Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
Metalworking (rec.crafts.metalworking) Discuss various aspects of working with metal, such as machining, welding, metal joining, screwing, casting, hardening/tempering, blacksmithing/forging, spinning and hammer work, sheet metal work. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
gummer dweeber - no military service
On 1/8/2012 2:08 PM, Hawwke-ptooey wrote:
And you think that you can change things by posting on RCM. Dan What do you think Dan. When someone exposes a person as a liar does that change anything? Hawwke-ptooey It changes things just as much as you do when you expose yourself as a fool by posting. David |
#2
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
gummer dweeber - no military service
On 1/8/2012 2:09 PM, David R. Birch wrote:
On 1/8/2012 2:08 PM, Hawwke-ptooey wrote: And you think that you can change things by posting on RCM. Dan What do you think Dan. When someone exposes a person as a liar does that change anything? Hawwke-ptooey It changes things just as much as you do when you expose yourself as a fool by posting. David Shut up, punk. Nobody asked you for your two cents. Hawke |
#3
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
gummer dweeber - no military service
On Jan 10, 3:31*pm, Hawke wrote:
Shut up, punk. Nobody asked you for your two cents. Hawke Temper , Temper. This is a usegroup and open to everyone that wants to participate. If you were corresponding by email, it would be different. Dan |
#4
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
gummer dweeber - no military service
On Jan 10, 3:31 pm, Hawke wrote: Shut up, punk. Nobody asked you for your two cents. Hawke Hey hawkie punk, nobody asked you for your two ****ing cents either! |
#5
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
gummer dweeber - no military service
On 1/10/2012 6:45 PM, Phil Kangas wrote:
On Jan 10, 3:31 pm, Hawke wrote: Shut up, punk. Nobody asked you for your two cents. Hawke Hey hawkie punk, nobody asked you for your two ****ingcents either! He doesn't have two cents, unless the welfare office gave him one more. |
#6
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
gummer dweeber - no military service
On 1/10/2012 2:31 PM, Hawke wrote:
On 1/8/2012 2:09 PM, David R. Birch wrote: On 1/8/2012 2:08 PM, Hawwke-ptooey wrote: And you think that you can change things by posting on RCM. Dan What do you think Dan. When someone exposes a person as a liar does that change anything? Hawwke-ptooey It changes things just as much as you do when you expose yourself as a fool by posting. David Shut up, punk. Nobody asked you for your two cents. Hawke Punk? Decades ago, back when I was a punk, the word wasn't in common usage. I outgrew that level long before I reached the age of 14, which is where you seemed to have stopped maturing. Has anyone here ever asked anyone for their 2 cents? :^) I wouldn't ask for yours because I'm sure you spent all your pocket change buying that poli sci diploma. You just can't resist displaying for all your immaturity and cluelessness. The problem is that you have displayed so little credibility, maturity and accumulated wisdom in your typical posts that no one takes you seriously. You come on like a little boy trying to join an adult conversation, but you just don't have enough depth of insight to be able to make a useful contribution, plus you're too petty and obnoxious to even be amusing. You make big noises about your alleged poli sci degree, but all that you show us is that left = good, right(as in, anyone who points out your errors)= bad. You can't even recognize that there are valid political stances other than left/right or that there are people like me far to the left of you who see you for the shallow poseur that you are. David |
#7
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
gummer dweeber - no military service
On 1/10/2012 8:49 PM, David R. Birch wrote:
On 1/10/2012 2:31 PM, Hawke wrote: On 1/8/2012 2:09 PM, David R. Birch wrote: On 1/8/2012 2:08 PM, Hawwke-ptooey wrote: And you think that you can change things by posting on RCM. Dan What do you think Dan. When someone exposes a person as a liar does that change anything? Hawwke-ptooey It changes things just as much as you do when you expose yourself as a fool by posting. David Shut up, punk. Nobody asked you for your two cents. Hawke Punk? Decades ago, back when I was a punk, the word wasn't in common usage. I outgrew that level long before I reached the age of 14, which is where you seemed to have stopped maturing. Has anyone here ever asked anyone for their 2 cents? :^) I wouldn't ask for yours because I'm sure you spent all your pocket change buying that poli sci diploma. I dug back in Google Groups and found at least one instance (December 2009) when he said he had a degree in political science. That fits. Do you have any idea how old he is, and what he does for a living? You just can't resist displaying for all your immaturity and cluelessness. The problem is that you have displayed so little credibility, maturity and accumulated wisdom in your typical posts that no one takes you seriously. You come on like a little boy trying to join an adult conversation, but you just don't have enough depth of insight to be able to make a useful contribution, plus you're too petty and obnoxious to even be amusing. There's something about him that makes me think he's much older than the views he expresses - not exactly immature, in the sense that he'd still be shoplifting candy bars from the drugstore or doing frat party beer busts, but maybe a case of arrested development. I've encountered people in their 30s or 40s who expressed similarly extremist political views to his, but they expressed them in age-appropriate styles. Something about his writing suggests youth, but I don't think he's all that young. I'm still curious to know how he makes a living. Earlier this evening he wrote about not having to work to support himself. My first guess is nutless househusband. I don't think he's old enough to have kids who are supporting him, and I don't think he's a welfare scrounger. You make big noises about your alleged poli sci degree, but all that you show us is that left = good, right(as in, anyone who points out your errors)= bad. You can't even recognize that there are valid political stances other than left/right or that there are people like me far to the left of you who see you for the shallow poseur that you are. It's funny that he accuses others of so-called "black-white" thinking, because he's not only susceptible to it, he lives by it. His notion that wealth disparities are bad /per se/, without being able to come close to articulating /why/ they're bad, is an example. |
#8
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
gummer dweeber - no military service
On Jan 11, 12:21*am, George Plimpton wrote:
Do you have any idea how old he is, and what he does for a living? He has said that he got his college degree when he was fifty, at least that is what I remember. And something else he said has me thinking he is less that 65 year old. Do not remember exactly what it was that makes me think that. So I think of him as someone who graduated from college about 15 years ago. There's something about him that makes me think he's much older than the views he expresses - not exactly immature, in the sense that he'd still be shoplifting candy bars from the drugstore or doing frat party beer busts, but maybe a case of arrested development. *I've encountered people in their 30s or 40s who expressed similarly extremist political views to his, but they expressed them in age-appropriate styles. Something about his writing suggests youth, but I don't think he's all that young. That fits in with my thoughts of him being about 15 years after graduation. So much like a 35 year old in his thinking. I'm still curious to know how he makes a living. *Earlier this evening he wrote about not having to work to support himself. *My first guess is nutless househusband. *I don't think he's old enough to have kids who are supporting him, and I don't think he's a welfare scrounger. I do not think he has ever been married. At least I can not remember him ever posting anything that would make me think he is or had been married. It's funny that he accuses others of so-called "black-white" thinking, because he's not only susceptible to it, he lives by it. *His notion that wealth disparities are bad /per se/, without being able to come close to articulating /why/ they're bad, is an example. I think ho accuses others of that because I give him a bad time about seeing the world as black and white. So he accuses others of that to make it seem like he does not see the word in black and white. Dan |
#9
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
gummer dweeber - no military service
"David R. Birch" wrote in message ... On 1/10/2012 2:31 PM, Hawke wrote: On 1/8/2012 2:09 PM, David R. Birch wrote: On 1/8/2012 2:08 PM, Hawwke-ptooey wrote: And you think that you can change things by posting on RCM. Dan What do you think Dan. When someone exposes a person as a liar does that change anything? Hawwke-ptooey It changes things just as much as you do when you expose yourself as a fool by posting. David Shut up, punk. Nobody asked you for your two cents. Hawke Punk? Decades ago, back when I was a punk, the word wasn't in common usage. I outgrew that level long before I reached the age of 14, which is where you seemed to have stopped maturing. Has anyone here ever asked anyone for their 2 cents? :^) I wouldn't ask for yours because I'm sure you spent all your pocket change buying that poli sci diploma. You just can't resist displaying for all your immaturity and cluelessness. The problem is that you have displayed so little credibility, maturity and accumulated wisdom in your typical posts that no one takes you seriously. You come on like a little boy trying to join an adult conversation, but you just don't have enough depth of insight to be able to make a useful contribution, plus you're too petty and obnoxious to even be amusing. You make big noises about your alleged poli sci degree, but all that you show us is that left = good, right(as in, anyone who points out your errors)= bad. You can't even recognize that there are valid political stances other than left/right or that there are people like me far to the left of you who see you for the shallow poseur that you are. David Poli sci degree? What's that worth? Even the paper that it's written on seems that it would chafe. I guess it's like the gal that was complaining on talk radio about there not being enough good paying jobs for a "ancient Greek cultural arts" diploma. Or something like that. Even if she got a lot of actual "Greek" ;-) experience in college, women who will do that sort of thing make decent money as I hear it is somewhat specialized in that circle. It would seem that as with welders and machinists, it would be logical to check out what the job pays before you invest years and years and the government's money in it. Or maybe the goal is to become so smart that you can't do anything but teach, and we all know that's a cushy secure job for life once tenure is achieved. And then there's the speaking circuit. Or politics. Or usenet, but that doesn't pay well, either. I'm confused. ;-) And most poli sci majors that I have ever met are one peg above crazy as a ******** rat types. Steve www.heartsurgerysurvivalguide.com |
#10
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
gummer dweeber - no military service
|
#11
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
gummer dweeber - no military service
On 1/10/2012 7:20 PM, George Plimpton wrote:
On 1/10/2012 6:45 PM, Phil Kangas wrote: On Jan 10, 3:31 pm, Hawke wrote: Shut up, punk. Nobody asked you for your two cents. Hawke Hey hawkie punk, nobody asked you for your two ****ingcents either! He doesn't have two cents, unless the welfare office gave him one more. Something from your tone tells me you ain't rich and you know that means you aren't smart either. Hawke |
#12
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
gummer dweeber - no military service
On 1/10/2012 8:49 PM, David R. Birch wrote:
On 1/10/2012 2:31 PM, Hawke wrote: On 1/8/2012 2:09 PM, David R. Birch wrote: On 1/8/2012 2:08 PM, Hawwke-ptooey wrote: And you think that you can change things by posting on RCM. Dan What do you think Dan. When someone exposes a person as a liar does that change anything? Hawwke-ptooey It changes things just as much as you do when you expose yourself as a fool by posting. David Shut up, punk. Nobody asked you for your two cents. Hawke Punk? Decades ago, back when I was a punk, the word wasn't in common usage. I outgrew that level long before I reached the age of 14, which is where you seemed to have stopped maturing. Has anyone here ever asked anyone for their 2 cents? :^) I wouldn't ask for yours because I'm sure you spent all your pocket change buying that poli sci diploma. You just can't resist displaying for all your immaturity and cluelessness. The problem is that you have displayed so little credibility, maturity and accumulated wisdom in your typical posts that no one takes you seriously. You come on like a little boy trying to join an adult conversation, but you just don't have enough depth of insight to be able to make a useful contribution, plus you're too petty and obnoxious to even be amusing. You make big noises about your alleged poli sci degree, but all that you show us is that left = good, right(as in, anyone who points out your errors)= bad. You can't even recognize that there are valid political stances other than left/right or that there are people like me far to the left of you who see you for the shallow poseur that you are. David And you just keep repeating the same tripe. I've looked to see your highly intellectual and rational commentary on numerous subjects but there doesn't seem to be any for me to look at. All I can find are examples of you acting superior and condescending. You try to come across as some kind of authority that has a right to judge others. Yet you have shown nothing that would indicate you have anything making you better than average. You don't tell us about your advanced degrees. You don't have brilliant things you have written. You do have plenty of childish personal criticisms. But not a thing showing you to be anything to write home about. So how about showing us how great you are instead of just talking about how great you are? Unless the truth is you aren't very good at much of anything, which I suspect is the reality. You pretend to be what your aren't because what you really are is woefully inadequate. Hawke |
#13
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
gummer dweeber - no military service
|
#14
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
gummer dweeber - no military service
On 1/12/2012 11:52 AM, Hawke wrote:
On 1/10/2012 7:20 PM, George Plimpton wrote: On 1/10/2012 6:45 PM, Phil Kangas wrote: On Jan 10, 3:31 pm, Hawke wrote: Shut up, punk. Nobody asked you for your two cents. Hawke Hey hawkie punk, nobody asked you for your two ****ingcents either! He doesn't have two cents, unless the welfare office gave him one more. Something from your tone tells me you ain't rich and you know that means you aren't smart either. I know that I'm more successful than you. Of course, that's a low hurdle to get over. |
#15
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
gummer dweeber - no military service
On Jan 12, 2:51*pm, Hawke wrote:
On 1/10/2012 4:23 PM, wrote: On Jan 10, 3:31 pm, *wrote: Shut up, punk. Nobody asked you for your two cents. Hawke Temper , Temper. *This is a usegroup and open to everyone that wants to participate. *If you were corresponding by email, it would be different. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *Dan You snipped out what my reply was to. If you had left that in then you would see what I said was appropriate. The boy needed a reprimand! Hawke Anyone interested can find all the pieces I cut out. Dan |
#17
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
gummer dweeber - no military service
On 1/12/2012 1:04 PM, George Plimpton wrote:
On 1/12/2012 11:52 AM, Hawke wrote: On 1/10/2012 7:20 PM, George Plimpton wrote: On 1/10/2012 6:45 PM, Phil Kangas wrote: On Jan 10, 3:31 pm, Hawke wrote: Shut up, punk. Nobody asked you for your two cents. Hawke Hey hawkie punk, nobody asked you for your two ****ingcents either! He doesn't have two cents, unless the welfare office gave him one more. Something from your tone tells me you ain't rich and you know that means you aren't smart either. I know that I'm more successful than you. Of course, that's a low hurdle to get over. Like I just said, you're not what people think of when they think of as rich. So that means you aren't even smart at least according to the old standby, if you're so smart why aren't you rich? I think that applies to you quite well. Hawke |
#18
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
gummer dweeber - no military service
On 1/12/2012 2:31 PM, George Plimpton wrote:
All this speculation. I can clear it up for you. I'm 61 years old, That's right about what I guessed. white, single, lifelong bachelor, and I get my money from investments I made over the years. If you live off investments you made, you're a one-percenter. You'd be wiped out by the very policies you advocate. I'm hardly a one-percenter. Just because I am able to get by on what my investments generate I'm not in that privileged class. I'm in a really unusual class. I live off of investments and do not have to work but I'm by no means rich, not by a long shot. I don't know if that is something to cry about or be happy over. Furthermore, the policies you advocate would make it all but impossible for others to reach a position in which they can live off their investments. You're crazy. What I advocate only applies to the privileged people with extreme amounts of money. People like Romney. People with hundreds of millions in assets. The kind of person who would tear down a 3,000 sq ft. Malibu beach front property to expand it to 12,000 sq ft. That's the kind of person my policies would affect. But they would affect most regular people too because I'd make sure they got more money in their pockets at the end of the day. In other words, I'd be fighting for the common man and not for the super rich. I know that seem backwards to you. I've had numerous jobs. I was a real estate agent for a while and I also owned a tennis pro shop and was a U.S.P.T.A. certified instructor. I went to college at Calif. State University, Chico. My B.A. is in Political science and I'm also a certified paralegal. So that's me. So, you're a dilettante. If I was engaged in some endeavor just for the hell of it I might be but I'm not. Right now what I am doing is helping our my two geriatric parents. Not exactly what you find a dilettante doing. One thing you failed to mention is having done anything that would have instilled any common sense. Just my age, life experience, and education. Not much. At least not compared to someone as awesome as you are. Or at least that is what you keep telling me. Hawke |
#19
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
gummer dweeber - no military service
On 1/12/2012 4:12 PM, Hawke wrote:
On 1/12/2012 1:04 PM, George Plimpton wrote: On 1/12/2012 11:52 AM, Hawke wrote: On 1/10/2012 7:20 PM, George Plimpton wrote: On 1/10/2012 6:45 PM, Phil Kangas wrote: On Jan 10, 3:31 pm, Hawke wrote: Shut up, punk. Nobody asked you for your two cents. Hawke Hey hawkie punk, nobody asked you for your two ****ingcents either! He doesn't have two cents, unless the welfare office gave him one more. Something from your tone tells me you ain't rich and you know that means you aren't smart either. I know that I'm more successful than you. Of course, that's a low hurdle to get over. Like I just said, you're not what people think of when they think of as rich. Nor did I ever suggest I am. So that means you aren't even smart Doesn't mean that at all. |
#20
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
gummer dweeber - no military service
On 1/12/2012 1:51 PM, Hawwk-ptooey wrote:
On 1/10/2012 4:23 PM, wrote: On Jan 10, 3:31 pm, wrote: Shut up, punk. Nobody asked you for your two cents. Hawwk-ptooey Temper , Temper. This is a usegroup and open to everyone that wants to participate. If you were corresponding by email, it would be different. Dan You snipped out what my reply was to. If you had left that in then you would see what I said was appropriate. The boy needed a reprimand! Hawwk-ptooey I'm sure that anyone who cared to had read what led to your pathetic childish response. I scoff at the idea that your reprimand would be taken seriously by the adults who frequent this group. I'm sure I'm not the only one who finds your pettiness annoying. Maybe there's another group that could feed your desperate need for attention. The problem is that you have displayed so little credibility, maturity and accumulated wisdom in your typical posts that no one takes you seriously. You come on like a little boy trying to join an adult conversation, but you just don't have enough depth of insight to be able to make a useful contribution, plus you're too petty and obnoxious to even be amusing. You make big noises about your alleged poli sci degree, but all that you show us is that left = good, right(as in, anyone who points out your errors)= bad. You can't even recognize that there are valid political stances other than left/right or that there are people like me far to the left of you who see you for the shallow poseur that you are. Get lost. David |
#21
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
gummer dweeber - no military service
On 1/12/2012 1:52 PM, Hawwk-ptooey wrote:
On 1/10/2012 7:20 PM, George Plimpton wrote: On 1/10/2012 6:45 PM, Phil Kangas wrote: On Jan 10, 3:31 pm, Hawke wrote: Shut up, punk. Nobody asked you for your two cents. Hawwk-ptooey Hey hawkie punk, nobody asked you for your two ****ingcents either! He doesn't have two cents, unless the welfare office gave him one more. Something from your tone tells me you ain't rich and you know that means you aren't smart either. Hawwk-ptooey I know quite a few very smart people, all of them smarter than you, although that's a low hurdle. Some of them are rich because what they do leads to wealth, but wealth isn't why they do it. Most of the smartest just don't find the pursuit of wealth very interesting. But you probably don't understand that either. You seem to be the type who resents wealth because you recognize that your limited competence will never lead to wealth. Or much of anything. David |
#22
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
gummer dweeber - no military service
On 1/12/2012 2:01 PM, Hawwke-ptooey wrote:
On 1/10/2012 8:49 PM, David R. Birch wrote: On 1/10/2012 2:31 PM, Hawwke-ptooeye wrote: On 1/8/2012 2:09 PM, David R. Birch wrote: On 1/8/2012 2:08 PM, Hawwke-ptooey wrote: And you think that you can change things by posting on RCM. Dan What do you think Dan. When someone exposes a person as a liar does that change anything? Hawwke-ptooey It changes things just as much as you do when you expose yourself as a fool by posting. David Shut up, punk. Nobody asked you for your two cents. Hawwke-ptooey Punk? Decades ago, back when I was a punk, the word wasn't in common usage. I outgrew that level long before I reached the age of 14, which is where you seemed to have stopped maturing. Has anyone here ever asked anyone for their 2 cents? :^) I wouldn't ask for yours because I'm sure you spent all your pocket change buying that poli sci diploma. You just can't resist displaying for all your immaturity and cluelessness. The problem is that you have displayed so little credibility, maturity and accumulated wisdom in your typical posts that no one takes you seriously. You come on like a little boy trying to join an adult conversation, but you just don't have enough depth of insight to be able to make a useful contribution, plus you're too petty and obnoxious to even be amusing. You make big noises about your alleged poli sci degree, but all that you show us is that left = good, right(as in, anyone who points out your errors)= bad. You can't even recognize that there are valid political stances other than left/right or that there are people like me far to the left of you who see you for the shallow poseur that you are. David And you just keep repeating the same tripe. I've looked to see your highly intellectual and rational commentary on numerous subjects but there doesn't seem to be any for me to look at. The group has noted your poor reading comprehension. All I can find are examples of you acting superior and condescending. This indicates you've only found what I wrote to you. You try to come across as some kind of authority that has a right to judge others. We all exercise judgement in everything we do. In your case, I don't really bother beyond pointing out your usual levels of inconsistency and hypocrisy. Yet you have shown nothing that would indicate you have anything making youbetter than average. You don't tell us about your advanced degrees. You're the only one who considers degrees important. You don't have brilliant things you have written. No, you just haven't read them, or if you have, they are beyond you. You do have plenty of childish personal criticisms. Just trying to help by pointing out your many faults so that you may correct them. But not a thing showing you to be anything to write home about. To whom would you write home? Why would they read it? So how about showing us how great you are instead of just talking about how great you are? I haven't talked about me being great, just about you being meager. Unless the truth is you aren't very good at much of anything, which I suspect is the reality. You pretend to be what your aren't because what you really are is woefully inadequate. Hawwke-ptooey I see from this that you have little experience with reality. Of course, this is what you show us with every post. David |
#23
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
gummer dweeber - no military service
On 1/12/2012 5:49 PM, George Plimpton wrote:
On 1/12/2012 4:12 PM, Hawke wrote: On 1/12/2012 1:04 PM, George Plimpton wrote: On 1/12/2012 11:52 AM, Hawke wrote: On 1/10/2012 7:20 PM, George Plimpton wrote: On 1/10/2012 6:45 PM, Phil Kangas wrote: On Jan 10, 3:31 pm, Hawke wrote: Shut up, punk. Nobody asked you for your two cents. Hawke Hey hawkie punk, nobody asked you for your two ****ingcents either! He doesn't have two cents, unless the welfare office gave him one more. Something from your tone tells me you ain't rich and you know that means you aren't smart either. I know that I'm more successful than you. Of course, that's a low hurdle to get over. Like I just said, you're not what people think of when they think of as rich. Nor did I ever suggest I am. So that means you aren't even smart Doesn't mean that at all. You know the saying right? If you're so smart why aren't you rich? I don't buy into that but it seems that most Libertarians do. Hawke |
#24
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
gummer dweeber - no military service
On 1/12/2012 8:57 PM, David R. Birch wrote:
On 1/12/2012 1:52 PM, Hawwk-ptooey wrote: On 1/10/2012 7:20 PM, George Plimpton wrote: On 1/10/2012 6:45 PM, Phil Kangas wrote: On Jan 10, 3:31 pm, Hawke wrote: Shut up, punk. Nobody asked you for your two cents. Hawwk-ptooey Hey hawkie punk, nobody asked you for your two ****ingcents either! He doesn't have two cents, unless the welfare office gave him one more. Something from your tone tells me you ain't rich and you know that means you aren't smart either. Hawwk-ptooey I know quite a few very smart people, all of them smarter than you, although that's a low hurdle. No you don't. Because of your bias you wouldn't recognize how smart I am even if it's obvious to others. I know from my education and from how I interact with really intelligent people, and from IQ tests that I am above average in intelligence. So your statement is false. Some of them are rich because what they do leads to wealth, but wealth isn't why they do it. Most of the smartest just don't find the pursuit of wealth very interesting. I never did. I always was more interested in being something instead of having things. Having more things doesn't do much for me. But you probably don't understand that either. I'm sure that you would be surprised at how much I know. Chances are it's more than you do. You talk a great game but so far I've seen no evidence to support that idea. What great success in life can you point to that makes you superior to anyone? You like to do put downs and that's common among underachievers. You seem to be the type who resents wealth because you recognize that your limited competence will never lead to wealth. My competence is far from limited. In fact, I'd put my capabilities up against yours any day of the week. You keep presenting yourself as superior. When do we get to see some proof of it? Or is all you are going to do is talk about it? Let's see something from you that demonstrates you are better than average at anything. Put up or shut up. Let's see what you've got. You act like someone who wants to be respected but you have done nothing to earn it. If you can't show any reason why you should be treated with respect then don't expect any. Or much of anything. In your ignorance you have no idea what I have. But I can tell you I have many things of value. Maybe not to someone as shallow and pretentious as you but to me any many others I've got a lot. And apparently all your superior abilities haven't led you to wealth either. So what happened? Hawke |
#25
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
gummer dweeber - no military service
On 1/12/2012 8:49 PM, David R. Birch wrote:
On 1/12/2012 1:51 PM, Hawwk-ptooey wrote: On 1/10/2012 4:23 PM, wrote: On Jan 10, 3:31 pm, wrote: Shut up, punk. Nobody asked you for your two cents. Hawwk-ptooey Temper , Temper. This is a usegroup and open to everyone that wants to participate. If you were corresponding by email, it would be different. Dan You snipped out what my reply was to. If you had left that in then you would see what I said was appropriate. The boy needed a reprimand! Hawwk-ptooey I'm sure that anyone who cared to had read what led to your pathetic childish response. I scoff at the idea that your reprimand would be taken seriously by the adults who frequent this group. I'm sure I'm not the only one who finds your pettiness annoying. Maybe there's another group that could feed your desperate need for attention. The problem is that you have displayed so little credibility, maturity and accumulated wisdom in your typical posts that no one takes you seriously. You come on like a little boy trying to join an adult conversation, but you just don't have enough depth of insight to be able to make a useful contribution, plus you're too petty and obnoxious to even be amusing. You make big noises about your alleged poli sci degree, but all that you show us is that left = good, right(as in, anyone who points out your errors)= bad. You can't even recognize that there are valid political stances other than left/right or that there are people like me far to the left of you who see you for the shallow poseur that you are. Get lost. David Keep repeating the same posts over and over and I'll keep giving you the same reply. Shut up! Hawke |
#26
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
gummer dweeber - no military service
On Jan 13, 3:00*pm, Hawke wrote:
No you don't. Because of your bias you wouldn't recognize how smart I am even if it's obvious to others. I know from my education and from how I interact with really intelligent people, and from IQ tests that I am above average in intelligence. So your statement is false. Hawke But saying you are above average in intelligence is not saying very much. Half the people in the U.S. are above average in intelligence. Dan |
#27
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
gummer dweeber - no military service
On 1/12/2012 9:19 PM, David R. Birch wrote:
And you just keep repeating the same tripe. I've looked to see your highly intellectual and rational commentary on numerous subjects but there doesn't seem to be any for me to look at. The group has noted your poor reading comprehension. My reading comprehension skills are at least as good as yours. I learned them getting my training as a paralegal. The question is are you going to pretend you know the law better than I do too? I've plowed through legal decisions you would never understand. But keep up the superiority charade all you want. All I can find are examples of you acting superior and condescending. This indicates you've only found what I wrote to you. I can't find anything you write that is above a sixth grade level. To anyone. I find nothing indicating you have any training or expertise in anything, even metalworking. You try to come across as some kind of authority that has a right to judge others. We all exercise judgement in everything we do. In your case, I don't really bother beyond pointing out your usual levels of inconsistency and hypocrisy. In your case that is completely understandable. You really have shown nothing to indicate you are even average. That is what's most consistent about you. You repeat yourself endlessly and you contribute nothing of value to the group. Apparently there is nothing with which you have any expertise in whatsoever. But you do take it upon yourself to act like a snob. Not a good combination. Yet you have shown nothing that would indicate you have anything making youbetter than average. You don't tell us about your advanced degrees. You're the only one who considers degrees important. That's what uneducated people say all the time. Try looking for work without having a college degree and see if any of the "job creators" agree with you. They won't. They all want people with degrees. I wonder why? Maybe they think they're better than the people without them. You don't have brilliant things you have written. No, you just haven't read them, or if you have, they are beyond you. Care to show us some of your best material? You know, some examples of how you are one of the better minds here. You do have plenty of childish personal criticisms. Just trying to help by pointing out your many faults so that you may correct them. Yeah, sure you are. Thanks for showing how dishonest you are. But not a thing showing you to be anything to write home about. To whom would you write home? Why would they read it? That's an expression that everyone should know. If you don't recognize that you really are lacking in basic knowledge. So how about showing us how great you are instead of just talking about how great you are? I haven't talked about me being great, just about you being meager. Anyone can understand that the flip side of that means you think you are something above meager yourself. If you are good enough to criticize and find fault in others you owe it to the group to explain why. So tell everyone how come you are so qualified to tell others how inferior they are? You have to be better to do that and you aren't showing you are any better than anyone. You do show what a chicken you are though. Unless the truth is you aren't very good at much of anything, which I suspect is the reality. You pretend to be what your aren't because what you really are is woefully inadequate. Hawwke-ptooey I see from this that you have little experience with reality. Of course, this is what you show us with every post. What you show with you posts is that you think you're better than you are and you show you haven't got the balls to come out with what makes you any better than anyone else. Where's your Ph.D from? Where's your Olympic medals. Where's your mansion you live in. I mean, you sound so superior lets see the proof of it. Of course if you can't then you're just like Gummer, a big mouth that doesn't tell the truth. In other words you'd be a liar that has no balls. Hawke |
#28
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
gummer dweeber - no military service
|
#29
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
gummer dweeber - no military service
On 1/13/2012 2:02 PM, Hawwk-ptooey wrote:
I'm sure that anyone who cared to had read what led to your pathetic childish response. I scoff at the idea that your reprimand would be taken seriously by the adults who frequent this group. I'm sure I'm not the only one who finds your pettiness annoying. Maybe there's another group that could feed your desperate need for attention. The problem is that you have displayed so little credibility, maturity and accumulated wisdom in your typical posts that no one takes you seriously. You come on like a little boy trying to join an adult conversation, but you just don't have enough depth of insight to be able to make a useful contribution, plus you're too petty and obnoxious to even be amusing. You make big noises about your alleged poli sci degree, but all that you show us is that left = good, right(as in, anyone who points out your errors)= bad. You can't even recognize that there are valid political stances other than left/right or that there are people like me far to the left of you who see you for the shallow poseur that you are. Get lost. David Keep repeating the same posts over and over and I'll keep giving you the same reply. Shut up! Hawwk-ptooey And I will continue to require you to stop annoying the adults until you can show you deserve to take your place among us. David |
#30
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
gummer dweeber - no military service
On 1/13/2012 2:00 PM, Hawwk-ptooey wrote:
On 1/12/2012 8:57 PM, David R. Birch wrote: On 1/12/2012 1:52 PM, Hawwk-ptooey wrote: On 1/10/2012 7:20 PM, George Plimpton wrote: On 1/10/2012 6:45 PM, Phil Kangas wrote: On Jan 10, 3:31 pm, Hawwk-ptooey wrote: Shut up, punk. Nobody asked you for your two cents. Hawwk-ptooey Hey hawkie punk, nobody asked you for your two ****ingcents either! He doesn't have two cents, unless the welfare office gave him one more. Something from your tone tells me you ain't rich and you know that means you aren't smart either. Hawwk-ptooey I know quite a few very smart people, all of them smarter than you, although that's a low hurdle. No you don't. Because of your bias you wouldn't recognize how smart I am even if it's obvious to others. I know from my education and from how I interact with really intelligent people, and from IQ tests that I am above average in intelligence. So your statement is false. Not really, above average puts you in the top 50%, most of my friends have demonstrated that they are in the top 2%. Some of them are rich because what they do leads to wealth, but wealth isn't why they do it. Most of the smartest just don't find the pursuit of wealth very interesting. I never did. I always was more interested in being something instead of having things. Having more things doesn't do much for me. So what happened to your "if you're so smart, why aren't you rich"? Are you disappointed that you will never be something more than a newsgroupie with a useless BA from a mediocre school? But you probably don't understand that either. I'm sure that you would be surprised at how much I know. Chances are it's more than you do. Low probability, I didn't stop learning when I left school like you did. You talk a great game but so far I've seen no evidence to support that idea. Yes, many of us have commented on your cluelessness. What great success in life can you point to that makes you superior toanyone? Nothing Nobel worthy so far, but NBD since that's been debased anyway. You like to do put downs and that's common amongunderachievers. Really? You obviously know far more than I do about underachieving. You seem to be the type who resents wealth because you recognize that your limited competence will never lead to wealth. My competence is far from limited. In fact, I'd put my capabilities up against yours any day of the week. You keep presenting yourself as superior. When do we get to see some proof of it? Or is all you are going to do is talk about it? Let's see something from you that demonstrates you are better than average at anything. Put up or shut up. Since you can't even recognize your own limited competence, I doubt any demonstration of mine would make an impression. Let's see what you've got. You act like someone who wants to be respected but you have done nothing to earn it. If you can't show any reason why you should be treated with respect then don't expect any. I know that I will never sink so low that I would crave your respect. Or much of anything. In your ignorance you have no idea what I have. But I can tell you I have many things of value. Not wisdom, though. Maybe not to someone as shallow and pretentious as you but to me any many others I've got a lot. What? "..any many others..." What? And apparently all your superior abilities haven't led you to wealth either. So what happened? Hawwk-ptooey Too busy learning and doing stuff to chase gaudy trinkets. David |
#31
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
gummer dweeber - no military service
On 1/13/2012 5:56 PM, David R. Birch wrote:
I know quite a few very smart people, all of them smarter than you, although that's a low hurdle. No you don't. Because of your bias you wouldn't recognize how smart I am even if it's obvious to others. I know from my education and from how I interact with really intelligent people, and from IQ tests that I am above average in intelligence. So your statement is false. Not really, above average puts you in the top 50%, most of my friends have demonstrated that they are in the top 2%. Let's look at your statement "most of my friends have demonstrated that they are in the top 2%". Really? How many friends are we talking about? One, two, fifty? So how many is most of your friends and how have they demonstrated they are in the top 2%? Did you check them to see they are in the near genius level? Being a bit less that truthful here aren't you? Some of them are rich because what they do leads to wealth, but wealth isn't why they do it. Most of the smartest just don't find the pursuit of wealth very interesting. I never did. I always was more interested in being something instead of having things. Having more things doesn't do much for me. So what happened to your "if you're so smart, why aren't you rich"? Are you disappointed that you will never be something more than a newsgroupie with a useless BA from a mediocre school? Where does it say that I agree with that? Because I don't. It's an ignorant statement used by people to demean others. So only people like you use it. You seek to demean on a regular basis, which tells me a lot about you . But you probably don't understand that either. I'm sure that you would be surprised at how much I know. Chances are it's more than you do. Low probability, I didn't stop learning when I left school like you did. Like I said, I'll put my knowledge up against yours any day of the week. You're just a blowhard with no credentials and no achievements to prove how great you portray yourself to be. Like you never stopped learning. Is that right. You must be pretty damn smart by now then, huh? How about showing someone? You talk a great game but so far I've seen no evidence to support that idea. Yes, many of us have commented on your cluelessness. And many of us have noticed your constant changing of subject rather than answering questions. Whether I'm clueless or not you still have shown no one anything about you showing you are in any way above average in anything. What are you hiding? What great success in life can you point to that makes you superior toanyone? Nothing Nobel worthy so far, but NBD since that's been debased anyway. You're just like everyone else who has an ordinary life, ordinary capabilities, and ordinary everything else. Why else would you be so reluctant to show us anything? Have you done nothing to take pride in? Poor guy. You like to do put downs and that's common amongunderachievers. Really? You obviously know far more than I do about underachieving. Yeah, I learned that when I was in school when my major was psychology. I learned a lot about human behavior. But I learned that in the school yard too. The guys cutting other people down did it so they wouldn't be the subject of ridicule themselves. You try one put down after another. Chances are you are just trying to take the attention off your shortcomings. That is also why you won't show anything. Nothing you have is any good. You seem to be the type who resents wealth because you recognize that your limited competence will never lead to wealth. My competence is far from limited. In fact, I'd put my capabilities up against yours any day of the week. You keep presenting yourself as superior. When do we get to see some proof of it? Or is all you are going to do is talk about it? Let's see something from you that demonstrates you are better than average at anything. Put up or shut up. Since you can't even recognize your own limited competence, I doubt any demonstration of mine would make an impression. It would if you were any good at anything. But if as I suspect you're just as average as they come then yeah, I doubt you would make any impression on me. Nice that you won't show anything that shows if you are good or bad at anything. Your lack of confidence says all we need to know about your limited capabilities. Let's see what you've got. You act like someone who wants to be respected but you have done nothing to earn it. If you can't show any reason why you should be treated with respect then don't expect any. I know that I will never sink so low that I would crave your respect. How about your own then? Any self respecting man would stand up and be willing to prove he's any good. Especially after he's made such a big deal about how bad somebody else is. But I see nothing that indicates you have any respect for yourself either. Or much of anything. In your ignorance you have no idea what I have. But I can tell you I have many things of value. Not wisdom, though. The people who seek out my counsel think otherwise. Most people I meet understand right away that I know more about more things than they do. You're the oddball who can't tell when he is communicating with a person who has a lot of knowledge. Maybe not to someone as shallow and pretentious as you but to me any many others I've got a lot. What? "..any many others..." What? And apparently all your superior abilities haven't led you to wealth either. So what happened? I'd say the same thing that happened to me is what happened to you. Too busy learning and doing stuff to chase gaudy trinkets. Good excuse. I'll have to remember that one next time someone asks me if I'm so smart how come I'm not rich. Hawke |
#32
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
gummer dweeber - no military service
On 1/13/2012 5:56 PM, David R. Birch wrote:
On 1/13/2012 2:02 PM, Hawwk-ptooey wrote: I'm sure that anyone who cared to had read what led to your pathetic childish response. I scoff at the idea that your reprimand would be taken seriously by the adults who frequent this group. I'm sure I'm not the only one who finds your pettiness annoying. Maybe there's another group that could feed your desperate need for attention. The problem is that you have displayed so little credibility, maturity and accumulated wisdom in your typical posts that no one takes you seriously. You come on like a little boy trying to join an adult conversation, but you just don't have enough depth of insight to be able to make a useful contribution, plus you're too petty and obnoxious to even be amusing. You make big noises about your alleged poli sci degree, but all that you show us is that left = good, right(as in, anyone who points out your errors)= bad. You can't even recognize that there are valid political stances other than left/right or that there are people like me far to the left of you who see you for the shallow poseur that you are. Get lost. David Keep repeating the same posts over and over and I'll keep giving you the same reply. Shut up! Hawwk-ptooey And I will continue to require you to stop annoying the adults until you can show you deserve to take your place among us. David And as long as you continue with that I'll continue to tell you to shut your mouth. Hawke |
#33
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
gummer dweeber - no military service
On Jan 15, 12:33*am, Hawke wrote:
Let's look at your statement "most of my friends have demonstrated that they are in the top 2%". Really? How many friends are we talking about? One, two, fifty? So how many is most of your friends and how have they demonstrated they are in the top 2%? Did you check them to see they are in the near genius level? Being a bit less that truthful here aren't you? Hawke The top 2 % is not that remarkable. Looking at Wiki, the top 2 % just means an IQ of 131 or better. When I was working in Alaska, one of my friends knew he was smart and wanted a way to get it on his employment record. At the time the company gave IQ tests , but not at remote sites as where we were in Alaska. Anyway I contacted the right people in the company and got permission to give IQ tests to employees. No danger in my cheating as I had already taken the test before going to Alaska. I can not remember all the scores, but as I remember the lowest score was about 120 and most scores were 130 or more. Not the results one would get if testing the general population, but this was a group of electronic techs and engineers. Dan |
#34
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
gummer dweeber - no military service
wrote -The top 2 % is not that remarkable. Looking at Wiki, the top 2 % just -means an IQ of 131 or better. When I was working in Alaska, one of my -friends knew he was smart and wanted a way to get it on his employment -record. At the time the company gave IQ tests , but not at remote -sites as where we were in Alaska. Anyway I contacted the right people -in the company and got permission to give IQ tests to employees. No -danger in my cheating as I had already taken the test before going to -Alaska. I can not remember all the scores, but as I remember the -lowest score was about 120 and most scores were 130 or more. Not the -results one would get if testing the general population, but this was -a group of electronic techs and engineers. -Dan The informal consensus in Mensa was to omit membership from the resume. The non-technical Human Resources (et.al.) personnel in a hi-tech company could be envious and defensive and needed to be treated carefully. jsw |
#35
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
gummer dweeber - no military service
The informal consensus in Mensa was to omit membership from the resume. The non-technical Human Resources (et.al.) personnel in a hi-tech company could be envious and defensive and needed to be treated carefully. jsw From my experiences, Mensa members were a coin flip as to whether their socks matched. Steve www.heartsurgerysurvivalguide.com |
#36
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
gummer dweeber - no military service
On 1/15/2012 9:17 AM, Steve B wrote:
The informal consensus in Mensa was to omit membership from the resume. The non-technical Human Resources (et.al.) personnel in a hi-tech company could be envious and defensive and needed to be treated carefully. jsw From my experiences, Mensa members were a coin flip as to whether their socks matched. Mensa is about the most pointless organization (after the Congressional Black Caucus) I've ever known. Everyone I've ever known who admitted to being in it was freakishly weird. Mensa membership is predicated purely on raw IQ. That's like evaluating a car based purely on horsepower. The heap might not even be operable due to all manner of other defects, but by golly, it puts out 500 horsepower, so it /must/ be good. NOT. I've known a good number of high IQ people who never achieved much (in no small part because they thought rewards were simply dished out on the basis of high IQ itself), and I've known people who didn't seem to be of especially high intelligence but who had tremendous drive and a great work ethic who achieved a lot. High IQ by itself doesn't mean much if you don't use it, or if your character is ****. |
#37
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
gummer dweeber - no military service
"Steve B" wrote in message ... The informal consensus in Mensa was to omit membership from the resume. The non-technical Human Resources (et.al.) personnel in a hi-tech company could be envious and defensive and needed to be treated carefully. jsw From my experiences, Mensa members were a coin flip as to whether their socks matched. Steve RUNVS? We arranged to have supper with a reporter in a restaurant, and watched her wander all around looking for a group that met her visual stereotype. After we flagged her over she apologized for having a negative one and commented that one well-muscled member looked more like a Bulgarian weight lifter than an intellectual. jsw |
#38
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
gummer dweeber - no military service
On Jan 15, 11:17*am, "Steve B" wrote:
The informal consensus in Mensa was to omit membership from the resume. The non-technical Human Resources (et.al.) personnel in a hi-tech company could be envious and defensive and needed to be treated carefully. jsw From my experiences, Mensa members were a coin flip as to whether their socks matched. Steve www.heartsurgerysurvivalguide.com Unlike NRA members who do not have a coin to flip nor the dexterity to do so. TMT |
#39
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
gummer dweeber - no military service
On Sun, 15 Jan 2012 14:32:27 -0500, "Jim Wilkins"
wrote: "Steve B" wrote in message m... The informal consensus in Mensa was to omit membership from the resume. The non-technical Human Resources (et.al.) personnel in a hi-tech company could be envious and defensive and needed to be treated carefully. jsw From my experiences, Mensa members were a coin flip as to whether their socks matched. Steve RUNVS? We arranged to have supper with a reporter in a restaurant, and watched her wander all around looking for a group that met her visual stereotype. After we flagged her over she apologized for having a negative one and commented that one well-muscled member looked more like a Bulgarian weight lifter than an intellectual. jsw Last MENSA group I went to, half the guys were wearing jeans, cowboy hats and boots, a couple of the ladies were wearing bib overalls, one looked like a hooker (and was) etc etc. There was (1) guy with a pocket protector and a calculator. Beer was by the bottle and several were chewing tobacco. A bit different than the generic idea of the groups....shrug. I should mention that a member here for a long time, cant remember his name..damnit..stroke moment..worked as a upperupper Uber engineer for Boeing as I recall. One of the guys who could walk in and shut down an entire department with a command. He wore Wrangler jeans, western shirts, big assed belt buckle and boots and his laptop had the startup music..big diesel tractor engine starting up. Im sure someone will come up with his name. He raises Icelandic horses. If he wasnt a Mensa member..he would have qualified without a blink. Gunner One could not be a successful Leftwinger without realizing that, in contrast to the popular conception supported by newspapers and mothers of Leftwingers, a goodly number of Leftwingers are not only narrow-minded and dull, but also just stupid. Gunner Asch |
#40
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
gummer dweeber - no military service
|
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
gummer dweeber - no military service | Metalworking | |||
gummer dweeber - no military service | Metalworking | |||
mrs. gummer and young gummer dwieber jr. | Metalworking | |||
Where's Gummer? | Metalworking | |||
Around the world, organized military forces of governments have manydifferent types of military uniforms that they wear. Clearly being one of thefounding fathers of the uniform, the militaries of countries have contributedgreatly towards what constit | Home Repair |