Electronics Repair (sci.electronics.repair) Discussion of repairing electronic equipment. Topics include requests for assistance, where to obtain servicing information and parts, techniques for diagnosis and repair, and annecdotes about success, failures and problems.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
 
Posts: n/a
Default Old Husband's tale

Everybody, and I mean everbody puts down a barrier so when they put a
car battery down so it's not in contact with the ground, or cement. Now
normally the battery will sit on steel (in the car) which is a
conductor.

They say that being on the ground kills the battery. How does a
nonconductor (concrete) being in contact with another nonconductor
cause this ? I refuse to believe it, but I do not put said batteries on
the ground. (I am a firm believer in Murphy's Law)

Is this myth or mystery, and if true, just how in the hell can it be
true. I'm considered pretty advanced when it comes to electronics, but
this belief is so ubiquitous, that says there might be something to it.

If anyone can shed some light on the process whereby the "ground" can
discharge a car battery please enlighten me. I've now heard this again
and have considered buying two brand new car batteries and chargers
with which to gain empirical evidence. Sometimes when I get curious
about something I have a hard time letting go of it.

Can anyone either explain this so I can STFU, or debunk it so I can run
my mouth ? I've been hearing this for about 30 years now and have
dropped the subject numerous times. That is no longer good enough.

Or are we talking about something like the pyramids or whatever ? I
know some physics but I am by no means a physicist. I'm having a hard
time believe this "myth" and I would like it cleared up in my lifetime,
so I asked.

Thanks to anyone that can set my mind to rest on this annoying subject.

JURB

  #2   Report Post  
Wayne Tiffany
 
Posts: n/a
Default

My suspicion is that when a battery is set down, it sits there a long time.
Long enough, and undisturbed enough, and uncharged enough that it
accumulates a layer of dust and dirt, which in conjunction with moisture,
slowly conducts off to the concrete floor or ground. And while a concrete
floor, or dry dirt for that matter, isn't as much off a conductor as steel,
it most certainly will conduct - I got nailed as a kid standing barefoot on
a basement floor! So putting the battery on a 2x4 or plywood or something
provides a better insulator and maybe even a better break in the dirt path..

Just my thoughts.

WT



wrote in message
oups.com...
Everybody, and I mean everbody puts down a barrier so when they put a
car battery down so it's not in contact with the ground, or cement. Now
normally the battery will sit on steel (in the car) which is a
conductor.

They say that being on the ground kills the battery. How does a
nonconductor (concrete) being in contact with another nonconductor
cause this ? I refuse to believe it, but I do not put said batteries on
the ground. (I am a firm believer in Murphy's Law)

Is this myth or mystery, and if true, just how in the hell can it be
true. I'm considered pretty advanced when it comes to electronics, but
this belief is so ubiquitous, that says there might be something to it.

If anyone can shed some light on the process whereby the "ground" can
discharge a car battery please enlighten me. I've now heard this again
and have considered buying two brand new car batteries and chargers
with which to gain empirical evidence. Sometimes when I get curious
about something I have a hard time letting go of it.

Can anyone either explain this so I can STFU, or debunk it so I can run
my mouth ? I've been hearing this for about 30 years now and have
dropped the subject numerous times. That is no longer good enough.

Or are we talking about something like the pyramids or whatever ? I
know some physics but I am by no means a physicist. I'm having a hard
time believe this "myth" and I would like it cleared up in my lifetime,
so I asked.

Thanks to anyone that can set my mind to rest on this annoying subject.

JURB



  #5   Report Post  
Dave Plowman (News)
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article rA9Me.222977$5V4.179143@pd7tw3no,
Ken Weitzel wrote:
I hold that the damage was caused by interaction between
the very alkaline cement and the battery acid.


How does the acid get there? The case is acid proof, otherwise the steel
it sits on in the car would corrode through in even shorter time.

--
*Experience is something you don't get until just after you need it.*

Dave Plowman London SW
To e-mail, change noise into sound.


  #6   Report Post  
CJT
 
Posts: n/a
Default

wrote:
Everybody, and I mean everbody puts down a barrier so when they put a
car battery down so it's not in contact with the ground, or cement. Now
normally the battery will sit on steel (in the car) which is a
conductor.

They say that being on the ground kills the battery. How does a
nonconductor (concrete) being in contact with another nonconductor
cause this ? I refuse to believe it, but I do not put said batteries on
the ground. (I am a firm believer in Murphy's Law)

Is this myth or mystery, and if true, just how in the hell can it be
true. I'm considered pretty advanced when it comes to electronics, but
this belief is so ubiquitous, that says there might be something to it.

If anyone can shed some light on the process whereby the "ground" can
discharge a car battery please enlighten me. I've now heard this again
and have considered buying two brand new car batteries and chargers
with which to gain empirical evidence. Sometimes when I get curious
about something I have a hard time letting go of it.

Can anyone either explain this so I can STFU, or debunk it so I can run
my mouth ? I've been hearing this for about 30 years now and have
dropped the subject numerous times. That is no longer good enough.

Or are we talking about something like the pyramids or whatever ? I
know some physics but I am by no means a physicist. I'm having a hard
time believe this "myth" and I would like it cleared up in my lifetime,
so I asked.

Thanks to anyone that can set my mind to rest on this annoying subject.

JURB

I set them on the ground all the time and never noticed a problem.

--
The e-mail address in our reply-to line is reversed in an attempt to
minimize spam. Our true address is of the form .
  #7   Report Post  
 
Posts: n/a
Default

1. Urban myth

2. Alkaline cement/battery acid

3. Dust dirt and moisture

4. Basement floor

CJT said he never had a problem, but didn't mention anything about
time. How long ? Nobody ever said it was dead in minutes, or even
hours.

A buddy and I have been discussing this, after reading the responses
and I can no longer summarily dismiss the effect, if the "urban legend"
is indeed true. At this stage I must admit that there is a possibility.

2. A reaction between whatever solubles are in or on the cement, along
with the highly acidic content of the battery housing, which has some
porosity, is an interesting possibility.

All of this might be enhanced in more humid climates. Even on cement,
even if it doesn't rain, if left long enough metals will corrode or
rust on the bottom.

3.Basement floor : While copper is an excellent conductor, cement is
not. That is not to say it is a good insulator. Your legs act as wires,
not very good wires, but functional enough to kill. If you are barefoot
on cement, it's not making all that good of a wire either, but look at
your footprint and you see the cross-sectional of this wire. A bit
bigger than the wires in your basic 12-2 Romex you think ? A copper
conductor of that size could carry thousands of amps. It needs alot
less to burn you, or to discharge your puny battery over time.The
linear resistance of a piece of wire is inversely proportional to it's
cross sectional area. So what do we have here, how many ohms ?

Actually I would be at a disadvantage here with my 13 wide sized feet.

When I want to know if something is true I need to prove it to myself.
Thanks all so far. I play Devil's advocate against my own initial point
of view for that reason. All these factors are evidence that this myth
might be true, but initially came from personal obsevations. Cause was
attributed to effect, but the matter was not looked into further.

JURB

  #8   Report Post  
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Further on:

2. Alkaline cement/battery acid


Most good scientists know that everything dissolves into everything, it
just a matter of how fast. As some minute conductance developes through
the bottom of the battery, if we are to assume this theory fact for the
moment, means we must accept the possibility the earth and/or concrete
which has a solid Earth ground throughout may indeed have an effect
that was unforseen.

It it also unreasonable to expect that there is no seepage at all in
the life of these batteries. If some electrolyte soaks into the dirt,
even an infinitesimal amount could it possibly be setting up cells
polaraized opposing those in the battery ? This enhances whatever
conduction there already is. Yet if the battery is removed you might
still not see a voltage on it, because the bottom of the battery forms
one of the plates of this self made battery under itself. (I think you
know what I mean)

I'm not saying this is true, but it is possible.

JURB

  #9   Report Post  
Ken Weitzel
 
Posts: n/a
Default



wrote:
1. Urban myth

2. Alkaline cement/battery acid

3. Dust dirt and moisture

4. Basement floor

CJT said he never had a problem, but didn't mention anything about
time. How long ? Nobody ever said it was dead in minutes, or even
hours.

A buddy and I have been discussing this, after reading the responses
and I can no longer summarily dismiss the effect, if the "urban legend"
is indeed true. At this stage I must admit that there is a possibility.

2. A reaction between whatever solubles are in or on the cement, along
with the highly acidic content of the battery housing, which has some
porosity, is an interesting possibility.

All of this might be enhanced in more humid climates. Even on cement,
even if it doesn't rain, if left long enough metals will corrode or
rust on the bottom.

3.Basement floor : While copper is an excellent conductor, cement is
not. That is not to say it is a good insulator. Your legs act as wires,
not very good wires, but functional enough to kill. If you are barefoot
on cement, it's not making all that good of a wire either, but look at
your footprint and you see the cross-sectional of this wire. A bit
bigger than the wires in your basic 12-2 Romex you think ? A copper
conductor of that size could carry thousands of amps. It needs alot
less to burn you, or to discharge your puny battery over time.The
linear resistance of a piece of wire is inversely proportional to it's
cross sectional area. So what do we have here, how many ohms ?

Actually I would be at a disadvantage here with my 13 wide sized feet.

When I want to know if something is true I need to prove it to myself.
Thanks all so far. I play Devil's advocate against my own initial point
of view for that reason. All these factors are evidence that this myth
might be true, but initially came from personal obsevations. Cause was
attributed to effect, but the matter was not looked into further.


Hi...

First - the story never ever called for hours, or minutes.
Being perhaps the "old guy", I believe it came from those
"olden" days when cars were put aside for the winter.
(at least here in Winnipeg (Winterpeg) Canada, where we
get more than our share of -40 degree days.

Folks would drain fluids, remove tires and put the car up
on blocks, and bring the battery inside to store in the
basement. So we were talking 4 or 6 month periods.

Second - in support of my position, I invite an experiment
from any who are willing and in a position to do it.

Those of us who change our own batteries pay a 5 dollar
deposit when we buy a new one, refundable whenever we
return the dud. I suspect not many would suffer much were
they to do without that 5 bucks for a month or two.

So, anyone buying a new one, with a still usuable but due
for replacement, keep the old one. Put it somewhere safe
on the newest cement available. Keep the kids safe, put it
perhaps on a garage floor.

Leave it alone for a month or two, then take a good look
at it. The case _will_ be covered with salts.

I fail kindergarten level chemistry, but what are those
salts? Where did they come from, and what effect does their
loss have on the battery?

Let us know; then take the battery back for your 5 bucks

Take care.

Ken

  #10   Report Post  
Jim Adney
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On 15 Aug 2005 16:01:44 -0700 wrote:

They say that being on the ground kills the battery. How does a
nonconductor (concrete) being in contact with another nonconductor
cause this ? I refuse to believe it, but I do not put said batteries on
the ground. (I am a firm believer in Murphy's Law)


I'm with you; I think this is a complete myth. The conductor theory
completely ignores the fact that they sit on steel while in the cars,
and the concrete dust theory ignores the fact that putting it on a
little square of plywood doesn't change the amount of concrete dust in
the air around it.

My personal theory is that this "problem" just shows up when a battery
is taken out of service and stored in a corner for a long time. Since
any battery will slowly self-discharge at some slow rate, the time
alone is usually enough to explain the fact that the battery is later
found to be dead. Add this to the fact that such batteries are often
already old and possibly from cars in poor condition (poor charging
voltage?) then the prognosis just gets worse.

Any lead acid battery left discharged for long will become sulfated.
This can be easily reversed, but not quickly; it takes time, and most
people won't spend the time. It can take a week or more, but by then
most people have declared it dead and replaced it.

There's also the explanation that the battery dies because the
concrete is cold, thus maintaining a temp gradient across the
electrolyte. Proof of this is claimed to come from the fact that
diesel-electric submarine batteries had active stirrers to keep the
electrolyte at an even temp. I won't claim to know anything about
submarines, but I suspect that stirring would be a very good thing to
keep the electrolyte concentration constant. Otherwise, the
electrolyte concentration would become depleted near the plates and
the battery would appear to be discharged. Stirring the solution,
would make for a much more uniform discharge curve.

-
-----------------------------------------------
Jim Adney

Madison, WI 53711 USA
-----------------------------------------------


  #13   Report Post  
Glynn R.
 
Posts: n/a
Default

The "old husband's tale" was once valid, but is not any longer. Not
that many years back, the standard container for lead-acid batteries
was hard rubber. It was a good insulator and resistant to acid, and had
the benefit of some resilience so the cases didn't crack or split at
the seams. You might, with some luck, find an "antique" hiding in
someone's garage and be able to inspect the casing of one of these
beauties yourself, though most of yesterday's batteries have long since
been recycled at the local lead smelter.

The danger of concrete was not electrical in nature but rather
chemical. Lime (calcium) in concrete or cement could pass through the
hard rubber compound whereas the acid could not. Cold wet concrete, not
unusual for a garage or driveway, set up the conditions for the lime to
actually leach into the battery casing, and it would, aided (I think)
by the charged ions of the electrolyte egging it on. Battery activity
requires a certain concentration of the acid, measured by its specific
gravity. The lime would neutralize some of the acid, altering its
concentration and producing a salt which would pollute the plates of
the battery. The electrolyte would have to be purged and the salts
washed out before you could put fresh acid of the proper concentration
in-- just a pain. Further, because the lime got permanently into the
rubber itself, it was less resilient on the bottom of the battery and
was more susceptible to the same pollution at a later date. Hence the
battery manufacturers would warn the service-station and garage owners
to always rack their batteries and not store them on the floor once
they had been "filled".

The military were the first to use acrylic and pvc cases for their
batteries, which were often filled and ready for use many months prior
to their actual use. When good strong pvc cases were economically
feasible in the mid '50's (think Tupperware), the battery industry
moved quickly away from rubber and into plastics. It was a good move,
being at once cheaper and solving the lime-leach problem. The cases are
also lighter and don't tend to expand or contract as much, important
because the seal between the case and the terminal posts, which used to
be a real bugaboo, is now truly tight. And the plastics transfer heat
to the outside of the battery better (though now, with today's tight
engine compartments, a battery over-jacket of foam rubber is sometimes
needed to protect the battery from the heat of the engine!).

How long would it take for a rubber-cased battery's electrolyte balance
to be upset (to the point where the battery's life was significantly
affected) by lime leaching in? I have no direct experience, but would
guess that a couple of months would be enough. But long before that,
you would probably be able to measure a voltage drop in the cells, due
to a less effective concentration of electrolyte-- possibly after a
week or two. In the battery biz, where you have to take ambient room
temp into account when measuring a cell's specific gravity, where .5v
differential between (nom.2.2v) cells can be a cause for concern about
the battery's health, little things can cause a big spoil.

Some of you old-timers in the telcom industry will probably remember
glass jar casings for some of your huge central office batteries. They
were taking no chances back then...

  #15   Report Post  
Dave Plowman (News)
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article vXcMe.27309$vj.437@pd7tw1no,
Ken Weitzel wrote:
Folks would drain fluids, remove tires and put the car up
on blocks, and bring the battery inside to store in the
basement. So we were talking 4 or 6 month periods.


Ah. Then anything which helped protect from the cold would be a good idea.

--
*Keep honking...I'm reloading.

Dave Plowman London SW
To e-mail, change noise into sound.


  #16   Report Post  
Dave Plowman (News)
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article .com,
Glynn R. wrote:
Some of you old-timers in the telcom industry will probably remember
glass jar casings for some of your huge central office batteries. They
were taking no chances back then...


And this type of battery could be dismantled for repair. ;-)

--
*Horn broken. - Watch for finger.

Dave Plowman London SW
To e-mail, change noise into sound.
  #17   Report Post  
bz
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Ken Weitzel wrote in news:vXcMe.27309$vj.437@pd7tw1no:

I fail kindergarten level chemistry, but what are those
salts? Where did they come from, and what effect does their
loss have on the battery?


If the case is clean and dry before you set it down [most are NOT clean],
there will be no such salts unless there is a crack in the case.

The 'salts' you see build up around the battery are due to spills of
battery acid. When the water evaporates, it will leave behind lead sulphate
and perhaps some other salts, depending on how pure the water has been that
was added to the battery, over the years. You can also have copper sulphate
from the wires leading to the battery corroding due to the acid spills.



--
bz

please pardon my infinite ignorance, the set-of-things-I-do-not-know is an
infinite set.

remove ch100-5 to avoid spam trap
  #18   Report Post  
Travis Jordan
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Ken Weitzel wrote:
So, anyone buying a new one, with a still usuable but due
for replacement, keep the old one. Put it somewhere safe
on the newest cement available. Keep the kids safe, put it
perhaps on a garage floor.

Leave it alone for a month or two, then take a good look
at it. The case _will_ be covered with salts.


As part of PM I change 1 or 2 batteries a year... the price of owing too
much stuff. I ALWAYS keep the freshest (old) batteries for emergency
use with 12VDC powered radios. So I have done exactly the experiment
you propose.

The old batteries sit directly on my garage floor. I never see any
salts or other deposits on them.


  #19   Report Post  
Jumpster Jiver
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Dave Plowman (News) wrote:
In article rA9Me.222977$5V4.179143@pd7tw3no,
Ken Weitzel wrote:

I hold that the damage was caused by interaction between
the very alkaline cement and the battery acid.



How does the acid get there? The case is acid proof, otherwise the steel
it sits on in the car would corrode through in even shorter time.

Aren't all car batteries, even maint. free ones vented? I believe that
along with the hydrogen gas a small amount of vaporized acid can escape
from the battery's vent allowing it to settle on nearby surfaces such as
the outside of the case.
  #20   Report Post  
Dave Plowman (News)
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article y9oMe.1223$yb.39@trndny07,
Jumpster Jiver wrote:
How does the acid get there? The case is acid proof, otherwise the
steel it sits on in the car would corrode through in even shorter time.

Aren't all car batteries, even maint. free ones vented? I believe that
along with the hydrogen gas a small amount of vaporized acid can escape
from the battery's vent allowing it to settle on nearby surfaces such as
the outside of the case.


There should be minimal gassing with a modern charging system. And most
recent cars I've seen have a vent tube to take the fumes away from where
they could do mischief in the event this occurs.

--
Is the hardness of the butter proportional to the softness of the bread?*

Dave Plowman London SW
To e-mail, change noise into sound.


  #21   Report Post  
Jim Adney
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Tue, 16 Aug 2005 16:05:50 GMT Jumpster Jiver
wrote:

Aren't all car batteries, even maint. free ones vented? I believe that
along with the hydrogen gas a small amount of vaporized acid can escape
from the battery's vent allowing it to settle on nearby surfaces such as
the outside of the case.


This is probably true to some small extent, but even then, any
reaction that takes place is on the outside of the battery and doesn't
affect what's inside.

-
-----------------------------------------------
Jim Adney
Madison, WI 53711 USA
-----------------------------------------------
  #22   Report Post  
Jim Adney
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On 15 Aug 2005 19:35:51 -0700 wrote:

2. A reaction between whatever solubles are in or on the cement, along
with the highly acidic content of the battery housing, which has some
porosity, is an interesting possibility.


The case is not acidic, so case contact with the floor can't be the
problem. Reaction of the acid with something from the floor that gets
in the air and then into the battery MIGHT be a possibility, but then
the people who say this happens, also claim that just putting the
battery on a small square of wood (on top of the concrete) prevents
the problem, even though it would not change anything that comes off
teh concrete and gets into the air.

3.Basement floor : While copper is an excellent conductor, cement is
not. That is not to say it is a good insulator. Your legs act as wires,
not very good wires, but functional enough to kill. If you are barefoot
on cement, it's not making all that good of a wire either, but look at
your footprint and you see the cross-sectional of this wire. A bit
bigger than the wires in your basic 12-2 Romex you think ? A copper
conductor of that size could carry thousands of amps. It needs alot
less to burn you, or to discharge your puny battery over time.The
linear resistance of a piece of wire is inversely proportional to it's
cross sectional area. So what do we have here, how many ohms ?


There is certaily self discharge between the battery posts, and
keeping the top of the battery clean minimizes this. Dirt and moisture
on the battery case will decrease the resistance and increase the rate
of discharge. Putting the battery on moist concrete will make this
slightly worse, but putting it on the steel battery tray in the car
would be even worse, contrary to what is reported.

Actually I would be at a disadvantage here with my 13 wide sized feet.


;-)

-
-----------------------------------------------
Jim Adney

Madison, WI 53711 USA
-----------------------------------------------
  #23   Report Post  
none
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Tue, 16 Aug 2005 03:19:55 GMT, Ken Weitzel
wrote:



wrote:
1. Urban myth

2. Alkaline cement/battery acid

3. Dust dirt and moisture

4. Basement floor

CJT said he never had a problem, but didn't mention anything about
time. How long ? Nobody ever said it was dead in minutes, or even
hours.

A buddy and I have been discussing this, after reading the responses
and I can no longer summarily dismiss the effect, if the "urban legend"
is indeed true. At this stage I must admit that there is a possibility.

2. A reaction between whatever solubles are in or on the cement, along
with the highly acidic content of the battery housing, which has some
porosity, is an interesting possibility.

All of this might be enhanced in more humid climates. Even on cement,
even if it doesn't rain, if left long enough metals will corrode or
rust on the bottom.

3.Basement floor : While copper is an excellent conductor, cement is
not. That is not to say it is a good insulator. Your legs act as wires,
not very good wires, but functional enough to kill. If you are barefoot
on cement, it's not making all that good of a wire either, but look at
your footprint and you see the cross-sectional of this wire. A bit
bigger than the wires in your basic 12-2 Romex you think ? A copper
conductor of that size could carry thousands of amps. It needs alot
less to burn you, or to discharge your puny battery over time.The
linear resistance of a piece of wire is inversely proportional to it's
cross sectional area. So what do we have here, how many ohms ?

Actually I would be at a disadvantage here with my 13 wide sized feet.

When I want to know if something is true I need to prove it to myself.
Thanks all so far. I play Devil's advocate against my own initial point
of view for that reason. All these factors are evidence that this myth
might be true, but initially came from personal obsevations. Cause was
attributed to effect, but the matter was not looked into further.


Hi...

First - the story never ever called for hours, or minutes.
Being perhaps the "old guy", I believe it came from those
"olden" days when cars were put aside for the winter.
(at least here in Winnipeg (Winterpeg) Canada, where we
get more than our share of -40 degree days.

Folks would drain fluids, remove tires and put the car up
on blocks, and bring the battery inside to store in the
basement. So we were talking 4 or 6 month periods.

Second - in support of my position, I invite an experiment
from any who are willing and in a position to do it.

Those of us who change our own batteries pay a 5 dollar
deposit when we buy a new one, refundable whenever we
return the dud. I suspect not many would suffer much were
they to do without that 5 bucks for a month or two.

So, anyone buying a new one, with a still usuable but due
for replacement, keep the old one. Put it somewhere safe
on the newest cement available. Keep the kids safe, put it
perhaps on a garage floor.

Leave it alone for a month or two, then take a good look
at it. The case _will_ be covered with salts.

I fail kindergarten level chemistry, but what are those
salts? Where did they come from, and what effect does their
loss have on the battery?

Let us know; then take the battery back for your 5 bucks

Take care.

Ken


I've worked with rechargeable batteries for many a moon and in my past
experience have seen batteries that weren't properly isolated from
ground contact drain much faster than those that were placed on rubber
mats or insulated storage boxes.
It includes nicads as well as traditional lead-acid.(including gel or
dry cell.)
When I worked in service as a photographer rechargeable modules were
the lifeblood of virtually every type of photographic system we
employed. From regular hand held cameras and strobe equipment the
belly cameras on recon aircraft.
We had a entire section of every ground base lab devoted to service
and charging of all the various types of batteries we used.
The one cardinal rule we had for batteries was never to leave them
sitting on bare ground or concrete.
Many of the larger modules even had their own storage cases, usually
steel with a rubber coating inside.
I distinctly recall on lab I transferred to having problems with the
battey modules for their strobes suffering from short charge life and
early death.
They'd be charged every evening by the nigh****ch and stored in a
metal storage locker for use by morning crews the following day.
The locker sat on a bare concrete floor and the plastic encased
modules were simply stacked onto the painted shelves of the locker.
None of the battery contacts came in contact with any conductive
suface but if left on the bare shelves of the locker would would
completely discharge in about 3 days or less.
I ran a test by placing a fully charged battery in a heavy plastic bag
and left it in the locker for a week, with another charged module
sitting right next to it on the shelf.
The bagged battery retained nearly all it's charge, the bare one was
dead.
After that we used a heavy plastic case with rubber mat to store the
batteries and the problem was resolved.

I've been told by those more knowledgeable than I in matters of
storage devices that there are instances where batteries can discharge
due to grounding.
I'm told it has something to do with relative humidity, also that sea
air also promotes rapid discharge as well.(salt in the air?)
My old man was an electrician who served his time on diesel
boats.(submarines) and he was a big believer in isolating batteries
from ground as well.


  #24   Report Post  
none
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Tue, 16 Aug 2005 00:12:38 GMT, CJT wrote:

wrote:
Everybody, and I mean everbody puts down a barrier so when they put a
car battery down so it's not in contact with the ground, or cement. Now
normally the battery will sit on steel (in the car) which is a
conductor.

Yes but the car has four rubber insulators it sits on, the tires.

They say that being on the ground kills the battery. How does a
nonconductor (concrete) being in contact with another nonconductor
cause this ? I refuse to believe it, but I do not put said batteries on
the ground. (I am a firm believer in Murphy's Law)

Is this myth or mystery, and if true, just how in the hell can it be
true. I'm considered pretty advanced when it comes to electronics, but
this belief is so ubiquitous, that says there might be something to it.

If anyone can shed some light on the process whereby the "ground" can
discharge a car battery please enlighten me. I've now heard this again
and have considered buying two brand new car batteries and chargers
with which to gain empirical evidence. Sometimes when I get curious
about something I have a hard time letting go of it.

Can anyone either explain this so I can STFU, or debunk it so I can run
my mouth ? I've been hearing this for about 30 years now and have
dropped the subject numerous times. That is no longer good enough.

Or are we talking about something like the pyramids or whatever ? I
know some physics but I am by no means a physicist. I'm having a hard
time believe this "myth" and I would like it cleared up in my lifetime,
so I asked.

Thanks to anyone that can set my mind to rest on this annoying subject.

JURB

I set them on the ground all the time and never noticed a problem.


  #25   Report Post  
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Stirring the solution,
would make for a much more uniform discharge curve. "

We've done some automotive work an I've noticed that nothing quite
charges a battery like a car, perhaps because it moves ?

When we had a severely depleted battery on charge we would agitate it
every few hours and at that time the ammeter reading would increase. I
guess it knocked the bubbles off of the plates ?

JURB



  #28   Report Post  
Michael A. Terrell
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Dave Plowman (News)" wrote:

In article rA9Me.222977$5V4.179143@pd7tw3no,
Ken Weitzel wrote:
I hold that the damage was caused by interaction between
the very alkaline cement and the battery acid.


How does the acid get there? The case is acid proof, otherwise the steel
it sits on in the car would corrode through in even shorter time.

--
*Experience is something you don't get until just after you need it.*

Dave Plowman London SW
To e-mail, change noise into sound.



Early car batteries had molded hard rubber cases that were less than
perfect when it came to leaks. There is a 1/4" of concrete missing in
the driveway next door where an old battery froze and developed hairline
cracks. A month later the concrete around the battery was badly etched,
and had had the 1/4" missing.

--
Link to my "Computers for disabled Veterans" project website deleted
after threats were telephoned to my church.

Michael A. Terrell
Central Florida
  #29   Report Post  
Jim Adney
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Wed, 24 Aug 2005 00:40:18 GMT "Michael A. Terrell"
wrote:

Early car batteries had molded hard rubber cases that were less than
perfect when it came to leaks. There is a 1/4" of concrete missing in
the driveway next door where an old battery froze and developed hairline
cracks. A month later the concrete around the battery was badly etched,
and had had the 1/4" missing.


I don't think there is any disagreement that a battery with a cracked
case will discharge, on concrete or elsewhere.

It's pretty clear that the question is in regard to a battery in good
condition.

-
-----------------------------------------------
Jim Adney
Madison, WI 53711 USA
-----------------------------------------------
  #30   Report Post  
Dave Plowman (News)
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article ,
Michael A. Terrell wrote:
How does the acid get there? The case is acid proof, otherwise the
steel it sits on in the car would corrode through in even shorter time.



Early car batteries had molded hard rubber cases that were less than
perfect when it came to leaks.


Possibly, which still makes it an old husband's tale since rubber hasn't
been used for many a year - apart from on period batteries for classics,
etc.

There is a 1/4" of concrete missing in
the driveway next door where an old battery froze and developed hairline
cracks.


Well it cracked and leaked. Batteries should be protected from freezing in
any eventuality.

A month later the concrete around the battery was badly etched,
and had had the 1/4" missing.


--
*Virtual reality is its own reward*

Dave Plowman London SW
To e-mail, change noise into sound.


  #31   Report Post  
Michael A. Terrell
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Dave Plowman (News)" wrote:

Well it cracked and leaked. Batteries should be protected from freezing in
any eventuality.



I agree, but the old man who lived there was in the care of Hospice,
and died that winter. I offered to take care of his place but he didn't
want anyone touching anything, which isn't uncommon around here with
someone in their 80s.

--
Michael A. Terrell
Central Florida
  #32   Report Post  
fireater
 
Posts: n/a
Default

wrote:
Everybody, and I mean everbody puts down a barrier so when they put a
car battery down so it's not in contact with the ground, or cement. Now
normally the battery will sit on steel (in the car) which is a
conductor.

They say that being on the ground kills the battery. How does a
nonconductor (concrete) being in contact with another nonconductor
cause this ? I refuse to believe it, but I do not put said batteries on
the ground. (I am a firm believer in Murphy's Law)

Is this myth or mystery, and if true, just how in the hell can it be
true. I'm considered pretty advanced when it comes to electronics, but
this belief is so ubiquitous, that says there might be something to it.

If anyone can shed some light on the process whereby the "ground" can
discharge a car battery please enlighten me. I've now heard this again
and have considered buying two brand new car batteries and chargers
with which to gain empirical evidence. Sometimes when I get curious
about something I have a hard time letting go of it.

Can anyone either explain this so I can STFU, or debunk it so I can run
my mouth ? I've been hearing this for about 30 years now and have
dropped the subject numerous times. That is no longer good enough.

Or are we talking about something like the pyramids or whatever ? I
know some physics but I am by no means a physicist. I'm having a hard
time believe this "myth" and I would like it cleared up in my lifetime,
so I asked.

Thanks to anyone that can set my mind to rest on this annoying subject.

JURB

ok lets get one thing straight... we are talking about an old and i mean
old "myth"... now years ago most cars had a chunk of wood under the
battery to stop them from touching the steel.. I think this can all be
cleared up with this thought.... new batteries ..not affected.... old
batteries... well regular batteries from years ago required water top
ups... they had a lot of seepage and evaporation and even spillage (oops
i over filled it) and acid from a battery on concrete well its not
pleasant... also if the battery was wet and dirty it could cause some
current leakage however i would believe it still wouldnt matter what it
was sitting on...

HERE IS WHAT I BELIEVE TO BE THE REAL REASON
Long time ago someone stored a battery on concrete..... forgot to
periodically charge it and it went dead ... so it was blamed on the
concrete. because they forgot to charge it ....
  #33   Report Post  
Asimov
 
Posts: n/a
Default

" bravely wrote to "All" (15 Aug 05 16:01:44)
--- on the heady topic of "Old Husband's tale"

I had it explained to me that the difference in temperature between
the cement and ambient air causes a vertical specific density
difference in the electrolyte. This effect results in an a emf between
the top and bottom of the plates which being conductive allows the
usual battery chemical reaction to take place. Thus the battery
slowly discharges over a period of many months (6 or more).

My thinking is that the black case exacerbates the problem by thermal
emission and perhaps a white case would be less prone to the effect.
BTW I've seen batteries in white cases. Anyhow, one idea I have had is
to cover the terminals with their plastic caps then cover the top with
a plastic bag and wrap the whole battery in aluminum foil. The idea
being to force the battery temperature to be equal between top and
bottom due to the good thermal conduction of the aluminum wrapping.
Perhaps wrapping insulation around the battery would be just as good.
But it's just an untested theory.

A*s*i*m*o*v


ZZ From:
ZZ Xref: core-easynews sci.electronics.repair:339749


ZZ Everybody, and I mean everbody puts down a barrier so when they put a
ZZ car battery down so it's not in contact with the ground, or cement.
ZZ Now normally the battery will sit on steel (in the car) which is a
ZZ conductor.

ZZ They say that being on the ground kills the battery. How does a
ZZ nonconductor (concrete) being in contact with another nonconductor
ZZ cause this ? I refuse to believe it, but I do not put said batteries
ZZ on the ground. (I am a firm believer in Murphy's Law)

ZZ Is this myth or mystery, and if true, just how in the hell can it be
ZZ true. I'm considered pretty advanced when it comes to electronics, but
ZZ this belief is so ubiquitous, that says there might be something to
ZZ it.
ZZ If anyone can shed some light on the process whereby the "ground" can
ZZ discharge a car battery please enlighten me. I've now heard this again
ZZ and have considered buying two brand new car batteries and chargers
ZZ with which to gain empirical evidence. Sometimes when I get curious
ZZ about something I have a hard time letting go of it.

ZZ Can anyone either explain this so I can STFU, or debunk it so I can
ZZ run my mouth ? I've been hearing this for about 30 years now and have
ZZ dropped the subject numerous times. That is no longer good enough.

ZZ Or are we talking about something like the pyramids or whatever ? I
ZZ know some physics but I am by no means a physicist. I'm having a hard
ZZ time believe this "myth" and I would like it cleared up in my
ZZ lifetime, so I asked.

ZZ Thanks to anyone that can set my mind to rest on this annoying
ZZ subject.
ZZ JURB

.... Chico of Borg: "Resistance? Atsa no good!"

  #34   Report Post  
Bill Jeffrey
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Asimov wrote:

I had it explained to me that the difference in temperature between
the cement and ambient air causes a vertical specific density
difference in the electrolyte. This effect results in an a emf between
the top and bottom of the plates which being conductive allows the
usual battery chemical reaction to take place. Thus the battery
slowly discharges over a period of many months (6 or more).


Are we still hashing through this? Did I miss the post where it said
"Check with the battery manufacturers" or "Check with someone who
actually knows"? This myth is so pervasive that most battery
manufacturers include it in their FAQ section. The universal statement?
Storing on concrete does not increase the self-discharge rate of a
battery, unless the battery is in a wooden case, ca. 1910.

http://www.exideworld.com/faq/faq_marine.html#concrete
http://www.trojanbattery.com/Tech-Support/FAQ.aspx
http://www.ibsa.com/www_2001/content...tech_maint.htm
http://www.uuhome.de/william.darden/...4.htm#concrete
etc etc etc

Or just Google "lead-acid battery concrete discharge" for 38,000 hits on
how this is not true.

Bill
  #35   Report Post  
Asimov
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Bill Jeffrey" bravely wrote to "All" (29 Sep 05 20:09:45)
--- on the heady topic of " Old Husband's tale"

BJ From: Bill Jeffrey
BJ Xref: core-easynews sci.electronics.repair:343536

BJ Asimov wrote:

I had it explained to me that the difference in temperature


BJ Are we still hashing through this?


I appologize to all for the sudden rash of replies. I don't know what
happened but my replies over the past few weeks have been in a logjam
and today suddenly they all got sent. Please, don't reply to any that
are not relevant, thank you.

A*s*i*m*o*v

.... If plugging it in doesn't help, turn it on.



  #36   Report Post  
clifto
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Asimov wrote:
I appologize to all for the sudden rash of replies. I don't know what
happened but my replies over the past few weeks have been in a logjam
and today suddenly they all got sent. Please, don't reply to any that
are not relevant, thank you.


Did your levee break?

--
If John McCain gets the 2008 Republican Presidential nomination,
my vote for President will be a write-in for Jiang Zemin.
  #37   Report Post  
Asimov
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"clifto" bravely wrote to "All" (30 Sep 05 12:55:43)
--- on the heady topic of " Old Husband's tale"

cl From: clifto
cl Xref: core-easynews sci.electronics.repair:343677

cl Asimov wrote:
I appologize to all for the sudden rash of replies. I don't know what
happened but my replies over the past few weeks have been in a logjam
and today suddenly they all got sent. Please, don't reply to any that
are not relevant, thank you.


cl Did your levee break?


Thanks, looks like everything is back to normal again.
(And... please, no comments from the peanut gallery. ;-)

A*s*i*m*o*v

.... Techs would rather pee on an electric fence for the light show

Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
MFI (a cautionary tale) R UK diy 22 August 5th 05 07:37 PM
OT - A heart-warming tale Sparks UK diy 16 May 3rd 05 03:30 PM
Router tale insert Joe C Woodworking 11 September 15th 04 12:09 PM
Sad Tale: Leitz Tooling Systems-"Free" Unisaw blade sharpening Rudy Woodworking 6 August 30th 04 08:36 AM
OT True tale of British Law Enforcement Gunner Metalworking 6 March 5th 04 11:44 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:13 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 DIYbanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about DIY & home improvement"