The Daring Dufas wrote:

Well, it's certainly happening in our lifetimes.

The good times lasted until John Adams came up with the Sedition Act:

"SECT. 2. And be it further enacted, That if any person shall write, print,
utter, or publish, or shall cause or procure to be written, printed,
uttered, or published, or shall knowingly and willingly assist or aid in
writing, printing, uttering, or publishing any false, scandalous and
malicious writing or writings against the government of the United States,
or either House of the Congress of the United States, or the President of
the United States, with intent to defame the said government, or either
House of the said Congress, or the said President, or to bring them, or
either of them, into contempt or disrepute; or to excite against them, or
either or any of them, the hatred of the good people of the United States,
or to stir up sedition within the United States; or to excite any unlawful
combinations therein, for opposing or resisting any law of the United
States, or any act of the President of the United States, done in pursuance
of any such law, or of the powers in him vested by the Constitution of the
United States; or to resist, oppose, or defeat any such law or act; or to
aid, encourage or abet any hostile designs of any foreign nation against the
United States, their people or government, then such person, being thereof
convicted before any court of the United States having jurisdiction thereof,
shall be punished by a fine not exceeding two thousand dollars, and by
imprisonment not exceeding two years. "

http://constitution.org/rf/sedition_1798.htm

Winston_Smith wrote:

Bob Barr's candidacy leads me to wonder if the LP knows
what a libertarian is.

Noticed that too, did you.

I recall reading a libertarian forum where one of the posters was at the
convention. It went from a 'Who let that idiot Barr in?" early in the day to
a shocked "Barr got the nomination."

Gunner Asch on Sun, 11 Aug 2013 16:35:14 -0700
typed in alt.survival the following:
On Sun, 11 Aug 2013 13:48:31 -0500, The Daring Dufas
wrote:

On 8/11/2013 12:23 PM, Gunner Asch wrote:
On Sun, 11 Aug 2013 11:07:30 -0600, rbowman
wrote:

pyotr filipivich wrote:

Strange. There seem to be a lot of "Libertarians" who seem to
believe otherwise. Or at least seem to believe that if they could
only get their guy elected President - He could fix everything. By
Executive Order if necessary, apparently.


LP members specialize in believing at least three impossible things before
breakfast. Do you thing the Democrats and Republicans are any different? Do
you think a Republican president in 2016 will fix anything? Do you think the
Tea Party contingent, most of whom don't really know the history of their
beloved Constitution, would fix anything if they came to power? Have those
dirty, commie progressives accomplished much?

I've watched too many swings of the pendulum. One of the better professors
in one of my college physics classes was into interesting demonstrations.
For one he constructed a pendulum from a bowling ball suspended from about a
20' wire attached to an eye in the ceiling of the lecture hall. He held the
ball firmly against his chin, let it go, and stood immobile. Of course, the
ball did not knock him on his ass on its return, much to the disappointment
of the class. A pendulum only swings back and forth within defined
constraints and left to its own devices will eventually stop at its
equilibrium point.

Conservatives would like to reach out, grab the ball, and hold it stationary
but it always slips out of their fingers. Progressives would like to speed
the pendulum up but their random pushes never in crease the amplitude to get
it beyond the range of isochronism.


and you seem to not understand the difference between small (L)
libertarians and those that belong to the Libertarian Party.

The difference is rather vast..and is almost as wide as the difference
between the Left and the Right.
--

I suppose Libertarians with a small "l" are the true individuals who
believe in freedom and liberty so much that they don't want to belong to
any group because a big organized group will always *******ize the
ideals that caused the formation of said group. Being free is hard. ^_^

TDD

True indeed. Ive followed the Libertarian Party for decades as many
of their bleeves echo mine. Frankly however...its been Dope First,
Political Freedom a distant second, and has largely been composed of
every wierdo, wackjob and oddball that were 120 degrees out, from
the wierdos, wackjobs and oddballs on the Left.

There are a growing number of people with (small L) Libertarian
leanings in the Republican party..but so far..the Republican Party is
still controlled by the Rinos/weak sisters and Blue Bloods on the East
Coast. And they are what are holding the GOP back. They have to
go.

I suspect that the Tea Party will finally take control of the GOP..but
it will take another decade or two.

The TEA party has done more in the last four years to influence
the GOP and national politics, than the Libertarians have accomplished
in the last twenty.

You'll note, the TEA party got the full force of the Feds turned
against them. I've not heard any such attention being paid to the
Libertarian Party.
--
pyotr filipivich.
Just about the time you finally see light at the end of the tunnel,
you find out it's a Government Project to build more tunnel.

"Gunner Asch" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 11 Aug 2013 13:48:31 -0500, The Daring Dufas
wrote:

On 8/11/2013 12:23 PM, Gunner Asch wrote:
On Sun, 11 Aug 2013 11:07:30 -0600, rbowman
wrote:

pyotr filipivich wrote:

Strange. There seem to be a lot of "Libertarians" who seem to
believe otherwise. Or at least seem to believe that if they could
only get their guy elected President - He could fix everything. By
Executive Order if necessary, apparently.


LP members specialize in believing at least three impossible things
before
breakfast. Do you thing the Democrats and Republicans are any different?
Do
you think a Republican president in 2016 will fix anything? Do you think
the
Tea Party contingent, most of whom don't really know the history of
their
beloved Constitution, would fix anything if they came to power? Have
those
dirty, commie progressives accomplished much?

I've watched too many swings of the pendulum. One of the better
professors
in one of my college physics classes was into interesting
demonstrations.
For one he constructed a pendulum from a bowling ball suspended from
about a
20' wire attached to an eye in the ceiling of the lecture hall. He held
the
ball firmly against his chin, let it go, and stood immobile. Of course,
the
ball did not knock him on his ass on its return, much to the
disappointment
of the class. A pendulum only swings back and forth within defined
constraints and left to its own devices will eventually stop at its
equilibrium point.

Conservatives would like to reach out, grab the ball, and hold it
stationary
but it always slips out of their fingers. Progressives would like to
speed
the pendulum up but their random pushes never in crease the amplitude to
get
it beyond the range of isochronism.


and you seem to not understand the difference between small (L)
libertarians and those that belong to the Libertarian Party.

The difference is rather vast..and is almost as wide as the difference
between the Left and the Right.
--

I suppose Libertarians with a small "l" are the true individuals who
believe in freedom and liberty so much that they don't want to belong to
any group because a big organized group will always *******ize the
ideals that caused the formation of said group. Being free is hard. ^_^

TDD

True indeed. Ive followed the Libertarian Party for decades as many
of their bleeves echo mine. Frankly however...its been Dope First,
Political Freedom a distant second, and has largely been composed of
every wierdo, wackjob and oddball that were 120 degrees out, from
the wierdos, wackjobs and oddballs on the Left.

There are a growing number of people with (small L) Libertarian
leanings in the Republican party..but so far..the Republican Party is
still controlled by the Rinos/weak sisters and Blue Bloods on the East
Coast. And they are what are holding the GOP back. They have to
go.

I suspect that the Tea Party will finally take control of the GOP..but
it will take another decade or two.



Gunner

--
""Almost all liberal behavioral tropes track the impotent rage of small
children. Thus, for example, there is also the popular tactic of
repeating some stupid, meaningless phrase a billion times" Arms for
hostages, arms for hostages, arms for hostages, it's just about sex, just
about sex, just about sex, dumb,dumb, money in politics,money in
politics, Enron, Enron, Enron. Nothing repeated with mind-numbing
frequency in all major news outlets will not be believed by some members
of the populace. It is the permanence of evil; you can't stop it." (Ann
Coulter)


Unfortunatly the country does not have a decade or two

On Sun, 11 Aug 2013 23:50:22 -0500, The Daring Dufas
wrote:

On 8/11/2013 6:35 PM, Gunner Asch wrote:
On Sun, 11 Aug 2013 13:48:31 -0500, The Daring Dufas
wrote:

On 8/11/2013 12:23 PM, Gunner Asch wrote:
On Sun, 11 Aug 2013 11:07:30 -0600, rbowman
wrote:

pyotr filipivich wrote:

Strange. There seem to be a lot of "Libertarians" who seem to
believe otherwise. Or at least seem to believe that if they could
only get their guy elected President - He could fix everything. By
Executive Order if necessary, apparently.


LP members specialize in believing at least three impossible things before
breakfast. Do you thing the Democrats and Republicans are any different? Do
you think a Republican president in 2016 will fix anything? Do you think the
Tea Party contingent, most of whom don't really know the history of their
beloved Constitution, would fix anything if they came to power? Have those
dirty, commie progressives accomplished much?

I've watched too many swings of the pendulum. One of the better professors
in one of my college physics classes was into interesting demonstrations.
For one he constructed a pendulum from a bowling ball suspended from about a
20' wire attached to an eye in the ceiling of the lecture hall. He held the
ball firmly against his chin, let it go, and stood immobile. Of course, the
ball did not knock him on his ass on its return, much to the disappointment
of the class. A pendulum only swings back and forth within defined
constraints and left to its own devices will eventually stop at its
equilibrium point.

Conservatives would like to reach out, grab the ball, and hold it stationary
but it always slips out of their fingers. Progressives would like to speed
the pendulum up but their random pushes never in crease the amplitude to get
it beyond the range of isochronism.


and you seem to not understand the difference between small (L)
libertarians and those that belong to the Libertarian Party.

The difference is rather vast..and is almost as wide as the difference
between the Left and the Right.
--

I suppose Libertarians with a small "l" are the true individuals who
believe in freedom and liberty so much that they don't want to belong to
any group because a big organized group will always *******ize the
ideals that caused the formation of said group. Being free is hard. ^_^

TDD

True indeed. Ive followed the Libertarian Party for decades as many
of their bleeves echo mine. Frankly however...its been Dope First,
Political Freedom a distant second, and has largely been composed of
every wierdo, wackjob and oddball that were 120 degrees out, from
the wierdos, wackjobs and oddballs on the Left.

There are a growing number of people with (small L) Libertarian
leanings in the Republican party..but so far..the Republican Party is
still controlled by the Rinos/weak sisters and Blue Bloods on the East
Coast. And they are what are holding the GOP back. They have to
go.

I suspect that the Tea Party will finally take control of the GOP..but
it will take another decade or two.

Gunner


When religious wackos got control of the Republican Party it was just as
bad as Commies getting control of The Democrat Party. Where have all the
sane people in government gone? O_o

TDD


Which "religious wackos" were those? Ill be waiting for the cites to
those "religious wackos" who got control of the Republican party.

Please..use as much white space as necessary.

Gunner



--
""Almost all liberal behavioral tropes track the impotent rage of small
children. Thus, for example, there is also the popular tactic of
repeating some stupid, meaningless phrase a billion times" Arms for
hostages, arms for hostages, arms for hostages, it's just about sex, just
about sex, just about sex, dumb,dumb, money in politics,money in
politics, Enron, Enron, Enron. Nothing repeated with mind-numbing
frequency in all major news outlets will not be believed by some members
of the populace. It is the permanence of evil; you can't stop it." (Ann
Coulter)

On Sun, 11 Aug 2013 23:09:52 -0700, pyotr filipivich
wrote:

Gunner Asch on Sun, 11 Aug 2013 16:35:14 -0700
typed in alt.survival the following:
On Sun, 11 Aug 2013 13:48:31 -0500, The Daring Dufas
wrote:

On 8/11/2013 12:23 PM, Gunner Asch wrote:
On Sun, 11 Aug 2013 11:07:30 -0600, rbowman
wrote:

pyotr filipivich wrote:

Strange. There seem to be a lot of "Libertarians" who seem to
believe otherwise. Or at least seem to believe that if they could
only get their guy elected President - He could fix everything. By
Executive Order if necessary, apparently.


LP members specialize in believing at least three impossible things before
breakfast. Do you thing the Democrats and Republicans are any different? Do
you think a Republican president in 2016 will fix anything? Do you think the
Tea Party contingent, most of whom don't really know the history of their
beloved Constitution, would fix anything if they came to power? Have those
dirty, commie progressives accomplished much?

I've watched too many swings of the pendulum. One of the better professors
in one of my college physics classes was into interesting demonstrations.
For one he constructed a pendulum from a bowling ball suspended from about a
20' wire attached to an eye in the ceiling of the lecture hall. He held the
ball firmly against his chin, let it go, and stood immobile. Of course, the
ball did not knock him on his ass on its return, much to the disappointment
of the class. A pendulum only swings back and forth within defined
constraints and left to its own devices will eventually stop at its
equilibrium point.

Conservatives would like to reach out, grab the ball, and hold it stationary
but it always slips out of their fingers. Progressives would like to speed
the pendulum up but their random pushes never in crease the amplitude to get
it beyond the range of isochronism.


and you seem to not understand the difference between small (L)
libertarians and those that belong to the Libertarian Party.

The difference is rather vast..and is almost as wide as the difference
between the Left and the Right.
--

I suppose Libertarians with a small "l" are the true individuals who
believe in freedom and liberty so much that they don't want to belong to
any group because a big organized group will always *******ize the
ideals that caused the formation of said group. Being free is hard. ^_^

TDD

True indeed. Ive followed the Libertarian Party for decades as many
of their bleeves echo mine. Frankly however...its been Dope First,
Political Freedom a distant second, and has largely been composed of
every wierdo, wackjob and oddball that were 120 degrees out, from
the wierdos, wackjobs and oddballs on the Left.

There are a growing number of people with (small L) Libertarian
leanings in the Republican party..but so far..the Republican Party is
still controlled by the Rinos/weak sisters and Blue Bloods on the East
Coast. And they are what are holding the GOP back. They have to
go.

I suspect that the Tea Party will finally take control of the GOP..but
it will take another decade or two.

The TEA party has done more in the last four years to influence
the GOP and national politics, than the Libertarians have accomplished
in the last twenty.

You'll note, the TEA party got the full force of the Feds turned
against them. I've not heard any such attention being paid to the
Libertarian Party.


Ayup. Good work too!

Say...you guys seen this article yet?

http://www.captainsjournal.com/2013/...surgency-cops/


--
""Almost all liberal behavioral tropes track the impotent rage of small
children. Thus, for example, there is also the popular tactic of
repeating some stupid, meaningless phrase a billion times" Arms for
hostages, arms for hostages, arms for hostages, it's just about sex, just
about sex, just about sex, dumb,dumb, money in politics,money in
politics, Enron, Enron, Enron. Nothing repeated with mind-numbing
frequency in all major news outlets will not be believed by some members
of the populace. It is the permanence of evil; you can't stop it." (Ann
Coulter)

One of the ways I know a Republican is successful. If the liberal
Democrats get into a frenzy attacking him (her).

..
Christopher A. Young
Learn about Jesus
www.lds.org
..

On 8/12/2013 2:09 AM, pyotr filipivich wrote:

I suspect that the Tea Party will finally take control of the GOP..but
it will take another decade or two.

The TEA party has done more in the last four years to influence
the GOP and national politics, than the Libertarians have accomplished
in the last twenty.

You'll note, the TEA party got the full force of the Feds turned
against them. I've not heard any such attention being paid to the
Libertarian Party.

What's about to happen? I see economic collapse,
martial law, and major power grab. And probably
class warfare, and a few other concerns.

..
Christopher A. Young
Learn about Jesus
www.lds.org
..

On 8/12/2013 5:53 AM, Ray Keller wrote:

There are a growing number of people with (small L) Libertarian
leanings in the Republican party..but so far..the Republican Party is
still controlled by the Rinos/weak sisters and Blue Bloods on the East
Coast. And they are what are holding the GOP back. They have to
go.

I suspect that the Tea Party will finally take control of the GOP..but
it will take another decade or two.



Gunner


Unfortunatly the country does not have a decade or two

On Mon, 12 Aug 2013 02:53:07 -0700, "Ray Keller"
wrote:


"Gunner Asch" wrote in message
.. .
On Sun, 11 Aug 2013 13:48:31 -0500, The Daring Dufas
wrote:

On 8/11/2013 12:23 PM, Gunner Asch wrote:
On Sun, 11 Aug 2013 11:07:30 -0600, rbowman
wrote:

pyotr filipivich wrote:

Strange. There seem to be a lot of "Libertarians" who seem to
believe otherwise. Or at least seem to believe that if they could
only get their guy elected President - He could fix everything. By
Executive Order if necessary, apparently.


LP members specialize in believing at least three impossible things
before
breakfast. Do you thing the Democrats and Republicans are any different?
Do
you think a Republican president in 2016 will fix anything? Do you think
the
Tea Party contingent, most of whom don't really know the history of
their
beloved Constitution, would fix anything if they came to power? Have
those
dirty, commie progressives accomplished much?

I've watched too many swings of the pendulum. One of the better
professors
in one of my college physics classes was into interesting
demonstrations.
For one he constructed a pendulum from a bowling ball suspended from
about a
20' wire attached to an eye in the ceiling of the lecture hall. He held
the
ball firmly against his chin, let it go, and stood immobile. Of course,
the
ball did not knock him on his ass on its return, much to the
disappointment
of the class. A pendulum only swings back and forth within defined
constraints and left to its own devices will eventually stop at its
equilibrium point.

Conservatives would like to reach out, grab the ball, and hold it
stationary
but it always slips out of their fingers. Progressives would like to
speed
the pendulum up but their random pushes never in crease the amplitude to
get
it beyond the range of isochronism.


and you seem to not understand the difference between small (L)
libertarians and those that belong to the Libertarian Party.

The difference is rather vast..and is almost as wide as the difference
between the Left and the Right.
--

I suppose Libertarians with a small "l" are the true individuals who
believe in freedom and liberty so much that they don't want to belong to
any group because a big organized group will always *******ize the
ideals that caused the formation of said group. Being free is hard. ^_^

TDD

True indeed. Ive followed the Libertarian Party for decades as many
of their bleeves echo mine. Frankly however...its been Dope First,
Political Freedom a distant second, and has largely been composed of
every wierdo, wackjob and oddball that were 120 degrees out, from
the wierdos, wackjobs and oddballs on the Left.

There are a growing number of people with (small L) Libertarian
leanings in the Republican party..but so far..the Republican Party is
still controlled by the Rinos/weak sisters and Blue Bloods on the East
Coast. And they are what are holding the GOP back. They have to
go.

I suspect that the Tea Party will finally take control of the GOP..but
it will take another decade or two.



Gunner

--
""Almost all liberal behavioral tropes track the impotent rage of small
children. Thus, for example, there is also the popular tactic of
repeating some stupid, meaningless phrase a billion times" Arms for
hostages, arms for hostages, arms for hostages, it's just about sex, just
about sex, just about sex, dumb,dumb, money in politics,money in
politics, Enron, Enron, Enron. Nothing repeated with mind-numbing
frequency in all major news outlets will not be believed by some members
of the populace. It is the permanence of evil; you can't stop it." (Ann
Coulter)


Unfortunatly the country does not have a decade or two

True enough.

But then..neither do the Leftwingers.


--
""Almost all liberal behavioral tropes track the impotent rage of small
children. Thus, for example, there is also the popular tactic of
repeating some stupid, meaningless phrase a billion times" Arms for
hostages, arms for hostages, arms for hostages, it's just about sex, just
about sex, just about sex, dumb,dumb, money in politics,money in
politics, Enron, Enron, Enron. Nothing repeated with mind-numbing
frequency in all major news outlets will not be believed by some members
of the populace. It is the permanence of evil; you can't stop it." (Ann
Coulter)

On 8/12/2013 5:11 AM, Gunner Asch wrote:
On Sun, 11 Aug 2013 23:50:22 -0500, The Daring Dufas
wrote:

On 8/11/2013 6:35 PM, Gunner Asch wrote:
On Sun, 11 Aug 2013 13:48:31 -0500, The Daring Dufas
wrote:

On 8/11/2013 12:23 PM, Gunner Asch wrote:
On Sun, 11 Aug 2013 11:07:30 -0600, rbowman
wrote:

pyotr filipivich wrote:

Strange. There seem to be a lot of "Libertarians" who seem to
believe otherwise. Or at least seem to believe that if they could
only get their guy elected President - He could fix everything. By
Executive Order if necessary, apparently.


LP members specialize in believing at least three impossible things before
breakfast. Do you thing the Democrats and Republicans are any different? Do
you think a Republican president in 2016 will fix anything? Do you think the
Tea Party contingent, most of whom don't really know the history of their
beloved Constitution, would fix anything if they came to power? Have those
dirty, commie progressives accomplished much?

I've watched too many swings of the pendulum. One of the better professors
in one of my college physics classes was into interesting demonstrations.
For one he constructed a pendulum from a bowling ball suspended from about a
20' wire attached to an eye in the ceiling of the lecture hall. He held the
ball firmly against his chin, let it go, and stood immobile. Of course, the
ball did not knock him on his ass on its return, much to the disappointment
of the class. A pendulum only swings back and forth within defined
constraints and left to its own devices will eventually stop at its
equilibrium point.

Conservatives would like to reach out, grab the ball, and hold it stationary
but it always slips out of their fingers. Progressives would like to speed
the pendulum up but their random pushes never in crease the amplitude to get
it beyond the range of isochronism.


and you seem to not understand the difference between small (L)
libertarians and those that belong to the Libertarian Party.

The difference is rather vast..and is almost as wide as the difference
between the Left and the Right.
--

I suppose Libertarians with a small "l" are the true individuals who
believe in freedom and liberty so much that they don't want to belong to
any group because a big organized group will always *******ize the
ideals that caused the formation of said group. Being free is hard. ^_^

TDD

True indeed. Ive followed the Libertarian Party for decades as many
of their bleeves echo mine. Frankly however...its been Dope First,
Political Freedom a distant second, and has largely been composed of
every wierdo, wackjob and oddball that were 120 degrees out, from
the wierdos, wackjobs and oddballs on the Left.

There are a growing number of people with (small L) Libertarian
leanings in the Republican party..but so far..the Republican Party is
still controlled by the Rinos/weak sisters and Blue Bloods on the East
Coast. And they are what are holding the GOP back. They have to
go.

I suspect that the Tea Party will finally take control of the GOP..but
it will take another decade or two.

Gunner


When religious wackos got control of the Republican Party it was just as
bad as Commies getting control of The Democrat Party. Where have all the
sane people in government gone? O_o

TDD


Which "religious wackos" were those? Ill be waiting for the cites to
those "religious wackos" who got control of the Republican party.

Please..use as much white space as necessary.

Gunner


All politics is local, here in Alabamastan the Republican party had to
go after those with conservative religious ideals since we are in the
middle of The Bible Belt. As for wackos of any type taking over the
political parties, perhaps I was being fecesious but the press sure put
a spotlight on the Christian beliefs of any of the Republicans who were
running for office. The Leftist press tried to equate their religion
with racism but Republicans are certainly not racist. G.W. Bush did
support faith based organizations but due to what I must believe are his
religious beliefs, had a problem with homosexuals, abortion and stem
cell research based on cells obtained from aborted fetuses. When
a politician makes decisions for the whole country based on his,her,its
religion, what do you call them. You don't have to be pious to possess a
sense of morality. Oh yea, I'm not anti religion unless it's based on
killing all nonbelievers. ^_^

https://tinyurl.com/mykhnwl

TDD

Gunner Asch wrote:

http://www.captainsjournal.com/2013/...surgency-cops/

Are you thinking those teams will be Oath Keepers?

rbowman on Mon, 12 Aug 2013 07:56:46 -0600 typed
in alt.survival the following:
Gunner Asch wrote:

http://www.captainsjournal.com/2013/...surgency-cops/

Are you thinking those teams will be Oath Keepers?

Ad there he goes for the red herring.

Sorry bowman, the two are only marginally related. But fear not,
you have a strong record of voting to keep the Republican's out, so
you have nothing to worry about.
--
pyotr filipivich.
Just about the time you finally see light at the end of the tunnel,
you find out it's a Government Project to build more tunnel.

On Mon, 12 Aug 2013 08:19:34 -0500, The Daring Dufas
wrote:

perhaps I was being fecesious but the press sure put
a spotlight on the Christian beliefs of any of the Republicans who were
running for office.

Of course the Leftwing press does. You havent figured out yet that
thats one of their tried and true tactics? They have done this for 30
yrs. And you are just now discovering this factoid????

Gunner

--
""Almost all liberal behavioral tropes track the impotent rage of small
children. Thus, for example, there is also the popular tactic of
repeating some stupid, meaningless phrase a billion times" Arms for
hostages, arms for hostages, arms for hostages, it's just about sex, just
about sex, just about sex, dumb,dumb, money in politics,money in
politics, Enron, Enron, Enron. Nothing repeated with mind-numbing
frequency in all major news outlets will not be believed by some members
of the populace. It is the permanence of evil; you can't stop it." (Ann
Coulter)

On Mon, 12 Aug 2013 08:19:34 -0500, The Daring Dufas
wrote:

. Oh yea, I'm not anti religion unless it's based on
killing all nonbelievers. ^_^

Then you dont have a problem with killing off all the Leftwingers,
right?

Some are zorostrians (belivers), some are wiccans (believers), most
are nominally christians (belivers) and so forth.

82% of the public at large believe in god(s) (feel free to google it)

32% of the public is leftwing extremist fringe kooks. So there is
considerable overlap.


--
""Almost all liberal behavioral tropes track the impotent rage of small
children. Thus, for example, there is also the popular tactic of
repeating some stupid, meaningless phrase a billion times" Arms for
hostages, arms for hostages, arms for hostages, it's just about sex, just
about sex, just about sex, dumb,dumb, money in politics,money in
politics, Enron, Enron, Enron. Nothing repeated with mind-numbing
frequency in all major news outlets will not be believed by some members
of the populace. It is the permanence of evil; you can't stop it." (Ann
Coulter)

On Mon, 12 Aug 2013 07:56:46 -0600, rbowman
wrote:

Gunner Asch wrote:

http://www.captainsjournal.com/2013/...surgency-cops/

Are you thinking those teams will be Oath Keepers?

which teams? The government teams? Or those defending against them?


--
""Almost all liberal behavioral tropes track the impotent rage of small
children. Thus, for example, there is also the popular tactic of
repeating some stupid, meaningless phrase a billion times" Arms for
hostages, arms for hostages, arms for hostages, it's just about sex, just
about sex, just about sex, dumb,dumb, money in politics,money in
politics, Enron, Enron, Enron. Nothing repeated with mind-numbing
frequency in all major news outlets will not be believed by some members
of the populace. It is the permanence of evil; you can't stop it." (Ann
Coulter)

On Mon, 12 Aug 2013 08:22:26 -0700, pyotr filipivich
wrote:

rbowman on Mon, 12 Aug 2013 07:56:46 -0600 typed
in alt.survival the following:
Gunner Asch wrote:

http://www.captainsjournal.com/2013/...surgency-cops/

Are you thinking those teams will be Oath Keepers?

Ad there he goes for the red herring.

Sorry bowman, the two are only marginally related. But fear not,
you have a strong record of voting to keep the Republican's out, so
you have nothing to worry about.

BIG gold star.

Gunner

--
""Almost all liberal behavioral tropes track the impotent rage of small
children. Thus, for example, there is also the popular tactic of
repeating some stupid, meaningless phrase a billion times" Arms for
hostages, arms for hostages, arms for hostages, it's just about sex, just
about sex, just about sex, dumb,dumb, money in politics,money in
politics, Enron, Enron, Enron. Nothing repeated with mind-numbing
frequency in all major news outlets will not be believed by some members
of the populace. It is the permanence of evil; you can't stop it." (Ann
Coulter)

On 8/12/2013 5:01 PM, Gunner Asch wrote:
On Mon, 12 Aug 2013 08:19:34 -0500, The Daring Dufas
wrote:

. Oh yea, I'm not anti religion unless it's based on
killing all nonbelievers. ^_^

Then you dont have a problem with killing off all the Leftwingers,
right?

Some are zorostrians (belivers), some are wiccans (believers), most
are nominally christians (belivers) and so forth.

82% of the public at large believe in god(s) (feel free to google it)

32% of the public is leftwing extremist fringe kooks. So there is
considerable overlap.


But are Leftwingers or P.L.L.C.F., Progressive Liberal Leftist
Commiecrat Freaks considered human? Most humans have no problem stamping
out vermin but I would like to see a catch, sterilize and release
program to deal with them. The catch, lobotomize and release
program didn't work because nobody could tell any difference. ^_^

TDD

On Monday, August 12, 2013 8:02:58 AM UTC-4, Stormin Mormon wrote:
What's about to happen? I see economic collapse,

martial law, and major power grab. And probably

class warfare, and a few other concerns.



.

Christopher A. Young

Learn about Jesus

www.lds.org

.



On 8/12/2013 5:53 AM, Ray Keller wrote:



There are a growing number of people with (small L) Libertarian

leanings in the Republican party..but so far..the Republican Party is

still controlled by the Rinos/weak sisters and Blue Bloods on the East

Coast. And they are what are holding the GOP back. They have to

go.



I suspect that the Tea Party will finally take control of the GOP..but

it will take another decade or two.







Gunner





Unfortunatly the country does not have a decade or two





You need a couple of baseball bats wrapped around your goddamned capitalist head and Jesus shoved up your ass sideways.