On Tue, 27 Apr 2021 01:51:01 GMT, **** the sick git, the notorious,
troll-feeding, senile asshole, blathered again:


I do tend to have multiple social groups.

And, going by some accounts, you are obviously despised in each one of
those, **** the Git!

On Tue, 27 Apr 2021 01:50:36 GMT, **** the sick git, the notorious,
troll-feeding, senile asshole, blathered again:


I do like how those who troll get so bent out of shape. So often the same
pattern:

I do like that you keep confirming that you ARE a notorious sucker of troll
cock, you abnormal delusional bigmouth! BG

On Tue, 27 Apr 2021 01:49:08 GMT, **** the sick git, the notorious,
troll-feeding, senile asshole, blathered again:

How can something that does not exist have a gender?

How can you not remove his cock from your toothless senile gob, **** the
Git? You know, the unwashed Scot once was reported to be of the "smelly"
kind! Is THAT what makes him so irresistable to you?

On Thu, 22 Apr 2021 20:25:44 +0100, Rod Speed wrote:



"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
news
On Sun, 18 Apr 2021 19:20:18 +0100, Rod Speed
wrote:



"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
news On Fri, 16 Apr 2021 21:54:22 +0100, Rod Speed
wrote:



"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
news On Thu, 15 Apr 2021 21:15:17 +0100, Snit
wrote:

On Apr 15, 2021 at 11:02:15 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

On Wed, 14 Apr 2021 19:12:00 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:

Commander Kinsey wrote

Another account must be made so they don't get the last word in.
The
silliest thing I got banned for was saying the word "damn". And
not
even
in a rude way, probably something like "the damn weather is awful
today".
Turns out the admin was a religious nutter.

Yeah, I got the same thing from another religious nutter for
using the term "hell of a lot", not a moderator in that case.

You have to wonder how far we would be today if religion had not
impeded
science.

Until a few hundred years ago there was not much of a split.

In English please.

He means that more than a couple of hundred years
ago, most of the science was done by the religious.
And some of them like Mendel made tremendous
advances in our scientific knowledge.

Until it conflicted with the teachings of the bible and was silenced.

That didn't happen very often at all, just with Bruno and Galileo.

They never did silence Darwin, just got a mega **** fight.

You're forgetting that with a large number of the population being
religious, science is slower to spread.

I'm not not really convinced about that. In fact you can make a
case that earlier than the last couple of centurys, it was mainly
the religious professionals who did advance most of the science
essentially because they had a lot of free time on their hands or
because the church chose to have some of their religious
professionals do that sort of thing like with the Vatican observatorys.

Just because it wasn't silenced, doesn't mean everyone will use it.

Yes, but the general public really doesn't get to use science that
much with evolution and the fundamentals of science like that.

There could have been improvements made on those discoveries, by people
who were too religious to believe in science.

One of the odder things is that there are a surprising number of
the religious who are stupid enough to not believe that evolution
is how it happened who still do real science in other scientific fields.

There's one example. Biology must have been hampered by the religious folk burying their head in the sand.

On Sat, 24 Apr 2021 20:37:00 +0100, Snit wrote:

On Apr 24, 2021 at 11:30:05 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

On Thu, 22 Apr 2021 16:01:42 +0100, Snit wrote:

On Apr 22, 2021 at 3:16:17 AM MST, ""Rod Speed"" wrote
:

I wonder why nobody ever says just "It's". For example:
John: "That engine's not running right."
Steve: "It's."

Language is weird. Heck, how do you think people generally pronounce
the word
"can't".

Without the t. So it sounds more like "can".
https://youtu.be/6bszZZlvj4E

You bugger. Bet I will focus on that
bloody word every time its used now.

Just watched the first ep of the Manson tapes and didn=E2=80=99t.

Corse that might just be because it is so ****ing bizarre.

I have caught it in some speech I hear.

Have a friend who insists it just cannot be true. I talk to her on Zoom --
she
has agreed to let me record her without her knowing (at the time) and then
see
how SHE sounds). She insists she ALWAYS pronounced the T. Will be
interesting
to find out.

Yanks can't even pronounce herb with the H.

We can if it is a name.

By the way, I did look for UK specific examples of "can't". Here is what I
found:

https://youtu.be/dGnBi6giZw0

Those are examples from the UK. "Can't" is still pronounced as "can" (in many
cases).

I listened to the first guy and he clearly said carnt. Check your ears.

"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
news
On Thu, 22 Apr 2021 20:25:44 +0100, Rod Speed
wrote:



"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
news
On Sun, 18 Apr 2021 19:20:18 +0100, Rod Speed
wrote:



"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
news On Fri, 16 Apr 2021 21:54:22 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
news On Thu, 15 Apr 2021 21:15:17 +0100, Snit
wrote:

On Apr 15, 2021 at 11:02:15 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

On Wed, 14 Apr 2021 19:12:00 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:

Commander Kinsey wrote

Another account must be made so they don't get the last word
in.
The
silliest thing I got banned for was saying the word "damn".
And
not
even
in a rude way, probably something like "the damn weather is
awful
today".
Turns out the admin was a religious nutter.

Yeah, I got the same thing from another religious nutter for
using the term "hell of a lot", not a moderator in that case.

You have to wonder how far we would be today if religion had not
impeded
science.

Until a few hundred years ago there was not much of a split.

In English please.

He means that more than a couple of hundred years
ago, most of the science was done by the religious.
And some of them like Mendel made tremendous
advances in our scientific knowledge.

Until it conflicted with the teachings of the bible and was silenced.

That didn't happen very often at all, just with Bruno and Galileo.

They never did silence Darwin, just got a mega **** fight.

You're forgetting that with a large number of the population being
religious, science is slower to spread.

I'm not not really convinced about that. In fact you can make a
case that earlier than the last couple of centurys, it was mainly
the religious professionals who did advance most of the science
essentially because they had a lot of free time on their hands or
because the church chose to have some of their religious
professionals do that sort of thing like with the Vatican observatorys.

Just because it wasn't silenced, doesn't mean everyone will use it.

Yes, but the general public really doesn't get to use science that
much with evolution and the fundamentals of science like that.

There could have been improvements made on those discoveries, by people
who were too religious to believe in science.

One of the odder things is that there are a surprising number of
the religious who are stupid enough to not believe that evolution
is how it happened who still do real science in other scientific fields.

There's one example. Biology must have been hampered by the religious
folk burying their head in the sand.

In fact it was dramatically advanced by Mendel who did have the time
to discover how plant breeding works, and with plenty of other
professionally
religious like CofE vicars with lots of time on their hands between sermons.

The roman catholics were more into ****ing the altar boys.

On Wed, 28 Apr 2021 05:06:00 +1000, cantankerous trolling geezer Rodent
Speed, the auto-contradicting senile sociopath, blabbered, again:


FLUSH the two subnormal sociopathic cretins' endless absolutely idiotic
blather

--
Another typical retarded "conversation" between Birdbrain and senile Rodent:

Senile Rodent: " Did you ever dig a hole to bury your own ****?"

Birdbrain: "I do if there's no flush toilet around."

Senile Rodent: "Yeah, I prefer camping like that, off by myself with
no dunnys around and have always buried the ****."

MID:

On Apr 27, 2021 at 10:53:26 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

On Sat, 24 Apr 2021 20:37:00 +0100, Snit wrote:

On Apr 24, 2021 at 11:30:05 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

On Thu, 22 Apr 2021 16:01:42 +0100, Snit wrote:

On Apr 22, 2021 at 3:16:17 AM MST, ""Rod Speed"" wrote
:

I wonder why nobody ever says just "It's". For example:
John: "That engine's not running right."
Steve: "It's."

Language is weird. Heck, how do you think people generally pronounce
the word
"can't".

Without the t. So it sounds more like "can".
https://youtu.be/6bszZZlvj4E

You bugger. Bet I will focus on that
bloody word every time its used now.

Just watched the first ep of the Manson tapes and didn=E2=80=99t.

Corse that might just be because it is so ****ing bizarre.

I have caught it in some speech I hear.

Have a friend who insists it just cannot be true. I talk to her on Zoom --
she
has agreed to let me record her without her knowing (at the time) and then
see
how SHE sounds). She insists she ALWAYS pronounced the T. Will be
interesting
to find out.

Yanks can't even pronounce herb with the H.

We can if it is a name.

By the way, I did look for UK specific examples of "can't". Here is what I
found:

https://youtu.be/dGnBi6giZw0

Those are examples from the UK. "Can't" is still pronounced as "can" (in
many
cases).

I listened to the first guy and he clearly said carnt. Check your ears.

There is a slight r. Common in British English?

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot
use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow
superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

On Apr 27, 2021 at 10:43:11 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

On Thu, 22 Apr 2021 20:25:44 +0100, Rod Speed
wrote:



"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
news
On Sun, 18 Apr 2021 19:20:18 +0100, Rod Speed
wrote:



"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
news On Fri, 16 Apr 2021 21:54:22 +0100, Rod Speed
wrote:



"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
news On Thu, 15 Apr 2021 21:15:17 +0100, Snit
wrote:

On Apr 15, 2021 at 11:02:15 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

On Wed, 14 Apr 2021 19:12:00 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:

Commander Kinsey wrote

Another account must be made so they don't get the last word in.
The
silliest thing I got banned for was saying the word "damn". And
not
even
in a rude way, probably something like "the damn weather is awful
today".
Turns out the admin was a religious nutter.

Yeah, I got the same thing from another religious nutter for
using the term "hell of a lot", not a moderator in that case.

You have to wonder how far we would be today if religion had not
impeded
science.

Until a few hundred years ago there was not much of a split.

In English please.

He means that more than a couple of hundred years
ago, most of the science was done by the religious.
And some of them like Mendel made tremendous
advances in our scientific knowledge.

Until it conflicted with the teachings of the bible and was silenced.

That didn't happen very often at all, just with Bruno and Galileo.

They never did silence Darwin, just got a mega **** fight.

You're forgetting that with a large number of the population being
religious, science is slower to spread.

I'm not not really convinced about that. In fact you can make a
case that earlier than the last couple of centurys, it was mainly
the religious professionals who did advance most of the science
essentially because they had a lot of free time on their hands or
because the church chose to have some of their religious
professionals do that sort of thing like with the Vatican observatorys.

Just because it wasn't silenced, doesn't mean everyone will use it.

Yes, but the general public really doesn't get to use science that
much with evolution and the fundamentals of science like that.

There could have been improvements made on those discoveries, by people
who were too religious to believe in science.

One of the odder things is that there are a surprising number of
the religious who are stupid enough to not believe that evolution
is how it happened who still do real science in other scientific fields.

There's one example. Biology must have been hampered by the religious folk
burying their head in the sand.

You talk about trusting your own experiences and intuitions over studies and
science.

So what about people who say they have a personal relationship with a god?

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot
use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow
superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

On Tue, 27 Apr 2021 19:53:50 GMT, **** the sick git, the notorious,
troll-feeding, senile asshole, blathered again:


I listened to the first guy and he clearly said carnt. Check your ears.

There is a slight r. Common in British English?

There is a troll and a senile sucker of troll cock here, senile ****head!
LOL

"Snit" wrote in message
...
On Apr 27, 2021 at 10:43:11 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

On Thu, 22 Apr 2021 20:25:44 +0100, Rod Speed
wrote:



"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
news On Sun, 18 Apr 2021 19:20:18 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
news On Fri, 16 Apr 2021 21:54:22 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
news On Thu, 15 Apr 2021 21:15:17 +0100, Snit

wrote:

On Apr 15, 2021 at 11:02:15 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

On Wed, 14 Apr 2021 19:12:00 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:

Commander Kinsey wrote

Another account must be made so they don't get the last word
in.
The
silliest thing I got banned for was saying the word "damn".
And
not
even
in a rude way, probably something like "the damn weather is
awful
today".
Turns out the admin was a religious nutter.

Yeah, I got the same thing from another religious nutter for
using the term "hell of a lot", not a moderator in that case.

You have to wonder how far we would be today if religion had not
impeded
science.

Until a few hundred years ago there was not much of a split.

In English please.

He means that more than a couple of hundred years
ago, most of the science was done by the religious.
And some of them like Mendel made tremendous
advances in our scientific knowledge.

Until it conflicted with the teachings of the bible and was
silenced.

That didn't happen very often at all, just with Bruno and Galileo.

They never did silence Darwin, just got a mega **** fight.

You're forgetting that with a large number of the population being
religious, science is slower to spread.

I'm not not really convinced about that. In fact you can make a
case that earlier than the last couple of centurys, it was mainly
the religious professionals who did advance most of the science
essentially because they had a lot of free time on their hands or
because the church chose to have some of their religious
professionals do that sort of thing like with the Vatican observatorys.

Just because it wasn't silenced, doesn't mean everyone will use it.

Yes, but the general public really doesn't get to use science that
much with evolution and the fundamentals of science like that.

There could have been improvements made on those discoveries, by
people
who were too religious to believe in science.

One of the odder things is that there are a surprising number of
the religious who are stupid enough to not believe that evolution
is how it happened who still do real science in other scientific
fields.

There's one example. Biology must have been hampered by the religious
folk
burying their head in the sand.

You talk about trusting your own experiences and intuitions over studies
and
science.

So what about people who say they have a personal relationship with a god?

They are deluded. His personal experience with climate isnt.

On Tue, 27 Apr 2021 20:04:56 GMT, **** the sick git, the notorious,
troll-feeding, senile asshole, blathered again:


You talk about trusting your own experiences and intuitions over studies and
science.

HIS experience is that you keep sucking him off, EVERY time he sets out a
bait for you, you filthy senile sucker of troll cock!

On 04/27/2021 11:43 AM, Commander Kinsey wrote:
There's one example. Biology must have been hampered by the religious
folk burying their head in the sand.


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kenneth_R._Miller

A real ostrich, that guy. It's more the fundamentalist Protestants who
prefer the sand box. The Catechism of the Catholic Church is a well
organized document clearly stating this is what we believe, this is what
we don't believe, and whatever floats your boat. Creationism and the
young earth theories fit in the latter class. A Catholic can, if he
chooses, believe the earth is 6000 years old. He probably would be
considered a nutter but not a heretic.

Abortion, however, is in the not believe column. By extension embryonic
stem cell research is included although adult stem cell research is fine.

https://www.dw.com/en/researchers-in...ryo/a-57224980

That probably falls under the **** list. In any case there are already
too many humans with chimp characteristics.

On Tue, 27 Apr 2021 20:15:33 -0600, lowbrowwoman, the endlessly driveling,
troll-feeding, senile idiot, blabbered again:


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kenneth_R._Miller

A real ostrich, that guy.

You just made Birdbrain's day, senile whore! He now gets sucked off by TWO
toothless senile assholes simultaneously, **** the Git and lowbrowwoman!
****ing stupid senile assholes! LOL

On Fri, 23 Apr 2021 21:02:43 +0100, Rod Speed wrote:



"Snit" wrote in message
...
On Apr 23, 2021 at 10:55:17 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

On Wed, 21 Apr 2021 19:18:06 +0100, Snit
wrote:

On Apr 21, 2021 at 11:14:59 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

On Sun, 18 Apr 2021 00:45:22 +0100, Snit
wrote:

On Apr 17, 2021 at 4:34:04 PM MST, ""Rod Speed"" wrote
:



"Snit" wrote in message
...
On Apr 17, 2021 at 4:28:52 PM MST, ""Rod Speed"" wrote
:

Snit wrote
Commander Kinsey wrote
Snit wrote

research on reduction of abortions,

That's not science, that's morals.

If you want to reduce abortions, which most conservatives
claim to
want, there are known methods to do it. At least in American
the
Republican party (the more conservative of the two) rejects
every one of
these things. There "solution" is to deny women equal rights.

Abortion has nothing to do with equal rights.

Right. Denying people the right to one does.

Wrong, Nothing unequal about it.

Denying people equal rights ties into a conversation about equal
rights.
Don't
think people should have abortions -- then don't have one. And, hey,
I want
to
see there be fewer, so let's back policy which is known to reduce
the
number.

WTF are you on about wanting to reduce the number? Are you saying
women
shouldn't be allowed to have them?

Women should... but I would like to see the need be reduced.

So this is nothing to do with abortions then. It's to do with you
wanting to
brainwash women into behaving differently.

It is about giving them tools, educators, and choice.

They already have all of that and choose to kill their unborn children.

And so they should. Their children, not the state's children.

On Thu, 22 Apr 2021 20:46:21 +0100, Snit wrote:

On Apr 22, 2021 at 11:21:47 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

And that=E2=80=99s just as true of purported man made climate change.

Its obvious that climate does change, that=E2=80=99s obvious from
the ice ages etc, but its much less clear how much of the
change we have seen is man made. It wasn=E2=80=99t that long ago
that most scientists were hyperventilating about global cooling.

Yes, we can certainly measure a substantial hike in atmospheric
CO2 levels, but its much less clear how much effect that actually
has on world temperatures, let alone climate change.

It's bloody obvious to me. We know there used to be more CO2 in the air.
And the world was perfectly fine back then.

There has been no time in the history of man when the CO2 levels were as
high
as they are now.

Why does man have to be there?

Just a personal preference I prefer to not have man go extinct... and am none
too happy about man creating the current mass extinction we are in.

Surely you know that's not what I meant.

On Fri, 23 Apr 2021 12:35:52 +0100, FromTheRafters wrote:

% formulated the question :
On 2021-04-22 12:46 p.m., Snit wrote:
On Apr 22, 2021 at 11:21:47 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

And that=E2=80=99s just as true of purported man made climate
change.
Its obvious that climate does change, that=E2=80=99s obvious from
the ice ages etc, but its much less clear how much of the
change we have seen is man made. It wasn=E2=80=99t that long ago
that most scientists were hyperventilating about global cooling.
Yes, we can certainly measure a substantial hike in atmospheric
CO2 levels, but its much less clear how much effect that actually
has on world temperatures, let alone climate change.
It's bloody obvious to me. We know there used to be more CO2 in
the air.
And the world was perfectly fine back then.
There has been no time in the history of man when the CO2 levels
were as
high
as they are now.

Why does man have to be there?

Just a personal preference I prefer to not have man go extinct... and am
none
too happy about man creating the current mass extinction we are in.

one day our sun will blow up and all you know will be gone

If by "blow up" you mean enter the Red Giant phase. Our Sun is not
likely to explode.

It's a slow explosion.

On Fri, 23 Apr 2021 23:10:03 +0100, Snit wrote:

On Apr 23, 2021 at 11:25:18 AM MST, "%" wrote
:

On 2021-04-23 10:40 a.m., Snit wrote:
On Apr 23, 2021 at 9:38:36 AM MST, "%" wrote
:

On 2021-04-23 9:22 a.m., Snit wrote:
On Apr 23, 2021 at 9:20:42 AM MST, "%" wrote
:

On 2021-04-23 9:13 a.m., Snit wrote:
On Apr 23, 2021 at 8:38:27 AM MST, "%" wrote
:

On 2021-04-22 8:19 p.m., Snit wrote:
On Apr 22, 2021 at 8:08:16 PM MST, "%" wrote
:

On 2021-04-22 7:40 p.m., Snit wrote:
On Apr 22, 2021 at 7:30:58 PM MST, "%" wrote
:

On 2021-04-22 6:03 p.m., Snit wrote:
On Apr 22, 2021 at 6:00:02 PM MST, "%" wrote
:

On 2021-04-22 12:46 p.m., Snit wrote:
On Apr 22, 2021 at 11:21:47 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

And that=E2=80=99s just as true of purported man made
climate change.

Its obvious that climate does change,
that=E2=80=99s obvious from
the ice ages etc, but its much less clear how much of the
change we have seen is man made. It
wasn=E2=80=99t that long ago
that most scientists were hyperventilating
about global cooling.

Yes, we can certainly measure a substantial
hike in atmospheric
CO2 levels, but its much less clear how much effect
that actually
has on world temperatures, let alone climate change.

It's bloody obvious to me. We know there used to
be more CO2 in
the air.
And the world was perfectly fine back then.

There has been no time in the history of man when
the CO2 levels
were as
high
as they are now.

Why does man have to be there?

Just a personal preference I prefer to not have man go
extinct... and am
none
too happy about man creating the current mass
extinction we are in.

one day our sun will blow up and all you know will be gone

I am working on travel plans before that.


you'll never get off the ground cause there won't be any

I'll grind it until it is ground.

you're an organ grinder

Only to those who really deserve it, and then I outsource the work.

do you have a coin snatching monkey

That's what she said.

its what you should've asked her

We asked each other.

that's very emotional

It was touching.

do you have a youtube of it we could make some money

I tried making some but the police said it was no good.

Vote Libertarian.

On Fri, 23 Apr 2021 18:40:27 +0100, Snit wrote:

On Apr 23, 2021 at 9:38:36 AM MST, "%" wrote
:

On 2021-04-23 9:22 a.m., Snit wrote:
On Apr 23, 2021 at 9:20:42 AM MST, "%" wrote
:

On 2021-04-23 9:13 a.m., Snit wrote:
On Apr 23, 2021 at 8:38:27 AM MST, "%" wrote
:

On 2021-04-22 8:19 p.m., Snit wrote:
On Apr 22, 2021 at 8:08:16 PM MST, "%" wrote
:

On 2021-04-22 7:40 p.m., Snit wrote:
On Apr 22, 2021 at 7:30:58 PM MST, "%" wrote
:

On 2021-04-22 6:03 p.m., Snit wrote:
On Apr 22, 2021 at 6:00:02 PM MST, "%" wrote
:

On 2021-04-22 12:46 p.m., Snit wrote:
On Apr 22, 2021 at 11:21:47 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

And that=E2=80=99s just as true of purported man made
climate change.

Its obvious that climate does change,
that=E2=80=99s obvious from
the ice ages etc, but its much less clear how much of the
change we have seen is man made. It
wasn=E2=80=99t that long ago
that most scientists were hyperventilating
about global cooling.

Yes, we can certainly measure a substantial
hike in atmospheric
CO2 levels, but its much less clear how much effect
that actually
has on world temperatures, let alone climate change.

It's bloody obvious to me. We know there used to
be more CO2 in
the air.
And the world was perfectly fine back then.

There has been no time in the history of man when
the CO2 levels
were as
high
as they are now.

Why does man have to be there?

Just a personal preference I prefer to not have man go
extinct... and am
none
too happy about man creating the current mass
extinction we are in.

one day our sun will blow up and all you know will be gone

I am working on travel plans before that.


you'll never get off the ground cause there won't be any

I'll grind it until it is ground.

you're an organ grinder

Only to those who really deserve it, and then I outsource the work.

do you have a coin snatching monkey

That's what she said.

its what you should've asked her

We asked each other.

that's very emotional

It was touching.

What was it touching?

"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
news
On Fri, 23 Apr 2021 21:02:43 +0100, Rod Speed
wrote:



"Snit" wrote in message
...
On Apr 23, 2021 at 10:55:17 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

On Wed, 21 Apr 2021 19:18:06 +0100, Snit
wrote:

On Apr 21, 2021 at 11:14:59 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

On Sun, 18 Apr 2021 00:45:22 +0100, Snit
wrote:

On Apr 17, 2021 at 4:34:04 PM MST, ""Rod Speed"" wrote
:



"Snit" wrote in message
...
On Apr 17, 2021 at 4:28:52 PM MST, ""Rod Speed"" wrote
:

Snit wrote
Commander Kinsey wrote
Snit wrote

research on reduction of abortions,

That's not science, that's morals.

If you want to reduce abortions, which most conservatives
claim to
want, there are known methods to do it. At least in American
the
Republican party (the more conservative of the two) rejects
every one of
these things. There "solution" is to deny women equal rights.

Abortion has nothing to do with equal rights.

Right. Denying people the right to one does.

Wrong, Nothing unequal about it.

Denying people equal rights ties into a conversation about equal
rights.
Don't
think people should have abortions -- then don't have one. And,
hey,
I want
to
see there be fewer, so let's back policy which is known to reduce
the
number.

WTF are you on about wanting to reduce the number? Are you saying
women
shouldn't be allowed to have them?

Women should... but I would like to see the need be reduced.

So this is nothing to do with abortions then. It's to do with you
wanting to brainwash women into behaving differently.

It is about giving them tools, educators, and choice.

They already have all of that and choose to kill their unborn children.

And so they should. Their children, not the state's children.

So its fine to kill the born children when they turn out to be a nuisance ?

You wouldn't have lasted long.

On Apr 28, 2021 at 11:36:08 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

On Fri, 23 Apr 2021 18:40:27 +0100, Snit wrote:

On Apr 23, 2021 at 9:38:36 AM MST, "%" wrote
:

On 2021-04-23 9:22 a.m., Snit wrote:
On Apr 23, 2021 at 9:20:42 AM MST, "%" wrote
:

On 2021-04-23 9:13 a.m., Snit wrote:
On Apr 23, 2021 at 8:38:27 AM MST, "%" wrote
:

On 2021-04-22 8:19 p.m., Snit wrote:
On Apr 22, 2021 at 8:08:16 PM MST, "%" wrote
:

On 2021-04-22 7:40 p.m., Snit wrote:
On Apr 22, 2021 at 7:30:58 PM MST, "%" wrote
:

On 2021-04-22 6:03 p.m., Snit wrote:
On Apr 22, 2021 at 6:00:02 PM MST, "%" wrote
:

On 2021-04-22 12:46 p.m., Snit wrote:
On Apr 22, 2021 at 11:21:47 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

And that=E2=80=99s just as true of purported man made
climate change.

Its obvious that climate does change,
that=E2=80=99s obvious from
the ice ages etc, but its much less clear how much of the
change we have seen is man made. It
wasn=E2=80=99t that long ago
that most scientists were hyperventilating
about global cooling.

Yes, we can certainly measure a substantial
hike in atmospheric
CO2 levels, but its much less clear how much effect
that actually
has on world temperatures, let alone climate change.

It's bloody obvious to me. We know there used to
be more CO2 in
the air.
And the world was perfectly fine back then.

There has been no time in the history of man when
the CO2 levels
were as
high
as they are now.

Why does man have to be there?

Just a personal preference I prefer to not have man go
extinct... and am
none
too happy about man creating the current mass
extinction we are in.

one day our sun will blow up and all you know will be gone

I am working on travel plans before that.


you'll never get off the ground cause there won't be any

I'll grind it until it is ground.

you're an organ grinder

Only to those who really deserve it, and then I outsource the work.

do you have a coin snatching monkey

That's what she said.

its what you should've asked her

We asked each other.

that's very emotional

It was touching.

What was it touching?

No comment.

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot
use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow
superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

On Apr 28, 2021 at 11:35:57 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

On Fri, 23 Apr 2021 23:10:03 +0100, Snit wrote:

On Apr 23, 2021 at 11:25:18 AM MST, "%" wrote
:

On 2021-04-23 10:40 a.m., Snit wrote:
On Apr 23, 2021 at 9:38:36 AM MST, "%" wrote
:

On 2021-04-23 9:22 a.m., Snit wrote:
On Apr 23, 2021 at 9:20:42 AM MST, "%" wrote
:

On 2021-04-23 9:13 a.m., Snit wrote:
On Apr 23, 2021 at 8:38:27 AM MST, "%" wrote
:

On 2021-04-22 8:19 p.m., Snit wrote:
On Apr 22, 2021 at 8:08:16 PM MST, "%" wrote
:

On 2021-04-22 7:40 p.m., Snit wrote:
On Apr 22, 2021 at 7:30:58 PM MST, "%" wrote
:

On 2021-04-22 6:03 p.m., Snit wrote:
On Apr 22, 2021 at 6:00:02 PM MST, "%" wrote
:

On 2021-04-22 12:46 p.m., Snit wrote:
On Apr 22, 2021 at 11:21:47 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

And that=E2=80=99s just as true of purported man made
climate change.

Its obvious that climate does change,
that=E2=80=99s obvious from
the ice ages etc, but its much less clear how much of the
change we have seen is man made. It
wasn=E2=80=99t that long ago
that most scientists were hyperventilating
about global cooling.

Yes, we can certainly measure a substantial
hike in atmospheric
CO2 levels, but its much less clear how much effect
that actually
has on world temperatures, let alone climate change.

It's bloody obvious to me. We know there used to
be more CO2 in
the air.
And the world was perfectly fine back then.

There has been no time in the history of man when
the CO2 levels
were as
high
as they are now.

Why does man have to be there?

Just a personal preference I prefer to not have man go
extinct... and am
none
too happy about man creating the current mass
extinction we are in.

one day our sun will blow up and all you know will be gone

I am working on travel plans before that.


you'll never get off the ground cause there won't be any

I'll grind it until it is ground.

you're an organ grinder

Only to those who really deserve it, and then I outsource the work.

do you have a coin snatching monkey

That's what she said.

its what you should've asked her

We asked each other.

that's very emotional

It was touching.

do you have a youtube of it we could make some money

I tried making some but the police said it was no good.

Vote Libertarian.

I prefer mature candidates.

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot
use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow
superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

On Apr 28, 2021 at 11:35:04 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

On Fri, 23 Apr 2021 12:35:52 +0100, FromTheRafters
wrote:

% formulated the question :
On 2021-04-22 12:46 p.m., Snit wrote:
On Apr 22, 2021 at 11:21:47 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

And that=E2=80=99s just as true of purported man made climate
change.
Its obvious that climate does change, that=E2=80=99s obvious from
the ice ages etc, but its much less clear how much of the
change we have seen is man made. It wasn=E2=80=99t that long ago
that most scientists were hyperventilating about global cooling.
Yes, we can certainly measure a substantial hike in atmospheric
CO2 levels, but its much less clear how much effect that actually
has on world temperatures, let alone climate change.
It's bloody obvious to me. We know there used to be more CO2 in
the air.
And the world was perfectly fine back then.
There has been no time in the history of man when the CO2 levels
were as
high
as they are now.

Why does man have to be there?

Just a personal preference I prefer to not have man go extinct... and am
none
too happy about man creating the current mass extinction we are in.

one day our sun will blow up and all you know will be gone

If by "blow up" you mean enter the Red Giant phase. Our Sun is not
likely to explode.

It's a slow explosion.

If we keep using solar and sucking all that energy from the sun who knows what
will happen!

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot
use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow
superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

On Apr 28, 2021 at 11:34:41 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

On Thu, 22 Apr 2021 20:46:21 +0100, Snit wrote:

On Apr 22, 2021 at 11:21:47 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

And that=E2=80=99s just as true of purported man made climate change.

Its obvious that climate does change, that=E2=80=99s obvious from
the ice ages etc, but its much less clear how much of the
change we have seen is man made. It wasn=E2=80=99t that long ago
that most scientists were hyperventilating about global cooling.

Yes, we can certainly measure a substantial hike in atmospheric
CO2 levels, but its much less clear how much effect that actually
has on world temperatures, let alone climate change.

It's bloody obvious to me. We know there used to be more CO2 in the air.
And the world was perfectly fine back then.

There has been no time in the history of man when the CO2 levels were as
high
as they are now.

Why does man have to be there?

Just a personal preference I prefer to not have man go extinct... and am
none
too happy about man creating the current mass extinction we are in.

Surely you know that's not what I meant.

Yes, you were trying to pretend that man's influence is not well understood
because in the past there were other times of high CO2, though there were
other reasons and none of the times it has been anywhere even near as high
have the changes happened so quickly.

You are working to push your intuition, based on faith, over the science.

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot
use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow
superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

On Wed, 28 Apr 2021 19:40:36 GMT, **** the git, the notorious,
troll-feeding, senile asshole, blathered again:


If we keep using solar and sucking all that energy from the sun who knows what
will happen!

If you KEEP sucking him off like that he we'll soon be all sore, you
passionate senile sucker of troll cock! BG

On Wed, 28 Apr 2021 19:41:40 GMT, **** the git, the notorious,
troll-feeding, senile asshole, blathered again:


Yes, you were trying to pretend that man's influence

What he's trying to achieve is to influence ANY senile asshole on these
groups to suck him off! So far he has been most lucky with YOU, senile
sucker of troll cock!

On Wed, 28 Apr 2021 19:40:08 GMT, **** the git, the notorious,
troll-feeding, senile asshole, blathered again:


I prefer mature candidates.

Whoda guessed! From what we could see you definitely prefer to suck off
immature ******s!

On Wed, 28 Apr 2021 19:39:50 GMT, **** the git, the notorious,
troll-feeding, senile asshole, blathered again:


What was it touching?

No comment.

Right, just be quiet and keep sucking, senile sucker of troll cock!

On Thu, 29 Apr 2021 05:34:52 +1000, cantankerous trolling geezer Rodent
Speed, the auto-contradicting senile sociopath, blabbered, again:

FLUSH the two subnormal sociopathic cretins' endless absolutely idiotic
blather

--
Another typical retarded conversation between our two village idiots,
Birdbrain and Rodent Speed:

Birdbrain: "You beat me to it. Plain sex is boring."

Senile Rodent: "Then **** the cats. That wont be boring."

Birdbrain: "Sell me a de-clawing tool first."

Senile Rodent: "Wont help with the teeth."

Birdbrain: "They've never gone for me with their mouths."

Rodent Speed: "They will if you are stupid enough to try ****ing them."

Birdbrain: "No, they always use claws."

Rodent Speed: "They wont if you try ****ing them. Try it and see."

Message-ID:

On 04/28/2021 12:35 PM, Commander Kinsey wrote:
Vote Libertarian.

In this country I only vote for the Libertarian as a 'none of the above'
statement. I may have left-libertarian tendencies but in the US the
capital L libertarians are right-libertarians.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/It_Usu..._with_Ayn_Rand

On Apr 28, 2021 at 8:44:12 PM MST, "rbowman" wrote
:

On 04/28/2021 12:35 PM, Commander Kinsey wrote:
Vote Libertarian.

In this country I only vote for the Libertarian as a 'none of the above'
statement. I may have left-libertarian tendencies but in the US the
capital L libertarians are right-libertarians.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/It_Usu..._with_Ayn_Rand

They pretend that conservative fiscal policies will lead to liberal social
results, as if the magic market is going to go contrary to profits to protect
human rights and the environment.

A great example of where they advertise this fact is a common Libertarian
piece of literature about a pencil.

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot
use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow
superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

On Wed, 28 Apr 2021 21:44:12 -0600, lowbrowwoman, the endlessly driveling,
troll-feeding, senile idiot, blabbered again:


In this country I only vote for the Libertarian

In this newsgroup you only suck troll cock (apart from your notorious
bull****ting and pathological gossiping), you abnormal senile blabbermouth!
BG

On Sat, 24 Apr 2021 20:38:04 +0100, Snit wrote:

On Apr 24, 2021 at 11:28:05 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

On Wed, 21 Apr 2021 19:43:06 +0100, Snit wrote:

On Apr 21, 2021 at 11:16:35 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

On Sun, 18 Apr 2021 17:54:15 +0100, Snit wrote:

On Apr 17, 2021 at 6:17:43 PM MST, "%" wrote
:

On 2021-04-17 3:50 p.m., Snit wrote:
On Apr 17, 2021 at 10:28:03 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:


...
Scientists are liberal because they want funding for free.

Scientists are liberal because the conservative mindset is to deny
evidence.
We can see this with COVID,

No, we just don't make such a fuss over a small thing. A thing that
kills 4
times less than cancer and 40 times less than the world population growth.

The idea that over half a million dead in America, and many more than that
around the world, and that is WITH some fairly significant precautions,
is a
"small thing" is an utter rejection of the facts.

man-made global climate change,

It was 1C here in Scotland a few days ago, in spring. There is no global
warming.

Denial of the fact from you. That is what I mean.

http://climate.nasa.gov

research on reduction of abortions,

That's not science, that's morals.

If you want to reduce abortions, which most conservatives claim to want,
there
are known methods to do it. At least in American the Republican party (the
more conservative of the two) rejects every one of these things. There
"solution" is to deny women equal rights.

and in some cases even things like evolution.

Evolution could take place if we let coronavirus kill off the weak.

Evolution IS taking place. And the more the virus spreads the more it
mutates
/ evolves.

well which is it

It is.

I wonder why nobody ever says just "It's". For example:
John: "That engine's not running right."
Steve: "It's."

Language is weird. Heck, how do you think people generally pronounce the
word
"can't".

Without the t. So it sounds more like "can".

https://youtu.be/6bszZZlvj4E

Just weird.

No. There are two differences for anyone who speaks English properly (as in
everyone outside the US). It's "cann" or "carnt". Not "cayan" or "cayant".

These are UK samples: https://youtu.be/dGnBi6giZw0

He is saying CARNT. Don't tell me American ears are screwed up? Maybe that's why you speak funny.

On Sat, 24 Apr 2021 22:37:30 +0100, % wrote:

On 2021-04-24 12:38 p.m., Snit wrote:
On Apr 24, 2021 at 11:28:05 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

On Wed, 21 Apr 2021 19:43:06 +0100, Snit wrote:

On Apr 21, 2021 at 11:16:35 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

On Sun, 18 Apr 2021 17:54:15 +0100, Snit wrote:

On Apr 17, 2021 at 6:17:43 PM MST, "%" wrote
:

On 2021-04-17 3:50 p.m., Snit wrote:
On Apr 17, 2021 at 10:28:03 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:


...
Scientists are liberal because they want funding for free.

Scientists are liberal because the conservative mindset is to deny
evidence.
We can see this with COVID,

No, we just don't make such a fuss over a small thing. A thing that
kills 4
times less than cancer and 40 times less than the world population growth.

The idea that over half a million dead in America, and many more than that
around the world, and that is WITH some fairly significant precautions,
is a
"small thing" is an utter rejection of the facts.

man-made global climate change,

It was 1C here in Scotland a few days ago, in spring. There is no global
warming.

Denial of the fact from you. That is what I mean.

http://climate.nasa.gov

research on reduction of abortions,

That's not science, that's morals.

If you want to reduce abortions, which most conservatives claim to want,
there
are known methods to do it. At least in American the Republican party (the
more conservative of the two) rejects every one of these things. There
"solution" is to deny women equal rights.

and in some cases even things like evolution.

Evolution could take place if we let coronavirus kill off the weak.

Evolution IS taking place. And the more the virus spreads the more it
mutates
/ evolves.

well which is it

It is.

I wonder why nobody ever says just "It's". For example:
John: "That engine's not running right."
Steve: "It's."

Language is weird. Heck, how do you think people generally pronounce the
word
"can't".

Without the t. So it sounds more like "can".

https://youtu.be/6bszZZlvj4E

Just weird.

No. There are two differences for anyone who speaks English properly (as in
everyone outside the US). It's "cann" or "carnt". Not "cayan" or "cayant".

These are UK samples: https://youtu.be/dGnBi6giZw0

is this the line for the free soup

Well Snit is a radical left winger, so yes, everything is magically free.

On Sun, 25 Apr 2021 19:47:48 +0100, Snit wrote:

On Apr 25, 2021 at 11:46:00 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

Irrelevant if it kills those or not. And they can hide indoors.

The point is we should let it kill off any younger folk that it can, as
they're the weaker ones.

As you call for these deaths wby don't you volunteer? Set an example?

I am, by not wearing a mask.

Go get the disease.

It's too unlikely to worry about, and if I got it, chances are I wouldn't even get symptoms. What a fuss about nothing. The whole world has turned into a bunchy of pathetic pansies. Except locally, about 80-90% of people I see are not bothering with masks or social distancing, and haven't for the whole year.

On Sun, 25 Apr 2021 19:49:39 +0100, Snit wrote:

On Apr 25, 2021 at 11:43:52 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

Grossly overreacting was therefore a trait that needed removing for the
next generation.

Nope because it means they do much better with the
non pandemic infections and don't have to bother to
wash their hands all the time and can get away with
doing what is more convenient like not throwing
away food that has had a fly walk on it etc etc etc.

Having a trait that makes you better at 9 things but worse at another,
getting you killed, is not a good trait to have. Say you could do
calculations twice as fast, you could sing perfect pitch, you could do 1000
pushups, but the sight of a car made you spontaneously combust. That would
not be a good thing to have. By your reasoning, you would be called
superior, and have a hired help to warn you of approaching cars.

You have no right to say who should not be saved.

You have no right to intervene in evolution and keep the worthless alive.

On Sun, 25 Apr 2021 20:14:27 +0100, Snit wrote:

On Apr 25, 2021 at 11:57:58 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

On Sun, 25 Apr 2021 00:03:02 +0100, rbowman wrote:

On 04/24/2021 12:30 PM, Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Thu, 22 Apr 2021 16:01:42 +0100, Snit wrote:

On Apr 22, 2021 at 3:16:17 AM MST, ""Rod Speed"" wrote
:

I wonder why nobody ever says just "It's". For example:
John: "That engine's not running right."
Steve: "It's."

Language is weird. Heck, how do you think people generally
pronounce
the word
"can't".

Without the t. So it sounds more like "can".
https://youtu.be/6bszZZlvj4E

You bugger. Bet I will focus on that
bloody word every time its used now.

Just watched the first ep of the Manson tapes and didn=E2=80=99t.

Corse that might just be because it is so ****ing bizarre.

I have caught it in some speech I hear.

Have a friend who insists it just cannot be true. I talk to her on
Zoom -- she
has agreed to let me record her without her knowing (at the time) and
then see
how SHE sounds). She insists she ALWAYS pronounced the T. Will be
interesting
to find out.

Yanks can't even pronounce herb with the H.

As in Herbert Marcuse? I had a kid's book that was in an Indian setting.
The medicine man was named Herb Gatherer but it took a while for my
epiphany that his first name wasn't Herbert.

I can't remember the title but I'm certain it would appall the modern
generation with its stereotyping and cultural appropriation. I thought
it was pretty neat and read it several times.

Stereotypes get there for a reason.

Such as the stereotypes of libertarians?

Ambiguous sentence. Do you mean the stereotype people have of them, or the ones Libertarians have of others?

On Apr 29, 2021 at 12:37:25 PM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

As in Herbert Marcuse? I had a kid's book that was in an Indian setting.
The medicine man was named Herb Gatherer but it took a while for my
epiphany that his first name wasn't Herbert.

I can't remember the title but I'm certain it would appall the modern
generation with its stereotyping and cultural appropriation. I thought
it was pretty neat and read it several times.

Stereotypes get there for a reason.

Such as the stereotypes of libertarians?

Ambiguous sentence. Do you mean the stereotype people have of them, or the
ones Libertarians have of others?

The ones people have of Libertarians... though I suppose it works both ways.

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot
use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow
superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

On Apr 29, 2021 at 12:35:52 PM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

On Sun, 25 Apr 2021 19:49:39 +0100, Snit wrote:

On Apr 25, 2021 at 11:43:52 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

Grossly overreacting was therefore a trait that needed removing for the
next generation.

Nope because it means they do much better with the
non pandemic infections and don't have to bother to
wash their hands all the time and can get away with
doing what is more convenient like not throwing
away food that has had a fly walk on it etc etc etc.

Having a trait that makes you better at 9 things but worse at another,
getting you killed, is not a good trait to have. Say you could do
calculations twice as fast, you could sing perfect pitch, you could do 1000
pushups, but the sight of a car made you spontaneously combust. That would
not be a good thing to have. By your reasoning, you would be called
superior, and have a hired help to warn you of approaching cars.

You have no right to say who should not be saved.

You have no right to intervene in evolution and keep the worthless alive.

Back to your deserted island you go.

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot
use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow
superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

On Apr 29, 2021 at 12:35:20 PM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

On Sun, 25 Apr 2021 19:47:48 +0100, Snit wrote:

On Apr 25, 2021 at 11:46:00 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

Irrelevant if it kills those or not. And they can hide indoors.

The point is we should let it kill off any younger folk that it can, as
they're the weaker ones.

As you call for these deaths wby don't you volunteer? Set an example?

I am, by not wearing a mask.

Go get the disease.

It's too unlikely to worry about, and if I got it, chances are I wouldn't
even get symptoms. What a fuss about nothing. The whole world has turned
into a bunchy of pathetic pansies. Except locally, about 80-90% of people I
see are not bothering with masks or social distancing, and haven't for the
whole year.

You says turned into as if this is the first pandemic.

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot
use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow
superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.