Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#321
Posted to alt.computer.workshop,alt.home.repair,uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Spank!
On Apr 29, 2021 at 12:33:48 PM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
: Language is weird. Heck, how do you think people generally pronounce the word "can't". Without the t. So it sounds more like "can". https://youtu.be/6bszZZlvj4E Just weird. No. There are two differences for anyone who speaks English properly (as in everyone outside the US). It's "cann" or "carnt". Not "cayan" or "cayant". These are UK samples: https://youtu.be/dGnBi6giZw0 is this the line for the free soup Well Snit is a radical left winger, so yes, everything is magically free. How duos figure thongs would be magically free? Do you think they are in Nordic countries? -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. |
#322
Posted to alt.computer.workshop,alt.home.repair,uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Spank!
On 2021-04-29 1:32 p.m., Snit wrote:
On Apr 29, 2021 at 12:37:25 PM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote : As in Herbert Marcuse? I had a kid's book that was in an Indian setting. The medicine man was named Herb Gatherer but it took a while for my epiphany that his first name wasn't Herbert. I can't remember the title but I'm certain it would appall the modern generation with its stereotyping and cultural appropriation. I thought it was pretty neat and read it several times. Stereotypes get there for a reason. Such as the stereotypes of libertarians? Ambiguous sentence. Do you mean the stereotype people have of them, or the ones Libertarians have of others? The ones people have of Libertarians... though I suppose it works both ways. which ways are both ways |
#323
Posted to alt.computer.workshop,alt.home.repair,uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Spank!
On Apr 29, 2021 at 1:34:01 PM MST, "%" wrote
: On 2021-04-29 1:32 p.m., Snit wrote: On Apr 29, 2021 at 12:37:25 PM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote : As in Herbert Marcuse? I had a kid's book that was in an Indian setting. The medicine man was named Herb Gatherer but it took a while for my epiphany that his first name wasn't Herbert. I can't remember the title but I'm certain it would appall the modern generation with its stereotyping and cultural appropriation. I thought it was pretty neat and read it several times. Stereotypes get there for a reason. Such as the stereotypes of libertarians? Ambiguous sentence. Do you mean the stereotype people have of them, or the ones Libertarians have of others? The ones people have of Libertarians... though I suppose it works both ways. which ways are both ways Stereotypes Libertarians have of how others stereotype them. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. |
#324
Posted to alt.computer.workshop,alt.home.repair,uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
****, the Git, the Troll-feeding Senile HUGE ASSHOLE!
On Thu, 29 Apr 2021 20:33:24 GMT, **** the git, the notorious,
troll-feeding, senile asshole, blathered again: You says turned into as if this is the first pandemic. The Scottish ******'s unwashed cock must be all sore by now, the way you keep sucking on it incessantly, **** the Git! |
#325
Posted to alt.computer.workshop,alt.home.repair,uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
****, the Git, the Troll-feeding Senile HUGE ASSHOLE!
On Thu, 29 Apr 2021 20:32:57 GMT, **** the git, the notorious,
troll-feeding, senile asshole, blathered again: Back to your deserted island you go. Nope, for YOU it's only back to sucking his cock again, senile sucker of troll cock! G |
#326
Posted to alt.computer.workshop,alt.home.repair,uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
****, the Git, the Troll-feeding Senile HUGE ASSHOLE!
On Thu, 29 Apr 2021 20:32:06 GMT, **** the git, the notorious,
troll-feeding, senile asshole, blathered again: The ones people have of Libertarians... though I suppose it works both ways. Nope it only works ONE way for the two of you: HE shows up and YOU instantly suck him off, every single time, senile sucker of troll cock! LOL |
#327
Posted to alt.computer.workshop,alt.home.repair,uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
****, the Git, the Troll-feeding Senile HUGE ASSHOLE!
On Thu, 29 Apr 2021 20:33:55 GMT, **** the git, the notorious,
troll-feeding, senile asshole, blathered again: How duos figure thongs would be magically free? Do you think they are in Nordic countries? Keep your sick **** out of these newsgroups, you sick senile troll! |
#328
Posted to alt.computer.workshop,alt.home.repair,uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Spank!
"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message news On Sun, 25 Apr 2021 19:49:39 +0100, Snit wrote: On Apr 25, 2021 at 11:43:52 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote : Grossly overreacting was therefore a trait that needed removing for the next generation. Nope because it means they do much better with the non pandemic infections and don't have to bother to wash their hands all the time and can get away with doing what is more convenient like not throwing away food that has had a fly walk on it etc etc etc. Having a trait that makes you better at 9 things but worse at another, getting you killed, is not a good trait to have. Say you could do calculations twice as fast, you could sing perfect pitch, you could do 1000 pushups, but the sight of a car made you spontaneously combust. That would not be a good thing to have. By your reasoning, you would be called superior, and have a hired help to warn you of approaching cars. You have no right to say who should not be saved. You have no right to intervene in evolution and keep the worthless alive. It was actually the best who were kept alive with the spanish flu. |
#329
Posted to alt.computer.workshop,alt.home.repair,uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
The Two Inseparable Trolling Resident Sociopaths together again
On Fri, 30 Apr 2021 07:28:10 +1000, cantankerous trolling geezer Rodent
Speed, the auto-contradicting senile sociopath, blabbered, again: FLUSH the two subnormal sociopathic cretins' endless absolutely idiotic blather -- Typical retarded "conversation" between the Scottish ****** and the senile Ozzietard: Birdbrain: "Horse **** doesn't stink." Senile Rodent: "It does if you roll in it." Birdbrain: "I've never worked out why, I assumed it was maybe meateaters that made stinky ****, but then why does vegetarian human **** stink? Is it just the fact that we're capable of digesting meat?" Senile Rodent: "Nope, some cow **** stinks too." Message-ID: |
#330
Posted to alt.computer.workshop,alt.home.repair,uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Spank!
On Sun, 25 Apr 2021 21:34:37 +0100, Rod Speed wrote:
"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message news On Thu, 22 Apr 2021 20:28:34 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "Commander Kinsey" wrote in message news On Sun, 18 Apr 2021 19:24:27 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "Commander Kinsey" wrote in message news On Sat, 17 Apr 2021 20:28:16 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "Commander Kinsey" wrote in message news On Fri, 16 Apr 2021 19:09:40 +0100, Snit wrote: On Apr 16, 2021 at 11:00:16 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote : On Fri, 16 Apr 2021 03:44:18 +0100, Snit wrote: On Apr 15, 2021 at 7:14:23 PM MST, "rbowman" wrote : On 04/15/2021 12:02 PM, Commander Kinsey wrote: On Wed, 14 Apr 2021 19:12:00 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: Commander Kinsey wrote Another account must be made so they don't get the last word in. The silliest thing I got banned for was saying the word "damn". And not even in a rude way, probably something like "the damn weather is awful today". Turns out the admin was a religious nutter. Yeah, I got the same thing from another religious nutter for using the term "hell of a lot", not a moderator in that case. You have to wonder how far we would be today if religion had not impeded science. Do you know who first formulated the Big Bang theory? Ever here of Gregor Mendel? Blaise Pascal? Quite a few scientists manage to have a foot in both worlds. In general the Catholics seem more flexible than the Protestants, particularly the 'gimme that old time religion' branch. In the past the two were heavily tied together... but that is no longer the case. There are still some religious scientists, but scientists tend to be atheist at a higher level than the general public. They also tend to be more liberal, which makes sense given how at least in the US conservatives tend to reject our best evidence. Scientists are liberal because they want funding for free. Scientists are liberal because the conservative mindset is to deny evidence. We can see this with COVID, No, we just don't make such a fuss over a small thing. A thing that kills 4 times less than cancer and 40 times less than the world population growth. man-made global climate change, It was 1C here in Scotland a few days ago, in spring. There is no global warming. research on reduction of abortions, That's not science, that's morals. and in some cases even things like evolution. Evolution could take place if we let coronavirus kill off the weak. Nope, because it mostly kills those way past reproducing. Irrelevant if it kills those or not. And they can hide indoors. The point is we should let it kill off any younger folk that it can, as they're the weaker ones. In fact there isnt any evidence that it does kill of the weaker ones. The Spanish Flu didn't, in fact it killed off the stronger ones because their much better immune system grossly over reacted and it was the cytokine storm that killed them very quickly. Grossly overreacting was therefore a trait that needed removing for the next generation. Nope because it means they do much better with the non pandemic infections and don't have to bother to wash their hands all the time and can get away with doing what is more convenient like not throwing away food that has had a fly walk on it etc etc etc. Having a trait that makes you better at 9 things but worse at another, getting you killed, is not a good trait to have. Depends on the death rate. The death rate of coronavirus is high enough to remove those with the wrong genes. We must let it happen. In fact we evolved like that with kids sure that nothing can kill them and in fact that works fine. What kids are you referring to? Say you could do calculations twice as fast, you could sing perfect pitch, you could do 1000 pushups, but the sight of a car made you spontaneously combust. That would not be a good thing to have. Yes but we never have evolved to have the sight of a car make you spontaneously combust for some odd reason. It's called an analogy, stretching something out of proportion to mare you see the point. -- Sent from my iPhone, this spam courtesy of Apple incorporated. |
#331
Posted to alt.computer.workshop,alt.home.repair,uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Spank!
On Sun, 25 Apr 2021 21:41:46 +0100, Rod Speed wrote:
"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message news On Thu, 22 Apr 2021 20:35:17 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "Commander Kinsey" wrote in message news On Sun, 18 Apr 2021 19:28:26 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "Snit" wrote in message ... On Apr 18, 2021 at 10:38:16 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote : On Sat, 17 Apr 2021 20:28:16 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "Commander Kinsey" wrote in message news On Fri, 16 Apr 2021 19:09:40 +0100, Snit wrote: On Apr 16, 2021 at 11:00:16 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote : On Fri, 16 Apr 2021 03:44:18 +0100, Snit wrote: On Apr 15, 2021 at 7:14:23 PM MST, "rbowman" wrote : On 04/15/2021 12:02 PM, Commander Kinsey wrote: On Wed, 14 Apr 2021 19:12:00 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: Commander Kinsey wrote Another account must be made so they don't get the last word in. The silliest thing I got banned for was saying the word "damn". And not even in a rude way, probably something like "the damn weather is awful today". Turns out the admin was a religious nutter. Yeah, I got the same thing from another religious nutter for using the term "hell of a lot", not a moderator in that case. You have to wonder how far we would be today if religion had not impeded science. Do you know who first formulated the Big Bang theory? Ever here of Gregor Mendel? Blaise Pascal? Quite a few scientists manage to have a foot in both worlds. In general the Catholics seem more flexible than the Protestants, particularly the 'gimme that old time religion' branch. In the past the two were heavily tied together... but that is no longer the case. There are still some religious scientists, but scientists tend to be atheist at a higher level than the general public. They also tend to be more liberal, which makes sense given how at least in the US conservatives tend to reject our best evidence. Scientists are liberal because they want funding for free. Scientists are liberal because the conservative mindset is to deny evidence. We can see this with COVID, No, we just don't make such a fuss over a small thing. A thing that kills 4 times less than cancer and 40 times less than the world population growth. man-made global climate change, It was 1C here in Scotland a few days ago, in spring. There is no global warming. research on reduction of abortions, That's not science, that's morals. and in some cases even things like evolution. Evolution could take place if we let coronavirus kill off the weak. Nope, because it mostly kills those way past reproducing. Irrelevant if it kills those or not. And they can hide indoors. The point is we should let it kill off any younger folk that it can, as they're the weaker ones. As you call for these deaths wby don't you volunteer? And he is significantly medically ****ed. But doesnt reproduce. Exactly, I would only reproduce if I was fit, healthy, rich, and good looking. Imagine the next generation if everyone did that. Didnt work with Phil the Greek, look at the useless ****s he produced. That is not good looking. Most women would disagree with you about that. ********. You don't get actors looking that ugly. Unless they're playing bad guys. And the wife has to be all those things too obviously. Nope, it doesnt work like that. Liz's mum was never anything special. If both are special, the kids will be special. If one is special, then the kids have a 50% chance. Set an example? He does, but by streaking, quite literally. How does that kill anyone? That bit wasnt about killing anyone, although in your case likely some died laughing or atleast crashed the car or the motorbike etc. Yes, a distraction at seeing my sexy body. Laughing at your microdick, actually. It's above the national average. -- Sent from my iPhone, this spam courtesy of Apple incorporated. |
#332
Posted to alt.computer.workshop,alt.home.repair,uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Spank!
On Thu, 29 Apr 2021 22:28:10 +0100, Rod Speed wrote:
"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message news On Sun, 25 Apr 2021 19:49:39 +0100, Snit wrote: On Apr 25, 2021 at 11:43:52 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote : Grossly overreacting was therefore a trait that needed removing for the next generation. Nope because it means they do much better with the non pandemic infections and don't have to bother to wash their hands all the time and can get away with doing what is more convenient like not throwing away food that has had a fly walk on it etc etc etc. Having a trait that makes you better at 9 things but worse at another, getting you killed, is not a good trait to have. Say you could do calculations twice as fast, you could sing perfect pitch, you could do 1000 pushups, but the sight of a car made you spontaneously combust. That would not be a good thing to have. By your reasoning, you would be called superior, and have a hired help to warn you of approaching cars. You have no right to say who should not be saved. You have no right to intervene in evolution and keep the worthless alive. It was actually the best who were kept alive with the spanish flu. Well that would work better, I assume you're saying they protected who they felt were more worthy. -- Sent from my iPhone, this spam courtesy of Apple incorporated. |
#333
Posted to alt.computer.workshop,alt.home.repair,uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Spank!
"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message news On Sun, 25 Apr 2021 21:34:37 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "Commander Kinsey" wrote in message news On Thu, 22 Apr 2021 20:28:34 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "Commander Kinsey" wrote in message news On Sun, 18 Apr 2021 19:24:27 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "Commander Kinsey" wrote in message news On Sat, 17 Apr 2021 20:28:16 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "Commander Kinsey" wrote in message news On Fri, 16 Apr 2021 19:09:40 +0100, Snit wrote: On Apr 16, 2021 at 11:00:16 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote : On Fri, 16 Apr 2021 03:44:18 +0100, Snit wrote: On Apr 15, 2021 at 7:14:23 PM MST, "rbowman" wrote : On 04/15/2021 12:02 PM, Commander Kinsey wrote: On Wed, 14 Apr 2021 19:12:00 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: Commander Kinsey wrote Another account must be made so they don't get the last word in. The silliest thing I got banned for was saying the word "damn". And not even in a rude way, probably something like "the damn weather is awful today". Turns out the admin was a religious nutter. Yeah, I got the same thing from another religious nutter for using the term "hell of a lot", not a moderator in that case. You have to wonder how far we would be today if religion had not impeded science. Do you know who first formulated the Big Bang theory? Ever here of Gregor Mendel? Blaise Pascal? Quite a few scientists manage to have a foot in both worlds. In general the Catholics seem more flexible than the Protestants, particularly the 'gimme that old time religion' branch. In the past the two were heavily tied together... but that is no longer the case. There are still some religious scientists, but scientists tend to be atheist at a higher level than the general public. They also tend to be more liberal, which makes sense given how at least in the US conservatives tend to reject our best evidence. Scientists are liberal because they want funding for free. Scientists are liberal because the conservative mindset is to deny evidence. We can see this with COVID, No, we just don't make such a fuss over a small thing. A thing that kills 4 times less than cancer and 40 times less than the world population growth. man-made global climate change, It was 1C here in Scotland a few days ago, in spring. There is no global warming. research on reduction of abortions, That's not science, that's morals. and in some cases even things like evolution. Evolution could take place if we let coronavirus kill off the weak. Nope, because it mostly kills those way past reproducing. Irrelevant if it kills those or not. And they can hide indoors. The point is we should let it kill off any younger folk that it can, as they're the weaker ones. In fact there isnt any evidence that it does kill of the weaker ones. The Spanish Flu didn't, in fact it killed off the stronger ones because their much better immune system grossly over reacted and it was the cytokine storm that killed them very quickly. Grossly overreacting was therefore a trait that needed removing for the next generation. Nope because it means they do much better with the non pandemic infections and don't have to bother to wash their hands all the time and can get away with doing what is more convenient like not throwing away food that has had a fly walk on it etc etc etc. Having a trait that makes you better at 9 things but worse at another, getting you killed, is not a good trait to have. Depends on the death rate. The death rate of coronavirus is high enough to remove those with the wrong genes. Nope, the death rate is minimal with those who can still reproduce. It isnt even that high with those over 70 either, below 4% We must let it happen. Nope, it would make no difference. In fact we evolved like that with kids sure that nothing can kill them and in fact that works fine. What kids are you referring to? Late teenagers. That why they have always been the cannon fodder in wars. Even those now don't die at a high enough rate from anything to have any real effect on evolution, even if we scrapped seat belts, air bags, cars with crumple zones etc etc etc. Say you could do calculations twice as fast, you could sing perfect pitch, you could do 1000 pushups, but the sight of a car made you spontaneously combust. That would not be a good thing to have. Yes but we never have evolved to have the sight of a car make you spontaneously combust for some odd reason. It's called an analogy, stretching something out of proportion to mare you see the point. No one get to mare me and don't you forget that, cow face. |
#334
Posted to alt.computer.workshop,alt.home.repair,uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Spank!
"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message news On Sun, 25 Apr 2021 21:41:46 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "Commander Kinsey" wrote in message news On Thu, 22 Apr 2021 20:35:17 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "Commander Kinsey" wrote in message news On Sun, 18 Apr 2021 19:28:26 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "Snit" wrote in message ... On Apr 18, 2021 at 10:38:16 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote : On Sat, 17 Apr 2021 20:28:16 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "Commander Kinsey" wrote in message news On Fri, 16 Apr 2021 19:09:40 +0100, Snit wrote: On Apr 16, 2021 at 11:00:16 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote : On Fri, 16 Apr 2021 03:44:18 +0100, Snit wrote: On Apr 15, 2021 at 7:14:23 PM MST, "rbowman" wrote : On 04/15/2021 12:02 PM, Commander Kinsey wrote: On Wed, 14 Apr 2021 19:12:00 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: Commander Kinsey wrote Another account must be made so they don't get the last word in. The silliest thing I got banned for was saying the word "damn". And not even in a rude way, probably something like "the damn weather is awful today". Turns out the admin was a religious nutter. Yeah, I got the same thing from another religious nutter for using the term "hell of a lot", not a moderator in that case. You have to wonder how far we would be today if religion had not impeded science. Do you know who first formulated the Big Bang theory? Ever here of Gregor Mendel? Blaise Pascal? Quite a few scientists manage to have a foot in both worlds. In general the Catholics seem more flexible than the Protestants, particularly the 'gimme that old time religion' branch. In the past the two were heavily tied together... but that is no longer the case. There are still some religious scientists, but scientists tend to be atheist at a higher level than the general public. They also tend to be more liberal, which makes sense given how at least in the US conservatives tend to reject our best evidence. Scientists are liberal because they want funding for free. Scientists are liberal because the conservative mindset is to deny evidence. We can see this with COVID, No, we just don't make such a fuss over a small thing. A thing that kills 4 times less than cancer and 40 times less than the world population growth. man-made global climate change, It was 1C here in Scotland a few days ago, in spring. There is no global warming. research on reduction of abortions, That's not science, that's morals. and in some cases even things like evolution. Evolution could take place if we let coronavirus kill off the weak. Nope, because it mostly kills those way past reproducing. Irrelevant if it kills those or not. And they can hide indoors. The point is we should let it kill off any younger folk that it can, as they're the weaker ones. As you call for these deaths wby don't you volunteer? And he is significantly medically ****ed. But doesnt reproduce. Exactly, I would only reproduce if I was fit, healthy, rich, and good looking. Imagine the next generation if everyone did that. Didnt work with Phil the Greek, look at the useless ****s he produced. That is not good looking. Most women would disagree with you about that. ********. You don't get actors looking that ugly. More bull**** with all of Mel Gibson, Trevor Howard etc etc etc. Unless they're playing bad guys. And the wife has to be all those things too obviously. Nope, it doesnt work like that. Liz's mum was never anything special. If both are special, the kids will be special. More mindless bull**** with Maggie Thatcher and Dennis. If one is special, then the kids have a 50% chance. More mindless bull****. Set an example? He does, but by streaking, quite literally. How does that kill anyone? That bit wasnt about killing anyone, although in your case likely some died laughing or atleast crashed the car or the motorbike etc. Yes, a distraction at seeing my sexy body. Laughing at your microdick, actually. It's above the national average. Bull**** it is, we have the videos of you streaking. |
#335
Posted to alt.computer.workshop,alt.home.repair,uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
The Two Inseparable Trolling Resident Sociopaths together again
On Sat, 1 May 2021 05:40:43 +1000, cantankerous trolling geezer Rodent
Speed, the auto-contradicting senile sociopath, blabbered, again: FLUSH the two subnormal sociopathic cretins' endless absolutely idiotic blather -- TYPICAL retarded "conversation" between sociopath Rodent and sociopath Birdbrain from August 26th 2018: Birdbrain: "I have one head but 5 fingers." Senile Rodent: "Obvious lie. You hairy legged cross dressers are so inbred that you all have two heads." Birdbrain: "You're the one that likes hairy legs remember?" Senile Rodent: "The problem isnt the hairy legs, it's the gross inbreeding that produces two headed unemployables like you." Birdbrain: "So why did you mention hairy legs?" Senile Rodent: "Because that's what those who arent actually stupid enough to shave their legs have." Birdbrain: "You only have hairy legs if both of the following are true: 1) You're quite far back on the evolutionary scale. 2) You haven't learned what a razor is for." Senile Rodent: "Only a terminal ****wit or a woman shaves their legs." Birdbrain: "There is literally zero point in having hair all over your body." Senile Rodent: "There is even less point in wasting your time changing what you are born with." MID: |
#336
Posted to alt.computer.workshop,alt.home.repair,uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Spank!
"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message news On Thu, 29 Apr 2021 22:28:10 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "Commander Kinsey" wrote in message news On Sun, 25 Apr 2021 19:49:39 +0100, Snit wrote: On Apr 25, 2021 at 11:43:52 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote : Grossly overreacting was therefore a trait that needed removing for the next generation. Nope because it means they do much better with the non pandemic infections and don't have to bother to wash their hands all the time and can get away with doing what is more convenient like not throwing away food that has had a fly walk on it etc etc etc. Having a trait that makes you better at 9 things but worse at another, getting you killed, is not a good trait to have. Say you could do calculations twice as fast, you could sing perfect pitch, you could do 1000 pushups, but the sight of a car made you spontaneously combust. That would not be a good thing to have. By your reasoning, you would be called superior, and have a hired help to warn you of approaching cars. You have no right to say who should not be saved. You have no right to intervene in evolution and keep the worthless alive. It was actually the best who were kept alive with the spanish flu. Well that would work better, I assume you're saying they protected who they felt were more worthy. Nope, they watched the best die very quickly often quite literally in hours due to the massive cytokine storm seen with those with the best immune systems. |
#337
Posted to alt.computer.workshop,alt.home.repair,uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
The Two Inseparable Trolling Resident Sociopaths together again
On Sat, 1 May 2021 05:50:04 +1000, cantankerous trolling geezer Rodent
Speed, the auto-contradicting senile sociopath, blabbered, again: FLUSH the two subnormal sociopathic cretins' endless absolutely idiotic blather -- Another typical retarded "conversation" between Birdbrain and senile Rodent: Senile Rodent: " Did you ever dig a hole to bury your own ****?" Birdbrain: "I do if there's no flush toilet around." Senile Rodent: "Yeah, I prefer camping like that, off by myself with no dunnys around and have always buried the ****." MID: |
#338
Posted to alt.computer.workshop,alt.home.repair,uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
The Two Inseparable Trolling Resident Sociopaths together again
On Sat, 1 May 2021 05:53:54 +1000, cantankerous trolling geezer Rodent
Speed, the auto-contradicting senile sociopath, blabbered, again: FLUSH the two subnormal sociopathic idiots' endless absolutely idiotic blather -- Another typical retarded "conversation" between the two resident idiots: Birdbrain: "But imagine how cool it was to own slaves." Senile Rodent: "Yeah, right. Feed them, clothe them, and fix them when they're broken. After all, you paid good money for them. Then you've got to keep an eye on them all the time." Birdbrain: "Better than having to give them wages on top of that." Senile Rodent: "Specially when they make more slaves for you and produce their own food and clothes." MID: |
#339
Posted to alt.computer.workshop,alt.home.repair,uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Spank!
On Sun, 25 Apr 2021 21:37:00 +0100, Rod Speed wrote:
"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message news On Wed, 21 Apr 2021 19:20:41 +0100, Snit wrote: On Apr 21, 2021 at 11:13:56 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote : On Sat, 17 Apr 2021 23:50:26 +0100, Snit wrote: On Apr 17, 2021 at 10:28:03 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote : and in some cases even things like evolution. Evolution could take place if we let coronavirus kill off the weak. Evolution IS taking place. And the more the virus spreads the more it mutates / evolves. I was obviously talking about the evolution of humans to fight it off. Think about Eskimos and the cold virus. And we as a species have evolved the ability to make vaccines. No, Fraid so. we've invented the ability to screw up our future evolution. No we havent. Making useful vaccines has in fact allowed us to evolve even smarter people, most obviously with the spanish flu which killed the best people very quickly indeed. But allowed people to live who are susceptible to viruses. Making future generations need more vaccines. -- Sent from my iPhone, this spam courtesy of Apple incorporated. |
#340
Posted to alt.computer.workshop,alt.home.repair,uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Spank!
On Mon, 26 Apr 2021 19:25:54 +0100, Rod Speed wrote:
"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message news On Fri, 23 Apr 2021 21:03:53 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "Snit" wrote in message ... On Apr 23, 2021 at 10:54:38 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote : On Wed, 21 Apr 2021 06:05:23 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: Some gutless ****wit troll desperately cowering behind "Snit" repetitively ****ted the same mindless troll**** and lies as it always does when its got done like a ****ing dinner, as it always is. Tedious, isn't he? What Rod Speed ran from: More of you lies, that troll**** is what I flushed, repeatedly. Snit is what's called a floater. Which one of these ? https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/floater Only 10 is used in Scotland. It means you've been unsuccessful in flushing your turd because it contained too much farts and floated. You have to weigh it down with many pieces of bogroll and flush again. I was referring to 10 with snit, since you tried to flush him and he didn't. -- Sent from my iPhone, this spam courtesy of Apple incorporated. |
#341
Posted to alt.computer.workshop,alt.home.repair,uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Spank!
On Tue, 27 Apr 2021 02:06:56 +0100, Rod Speed wrote:
"Snit" wrote in message ... On Apr 26, 2021 at 10:41:23 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote : On Wed, 21 Apr 2021 19:21:18 +0100, Snit wrote: On Apr 21, 2021 at 11:11:28 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote : On Sat, 17 Apr 2021 23:56:53 +0100, Snit wrote: On Apr 17, 2021 at 10:28:50 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote : On Fri, 16 Apr 2021 19:10:05 +0100, Snit wrote: On Apr 16, 2021 at 10:59:28 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote : On Thu, 15 Apr 2021 21:15:17 +0100, Snit wrote: On Apr 15, 2021 at 11:02:15 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote : On Wed, 14 Apr 2021 19:12:00 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: Commander Kinsey wrote Another account must be made so they don't get the last word in. The silliest thing I got banned for was saying the word "damn". And not even in a rude way, probably something like "the damn weather is awful today". Turns out the admin was a religious nutter. Yeah, I got the same thing from another religious nutter for using the term "hell of a lot", not a moderator in that case. You have to wonder how far we would be today if religion had not impeded science. Until a few hundred years ago there was not much of a split. In English please. The two have a history that is tied together. I doubt it. You have been shown evidence. Your acceptance or rejection of the evidence is on you. Religion did not help science. Just because some scientists were religious means nothing. If there had been no religion, those same people would still have become scientists. It was not just that they were religious, they were doing research in the name of religion. Why do you think there is a Vatican Observatory? How about the Center for Theology and the Natural Sciences? And Islam-backed work, getting much from the Greeks, pushed a lot in the areas of mathematics, optics, astronomy, and medicine. Many early scientists saw studying the world as a form of studying their idea of a deity. Yeah and when that science they were doing produces something against the bible it's immediately discounted. In far too many cases, agreed. But look at you, now, you reject both religion AND much of science. Meanwhile I am not religious but very much look to science. I do not reject science. You reject man-made global climate change and other well established things shown though peer review research. I reject that it's made enough difference to need to give a damn. I understand you reject the evidence. Not sure what else there is to say about that. You mock others for their religious as being faith based but you have your own equally strong faith based views. Bull****. He actually realises that climate has not changed enough to matter. Don't back me up again or I'll fall in love with you. -- Sent from my iPhone, this spam courtesy of Apple incorporated. |
#342
Posted to alt.computer.workshop,alt.home.repair,uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Spank!
On Tue, 27 Apr 2021 02:48:15 +0100, Snit wrote:
On Apr 26, 2021 at 10:50:44 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote : On Fri, 23 Apr 2021 19:07:36 +0100, Snit wrote: On Apr 23, 2021 at 10:51:58 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote : On Tue, 20 Apr 2021 20:02:12 +0100, Snit wrote: On Apr 20, 2021 at 11:20:45 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote : On Sat, 17 Apr 2021 05:23:56 +0100, Snit wrote: On Apr 16, 2021 at 9:01:57 PM MST, ""Rod Speed"" wrote : Snit wrote Rod Speed wrote Snit wrote Rod Speed wrote Snit wrote Rod Speed wrote What matters is the evidence with science, not individuals. Correct: though the experts will generally side with the evidence (if they did not they would not be the experts!) Problem is that the evidence changes, particularly with the recent less than predicted rate of world temperature change. Do you mean the hand picked specific areas where it was less even as the world beat the predictions? Nope, the world as a whole didn=E2=80=99t beat predictions. Would love to see the peer reviewed research you are referring to. You're the one that needs to provide that given you claim it exceeded predictions. You have no research to back your claims, nor scientific sites. OK. That is what I figured. You have no research Countered by the evidence provided. If you want to have a conversation, fine, but I am not interested in you making insane claims you cannot back and then ignoring the fact evidence has been provided. If you ACTUALLY want to learn about man-made global climate change this is a good place to start: http://climate.nasa.gov A government website is the last place to go for facts. Do you have a more reputable site to get info on man-made global climate change? if so please share. Looking out of my window. A simple "no" would have done. You have an unsupported intuition. It was a yes. First hand information, supported by everyone else who has looked out of their window, or had to clear snow off their car. You have an intuition, contrary to the evidence, based on limited data. I have enough evidence to verify that **** all has changed. Only a fool would spend billions researching something that is not apparent. -- Sent from my iPhone, this spam courtesy of Apple incorporated. |
#343
Posted to alt.computer.workshop,alt.home.repair,uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Spank!
Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Tue, 27 Apr 2021 02:48:15 +0100, Snit wrote: On Apr 26, 2021 at 10:50:44 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote : On Fri, 23 Apr 2021 19:07:36 +0100, Snit wrote: On Apr 23, 2021 at 10:51:58 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote : On Tue, 20 Apr 2021 20:02:12 +0100, Snit wrote: On Apr 20, 2021 at 11:20:45 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote : On Sat, 17 Apr 2021 05:23:56 +0100, Snit wrote: On Apr 16, 2021 at 9:01:57 PM MST, ""Rod Speed"" wrote : Snit wrote Rod Speed wrote Snit wrote Rod Speed wrote Snit wrote Rod Speed wrote What matters is the evidence with science, not individuals. Correct: though the experts will generally side with the evidence (if they did not they would not be the experts!) Problem is that the evidence changes, particularly with the recent less than predicted rate of world temperature change. Do you mean the hand picked specific areas where it was less even as the world beat the predictions? Nope, the world as a whole didn=E2=80=99t beat predictions. Would love to see the peer reviewed research you are referring to. You're the one that needs to provide that given you claim it exceeded predictions. You have no research to back your claims, nor scientific sites. OK. That is what I figured. You have no research Countered by the evidence provided. If you want to have a conversation, fine, but I am not interested in you making insane claims you cannot back and then ignoring the fact evidence has been provided. If you ACTUALLY want to learn about man-made global climate change this is a good place to start: http://climate.nasa.gov A government website is the last place to go for facts. Do you have a more reputable site to get info on man-made global climate change? if so please share. Looking out of my window. A simple "no" would have done. You have an unsupported intuition. It was a yes. First hand information, supported by everyone else who has looked out of their window, or had to clear snow off their car. You have an intuition, contrary to the evidence, based on limited data. I have enough evidence to verify that **** all has changed. Only a fool would spend billions researching something that is not apparent. Just as many religious people say they have personal experience of a god. Except with that belief it is not actively denying peer reviewed research. While there is no evidence of a god, belief in one does not lead you to necessarily deny things like the evididence of man-made global climate change. Your religion is more harmful than the ones you mock. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. |
#344
Posted to alt.computer.workshop,alt.home.repair,uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Spank!
Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Tue, 27 Apr 2021 02:06:56 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "Snit" wrote in message ... On Apr 26, 2021 at 10:41:23 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote : On Wed, 21 Apr 2021 19:21:18 +0100, Snit wrote: On Apr 21, 2021 at 11:11:28 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote : On Sat, 17 Apr 2021 23:56:53 +0100, Snit wrote: On Apr 17, 2021 at 10:28:50 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote : On Fri, 16 Apr 2021 19:10:05 +0100, Snit wrote: On Apr 16, 2021 at 10:59:28 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote : On Thu, 15 Apr 2021 21:15:17 +0100, Snit wrote: On Apr 15, 2021 at 11:02:15 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote : On Wed, 14 Apr 2021 19:12:00 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: Commander Kinsey wrote Another account must be made so they don't get the last word in. The silliest thing I got banned for was saying the word "damn". And not even in a rude way, probably something like "the damn weather is awful today". Turns out the admin was a religious nutter. Yeah, I got the same thing from another religious nutter for using the term "hell of a lot", not a moderator in that case. You have to wonder how far we would be today if religion had not impeded science. Until a few hundred years ago there was not much of a split. In English please. The two have a history that is tied together. I doubt it. You have been shown evidence. Your acceptance or rejection of the evidence is on you. Religion did not help science. Just because some scientists were religious means nothing. If there had been no religion, those same people would still have become scientists. It was not just that they were religious, they were doing research in the name of religion. Why do you think there is a Vatican Observatory? How about the Center for Theology and the Natural Sciences? And Islam-backed work, getting much from the Greeks, pushed a lot in the areas of mathematics, optics, astronomy, and medicine. Many early scientists saw studying the world as a form of studying their idea of a deity. Yeah and when that science they were doing produces something against the bible it's immediately discounted. In far too many cases, agreed. But look at you, now, you reject both religion AND much of science. Meanwhile I am not religious but very much look to science. I do not reject science. You reject man-made global climate change and other well established things shown though peer review research. I reject that it's made enough difference to need to give a damn. I understand you reject the evidence. Not sure what else there is to say about that. You mock others for their religious as being faith based but you have your own equally strong faith based views. Bull****. He actually realises that climate has not changed enough to matter. Don't back me up again or I'll fall in love with you. You fall in love with everyone. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. |
#345
Posted to alt.computer.workshop,alt.home.repair,uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Spank!
Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Sun, 25 Apr 2021 21:37:00 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "Commander Kinsey" wrote in message news On Wed, 21 Apr 2021 19:20:41 +0100, Snit wrote: On Apr 21, 2021 at 11:13:56 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote : On Sat, 17 Apr 2021 23:50:26 +0100, Snit wrote: On Apr 17, 2021 at 10:28:03 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote : and in some cases even things like evolution. Evolution could take place if we let coronavirus kill off the weak. Evolution IS taking place. And the more the virus spreads the more it mutates / evolves. I was obviously talking about the evolution of humans to fight it off. Think about Eskimos and the cold virus. And we as a species have evolved the ability to make vaccines. No, Fraid so. we've invented the ability to screw up our future evolution. No we havent. Making useful vaccines has in fact allowed us to evolve even smarter people, most obviously with the spanish flu which killed the best people very quickly indeed. But allowed people to live who are susceptible to viruses. Making future generations need more vaccines. Are you falsely assuming if you are more susceptible to one virus you will be to others? If so this implies Windows computers are more susceptible to Mac viruses than Macs are! -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. |
#346
Posted to alt.computer.workshop,alt.home.repair,uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Spank!
"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message news On Sun, 25 Apr 2021 21:37:00 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "Commander Kinsey" wrote in message news On Wed, 21 Apr 2021 19:20:41 +0100, Snit wrote: On Apr 21, 2021 at 11:13:56 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote : On Sat, 17 Apr 2021 23:50:26 +0100, Snit wrote: On Apr 17, 2021 at 10:28:03 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote : and in some cases even things like evolution. Evolution could take place if we let coronavirus kill off the weak. Evolution IS taking place. And the more the virus spreads the more it mutates / evolves. I was obviously talking about the evolution of humans to fight it off. Think about Eskimos and the cold virus. And we as a species have evolved the ability to make vaccines. No, Fraid so. we've invented the ability to screw up our future evolution. No we havent. Making useful vaccines has in fact allowed us to evolve even smarter people, most obviously with the spanish flu which killed the best people very quickly indeed. But allowed people to live who are susceptible to viruses. No it didn't given that they didn't have a vaccine for the spanish flu. Making future generations need more vaccines. Nope. |
#347
Posted to alt.computer.workshop,alt.home.repair,uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Spank!
"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message news On Mon, 26 Apr 2021 19:25:54 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "Commander Kinsey" wrote in message news On Fri, 23 Apr 2021 21:03:53 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "Snit" wrote in message ... On Apr 23, 2021 at 10:54:38 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote : On Wed, 21 Apr 2021 06:05:23 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: Some gutless ****wit troll desperately cowering behind "Snit" repetitively ****ted the same mindless troll**** and lies as it always does when its got done like a ****ing dinner, as it always is. Tedious, isn't he? What Rod Speed ran from: More of you lies, that troll**** is what I flushed, repeatedly. Snit is what's called a floater. Which one of these ? https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/floater Only 10 is used in Scotland. That's a lie with 1. It means you've been unsuccessful in flushing your turd because it contained too much farts and floated. Nope, because it contained too much undigested vegy crap. You have to weigh it down with many pieces of bogroll and flush again. You arent weighing it down because bog roll floats too. You are increasing the surface area so the flush has more area to work out to get the turd round the bend. I was referring to 10 with snit, since you tried to flush him and he didn't. I didn't try to flush him, just his troll****. |
#348
Posted to alt.computer.workshop,alt.home.repair,uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
****, the Sick Git, the Troll-feeding Senile HUGE ASSHOLE!
On Sat, 01 May 2021 18:46:35 GMT, **** the sick git, the notorious,
troll-feeding, senile asshole, blathered again: Don't back me up again or I'll fall in love with you. You fall in love with everyone. But it's YOU who keeps sucking HIM off, not the other way round, **** the Git! |
#349
Posted to alt.computer.workshop,alt.home.repair,uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
****, the Sick Git, the Troll-feeding Senile HUGE ASSHOLE!
On Sat, 01 May 2021 18:46:36 GMT, **** the sick git, the notorious,
troll-feeding, senile asshole, blathered again: Are you falsely assuming if you are more susceptible to one virus you will be to others? HE only assumes that you will keep sucking him off as long as he keeps baiting you, senile asshole! BG |
#350
Posted to alt.computer.workshop,alt.home.repair,uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Spank!
"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message news On Tue, 27 Apr 2021 02:06:56 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "Snit" wrote in message ... On Apr 26, 2021 at 10:41:23 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote : On Wed, 21 Apr 2021 19:21:18 +0100, Snit wrote: On Apr 21, 2021 at 11:11:28 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote : On Sat, 17 Apr 2021 23:56:53 +0100, Snit wrote: On Apr 17, 2021 at 10:28:50 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote : On Fri, 16 Apr 2021 19:10:05 +0100, Snit wrote: On Apr 16, 2021 at 10:59:28 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote : On Thu, 15 Apr 2021 21:15:17 +0100, Snit wrote: On Apr 15, 2021 at 11:02:15 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote : On Wed, 14 Apr 2021 19:12:00 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: Commander Kinsey wrote Another account must be made so they don't get the last word in. The silliest thing I got banned for was saying the word "damn". And not even in a rude way, probably something like "the damn weather is awful today". Turns out the admin was a religious nutter. Yeah, I got the same thing from another religious nutter for using the term "hell of a lot", not a moderator in that case. You have to wonder how far we would be today if religion had not impeded science. Until a few hundred years ago there was not much of a split. In English please. The two have a history that is tied together. I doubt it. You have been shown evidence. Your acceptance or rejection of the evidence is on you. Religion did not help science. Just because some scientists were religious means nothing. If there had been no religion, those same people would still have become scientists. It was not just that they were religious, they were doing research in the name of religion. Why do you think there is a Vatican Observatory? How about the Center for Theology and the Natural Sciences? And Islam-backed work, getting much from the Greeks, pushed a lot in the areas of mathematics, optics, astronomy, and medicine. Many early scientists saw studying the world as a form of studying their idea of a deity. Yeah and when that science they were doing produces something against the bible it's immediately discounted. In far too many cases, agreed. But look at you, now, you reject both religion AND much of science. Meanwhile I am not religious but very much look to science. I do not reject science. You reject man-made global climate change and other well established things shown though peer review research. I reject that it's made enough difference to need to give a damn. I understand you reject the evidence. Not sure what else there is to say about that. You mock others for their religious as being faith based but you have your own equally strong faith based views. Bull****. He actually realises that climate has not changed enough to matter. Don't back me up again or I'll fall in love with you. Not a problem, I have a poofter stopper. |
#351
Posted to alt.computer.workshop,alt.home.repair,uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
****, the Sick Git, the Troll-feeding Senile HUGE ASSHOLE!
On Sat, 01 May 2021 18:46:34 GMT, **** the sick git, the notorious,
troll-feeding, senile asshole, blathered again: Just as many religious people say they have personal experience of a god. Except with that belief it is not actively denying peer reviewed research. While there is no evidence of a god, belief in one does not lead you to necessarily deny things like the evididence of man-made global climate change. Your religion is more harmful than the ones you mock. Your continued sucking him off is more disgusting than his trolling, senile sucker of troll cock! |
#352
Posted to alt.computer.workshop,alt.home.repair,uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
The Two Inseparable Trolling Resident Sociopaths together again
On Sun, 2 May 2021 04:47:08 +1000, cantankerous trolling geezer Rodent
Speed, the auto-contradicting senile sociopath, blabbered, again: FLUSH the two subnormal sociopathic cretins' endless absolutely idiotic blather -- Another typical retarded conversation between our two village idiots, Birdbrain and Rodent Speed: Birdbrain: "You beat me to it. Plain sex is boring." Senile Rodent: "Then **** the cats. That wont be boring." Birdbrain: "Sell me a de-clawing tool first." Senile Rodent: "Wont help with the teeth." Birdbrain: "They've never gone for me with their mouths." Rodent Speed: "They will if you are stupid enough to try ****ing them." Birdbrain: "No, they always use claws." Rodent Speed: "They wont if you try ****ing them. Try it and see." Message-ID: |
#353
Posted to alt.computer.workshop,alt.home.repair,uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Spank!
"Snit" wrote in message ... Commander Kinsey wrote: On Tue, 27 Apr 2021 02:48:15 +0100, Snit wrote: On Apr 26, 2021 at 10:50:44 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote : On Fri, 23 Apr 2021 19:07:36 +0100, Snit wrote: On Apr 23, 2021 at 10:51:58 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote : On Tue, 20 Apr 2021 20:02:12 +0100, Snit wrote: On Apr 20, 2021 at 11:20:45 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote : On Sat, 17 Apr 2021 05:23:56 +0100, Snit wrote: On Apr 16, 2021 at 9:01:57 PM MST, ""Rod Speed"" wrote : Snit wrote Rod Speed wrote Snit wrote Rod Speed wrote Snit wrote Rod Speed wrote What matters is the evidence with science, not individuals. Correct: though the experts will generally side with the evidence (if they did not they would not be the experts!) Problem is that the evidence changes, particularly with the recent less than predicted rate of world temperature change. Do you mean the hand picked specific areas where it was less even as the world beat the predictions? Nope, the world as a whole didn=E2=80=99t beat predictions. Would love to see the peer reviewed research you are referring to. You're the one that needs to provide that given you claim it exceeded predictions. You have no research to back your claims, nor scientific sites. OK. That is what I figured. You have no research Countered by the evidence provided. If you want to have a conversation, fine, but I am not interested in you making insane claims you cannot back and then ignoring the fact evidence has been provided. If you ACTUALLY want to learn about man-made global climate change this is a good place to start: http://climate.nasa.gov A government website is the last place to go for facts. Do you have a more reputable site to get info on man-made global climate change? if so please share. Looking out of my window. A simple "no" would have done. You have an unsupported intuition. It was a yes. First hand information, supported by everyone else who has looked out of their window, or had to clear snow off their car. You have an intuition, contrary to the evidence, based on limited data. I have enough evidence to verify that **** all has changed. Only a fool would spend billions researching something that is not apparent. Just as many religious people say they have personal experience of a god. Except with that belief it is not actively denying peer reviewed research. Trouble with that "peer reviewed research" is that it is peer reviewed by others of the MMCC cult. While there is no evidence of a god, belief in one does not lead you to necessarily deny things like the evididence of man-made global climate change. Easy to claim that there is evidence of man-made global climate change. Your religion is more harmful than the ones you mock. More mindless bull****. |
#354
Posted to alt.computer.workshop,alt.home.repair,uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
The Two Brain Dead Inseparable Trolling Resident Sociopaths together again
On Sun, 2 May 2021 04:51:21 +1000, cantankerous trolling geezer Rodent
Speed, the auto-contradicting senile sociopath, blabbered, again: FLUSH the two subnormal sociopathic cretins' endless absolutely idiotic blather -- Another typical retarded "conversation" between the two resident idiots: Birdbrain: "But imagine how cool it was to own slaves." Senile Rodent: "Yeah, right. Feed them, clothe them, and fix them when they're broken. After all, you paid good money for them. Then you've got to keep an eye on them all the time." Birdbrain: "Better than having to give them wages on top of that." Senile Rodent: "Specially when they make more slaves for you and produce their own food and clothes." MID: |
#355
Posted to alt.computer.workshop,alt.home.repair,uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Spank!
Rod Speed wrote:
"Snit" wrote in message ... Commander Kinsey wrote: On Tue, 27 Apr 2021 02:48:15 +0100, Snit wrote: On Apr 26, 2021 at 10:50:44 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote : On Fri, 23 Apr 2021 19:07:36 +0100, Snit wrote: On Apr 23, 2021 at 10:51:58 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote : On Tue, 20 Apr 2021 20:02:12 +0100, Snit wrote: On Apr 20, 2021 at 11:20:45 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote : On Sat, 17 Apr 2021 05:23:56 +0100, Snit wrote: On Apr 16, 2021 at 9:01:57 PM MST, ""Rod Speed"" wrote : Snit wrote Rod Speed wrote Snit wrote Rod Speed wrote Snit wrote Rod Speed wrote What matters is the evidence with science, not individuals. Correct: though the experts will generally side with the evidence (if they did not they would not be the experts!) Problem is that the evidence changes, particularly with the recent less than predicted rate of world temperature change. Do you mean the hand picked specific areas where it was less even as the world beat the predictions? Nope, the world as a whole didn=E2=80=99t beat predictions. Would love to see the peer reviewed research you are referring to. You're the one that needs to provide that given you claim it exceeded predictions. You have no research to back your claims, nor scientific sites. OK. That is what I figured. You have no research Countered by the evidence provided. If you want to have a conversation, fine, but I am not interested in you making insane claims you cannot back and then ignoring the fact evidence has been provided. If you ACTUALLY want to learn about man-made global climate change this is a good place to start: http://climate.nasa.gov A government website is the last place to go for facts. Do you have a more reputable site to get info on man-made global climate change? if so please share. Looking out of my window. A simple "no" would have done. You have an unsupported intuition. It was a yes. First hand information, supported by everyone else who has looked out of their window, or had to clear snow off their car. You have an intuition, contrary to the evidence, based on limited data. I have enough evidence to verify that **** all has changed. Only a fool would spend billions researching something that is not apparent. Just as many religious people say they have personal experience of a god. Except with that belief it is not actively denying peer reviewed research. Trouble with that "peer reviewed research" is that it is peer reviewed by others of the MMCC cult. What do you even mean by this other than to say you reject evidence. While there is no evidence of a god, belief in one does not lead you to necessarily deny things like the evididence of man-made global climate change. Easy to claim that there is evidence of man-made global climate change. And easy to show evidence you reject. Your religion is more harmful than the ones you mock. More mindless bull****. If so you would have offered a reasoned refutation. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. |
#356
Posted to alt.computer.workshop,alt.home.repair,uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
****, the Sick Git, the Troll-feeding Senile HUGE ASSHOLE!
On Sat, 01 May 2021 20:13:55 GMT, **** the sick git, the notorious,
troll-feeding, senile asshole, blathered again: If so you would have offered a reasoned refutation. Admit it, **** the Git, you simply love sucking off EVERY demented troll! LOL |
#357
Posted to alt.computer.workshop,alt.home.repair,uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Spank!
"Snit" wrote in message ... Rod Speed wrote: "Snit" wrote in message ... Commander Kinsey wrote: On Tue, 27 Apr 2021 02:48:15 +0100, Snit wrote: On Apr 26, 2021 at 10:50:44 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote : On Fri, 23 Apr 2021 19:07:36 +0100, Snit wrote: On Apr 23, 2021 at 10:51:58 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote : On Tue, 20 Apr 2021 20:02:12 +0100, Snit wrote: On Apr 20, 2021 at 11:20:45 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote : On Sat, 17 Apr 2021 05:23:56 +0100, Snit wrote: On Apr 16, 2021 at 9:01:57 PM MST, ""Rod Speed"" wrote : Snit wrote Rod Speed wrote Snit wrote Rod Speed wrote Snit wrote Rod Speed wrote What matters is the evidence with science, not individuals. Correct: though the experts will generally side with the evidence (if they did not they would not be the experts!) Problem is that the evidence changes, particularly with the recent less than predicted rate of world temperature change. Do you mean the hand picked specific areas where it was less even as the world beat the predictions? Nope, the world as a whole didn=E2=80=99t beat predictions. Would love to see the peer reviewed research you are referring to. You're the one that needs to provide that given you claim it exceeded predictions. You have no research to back your claims, nor scientific sites. OK. That is what I figured. You have no research Countered by the evidence provided. If you want to have a conversation, fine, but I am not interested in you making insane claims you cannot back and then ignoring the fact evidence has been provided. If you ACTUALLY want to learn about man-made global climate change this is a good place to start: http://climate.nasa.gov A government website is the last place to go for facts. Do you have a more reputable site to get info on man-made global climate change? if so please share. Looking out of my window. A simple "no" would have done. You have an unsupported intuition. It was a yes. First hand information, supported by everyone else who has looked out of their window, or had to clear snow off their car. You have an intuition, contrary to the evidence, based on limited data. I have enough evidence to verify that **** all has changed. Only a fool would spend billions researching something that is not apparent. Just as many religious people say they have personal experience of a god. Except with that belief it is not actively denying peer reviewed research. Trouble with that "peer reviewed research" is that it is peer reviewed by others of the MMCC cult. What do you even mean by this other than to say you reject evidence. I dont reject evidence. I do realise that peer reviewed means nothing when the peer reviewers are others of the MMCC cult. While there is no evidence of a god, belief in one does not lead you to necessarily deny things like the evididence of man-made global climate change. Easy to claim that there is evidence of man-made global climate change. And easy to show evidence you reject. I dont reject evidence. Your religion is more harmful than the ones you mock. More mindless bull****. If so you would have offered a reasoned refutation. More mindless bull****. Its obvious the massive damage that religions have done over time with religious wars alone, ****wit. Not a shred of evidence that MMGCC has produced anything even remotely like that immense pile of corpses. |
#358
Posted to alt.computer.workshop,alt.home.repair,uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Lonely Obnoxious Cantankerous Auto-contradicting Senile Ozzie Troll Alert!
On Sun, 2 May 2021 07:01:00 +1000, cantankerous trolling geezer Rodent
Speed, the auto-contradicting senile sociopath, blabbered, again: More mindless bull****. Yeah, senile Rodent, show the senile asshole what it gets for feeding a senile asshole like you! LOL |
#359
Posted to alt.computer.workshop,alt.home.repair,uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Spank!
On Sun, 25 Apr 2021 19:52:51 +0100, Snit wrote:
On Apr 25, 2021 at 11:41:26 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote : On Wed, 21 Apr 2021 19:20:41 +0100, Snit wrote: On Apr 21, 2021 at 11:13:56 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote : On Sat, 17 Apr 2021 23:50:26 +0100, Snit wrote: On Apr 17, 2021 at 10:28:03 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote : ... Scientists are liberal because they want funding for free. Scientists are liberal because the conservative mindset is to deny evidence. We can see this with COVID, No, we just don't make such a fuss over a small thing. A thing that kills 4 times less than cancer and 40 times less than the world population growth. The idea that over half a million dead in America, and many more than that around the world, and that is WITH some fairly significant precautions, is a "small thing" is an utter rejection of the facts. It's 4 times smaller than cancer and 40 times smaller then the population growth. Those are numbers, irrefutable numbers. In the US it is the third leading cause of death. And that is with some precautions. Your lack of compassion does not reduce the harm. It's FOUR TIMES LESS. So 100 people die, but only 20 of them were coronavirus. And that's assuming nobody died of anything other than the virus or cancer. It is still the third leading cause of death. Maybe even higher now. So not the most important one to deal with. It's like putting out a candle in the hall when your entire kitchen is on fire. Again, your lack of compassion is on you... a "bad trait" if you will. And those without compassion are bad for society... so by your own standards should you not be weeded out? I'm not telling people to live "dangerously", I'm telling them not to insist that I don't. man-made global climate change, It was 1C here in Scotland a few days ago, in spring. There is no global warming. Denial of the fact from you. That is what I mean. I can see the temperature with my own eyes! It's on the thermometer over there! You use a local temperature to try to deny evidence of man-made global climate change. Your logic is flawed. So magically my part of the world stays the same and the rest goes up? Right.... Look, just move to the place that's the temperature you like, if you're fussy enough to care about the alleged 2C change. Selection bias Stop using silly psychological labels you've read somewhere. is not a good way to look at climate. I say go with the evidence. I have plenty evidence right here, the weather outside my house is what it always has been. And moving does not reduce man-made global climate change, nor its harm. Of course it does. If it becomes too hot to grow crops where you live, move further north, or grow more appropriate crops. The UK will be able to grow oranges. Russia will become a huge farmland instead of frozen wastes. http://climate.nasa.gov research on reduction of abortions, That's not science, that's morals. If you want to reduce abortions, which most conservatives claim to want, there are known methods to do it. At least in American the Republican party (the more conservative of the two) rejects every one of these things. There "solution" is to deny women equal rights. The whole idea that an abortion is wrong is insanity. The child belongs to the mother, and nobody else. The Republican party pretends to be against abortion but then refused to do anything to help reduce the numbers. The Democrats want it to be legal but want to keep it rare. Reducing the numbers can only mean you're taking away the right of choice from the woman. I thought you liked human rights? The government should not intervene. I say increase the choice. Many who get an abortion would not have needed one if they had more choices -- this is based on the evidence of better education, free birth control, more access to Planned Parenthood and the like, etc. It's not rocket science to use a condom. You don't need education for something that simple. Even if you forget/were drunk, there's a morning after pill. and in some cases even things like evolution. Evolution could take place if we let coronavirus kill off the weak. Evolution IS taking place. And the more the virus spreads the more it mutates / evolves. I was obviously talking about the evolution of humans to fight it off. Think about Eskimos and the cold virus. And we as a species have evolved the ability to make vaccines. No, we've invented the ability to screw up our future evolution. Evolution has no plan. It is not forward "thinking" -- it does not think at all. It doesn't have to. It works by simply deleting the failures. But society is allowing those failures to breed, producing more failures. -- Sent from my iPhone, this spam courtesy of Apple incorporated. |
#360
Posted to alt.computer.workshop,alt.home.repair,uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Spank!
On Mon, 26 Apr 2021 19:22:29 +0100, Rod Speed wrote:
"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message news On Fri, 23 Apr 2021 21:00:20 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "Commander Kinsey" wrote in message news On Tue, 20 Apr 2021 19:44:53 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "Commander Kinsey" wrote in message news On Sat, 17 Apr 2021 20:34:32 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "Commander Kinsey" wrote in message news On Fri, 16 Apr 2021 19:10:05 +0100, Snit wrote: On Apr 16, 2021 at 10:59:28 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote : On Thu, 15 Apr 2021 21:15:17 +0100, Snit wrote: On Apr 15, 2021 at 11:02:15 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote : On Wed, 14 Apr 2021 19:12:00 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: Commander Kinsey wrote Another account must be made so they don't get the last word in. The silliest thing I got banned for was saying the word "damn". And not even in a rude way, probably something like "the damn weather is awful today". Turns out the admin was a religious nutter. Yeah, I got the same thing from another religious nutter for using the term "hell of a lot", not a moderator in that case. You have to wonder how far we would be today if religion had not impeded science. Until a few hundred years ago there was not much of a split. In English please. The two have a history that is tied together. I doubt it. Its true anyway. Religion did not help science. Yes it did, if only because a lot of the professionally religious had a lot time on their hands that allowed them to do science. Just because some scientists were religious means nothing. In earlier times it was in fact almost all of them. If there had been no religion, those same people would still have become scientists. Nope, they wouldn't have been in religious institutions with a lot of time on their hands as parasites on the community. Mendel would have had to get off his lard arse and earn a living. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gregor...ife_and_career Inventing things is a living. He would have got the same food and accommodation if he had just grovelled to some god or other instead of doing something useful. Einstein managed to earn money as a patent clerk, and invent ****. He didn't actually invent anything much when he was a patent clerk Didn't have to, that earned him enough money to go invent later. That utterly mangles what actually happened. He didn't save up what the patent office payed him and did the inventing with that money. Of course he did, he was a tight Jew. and was stupid enough to believe in some god too. I doubt his religion played any part in creating his theories. It did actually. He ran that stupid line 'god does not play dice with the universe' If god had wished us to know about the universe would he not have told us? Pity about radioactive decay alone. Randomness is simply lack of detailed knowledge. Take flipping a coin. If you know enough about how hard you spin it etc, you can work out what side it will land on. -- Sent from my iPhone, this spam courtesy of Apple incorporated. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
SPANK ON PINKO SENSEI THE DOUCHELICKER | Woodworking |