Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
Home Repair (alt.home.repair) For all homeowners and DIYers with many experienced tradesmen. Solve your toughest home fix-it problems. |
Reply |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
We need to ban police cars
How many more people will die before we do something about these horrific police cars?
Two 6-year-olds killed, at least 11 injured as stabbing suspect crashes stolen police car in Dayton, OH. https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news...ayton-n1046576 |
#2
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
We need to ban police cars
On 8/27/19 4:06 PM, Libtard Logic wrote:
How many more people will die before we do something about these horrific police cars? Two 6-year-olds killed, at least 11 injured as stabbing suspect crashes stolen police car in Dayton, OH. https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news...ayton-n1046576 Guns are made for the sole purpose of killing. Police cars are not. |
#3
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
We need to ban police cars
wrote in message ... On 8/27/19 4:06 PM, Libtard Logic wrote: How many more people will die before we do something about these horrific police cars? Two 6-year-olds killed, at least 11 injured as stabbing suspect crashes stolen police car in Dayton, OH. https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news...ayton-n1046576 Guns are made for the sole purpose of killing. Wrong, plenty are used for target shooting. Police cars are not. |
#4
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Lonely Psychopathic Senile Ozzie Troll Alert!
On Wed, 28 Aug 2019 08:28:55 +1000, cantankerous trolling geezer Rodent
Speed, the auto-contradicting senile sociopath, blabbered, again: Guns are made for the sole purpose of killing. Wrong, plenty are used for target shooting. That's not the true purpose of gun, senile Ozzie cretin! -- about senile Rot Speed: "This is like having a conversation with someone with brain damage." MID: |
#5
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
We need to ban police cars
On 8/27/19 2:44 PM, wrote:
On 8/27/19 4:06 PM, Libtard Logic wrote: How many more people will die before we do something about these horrific police cars? Two 6-year-olds killed, at least 11 injured as stabbing suspect crashes stolen police car in Dayton, OH. https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news...ayton-n1046576 Guns are made for the sole purpose of killing. What a crok! Guns have a ton of other uses. And guns save about 17 to 1 lives versus those cost by criminals using guns. Police cars are not. And the USA's worst mass murder was by an arsonist. So lets ban fire. The problem is not the instrument but the user. We have always had guns, but not mass shootings. What is different is that we now have Liberals that have no grounding in morality. Without religoun to tell them what is right and what is wrong, killing a human being is no different than killing a bug. And if you think it is magazine capacity, look up the date on the Browning Hi Power. Oh ya, and criminals don't obey laws, that is why they are called criminals. Well, except by Liberal who now call them "justice-involved persons". Criminals get all the instruments of murder they want, be it a stolen cop car, a cigarette lighter, a knife, a bat, any kind of gun ... Harassing the legal gun owner is not the answer. Oh ya, and the biggest killer of humans in the past century was Death by Left Wing Government (Nazis, Soviets, ChiComs, Pol Pot, etc.) to the tune of around 200 million souls. And now you know why Liberals want to ban guns and not instruments of murder. It impedes their beloved Dictatorship of the Protectorate. |
#6
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
We need to ban police cars
On Tuesday, August 27, 2019 at 3:06:55 PM UTC-5, Libtard Logic wrote:
How many more people will die before we do something about these horrific police cars? Two 6-year-olds killed, at least 11 injured as stabbing suspect crashes stolen police car in Dayton, OH. https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news...ayton-n1046576 How do you figure it was the police car at fault? The car was stolen. Andy |
#7
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
We need to ban police cars
"A K" wrote in message ... On Tuesday, August 27, 2019 at 3:06:55 PM UTC-5, Libtard Logic wrote: How many more people will die before we do something about these horrific police cars? Two 6-year-olds killed, at least 11 injured as stabbing suspect crashes stolen police car in Dayton, OH. https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news...ayton-n1046576 How do you figure it was the police car at fault? The car was stolen. It was a joke, Joyce. |
#8
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
We need to ban police cars
On Tuesday, August 27, 2019 at 7:06:06 PM UTC-4, T wrote:
On 8/27/19 2:44 PM, wrote: On 8/27/19 4:06 PM, Libtard Logic wrote: How many more people will die before we do something about these horrific police cars? Two 6-year-olds killed, at least 11 injured as stabbing suspect crashes stolen police car in Dayton, OH. https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news...ayton-n1046576 Guns are made for the sole purpose of killing. What a crok! Guns have a ton of other uses. And guns save about 17 to 1 lives versus those cost by criminals using guns. I'm sure the cite for that statistic won't be forthcoming..... Police cars are not. And the USA's worst mass murder was by an arsonist. So lets ban fire. How many mass murders by arson have we seen this year in the USA? Even with the rare case, it's almost always someone targeting someone specifically that they are out to get over some personal dispute, so they set fire to their house. It's not some whacko going to Las Vegas and burning up 50 random people, it's not someone going to Parkland and burning up 15 people in a school. When we have an actual significant problem with mass arsons, then we should address that. The problem is not the instrument but the user. We have always had guns, but not mass shootings. That's a new line. Previously the gun nut position has typically been to deny that mass shootings are anything new. And certainly the easy availability of guns, where some whack job, with 21 police visits to the house, with the police knowing he's being treated for mental problems, knowing he was suicidal, can just walk into Dick's and buy all the guns he wants, is a very, very bad system. What is different is that we now have Liberals that have no grounding in morality. Without religoun to tell them what is right and what is wrong, killing a human being is no different than killing a bug. Oh please. Those whacko muslims have their religion, how's that working out? I'm not religious, I don't go to church, but I know right from wrong. And I know we have a president who doesn't. He lies and lies and lies. He inflames his trumpets with those lies, including smearing immigrants, both legal and illegal. He stirs up hate. He divides the country instead of uniting us. Maybe you should look there? And how does what we see Trump do, everything from lies, to adultery, to saying there were very fine people marching with Nazis and the KKK, fit with the values of your church? Last week Trump smeared LEGAL immigrants as rapists, murderers, and worse. And if you think it is magazine capacity, look up the date on the Browning Hi Power. Oh ya, and criminals don't obey laws, that is why they are called criminals. A reasonable permit process, where the local police chief has to issue a permit following an actual meaningful background check, would not rely on criminals obeying the law to keep someone like Cruz, the Parkland shooter from walking into Dicks and buying whatever he wants. It would rely on Dicks Sporting Goods obeying the law and not selling him guns without a permit. Well, except by Liberal who now call them "justice-involved persons". Criminals get all the instruments of murder they want, be it a stolen cop car, a cigarette lighter, a knife, a bat, any kind of gun ... When is the last time anyone killed 10, 20, 50 people with a bat, a knife, or a cigarette lighter? You could add up all of the above deaths last year in the US from all that BS and it would be just a fraction of the deaths from guns. Harassing the legal gun owner is not the answer. Asking for a reasonable permit process to keep guns out of the hands of people who should not have them is not harassment. Oh ya, and the biggest killer of humans in the past century was Death by Left Wing Government (Nazis, Soviets, ChiComs, Pol Pot, etc.) to the tune of around 200 million souls. And now you know why Liberals want to ban guns and not instruments of murder. It impedes their beloved Dictatorship of the Protectorate. So typical, so crazy, so sad. Meanwhile it's just a matter of time until the next whack job walks into a gun store in a state that has lax laws, buys a gun and commits the next mass shooting. |
#9
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Lonely Psychopathic Senile Ozzie Troll Alert!
On Wed, 28 Aug 2019 16:10:10 +1000, cantankerous trolling geezer Rodent
Speed, the auto-contradicting senile sociopath, blabbered, again: How do you figure it was the police car at fault? The car was stolen. It was a joke, Joyce. No, it wasn't, senile idiot! -- Website (from 2007) dedicated to the 85-year-old trolling senile cretin from Oz: https://www.pcreview.co.uk/threads/r...d-faq.2973853/ |
#10
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
We need to ban police cars
On 8/28/19 2:10 AM, Rod Speed wrote:
"A K" wrote in message ... On Tuesday, August 27, 2019 at 3:06:55 PM UTC-5, Libtard Logic wrote: How many more people will die before we do something about these horrific police cars? Two 6-year-olds killed, at least 11 injured as stabbing suspect crashes stolen police car in Dayton, OH. https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news...ayton-n1046576 How do you figure it was the police car at fault? The car was stolen. It was a joke, Joyce. Yup, you got it! Guns don't kill, people do. Police cars don't kill, people do. It's amazing how many gun-grabbin' libtards can't seem to understand that. |
#11
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
We need to ban police cars
On 8/28/19 1:43 AM, A K wrote:
On Tuesday, August 27, 2019 at 3:06:55 PM UTC-5, Libtard Logic wrote: How many more people will die before we do something about these horrific police cars? Two 6-year-olds killed, at least 11 injured as stabbing suspect crashes stolen police car in Dayton, OH. https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news...ayton-n1046576 How do you figure it was the police car at fault? The car was stolen. Andy It's the same faulty libtard logic that blames guns for gun homicides. |
#12
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
We need to ban police cars
On 8/28/19 3:32 AM, devnull wrote:
On 8/28/19 1:43 AM, A K wrote: On Tuesday, August 27, 2019 at 3:06:55 PM UTC-5, Libtard Logic wrote: How many more people will die before we do something about these horrific police cars? Two 6-year-olds killed, at least 11 injured as stabbing suspect crashes stolen police car in Dayton, OH. https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news...ayton-n1046576 How do you figure it was the police car at fault? The car was stolen. Andy It's the same faulty libtard logic that blames guns for gun homicides. Interesting how it is only insurrection capable weapons that they want to ban. Hmmmmmmmmmm |
#13
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
We need to ban police cars
On 8/27/2019 4:06 PM, T wrote:
And guns save about 17 to 1 lives versus those cost by criminals using guns. Now that is some fine trumptard logic! Funny how you never back up any of the BS you spout with legitimate references. Never a single reason to believe a word you say. |
#14
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
We need to ban police cars
On 8/28/2019 3:28 AM, Captain Obvious wrote:
On 8/28/19 2:10 AM, Rod Speed wrote: "A K" wrote in message ... On Tuesday, August 27, 2019 at 3:06:55 PM UTC-5, Libtard Logic wrote: How many more people will die before we do something about these horrific police cars? Two 6-year-olds killed, at least 11 injured as stabbing suspect crashes stolen police car in Dayton, OH. https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news...ayton-n1046576 How do you figure it was the police car at fault? The car was stolen. It was a joke, Joyce. Yup, you got it! Guns don't kill, people do. Police cars don't kill, people do. It's amazing how many gun-grabbin' libtards can't seem to understand that. Funny, how these right wing wacko terrorists are so fond of previously illegal weapons of war. Back then, we didn't have anywhere near a bad of atrocities. What could have changed that? |
#15
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
We need to ban police cars
On 8/28/2019 1:59 PM, Bob F wrote:
Funny, how these right wing wacko terrorists are so fond of previously illegal weapons of war. Back then, we didn't have anywhere near a bad of atrocities. What could have changed that? Ted Kennedy's Oldsmobile killed more people than all my guns put together.* Why is that? -- Get off my lawn! |
#16
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
We need to ban police cars
On 8/28/19 10:55 AM, Bob F wrote:
On 8/27/2019 4:06 PM, T wrote: And guns save about 17 to 1 lives versus those cost by criminals using guns. Now that is some fine trumptard logic! Funny how you never back up any of the BS you spout with legitimate references. Never a single reason to believe a word you say. Ahhhh. Result to name calling because you have no point. Next time just ask me for a reference. Let me ask you a question. Is there a particular reason why you are only interested in banning legal ownership of weapons that can used for insurrection and not all instruments of murder? Dictatorship of the Proletariat come to mind by chance? Here is your reference. You will note that this article has 23 cites https://gunowners.org/sk0802htm/ Arm Yourself With The Facts Fact Sheet: Guns Save Lives Written by GOA Published: 29 September 2008 Fact Sheet: Guns Save Lives A. Guns save more lives than they take; prevent more injuries than they inflict * Guns used 2.5 million times a year in self-defense. Law-abiding citizens use guns to defend themselves against criminals as many as 2.5 million times every year or about 6,850 times a day. [1] This means that each year, firearms are used more than 80 times more often to protect the lives of honest citizens than to take lives. [2] * Of the 2.5 million times citizens use their guns to defend themselves every year, the overwhelming majority merely brandish their gun or fire a warning shot to scare off their attackers. Less than 8% of the time, a citizen will kill or wound his/her attacker.[3] * As many as 200,000 women use a gun every year to defend themselves against sexual abuse.[4] * Even anti-gun Clinton researchers concede that guns are used 1.5 million times annually for self-defense. According to the Clinton Justice Department, there are as many as 1.5 million cases of self-defense every year. The National Institute of Justice published this figure in 1997 as part of Guns in America a study which was authored by noted anti-gun criminologists Philip Cook and Jens Ludwig.[5] * Armed citizens kill more crooks than do the police. Citizens shoot and kill at least twice as many criminals as police do every year (1,527 to 606).[6] And readers of Newsweek learned that only 2 percent of civilian shootings involved an innocent person mistakenly identified as a criminal. The error rate for the police, however, was 11 percent, more than five times as high.[7] * Handguns are the weapon of choice for self-defense. Citizens use handguns to protect themselves over 1.9 million times a year. [8] Many of these self-defense handguns could be labeled as Saturday Night Specials. B. Concealed carry laws help reduce crime * Nationwide: one-half million self-defense uses. Every year, as many as one-half million citizens defend themselves with a firearm away from home. [9] * Concealed carry laws are dropping crime rates across the country. A comprehensive national study determined in 1996 that violent crime fell after states made it legal to carry concealed firearms. The results of the study showed: * States which passed concealed carry laws reduced their murder rate by 8.5%, rapes by 5%, aggravated assaults by 7% and robbery by 3%; [10] and * If those states not having concealed carry laws had adopted such laws in 1992, then approximately 1,570 murders, 4,177 rapes, 60,000 aggravated assaults and over 11,000 robberies would have been avoided yearly.[11] * Vermont: one of the safest five states in the country. In Vermont, citizens can carry a firearm without getting permission without paying a fee or without going through any kind of government-imposed waiting period. And yet for ten years in a row, Vermont has remained one of the top-five, safest states in the union having three times received the Safest State Award.[12] * Florida: concealed carry helps slash the murder rates in the state. In the fifteen years following the passage of Floridas concealed carry law in 1987, over 800,000 permits to carry firearms were issued to people in the state. [13] FBI reports show that the homicide rate in Florida, which in 1987 was much higher than the national average, fell 52% during that 15-year period thus putting the Florida rate below the national average. [14] * Do firearms carry laws result in chaos? No. Consider the case of Florida. A citizen in the Sunshine State is far more likely to be attacked by an alligator than to be assaulted by a concealed carry holder. 1. During the first fifteen years that the Florida law was in effect, alligator attacks outpaced the number of crimes committed by carry holders by a 229 to 155 margin. 2. And even the 155 crimes committed by concealed carry permit holders are somewhat misleading as most of these infractions resulted from Floridians who accidentally carried their firearms into restricted areas, such as an airport. [15] C. Criminals avoid armed citizens * Kennesaw, GA. In 1982, this suburb of Atlanta passed a law requiring heads of households to keep at least one firearm in the house. The residential burglary rate subsequently dropped 89% in Kennesaw, compared to the modest 10.4% drop in Georgia as a whole. [16] * Ten years later (1991), the residential burglary rate in Kennesaw was still 72% lower than it had been in 1981, before the law was passed. [17] * Nationwide. Statistical comparisons with other countries show that burglars in the United States are far less apt to enter an occupied home than their foreign counterparts who live in countries where fewer civilians own firearms. Consider the following rates showing how often a homeowner is present when a burglar strikes: * Homeowner occupancy rate in the gun control countries of Great Britain, Canada and Netherlands: 45% (average of the three countries); and, * Homeowner occupancy rate in the United States: 12.7%. [18] Rapes averted when women carry or use firearms for protection * Orlando, FL. In 1966-67, the media highly publicized a safety course which taught Orlando women how to use guns. The result: Orlandos rape rate dropped 88% in 1967, whereas the rape rate remained constant in the rest of Florida and the nation. [19] * Nationwide. In 1979, the Carter Justice Department found that of more than 32,000 attempted rapes, 32% were actually committed. But when a woman was armed with a gun or knife, only 3% of the attempted rapes were actually successful. [20] Justice Department study: * 3/5 of felons polled agreed that a criminal is not going to mess around with a victim he knows is armed with a gun. [21] * 74% of felons polled agreed that one reason burglars avoid houses when people are at home is that they fear being shot during the crime.[22] * 57% of felons polled agreed that criminals are more worried about meeting an armed victim than they are about running into the police. [23] [1] Gary Kleck and Marc Gertz, Armed Resistance to Crime: The Prevalence and Nature of Self-Defense With a Gun, 86 The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, Northwestern University School of Law, 1 (Fall 1995):164. Dr. Kleck is a professor in the school of criminology and criminal justice at Florida State University in Tallahassee. He has researched extensively and published several essays on the gun control issue. His book, Point Blank: Guns and Violence in America, has become a widely cited source in the gun control debate. In fact, this book earned Dr. Kleck the prestigious American Society of Criminology Michael J. Hindelang award for 1993. This award is given for the book published in the past two to three years that makes the most outstanding contribution to criminology. Even those who dont like the conclusions Dr. Kleck reaches, cannot argue with his impeccable research and methodology. In A Tribute to a View I Have Opposed, Marvin E. Wolfgang writes that, What troubles me is the article by Gary Kleck and Marc Gertz. The reason I am troubled is that they have provided an almost clear-cut case of methodologically sound research in support of something I have theoretically opposed for years, namely, the use of a gun in defense against a criminal perpetrator. I have to admit my admiration for the care and caution expressed in this article and this research. Can it be true that about two million instances occur each year in which a gun was used as a defensive measure against crime? It is hard to believe. Yet, it is hard to challenge the data collected. We do not have contrary evidence. Wolfgang, A Tribute to a View I Have Opposed, The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, at 188. Wolfgang says there is no contrary evidence. Indeed, there are more than a dozen national polls one of which was conducted by The Los Angeles Times that have found figures comparable to the Kleck-Gertz study. Even the Clinton Justice Department (through the National Institute of Justice) found there were as many as 1.5 million defensive users of firearms every year. See National Institute of Justice, Guns in America: National Survey on Private Ownership and Use of Firearms, Research in Brief (May 1997). As for Dr. Kleck, readers of his materials may be interested to know that he is a member of the ACLU, Amnesty International USA, and Common Cause. He is not and has never been a member of or contributor to any advocacy group on either side of the gun control debate. [2] According to the National Safety Council, the total number of gun deaths (by accidents, suicides and homicides) account for less than 30,000 deaths per year. See Injury Facts, published yearly by the National Safety Council, Itasca, Illinois. [3] Kleck and Gertz, Armed Resistance to Crime, at 173, 185. [4]Kleck and Gertz, Armed Resistance to Crime, at 185. [5]Philip J. Cook and Jens Ludwig, Guns in America: National Survey on Private Ownership and Use of Firearms, NIJ Research in Brief (May 1997); available at https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles/165476.pdf on the internet. The finding of 1.5 million yearly self-defense cases did not sit well with the anti-gun bias of the studys authors, who attempted to explain why there could not possibly be one and a half million cases of self-defense every year. Nevertheless, the 1.5 million figure is consistent with a mountain of independent surveys showing similar figures. The sponsors of these studies nearly a dozen are quite varied, and include anti-gun organizations, news media organizations, governments and commercial polling firms. See also Kleck and Gertz, supra note 1, pp. 182-183. [6]Kleck, Point Blank: Guns and Violence in America, (1991):111-116, 148. [7]George F. Will, Are We a Nation of Cowards?, Newsweek (15 November 1993):93. [8]Id. at 164, 185. [9]Dr. Gary Kleck, interview with J. Neil Schulman, Q and A: Guns, crime and self-defense, The Orange County Register (19 September 1993). In the interview with Schulman, Dr. Kleck reports on findings from a national survey which he and Dr. Marc Gertz conducted in Spring, 1993 a survey which findings were reported in Kleck and Gertz, Armed Resistance to Crime. [10]One of the authors of the University of Chicago study reported on the studys findings in John R. Lott, Jr., More Guns, Less Violent Crime, The Wall Street Journal (28 August 1996). See also John R. Lott, Jr. and David B. Mustard, Crime, Deterrence, and Right-to-Carry Concealed Handguns, University of Chicago (15 August 1996); and Lott, More Guns, Less Crime (1998, 2000). [11]Lott and Mustard, Crime, Deterrence, and Right-to-Carry Concealed Handguns. [12]Kathleen OLeary Morgan, Scott Morgan and Neal Quitno, Rankings of States in Most Dangerous/Safest State Awards 1994 to 2003, Morgan Quitno Press (2004) at http://www.statestats.com/dang9403.htm. Morgan Quitno Press is an independent private research and publishing company which was founded in 1989. The company specializes in reference books and monthly reports that compare states and cities in several different subject areas. In the first 10 years in which they published their Safest State Award, Vermont has consistently remained one of the top five safest states. [13]Memo by Jim Smith, Secretary of State, Florida Department of State, Division of Licensing, Concealed Weapons/Firearms License Statistical Report (October 1, 2002). 14Floridas murder rate was 11.4 per 100,000 in 1987, but only 5.5 in 2002. Compare Federal Bureau of Investigation, Crime in the United States, Uniform Crime Reports, (1988): 7, 53; and FBI, (2003):19, 79. [15]John R. Lott, Jr., Right to carry would disprove horror stories, Kansas City Star, (July 12, 2003). [16]Gary Kleck, Crime Control Through the Private Use of Armed Force, Social Problems 35 (February 1988):15. [17]Compare Kleck, Crime Control, at 15, and Chief Dwaine L. Wilson, City of Kennesaw Police Department, Month to Month Statistics: 1991. (Residential burglary rates from 1981-1991 are based on statistics for the months of March October.) [18]Kleck, Point Blank, at 140. [19]Kleck, Crime Control, at 13. [20]U.S. Department of Justice, Law Enforcement Assistance Administration, Rape Victimization in 26 American Cities (1979), p. 31. [21]U.S., Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice, The Armed Criminal in America: A Survey of Incarcerated Felons, Research Report (July 1985): 27. [22]Id. [23]Id. |
#17
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
We need to ban police cars
On 8/28/19 10:59 AM, Bob F wrote:
On 8/28/2019 3:28 AM, Captain Obvious wrote: On 8/28/19 2:10 AM, Rod Speed wrote: "A K" wrote in message ... On Tuesday, August 27, 2019 at 3:06:55 PM UTC-5, Libtard Logic wrote: How many more people will die before we do something about these horrific police cars? Two 6-year-olds killed, at least 11 injured as stabbing suspect crashes stolen police car in Dayton, OH. https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news...ayton-n1046576 How do you figure it was the police car at fault? The car was stolen. It was a joke, Joyce. Yup, you got it! Guns don't kill, people do. Police cars don't kill, people do. It's amazing how many gun-grabbin' libtards can't seem to understand that. Funny, how these right wing wacko terrorists are so fond of previously illegal weapons of war. Back then, we didn't have anywhere near a bad of atrocities. What could have changed that? What makes you think they are all right wing? Most of the violence comes from the Left. And to answer your question, we have always had weapons. What has changed is that we now have Liberal/Regressives that are godless and have no limits on their behavior. Without an external authority over them, morality is what serves their self interest and killing another human being, a baby or a grown adult, is no more than squashing a bug. |
#18
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
We need to ban police cars
On 8/28/19 11:16 AM, Grumpy Old White Guy wrote:
On 8/28/2019 1:59 PM, Bob F wrote: Funny, how these right wing wacko terrorists are so fond of previously illegal weapons of war. Back then, we didn't have anywhere near a bad of atrocities. What could have changed that? Ted Kennedy's Oldsmobile killed more people than all my guns put together.* Why is that? I placed my gun on my table and stared at it for hours. Although quite handsome in its own right, it just sat there and did nothing. Go figure... It is only weapons that can be used for insurrection that they want to ban. They could give a s*** about instruments that can be used for murder. |
#19
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
We need to ban police cars
"Bob F" wrote in message ... On 8/28/2019 3:28 AM, Captain Obvious wrote: On 8/28/19 2:10 AM, Rod Speed wrote: "A K" wrote in message ... On Tuesday, August 27, 2019 at 3:06:55 PM UTC-5, Libtard Logic wrote: How many more people will die before we do something about these horrific police cars? Two 6-year-olds killed, at least 11 injured as stabbing suspect crashes stolen police car in Dayton, OH. https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news...ayton-n1046576 How do you figure it was the police car at fault? The car was stolen. It was a joke, Joyce. Yup, you got it! Guns don't kill, people do. Police cars don't kill, people do. It's amazing how many gun-grabbin' libtards can't seem to understand that. Funny, how these right wing wacko terrorists are so fond of previously illegal weapons of war. Back then, we didn't have anywhere near a bad of atrocities. What could have changed that? Just the usual fad/fashion stuff. In the 60s it was the black panthers, simbionese liberation army, bader meinhof etc. |
#20
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Lonely Psychopathic Senile Ozzie Troll Alert!
On Thu, 29 Aug 2019 05:16:17 +1000, cantankerous trolling geezer Rodent
Speed, the auto-contradicting senile sociopath, blabbered, again: Funny, how these right wing wacko terrorists are so fond of previously illegal weapons of war. Back then, we didn't have anywhere near a bad of atrocities. What could have changed that? Just the usual fad/fashion stuff. In the 60s it was the black panthers, simbionese liberation army, bader meinhof etc. You got a weirdly "functioning" mind, senile idiot. But then, you are senile and even got your own website dedicated to your idiocy and trolling! BG -- "Anonymous" to trolling senile Rot Speed: "You can **** off as you know less than pig **** you sad little ignorant ****." MID: |
#21
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
We need to ban police cars
On Wednesday, August 28, 2019 at 3:09:28 PM UTC-4, T wrote:
On 8/28/19 11:16 AM, Grumpy Old White Guy wrote: On 8/28/2019 1:59 PM, Bob F wrote: Funny, how these right wing wacko terrorists are so fond of previously illegal weapons of war. Back then, we didn't have anywhere near a bad of atrocities. What could have changed that? Ted Kennedy's Oldsmobile killed more people than all my guns put together.* Why is that? I placed my gun on my table and stared at it for hours. Although quite handsome in its own right, it just sat there and did nothing. Go figure... It is only weapons that can be used for insurrection that they want to ban. They could give a s*** about instruments that can be used for murder. ROFL That's a shift. Previously the gun nuts were claiming that people who favor some reasonable gun laws to stop known trouble makers from just walking into a sporting goods store and buying guns were out to take all guns away. Now it's just that they want to ban weapons that can be used for 'insurrection". BTW, somewhere in there didn't you just admit that would be weapons of war. Yet the typical argument has been that the weapons Americans are allowed to own are not suitable for war. So, which is it? |
#22
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
We need to ban police cars
On Wednesday, August 28, 2019 at 3:05:42 PM UTC-4, T wrote:
On 8/28/19 10:59 AM, Bob F wrote: On 8/28/2019 3:28 AM, Captain Obvious wrote: On 8/28/19 2:10 AM, Rod Speed wrote: "A K" wrote in message ... On Tuesday, August 27, 2019 at 3:06:55 PM UTC-5, Libtard Logic wrote: How many more people will die before we do something about these horrific police cars? Two 6-year-olds killed, at least 11 injured as stabbing suspect crashes stolen police car in Dayton, OH. https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news...ayton-n1046576 How do you figure it was the police car at fault? The car was stolen. It was a joke, Joyce. Yup, you got it! Guns don't kill, people do. Police cars don't kill, people do. It's amazing how many gun-grabbin' libtards can't seem to understand that. Funny, how these right wing wacko terrorists are so fond of previously illegal weapons of war. Back then, we didn't have anywhere near a bad of atrocities. What could have changed that? What makes you think they are all right wing? Most of the violence comes from the Left. And to answer your question, we have always had weapons. What has changed is that we now have Liberal/Regressives that are godless and have no limits on their behavior. How about the white supremacists and similar? I guess they believe in God, so they are A-OK and God is limiting their behavior? Without an external authority over them, The authority would be our laws and govt. Those muslims extremists say they have God on their side, how's that working out? morality is what serves their self interest and killing another human being, a baby or a grown adult, is no more than squashing a bug. Attitudes like this are why nothing can get done anymore and the country is coming apart. Sadly, you just see the left as extreme and can't see that much of what you post is just as extreme, just as closed minded, just as bad. |
#23
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
We need to ban police cars
On 8/28/2019 12:09 PM, T wrote:
On 8/28/19 11:16 AM, Grumpy Old White Guy wrote: On 8/28/2019 1:59 PM, Bob F wrote: Funny, how these right wing wacko terrorists are so fond of previously illegal weapons of war. Back then, we didn't have anywhere near a bad of atrocities. What could have changed that? Ted Kennedy's Oldsmobile killed more people than all my guns put together.* Why is that? I placed my gun on my table and stared at it for hours.* Although quite handsome in its own right, it just sat there and did nothing.* Go figure... It is only weapons that can be used for insurrection that they want to ban.* They could give a s*** about instruments that can be used for murder. The constitution clearly states that one of the purposes of the militia, for which we are supposed to have guns, it to SUPPRESS insurrection. Clause 15: To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions; |
#24
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
We need to ban police cars
On 8/28/19 5:39 PM, Bob F wrote:
On 8/28/2019 12:09 PM, T wrote: On 8/28/19 11:16 AM, Grumpy Old White Guy wrote: On 8/28/2019 1:59 PM, Bob F wrote: Funny, how these right wing wacko terrorists are so fond of previously illegal weapons of war. Back then, we didn't have anywhere near a bad of atrocities. What could have changed that? Ted Kennedy's Oldsmobile killed more people than all my guns put together.* Why is that? I placed my gun on my table and stared at it for hours.* Although quite handsome in its own right, it just sat there and did nothing.* Go figure... It is only weapons that can be used for insurrection that they want to ban.* They could give a s*** about instruments that can be used for murder. The constitution clearly states that one of the purposes of the militia, for which we are supposed to have guns, it to SUPPRESS insurrection. Clause 15: To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions; Hi Bob, I could not help but notice that you did not answer my question about insurrection weapons and instruments of murder. Boy you have a selective interpretation! 2nd amendment: A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed. If in doubt, the EXACT meaning of the constitution is DEFINED in the Federalist papers. The Federalist No. 46 Notwithstanding the military establishments in the several kingdoms of Europe, which are carried as far as the public resources will bear, the governments are afraid to trust the people with arms. And it is not certain, that with this aid alone they would not be able to shake off their yokes. But were the people to possess the additional advantages of local governments chosen by themselves, who could collect the national will and direct the national force, and of officers appointed out of the militia, by these governments, and attached both to them and to the militia, it may be affirmed with the greatest assurance, that the throne of every tyranny in Europe would be speedily overturned in spite of the legions which surround it. You need to get off your ass, find a shooting range, take some lessons, and see what this is all about. -T |
#25
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
We need to ban police cars
On 8/29/2019 12:49 PM, T wrote:
On 8/28/19 5:39 PM, Bob F wrote: On 8/28/2019 12:09 PM, T wrote: On 8/28/19 11:16 AM, Grumpy Old White Guy wrote: On 8/28/2019 1:59 PM, Bob F wrote: Funny, how these right wing wacko terrorists are so fond of previously illegal weapons of war. Back then, we didn't have anywhere near a bad of atrocities. What could have changed that? Ted Kennedy's Oldsmobile killed more people than all my guns put together.* Why is that? I placed my gun on my table and stared at it for hours.* Although quite handsome in its own right, it just sat there and did nothing.* Go figure... It is only weapons that can be used for insurrection that they want to ban.* They could give a s*** about instruments that can be used for murder. The constitution clearly states that one of the purposes of the militia, for which we are supposed to have guns, it to SUPPRESS insurrection. Clause 15: To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions; Hi Bob, I could not help but notice that you did not answer my question about insurrection weapons and instruments of murder. Boy you have a selective interpretation! 2nd amendment: *** A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security *** of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear *** arms, shall not be infringed. If in doubt, the EXACT meaning of the constitution is DEFINED in the Federalist papers. The Federalist No. 46 ** Notwithstanding the military establishments in the several ** kingdoms of Europe, which are carried as far as the public ** resources will bear, the governments are afraid to trust ** the people with arms. And it is not certain, that with this ** aid alone they would not be able to shake off their yokes. ** But were the people to possess the additional advantages of ** local governments chosen by themselves, who could collect ** the national will and direct the national force, and of ** officers appointed out of the militia, by these governments, ** and attached both to them and to the militia, it may be ** affirmed with the greatest assurance, that the throne of ** every tyranny in Europe would be speedily overturned in spite ** of the legions which surround it. You need to get off your ass, find a shooting range, take some lessons, and see what this is all about. I don't need a gun to prove my manhood. Knowing the 5x increase in the chance of someone in my house dying from gunshot if I had a gun in the house, I think I will pass. I have never felt a need for one anyway. I'd much rather go snowboarding or play volleyball. |
#26
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
We need to ban police cars
On 8/28/2019 12:16 PM, Rod Speed wrote:
"Bob F" wrote in message ... On 8/28/2019 3:28 AM, Captain Obvious wrote: On 8/28/19 2:10 AM, Rod Speed wrote: "A K" wrote in message ... On Tuesday, August 27, 2019 at 3:06:55 PM UTC-5, Libtard Logic wrote: How many more people will die before we do something about these horrific police cars? Two 6-year-olds killed, at least 11 injured as stabbing suspect crashes stolen police car in Dayton, OH. https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news...ayton-n1046576 How do you figure it was the police car at fault? The car was stolen. It was a joke, Joyce. Yup, you got it! Guns don't kill, people do. Police cars don't kill, people do. It's amazing how many gun-grabbin' libtards can't seem to understand that. Funny, how these right wing wacko terrorists are so fond of previously illegal weapons of war. Back then, we didn't have anywhere near a bad of atrocities. What could have changed that? Just the usual fad/fashion stuff. In the 60s it was the black panthers, simbionese liberation army, bader meinhof etc. Correct. A few black people started carrying, expressing their right to do so, and the rightie's hero Reagan immediately passed gun control. |
#27
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
We need to ban police cars
On Thursday, August 29, 2019 at 7:42:27 PM UTC-4, Bob F wrote:
On 8/29/2019 12:49 PM, T wrote: On 8/28/19 5:39 PM, Bob F wrote: On 8/28/2019 12:09 PM, T wrote: On 8/28/19 11:16 AM, Grumpy Old White Guy wrote: On 8/28/2019 1:59 PM, Bob F wrote: Funny, how these right wing wacko terrorists are so fond of previously illegal weapons of war. Back then, we didn't have anywhere near a bad of atrocities. What could have changed that? Ted Kennedy's Oldsmobile killed more people than all my guns put together.* Why is that? I placed my gun on my table and stared at it for hours.* Although quite handsome in its own right, it just sat there and did nothing.* Go figure... It is only weapons that can be used for insurrection that they want to ban.* They could give a s*** about instruments that can be used for murder. The constitution clearly states that one of the purposes of the militia, for which we are supposed to have guns, it to SUPPRESS insurrection. Clause 15: To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions; Hi Bob, I could not help but notice that you did not answer my question about insurrection weapons and instruments of murder. Boy you have a selective interpretation! 2nd amendment: *** A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security *** of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear *** arms, shall not be infringed. If in doubt, the EXACT meaning of the constitution is DEFINED in the Federalist papers. The Federalist No. 46 ** Notwithstanding the military establishments in the several ** kingdoms of Europe, which are carried as far as the public ** resources will bear, the governments are afraid to trust ** the people with arms. And it is not certain, that with this ** aid alone they would not be able to shake off their yokes.. ** But were the people to possess the additional advantages of ** local governments chosen by themselves, who could collect ** the national will and direct the national force, and of ** officers appointed out of the militia, by these governments, ** and attached both to them and to the militia, it may be ** affirmed with the greatest assurance, that the throne of ** every tyranny in Europe would be speedily overturned in spite ** of the legions which surround it. You need to get off your ass, find a shooting range, take some lessons, and see what this is all about. I don't need a gun to prove my manhood. Knowing the 5x increase in the chance of someone in my house dying from gunshot if I had a gun in the house, I think I will pass. I have never felt a need for one anyway. I'd much rather go snowboarding or play volleyball. Oh no, when the insurrection starts, what good will that snowboard be? LOL The problem I see is that a lot of these wing nuts that believe this stuff could think that the enemy is guys like you and start their "insurrection". Who decides what an insurrection is, when the govt needs to be overthrown and who the enemy really is? We kind of had that it 1860, didn't work out too well. Also Mr. T must be out of his mind to think that armed citizens are going to overpower the police, Homeland Security, Dept of Defense, etc. First thing they'd do is cut off the supply of ammo, not hard to do, but I suppose Mr. T has 200,000 rounds stored and ready in his patriot bunker. |
#28
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
We need to ban police cars
On Thursday, August 29, 2019 at 7:42:27 PM UTC-4, Bob F wrote:
On 8/29/2019 12:49 PM, T wrote: On 8/28/19 5:39 PM, Bob F wrote: On 8/28/2019 12:09 PM, T wrote: On 8/28/19 11:16 AM, Grumpy Old White Guy wrote: On 8/28/2019 1:59 PM, Bob F wrote: Funny, how these right wing wacko terrorists are so fond of previously illegal weapons of war. Back then, we didn't have anywhere near a bad of atrocities. What could have changed that? Ted Kennedy's Oldsmobile killed more people than all my guns put together.* Why is that? I placed my gun on my table and stared at it for hours.* Although quite handsome in its own right, it just sat there and did nothing.* Go figure... It is only weapons that can be used for insurrection that they want to ban.* They could give a s*** about instruments that can be used for murder. The constitution clearly states that one of the purposes of the militia, for which we are supposed to have guns, it to SUPPRESS insurrection. Clause 15: To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions; Hi Bob, I could not help but notice that you did not answer my question about insurrection weapons and instruments of murder. Boy you have a selective interpretation! 2nd amendment: *** A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security *** of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear *** arms, shall not be infringed. If in doubt, the EXACT meaning of the constitution is DEFINED in the Federalist papers. The Federalist No. 46 ** Notwithstanding the military establishments in the several ** kingdoms of Europe, which are carried as far as the public ** resources will bear, the governments are afraid to trust ** the people with arms. And it is not certain, that with this ** aid alone they would not be able to shake off their yokes.. ** But were the people to possess the additional advantages of ** local governments chosen by themselves, who could collect ** the national will and direct the national force, and of ** officers appointed out of the militia, by these governments, ** and attached both to them and to the militia, it may be ** affirmed with the greatest assurance, that the throne of ** every tyranny in Europe would be speedily overturned in spite ** of the legions which surround it. You need to get off your ass, find a shooting range, take some lessons, and see what this is all about. I don't need a gun to prove my manhood. Knowing the 5x increase in the chance of someone in my house dying from gunshot if I had a gun in the house, I think I will pass. I have never felt a need for one anyway. I'd much rather go snowboarding or play volleyball. Everybody's different. My husband enjoys target shooting and eating venison. That 5x increase in the chances doesn't mean anything on an individual basis. Details matter. Cindy Hamilton |
#29
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
We need to ban police cars
On 8/29/19 7:42 PM, Bob F wrote:
On 8/29/2019 12:49 PM, T wrote: On 8/28/19 5:39 PM, Bob F wrote: On 8/28/2019 12:09 PM, T wrote: On 8/28/19 11:16 AM, Grumpy Old White Guy wrote: On 8/28/2019 1:59 PM, Bob F wrote: Funny, how these right wing wacko terrorists are so fond of previously illegal weapons of war. Back then, we didn't have anywhere near a bad of atrocities. What could have changed that? Ted Kennedy's Oldsmobile killed more people than all my guns put together.* Why is that? I placed my gun on my table and stared at it for hours.* Although quite handsome in its own right, it just sat there and did nothing.* Go figure... It is only weapons that can be used for insurrection that they want to ban.* They could give a s*** about instruments that can be used for murder. The constitution clearly states that one of the purposes of the militia, for which we are supposed to have guns, it to SUPPRESS insurrection. Clause 15: To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions; Hi Bob, I could not help but notice that you did not answer my question about insurrection weapons and instruments of murder. Boy you have a selective interpretation! 2nd amendment: **** A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security **** of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear **** arms, shall not be infringed. If in doubt, the EXACT meaning of the constitution is DEFINED in the Federalist papers. The Federalist No. 46 *** Notwithstanding the military establishments in the several *** kingdoms of Europe, which are carried as far as the public *** resources will bear, the governments are afraid to trust *** the people with arms. And it is not certain, that with this *** aid alone they would not be able to shake off their yokes. *** But were the people to possess the additional advantages of *** local governments chosen by themselves, who could collect *** the national will and direct the national force, and of *** officers appointed out of the militia, by these governments, *** and attached both to them and to the militia, it may be *** affirmed with the greatest assurance, that the throne of *** every tyranny in Europe would be speedily overturned in spite *** of the legions which surround it. You need to get off your ass, find a shooting range, take some lessons, and see what this is all about. I don't need a gun to prove my manhood. Knowing the 5x increase in the chance of someone in my house dying from gunshot if I had a gun in the house, I think I will pass. I have never felt a need for one anyway. I'd much rather go snowboarding or play volleyball. It's better to have a gun and not need it than to need a gun and not have it. |
#30
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
We need to ban police cars
On 8/29/19 4:42 PM, Bob F wrote:
I*don't*need*a*gun*to*prove*my*manhood. That all depends on if you are a man to start with. Cars are dangerous as all hell. Does driving make you a man? If you are going to criticize guns, find out what they are actually about before opening your mouth. Gun courses at ranges will lend you guns. You don't have to buy one. (Although they will want you to try several out in the hopes you will adore one particular one and purchase it from them.) Knowing the 5x increase in the chance of someone in my house dying from gunshot if I had a gun in the house, I think I will pass. I have never felt*a*need*for*one*anyway. Oh brother. And how many times more likely are you to slip and break your head open if you have a bathtub/shower, especially if you use soap! And take and NRA certified course on gun safety before owning a gun. AND PAY ATTENTION! I'd*much*rather*go*snowboarding*or*play*vol leyball. I prefer fishing myself. But shooting is also a blast. I am pretty good at 50 yards free standing with my 45. |
#31
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
We need to ban police cars
On 8/30/19 3:20 AM, Cindy Hamilton wrote:
Everybody's different. My husband enjoys target shooting and eating venison. 1+ on the target shooting 1- on the venison. YUK YUK YUK YUK !!!! I hate venison. And that included EVERY WAY other tell me they prepare it. But weird, I adore Elk and Moose. |
#32
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
We need to ban police cars
On 8/30/19 3:25 AM, devnull wrote:
On 8/29/19 7:42 PM, Bob F wrote: On 8/29/2019 12:49 PM, T wrote: On 8/28/19 5:39 PM, Bob F wrote: On 8/28/2019 12:09 PM, T wrote: On 8/28/19 11:16 AM, Grumpy Old White Guy wrote: On 8/28/2019 1:59 PM, Bob F wrote: Funny, how these right wing wacko terrorists are so fond of previously illegal weapons of war. Back then, we didn't have anywhere near a bad of atrocities. What could have changed that? Ted Kennedy's Oldsmobile killed more people than all my guns put together.* Why is that? I placed my gun on my table and stared at it for hours.* Although quite handsome in its own right, it just sat there and did nothing.* Go figure... It is only weapons that can be used for insurrection that they want to ban.* They could give a s*** about instruments that can be used for murder. The constitution clearly states that one of the purposes of the militia, for which we are supposed to have guns, it to SUPPRESS insurrection. Clause 15: To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions; Hi Bob, I could not help but notice that you did not answer my question about insurrection weapons and instruments of murder. Boy you have a selective interpretation! 2nd amendment: **** A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security **** of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear **** arms, shall not be infringed. If in doubt, the EXACT meaning of the constitution is DEFINED in the Federalist papers. The Federalist No. 46 *** Notwithstanding the military establishments in the several *** kingdoms of Europe, which are carried as far as the public *** resources will bear, the governments are afraid to trust *** the people with arms. And it is not certain, that with this *** aid alone they would not be able to shake off their yokes. *** But were the people to possess the additional advantages of *** local governments chosen by themselves, who could collect *** the national will and direct the national force, and of *** officers appointed out of the militia, by these governments, *** and attached both to them and to the militia, it may be *** affirmed with the greatest assurance, that the throne of *** every tyranny in Europe would be speedily overturned in spite *** of the legions which surround it. You need to get off your ass, find a shooting range, take some lessons, and see what this is all about. I don't need a gun to prove my manhood. Knowing the 5x increase in the chance of someone in my house dying from gunshot if I had a gun in the house, I think I will pass. I have never felt a need for one anyway. I'd much rather go snowboarding or play volleyball. It's better to have a gun and not need it than to need a gun and not have it. What??? Are you implying a gun is like a seat belt or a shower mat? Where are you getting such radical thoughts!!! This is what happens to you when you think instead of feel! :-) |
#33
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
We need to ban police cars
And you STILL did not answer my question about why you
are only interested in banning weapons that can be used for insurrection and not all instruments of murder. This is CLEARLY not about public safety, but about the safety of the proletariat. Best solution to the Dictatorship of the Proletariat is HOT LEAD. And your team knows that. YOU CAN NOT TRUST A GOVERNMENT THAT DOES NOT TRUST ITS PEOPLE WITH THE MEANS OF ITS OVERTHROW. |
#35
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
We need to ban police cars
On Friday, August 30, 2019 at 10:55:00 PM UTC-4, Ralph Mowery wrote:
In article , lid says... It's better to have a gun and not need it than to need a gun and not have it. What??? Are you implying a gun is like a seat belt or a shower mat? Where are you getting such radical thoughts!!! This is what happens to you when you think instead of feel! :-) Just like a parachute. If you ever need one and do not have one, chances are you will never need one again. --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus How many people die each year from having a parachute in their house, where it was used on the spur of the moment in anger or a kid gets a hold of it, etc? Many criminals break into homes and steal parachutes and use them in crimes? |
#36
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
We need to ban police cars
On 8/30/19 7:54 PM, Ralph Mowery wrote:
In article , lid says... It's better to have a gun and not need it than to need a gun and not have it. What??? Are you implying a gun is like a seat belt or a shower mat? Where are you getting such radical thoughts!!! This is what happens to you when you think instead of feel! :-) Just like a parachute. If you ever need one and do not have one, chances are you will never need one again. You are thinking again! What did I tell you about thinking!!! You are suppose to FEEL, not think! :-) |
#37
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
We need to ban police cars
On 31/08/2019 03:54, Ralph Mowery wrote:
In article , lid says... It's better to have a gun and not need it than to need a gun and not have it. What??? Are you implying a gun is like a seat belt or a shower mat? Where are you getting such radical thoughts!!! This is what happens to you when you think instead of feel! :-) Just like a parachute. If you ever need one and do not have one, chances are you will never need one again. --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus Doh! if you're gonna do a parachute jump, then yes, wear one. Or are you saying that you wear a parachute whenever you go up in a plane? Do airlines allow that now then !? -- Bod |
#38
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
We need to ban police cars
On 31/08/2019 04:13, trader_4 wrote:
On Friday, August 30, 2019 at 10:55:00 PM UTC-4, Ralph Mowery wrote: In article , lid says... It's better to have a gun and not need it than to need a gun and not have it. What??? Are you implying a gun is like a seat belt or a shower mat? Where are you getting such radical thoughts!!! This is what happens to you when you think instead of feel! :-) Just like a parachute. If you ever need one and do not have one, chances are you will never need one again. --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus How many people die each year from having a parachute in their house, where it was used on the spur of the moment in anger or a kid gets a hold of it, etc? Many criminals break into homes and steal parachutes and use them in crimes? Moral of the story: you should wear a parachute at all times. You never know when you might accidentally fall off a cliff or a very high building. You know it makes sense! -- Bod |
#39
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
We need to ban police cars
On 31/08/2019 04:35, T wrote:
On 8/30/19 7:54 PM, Ralph Mowery wrote: In article , lid says... It's better to have a gun and not need it than to need a gun and not have it. What???* Are you implying a gun is like a seat belt or a shower mat? Where are you getting such radical thoughts!!!* This is what happens to you when you think instead of feel! :-) Just* like a parachute.* If you ever need one and do not have one, chances are you will never need one again. You are thinking again!* What did I tell you about thinking!!! You are suppose to FEEL, not think! :-) Why would you need to carry a gun, Mr T? Surely your god will protect you. -- Bod |
#40
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
We need to ban police cars
On Friday, August 30, 2019 at 9:28:16 PM UTC-4, T wrote:
On 8/30/19 3:20 AM, Cindy Hamilton wrote: Everybody's different. My husband enjoys target shooting and eating venison. 1+ on the target shooting 1- on the venison. YUK YUK YUK YUK !!!! I hate venison. And that included EVERY WAY other tell me they prepare it. I don't like venison very much, nor the smell of it cooking. But weird, I adore Elk and Moose. Not readily available here. I had a bear summer sausage once that was very good. Cindy Hamilton |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Britain to ban sale of all diesel and petrol cars and vans from2040 | Home Repair | |||
Britain to ban sale of all diesel and petrol cars and vans from 2040 | Home Repair | |||
Britain to ban sale of all diesel and petrol cars and vans from 2040 | Home Repair | |||
Al Go Spend $90 Trillion To Ban Cars From Every Major City In The World | Home Repair |