Bob F wrote:
"dfr" wrote in message
...
Bob F wrote:
"clams casino" wrote in message
...
dfr wrote:


At least what happens in Iraq is kept outside first world
countrys. They get to kill each other there instead.


That's what has me completely baffled.

1 - Why do they continue to fight our military in Iraq when they
could cause much more harm outside Iraq. Certainly is not because
GW has told them to stay in Iraq.as keeps telling us.

2 - All they would have to do is stay quiet for 6 months. GW would
claim visctory, US would leave and bingo - easy pickens.

I think you are missing something if you think Bush ever intends to
leave,

His intentions are completely irrelevant.

As soon as we leave, any chance of them passing and following
the proposed oil act will be gone. Then what would have been the
point of invading? They aren't building those permanent bases and
embassy for nothing.

The shrub gets no say what so ever on leaving once he's been given
the bums rush at the next election, he doesnt even get to run at the
next election.

So he gets no say what so ever on leaving.


Then again - maybe he's not planning on leaving.

He leaves anyway, planning or not.

Or maybe he's sure he can steal another election for his "man".

Then he had better give up the wacky weed.