On Apr 23, 2021 at 9:20:42 AM MST, "%" wrote
:

On 2021-04-23 9:13 a.m., Snit wrote:
On Apr 23, 2021 at 8:38:27 AM MST, "%" wrote
:

On 2021-04-22 8:19 p.m., Snit wrote:
On Apr 22, 2021 at 8:08:16 PM MST, "%" wrote
:

On 2021-04-22 7:40 p.m., Snit wrote:
On Apr 22, 2021 at 7:30:58 PM MST, "%" wrote
:

On 2021-04-22 6:03 p.m., Snit wrote:
On Apr 22, 2021 at 6:00:02 PM MST, "%" wrote
:

On 2021-04-22 12:46 p.m., Snit wrote:
On Apr 22, 2021 at 11:21:47 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

And that=E2=80=99s just as true of purported man made
climate change.

Its obvious that climate does change,
that=E2=80=99s obvious from
the ice ages etc, but its much less clear how much of the
change we have seen is man made. It wasn=E2=80=99t that long ago
that most scientists were hyperventilating about global cooling.

Yes, we can certainly measure a substantial hike in atmospheric
CO2 levels, but its much less clear how much effect
that actually
has on world temperatures, let alone climate change.

It's bloody obvious to me. We know there used to be more CO2 in
the air.
And the world was perfectly fine back then.

There has been no time in the history of man when the CO2 levels
were as
high
as they are now.

Why does man have to be there?

Just a personal preference I prefer to not have man go
extinct... and am
none
too happy about man creating the current mass extinction we are in.

one day our sun will blow up and all you know will be gone

I am working on travel plans before that.


you'll never get off the ground cause there won't be any

I'll grind it until it is ground.

you're an organ grinder

Only to those who really deserve it, and then I outsource the work.

do you have a coin snatching monkey

That's what she said.

its what you should've asked her

We asked each other.

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot
use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow
superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

On 2021-04-23 9:22 a.m., Snit wrote:
On Apr 23, 2021 at 9:20:42 AM MST, "%" wrote
:

On 2021-04-23 9:13 a.m., Snit wrote:
On Apr 23, 2021 at 8:38:27 AM MST, "%" wrote
:

On 2021-04-22 8:19 p.m., Snit wrote:
On Apr 22, 2021 at 8:08:16 PM MST, "%" wrote
:

On 2021-04-22 7:40 p.m., Snit wrote:
On Apr 22, 2021 at 7:30:58 PM MST, "%" wrote
:

On 2021-04-22 6:03 p.m., Snit wrote:
On Apr 22, 2021 at 6:00:02 PM MST, "%" wrote
:

On 2021-04-22 12:46 p.m., Snit wrote:
On Apr 22, 2021 at 11:21:47 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

And that=E2=80=99s just as true of purported man made
climate change.

Its obvious that climate does change,
that=E2=80=99s obvious from
the ice ages etc, but its much less clear how much of the
change we have seen is man made. It wasn=E2=80=99t that long ago
that most scientists were hyperventilating about global cooling.

Yes, we can certainly measure a substantial hike in atmospheric
CO2 levels, but its much less clear how much effect
that actually
has on world temperatures, let alone climate change.

It's bloody obvious to me. We know there used to be more CO2 in
the air.
And the world was perfectly fine back then.

There has been no time in the history of man when the CO2 levels
were as
high
as they are now.

Why does man have to be there?

Just a personal preference I prefer to not have man go
extinct... and am
none
too happy about man creating the current mass extinction we are in.

one day our sun will blow up and all you know will be gone

I am working on travel plans before that.


you'll never get off the ground cause there won't be any

I'll grind it until it is ground.

you're an organ grinder

Only to those who really deserve it, and then I outsource the work.

do you have a coin snatching monkey

That's what she said.

its what you should've asked her

We asked each other.

that's very emotional

On Apr 23, 2021 at 9:38:36 AM MST, "%" wrote
:

On 2021-04-23 9:22 a.m., Snit wrote:
On Apr 23, 2021 at 9:20:42 AM MST, "%" wrote
:

On 2021-04-23 9:13 a.m., Snit wrote:
On Apr 23, 2021 at 8:38:27 AM MST, "%" wrote
:

On 2021-04-22 8:19 p.m., Snit wrote:
On Apr 22, 2021 at 8:08:16 PM MST, "%" wrote
:

On 2021-04-22 7:40 p.m., Snit wrote:
On Apr 22, 2021 at 7:30:58 PM MST, "%" wrote
:

On 2021-04-22 6:03 p.m., Snit wrote:
On Apr 22, 2021 at 6:00:02 PM MST, "%" wrote
:

On 2021-04-22 12:46 p.m., Snit wrote:
On Apr 22, 2021 at 11:21:47 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

And that=E2=80=99s just as true of purported man made
climate change.

Its obvious that climate does change,
that=E2=80=99s obvious from
the ice ages etc, but its much less clear how much of the
change we have seen is man made. It
wasn=E2=80=99t that long ago
that most scientists were hyperventilating
about global cooling.

Yes, we can certainly measure a substantial
hike in atmospheric
CO2 levels, but its much less clear how much effect
that actually
has on world temperatures, let alone climate change.

It's bloody obvious to me. We know there used to
be more CO2 in
the air.
And the world was perfectly fine back then.

There has been no time in the history of man when
the CO2 levels
were as
high
as they are now.

Why does man have to be there?

Just a personal preference I prefer to not have man go
extinct... and am
none
too happy about man creating the current mass
extinction we are in.

one day our sun will blow up and all you know will be gone

I am working on travel plans before that.


you'll never get off the ground cause there won't be any

I'll grind it until it is ground.

you're an organ grinder

Only to those who really deserve it, and then I outsource the work.

do you have a coin snatching monkey

That's what she said.

its what you should've asked her

We asked each other.

that's very emotional

It was touching.

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot
use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow
superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

On Tue, 20 Apr 2021 19:44:53 +0100, Rod Speed wrote:



"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
news
On Sat, 17 Apr 2021 20:34:32 +0100, Rod Speed
wrote:



"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
news On Fri, 16 Apr 2021 19:10:05 +0100, Snit
wrote:

On Apr 16, 2021 at 10:59:28 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

On Thu, 15 Apr 2021 21:15:17 +0100, Snit
wrote:

On Apr 15, 2021 at 11:02:15 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

On Wed, 14 Apr 2021 19:12:00 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:

Commander Kinsey wrote

Another account must be made so they don't get the last word in.
The
silliest thing I got banned for was saying the word "damn". And
not even
in a rude way, probably something like "the damn weather is
awful
today".
Turns out the admin was a religious nutter.

Yeah, I got the same thing from another religious nutter for
using the term "hell of a lot", not a moderator in that case.

You have to wonder how far we would be today if religion had not
impeded
science.

Until a few hundred years ago there was not much of a split.

In English please.

The two have a history that is tied together.

I doubt it.

Its true anyway.

Religion did not help science.

Yes it did, if only because a lot of the professionally religious
had a lot time on their hands that allowed them to do science.

Just because some scientists were religious means nothing.

In earlier times it was in fact almost all of them.

If there had been no religion, those same people would still have become
scientists.

Nope, they wouldn't have been in religious institutions with
a lot of time on their hands as parasites on the community.

Mendel would have had to get off his lard arse and earn a living.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gregor...ife_and_career

Inventing things is a living.

He would have got the same food and accommodation
if he had just grovelled to some god or other instead
of doing something useful.

Einstein managed to earn money as a patent clerk, and invent ****.

On Tue, 20 Apr 2021 20:02:12 +0100, Snit wrote:

On Apr 20, 2021 at 11:20:45 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

On Sat, 17 Apr 2021 05:23:56 +0100, Snit wrote:

On Apr 16, 2021 at 9:01:57 PM MST, ""Rod Speed"" wrote
:

Snit wrote
Rod Speed wrote
Snit wrote
Rod Speed wrote
Snit wrote
Rod Speed wrote

What matters is the evidence with science, not individuals.

Correct: though the experts will generally side with the evidence
(if they did not they would not be the experts!)

Problem is that the evidence changes, particularly with the
recent less than predicted rate of world temperature change.

Do you mean the hand picked specific areas where it was less even as
the world beat the predictions?

Nope, the world as a whole didn=E2=80=99t beat predictions.

Would love to see the peer reviewed research you are referring to.

You're the one that needs to provide that
given you claim it exceeded predictions.

You have no research to back your claims, nor scientific sites. OK. That
is
what I figured.

You have no research

Countered by the evidence provided.

If you want to have a conversation, fine, but I am not interested in you
making insane claims you cannot back and then ignoring the fact evidence has
been provided. If you ACTUALLY want to learn about man-made global climate
change this is a good place to start:

http://climate.nasa.gov

A government website is the last place to go for facts.

Do you have a more reputable site to get info on man-made global climate
change? if so please share.

Looking out of my window.

On Tue, 20 Apr 2021 22:20:13 +0100, Rod Speed wrote:



"Snit" wrote in message
...
On Apr 20, 2021 at 1:03:55 PM MST, ""Rod Speed"" wrote
:



"Snit" wrote in message
...
On Apr 20, 2021 at 11:20:45 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

On Sat, 17 Apr 2021 05:23:56 +0100, Snit
wrote:

On Apr 16, 2021 at 9:01:57 PM MST, ""Rod Speed"" wrote
:

Snit wrote
Rod Speed wrote
Snit wrote
Rod Speed wrote
Snit wrote
Rod Speed wrote

What matters is the evidence with science, not
individuals.

Correct: though the experts will generally side with the
evidence
(if they did not they would not be the experts!)

Problem is that the evidence changes, particularly with the
recent less than predicted rate of world temperature
change.

Do you mean the hand picked specific areas where it was less
even as
the world beat the predictions?

Nope, the world as a whole didn=E2=80=99t beat predictions.

Would love to see the peer reviewed research you are referring
to.

You're the one that needs to provide that
given you claim it exceeded predictions.

You have no research to back your claims, nor scientific sites.
OK. That
is
what I figured.

You have no research

Countered by the evidence provided.

If you want to have a conversation, fine, but I am not interested in
you
making insane claims you cannot back and then ignoring the fact
evidence has
been provided. If you ACTUALLY want to learn about man-made global
climate
change this is a good place to start:

http://climate.nasa.gov

A government website is the last place to go for facts.

Do you have a more reputable site to get info on man-made global
climate
change? if so please share.

It isnt about reputable, its about the evidence presented with science.

Peer reviewed studies.

Reviewed by other MMCC cult members...

A cult, yes that's a good way of describing it. Or perhaps a religion. "This must be so, so let's find ways to "prove" it".

On Wed, 21 Apr 2021 05:54:57 +0100, Snit wrote:

On Apr 20, 2021 at 8:47:23 PM MST, ""Rod Speed"" wrote
:

Some gutless ****wit troll desperately cowering behind
"Snit" repetitively ****ted
the same mindless troll**** and lies as it always does when
its got done like a ****ing dinner, as it always is.

What you snipped:
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Again, I look to peer reviewed papers (and not just hand picking but a wide
range if I am interested in a topic), scientific sites, fact checkers, top
experts and organizations, etc.

You find this to be a bad thing and say that ties me to a cult. We do not see
eye-to-eye. So what?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Sad your frustration at not being able to answer this question led you to lash
out so immaturely.

I hope you do better next time.

If you wanted to say god existed, you could come up with "evidence" for that too. Doesn't mean he exists.

On Wed, 21 Apr 2021 06:05:23 +0100, Rod Speed wrote:

Some gutless ****wit troll desperately cowering behind
"Snit" repetitively ****ted
the same mindless troll**** and lies as it always does when
its got done like a ****ing dinner, as it always is.

Tedious, isn't he?

On Wed, 21 Apr 2021 19:18:06 +0100, Snit wrote:

On Apr 21, 2021 at 11:14:59 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

On Sun, 18 Apr 2021 00:45:22 +0100, Snit wrote:

On Apr 17, 2021 at 4:34:04 PM MST, ""Rod Speed"" wrote
:



"Snit" wrote in message
...
On Apr 17, 2021 at 4:28:52 PM MST, ""Rod Speed"" wrote
:

Snit wrote
Commander Kinsey wrote
Snit wrote

research on reduction of abortions,

That's not science, that's morals.

If you want to reduce abortions, which most conservatives claim to
want, there are known methods to do it. At least in American the
Republican party (the more conservative of the two) rejects every one of
these things. There "solution" is to deny women equal rights.

Abortion has nothing to do with equal rights.

Right. Denying people the right to one does.

Wrong, Nothing unequal about it.

Denying people equal rights ties into a conversation about equal rights.
Don't
think people should have abortions -- then don't have one. And, hey, I want
to
see there be fewer, so let's back policy which is known to reduce the
number.

WTF are you on about wanting to reduce the number? Are you saying women
shouldn't be allowed to have them?

Women should... but I would like to see the need be reduced.

So this is nothing to do with abortions then. It's to do with you wanting to brainwash women into behaving differently.

On Apr 23, 2021 at 10:51:58 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

On Tue, 20 Apr 2021 20:02:12 +0100, Snit wrote:

On Apr 20, 2021 at 11:20:45 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

On Sat, 17 Apr 2021 05:23:56 +0100, Snit wrote:

On Apr 16, 2021 at 9:01:57 PM MST, ""Rod Speed"" wrote
:

Snit wrote
Rod Speed wrote
Snit wrote
Rod Speed wrote
Snit wrote
Rod Speed wrote

What matters is the evidence with science, not individuals.

Correct: though the experts will generally side with the evidence
(if they did not they would not be the experts!)

Problem is that the evidence changes, particularly with the
recent less than predicted rate of world temperature change.

Do you mean the hand picked specific areas where it was less even as
the world beat the predictions?

Nope, the world as a whole didn=E2=80=99t beat predictions.

Would love to see the peer reviewed research you are referring to.

You're the one that needs to provide that
given you claim it exceeded predictions.

You have no research to back your claims, nor scientific sites. OK. That
is
what I figured.

You have no research

Countered by the evidence provided.

If you want to have a conversation, fine, but I am not interested in you
making insane claims you cannot back and then ignoring the fact evidence
has
been provided. If you ACTUALLY want to learn about man-made global climate
change this is a good place to start:

http://climate.nasa.gov

A government website is the last place to go for facts.

Do you have a more reputable site to get info on man-made global climate
change? if so please share.

Looking out of my window.

A simple "no" would have done. You have an unsupported intuition.

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot
use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow
superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

On Apr 23, 2021 at 10:55:17 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

On Wed, 21 Apr 2021 19:18:06 +0100, Snit wrote:

On Apr 21, 2021 at 11:14:59 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

On Sun, 18 Apr 2021 00:45:22 +0100, Snit wrote:

On Apr 17, 2021 at 4:34:04 PM MST, ""Rod Speed"" wrote
:



"Snit" wrote in message
...
On Apr 17, 2021 at 4:28:52 PM MST, ""Rod Speed"" wrote
:

Snit wrote
Commander Kinsey wrote
Snit wrote

research on reduction of abortions,

That's not science, that's morals.

If you want to reduce abortions, which most conservatives claim to
want, there are known methods to do it. At least in American the
Republican party (the more conservative of the two) rejects every one of
these things. There "solution" is to deny women equal rights.

Abortion has nothing to do with equal rights.

Right. Denying people the right to one does.

Wrong, Nothing unequal about it.

Denying people equal rights ties into a conversation about equal rights.
Don't
think people should have abortions -- then don't have one. And, hey, I want
to
see there be fewer, so let's back policy which is known to reduce the
number.

WTF are you on about wanting to reduce the number? Are you saying women
shouldn't be allowed to have them?

Women should... but I would like to see the need be reduced.

So this is nothing to do with abortions then. It's to do with you wanting to
brainwash women into behaving differently.

It is about giving them tools, educators, and choice.

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot
use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow
superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

On Apr 23, 2021 at 10:54:38 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

On Wed, 21 Apr 2021 06:05:23 +0100, Rod Speed
wrote:

Some gutless ****wit troll desperately cowering behind
"Snit" repetitively ****ted
the same mindless troll**** and lies as it always does when
its got done like a ****ing dinner, as it always is.

Tedious, isn't he?

What Rod Speed ran from:
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Again, I look to peer reviewed papers (and not just hand picking but a wide
range if I am interested in a topic), scientific sites, fact checkers, top
experts and organizations, etc.

You find this to be a bad thing and say that ties me to a cult. We do not see
eye-to-eye. So what?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I find it amusing how offended some are by that.

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot
use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow
superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

On Apr 23, 2021 at 10:54:25 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

On Wed, 21 Apr 2021 05:54:57 +0100, Snit wrote:

On Apr 20, 2021 at 8:47:23 PM MST, ""Rod Speed"" wrote
:

Some gutless ****wit troll desperately cowering behind
"Snit" repetitively ****ted
the same mindless troll**** and lies as it always does when
its got done like a ****ing dinner, as it always is.

What you snipped:
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Again, I look to peer reviewed papers (and not just hand picking but a wide
range if I am interested in a topic), scientific sites, fact checkers, top
experts and organizations, etc.

You find this to be a bad thing and say that ties me to a cult. We do not
see
eye-to-eye. So what?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Sad your frustration at not being able to answer this question led you to
lash
out so immaturely.

I hope you do better next time.

If you wanted to say god existed, you could come up with "evidence" for that
too.

Well, god does exist -- as a concept (or set of concepts).

Doesn't mean he exists.

Can you point to the peer reviewed papers that back the idea of a deity?
Scientific sites? Fact checkers?

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot
use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow
superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

On Apr 23, 2021 at 10:52:56 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

On Tue, 20 Apr 2021 22:20:13 +0100, Rod Speed
wrote:



"Snit" wrote in message
...
On Apr 20, 2021 at 1:03:55 PM MST, ""Rod Speed"" wrote
:



"Snit" wrote in message
...
On Apr 20, 2021 at 11:20:45 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

On Sat, 17 Apr 2021 05:23:56 +0100, Snit
wrote:

On Apr 16, 2021 at 9:01:57 PM MST, ""Rod Speed"" wrote
:

Snit wrote
Rod Speed wrote
Snit wrote
Rod Speed wrote
Snit wrote
Rod Speed wrote

What matters is the evidence with science, not
individuals.

Correct: though the experts will generally side with the
evidence
(if they did not they would not be the experts!)

Problem is that the evidence changes, particularly with the
recent less than predicted rate of world temperature
change.

Do you mean the hand picked specific areas where it was less
even as
the world beat the predictions?

Nope, the world as a whole didn=E2=80=99t beat predictions.

Would love to see the peer reviewed research you are referring
to.

You're the one that needs to provide that
given you claim it exceeded predictions.

You have no research to back your claims, nor scientific sites.
OK. That
is
what I figured.

You have no research

Countered by the evidence provided.

If you want to have a conversation, fine, but I am not interested in
you
making insane claims you cannot back and then ignoring the fact
evidence has
been provided. If you ACTUALLY want to learn about man-made global
climate
change this is a good place to start:

http://climate.nasa.gov

A government website is the last place to go for facts.

Do you have a more reputable site to get info on man-made global
climate
change? if so please share.

It isnt about reputable, its about the evidence presented with science.

Peer reviewed studies.

Reviewed by other MMCC cult members...

A cult, yes that's a good way of describing it. Or perhaps a religion.
"This must be so, so let's find ways to "prove" it".

If one can disprove a going top theory one gets lots of recognition in
science. Does not mean there is no friction to stop such, but overall look at
the famous scientists -- each and every one proposed new ways to see things.

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot
use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow
superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

On Fri, 23 Apr 2021 18:08:03 GMT, **** the git, the notorious,
troll-feeding, senile asshole, blathered again:



It is about giving them tools, educators, and choice.

You just can't wait to suck the unwashed Scottish ****** off, time and
again, eh, senile ****? BG

On Fri, 23 Apr 2021 18:10:51 GMT, **** the git, the notorious,
troll-feeding, senile asshole, blathered again:


If one can disprove a going

I disapprove of your sucking off the unwashed trolling ******'s unwashed
cock, time and again, **** the Git, you dedicated senile sucker of troll
cock!

On Fri, 23 Apr 2021 18:07:36 GMT, **** the git, the notorious,
troll-feeding, senile asshole, blathered again:


A simple "no" would have done.

If YOU only could say "no" to the unwashed trolling ******'s cock, **** the
Git!

fOn Fri, 23 Apr 2021 18:08:55 GMT, **** the git, the notorious,
troll-feeding, senile asshole, blathered again:


What Rod Speed ran from:

What YOU run after, **** the Git: every unwashed troll's cock!

On Fri, 23 Apr 2021 18:09:55 GMT, **** the git, the notorious,
troll-feeding, senile asshole, blathered again:


Can you point to the peer reviewed papers that back the idea of a deity?
Scientific sites? Fact checkers?

Well, he can troll you some more and make you suck him off some more! Wanna
bet, senile sucker of troll cock? BG

On 2021-04-23 10:40 a.m., Snit wrote:
On Apr 23, 2021 at 9:38:36 AM MST, "%" wrote
:

On 2021-04-23 9:22 a.m., Snit wrote:
On Apr 23, 2021 at 9:20:42 AM MST, "%" wrote
:

On 2021-04-23 9:13 a.m., Snit wrote:
On Apr 23, 2021 at 8:38:27 AM MST, "%" wrote
:

On 2021-04-22 8:19 p.m., Snit wrote:
On Apr 22, 2021 at 8:08:16 PM MST, "%" wrote
:

On 2021-04-22 7:40 p.m., Snit wrote:
On Apr 22, 2021 at 7:30:58 PM MST, "%" wrote
:

On 2021-04-22 6:03 p.m., Snit wrote:
On Apr 22, 2021 at 6:00:02 PM MST, "%" wrote
:

On 2021-04-22 12:46 p.m., Snit wrote:
On Apr 22, 2021 at 11:21:47 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

And that=E2=80=99s just as true of purported man made
climate change.

Its obvious that climate does change,
that=E2=80=99s obvious from
the ice ages etc, but its much less clear how much of the
change we have seen is man made. It
wasn=E2=80=99t that long ago
that most scientists were hyperventilating
about global cooling.

Yes, we can certainly measure a substantial
hike in atmospheric
CO2 levels, but its much less clear how much effect
that actually
has on world temperatures, let alone climate change.

It's bloody obvious to me. We know there used to
be more CO2 in
the air.
And the world was perfectly fine back then.

There has been no time in the history of man when
the CO2 levels
were as
high
as they are now.

Why does man have to be there?

Just a personal preference I prefer to not have man go
extinct... and am
none
too happy about man creating the current mass
extinction we are in.

one day our sun will blow up and all you know will be gone

I am working on travel plans before that.


you'll never get off the ground cause there won't be any

I'll grind it until it is ground.

you're an organ grinder

Only to those who really deserve it, and then I outsource the work.

do you have a coin snatching monkey

That's what she said.

its what you should've asked her

We asked each other.

that's very emotional

It was touching.

do you have a youtube of it we could make some money

"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
news
On Tue, 20 Apr 2021 19:44:53 +0100, Rod Speed
wrote:



"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
news
On Sat, 17 Apr 2021 20:34:32 +0100, Rod Speed
wrote:



"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
news On Fri, 16 Apr 2021 19:10:05 +0100, Snit
wrote:

On Apr 16, 2021 at 10:59:28 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

On Thu, 15 Apr 2021 21:15:17 +0100, Snit
wrote:

On Apr 15, 2021 at 11:02:15 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

On Wed, 14 Apr 2021 19:12:00 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:

Commander Kinsey wrote

Another account must be made so they don't get the last word
in.
The
silliest thing I got banned for was saying the word "damn".
And
not even
in a rude way, probably something like "the damn weather is
awful
today".
Turns out the admin was a religious nutter.

Yeah, I got the same thing from another religious nutter for
using the term "hell of a lot", not a moderator in that case.

You have to wonder how far we would be today if religion had not
impeded
science.

Until a few hundred years ago there was not much of a split.

In English please.

The two have a history that is tied together.

I doubt it.

Its true anyway.

Religion did not help science.

Yes it did, if only because a lot of the professionally religious
had a lot time on their hands that allowed them to do science.

Just because some scientists were religious means nothing.

In earlier times it was in fact almost all of them.

If there had been no religion, those same people would still have
become
scientists.

Nope, they wouldn't have been in religious institutions with
a lot of time on their hands as parasites on the community.

Mendel would have had to get off his lard arse and earn a living.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gregor...ife_and_career

Inventing things is a living.

He would have got the same food and accommodation
if he had just grovelled to some god or other instead
of doing something useful.

Einstein managed to earn money as a patent clerk, and invent ****.

He didn't actually invent anything much when he was a patent
clerk and was stupid enough to believe in some god too.

"Snit" wrote in message
...
On Apr 23, 2021 at 10:55:17 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

On Wed, 21 Apr 2021 19:18:06 +0100, Snit
wrote:

On Apr 21, 2021 at 11:14:59 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

On Sun, 18 Apr 2021 00:45:22 +0100, Snit
wrote:

On Apr 17, 2021 at 4:34:04 PM MST, ""Rod Speed"" wrote
:



"Snit" wrote in message
...
On Apr 17, 2021 at 4:28:52 PM MST, ""Rod Speed"" wrote
:

Snit wrote
Commander Kinsey wrote
Snit wrote

research on reduction of abortions,

That's not science, that's morals.

If you want to reduce abortions, which most conservatives
claim to
want, there are known methods to do it. At least in American
the
Republican party (the more conservative of the two) rejects
every one of
these things. There "solution" is to deny women equal rights.

Abortion has nothing to do with equal rights.

Right. Denying people the right to one does.

Wrong, Nothing unequal about it.

Denying people equal rights ties into a conversation about equal
rights.
Don't
think people should have abortions -- then don't have one. And, hey,
I want
to
see there be fewer, so let's back policy which is known to reduce
the
number.

WTF are you on about wanting to reduce the number? Are you saying
women
shouldn't be allowed to have them?

Women should... but I would like to see the need be reduced.

So this is nothing to do with abortions then. It's to do with you
wanting to
brainwash women into behaving differently.

It is about giving them tools, educators, and choice.

They already have all of that and choose to kill their unborn children.

"Snit" wrote in message
...
On Apr 23, 2021 at 10:54:38 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

On Wed, 21 Apr 2021 06:05:23 +0100, Rod Speed
wrote:

Some gutless ****wit troll desperately cowering behind
"Snit" repetitively ****ted
the same mindless troll**** and lies as it always does when
its got done like a ****ing dinner, as it always is.

Tedious, isn't he?

What Rod Speed ran from:

More of you lies, that troll**** is what I flushed, repeatedly.

On Sat, 24 Apr 2021 06:00:20 +1000, cantankerous trolling geezer Rodent
Speed, the auto-contradicting senile sociopath, blabbered, again:

FLUSH the two subnormal sociopathic cretins' endless absolutely idiotic
blather

--
Another typical retarded conversation between our two village idiots,
Birdbrain and Rodent Speed:

Birdbrain: "You beat me to it. Plain sex is boring."

Senile Rodent: "Then **** the cats. That wont be boring."

Birdbrain: "Sell me a de-clawing tool first."

Senile Rodent: "Wont help with the teeth."

Birdbrain: "They've never gone for me with their mouths."

Rodent Speed: "They will if you are stupid enough to try ****ing them."

Birdbrain: "No, they always use claws."

Rodent Speed: "They wont if you try ****ing them. Try it and see."

Message-ID:

On Apr 23, 2021 at 11:25:18 AM MST, "%" wrote
:

On 2021-04-23 10:40 a.m., Snit wrote:
On Apr 23, 2021 at 9:38:36 AM MST, "%" wrote
:

On 2021-04-23 9:22 a.m., Snit wrote:
On Apr 23, 2021 at 9:20:42 AM MST, "%" wrote
:

On 2021-04-23 9:13 a.m., Snit wrote:
On Apr 23, 2021 at 8:38:27 AM MST, "%" wrote
:

On 2021-04-22 8:19 p.m., Snit wrote:
On Apr 22, 2021 at 8:08:16 PM MST, "%" wrote
:

On 2021-04-22 7:40 p.m., Snit wrote:
On Apr 22, 2021 at 7:30:58 PM MST, "%" wrote
:

On 2021-04-22 6:03 p.m., Snit wrote:
On Apr 22, 2021 at 6:00:02 PM MST, "%" wrote
:

On 2021-04-22 12:46 p.m., Snit wrote:
On Apr 22, 2021 at 11:21:47 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

And that=E2=80=99s just as true of purported man made
climate change.

Its obvious that climate does change,
that=E2=80=99s obvious from
the ice ages etc, but its much less clear how much of the
change we have seen is man made. It
wasn=E2=80=99t that long ago
that most scientists were hyperventilating
about global cooling.

Yes, we can certainly measure a substantial
hike in atmospheric
CO2 levels, but its much less clear how much effect
that actually
has on world temperatures, let alone climate change.

It's bloody obvious to me. We know there used to
be more CO2 in
the air.
And the world was perfectly fine back then.

There has been no time in the history of man when
the CO2 levels
were as
high
as they are now.

Why does man have to be there?

Just a personal preference I prefer to not have man go
extinct... and am
none
too happy about man creating the current mass
extinction we are in.

one day our sun will blow up and all you know will be gone

I am working on travel plans before that.


you'll never get off the ground cause there won't be any

I'll grind it until it is ground.

you're an organ grinder

Only to those who really deserve it, and then I outsource the work.

do you have a coin snatching monkey

That's what she said.

its what you should've asked her

We asked each other.

that's very emotional

It was touching.

do you have a youtube of it we could make some money

I tried making some but the police said it was no good.

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot
use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow
superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

On Wed, 21 Apr 2021 19:43:06 +0100, Snit wrote:

On Apr 21, 2021 at 11:16:35 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

On Sun, 18 Apr 2021 17:54:15 +0100, Snit wrote:

On Apr 17, 2021 at 6:17:43 PM MST, "%" wrote
:

On 2021-04-17 3:50 p.m., Snit wrote:
On Apr 17, 2021 at 10:28:03 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:


...
Scientists are liberal because they want funding for free.

Scientists are liberal because the conservative mindset is to deny
evidence.
We can see this with COVID,

No, we just don't make such a fuss over a small thing. A thing that
kills 4
times less than cancer and 40 times less than the world population growth.

The idea that over half a million dead in America, and many more than that
around the world, and that is WITH some fairly significant precautions,
is a
"small thing" is an utter rejection of the facts.

man-made global climate change,

It was 1C here in Scotland a few days ago, in spring. There is no global
warming.

Denial of the fact from you. That is what I mean.

http://climate.nasa.gov

research on reduction of abortions,

That's not science, that's morals.

If you want to reduce abortions, which most conservatives claim to want,
there
are known methods to do it. At least in American the Republican party (the
more conservative of the two) rejects every one of these things. There
"solution" is to deny women equal rights.

and in some cases even things like evolution.

Evolution could take place if we let coronavirus kill off the weak.

Evolution IS taking place. And the more the virus spreads the more it
mutates
/ evolves.

well which is it

It is.

I wonder why nobody ever says just "It's". For example:
John: "That engine's not running right."
Steve: "It's."

Language is weird. Heck, how do you think people generally pronounce the word
"can't".

Without the t. So it sounds more like "can".

https://youtu.be/6bszZZlvj4E

Just weird.

No. There are two differences for anyone who speaks English properly (as in everyone outside the US). It's "cann" or "carnt". Not "cayan" or "cayant".

On Thu, 22 Apr 2021 16:01:42 +0100, Snit wrote:

On Apr 22, 2021 at 3:16:17 AM MST, ""Rod Speed"" wrote
:

I wonder why nobody ever says just "It's". For example:
John: "That engine's not running right."
Steve: "It's."

Language is weird. Heck, how do you think people generally pronounce
the word
"can't".

Without the t. So it sounds more like "can".
https://youtu.be/6bszZZlvj4E

You bugger. Bet I will focus on that
bloody word every time its used now.

Just watched the first ep of the Manson tapes and didnt.

Corse that might just be because it is so ****ing bizarre.

I have caught it in some speech I hear.

Have a friend who insists it just cannot be true. I talk to her on Zoom -- she
has agreed to let me record her without her knowing (at the time) and then see
how SHE sounds). She insists she ALWAYS pronounced the T. Will be interesting
to find out.

Yanks can't even pronounce herb with the H.

On Apr 24, 2021 at 11:30:05 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

On Thu, 22 Apr 2021 16:01:42 +0100, Snit wrote:

On Apr 22, 2021 at 3:16:17 AM MST, ""Rod Speed"" wrote
:

I wonder why nobody ever says just "It's". For example:
John: "That engine's not running right."
Steve: "It's."

Language is weird. Heck, how do you think people generally pronounce
the word
"can't".

Without the t. So it sounds more like "can".
https://youtu.be/6bszZZlvj4E

You bugger. Bet I will focus on that
bloody word every time its used now.

Just watched the first ep of the Manson tapes and didn=E2=80=99t.

Corse that might just be because it is so ****ing bizarre.

I have caught it in some speech I hear.

Have a friend who insists it just cannot be true. I talk to her on Zoom --
she
has agreed to let me record her without her knowing (at the time) and then
see
how SHE sounds). She insists she ALWAYS pronounced the T. Will be
interesting
to find out.

Yanks can't even pronounce herb with the H.

We can if it is a name.

By the way, I did look for UK specific examples of "can't". Here is what I
found:

https://youtu.be/dGnBi6giZw0

Those are examples from the UK. "Can't" is still pronounced as "can" (in many
cases).

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot
use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow
superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

On Apr 24, 2021 at 11:28:05 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

On Wed, 21 Apr 2021 19:43:06 +0100, Snit wrote:

On Apr 21, 2021 at 11:16:35 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

On Sun, 18 Apr 2021 17:54:15 +0100, Snit wrote:

On Apr 17, 2021 at 6:17:43 PM MST, "%" wrote
:

On 2021-04-17 3:50 p.m., Snit wrote:
On Apr 17, 2021 at 10:28:03 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:


...
Scientists are liberal because they want funding for free.

Scientists are liberal because the conservative mindset is to deny
evidence.
We can see this with COVID,

No, we just don't make such a fuss over a small thing. A thing that
kills 4
times less than cancer and 40 times less than the world population growth.

The idea that over half a million dead in America, and many more than that
around the world, and that is WITH some fairly significant precautions,
is a
"small thing" is an utter rejection of the facts.

man-made global climate change,

It was 1C here in Scotland a few days ago, in spring. There is no global
warming.

Denial of the fact from you. That is what I mean.

http://climate.nasa.gov

research on reduction of abortions,

That's not science, that's morals.

If you want to reduce abortions, which most conservatives claim to want,
there
are known methods to do it. At least in American the Republican party (the
more conservative of the two) rejects every one of these things. There
"solution" is to deny women equal rights.

and in some cases even things like evolution.

Evolution could take place if we let coronavirus kill off the weak.

Evolution IS taking place. And the more the virus spreads the more it
mutates
/ evolves.

well which is it

It is.

I wonder why nobody ever says just "It's". For example:
John: "That engine's not running right."
Steve: "It's."

Language is weird. Heck, how do you think people generally pronounce the
word
"can't".

Without the t. So it sounds more like "can".

https://youtu.be/6bszZZlvj4E

Just weird.

No. There are two differences for anyone who speaks English properly (as in
everyone outside the US). It's "cann" or "carnt". Not "cayan" or "cayant".

These are UK samples: https://youtu.be/dGnBi6giZw0

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot
use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow
superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

On Sat, 24 Apr 2021 19:37:00 GMT, **** the git, the notorious,
troll-feeding, senile asshole, blathered again:


We can if it is a name.

What you "can" is suck troll cock, incessantly and devotedly, **** the Git!

On Sat, 24 Apr 2021 19:38:04 GMT, **** the git, the notorious,
troll-feeding, senile asshole, blathered again:


These are UK samples: https://youtu.be/dGnBi6giZw0

WTF has all this **** got to do with ANY of the three ngs you keep
crossposting it to, you perverted troll-feeding senile ASSHOLE?

On 2021-04-24 12:38 p.m., Snit wrote:
On Apr 24, 2021 at 11:28:05 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

On Wed, 21 Apr 2021 19:43:06 +0100, Snit wrote:

On Apr 21, 2021 at 11:16:35 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

On Sun, 18 Apr 2021 17:54:15 +0100, Snit wrote:

On Apr 17, 2021 at 6:17:43 PM MST, "%" wrote
:

On 2021-04-17 3:50 p.m., Snit wrote:
On Apr 17, 2021 at 10:28:03 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:


...
Scientists are liberal because they want funding for free.

Scientists are liberal because the conservative mindset is to deny
evidence.
We can see this with COVID,

No, we just don't make such a fuss over a small thing. A thing that
kills 4
times less than cancer and 40 times less than the world population growth.

The idea that over half a million dead in America, and many more than that
around the world, and that is WITH some fairly significant precautions,
is a
"small thing" is an utter rejection of the facts.

man-made global climate change,

It was 1C here in Scotland a few days ago, in spring. There is no global
warming.

Denial of the fact from you. That is what I mean.

http://climate.nasa.gov

research on reduction of abortions,

That's not science, that's morals.

If you want to reduce abortions, which most conservatives claim to want,
there
are known methods to do it. At least in American the Republican party (the
more conservative of the two) rejects every one of these things. There
"solution" is to deny women equal rights.

and in some cases even things like evolution.

Evolution could take place if we let coronavirus kill off the weak.

Evolution IS taking place. And the more the virus spreads the more it
mutates
/ evolves.

well which is it

It is.

I wonder why nobody ever says just "It's". For example:
John: "That engine's not running right."
Steve: "It's."

Language is weird. Heck, how do you think people generally pronounce the
word
"can't".

Without the t. So it sounds more like "can".

https://youtu.be/6bszZZlvj4E

Just weird.

No. There are two differences for anyone who speaks English properly (as in
everyone outside the US). It's "cann" or "carnt". Not "cayan" or "cayant".

These are UK samples: https://youtu.be/dGnBi6giZw0

is this the line for the free soup

On Apr 24, 2021 at 2:37:30 PM MST, "%" wrote
:

On 2021-04-24 12:38 p.m., Snit wrote:
On Apr 24, 2021 at 11:28:05 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

On Wed, 21 Apr 2021 19:43:06 +0100, Snit wrote:

On Apr 21, 2021 at 11:16:35 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

On Sun, 18 Apr 2021 17:54:15 +0100, Snit
wrote:

On Apr 17, 2021 at 6:17:43 PM MST, "%" wrote
:

On 2021-04-17 3:50 p.m., Snit wrote:
On Apr 17, 2021 at 10:28:03 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:


...
Scientists are liberal because they want funding for free.

Scientists are liberal because the conservative mindset is to deny
evidence.
We can see this with COVID,

No, we just don't make such a fuss over a small thing. A thing that
kills 4
times less than cancer and 40 times less than the world
population growth.

The idea that over half a million dead in America, and many more
than that
around the world, and that is WITH some fairly significant precautions,
is a
"small thing" is an utter rejection of the facts.

man-made global climate change,

It was 1C here in Scotland a few days ago, in spring. There is
no global
warming.

Denial of the fact from you. That is what I mean.

http://climate.nasa.gov

research on reduction of abortions,

That's not science, that's morals.

If you want to reduce abortions, which most conservatives claim to want,
there
are known methods to do it. At least in American the Republican
party (the
more conservative of the two) rejects every one of these things. There
"solution" is to deny women equal rights.

and in some cases even things like evolution.

Evolution could take place if we let coronavirus kill off the weak.

Evolution IS taking place. And the more the virus spreads the more it
mutates
/ evolves.

well which is it

It is.

I wonder why nobody ever says just "It's". For example:
John: "That engine's not running right."
Steve: "It's."

Language is weird. Heck, how do you think people generally pronounce the
word
"can't".

Without the t. So it sounds more like "can".

https://youtu.be/6bszZZlvj4E

Just weird.

No. There are two differences for anyone who speaks English properly (as in
everyone outside the US). It's "cann" or "carnt". Not "cayan" or "cayant".

These are UK samples: https://youtu.be/dGnBi6giZw0

is this the line for the free soup

No. It is the Soup Exchange ... where they still wanted money no matter what
type soup I brought. Damned false advertising! Maybe that is why they went out
of business (then they blamed COVID!)

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot
use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow
superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

On 04/24/2021 12:30 PM, Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Thu, 22 Apr 2021 16:01:42 +0100, Snit wrote:

On Apr 22, 2021 at 3:16:17 AM MST, ""Rod Speed"" wrote
:

I wonder why nobody ever says just "It's". For example:
John: "That engine's not running right."
Steve: "It's."

Language is weird. Heck, how do you think people generally
pronounce
the word
"can't".

Without the t. So it sounds more like "can".
https://youtu.be/6bszZZlvj4E

You bugger. Bet I will focus on that
bloody word every time its used now.

Just watched the first ep of the Manson tapes and didnt.

Corse that might just be because it is so ****ing bizarre.

I have caught it in some speech I hear.

Have a friend who insists it just cannot be true. I talk to her on
Zoom -- she
has agreed to let me record her without her knowing (at the time) and
then see
how SHE sounds). She insists she ALWAYS pronounced the T. Will be
interesting
to find out.

Yanks can't even pronounce herb with the H.

As in Herbert Marcuse? I had a kid's book that was in an Indian setting.
The medicine man was named Herb Gatherer but it took a while for my
epiphany that his first name wasn't Herbert.

I can't remember the title but I'm certain it would appall the modern
generation with its stereotyping and cultural appropriation. I thought
it was pretty neat and read it several times.

On 25/04/2021 00:03, rbowman wrote:
On 04/24/2021 12:30 PM, Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Thu, 22 Apr 2021 16:01:42 +0100, Snit
wrote:

On Apr 22, 2021 at 3:16:17 AM MST, ""Rod Speed"" wrote
:

Â*Â* I wonder why nobody ever says just "It's".Â* For example:
Â*Â* John: "That engine's not running right."
Â*Â* Steve: "It's."

Â*Â* Language is weird. Heck, how do you think people generally
pronounce
Â* the word
Â*Â* "can't".

Â*Â* Without the t. So it sounds more like "can".
Â*Â* https://youtu.be/6bszZZlvj4E

Â* You bugger. Bet I will focus on that
Â* bloody word every time its used now.

Just watched the first ep of the Manson tapes and didnt.

Corse that might just be because it is so ****ing bizarre.

I have caught it in some speech I hear.

Have a friend who insists it just cannot be true. I talk to her on
Zoom -- she
has agreed to let me record her without her knowing (at the time) and
then see
how SHE sounds). She insists she ALWAYS pronounced the T. Will be
interesting
to find out.

Yanks can't even pronounce herb with the H.

As in Herbert Marcuse? I had a kid's book that was in an Indian setting.
The medicine man was named Herb Gatherer but it took a while for my
epiphany that his first name wasn't Herbert.

I can't remember the title but I'm certain it would appall the modern
generation with its stereotyping and cultural appropriation. I thought
it was pretty neat and read it several times.

Your comment led me here .....

https://www.google.co.uk/books/editi...sec=frontcover

It was not the story you mentioned .... but it brought a tear to my eye! :-D

On Sat, 24 Apr 2021 17:03:02 -0600, lowbrowwoman, the endlessly driveling,
troll-feeding, senile idiot, blabbered again:

As in Herbert Marcuse?

You miserable lonely senile ASSHOLES on ahr will be thankful for ANY idiotic
baits some troll keeps setting out for you, right, lowbrowwoman? For just
ANY idiotic bait! BG

On Sun, 25 Apr 2021 08:19:10 +0100, David Brooks
wrote:

.... but it brought a tear to my eye!

That's expected when you use a black dildo of the caliber you
bought.
Order a smaller one, and don't bother your ophthalmologist
with your symptoms. It's a waste of NHS resources.
HTH

------------------------------------
BD: I want people to "get to know me better. I have nothing to
hide".
I'm always here to help, this page was put up at BD's request,
rather, he said "Do it *NOW*!":

https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php

76 confirmed #FAKE_NYMS, most used in cybercrimes!
Google "David Brooks Devon"
[]'s
--
Don't be evil - Google 2004
We have a new policy - Google 2012

On Wed, 21 Apr 2021 19:20:41 +0100, Snit wrote:

On Apr 21, 2021 at 11:13:56 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

On Sat, 17 Apr 2021 23:50:26 +0100, Snit wrote:

On Apr 17, 2021 at 10:28:03 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:


...
Scientists are liberal because they want funding for free.

Scientists are liberal because the conservative mindset is to deny
evidence.
We can see this with COVID,

No, we just don't make such a fuss over a small thing. A thing that kills 4
times less than cancer and 40 times less than the world population growth.

The idea that over half a million dead in America, and many more than that
around the world, and that is WITH some fairly significant precautions, is a
"small thing" is an utter rejection of the facts.

It's 4 times smaller than cancer and 40 times smaller then the population
growth. Those are numbers, irrefutable numbers.

In the US it is the third leading cause of death. And that is with some
precautions. Your lack of compassion does not reduce the harm.

It's FOUR TIMES LESS. So 100 people die, but only 20 of them were coronavirus. And that's assuming nobody died of anything other than the virus or cancer.

man-made global climate change,

It was 1C here in Scotland a few days ago, in spring. There is no global
warming.

Denial of the fact from you. That is what I mean.

I can see the temperature with my own eyes! It's on the thermometer over
there!

You use a local temperature to try to deny evidence of man-made global climate
change. Your logic is flawed.

So magically my part of the world stays the same and the rest goes up? Right.... Look, just move to the place that's the temperature you like, if you're fussy enough to care about the alleged 2C change.

http://climate.nasa.gov

research on reduction of abortions,

That's not science, that's morals.

If you want to reduce abortions, which most conservatives claim to want,
there
are known methods to do it. At least in American the Republican party (the
more conservative of the two) rejects every one of these things. There
"solution" is to deny women equal rights.

The whole idea that an abortion is wrong is insanity. The child belongs to
the mother, and nobody else.

The Republican party pretends to be against abortion but then refused to do
anything to help reduce the numbers. The Democrats want it to be legal but
want to keep it rare.

Reducing the numbers can only mean you're taking away the right of choice from the woman. I thought you liked human rights? The government should not intervene.

and in some cases even things like evolution.

Evolution could take place if we let coronavirus kill off the weak.

Evolution IS taking place. And the more the virus spreads the more it
mutates
/ evolves.

I was obviously talking about the evolution of humans to fight it off. Think
about Eskimos and the cold virus.

And we as a species have evolved the ability to make vaccines.

No, we've invented the ability to screw up our future evolution.

On Thu, 22 Apr 2021 20:28:34 +0100, Rod Speed wrote:



"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
news
On Sun, 18 Apr 2021 19:24:27 +0100, Rod Speed
wrote:



"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
news On Sat, 17 Apr 2021 20:28:16 +0100, Rod Speed
wrote:



"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
news On Fri, 16 Apr 2021 19:09:40 +0100, Snit
wrote:

On Apr 16, 2021 at 11:00:16 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

On Fri, 16 Apr 2021 03:44:18 +0100, Snit
wrote:

On Apr 15, 2021 at 7:14:23 PM MST, "rbowman" wrote
:

On 04/15/2021 12:02 PM, Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Wed, 14 Apr 2021 19:12:00 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:

Commander Kinsey wrote

Another account must be made so they don't get the last word
in.
The
silliest thing I got banned for was saying the word "damn".
And
not
even
in a rude way, probably something like "the damn weather is
awful
today".
Turns out the admin was a religious nutter.

Yeah, I got the same thing from another religious nutter for
using the term "hell of a lot", not a moderator in that case.

You have to wonder how far we would be today if religion had
not
impeded
science.

Do you know who first formulated the Big Bang theory? Ever here
of
Gregor Mendel? Blaise Pascal?

Quite a few scientists manage to have a foot in both worlds. In
general
the Catholics seem more flexible than the Protestants,
particularly
the
'gimme that old time religion' branch.

In the past the two were heavily tied together... but that is no
longer the
case. There are still some religious scientists, but scientists
tend
to be
atheist at a higher level than the general public. They also tend
to
be more
liberal, which makes sense given how at least in the US
conservatives
tend
to
reject our best evidence.

Scientists are liberal because they want funding for free.

Scientists are liberal because the conservative mindset is to deny
evidence.
We can see this with COVID,

No, we just don't make such a fuss over a small thing. A thing that
kills
4 times less than cancer and 40 times less than the world population
growth.

man-made global climate change,

It was 1C here in Scotland a few days ago, in spring. There is no
global
warming.

research on reduction of abortions,

That's not science, that's morals.

and in some cases even things like evolution.

Evolution could take place if we let coronavirus kill off the weak.

Nope, because it mostly kills those way past reproducing.

Irrelevant if it kills those or not. And they can hide indoors.

The point is we should let it kill off any younger folk that it can, as
they're the weaker ones.

In fact there isnt any evidence that it does kill of the weaker ones.

The Spanish Flu didn't, in fact it killed off the stronger ones
because their much better immune system grossly over reacted
and it was the cytokine storm that killed them very quickly.

Grossly overreacting was therefore a trait that needed removing for the
next generation.

Nope because it means they do much better with the
non pandemic infections and don't have to bother to
wash their hands all the time and can get away with
doing what is more convenient like not throwing
away food that has had a fly walk on it etc etc etc.

Having a trait that makes you better at 9 things but worse at another, getting you killed, is not a good trait to have. Say you could do calculations twice as fast, you could sing perfect pitch, you could do 1000 pushups, but the sight of a car made you spontaneously combust. That would not be a good thing to have. By your reasoning, you would be called superior, and have a hired help to warn you of approaching cars.

On Sun, 18 Apr 2021 18:42:39 +0100, Snit wrote:

On Apr 18, 2021 at 10:38:16 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

On Sat, 17 Apr 2021 20:28:16 +0100, Rod Speed
wrote:



"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
news On Fri, 16 Apr 2021 19:09:40 +0100, Snit
wrote:

On Apr 16, 2021 at 11:00:16 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

On Fri, 16 Apr 2021 03:44:18 +0100, Snit
wrote:

On Apr 15, 2021 at 7:14:23 PM MST, "rbowman" wrote
:

On 04/15/2021 12:02 PM, Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Wed, 14 Apr 2021 19:12:00 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:

Commander Kinsey wrote

Another account must be made so they don't get the last word in.
The
silliest thing I got banned for was saying the word "damn". And
not
even
in a rude way, probably something like "the damn weather is awful
today".
Turns out the admin was a religious nutter.

Yeah, I got the same thing from another religious nutter for
using the term "hell of a lot", not a moderator in that case.

You have to wonder how far we would be today if religion had not
impeded
science.

Do you know who first formulated the Big Bang theory? Ever here of
Gregor Mendel? Blaise Pascal?

Quite a few scientists manage to have a foot in both worlds. In
general
the Catholics seem more flexible than the Protestants, particularly
the
'gimme that old time religion' branch.

In the past the two were heavily tied together... but that is no
longer the
case. There are still some religious scientists, but scientists tend
to be
atheist at a higher level than the general public. They also tend to
be more
liberal, which makes sense given how at least in the US conservatives
tend
to
reject our best evidence.

Scientists are liberal because they want funding for free.

Scientists are liberal because the conservative mindset is to deny
evidence.
We can see this with COVID,

No, we just don't make such a fuss over a small thing. A thing that kills
4 times less than cancer and 40 times less than the world population
growth.

man-made global climate change,

It was 1C here in Scotland a few days ago, in spring. There is no global
warming.

research on reduction of abortions,

That's not science, that's morals.

and in some cases even things like evolution.

Evolution could take place if we let coronavirus kill off the weak.

Nope, because it mostly kills those way past reproducing.

Irrelevant if it kills those or not. And they can hide indoors.

The point is we should let it kill off any younger folk that it can, as
they're the weaker ones.

As you call for these deaths wby don't you volunteer? Set an example?

I am, by not wearing a mask.