On Mon, 21 Jun 2004 07:41:21 GMT, "Mysterion"
wrote:

Nice to see that a near death experience hasn't stopped you from being a
blustering asshole.

Nah, he's always been a blustering asshole with delusions of adequacy.

On Sun, 27 Jun 2004 17:20:54 -0000, Retief
wrote:

Tim May wrote:

(Yes, I removed you from my killfiles. My attorney advised me to keep
all of your posts in a folder and to print them out at intervals. She

So, after years of railing against the government, Tim now runs to the
government for help... How typical...

Tim's attorney is an officer of the Court -- and any action she takes
on Tim's behalf will be through those Courts (and my taxes will end up
paying for Tim May's protection).

Where did Tim say that he had a court case pending? Frankly, gummer
probably needs someone to tell him what time to get up, what time to
eat and what to eat, when to change his clothes, and how many twinkies
he can buy from canteen. It's obvious where letting him make his own
decisions has taken him.


said your profile pretty much matches someone about to "go postal.")

Doesn't California have a law against practicing medicine without a
license? Where did Tim's attorney get her M.D.?

Psychologists are not usually M.D.'s. In fact, the minimum
requirements don't require you to be a doctor at all.

"Bob Brock" wrote in message
...

Psychologists are not usually M.D.'s. In fact, the minimum
requirements don't require you to be a doctor at all.

But you would be crazy to use one who wasnt !!!

--

SVL

Retief wrote:


Yadda, yadda, yadda...

So the question is, "was it luck"?

Tim May claims it was not luck. That is, there was no luck involved,
but all skill.

But of course, ALL business has a certain aspect of luck. Unless Tim
had some insider information, that completely removed "luck" from the
equation.

Would Tim May be where he is, had Apple gone belly up? Likewise with
the rest of the list? No.

Tim was in the right place, at the right time, and with some careful
thought (to minimize, but never eliminate luck), he was successful in
his stocks. That's still what we call luck, Tim.

If it wasn't luck, then Tim could do the same, in any time period,
with any available stocks, and any (however limited) amount of
capital. I have my doubts on that...

Retief

Now I am not a Tim May fan but you have to realize that making money
in the stock market depends on a lot of factors and many of them
have noting to do with luck.

Did it involve luck buying Boeing when Boeing proposed building a
400 passenger airliner (The B747) that would carry passengers at
on half the seat mile cost of it's previous generation of aircraft.

Did it involve luck buying defense stocks in the 1980 when Ronald
Reagan was going to rebuild the American Military.

Did it involve luck buying Entertainment stocks (Carnival Cruse lines
and resorts ) with a big jump in disposable income of Seniors, coupled
with advances in general health of seniors and large number of Seniors
retiring in the 1980's and early 90's.

Did it involve luck investing in health care when our population is
getting older and most americans will use 80% of all the dollars they
spend for health care in their whole lives in the last year of life.

Dose it involve luck investing in power generation companies when our
yearly need of power is growing at a 9-15% per year rate yet we are not
building any new power plants.

Does it involve luck when investing in security companies, when this
war or terror mill go on for 20 years or more and International
business and their properties are going to be the primary targets of
terrorist organizations.

No making money in the stock market is a function of analyzing trends
that are occurring every day, realizing how the trends will effect
economic conditions and what will be the necessary economic assets
necessary to service the conditions.

No Tim May may have had some luck in picking his stocks but remember

"The race may not always go to the swiftest,
or the fight to the strongest.
Buts that's they way the smart money bets."

The Independent of Clackamas County, Oregon

"The great questions of the day will not be settled by means of
speeches and majority decisions ... but by iron and blood."

(Otto Von Bismarck, Speech, Sept. 30, 1862.)

On Sun, 27 Jun 2004 11:55:05 -0700, "PrecisionMachinisT"
wrote:


"Bob Brock" wrote in message
.. .

Psychologists are not usually M.D.'s. In fact, the minimum
requirements don't require you to be a doctor at all.

But you would be crazy to use one who wasnt !!!

Could be. ;-)

Gotta be careful of the terminology.

A Psychologist is a person who studies psychology. He's likely an
academic, maybe a Phd., but not necessarily licensed to treat
patients. He cannot legally prescribe medications. He is a
researcher and may legally give you advice but he is not on the same
level as a doctor.

A Psychiatrist is a doctor licensed to treat patients and prescribe
meds. He may also be a Psychologist because, as logic would dictate,
he must have been a student of psychology.

Strider

"Bob Brock" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 21 Jun 2004 07:41:21 GMT, "Mysterion"
wrote:

Nice to see that a near death experience hasn't stopped you from being a
blustering asshole.

Nah, he's always been a blustering asshole with delusions of adequacy.

Two NDEs, and eight hours of surgery with my heart an a different table
didn't change me a lot in some ways, and very much so in others.

You are what you are.

What is is. What ain't ain't.

Live with it, and stick to your own skin.

Steve

"Strabo" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 23 Jun 2004 15:46:53 GMT, "Jeff McCann"
wrote:

"Strabo" wrote in message
news [snip]
My point is that if a service sees high then we should
ask if it is relatively higher than it was 30 or 40 years ago.

A simple fracture of the lower leg is remedied today
just as it was then, an x-ray, setting and time and materials
for a cast.

For a cash payment and adjusting for inflation, one would assume
that the differences would first be in additional paperwork,
plant overhead, material costs or salaries. If it still doesn't
jive then waste, corruption and profit margins are the issue.

I assume perceived value of a mended leg is the same.

Today, you would likely be referred to an orthopedist, or the on-call
orthopedist would come to the ER to set your leg. Additional imaging
may be ordered. You would also likely get physical therapy services.
If it is a difficult or complicated fracture, surgery may be in
order,
and the odds of full recovery are much greater. Complication rates
are
also lower today than in years gone by, when your leg may have been
set
by a GP in the ER. There is a qualitative difference in the care
received.

Jeff

I said, a 'simple fracture'.

What would have taked two hours and a few dollars in materials
today takes a day and $1500-$2000+.

The other notable high priced service is law. Not a coincidence
that both involve life threatening issues.

Maybe we are over-doctored as well as over-lawyered?

Jeff

We all get a turn in the barrel.

Is this in refernece to a joke I heard long ago?!!!!!!
Rick

"Sue" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 26 Jun 2004 22:30:13 -0700, "Harold & Susan Vordos"
wrote:


"Tim May" wrote in message
t...
In article , Harold & Susan Vordos
wrote:

snip-----

Nitwit. You shouldn't be posting to Usenet. I assume you know that the
word "gullible" is not in any dictionary in the English language?

--Tim May

Lighten up, Tim. We all get a turn in the barrel.

Nitwit? Me?

Welcome to the Nitwit Club. He's called me that so many times I must
be president of the NC by now. G I've never denied it, BTW.
Sue


Hey, no fair!! I want to be pres! g

Harold

"Rhbuxton" wrote in message
...


We all get a turn in the barrel.

Is this in refernece to a joke I heard long ago?!!!!!!
Rick

Dare I ask?

Harold

In article , Harold & Susan Vordos
wrote:

"Sue" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 26 Jun 2004 22:30:13 -0700, "Harold & Susan Vordos"
wrote:


"Tim May" wrote in message
t...
In article , Harold & Susan Vordos
wrote:

snip-----

Nitwit. You shouldn't be posting to Usenet. I assume you know that the
word "gullible" is not in any dictionary in the English language?

--Tim May

Lighten up, Tim. We all get a turn in the barrel.

Nitwit? Me?

Welcome to the Nitwit Club. He's called me that so many times I must
be president of the NC by now. G I've never denied it, BTW.
Sue


Hey, no fair!! I want to be pres! g

Many are called, few are chosen. Most of you qualify for the Nitwit's
Club, but only a handful are candidates for President.

I'll announce the finalists in a few weeks.

--Tim May

"Tim May" wrote in message
...
In article , Harold & Susan Vordos
wrote:

"Sue" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 26 Jun 2004 22:30:13 -0700, "Harold & Susan Vordos"
wrote:


"Tim May" wrote in message
t...
In article , Harold & Susan Vordos
wrote:

snip-----

Nitwit. You shouldn't be posting to Usenet. I assume you know that
the
word "gullible" is not in any dictionary in the English language?

--Tim May

Lighten up, Tim. We all get a turn in the barrel.

Nitwit? Me?

Welcome to the Nitwit Club. He's called me that so many times I must
be president of the NC by now. G I've never denied it, BTW.
Sue


Hey, no fair!! I want to be pres! g

Many are called, few are chosen. Most of you qualify for the Nitwit's
Club, but only a handful are candidates for President.

I'll announce the finalists in a few weeks.

--Tim May

Thanks, Tim. Please keep my exceptional qualifications in mind! g

Harold

Tim May wrote:

In article , Harold & Susan Vordos
wrote:

"Sue" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 26 Jun 2004 22:30:13 -0700, "Harold & Susan Vordos"
wrote:


"Tim May" wrote in message
t...
In article , Harold & Susan Vordos
wrote:

snip-----

Nitwit. You shouldn't be posting to Usenet. I assume you know that the
word "gullible" is not in any dictionary in the English language?

--Tim May

Huh??? I found it on page 443 of my Webster's collegiate Dictionary
gullible (adj) Easily gulled, duped, or imposed upon

Oh well I mangle the English language pretty well my self. But I have
and excuse Dyslexia what's yours?


Lighten up, Tim. We all get a turn in the barrel.

Nitwit? Me?

Welcome to the Nitwit Club. He's called me that so many times I must
be president of the NC by now. G I've never denied it, BTW.
Sue


Hey, no fair!! I want to be pres! g

Many are called, few are chosen. Most of you qualify for the Nitwit's
Club, but only a handful are candidates for President.

I'll announce the finalists in a few weeks.

--Tim May

--
The Independent of Clackamas County, Oregon

"The great questions of the day will not be settled by means of
speeches and majority decisions ... but by iron and blood."

(Otto Von Bismarck, Speech, Sept. 30, 1862.)

"Bart Bailey" wrote in message
...
In posted on
Sun, 27 Jun 2004 21:33:27 -0700, Tim May wrote: Begin:

In article , Harold & Susan Vordos
wrote:

"Sue" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 26 Jun 2004 22:30:13 -0700, "Harold & Susan Vordos"
wrote:


"Tim May" wrote in message
t...
In article , Harold & Susan Vordos
wrote:

snip-----

Nitwit. You shouldn't be posting to Usenet. I assume you know that
the
word "gullible" is not in any dictionary in the English language?

--Tim May

Lighten up, Tim. We all get a turn in the barrel.

Nitwit? Me?

Welcome to the Nitwit Club. He's called me that so many times I must
be president of the NC by now. G I've never denied it, BTW.
Sue


Hey, no fair!! I want to be pres! g

Many are called, few are chosen. Most of you qualify for the Nitwit's
Club, but only a handful are candidates for President.

I'll announce the finalists in a few weeks.

--Tim May

Well, if I may invoke tenure here, I was nominated back pre-y2k for
Tim's nitwit club. http://xrl.us/ca6c

--

Bart

Surely your term of office has expired by now. There must be room for
me. There must!

On the other hand, I may not have the qualifications I think I have,
especially when I consider that you were plonked, and I was not.

I think we may have Tim on a low simmer here after asking him to lighten up.
Maybe he's seeing the humor in it after all.. One can hope.

Harold

On Sun, 27 Jun 2004 20:44:03 -0400, Tom Quackenbush
wrote:

Bob Brock wrote:
Mysterion wrote:

Nice to see that a near death experience hasn't stopped you from being a
blustering asshole.

Nah, he's always been a blustering asshole with delusions of adequacy.

So, is it safe to assume that you don't have delusions of adequacy?

I'm non-delusional.

On Sun, 27 Jun 2004 17:23:46 -0700, "SteveB"
wrote:


"Bob Brock" wrote in message
.. .
On Mon, 21 Jun 2004 07:41:21 GMT, "Mysterion"
wrote:

Nice to see that a near death experience hasn't stopped you from being a
blustering asshole.

Nah, he's always been a blustering asshole with delusions of adequacy.

Two NDEs, and eight hours of surgery with my heart an a different table
didn't change me a lot in some ways, and very much so in others.

You are what you are.

What is is. What ain't ain't.

Live with it, and stick to your own skin.

Steve

Are you talking to me or gunner?

On Sun, 27 Jun 2004 11:55:05 -0700, "PrecisionMachinisT"
wrote:


"Bob Brock" wrote in message
.. .

Psychologists are not usually M.D.'s. In fact, the minimum
requirements don't require you to be a doctor at all.

But you would be crazy to use one who wasnt !!!

Then don't use a psychologist. Most of them aren't doctors and those
that are are PhD's and not MD's.

Tim May wrote in message t...


Nitwit. You shouldn't be posting to Usenet. I assume you know that the
word "gullible" is not in any dictionary in the English language?

Main Entry: gull·ible
Variant(s): also gull.able /'g&-l&-b&l/
Function: adjective
Date: 1818
See: Right-winger
--
Cliff

Tim May wrote in message t...


Nitwit. You shouldn't be posting to Usenet. I assume you know that the
word "gullible" is not in any dictionary in the English language?

Main Entry: gull·ible
Variant(s): also gull.able /'g&-l&-b&l/
Function: adjective
Date: 1818
See: Right-winger
--
Cliff

In article , The Independent
wrote:

Tim May wrote:

In article , Harold & Susan Vordos
wrote:

"Sue" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 26 Jun 2004 22:30:13 -0700, "Harold & Susan Vordos"
wrote:


"Tim May" wrote in message
t...
In article , Harold & Susan Vordos
wrote:

snip-----

Nitwit. You shouldn't be posting to Usenet. I assume you know that
the
word "gullible" is not in any dictionary in the English language?

--Tim May

Huh??? I found it on page 443 of my Webster's collegiate Dictionary
gullible (adj) Easily gulled, duped, or imposed upon



Think carefully about what you just wrote.

I'm surprised people are still falling for this one. Our educational
standards today, presumably.


--Tim May

In article , Cliff
Huprich wrote:

Tim May wrote in message
t...


Nitwit. You shouldn't be posting to Usenet. I assume you know that the
word "gullible" is not in any dictionary in the English language?

Main Entry: gull·ible
Variant(s): also gull.able /'g&-l&-b&l/
Function: adjective
Date: 1818
See: Right-winger


Another sucker.


--Tim May

Tim May wrote:
In article , Cliff
Huprich wrote:



Main Entry: gull·ible
Variant(s): also gull.able /'g&-l&-b&l/
Function: adjective
Date: 1818
See: Right-winger

Another sucker.


+10 to Cliffy for drawing out the predicable response.

In misc.survivalism The Independent wrote:


Tim May wrote:

In article , Harold & Susan Vordos
wrote:

"Sue" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 26 Jun 2004 22:30:13 -0700, "Harold & Susan Vordos"
wrote:


"Tim May" wrote in message
t...
In article , Harold & Susan Vordos
wrote:

snip-----

Nitwit. You shouldn't be posting to Usenet. I assume you know that the
word "gullible" is not in any dictionary in the English language?

--Tim May

Huh??? I found it on page 443 of my Webster's collegiate Dictionary
gullible (adj) Easily gulled, duped, or imposed upon

Oh well I mangle the English language pretty well my self. But I have
and excuse Dyslexia what's yours?


Lighten up, Tim. We all get a turn in the barrel.

Nitwit? Me?

Welcome to the Nitwit Club. He's called me that so many times I must
be president of the NC by now. G I've never denied it, BTW.
Sue


Hey, no fair!! I want to be pres! g

Many are called, few are chosen. Most of you qualify for the Nitwit's
Club, but only a handful are candidates for President.

I'll announce the finalists in a few weeks.

--Tim May


--
....I'm an air-conditioned gypsy...

- The Who

"Bob Brock" wrote in message
news
On Sun, 27 Jun 2004 17:23:46 -0700, "SteveB"
wrote:


"Bob Brock" wrote in message
.. .
On Mon, 21 Jun 2004 07:41:21 GMT, "Mysterion"
wrote:

Nice to see that a near death experience hasn't stopped you from being
a
blustering asshole.

Nah, he's always been a blustering asshole with delusions of adequacy.

Two NDEs, and eight hours of surgery with my heart an a different table
didn't change me a lot in some ways, and very much so in others.

You are what you are.

What is is. What ain't ain't.

Live with it, and stick to your own skin.

Steve

Are you talking to me or gunner?


Neither. I was merely sharing with the rest.

Steve

I don't have any doubts. Anyone can become rich in any time period if
they work at it just a little. The Standard and Poors Index 500 has
on the average returned about 10% per year. Some years much more,
some years big losses, but an average of 10% per year compounded. The
problem is most people do not save a percentage of what they earn. It
doesn't even take any skill or luck.

Dan


Retief wrote in message


Tim was in the right place, at the right time, and with some careful
thought (to minimize, but never eliminate luck), he was successful in
his stocks. That's still what we call luck, Tim.

If it wasn't luck, then Tim could do the same, in any time period,
with any available stocks, and any (however limited) amount of
capital. I have my doubts on that...


Retief

In article , Dan Caster
wrote:

I don't have any doubts. Anyone can become rich in any time period if
they work at it just a little. The Standard and Poors Index 500 has
on the average returned about 10% per year. Some years much more,
some years big losses, but an average of 10% per year compounded. The
problem is most people do not save a percentage of what they earn. It
doesn't even take any skill or luck.

This is mostly the power of compounded interest, as you say. It's often
more than just simple compounding, as it represents ownership in the
future, and thus the amplification of wealth overall.

For some here, it may be too late (too old, too much learned
helplessness). But for any of you reading this who are under the age of
30, get out your calculator and see what the power of compounded
interest is all about.

I covered a lot of these points in a long article entitled "Life
Choices." A lot of people seemed to have liked it.

Survivalism is an important meme, or idea. But some of the most
important parts of survival have to do with finding a solid career, not
getting sucked under by deadweight spouses and friends, saving and
investing, and pursuing work that is both rewarding and enriching.

These are some of the themes covered by some of the writers we often
cite here, folks like Robert Heinlein, Ayn Rand, and others. While they
don't provide recipe books for how to find friends and spouses, what
to do when a job lays you off, and similar "short term, self-help"
advice, the messages are there if one fully absorbs the messages of
achievement, self-reliance, and even "paranoia."

One of my old bosses at Intel, the famous Andy Grove, had a saying
which got a lot of attention, most negative (from the liberal press):
"Only the paranoid survive." This means being paranoid about saving for
a rainy day just as it means buying firearms, just as it means
speculating about the consequences of a comet hitting the earth.

Of course, losing a job is a lot more likely than a comet strike is,
so it makes sense to prepare for this. I did so from my first months at
Intel, building up my store of saved money, what we used to call "
'**** you!' money," for obvious reasons. The people who couldn't escape
the "company store" were the people who have never saved enough of this
" '**** you!' money." Same as with people trapped in their jobs because
they can't afford to break free, or to move from a dying town.

Saving money is even more important that buying firearms. Heresy, to
some, but absolutely true.

--Tim May

On Sun, 27 Jun 2004 23:50:06 -0700, The Independent
wrote:

Nitwit. You shouldn't be posting to Usenet. I assume you know that the
word "gullible" is not in any dictionary in the English language?

--Tim May

Huh??? I found it on page 443 of my Webster's collegiate Dictionary
gullible (adj) Easily gulled, duped, or imposed upon

Oh well I mangle the English language pretty well my self. But I have
and excuse Dyslexia what's yours?


LOL... it was a test

On Mon, 28 Jun 2004 09:13:52 -0700, Tim May
wrote:

wrote:

"Sue" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 26 Jun 2004 22:30:13 -0700, "Harold & Susan Vordos"
wrote:


"Tim May" wrote in message
t...
In article , Harold & Susan Vordos
wrote:

snip-----

Nitwit. You shouldn't be posting to Usenet. I assume you know that
the
word "gullible" is not in any dictionary in the English language?

--Tim May

Huh??? I found it on page 443 of my Webster's collegiate Dictionary
gullible (adj) Easily gulled, duped, or imposed upon



Think carefully about what you just wrote.

I'm surprised people are still falling for this one. Our educational
standards today, presumably.


--Tim May


hehehehehe.. ok that was good

"Bob Brock" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 27 Jun 2004 11:55:05 -0700, "PrecisionMachinisT"
wrote:


"Bob Brock" wrote in message
.. .

Psychologists are not usually M.D.'s. In fact, the minimum
requirements don't require you to be a doctor at all.

But you would be crazy to use one who wasnt !!!

Then don't use a psychologist. Most of them aren't doctors and those
that are are PhD's and not MD's.

I dont, but in your case I suggest checking with a psychologist first......

--

SVL

PrecisionMachinisT wrote:

"Bob Brock" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 27 Jun 2004 11:55:05 -0700, "PrecisionMachinisT"
wrote:


"Bob Brock" wrote in message
.. .

Psychologists are not usually M.D.'s. In fact, the minimum
requirements don't require you to be a doctor at all.

But you would be crazy to use one who wasnt !!!

Then don't use a psychologist. Most of them aren't doctors and those
that are are PhD's and not MD's.

I dont, but in your case I suggest checking with a psychologist first......

--

SVL


Assholes need proctologists not psychologists.



John

"john" wrote in message
...


PrecisionMachinisT wrote:

"Bob Brock" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 27 Jun 2004 11:55:05 -0700, "PrecisionMachinisT"
wrote:


"Bob Brock" wrote in message
.. .

Psychologists are not usually M.D.'s. In fact, the minimum
requirements don't require you to be a doctor at all.

But you would be crazy to use one who wasnt !!!

Then don't use a psychologist. Most of them aren't doctors and those
that are are PhD's and not MD's.

I dont, but in your case I suggest checking with a psychologist
first......


Assholes need proctologists not psychologists.


....LOL...

No ****!!

G

--

SVL

"Santa Cruz Mike" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 28 Jun 2004 23:22:47 -0400, john
wrote:

Assholes need proctologists not psychologists.



John


OUCVH!!!!!!!!!

Painless, actually slightly enjoyable.......

G

Ya spose *I* owe him one *now* ???

--

SVL

On Mon, 28 Jun 2004 23:22:47 -0400, john
wrote:

Assholes need proctologists not psychologists.



John


OUCVH!!!!!!!!!

On Mon, 28 Jun 2004 23:22:47 -0400, john
wrote:



PrecisionMachinisT wrote:

"Bob Brock" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 27 Jun 2004 11:55:05 -0700, "PrecisionMachinisT"
wrote:


"Bob Brock" wrote in message
.. .

Psychologists are not usually M.D.'s. In fact, the minimum
requirements don't require you to be a doctor at all.

But you would be crazy to use one who wasnt !!!

Then don't use a psychologist. Most of them aren't doctors and those
that are are PhD's and not MD's.

I dont, but in your case I suggest checking with a psychologist first......

--

SVL


Assholes need proctologists not psychologists.

Gosh, you gave him a diagnosis and a referral all in the same
sentence.

On Mon, 28 Jun 2004 19:59:14 -0700, "PrecisionMachinisT"
wrote:


"Bob Brock" wrote in message
.. .
On Sun, 27 Jun 2004 11:55:05 -0700, "PrecisionMachinisT"
wrote:


"Bob Brock" wrote in message
.. .

Psychologists are not usually M.D.'s. In fact, the minimum
requirements don't require you to be a doctor at all.

But you would be crazy to use one who wasnt !!!

Then don't use a psychologist. Most of them aren't doctors and those
that are are PhD's and not MD's.

I dont, but in your case I suggest checking with a psychologist first......

OK...if you think that you are crazy enough to require a psychiatrist
for meds, go ahead. You really don't need permission.

"Lawrence Glickman" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 28 Jun 2004 20:51:10 -0700, "PrecisionMachinisT"
wrote:


"Santa Cruz Mike" wrote in message
.. .
On Mon, 28 Jun 2004 23:22:47 -0400, john
wrote:

Assholes need proctologists not psychologists.



John


OUCVH!!!!!!!!!

Painless, actually slightly enjoyable.......

G

Ya spose *I* owe him one *now* ???

you talking about a cock in the ass? Painless? Enjoyable?
Good. Next time I need a colonoscopy, YOU take the ****ing exam for
me. Just had one, neither painless nor enjoyable. But then again,
I'm not a flaming faggot with a prolapsed rectim from being buggered 3
times a day.


Neither am I !!!

So shove this up your ass...


......................./´¯/)
.....................,/¯../
..................../..../
............../´¯/'...'/´¯¯`·¸
.........../'/.../..../......./¨¯\
.........('(...´...´.... ¯~/'...')
..........\.................'...../
...........''...\.......... _.·´
.............\..............(
...............\.............\....

*******WAD!!!***


--

SVL

There was an article in the newspaper that indicated that the service
jobs pay a bit higher than factory jobs. Don't forget that service
jobs include stock brokers, insurance salesmen, bankers, computer
service desk jobs, web page designers...........

It would be nice if everyone could have a high paying job. Maybe we
should raise the minium wage to $30 / hour.

Dan



RainLover wrote in message


I find it interesting that Bush is raving about all the NEW JOBS, even though
the vast majority of those are low-paying service jobs. A full time
McDonald's worker makes $20k a year and no health benifits... THESE are the
jobs that are on the increase.

The "haves" always love to think that if THEY have a good job and enough money
and savings, EVERYONE should be able to have that and the 'have nots' are just
lazy.

Of course, the "haves" are wrong.

James, Seattle

"Lawrence Glickman" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 28 Jun 2004 21:06:12 -0700, "PrecisionMachinisT"
wrote:


"Lawrence Glickman" wrote in message
.. .
On Mon, 28 Jun 2004 20:51:10 -0700, "PrecisionMachinisT"
wrote:


"Santa Cruz Mike" wrote in message
.. .
On Mon, 28 Jun 2004 23:22:47 -0400, john
wrote:

Assholes need proctologists not psychologists.



John


OUCVH!!!!!!!!!

Painless, actually slightly enjoyable.......

G

Ya spose *I* owe him one *now* ???

you talking about a cock in the ass? Painless? Enjoyable?
Good. Next time I need a colonoscopy, YOU take the ****ing exam for
me. Just had one, neither painless nor enjoyable. But then again,
I'm not a flaming faggot with a prolapsed rectim from being buggered 3
times a day.


Neither am I !!!

So shove this up your ass...


....................../´¯/)
....................,/¯../
.................../..../
............./´¯/'...'/´¯¯`·¸
........../'/.../..../......./¨¯\
........('(...´...´.... ¯~/'...')
.........\.................'...../
..........''...\.......... _.·´
............\..............(
..............\.............\....

*******WAD!!!***

You'll have to move your head out of the way to make room............

No yer mistaken, thats *your* head, IDIOT !!!

Now go back to playing with your paranoid friends, Im getting bored.....

--

SVL

On Mon, 28 Jun 2004 20:51:10 -0700, "PrecisionMachinisT"
wrote:


"Santa Cruz Mike" wrote in message
.. .
On Mon, 28 Jun 2004 23:22:47 -0400, john
wrote:

Assholes need proctologists not psychologists.



John


OUCVH!!!!!!!!!

Painless, actually slightly enjoyable.......

G

Ya spose *I* owe him one *now* ???

you talking about a cock in the ass? Painless? Enjoyable?
Good. Next time I need a colonoscopy, YOU take the ****ing exam for
me. Just had one, neither painless nor enjoyable. But then again,
I'm not a flaming faggot with a prolapsed rectim from being buggered 3
times a day.

Lg

On Mon, 28 Jun 2004 21:06:12 -0700, "PrecisionMachinisT"
wrote:


"Lawrence Glickman" wrote in message
.. .
On Mon, 28 Jun 2004 20:51:10 -0700, "PrecisionMachinisT"
wrote:


"Santa Cruz Mike" wrote in message
.. .
On Mon, 28 Jun 2004 23:22:47 -0400, john
wrote:

Assholes need proctologists not psychologists.



John


OUCVH!!!!!!!!!

Painless, actually slightly enjoyable.......

G

Ya spose *I* owe him one *now* ???

you talking about a cock in the ass? Painless? Enjoyable?
Good. Next time I need a colonoscopy, YOU take the ****ing exam for
me. Just had one, neither painless nor enjoyable. But then again,
I'm not a flaming faggot with a prolapsed rectim from being buggered 3
times a day.


Neither am I !!!

So shove this up your ass...


....................../´¯/)
....................,/¯../
.................../..../
............./´¯/'...'/´¯¯`·¸
........../'/.../..../......./¨¯\
........('(...´...´.... ¯~/'...')
.........\.................'...../
..........''...\.......... _.·´
............\..............(
..............\.............\....

*******WAD!!!***

You'll have to move your head out of the way to make room............