"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
news
On Sun, 02 May 2021 20:35:46 +0100, Snit
wrote:

Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Sun, 25 Apr 2021 19:52:51 +0100, Snit
wrote:

On Apr 25, 2021 at 11:41:26 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

On Wed, 21 Apr 2021 19:20:41 +0100, Snit
wrote:

On Apr 21, 2021 at 11:13:56 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

On Sat, 17 Apr 2021 23:50:26 +0100, Snit
wrote:

On Apr 17, 2021 at 10:28:03 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:


...
Scientists are liberal because they want funding for free.

Scientists are liberal because the conservative mindset is to
deny
evidence.
We can see this with COVID,

No, we just don't make such a fuss over a small thing. A thing
that
kills 4
times less than cancer and 40 times less than the world population
growth.

The idea that over half a million dead in America, and many more
than that
around the world, and that is WITH some fairly significant
precautions,
is a
"small thing" is an utter rejection of the facts.

It's 4 times smaller than cancer and 40 times smaller then the
population
growth. Those are numbers, irrefutable numbers.

In the US it is the third leading cause of death. And that is with
some
precautions. Your lack of compassion does not reduce the harm.

It's FOUR TIMES LESS. So 100 people die, but only 20 of them were
coronavirus. And that's assuming nobody died of anything other than
the
virus or cancer.

It is still the third leading cause of death. Maybe even higher now.

So not the most important one to deal with. It's like putting out a
candle in the hall when your entire kitchen is on fire.

It is the most preventable of the three €” and still at third WITH lots of
precautions.

But it's still a very small chance of you actually dying of it, lower than
a percent!

Not with the over 65s even now. And its still preferable to not
die and plenty who do recover get unpleasant long term medical
problems and other damned irritating side effects like loss of taste
and normal stuff that usually smells nice smelling awful. **** that.

Again, your lack of compassion is on you... a "bad trait" if you will.

And those without compassion are bad for society... so by your own
standards
should you not be weeded out?

I'm not telling people to live "dangerously", I'm telling them not to
insist that I don't.

And insisting on a special entitlement to risk their lives €” showing a
lack
of compassion on your part.

I'm not ripping off people's masks.

man-made global climate change,

It was 1C here in Scotland a few days ago, in spring. There is no
global
warming.

Denial of the fact from you. That is what I mean.

I can see the temperature with my own eyes! It's on the thermometer
over
there!

You use a local temperature to try to deny evidence of man-made
global
climate
change. Your logic is flawed.

So magically my part of the world stays the same and the rest goes up?
Right.... Look, just move to the place that's the temperature you
like, if
you're fussy enough to care about the alleged 2C change.

Selection bias

Stop using silly psychological labels you've read somewhere.

Do you even know what it is you are being called out on?

Yeah I looked it up and it's bull****.

is not a good way to look at climate. I say go with the
evidence.

I have plenty evidence right here, the weather outside my house is what
it always has been.

Likely untrue but also not relevant.

It's true and it's a good unbiassed data point.

And moving does not reduce man-made global climate change, nor its
harm.

Of course it does. If it becomes too hot to grow crops where you live,
move further north, or grow more appropriate crops. The UK will be able
to grow oranges. Russia will become a huge farmland instead of frozen
wastes.

Food supplies will be harmed €” more than they are now.

What evidence do you have for this? At the moment we have food growing
well in some places and not at all in others. So they swap about, who
cares?

They wont necessarily swap about.

http://climate.nasa.gov

research on reduction of abortions,

That's not science, that's morals.

If you want to reduce abortions, which most conservatives claim to
want,
there
are known methods to do it. At least in American the Republican
party (the
more conservative of the two) rejects every one of these things.
There
"solution" is to deny women equal rights.

The whole idea that an abortion is wrong is insanity. The child
belongs to
the mother, and nobody else.

The Republican party pretends to be against abortion but then refused
to do
anything to help reduce the numbers. The Democrats want it to be
legal but
want to keep it rare.

Reducing the numbers can only mean you're taking away the right of
choice
from the woman. I thought you liked human rights? The government
should not
intervene.

I say increase the choice. Many who get an abortion would not have
needed one
if they had more choices -- this is based on the evidence of better
education,
free birth control, more access to Planned Parenthood and the like,
etc.

It's not rocket science to use a condom. You don't need education for
something that simple. Even if you forget/were drunk, there's a morning
after pill.

Evidence shows education works.

You mean brainwash. Let people make their own decisions.

Trouble is that stupid women that **** their lives by having
kids when they are still in school arent capable of making
sensible decisions and its hard to reverse the lousy decision.

and in some cases even things like evolution.

Evolution could take place if we let coronavirus kill off the
weak.

Evolution IS taking place. And the more the virus spreads the more
it
mutates
/ evolves.

I was obviously talking about the evolution of humans to fight it
off.
Think
about Eskimos and the cold virus.

And we as a species have evolved the ability to make vaccines.

No, we've invented the ability to screw up our future evolution.

Evolution has no plan. It is not forward "thinking" -- it does not
think at
all.

It doesn't have to. It works by simply deleting the failures. But
society is allowing those failures to breed, producing more failures.

People have not stopped you from breeding. True enough. Are you
suggesting you should have been sterilized?

I don't need to be, I'm clever enough to realise there are plenty of genes
better than mine so I would never pass mine on. I don't think I would
even if I was perfect, since the world is vastly overpopulated.

That last is radically overstated.

"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
news
On Tue, 04 May 2021 18:53:49 +0100, Rod Speed
wrote:



"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
news
On Thu, 29 Apr 2021 04:56:06 +0100, Snit
wrote:

On Apr 28, 2021 at 8:44:12 PM MST, "rbowman" wrote
:

On 04/28/2021 12:35 PM, Commander Kinsey wrote:
Vote Libertarian.

In this country I only vote for the Libertarian as a 'none of the
above'
statement. I may have left-libertarian tendencies but in the US the
capital L libertarians are right-libertarians.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/It_Usu..._with_Ayn_Rand

They pretend that conservative fiscal policies will lead to liberal
social
results, as if the magic market is going to go contrary to profits to
protect
human rights and the environment.

The market does what the customers request.

Often, but not always.

If it doesn't, they don't make many sales.

The reality is that plenty are forced to buy what they would
rather not have to buy instead of what they prefer.

I hate the current fad for shorts that come down to your
knees but don't have a lot of choice when buying shorts.

You are stuck with cars that arent what you would prefer to buy.

There is **** all in the way of movies that I choose to watch.

Imagine a world with no green legislation. Now imagine 5 companies
making
the same thing. Two of them advertise green-ness in manufacturing etc.
Anyone who believed in ecology would only buy from those two

If they believe the claims.

They can check up if they wish.

That's not that easy with the stupid claims the fanatics spew.

It isnt even very clear just how much cows milk for humans
****s the environment for example, let alone meat.

and the others would go bankrupt or change their ways.

Hardly ever because most arent into ecology.

Only a minority are silly enough to buy the "organic" **** in the
supermarket.

So why do people keep voting for parties that put this climate change
****e through?

Basically they don't have much choice with who they can vote for.

In the UK the two main partys that have any chance of
forming govt are into banning ICE new cars for example.

On Thu, 13 May 2021 07:23:58 +1000, cantankerous trolling geezer Rodent
Speed, the auto-contradicting senile sociopath, blabbered, again:

FLUSH the two subnormal sociopathic cretins' endless absolutely idiotic
blather

--
Another typical retarded "conversation" between the two resident idiots:

Birdbrain: "But imagine how cool it was to own slaves."

Senile Rodent: "Yeah, right. Feed them, clothe them, and fix them when
they're broken.
After all, you paid good money for them. Then you've got to keep an eye
on them all the time."

Birdbrain: "Better than having to give them wages on top of that."

Senile Rodent: "Specially when they make more slaves for you
and produce their own food and clothes."

MID:

On Thu, 13 May 2021 07:30:25 +1000, cantankerous trolling geezer Rodent
Speed, the auto-contradicting senile sociopath, blabbered, again:

FLUSH the two subnormal sociopathic cretins' endless absolutely idiotic
blather

--
Another typical retarded "conversation" between Birdbrain and senile Rodent:

Senile Rodent: " Did you ever dig a hole to bury your own ****?"

Birdbrain: "I do if there's no flush toilet around."

Senile Rodent: "Yeah, I prefer camping like that, off by myself with
no dunnys around and have always buried the ****."

MID:

wrote in message
...
On Wed, 12 May 2021 14:55:47 +1000, "Joey" wrote:



"rbowman" wrote in message
...
On 05/11/2021 11:49 AM, Commander Kinsey wrote:

You calling a lack of faith faith is insanity. You'll be saying
atheism
is a faith next.

It is.

Nope.

'Who the **** knows', aka agnosticism, is a more valid stance.

Not when there isnt a shred of evidence that any god exists
and its obvious that the believers are using gods as a crutch
for their pathetically inadequate 'lives'

If it weren't for Religion a whole lot more people who
would be killers, thieves and more. Only the fear of
that 'god' thing and 'hell' keeps them honest.

That's very arguable indeed given how many god
botherers have been convicted and and jailed or
executed for murder, rape, fraud, theft etc etc etc.

Religion certainly has some effect on some behaviour
of the believers with some stuff like divorce, same sex
****ing, even marriage, and birth control and abortion,
but clearly the effect isnt huge now that most of what
religions have banned isnt even illegal anymore.

So STFU before you convince them that atheism is the way to go.

You will never convince anyone of something like that.

Ammo is not only expensive and
almost can't be found these days,

That's bull****.

so I don't need a few million more a-holes junkin'
around my town with no fear of gawd or hell.

There are **** all that don't kill you because
some god or other has told them not to.

"rbowman" wrote in message
...
On 05/11/2021 10:47 PM, Snit wrote:
Some of it might be semantics. Do you KNOW there are no Underground
Marshmallow People running the world. Well, in general conversation I
assume
you do. I hope you do at least! But on a deep philosophical level you
cannot
be absolutely certain of it. You cannot prove a negative.


In the two truths doctrine formulated by Nagarjuna and others the is
conventional reality and there is ultimate reality. Conventional reality
is filled with handy assumptions like there are no Marshmallow people.
Ultimate reality considers all those assumptions to be empty.

Nagarjuna's principal work is based on a tetralemma.

All things exist
All things do not exist
All things both exist and do not exist
All things neither exist nor do not exist

Thats typical mindless wanking only clowns like that get up to.

Maybe the Marshmallow People are hiding there someplace.

On Thu, 13 May 2021 07:56:03 +1000, Joey, better known as cantankerous
trolling senile geezer Rodent Speed, wrote:

FLUSH the trolling senile asshole's latest troll**** unread

--
Hawk addressing the obnoxious senile Australian pest:
"I'm willing to bet you scream your own name when jacking off."
MID:

"rbowman" wrote in message
...
On 05/11/2021 10:55 PM, Joey wrote:


"rbowman" wrote in message
...
On 05/11/2021 11:49 AM, Commander Kinsey wrote:

You calling a lack of faith faith is insanity. You'll be saying
atheism
is a faith next.

It is.

Nope.

'Who the **** knows', aka agnosticism, is a more valid stance.

Not when there isnt a shred of evidence that any god exists
and its obvious that the believers are using gods as a crutch
for their pathetically inadequate 'lives'

Spoken like a True Believer...

Nope, one who looks at the evidence.

Its not very surprising that at the time most are illiterate
that it works better to proclaim that some god or other
doesn't let you eat port or fish without scales once you
have noticed the downsides with doing that.

Less clear how you can convince everyone to hack the
end of their kid's dick on day 7 or whenever it is and
they just click the heels of their sandals, whip out their
knives and start hacking away. Hard to see even Billy
Graham being able to get away with something like that.

"rbowman" wrote in message
...
On 05/11/2021 11:55 PM, wrote:
If it weren't for Religion a whole lot more people who would be
killers, thieves and more. Only the fear of that 'god' thing and
'hell' keeps them honest.

Evelyn Waugh the novelist converted to Catholicism and was also known as a
real prick.

And a rabid racist. Hilarious reading some of the Amazon reviews
of his books with non whites bursting a blood vessel about that.

When someone asked him how he squared the two he replied that without
religion he would be a lot worse.

But he was a god botherer before he converted.

So STFU before you convince them that atheism is the way to go. Ammo
is not only expensive and almost can't be found these days, so I don't
need a few million more a-holes junkin' around my town with no fear of
gawd or hell.

I doubt you would find much belief in either among the rioters.

Or the gang bangers.

Some of them don't even believe in the divine power of 230 grains of lead
traveling at 900 ft/s. That's what you get when you replace religion,
whether it is true or not, with nihilism.

On Thu, 13 May 2021 08:05:56 +1000, Joey, better known as cantankerous
trolling senile geezer Rodent Speed, wrote:


FLUSH the trolling senile asshole's latest troll**** unread

On Thu, 13 May 2021 08:13:49 +1000, Joey, better known as cantankerous
trolling senile geezer Rodent Speed, wrote:

FLUSH yet more of the trolling senile asshole's latest troll**** unread

On Thu, 13 May 2021 08:10:28 +1000, Joey, better known as cantankerous
trolling senile geezer Rodent Speed, wrote:

FLUSH the trolling senile asshole's latest troll**** unread

--
Richard about senile Rodent:
"Rod Speed, a bare faced pig and ignorant ****."
MID:

On Tue, 04 May 2021 19:50:13 +0100, Snit wrote:

On May 4, 2021 at 10:41:00 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

On Thu, 29 Apr 2021 04:56:06 +0100, Snit wrote:

On Apr 28, 2021 at 8:44:12 PM MST, "rbowman" wrote
:

On 04/28/2021 12:35 PM, Commander Kinsey wrote:
Vote Libertarian.

In this country I only vote for the Libertarian as a 'none of the above'
statement. I may have left-libertarian tendencies but in the US the
capital L libertarians are right-libertarians.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/It_Usu..._with_Ayn_Rand

They pretend that conservative fiscal policies will lead to liberal social
results, as if the magic market is going to go contrary to profits to
protect
human rights and the environment.

The market does what the customers request.

Sometimes.

Imagine a world with no green legislation. Now imagine 5 companies making
the same thing. Two of them advertise green-ness in manufacturing etc.
Anyone who believed in ecology would only buy from those two and the others
would go bankrupt or change their ways.

The one which is more green would likely cost more -- there are savings in not
doing the right thing. With most people barely scraping by, as happens in a
complete "free" market with no protections, people would by the cheap stuff.
We see this with Walmart and Amazon now.

What would make human nature change to get the results you speak of?

Why should we make them change? If they want to save money rather than the environment, then let them. It's none of your business if others don't want to be as green as you.

--
Sent from my iPhone, this spam courtesy of Apple incorporated.

On Fri, 07 May 2021 19:39:37 +0100, Rod Speed wrote:



"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
news
On Fri, 30 Apr 2021 20:40:43 +0100, Rod Speed
wrote:



"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
news On Sun, 25 Apr 2021 21:34:37 +0100, Rod Speed
wrote:

Depends on the death rate.

The death rate of coronavirus is high enough to remove those with the
wrong genes.

Nope, the death rate is minimal with those who can still reproduce.
It isnt even that high with those over 70 either, below 4%

So why worry?

Because most of those it has killed would prefer to not be dead.

**** happens, more often with cancer or getting run over by a bus.

We must let it happen.

Nope, it would make no difference.

It would remove those with ****ty immune systems,

Nope,

creating a better next generation.

Nope, because the vast bulk of those it kills are way past reproducing.

I know a woman who had her child at 40. Are you saying 40 year olds can't die of the virus?

In fact we evolved like that with kids sure that nothing can kill them
and in fact that works fine.

What kids are you referring to?

Late teenagers. That why they have always been the cannon fodder in wars.

Even those now don't die at a high enough rate from anything
to have any real effect on evolution, even if we scrapped seat
belts, air bags, cars with crumple zones etc etc etc.

They would if we stopped pampering them in hospitals.

Nope, **** all of those ever need hospital treatment to stop them dying.

So why do we bother with all that ****?

Say you could do calculations twice as fast, you could sing perfect
pitch, you could do 1000 pushups, but the sight of a car made you
spontaneously combust. That would not be a good thing to have.

Yes but we never have evolved to have the sight of a car
make you spontaneously combust for some odd reason.

It's called an analogy, stretching something out of proportion to mare
you see the point.

No one get to mare me and don't you forget that, cow face.

In Dutch I was announcing you.

How did I miss the K and hit the R? They're miles away!

You were blotto and drug crazed, as always.

I almost never drink enough to look like I'm drunk. No pig has ever suspected I'm drunk and breathalysed me.

--
Sent from my iPhone, this spam courtesy of Apple incorporated.

On Fri, 07 May 2021 20:47:33 +0100, Snit wrote:

On May 7, 2021 at 10:51:20 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

On Mon, 03 May 2021 08:58:58 +0100, Snit wrote:

rbowman wrote:
On 05/02/2021 01:30 PM, Snit wrote:
Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Tue, 27 Apr 2021 20:53:50 +0100, Snit wrote:

On Apr 27, 2021 at 10:53:26 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

On Sat, 24 Apr 2021 20:37:00 +0100, Snit wrote:

On Apr 24, 2021 at 11:30:05 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

On Thu, 22 Apr 2021 16:01:42 +0100, Snit wrote:

On Apr 22, 2021 at 3:16:17 AM MST, ""Rod Speed"" wrote
:

I wonder why nobody ever says just "It's". For example:
John: "That engine's not running right."
Steve: "It's."

Language is weird. Heck, how do you think people generally pronounce
the word
"can't".

Without the t. So it sounds more like "can".
https://youtu.be/6bszZZlvj4E

You bugger. Bet I will focus on that
bloody word every time its used now.

Just watched the first ep of the Manson tapes and didn=3DE2=3D80=3D99t.

Corse that might just be because it is so ****ing bizarre.

I have caught it in some speech I hear.

Have a friend who insists it just cannot be true. I talk to her on Zoom --
she
has agreed to let me record her without her knowing (at the time) and then
see
how SHE sounds). She insists she ALWAYS pronounced the T. Will be
interesting
to find out.

Yanks can't even pronounce herb with the H.

We can if it is a name.

By the way, I did look for UK specific examples of "can't". Here is what I
found:

https://youtu.be/dGnBi6giZw0

Those are examples from the UK. "Can't" is still pronounced as "can" (in
many
cases).

I listened to the first guy and he clearly said carnt. Check your ears.

There is a slight r. Common in British English?

It's not slight. It's the same as saying tarnished. Would you mishear
that as tannished?


I=E2=80=99m still focused on the lack of a real T in can=E2=80=99t.

Just weird.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3DCjwqgghyW-Y

'Put the O Back in ****ry' Shooter Jennings

What's a missing letter?


When can=E2=80=99t is pronounced as can you would think it would risk
confusion.

Except I've never known anyone do that, including in your video.

All I can say is watch the videos I showed.

I have. Your ears are at fault.

--
Sent from my iPhone, this spam courtesy of Apple incorporated.

On Fri, 07 May 2021 20:49:20 +0100, Snit wrote:

On May 7, 2021 at 10:54:59 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

On Wed, 05 May 2021 20:07:41 +0100, Snit wrote:

On May 5, 2021 at 11:32:18 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

We asked each other.

that's very emotional

It was touching.

do you have a youtube of it we could make some money

I tried making some but the police said it was no good.

Vote Libertarian.

I prefer mature candidates.

I prefer common sense.

That comes with maturity.

No, you lose it with maturity and brainwashing.

Really the whole idea of "common sense" is all too often just tied to what
each person thinks is correct. I am not against it -- and am very
"MacGyverish" in how I problem solve, but for things that matter I tend to
look to more verifiable evidence.

No, common sense is clearly defined. It's whatever is ****ing obvious. If I jump off that cliff, I will hit the bottom really fast and probably die. I don't need to do any scientific tests.

--
Sent from my iPhone, this spam courtesy of Apple incorporated.

On Wed, 12 May 2021 02:49:59 +0100, Snit wrote:

On May 11, 2021 at 6:13:47 PM MST, "rbowman" wrote
:

On 05/11/2021 11:49 AM, Commander Kinsey wrote:

You calling a lack of faith faith is insanity. You'll be saying atheism
is a faith next.

It is. 'Who the **** knows', aka agnosticism, is a more valid stance.

I am open to the possibility, just as I am open to the idea that the Invisible
Green Dragon created the gods and that the Underground Marshmallow People are
running the world. These things are *possible* (when looked at from a purely
logical stance) but so grossly unlikely as to the point of not being worth
considering.

So not a belief, but basic logic.

--
Sent from my iPhone, this spam courtesy of Apple incorporated.

"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
news
On Fri, 07 May 2021 19:39:37 +0100, Rod Speed
wrote:



"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
news
On Fri, 30 Apr 2021 20:40:43 +0100, Rod Speed
wrote:



"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
news On Sun, 25 Apr 2021 21:34:37 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:

Depends on the death rate.

The death rate of coronavirus is high enough to remove those with the
wrong genes.

Nope, the death rate is minimal with those who can still reproduce.
It isnt even that high with those over 70 either, below 4%

So why worry?

Because most of those it has killed would prefer to not be dead.

**** happens, more often with cancer

Yes, but is clearly better to not have covid kill you.

or getting run over by a bus.

Nope, nowhere even remotely like 600K in the USA are
run over by a bus ever year, or 150K in the UK either.

We must let it happen.

Nope, it would make no difference.

It would remove those with ****ty immune systems,

Nope,

creating a better next generation.

Nope, because the vast bulk of those it kills are way past reproducing.

I know a woman who had her child at 40. Are you saying 40 year olds can't
die of the virus?

Nope, that most who have been killed by the virus are over 65.

In fact we evolved like that with kids sure that nothing can kill
them
and in fact that works fine.

What kids are you referring to?

Late teenagers. That why they have always been the cannon fodder in
wars.

Even those now don't die at a high enough rate from anything
to have any real effect on evolution, even if we scrapped seat
belts, air bags, cars with crumple zones etc etc etc.

They would if we stopped pampering them in hospitals.

Nope, **** all of those ever need hospital treatment to stop them dying.

So why do we bother with all that ****?

Because its killing far more than any other infectious disease
and leaving heaps more with very unpleasant long term
medical downsides even when it doesn't kill them.

Say you could do calculations twice as fast, you could sing perfect
pitch, you could do 1000 pushups, but the sight of a car made you
spontaneously combust. That would not be a good thing to have.

Yes but we never have evolved to have the sight of a car
make you spontaneously combust for some odd reason.

It's called an analogy, stretching something out of proportion to mare
you see the point.

No one get to mare me and don't you forget that, cow face.

In Dutch I was announcing you.

How did I miss the K and hit the R? They're miles away!

You were blotto and drug crazed, as always.

I almost never drink enough to look like I'm drunk. No pig has ever
suspected I'm drunk and breathalysed me.

Ours breathalyse everyone they pull over for random breath tests.
Do drug tests too so you would be toast the first time you are stopped.

On Wed, 12 May 2021 05:47:48 +0100, Snit wrote:

On May 11, 2021 at 9:23:06 PM MST, "rbowman" wrote
:

On 05/11/2021 07:49 PM, Snit wrote:
On May 11, 2021 at 6:13:47 PM MST, "rbowman" wrote
:

On 05/11/2021 11:49 AM, Commander Kinsey wrote:

You calling a lack of faith faith is insanity. You'll be saying atheism
is a faith next.

It is. 'Who the **** knows', aka agnosticism, is a more valid stance.

I am open to the possibility, just as I am open to the idea that the
Invisible
Green Dragon created the gods and that the Underground Marshmallow People
are
running the world. These things are *possible* (when looked at from a purely
logical stance) but so grossly unlikely as to the point of not being worth
considering.


Heidegger asks the question "why there is something rather than nothing".

https://www.atheists.org/activism/re...about-atheism/

Even they manage to confuse the issue. In a few paragraphs they go from
"To be clear: Atheism is not a disbelief in gods or a denial of gods; it
is a lack of belief in gods."' to "Agnostic isnt just a €œweaker€�
version of being an atheist. It answers a different question. Atheism is
about what you believe. Agnosticism is about what you know."

For the militant atheists I reject the disbelief; rather they project a
complete belief that there are no gods. Belief is belief.

Some of it might be semantics. Do you KNOW there are no Underground
Marshmallow People running the world. Well, in general conversation I assume
you do. I hope you do at least! But on a deep philosophical level you cannot
be absolutely certain of it. You cannot prove a negative.

It is so unlikely that we can assume they're not there. The same goes for god. So not a belief.

--
Sent from my iPhone, this spam courtesy of Apple incorporated.

On Wed, 12 May 2021 23:05:56 +0100, Joey wrote:



"rbowman" wrote in message
...
On 05/11/2021 10:47 PM, Snit wrote:
Some of it might be semantics. Do you KNOW there are no Underground
Marshmallow People running the world. Well, in general conversation I
assume
you do. I hope you do at least! But on a deep philosophical level you
cannot
be absolutely certain of it. You cannot prove a negative.


In the two truths doctrine formulated by Nagarjuna and others the is
conventional reality and there is ultimate reality. Conventional reality
is filled with handy assumptions like there are no Marshmallow people..
Ultimate reality considers all those assumptions to be empty.

Nagarjuna's principal work is based on a tetralemma.

All things exist
All things do not exist
All things both exist and do not exist
All things neither exist nor do not exist

Thats typical mindless wanking only clowns like that get up to.

Agreed, but why aren't you called Rod again?

--
Sent from my iPhone, this spam courtesy of Apple incorporated.

Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Wed, 12 May 2021 05:47:48 +0100, Snit wrote:

On May 11, 2021 at 9:23:06 PM MST, "rbowman" wrote
:

On 05/11/2021 07:49 PM, Snit wrote:
On May 11, 2021 at 6:13:47 PM MST, "rbowman" wrote
:

On 05/11/2021 11:49 AM, Commander Kinsey wrote:

You calling a lack of faith faith is insanity. You'll be saying atheism
is a faith next.

It is. 'Who the **** knows', aka agnosticism, is a more valid stance.

I am open to the possibility, just as I am open to the idea that the
Invisible
Green Dragon created the gods and that the Underground Marshmallow People
are
running the world. These things are *possible* (when looked at from a purely
logical stance) but so grossly unlikely as to the point of not being worth
considering.


Heidegger asks the question "why there is something rather than nothing".

https://www.atheists.org/activism/re...about-atheism/

Even they manage to confuse the issue. In a few paragraphs they go from
"To be clear: Atheism is not a disbelief in gods or a denial of gods; it
is a lack of belief in gods."' to "Agnostic isnt just a €œweaker€�
version of being an atheist. It answers a different question. Atheism is
about what you believe. Agnosticism is about what you know."

For the militant atheists I reject the disbelief; rather they project a
complete belief that there are no gods. Belief is belief.

Some of it might be semantics. Do you KNOW there are no Underground
Marshmallow People running the world. Well, in general conversation I assume
you do. I hope you do at least! But on a deep philosophical level you cannot
be absolutely certain of it. You cannot prove a negative.

It is so unlikely that we can assume they're not there. The same goes
for god. So not a belief.


Agreed.

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

On Fri, 14 May 2021 04:50:05 +1000, cantankerous trolling geezer Rodent
Speed, the auto-contradicting senile sociopath, blabbered, again:

FLUSH the two subnormal sociopathic cretins' endless absolutely idiotic
blather

--
Another typical retarded conversation between our two village idiots,
Birdbrain and Rodent Speed:

Birdbrain: "You beat me to it. Plain sex is boring."

Senile Rodent: "Then **** the cats. That wont be boring."

Birdbrain: "Sell me a de-clawing tool first."

Senile Rodent: "Wont help with the teeth."

Birdbrain: "They've never gone for me with their mouths."

Rodent Speed: "They will if you are stupid enough to try ****ing them."

Birdbrain: "No, they always use claws."

Rodent Speed: "They wont if you try ****ing them. Try it and see."

Message-ID:

On Thu, 13 May 2021 19:26:36 GMT, **** the sick git, the notorious,
troll-feeding, senile asshole, blathered again:


Agreed.

You are one sick senile ****head, **** the Git! LOL

Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Wed, 12 May 2021 02:49:59 +0100, Snit wrote:

On May 11, 2021 at 6:13:47 PM MST, "rbowman" wrote
:

On 05/11/2021 11:49 AM, Commander Kinsey wrote:

You calling a lack of faith faith is insanity. You'll be saying atheism
is a faith next.

It is. 'Who the **** knows', aka agnosticism, is a more valid stance.

I am open to the possibility, just as I am open to the idea that the Invisible
Green Dragon created the gods and that the Underground Marshmallow People are
running the world. These things are *possible* (when looked at from a purely
logical stance) but so grossly unlikely as to the point of not being worth
considering.

So not a belief, but basic logic.


Yup.

Denial of man made climate change, in the other hand, is more comparable to
denying oxygen because you cant see it.

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

On Thu, 13 May 2021 19:49:59 GMT, **** the sick git, the notorious,
troll-feeding, senile asshole, blathered again:


Denial of man made climate change, in the other hand, is more comparable to
denying oxygen because you can¢t see it.

In [sic] the other hand, everyone can see what a devoted sucker of troll
cock you are, **** the Git! BG

On May 13, 2021 at 11:19:09 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

On Tue, 04 May 2021 19:50:13 +0100, Snit wrote:

On May 4, 2021 at 10:41:00 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

On Thu, 29 Apr 2021 04:56:06 +0100, Snit wrote:

On Apr 28, 2021 at 8:44:12 PM MST, "rbowman" wrote
:

On 04/28/2021 12:35 PM, Commander Kinsey wrote:
Vote Libertarian.

In this country I only vote for the Libertarian as a 'none of the above'
statement. I may have left-libertarian tendencies but in the US the
capital L libertarians are right-libertarians.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/It_Usu..._with_Ayn_Rand

They pretend that conservative fiscal policies will lead to liberal social
results, as if the magic market is going to go contrary to profits to
protect
human rights and the environment.

The market does what the customers request.

Sometimes.

Imagine a world with no green legislation. Now imagine 5 companies making
the same thing. Two of them advertise green-ness in manufacturing etc.
Anyone who believed in ecology would only buy from those two and the others
would go bankrupt or change their ways.

The one which is more green would likely cost more -- there are savings in
not
doing the right thing. With most people barely scraping by, as happens in a
complete "free" market with no protections, people would by the cheap stuff.
We see this with Walmart and Amazon now.

What would make human nature change to get the results you speak of?

Why should we make them change? If they want to save money rather than the
environment, then let them. It's none of your business if others don't want
to be as green as you.

People working alone do not put themselves at a disadvantage. We have laws and
regulations for a reason.

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot
use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow
superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

On May 13, 2021 at 11:37:37 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3DCjwqgghyW-Y

'Put the O Back in ****ry' Shooter Jennings

What's a missing letter?


When can=E2=80=99t is pronounced as can you would think it would risk
confusion.

Except I've never known anyone do that, including in your video.

All I can say is watch the videos I showed.

I have. Your ears are at fault.

I will trust my ears and those of the professional who does the videos.

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot
use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow
superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

On May 13, 2021 at 11:38:57 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

On Fri, 07 May 2021 20:49:20 +0100, Snit wrote:

On May 7, 2021 at 10:54:59 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

On Wed, 05 May 2021 20:07:41 +0100, Snit wrote:

On May 5, 2021 at 11:32:18 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

We asked each other.

that's very emotional

It was touching.

do you have a youtube of it we could make some money

I tried making some but the police said it was no good.

Vote Libertarian.

I prefer mature candidates.

I prefer common sense.

That comes with maturity.

No, you lose it with maturity and brainwashing.

Really the whole idea of "common sense" is all too often just tied to what
each person thinks is correct. I am not against it -- and am very
"MacGyverish" in how I problem solve, but for things that matter I tend to
look to more verifiable evidence.

No, common sense is clearly defined. It's whatever is ****ing obvious. If I
jump off that cliff, I will hit the bottom really fast and probably die. I
don't need to do any scientific tests.

There are some areas where it is clear... and other areas where it is not. And
places where you say things contrary to evidence and logic and reason and your
only excuse is you think it is correct, and then you call that "common sense"
as if it was evidence. That is where you show deep faith.

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot
use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow
superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

On May 13, 2021 at 11:49:32 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

On Wed, 12 May 2021 02:49:59 +0100, Snit wrote:

On May 11, 2021 at 6:13:47 PM MST, "rbowman" wrote
:

On 05/11/2021 11:49 AM, Commander Kinsey wrote:

You calling a lack of faith faith is insanity. You'll be saying atheism
is a faith next.

It is. 'Who the **** knows', aka agnosticism, is a more valid stance.

I am open to the possibility, just as I am open to the idea that the
Invisible
Green Dragon created the gods and that the Underground Marshmallow People
are
running the world. These things are *possible* (when looked at from a purely
logical stance) but so grossly unlikely as to the point of not being worth
considering.

So not a belief, but basic logic.

To lack faith in a deity is not a belief... I would agree with that.

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot
use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow
superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

On Thu, 13 May 2021 20:53:34 GMT, **** the sick git, the notorious,
troll-feeding, senile asshole, blathered again:



I will trust my ears and those of the professional who does the videos.

No, you don't, **** the Git! You ONLY suck troll cock! BG

On Thu, 13 May 2021 20:55:34 GMT, **** the sick git, the notorious,
troll-feeding, senile asshole, blathered again:


To lack faith in a deity is not a belief... I would agree with that.

What has your sick **** got to do with ANY of the three ngs you keep
crossposting it to, senile troll?

On Thu, 13 May 2021 20:54:25 GMT, **** the sick git, the notorious,
troll-feeding, senile asshole, blathered again:


There are some areas where it is clear... and other areas where it is not. And
places where you say things contrary to evidence and logic and reason and your
only excuse is you think it is correct, and then you call that "common sense"
as if it was evidence. That is where you show deep faith.

You show that you are not only a notorious sucker of troll cock but a filthy
deranged troll yourself, **** the Git!

On Thu, 13 May 2021 20:41:05 GMT, **** the sick git, the notorious,
troll-feeding, senile asshole, blathered again:


People working alone do not put themselves at a disadvantage. We have laws and
regulations for a reason.

Nope, **** the Git, you ONLY got **** for brains! BG

On 2021-05-13 1:53 p.m., Snit wrote:
On May 13, 2021 at 11:37:37 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3DCjwqgghyW-Y

'Put the O Back in ****ry' Shooter Jennings

What's a missing letter?


When can=E2=80=99t is pronounced as can you would think it would risk
confusion.

Except I've never known anyone do that, including in your video.

All I can say is watch the videos I showed.

I have. Your ears are at fault.

I will trust my ears and those of the professional who does the videos.

you remind me of dumbo when you fly around the room like that

On Fri, 07 May 2021 19:45:16 +0100, Rod Speed wrote:



"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
news
On Sun, 02 May 2021 19:14:02 +0100, Rod Speed
wrote:



"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
news On Mon, 26 Apr 2021 19:22:29 +0100, Rod Speed
wrote:



"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
news On Fri, 23 Apr 2021 21:00:20 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:

and was stupid enough to believe in some god too.

I doubt his religion played any part in creating his theories.

It did actually. He ran that stupid line 'god does not play dice with
the
universe'

If god had wished us to know about the universe would he not have told
us?

Unlikely that some arsehole who just yawned when 6M of its alleged
chosen people were gassed and cremated by Adolf and his henchmen.
Presumably he chose to lie to them about being chosen people and
was ****ing himself and laughing as they got gassed etc.

Or the whole world is a computer game

They didn't have computer games in those days.

Not inside our game they didn't, no. But god has one. We've only recently invented games inside the game.

and the guy playing Hitler got a new high score.

In fact the bugger lost so spectacularly
he had to shoot himself and his slut.

He did very well actually, it took a lot of do gooders to stop him.

Pity about radioactive decay alone.

Randomness is simply lack of detailed knowledge. Take flipping a coin.
If you know enough about how hard you spin it etc, you can work out what
side it will land on.

Doesn't work with radioactive decay.

I don't believe you, there must be a way of calculating it precisely.

No there isnt with radioactive decay because there is nothing to calculate.

That we know about so far. Think back to when we couldn't see inside an atom.

--
Sent from my iPhone, this spam courtesy of Apple incorporated.

On Sat, 08 May 2021 01:46:50 +0100, Snit wrote:

On May 7, 2021 at 5:17:04 PM MST, ""Rod Speed"" wrote
:



"Snit" wrote in message
...
On May 7, 2021 at 5:01:01 PM MST, ""Rod Speed"" wrote
:



"Snit" wrote in message
...
On May 7, 2021 at 10:36:54 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

On Wed, 28 Apr 2021 20:41:40 +0100, Snit
wrote:

On Apr 28, 2021 at 11:34:41 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

On Thu, 22 Apr 2021 20:46:21 +0100, Snit
wrote:

On Apr 22, 2021 at 11:21:47 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

And that=E2=80=99s just as true of purported man made
climate change.

Its obvious that climate does change, that=E2=80=99s
obvious from
the ice ages etc, but its much less clear how much of the
change we have seen is man made. It wasn=E2=80=99t that
long ago
that most scientists were hyperventilating about global
cooling.

Yes, we can certainly measure a substantial hike in
atmospheric
CO2 levels, but its much less clear how much effect that
actually
has on world temperatures, let alone climate change.

It's bloody obvious to me. We know there used to be more
CO2 in the air.
And the world was perfectly fine back then.

There has been no time in the history of man when the CO2
levels were as
high
as they are now.

Why does man have to be there?

Just a personal preference I prefer to not have man go extinct...
and am
none
too happy about man creating the current mass extinction we are
in.

Surely you know that's not what I meant.

Yes, you were trying to pretend that man's influence is not well
understood
because in the past there were other times of high CO2, though there
were
other reasons and none of the times it has been anywhere even near
as high
have the changes happened so quickly.

You are working to push your intuition, based on faith, over the
science.

No, I was pointing out the earth survives high CO2 levels just fine
because
it did in the past. And that we would manage also. You do know how
much CO2
is required to kill you, right?

The earth will survive the harm we are causing...

Its far from clear that we are actually doing great harm at
all, particularly when compared with what the ice ages did.

We are in a great extinction,

Bull**** we are.

or at least likely so,

More bull****.

and seeing the impacts now.

More bull****.

If you want to learn more about it this is a good site to get started:
http://climate.nasa.gov

More bull****. Its just the spewing of the MMGCC cult.

but we are in a great extinction

Bull****.

There is some debate -- but it seems likely.

Bull****.

and it may end up including humans.

No chance. We even survived the ice ages.

The ice ages man made it through (the most recent one) did not lead to a
great extinction.

Bull****.

We rely on many other species

Only a few actually.

Quite a few... give how they rely on each other. And we benefit from many
more.

More bull****.

and the ecosystems we are destroying.

The ice ages destroyed far more and we survived that fine.

You are trying to equate all of the ice ages.

Nope, rubbing your stupid nose in the fact that they
destroyed far more ecosystems than man has done.

The one man made it through was not a big one.

But they destroyed far more ecosystems than man ever has.

You reject evidence and just cry "bull****". OK.

You worry too much and look for evidence where there is none. If you look hard enough at the clouds, you can become sure they're in the shape of a dog. See! Evidence! That's the ears, that bit's the tail....

--
Sent from my iPhone, this spam courtesy of Apple incorporated.

On Sat, 08 May 2021 17:59:59 +0100, Rod Speed wrote:



"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
news
On Fri, 30 Apr 2021 20:40:43 +0100, Rod Speed
wrote:



"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
news On Sun, 25 Apr 2021 21:34:37 +0100, Rod Speed
wrote:



"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
news On Thu, 22 Apr 2021 20:28:34 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
news On Sun, 18 Apr 2021 19:24:27 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
news On Sat, 17 Apr 2021 20:28:16 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
news On Fri, 16 Apr 2021 19:09:40 +0100, Snit

wrote:

On Apr 16, 2021 at 11:00:16 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

On Fri, 16 Apr 2021 03:44:18 +0100, Snit

wrote:

On Apr 15, 2021 at 7:14:23 PM MST, "rbowman" wrote
:

On 04/15/2021 12:02 PM, Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Wed, 14 Apr 2021 19:12:00 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:

Commander Kinsey wrote

Another account must be made so they don't get the last
word
in.
The
silliest thing I got banned for was saying the word
"damn".
And
not
even
in a rude way, probably something like "the damn
weather
is
awful
today".
Turns out the admin was a religious nutter.

Yeah, I got the same thing from another religious nutter
for
using the term "hell of a lot", not a moderator in that
case.

You have to wonder how far we would be today if religion
had
not
impeded
science.

Do you know who first formulated the Big Bang theory? Ever
here
of
Gregor Mendel? Blaise Pascal?

Quite a few scientists manage to have a foot in both
worlds.
In
general
the Catholics seem more flexible than the Protestants,
particularly
the
'gimme that old time religion' branch.

In the past the two were heavily tied together... but that
is
no
longer the
case. There are still some religious scientists, but
scientists
tend
to be
atheist at a higher level than the general public. They also
tend
to
be more
liberal, which makes sense given how at least in the US
conservatives
tend
to
reject our best evidence.

Scientists are liberal because they want funding for free.

Scientists are liberal because the conservative mindset is to
deny
evidence.
We can see this with COVID,

No, we just don't make such a fuss over a small thing. A thing
that
kills
4 times less than cancer and 40 times less than the world
population
growth.

man-made global climate change,

It was 1C here in Scotland a few days ago, in spring. There is
no
global
warming.

research on reduction of abortions,

That's not science, that's morals.

and in some cases even things like evolution.

Evolution could take place if we let coronavirus kill off the
weak.

Nope, because it mostly kills those way past reproducing.

Irrelevant if it kills those or not. And they can hide indoors.

The point is we should let it kill off any younger folk that it
can,
as
they're the weaker ones.

In fact there isnt any evidence that it does kill of the weaker
ones.

The Spanish Flu didn't, in fact it killed off the stronger ones
because their much better immune system grossly over reacted
and it was the cytokine storm that killed them very quickly.

Grossly overreacting was therefore a trait that needed removing for
the
next generation.

Nope because it means they do much better with the
non pandemic infections and don't have to bother to
wash their hands all the time and can get away with
doing what is more convenient like not throwing
away food that has had a fly walk on it etc etc etc.

Having a trait that makes you better at 9 things but worse at another,
getting you killed, is not a good trait to have.

Depends on the death rate.

In fact we evolved like that with kids sure that nothing can kill them
and in fact that works fine.

What kids are you referring to?

Late teenagers. That's why they have always been the cannon fodder in
wars.

Well there's no point sending overweight old men is there?

That's not the alternative.

What other alternative is there? Girls?

Best to use the fit lads to kill.

But those with now enough sense to realise that
they arent immortal arent any use as cannon fodder.

Then use the braver ones.

--
Sent from my iPhone, this spam courtesy of Apple incorporated.

Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Sat, 08 May 2021 01:46:50 +0100, Snit wrote:

On May 7, 2021 at 5:17:04 PM MST, ""Rod Speed"" wrote
:



"Snit" wrote in message
...
On May 7, 2021 at 5:01:01 PM MST, ""Rod Speed"" wrote
:



"Snit" wrote in message
...
On May 7, 2021 at 10:36:54 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

On Wed, 28 Apr 2021 20:41:40 +0100, Snit
wrote:

On Apr 28, 2021 at 11:34:41 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

On Thu, 22 Apr 2021 20:46:21 +0100, Snit
wrote:

On Apr 22, 2021 at 11:21:47 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

And that=E2=80=99s just as true of purported man made
climate change.

Its obvious that climate does change, that=E2=80=99s
obvious from
the ice ages etc, but its much less clear how much of the
change we have seen is man made. It wasn=E2=80=99t that
long ago
that most scientists were hyperventilating about global
cooling.

Yes, we can certainly measure a substantial hike in
atmospheric
CO2 levels, but its much less clear how much effect that
actually
has on world temperatures, let alone climate change.

It's bloody obvious to me. We know there used to be more
CO2 in the air.
And the world was perfectly fine back then.

There has been no time in the history of man when the CO2
levels were as
high
as they are now.

Why does man have to be there?

Just a personal preference I prefer to not have man go extinct...
and am
none
too happy about man creating the current mass extinction we are
in.

Surely you know that's not what I meant.

Yes, you were trying to pretend that man's influence is not well
understood
because in the past there were other times of high CO2, though there
were
other reasons and none of the times it has been anywhere even near
as high
have the changes happened so quickly.

You are working to push your intuition, based on faith, over the
science.

No, I was pointing out the earth survives high CO2 levels just fine
because
it did in the past. And that we would manage also. You do know how
much CO2
is required to kill you, right?

The earth will survive the harm we are causing...

Its far from clear that we are actually doing great harm at
all, particularly when compared with what the ice ages did.

We are in a great extinction,

Bull**** we are.

or at least likely so,

More bull****.

and seeing the impacts now.

More bull****.

If you want to learn more about it this is a good site to get started:
http://climate.nasa.gov

More bull****. Its just the spewing of the MMGCC cult.

but we are in a great extinction

Bull****.

There is some debate -- but it seems likely.

Bull****.

and it may end up including humans.

No chance. We even survived the ice ages.

The ice ages man made it through (the most recent one) did not lead to a
great extinction.

Bull****.

We rely on many other species

Only a few actually.

Quite a few... give how they rely on each other. And we benefit from many
more.

More bull****.

and the ecosystems we are destroying.

The ice ages destroyed far more and we survived that fine.

You are trying to equate all of the ice ages.

Nope, rubbing your stupid nose in the fact that they
destroyed far more ecosystems than man has done.

The one man made it through was not a big one.

But they destroyed far more ecosystems than man ever has.

You reject evidence and just cry "bull****". OK.

You worry too much and look for evidence where there is none.

Your claim is a faith based one with no support.

If you look hard enough at the clouds, you can become sure they're in the
shape of a dog. See! Evidence! That's the ears, that bit's the tail....


If you think climate science is based on confirmation bias or the like then
show it.

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

On Fri, 14 May 2021 19:45:29 GMT, **** the git, the notorious,
troll-feeding, senile asshole, blathered again:


If you think climate science is based on confirmation bias or the like then
show it.

What has your sick senile **** got to do with ANY of the three ngs you keep
crossposting it to, you sick senile ****head?

"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
news
On Fri, 07 May 2021 19:45:16 +0100, Rod Speed
wrote:



"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
news
On Sun, 02 May 2021 19:14:02 +0100, Rod Speed
wrote:



"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
news On Mon, 26 Apr 2021 19:22:29 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
news On Fri, 23 Apr 2021 21:00:20 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:

and was stupid enough to believe in some god too.

I doubt his religion played any part in creating his theories.

It did actually. He ran that stupid line 'god does not play dice with
the
universe'

If god had wished us to know about the universe would he not have told
us?

Unlikely that some arsehole who just yawned when 6M of its alleged
chosen people were gassed and cremated by Adolf and his henchmen.
Presumably he chose to lie to them about being chosen people and
was ****ing himself and laughing as they got gassed etc.

Or the whole world is a computer game

They didn't have computer games in those days.

Not inside our game they didn't, no. But god has one.

There is no god, just an endless variety of crutches for pathetically
inadequate 'minds' like Muggles and the lowbrowman.

We've only recently invented games inside the game.

There is no game, just evolution.

and the guy playing Hitler got a new high score.

In fact the bugger lost so spectacularly
he had to shoot himself and his slut.

He did very well actually,

Nope, he was another pathetic vegy who got
his rocks off by getting his slut to **** on him.

it took a lot of do gooders to stop him.

It actually took just one bullet to stop him.

At least he did have the balls to do that.

Pity about radioactive decay alone.

Randomness is simply lack of detailed knowledge.

Take flipping a coin. If you know enough about how hard you spin it
etc, you can work out what side it will land on.

Doesn't work with radioactive decay.

I don't believe you, there must be a way of calculating it precisely.

No there isnt with radioactive decay because there is nothing to
calculate.

That we know about so far. Think back to when we couldn't see inside an
atom.

It will never be possible to calculate, just like it still
isnt with where a rain drop will form in a cloud.