"Snit" wrote in message
...
Rod Speed wrote:


"Snit" wrote in message
...
Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Tue, 27 Apr 2021 02:48:15 +0100, Snit
wrote:

On Apr 26, 2021 at 10:50:44 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

On Fri, 23 Apr 2021 19:07:36 +0100, Snit
wrote:

On Apr 23, 2021 at 10:51:58 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

On Tue, 20 Apr 2021 20:02:12 +0100, Snit

wrote:

On Apr 20, 2021 at 11:20:45 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

On Sat, 17 Apr 2021 05:23:56 +0100, Snit
wrote:

On Apr 16, 2021 at 9:01:57 PM MST, ""Rod Speed"" wrote
:

Snit wrote
Rod Speed wrote
Snit wrote
Rod Speed wrote
Snit wrote
Rod Speed wrote

What matters is the evidence with science, not
individuals.

Correct: though the experts will generally side with the
evidence
(if they did not they would not be the experts!)

Problem is that the evidence changes, particularly with
the
recent less than predicted rate of world temperature
change.

Do you mean the hand picked specific areas where it was
less
even as
the world beat the predictions?

Nope, the world as a whole didn=E2=80=99t beat predictions.

Would love to see the peer reviewed research you are
referring
to.

You're the one that needs to provide that
given you claim it exceeded predictions.

You have no research to back your claims, nor scientific
sites.
OK. That
is
what I figured.

You have no research

Countered by the evidence provided.

If you want to have a conversation, fine, but I am not
interested
in you
making insane claims you cannot back and then ignoring the fact
evidence
has
been provided. If you ACTUALLY want to learn about man-made
global
climate
change this is a good place to start:

http://climate.nasa.gov

A government website is the last place to go for facts.

Do you have a more reputable site to get info on man-made global
climate
change? if so please share.

Looking out of my window.

A simple "no" would have done. You have an unsupported intuition.

It was a yes. First hand information, supported by everyone else who
has
looked out of their window, or had to clear snow off their car.

You have an intuition, contrary to the evidence, based on limited
data.

I have enough evidence to verify that **** all has changed. Only a
fool
would spend billions researching something that is not apparent.


Just as many religious people say they have personal experience of a
god.
Except with that belief it is not actively denying peer reviewed
research.

Trouble with that "peer reviewed research" is that
it is peer reviewed by others of the MMCC cult.

What do you even mean by this other than to say you reject evidence.

I dont reject evidence. I do realise that peer reviewed means
nothing when the peer reviewers are others of the MMCC cult.

While there is no evidence of a god, belief in one
does not lead you to necessarily deny things like the
evididence of man-made global climate change.

Easy to claim that there is evidence of man-made global climate change.

And easy to show evidence you reject.

I dont reject evidence.

Your religion is more harmful than the ones you mock.

More mindless bull****.

If so you would have offered a reasoned refutation.

More mindless bull****. Its obvious the massive damage that
religions have done over time with religious wars alone, ****wit.

Not a shred of evidence that MMGCC has produced anything
even remotely like that immense pile of corpses.