"Home Enviro Health Specialists" wrote in
message ...

You should be honored and not insulting or argumentative towards people
who

Go **** off you ****head spamming cocksucker.

--

wrote:
On Jul 6, 8:06 pm, "Noon-Air" wrote:
"Bob F" wrote in message

. ..



wrote in message
ups.com...
On Jul 6, 7:40 pm, ftwhd wrote:
...
Go away.
Are you suggesting that this post is not on-topic to a particualr
group?
It must be one of the jerks on alt.hvac.
Ya think it might be because its CROSS POSTED TO 3 DIFFERENT GROUPS?????

No, I didn't think that. The post is about repairing A/C, and
saving money. Three relevant groups is well within accepted usage
standards.
A quick check on Wikipedia for "crossposting" says "Crossposting
is usually practiced when material is relevant and of interest to the
readers of more than one newsgroup." and "Crossposting to more than a
small number of newsgroups is likely to be counterproductive. A
commonly suggested limit is three newsgroups."
I've read elsewhere that up to 5 is okay if the groups are
relevant.


So Bill I guess this post would equate to yet another lie that came out
of you mouth, when you say I am a spammer.

--
Jim - UV-C Light Purification
e-mail:
--------------------------
HVAC Coil Irradiation to kill *Mold, *Mildew,
*Viruses and *Bacteria.
*Downstream Air Purification
--------------------------
Proven case studies, EPA Evaluation, Etc.
http://www.uvclightpurification.com
--------------------------
Find an additional source of income to your present HVAC business and
provide a healthier environment for your clients, energy savings, and
extend life of the HVAC.
---------------------------
Please contact me with any questions, suggestions or input that you may
have.

Thank You

wrote:
On Jul 6, 10:32 pm, "Jeffrey Lebowski" wrote:
wrote in message
...
Despite what you might like to think, your post is not appropriate to the
group alt.hvac...


The description of the group on Google is "Heating, venting and air
conditioning."
That's what this post is about.

I went and browsed the group and read some relevant threads. There is
no FAQ or charter that was voted on. There are a few people there
that are unhappy that sci.engr.heat-vent-ac didn't get popular...
which may be what this is about. The overwhelming response in the
threads is that alt.hvac is public, and for general discussion.

To anybody else replying to this guys post, note he added a "follow-up
to:" header to alt.****tard, and your newsreader may send it there and
not to the relevant groups. Posting via Google will do that, so just
replace alt.****tard with "alt.home.repair,misc.consumers.frugal-
living,alt.hvac"
This guy is talking about netiquette, and this says a lot about his
post.


So Bill I guess this post would equate to yet another lie that came out
of you mouth. When you asked me "did you apply to the charter for
membership?"

--
Jim - UV-C Light Purification
e-mail:
--------------------------
HVAC Coil Irradiation to kill *Mold, *Mildew,
*Viruses and *Bacteria.
*Downstream Air Purification
--------------------------
Proven case studies, EPA Evaluation, Etc.
http://www.uvclightpurification.com
--------------------------
Find an additional source of income to your present HVAC business and
provide a healthier environment for your clients, energy savings, and
extend life of the HVAC.
---------------------------
Please contact me with any questions, suggestions or input that you may
have.

Thank You

"Home Enviro Health Specialists" wrote in
message ...


Still trying to sell your snake oil products?

"Home Enviro Health Specialists" wrote in
message ...

Still trying to sell your snake oil products?

In article ,
"Bob F" wrote:
Read a little. Go see what Richard Clarke had to say about the intelligence
at
that time. The bushies hand picked intelligence, or manufactured it to meet
their desires. Read about the downing street memos. Saddam was contained - he
was no danger to us. He had no WMDs. There was plenty of intelligence that
said
not to invade. But that wasn't what bushie and cheney wanted.

Saddam was still shooting at our planes. He was violating the ceasefire
and UN agreements.
Just let him fester is your answer. Worthless. That's what Clinton did.
There is no answer you'll accept except Bush ****ed up.
Bush made a Command decision. Something Clinton never did. Clinton
didn't do jack ****.

Clinton didn't get us into Iraq. You idiots want to blame everything on
clinton.
HE was 4x the quality of president that bushie is. Bushie and bushies crew
ignored all the warnings from Clinton about Al Queda and all the other
warnings
he had before 9/11. He did NOTHING.

And Clinton did what about it on his watch?
He had the police investigate. How many terrorist attacks occurred on
Clintons watch and what did he do?
Guess what Bush did and is still doing? :-)

Let's see. 50% of the foreign fighters captured in Iraq are Saudies. Most of
the
9/11 attackers were Saudies. Most of the Financing of Al Queda comes from
Saudies. Good idea - lets attack Iran.

The Saudi's have no nuke program. I see now. You're a "containment" guy.
That means you're willing to wait until a US city is vaporized to maybe,
maybe do something.
Preventing that is what sane people do. Iran's president has stated
exactly what they want to do. As have the terrorists.
You can ignore it. I find loonies typically do.

What Bush did was smart. History will bear it out.
Clinton will go down with Carter as another inept Democrat.

You can cherry pick whatever and hindsight all you want. Fortunately
people like you aren't in charge or we'd have had other 9/11s by now.

--
http://michellemalkin.com/

Bill wrote:
In article ,
"Bob F" wrote:
Read a little. Go see what Richard Clarke had to say about the
intelligence at
that time. The bushies hand picked intelligence, or manufactured it
to meet their desires. Read about the downing street memos. Saddam
was contained - he was no danger to us. He had no WMDs. There was
plenty of intelligence that said
not to invade. But that wasn't what bushie and cheney wanted.

Saddam was still shooting at our planes. He was violating the
ceasefire and UN agreements.
Just let him fester is your answer. Worthless. That's what Clinton
did. There is no answer you'll accept except Bush ****ed up.
Bush made a Command decision. Something Clinton never did. Clinton
didn't do jack ****.

Clinton didn't get us into Iraq. You idiots want to blame everything
on clinton.
HE was 4x the quality of president that bushie is. Bushie and
bushies crew ignored all the warnings from Clinton about Al Queda
and all the other warnings
he had before 9/11. He did NOTHING.

And Clinton did what about it on his watch?
He had the police investigate. How many terrorist attacks
occurred on Clintons watch and what did he do?

Even slick would have done something post 9/11.

Guess what Bush did and is still doing? :-)

****ing an immense amount of money against the wall in Iraq to no useful purpose.

And an unacceptable number of US lives too.

His dad had much more of a clue about what made sense with Iraq.

Let's see. 50% of the foreign fighters captured in Iraq are Saudies.
Most of the
9/11 attackers were Saudies. Most of the Financing of Al Queda comes
from Saudies. Good idea - lets attack Iran.

The Saudi's have no nuke program. I see now. You're a "containment"
guy. That means you're willing to wait until a US city is vaporized
to maybe, maybe do something.
Preventing that is what sane people do. Iran's president has stated
exactly what they want to do. As have the terrorists.
You can ignore it. I find loonies typically do.

What Bush did was smart. History will bear it out.

Nope, not with Iraq.

Clinton will go down with Carter as another inept Democrat.

Probably.

You can cherry pick whatever and hindsight all you want.

It wasnt hindsight that saw W's dad avoid invading Iraq.

Fortunately people like you aren't in charge

You too.

or we'd have had other 9/11s by now.

Nope. It was never going to be repeatable once it became
obvious what could be done with hijacked aircraft. No one
will ever let their plane get hijacked again.

Its moved on to much harder stuff to prevent like the london and madrid bombings now.

"dfr" wrote in message
...
Bob F wrote:
"clams casino" wrote in message
...
dfr wrote:


At least what happens in Iraq is kept outside first world countrys.
They get to kill each other there instead.


That's what has me completely baffled.

1 - Why do they continue to fight our military in Iraq when they
could cause much more harm outside Iraq. Certainly is not because
GW has told them to stay in Iraq.as keeps telling us.

2 - All they would have to do is stay quiet for 6 months. GW would
claim visctory, US would leave and bingo - easy pickens.

I think you are missing something if you think Bush ever intends to leave,

His intentions are completely irrelevant.

As soon as we leave, any chance of them passing and following
the proposed oil act will be gone. Then what would have been the
point of invading? They aren't building those permanent bases and
embassy for nothing.

The shrub gets no say what so ever on leaving once he's been given the
bums rush at the next election, he doesnt even get to run at the next
election.

So he gets no say what so ever on leaving.


Then again - maybe he's not planning on leaving. Or maybe he's sure he can steal
another election for his "man".

Bob

"Rod Speed" wrote in message
news:46a259a5$0$12853$5a62ac22@per-qv1-newsreader-
Saddam was still shooting at our planes. He was violating the
ceasefire and UN agreements.
Just let him fester is your answer. Worthless. That's what Clinton
did. There is no answer you'll accept except Bush ****ed up.
Bush made a Command decision. Something Clinton never did. Clinton
didn't do jack ****.

And Bush did the same with every warning about bin Laden before 9/11. Clintons
people told his that Al Queda should be #1 priority - Bush did NOTHING.


Clinton didn't get us into Iraq. You idiots want to blame everything
on clinton.
HE was 4x the quality of president that bushie is. Bushie and
bushies crew ignored all the warnings from Clinton about Al Queda
and all the other warnings
he had before 9/11. He did NOTHING.

And Clinton did what about it on his watch?
He had the police investigate. How many terrorist attacks
occurred on Clintons watch and what did he do?

He through the culprits in jail. Which is way more than Bush has ever done.


Even slick would have done something post 9/11.

Guess what Bush did and is still doing? :-)

The wrong thing, obviously.


****ing an immense amount of money against the wall in Iraq to no useful
purpose.

And an unacceptable number of US lives too.

His dad had much more of a clue about what made sense with Iraq.

It's not often I approve of anything you say Rod. Is this really Rod Speed?


Let's see. 50% of the foreign fighters captured in Iraq are Saudies.
Most of the
9/11 attackers were Saudies. Most of the Financing of Al Queda comes
from Saudies. Good idea - lets attack Iran.

The Saudi's have no nuke program. I see now. You're a "containment"
guy. That means you're willing to wait until a US city is vaporized
to maybe, maybe do something.
Preventing that is what sane people do. Iran's president has stated
exactly what they want to do. As have the terrorists.
You can ignore it. I find loonies typically do.

The loonies in the white house are doing everything in their power to promote
terrorism.



What Bush did was smart. History will bear it out.

Nope, not with Iraq.

History will without doubt rate Bush II as this nations worst president.


Clinton will go down with Carter as another inept Democrat.

Probably.

You can cherry pick whatever and hindsight all you want.

It wasnt hindsight that saw W's dad avoid invading Iraq.

Fortunately people like you aren't in charge

You too.

or we'd have had other 9/11s by now.

Nope. It was never going to be repeatable once it became
obvious what could be done with hijacked aircraft. No one
will ever let their plane get hijacked again.

Its moved on to much harder stuff to prevent like the london and madrid
bombings now.


And when the next terrorist attack on America occurs, the right wing wackos that
support Bushie will say it's the Damocratic party's fault, despite the fact that
it will clearly disprove their "Fight 'em there" theory.

How the hell can they keep ignoring all the security agency reports coming out
saying how much worse off we are now?

Bob

Bob F wrote:
"dfr" wrote in message
...
Bob F wrote:
"clams casino" wrote in message
...
dfr wrote:


At least what happens in Iraq is kept outside first world
countrys. They get to kill each other there instead.


That's what has me completely baffled.

1 - Why do they continue to fight our military in Iraq when they
could cause much more harm outside Iraq. Certainly is not because
GW has told them to stay in Iraq.as keeps telling us.

2 - All they would have to do is stay quiet for 6 months. GW would
claim visctory, US would leave and bingo - easy pickens.

I think you are missing something if you think Bush ever intends to
leave,

His intentions are completely irrelevant.

As soon as we leave, any chance of them passing and following
the proposed oil act will be gone. Then what would have been the
point of invading? They aren't building those permanent bases and
embassy for nothing.

The shrub gets no say what so ever on leaving once he's been given
the bums rush at the next election, he doesnt even get to run at the
next election.

So he gets no say what so ever on leaving.


Then again - maybe he's not planning on leaving.

He leaves anyway, planning or not.

Or maybe he's sure he can steal another election for his "man".

Then he had better give up the wacky weed.

Bob F wrote:
"Rod Speed" wrote in message
news:46a259a5$0$12853$5a62ac22@per-qv1-newsreader-
Saddam was still shooting at our planes. He was violating the
ceasefire and UN agreements.
Just let him fester is your answer. Worthless. That's what Clinton
did. There is no answer you'll accept except Bush ****ed up.
Bush made a Command decision. Something Clinton never did. Clinton
didn't do jack ****.

And Bush did the same with every warning about bin Laden before 9/11.
Clintons people told his that Al Queda should be #1 priority - Bush
did NOTHING.

Clinton didn't get us into Iraq. You idiots want to blame
everything on clinton.
HE was 4x the quality of president that bushie is. Bushie and
bushies crew ignored all the warnings from Clinton about Al Queda
and all the other warnings
he had before 9/11. He did NOTHING.

And Clinton did what about it on his watch?
He had the police investigate. How many terrorist attacks
occurred on Clintons watch and what did he do?

He through the culprits in jail. Which is way more than Bush has ever
done.

Even slick would have done something post 9/11.

Guess what Bush did and is still doing? :-)

The wrong thing, obviously.


****ing an immense amount of money against the wall in Iraq to no
useful purpose.

And an unacceptable number of US lives too.

His dad had much more of a clue about what made sense with Iraq.

It's not often I approve of anything you say Rod. Is this really Rod
Speed?

Let's see. 50% of the foreign fighters captured in Iraq are
Saudies. Most of the
9/11 attackers were Saudies. Most of the Financing of Al Queda
comes from Saudies. Good idea - lets attack Iran.

The Saudi's have no nuke program. I see now. You're a "containment"
guy. That means you're willing to wait until a US city is vaporized
to maybe, maybe do something.
Preventing that is what sane people do. Iran's president has stated
exactly what they want to do. As have the terrorists.
You can ignore it. I find loonies typically do.

The loonies in the white house are doing everything in their power to
promote terrorism.



What Bush did was smart. History will bear it out.

Nope, not with Iraq.

History will without doubt rate Bush II as this nations worst president.

Plenty of doubt, actually.

Clinton will go down with Carter as another inept Democrat.

Probably.

You can cherry pick whatever and hindsight all you want.

It wasnt hindsight that saw W's dad avoid invading Iraq.

Fortunately people like you aren't in charge

You too.

or we'd have had other 9/11s by now.

Nope. It was never going to be repeatable once it became
obvious what could be done with hijacked aircraft. No one
will ever let their plane get hijacked again.

Its moved on to much harder stuff to prevent like the london and
madrid bombings now.

And when the next terrorist attack on America occurs, the right wing
wackos that support Bushie will say it's the Damocratic party's fault, despite the fact that it
will clearly disprove their "Fight 'em there" theory.

How the hell can they keep ignoring all the security agency reports coming out saying how much
worse off we are now?

They have no choice, there aint anyway way to wind the clock back now.

Please quit cross posting this crap to alt.hvac, nobody cares about all of
the left wing political crap

BTW.....welcome to my killfile

*PLONK*

"Noon-Air" wrote in message
. ..
Please quit cross posting this crap to alt.hvac, nobody cares about all of the
left wing political crap

BTW.....welcome to my killfile

*PLONK*

You've just made my day. Bye bye.

Bob