On Tue, 04 May 2021 18:53:26 GMT, **** the sick git, the notorious,
troll-feeding, senile asshole, blathered again:



Your rejection of evidence on man-made global climate change is based on
faith... yet you belittle others for having faith.

Curious.

The ONLY thing curious here is that a senile asshole like you keeps feeding
a clinically insane sociopathic troll like him! LOL

On Tue, 04 May 2021 18:50:13 GMT, **** the sick git, the notorious,
troll-feeding, senile asshole, blathered again:


The market does what the customers request.

Sometimes.

OTOH, when he requests that you suck him off, YOU do it EVERY time, senile
sucker of troll cock! VBG

"Snit" wrote in message
...
On May 4, 2021 at 10:41:00 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

On Thu, 29 Apr 2021 04:56:06 +0100, Snit
wrote:

On Apr 28, 2021 at 8:44:12 PM MST, "rbowman" wrote
:

On 04/28/2021 12:35 PM, Commander Kinsey wrote:
Vote Libertarian.

In this country I only vote for the Libertarian as a 'none of the
above'
statement. I may have left-libertarian tendencies but in the US the
capital L libertarians are right-libertarians.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/It_Usu..._with_Ayn_Rand

They pretend that conservative fiscal policies will lead to liberal
social
results, as if the magic market is going to go contrary to profits to
protect
human rights and the environment.

The market does what the customers request.

Sometimes.
Imagine a world with no green legislation. Now imagine 5 companies
making the same thing. Two of them advertise green-ness in manufacturing
etc. Anyone who believed in ecology would only buy from those two and the
others
would go bankrupt or change their ways.

The one which is more green would likely cost more -- there are savings in
not doing the right thing.

With most people barely scraping by, as happens in a complete "free"
market with no protections,

Thats not what happened in HongKong before
it was handed back to China, or in Shanghai
before the communists ruled the roost.

people would by the cheap stuff.

Plenty didnt in those two situations.

We see this with Walmart and Amazon now.

Not because there are no protections.

What would make human nature change to get the results you speak of?

Doesnt require any change.

"Snit" wrote in message
...
On May 4, 2021 at 10:35:43 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

On Tue, 27 Apr 2021 02:50:36 +0100, Snit
wrote:

On Apr 26, 2021 at 10:54:42 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

On Fri, 23 Apr 2021 19:08:55 +0100, Snit
wrote:

On Apr 23, 2021 at 10:54:38 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

On Wed, 21 Apr 2021 06:05:23 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:

Some gutless ****wit troll desperately cowering behind
"Snit" repetitively ****ted
the same mindless troll**** and lies as it always does when
its got done like a ****ing dinner, as it always is.

Tedious, isn't he?

What Rod Speed ran from:
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Again, I look to peer reviewed papers (and not just hand picking but
a wide
range if I am interested in a topic), scientific sites, fact
checkers, top
experts and organizations, etc.

You find this to be a bad thing and say that ties me to a cult. We
do not
see
eye-to-eye. So what?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I find it amusing how offended some are by that.

No, he just got bored of you repeating yourself ad nauseum.

I do like how those who troll get so bent out of shape. So often the
same
pattern:

1) They make a claim.
2) There is a response they do not like.

They go back to 1. Carroll and Gremlin are masters at this.

It's fustration at nobody understanding simple concepts.

And there's no such thing as a troll, just people you don't agree with.

There are people who tend to troll -- those who make insane attacks just
to
get attention, for example.

Yep, like that pathetic little wretch Peeler who does
nothing but follow a few of us around like a little
dog and yap at every single post we make.

"Snit" wrote in message
...
On May 4, 2021 at 10:34:16 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

On Tue, 27 Apr 2021 02:49:08 +0100, Snit
wrote:

On Apr 26, 2021 at 10:51:30 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

On Fri, 23 Apr 2021 19:09:55 +0100, Snit
wrote:

On Apr 23, 2021 at 10:54:25 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

On Wed, 21 Apr 2021 05:54:57 +0100, Snit
wrote:

On Apr 20, 2021 at 8:47:23 PM MST, ""Rod Speed"" wrote
:

Some gutless ****wit troll desperately cowering behind
"Snit" repetitively ****ted
the same mindless troll**** and lies as it always does when
its got done like a ****ing dinner, as it always is.

What you snipped:
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Again, I look to peer reviewed papers (and not just hand picking
but
a wide
range if I am interested in a topic), scientific sites, fact
checkers, top
experts and organizations, etc.

You find this to be a bad thing and say that ties me to a cult.
We do not
see
eye-to-eye. So what?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Sad your frustration at not being able to answer this question
led you to
lash
out so immaturely.

I hope you do better next time.

If you wanted to say god existed, you could come up with "evidence"
for
that
too.

Well, god does exist -- as a concept (or set of concepts).

So he doesn't then. Things don't exist because you want them to.

How can something that does not exist have a gender?

I picked one. Just like if you're talking about a complete stranger.
"Someone left a note on my door, he didn't say who he was". I don't go
for
this modern gender neutral ****.

Modern? As in since language started?

Not with english.

And why would nature feel the need to fit into a man made binary system?

What ?

Doesn't mean he exists.

Can you point to the peer reviewed papers that back the idea of a
deity?
Scientific sites? Fact checkers?

Why would there be any, since he doesn't exist.

I agree -- but I do know there are many concepts of gods.

And many people foolish enough to believe them. Kinda like climate
change. It was hailing today! In ****ing May!

Your rejection of evidence on man-made global climate change

There is **** all evidence that it is man made. And even when likely
agriculture instead of hunting and gathering presumably did have
some effect on global climate, we survived that fine anyway.

Hardly surprising given that we managed to survive ice ages too.

is based on faith...

Bull**** it is.

yet you belittle others for having faith.

For a very good reason.

On 2021-05-04 12:59 p.m., Rod Speed wrote:


"Snit" wrote in message
...
On May 4, 2021 at 10:34:16 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

On Tue, 27 Apr 2021 02:49:08 +0100, Snit
wrote:

Â*On Apr 26, 2021 at 10:51:30 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

Â*On Fri, 23 Apr 2021 19:09:55 +0100, Snit
wrote:

Â* On Apr 23, 2021 at 10:54:25 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
Â* :

Â* On Wed, 21 Apr 2021 05:54:57 +0100, Snit
wrote:

Â*Â* On Apr 20, 2021 at 8:47:23 PM MST, ""Rod Speed"" wrote
Â*Â* :

Â*Â* Some gutless ****wit troll desperately cowering behind
Â*Â* "Snit" repetitively ****ted
Â*Â* the same mindless troll**** and lies as it always does when
Â*Â* its got done like a ****ing dinner, as it always is.

Â*Â* What you snipped:

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Â*Â* Again, I look to peer reviewed papers (and not just hand
picking but
a wide
Â*Â* range if I am interested in a topic), scientific sites, fact
checkers, top
Â*Â* experts and organizations, etc.

Â*Â* You find this to be a bad thing and say that ties me to a
cult. We do not
Â* see
Â*Â* eye-to-eye. So what?

----------------------------------------------------------------------


Â*Â* Sad your frustration at not being able to answer this
question led you to
Â* lash
Â*Â* out so immaturely.

Â*Â* I hope you do better next time.

Â* If you wanted to say god existed, you could come up with
"evidence" for
that
Â* too.

Â* Well, god does exist -- as a concept (or set of concepts).

Â*So he doesn't then.Â* Things don't exist because you want them to.

Â*How can something that does not exist have a gender?

I picked one.Â* Just like if you're talking about a complete stranger.
"Someone left a note on my door, he didn't say who he was".Â* I don't
go for
this modern gender neutral ****.

Modern? As in since language started?

Not with english.

And why would nature feel the need to fit into a man made binary system?

What ?

Â*Â* Doesn't mean he exists.

Â* Can you point to the peer reviewed papers that back the idea of
a deity?
Â* Scientific sites? Fact checkers?

Â*Why would there be any, since he doesn't exist.

Â*I agree -- but I do know there are many concepts of gods.

And many people foolish enough to believe them.Â* Kinda like climate
change. It was hailing today!Â* In ****ing May!

Your rejection of evidence on man-made global climate change

There is **** all evidence that it is man made. And even when likely
agriculture instead of hunting and gathering presumably did have
some effect on global climate, we survived that fine anyway.

Hardly surprising given that we managed to survive ice ages too.

is based on faith...

Bull**** it is.

yet you belittle others for having faith.

For a very good reason.

i got cher reason rye cheer

On Wed, 5 May 2021 05:53:46 +1000, cantankerous trolling geezer Rodent
Speed, the auto-contradicting senile sociopath, blabbered, again:


There are people who tend to troll -- those who make insane attacks just
to
get attention, for example.

Yep, like that pathetic little wretch Peeler who does
nothing but follow a few of us around like a little
dog and yap at every single post we make.

Need a hanky, you pathetic bitchslapped senile trolling asshole? LOL

BTW, it's 05:53 in Australia already! LOL So you've been up and trolling for
OVER THREE HOURS already, yet again, you abnormal senile swine! Just HOW
idiotic and senile are you, cretin?

--
Marland answering senile Rodent's statement, "I don't leak":
"That¢s because so much **** and ****e emanates from your gob that there is
nothing left to exit normally, your arsehole has clammed shut through disuse
and the end of prick is only clear because you are such a ******."
Message-ID:

"Rod Speed is an entirely modern phenomenon. Essentially, Rod Speed
is an insecure and worthless individual who has discovered he can
enhance his own self-esteem in his own eyes by playing "the big, hard
man" on the InterNet."
https://www.pcreview.co.uk/threads/r...d-faq.2973853/

--
John addressing the senile Australian pest:
"You are a complete idiot. But you make me larf. LOL"
MID:

On Wed, 5 May 2021 05:51:43 +1000, cantankerous trolling geezer Rodent
Speed, the auto-contradicting senile sociopath, blabbered, again:


That¢s not what happened in HongKong before
it was handed back to China, or in Shanghai
before the communists ruled the roost.

people would by the cheap stuff.

Plenty didn¢t in those two situations.

We see this with Walmart and Amazon now.

Not because there are no protections.

What would make human nature change to get the results you speak of?

Doesn¢t require any change.

ROTFLOL! In auto-contradicting mode again, you hilarious clinically insane
senile sociopathic troll?

--
Kerr-Mudd,John addressing the auto-contradicting senile cretin:
"Auto-contradictor Rod is back! (in the KF)"
MID:

On Wed, 28 Apr 2021 20:34:52 +0100, Rod Speed wrote:



"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
news
On Fri, 23 Apr 2021 21:02:43 +0100, Rod Speed
wrote:



"Snit" wrote in message
...
On Apr 23, 2021 at 10:55:17 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

On Wed, 21 Apr 2021 19:18:06 +0100, Snit
wrote:

On Apr 21, 2021 at 11:14:59 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

On Sun, 18 Apr 2021 00:45:22 +0100, Snit
wrote:

On Apr 17, 2021 at 4:34:04 PM MST, ""Rod Speed"" wrote
:



"Snit" wrote in message
...
On Apr 17, 2021 at 4:28:52 PM MST, ""Rod Speed"" wrote
:

Snit wrote
Commander Kinsey wrote
Snit wrote

research on reduction of abortions,

That's not science, that's morals.

If you want to reduce abortions, which most conservatives
claim to
want, there are known methods to do it. At least in American
the
Republican party (the more conservative of the two) rejects
every one of
these things. There "solution" is to deny women equal rights.

Abortion has nothing to do with equal rights.

Right. Denying people the right to one does.

Wrong, Nothing unequal about it.

Denying people equal rights ties into a conversation about equal
rights.
Don't
think people should have abortions -- then don't have one. And,
hey,
I want
to
see there be fewer, so let's back policy which is known to reduce
the
number.

WTF are you on about wanting to reduce the number? Are you saying
women
shouldn't be allowed to have them?

Women should... but I would like to see the need be reduced.

So this is nothing to do with abortions then. It's to do with you
wanting to brainwash women into behaving differently.

It is about giving them tools, educators, and choice.

They already have all of that and choose to kill their unborn children.

And so they should. Their children, not the state's children.

So its fine to kill the born children when they turn out to be a nuisance ?

Of course. Might aswell try again until you get a good one. If you create a replacement, technically you haven't killed anything, the same number of kids exist.

You wouldn't have lasted long.

Correct.

--
Sent from my iPhone, this spam courtesy of Apple incorporated.

On Wed, 28 Apr 2021 20:40:08 +0100, Snit wrote:

On Apr 28, 2021 at 11:35:57 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

On Fri, 23 Apr 2021 23:10:03 +0100, Snit wrote:

On Apr 23, 2021 at 11:25:18 AM MST, "%" wrote
:

On 2021-04-23 10:40 a.m., Snit wrote:
On Apr 23, 2021 at 9:38:36 AM MST, "%" wrote
:

On 2021-04-23 9:22 a.m., Snit wrote:
On Apr 23, 2021 at 9:20:42 AM MST, "%" wrote
:

On 2021-04-23 9:13 a.m., Snit wrote:
On Apr 23, 2021 at 8:38:27 AM MST, "%" wrote
:

On 2021-04-22 8:19 p.m., Snit wrote:
On Apr 22, 2021 at 8:08:16 PM MST, "%" wrote
:

On 2021-04-22 7:40 p.m., Snit wrote:
On Apr 22, 2021 at 7:30:58 PM MST, "%" wrote
:

On 2021-04-22 6:03 p.m., Snit wrote:
On Apr 22, 2021 at 6:00:02 PM MST, "%" wrote
:

On 2021-04-22 12:46 p.m., Snit wrote:
On Apr 22, 2021 at 11:21:47 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

And that=E2=80=99s just as true of purported man made
climate change.

Its obvious that climate does change,
that=E2=80=99s obvious from
the ice ages etc, but its much less clear how much of the
change we have seen is man made. It
wasn=E2=80=99t that long ago
that most scientists were hyperventilating
about global cooling.

Yes, we can certainly measure a substantial
hike in atmospheric
CO2 levels, but its much less clear how much effect
that actually
has on world temperatures, let alone climate change.

It's bloody obvious to me. We know there used to
be more CO2 in
the air.
And the world was perfectly fine back then.

There has been no time in the history of man when
the CO2 levels
were as
high
as they are now.

Why does man have to be there?

Just a personal preference I prefer to not have man go
extinct... and am
none
too happy about man creating the current mass
extinction we are in.

one day our sun will blow up and all you know will be gone

I am working on travel plans before that.


you'll never get off the ground cause there won't be any

I'll grind it until it is ground.

you're an organ grinder

Only to those who really deserve it, and then I outsource the work.

do you have a coin snatching monkey

That's what she said.

its what you should've asked her

We asked each other.

that's very emotional

It was touching.

do you have a youtube of it we could make some money

I tried making some but the police said it was no good.

Vote Libertarian.

I prefer mature candidates.

I prefer common sense.

--
Sent from my iPhone, this spam courtesy of Apple incorporated.

On May 5, 2021 at 11:32:18 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

We asked each other.

that's very emotional

It was touching.

do you have a youtube of it we could make some money

I tried making some but the police said it was no good.

Vote Libertarian.

I prefer mature candidates.

I prefer common sense.

That comes with maturity.

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot
use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow
superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

On Wed, 05 May 2021 19:07:41 GMT, **** the git, the notorious,
troll-feeding, senile asshole, blathered again:


I prefer common sense.

That comes with maturity.

Obviously not in YOUR case, senile sucker of troll cock!

On Wed, 28 Apr 2021 20:40:36 +0100, Snit wrote:

On Apr 28, 2021 at 11:35:04 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

On Fri, 23 Apr 2021 12:35:52 +0100, FromTheRafters
wrote:

% formulated the question :
On 2021-04-22 12:46 p.m., Snit wrote:
On Apr 22, 2021 at 11:21:47 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

And that=E2=80=99s just as true of purported man made climate
change.
Its obvious that climate does change, that=E2=80=99s obvious from
the ice ages etc, but its much less clear how much of the
change we have seen is man made. It wasn=E2=80=99t that long ago
that most scientists were hyperventilating about global cooling.
Yes, we can certainly measure a substantial hike in atmospheric
CO2 levels, but its much less clear how much effect that actually
has on world temperatures, let alone climate change.
It's bloody obvious to me. We know there used to be more CO2 in
the air.
And the world was perfectly fine back then.
There has been no time in the history of man when the CO2 levels
were as
high
as they are now.

Why does man have to be there?

Just a personal preference I prefer to not have man go extinct... and am
none
too happy about man creating the current mass extinction we are in.

one day our sun will blow up and all you know will be gone

If by "blow up" you mean enter the Red Giant phase. Our Sun is not
likely to explode.

It's a slow explosion.

If we keep using solar and sucking all that energy from the sun who knows what
will happen!

It is highly irresponsible to write things like that in here. Most Americans are stupid enough to believe you.

--
Sent from my iPhone, this spam courtesy of Apple incorporated.

On Wed, 28 Apr 2021 20:41:40 +0100, Snit wrote:

On Apr 28, 2021 at 11:34:41 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

On Thu, 22 Apr 2021 20:46:21 +0100, Snit wrote:

On Apr 22, 2021 at 11:21:47 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

And that=E2=80=99s just as true of purported man made climate change.

Its obvious that climate does change, that=E2=80=99s obvious from
the ice ages etc, but its much less clear how much of the
change we have seen is man made. It wasn=E2=80=99t that long ago
that most scientists were hyperventilating about global cooling.

Yes, we can certainly measure a substantial hike in atmospheric
CO2 levels, but its much less clear how much effect that actually
has on world temperatures, let alone climate change.

It's bloody obvious to me. We know there used to be more CO2 in the air.
And the world was perfectly fine back then.

There has been no time in the history of man when the CO2 levels were as
high
as they are now.

Why does man have to be there?

Just a personal preference I prefer to not have man go extinct... and am
none
too happy about man creating the current mass extinction we are in.

Surely you know that's not what I meant.

Yes, you were trying to pretend that man's influence is not well understood
because in the past there were other times of high CO2, though there were
other reasons and none of the times it has been anywhere even near as high
have the changes happened so quickly.

You are working to push your intuition, based on faith, over the science.

No, I was pointing out the earth survives high CO2 levels just fine because it did in the past. And that we would manage also. You do know how much CO2 is required to kill you, right?

--
Sent from my iPhone, this spam courtesy of Apple incorporated.

On Thu, 29 Apr 2021 21:32:57 +0100, Snit wrote:

On Apr 29, 2021 at 12:35:52 PM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

On Sun, 25 Apr 2021 19:49:39 +0100, Snit wrote:

On Apr 25, 2021 at 11:43:52 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

Grossly overreacting was therefore a trait that needed removing for the
next generation.

Nope because it means they do much better with the
non pandemic infections and don't have to bother to
wash their hands all the time and can get away with
doing what is more convenient like not throwing
away food that has had a fly walk on it etc etc etc.

Having a trait that makes you better at 9 things but worse at another,
getting you killed, is not a good trait to have. Say you could do
calculations twice as fast, you could sing perfect pitch, you could do 1000
pushups, but the sight of a car made you spontaneously combust. That would
not be a good thing to have. By your reasoning, you would be called
superior, and have a hired help to warn you of approaching cars.

You have no right to say who should not be saved.

You have no right to intervene in evolution and keep the worthless alive.

Back to your deserted island you go.

That's all that will be left if the governments keep allowing inferior genetics to continue.

--
Sent from my iPhone, this spam courtesy of Apple incorporated.

On Fri, 30 Apr 2021 20:40:43 +0100, Rod Speed wrote:



"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
news
On Sun, 25 Apr 2021 21:34:37 +0100, Rod Speed
wrote:



"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
news On Thu, 22 Apr 2021 20:28:34 +0100, Rod Speed
wrote:



"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
news On Sun, 18 Apr 2021 19:24:27 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
news On Sat, 17 Apr 2021 20:28:16 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
news On Fri, 16 Apr 2021 19:09:40 +0100, Snit

wrote:

On Apr 16, 2021 at 11:00:16 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

On Fri, 16 Apr 2021 03:44:18 +0100, Snit

wrote:

On Apr 15, 2021 at 7:14:23 PM MST, "rbowman" wrote
:

On 04/15/2021 12:02 PM, Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Wed, 14 Apr 2021 19:12:00 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:

Commander Kinsey wrote

Another account must be made so they don't get the last
word
in.
The
silliest thing I got banned for was saying the word
"damn".
And
not
even
in a rude way, probably something like "the damn weather
is
awful
today".
Turns out the admin was a religious nutter.

Yeah, I got the same thing from another religious nutter
for
using the term "hell of a lot", not a moderator in that
case.

You have to wonder how far we would be today if religion
had
not
impeded
science.

Do you know who first formulated the Big Bang theory? Ever
here
of
Gregor Mendel? Blaise Pascal?

Quite a few scientists manage to have a foot in both worlds.
In
general
the Catholics seem more flexible than the Protestants,
particularly
the
'gimme that old time religion' branch.

In the past the two were heavily tied together... but that is
no
longer the
case. There are still some religious scientists, but
scientists
tend
to be
atheist at a higher level than the general public. They also
tend
to
be more
liberal, which makes sense given how at least in the US
conservatives
tend
to
reject our best evidence.

Scientists are liberal because they want funding for free.

Scientists are liberal because the conservative mindset is to
deny
evidence.
We can see this with COVID,

No, we just don't make such a fuss over a small thing. A thing
that
kills
4 times less than cancer and 40 times less than the world
population
growth.

man-made global climate change,

It was 1C here in Scotland a few days ago, in spring. There is no
global
warming.

research on reduction of abortions,

That's not science, that's morals.

and in some cases even things like evolution.

Evolution could take place if we let coronavirus kill off the
weak.

Nope, because it mostly kills those way past reproducing.

Irrelevant if it kills those or not. And they can hide indoors.

The point is we should let it kill off any younger folk that it can,
as
they're the weaker ones.

In fact there isnt any evidence that it does kill of the weaker ones.

The Spanish Flu didn't, in fact it killed off the stronger ones
because their much better immune system grossly over reacted
and it was the cytokine storm that killed them very quickly.

Grossly overreacting was therefore a trait that needed removing for
the
next generation.

Nope because it means they do much better with the
non pandemic infections and don't have to bother to
wash their hands all the time and can get away with
doing what is more convenient like not throwing
away food that has had a fly walk on it etc etc etc.

Having a trait that makes you better at 9 things but worse at another,
getting you killed, is not a good trait to have.

Depends on the death rate.

The death rate of coronavirus is high enough to remove those with the
wrong genes.

Nope, the death rate is minimal with those who can still reproduce.
It isnt even that high with those over 70 either, below 4%

So why worry?

We must let it happen.

Nope, it would make no difference.

It would remove those with ****ty immune systems, creating a better next generation.

In fact we evolved like that with kids sure that nothing can kill them
and in fact that works fine.

What kids are you referring to?

Late teenagers. That why they have always been the cannon fodder in wars.

Even those now don't die at a high enough rate from anything
to have any real effect on evolution, even if we scrapped seat
belts, air bags, cars with crumple zones etc etc etc.

They would if we stopped pampering them in hospitals.

Say you could do calculations twice as fast, you could sing perfect
pitch, you could do 1000 pushups, but the sight of a car made you
spontaneously combust. That would not be a good thing to have.

Yes but we never have evolved to have the sight of a car
make you spontaneously combust for some odd reason.

It's called an analogy, stretching something out of proportion to mare you
see the point.

No one get to mare me and don't you forget that, cow face.

In Dutch I was announcing you.

How did I miss the K and hit the R? They're miles away!

--
Sent from my iPhone, this spam courtesy of Apple incorporated.

On Sun, 02 May 2021 19:14:02 +0100, Rod Speed wrote:



"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
news
On Mon, 26 Apr 2021 19:22:29 +0100, Rod Speed
wrote:



"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
news On Fri, 23 Apr 2021 21:00:20 +0100, Rod Speed
wrote:



"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
news On Tue, 20 Apr 2021 19:44:53 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
news On Sat, 17 Apr 2021 20:34:32 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
news On Fri, 16 Apr 2021 19:10:05 +0100, Snit

wrote:

On Apr 16, 2021 at 10:59:28 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

On Thu, 15 Apr 2021 21:15:17 +0100, Snit

wrote:

On Apr 15, 2021 at 11:02:15 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

On Wed, 14 Apr 2021 19:12:00 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:

Commander Kinsey wrote

Another account must be made so they don't get the last
word
in.
The
silliest thing I got banned for was saying the word
"damn".
And
not even
in a rude way, probably something like "the damn weather
is
awful
today".
Turns out the admin was a religious nutter.

Yeah, I got the same thing from another religious nutter
for
using the term "hell of a lot", not a moderator in that
case.

You have to wonder how far we would be today if religion had
not
impeded
science.

Until a few hundred years ago there was not much of a split.

In English please.

The two have a history that is tied together.

I doubt it.

Its true anyway.

Religion did not help science.

Yes it did, if only because a lot of the professionally religious
had a lot time on their hands that allowed them to do science.

Just because some scientists were religious means nothing.

In earlier times it was in fact almost all of them.

If there had been no religion, those same people would still have
become
scientists.

Nope, they wouldn't have been in religious institutions with
a lot of time on their hands as parasites on the community.

Mendel would have had to get off his lard arse and earn a living.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gregor...ife_and_career

Inventing things is a living.

He would have got the same food and accommodation
if he had just grovelled to some god or other instead
of doing something useful.

Einstein managed to earn money as a patent clerk, and invent ****.

He didn't actually invent anything much when he was a patent
clerk

Didn't have to, that earned him enough money to go invent later.

That utterly mangles what actually happened.
He didn't save up what the patent office payed
him and did the inventing with that money.

Of course he did, he was a tight Jew.

and was stupid enough to believe in some god too.

I doubt his religion played any part in creating his theories.

It did actually. He ran that stupid line 'god does not play dice with the
universe'

If god had wished us to know about the universe would he not have told us?

Unlikely that some arsehole who just yawned when 6M of its alleged
chosen people were gassed and cremated by Adolf and his henchmen.
Presumably he chose to lie to them about being chosen people and
was ****ing himself and laughing as they got gassed etc.

Or the whole world is a computer game and the guy playing Hitler got a new high score.

Pity about radioactive decay alone.

Randomness is simply lack of detailed knowledge. Take flipping a coin.
If you know enough about how hard you spin it etc, you can work out what
side it will land on.

Doesn't work with radioactive decay.

I don't believe you, there must be a way of calculating it precisely.

--
Sent from my iPhone, this spam courtesy of Apple incorporated.

On Sun, 02 May 2021 20:30:12 +0100, Snit wrote:

Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Tue, 27 Apr 2021 02:51:01 +0100, Snit wrote:

On Apr 26, 2021 at 10:54:59 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

On Fri, 23 Apr 2021 21:03:53 +0100, Rod Speed
wrote:



"Snit" wrote in message
...
On Apr 23, 2021 at 10:54:38 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

On Wed, 21 Apr 2021 06:05:23 +0100, Rod Speed
wrote:

Some gutless ****wit troll desperately cowering behind
"Snit" repetitively ****ted
the same mindless troll**** and lies as it always does when
its got done like a ****ing dinner, as it always is.

Tedious, isn't he?

What Rod Speed ran from:

More of you lies, that troll**** is what I flushed, repeatedly.

Snit is what's called a floater.

I do tend to have multiple social groups.

That's your left wing never stop talking problem.


I miss Trumps silent ways.

Intelligence is the ability to make your point concisely and clearly. The left wing cannot do that.

--
Sent from my iPhone, this spam courtesy of Apple incorporated.

On Mon, 03 May 2021 08:58:58 +0100, Snit wrote:

rbowman wrote:
On 05/02/2021 01:30 PM, Snit wrote:
Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Tue, 27 Apr 2021 20:53:50 +0100, Snit wrote:

On Apr 27, 2021 at 10:53:26 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

On Sat, 24 Apr 2021 20:37:00 +0100, Snit wrote:

On Apr 24, 2021 at 11:30:05 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

On Thu, 22 Apr 2021 16:01:42 +0100, Snit wrote:

On Apr 22, 2021 at 3:16:17 AM MST, ""Rod Speed"" wrote
:

I wonder why nobody ever says just "It's". For example:
John: "That engine's not running right."
Steve: "It's."

Language is weird. Heck, how do you think people generally pronounce
the word
"can't".

Without the t. So it sounds more like "can".
https://youtu.be/6bszZZlvj4E

You bugger. Bet I will focus on that
bloody word every time its used now.

Just watched the first ep of the Manson tapes and didn=E2=80=99t.

Corse that might just be because it is so ****ing bizarre.

I have caught it in some speech I hear.

Have a friend who insists it just cannot be true. I talk to her on Zoom --
she
has agreed to let me record her without her knowing (at the time) and then
see
how SHE sounds). She insists she ALWAYS pronounced the T. Will be
interesting
to find out.

Yanks can't even pronounce herb with the H.

We can if it is a name.

By the way, I did look for UK specific examples of "can't". Here is what I
found:

https://youtu.be/dGnBi6giZw0

Those are examples from the UK. "Can't" is still pronounced as "can" (in
many
cases).

I listened to the first guy and he clearly said carnt. Check your ears.

There is a slight r. Common in British English?

It's not slight. It's the same as saying tarnished. Would you mishear
that as tannished?


Im still focused on the lack of a real T in cant.

Just weird.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CjwqgghyW-Y

'Put the O Back in ****ry' Shooter Jennings

What's a missing letter?


When cant is pronounced as can you would think it would risk confusion.

Except I've never known anyone do that, including in your video.

--
Sent from my iPhone, this spam courtesy of Apple incorporated.

On Tue, 04 May 2021 03:03:47 +0100, rbowman wrote:

On 05/03/2021 11:29 AM, Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Tue, 27 Apr 2021 02:30:26 +0100, rbowman wrote:

On 04/26/2021 11:53 AM, Commander Kinsey wrote:
I doubt his religion played any part in creating his theories.

In a way it did. He fervently believed in a steady state universe and
created a 'cosmological constant' (fudge factor) to make his equations
work.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cosmological_constant

I don't know if his belief derived from Judaism but it was strong enough
to ignore what his math was telling him.

Don't need religion to do that. Just the intelligence to know that the
maths isn't quite right.

Well, that point went over your head at 30,000 feet and climbing...

Then get better at explaining.

--
Sent from my iPhone, this spam courtesy of Apple incorporated.

On Wed, 05 May 2021 20:07:41 +0100, Snit wrote:

On May 5, 2021 at 11:32:18 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

We asked each other.

that's very emotional

It was touching.

do you have a youtube of it we could make some money

I tried making some but the police said it was no good.

Vote Libertarian.

I prefer mature candidates.

I prefer common sense.

That comes with maturity.

No, you lose it with maturity and brainwashing.

--
Sent from my iPhone, this spam courtesy of Apple incorporated.

"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
news
On Fri, 30 Apr 2021 20:40:43 +0100, Rod Speed
wrote:



"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
news
On Sun, 25 Apr 2021 21:34:37 +0100, Rod Speed
wrote:



"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
news On Thu, 22 Apr 2021 20:28:34 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
news On Sun, 18 Apr 2021 19:24:27 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
news On Sat, 17 Apr 2021 20:28:16 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
news On Fri, 16 Apr 2021 19:09:40 +0100, Snit

wrote:

On Apr 16, 2021 at 11:00:16 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

On Fri, 16 Apr 2021 03:44:18 +0100, Snit

wrote:

On Apr 15, 2021 at 7:14:23 PM MST, "rbowman" wrote
:

On 04/15/2021 12:02 PM, Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Wed, 14 Apr 2021 19:12:00 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:

Commander Kinsey wrote

Another account must be made so they don't get the last
word
in.
The
silliest thing I got banned for was saying the word
"damn".
And
not
even
in a rude way, probably something like "the damn
weather
is
awful
today".
Turns out the admin was a religious nutter.

Yeah, I got the same thing from another religious nutter
for
using the term "hell of a lot", not a moderator in that
case.

You have to wonder how far we would be today if religion
had
not
impeded
science.

Do you know who first formulated the Big Bang theory? Ever
here
of
Gregor Mendel? Blaise Pascal?

Quite a few scientists manage to have a foot in both
worlds.
In
general
the Catholics seem more flexible than the Protestants,
particularly
the
'gimme that old time religion' branch.

In the past the two were heavily tied together... but that
is
no
longer the
case. There are still some religious scientists, but
scientists
tend
to be
atheist at a higher level than the general public. They also
tend
to
be more
liberal, which makes sense given how at least in the US
conservatives
tend
to
reject our best evidence.

Scientists are liberal because they want funding for free.

Scientists are liberal because the conservative mindset is to
deny
evidence.
We can see this with COVID,

No, we just don't make such a fuss over a small thing. A thing
that
kills
4 times less than cancer and 40 times less than the world
population
growth.

man-made global climate change,

It was 1C here in Scotland a few days ago, in spring. There is
no
global
warming.

research on reduction of abortions,

That's not science, that's morals.

and in some cases even things like evolution.

Evolution could take place if we let coronavirus kill off the
weak.

Nope, because it mostly kills those way past reproducing.

Irrelevant if it kills those or not. And they can hide indoors.

The point is we should let it kill off any younger folk that it
can,
as
they're the weaker ones.

In fact there isnt any evidence that it does kill of the weaker
ones.

The Spanish Flu didn't, in fact it killed off the stronger ones
because their much better immune system grossly over reacted
and it was the cytokine storm that killed them very quickly.

Grossly overreacting was therefore a trait that needed removing for
the
next generation.

Nope because it means they do much better with the
non pandemic infections and don't have to bother to
wash their hands all the time and can get away with
doing what is more convenient like not throwing
away food that has had a fly walk on it etc etc etc.

Having a trait that makes you better at 9 things but worse at another,
getting you killed, is not a good trait to have.

Depends on the death rate.

The death rate of coronavirus is high enough to remove those with the
wrong genes.

Nope, the death rate is minimal with those who can still reproduce.
It isnt even that high with those over 70 either, below 4%

So why worry?

Because most of those it has killed would prefer to not be dead.

We must let it happen.

Nope, it would make no difference.

It would remove those with ****ty immune systems,

Nope,

creating a better next generation.

Nope, because the vast bulk of those it kills are way past reproducing.

In fact we evolved like that with kids sure that nothing can kill them
and in fact that works fine.

What kids are you referring to?

Late teenagers. That why they have always been the cannon fodder in wars.

Even those now don't die at a high enough rate from anything
to have any real effect on evolution, even if we scrapped seat
belts, air bags, cars with crumple zones etc etc etc.

They would if we stopped pampering them in hospitals.

Nope, **** all of those ever need hospital treatment to stop them dying.

Say you could do calculations twice as fast, you could sing perfect
pitch, you could do 1000 pushups, but the sight of a car made you
spontaneously combust. That would not be a good thing to have.

Yes but we never have evolved to have the sight of a car
make you spontaneously combust for some odd reason.

It's called an analogy, stretching something out of proportion to mare
you see the point.

No one get to mare me and don't you forget that, cow face.

In Dutch I was announcing you.

How did I miss the K and hit the R? They're miles away!

You were blotto and drug crazed, as always.

"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
news
On Sun, 02 May 2021 19:14:02 +0100, Rod Speed
wrote:



"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
news
On Mon, 26 Apr 2021 19:22:29 +0100, Rod Speed
wrote:



"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
news On Fri, 23 Apr 2021 21:00:20 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
news On Tue, 20 Apr 2021 19:44:53 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
news On Sat, 17 Apr 2021 20:34:32 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
news On Fri, 16 Apr 2021 19:10:05 +0100, Snit

wrote:

On Apr 16, 2021 at 10:59:28 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

On Thu, 15 Apr 2021 21:15:17 +0100, Snit

wrote:

On Apr 15, 2021 at 11:02:15 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey""
wrote
:

On Wed, 14 Apr 2021 19:12:00 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:

Commander Kinsey wrote

Another account must be made so they don't get the last
word
in.
The
silliest thing I got banned for was saying the word
"damn".
And
not even
in a rude way, probably something like "the damn weather
is
awful
today".
Turns out the admin was a religious nutter.

Yeah, I got the same thing from another religious nutter
for
using the term "hell of a lot", not a moderator in that
case.

You have to wonder how far we would be today if religion
had
not
impeded
science.

Until a few hundred years ago there was not much of a split.

In English please.

The two have a history that is tied together.

I doubt it.

Its true anyway.

Religion did not help science.

Yes it did, if only because a lot of the professionally religious
had a lot time on their hands that allowed them to do science.

Just because some scientists were religious means nothing.

In earlier times it was in fact almost all of them.

If there had been no religion, those same people would still
have
become
scientists.

Nope, they wouldn't have been in religious institutions with
a lot of time on their hands as parasites on the community.

Mendel would have had to get off his lard arse and earn a living.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gregor...ife_and_career

Inventing things is a living.

He would have got the same food and accommodation
if he had just grovelled to some god or other instead
of doing something useful.

Einstein managed to earn money as a patent clerk, and invent ****.

He didn't actually invent anything much when he was a patent
clerk

Didn't have to, that earned him enough money to go invent later.

That utterly mangles what actually happened.
He didn't save up what the patent office payed
him and did the inventing with that money.

Of course he did, he was a tight Jew.

and was stupid enough to believe in some god too.

I doubt his religion played any part in creating his theories.

It did actually. He ran that stupid line 'god does not play dice with
the
universe'

If god had wished us to know about the universe would he not have told
us?

Unlikely that some arsehole who just yawned when 6M of its alleged
chosen people were gassed and cremated by Adolf and his henchmen.
Presumably he chose to lie to them about being chosen people and
was ****ing himself and laughing as they got gassed etc.

Or the whole world is a computer game

They didn't have computer games in those days.

and the guy playing Hitler got a new high score.

In fact the bugger lost so spectacularly
he had to shoot himself and his slut.

Pity about radioactive decay alone.

Randomness is simply lack of detailed knowledge. Take flipping a coin.
If you know enough about how hard you spin it etc, you can work out what
side it will land on.

Doesn't work with radioactive decay.

I don't believe you, there must be a way of calculating it precisely.

No there isnt with radioactive decay because there is nothing to calculate.

On Sat, 8 May 2021 04:45:16 +1000, cantankerous trolling geezer Rodent
Speed, the auto-contradicting senile sociopath, blabbered, again:

FLUSH the two subnormal sociopathic cretins' endless absolutely idiotic
blather

--
Typical retarded "conversation" between the Scottish ****** and the senile
Ozzietard:

Birdbrain: "Horse **** doesn't stink."

Senile Rodent: "It does if you roll in it."

Birdbrain: "I've never worked out why, I assumed it was maybe meateaters
that made stinky ****, but then why does vegetarian human **** stink? Is it
just the fact that we're capable of digesting meat?"

Senile Rodent: "Nope, some cow **** stinks too."

Message-ID:

On Sat, 8 May 2021 04:39:37 +1000, cantankerous trolling geezer Rodent
Speed, the auto-contradicting senile sociopath, blabbered, again:

FLUSH the two subnormal sociopathic cretins' endless absolutely idiotic
blather

--
Another typical retarded "conversation" between Birdbrain and senile Rodent:

Senile Rodent: " Did you ever dig a hole to bury your own ****?"

Birdbrain: "I do if there's no flush toilet around."

Senile Rodent: "Yeah, I prefer camping like that, off by myself with
no dunnys around and have always buried the ****."

MID:

On May 7, 2021 at 10:51:20 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

On Mon, 03 May 2021 08:58:58 +0100, Snit wrote:

rbowman wrote:
On 05/02/2021 01:30 PM, Snit wrote:
Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Tue, 27 Apr 2021 20:53:50 +0100, Snit wrote:

On Apr 27, 2021 at 10:53:26 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

On Sat, 24 Apr 2021 20:37:00 +0100, Snit wrote:

On Apr 24, 2021 at 11:30:05 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

On Thu, 22 Apr 2021 16:01:42 +0100, Snit wrote:

On Apr 22, 2021 at 3:16:17 AM MST, ""Rod Speed"" wrote
:

I wonder why nobody ever says just "It's". For example:
John: "That engine's not running right."
Steve: "It's."

Language is weird. Heck, how do you think people generally pronounce
the word
"can't".

Without the t. So it sounds more like "can".
https://youtu.be/6bszZZlvj4E

You bugger. Bet I will focus on that
bloody word every time its used now.

Just watched the first ep of the Manson tapes and didn=3DE2=3D80=3D99t.

Corse that might just be because it is so ****ing bizarre.

I have caught it in some speech I hear.

Have a friend who insists it just cannot be true. I talk to her on Zoom --
she
has agreed to let me record her without her knowing (at the time) and then
see
how SHE sounds). She insists she ALWAYS pronounced the T. Will be
interesting
to find out.

Yanks can't even pronounce herb with the H.

We can if it is a name.

By the way, I did look for UK specific examples of "can't". Here is what I
found:

https://youtu.be/dGnBi6giZw0

Those are examples from the UK. "Can't" is still pronounced as "can" (in
many
cases).

I listened to the first guy and he clearly said carnt. Check your ears.

There is a slight r. Common in British English?

It's not slight. It's the same as saying tarnished. Would you mishear
that as tannished?


I=E2=80=99m still focused on the lack of a real T in can=E2=80=99t.

Just weird.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3DCjwqgghyW-Y

'Put the O Back in ****ry' Shooter Jennings

What's a missing letter?


When can=E2=80=99t is pronounced as can you would think it would risk
confusion.

Except I've never known anyone do that, including in your video.

All I can say is watch the videos I showed.

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot
use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow
superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

On May 7, 2021 at 10:35:35 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

On Wed, 28 Apr 2021 20:40:36 +0100, Snit wrote:

On Apr 28, 2021 at 11:35:04 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

On Fri, 23 Apr 2021 12:35:52 +0100, FromTheRafters
wrote:

% formulated the question :
On 2021-04-22 12:46 p.m., Snit wrote:
On Apr 22, 2021 at 11:21:47 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

And that=E2=80=99s just as true of purported man made climate
change.
Its obvious that climate does change, that=E2=80=99s obvious from
the ice ages etc, but its much less clear how much of the
change we have seen is man made. It wasn=E2=80=99t that long ago
that most scientists were hyperventilating about global cooling.
Yes, we can certainly measure a substantial hike in atmospheric
CO2 levels, but its much less clear how much effect that actually
has on world temperatures, let alone climate change.
It's bloody obvious to me. We know there used to be more CO2 in
the air.
And the world was perfectly fine back then.
There has been no time in the history of man when the CO2 levels
were as
high
as they are now.

Why does man have to be there?

Just a personal preference I prefer to not have man go extinct... and am
none
too happy about man creating the current mass extinction we are in.

one day our sun will blow up and all you know will be gone

If by "blow up" you mean enter the Red Giant phase. Our Sun is not
likely to explode.

It's a slow explosion.

If we keep using solar and sucking all that energy from the sun who knows
what
will happen!

It is highly irresponsible to write things like that in here. Most Americans
are stupid enough to believe you.

Not sure it's most, but far too many. Sigh.

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot
use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow
superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

On May 7, 2021 at 10:54:59 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

On Wed, 05 May 2021 20:07:41 +0100, Snit wrote:

On May 5, 2021 at 11:32:18 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

We asked each other.

that's very emotional

It was touching.

do you have a youtube of it we could make some money

I tried making some but the police said it was no good.

Vote Libertarian.

I prefer mature candidates.

I prefer common sense.

That comes with maturity.

No, you lose it with maturity and brainwashing.

Really the whole idea of "common sense" is all too often just tied to what
each person thinks is correct. I am not against it -- and am very
"MacGyverish" in how I problem solve, but for things that matter I tend to
look to more verifiable evidence.

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot
use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow
superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

On May 7, 2021 at 10:36:54 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

On Wed, 28 Apr 2021 20:41:40 +0100, Snit wrote:

On Apr 28, 2021 at 11:34:41 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

On Thu, 22 Apr 2021 20:46:21 +0100, Snit wrote:

On Apr 22, 2021 at 11:21:47 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

And that=E2=80=99s just as true of purported man made climate change.

Its obvious that climate does change, that=E2=80=99s obvious from
the ice ages etc, but its much less clear how much of the
change we have seen is man made. It wasn=E2=80=99t that long ago
that most scientists were hyperventilating about global cooling.

Yes, we can certainly measure a substantial hike in atmospheric
CO2 levels, but its much less clear how much effect that actually
has on world temperatures, let alone climate change.

It's bloody obvious to me. We know there used to be more CO2 in the air.
And the world was perfectly fine back then.

There has been no time in the history of man when the CO2 levels were as
high
as they are now.

Why does man have to be there?

Just a personal preference I prefer to not have man go extinct... and am
none
too happy about man creating the current mass extinction we are in.

Surely you know that's not what I meant.

Yes, you were trying to pretend that man's influence is not well understood
because in the past there were other times of high CO2, though there were
other reasons and none of the times it has been anywhere even near as high
have the changes happened so quickly.

You are working to push your intuition, based on faith, over the science.

No, I was pointing out the earth survives high CO2 levels just fine because
it did in the past. And that we would manage also. You do know how much CO2
is required to kill you, right?

The earth will survive the harm we are causing... but we are in a great
extinction and it may end up including humans. We rely on many other species
and the ecosystems we are destroying.

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot
use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow
superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

On May 7, 2021 at 10:50:33 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

On Sun, 02 May 2021 20:30:12 +0100, Snit wrote:

Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Tue, 27 Apr 2021 02:51:01 +0100, Snit wrote:

On Apr 26, 2021 at 10:54:59 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

On Fri, 23 Apr 2021 21:03:53 +0100, Rod Speed
wrote:



"Snit" wrote in message
...
On Apr 23, 2021 at 10:54:38 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

On Wed, 21 Apr 2021 06:05:23 +0100, Rod Speed
wrote:

Some gutless ****wit troll desperately cowering behind
"Snit" repetitively ****ted
the same mindless troll**** and lies as it always does when
its got done like a ****ing dinner, as it always is.

Tedious, isn't he?

What Rod Speed ran from:

More of you lies, that troll**** is what I flushed, repeatedly.

Snit is what's called a floater.

I do tend to have multiple social groups.

That's your left wing never stop talking problem.


I miss Trump=E2=80=99s silent ways.

Intelligence is the ability to make your point concisely and clearly. The
left wing cannot do that.

That is not really what intelligence is, but I can be quite clear and concise:
I back equal rights and environmental protection, as well as evidence based
policies and investment into the future of the society.

How about you?

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot
use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow
superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

On May 7, 2021 at 10:42:31 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

On Thu, 29 Apr 2021 21:32:57 +0100, Snit wrote:

On Apr 29, 2021 at 12:35:52 PM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

On Sun, 25 Apr 2021 19:49:39 +0100, Snit wrote:

On Apr 25, 2021 at 11:43:52 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

Grossly overreacting was therefore a trait that needed removing for the
next generation.

Nope because it means they do much better with the
non pandemic infections and don't have to bother to
wash their hands all the time and can get away with
doing what is more convenient like not throwing
away food that has had a fly walk on it etc etc etc.

Having a trait that makes you better at 9 things but worse at another,
getting you killed, is not a good trait to have. Say you could do
calculations twice as fast, you could sing perfect pitch, you could do 1000
pushups, but the sight of a car made you spontaneously combust. That would
not be a good thing to have. By your reasoning, you would be called
superior, and have a hired help to warn you of approaching cars.

You have no right to say who should not be saved.

You have no right to intervene in evolution and keep the worthless alive.

Back to your deserted island you go.

That's all that will be left if the governments keep allowing inferior
genetics to continue.

Sounds like you back Nazis and Trump.

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot
use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow
superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

On Fri, 07 May 2021 20:03:34 GMT, **** the git, the notorious,
troll-feeding, senile asshole, blathered again:


Sounds like you back Nazis and Trump.

Sounds more like you are totally addicted to the unwashed Scottish ******'s
cock, right, **** the Git? BG

On Fri, 07 May 2021 19:47:33 GMT, **** the git, the notorious,
troll-feeding, senile asshole, blathered again:


All I can say is watch the videos I showed.

All HE needs to say is "jump!" and jump you will, INSTANTLY, every time, you
devoted sucker of troll cock! LOL

On Fri, 07 May 2021 19:47:51 GMT, **** the git, the notorious,
troll-feeding, senile asshole, blathered again:



Not sure it's most, but far too many. Sigh.

You are obviously totally unable to wean your toothless senile gob away from
the trolling ******'s cock, eh, **** the Git? LOL

On Fri, 07 May 2021 19:50:37 GMT, **** the git, the notorious,
troll-feeding, senile asshole, blathered again:


The earth will survive the harm we are causing... but we are in a great
extinction and it may end up including humans. We rely on many other species
and the ecosystems we are destroying.

STILL hoping you might eventually win this game, my newest senile punching
bag? HILARIOUS! LOL

On Fri, 07 May 2021 19:51:26 GMT, **** the git, the notorious,
troll-feeding, senile asshole, blathered again:


That is not really what intelligence is, but I can be quite clear and concise:
I back equal rights and environmental protection, as well as evidence based
policies and investment into the future of the society.

How about you?

HE enjoys you sucking him off, every time he shows up to get sucked off by
you, senile sucker of troll cock! BG

On Fri, 07 May 2021 19:49:20 GMT, **** the git, the notorious,
troll-feeding, senile asshole, blathered again:


Really the whole idea of "common sense" is all too often just tied to what
each person thinks is correct. I am not against it -- and am very
"MacGyverish" in how I problem solve, but for things that matter I tend to
look to more verifiable evidence.

You're just a bull****ting senile HUGE ASSHOLE, **** the Git! LOL

On May 7, 2021 at 10:49:39 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

If god had wished us to know about the universe would he not have told us?

Unlikely that some arsehole who just yawned when 6M of its alleged
chosen people were gassed and cremated by Adolf and his henchmen.
Presumably he chose to lie to them about being chosen people and
was ****ing himself and laughing as they got gassed etc.

Or the whole world is a computer game and the guy playing Hitler got a new
high score.

Pity about radioactive decay alone.

Randomness is simply lack of detailed knowledge. Take flipping a coin.
If you know enough about how hard you spin it etc, you can work out what
side it will land on.

Doesn't work with radioactive decay.

I don't believe you, there must be a way of calculating it precisely.

I share your same intuition... but there is no evidence to back it.

This is a good example of where "common sense" and evidence might clash.
Common sense says there is an underlying mechanism that is deterministic, but
the evidence at least for now does not support that. Then we can get into
really weird stuff like the double slit experiment and strange attraction. Not
that I am anything close to an expert in those, but common sense does not
apply there!

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot
use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow
superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

On Fri, 07 May 2021 21:05:32 GMT, **** the git, the notorious,
troll-feeding, senile asshole, blathered again:

I share your same intuition...

You share more than just his intuition, senile sucker of troll cock! LOL