid of him.

He got more of them then they got of him.

Not with the yanks, they killed a lot
more krauts than the krauts killed yanks.

But how many religious nuts were killed vs. atheists?

Hard to say because it's a tad hard to define a
religious
nut.

Someone who believes in god.

Hard to claim that 95% of people are religious nuts.

Why? Most people are pretty stupid.

Heaps more god botherers than atheist tho, just because
there will always be heaps more than need a crutch for
their pathetic excuses for 'minds' than don't.

So no great loss then.

Dunno, we need someone to dig the ditches,
clean the dunnys, wipe little kids arses etc etc etc.

Remove all religious nuts, then the atheists can **** a
lot
and
fill
in
the gaps.

But wouldn't be stupid enough to do **** like that.

Nothing wrong with cleansing the world of idiots.

There is when you need idiots to do **** like that.

The non idiots arent stupid enough to do **** like that,
they are smart enough to get idiots to do it for them.

Somebody has to do it.

Yes, but it might as well be the idiots.

Having to do easy manual labour is a small price to pay for
removing
all
stupidity.

Not possible to remove all stupidity.

We could if we did away with political correctness and morals.

Nope, more would show up due to their mother's activity.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fetal_...ctrum_disorder

Not common enough to matter.

It is in fact very common indeed.

Cite a percentage.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fetal_...rder#Australia

"In Western Australia, the rate of births resulting in FASD is 0.02 per
1000 births for non-Indigenous Australians, however among indigenous
births the rate is 2.76 per 1000 births"

So, between 0.002% and 0.276%. Not common then.

It's a lot higher than that in the worst of the indigenous camps.

But nobody cares about the Abbos.

Those that end up paying to keep them in jail do.

So do those who pay for their benefits.

Then remove the benefits and introduce the death sentence.

Anyway, what has jail to do with illness?

Money tends to make people do things.

Wouldn't make me wipe little kids arses all day.

Or me. Then again women don't seem to hate things like that,
otherwise
nobody would ever have children.

Its more tolerated because you don't have to do it for long.

Then explain those who have many children.

They make the other children wipe the arses of the latest ones.

Never happened with me.

Your parents didn't have many children.

Two.

Notning even remotely like enough to see that done,
if only because they are so close together in age.

5 years apart.

Nothing like old enough to wipe a little kids arse.
They can't even wipe their own arse at that age.

At some point one will be able to for 5 years when the other cannot.

Nope, while they can eventually wipe their own arses, by the
time there are big enough to wipe someone else's arse, that
younger one can wipe its own arse with a 5 year difference.

Wiping your own arse and wiping another arse is the same technique. In fact wiping someone else's is easier, as you can see what you're doing.

At least you don't say "ass".

You need god bothering stupids to do that ****.

That's the whole point of religion, tell the most
stupid that they end up hell if they don't do that
sort of ****, so they keep doing that **** so they
don't end up in hell.

Nah, they do **** work to get paid.

Nope, they put their hand out to the state for benefits.

Then remove them.

Not legal to do that.

Then change the law.

Not possible, the stupid god botherers outnumber us.

They must be exterminated.

Not even possible when there are only 5% of us.

I do not believe 95% believe in god.

They do anyway.

Stats show otherwise.

Like hell they do.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demogr...United_Kingdom
9% but its much lower in the US.

39%.

The other 30% are actually stupid enough to believe that there might be
some god.

And you lot are rather more irreligious than most of the first and second
world.

That's because we're more intelligent than for example the Americans.

Nope. It appears to be because quite a few of the
earliest that moved to yankeeland from england
particularly did so because of the religious
persecution they got in england so its hardly
surprising that that did produce more stupid
believers in america eventually.

In England back in those days there was more religion, so surely it would be the atheists that would run away?

--
There's a word you are misunderstanding or misinterpreting, whether explicitly or by necessary and inescapable implication.

"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message
news
On Fri, 12 May 2017 18:46:47 +0100, Rod Speed
wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message
news
On Thu, 11 May 2017 21:07:53 +0100, Rod Speed
wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message
news On Thu, 11 May 2017 20:05:31 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message
news On Tue, 09 May 2017 21:52:54 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message
news On Sun, 07 May 2017 22:16:46 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message
news On Sun, 07 May 2017 21:18:33 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message
news On Sun, 07 May 2017 00:59:06 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in
message
news On Sat, 06 May 2017 22:54:42 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in
message
news On Sat, 06 May 2017 00:44:48 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in
message
news On Wed, 03 May 2017 20:54:41 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in
message
news On Tue, 25 Apr 2017 23:11:25 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote
in
message
news On Tue, 25 Apr 2017 20:27:49 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword"
wrote
in
message
news On Sat, 22 Apr 2017 21:36:38 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword"
wrote
in
message
news On Sat, 22 Apr 2017 16:11:29 +0100, Bod

wrote:

On 22/04/2017 15:04, James Wilkinson Sword
wrote:
On Fri, 21 Apr 2017 20:03:18 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:

No one has got within a bulls roar of him for
centurys.

Even Vlad the Impaler wasn't a patch on him.

Trump and BNP are getting there.

Hmm, Trump is a God lover.

So was Hitler,

Like hell he was.

Catholic apparently.

Nope, he never bothered to go to church as an
adult.

Didn't bother with a priest when he killed himself
either.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religi...f_Adolf_Hitler
agrees with you.

Yeah, its pretty accurate.

I blame Bod for giving me false information.

Yeah, have him summarily executed forthwith.

Bullet in the back of the neck is the way to go.

I did used to think he was an atheist.

Nar, just another stupid god botherer.

Make up your mind. Was Hitler religious or not?

I thought you were talking about Bod there.

Bod is an atheist.

but he still managed to get rid of a load of
competing
god
lovers.

And then they got rid of him.

He got more of them then they got of him.

Not with the yanks, they killed a lot
more krauts than the krauts killed yanks.

But how many religious nuts were killed vs.
atheists?

Hard to say because it's a tad hard to define a
religious
nut.

Someone who believes in god.

Hard to claim that 95% of people are religious nuts.

Why? Most people are pretty stupid.

Heaps more god botherers than atheist tho, just
because
there will always be heaps more than need a crutch
for
their pathetic excuses for 'minds' than don't.

So no great loss then.

Dunno, we need someone to dig the ditches,
clean the dunnys, wipe little kids arses etc etc etc.

Remove all religious nuts, then the atheists can **** a
lot
and
fill
in
the gaps.

But wouldn't be stupid enough to do **** like that.

Nothing wrong with cleansing the world of idiots.

There is when you need idiots to do **** like that.

The non idiots arent stupid enough to do **** like that,
they are smart enough to get idiots to do it for them.

Somebody has to do it.

Yes, but it might as well be the idiots.

Having to do easy manual labour is a small price to pay for
removing
all
stupidity.

Not possible to remove all stupidity.

We could if we did away with political correctness and morals.

Nope, more would show up due to their mother's activity.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fetal_...ctrum_disorder

Not common enough to matter.

It is in fact very common indeed.

Cite a percentage.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fetal_...rder#Australia

"In Western Australia, the rate of births resulting in FASD is 0.02
per
1000 births for non-Indigenous Australians, however among indigenous
births the rate is 2.76 per 1000 births"

So, between 0.002% and 0.276%. Not common then.

Money tends to make people do things.

Wouldn't make me wipe little kids arses all day.

Or me. Then again women don't seem to hate things like that,
otherwise
nobody would ever have children.

Its more tolerated because you don't have to do it for long.

Then explain those who have many children.

They make the other children wipe the arses of the latest ones.

Never happened with me.

Your parents didn't have many children.

Two.

Notning even remotely like enough to see that done,
if only because they are so close together in age.

5 years apart.

You need god bothering stupids to do that ****.

That's the whole point of religion, tell the most
stupid that they end up hell if they don't do that
sort of ****, so they keep doing that **** so they
don't end up in hell.

Nah, they do **** work to get paid.

Nope, they put their hand out to the state for benefits.

Then remove them.

Not legal to do that.

Then change the law.

Not possible, the stupid god botherers outnumber us.

They must be exterminated.

Not even possible when there are only 5% of us.

I do not believe 95% believe in god.

They do anyway.

Stats show otherwise.

Like hell they do.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demogr...United_Kingdom
9% but its much lower in the US.

39%.

Nope. The extra 30% are those stupid enough to believe that there might
be some god or other.

Not having an opinion either way is acceptable.

That's not the case with those 30%

It's a damn sight better than believing in god.

Still stupid.

On Sat, 13 May 2017 20:34:20 +0100, Rod Speed wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message
news
On Fri, 12 May 2017 18:46:47 +0100, Rod Speed
wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message
news On Thu, 11 May 2017 21:07:53 +0100, Rod Speed
wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message
news On Thu, 11 May 2017 20:05:31 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message
news On Tue, 09 May 2017 21:52:54 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:
They do anyway.

Stats show otherwise.

Like hell they do.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demogr...United_Kingdom
9% but its much lower in the US.

39%.

Nope. The extra 30% are those stupid enough to believe that there might
be some god or other.

Not having an opinion either way is acceptable.

That's not the case with those 30%

It's a damn sight better than believing in god.

Still stupid.

I'll take slightly stupid over very stupid.

--
The fact that a believer is happier than a skeptic is no more to the point than the fact that a drunken man is happier than a sober one -- George Bernard Shaw

"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message
news
On Sat, 13 May 2017 04:24:05 +0100, Rod Speed
wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message
news
On Thu, 11 May 2017 21:13:12 +0100, Rod Speed
wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message
news On Thu, 11 May 2017 20:05:31 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message
news On Tue, 09 May 2017 21:52:54 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message
news On Sun, 07 May 2017 22:16:46 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message
news On Sun, 07 May 2017 21:18:33 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message
news On Sun, 07 May 2017 00:59:06 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in
message
news On Sat, 06 May 2017 22:54:42 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in
message
news On Sat, 06 May 2017 00:44:48 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in
message
news On Wed, 03 May 2017 20:54:41 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in
message
news On Tue, 25 Apr 2017 23:11:25 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote
in
message
news On Tue, 25 Apr 2017 20:27:49 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword"
wrote
in
message
news On Sat, 22 Apr 2017 21:36:38 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword"
wrote
in
message
news On Sat, 22 Apr 2017 16:11:29 +0100, Bod

wrote:

On 22/04/2017 15:04, James Wilkinson Sword
wrote:
On Fri, 21 Apr 2017 20:03:18 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:

No one has got within a bulls roar of him for
centurys.

Even Vlad the Impaler wasn't a patch on him.

Trump and BNP are getting there.

Hmm, Trump is a God lover.

So was Hitler,

Like hell he was.

Catholic apparently.

Nope, he never bothered to go to church as an
adult.

Didn't bother with a priest when he killed himself
either.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religi...f_Adolf_Hitler
agrees with you.

Yeah, its pretty accurate.

I blame Bod for giving me false information.

Yeah, have him summarily executed forthwith.

Bullet in the back of the neck is the way to go.

I did used to think he was an atheist.

Nar, just another stupid god botherer.

Make up your mind. Was Hitler religious or not?

I thought you were talking about Bod there.

Bod is an atheist.

but he still managed to get rid of a load of
competing
god
lovers.

And then they got rid of him.

He got more of them then they got of him.

Not with the yanks, they killed a lot
more krauts than the krauts killed yanks.

But how many religious nuts were killed vs.
atheists?

Hard to say because it's a tad hard to define a
religious
nut.

Someone who believes in god.

Hard to claim that 95% of people are religious nuts.

Why? Most people are pretty stupid.

Heaps more god botherers than atheist tho, just
because
there will always be heaps more than need a crutch
for
their pathetic excuses for 'minds' than don't.

So no great loss then.

Dunno, we need someone to dig the ditches,
clean the dunnys, wipe little kids arses etc etc etc.

Remove all religious nuts, then the atheists can **** a
lot
and
fill
in
the gaps.

But wouldn't be stupid enough to do **** like that.

Nothing wrong with cleansing the world of idiots.

There is when you need idiots to do **** like that.

The non idiots arent stupid enough to do **** like that,
they are smart enough to get idiots to do it for them.

Somebody has to do it.

Yes, but it might as well be the idiots.

Having to do easy manual labour is a small price to pay for
removing
all
stupidity.

Not possible to remove all stupidity.

We could if we did away with political correctness and morals.

Nope, more would show up due to their mother's activity.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fetal_...ctrum_disorder

Not common enough to matter.

It is in fact very common indeed.

Cite a percentage.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fetal_...rder#Australia

"In Western Australia, the rate of births resulting in FASD is 0.02
per
1000 births for non-Indigenous Australians, however among indigenous
births the rate is 2.76 per 1000 births"

So, between 0.002% and 0.276%. Not common then.

It's a lot higher than that in the worst of the indigenous camps.

But nobody cares about the Abbos.

Those that end up paying to keep them in jail do.

So do those who pay for their benefits.

Then remove the benefits

Not even possible.

and introduce the death sentence.

Not enough support a death sentence for shoplifting.

Anyway, what has jail to do with illness?

Its those with fetal alcohol spectrum
disorder that do most of the crime.

Money tends to make people do things.

Wouldn't make me wipe little kids arses all day.

Or me. Then again women don't seem to hate things like that,
otherwise
nobody would ever have children.

Its more tolerated because you don't have to do it for long.

Then explain those who have many children.

They make the other children wipe the arses of the latest ones.

Never happened with me.

Your parents didn't have many children.

Two.

Notning even remotely like enough to see that done,
if only because they are so close together in age.

5 years apart.

Nothing like old enough to wipe a little kids arse.
They can't even wipe their own arse at that age.

At some point one will be able to for 5 years when the other cannot.

Nope, while they can eventually wipe their own arses, by the
time they are big enough to wipe someone else's arse, that
younger one can wipe its own arse with a 5 year difference.

Wiping your own arse and wiping another arse is the same technique.

Even more pig ignorant than you usually manage.

In fact wiping someone else's is easier, as you can see what you're doing.

Even more pig ignorant than you usually manage.

At least you don't say "ass".

Donkeys don't get their arses wiped.

You need god bothering stupids to do that ****.

That's the whole point of religion, tell the most
stupid that they end up hell if they don't do that
sort of ****, so they keep doing that **** so they
don't end up in hell.

Nah, they do **** work to get paid.

Nope, they put their hand out to the state for benefits.

Then remove them.

Not legal to do that.

Then change the law.

Not possible, the stupid god botherers outnumber us.

They must be exterminated.

Not even possible when there are only 5% of us.

I do not believe 95% believe in god.

They do anyway.

Stats show otherwise.

Like hell they do.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demogr...United_Kingdom
9% but its much lower in the US.

39%.

The other 30% are actually stupid enough to believe that there might be
some god.

And you lot are rather more irreligious than most of the first and
second world.

That's because we're more intelligent than for example the Americans.

Nope. It appears to be because quite a few of the
earliest that moved to yankeeland from england
particularly did so because of the religious
persecution they got in england so its hardly
surprising that that did produce more stupid
believers in america eventually.

In England back in those days there was more religion, so surely it would
be the atheists that would run away?

Nope, they just shut up and carried on regardless.

Much harder to keep quiet about your non CoE religion.

You lot even make Catholicism illegal and had a full civil war too.

And that that time were quite literally burning each other at the stake too.

"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message
news
On Sat, 13 May 2017 20:34:20 +0100, Rod Speed
wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message
news
On Fri, 12 May 2017 18:46:47 +0100, Rod Speed
wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message
news On Thu, 11 May 2017 21:07:53 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message
news On Thu, 11 May 2017 20:05:31 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message
news On Tue, 09 May 2017 21:52:54 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:
They do anyway.

Stats show otherwise.

Like hell they do.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demogr...United_Kingdom
9% but its much lower in the US.

39%.

Nope. The extra 30% are those stupid enough to believe that there
might
be some god or other.

Not having an opinion either way is acceptable.

That's not the case with those 30%

It's a damn sight better than believing in god.

Still stupid.

I'll take slightly stupid over very stupid.

More fool you. And those arent slightly stupid,
just not quite as stupid as the rabid believers.

On Sat, 13 May 2017 21:16:51 +0100, Rod Speed wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message
news
On Sat, 13 May 2017 04:24:05 +0100, Rod Speed
wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message
news On Thu, 11 May 2017 21:13:12 +0100, Rod Speed
wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message
news On Thu, 11 May 2017 20:05:31 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message
news On Tue, 09 May 2017 21:52:54 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message
news On Sun, 07 May 2017 22:16:46 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message
news On Sun, 07 May 2017 21:18:33 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message
news On Sun, 07 May 2017 00:59:06 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in
message
news On Sat, 06 May 2017 22:54:42 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in
message
news On Sat, 06 May 2017 00:44:48 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in
message
news On Wed, 03 May 2017 20:54:41 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in
message
news On Tue, 25 Apr 2017 23:11:25 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote
in
message
news On Tue, 25 Apr 2017 20:27:49 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword"
wrote
in
message
news On Sat, 22 Apr 2017 21:36:38 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword"
wrote
in
message
news On Sat, 22 Apr 2017 16:11:29 +0100, Bod

wrote:

On 22/04/2017 15:04, James Wilkinson Sword
wrote:
On Fri, 21 Apr 2017 20:03:18 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:

No one has got within a bulls roar of him for
centurys.

Even Vlad the Impaler wasn't a patch on him.

Trump and BNP are getting there.

Hmm, Trump is a God lover.

So was Hitler,

Like hell he was.

Catholic apparently.

Nope, he never bothered to go to church as an
adult.

Didn't bother with a priest when he killed himself
either.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religi...f_Adolf_Hitler
agrees with you.

Yeah, its pretty accurate.

I blame Bod for giving me false information.

Yeah, have him summarily executed forthwith.

Bullet in the back of the neck is the way to go.

I did used to think he was an atheist.

Nar, just another stupid god botherer.

Make up your mind. Was Hitler religious or not?

I thought you were talking about Bod there.

Bod is an atheist.

but he still managed to get rid of a load of
competing
god
lovers.

And then they got rid of him.

He got more of them then they got of him.

Not with the yanks, they killed a lot
more krauts than the krauts killed yanks.

But how many religious nuts were killed vs.
atheists?

Hard to say because it's a tad hard to define a
religious
nut.

Someone who believes in god.

Hard to claim that 95% of people are religious nuts.

Why? Most people are pretty stupid.

Heaps more god botherers than atheist tho, just
because
there will always be heaps more than need a crutch
for
their pathetic excuses for 'minds' than don't.

So no great loss then.

Dunno, we need someone to dig the ditches,
clean the dunnys, wipe little kids arses etc etc etc.

Remove all religious nuts, then the atheists can **** a
lot
and
fill
in
the gaps.

But wouldn't be stupid enough to do **** like that.

Nothing wrong with cleansing the world of idiots.

There is when you need idiots to do **** like that.

The non idiots arent stupid enough to do **** like that,
they are smart enough to get idiots to do it for them.

Somebody has to do it.

Yes, but it might as well be the idiots.

Having to do easy manual labour is a small price to pay for
removing
all
stupidity.

Not possible to remove all stupidity.

We could if we did away with political correctness and morals.

Nope, more would show up due to their mother's activity.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fetal_...ctrum_disorder

Not common enough to matter.

It is in fact very common indeed.

Cite a percentage.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fetal_...rder#Australia

"In Western Australia, the rate of births resulting in FASD is 0.02
per
1000 births for non-Indigenous Australians, however among indigenous
births the rate is 2.76 per 1000 births"

So, between 0.002% and 0.276%. Not common then.

It's a lot higher than that in the worst of the indigenous camps.

But nobody cares about the Abbos.

Those that end up paying to keep them in jail do.

So do those who pay for their benefits.

Then remove the benefits

Not even possible.

No reason it can't be done.

and introduce the death sentence.

Not enough support a death sentence for shoplifting.

Use the three strikes rule like the USA.

Anyway, what has jail to do with illness?

Its those with fetal alcohol spectrum
disorder that do most of the crime.

You're making assumptions.

Money tends to make people do things.

Wouldn't make me wipe little kids arses all day.

Or me. Then again women don't seem to hate things like that,
otherwise
nobody would ever have children.

Its more tolerated because you don't have to do it for long.

Then explain those who have many children.

They make the other children wipe the arses of the latest ones.

Never happened with me.

Your parents didn't have many children.

Two.

Notning even remotely like enough to see that done,
if only because they are so close together in age.

5 years apart.

Nothing like old enough to wipe a little kids arse.
They can't even wipe their own arse at that age.

At some point one will be able to for 5 years when the other cannot.

Nope, while they can eventually wipe their own arses, by the
time they are big enough to wipe someone else's arse, that
younger one can wipe its own arse with a 5 year difference.

Wiping your own arse and wiping another arse is the same technique.

Even more pig ignorant than you usually manage.

In fact wiping someone else's is easier, as you can see what you're doing.

Even more pig ignorant than you usually manage.

At least try to make a counter argument.

At least you don't say "ass".

Donkeys don't get their arses wiped.

Americans can't tell the difference between donkey and arse. Or tourist and terrorist. Or mirror and myrrh.

You need god bothering stupids to do that ****.

That's the whole point of religion, tell the most
stupid that they end up hell if they don't do that
sort of ****, so they keep doing that **** so they
don't end up in hell.

Nah, they do **** work to get paid.

Nope, they put their hand out to the state for benefits.

Then remove them.

Not legal to do that.

Then change the law.

Not possible, the stupid god botherers outnumber us.

They must be exterminated.

Not even possible when there are only 5% of us.

I do not believe 95% believe in god.

They do anyway.

Stats show otherwise.

Like hell they do.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demogr...United_Kingdom
9% but its much lower in the US.

39%.

The other 30% are actually stupid enough to believe that there might be
some god.

And you lot are rather more irreligious than most of the first and
second world.

That's because we're more intelligent than for example the Americans.

Nope. It appears to be because quite a few of the
earliest that moved to yankeeland from england
particularly did so because of the religious
persecution they got in england so its hardly
surprising that that did produce more stupid
believers in america eventually.

In England back in those days there was more religion, so surely it would
be the atheists that would run away?

Nope, they just shut up and carried on regardless.

Much harder to keep quiet about your non CoE religion.

You lot even make Catholicism illegal and had a full civil war too.

And that that time were quite literally burning each other at the stake too.

That's the Irish that are that stupid.

--
Complete with obligatory low frequency bass, electrically recorded on a four track in two hours. This has enough power to destroy the most expensive washing machine.

"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message
news
On Sat, 13 May 2017 21:16:51 +0100, Rod Speed
wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message
news
On Sat, 13 May 2017 04:24:05 +0100, Rod Speed
wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message
news On Thu, 11 May 2017 21:13:12 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message
news On Thu, 11 May 2017 20:05:31 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message
news On Tue, 09 May 2017 21:52:54 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message
news On Sun, 07 May 2017 22:16:46 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message
news On Sun, 07 May 2017 21:18:33 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in
message
news On Sun, 07 May 2017 00:59:06 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in
message
news On Sat, 06 May 2017 22:54:42 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in
message
news On Sat, 06 May 2017 00:44:48 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in
message
news On Wed, 03 May 2017 20:54:41 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote
in
message
news On Tue, 25 Apr 2017 23:11:25 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword"
wrote
in
message
news On Tue, 25 Apr 2017 20:27:49 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword"
wrote
in
message
news On Sat, 22 Apr 2017 21:36:38 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword"
wrote
in
message
news On Sat, 22 Apr 2017 16:11:29 +0100, Bod

wrote:

On 22/04/2017 15:04, James Wilkinson Sword
wrote:
On Fri, 21 Apr 2017 20:03:18 +0100, Rod
Speed

wrote:

No one has got within a bulls roar of him
for
centurys.

Even Vlad the Impaler wasn't a patch on
him.

Trump and BNP are getting there.

Hmm, Trump is a God lover.

So was Hitler,

Like hell he was.

Catholic apparently.

Nope, he never bothered to go to church as an
adult.

Didn't bother with a priest when he killed
himself
either.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religi...f_Adolf_Hitler
agrees with you.

Yeah, its pretty accurate.

I blame Bod for giving me false information.

Yeah, have him summarily executed forthwith.

Bullet in the back of the neck is the way to go.

I did used to think he was an atheist.

Nar, just another stupid god botherer.

Make up your mind. Was Hitler religious or not?

I thought you were talking about Bod there.

Bod is an atheist.

but he still managed to get rid of a load of
competing
god
lovers.

And then they got rid of him.

He got more of them then they got of him.

Not with the yanks, they killed a lot
more krauts than the krauts killed yanks.

But how many religious nuts were killed vs.
atheists?

Hard to say because it's a tad hard to define a
religious
nut.

Someone who believes in god.

Hard to claim that 95% of people are religious nuts.

Why? Most people are pretty stupid.

Heaps more god botherers than atheist tho, just
because
there will always be heaps more than need a crutch
for
their pathetic excuses for 'minds' than don't.

So no great loss then.

Dunno, we need someone to dig the ditches,
clean the dunnys, wipe little kids arses etc etc etc.

Remove all religious nuts, then the atheists can ****
a
lot
and
fill
in
the gaps.

But wouldn't be stupid enough to do **** like that.

Nothing wrong with cleansing the world of idiots.

There is when you need idiots to do **** like that.

The non idiots arent stupid enough to do **** like that,
they are smart enough to get idiots to do it for them.

Somebody has to do it.

Yes, but it might as well be the idiots.

Having to do easy manual labour is a small price to pay for
removing
all
stupidity.

Not possible to remove all stupidity.

We could if we did away with political correctness and morals.

Nope, more would show up due to their mother's activity.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fetal_...ctrum_disorder

Not common enough to matter.

It is in fact very common indeed.

Cite a percentage.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fetal_...rder#Australia

"In Western Australia, the rate of births resulting in FASD is 0.02
per
1000 births for non-Indigenous Australians, however among indigenous
births the rate is 2.76 per 1000 births"

So, between 0.002% and 0.276%. Not common then.

It's a lot higher than that in the worst of the indigenous camps.

But nobody cares about the Abbos.

Those that end up paying to keep them in jail do.

So do those who pay for their benefits.

Then remove the benefits

Not even possible.

No reason it can't be done.

Corse there is, not enough voters want that,
so any govt stupid enough to to that would
get the bums rush at the ballot box, and they
know it, so even the torys who would like to
do that arent actually stupid enough to
commit political suicide like that.

and introduce the death sentence.

Not enough support a death sentence for shoplifting.

Use the three strikes rule like the USA.

Not enough support a death penalty for shoplifting
or drug use to be able to get that up even after the
third time they get caught doing it.

Anyway, what has jail to do with illness?

Its those with fetal alcohol spectrum
disorder that do most of the crime.

You're making assumptions.

Nope, it's a trivially provable fact. Its so easy to see if an
individual has that problem that its easy to see if there is
an excess of those in prison. That even affects how you look.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fetal_...y_with_FAS.jpg

Money tends to make people do things.

Wouldn't make me wipe little kids arses all day.

Or me. Then again women don't seem to hate things like
that,
otherwise
nobody would ever have children.

Its more tolerated because you don't have to do it for long.

Then explain those who have many children.

They make the other children wipe the arses of the latest ones.

Never happened with me.

Your parents didn't have many children.

Two.

Notning even remotely like enough to see that done,
if only because they are so close together in age.

5 years apart.

Nothing like old enough to wipe a little kids arse.
They can't even wipe their own arse at that age.

At some point one will be able to for 5 years when the other cannot.

Nope, while they can eventually wipe their own arses, by the
time they are big enough to wipe someone else's arse, that
younger one can wipe its own arse with a 5 year difference.

Wiping your own arse and wiping another arse is the same technique.

Even more pig ignorant than you usually manage.

In fact wiping someone else's is easier, as you can see what you're
doing.

Even more pig ignorant than you usually manage.

At least try to make a counter argument.

Everyone can see that I did.

At least you don't say "ass".

Donkeys don't get their arses wiped.

Americans can't tell the difference between donkey and arse. Or tourist
and terrorist. Or mirror and myrrh.

Not one of them, eh ?

You need god bothering stupids to do that ****.

That's the whole point of religion, tell the most
stupid that they end up hell if they don't do that
sort of ****, so they keep doing that **** so they
don't end up in hell.

Nah, they do **** work to get paid.

Nope, they put their hand out to the state for benefits.

Then remove them.

Not legal to do that.

Then change the law.

Not possible, the stupid god botherers outnumber us.

They must be exterminated.

Not even possible when there are only 5% of us.

I do not believe 95% believe in god.

They do anyway.

Stats show otherwise.

Like hell they do.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demogr...United_Kingdom
9% but its much lower in the US.

39%.

The other 30% are actually stupid enough to believe that there might
be
some god.

And you lot are rather more irreligious than most of the first and
second world.

That's because we're more intelligent than for example the Americans.

Nope. It appears to be because quite a few of the
earliest that moved to yankeeland from england
particularly did so because of the religious
persecution they got in england so its hardly
surprising that that did produce more stupid
believers in america eventually.

In England back in those days there was more religion, so surely it
would be the atheists that would run away?

Nope, they just shut up and carried on regardless.

Much harder to keep quiet about your non CoE religion.

You lot even make Catholicism illegal and had a full civil war too.

And that that time were quite literally burning each other at the stake
too.

That's the Irish that are that stupid.

Nope, plenty of english too. And scots too.

On Sun, 14 May 2017 20:36:29 +0100, Rod Speed wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message
news
On Sat, 13 May 2017 21:16:51 +0100, Rod Speed
wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message
news On Sat, 13 May 2017 04:24:05 +0100, Rod Speed
wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message
news On Thu, 11 May 2017 21:13:12 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message
news "In Western Australia, the rate of births resulting in FASD is 0.02
per
1000 births for non-Indigenous Australians, however among indigenous
births the rate is 2.76 per 1000 births"

So, between 0.002% and 0.276%. Not common then.

It's a lot higher than that in the worst of the indigenous camps.

But nobody cares about the Abbos.

Those that end up paying to keep them in jail do.

So do those who pay for their benefits.

Then remove the benefits

Not even possible.

No reason it can't be done.

Corse there is, not enough voters want that,
so any govt stupid enough to to that would
get the bums rush at the ballot box, and they
know it, so even the torys who would like to
do that arent actually stupid enough to
commit political suicide like that.

Most people not on benefits don't want them. It saps money from their taxes.

and introduce the death sentence.

Not enough support a death sentence for shoplifting.

Use the three strikes rule like the USA.

Not enough support a death penalty for shoplifting
or drug use to be able to get that up even after the
third time they get caught doing it.

Anyway, what has jail to do with illness?

Its those with fetal alcohol spectrum
disorder that do most of the crime.

You're making assumptions.

Nope, it's a trivially provable fact. Its so easy to see if an
individual has that problem that its easy to see if there is
an excess of those in prison. That even affects how you look.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fetal_...y_with_FAS.jpg

Nobody knows how dangerous it is.
https://www.theguardian.com/lifeands...-safe-research

Money tends to make people do things.

Wouldn't make me wipe little kids arses all day.

Or me. Then again women don't seem to hate things like
that,
otherwise
nobody would ever have children.

Its more tolerated because you don't have to do it for long.

Then explain those who have many children.

They make the other children wipe the arses of the latest ones.

Never happened with me.

Your parents didn't have many children.

Two.

Notning even remotely like enough to see that done,
if only because they are so close together in age.

5 years apart.

Nothing like old enough to wipe a little kids arse.
They can't even wipe their own arse at that age.

At some point one will be able to for 5 years when the other cannot.

Nope, while they can eventually wipe their own arses, by the
time they are big enough to wipe someone else's arse, that
younger one can wipe its own arse with a 5 year difference.

Wiping your own arse and wiping another arse is the same technique.

Even more pig ignorant than you usually manage.

In fact wiping someone else's is easier, as you can see what you're
doing.

Even more pig ignorant than you usually manage.

At least try to make a counter argument.

Everyone can see that I did.

You have not made an argument against the fact that it's easier to do something when it 's in front of you so you can see it.

At least you don't say "ass".

Donkeys don't get their arses wiped.

Americans can't tell the difference between donkey and arse. Or tourist
and terrorist. Or mirror and myrrh.

Not one of them, eh ?

Bound to be a few that can speak properly, probably born in the UK.

You need god bothering stupids to do that ****.

That's the whole point of religion, tell the most
stupid that they end up hell if they don't do that
sort of ****, so they keep doing that **** so they
don't end up in hell.

Nah, they do **** work to get paid.

Nope, they put their hand out to the state for benefits.

Then remove them.

Not legal to do that.

Then change the law.

Not possible, the stupid god botherers outnumber us.

They must be exterminated.

Not even possible when there are only 5% of us.

I do not believe 95% believe in god.

They do anyway.

Stats show otherwise.

Like hell they do.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demogr...United_Kingdom
9% but its much lower in the US.

39%.

The other 30% are actually stupid enough to believe that there might
be
some god.

And you lot are rather more irreligious than most of the first and
second world.

That's because we're more intelligent than for example the Americans.

Nope. It appears to be because quite a few of the
earliest that moved to yankeeland from england
particularly did so because of the religious
persecution they got in england so its hardly
surprising that that did produce more stupid
believers in america eventually.

In England back in those days there was more religion, so surely it
would be the atheists that would run away?

Nope, they just shut up and carried on regardless.

Much harder to keep quiet about your non CoE religion.

You lot even make Catholicism illegal and had a full civil war too.

And that that time were quite literally burning each other at the stake
too.

That's the Irish that are that stupid.

Nope, plenty of english too. And scots too.

Not nowadays. The Irish still are though.

--
A mistake is evidence that someone has tried to do something.

"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message
news
On Sun, 14 May 2017 20:36:29 +0100, Rod Speed
wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message
news
On Sat, 13 May 2017 21:16:51 +0100, Rod Speed
wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message
news On Sat, 13 May 2017 04:24:05 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message
news On Thu, 11 May 2017 21:13:12 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message
news "In Western Australia, the rate of births resulting in FASD is
0.02
per
1000 births for non-Indigenous Australians, however among
indigenous
births the rate is 2.76 per 1000 births"

So, between 0.002% and 0.276%. Not common then.

It's a lot higher than that in the worst of the indigenous camps.

But nobody cares about the Abbos.

Those that end up paying to keep them in jail do.

So do those who pay for their benefits.

Then remove the benefits

Not even possible.

No reason it can't be done.

Corse there is, not enough voters want that,
so any govt stupid enough to to that would
get the bums rush at the ballot box, and they
know it, so even the torys who would like to
do that arent actually stupid enough to
commit political suicide like that.

Most people not on benefits don't want them.

Most people do get the child benefits.

It saps money from their taxes.

Yes, but most who get child benefits are too stupid to
realise that society as a whole would be better with child
benefits only for the kids that would starve without them.

and introduce the death sentence.

Not enough support a death sentence for shoplifting.

Use the three strikes rule like the USA.

Not enough support a death penalty for shoplifting
or drug use to be able to get that up even after the
third time they get caught doing it.

Anyway, what has jail to do with illness?

Its those with fetal alcohol spectrum
disorder that do most of the crime.

You're making assumptions.

Nope, it's a trivially provable fact. Its so easy to see if an
individual has that problem that its easy to see if there is
an excess of those in prison. That even affects how you look.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fetal_...y_with_FAS.jpg

Nobody knows how dangerous it is.
https://www.theguardian.com/lifeands...-safe-research

Irrelevant to the fact that its drinking alcohol in very
large amounts during pregnancy is what produces FAS.

Money tends to make people do things.

Wouldn't make me wipe little kids arses all day.

Or me. Then again women don't seem to hate things like
that,
otherwise
nobody would ever have children.

Its more tolerated because you don't have to do it for
long.

Then explain those who have many children.

They make the other children wipe the arses of the latest
ones.

Never happened with me.

Your parents didn't have many children.

Two.

Notning even remotely like enough to see that done,
if only because they are so close together in age.

5 years apart.

Nothing like old enough to wipe a little kids arse.
They can't even wipe their own arse at that age.

At some point one will be able to for 5 years when the other cannot.

Nope, while they can eventually wipe their own arses, by the
time they are big enough to wipe someone else's arse, that
younger one can wipe its own arse with a 5 year difference.

Wiping your own arse and wiping another arse is the same technique.

Even more pig ignorant than you usually manage.

In fact wiping someone else's is easier, as you can see what you're
doing.

Even more pig ignorant than you usually manage.

At least try to make a counter argument.

Everyone can see that I did.

You have not made an argument against the fact that it's easier to do
something when it 's in front of you so you can see it.

There is a lot more to it than just seeing. Little kids that that have
only just worked out how to wipe their own arses don't have the
strength to wipe the arse of another little kid sitting on a dunny.

They don't need any strength to wipe their own arse.

At least you don't say "ass".

Donkeys don't get their arses wiped.

Americans can't tell the difference between donkey and arse. Or tourist
and terrorist. Or mirror and myrrh.

Not one of them, eh ?

Bound to be a few that can speak properly, probably born in the UK.

Even you should be able to manage better than that. Obviously not.

You need god bothering stupids to do that ****.

That's the whole point of religion, tell the most
stupid that they end up hell if they don't do that
sort of ****, so they keep doing that **** so they
don't end up in hell.

Nah, they do **** work to get paid.

Nope, they put their hand out to the state for
benefits.

Then remove them.

Not legal to do that.

Then change the law.

Not possible, the stupid god botherers outnumber us.

They must be exterminated.

Not even possible when there are only 5% of us.

I do not believe 95% believe in god.

They do anyway.

Stats show otherwise.

Like hell they do.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demogr...United_Kingdom
9% but its much lower in the US.

39%.

The other 30% are actually stupid enough to believe that there
might
be
some god.

And you lot are rather more irreligious than most of the first and
second world.

That's because we're more intelligent than for example the
Americans.

Nope. It appears to be because quite a few of the
earliest that moved to yankeeland from england
particularly did so because of the religious
persecution they got in england so its hardly
surprising that that did produce more stupid
believers in america eventually.

In England back in those days there was more religion, so surely it
would be the atheists that would run away?

Nope, they just shut up and carried on regardless.

Much harder to keep quiet about your non CoE religion.

You lot even make Catholicism illegal and had a full civil war too.

And that that time were quite literally burning each other at the stake
too.

That's the Irish that are that stupid.

Nope, plenty of english too. And scots too.

Not nowadays. The Irish still are though.

Nope.

On Tue, 25 Apr 2017 22:26:58 +0100, Rod Speed wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message
news
On Tue, 25 Apr 2017 21:11:47 +0100, Rod Speed
wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message
news On Tue, 25 Apr 2017 19:28:14 +0100, Rod Speed
wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message
news On Tue, 25 Apr 2017 12:25:58 +0100, whisky-dave

wrote:

On Sunday, 23 April 2017 21:28:26 UTC+1, James Wilkinson Sword
wrote:
On Sun, 23 Apr 2017 20:11:57 +0100, ARW

wrote:

On 23/04/2017 18:51, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Sun, 23 Apr 2017 07:14:36 +0100, ARW

wrote:

On 23/04/2017 04:34, Mike Tomlinson wrote:
En el artículo , Bob Eager
escribió:

Can we have more of Mike's kittens, please?

Coming soon. Promise.


Probably for the last time.

It will be soon time for them to go to new homes (apart from the
one
you
are keeping).

Book mother and daughter in for the snip at the same time, or we
will
have pictures of filthy sluts grand kittens in a couple of
months:-)

Why do so many people have this crazy idea that we should
mutilate
all
cat's genitalia? How would you feel if the government forced you
to
have your testicles removed? It's barbaric.

I can use a condom.

The point is we should never remove the choice of a person (or
animal).

What if they haven't the ability to judge the situation they are in ?

Since cats have been around for millennia, I think they're doing just
fine.

How they evolved and modern situation is very different.

Modern situation is artificial, created by us.

Sure, but that is the one we are talking about castrating and desexing
cats
in.

No need to. Let them live their own life.

Doesn't work, you have to kill too many as adult cats.

No need to kill any.

They aren't big destructive animals like elephants.

Sure, but enough of a nuisance that they
get trapped and taken to the pound and
killed there because no one wants them.

Only by moronic governments.

And they manage in that too.

No they don't population wise.

Reducing their numbers by mutilating them is inhumane.

So its much more humane to wait for them
to turn into adult cats and kill them then ?

Don't kill them at all.

Too expensive to keep feeding an ever growing
collection of cats furiously breeding at the pound.

Let them find their own food.

No point in un interfering

The alternative is to have lots of people killing surplus adult cats.

Surplus cats are not harmful,

Corse they are.

They are 50 times smaller than we are.

Rats and mice are even smaller and we kill them too.

They spread disease.

We don't cull birds.

We do when they start munching on the rice crop.

Farmers might.

it's not as though they're capable of killing people.

There are more harms than just being killed.

Like?

Going feral.

Doesn't harm humans.

We have people who attempt to ensure that surplus dogs in the pound
don't get killed but no one even trys with cats,

There are cat protection societies just like with dogs.

And even in that soggy little frigid island,
most of the surplus cats are killed.

There aren't surplus cats.

You seriously trying to claim that no pound ever kills any
surplus cats anywhere on that soggy little frigid island ?

You need to get out more.

THREE out of four pounds had no cats available for sale when I wanted one. That means there are not enough of them.

And that's where I tried to get my first cat from, except they'd run
out!

Because you hairy legged cross dressers eat them.

No, because too many people neuter their cats.

What do you 'think' haggis is made from ?

Almost nobody eats that revolting stuff.

Don't believe that. I just saw a video of the head of the Campbells
handing it out at their 'best of the west' pigout fest.

For a few weirdos.

Which only goes to show there are not enough cats.

Even sillier than you usually manage.

If there were none left,

There are plenty left. You've got 6 of the ****ers.

I had to search for them.

then we are over-culling them.

Nope, just desexing them so you don't get infested with them.

They're not dangerous.

its just not possible except where you barbarians eat them.

"You barbarians"? I think you'll find that's the Chinese.

They arent silly enough to eat haggis.

But they do eat cats and dogs. Legally.

Not anymore.

Says who?

And its never been legal
on that soggy little frigid island of yours.

Exactly, we're more civilised.

and claiming we have more rights than them.

Corse we do.

Says who?

Says anyone with even half a clue.

So you don't have a reason then,

Wrong, as always.

thought so.

Obvious lie.

Still waiting for your reasoning that we have more rights than cats.

--
A Pakistani woman was sexually assaulted yesterday. Police are still trying to find a motive.

"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message
news
On Tue, 25 Apr 2017 22:26:58 +0100, Rod Speed
wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message
news
On Tue, 25 Apr 2017 21:11:47 +0100, Rod Speed
wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message
news On Tue, 25 Apr 2017 19:28:14 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"James Wilkinson Sword" wrote in message
news On Tue, 25 Apr 2017 12:25:58 +0100, whisky-dave

wrote:

On Sunday, 23 April 2017 21:28:26 UTC+1, James Wilkinson Sword
wrote:
On Sun, 23 Apr 2017 20:11:57 +0100, ARW

wrote:

On 23/04/2017 18:51, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Sun, 23 Apr 2017 07:14:36 +0100, ARW

wrote:

On 23/04/2017 04:34, Mike Tomlinson wrote:
En el artículo , Bob Eager
escribió:

Can we have more of Mike's kittens, please?

Coming soon. Promise.


Probably for the last time.

It will be soon time for them to go to new homes (apart from
the
one
you
are keeping).

Book mother and daughter in for the snip at the same time, or
we
will
have pictures of filthy sluts grand kittens in a couple of
months:-)

Why do so many people have this crazy idea that we should
mutilate
all
cat's genitalia? How would you feel if the government forced
you
to
have your testicles removed? It's barbaric.

I can use a condom.

The point is we should never remove the choice of a person (or
animal).

What if they haven't the ability to judge the situation they are in
?

Since cats have been around for millennia, I think they're doing
just
fine.

How they evolved and modern situation is very different.

Modern situation is artificial, created by us.

Sure, but that is the one we are talking about castrating and desexing
cats
in.

No need to. Let them live their own life.

Doesn't work, you have to kill too many as adult cats.

No need to kill any.

Corse there is when no one wants them when they end
up in the pound. No point in huge pound cat farms.

They aren't big destructive animals like elephants.

Sure, but enough of a nuisance that they
get trapped and taken to the pound and
killed there because no one wants them.

Only by moronic governments.

By people sick of the feral cats.

Govts hardly ever do that.

And they manage in that too.

No they don't population wise.

Reducing their numbers by mutilating them is inhumane.

So its much more humane to wait for them
to turn into adult cats and kill them then ?

Don't kill them at all.

Too expensive to keep feeding an ever growing
collection of cats furiously breeding at the pound.

Let them find their own food.

They end up killing the birds.

No point in un interfering

The alternative is to have lots of people killing surplus adult cats.

Surplus cats are not harmful,

Corse they are.

They are 50 times smaller than we are.

Rats and mice are even smaller and we kill them too.

They spread disease.

Urban myth.

We don't cull birds.

We do when they start munching on the rice crop.

Farmers might.

No might about it.

it's not as though they're capable of killing people.

There are more harms than just being killed.

Like?

Going feral.

Doesn't harm humans.

Does harm the wildlife.

We have people who attempt to ensure that surplus dogs in the pound
don't get killed but no one even trys with cats,

There are cat protection societies just like with dogs.

And even in that soggy little frigid island,
most of the surplus cats are killed.

There aren't surplus cats.

You seriously trying to claim that no pound ever kills any
surplus cats anywhere on that soggy little frigid island ?

You need to get out more.

THREE out of four pounds had no cats available for sale when I wanted one.

That's because you barbarians eat them.

That means there are not enough of them.

**** all pounds are like that. Most kill
them because no one wants them.

And that's where I tried to get my first cat from, except they'd run
out!

Because you hairy legged cross dressers eat them.

No, because too many people neuter their cats.

What do you 'think' haggis is made from ?

Almost nobody eats that revolting stuff.

Don't believe that. I just saw a video of the head of the Campbells
handing it out at their 'best of the west' pigout fest.

For a few weirdos.

Hell of a lot more than a few.

Which only goes to show there are not enough cats.

Even sillier than you usually manage.

If there were none left,

There are plenty left. You've got 6 of the ****ers.

I had to search for them.

Doesn't happen around here, the pound has to kill them.

then we are over-culling them.

Nope, just desexing them so you don't get infested with them.

They're not dangerous.

Sure, but they are a damned nuisance.

its just not possible except where you barbarians eat them.

"You barbarians"? I think you'll find that's the Chinese.

They arent silly enough to eat haggis.

But they do eat cats and dogs. Legally.

Not anymore.

Says who?

The law.

And its never been legal on that soggy little frigid island of yours.

Exactly, we're more civilised.

That's very arguable.

and claiming we have more rights than them.

Corse we do.

Says who?

Says anyone with even half a clue.

So you don't have a reason then,

Wrong, as always.

thought so.

Obvious lie.

Still waiting for your reasoning that we have more rights than cats.

Don't need any, its obvious.