Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
Electronics Repair (sci.electronics.repair) Discussion of repairing electronic equipment. Topics include requests for assistance, where to obtain servicing information and parts, techniques for diagnosis and repair, and annecdotes about success, failures and problems. |
Reply |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#42
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Think twice before you buy Duracell batteries
"That's my lunch plus a tip. "
That's not an expensive lunch here. I can imagine there, perhaps a sandwich and bag of fries. And you probably want something to drink so that cuts into it even more. I haven't gone out for lunch in years, everybody just pays through it if you eat there, at least where I have worked. Which brings us to a cute little true story. I lived in Cleveland and worked in Willowick which is about 23 miles to the east. Show was getting more and more business even though we were seriously high performance. i did three times the work of my predecessor, and (maybe unfortunately taught them what to expect from a real tech) still it got to the point where we could not keep up with it. I didn't drive, I have had license problems for a long time, but only recently did I stop driving due to my eyesight. anyway he gets introduced to me as "another Electrasound graduate". Electrasound was factory service for almost everyone back then. They required a very high level of competence and had the over 100 page test to prove it. i beat 154 other applicants and got the job, as well as rewrote their test. There was a question they give you the schematic and some voltage readings and wanted you to put numbers by the answers instead of just checking them off. Well I found an option they should have included but didn't. It got to the service manager and he said "Damn, he's right". So between the two of this at the later company we had plety of clout. the boss would ask what we want for lunch and actually go get it for us. In retrospect I think we could have made them pay for it as well but that didn't occur to us. So one day Rich (the other Electrasound graduate they called us)and I decided we wanted to go out for lunch so we went to the Ground Round for a few beers and some surf-n-turf. When it came time to go back to work Rich says "I don't like how he said "you guys won't come back" and i said "Me too". Then I forget who said it but "Know what we should do ?". So guess what we did. Now only that we called the shop and told him we need him to bring down about fifty bucks to pay the tab because we were caught short. His answer ? "I can't leave right now because everyone else is gone on the road". That was a lie but it was so much fun. Then we went to the strip joint after we caught a good enough buzz. Back then in Ohio you couldn't have nudity and alcohol in the same business. I digressed greatly, I will get serious in another post. |
#43
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Think twice before you buy Duracell batteries
This horse is dead, flayed, flensed, rendered, tanned and dyed.
The difference between Duracell/Eveready/US-Made batteries is that if the units kill something, the Manufacturer will replace or pay. I received a check for $378 and change, representing the cost of a Geiger Counter that I purchased for $50 at surplus, when a pair of Eveready batteries self-destructed inside. They even refunded the cost of shipping the unit to them. Otherwise, one is SOL and deserves _exactly_ what one gets. Peter Wieck Melrose Park, PA |
#44
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Think twice before you buy Duracell batteries
On Tue, 4 Oct 2016 13:56:54 -0700 (PDT), "
wrote: The difference between Duracell/Eveready/US-Made batteries is that if the units kill something, the Manufacturer will replace or pay. I received a check for $378 and change, representing the cost of a Geiger Counter that I purchased for $50 at surplus, when a pair of Eveready batteries self-destructed inside. They even refunded the cost of shipping the unit to them. Impressive. I managed to get about $20 from Eveready and $30 from Mallory for trashing various Maglites. I've filed a few random claims over the years, that usually get disappeared by the manufacturer. Otherwise, one is SOL and deserves _exactly_ what one gets. Really? You seem ready to accept failure as inevitable and inexorable. I think otherwise. Ever wonder why there are alkaline cells around that live a normal and useful life well beyond their expected lifetime? I've seen plenty of really old alkaline batteries that simply discharged their coulombs gracefully without a hint of leakage. Perhaps I'm using more alkaline batteries these days, but I don't seem to recall such massive a leakage problem during the 1970's. I certainly don't recall seeing any leak in the original packaging. It might also be useful for you to consider the possibility that the leakage problem might be artificial and might easily be fixed by better sealing methods or construction methods. This explains the failure mechanism (hydrogen gas outgassing rupturing the vent seal). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alkaline_battery#Leaks Now how hard would it be to make a better seal, or direct the gas away from the electrolyte? I would be tempted to conjure a conspiracy theory that this failure mode is intentional, since it sells plenty of batteries. Why fix something that produces sales? -- Jeff Liebermann 150 Felker St #D http://www.LearnByDestroying.com Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558 |
#45
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Think twice before you buy Duracell batteries
Bluntly, this happens to consumers because they are either careless or lazy and would rather complain than take effective action. Battery makers, in my experience jump all over themselves to make customers happy. Do you think, after my experience I would ever buy a second tier battery?
Peter Wieck Melrose Park, PA |
#46
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Think twice before you buy Duracell batteries
On Tue, 4 Oct 2016 19:00:23 -0700 (PDT), "
wrote: Bluntly, this happens to consumers because they are either careless or lazy and would rather complain than take effective action. Right. Blame the victims. To most consumers, batteries are a commodity item, where the various manufacturers and labels are interchangeable. Perhaps an astute buying might read reviews or run a few tests, but the GUM (great unwashed masses) will tend to buy the same brand of battery repeatedly even when faced with demonstratable failures, leaks, counterfeits, and marginal warranties. The Energizer rabbit probably sold more batteries than any magazine or online battery review. Also, "effective action" usually follows a complaint. More specifically, I have had a vendor spontaneously provide effective action or financial compensation without me providing a suitable complaint. Even if I were "careless and lazy", I can still produce a suitable complaint, which just might produce "effective action" by the battery vendor or manufacturer. Battery makers, in my experience jump all over themselves to make customers happy. Do you think, after my experience I would ever buy a second tier battery? Yes, I do think you would, if you didn't know it was a second rate battery. That happens all the time, when a manufacturer outsources their production to the lowest bidder, changes supplier, or simply cheapens the product. I can supply examples if you need them. I have no idea what company manufacturers Kirkland batteries, or even if it's only one company. Volume manufacturers usually have multiple suppliers, between which they arrange bidding wars to produce the absolute lowest possible price. A drop in quality is implied, but never mentioned. If it lasts the warranty period, it's good enough. In this case, the Kirkland batteries probably lasted the required 7 year shelf life. If you were a Prepper, who stores batteries for some future Armageddon, shelf life would be a major issue. Devices with low drain and low duty cycle, where the battery would be expected to last well beyond its shelf life is another problem area. For these users, there are better types of cells available, such as Lithium AA at 5 times the cost of alkaline cells. However, for the commodity applications, alkaline cells are cheap, commonly available, cheap, fairly reliable, cheap, warranties, cheap, and did I mention cheap? So for your commodity applications, where a $2 cell is not an economical option, you're stuck with the $0.40 alkaline cell. Yes, I think you will be buying 2nd rate batteries, unless you can find a genuine leak proof alkaline for the same price. -- Jeff Liebermann 150 Felker St #D http://www.LearnByDestroying.com Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558 |
#47
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Think twice before you buy Duracell batteries
On Tuesday, October 4, 2016 at 10:42:34 PM UTC-4, Jeff Liebermann wrote:
Yes, I do think you would, if you didn't know it was a second rate battery. That happens all the time, when a manufacturer outsources their production to the lowest bidder, changes supplier, or simply cheapens the product. I can supply examples if you need them. I have no idea what company manufacturers Kirkland batteries, or even if it's only one company. Now, here is where you go off the rails. When one purchases a 'house brand' to save a few pennies towards a critical application, the consequences of such a choice are to be factored into it. "I have no idea what company..." means that you accept without qualification or complaint that these devices may be second tier. And that is exactly my point. Batteries, whether in use or not are wearing parts - just like tires. In an urban setting or areas where there are elevated levels of ozone, tires 'age out" in anywhere between 3 and 6 years depending on the type and composition. Those who do not keep this in mind are taking their lives in their hands. Battery manufacturers make their batteries *JUST* good enough to support their price-point, and no more. Those that do not support an infrastructure that provides warranties and replacements are at a significant advantage. And, like lemmings, the great unwashed gobble them up based on price, alone. Then have the temerity to whine and pule about the results. Two things - one philosophical, one very practical: If that first package of underwear at $3.29 from China stayed on the shelf for the $3.69 package made in the US, life would be different in this country today. But, no, the great unwashed gobbled them up, saving that $0.40. Little did they realize or care that their neighbors lost their jobs thereby *UNTIL* their own jobs were threatened - and you could hear them howl three states away. Do you want to give up a small, but vital technology to the Chinese? Do you want it such that your flashlight/radio/game depends on a 12,000 mile supply line crossing (at least) one ocean? Lastly, do you know that there is not one single LCD device manufactured in the US. Not one. That Boeing aircraft would have analog controls were it to depend on US sources. Or, that fighter jet, gauges in a nuclear submarine.. The US does not even have the tooling or basic infrastructure to make LCD devices were the need to arise. It would probably take 2-3 years to ramp up. So, yes, we can entirely lose vital industries by neglect, ignorance or by simply not recognizing the implications. Peter Wieck Melrose Park, PA |
#48
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Think twice before you buy Duracell batteries
"Lastly, do you know that there is not one single LCD device manufactured in the US. Not one. That Boeing aircraft would have analog controls were it to depend on US sources. Or, that fighter jet, gauges in a nuclear submarine. The US does not even have the tooling or basic infrastructure to make LCD devices were the need to arise. It would probably take 2-3 years to ramp up. So, yes, we can entirely lose vital industries by neglect, ignorance or by simply not recognizing the implications. "
No rockets either, the US buys them from Russia. So bitch Clinton wants to start **** with them. And both candidates probably want to start **** in the South China Sea. Good thinking. How's that globalism working out forya now ? |
#49
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Think twice before you buy Duracell batteries
On Tue, 04 Oct 2016 10:11:15 -0700, Jeff Liebermann
wrote: On Mon, 3 Oct 2016 17:17:57 -0700 (PDT), wrote: (...) Look what I found on my battery "shelf": http://802.11junk.com/jeffl/crud/Kirkland-AAA-leak.jpg They were unopened until today, when I ripped open the left side to pull out a few batteries. They're marked with a 7 shelf life. I'm only 2.7 years over the 2014 expiration date, but have no idea when I bought them. I guess it's "use them or lose them" because I stupidly used up newer battery packages before diving into the older batteries buried in the back of the battery "shelf". Grumble, and $15 gone. Oddly, most of the batteries I pulled out and cleaned seem to work. I'll run a capacity test on a leaky battery later. No, I'm not going to put an expired and leaking battery in my toys. I have never seen alkaline AAA batteries of any brand where some didn't leak. As far as AA ones go, Kirkland and the AA that Dollar General used to have manufactured in Indonesia seemed to leak the least. --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus |
#50
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Think twice before you buy Duracell batteries
On Wednesday, October 5, 2016 at 12:29:01 PM UTC-4, wrote:
No rockets either, the US buys them from Russia. So bitch Clinton wants to start **** with them. And both candidates probably want to start **** in the South China Sea. Good thinking. How's that globalism working out forya now ? RANT WARNING RANT WARNING We have enough "Rockets" to vaporize all of Asia and Europe several times over, and with capacity to spare. What we do not have are man-lifting rockets in place. We absolutely have the capacity to make such rockets from the Saturn V up to de-mothballing a shuttle, and in surprisingly short order. My concern is related to not having the capacity to make it at all. The LCD screen was invented in Pittsburgh, PA and refined in Switzerland. Despite that, we do not have the *CAPACITY* to make them in this country at all. Not the tooling, not the technology, not even the legacy knowledge. It is a subtle, but very important difference. And, for the political record, it is the lack of understanding of this difference that is an indication of how big a problem systemic ignorance is in the good old USA. We get exactly the government we deserve, as we vote them in time after time after time, and every part and piece of our government devolves back to those elected "representatives" as by deliberate choice or by neglect, they permit all those parts and pieces to continue. The difference between *your* politicians and *my* politicians is that mine tell me the lies that I want to hear, yours tell you the lies you want to hear. That they are lying is neither in doubt or a subject of debate. But, to get direct, getting in bed with Putin is probably not a good idea. And 'starting ****' with him has the virtue of putting him in the same position as pretty much every other Russian/Soviet leader has been since the 1940s - on the top of a shaky edifice sustained only by the passivity of the populace. The greatest fear of any dictator/autocrat is the loss of that power. Putin is not stupid, and understands that he will get away with everything if not challenged. As long as there is a scintilla of actual risk to his power, he will back down. Lastly, keep in mind that the Average American: Does not have a college education. Does not have a passport. Speaks one language - badly. Has never traveled voluntarily more than 200 miles from his/her birthplace. Has never visited a foreign country, not even the Mexico or Canada. Cannot name the Speaker of the House, even today. Cannot name the three branches of government. Does not believe in Evolution (42% creationism, 32% evolution, 26% no opinion). Only 71.2% of eligible voters are registered. Only 57.5% of registered voters voted in 2012. Meaning that the average American eligible to vote does not vote (only 41.5% net). And you think that our present government is anything other than exactly what we deserve, doing exactly what we should expect it to do based on what we tell it (and allow) it to do? This has not one damned thing to do with party, democrat, republican, libertarian, communist, green, whatever. It has to do with massive, systemic and deliberate neglect, and industrial-grade stupidity mixed equally with mil.Spec. ignorance. Like some few of you here, I have lived in another culture vastly different from here - and I have seen how Americans are perceived in other parts of the world. You might be surprised how easily it is for other cultures to separate Americans (whom they largely respect and admire) from American Culture (continuous amazement, mixed with a varying amounts of jealousy and horror) and the American Government (poorly understood, largely disliked - much as here). Would that Americans had the same ability to separate the individual and sub-group from the various other parts and pieces of the entirety in other cultures and regions. Peter Wieck Melrose Park, PA |
#51
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Think twice before you buy Duracell batteries
"We have enough "Rockets" to vaporize all of Asia and Europe several times over, and with capacity to spare."
Then why have they never defended this country ? |
#52
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Think twice before you buy Duracell batteries
On Wednesday, October 5, 2016 at 7:04:32 PM UTC-4, wrote:
"We have enough "Rockets" to vaporize all of Asia and Europe several times over, and with capacity to spare." Then why have they never defended this country ? Lemme see.... Please tell me how a nuclear holocaust defends anyone or anything? Please tell me exactly how a "rocket" defends any one or any thing? Do you understand the concept of MAD (Mutually Assured Destruction)? Now, you first decry how we "have no rockets", and when it becomes clear that we do, now you are shifting your premise. One would think that you are at least logically challenged. I think it goes much deeper than that - that you are both ignorant and the victim of received wisdom, having no ability to think for yourself. That is a sad condition as you have no ability to discern truth from fiction and threat from perception. Peter Wieck Melrose Park, PA |
#53
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Think twice before you buy Duracell batteries
"Lemme see...."
I don't know from where you derived all that but all I can say is to read the lines, not between the lines. Pearl Harbor, the WTC, all they got are excuses and they don't hold much water. They started this "read between the lines" **** when I was in school. My thought was - if that is what he meant why the **** didn't he just type it ? But I'll admit you have better reasoning skills then I, you can reason bull**** that isn't there. |
#54
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Think twice before you buy Duracell batteries
Thank you for carefully avoiding taking responsibility for the question you asked, or for clarifying the basis on which it was asked.
Of course, by making several statements, I must also ask where "rockets" or the 1941 equivalent thereof, would have stopped the US from entering into WWII, or is that a conspiracy too? Keep in mind that the conspiracy theorists believe that Roosevelt know all about the attack and allowed it to happen to get the US into to war... Is that your position as well? Give you the credibility and sensibility of housefly, with apologies to the insect. Peter Wieck Melrose Park, PA |
#55
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Think twice before you buy Duracell batteries
On Thursday, October 6, 2016 at 1:25:43 PM UTC-4, wrote:
Thank you for carefully avoiding taking responsibility for the question you asked, or for clarifying the basis on which it was asked. Of course, by making several statements, I must also ask where "rockets" or the 1941 equivalent thereof, would have stopped the US from entering into WWII, or is that a conspiracy too? Keep in mind that the conspiracy theorists believe that Roosevelt know all about the attack and allowed it to happen to get the US into to war... Is that your position as well? Peter Wieck Melrose Park, PA I want to preface what I'm about to say in that I believe most conspiracy theorists are effing insane.. However: I do believe that Roosevelt and the U.S. military knew an attack was imminent. Roosevelt was elected on a non-intervention platform that was extremely popular at that time, particularly since WWI was still in recent memory. The anti-war movement in America was quite large and vocal. By the time 1941 rolled around, it was clear that Nazi Germany would likely defeat England and we'd be fighting them eventually, and mostly by ourselves. The Lend-Lease act was helping England but without direct help from the U.S., it wouldn't be enough. The only way Nazi Germany could be defeated was with an expansion of the war (sounds silly, doesn't it?). Roosevelt did not want to declare war on the Axis without direct provocation, and the "surprise" attack by Japan provided that. The sneak attack changed America's perception of the war overnight and recruitment offices were flooded the next day and continued on. But I also want to be clear in that I believe that no one in the U.S. military or Roosevelt himself could have possibly foreseen the devastation that that attack on Pearl delivered. The only thing "surprise" about the Dec 7th attack was the brilliance planning and execution of it. John Wolcott, CT |
#56
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Think twice before you buy Duracell batteries
|
#57
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Think twice before you buy Duracell batteries
|
#58
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Think twice before you buy Duracell batteries
On Thursday, October 6, 2016 at 2:32:03 PM UTC-4, wrote:
I want to preface what I'm about to say in that I believe most conspiracy theorists are effing insane.. However: I do believe that Roosevelt and the U.S. military knew an attack was imminent. Roosevelt was elected on a non-intervention platform that was extremely popular at that time, particularly since WWI was still in recent memory. The anti-war movement in America was quite large and vocal. By the time 1941 rolled around, it was clear that Nazi Germany would likely defeat England and we'd be fighting them eventually, and mostly by ourselves.. The Lend-Lease act was helping England but without direct help from the U.S., it wouldn't be enough. The only way Nazi Germany could be defeated was with an expansion of the war (sounds silly, doesn't it?). Roosevelt did not want to declare war on the Axis without direct provocation, and the "surprise" attack by Japan provided that. The sneak attack changed America's perception of the war overnight and recruitment offices were flooded the next day and continued on. But I also want to be clear in that I believe that no one in the U.S. military or Roosevelt himself could have possibly foreseen the devastation that that attack on Pearl delivered. The only thing "surprise" about the Dec 7th attack was the brilliance planning and execution of it. John Wolcott, CT Agreed on most of this. That Japan attacked Pearl may not have been have been a complete surprise. I expect that the war department was more focused on the Philippines than Pearl. I expect that some suspected a possible attack on the West Coast, or Pearl, but neither so large nor with so much of the Japanese fleet. At the same time, the Japanese high command recognized that if the US was aroused *and* at full strength from the very beginning, their chances were nil and the devastation to the home Island would have started much earlier. A knock-out blow was their only chance - and one that did not risk the fleet was equally at issue. What is equally remarkable is how small a role Battleships actually played in the Pacific war. Carriers did the grunt work, submarines did fleet and commerce harassment ((The Japanese lost 1,178 Merchant Ships sunk for a tonnage total of 5,053,491 tons. The Naval losses were 214 ships and submarines totaling 577,626 tons. A staggering five million, six hundred thirty one thousand, one hundred seventeen tons, (5,631,117 tons), 1,392 ships. All to US submarines)) Not until late in the war were there enough large surface vessels to provide invasion/landing support, and by then the Japanese fleet was either destroyed or bottled up in the home islands. Shadows of things to come. Th Peter Wieck Melrose Park, PA |
#59
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Think twice before you buy Duracell batteries
"Ralph Mowery" wrote in message k.net... In article , says... Roosevelt did not want to declare war on the Axis without direct provocation, and the "surprise" attack by Japan provided that. The sneak attack changed America's perception of the war overnight and recruitment offices were flooded the next day and continued on. But I also want to be clear in that I believe that no one in the U.S. military or Roosevelt himself could have possibly foreseen the devastation that that attack on Pearl delivered. The only thing "surprise" about the Dec 7th attack was the brilliance planning and execution of it. John Wolcott, CT While we lost a lot of good men, the ships that were sank and dammaged and the aircraft were a bunch of left over old junk. The main ships (aircraft carriers) were not there at the time. I believe that was a setup just to get Japan to attack ,but not suffer too much of a loss to the US. The historical evidence tells me there was a fair bit of ****wittery in the top brass. American codebreakers were more or less keeping up with the Jap codes - so they should've known the **** was about to hit the fan. All the airfield fighters were lined up in a neat row for fear of sabotage near the tree line. They ignored warnings from British Intelligence about suspicious Jap troop movements. The footsloggers working the radar set did their job and reported the incoming - they were told; "don't worry about it". Some historians claim that all the ammo was locked away - the officer with the key couldn't be found and they had to smash the door in - getting strafed and frantically running around handing out ammo clips so a few people could shoot back. How they weren't prepared for an air raid is one of the great mystries.................................. |
#60
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Think twice before you buy Duracell batteries
"(PeteCresswell)" wrote in message ... Per : However: I do believe that Roosevelt and the U.S. military knew an attack was imminent. This is sort of tangential, but when I was stationed in Hawaii I worked the 4-to-midnight shift and used to hitchhike into Waikiki every morning during summer surf season. Got a few very interesting rides - and one of them was an old guy who claimed to be operating the radar up by Wheeler AFB the day of the attack. His story was something to the effect of "This radar stuff was new to everybody and we were considered to be sort of on the fringe..... but we saw the attack planes coming on the radar, tried to alert the higher ups, but did not get anywhere." I cannot recall whether the higher-ups just didn't believe them or whether they attributed the sighting to some expected flight of aircraft approaching from the mainland.... but there's not doubt in my mind that the old guy was telling it like he experienced it. A flight of B17s was due, but I think the "incoming" reported by the radar operators was from the wrong direction. The base was "on alert" - but didn't do much about it............................. |
#61
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Think twice before you buy Duracell batteries
"I want to preface what I'm about to say in that I believe most conspiracy theorists are effing insane.. "
Well, since I am a housefly to that guy there is no reason to tell him this.. The excuse they give is there was some sort of "shipment" coming in and they thought that was it so they did not respond when they saw them on the RADAR. Of course some accounts say the RADAR was removed for some unexplained reason but not being a true conspiracy theorist I am not so sure I believe that one. My Uncle was in the AF and worked on them and would tell you that they are not easy to remove. So can common sense. So now the story changed to they were expecting a shipment. A shipment of what from a country the US was antagonizing with blockades and whatever, starving their population, preventing food and medical supplies from getting in, just what the **** do you think they would be shipping to the US ? And I'll have you know, I had a hard time even considering that FDR knew and purposely allowed Pearl Harbor to happen until they changed their story. When they started that those planes were detected and expected they lost me.. We were trying to kill Japan, NOTHING was expected from them, except an attack. I bet Mr. Housefly thinks the Tuskeegee experiments never happened. The government has been honest and forthright with all their dealings of course. Just ask Snowden or Assange. I'll also have you know that I was a criminal when I was younger and I did not get caught because I am smart enough to know what evidence is and what is not. They had me in a room trying to get me to sign a paper. Let me tell all the sheeple out there, any time the government wants you to sign a paper, that means they want something they don't have for example, authority. And a housefly, if it could talk could tell more truth than the lamestream media. Anyway, I never bought into this FDR knew **** until they changed their story. now I consider it a possibility. Do y'all know what considering it a possibility rather than putting forth a possible theory means ? Nobody knows science anymore ? People who summarily dismiss any possibilities other than the "truth" Uncle Sam gives you are of no use to me, or society. They should be eliminated along with the criminal government they support so dearly. |
#62
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Think twice before you buy Duracell batteries
On Friday, October 7, 2016 at 12:12:50 PM UTC-4, wrote:
Well, since I am a housefly to that guy there is no reason to tell him this. Actually, I had to apologize to the insect variety to even suggest you had achieved that humble status. And, as it happens, nothing you have written before or since suggests that the characterization is in any way inaccurate. Peter Wieck Melrose Park, PA |
#63
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Think twice before you buy Duracell batteries
Flick me with your tail then sheep.
|
#64
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Think twice before you buy Duracell batteries
On 2016-10-05, Chuck wrote:
I have never seen alkaline AAA batteries of any brand where some didn't leak. As far as AA ones go, Kirkland and the AA that Dollar General used to have manufactured in Indonesia seemed to leak the least. I get very good service by sticking with major brands like Toceba, Dinacell, and Sorny, available at a discount at local flea markets. -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Roger Blake (Posts from Google Groups killfiled due to excess spam.) NSA sedition and treason -- http://www.DeathToNSAthugs.com Don't talk to cops! -- http://www.DontTalkToCops.com Badges don't grant extra rights -- http://www.CopBlock.org ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
#65
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Think twice before you buy Duracell batteries
On Saturday, October 8, 2016 at 6:50:57 PM UTC-4, Roger Blake wrote:
On 2016-10-05, Chuck wrote: I have never seen alkaline AAA batteries of any brand where some didn't leak. As far as AA ones go, Kirkland and the AA that Dollar General used to have manufactured in Indonesia seemed to leak the least. I get very good service by sticking with major brands like Toceba, Dinacell, and Sorny, available at a discount at local flea markets. -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Roger Blake (Posts from Google Groups killfiled due to excess spam.) NSA sedition and treason -- http://www.DeathToNSAthugs.com Don't talk to cops! -- http://www.DontTalkToCops.com Badges don't grant extra rights -- http://www.CopBlock.org ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Sounds like the knock-off brands of TV Homer Simpson was shopping for, including Magnetbox and Panaphonics. |
#66
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Think twice before you buy Duracell batteries
On Sat, 8 Oct 2016 22:50:39 -0000 (UTC), Roger Blake
wrote: On 2016-10-05, Chuck wrote: I have never seen alkaline AAA batteries of any brand where some didn't leak. As far as AA ones go, Kirkland and the AA that Dollar General used to have manufactured in Indonesia seemed to leak the least. I get very good service by sticking with major brands like Toceba, Dinacell, and Sorny, available at a discount at local flea markets. I have the incurable habit of mangling company and product brand names. DuraSmell, NeverReady, SoniPanic, Pray-o-Vac, Power-on-sick, YuGuessAh, Farta, AlteredState, Exhide, etc[1]. [1] Translation: Duracell, Eveready, Panasonic, Ray-o-Vac, Power Sonic, Yuasa, Varta, All State, Exide. -- Jeff Liebermann 150 Felker St #D http://www.LearnByDestroying.com Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558 |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Cheap alternative to Duracell AA batteries | UK diy | |||
Golston fake Duracell Batteries | UK diy | |||
How to clean Mag-Lite flashlight when Duracell March 2013 alkaline batteries leaked | Home Repair | |||
Duracell dumbness | Electronics Repair | |||
Are Poundland "Duracell" batteries fakes? | UK diy |