Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
UK diy (uk.d-i-y) For the discussion of all topics related to diy (do-it-yourself) in the UK. All levels of experience and proficency are welcome to join in to ask questions or offer solutions. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Grudfos Alpha & Potterton Suprima 'bug'?
I installed an Alpha during the summer and, now the CH is on, I've
noticed that whenever the Suprima re-fires after the boiler stat has shut it down, then the Alpha speeds up before gradually settling down again. This means that, contrary to the way it's supposed to work, the noise through our TRV's is quite loud, and all the more noticeable because it comes & goes. The Alpha is set at the lowest point on its variable scale. I *think* that what's happening is that the Suprima is momentarily disconnecting the pump as the boiler fires? If this is true, then the pump is acting correctly. Is this (disconnecting the pump) a known *bug* with the Suprima? Thanks Rory |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
In message , Rory
writes I installed an Alpha during the summer and, now the CH is on, I've noticed that whenever the Suprima re-fires after the boiler stat has shut it down, then the Alpha speeds up before gradually settling down again. This means that, contrary to the way it's supposed to work, the noise through our TRV's is quite loud, and all the more noticeable because it comes & goes. The Alpha is set at the lowest point on its variable scale. I *think* that what's happening is that the Suprima is momentarily disconnecting the pump as the boiler fires? If this is true, then the pump is acting correctly. Is this (disconnecting the pump) a known *bug* with the Suprima? Thanks Rory When a Suprima comes on, it momentarily energises the pump, this is normal. It should also energise the pump on a daily basis to prevent it seizing up during the summer The information contained in this post may not be published in, or used by http://www.diyprojects.info -- geoff |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
"raden" wrote in message ... In message , Rory writes I installed an Alpha during the summer and, now the CH is on, I've noticed that whenever the Suprima re-fires after the boiler stat has shut it down, then the Alpha speeds up before gradually settling down again. This means that, contrary to the way it's supposed to work, the noise through our TRV's is quite loud, and all the more noticeable because it comes & goes. The Alpha is set at the lowest point on its variable scale. I *think* that what's happening is that the Suprima is momentarily disconnecting the pump as the boiler fires? If this is true, then the pump is acting correctly. Is this (disconnecting the pump) a known *bug* with the Suprima? Thanks Rory When a Suprima comes on, it momentarily energises the pump, this is normal. It should also energise the pump on a daily basis to prevent it seizing up during the summer It is best to have the pump externally controlled, so that when the boiler pulses the pump it really doesn't matter as it is running anyhow. Also when the CH it on it is best to have the pump running continuously and allow the boilers burner to cut in and out. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
raden wrote When a Suprima comes on, it momentarily energises the pump, this is normal. It should also energise the pump on a daily basis to prevent it seizing up during the summer IMM wrote It is best to have the pump externally controlled, so that when the boiler pulses the pump it really doesn't matter as it is running anyhow. Also when the CH it on it is best to have the pump running continuously and allow the boilers burner to cut in and out. Thanks for both replies - energising the pump is fine, it's the momentary drop-out before energisation that appears to cause the problem (of the pump speeding up). IMM's suggestion accords with my own thinking - I believe I could achieve this by simply shorting Switched Live and Pump Live on the boiler (so the pump will run if the valves are open but will still over-run too). Is there any reason not to do this - might it upset the boiler controller? |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
"Rory" wrote in message ... raden wrote When a Suprima comes on, it momentarily energises the pump, this is normal. It should also energise the pump on a daily basis to prevent it seizing up during the summer IMM wrote It is best to have the pump externally controlled, so that when the boiler pulses the pump it really doesn't matter as it is running anyhow. Also when the CH it on it is best to have the pump running continuously and allow the boilers burner to cut in and out. Thanks for both replies - energising the pump is fine, it's the momentary drop-out before energisation that appears to cause the problem (of the pump speeding up). IMM's suggestion accords with my own thinking - I believe I could achieve this by simply shorting Switched Live and Pump Live on the boiler (so the pump will run if the valves are open but will still over-run too). Is there any reason not to do this - might it upset the boiler controller? I can't see any reason why it would. The boiler would switch the pump when needed. If the pump is not running then it switches, if running, it doesn't care. The temperature in the house will be a little more stable with the pump running all the time when on CH. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
IMM wrote:
IMM's suggestion accords with my own thinking - I believe I could achieve this by simply shorting Switched Live and Pump Live on the boiler (so the pump will run if the valves are open but will still over-run too). Is there any reason not to do this - might it upset the boiler controller? I can't see any reason why it would. The boiler would switch the pump when needed. If the pump is not running then it switches, if running, it doesn't care. The temperature in the house will be a little more stable with the pump running all the time when on CH. Drat - it's not so easy. The controller sees this as a wiring fault and puts the boiler into lock-out. Now I look, this condition is in the Fault Finding Guide. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
"Rory" wrote in message ... IMM wrote: IMM's suggestion accords with my own thinking - I believe I could achieve this by simply shorting Switched Live and Pump Live on the boiler (so the pump will run if the valves are open but will still over-run too). Is there any reason not to do this - might it upset the boiler controller? I can't see any reason why it would. The boiler would switch the pump when needed. If the pump is not running then it switches, if running, it doesn't care. The temperature in the house will be a little more stable with the pump running all the time when on CH. Drat - it's not so easy. The controller sees this as a wiring fault and puts the boiler into lock-out. Now I look, this condition is in the Fault Finding Guide. Put a relay in. The boiler energises a relay which switches the pump. Isolate the backfeed from the external switching from the pcb. A relay for £3 and base £2 from Maplin. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
In message , IMM writes
"raden" wrote in message ... In message , Rory writes I installed an Alpha during the summer and, now the CH is on, I've noticed that whenever the Suprima re-fires after the boiler stat has shut it down, then the Alpha speeds up before gradually settling down again. This means that, contrary to the way it's supposed to work, the noise through our TRV's is quite loud, and all the more noticeable because it comes & goes. The Alpha is set at the lowest point on its variable scale. I *think* that what's happening is that the Suprima is momentarily disconnecting the pump as the boiler fires? If this is true, then the pump is acting correctly. Is this (disconnecting the pump) a known *bug* with the Suprima? Thanks Rory When a Suprima comes on, it momentarily energises the pump, this is normal. It should also energise the pump on a daily basis to prevent it seizing up during the summer It is best to have the pump externally controlled, so that when the boiler pulses the pump it really doesn't matter as it is running anyhow. You keep your CH on all through the summer ? or did you not read what I typed ? The information contained in this post may not be published in, or used by http://www.diyprojects.info -- geoff |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
IMM wrote:
Drat - it's not so easy. The controller sees this as a wiring fault and puts the boiler into lock-out. Now I look, this condition is in the Fault Finding Guide. Put a relay in. The boiler energises a relay which switches the pump. Isolate the backfeed from the external switching from the pcb. A relay for £3 and base £2 from Maplin. That would work as long as the controllers not doing anything super-clever. Strange that it monitors the pump live at all, really, because it can only go live under the boilers control. Perhaps I could break the track on the PCB that provides the f/b! |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Rory wrote:
IMM wrote: Drat - it's not so easy. The controller sees this as a wiring fault and puts the boiler into lock-out. Now I look, this condition is in the Fault Finding Guide. Put a relay in. The boiler energises a relay which switches the pump. Isolate the backfeed from the external switching from the pcb. A relay for £3 and base £2 from Maplin. That would work as long as the controllers not doing anything super-clever. Strange that it monitors the pump live at all, really, because it can only go live under the boilers control. Perhaps I could break the track on the PCB that provides the f/b! Actually, I can't see that a relay would help - presumeably the coil would be wired to pump live, so it would still pulse the pump as the boiler fires. If I connect another live to the pump somewhere then either the pump or boiler would run 24/7 and/or the boiler would still see it as a wiring fault. |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
"Rory" wrote in message ... IMM wrote: Drat - it's not so easy. The controller sees this as a wiring fault and puts the boiler into lock-out. Now I look, this condition is in the Fault Finding Guide. Put a relay in. The boiler energises a relay which switches the pump. Isolate the backfeed from the external switching from the pcb. A relay for £3 and base £2 from Maplin. That would work as long as the controllers not doing anything super-clever. Strange that it monitors the pump live at all, really, because it can only go live under the boilers control. Perhaps I could break the track on the PCB that provides the f/b! Ask Maxie about that. I would prefer a simple cheap relay. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
"Rory" wrote in message ... Rory wrote: IMM wrote: Drat - it's not so easy. The controller sees this as a wiring fault and puts the boiler into lock-out. Now I look, this condition is in the Fault Finding Guide. Put a relay in. The boiler energises a relay which switches the pump. Isolate the backfeed from the external switching from the pcb. A relay for £3 and base £2 from Maplin. That would work as long as the controllers not doing anything super-clever. Strange that it monitors the pump live at all, really, because it can only go live under the boilers control. Perhaps I could break the track on the PCB that provides the f/b! Actually, I can't see that a relay would help - presumeably the coil would be wired to pump live, so it would still pulse the pump as the boiler fires. If I connect another live to the pump somewhere then either the pump or boiler would run 24/7 and/or the boiler would still see it as a wiring fault. Maxie, will reveal if it actually "pulses" the pump. What length a pulse is, is open to interpretation. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
In message , Rory
writes IMM wrote: Drat - it's not so easy. The controller sees this as a wiring fault and puts the boiler into lock-out. Now I look, this condition is in the Fault Finding Guide. Put a relay in. The boiler energises a relay which switches the pump. Isolate the backfeed from the external switching from the pcb. A relay for £3 and base £2 from Maplin. That would work as long as the controllers not doing anything super-clever. Strange that it monitors the pump live at all, really, because it can only go live under the boilers control. Perhaps I could break the track on the PCB that provides the f/b! Send it to yourself via Securicor and let them do it for you !!! Modifying the pcb in your boiler is not a good idea, you leave yourself open to all sorts of problems, legally for a start. The information contained in this post may not be published in, or used by http://www.diyprojects.info -- geoff |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
"raden" wrote in message ... In message , IMM writes "raden" wrote in message ... In message , Rory writes I installed an Alpha during the summer and, now the CH is on, I've noticed that whenever the Suprima re-fires after the boiler stat has shut it down, then the Alpha speeds up before gradually settling down again. This means that, contrary to the way it's supposed to work, the noise through our TRV's is quite loud, and all the more noticeable because it comes & goes. The Alpha is set at the lowest point on its variable scale. I *think* that what's happening is that the Suprima is momentarily disconnecting the pump as the boiler fires? If this is true, then the pump is acting correctly. Is this (disconnecting the pump) a known *bug* with the Suprima? Thanks Rory When a Suprima comes on, it momentarily energises the pump, this is normal. It should also energise the pump on a daily basis to prevent it seizing up during the summer It is best to have the pump externally controlled, so that when the boiler pulses the pump it really doesn't matter as it is running anyhow. You keep your CH on all through the summer ? or did you not read what I typed ? Read other post on this...inserting a relay. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
raden wrote:
You keep your CH on all through the summer ? On the Suprima surely the pump running every 24hrs in the summer *generally* doesn't matter as it can only be used on fully pumped systems? |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
IMM wrote:
Maxie, will reveal if it actually "pulses" the pump. What length a pulse is, is open to interpretation. I reckon what I need is a relay with a time delay off (for the overrun) with the coil wired to the boilers Switched Live (ie the input from the valve microswitches). If I wire the pump to the relay's common, it's n/o to a permanent Live and its n/c to the Pump Live then it should works as desired. The only thing that concerns me slightly is that in the boilers fault Finding Guide it suugests *intermittant* lockout can be caused by Pump Live and Switched Live being connected - when I did it, it locked out straight away. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
"Rory" wrote in message ... IMM wrote: Maxie, will reveal if it actually "pulses" the pump. What length a pulse is, is open to interpretation. I reckon what I need is a relay with a time delay off (for the overrun) with the coil wired to the boilers Switched Live (ie the input from the valve microswitches). If I wire the pump to the relay's common, it's n/o to a permanent Live and its n/c to the Pump Live then it should works as desired. The only thing that concerns me slightly is that in the boilers fault Finding Guide it suugests *intermittant* lockout can be caused by Pump Live and Switched Live being connected - when I did it, it locked out straight away. The relay isolates the external pump live. Or you could forget switching the pump from the boiler pcb altogether. Use a pipe stat on the flow very near the boiler. This switches the pump. When the flow is above say 65C the pump keeps running until the boiler cools. Not only that you have control via the pipe stat on the level of heat to be removed from the boiler. This is more specific, rather than just a timer, which may over-pump and over-cool the boiler. Simple and Sorted! |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
IMM wrote:
The relay isolates the external pump live. Or you could forget switching the pump from the boiler pcb altogether. Use a pipe stat on the flow very near the boiler. This switches the pump. When the flow is above say 65C the pump keeps running until the boiler cools. Not only that you have control via the pipe stat on the level of heat to be removed from the boiler. This is more specific, rather than just a timer, which may over-pump and over-cool the boiler. Simple and Sorted! Thanks for your ideas - I'm slightly baffled as to how the pipe stat would be wired to the pump. I can see how it would stop the pump as the flow temp dropped below (say) 65C, but how do I get the pump to start when the system is cold and the stat contacts would be open? I can't connect Live to Pump Live in any way (as the boiler sees it as a fault). The only solution I can think of is to wire Pump Live to a relay coil and then have the n/o contacts in parallel with pipe stat. Is there a simpler way (without a relay) that I'm missing? |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
In article , Rory wrote:
Thanks for your ideas - I'm slightly baffled as to how the pipe stat would be wired to the pump. I can see how it would stop the pump as the flow temp dropped below (say) 65C, but how do I get the pump to start when the system is cold and the stat contacts would be open? The pipe stat will have n/o and n/c contacts. Common goes to pump, n/c to boiler call, n/o to permanent live. Boiler switches on and pump runs. When the set temp is reached the stat switches over and the pump keeps running until the system cools down. -- Tony Bryer SDA UK 'Software to build on' http://www.sda.co.uk Free SEDBUK boiler database browser http://www.sda.co.uk/qsedbuk.htm |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Tony Bryer wrote:
The pipe stat will have n/o and n/c contacts. Common goes to pump, n/c to boiler call, n/o to permanent live. Boiler switches on and pump runs. When the set temp is reached the stat switches over and the pump keeps running until the system cools down. Thanks - I can see that would work. However, the original problem is that the boiler restarts my Alpha pump every time it fires (so it speeds up for a while before settling down again). This (the restarting) would still happen as the pipe stat contacts changed over (although I appreciate it would be much less frequent than it is now). I'm minded to try the delayed off relay approach - at least I can contain that in the boiler cupboard, a pipe stat would have to be external. |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
"Tony Bryer" wrote in message ... In article , Rory wrote: Thanks for your ideas - I'm slightly baffled as to how the pipe stat would be wired to the pump. I can see how it would stop the pump as the flow temp dropped below (say) 65C, but how do I get the pump to start when the system is cold and the stat contacts would be open? The pipe stat will have n/o and n/c contacts. Common goes to pump, n/c to boiler call, n/o to permanent live. Boiler switches on and pump runs. When the set temp is reached the stat switches over and the pump keeps running until the system cools down. This will momentarily de-energise the pump as the stat switches over from a switched live to a permanent live. This is what he doesn't want as it effects the pump operation. It is best to have the switched live energise the pump as per normal. Then a permanent live through the stat to the pump. When cold the switched live switches on the pump. The flow gets over 65C and the stat switches in the permanent live to the pump too. It doesn't matter as the pump is already energised. The switched live de-energises, but the stat is still above 65C so the permanent live keeps the pump energised and running until the flow is cooled. Simple. |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
IMM wrote:
It is best to have the switched live energise the pump as per normal. Then a permanent live through the stat to the pump. When cold the switched live switches on the pump. The flow gets over 65C and the stat switches in the permanent live to the pump too. It doesn't matter as the pump is already energised. The switched live de-energises, but the stat is still above 65C so the permanent live keeps the pump energised and running until the flow is cooled. Simple. What I think will happen here is that when the pipe stat switches in the permanent live then this will connect to the boilers switched live and cause the boiler to run continuously (limited by the boiler stat). That is what I almost achieved when I shorted Pump Live to Switch Live - if the boiler control hadn't sensed it and locked out the boiler then the overrun timer would have kept the boiler firing. I reckon it *has* to have a relay - simples solution I can think of is coil wired to pump live and n/o contacts in parallel with n/o on pipe stat, supplied by permanent live. Any other offers? |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
In message , Rory
writes raden wrote: You keep your CH on all through the summer ? On the Suprima surely the pump running every 24hrs in the summer *generally* doesn't matter as it can only be used on fully pumped systems? That's not what I was on about The information contained in this post may not be published in, or used by http://www.diyprojects.info -- geoff |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
raden wrote:
That's not what I was on about Sorry. What were you on about? I understand about pulsing the pump every 24hrs and on initial power up, the question that's bugging me (which you may know the answer to) is; When the boiler is going through it's relighting procedure after pausing having satisfied the boiler stat (but not the CH or HW stat) does the controller deliberately momentarily disconnect the pump? If, perhaps, the controller shouldn't do this, or the firmware has been upgraded, then it would be worth me changing the PCB to cure the annoyance this causes. |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
In message , Rory
writes raden wrote: That's not what I was on about Sorry. What were you on about? DIMM was talking about running his pump from his programmer I understand about pulsing the pump every 24hrs and on initial power up, the question that's bugging me (which you may know the answer to) is; When the boiler is going through it's relighting procedure after pausing having satisfied the boiler stat (but not the CH or HW stat) does the controller deliberately momentarily disconnect the pump? Yes, If, perhaps, the controller shouldn't do this, or the firmware has been upgraded, then it would be worth me changing the PCB to cure the annoyance this causes. They all do the same, your £150+ would be wasted. The information contained in this post may not be published in, or used by http://www.diyprojects.info -- geoff |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
"raden" wrote in message ... In message , Rory writes raden wrote: That's not what I was on about Sorry. What were you on about? DIMM was talking about running his pump from his programmer Maxie,are you asking DIm Lin the far eastern luscious lovely about this? My oh my.... I understand about pulsing the pump every 24hrs and on initial power up, the question that's bugging me (which you may know the answer to) is; When the boiler is going through it's relighting procedure after pausing having satisfied the boiler stat (but not the CH or HW stat) does the controller deliberately momentarily disconnect the pump? Yes, If, perhaps, the controller shouldn't do this, or the firmware has been upgraded, then it would be worth me changing the PCB to cure the annoyance this causes. They all do the same, your £150+ would be wasted. The information contained in this post may not be published in, or used by http://www.diyprojects.info -- geoff |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
raden wrote:
I understand about pulsing the pump every 24hrs and on initial power up, the question that's bugging me (which you may know the answer to) is; When the boiler is going through it's relighting procedure after pausing having satisfied the boiler stat (but not the CH or HW stat) does the controller deliberately momentarily disconnect the pump? Yes, Do many boilers do this? If so, would seem to negate one of the benefits of choosing the Alpha. If, perhaps, the controller shouldn't do this, or the firmware has been upgraded, then it would be worth me changing the PCB to cure the annoyance this causes. They all do the same, your £150+ would be wasted. I wouldn't dream of spending £150 - if/when I need to change the PCB I'll buy one off you. Hopefully it will be soldered better than the original. |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
In message , Rory
writes raden wrote: I understand about pulsing the pump every 24hrs and on initial power up, the question that's bugging me (which you may know the answer to) is; When the boiler is going through it's relighting procedure after pausing having satisfied the boiler stat (but not the CH or HW stat) does the controller deliberately momentarily disconnect the pump? Yes, Do many boilers do this? If so, would seem to negate one of the benefits of choosing the Alpha. If, perhaps, the controller shouldn't do this, or the firmware has been upgraded, then it would be worth me changing the PCB to cure the annoyance this causes. They all do the same, your £150+ would be wasted. I wouldn't dream of spending £150 - if/when I need to change the PCB I'll buy one off you. Hopefully it will be soldered better than the original. Definitely, but it would still contain the same software -- geoff |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
In message , Rory
writes IMM wrote: Drat - it's not so easy. The controller sees this as a wiring fault and puts the boiler into lock-out. Now I look, this condition is in the Fault Finding Guide. Put a relay in. The boiler energises a relay which switches the pump. Isolate the backfeed from the external switching from the pcb. A relay for £3 and base £2 from Maplin. That would work as long as the controllers not doing anything super-clever. Strange that it monitors the pump live at all, really, because it can only go live under the boilers control. Perhaps I could break the track on the PCB that provides the f/b! I refer the learned gentleman back to insurance liability If you modify the pcb in any way, then it is no longer correct for the boiler. This may seem a trivial point to you atm, but you leave yourself open. -- geoff |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Potterton Suprima 80 "Lockout" | UK diy | |||
Potterton Suprima problems | UK diy | |||
Potterton Suprima 100 update | UK diy | |||
CH boiler - making droning noise - Potterton Suprima 60 | UK diy | |||
Potterton Suprima 80 | UK diy |