Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
UK diy (uk.d-i-y) For the discussion of all topics related to diy (do-it-yourself) in the UK. All levels of experience and proficency are welcome to join in to ask questions or offer solutions. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Wiring conventions
Hello
Following on from my recent installation of an extractor fan. The fan I fitted requires 4 connections: neutral, permanent live, and two switched lives. I bought myself a length of 4 core cable of the required rating but I'm confused about which colours to use and whether there might be a different coloured cable that I should have used. The cable that I bought has inners coloured brown, blue, black and green/yellow. I wired the blue to the neutral and the brown to the permanent live - leaving the black and green/yellow for the two switched lives. I have a 3 pole isolator on all of the live cables, but even so, I'm not comfortable with having a green/yellow for a potentially live cable and I'd like to find a solution to this asap. What is the normal convention in these situations - is there a 4 core cable with different colours made specifically for this type of installation? Thanks Thomas |
#2
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Wiring conventions
Thomas wrote:
The cable that I bought has inners coloured brown, blue, black and green/yellow. I wired the blue to the neutral and the brown to the permanent live - leaving the black and green/yellow for the two switched lives. I have a 3 pole isolator on all of the live cables, but even so, I'm not comfortable with having a green/yellow for a potentially live cable and I'd like to find a solution to this asap. You're right to be uncomfortable, you're NOT allowed to use green/yellow as a live, even if you sleeve it in brown. It can only be used as "earth". What is the normal convention in these situations - is there a 4 core cable with different colours made specifically for this type of installation? You can get a 5 core flex suitable for your purpose http://www.tlc-direct.co.uk/Main_Ind...e_3/index.html Higher number of cores may be numbered instead of coloured. |
#3
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Wiring conventions
On 11/09/2012 16:29, Thomas wrote:
Hello Following on from my recent installation of an extractor fan. The fan I fitted requires 4 connections: neutral, permanent live, and two switched lives. I bought myself a length of 4 core cable of the required Sounds like your bought one wire too few... rating but I'm confused about which colours to use and whether there might be a different coloured cable that I should have used. Blue is neutral, while brown, and black are "live" colours (in the harmonised colour scheme). Green/yellow is earth. The cable that I bought has inners coloured brown, blue, black and green/yellow. I wired the blue to the neutral and the brown to the permanent live - leaving the black and green/yellow for the two switched lives. I have a 3 pole isolator on all of the live cables, but even so, I'm not comfortable with having a green/yellow for a potentially live cable and I'd like to find a solution to this asap. What is the normal convention in these situations - is there a 4 core cable with different colours made specifically for this type of installation? Its very bad practice to re-purpose a green/yellow CPC in a cable/flex. The typical 5 core flex used by central heating installers may be more appropriate. Or I would probably run a length of T&E and one of 3&E to give five cores plus earth. -- Cheers, John. /================================================== ===============\ | Internode Ltd - http://www.internode.co.uk | |-----------------------------------------------------------------| | John Rumm - john(at)internode(dot)co(dot)uk | \================================================= ================/ |
#4
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Wiring conventions
John Rumm wrote:
On 11/09/2012 16:29, Thomas wrote: Hello Following on from my recent installation of an extractor fan. The fan I fitted requires 4 connections: neutral, permanent live, and two switched lives. I bought myself a length of 4 core cable of the required Sounds like your bought one wire too few... rating but I'm confused about which colours to use and whether there might be a different coloured cable that I should have used. Blue is neutral, while brown, and black are "live" colours (in the harmonised colour scheme). Green/yellow is earth. The cable that I bought has inners coloured brown, blue, black and green/yellow. I wired the blue to the neutral and the brown to the permanent live - leaving the black and green/yellow for the two switched lives. I have a 3 pole isolator on all of the live cables, but even so, I'm not comfortable with having a green/yellow for a potentially live cable and I'd like to find a solution to this asap. What is the normal convention in these situations - is there a 4 core cable with different colours made specifically for this type of installation? Its very bad practice to re-purpose a green/yellow CPC in a cable/flex. The typical 5 core flex used by central heating installers may be more appropriate. Or I would probably run a length of T&E and one of 3&E to give five cores plus earth. As both John and Andy have pointed out you should not use the green/yellow for anything other than "earth". It's also bad practice not to run an earth out with all the other cores even for something that will not be earthed. You "park" the earth core in a piece of strip connector inside the fan. As they both said, 5 core flex is one suitable answer. -- Adam |
#5
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Wiring conventions
In article , John Rumm wrote:
On 11/09/2012 16:29, Thomas wrote: The fan I fitted requires 4 connections: neutral, permanent live, and two switched lives. I bought myself a length of 4 core cable of the required Sounds like your bought one wire too few... If it really doesn't need an earth (double insulated), and he can find four core in blue, brown, grey and black, that should be enough. Its very bad practice to re-purpose a green/yellow CPC in a cable/flex. While not disagreeing with you, I notice that Googling for "For green and yellow conductors in multicore cables, overmarking in another colour at terminations is permitted. This is prohibited for single core green-and-yellow conductors." has a few hits. http://www.simptech-solutions.com/eb...egulations.pdf |
#6
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Wiring conventions
Alan Braggins wrote:
In article , John Rumm wrote: On 11/09/2012 16:29, Thomas wrote: The fan I fitted requires 4 connections: neutral, permanent live, and two switched lives. I bought myself a length of 4 core cable of the required Sounds like your bought one wire too few... If it really doesn't need an earth (double insulated), and he can find four core in blue, brown, grey and black, that should be enough. Its very bad practice to re-purpose a green/yellow CPC in a cable/flex. While not disagreeing with you, I notice that Googling for "For green and yellow conductors in multicore cables, overmarking in another colour at terminations is permitted. This is prohibited for single core green-and-yellow conductors." has a few hits. http://www.simptech-solutions.com/eb...egulations.pdf Reg 514.4.2 The bi-colour combination green-and-yellow shall be used exclusively for the identification of a protective conductor and this combination shall not be used for any other purpose" -- Adam |
#7
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Wiring conventions
On Tuesday, September 11, 2012 4:28:49 PM UTC+1, Thomas wrote:
Hello Following on from my recent installation of an extractor fan. The fan I fitted requires 4 connections: neutral, permanent live, and two switched lives. I bought myself a length of 4 core cable of the required rating but I'm confused about which colours to use and whether there might be a different coloured cable that I should have used. The cable that I bought has inners coloured brown, blue, black and green/yellow. I wired the blue to the neutral and the brown to the permanent live - leaving the black and green/yellow for the two switched lives. I have a 3 pole isolator on all of the live cables, but even so, I'm not comfortable with having a green/yellow for a potentially live cable and I'd like to find a solution to this asap. What is the normal convention in these situations - is there a 4 core cable with different colours made specifically for this type of installation? Thanks Thomas If you dont have enough conductors, just use 2 T&E cables - or 3&e + T&E or whatever you need. NT |
#8
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Wiring conventions
In article , ARW wrote:
Alan Braggins wrote: In article , John Rumm wrote: Its very bad practice to re-purpose a green/yellow CPC in a cable/flex. While not disagreeing with you, I notice that Googling for "For green ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ and yellow conductors in multicore cables, overmarking in another colour at terminations is permitted. This is prohibited for single core green-and-yellow conductors." has a few hits. http://www.simptech-solutions.com/eb...egulations.pdf Reg 514.4.2 The bi-colour combination green-and-yellow shall be used exclusively for the identification of a protective conductor and this combination shall not be used for any other purpose" I've not got the actual regs, only seen bits of guides to them. http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=q...ctors.&f=false for example says "prohibited for single core green-and-yellow conductors (Regulation 514.4.2)" |
#9
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Wiring conventions
wrote in message ... If you dont have enough conductors, just use 2 T&E cables - or 3&e + T&E or whatever you need. The problem is that there is a silicon grommet at the entrnce to the unit which is designed to seal around a single inlet cable. Using multiple cables would provide a moisture ingress path :-( Thanks Thomas |
#10
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Wiring conventions
In article ,
Thomas wrote: The cable that I bought has inners coloured brown, blue, black and green/yellow. I wired the blue to the neutral and the brown to the permanent live - leaving the black and green/yellow for the two switched lives. I have a 3 pole isolator on all of the live cables, but even so, I'm not comfortable with having a green/yellow for a potentially live cable and I'd like to find a solution to this asap. You've bought the wrong cable. It is presumable a flex since it has sleeved earth? It is flex designed for three phase stuff by the colours. And yellow/green is for earth *only*. Any decent wholesaler will have 4 core plus earth flex. Like this:- http://www.tlc-direct.co.uk/Main_Ind...e_3/index.html If you don't need the earth, leave it unused, but taped safely out of the way. -- *Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large groups. Dave Plowman London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound. |
#11
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Wiring conventions
Dave Plowman (News) wrote:
In article , Thomas wrote: The cable that I bought has inners coloured brown, blue, black and green/yellow. I wired the blue to the neutral and the brown to the permanent live - leaving the black and green/yellow for the two switched lives. I have a 3 pole isolator on all of the live cables, but even so, I'm not comfortable with having a green/yellow for a potentially live cable and I'd like to find a solution to this asap. You've bought the wrong cable. It is presumable a flex since it has sleeved earth? It is flex designed for three phase stuff by the colours. And yellow/green is for earth *only*. Any decent wholesaler will have 4 core plus earth flex. Like this:- http://www.tlc-direct.co.uk/Main_Ind...e_3/index.html If you don't need the earth, leave it unused, but taped safely out of the way. It may be considered good practise to earth unused conductors. Not sure if it's a reg or not, I am in a meeting right now and my red book's at home. -- Tim Watts |
#12
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Wiring conventions
Tim Watts wrote:
Dave Plowman (News) wrote: In article , Thomas wrote: The cable that I bought has inners coloured brown, blue, black and green/yellow. I wired the blue to the neutral and the brown to the permanent live - leaving the black and green/yellow for the two switched lives. I have a 3 pole isolator on all of the live cables, but even so, I'm not comfortable with having a green/yellow for a potentially live cable and I'd like to find a solution to this asap. You've bought the wrong cable. It is presumable a flex since it has sleeved earth? It is flex designed for three phase stuff by the colours. And yellow/green is for earth *only*. Any decent wholesaler will have 4 core plus earth flex. Like this:- http://www.tlc-direct.co.uk/Main_Ind...e_3/index.html If you don't need the earth, leave it unused, but taped safely out of the way. It may be considered good practise to earth unused conductors. Not sure if it's a reg or not, I am in a meeting right now and my red book's at home. http://wiki.diyfaq.org.uk/index.php?...ile:Img206.jpg Now Reg number 131.2.1 in the 17th. Of course that would never happen. In real life all the unused cores would be shoved into the same piece of strip connector with the earth. -- Adam |
#13
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Wiring conventions
On 15/09/2012 12:29, ARW wrote:
http://wiki.diyfaq.org.uk/index.php?...ile:Img206.jpg Now Reg number 131.2.1 in the 17th. Of course that would never happen. In real life all the unused cores would be shoved into the same piece of strip connector with the earth. File:Img206.jpg No file by this name exists. Andy |
#14
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Wiring conventions
Andy Champ wrote:
On 15/09/2012 12:29, ARW wrote: http://wiki.diyfaq.org.uk/index.php?...ile:Img206.jpg Now Reg number 131.2.1 in the 17th. Of course that would never happen. In real life all the unused cores would be shoved into the same piece of strip connector with the earth. File:Img206.jpg No file by this name exists.# It does. Now at http://i428.photobucket.com/albums/q...020/img206.jpg due to copyright reasons. -- Adam |
#15
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Wiring conventions
Adam wrote:
Reg 514.4.2 The bi-colour combination green-and-yellow shall be used exclusively for the identification of a protective conductor and this combination shall not be used for any other purpose" I would suggest that this regulation specifically refers to the visible green/yellow colour combination of the conductor. If the visible colours of a conductor are green/yellow, then that 'exclusively identifies that conductor as a protective conductor'. However, if the exposed green/yellow conductor of a multicore cable is fully oversheathed or sleeved in another colour (e.g. brown) at the terminations, then IMO, the new designation for that conductor would not contravene the regulations. It's not that different from oversheathing the blue neutral in a switch drop with brown sleeving to redesignate it as a live conductor. -- Interloper |
#16
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Wiring conventions
Interloper wrote:
Adam wrote: Reg 514.4.2 The bi-colour combination green-and-yellow shall be used exclusively for the identification of a protective conductor and this combination shall not be used for any other purpose" I would suggest that this regulation specifically refers to the visible green/yellow colour combination of the conductor. If the visible colours of a conductor are green/yellow, then that 'exclusively identifies that conductor as a protective conductor'. However, if the exposed green/yellow conductor of a multicore cable is fully oversheathed or sleeved in another colour (e.g. brown) at the terminations, then IMO, the new designation for that conductor would not contravene the regulations. It's not that different from oversheathing the blue neutral in a switch drop with brown sleeving to redesignate it as a live conductor. Hang about - whilst I cannot put my finger on the reg this second, I believe that using a green/yellow conductor for any other purpose is absolutely verboten. Give me a few hours - I think I can back that up... But common sense wise - what if someone cuts the cable later, determines an apparant CPC and bonds it to something exposed? -- Tim Watts Personal Blog: http://www.dionic.net/tim/ "She got her looks from her father. He's a plastic surgeon." |
#17
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Wiring conventions
In message , Tim Watts
writes Hang about - whilst I cannot put my finger on the reg this second, I believe that using a green/yellow conductor for any other purpose is absolutely verboten. There is of course an exemption for this if you are a plumber, then the green/yellow, or even just the bare copper earth lead can be, and is, used for a live return. Please don't take the above seriously. -- Bill ( A different one ) |
#18
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Wiring conventions
"Tim Watts" wrote:
Interloper wrote: Adam wrote: Reg 514.4.2 The bi-colour combination green-and-yellow shall be used exclusively for the identification of a protective conductor and this combination shall not be used for any other purpose" I would suggest that this regulation specifically refers to the visible green/yellow colour combination of the conductor. If the visible colours of a conductor are green/yellow, then that 'exclusively identifies that conductor as a protective conductor'. However, if the exposed green/yellow conductor of a multicore cable is fully oversheathed or sleeved in another colour (e.g. brown) at the terminations, then IMO, the new designation for that conductor would not contravene the regulations. It's not that different from oversheathing the blue neutral in a switch drop with brown sleeving to redesignate it as a live conductor. Hang about - whilst I cannot put my finger on the reg this second, I believe that using a green/yellow conductor for any other purpose is absolutely verboten. You might be right, but I couldn't find a regulation prohibiting the reassignment of the green/yellow conductor in a multicore cable. I think you'll find that using the combination green/yellow *COLOUR* for anything other than a protective conductor is 'absolutely verboten' (or 'absolutely forbidden', once the UK is out of the EU). However, reassigning the green/yellow conductor of a multicore cable (*NOT* a single core conductor, which is forbidden), does not appear to contravene the regs. Reassignment of a conductor at the termination using tape, sleeving, or alphanumeric identifiers takes precedence over the original core colour (although it would be good practice to also oversleeve a reassigned green/yellow conductor in a multicore cable when alphanumeric identifiers are being used). Give me a few hours - I think I can back that up... OK, over to you, then ;-) But common sense wise - what if someone cuts the cable later, determines an apparent CPC and bonds it to something exposed? What, without checking/testing the 'apparent aspect of their CPC observation? I guess the protective device/mcb/rcd will trip on re-energisation :-) If someone 'cuts the cable later', they should be a qualified electrician and know what they're doing. If they are remaking the termination for some reason, they should at least notice that the green/yellow conductor has been reassigned at the old termination. If they're simply reusing the cable for something else, then any previous reassignments at the terminations would be irrelevant. This extract is taken from an ECA Guide to the 17th Edition IEE Wiring Regulations: "D 3.1 Principle of required identification (514.3.1) It is most important to understand the principle behind the drafting of the 17th Edition in respect of cable identification. Cable cores shall be identifiable at their terminations either by colour or by alphanumeric characters. While this has not changed from the 16th Edition it is worth discussing the principles. It is noted that cores should preferably be identifiable throughout their length. For many applications coloured cables, either single- or multicore, will be used and these cables are obviously identified throughout their length. However, in many other applications installers will need to make use of this Regulation (514.3.1) for overmarking at terminations. The principles and applications of identification are now discussed with the use of diagrams. [sorry, can't post the diagrams] Figure D 3.1 shows the principle of identification where colours are used, i.e. marking by colour at all terminations and preferably throughout the length. In Figure D 3.1 marking throughout the length is not used and single core cables have been used. It should be noted that the colour of the cables originally used is not important and overmarking by tape or similar takes precedence. Building on this principle, Figure D 3.2 shows the principle of identification where alphanumeric identification is used. It is perhaps more obvious now that marking throughout the length is not necessary. It should be noted that the colour of the cables originally used is not important and overmarking takes precedence. This principle holds whatever the colour of cores of the original cable, and applies at terminations by coloured tapes or by characters. In summary, an important principle is established in that, wherever marking at terminations by either tapes, lettering or numbering is used, the original cable colours must be ignored; this can be against your gut feeling but you must get used to it! Common examples and applications where identification is only practised at terminations include the following: - Multicore cables with more than five cores. - MICC cables. - Control applications wired in single-core conductors. - Applications where coloured cable is not available, including connections to large generators or transformers, where often only black cable is available. It should now be established that installers may wish to use any single cable colour, or combination of colours, and overmark at terminations, and this is not considered a lesser option. For green-and-yellow conductors in multicore cables, overmarking in another colour at terminations is permitted. Overmarking at terminations is prohibited for single-core green-and-yellow conductors." -- Interloper |
#19
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Wiring conventions
En el artículo , Tim Watts
escribió: But common sense wise - what if someone cuts the cable later, determines an apparant CPC and bonds it to something exposed? The same argument applies - what if it's a switch wire and the blue wire is sheathed brown at both ends, but not where it is cut? It's an interesting question. -- (\_/) (='.'=) (")_(") |
#20
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Wiring conventions
Interloper wrote:
"Tim Watts" wrote: Hang about - whilst I cannot put my finger on the reg this second, I believe that using a green/yellow conductor for any other purpose is absolutely verboten. You might be right, but I couldn't find a regulation prohibiting the reassignment of the green/yellow conductor in a multicore cable. I think you'll find that using the combination green/yellow *COLOUR* for anything other than a protective conductor is 'absolutely verboten' (or 'absolutely forbidden', once the UK is out of the EU). However, reassigning the green/yellow conductor of a multicore cable (*NOT* a single core conductor, which is forbidden), does not appear to contravene the regs. Reassignment of a conductor at the termination using tape, sleeving, or alphanumeric identifiers takes precedence over the original core colour (although it would be good practice to also oversleeve a reassigned green/yellow conductor in a multicore cable when alphanumeric identifiers are being used). Give me a few hours - I think I can back that up... OK, over to you, then ;-) BS7671:2008 17th Edition pre Amendment 1: 514.4.2 (Excerpt): "The bi-colour combination green-and-yellow shall be used exclusively for identification of a protective conductor and this combination shall not be used for any other purpose. Single-core cables that are coloured green-and-yellow throughout their length shall only be used as a protective conductor and shall not be over- marked at their terminations, except as premitted by Regulation 514.4.3..." Yes, it makes a big point of single-cores but the overall meaning is pretty clear - it would be a brave man that would argue against that. IMHO the first sentence covers all eventualities and the second is just reinforcement. Reg 514.4.3 refers to PEN conductors which are G/Y with blue sleeves at the terminations. But common sense wise - what if someone cuts the cable later, determines an apparent CPC and bonds it to something exposed? What, without checking/testing the 'apparent aspect of their CPC observation? I guess the protective device/mcb/rcd will trip on re-energisation :-) If someone 'cuts the cable later', they should be a qualified electrician and know what they're doing. If they are remaking the termination for some reason, they should at least notice that the green/yellow conductor has been reassigned at the old termination. If they're simply reusing the cable for something else, then any previous reassignments at the terminations would be irrelevant. Yes - but even qualified electricians don't like being caught out with extreme weirdness ;- This is why there are colour standards - which are otherwise arguably irrelevent to safety as the electrons don;t really care. It should now be established that installers may wish to use any single cable colour, or combination of colours, and overmark at terminations, and this is not considered a lesser option. For green-and-yellow conductors in multicore cables, overmarking in another colour at terminations is permitted. Overmarking at terminations is prohibited for single-core green-and-yellow conductors." That's their view, but I don't much like it - I think it is argued on the letter rather than the spirit of 514.4.2 -- Tim Watts Personal Blog: http://www.dionic.net/tim/ "History will be kind to me for I intend to write it." |
#21
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Wiring conventions
Mike Tomlinson wrote:
En el artÃ*culo , Tim Watts escribió: But common sense wise - what if someone cuts the cable later, determines an apparant CPC and bonds it to something exposed? The same argument applies - what if it's a switch wire and the blue wire is sheathed brown at both ends, but not where it is cut? It's an interesting question. Not really - at least not these days. 17th basically states that "neutral" is to be considered a live conductor, as opposed to what we all call live which is now called "line" (rather than "phase" like it used to be). In other words, neutral is regarded as dangerous and not to be left uninsulated, exposed, connected to random metalwork etc. In this repsect the CPC has a very special status which is why it's important to avoid mistakes of this nature. -- Tim Watts Personal Blog: http://www.dionic.net/tim/ "History will be kind to me for I intend to write it." |
#22
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Wiring conventions
En el artículo , Tim Watts
escribió: Not really - at least not these days. 17th basically states that "neutral" is to be considered a live conductor Thanks for that. -- (\_/) (='.'=) (")_(") |
#23
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Wiring conventions
"Tim Watts" wrote
Give me a few hours - I think I can back that up... OK, over to you, then ;-) BS7671:2008 17th Edition pre Amendment 1: 514.4.2 (Excerpt): "The bi-colour combination green-and-yellow shall be used exclusively for identification of a protective conductor and this combination shall not be used for any other purpose." This rule is referring specifically and only to the colour identification of a conductor (at the termination point). If the conductor colour is the bi-colour combination of green-and-yellow , then that conductor must be a CPC. The bi-colour combination of green-and-yellow shall not be used for any other purpose. However, this rule has no bearing on the reassignment of a green/yellow conductor by oversleeving with a different colour at the termination points. Single-core cables that are coloured green-and-yellow throughout their length shall only be used as a protective conductor and shall not be over- marked at their terminations, except as permitted by Regulation 514.4.3..." This rule specifically precludes the reassignment of a single-core green/yellow conductor for any other purpose. I suggest this rule exists to ensure reassignment of a green/yellow conductor will only occur in a multicore cable. This rule would be superfluous if the reassignment of a green/yellow conductor was not permitted under any circumstances. The rule could have been made much clearer. Yes, it makes a big point of single-cores but the overall meaning is pretty clear - it would be a brave man that would argue against that. IMHO the first sentence covers all eventualities and the second is just reinforcement. The first rule (sentence) is very clear about the use of the bi-colour combination of green-and-yellow only. It refers just to the colour identification, and not to conductor reassignment. Yes - but even qualified electricians don't like being caught out with extreme weirdness ;- This is why there are colour standards - which are otherwise arguably irrelevant to safety as the electrons don't really care. IMO, the colour standards are now a mess that frequently has to be clarified by the use of additional alpha-numerical identifiers.. The latest colours were chosen as the EU standard in such a way that no country could be seen to be at an advantage as a consequence of the colour standard they were already using. At least the UK was instrumental in persuading the other European countries to adopt three different phase colours (brown, black and grey, rather than brown, black, black). It's taken since 1969 to agree and implement these colour changes! -- Interloper |
#24
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Wiring conventions
Interloper wrote:
"Tim Watts" wrote Give me a few hours - I think I can back that up... OK, over to you, then ;-) BS7671:2008 17th Edition pre Amendment 1: 514.4.2 (Excerpt): "The bi-colour combination green-and-yellow shall be used exclusively for identification of a protective conductor and this combination shall not be used for any other purpose." This rule is referring specifically and only to the colour identification of a conductor (at the termination point). If the conductor colour is the bi-colour combination of green-and-yellow , then that conductor must be a CPC. The bi-colour combination of green-and-yellow shall not be used for any other purpose. However, this rule has no bearing on the reassignment of a green/yellow conductor by oversleeving with a different colour at the termination points. Single-core cables that are coloured green-and-yellow throughout their length shall only be used as a protective conductor and shall not be over- marked at their terminations, except as permitted by Regulation 514.4.3..." This rule specifically precludes the reassignment of a single-core green/yellow conductor for any other purpose. I suggest this rule exists to ensure reassignment of a green/yellow conductor will only occur in a multicore cable. This rule would be superfluous if the reassignment of a green/yellow conductor was not permitted under any circumstances. The rule could have been made much clearer. Yes, it makes a big point of single-cores but the overall meaning is pretty clear - it would be a brave man that would argue against that. IMHO the first sentence covers all eventualities and the second is just reinforcement. The first rule (sentence) is very clear about the use of the bi-colour combination of green-and-yellow only. It refers just to the colour identification, and not to conductor reassignment. It's a compelling argument - I'm inclined to change my POV about the interpretation. I still maintain that it's a bad idea though. Yes - but even qualified electricians don't like being caught out with extreme weirdness ;- This is why there are colour standards - which are otherwise arguably irrelevant to safety as the electrons don't really care. IMO, the colour standards are now a mess that frequently has to be clarified by the use of additional alpha-numerical identifiers.. The latest colours were chosen as the EU standard in such a way that no country could be seen to be at an advantage as a consequence of the colour standard they were already using. At least the UK was instrumental in persuading the other European countries to adopt three different phase colours (brown, black and grey, rather than brown, black, black). It's taken since 1969 to agree and implement these colour changes! Yep. -- Tim Watts Personal Blog: http://www.dionic.net/tim/ "A fanatic is one who can't change his mind and won't change the subject." |
#25
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Wiring conventions
"Tim Watts" wrote:
Interloper wrote: The first rule (sentence) is very clear about the use of the bi-colour combination of green-and-yellow only. It refers just to the colour identification, and not to conductor reassignment. It's a compelling argument - I'm inclined to change my POV about the interpretation. I still maintain that it's a bad idea though. I agree it's not the perfect solution, but as a last resort when you have run out of cores, it's useful to know that reassignment of the green/yellow conductor in a multicore cable is permitted under the IEE Regulations. Providing, of course, that the integrity of the earthing system is not compromised as a consequence of the reassignment. -- Interloper |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
3 way switch ground wiring (ignor my neutral wiring thread) | Home Repair | |||
NEC question: low-voltage wiring crossing 120v wiring. | Home Repair | |||
Everyone surprisingly experience upon Ramez when the active conventions must in conjunction with the regulatory van. | Electronics Repair | |||
Moving radiators / rad naming conventions | UK diy | |||
Alarm PIR wire colour conventions | UK diy |